DOCSLIB.ORG

Graph Factorization from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Graph Factorization from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Contents Graph factorization From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Contents 1 2 × 2 real matrices 1 1.1 Profile ................................................. 1 1.2 Equi-areal mapping .......................................... 2 1.3 Functions of 2 × 2 real matrices .................................... 2 1.4 2 × 2 real matrices as complex numbers ............................... 3 1.5 References ............................................... 4 2 Abelian group 5 2.1 Definition ............................................... 5 2.2 Facts ................................................. 5 2.2.1 Notation ........................................... 5 2.2.2 Multiplication table ...................................... 6 2.3 Examples ............................................... 6 2.4 Historical remarks .......................................... 6 2.5 Properties ............................................... 6 2.6 Finite abelian groups ......................................... 7 2.6.1 Classification ......................................... 7 2.6.2 Automorphisms ....................................... 7 2.7 Infinite abelian groups ........................................ 8 2.7.1 Torsion groups ........................................ 9 2.7.2 Torsion-free and mixed groups ................................ 9 2.7.3 Invariants and classification .................................. 9 2.7.4 Additive groups of rings ................................... 9 2.8 Relation to other mathematical topics ................................. 10 2.9 A note on the typography ....................................... 10 2.10 See also ................................................ 10 2.11 Notes ................................................. 11 2.12 References .............................................. 11 2.13 External links ............................................. 11 3 Associative algebra 12 3.1 Formal definition ........................................... 12 3.1.1 From R-modules ....................................... 12 i ii CONTENTS 3.1.2 From rings .......................................... 13 3.2 Algebra homomorphisms ....................................... 13 3.3 Examples ............................................... 13 3.4 Constructions ............................................. 14 3.5 Associativity and the multiplication mapping ............................. 15 3.6 Coalgebras ............................................... 15 3.7 Representations ............................................ 15 3.7.1 Motivation for a Hopf algebra ................................. 16 3.7.2 Motivation for a Lie algebra .................................. 16 3.8 See also ................................................ 17 3.9 References ............................................... 17 4 Automata theory 18 4.1 Automata ............................................... 19 4.1.1 Informal description ..................................... 19 4.1.2 Formal definition ....................................... 19 4.2 Variant definitions of automata .................................... 19 4.3 Classes of automata .......................................... 21 4.3.1 Discrete, continuous, and hybrid automata .......................... 21 4.4 Hierarchy in terms of powers ..................................... 21 4.5 Applications .............................................. 21 4.6 Automata simulators .......................................... 21 4.7 Connection to category theory ..................................... 22 4.8 References ............................................... 22 4.9 Further reading ............................................ 22 4.10 External links ............................................. 23 5 Bijection 24 5.1 Definition ............................................... 25 5.2 Examples ............................................... 25 5.2.1 Batting line-up of a baseball team ............................... 25 5.2.2 Seats and students of a classroom ............................... 25 5.3 More mathematical examples and some non-examples ........................ 26 5.4 Inverses ................................................ 26 5.5 Composition .............................................. 26 5.6 Bijections and cardinality ....................................... 26 5.7 Properties ............................................... 27 5.8 Bijections and category theory ..................................... 27 5.9 Generalization to partial functions ................................... 28 5.10 Contrast with ............................................. 28 5.11 See also ................................................ 28 5.12 Notes ................................................. 28 CONTENTS iii 5.13 References ............................................... 29 5.14 External links ............................................. 29 6 Bipartite graph 30 6.1 Examples ............................................... 31 6.2 Properties ............................................... 32 6.2.1 Characterization ........................................ 32 6.2.2 König’s theorem and perfect graphs .............................. 32 6.2.3 Degree ............................................ 32 6.2.4 Relation to hypergraphs and directed graphs ......................... 33 6.3 Algorithms ............................................... 33 6.3.1 Testing bipartiteness ..................................... 33 6.3.2 Odd cycle transversal ..................................... 