Z.C. CASE NO. 13-14 McMillan Sand Filtration Site – 2501 First Street, N.W. February 18, 2014 APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO ZONING COMMISSION COMMENTS AT SET-DOWN MEETING

ZC COMMENT/ISSUE APPLICANT'S RESPONSE Housing: Family v. senior housing Over the past several years, the Applicant has worked closely with (Commissioner Cohen) the community to provide the right mix of uses at the site. Throughout the process, the community has expressed its strong and consistent preference for senior housing to enable family members and elders to age in close proximity to their current residences. The Applicant believes that there is sufficient demand in this segment of the city to support the provision of senior housing at the site as alternative measure. Based on a market study commissioned by the Applicant in 2012 from Real Property Research Group, there is a net demand for senior rental housing. Taking into account household trends and necessary unit replacement, it is projected that there will be excess demand for 279 senior rental units in the McMillan market area as of January 2015. The results of this derivation of senior rental demand indicate that the market has adequate depth of senior need to absorb the three senior pipeline rental properties and still maintain considerable excess demand for senior rental units. The Applicant is contemplating 84 units of affordable senior housing as a component of the project. Nevertheless, affordable housing opportunities are provided for families throughout the PUD. The townhouses offer inclusionary zoning ("IZ") units at a rate of 10 percent of the total gross floor area, or 18 units, which equates to 12 percent of the total number of rowhoues. This exceeds the eight percent of gross floor area requirement of IZ. The future multi-family building to be located on Parcel 2 will also provide IZ units for families, setting aside at least ten percent of the total gross floor area.

Housing: Amount of low-income housing The Commission requested additional information on the level of for District project (Commissioner Miller) affordability typically required for District projects. District projects have typically required affordability rates at 80% of AMI for market-rate housing and at 30-60% of AMI for senior housing. See, for example, Z.C. 07-13, Z.C. 07-26 and Z.C. 11-24. This PUD is consistent with those standards and the requirements of the Applicant's Exclusive Rights Agreement with the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development. As noted above, the Applicant will exceed the IZ requirements by providing approximately 10 percent of the residential gross floor area of the rowhouses (12% of the units) and at least 20 percent of the total multi-family building program (both Parcel and Parcel 4) gross floor area for affordable units.

Architecture: blank wall on Evarts St. The Applicant is uncertain about which elevation this comment (Commissioner Cohen) applies and looks forward to discussions on this point at the hearing. The Applicant notes, however, that the loading docks to

the multi-family/retail building face south on Evarts Street, resulting in an elevation that is less articulated at the ground level.

Architecture: location of healing gardens The health care facility at the north portion of the site requires a along high-traffic Michigan Ave. vehicular drop off area to accommodate passenger cars, vans, (Commissioner Cohen) medical transports, taxis and shuttle buses. This vehicular access to the medical office fronts on Michigan Avenue to protect the historic North Service Court, which cannot accommodate the anticipated volume of passenger loading and unloading. The healing gardens serve as a landscape buffer for the Michigan Avenue transportation hub, while enhancing the historic Olmsted Walk lining the perimeter of the site. Unlike the straight pathways on the other three external street frontages, the Michigan Avenue segment of the Olmsted Walk is curvilinear. Additionally, the "plinth" of the McMillan Sand Filtration site is below the grade of Michigan Avenue. The gardens are intended to create a soft transition from the hard edge of Michigan Avenue to the scenic elements of the Olmsted Walk and provide visitors a contemplative area featuring plants known for their healing qualities.

Architecture: articulation of townhouse end The rowhouses were the subject of significant discussion before units (Commissioner May) the Historic Preservation Review Board ("HPRB"). HPRB concluded that the rowhouse designs as they were ultimately approved (and as submitted in this PUD application) well complimented the historic resources and captured the modern design intent envisioned by HPRB and the Applicant. The end units have been fully designed to take advantage of their additional exterior wall. The Master Plan allows the row home buildings to be built along Evarts Street in a rhythm and pattern respectful to the rhythm and pattern found with silos in the South service corridor. Each building is separated by either a street or alley in alternating sequence along the length of Evarts Street. The side facades of these buildings have been uniformly designed to reinforce this repetition and rhythm, and activate Evarts Street by being symmetrically balanced with windows flanking a centrally featured cantilevered bay window.

Architecture: need more renderings of The Applicant is presently preparing additional renderings for its interior of project (Commissioner May) 20-day submission.

Architecture: need to address scale, The design intent in the approved guidelines is to reflect the brutalist appearance of other buildings industrial nature of the existing resources on the site by expressing (Commissioner Turnbull) "a sense of both the raw quality found in the sand bins and filtration beds with the refined qualities found in the regulator houses." McMillan Master Plan Design Guidelines, at 9. Buildings along the North Service Court are to "have a podium expressed similarly to the other buildings that will employ a concrete color that recalls the historic North Service Court wall." The multi- family/retail building employs a white skin that is "gridded and banded to visually reference the geometries and material use in the other buildings while symbolically referring to the site's

2

historic water filtration function." The healthcare facility similarly incorporates the materials and vocabulary of the regulator houses and the sand storage bins into a contemporary architectural language. The Applicant worked with HPRB and HPO staff to achieve building designs that evoke the unique qualities of the site. HPRB found the concept designs to "represent an architecturally coordinated and cohesive approach that specifically relates to the character of the McMillan site." See HPRB Actions, October 31, 2014. The Applicant looks forward to describing the design approach in greater detail at the hearing.

Architecture: design should reflect and Two design approaches for this unique historic site – whether to blend in with the surrounding devise a contextual neighborhood design or reflect the industrial neighborhood (Commissioner Turnbull) character of the landmark that set it apart from the surrounding area – were specifically explored during the Historic Preservation Review Board ("HPRB") process. Initial designs presented to HPRB in 2012 integrated the site more with the surrounding community. HPRB commented, however, that the "plan was trying to relate too closely to the many disparate conditions around it, rather than reinforcing and recreating a unique place that is specific to the character of McMillan and distinct from what is surrounding it." In response, the Applicant developed Design Guidelines, which were adopted by HPRB, that emphasize a cohesive approach to landscape and architecture that act as additions to the historic landmark. Overall building forms and geometries should be very simple to reflect the simplicity of both the site's organization and its historic structures. The Applicant will present this design approach in greater detail at the hearing.

Historic Elements: re-use of vaults, historic The majority of the underground sand filtration "cells" are elements (Commissioner Cohen) structurally unstable and cannot be re-purposed as they exist now. However, Cell 14 at the northeast corner of the site has been retrofitted by D.C. Water for stormwater management until 2022. Thereafter, the Applicant will adapt this cell for active uses dependent on its condition. Cell 28 will be partially preserved and incorporated into the architecture of the Community Center. Cell 29 at the southeast corner of the site will be exposed and its structural elements will frame a landscaped water feature. All above-grade historic structures in the north and south service courts will be preserved, as described on pages 22-25 of the Stage 1 (Master Plan) drawings dated November 22, 2013.

Historic Elements: re-use of historic The Applicant enthusiastically endorses the idea of re-using the fountain in possession of NPS historic fountain on the site and would look forward to working (Commissioner May) with the Office of Planning to obtain permission and receive the missing pieces from the federal government to implement this proposal.

Lighting Plan: none provided The Applicant retained George Sexton Associates as its lighting (Commissioner Cohen) consultant in November 2013 and will provide a schematic lighting plan with its 20-day submission.

3

Parking: explanation of parking spaces at A typographical error on the zoning tabulations for the community community center; number of spaces center incorrectly listed the parking requirement as 95 spaces seems too low (Commissioner Miller); when the actual requirement is 9 spaces. The Applicant exceeds number of spaces seem too high this requirement by providing 21 spaces in the South Service (Commissioner Cohen); need to hear from Court. Ample additional parking is located throughout the site DDOT within close walking distance to the community center. The Applicant is presently reviewing with the DDOT its transportation impact study and the draft report is included as exhibit to this prehearing submission.

4

GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW BOARD

HPRB AGENDA March 28 and April 4, 2013

The Historic Preservation Review Board met to consider the following items on March 28, 2013. Present: Robert Sonderman (Acting Chair), Maria Casarella, Graham Davidson, Nancy Metzger, and Joseph Taylor. Absent: Rauzia Ally, Andrew Aurbach and Gretchen Pfaehler.

MARCH 28 AGENDA

LANDMARK DESIGNATION HEARING Chapman Stables, 37-57 N Street and 54-64/66-76 Hanover Place, NW, Case #13-09. The HPO recommends that the Board find the property meets the designation criteria for listing in the DC Inventory, but that the boundaries of the proposed landmark designation be revised to include the Chapman Stable and Garage at 37-57 N Street on Square 617, Lot 215 only. The HPO further recommends that the Board forward the nomination with its revised boundaries to the National Register of Historic Places for listing. Vote: 5-0

Chapman Stables, 37-57 N Street and 54-64/66-76 Hanover Place, NW, HPA #13-255, raze application The raze application was withdrawn by the applicant

MCMILLAN PARK RESERVOIR McMillan Reservoir Sand Filtration Site, HPA #13-208 and HPA #13-214, raze permit for two below- grade sand filtration cells and concept application for proposed finished treatment of site. The Board found the proposed demolition to be inconsistent with the purposes of the preservation act, as it will result in the demolition of important character-defining features of the McMillan Park Reservoir landmark; and recommended to the Mayor’s Agent that if the project is determined to be a project of special merit, that Option C proposed by the applicant would result in the best possible mitigation of the loss of the filtration cells, as it would result in the recreation of the site’s distinctive original topography and would take advantage of the existing south service court to provide access to the site. Vote: 4-0 (Casarella recused)

DUPONT CIRCLE HISTORIC DISTRICT 1216 18th Street NW, HPA #13-212, concept/rear roof deck and screening of mechanical equipment. [Deferred at the request of ANC 2-B]

CAPITOL HILL HISTORIC DISTRICT 1331 Constitution Avenue, NE, HPA #13-186, concept/second and third story additions. The Board found the concept to be consistent with the purposes of the preservation act and delegated final approval to staff, with the condition that the applicants work with HPO to finalize storefront details and the location of the roof deck railing. Vote: 5-1 (Metzger opposed; Aurbach and Pfaehler absent)

1100 4th Street, SW, Suite E650, Washington, D.C. 20024 (202) 442-8800 fax (202) 442-7638 2

541 7th Street, SE, HPA #13-211, concept/rooftop addition. The Board found the concept to be consistent with the purposes of the preservation act and delegated final approval to staff, with the condition that the applicants continue to work with HPO on the north and rear elevations of the house. Vote: 5-0

452 New Jersey Avenue, SE, HPA #13-145, concept/rear addition and façade reconstruction. The Board found the concept to be consistent with the purposes of the preservation act and delegated final approval to staff with the condition the applicant salvage as much of the façade’s historic fabric as possible. Vote: 5-0

513 C Street, NE, HPA #13-116, concept/raze and new construction of two townhouses. The Board found the concept to be consistent with the purposes of the preservation act and delegated final approval to staff with the condition that the applicant work with staff to refine the rear elevation balconies. Vote: 5-0

SAINT ELIZABETHS EAST CAMPUS 1100 Alabama Avenue (2700 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue), SE, HPA #13-032, revised concept/ construction of pavilion. The Board gave final approval to the project as presented (with some preference shown for the “nose” at the northern end to be of ten-foot length). Vote: 6-0.

APRIL 4 AGENDA

The Historic Preservation Review Board met to consider the following items on April 4, 2013. Present: Gretchen Pfaehler, Chair; Andrew Aurbach, Maria Casarella, Graham Davidson, and Nancy Metzger. Absent: (Rauzia Ally, except for McMillan presentation), Robert Sonderman, and Joseph Taylor.

SPINGARN HIGH SCHOOL Spingarn High School, 2500 Benning Road, NE, HPA #13-004, revised concept review for proposed streetcar car barn. The Board endorsed refined concept Scheme 1 – “Vertical/Civic” and commended the applicant and architectural team on the improvements that had been made to make more of an appropriate civic statement while simultaneously acknowledging the industrial and educational uses of the facility. Although, further study was recommended for some of the architectural, landscape and infrastructure- related details, the Board unanimously adopted the staff report recommendation to find the concept consistent with the preservation act. However, the Board requested another opportunity to review the designs and did not delegate further design review to staff. Vote: 5-0

EQUITABLE COOPERATIVE BUILDING/DOWNTOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT 915 F Street NW, HPA #13-027, revised concept/five story rear addition. The HPRB asked the applicant to revise the elevation materials to an alternative finish material and delegated final approval to staff. Vote: 5-0.

3

WOODLEY PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 2616 Garfield Street NW, HPA #13-216, rooftop stair enclosure and deck. The Board approved a roof deck and stair penthouse on the condition of the applicant’s careful attention to details, which were not fully presented in the drawings. The staff shall review the further detail of the roof deck elements. Vote: 5-0.

U STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT 2200 14th Street, NW, HPA #13-213, concept/new construction, six-story apartment building. The Board found the general conceptual height, massing and architectural direction to be compatible with the U Street Historic District, and asked the applicant to continue working with staff to further clarify the scope of demolition for the historic building and how the new construction above will impact it, refine the design of the storefront to reflect the historic condition, provide drawings for the north and west elevations, and fully integrate the design of the penthouse into the building design, and delegated final approval to staff. Vote: 5-0.

SHAW HISTORIC DISTRICT 1011-1015 M Street NW and 1201-1207 11th Street NW, HPA #13-154, concept/new construction, nine-story multi-unit residential building on vacant lot. The Board found concept “Option A” to be compatible with the character of the Shaw Historic District and consistent with the purposes of the preservation act, and delegated final approval to staff. Vote: 5- 0.

MCMILLAN PARK RESERVOIR Revised master plan and design guidelines. The Board heard the applicant’s presentation and concluded hearing community testimony, but left the record open to allow ANC 1-B additional time to provide its comments. The case was continued to the April 25th meeting.

CONSENT CALENDAR

The Board approved the following items on the consent calendar on March 28.

CAPITOL HILL HISTORIC DISTRICT 1205 Walter Street, SE, HPA #13-181, concept/two-story rear addition. 608 Constitution Avenue, NE, HPA #13-204, concept/rear addition.

DUPONT CIRCLE HISTORIC DISTRICT 1823 S Street, NW, HPA #13-209, concept/partial fourth floor addition.

SHAW HISTORIC DISTRICT 1418 9th Street NW, HPA #13-207, concept/3-story rear addition to 3-story brick rowbuilding. ______

Transcripts of Historic Preservation Review Board Meetings may be purchased from the court reporting agency that covered this hearing – Olender Reporting, Inc. (202) 898-1108, www.olenderreporting.com,or [email protected]. Copies of individual staff reports that are prepared in advance of the hearing are posted on our website at http://planning.dc.gov

HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW BOARD MASTER PLAN REVIEW

Property Address: North Capitol/Michigan Avenue, NW X Agenda Landmark/District: McMillan Reservoir Consent Calendar X Conceptual Review Meeting Date: October 31, 2013 X Alteration Staff Reviewer: Steve Callcott X New Construction X Demolition

Vision McMillan Partners (VMP) seeks on-going conceptual design review for four development projects at the McMillan Reservoir sand filtration site that were initially presented in June. The proposal also includes substantive revisions to the master plan.

In its previous reviews, the Board has consistently cited the site’s edge condition as an important character-defining feature that should be retained and has emphasized that new development should have a strong sense of cohesion and relationship to the character of the landmark. The Board’s recommendations in June fell along three general lines:

1) The site needs to have a consistent perimeter condition that should include retaining the topographical plinth, recreating the Olmsted walk, and that the new construction should be pulled back accordingly; 2) The site’s tripartite organization, as defined by the north and south maintenance corridors, should remain the dominant organizing principle, and secondary roads and new construction should reinforce rather than dilute the legibility of that organization; 3) To ensure that a strong sense of place be maintained, the new construction should be of a very high quality, unified and cohesive.

The individual projects, from south to north, include: 1) the community center and park designed by Matthew Bell of EE & K/Perkins Eastman and Warren Byrd of Nelson Byrd Woltz landscape architects; 2) 161 rowhouses designed by Jack McLaurin of Lessard Group architects for developer/builder EYA; 3) a mixed-use building with a ground-level grocery store with apartments above designed by MV + A and David Jameson Architects for Jair Lynch Development Partners; and 4) two medical office buildings with ground level retail designed by Shalom Baranes architects for the Trammell Crow Company. 1

Master Plan Revisions The master plan has been revised in three substantive ways to respond to the Board’s comments. A consistent setback has been provided around all sides of the site, allowing the topography to be largely retained and the Olmsted Walk recreated. The middle section of the site, containing

1 A fifth development site, to the west of the grocery store/apartment building is not being planned for development at this time. 1 the townhouses and the grocery store/apartment building, has been reorganized to orient the new construction along four narrow north/south roads to provide greater cohesiveness to this zone and to open up views to the maintenance corridors. And finally, all buildings facing on the north maintenance corridor would be required to have a 20’ high masonry retail base, a reference to the portal walls that would be removed, and to provide a setback for the upper floors.

Revised Development Proposals Community center and park The community center was commended by the HPRB for its design and compatibility previously and has not substantially changed. As before, the two-level 17,500 square foot glass pavilion would access the upper and lower levels of the surrounding park. As recommended, the elevator override that previously penetrated the green roof roof has been eliminated.

Rowhouses The site plan and architecture of the rowhouses have been entirely redesigned to respond to the Board’s suggestions that they needed to be simplified and coalesced into larger, civic-scaled terraces that relate to the scale of the site. Accordingly, each group has been designed so that the individual houses form part of a larger compositional block or terrace. On each terrace, the setback top floors are now integrated into the composition as a secondary geometric element to the underlying block. While still providing variety, they are unified by their use of simple geometries and an edited palette of white and black brick, grey metal panels, rectangular projections, and charcoal-toned and wood detailing.

Grocery store/apartment building This mixed-use building was previously proposed as a series of X-shaped towers above a reclaimed concrete gabion base. While found to be conceptually strong in its reference to the McMillan site, the project’s sharp contrast in materials and geometries were thought to be discordant and distracting. The redesigned building maintains the retail/grocery base, now clad with a canted board-formed concrete wall facing the north maintenance corridor. The apartment tower above is organized in an E-shape opening to North Capitol Street and incorporates a set back from the north maintenance corridor. The white skin of the building would be gridded and banded to visually reference the geometries and material use in the other buildings while symbolically referring to the site’s historic water filtration function.

Medical office buildings As with the grocery store, these buildings have been revised to have a consistent two-story (20 foot) retail plinth clad in board-formed concrete and the upper floors have been set back so as to relieve the impact of the buildings’ height on the north maintenance corridor. The shift in the upper floors has resulted in a concurrent reduction in the size of the courtyard garden facing Michigan Avenue. While the buildings still step down in height from west to east, the sloped roofs have been eliminated to simplify their rooflines. The architecture has been developed to relate to the character of the other projects and the site through simple geometries and a palette of concrete, light-toned terra cotta panels, and charcoal and wood-toned detailing. One of the buildings would include a green wall supporting planters for vines, and on the east side, would have a substantial opening and projection to engage the retained cell 14.

2

Evaluation Demolition As has been acknowledged by the Board since its initial review, demolition of the majority of the sand filter beds and the extent of new construction would result in the loss of important engineering, architectural and open space features for which the property is recognized and designated. The extent of removal meets the definition of substantial demolition as defined by the historic preservation regulations and is not consistent with the purposes of the preservation act.2 Throughout this review process, the Board’s comments have been to improve the preservation scope of work and compatibility of the redevelopment with the landmark in anticipation of the project being forwarded to the Mayor’s Agent where the applicants will be making a case that the redevelopment represents a project of special merit.

Master Plan While resulting in substantial demolition of the below-grade cells and compromise to the site’s open space character, the latest version of the master plan represents a significant improvement over previous versions and now retains the significant above-grade topographical, architectural and engineering features that were identified by the Board as the most important. As before, there would be substantial rehabilitation and meaningful incorporation of the sand bins, regulator houses and sand washers into the park and the retail street along the north maintenance corridor; the service court walls would be largely retained in the south corridor; two of the below-grade cells would be retained, interpreted and reused; a substantial open space would be retained within the 8 acre park at the southern end of the site; and the raised topography at the southern edge of the site (where it is most pronounced) would be retained.

The revised plan substantially improves upon those commitments by retaining a berm and building set back along all edges of the site, and would recreate the elevated hawthorn-lined perimeter walkway laid out by Frederick Law Olmsted, Jr. While the topography will be slightly and compatibly modified to improve the width of the public sidewalks and sight- lines into the site, the distinctive edge condition of the property will be retained, preserving an important visual characteristic of the McMillan landmark. While the loss of the portal walls along most of the north maintenance corridor is regrettable, the master plan’s design requirement for a 20 foot high masonry base on buildings fronting the corridor will evoke this lost element and the setbacks for additional floors above will provide space and relief to ensure the corridor isn’t overwhelmed by the new construction.