34 6.3.3 Matching ........................................... 35 6.4 Additional applications ........................................ 35 6.5 See also ................................................ 35 6.6 References .............................................. 36 6.7 External links ............................................. 37 7 Category (mathematics) 38 7.1 Definition ............................................... 39 7.2 History ................................................. 39 7.3 Small and large categories ....................................... 40 7.4 Examples ............................................... 40 7.5 Construction of new categories .................................... 40 7.5.1 Dual category ......................................... 40 7.5.2 Product categories ...................................... 41 7.6 Types of morphisms .......................................... 41 7.7 Types of categories .......................................... 42 7.8 See also ................................................ 42 7.9 Notes ................................................. 42 7.10 References ............................................... 42 8 Class function (algebra) 44 8.1 Characters ............................................... 44 8.2 Inner products ............................................. 44 8.3 See also ................................................ 44 8.4 References .............................................. 44 9 Complete bipartite graph 45 9.1 Definition ............................................... 45 9.2 Examples ............................................... 45 9.3 Properties ............................................... 46 iv CONTENTS 9.4 See also ................................................ 47 9.5 References ............................................... 47 10 Complete graph 48 10.1 Properties ............................................... 48 10.2 Geometry and topology ........................................ 48 10.3 Examples ............................................... 49 10.4 See also ................................................ 49 10.5 References ............................................... 49 10.6 External links ............................................. 49 11 Complete metric space 50 11.1 Examples ............................................... 50 11.2 Some theorems ............................................ 51 11.3 Completion .............................................. 51 11.4 Topologically complete spaces ..................................... 52 11.5 Alternatives and generalizations .................................... 52 11.6 See also ................................................ 52 11.7 Notes ................................................. 53 11.8 References ............................................... 53 12 Conjugacy class 54 12.1 Definition ............................................... 54 12.2 Examples ............................................... 54 12.3 Properties ............................................... 55 12.4 Conjugacy class equation ....................................... 55 12.4.1 Example ............................................ 56 12.5 Conjugacy of subgroups and general subsets ............................. 56 12.6 Conjugacy as group action ....................................... 56 12.7 Geometric interpretation ....................................... 56 12.8 See also ................................................ 57 12.9 References ............................................... 57 13 Connected space 58 13.1 Formal definition ........................................... 59 13.1.1 Connected components .................................... 59 13.1.2 Disconnected spaces ..................................... 59 13.2 Examples ............................................... 59 13.3 Path connectedness .......................................... 60 13.4 Arc connectedness .......................................... 61 13.5 Local connectedness ......................................... 61 13.6 Set operations ............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Vertex Coloring Problem and Its Generalizations
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by AMS Tesi di Dottorato UNIVERSITA` DEGLI STUDI DI BOLOGNA Dottorato di Ricerca in Automatica e Ricerca Operativa MAT/09 XIX Ciclo The Vertex Coloring Problem and its Generalizations Enrico Malaguti Il Coordinatore Il Tutor Prof. Claudio Melchiorri Prof. Paolo Toth A.A. 2003{2006 Contents Acknowledgments v Keywords vii List of ¯gures ix List of tables xi 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The Vertex Coloring Problem and its Generalizations . 1 1.2 Fair Routing . 6 I Vertex Coloring Problems 9 2 A Metaheuristic Approach for the Vertex Coloring Problem 11 2.1 Introduction . 11 2.1.1 The Heuristic Algorithm MMT . 12 2.1.2 Initialization Step . 13 2.2 PHASE 1: Evolutionary Algorithm . 15 2.2.1 Tabu Search Algorithm . 15 2.2.2 Evolutionary Diversi¯cation . 18 2.2.3 Evolutionary Algorithm as part of the Overall Algorithm . 21 2.3 PHASE 2: Set Covering Formulation . 22 2.3.1 The General Structure of the Algorithm . 24 2.4 Computational Analysis . 25 2.4.1 Performance of the Tabu Search Algorithm . 25 2.4.2 Performance of the Evolutionary Algorithm . 26 2.4.3 Performance of the Overall Algorithm . 26 2.4.4 Comparison with the most e®ective heuristic algorithms . 30 2.5 Conclusions . 33 3 An Evolutionary Approach for Bandwidth Multicoloring Problems 37 3.1 Introduction . 37 3.2 An ILP Model for the Bandwidth Coloring Problem . 39 3.3 Constructive Heuristics . 40 3.4 Tabu Search Algorithm . 40 i ii CONTENTS 3.5 The Evolutionary Algorithm .
    [Show full text]
  • Interval Edge-Colorings of Graphs
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2016 Interval Edge-Colorings of Graphs Austin Foster University of Central Florida Part of the Mathematics Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Foster, Austin, "Interval Edge-Colorings of Graphs" (2016). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 5133. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/5133 INTERVAL EDGE-COLORINGS OF GRAPHS by AUSTIN JAMES FOSTER B.S. University of Central Florida, 2015 A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Mathematics in the College of Sciences at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Summer Term 2016 Major Professor: Zixia Song ABSTRACT A proper edge-coloring of a graph G by positive integers is called an interval edge-coloring if the colors assigned to the edges incident to any vertex in G are consecutive (i.e., those colors form an interval of integers). The notion of interval edge-colorings was first introduced by Asratian and Kamalian in 1987, motivated by the problem of finding compact school timetables. In 1992, Hansen described another scenario using interval edge-colorings to schedule parent-teacher con- ferences so that every person’s conferences occur in consecutive slots.
    [Show full text]
  • Packing and Covering Dense Graphs
    Packing and Covering Dense Graphs Noga Alon ∗ Yair Caro y Raphael Yuster z Abstract Let d be a positive integer. A graph G is called d-divisible if d divides the degree of each vertex of G. G is called nowhere d-divisible if no degree of a vertex of G is divisible by d. For a graph H, gcd(H) denotes the greatest common divisor of the degrees of the vertices of H. The H-packing number of G is the maximum number of pairwise edge disjoint copies of H in G. The H-covering number of G is the minimum number of copies of H in G whose union covers all edges of G. Our main result is the following: For every fixed graph H with gcd(H) = d, there exist positive constants (H) and N(H) such that if G is a graph with at least N(H) vertices and has minimum degree at least (1 − (H)) G , then the H-packing number of G and the H-covering number of G can be computed j j in polynomial time. Furthermore, if G is either d-divisible or nowhere d-divisible, then there is a closed formula for the H-packing number of G, and the H-covering number of G. Further extensions and solutions to related problems are also given. 1 Introduction All graphs considered here are finite, undirected and simple, unless otherwise noted. For the standard graph-theoretic terminology the reader is referred to [1]. Let H be a graph without isolated vertices. An H-covering of a graph G is a set L = G1;:::;Gs of subgraphs of G, where f g each subgraph is isomorphic to H, and every edge of G appears in at least one member of L.
    [Show full text]
  • Rigid Analytic Curves and Their Jacobians
    Rigid analytic curves and their Jacobians Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades Dr. rer. nat. der Fakult¨at f¨urMathematik und Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Universit¨atUlm vorgelegt von Sophie Schmieg aus Ebersberg Ulm 2013 Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Werner Lutkebohmert¨ Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Stefan Wewers Amtierender Dekan: Prof. Dr. Dieter Rautenbach Tag der Promotion: 19. Juni 2013 Contents Glossary of Notations vii Introduction ix 1. The Jacobian of a curve in the complex case . ix 2. Mumford curves and general rigid analytic curves . ix 3. Outline of the chapters and the results of this work . x 4. Acknowledgements . xi 1. Some background on rigid geometry 1 1.1. Non-Archimedean analysis . 1 1.2. Affinoid varieties . 2 1.3. Admissible coverings and rigid analytic varieties . 3 1.4. The reduction of a rigid analytic variety . 4 1.5. Adic topology and complete rings . 5 1.6. Formal schemes . 9 1.7. Analytification of an algebraic variety . 11 1.8. Proper morphisms . 12 1.9. Etale´ morphisms . 13 1.10. Meromorphic functions . 14 1.11. Examples . 15 2. The structure of a formal analytic curve 17 2.1. Basic definitions . 17 2.2. The formal fiber of a point . 17 2.3. The formal fiber of regular points and double points . 22 2.4. The formal fiber of a general singular point . 23 2.5. Formal blow-ups . 27 2.6. The stable reduction theorem . 29 2.7. Examples . 31 3. Group objects and Jacobians 33 3.1. Some definitions from category theory . 33 3.2. Group objects . 35 3.3. Central extensions of group objects .