The revised master plan would retain significant character-defining features of the landmark sufficient to convey its historic character.

Development Both individually and collectively, the revised concepts are dramatically improved, reflecting the high level of quality, cohesiveness and distinctiveness that have been sought

2 DCMR 10-C, Section 305.1 (e) The removal or destruction of a substantial portion that includes character- defining features of the building or structure. 3 by the Board. Without resorting to replication or literal references, the architecture uses a carefully edited (while still rich and varied) vocabulary of colors, materials, patterns, geometries and forms to unite the proposal’s distinctly different building types. The resulting language is specific to and evocative of the landmark, interpreted in a fresh and contemporary manner. For the first time, it looks like a destination you would want to seek out to experience its distinct sense of place; one that includes equally interesting historic and new features balanced and blended compatibly together.

The revised conceptual designs represent an architecturally cohesive, high-quality and site- specific series of projects that relate to the character of the landmark.

Preservation Covenant In 1987, as a condition of transfer to the District of Columbia from the General Services Administration (GSA) and prior to its local and National Register listing, a preservation covenant was attached to the property. The covenant required that rehabilitation and renovation work be undertaken in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and that the project be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). The covenant states that if the SHPO did not “agree with” the plans (legally imprecise language that presumably means that they are found not to meet the Secretary’s Standards), the District would request the comments of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation in accordance with 36 CFR Part 800.

As the project will result in substantial demolition of character-defining features and the redevelopment will compromise the open-space quality of the site, the SHPO concludes that the project does not meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings and advises the District to forward the plans to the Advisory Council for comment.

Recommendation The HPO recommends that the Board:  Find that the proposal will result in substantial demolition, as defined in the preservation regulations, and therefore inconsistent with the purposes of the Historic Landmark and Historic District Protection Act;  Find that the revised master plan has been developed to retain important character- defining features of the site sufficient to convey its historic characteristics. The requirements for buildings on the north maintenance corridor to have a masonry base and setbacks for upper floors should be specifically codified in the master plan and design guidelines to ensure that these will be consistently applied to future projects;  Find the concept designs to represent an architecturally coordinated and cohesive approach that specifically relates to the character of the McMillan site;  Conduct a final design review of the projects if and when approved by the Zoning Commission as a PUD and the Mayor’s Agent as a project of special merit.

4

GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW BOARD

HPRB ACTIONS October 24 and October 31, 2013

The Historic Preservation Review Board met to consider the following items on October 24 and October 31, 2013.

OCTOBER 24 HPRB AGENDA

Present: Rauzia Ally, Andrew Aurbach, Maria Casarella, Graham Davidson, Nancy Metzger, Robert Sonderman, Joseph Taylor and Charles Wilson. Absent: Gretchen Pfaehler (Sonderman acting chair).

INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATION Presentation on the 2016 Historic Preservation Plan.  Informational presentation only.

LANDMARK HEARINGS The Round House, 1001 Irving Street NE, Case #13-06.  The Board denied landmark designation of the Round House, 1001 Irving Street NE. Vote: 3-5.

The Metropolitan Apartments, 200-210 Rhode Island Avenue NE, Case #13-19.  The Board designated the Metropolitan Apartments, 200-210 Rhode Island Avenue NE, a historic landmark to be entered into the D.C. Inventory of Historic Sites. The Board recommended that the SHPO forward the nomination for listing in the National Register as of local significance with a period of significance of 1936-1937. Vote: 8-0.

HISTORIC LANDMARKS Randall Junior High School, 65 I Street SW, HPA #13-341, revised concept/rehabilitation and 12-story addition.  The Board reaffirmed its previous comments to the Mayor’s Agent, and endorsed the revised concept with the following additions: (A) the concept should be further developed to avoid the lowering of auditorium windows and include the restoration of the cornice balustrade on the center block; (B) further consideration should be given to the treatment of the museum wing so as to reduce impacts on the historic building; (C) take into account the comments of the Board, particularly the relationship of the museum addition to the main block, and the metal skin between the corners; and (D) explore ways to improve the relationship between the historic building and the residential addition, with a closer look at revising the cantilever elements supported by the single columns. Vote: 8-0.

Patterson House, 15 Dupont Circle NW, HPA #13-577, concept/six-story addition.  The Board voted to establish the period of significance for the Patterson House as 1902-1948, therefore making the existing two-story addition from 1956 non-contributing. Vote: 7-0 (Wilson absent). At the request of the applicant, the Board did not make a motion or take a vote on the proposed concept, but concurred with the findings in the staff report that the addition was incompatibly tall and too close to the mansion.

1100 4th Street, SW, Suite E650, Washington, D.C. 20024 (202) 442-8800 fax (202) 442-7638 2

GEORGETOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT 2734 P Street NW, HPA #13-246, concept/demolition of rear ell, addition and rear carport and shed, and construction of a two-story addition and a carport. Case deferred at the request of the applicant.

U STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT 1921-23 14th Street and 1351 Wallach Place, NW, HPA #13-568, concept/alteration and new construction of nine- story apartment building.  The Board adopted the HPO report recommending approval of the general concept as compatible with the historic district. In addition to the suggestions for further refinement outlined in the HPO report, the Board requested additional study of the Wallach Place retail entrance and infill element, the width and size of the bay projections, elimination of the cantilevered element over the historic building, and the amount of glazing and material use. The Board requested to review the building again when appropriate. Vote : 4-2 (Casarella and Wilson absent)

SHERIDAN KALORAMA HISTORIC DISTRICT

1823 Phelps Place NW, HPA #13-593, concept/driveway reconfiguration in side yard.  The Board approved the concept as consistent with the purposes of the preservation act, with comments, and delegated final approval to staff. Vote: 4-2 (Casarella and Wilson absent)

2422 Tracy Place NW, HPA #13-600, after-the-fact permit for roof replacement.  The Board advised the Mayor’s Agent that the permit application for replacement of the pre-existing slate roof with fiberglass shingles is not consistent with the purposes of the preservation law, as it pertains to any roof elevation that is prominently visible from Tracy Place, NW. The Board approved the use of either synthetic slate or real slate on the front slope and right of side of the front dormer, with the condition that a sample be provided for HPO review at the time of permitting. Vote: 6-0. (Casarella and Wilson absent)

OCTOBER 31ST AGENDA

Present: Gretchen Pfaehler, Chair; Rauzia Ally, Andrew Aurbach, Maria Casarella, Graham Davidson, Nancy Metzger, Joseph Taylor and Charles Wilson. Absent: Robert Sonderman.

TAKOMA PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 6915-6917 Maple Street NW, HPA #13-565, concept/rear addition.  The Board found the proposed concept incompatible with the character of the historic district and provided direction to the applicant on how the addition could be revised to be compatible. Vote: 8-0.

DOWNTOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT 610-624 Eye Street and 609-619 H Street NW, HPA #13-627, concept/ demolition, alterations and new construction for office and retail building.

 The Board found the demolition of contributing buildings, the size, design, and scale of the proposed addition and the closing of the public alley to be incompatible with the character of the historic district and inconsistent with the purposes of the preservation act. The Board recommended that any addition on

3

the site be substantially smaller and respect and retain the historic buildings on the site. Vote: 7-0 (Wilson absent).

HISTORIC LANDMARKS McMillan Park Reservoir, 2501 First Street NW, HPA #13-318, revised concept/townhouses, mixed use retail and residential buildings, medical office buildings.  The Board: (A) Determined that the proposal will result in substantial demolition, as defined in the preservation regulations, and therefore inconsistent with the purposes of the Historic Landmark and Historic District Protection Act; (B) Found the revised master plan has been developed to retain important character-defining features of the site sufficient to convey its historic characteristics; (C) Found the revised concept designs to represent an architecturally coordinated and cohesive approach that specifically relates to the character of the McMillan site; and (D) Asked that the project return for final review after approval by the Zoning Commission and Mayor’s Agent. Vote: 7-0 (Taylor absent).

CONSENT CALENDAR

The Board approved the following items on the consent calendar on October 24: 8-0.

ANACOSTIA HISTORIC DISTRICT 2221 Chester Street SE, HPA #13-618, construction of two-story detached dwelling. 1352 Valley Place SE, HPA #13-619, construction of two-story detached dwelling.

CAPITOL HILL HISTORIC DISTRICT 327 7th Street NE, HPA #13-615, concept/rear addition. 414 East Capitol Street NE, HPA #13-546, concept/rear addition.

CLEVELAND PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 3703 Porter Street NW, HPA #13-574, permit/solar panels. 3045 Ordway Street NW, HPA #13-582, permit/rear addition.

14TH STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT 1734-36 14th Street NW, concept/renovation and rear addition.

WASHINGTON HEIGHTS HISTORIC DISTRICT 2316 18th Street NW, HPA #13-473, concept/roof addition.

______

Transcripts of Historic Preservation Review Board Meetings may be purchased from the court reporting agency that covered this hearing – Olender Reporting, Inc. (202) 898-1108, www.olenderreporting.com,or [email protected]. Copies of individual staff reports that are prepared in advance of the hearing are posted on our website at http://planning.dc.gov

OWNER CIVIL ENGINEER DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOWMAN CONSULTING

DEVELOPMENT TEAM STRUCTURAL ENGINEER EYA ROBERT SILMAN ASSOCIATES JAIR LYNCH DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY TRAFFIC CONSULTANT MASTER PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES GOROVE / SLADE PROJECT DIRECTOR ANNE L. CORBETT LAND USE COUNSEL NOVEMBER 29, 2012 HOLLAND & KNIGHT MASTER PLAN ARCHITECT AUGUST 21, 2013 UPDATE EE&K A PERKINS EASTMAN COMPANY BUILDING ARCHITECTS OCTOBER 22, 2013 UPDATE EE&K A PERKINS EASTMAN COMPANY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LESSARD DESIGN NELSON BYRD WOLTZ MV+A / DAVID JAMESON SHALOM BARANES ASSOCIATES HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANT EHT TRACERIES, INC. NTABLEAME OFOF SCECTIONONTENTS & PROJECT BACKGROUND

PROJECT BACKGROUND ...... 2 PROJECT BACKGROUND SITE CONTEXT Since the opening of the fi ltration plant in 1905, ABOUT THE DESIGN GUIDELINES ...... 3 SITE SIGNIFICANCE the site’s context has evolved to include various Th e site of the McMillan Slow Sand Filtration Plant neighborhoods, institutions, landscapes, and 1: PRESERVE THE SITE AS A DISTINCT LANDMARK ...... 4 is signifi cant to Washington, DC, as a unique historic infrastructure, but the site itself remains a distinct and landmark and a major public asset. Th e site occupies unique “island” within the city. As the city has grown 2: PRESERVE AND CELEBRATE THE SITE’S HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE ...... 5 a key location within the extended boundaries of the up around McMillan, the site has become increasingly City of Washington as envisioned in the McMillan visible as a key convergence (or separator) of varied and 3: PRESERVE, RESTORE, AND ADAPT THE SITE’S CHARACTERISTIC HISTORIC RESOURCES ...... 6 Commission’s Plan of 1901, and it exemplifi es the diverse communities. infl uence of the City Beautiful Movement on public INTRODUCTION 4: CREATE A COHESIVE AND ACCESSIBLE URBAN COMMUNITY ...... 7 works at the turn of the twentieth century. Th e dual role of the site as an individual landmark and urban nexus has informed the master planning 5: DESIGN COMPLEMENTARY LANDSCAPE AND ARCHITECTURE ...... 8 SITE HISTORY approach for redevelopment.

Th e McMillan Site is a 24.69-acre parcel that was once MASTER PLAN part of the larger 92-acre McMillan Reservoir and Filtration Plant complex. Th e property is within the Th e Master Plan for the McMillan Site culminates McMillan Park Reservoir Historic Landmark, which was years of study and community outreach. In 2006, the listed in the District of Columbia Inventory of Historic District of Columbia issued a request for proposals with Sites in 1991. the goal of attracting a developer to partner with the city government in the creation and implementation Constructed between 1902 and 1905, the McMillan of a Master Plan. Vision McMillan Partners (VMP) Slow Sand Filtration Plant was the fi rst large-scale water was selected to lead the eff ort and has since engaged purifi cation facility in Washington, DC. Although a team of design and planning professionals to work utilitarian in purpose, the complex was designed to with the community throughout the process. VMP has be enjoyed by the public as a visual landmark, and its coordinated with the McMillan Advisory Group* and various buildings and structures are consistent with the conducted a series of workshops and outreach activities ideals of the City Beautiful Movement. to ensure that plans for future use and redevelopment embody the community’s vision for the property. Between 1907 and 1911, Frederick Law Olmsted, Jr. was retained to develop a landscape design to transform Th e Master Plan seeks to balance economic the larger reservoir and fi ltration plant site into a development with public benefi t, historic preservation, public park, beautifying the grounds with plantings and community amenities. Th e redevelopment will and pedestrian paths. Open space for active recreation incorporate residential, offi ce, and retail uses and a was located adjacent to the reservoir, and a perimeter series of passive and active open spaces to support pedestrian path was located on the site of the fi ltration diverse recreational programming. Th e redevelopment plant. will not only enhance the life of existing and new neighborhood residents, but also serve the various Th e McMillan Site was enjoyed as a park until the medical and educational institutions that play 1940s, when it was permanently closed to the public important roles in this area of the city. during World War II. Operation of the fi ltration plant ended after the property was sold by the federal Th e Master Plan incorporates approximately two government to the city in 1986. million square feet of development and a holistic preservation strategy that will protect and enhance Since the sale of the property, the McMillan Site has McMillan as a historically and culturally signifi cant been the subject of numerous studies and development landmark in the city. proposals. Community members, historians, landscape architects, urban planners, engineers, and developers * McMillan Advisory Group (MAG) is a group comprised of citizen have spent years studying the site and determining its stakeholders, including members of civic associations, ANCs, and existing conditions and future potential. other community leaders from Wards 1 and 5. Site aerial, circa 1930 2 september 5, 2013 McMillan Design Guidelines ABOUT THE DESIGN GUIDELINES

DESIGN GUIDELINES MISSION

Th e opportunity is rare in our era to preserve and Vision McMillan Partners (VMP) is charged with the enhance a unique urban place in our nation’s capital following mission: and to return a long-neglected landmark to the Preserve and enhance McMillan’s unique sense of place. community. Th e Design Guidelines will direct the implementation of the Master Plan to ensure that this eff ort fulfi lls the potential promised by this site. VISION

Th e Design Guidelines: When complete, the 21st-century McMillan site will INTRODUCTION be a cohesive and distinctive mixed-use neighborhood that • Provide a framework for design that refl ects refl ects the site’s unique aesthetic, character, and history community and stakeholder feedback, which in its architecture and public space. was collected in a collaborative process throughout the initial phases of the project. Th e redeveloped McMillan site will be clearly identifi able inside and out while at the same time • Coordinate the design eff orts of many connected to its surrounding neighborhoods. architects, landscape architects, and engineers to produce a cohesive whole that is both Visitors and residents will be able to experience and unifi ed and diverse. learn about the site’s critical role in public health and water fi ltration in the early 20th century. Th ey will also • Ensure that all design eff orts refl ect and be able to engage in healthy activities via expansive enhance the history of this important site. recreation opportunities, including a pool, splash fountain, play fi elds, and places for exercise. • Provide clear strategies for creating a unique place that will be beautiful, memorable, Th ese Design Guidelines will guide the development urban, diverse, and inclusive. process toward fulfi lling the vision—creating an urban Sand washing process, archival drawing, date unknown place that gives new life to this landmark and extends Without being overly prescriptive about how the the legacy of the McMillan Sand Filtration Site. built environment should look in terms of style, the Design Guidelines provide strategies and direction for preservation, architecture, landscape, and urban design that will achieve a unifi ed whole—a strong sense of OBJECTIVES place at McMillan. Five objectives form the foundation of the Design Guidelines. Each objective is expanded with principles, Th ese guidelines are intended to help create an strategies, and precedents in the sections that follow. urban place that will not only itself function as a new community, but will also integrate with its neighboring communities. Further, this new community will enhance the city as a whole, providing a highly visible example of creative reclamation of an abandoned site.

What is now an inaccessible void in the heart of the city will become a vital, interesting, and unique urban place. Th ese Design Guidelines will ensure that the vision becomes reality.

McMillan Site, existing condition McMillan Design Guidelines september 5, 2013 3 DESIGN GUIDELINES

OBJECTIVE ONE A. EXTERNAL EXPERIENCE

At street level, on foot, bicycle or in a vehicle, the viewer should acquire a sense of the Preserve the site as a distinct landmark, creating a unique totality of the place, signaled by key distinguishing elements including preserved cohesive built environment. historic structures, topography, plant material, lighting, and streetscape.

B. INTERNAL EXPERIENCE

Inside the site, the viewer should experience a consistent and unique environment supported by the elements of the place: historic structures, new buildings, and landscape features, as well as pathways, lighting, signage, streetscape, and public art. Th e environment should be cohesive yet diverse. Views through and from the site should be preserved and enhanced, with special consideration for the view south to the Capitol. Detail, Olmsted, Jr. plan, circa 1911 C. THE “PLINTH”

Th e constructed plain or plinth—a series of fl at, grass-covered surfaces that cover the roof structure of the underground fi lter beds—is a defi ning element of this landmark. Th e plinth should be memorialized in the site design to retain the unique sense of place it created. Th e site design should incorporate contiguous sections spanning the length and/or width of the site at the 170-foot elevation of the historic plinth.

D. EDGES

Th e site’s perimeter should retain a clear and distinctive edge that visually communicates a sense of the place as a whole and sets it apart from the surroundings. Th e re-creation of the Olmsted Walk and its associated landscape should clearly defi ne the perimeter. Th e constructed “berms” that currently edge the site, both “positive” (sloping up from the street) and “negative” (sloping down from the street), should be conceptually integrated and/or referenced in the new site design, without compromising pedestrian and vehicular access, views, and public safety.

E. ENTRYWAYS This objective addresses: Corner stair, existing condition Major entrance points should welcome people arriving at the site. Th ese entryways a. External Experience should have a consistent and celebratory character, and should be scaled appropriately for the site and immediate context. When entering the site through these entryways, a 1: PRESERVE THE SITE AS A DISTINCT LANDMARK DISTINCT A AS SITE THE PRESERVE 1: b. Internal Experience sense of threshold and arrival at a unique place should be experienced.

c. The “Plinth” F. STREETSCAPE

d. Edges Streetscape is one of the most eff ective ways to create a cohesive urban environment. Th e streetscape at McMillan should set this place apart from its surroundings, e. Entryways celebrating its unique character. Elements of streetscape design include: sidewalks, crosswalks, and street paving; trees, tree boxes, and other bio-retention basins; street f. Streetscape lamps, furniture, and trash cans. Th e design of these elements should be informed by the site’s historic conditions. Perimeter path, circa 1946 4 september 5, 2013 McMillan Design Guidelines DNESIGNAME OFGUIDELINES SECTION

OBJECTIVE TWO A. PEOPLE

Honor the landmark’s association with Senator James McMillan and landscape architect Preserve and celebrate the historic signifi cance of the site. Frederick Law Olmsted, Jr.

B. PLACE

Tell the story of the McMillan Sand Filtration Site through interpretive programming. Reveal and interpret the site’s character, history, and function in the context of the city’s

growth in the early twentieth century. SIGNIFICANCE

Sen. James McMillan Frederick Law Olmsted, Jr. C. PURPOSE

Incorporate the theme of water throughout the site, considering the act of fi ltering water and the role of sand in the process.

i. Create distinctive water elements throughout the site that can be actively and passively experienced; and

ii. Create a state-of-the-art stormwater management system on site to capture, retain, and reuse stormwater as extensively as possible, exposing the mechanics of water fi ltration in the stormwater management system, and incorporating E’S HISTORIC bio-retention systems into the landscape design.

Overall site plan for reservoir and fi ltration plan, circa 1902

This objective addresses: SIT PRESERVE 2: a. People b. Place c. Purpose

PRECEDENT: Paddington Reservoir Gardens, Sydney (Tonkin Zulaikha Greer Architects) McMillan Design Guidelines september 5, 2013 5 DESIGN GUIDELINES

OBJECTIVE THREE A. BUILT RESOURCES

Preserve and allow for future adaptive reuse of existing above- and below-ground Preserve, restore, and adapt the site’s characteristic historic built resources. Ensure that the treatment of retained historic resources is historic resources. Retain suffi cient historic integrity of the consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Integrate these resources into the site design and program. landmark to convey its signifi cance to the history of public works, water purifi cation, and landscape architecture. i. Retain below-ground spaces suffi ciently sized to preserve the expansiveness and distinctive repetitive structure of the fi lter beds. Where appropriate, associated portals and entrance ramps should be retained as primary access points to underground space. Filter bed ramp, existing condition Manhole opening, existing condition ii. Preserve and adapt both service courts and the buildings within them.

iii. Manholes and manhole covers associated with preserved fi lter beds should be preserved with any necessary modifi cations for public safety. Manhole covers associated with demolished fi lter beds should be adaptively reused on the site.

iv. Relocate and restore the historic McMillan Fountain in a publicly accessible, highly visible location on the site.