    [Show full text]
  • Embedding Trees in Dense Graphs
    Embedding trees in dense graphs Václav Rozhoň February 14, 2019 joint work with T. Klimo¹ová and D. Piguet Václav Rozhoň Embedding trees in dense graphs February 14, 2019 1 / 11 Alternative definition: substructures in graphs Extremal graph theory Definition (Extremal graph theory, Bollobás 1976) Extremal graph theory, in its strictest sense, is a branch of graph theory developed and loved by Hungarians. Václav Rozhoň Embedding trees in dense graphs February 14, 2019 2 / 11 Extremal graph theory Definition (Extremal graph theory, Bollobás 1976) Extremal graph theory, in its strictest sense, is a branch of graph theory developed and loved by Hungarians. Alternative definition: substructures in graphs Václav Rozhoň Embedding trees in dense graphs February 14, 2019 2 / 11 Density of edges vs. density of triangles (Razborov 2008) (image from the book of Lovász) Extremal graph theory Theorem (Mantel 1907) Graph G has n vertices. If G has more than n2=4 edges then it contains a triangle. Generalisations? Václav Rozhoň Embedding trees in dense graphs February 14, 2019 3 / 11 Extremal graph theory Theorem (Mantel 1907) Graph G has n vertices. If G has more than n2=4 edges then it contains a triangle. Generalisations? Density of edges vs. density of triangles (Razborov 2008) (image from the book of Lovász) Václav Rozhoň Embedding trees in dense graphs February 14, 2019 3 / 11 3=2 The answer for C4 is of order n , lower bound via finite projective planes. What is the answer for trees? Extremal graph theory Theorem (Mantel 1907) Graph G has n vertices. If G has more than n2=4 edges then it contains a triangle.
    [Show full text]
  • Uniform Factorizations of Graphs
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Dissertations Graduate College 12-1979 Uniform Factorizations of Graphs David Burns Western Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations Part of the Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Burns, David, "Uniform Factorizations of Graphs" (1979). Dissertations. 2682. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/2682 This Dissertation-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIFORM FACTORIZATIONS OF GRAPHS by David Burns A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan December 197 9 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT S I wish to thank Professor Shashichand Kapoor, my advisor, for his guidance and encouragement during the writing of this dissertation. I would also like to thank my other working partners Professor Phillip A. Ostrand of the University of California at Santa Barbara and Professor Seymour Schuster of Carleton College for their many contributions to this study. I am also grateful to Professors Yousef Alavi, Gary Chartrand, and Dionsysios Kountanis of Western Michigan University for their careful reading of the manuscript and to Margaret Johnson for her expert typing. David Burns Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Journal of Science ANALYSIS International Journal for Science ISSN 2319 – 7730 EISSN 2319 – 7749
    Indian Journal of Science ANALYSIS International Journal for Science ISSN 2319 – 7730 EISSN 2319 – 7749 Graph colouring problem applied in genetic algorithm Malathi R Assistant Professor, Dept of Mathematics, Scsvmv University, Enathur, Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu 631561, India, Email Id: [email protected] Publication History Received: 06 January 2015 Accepted: 05 February 2015 Published: 18 February 2015 Citation Malathi R. Graph colouring problem applied in genetic algorithm. Indian Journal of Science, 2015, 13(38), 37-41 ABSTRACT In this paper we present a hybrid technique that applies a genetic algorithm followed by wisdom of artificial crowds that approach to solve the graph-coloring problem. The genetic algorithm described here, utilizes more than one parent selection and mutation methods depending u p on the state of fitness of its best solution. This results in shifting the solution to the global optimum, more quickly than using a single parent selection or mutation method. The algorithm is tested against the standard DIMACS benchmark tests while, limiting the number of usable colors to the chromatic numbers. The proposed algorithm succeeded to solve the sample data set and even outperformed a recent approach in terms of the minimum number of colors needed to color some of the graphs. The Graph Coloring Problem (GCP) is also known as complete problem. Graph coloring also includes vertex coloring and edge coloring. However, mostly the term graph coloring refers to vertex coloring rather than edge coloring. Given a number of vertices, which form a connected graph, the objective is that to color each vertex so that if two vertices are connected in the graph (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Results on Domination Number and Bondage Number for Some Families of Graphs