B. LANDSCAPE RESOURCES

Integrate preservation and adaptive reuse of historic resources into the design of open spaces.

i. Preserve the site’s clear tripartite organization and trapezoidal footprint. Th e site design should use simple geometries that relate to the original site layout.

ii. Convey a sense of the unique man-made topography of the landmark. Physical and/or interpretive evidence of the site’s defi ning topographic features (underground fi lter beds, service court level, raised plain/plinth) should be Perimeter walk and “plinth,” circa 1910 provided at key locations.

iii. Recall aspects of Olmsted, Jr.’s original landscape design in the landscape and This objective addresses: park design for the site. 1. Incorporate a perimeter pedestrian path that recreates or interprets the a. Built Resources historic “Olmsted Walk.”

b. Landscape Resources 2. Reconstruct corner stairs where appropriate.

Ulmus americana Catalpa speciosa Gymnocladus dioicus Fraxinus americana 3. Incorporate Olmsted’s original planting lists in the landscape palette for Elm Northern catalpa Kentucky coffee tree White Ash the site. Substitute native, pest-resistant, and/or drought-resistant species where appropriate. 3: PRESERVE, RESTORE, & ADAPT HISTORIC RESOURCES HISTORIC ADAPT & RESTORE, PRESERVE, 3:

&RUQXVÀRULGD Franklinia alatamaha Cercis canadensis Chionanthus virginicus )ORZHULQJ'RJZRRG Franklinia Eastern Redbud Fringe Tree Select trees from Olmsted’s plan 6 september 5, 2013 McMillan Design Guidelines DNESIGNAME OFGUIDELINES SECTION

OBJECTIVE FOUR A. PERMEABILITY

Increase access to and permeability of the site by adding through streets and paths. Create a cohesive and accessible urban community that connects to the surrounding neighborhoods. B. APPROACHABILITY

Use edges, streetscape, and public spaces to form a distinct and memorable place that is inviting, not walled-off or exclusive, in character.

C. WALKABILITY

Develop a superior pedestrian environment with public parks and open spaces, great streets with retail, a grocery store, and restaurants, and access to multiple transit modes.

PRECEDENT: City Garden, St. Louis (Nelson Byrd Woltz) D. LAND USE & BUILDING MASSING

Select and locate land uses to promote an economically thriving, diverse, and safe mixed- use urban community. Relate building massing to the surrounding neighborhoods.

This objective addresses: PRECEDENT: City Garden, St. Louis (Nelson Byrd Woltz) a. Permeability b. Approachability c. Walkability d. Land Use & Building Massing 4: CREATE A COHESIVE & ACCESSIBLE URBAN COMMUNITY URBAN ACCESSIBLE & COHESIVE A CREATE 4:

PRECEDENT: Thriving mixed-use streets, Washington, DC McMillan Design Guidelines september 5, 2013 7 DESIGN GUIDELINES

OBJECTIVE FIVE A. RESPECT FOR HISTORIC ELEMENTS C. WATER & HEALTH

Give historic resources pride of place through respectful and compatible new landscape Where appropriate, incorporate the theme of water capture and fi ltration in new Design landscape and architecture that reinforces and architecture. buildings, as functional and/or aesthetic design elements.

McMillan’s unique sense of place and complements i. Th e service courts comprise the iconic urban framework of the site. All new D. INDUSTRY historic resources. landscape and architecture adjacent to the service courts should reinforce their role as character-defi ning urban corridors. Integrate materials that recall the industrial nature of historic resources on the site. ii. Th e cylindrical sand storage bins are the iconic above-ground structures of the site. Th e forms, proportions, materials, and colors of new buildings should be E. REPURPOSING FOUND MATERIALS distinct from but complementary to the sand storage bins. Integrate materials found on site or resulting from demolition into new components of iii. Th e regulator houses and fi lter bed portals, characterized by their human scale, the landscape and architecture. varied materials, and fi ne architectural details, contrast with and complement the monolithic sand storage bins. New architecture on the ground/base levels facing the service courts should likewise relate to the human scale and provide visual contrast with the sand bins.

iv. Restored, adapted, or recreated fi lter beds should retain and enhance the unique spatial character and repetitive structure of the below-grade cells.

B. COHESION

Create a sense of cohesion in the design of landscape and architecture.

i. New landscape and architecture should be additions that enhance the landmark. As such, they should reference the site’s history and heighten the experience of Grids, existing the site.

ii. Landscape and architecture should reinforce the site’s unifi ed identity along the perimeter.

iii. Landscape and architecture should employ a consistent and limited palette of forms, geometries, rhythms, materials, and colors that relates to the site’s This objective addresses: historic resources. a. Paving patterns, materials, and colors, lighting, street furniture, and other a. Respect for Historic Elements streetscape elements should reference and, where appropriate, replicate the historic site palette. Clear visual distinction should be made between b. Cohesion restored/recreated historic elements (service courts, the Olmsted walk, corner stairs) and new elements (gardens, parks, open spaces, paths, and c. Water & Health streets that did not exist in the original plan).

d. Industry b. Overall building forms and geometries should be rational and straightforward to refl ect the site’s logical organization and the historic structures’ e. Repurposing Found Materials formal simplicity. Pronounced eaves, gables, cornices, and other similar

5: DESIGN COMPLEMENTARY LANDSCAPE & ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPE COMPLEMENTARY DESIGN 5: projecting architectural features are discouraged. However, systematic layering and variation of façade elements is appropriate and encouraged.

Material and color palette, existing 8 september 5, 2013 McMillan Design Guidelines

isstrongly orientedvertically suggested. foundinthesandbinsandfi regulator ii. house. i. special precinct ithasalwaysbeen. with thearchitecture thatsurrounds them-tokeepMcMillan lookingliketheuniqueand of thecity. Th fromwhile atthesametimekeepingproject therest intotallookinglikeaplaceapart buildings. It isastatedgoaltohave allthesebuildingtypeslookliketheybelongtogether, center, row houses, mixed usemedicaloffi Th A. COHESIONGUIDELINES McMillan Design Guidelines McMillan d.Storefronts design guidelineswillbeprovided inthefollowing section. have ausableterrace level. Plantings overhanging thiswallare encouraged. b. Each buildingwillsetbackoff employed. c. A buildingsthatwillemploy aconcrete colorthat recalls thehistoricNorth Th a.Each buildingwillhave apodiumexpressed similarly totheother superfi Service Court wall. ere are fourarchitectural typesthatmakeuptheMcMillan project. Apubliccommunity vi. v. v. iv. iii. Th ebuildingsneedtoboth lookrighttogetherandtodrawadistinctdiff Th Th All buildingswillemploy simplegeometriesandmassingstrategies. Th Th erow houseswillbecomposed assinglefacadesalongthelengthofeachgrouping. ere mustbeaunifi ematerialsused by thearchitects willexpress asenseofboththeraw qualities eNorth willhave thefollowing Court Service guidelinesthatare specifi ecolorandorientation ofthebuildingfenestraion willbesimilar. Dark frames e podium will have a canted wall as the original service court wall court epodiumwillhave acantedwallastheoriginal service edpalettethatallthebuildingsadhere to ltration bedswiththerefi cial pattern recalling cialpattern thesilosisalsoencouraged. ce buildings,andmixed usemulti-family thispodiumbetween 15and30feet, nedqualitiesfoundinthe ctoit: erence ARCHITECTURAL C. COLORC. PALETTE iv. Row housesare composedassingle building iii.Generally punched solidwallswithvertical openings ii.Simple charcoal &whitecolorpalette elevations lines McMillan architectural cohesionguidelinesl. Th IMAGES INFLUENTIAL B. ese images served assources ofdesignideasforthe eseimagesserved i. Massing sisimpleandalignedwithproperty

and tertiary buildingcolor and tertiary Highlights, smallelements buildingcolor secondary Fenestration, railingsand Primary Building Color COHESION september 5,2013 9 6: DESIGN ALL BUILDINGS TO COEXIST IN A SINGULAR WAY STOREFRONT DESIGN GUIDELINES

STOREFRONT DESIGN GUIDELINES A. INTRODUCTION structure reading on either side, or may extend in front of structural bays to make varying sizes of frontage, and allowing more freedom to the storefront designer In addition to the creation of a vibrant and vital retail To ensure these conditions are met, a balance must be struck between the potentially competing interests. environment, the storefronts along the North Service iv. Storefronts may stand out from the zero plane up to 30”. i. Th e need to express individual retail identities with the over-arching need to Corridor need to satisfy two very important conditions: v. Storefronts may carve away from the zero plane to a desired depth, however preserve the sense of McMillan’s identity and expression along the North Service some portion of the storefront must be fl ush with, or stand out from, the “zero Court as a singular place. plane”. •The respectful preservation of the Genus Loci and sense of ii. Th ere will be a common spatial and material expression on both the north and place that the McMillan site has today south sides of the street as well as guidelines for contrasting with those rules to meet these ends.

•The preservation of the identity of the fi rst and future B. COLOR (specifics TBD with a color consultant)

retail tenants to locate along the North Service Court. i. Th e “Zero Plane” will match material, material expression and color on both sides of the street. Th e color should be derived from the existing color palette of the McMillan site

ii. Fenestration color – Dark charcoal frames, bay windows, storefronts, etc. are encouraged, though a fair amount of design freedom shall be allowed in selecting the colors for storefront fenestration. A wide ranging palette will be suggested by the color consultant - specifi cs TBD

iii. Canopy colors shall be selected from the color consultant’s palette

iv. Balconies, railings, etc shall be dark charcoal - Specifi cs TBD

v. All color and material samples will be submitted to EEK for approval to ensure cohesion across all building types.

C. THE ZERO PLANE

Th e “Zero Plane” is defi ned as the vertical surface that defi nes the edges of the North Service Court, and acts as the wall of the building base, defi ned in the general guidelines as being from 18’-20’ in height. Storefronts can fi t within an opening in the the base, stand out from the base, and in some instances span above an opening in the base.

i. Th e zero plane must be legible on all sides of a given storefront

ii. Storefronts shall always leave a minimum of 3’ of “zero plane” above the storefront so it reads across the top of all retail bays up and down the NSC.

iii. Th e storefronts may be confi ned to a single punched opening with the lines of 5: CREATE STOREFRONTS THAT RESPECT SITE HISTORY SITE RESPECT THAT STOREFRONTS CREATE 5:

10 september 5, 2013 McMillan Design Guidelines STOREFRONT DESIGN GUIDELINES

D. MASSING GUIDELINES E. SIGNAGE GUIDELINES

Th e storefronts along the North Service Court will adhere to these general massing Signage will conform to these general guidelines and fi t within the ranges in the graphic guidelines: provided:

i. Signs may be placed on the glass of the storefront, the door, or the transom i. No storefront will be entirely suppressed into the mass of the Zero Plane - some part of the storefront must at least be fl ush with this plane. ii. Signs may be placed on a canopy, attached as pin letters or painted on the Zero Plane

ii. Th e protrusion of the storefront shall be between 0” and 30” in depth iii. Metal or wood blade signs may be used

Possible storefront confi gurations iii. All storefront protrusions will be between 10’ and 15’ in height. Spanning above iv. Lights may be used within their designated zone opening is also allowed. v. Plastic back-lit signs are not allowed, large three dimensional objects are discouraged

iv. Flush or recessed transoms, doors or louvers are allowed

v. Th e Zero Plane will be between 18’ and 20’ in height, and must never be less than 4’ along the top of the storefronts

vi. Th eir need be no relationship between the structure of the building and the glass of Possible storefront confi gurations the storefront; there may be if one is desired

18’-20’ to top of Zero Plane 3’ Minimum 3’ Minimum 2’ Min C L T E TEA SHOP A 6’ MaxS H O P TEA SHOP Tea Shop

Tea Shop 10’-15’ 10-15’ 10’ Min HISTORY SITE RESPECT THAT STOREFRONTS CREATE 5:

Graphic Signage and Zero Plane Guidelines McMillan Design Guidelines september 5, 2013 11

PARCELS & STREET DIMENSIONS

North Capital St MASTER PLAN MASTER PARCEL 4 PARCEL 117’ One Quarter St, NW 52’ 54’ 56’ 48’ PARCEL 3 PARCEL

Half St, NW 72’ 76’ 76’

72’ Michigan Ave, NW Ave, Michigan South Service Court, NW Evarts St, NW Channing St, NW North Service Court, NW 48’48’

52’ 56’ 56’ Three Quarters St, NW ’ 48 48’ 51’’ PARCEL 6 PARCEL PARCEL 7 PARCEL PARCEL 1 PARCEL PARCEL 2 PARCEL PARCEL 5 PARCEL

First St, NW SCALE *All dimensions are nominal, and for illustrative purposes only. Please see civil engineering drawings for all specifics. 0’ 50’ 100’

10 February 6, 2014 McMillan – Stage One PUD Application PARCELS & STREET DIMENSIONS

North Capital St MASTER PLAN MASTER PARCEL 4 PARCEL 117’ One Quarter St, NW 52’ 54’ 56’ 48’ PARCEL 3 PARCEL

Half St, NW 72’ 76’ 76’

72’ Michigan Ave, NW Ave, Michigan South Service Court, NW Evarts St, NW Channing St, NW North Service Court, NW 48’48’

52’ 56’ 56’ Three Quarters St, NW ’ 48 48’ 51’’ PARCEL 6 PARCEL PARCEL 7 PARCEL PARCEL 1 PARCEL PARCEL 2 PARCEL PARCEL 5 PARCEL

First St, NW SCALE *All dimensions are nominal, and for illustrative purposes only. Please see civil engineering drawings for all specifics. 0’ 50’ 100’

10 February 6, 2014 McMillan – Stage One PUD Application MCMILLAN PUBLIC A RT The public art program will distinguish McMillan as a unique destination, while referencing the important history of the site and reflecting the character of the surrounding community. Building public art into the redevelopment plan demonstrates Vision McMillan’s commitment to the community, as well as to the importance of creative place-making. McMillan’s public art program will strategically incorporate art installations that enhance the site’s community assets to be enjoyed by the public.

MASTER PLAN MASTER Public art will be incorporated into the overall lighting and landscape plan, with consideration for the site’s historical features and highlighting the importance of water, movement, recycled materials and scale. The public art plan will allow the historic architectural features and the natural landscape with its tree-lined perimeter to shine. Character-defining elements will serve as themes for the public artworks. Similarly, certain existing elements such as the sand storage bins and regulator house will be developed with a public art objective.

The site’s unique, historic character offers inspiration for public art themes including repetition and grids, the simple geometry of the cylindrical sand storage bins, cubic brick regulator houses and pyramidal concrete washers. These key concepts will inform the selection and development process for public art on the site. Similarly, the public art team will consider potential synergies with the external viewpoints that connect neighborhood landmarks and points of city pride (i.e. Washington Monument; Basilica; Howard University’s Clock Tower).

In addition, the site’s functional elements such as manhole covers, benches, pavers, and playground equipment, provide opportunities to include artists in the design, and in some cases, the fabrication of these objects. The public art program will be closely coordinated with the project’s design team to insure a cohesive approach that compliments the site’s architecture and landscape.

Public art will be integrated into the site in thoughtful, innovative ways that define space, create a holistic art environment and make a strong aesthetic statement. The public art program will also draw attention to overlooked spaces, integrate artwork into the natural and built environment and evoke movement, whimsy, and character.

66 February 14, 2014 McMillan – Stage One PUD Application MCMILLAN PUBLIC A RT

Defining Place: Creating artist- GOALS designed gathering places Create a holistic, integrated art environment that makes a strong aesthetic statement

Activate space and functionality PLANMASTER

Use public art to create an experience that references the historical significance of McMillan Reusing & Recycling through content and/or materials Materials: Artists using historic and functional references by Highlight locations in innovative or reusing materials unconventional ways

Enliven gathering locations where people could gravitate to and explore

Consider potential synergies Dynamic Platforms for with the external viewpoints Contemporary Art: Creating that connect to neighborhood spaces for rotating art installations landmarks and points of city pride (i.e. Washington Monument; Basilica; Howard University’s Clock Tower)

Design artworks to be distinctive yet complimentary to both the historical assets and the new developments at McMillan Integrated Streetscape Design: Functional design Consider key material features elements envisioned by artists such as filter bed sand, iron in reference to the ironwork on portals and on manhole covers and other materials used throughout site: concrete, brick, clay, tile, wood and metal

McMillan – Stage One PUD Application February 14, 2014 67 MCMILLAN PUBLIC A RT Discovering art in unexpected places... KEY ELEMENTS MASTER PLAN MASTER

water

sand

...incorporating historic elements...

earth

...drawing attention to overlooked spaces concrete

68 February 14, 2014 McMillan – Stage One PUD Application MCMILLAN PUBLIC A RT

OPPORTUNITIES FOR ARTISTIC INTERVENTION MASTER PLANMASTER

A. MAIN GATEWAY B. GATEWAY 2 C. GATEWAY 3 (STAIRS) D. GATEWAY 4 E. COMMUNITY CENTER F. REGULATOR HOUSE G. MANHOLE COVERS (CELL 14) H. SAND STORAGE BINS/SILOS I. STATIONARY SAND WASHER J. PAVERS K. BENCHES/SEATING L. PLINTH AND/OR SCULPTURAL WORKS M. WATER INTEGRATED WORK INTO DRAIN/ BASIN INFRASTRUCTURE N. HEALING GARDENS O. OLMSTED UNDERPASS AND PEDESTRIAN AREA Integrate artist-designed natural elements into main entrance to highlight ‘sectional’ theme of site NOTE: LOCATION OF ARTIST DESIGNED APVERS (J) AND BENCHES/ SEATING (K) PENDING FURTHER LANDSCAPE INPUT

McMillan – Stage One PUD Application February 14, 2014 69 MCMILLAN PUBLIC A RT

Adaptive re-use of regulator houses as food & art projects MASTER PLAN MASTER

Artist-designed manhole covers: potential for collaboration with DC public schools and local artists, honoring of local art movements such as the DC Color School and light integration

70 February 14, 2014 McMillan – Stage One PUD Application MCMILLAN PUBLIC A RT

The Sand Filtration Silos will be highlighted by light, projections, murals, and other creative elements MASTER PLANMASTER

Themes of health and water are critical to the historical and present-day identity of McMillan. Projections can create dynamic murals of light that reinterpret these themes to extract a more modern and holistic understanding of the site and place

McMillan – Stage One PUD Application February 14, 2014 71 MCMILLAN PUBLIC A RT

Community Center and Olmsted Underpass activation can be achieved through sculpture, technology, lighting, and interactive themes MASTER PLAN MASTER

Streetscape elements can include artist-designed pavers, playground equipment, and benches

72 February 14, 2014 McMillan – Stage One PUD Application MCMILLAN PUBLIC A RT

Healing Garden activation can be achieved through integrated works MASTER PLANMASTER

Recycled materials on site can be reinterpreted into sculptures Kinetic sculptures can be employed to create dynamic experiences

McMillan – Stage One PUD Application February 14, 2014 73 PHASING PLAN

DC Water Control until 2022

Future Phase 2

Future Phase 2

Future Phase 2

DELIVERY SCHEDULE 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

INFRASTRUCTURE Start Delivery

PUBLIC AMENITIES Start Delivery

ROWHOUSES Start Delivery

HEALTHCARE Start Delivery

MIXED USE / MF Start Delivery PROPOSED SITE TABULATIONS

PROPOSED BUILDING MAXIMUM BUILDABLE PROPOSED BUILDING EFFECTIVE BUILDING AGGREGATE ZONING GROSS MAXIMUM PROPOSED MAXIMUM BUILDING PROPOSED AREA EFFECTIVE AREA PROPOSED GROSS FLOOR AREA PERMITTED FAR PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT MAXIMUM BUILDING AREA NAME PROPOSED ZONING FOOTPRINT AREA AREA FOOTPRINT FOOTPRINT PROPOSED FAR FLOOR AREA AGGREGATE FAR PER AGGREGATE FAR PER EFFECTIVE FAR * HEIGHT PROPOSED BUILDING STORIES USE (PUD GUIDELINES) STORIES SF SF SF % % % SF SF ZONING DISTRICT ZONING DISTRICT FT FT

PARCEL 1 OFFICE 860,000 MAX 4.01 5.42 C-3-C 214,555 158,547 115,800 100% 54% 73% 8.0 MAX 875,000 MAX 8.0 4.08 130 130 10 (MOB) RETAIL 15,000 MIN 0.07 0.09

PARCEL 2 FUTURE RETAIL 23,250 MIN 4.0 - NON-RESIDENTIAL 0.35 66,989 43,900 100% 66% 334,950 MAX 110 110 8 (FUTURE) FUTURE RESIDENTIAL 311,700 MAX 8.0 RESIDENTIAL / MAX 4.65

PARCEL 3 FUTURE RETAIL 3,000 MIN 0.09 33,311 20,500 100% 4.0 NON-RESIDENTIAL 173,000 MAX 110 110 8 (FUTURE) FUTURE OFFICE 170,000 MAX 5.10 2.62 PARCEL 4 RETAIL 100% 55% 52,920 MIN 4.0 NON-RESIDENTIAL 0.55 95,984 69,900 308,150 MAX 110 78 NO LIMIT 6 (GROCERY/RESID) RESIDENTIAL 75% 18% 255,230 MAX 8.0 RESIDENTIAL / MAX 2.66 CR N/A N/A 8.0 N/A PARCEL 5 ** 251,281 RESIDENTIAL 87,446 75% 35% 356,800 8.0 RESIDENTIAL / MAX 1.42 356,800 110 42 4 (RESIDENTIAL)

PARK/ HISTORIC STRUCURES PARCEL 6 16,300 22,000 0.07 26 2 328,059 /COMMUNITY CENTER 20% 6% 4.0 NON-RESIDENTIAL 23,800 0.07 110 (PARK/COM CTR) SAND BIN - RETAIL 1,800 1,800 0.01 EX HISTORIC STRUCTURES EX HISTORIC STRUCTURES PUBLIC SPACE 4,500 4,500 0.05 / HISTORIC STRUCTURES EX HISTORIC PARCEL 7 85,177 100% 7% 4.0 NON-RESIDENTIAL 6,300 0.07 110 EX HISTORIC STRUCTURES SAND BIN - RETAIL 1,800 1,800 0.02 STRUCTURES

Total 1,075,356 353,846 2,069,900 2,071,700 Parking Tabulations Existing On-Street Parking in Public Right-of-Way Street Name Number of Spaces Michigan Avenue 0 1st Street 51 Channing Street 33 N. Capitol Street 0 Total Existing On-Street Parking 84

Required Parking / Proposed Parking Parcel 1 (MOB) Zone C-3-C Gross Floor Area Required Parking / Proposed Parking / Land Use Type Parking Requirement sf Loading Spaces Loading Spaces Medical Office 0 Space For 1st 2,000 sf, & 1 Space Per 900 sf of Gross Floor Area in Excess of 2,000 sf 860,000 953 1,650 (3) Loading berths At 30' Deep, (1) Loading Space at 20' Deep - 4 - Berths 4 - Berths Loading (3) Loading Platforms At 100 sf - 3 - Platforms 3 - Platforms Retail 0 Spaces for 1st 3,000 sf, & 1 Space Per 750 sf of Gross Floor Area in Excess of 3,000 sf 15,000 16 17 Loading None Required Per 2201.2 (GFA < 10% of Total GFA) - - (Shared with Office) Accessible 1,001 Total Spaces and Over: 20 Spaces, Plus 1 Space for Each 100 Spaces over 1,000 Spaces - 27 61 Parcel 2 (Future Residential / Retail) Zone CR Gross Floor Area - sf Required Parking / Proposed Parking / Land Use Type Parking Requirement / Unit Loading Spaces Loading Spaces Retail 0 Space for 1st 3,000 sf, & 1 Space Per 750 sf of Gross Floor Area in Excess of 3,000 sf 23,250 27 95 (2) Loading berths At 30' Deep, (1) Loading Space at 20' Deep - 3 - Berths 3 - Berths Loading (2) Loading Platforms At 100 sf - 2 - Platforms 2 - Platforms Residential 1 Space per (3) Dwelling Units 258 86 218 (1) Loading berths At 55' Deep, (1) Loading Space at 20' Deep - 3 - Berths (Shared with Retail) Loading (1) Platform At 200 sf - 1 - Platform (Shared with Retail) Accessible 301-400 Total Spaces: 8 Spaces - 8 8 Parcel 3 (Future Office / Retail) Zone CR Gross Floor Area - sf Required Parking / Proposed Parking / Land Use Type Parking Requirement / Unit Loading Spaces Loading Spaces Retail 0 Space for 1st 3,000 sf, & 1 Space Per 750 sf of Gross Floor Area in Excess of 3,000 sf 3,000 0 0 Loading Not Required, Less then 5,000 sf - - - Office (0 Spaces For 1st 2,000 sf, & 1 Space Per 1,800 sf of Gross Floor Area in Excess of 2,000 sf)*2 170,000 187 194 (2) Loading berths At 30' Deep, (1) Loading Space at 20' Deep - 3 - Berths 3 - Berths Loading (2) Loading Platforms At 100 sf - 2 - Platforms 2 - Platforms Accessible 151-200 Total Spaces: 6 Spaces - 6 6 Parcel 4 (Grocery / Residential) Zone CR Gross Floor Area - sf Required Parking / Proposed Parking / Land Use Type Parking Requirement / Unit Loading Spaces Loading Spaces Grocery 0 Space for 1st 3,000 sf, & 1 Space Per 750 sf of Gross Floor Area in Excess of 3,000 sf 52,920 67 160 (1) Loading berth at 30' Deep, (1) Loading berth at 55' Deep, (1) Loading Space at 20' Deep - 3 - Berths 3 - Berths Loading (1) Loading Platform At 100 sf, (1) Loading Platform at 200 sf - 2 - Platforms 2 - Platforms Residential 1 Space per (3) Dwelling Units 278 93 179 (1) Loading berth at 55' Deep, (1) Loading Space at 20' Deep - 2 - Berths 2 - Berths Loading (1) Loading Platform At 200 sf - 1 - Platform 1 - Platform Accessible 301-400 Total Spaces: 8 Spaces - 8 8 Parcel 5 (Residential) Zone CR Required Parking / Proposed Parking / Land Use Type Parking Requirement Unit Loading Spaces Loading Spaces 208 (Garaged) Residential 1 Space per Dwelling Unit 146 146 116 (Garaged Optional)

Parcel 6 (On-Street Parking) Zone CR Gross Floor Area - sf Required Parking / Proposed Parking / Land Use Type Parking Requirement / Public Space Loading Spaces Loading Spaces Community Center 1 Space per 2,000 sf of Building and Use 17,500 9 21 Loading Not Required, Less then 30,000 sf GFA - - 1 - Loading Space Accessible 1-25 Total Spaces: 1 Space - 1 1 Parcel 7 (On-Street Parking) Zone CR Required Parking / Proposed Parking / Land Use Type Parking Requirement Public Space Loading Spaces Loading Spaces Public Space No Requirement - - - Accessible 0 Total Spaces: 0 Spaces - - - Total Existing Parking Required Loading Proposed Loading Required Accessible Proposed Accessible Required Parking Proposed Parking Spaces Spaces Spaces* Parking Parking Spaces Spaces 84 18 16 50 76 1,437 2,742 * 3 Shared Spaces *+116 Optional Spaces MASTER PLAN 4 ZONING TABULATIONS 5. BECAUSE MEDICAL 2. EFFECTIVE PARKING 3. Gross floor 1. ACTUAL FARINCLUDES 4. AS ATHROUGH LOT,THE LOADING ROOF STRUCTURE REAR YARD LOT OCCUPANC GROSS FLOORARE FLOOR AREARATIO STREET SITE BUILDING AREA MEDICAL TOTAL RETAIL TOTAL RETAIL TOTAL RETAIL SETBACK HEIGHT MEDICAL OFFICE FIRST MICHIGAN NORTH CAPITOLSTREET EFFECTIVE TOTA 1st STREET HALF STREET CELL PARCEL AREA WIDTHS #14 12' 12' 12' 10' 10' STREET, (§2101) (§2201) EXCLUDES HEIGH x30' x30' x30' x20' x20' area OFFICE OFFICE (§774) AVENUE, SETBACK BERTHS BERTH/100SF BERTH/100SF SERVICE/DELIVERY SERVICE/DELIVERY of ground R.O.W. NW Y T OFFICE (§772.1) L (§2405.1) (§411) CELL A (§2405.2) THE NW REAR YARDISMEASURED FROMTHE #14AND level is USEOCCUPIES MORETHAN ENTIREZONING PLATFORMS PLATFORMS calculated SPACE SPACE THE HALF STREET RECORD using perimeter LOT R.O.W. 130 (16,082) 158,547 (3,047) (36,879) 90 90 214,555 90% IN IN EXCESS FT FT 2.5 IN IN Z ONIG TAB FT EXCESS ‐ USED OF THE ‐ USED IN method. PERFT CENTER LINEOF THE THE CALCULATION OF OF PERMITTED/REQUIRED FOR GROSS CALCULATION FOR 2,000 3,000 OF MEASURING BUILDING 0.37 FARMAX HEIGHTACTCOMPLIANCEPURPOSES 970 SF,1PER900 FLOOR 18' SF,1PER750 1,716,440 1,716,440 1,716,440 1:1 100% ‐6" MAX SPACES 130' NORTH CAPITOL 8.0 0 MIN 1 3 1 3 5 AREA HEIGHT ULATIONS POINT AND SF SF =954 = 27' =16SPACES C‐3 w/PUDGUIDELINES CELLAR PURPOSES STREET ‐1" MIN SPACES FLOOR (§774.11). AREA, RETAILLOADING ISN'TREQUIRED (§2201.2) 4 ACTUAL 54% 73% 875,000 860,000 15,000 0.37 FARMAX PROVIDED 18' 1,900 27' 5.52 4.08 1:1 ‐6" MAX ‐1" MIN 130' MIN 4 4 MAX MAX MIN MAX EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE ACTUAL

1 1

2 2 5. Theprovided number of automobile NOTES: layouts 1. Interiorplan minimum. 4. Driveaisles 3. Bicycle parking spaces shall 2. Number spaces. SIZE NUMBER PARKING TABULATIONS (§2201.2).required isn’t loading retail area, floor cellar and area floor gross of the 90% than more occupies use office medical Because 5. (§774.11). Street Capitol of line North center the from measured yard is rear the lot, athrough 4. As method. perimeter using calculated level ground of area is floor Gross 3. calculation. the In R.O.W. Street Half the and Setback Street FAR #14, Effective excludes2. cell 1st calculation. the in parcel 1. zoning entire FAR the Actual includes NOTES: VAN COMPACT STANDARD RETAIL (SF MEDICAL OFSPACES TOTAL may OFSPACES ofcompact spaces is OFFICE ‐MIN.) vary. will layouts parkingspacecount (§2115) be20feet (SF A. 860,000 ‐MAX.) parking spaces requiredfor office are (§2101) conceptual minimum beprovided approximate, up P ARKING TB may 15,000 and in areas bereduced, atleast equal shown describedin IN IN to40% forillustrative EXCESS EXCESS but 9' 8' 9' tofive percent ofparking may use. not x19', x16', x19', OF OF DCMR11.2117.5. 3,000 2,000 below PERMITTED ULATIONS WITH7' WITH6' WITH6' purposes. SF,1PER750 SF,1PER900 therequired

becompact ‐2" MINIMUM ‐6" MINIMUM ‐6" MINIMUM (5%) ofthe PARCEL DIAGRAMS 1AREA

Thefinal 1ST ST. NW 1ST ST. NW / REQUIRED SF SF = =

CLEARANCE CLEARANCE CLEARANCE 970 5 SPACES 954 6SPACES 16 SPACES (MIN.)

MICHIGAN AVE.

HALF ST. MICHIGAN AVE. TOTAL P4 P3 ACCESSIBLE P2 COMPACT STANDARD P1 G LEVEL 9' 8' 9'

1,900 x19', x16', x19', WITH6' WITH6' WITH7' SPACES PROVIDED ‐6" MINIMUM ‐6" MINIMUM ‐2" MINIMUM ,8 8 61 283 1,384 5 70 0 0 47 77 14 64 49 82 352 11 342 302 249 139 (MAX.)REQUESTED Vision McMillan N CLEARANCE CLEARANCE CLEARANCE CELL #14

N. CAPITOL ST. N. CAPITOL ST. Zoning Tabulations

Site Area Site Area 95,984 sf Minus Internal Streets / Easements (32,006 sf) Effective Total 71,909 sf

Street Widths North Capitol Street 130 Ft - used for height act compliance purposes

INTRODUCTION Evarts Street, NW 50 ft (private) Quarter Street, NW 52 ft (private) North Service Court, NW 117 ft (private)

CR PUD Guidelines Parking & Loading Tabulations Permitted/Required Provided Parcel 4 Building Height (§2405.1) 110’ 77’ Land Use Type Parking or Loading Requirement Gross Required Proposed Floor Area Ratio (§2405.2) 8.0 Residential 2.66 Residential actual Floor Area 4.0 Non-residential 3.55 Residential effective / Unit 8.0 Total 0.55 Non-residential actual Retail 1 Space for 1st 3,000 sf, & 1 Space Per 750 sf of 52,920 68 160 Gross Floor Area in Excess of 3,000 sf 0.74 Non-residential effective Loading (1) Loading Berth at 30’ Deep with (1) platform @ - 2 Berths with (2) 73’-6” berths 3.21 Total actual 100sf, (1) Loading Berth at 55’ Deep with (1) Platform required with (2) 200 sf 4.29 Total effective at 200 sf, (1) Loading Space at 20’ Deep platforms platforms Gross Floor Area 1 Loading (1) 20’ Loading Residential 490,350 255,230 space space Retail (Grocery Store) - 52,920 Residential 1 Space per (3) Dwelling Units 278 93 178 Total 490,350 308,150 Loading (1) Loading Berth at 55’ Deep with (1) Platform at 200 - 1 Berth with (1) 40’ berth with Lot Occupancy (§772.1) 100% non-residential Non-residential: 72% (69,625/95,984) actual sf, (1) Loading Space at 20’ Deep required 200 sf platform 75% residential 97% (69,625/71,909) effective platform (1) 20’ Loading Residential: 53% (51,046/95,984) actual 1 Loading space 71% (51,046/71,909) effective space Roof Structure (§411) Accessible 401-500 Total Spaces: 9 Spaces - 9 9 Area 0.37 FAR max 0.37 FAR max Height 18’-6” max 18’-6” max Setback 1:1 min Relief Requested Notes 1. (§411.4) Permitted to provide multiple penthouses when multiple elevator or stair cores extend to roof. 2. (§411.17) All other screens and walls are less than four feet above parapet. 3. (§770.6) Housing for mechanical equipment shall be set back from all exterior walls a distance at least equal to its heigh above the roof upon which it is located.

2 november 13, 2013 McMillan – Stage One PUD Application Parking Plans

Line of Building Above Line of Building Above Grocery

Residential

Senior Affordable Residential

Parking/ Loading/MEP EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES EXECUTIVE

Note: Standard Spaces: (Unmarked) 9’ x 19’ Grocery / Multifamily Building / Multifamily Grocery Compact Spaces: (Marked with C) 8’ x 16’

Accessible Spaces (Marked with Accessible Symbol) 9’x 19’ Not including accessible aisle.

C

P1 PLAN – RETAIL PARKING P2 PLAN – RESIDENTIAL PARKING

6 november 13, 2013 McMillan – Stage One PUD Application Street Level Plan

NORTH SERVICE COURT

Grocery

Line of parking below Residential

Senior Affordable Residential

Parking/ Loading/MEP

Retail doors to be coordinated with future tenant NORTH CAPITOL STREET Grocery / Multifamily Building / Multifamily Grocery 1/4 STREET NW

STREET LEVEL PLAN

EVARTS STREET NW

McMillan – Stage One PUD Application november 13, 2013 7 Residential Level Plans

Line of parking below Line of parking below

Residential

Senior Affordable Residential

Parking/ Loading/MEP EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES EXECUTIVE Grocery / Multifamily Building / Multifamily Grocery

LEVEL 2 PLAN LEVELS 3–6 PLAN

8 november 13, 2013 McMillan – Stage One PUD Application Roof Plan

Line of parking below

Residential

Senior Affordable Residential

Parking/ Loading/MEP Grocery / Multifamily Building / Multifamily Grocery

Elevator over-run less than 4’-0” above parapet height

ROOF PLAN

McMillan – Stage One PUD Application november 13, 2013 9 SITENAME USE OF S ECTIONPLAN

SITE USE PLAN BY TYPES

KEY

BUILDINGS ROW HOUSE • 130 UNITS * * DENOTES IZ UNIT • 18 UNITS

BACK TO BACK • 16 UNITS

ENTIRE SITE 1 February 18, 2014 McMillan – Stage Two PUD Application NSITEAME USEOF S ECTIONPLAN BUILDINGS

**** * ** ** ** * * * * *

**

ROW HOUSE PORTION OF SITE McMillan – Stage Two PUD Application February 18, 2014 2 NFLOORAME OF SPLANSECTION BUILDINGS

FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR THIRD FLOOR FOURTH FLOOR

0 4’ 8’

ROW HOUSE • A UNIT (14’ WIDE) SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0”

3 February 18, 2014 McMillan – Stage Two PUD Application NFLOORAME OF SPLANSECTION BUILDINGS

FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR THIRD FLOOR FOURTH FLOOR

0 4’ 8’

ROW HOUSE • B UNIT (16’ WIDE) SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0”

McMillan – Stage Two PUD Application February 18, 2014 4 NFLOORAME OF PLANSSECTION BUILDINGS

FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR THIRD FLOOR FOURTH FLOOR

0 4’ 8’

ROW HOUSE • C UNIT (18’ WIDE) SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0”

5 February 18, 2014 McMillan – Stage Two PUD Application NFLOORAME OF SPLANSECTION BUILDINGS

FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR THIRD FLOOR FOURTH FLOOR

0 4’ 8’

ROW HOUSE • D UNIT (CORNER/20’ WIDE) SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0”

McMillan – Stage Two PUD Application February 18, 2014 6 ELEVATIONSNAME OF SECTION

E F F E E F BUILDINGS

A B B A A B B A

G

C C C C AA BB

BUILDING KEY PLAN BUILDING E STREET ELEVATION AA: HALF STREET • EAST SIDE ELEVATION

BUILDING BEYOND

BUILDINGC BUILDING B 0 8’ 16’

STREET ELEVATION BB: “QUARTER” STREET • WEST SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16” = 1’-0”

7 February 18, 2014 McMillan – Stage Two PUD Application NAMEELEVATIONS OF SECTION BUILDINGS

BUILDING BEYOND

BUILDING A BUILDING C

BUILDING F 0 8’ 16’

SCALE: 1/16” = 1’-0”

McMillan – Stage Two PUD Application February 18, 2014 8 ELEVATIONSNAME OF SECTION

E F F E E F BUILDINGS DD GG

A B B A A B B A

G

C C C C EE

CC FF

BUILDING KEY PLAN BUILDING C STREET ELEVATION CC: SOUTH SERVICE COURT • NORTH SIDE ELEVATION

G BUILDING 0 8’ 16’

STREET ELEVATION EE: NORTH CAPITOL STREET • EAST SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16” = 1’-0”

9 February 18, 2014 McMillan – Stage Two PUD Application NAMEELEVATIONS OF SECTION BUILDINGS

BUILDING BEYOND

BUILDINGB BUILDING A STREET ELEVATION DD: EVARTS STREET • SOUTH SIDE ELEVATION

G G BUILDING BUILDING 0 8’ 16’

STREET ELEVATION FF: SOUTH SERVICE COURT • NORTH SIDE ELEVATION STREET ELEVATION GG: EVARTS STREET • SOUTH SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16” = 1’-0”

McMillan – Stage Two PUD Application February 18, 2014 10 SITENAME SECTIONS OF SECTION BUILDINGS

HH

BUILDING KEY PLAN

SITE SECTION HH: FROM NORTH CAPITOL STREET TO HALF STREET

11 February 18, 2014 McMillan – Stage Two PUD Application SITENAME SECTIONS OF SECTION BUILDINGS

McMillan – Stage Two PUD Application February 18, 2014 12 NDETAILSAME OF S &ECTION MATERIALS

4 BUILDINGS

6

A. 3

1 WHITESTONE BRICK WITH WHITE MORTAR

2 MANGANESE IRONSPOT SMOOTH BRICK WITH WHITE MORTAR 1 1 2 3 CHARCOAL GREY PANEL

4 CHARCOAL GREY (ZINC) METAL SIDING WITH CONCEALED FASTENERS 7 5 STAINED WOOD CANOPY WITH WIRE TIEBACKS 2

5 6 BLACK (ALUMINUM) METAL HANDRAILS 4 7 CLEAR GLASS WITH LOW-E COATING; CHARCOAL GREY WINDOW TRIM 8 CHARCOAL GREY METAL WRAPPED DOOR 8 4 WITH CLEAR GLASS WITH LOW-E COATING 6

5 A. DETAIL B. DETAIL

13 February 18, 2014 McMillan – Stage Two PUD Application DETAILSNAME & MATERIALSOF SECTION

16 BUILDINGS

B. C.

9 BLOCKS DESIGNED IN SYMMETRICALLY BALANCED LAYOUT 11 12

10 PLINTH SET-UP BY CANOPIES AND BAYS

11 SINGLE, PUNCHED WINDOW WHERE PLACED WITHIN 14 BRICK

12 SERIES OF WINDOWS WHERE PLACED ON BAY OR PANEL

13 PANEL, CANTILEVERING TWO-STORY BAY

14 BRICK, TWO-STORY BAY WITHIN BLOCK INTERIOR 15 13

15 SINGLE OR GROUPED WOOD CANOPY DEPENDING BUILDING LOCATION 10 16 LOFT LEVEL SETBACK FROM THIRD-STORY PARAPET

B. DETAIL C. DETAIL

McMillan – Stage Two PUD Application February 18, 2014 14

ZONING T ABULATION

Site Area Parcel 6 328,059 sf

Street Widths South Service Court, NW (Private) 98’ North Capitol Street 130’ First Street, NW 90’ Channing Street, NW 62’

CR w/ PUD Guidelines Permitted/Required Provided Building Height 110’ 1

26’ COMMUNITY CENTER Floor Area Ratio 4.0 (non-residential) 0.05 Gross Floor Area 1,312,236 sf 17,500 sf Lot Occupancy 75% 4% Rear Yard none required for non-residential 215’ building Side Yard none required; if provided, 3in/ft 188’ of height, but not less than 8 ft Parking 1 per 2000 sqft or 9 spaces 21 parking spaces in South Service Court parkway Loading None required for buildings Dedicated loading space along South < 30,000sqft Service Court

NOTES

1”Where a building is removed from all lot lines by a distance equal to its height above grade, the FAR Calculated with area within red boundary, called height of the building shall be measured from the natural grade at the middle of the front of the Parcel 6. South Service Court, NW (used for height

building to the highest point of the roof, excluding parapets not exceeding four feet in height.” 98’ act compliance) Natural grade of the McMillan site has not yet been determined. Building height is measured at FAR Calculated including ROW in the South Service Court +165.00 MP elevation +165.00 ft at the South Service Court at the front of the building.