    International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Volume 107 No. 3 2016, 565-577 ISSN: 1311-8080 (printed version); ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-line version) url: http://www.ijpam.eu AP doi: 10.12732/ijpam.v107i3.5 ijpam.eu RESULTS ON DOMINATION NUMBER AND BONDAGE NUMBER FOR SOME FAMILIES OF GRAPHS G. Hemalatha1, P. Jeyanthi2 § 1Department of Mathematics Shri Andal Alagar College of Engineering Mamandur, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu, INDIA 2Research Centre, Department of Mathematics Govindammal Aditanar College for Women Tiruchendur 628 215, Tamil Nadu, INDIA Abstract: Let G = (V, E) be a simple graph on the vertex set V . In a graph G, A set S ⊆ V is a dominating set of G if every vertex in VS is adjacent to some vertex in S. The domination number of a graph Gγ(G)] is the minimum size of a dominating set of vertices in G. The bondage number of a graph G[Bdγ(G)] is the cardinality of a smallest set of edges whose removal results in a graph with domination number larger than that of G. In this paper we establish domination number and the bondage number for some families of graphs. AMS Subject Classification: 05C69 Key Words: dominating set, bondage number, domination number, cocktail party graph, coxeter graph, crown graph, cubic symmetric graph, doyle graph, folkman graph, levi graph, icosahedral graph 1. Introduction The domination in graphs is one of the major areas in graph theory which attracts many researchers because it has the potential to solve many real life problems involving design and analysis of communication network, social net- Received: October 17, 2015 c 2016 Academic Publications, Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Restricted Colorings of Graphs
    Restricted colorings of graphs Noga Alon ∗ Department of Mathematics Raymond and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel and Bellcore, Morristown, NJ 07960, USA Abstract The problem of properly coloring the vertices (or edges) of a graph using for each vertex (or edge) a color from a prescribed list of permissible colors, received a considerable amount of attention. Here we describe the techniques applied in the study of this subject, which combine combinatorial, algebraic and probabilistic methods, and discuss several intriguing conjectures and open problems. This is mainly a survey of recent and less recent results in the area, but it contains several new results as well. ∗Research supported in part by a United States Israel BSF Grant. Appeared in "Surveys in Combinatorics", Proc. 14th British Combinatorial Conference, London Mathematical Society Lecture Notes Series 187, edited by K. Walker, Cambridge University Press, 1993, 1-33. 0 1 Introduction Graph coloring is arguably the most popular subject in graph theory. An interesting variant of the classical problem of coloring properly the vertices of a graph with the minimum possible number of colors arises when one imposes some restrictions on the colors available for every vertex. This variant received a considerable amount of attention that led to several fascinating conjectures and results, and its study combines interesting combinatorial techniques with powerful algebraic and probabilistic ideas. The subject, initiated independently by Vizing [51] and by Erd}os,Rubin and Taylor [24], is usually known as the study of the choosability properties of a graph. In the present paper we survey some of the known recent and less recent results in this topic, focusing on the techniques involved and mentioning some of the related intriguing open problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus</Em>
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 8-6-2008 Three Wittgensteins: Interpreting the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus Thomas J. Brommage Jr. University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Brommage, Thomas J. Jr., "Three Wittgensteins: Interpreting the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus" (2008). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/149 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Three Wittgensteins: Interpreting the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus by Thomas J. Brommage, Jr. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Co-Major Professor: Kwasi Wiredu, B.Phil. Co-Major Professor: Stephen P. Turner, Ph.D. Charles B. Guignon, Ph.D. Richard N. Manning, J. D., Ph.D. Joanne B. Waugh, Ph.D. Date of Approval: August 6, 2008 Keywords: Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, logical empiricism, resolute reading, metaphysics © Copyright 2008 , Thomas J. Brommage, Jr. Acknowledgments There are many people whom have helped me along the way. My most prominent debts include Ray Langely, Billy Joe Lucas, and Mary T. Clark, who trained me in philosophy at Manhattanville College; and also to Joanne Waugh, Stephen Turner, Kwasi Wiredu and Cahrles Guignon, all of whom have nurtured my love for the philosophy of language.