Side yard distance given is to the North Captiol Street +26.00 above MP parcel boundary First Street First North Capitol Street Rear yard distance given is to the Channing Street parcel boundary 90’ 130’

Channing Street MCMILLAN COMMUNITY CENTER 62’

McMillan – Stage Two Consolidated PUD Application February 18, 2014 7

McMillan Redevelopment Fiscal & Economic Impact Analysis: Revised Program

Vision McMillan Partners| June 2011

Executive Summary

Project Overview Green Door Advisors (GDA) was retained by Vision McMillan Partners (VMP) to conduct a fiscal and economic impact analysis of the proposed redevelopment of the historic McMillan Reservoir. Vision McMillan Partners is a joint venture development team including Trammell Crow Company (TCC), Jair Lynch Companies, and EYA. The proposed project is located in Northwest DC along Michigan Avenue NW between First Street NW and North Capitol Street. The 25-acre site is a historic landmark, and some of the historic resources of the site will be maintained as the site is redeveloped. The site is also located proximate to a number of key institutional assets, including the Armed Forces Retirement Homes (AFRH Washington DC), the VA Hospital, Washington Hospital Center, Children’s Medical Center, and Howard University. As proposed, the redevelopment will include townhomes, workforce condominiums, market rate rental apartments, affordable senior apartments, retail, restaurants, grocery, medical office, and a substantial amount of open space.

GDA analyzed the fiscal and economic benefits of the proposed redevelopment plan to the District of Columbia over a 30-year period, from 2012 to 2041. This analysis took account of all relevant categories of District of Columbia revenues and expenditures expected to be received and incurred as a result of the redevelopment. These revenues and expenditures were incorporated into a detailed model to provide the overall net fiscal impact of the development over the 30-year period. The assumptions used for the fiscal impact analysis were based on inputs from the District of Columbia FY 2010 Budget, as well as assumptions from the District of Columbia Office of Tax and Revenue, the Washington, D.C. 2011 Budget Support Act, Claritas, 2000 U.S. Census, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), independent third-party market studies, and VMP (see Exhibit 7).

Development Program The proposed development program includes 756 residential units, of which 296 are workforce/affordable, 1 million square feet of medical office space, grocery store, and over 33,000 square feet of retail and restaurants. The detailed development program is included in Exhibit 6 and the following table.

Proposed Development Program for McMillan Reservoir Redevelopment - VMP

Proposed Development Program 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 TOTAL

For-Rent Residential Units Apartments - Market Rate 0 96 144 64 0 0 0 304 Senior Apartments - ADU 72 14 0 0 0 0 0 86

For-Sale Residential Units Townhomes - Market Rate 42 69 41 4 0 0 0 156 Townhomes - WDU 13600000 19 Condo - WDU 6 36 36 36 36 36 5 191

Office 842,079 184,783 0 0 0 0 0 1,026,862 Retail (In-line) 15,500 12,635 0 0 0 0 0 28,135 Restaurants 2,500 2,500 0 0 0 0 0 5,000 Retail [Grocery] 44,70000000044,700

Public Parking Spaces 1,647 653 0 0 0 0 0 2,300

Total Residential Units 133 221 221 104 36 36 5 756 Total Commercial GSF 904,779 199,918 0 0 0 0 0 1,104,697 Total Parking Spaces 1,647 653 0 0 0 0 0 2,300

231 Van Buren Street NW Washington, DC 20012 O 202.234.0726 C 202.230.4041 www.greendooradvisors.com

Page 1

Summary of Fiscal Impact Analysis Results The results from our detailed model show that the redevelopment of the McMillan Reservoir site will have a positive fiscal impact on the District of Columbia. The total net fiscal impact of the proposed redevelopment for the 30-year period 2012-2041 will be $873.8 million for the District of Columbia (see table below and Exhibits 1 and 2).

Based on this analysis and assumptions, the redevelopment program will generate $1.2 billion in revenues and $309.3 million in expenditures over the 30-year period (2012-2041) for The District of Columbia. The favorable net fiscal impact of the proposed redevelopment is primarily due to revenue generated by real property taxes, personal income taxes, and miscellaneous revenues.

Summary of Fiscal Impact Analysis Results, 2012 – 2041 GENERAL FUND $% REVENUES Real Property Tax $457,282,100 39% Personal Property Tax $8,931,800 1% Sales Tax $72,031,500 6% Meals Tax $13,745,600 1% Deed Recordation/Transfer Tax $14,272,000 1% Income Tax $413,986,900 35% Parking Tax $735,400 0% Miscellaneous Revenues $202,069,700 17% TOTAL $1,183,055,000 100% EXPENDITURES Misc./Non-Educational Operating Expenditures $141,279,300 46% Capital Expenditures $97,898,000 32% Educational Expenditures $70,106,500 23% TOTAL $309,283,800 100% TOTAL NET FISCAL IMPACT $873,771,200

The results of the analysis are described in this report and can be found in Exhibits 1 through 5. Exhibits 6 through 8 show all of the assumptions and estimates used in the fiscal impact analysis.

Revenues

Real Property Tax Real property tax is a significant source of revenue generated by the proposed McMillan redevelopment. The site is currently owned by the District, and therefore is generating no real property tax revenue for the District. The transfer of the site to private ownership and the development of active uses will create a large influx of tax revenue for the District.

GDA estimated the assessed value of each land use to determine the real property tax revenues generated by the project. The estimated assessed values were determined based on methodology utilized by the District of Columbia Office of Tax and Revenue, therefore providing a realistic estimate of how the property will be valued and taxed during construction and after development is complete. When the unimproved land is transferred from public to private ownership at the onset of the development process, the unimproved

231 Van Buren Street NW Washington, DC 20012 O 202.234.0726 C 202.230.4041 www.greendooradvisors.com

Page 2

land will begin to generate to revenue for the District. The value of the unimproved land used in this analysis is based on a third-party appraisal conducted for the site. When 60% of construction is complete for each land use, the assessed value for that land use will be modified to reflect the portion of the development budget that has been completed. For example, when construction is 80% complete, the assessed value would be 80% of the total development budget for that land use. The development budgets used for valuation in this analysis were provided by VMP and were modified to reflect the escalation of costs over time.

Once construction is complete, the assessed values are calculated using the income approach. The assessed value of for-sale residential properties was informed by the weighted average sale prices, according to the third-party market study recommendations provided by VMP. These assessed values were inflated at 3% per year and include the value of a parking spot in the sale price. The Homestead Exemption of $67,500 per condo and townhome unit was deducted from the assessed values before the property tax rate was applied. The assessed values of rental apartments, office, retail, and restaurant land uses were calculated based on the anticipated net operating income for each land use. A cap rate was then applied to the net operating income to derive the value of each land use, on a per square foot or per unit basis.

Real property tax revenues were then calculated by applying current District tax rates to the projected assessed values.

Personal Property Tax Personal property tax is collected on tangible property used in a trade or business. The addition of employees and residents to the District generates economic activity which leads to increased overall value of personal property in the District. The District of Columbia FY 2010 Budget and the 2010 total resident and employee counts for the District were used to determine the personal property tax revenue collected on a per resident and per employee basis.

Using the District of Columbia FY 2010 Budget, GDA estimated the portion of the total District personal property tax revenues that were attributable to employees and residents. GDA then divided each portion of the total revenue by the number of District employees or residents to derive the average personal property tax revenue to the District on a per employee and per resident basis. The average per employee and per resident personal property tax revenues were then multiplied by the number of full-time employees and residents generated by the redevelopment, to determine the total personal property tax revenues generated by the McMillan redevelopment.

Of the total personal property tax collected, 17.4% is directed to the Neighborhood Investment Fund (NIF) and the remaining is collected by the General Fund.

Sales Tax Sales taxes generated by the McMillan redevelopment include retail expenditures in the District during the construction process, on-site retail sales, on-site alcohol sales, and future McMillan resident retail and alcohol expenditures off-site within the District.

A. Construction Expenditures: Retail sales tax revenue will be generated by the purchase of materials for the McMillan project construction. Construction costs for each land use were based on the costs of construction provided by VMP, and GDA made assumptions regarding the portion of construction

231 Van Buren Street NW Washington, DC 20012 O 202.234.0726 C 202.230.4041 www.greendooradvisors.com

Page 3

expenditures that would result in retail sales tax revenues. GDA assumed that 45% of the commercial construction materials and 30% of residential construction materials will be purchased within the District.

B. On-Site Retail Sales: With the proposed redevelopment scenario, sales taxes revenues are generated by purchases made (including purchases made by residents and non-residents) at the proposed retail uses. The estimated average spending per gross square foot was based on actual sales for similar store types in this market. Almost all of the retail sales in the 28,000 square feet of traditional retail space will be taxable at the retail sales tax rate, while only 5% of sales at the grocery store are non-food items taxable at this rate.

C. Alcohol Sales: The on-site alcohol sales, estimated as a portion of the grocery store revenues, are taxed at a higher rate of 9%. This analysis accounts for these alcohol sales tax revenues generated on-site as well as the revenues generated as future McMillan residents purchase alcohol off-site and elsewhere in the District. The estimated alcohol sales are based on BLS data regarding consumer spending patterns and the portion of income spent on alcohol consumed off of the premises where purchased.

D. Resident Expenditures Off-Site: A portion of the McMillan residents’ household consumer expenditures will be made within off-site retail located within the District, therefore contributing to the District’s retail sales tax revenues. The retail sales taxes generated by future residents of the McMillan redevelopment have been estimated based on household consumer expenditures as a percent of household income, as provided by the BLS and Claritas. The resident household incomes used for this analysis are based on the annual household incomes correlating to the rental rate and sales prices provided in the third-party market studies for McMillan’s proposed residential uses.

Meals Tax Meals taxes will be generated by the proposed on-site restaurants at the McMillan redevelopment as well as by McMillan households eating at restaurants off-site within the District. Of the 10% meals tax rate in the District, 90% is directed to the General Fund and 10% is directed to the Convention Center Fund.

A. On-Site Restaurant Sales: With the proposed redevelopment scenario, meal tax revenues are generated by restaurant sales (including residents’ and non-residents’ meals) at the proposed 5,000 square feet of restaurant space. The projected revenues per square foot of restaurant space is based on average restaurant sales within the market and based on known industry standards for revenues per square foot.

B. Resident Expenditures Off-Site: A portion of the household restaurant expenditures of residents at the development will be made within off-site restaurants located within the District. Meals taxes generated by residents of the McMillan redevelopment project have been estimated based on household expenditures spent on meals as a percent of household income, as provided by the BLS and Claritas.

Deed Recordation and Deed Transfer Tax The District collects a deed recordation and transfer tax upon the transfer of real property. The rates for properties valued under $400,000 are 1.10% for deed recordation and a deed transfer tax of 1.10%, with an effective recordation and transfer tax rate of 2.20%. For properties valued over $400,000, the deed recordation and transfer tax rates are each 1.45%, with an effective rate of 2.9%. Recordation taxes were calculated for the initial sale of the proposed McMillan residential units, as well as subsequent transfers, based on homeowner turnover rates for for-sale residential housing in the District. The deed recordation

231 Van Buren Street NW Washington, DC 20012 O 202.234.0726 C 202.230.4041 www.greendooradvisors.com

Page 4

and transfer tax was also calculated for the initial transfer of land from public to private ownership. The value for this transfer was based on the value provided in the independent third-party appraisal.

Income Tax Personal income tax is collected from residents of the proposed McMillan residential units and from the permanent full-time employees of the commercial uses on-site, as well as from the construction employees during the development process.

A. Commercial: GDA estimated average taxable income of construction, medical office, retail, and restaurant employees at the proposed redevelopment that are expected to live in the District based on the Bureau of Labor Statistics average annual industry-specific wages for employees. We assumed that 35% of the medical office employees are District residents, that 85% of the retail, restaurant, and grocery employees, and 40% of construction employees are District residents. The income tax rate was then applied to these employee incomes to determine the total income tax revenue collected by the District from McMillan employees.

B. Residential: GDA calculated residential income of each housing type offered based on the approximate income needed to rent or purchase a unit at the prices recommended by the independent third-party residential market studies of the McMillan redevelopment. The average income required to rent apartments at the recommended pricing was weighted by the number of units at each price point and size, for both the standard market rate and for the affordable units. For the for-sale residential units, GDA used the average income required to purchase condominiums and townhomes at the recommended pricing, weighted by the number of units at each price, for both market-rate and workforce units.

Miscellaneous Revenues Miscellaneous revenues include such items as public utilities, insurance premiums, development related permits and licenses, fines & forfeits, and other items of revenue that are not calculated directly in the fiscal impact model. Using the District of Columbia FY 2010 Budget, GDA estimated the portion of each type of miscellaneous revenues that is attributable to residential and commercial uses, and calculated the average miscellaneous revenues per resident and per employee. The resulting revenue of $1,011 per employee and $640 per resident is then multiplied by the number of residents and employees projected to be located at the McMillan redevelopment. The detailed allocation of miscellaneous District revenues can be found in Exhibit 9.

Expenditures

Operating Expenditures (Non-Educational) District operating expenditures include budget categories such as public safety, government direction and support, human support services, and public works, and exclude education costs. GDA estimated the portion of each type of operating expenditures that would increase as a result of the development, and the proportion of added expenditures that are attributable to residential and commercial uses. This calculated the average operating costs per resident and per employee. The resulting non-educational operating cost is

231 Van Buren Street NW Washington, DC 20012 O 202.234.0726 C 202.230.4041 www.greendooradvisors.com

Page 5

$476 per employee and $986 per resident for the District. The detailed allocation of non-educational operating expenditures can be found in Exhibit 9.

Educational Expenditures The proposed McMillan residential development will result in educational expenditures for school-aged children. The educational expenditures were calculated based the 2010-2011 budget for the District’s public schools, and are $10,752 per pupil. This educational cost per pupil was applied to the anticipated number of school children living in the proposed McMillan residential units using a pupil generation rate. The pupil generation rates used in this analysis are based on an Urban Institute study identifying student generation rates for new development in the District, and based on the development team’s experience with developments within the District. Based on these pupil generation rates, the proposed redevelopment program is projected to generate 144 pupils, most of which are projected to reside in the townhomes and apartments.

Capital Expenditures The anticipated capital expenditures incurred by the District are for the land development and infrastructure needs prior to the construction process. The fiscal model assumes that the District will issue a 20-year bond at an interest rate of 5% to finance these land development and infrastructure costs. The annual payment on this bond is then considered the annual cost of the capital expenditures until the bond is paid off after 20 years.

Other Funds In addition to the net fiscal benefit of $873.8 million to the General Fund, the proposed McMillan redevelopment also provides revenues to the Convention Center Fund and the Neighborhood Investment Fund. The Convention Center Fund receives revenues from meals taxes and the Neighborhood Investment Fund is funded through a portion of personal property taxes. The proposed McMillan redevelopment program results in $1.9 million to the Neighborhood Investment Fund over the 30-year period, and $1 million to the Convention Center Fund.

Indirect/Induced Benefits The analysis also took account of indirect and induced economic benefits from redeveloping the McMillan reservoir not accounted for in the direct fiscal impact of the development. The indirect and induced economic benefits are generated by McMillan’s on-site businesses and residents purchasing goods and services from other District businesses. These additional dollars spent in the District are calculated using multipliers from IMPLAN, a national economic analysis and impact modeling firm. The multipliers estimate the amount of additional sales in economic spin-off that will take place in the District, the additional employment created from this economic spin-off, and the labor income generated through additional employment. The fiscal impact model then provides a projection of the additional sales and income tax revenues generated by this indirect and induced economic activity.

The proposed McMillan redevelopment is projected to generate an additional $373.1 million of indirect and induced gross output in the District over the 30-year period, resulting in over $22.4 million in additional sales tax revenues to the District. The estimated 1,132 new jobs created in the District from this indirect and 231 Van Buren Street NW Washington, DC 20012 O 202.234.0726 C 202.230.4041 www.greendooradvisors.com

Page 6

induced economic activity is projected to create $145.2 million in additional income tax revenues for the District. These indirect and induced benefits demonstrate the significant positive indirect and induced impacts of the proposed McMillan redevelopment to the District.

Job Creation The redevelopment of the McMillan Reservoir will also have a positive economic impact in the form of new job creation in the District of Columbia. GDA estimates that at project build-out, approximately 3,270 new permanent jobs will be created as a consequence of the on-site commercial development. Of the 3,270 total new employees, 190 are retail, restaurant and grocery employees, and 3,081 are medical office employees. In addition to these new full-time jobs, the project development will also create 3,034 construction jobs created during the construction phase of the project. The following chart shows the estimated average income of future McMillan employees, based on the Bureau of Labor Statistics average annual industry-specific wages for employees in the District.

Estimated Jobs Created through McMillan Redevelopment

Land Use Number of Estimated Average % DC Jobs Income Residents Retail & Restaurant 190 $30,000 85%

Medical Office 3.081 $76,000 35%

Construction 3,034 $70,000 40%

231 Van Buren Street NW Washington, DC 20012 O 202.234.0726 C 202.230.4041 www.greendooradvisors.com

Page 7

General Limiting Conditions

Reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the data contained in this study reflect accurate and timely information and are believed to be reliable. This study is based on estimates, assumptions, and other information developed by Green Door Advisors (GDA) from its independent research effort, general knowledge of the industry, and consultations with the client and its representatives. No responsibility is assumed for inaccuracies in reporting by the client, its agent, and representatives or in any other data source used in preparing or presenting this study. This report is based on information that to our knowledge was current as of the date of this report, and GDA has not undertaken any update of its research effort since such date.

Our report may contain prospective financial information, estimates, or opinions that represent our view of reasonable expectations at a particular time, but such information, estimates, or opinions are not offered as predictions or assurances that a particular level of income or profit will be achieved, that particular events will occur, or that a particular price will be offered or accepted. Actual results achieved during the period covered by our prospective financial analysis may vary from those described in our report, and the variations may be material. Therefore, no warranty or representation is made by Green Door Advisors that any of the projected values or results contained in this study will be achieved.

Possession of this study does not carry with it the right of publication thereof or to use the name of "GDA" or "Green Door Advisors" in any manner without first obtaining the prior written consent of GDA. No abstracting, excerpting, or summarization of this study may be made without first obtaining the prior written consent of GDA. This report is not to be used in conjunction with any public or private offering of securities or other similar purpose where it may be relied upon to any degree by any person other than the client without first obtaining the prior written consent of GDA. This study may not be used for any purpose other than that for which it is prepared or for which prior written consent has first been obtained from GDA.

231 Van Buren Street NW Washington, DC 20012 O 202.234.0726 C 202.230.4041 www.greendooradvisors.com

Page 8 Exhibit 1

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS MCMILLAN REDEVELOPMENT 30 Years (2012 - 2041)

Total Revenues $1,183,055,000

Expenditures $309,283,800

Net Fiscal $873,771,200 Benefit

$0 $200,000,000 $400,000,000 $600,000,000 $800,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $1,200,000,000

Net Fiscal Benefit Expenditures Total Revenues

01 Graph 64-12483.01 Printed: 6/16/2011 Page 9 Exhibit 2 SUMMARY OF FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS MCMILLAN REDEVELOPMENT WASHINGTON, D.C. 30 Years (2012 - 2041) GENERAL FUND $% REVENUES Real Property Tax $457,282,100 39% Personal Property Tax $8,931,800 1% Sales Tax $72,031,500 6% Meals Tax $13,745,600 1% Deed Recordation/Transfer Tax $14,272,000 1% Income Tax $413,986,900 35% Parking Tax $735,400 0% Miscellaneous Revenues $202,069,700 17% TOTAL $1,183,055,000 100% EXPENDITURES Misc./Non-Educational Operating Expenditures $141,279,300 46% Capital Expenditures $97,898,000 32% Educational Expenditures $70,106,500 23% TOTAL $309,283,800 100%

TOTAL NET FISCAL IMPACT $873,771,200 ADDITIONAL REVENUE DEDICATED TO OTHER FUNDS NEIGHBORHOOD INVESTMENT FUND Personal Property Tax $1,881,000 100% TOTAL $1,881,000 100% CONVENTION CENTER FUND Meals Tax $1,000,000 100% Hotel Tax $0 0% TOTAL $1,000,000 100% TOTAL ADDITIONAL REVENUE $2,881,000 INDIRECT/INDUCED IMPACTS TOTAL ESTIMATED INDIRECT SALES TAX REVENUES $22,387,000 13% TOTAL ESTIMATED INDIRECT/INDUCED INCOME TAX REVENUE $145,179,000 87% INDIRECT/INDUCED NET FISCAL IMPACT $167,566,000

PERMANENT JOBS CREATED NEW FULL-TIME JOBS CREATED (DIRECT) 3,270 NEW FULL-TIME JOBS CREATED (INDIRECT) 1,132 CONSTRUCTION JOBS CREATED NEW FTE CONSTRUCTION JOBS (DIRECT) 3,034

02 Summary 64-112483.01 Printed: 6/16/2011 Page 10 Exhibit 3

CUMULATIVE NET FISCAL IMPACT MCMILLAN REDEVELOPMENT 30 Years (2012 - 2041)

$945,000,000

$885,000,000

$825,000,000 $765,000,000 $705,000,000 $645,000,000 $585,000,000 $525,000,000 $465,000,000 $405,000,000 $345,000,000 $285, 000, 000 $225,000,000 $165,000,000 $105,000,000 $45,000,000 ($15,000,000)

Cumulative Net Fiscal Impact For The McMillan Redevelopment

03 Cumulative 64-12483.01 Printed: 6/16/2011 Page 11 Exhibit 4

ANNUAL SUMMARY OF NET FISCAL IMPACT MCMILLAN REDEVELOPMENT 30 Years (2012 - 2041)

ANNUAL CUMULATIVE ANNUAL NET FISCAL CUMULATIVE YEAR REVENUES REVENUES EXPENDITURES IMPACT (NFI) NFI 2012 $0 $0 $4,894,900 ($4,894,900) ($4,894,900) 2013 $9,934,700 $9,934,700 $5,832,100 $4,102,600 ($792,300) 2014 $3,892,100 $13,826,800 $5,251,300 ($1,359,200) ($2,151,500) 2015 $19,281,800 $33,108,600 $7,075,900 $12,205,900 $10,054,400 2016 $25,955,400 $59,064,000 $8,584,600 $17,370,800 $27,425,200 2017 $29,553,800 $88,617,800 $9,829,900 $19,723,900 $47,149,100 2018 $31,029,100 $119,646,900 $10,473,900 $20,555,200 $67,704,300 2019 $32,136,800 $151,783,700 $10,733,300 $21,403,500 $89,107,800 2020 $33,490,200 $185,273,900 $11,030,800 $22,459,400 $111,567,200 2021 $34,236,600 $219,510,500 $11,232,300 $23,004,300 $134,571,500 2022 $35,271,600 $254,782,100 $11,422,400 $23,849,200 $158,420,700 2023 $36,396,800 $291,178,900 $11,618,200 $24,778,600 $183,199,300 2024 $37,555,700 $328,734,600 $11,819,900 $25,735,800 $208,935,100 2025 $38,749,400 $367,484,000 $12,027,600 $26,721,800 $235,656,900 2026 $39,978,800 $407,462,800 $12,241,600 $27,737,200 $263,394,100 2027 $41,246,800 $448,709,600 $12,462,000 $28,784,800 $292,178,900 2028 $42,553,700 $491,263,300 $12,689,100 $29,864,600 $322,043,500 2029 $43,900,000 $535,163,300 $12,922,900 $30,977,100 $353,020,600 2030 $45,286,400 $580,449,700 $13,163,700 $32,122,700 $385,143,300 2031 $46,714,500 $627,164,200 $13,411,800 $33,302,700 $418,446,000 2032 $48,186,300 $675,350,500 $8,772,300 $39,414,000 $457,860,000 2033 $49,703,100 $725,053,600 $9,035,600 $40,667,500 $498,527,500 2034 $51,265,800 $776,319,400 $9,306,600 $41,959,200 $540,486,700 2035 $52,875,000 $829,194,400 $9,585,800 $43,289,200 $583,775,900 2036 $54,532,800 $883,727,200 $9,873,400 $44,659,400 $628,435,300 2037 $56,240,300 $939,967,500 $10,169,600 $46,070,700 $674,506,000 2038 $57,999,500 $997,967,000 $10,474,700 $47,524,800 $722,030,800 2039 $59,811,200 $1,057,778,200 $10,789,000 $49,022,200 $771,053,000 2040 $61,677,400 $1,119,455,600 $11,112,600 $50,564,800 $821,617,800 2041 $63,599,400 $1,183,055,000 $11,446,000 $52,153,400 $873,771,200

04 Ann Sum 64-12483.01 Printed: 6/16/2011 Page 12 Exhibit 5

ANNUAL EXPENDITURES MCMILLAN REDEVELOPMENT 30 Years (2012 - 2041)

$20,000,000

$18,000,000

$16,000,000

$14,000,000

$12,000,000

$10,000,000

$8,000,000

$6,000,000

$4,000,000

$2,000,000

$0

"Annual Expenditures"

05 Expenditures 64-12483.01 Printed: 6/16/2011 Page 13

Exhibit 6

ESTIMATED INITIAL YEAR OF FULL OPERATION MCMILLAN REDEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 2011

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Land Uses/Product 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 TOTAL

McMillan Development Program (Units/GSF)

For-Rent Residential Apartments - Market Rate 00009614464000 304 Senior Apartments - ADU 0 0 0 72 14 00000 86

For-Sale Residential Townhomes - Market Rate 0 0 0 42 69 41 4000 156 Townhomes - WDU 0 0 0 13 600000 19 Condo - WDU 000636363636365 191

Commercial GSF Office 0 0 0 842,079 184,783 000001,026,862 Retail (In-line) 0 0 0 15,500 12,635 0000028,135 Restaurants 0 0 0 2,500 2,500 00000 5,000 Retail [Grocery] 0 0 0 44,700 00000044,700 Public Parking Spaces 0 0 0 1,647 653 00000 2,300

Total Residential Units 0 0 0 133 221 221 104 36 36 5 756 Total Commercial GSF 0 0 0 904,779 199,918 000001,104,697

Land Area Taken Down (Acres) 0.0 0.0 2.6 6.1 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 Cumulative Development of Unimp. Acres 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 10.8 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1

SOURCE: Vision McMillan Partners; Green Door Advisors

06 Development Program 64-12483.01 Printed: 6/16/2011 Page 14 Exhibit 7

FISCAL IMPACT MODEL ASSUMPTIONS WASHINGTON, D.C. 2011 ESCALATION AND FINANCING RATES Revenues 3.0% per yr Expenditures 3.0% per yr Interest Rate on 20-yr Bond 5.0% per yr

VALUE BY LAND USE VALUE (2010$) RENTS, REVENUE, AND OTHER ASSUMPTIONS

Resident/ Retail Prepared Sales Land Area Employee Construction Value Average Sales Estimated NOI per Assessed Value per GSF per Taxable Foods from 1 2 3 Type (Acres) Household Income per SF, Unit Price GSF, Unit Cap Rate GSF or Unit Sales/GSF Employee Occupancy Sales Sales Alcohol Unimproved Land 11.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $1,654,238 per Acre N/A N/A N/A

Residential Apartments - Market Rate N/A $78,016 $229,934 /Unit N/A $17,883 /Unit 7.5% $238,444 /Unit N/A N/A 95% Senior Apartments - ADU N/A $37,654 $262,840 /Unit N/A $9,407 /Unit 7.5% $125,431 /Unit N/A N/A 95% Townhomes - Market Rate N/A $128,625 $269,219 /Unit $483,333 /Unit N/A N/A $483,333 /Unit N/A N/A N/A Townhomes - WDU N/A $93,200 $223,718 /Unit $346,957 /Unit N/A N/A $346,957 /Unit N/A N/A N/A Condo - WDU N/A $82,800 $266,360 /Unit $308,241 /Unit N/A N/A $308,241 /Unit N/A N/A N/A

Commercial Office N/A $76,100 $348 /GSF N/A $34 /GSF 8.5% $400 per GSF N/A 300 SF/Emp 90% Retail [In-Line] N/A $26,400 $270 /GSF N/A $32 /GSF 9.0% $356 per GSF $350 /GSF 350 SF/Emp 90% 95% 0% 0% Restaurants N/A $22,800 $270 /GSF N/A $32 /GSF 9.0% $356 per GSF $400 /GSF 250 SF/Emp 90% 100% 0% N/A Retail [Grocery] N/A $30,800 $270 /GSF N/A $20 /GSF 9.0% $222 per GSF $500 /GSF 450 SF/Emp 100% 5% 5% 5%

Demographics Source Population 596,300 FY 2010 Budget Households 258,700 FY 2010 Budget Household Size, Avg. 2.30 FY 2010 Budget Condominiums 1.90 US Census Rental Apartments 1.90 US Census Townhome 2.64 US Census Active Adult 1.50 US Census At-Place Employment 702,500 FY 2010 Budget Owner Turnover 7% turnover/yr US Census Owner Turnover - ADU 3% turnover/yr GDA Total Relevant School Expenditures $563,538,346 DC Public Schools FY 2011 Budget Total Students 52,413 DC Public Schools FY 2011 Budget School expenditures per pupil $10,752 DC Public Schools FY 2011 Budget Pupil Generation Rates per Household 4 Apartments - Market Rate 0.24 Urban Institute Apartments - ADU 0.24 Urban Institute Senior Apartments - ADU 0.00 Urban Institute Senior Apartments - Market Rate 0.00 Urban Institute Townhomes - Market Rate 0.35 Urban Institute, VMP Townhomes - WDU 0.35 Urban Institute, VMP Condo - Market Rate 0.07 Urban Institute Condo - WDU 0.07 Urban Institute

1 The construction costs per SF include the construction costs for vertical development and the appropriate share of land development costs 2The sales price for condo units includes the cost of a parking space. 3 The NOI calculations for all rental apartments includes the value of residential parking. 4 Based on the Urban Institute Study Housing in the Nation's Capital (2006) and VMP assumptions SOURCE: FY 2010 Budget for Washington D.C.; Claritas; U.S. Census; Bureau of Labor Statistics; Green Door Advisors; Washington, DC Public Schools, Urban Institute

07 Assumptions 64-12483.01 Printed: 6/16/2011 Page 15 Exhibit 8

FISCAL IMPACT MODEL TAX RATES WASHINGTON, D.C. 2011

Taxes Tax Rates Other Funds Source Comments

Real Property Tax - Class I $0.850 per $100 AV FY 2010 Budget Real Property Tax - Class II $1.850 per $100 AV FY 2010 Budget For Value Over $3million Real Property Tax - Class II $1.650 per $100 AV FY 2010 Budget For Value Under $3million Real Property Tax - Class III $5.000 per $100 AV FY 2011 Budget Support Act Homestead Exemption $67,500 FY 2010 Budget Personal Property Tax $3.400 per $100 AV 17.4% FY 2010 Budget 17.4% Dedicated to Neighborhood Investment Fund Sales Tax 6.00% FY 2010 Budget Alcohol Tax - Consumption Off Premises 9.00% FY 2010 Budget Meals Tax 9.00% 1.00% FY 2010 Budget 1% Dedicated to Convention Center Fund Hotel Tax 10.05% 4.45% FY 2010 Budget 4.45% Dedicated to Convention Center Fund Parking Tax 12.00% FY 2010 Budget Parking in commercial lots Individual Income Tax FY 2010 Budget Income $0 - $10,000 4.00% FY 2010 Budget Income $10,000 - $39,999 6.00% FY 2010 Budget Income $40,000 and up 8.50% FY 2010 Budget Blended Individual Income Tax Rate 6.00% GDA Used for Indirect and Induced Labor Income Revenue Transfer & Recordation Tax, Effective Rate 2.20% FY 2010 Budget Deed Transfer Tax - Under $400,000 Value 1.10% FY 2010 Budget Deed Recordation Tax - Under $400,000 Value 1.10% FY 2010 Budget Transfer & Recordation Tax, Effective Rate 2.90% Deed Transfer Tax - Over $400,000 Value 1.45% Deed Recordation Tax - Over $400,000 Value 1.45%

SOURCE: FY 2010 Budget for Washington D.C., 2011 Budget Support Act

08 Tax Rates 64-12483.01 Printed: 6/16/2011 Page 16 Exhibit 9

ALLOCATION OF DISTRICT REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES WASHINGTON, D.C. FY 2010

POPULATION 596,300 45.9% EMPLOYMENT 702,500 54.1% TOTAL 1,298,800 100.0%

REVENUE (GENERAL FUND - Net of Transfer to Other Funds) PERCENTAGE ALLOCATION BUDGET ALLOCATION REVENUE PER DEPARTMENTS/CATEGORIES GENERAL FUND UNALL. EMP. RES. EMPLOYEE RESIDENT EMPLOYEE RESIDENT Real Property 1 $1,738,471,000 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% $0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 Personal Property 1 $56,216,000 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% $0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 2 Sales Tax (including Meals Tax) $811,178,000 94.4% 1.0% 4.6% $8,111,780 $37,340,183 $11.55 $62.62 1 Income Tax $1,445,877,000 74.0% 26.0% 0.0% $376,516,000 $0 $535.97 $0.00 Gross Receipts: Public Utility/Toll Telecom/Insurance Premiums $261,070,000 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% $130,535,000 $130,535,000 $185.81 $218.91 Other Taxes $175,524,000 57.8% 8.0% 34.2% $14,091,000 $60,000,000 $20.06 $100.62 Non-Tax Revenue: Permits and Licenses $60,034,000 0.0% 54.1% 45.9% $32,471,424 $27,562,576 $46.22 $46.22 Non-Tax Revenue: Fines & Forfeits/Charges for Service/Miscellaneous $275,144,000 0.0% 54.1% 45.9% $148,820,958 $126,323,042 $211.84 $211.84 Lottery/Interfund Transfer $65,775,000 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% $0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 Dedicated Tax Revenue & Special Purpose Fund Revenue $875,885,000 TOTAL $5,765,174,000 $1,011.45 $640.22

OPERATING EXPENDITURES (GENERAL FUND) PERCENTAGE ALLOCATION BUDGET ALLOCATION EXPENDITURES PER DEPARTMENTS/CATEGORIES GENERAL FUND UNALL. EMP. RES. EMPLOYEE RESIDENT EMPLOYEE RESIDENT

Government Direction & Support $311,154,000 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% $0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 Economic Development & Regulation $164,633,000 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% $0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 Public Safety & Justice $931,795,000 78.4% 11.7% 9.9% $108,955,110 $92,483,890 $155.10 $155.10 Public Education System $1,359,696,000 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% $0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 Human Support Services $1,378,216,000 80.4% 0.0% 19.6% $0 $270,085,000 $0.00 $452.93 Public Works $413,602,000 91.7% 0.0% 8.3% $0 $34,210,000 $0.00 $57.37 Financing and Other $904,805,000 54.0% 24.9% 21.1% $225,195,927 $191,152,073 $320.56 $320.56 Enterprise & Other Funds $172,971,000 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% $0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 TOTAL $5,636,872,000 $475.66 $985.97

1 Real Property, Personal Property & Income Tax revenues from the proposed development are allocated directly in the model; For Income Tax: Corporate Franchise Tax and Unincorporated Business Franchise Tax are allocated here. 2 General Sales, Meals, and Alcohol tax allocated directly in the model. Other key items including Motor Fuel, and Cigarettes are allocated in this line. SOURCE: FY 2010 Budget for Washington D.C.; Claritas; U.S. Census; Bureau of Labor Statistics; Green Door Advisors

09 - Rev & Exp 64-12483.01 Printed:6/16/2011 Page 17 BC DEF GHIJM N O P Q R S T 7 8 ASSUMPTION ASSUMPTION TOTAL 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 9 (2010$) Column 2 (2012-2041) Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 10 11 ESCALATIONS 12 Revenues 3.0% 1.061 1.093 1.126 1.159 1.194 1.230 1.267 1.305 13 Commercial 3.0% 1.061 1.093 1.126 1.159 1.194 1.230 1.267 1.305 14 Residential 3.0% 1.061 1.093 1.126 1.159 1.194 1.230 1.267 1.305 15 Expenditures 3.0% 1.061 1.093 1.126 1.159 1.194 1.230 1.267 1.305 16 17 DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 18 19 Residential 20 Delivery (Units) 756 0 0 0 133 221 221 104 36 21 Cumulative Units 756 0 0 0 133 354 575 679 715 22 23 For-Rent Residential 24 Delivery (Units) 390 0 0 0 72 110 144 64 0 25 Cumulative Units 390 0 0 0 72 182 326 390 390 26 27 Apartments - Market Rate 28 Delivery (Units) 304 0 0 0 0 96 144 64 0 29 Cumulative Units 304 0 0 0 0 96 240 304 304 34 35 Senior Apartments - ADU 36 Delivery (Units) 86 0 007214000 37 Cumulative Units 86 0 0 07286868686 38 43 For-Sale Residential 44 Delivery 366 0 0 0 61 111 77 40 36 45 Cumulative GSF 366 0 0 0 61 172 249 289 325 46 47 Townhomes - Market Rate 48 Delivery (Units) 156 0 0 0426941 4 0 49 Cumulative Units 156 0 0 0 42 111 152 156 156 50 51 Townhomes - WDU 52 Delivery (Units) 19 0 00136000 53 Cumulative Units 19 0 0 01319191919 58 59 Condo - WDU 60 Delivery (Units) 191 0 0 0 6 36 36 36 36 61 Cumulative Units 191 0 0 0 6 42 78 114 150 62 63 Commercial 64 Delivery (GSF) 1,104,697 0 0 0 904,779 199,918 0 0 0 65 Cumulative GSF 1,104,697 0 0 0 904,779 1,104,697 1,104,697 1,104,697 1,104,697 66 67 Office 68 Delivery (GSF) 1,026,862 0 0 0 842,079 184,783 0 0 0 69 Cumulative GSF 1,026,862 0 0 0 842,079 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 70 71 Retail, Restaurant, & Grocery 72 Delivery (GSF) 77,835 0 0 0 62,700 15,135 0 0 0 73 Cumulative GSF 77,835 0 0 0 62,700 77,835 77,835 77,835 77,835 74 75 Retail (In-line) 76 Delivery 28,135 0 0 0 15,500 12,635 0 0 0 77 Cumulative GSF 28,135 0 0 0 15,500 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 78 79 Restaurants 80 Delivery 5,000 0 0 0 2,500 2,500 0 0 0 81 Cumulative GSF 5,000 0 0 0 2,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 82 83 Retail [Grocery] 84 Delivery 44,700 0 0 0 44,700 0000 85 Cumulative GSF 44,700 0 0 0 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 86 93