    [Show full text]
  • First Order Logic
    Artificial Intelligence CS 165A Mar 10, 2020 Instructor: Prof. Yu-Xiang Wang ® First Order Logic 1 Recap: KB Agents True sentences TELL Knowledge Base Domain specific content; facts ASK Inference engine Domain independent algorithms; can deduce new facts from the KB • Need a formal logic system to work • Need a data structure to represent known facts • Need an algorithm to answer ASK questions 2 Recap: syntax and semantics • Two components of a logic system • Syntax --- How to construct sentences – The symbols – The operators that connect symbols together – A precedence ordering • Semantics --- Rules the assignment of sentences to truth – For every possible worlds (or “models” in logic jargon) – The truth table is a semantics 3 Recap: Entailment Sentences Sentence ENTAILS Representation Semantics Semantics World Facts Fact FOLLOWS A is entailed by B, if A is true in all possiBle worlds consistent with B under the semantics. 4 Recap: Inference procedure • Inference procedure – Rules (algorithms) that we apply (often recursively) to derive truth from other truth. – Could be specific to a particular set of semantics, a particular realization of the world. • Soundness and completeness of an inference procedure – Soundness: All truth discovered are valid. – Completeness: All truth that are entailed can be discovered. 5 Recap: Propositional Logic • Syntax:Syntax – True, false, propositional symbols – ( ) , ¬ (not), Ù (and), Ú (or), Þ (implies), Û (equivalent) • Semantics: – Assigning values to the variables. Each row is a “model”. • Inference rules: – Modus Pronens etc. Most important: Resolution 6 Recap: Propositional logic agent • Representation: Conjunctive Normal Forms – Represent them in a data structure: a list, a heap, a tree? – Efficient TELL operation • Inference: Solve ASK question – Use “Resolution” only on CNFs is Sound and Complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Finite Projective Geometries 243
    FINITE PROJECTÎVEGEOMETRIES* BY OSWALD VEBLEN and W. H. BUSSEY By means of such a generalized conception of geometry as is inevitably suggested by the recent and wide-spread researches in the foundations of that science, there is given in § 1 a definition of a class of tactical configurations which includes many well known configurations as well as many new ones. In § 2 there is developed a method for the construction of these configurations which is proved to furnish all configurations that satisfy the definition. In §§ 4-8 the configurations are shown to have a geometrical theory identical in most of its general theorems with ordinary projective geometry and thus to afford a treatment of finite linear group theory analogous to the ordinary theory of collineations. In § 9 reference is made to other definitions of some of the configurations included in the class defined in § 1. § 1. Synthetic definition. By a finite projective geometry is meant a set of elements which, for sugges- tiveness, are called points, subject to the following five conditions : I. The set contains a finite number ( > 2 ) of points. It contains subsets called lines, each of which contains at least three points. II. If A and B are distinct points, there is one and only one line that contains A and B. HI. If A, B, C are non-collinear points and if a line I contains a point D of the line AB and a point E of the line BC, but does not contain A, B, or C, then the line I contains a point F of the line CA (Fig.
    [Show full text]