Page 18 BC DEF GHIJM N O P Q R S T 7 8 ASSUMPTION ASSUMPTION TOTAL 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 9 (2010$) Column 2 (2012-2041) Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 94 EMPLOYEE RATIOS Gross GSF per Employee 95 Office 300 GSF per Employee 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 97 Vacancy Rate 10.0% 98 99 Retail [In-Line] 350 GSF per Employee 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 101 Vacancy Rate 10.0% 102 103 Restaurants 250 GSF per Employee 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 105 Vacancy Rate 10.0% 106 107 Retail [Grocery] 450 GSF per Employee 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 109 Vacancy Rate 0.0% 114 115 HOUSEHOLD RATIOS On-Site Residents 116 117 Apartments - Market Rate 1.9 Residents per Household 549 0 0 0 0 173 433 549 549 118 Occupancy Rate 95.0% 122 123 Senior Apartments - ADU 1.5 Residents per Household 123 0 0 0 103 123 123 123 123 124 Occupancy Rate 95.0% 128 129 Townhomes - Market Rate 2.6 Residents per Household 412 0 0 0 111 293 402 412 412 130 131 Townhomes - WDU 2.6 Residents per Household 50 0 0 0 34 50 50 50 50 134 135 Condo - WDU 1.9 Residents per Household 363 0 0 0 11 80 148 217 285 136 137 CONSTRUCTION VALUE (HARD COSTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SALES) 138 139 Apartments - Market Rate 140 Construction Costs per Unit $229,934 per SF $243,937 $251,255 $258,793 $266,556 $274,553 $282,790 $291,273 $300,012 141 Construction Value $80,801,700 $0 $0 $24,810,064 $38,384,129 $17,607,507 $0 $0 $0 142 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 782,513 0 0 240,270 371,726 170,517 0 0 0 143 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 386 0 0 119 184 84 0 0 0 150 151 Senior Apartments - ADU 152 Construction Costs per Unit $262,840 per SF $278,847 $287,213 $295,829 $304,704 $313,845 $323,261 $332,958 $342,947 153 Construction Value $24,819,231 $0 $20,735,978 $4,083,253 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 154 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 240,358 0 200,815 39,544 00000 155 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 119 0 99 20 00000 163 164 Townhomes - Market Rate 165 Construction Costs per Unit $269,219 per SF $285,614 $294,182 $303,008 $312,098 $321,461 $331,105 $341,038 $351,269 166 Construction Value $47,342,507 $0 $12,360,498 $20,947,392 $12,785,763 $1,248,854 $0 $0 $0 167 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 458,482 0 119,704 202,862 123,822 12,094 0 0 0 168 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 226 0 59 100 61 6000 169 170 Townhomes - WDU 171 Construction Costs per Unit $223,718 per SF $237,342 $244,462 $251,796 $259,350 $267,130 $275,144 $283,399 $291,901 172 Construction Value $4,688,665 $0 $3,182,027 $1,506,637 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 173 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 45,407 0 30,816 14,591 00000 174 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 22 0 15 700000 181

Page 19 BC DEF GHIJM N O P Q R S T 7 8 ASSUMPTION ASSUMPTION TOTAL 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 9 (2010$) Column 2 (2012-2041) Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 182 Condo - WDU 183 Construction Costs per Unit $266,360 per SF $282,581 $291,059 $299,790 $308,784 $318,048 $327,589 $337,417 $347,539 184 Construction Value $60,776,037 $0 $1,751,137 $10,822,026 $11,116,231 $11,449,718 $11,793,210 $12,180,286 $1,663,428 185 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 588,577 0 16,959 104,804 107,654 110,883 114,210 117,958 16,109 186 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 291 0 8 52 53 55 56 58 8 187 188 Total Residential Construction Value $218,428,140 $0 $38,029,640 $62,169,373 $62,286,123 $30,306,080 $11,793,210 $12,180,286 $1,663,428 189 Total Residential FTE Construction Jobs 1,045 0 182 297 298 145 56 58 8 190 191 Office 192 Construction Costs per GSF $348 /FAR SF $370 $381 $392 $404 $416 $428 $441 $454 193 Construction Value $392,941,509 $0 $320,501,926 $72,439,584 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 194 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 3,805,388 0 3,103,857 701,531 00000 195 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 1,879 0 1,533 346 00000 196 197 Retail [In-Line] 198 Construction Costs per GSF $270 /GSF $287 $295 $304 $313 $323 $332 $342 $353 199 Construction Value $8,422,339 $0 $4,578,313 $3,844,026 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 200 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 81,565 0 44,338 37,227 00000 201 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 40 0 22 18 00000 202 203 Restaurants 204 Construction Costs per GSF $270 /GSF $287 $295 $304 $313 $323 $332 $342 $353 205 Construction Value $1,499,028 $0 $738,438 $760,591 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 206 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 14,517 0 7,151 7,366 00000 207 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 7 0 4400000 208 209 Retail [Grocery] 210 Construction Costs per GSF $270 /GSF $287 $295 $304 $313 $323 $332 $342 $353 211 Construction Value $13,203,264 $0 $13,203,264 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 212 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 127,865 0 127,865 000000 213 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 63 0 63 000000 220 221 Total Commercial Construction Value - 2 Years Prior to Delivery $416,066,141 $0 $339,021,941 $77,044,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 222 Total Commercial FTE Construction Jobs 1,990 0 1,621 368 00000 223 224 Total Construction Value - 2 Years Prior to Delivery $634,494,280 $0 $377,051,580 $139,213,573 $62,286,123 $30,306,080 $11,793,210 $12,180,286 $1,663,428 225 Total FTE Construction Jobs 3,034 0 1,803 666 298 145 56 58 8 226 227 228 ASSESSED VALUE 229 230 PROJECT VALUE - UNIMPROVED LAND BASE 231 Unimproved Land Base Value per Acre $1,654,238 /Acre $1,754,981 $1,807,631 $1,861,859 $1,917,715 $1,975,247 $2,034,504 $2,095,539 $2,158,405 232 233 Land Takedown 11.1 0.0 0.0 2.6 6.1 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 234 Cumulative Land Takedown 0.0 0.0 2.6 8.7 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 235 236 Cumulative Development of Unimproved Land 11.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 10.8 11.1 11.1 11.1 237 238 Remaining Land Area - Taken Down & Unimproved 0.0 0.0 2.6 3.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 239 Remaining Value of Unimproved Land Base $0 $0 $4,840,835 $6,424,346 $592,574 $0 $0 $0 240 241 Total Value of Unimproved Land $11,857,755 $0 $0 $4,840,835 $6,424,346 $592,574 $0 $0 $0 242 243 INTERIM PROJECT VALUE BASED ON CONSTRUCTION COST 244 245 Residential 246 Apartments - Market Rate 247 Units Under Construction 0 0 0 0 270 304 0 0 248 Under Construction Value $229,934 /Unit $131,969,516 $0 $0 $0 $0 $62,069,599 $69,899,917 $0 $0 253 254 Senior Apartments - ADU 255 Units Under Construction 0 0 0728686 0 0 256 Under Construction Value $262,840 /Unit $76,636,202 $0 $0 $0 $21,845,109 $26,990,686 $27,800,407 $0 $0 261 262 Townhomes - Market Rate 263 Units Under Construction 0 0007000 264 Under Construction Value $269,219 /Unit $2,124,107 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,124,107 $0 $0 $0 265 266 Townhomes - WDU 267 Units Under Construction 0 0001000 268 Under Construction Value $223,718 /Unit $207,660 $0 $0 $0 $0 $207,660 $0 $0 $0

Page 20 BC DEF GHIJM N O P Q R S T 7 8 ASSUMPTION ASSUMPTION TOTAL 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 9 (2010$) Column 2 (2012-2041) Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 273 274 Condo - WDU 275 Units Under Construction 0 00740000 276 Under Construction Value $266,360 /Unit $22,899,799 $0 $0 $0 $22,899,799 $0 $0 $0 $0 277 278 Total Residential Units Under Construction 0 0 0 146 363 390 0 0 279 Total Residential Project Value Under Construction $233,837,283 $0 $0 $0 $44,744,908 $91,392,052 $97,700,324 $0 $0 280 281 Retail 282 Office 283 GSF Under Construction 0 0 0 741,384 911,341 184,783 0 0 284 Under Construction Value $348 /FAR SF $757,544,850 $0 $0 $0 $299,361,012 $379,027,149 $79,156,689 $0 $0 285 286 Retail (In-line) 287 GSF Under Construction 0 0 0 13,647 22,032 9,135 0 0 288 Under Construction Value $270 /FAR SF $14,424,363 $0 $0 $0 $4,276,319 $7,111,138 $3,036,905 $0 $0 289 290 Restaurants 291 GSF Under Construction 0 0 0 2,201 4,720 0 0 0 292 Under Construction Value $270 /FAR SF $2,213,159 $0 $0 $0 $689,729 $1,523,430 $0 $0 $0 293 294 Retail [Grocery] 295 GSF Under Construction 0 0 0 17,356 44,700 0 0 0 296 Under Construction Value $270 /FAR SF $19,866,312 $0 $0 $0 $5,438,749 $14,427,564 $0 $0 $0 301 302 Total Commercial GSF Under Construction 0 0 0 774,588 982,793 193,918 0 0 303 Total Commercial Project Value Under Construction $794,048,684 $0 $0 $0 $309,765,809 $402,089,281 $82,193,594 $0 $0 304 305 Total Interim Project Value Based on Construction Cost $1,027,885,967 $0 $0 $0 $354,510,717 $493,481,332 $179,893,918 $0 $0 306 307 PROJECT VALUE BASED ON INCOME APPROACH 308 309 Residential 310 Apartments - Market Rate 311 Units Completed 3040 00000304304 312 Developed Units Assessed Value $238,444 /Unit $181,222,982 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $91,824,190 $94,578,916 317 318 Senior Apartments - ADU 319 Units Completed 860 000008686 320 Developed Units Assessed Value $125,431 /Unit $26,968,578 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,664,756 $14,074,699 325 326 Townhomes - Market Rate 327 Units Completed 156 0 0 0 57 139 156 156 156 328 Developed Units Assessed Value $483,333 /Unit $188,506,058 $0 $0 $0 $31,938,001 $80,220,413 $92,732,489 $95,514,464 $98,379,898 329 330 Townhomes - WDU 331 Units Completed 19 0 0 0 7 17 19 19 19 332 Developed Units Assessed Value $346,957 /Unit $16,480,977 $0 $0 $0 $2,815,526 $7,042,837 $8,107,549 $8,350,775 $8,601,298 337 338 Condo - WDU 339 Units Completed 191 0 0 0 0 191 191 191 191 340 Developed Units Assessed Value $308,241 /Unit $147,189,609 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,298,577 $72,407,534 $74,579,760 $76,817,153 341 342 Total Residential Units Completed 756 0 0 0 64 347 366 756 756 343 Total Residential Project Value - Completed $560,368,204 $0 $0 $0 $34,753,527 $157,561,828 $173,247,572 $283,933,945 $292,451,964

Page 21 BC DEF GHIJM N O P Q R S T 7 8 ASSUMPTION ASSUMPTION TOTAL 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 9 (2010$) Column 2 (2012-2041) Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 344 345 Retail 346 Office 347 GSF Completed 1,026,862 0 0000842,079 1,026,862 1,026,862 348 Developed GSF Value $400 /GSF $1,026,894,958 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $414,260,553 $520,319,202 $535,928,778 349 350 Retail (In-line) 351 GSF Completed 28,135 0 000019,000 28,135 28,135 352 Developed GSF Value $356 /GSF $25,009,693 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,308,481 $12,672,205 $13,052,371 353 354 Restaurants 355 GSF Completed 5,000 0 00005,000 5,000 5,000 356 Developed GSF Value $356 /GSF $4,444,587 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,186,442 $2,252,036 $2,319,597 357 358 Retail [Grocery] 359 GSF Completed 44,700 0 000044,700 44,700 44,700 360 Developed GSF Value $222 /GSF $24,834,131 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,216,747 $12,583,249 $12,960,747 365 366 Total Commercial Project Value Completed $1,081,183,369 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $436,972,224 $547,826,692 $564,261,493 367 368 Total Project Value Based on Income Approach $1,641,551,574 $0 $0 $0 $34,753,527 $157,561,828 $610,219,796 $831,760,637 $856,713,456 369 370 REVENUES 371 372 REAL PROPERTY REVENUES 373 374 Assessed Value of Unimproved Land $0 $0 $4,840,835 $6,424,346 $592,574 $0 $0 $0 375 Value Subject to Real Property Tax $0 $0 $4,840,835 $6,424,346 $592,574 $0 $0 $0 376 Real Property Tax - Unimproved Land $5.000 per $100 AV $592,888 $0 $0 $242,042 $321,217 $29,629 $0 $0 $0 377 378 Assessed Value of Commercial Uses Under Construction $0 $0 $0 $309,765,809 $402,089,281 $82,193,594 $0 $0 379 Value Subject to Real Property Tax $0 $0 $0 $309,765,809 $402,089,281 $82,193,594 $0 $0 380 Real Property Tax - Commercial Uses Under Construction $1.850 per $100 AV Value Over $3M $0 $0 $0 $5,724,667 $7,432,652 $1,514,581 $0 $0 381 Real Property Tax - Commercial Uses Under Construction $1.650 per $100 AV Value Under $3M $0 $0 $0 $49,500 $49,500 $49,500 $0 $0 382 Total Real Property Tax - Commercial Uses Under Const. $14,820,401 $0 $0 $0 $5,774,167 $7,482,152 $1,564,081 $0 $0 383 384 Assessed Value of Residential Uses Under Construction $0 $0 $0 $44,744,908 $91,392,052 $97,700,324 $0 $0 385 Value Subject to Real Property Tax $0 $0 $0 $44,744,908 $91,392,052 $97,700,324 $0 $0 386 Real Property Tax - Residential Uses Under Const. $0.850 per $100 AV $1,987,617 $0 $0 $0 $380,332 $776,832 $830,453 $0 $0 387 388 Assessed Value of Commercial - Completed $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $436,972,224 $547,826,692 $564,261,493 389 Value Subject to Real Property Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $436,972,224 $547,826,692 $564,261,493 390 Real Property Tax - Commercial Uses - Completed $1.850 per $100 AV Value Over $3M $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,077,986 $10,128,794 $10,432,838 391 Real Property Tax - Commercial Uses - Completed $1.650 per $100 AV Value Under $3M $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $49,500 $49,500 $49,500 392 Total Real Property Tax - Completed Commercial Uses $358,076,663 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,127,486 $10,178,294 $10,482,338 393 394 Assessed Value of Residential Uses - Completed $0 $0 $0 $34,753,527 $157,561,828 $173,247,572 $283,933,945 $292,451,964 395 Owner Occupied Condos 80% owner occupied units 0 0 0 0 153 153 153 153 396 Owner Occupied Townhomes 80% owner occupied units 0 0 0 51 125 140 140 140 397 Homestead Exemption $67,500 per Unit $0 $0 $0 $3,456,000 $18,738,000 $19,764,000 $19,764,000 $19,764,000 398 Value Subject to Real Property Tax $0 $0 $0 $31,297,527 $138,823,828 $153,483,572 $264,169,945 $272,687,964 399 Real Property Tax - Residential Uses - Completed $0.850 per $100 AV $81,804,956 $0 $0 $0 $266,029 $1,180,003 $1,304,610 $2,245,445 $2,317,848 400 401 TOTAL REAL PROPERTY REVENUES $457,282,524 $0 $0 $242,042 $6,741,745 $9,468,615 $11,826,631 $12,423,738 $12,800,185 402 403 PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUES 404 405 Resident-Driven Personal Property Tax Revenues 406 Personal Property Tax Revenues per Resident $24 per resident $25 $26 $27 $27 $28 $29 $30 $31 407 Total Residents 0 0 0 260 719 1,156 1,350 1,418 408 Total Resident-Driven Personal Property Tax Revenues $1,591,617 $0 $0 $0 $7,093 $20,240 $33,499 $40,308 $43,621 409 410 Employee-Driven Personal Property Tax Revenues 411 Personal Property Tax Revenues per Employee $60 per employee $64 $66 $68 $70 $72 $74 $76 $78 412 Total Employees 0 0 0 2,674 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 413 Total Employee-Driven Personal Property Tax Revenues $9,221,323 $0 $0 $0 $186,077 $234,359 $241,390 $248,631 $256,090 426 427 TOTAL PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUE $10,812,940 $0 $0 $0 $193,170 $254,599 $274,889 $288,940 $299,711 428 Funds Directed to Neighborhood Investment Fund 17.4% $1,881,452 $0 $0 $0 $33,612 $44,300 $47,831 $50,276 $52,150 429 TOTAL PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUE - GENERAL FUND $8,931,488 $0 $0 $0 $159,558 $210,299 $227,058 $238,664 $247,562 430

Page 22 BC DEF GHIJM N O P Q R S T 7 8 ASSUMPTION ASSUMPTION TOTAL 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 9 (2010$) Column 2 (2012-2041) Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 431 SALES TAX REVENUES 432 433 CONSTRUCTION SALES 434 Commercial Construction (2 Yrs Prior to Delivery) % of improvement 435 Commercial Improvement Value (hard costs minus labor) 85% of Construction Value $214,967,506 $0 $175,161,336 $39,806,170 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 436 % Materials and Purchased in the District 45% of Construction Value $96,735,378 $0 $78,822,601 $17,912,776 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 437 Retail Sales Tax Rev (Commercial Construction) 6.00% $5,804,123 $0 $4,729,356 $1,074,767 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 438 439 For-Rent Residential Construction (2 Yrs. Prior to Delivery) % of improvement 440 Residential Improvement Value (hard costs minus labor) 75% of Construction Value $44,008,721 $0 $8,639,991 $12,038,882 $15,993,387 $7,336,461 $0 $0 $0 441 % Materials and Purchased in the District 30% of Construction Value $13,202,616 $0 $2,591,997 $3,611,665 $4,798,016 $2,200,938 $0 $0 $0 442 Retail Sales Tax Rev (Residential Construction) 6.00% $792,157 $0 $155,520 $216,700 $287,881 $132,056 $0 $0 $0 443 444 For-Sale Residential Construction (2 Yrs. Prior to Delivery) % of improvement 445 Residential Improvement Value (hard costs minus labor) 60% of Construction Value $67,684,325 $0 $10,376,197 $19,965,634 $14,341,197 $7,619,144 $7,075,926 $7,308,171 $998,057 446 % Materials and Purchased in the District 30% of Construction Value $20,305,298 $0 $3,112,859 $5,989,690 $4,302,359 $2,285,743 $2,122,778 $2,192,451 $299,417 447 Retail Sales Tax Rev (Residential Construction) 6.00% $1,218,318 $0 $186,772 $359,381 $258,142 $137,145 $127,367 $131,547 $17,965 448 449 RETAIL ON-SITE SALES 450 Effective Retail SF Total Effective SF 451 Retail [In-Line] 25,322 0 0 0 13,950 25,322 25,322 25,322 25,322 452 Retail [Grocery] 44,700 0 0 0 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 453 Total Effective Square Feet 0 0 0 58,650 70,022 70,022 70,022 70,022 454 455 Retail Sales Sales/SF Taxable Sales 456 Retail [In-Line] $350 per GSF 95% $392,958,685 0 0 0 5,377,148 10,053,202 10,354,798 10,665,442 10,985,406 457 Retail [Grocery] $500 per GSF 5% $52,738,873 0 0 0 1,295,489 1,334,353 1,374,384 1,415,616 1,458,084 458 459 Total Sales $445,697,559 $0 $0 $0 $6,672,637 $11,387,556 $11,729,183 $12,081,058 $12,443,490 460 Retail Sales Tax Rev (On-Site Retail) 6.00% $26,741,854 $0 $0 $0 $400,358 $683,253 $703,751 $724,863 $746,609 461 462 RETAIL SALES FROM RESIDENTS 463 Residential Taxable Sales % Spent on Retail (Excluding Food) 2010 Income 464 Apartments - Market Rate 20% $78,016 $202,586,120 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,696,814 $4,372,892 $5,708,294 $5,879,543 466 Senior Apartments - ADU 30% $37,654 $43,921,712 $0 $0 $0 $909,327 $1,115,668 $1,149,138 $1,183,612 $1,219,120 468 Townhomes - Market Rate 20% $128,625 $184,493,052 $0 $0 $0 $1,253,029 $3,414,135 $4,812,699 $5,083,681 $5,236,191 469 Townhomes - WDU 30% $93,200 $25,185,954 $0 $0 $0 $427,142 $642,201 $661,467 $681,311 $701,751 471 Condo - WDU 30% $82,800 $209,378,484 $0 $0 $0 $175,402 $1,264,647 $2,416,039 $3,635,377 $4,925,700 472 473 Total Retail Taxable Sales 95% taxable $632,287,056 $0 $0 $0 $2,626,655 $7,726,792 $12,741,623 $15,477,661 $17,064,190 474 Retail Expenditures Made Off-Site, In DC 60% $379,372,234 $0 $0 $0 $1,575,993 $4,636,075 $7,644,974 $9,286,597 $10,238,514 475 Total Residential Sales Tax Revenues 9.00% $34,143,501 $0 $0 $0 $141,839 $417,247 $688,048 $835,794 $921,466 476 477 ALCOHOL SALES ON-SITE 478 Alcohol Sales Sales/SF % Sales Alcohol Total Alcohol Sales 479 Retail [In-Line] $350 per GSF 0% 0 0 0000000 480 Grocery Store $500 per GSF 5% 1,117,500 0 0 0 1,117,500 1,117,500 1,117,500 1,117,500 1,117,500 481 Total Sales $30,172,500 $0 $0 $0 $1,117,500 $1,117,500 $1,117,500 $1,117,500 $1,117,500 483482 Sales Tax from Alcohol Sales 9.00% $2,715,525 $0 $0 $0 $100,575 $100,575 $100,575 $100,575 $100,575 484 ALCOHOL SALES FROM RESIDENTS 485 Residential Taxable Sales - Alcohol %Spent on Alcohol 2010 Income 486 Apartments - Market Rate 1% $78,016 $10,129,306 $0 $0 $0 $0 $84,841 $218,645 $285,415 $293,977 488 Senior Apartments - ADU 1% $37,654 $1,446,109 $0 $0 $0 $29,939 $36,733 $37,835 $38,970 $40,139 490 Townhomes - Market Rate 1% $128,625 $9,224,653 $0 $0 $0 $62,651 $170,707 $240,635 $254,184 $261,810 491 Townhomes - WDU 1% $93,200 $829,240 $0 $0 $0 $14,064 $21,144 $21,779 $22,432 $23,105 494493 Condo - WDU 1% $82,800 $6,893,722 $0 $0 $0 $5,775 $41,638 $79,547 $119,694 $162,177 495 Total Alcohol Taxable Sales 80% taxable $22,818,423 $0 $0 $0 $89,943 $284,050 $478,752 $576,556 $624,966 496 Alcohol Expenditures Made Off-Site, In DC 30% taxable $6,845,527 $0 $0 $0 $26,983 $85,215 $143,626 $172,967 $187,490 497 Total Residential Alcohol Sales Tax Revenues 9.00% $616,097 $0 $0 $0 $2,428 $7,669 $12,926 $15,567 $16,874 498 499 TOTAL SALES TAX REVENUE $72,031,574 $0 $5,071,647 $1,650,848 $1,191,224 $1,477,945 $1,632,667 $1,808,346 $1,803,490 500 501 MEALS TAX Total Restaurant SF 502 Restaurants 4,500 0 0 0 2,250 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 503 Total Restaurant Sales $400 per GSF $0 $0 $0 $1,043,347 $2,149,294 $2,213,773 $2,280,186 $2,348,592 504 Prepared Foods at Grocery 5% $0 $0 $0 $1,295,489 $1,334,353 $1,374,384 $1,415,616 $1,458,084 505 Meals Tax Revenues (on-site restaurants) 9.0% $12,297,964 $0 $0 $0 $210,495 $313,528 $322,934 $332,622 $342,601 506 507 Residential Meals Tax Revenues 508 Total Taxable Sales $0 $0 $0 $2,626,655 $7,726,792 $12,741,623 $15,477,661 $17,064,190 509 Meals at Eating Places % of Retail Spending 3.4% $0 $0 $0 $89,088 $262,068 $432,155 $524,953 $578,762 510 % of Expenditures Off-Site & in DC 75.0% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 511 Restaurant Expenditures Made Off-Site $0 $0 $0 $66,816 $196,551 $324,116 $393,714 $434,072 512 Total Effective Residential Meals Tax Revenues 9.00% Effective Rate to General Fund $1,447,547 $0 $0 $0 $6,013 $17,690 $29,170 $35,434 $39,066 513 514 TOTAL MEALS TAX REVENUE $13,745,512 $0 $0 $0 $216,509 $331,218 $352,105 $368,056 $381,667

Page 23 BC DEF GHIJM N O P Q R S T 7 8 ASSUMPTION ASSUMPTION TOTAL 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 9 (2010$) Column 2 (2012-2041) Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 515 525 DEED RECORDATION/TRANSFER TAX 526 527 Land Taken Down (Acres) 11.1 0.0 0.0 2.6 6.1 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 528 Land Sale - Assessed Value per Acre $1,654,238 $83,493,958 $1,754,981 $1,807,631 $1,861,859 $1,917,715 $1,975,247 $2,034,504 $2,095,539 $2,158,405 529 Total Land Sales and Transaction Costs $0 $0 $4,840,835 $11,698,063 $4,830,096 $0 $0 $0 530 531 Deed Recordation/Transfer Tax on Land Sale 2.90% $619,701 $0 $0 $140,384 $339,244 $140,073 $0 $0 $0 532 533 New Owner Occupied Unit Sales - Under $400k 534 Townhomes - Market Rate $483,333 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 535 Townhomes - WDU $346,957 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 537 Condo - WDU $308,241 $0 $0 $0 $2,149,886 $13,286,295 $13,647,493 $14,056,918 $0 538 539 Owner Occupied Households in Turnover 540 Townhomes - Market Rate 6.7% turnover per yr 0 000371010 541 Townhomes - WDU 3.0% turnover per yr 0 0000111 543 Condo - WDU 3.0% turnover per yr 0 0000123 544 545 Value of Housing Unit Sales in Turnover - Under $400K 546 Townhomes - Market Rate $483,333 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 547 Townhomes - WDU $346,957 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 549 Condo - WDU $308,241 $0 $0 $0 $0 $66,431 $478,971 $915,048 $0 550 551 Recordation/Transfer Tax, Properties under $400k 2.20% $0 $0 $0 $47,297 $293,760 $310,782 $329,383 $0 552 553 New Owner Occupied Unit Sales - Over $400k 554 Townhomes - Market Rate $483,333 $0 $0 $0 $23,542,474 $39,897,540 $24,352,457 $2,378,636 $0 555 Townhomes - WDU $346,957 $0 $0 $0 $5,235,446 $2,478,897 $0 $0 $0 557 Condo - WDU $308,241 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,478,626 558 559 Owner Occupied Households in Turnover 560 Townhomes - Market Rate 6.7% turnover per yr 0 000371010 561 Townhomes - WDU 3.0% turnover per yr 0 0000111 563 Condo - WDU 3.0% turnover per yr 0 0000123 564 565 Value of Housing Unit Sales in Turnover - Over $400K 566 Townhomes - Market Rate $483,333 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,617,853 $4,408,170 $6,213,931 $6,563,810 567 Townhomes - WDU $346,957 $0 $0 $0 $0 $161,775 $243,226 $250,523 $258,039 569 Condo - WDU $308,241 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,376,858 570 571 Recordation/Transfer Tax, Properties over $400k 2.90% $12,671,126 $0 $0 $0 $834,560 $1,280,526 $841,112 $256,450 $657,643 572 573 TOTAL DEED RECORDATION/TRANSFER TAX REVENUE $14,272,050 $0 $0 $140,384 $1,221,101 $1,714,359 $1,151,894 $585,833 $657,643 574 575 INCOME TAX 576 577 EMPLOYEE INCOME 578 579 Office 580 Number of Employees 300 GSF/Employee 3,081 0 0 0 2,526 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 581 Average Employee Income $76,100 $80,734 $83,157 $85,651 $88,221 $90,867 $93,593 $96,401 $99,293 582 Taxable Employee Income 80% taxable $64,588 $66,525 $68,521 $70,577 $72,694 $74,875 $77,121 $79,435 583 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 584 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $225,186 $4,290 $4,455 $4,624 $4,799 $4,979 $5,164 $5,355 $5,552 585 % of Employees Living in Washington D.C. 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 586 Employee Income Tax Revenue $227,451,650 $0 $0 $0 $4,243,206 $5,368,363 $5,568,230 $5,774,092 $5,986,130 587 588 Retail [In-Line] 589 Number of Employees 350 GSF/Employee 72 0 0 0 40 72 72 72 72 590 Average Employee Income $26,400 $28,008 $28,848 $29,713 $30,605 $31,523 $32,469 $33,443 $34,446 591 Taxable Employee Income 80% taxable $22,406 $23,078 $23,771 $24,484 $25,218 $25,975 $26,754 $27,557 592 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $32,124 $1,144 $1,185 $1,226 $1,269 $1,313 $1,358 $1,405 $1,453 593 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $27,433 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 594 % of Employees Living in Washington D.C. 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 595 Employee Income Tax Revenue $3,408,788 $0 $0 $0 $42,993 $80,749 $83,541 $86,416 $89,377 596 597 Restaurants 598 Number of Employees 250 GSF/Employee 18 0 0 0 9 18 18 18 18 599 Average Employee Income $22,800 $24,189 $24,914 $25,662 $26,431 $27,224 $28,041 $28,882 $29,749 600 Taxable Employee Income 80% taxable $19,351 $19,931 $20,529 $21,145 $21,780 $22,433 $23,106 $23,799 601 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $37,331 $961 $996 $1,032 $1,069 $1,107 $1,146 $1,186 $1,228 602 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $12,284 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 603 % of Employees Living in Washington D.C. 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 604 Employee Income Tax Revenue $705,208 $0 $0 $0 $8,176 $16,934 $17,533 $18,151 $18,788 605

Page 24 BC DEF GHIJM N O P Q R S T 7 8 ASSUMPTION ASSUMPTION TOTAL 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 9 (2010$) Column 2 (2012-2041) Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 606 Retail [Grocery] 607 Number of Employees 450 GSF/Employee 99 0 0 0 99 99 99 99 99 608 Average Employee Income $30,800 $32,676 $33,656 $34,666 $35,706 $36,777 $37,880 $39,017 $40,187 609 Taxable Employee Income 80% taxable $26,141 $26,925 $27,733 $28,565 $29,421 $30,304 $31,213 $32,150 610 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $26,171 $1,368 $1,415 $1,464 $1,514 $1,565 $1,618 $1,673 $1,729 611 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $46,384 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 612 % of Employees Living in Washington D.C. 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 613 Employee Income Tax Revenue $5,767,439 $0 $0 $0 $127,821 $132,162 $136,634 $141,239 $145,983 623 624 Construction 625 Construction Employee - FTE Jobs 3,034 0 1,803 666 298 145 56 58 8 626 Average Income - Construction Employees $69,700 174,256 $73,945 $76,163 $78,448 $80,801 $83,225 $85,722 $88,294 $90,943 627 Average Taxable Income 80% taxable $59,156 $60,930 $62,758 $64,641 $66,580 $68,578 $70,635 $72,754 628 Construction Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 629 Construction Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $203,221 $3,828 $3,979 $4,134 $4,294 $4,459 $4,629 $4,804 $4,984 630 % of Employees Living in Washington D.C. 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 631 Total Const. Employee Income Tax Rev. $4,973,551 $0 $2,870,056 $1,101,049 $511,693 $258,527 $104,432 $111,935 $15,860 632 633 Total Employees 0 1,803 666 2,972 3,415 3,327 3,329 3,278 634 Total Employees - Excluding Construction 3,270 0 0 0 2,674 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 635 Total Employee Income Tax Revenue $242,306,637 $0 $2,870,056 $1,101,049 $4,933,889 $5,856,735 $5,910,370 $6,131,833 $6,256,138 636 637638 HOUSEHOLD INCOME 639 Apartments - Market Rate 640 Number of Households 289 0 0 0 0 91 228 289 289 641 Average Household Income $78,016 $82,767 $85,250 $87,807 $90,441 $93,155 $95,949 $98,828 $101,793 642 Taxable Household Income 80% taxable $66,213 $68,200 $70,246 $72,353 $74,524 $76,759 $79,062 $81,434 643 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 644 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $231,761 $4,428 $4,597 $4,771 $4,950 $5,135 $5,325 $5,520 $5,722 645 Household Income Tax Revenue $60,179,101 $0 $0 $0 $0 $467,627 $1,213,333 $1,594,260 $1,652,485 654 655 Senior Apartments - ADU 656 Number of Households 82 0 0 06982828282 657 Average Household Income $37,654 $39,947 $41,146 $42,380 $43,651 $44,961 $46,310 $47,699 $49,130 658 Taxable Household Income 80% taxable $31,958 $32,916 $33,904 $34,921 $35,969 $37,048 $38,159 $39,304 659 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $15,451 $1,717 $1,775 $1,834 $1,895 $1,958 $2,023 $2,090 $2,158 660 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $78,679 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 661 Household Income Tax Revenue $7,230,349 $0 $0 $0 $129,991 $159,978 $165,268 $170,716 $176,328 670 671 Townhomes - Market Rate 672 Number of Households 156 0 0 0 42 111 152 156 156 673 Average Household Income $128,625 $136,458 $140,552 $144,769 $149,112 $153,585 $158,193 $162,938 $167,827 674 Taxable Household Income 80% taxable $109,167 $112,442 $115,815 $119,289 $122,868 $126,554 $130,351 $134,261 675 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 676 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $405,460 $8,079 $8,358 $8,644 $8,940 $9,244 $9,557 $9,880 $10,212 677 Household Income Tax Revenue $57,868,502 $0 $0 $0 $375,610 $1,027,428 $1,453,780 $1,541,252 $1,593,105 678 679 Townhomes - WDU 680 Number of Households 19 0 0 01319191919 681 Average Household Income $93,200 $98,876 $101,842 $104,897 $108,044 $111,286 $114,624 $118,063 $121,605 682 Taxable Household Income 80% taxable $79,101 $81,474 $83,918 $86,435 $89,029 $91,699 $94,450 $97,284 683 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 684 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $283,876 $5,524 $5,725 $5,933 $6,147 $6,367 $6,594 $6,828 $7,069 685 Household Income Tax Revenue $5,030,411 $0 $0 $0 $80,012 $120,981 $125,295 $129,737 $134,313

Page 25 BC DEF GHIJM N O P Q R S T 7 8 ASSUMPTION ASSUMPTION TOTAL 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 9 (2010$) Column 2 (2012-2041) Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 694 695 Condo - WDU 696 Number of Households 191 0 0 0 6 42 78 114 150 697 Average Household Income $82,800 $87,843 $90,478 $93,192 $95,988 $98,868 $101,834 $104,889 $108,035 698 Taxable Household Income 80% taxable $70,274 $72,382 $74,554 $76,790 $79,094 $81,467 $83,911 $86,428 699 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 700 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $248,182 $4,773 $4,952 $5,137 $5,327 $5,523 $5,725 $5,932 $6,146 701 Household Income Tax Revenue $41,372,081 $0 $0 $0 $32,051 $232,601 $447,184 $676,979 $922,666 702 703 Total Residents 0 0 0 260 719 1,156 1,350 1,418 704 Total Households 0 0 0 130 345 559 660 696 705 Total Household Income Tax Revenue $171,680,444 $0 $0 $0 $617,664 $2,008,616 $3,404,859 $4,112,944 $4,478,898 706 707 TOTAL INCOME TAX REVENUE $413,987,081 $0 $2,870,056 $1,101,049 $5,551,553 $7,865,351 $9,315,229 $10,244,777 $10,735,036 708 709 PARKING TAX REVENUE 710 711 Average Annual Revenue per Space (Monthly & Public) $2,279 $2,418 $2,490 $2,565 $2,642 $2,721 $2,803 $2,887 $2,974 712 Total Income-Generating Parking Spaces 0 0 0 0 1,647 653 0 0 0 713 714 Total Parking Revenues $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,351,350 $1,776,973 $0 $0 $0 715 716 Parking Tax Revenue 12% $0 $0 $0 $522,162 $213,237 $0 $0 $0 717 718 TOTAL PARKING TAX REVENUES $735,399 $0 $0 $0 $522,162 $213,237 $0 $0 $0 719 720 721 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES 722 723 Miscellaneous Revenues (See Appendix) 724 Per Employee $1,011 $1,073 $1,105 $1,138 $1,173 $1,208 $1,244 $1,281 $1,320 725 No. Employees 3,270 $0 $1,803 $666 $2,972 $3,415 $3,327 $3,329 $3,278 726 Misc Rev (Employee) $158,835,285 $0 $1,992,987 $757,918 $3,485,183 $4,124,637 $4,138,241 $4,264,760 $4,326,326 727 728 Per Resident $640 $679 $700 $721 $742 $764 $787 $811 $835 729 No. Residents 1,496 0 0 0 260 719 1,156 1,350 1,418 730 Misc Rev (Resident) $43,234,441 $0 $0 $0 $192,671 $549,795 $909,961 $1,094,931 $1,184,916 731 732 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES $202,069,725 $0 $1,992,987 $757,918 $3,677,854 $4,674,432 $5,048,202 $5,359,691 $5,511,242 733 734 TOTAL REVENUES $1,183,055,000 $0 $9,934,700 $3,892,100 $19,281,800 $25,955,400 $29,553,800 $31,029,100 $32,136,800 735 Real Property Tax $457,282,100 $0 $0 $242,000 $6,741,700 $9,468,600 $11,826,600 $12,423,700 $12,800,200 736 Personal Property Tax $8,931,800 $0 $0 $0 $159,600 $210,300 $227,100 $238,700 $247,600 737 Sales Tax $72,031,500 $0 $5,071,600 $1,650,800 $1,191,200 $1,477,900 $1,632,700 $1,808,300 $1,803,500 738 Meals Tax $13,745,600 $0 $0 $0 $216,500 $331,200 $352,100 $368,100 $381,700 740 Deed Recordation/Transfer Tax $14,272,000 $0 $0 $140,400 $1,221,100 $1,714,400 $1,151,900 $585,800 $657,600 741 Income Tax $413,986,900 $0 $2,870,100 $1,101,000 $5,551,600 $7,865,400 $9,315,200 $10,244,800 $10,735,000 742 Parking Tax $735,400 $0 $0 $0 $522,200 $213,200 $0 $0 $0 743 Miscellaneous Revenues $202,069,700 $0 $1,993,000 $757,900 $3,677,900 $4,674,400 $5,048,200 $5,359,700 $5,511,200 744

Page 26 BC DEF GHIJM N O P Q R S T 7 8 ASSUMPTION ASSUMPTION TOTAL 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 9 (2010$) Column 2 (2012-2041) Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 745 EXPENDITURES 746 747 MISC./NON-EDUCATIONAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES (SEE APPENDIX) 748 749 Expenditures Per Employee $476 $504.63 $519.77 $535.36 $551.42 $567.96 $585.00 $602.55 $620.63 750 No. Employees 3,270 0 1,803 666 2,972 3,415 3,327 3,329 3,278 751 Op. Expenditures (Employee) $74,696,027 $0 $937,249 $356,429 $1,638,989 $1,939,708 $1,946,105 $2,005,604 $2,034,557 752 753 Per Resident $986 $1,046 $1,077 $1,110 $1,143 $1,177 $1,213 $1,249 $1,286 754 No. Residents 1,496 0 0 0 260 719 1,156 1,350 1,418 755 Op. Expenditures (Resident) $66,583,228 $0 $0 $0 $296,723 $846,712 $1,401,386 $1,686,249 $1,824,830 756 757 TOTAL MISC./NON-EDUC OPERATING EXPENDITURES $141,279,255 $0 $937,249 $356,429 $1,935,712 $2,786,419 $3,347,491 $3,691,852 $3,859,387 758 759 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 760 761 Land Development & Infrastructure Costs $5,159,037 per acre 11.1 Acres $61,000,777 $61,000,777 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 762 Value of Phase 1 Land Takedown $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 763 Net Land Development Costs $61,000,777 $61,000,777 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 764 765 Annual Payment on 20 Year Bond 5.0% Interest Rate 20 Years $4,894,860 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 766 Cumulative Bond Payments $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 767 768 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES $97,897,204 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 769 770 EDUCATIONAL EXPENDITURES 771 772 Pupil Generation 773 Apartments - Market Rate 0.24 per household 69 0 0 0 0 22 55 69 69 775 Senior Apartments - ADU 0.00 per household 0 0 0000000 777 Townhomes - Market Rate 0.35 per household 55 0 0 0 15 39 53 55 55 778 Townhomes - WDU 0.35 per household 7 0 0057777 780 Condo - WDU 0.07 per household 13 0 00035811 781 782 Total On-Site Pupils 144 0 0 0 20 70 120 139 141 783 784 School Expenditures per Pupil $10,752 per pupil $11,407 $11,749 $12,101 $12,464 $12,838 $13,223 $13,620 $14,029 785 786 TOTAL SCHOOL OPERATING EXPENDITURES $70,106,631 $0 $0 $0 $245,332 $903,276 $1,587,454 $1,887,074 $1,979,039 787 788 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES $309,283,800 $4,894,900 $5,832,100 $5,251,300 $7,075,900 $8,584,600 $9,829,900 $10,473,900 $10,733,300 789 Misc./Non-Educational Operating Expenditures $141,279,300 $0 $937,200 $356,400 $1,935,700 $2,786,400 $3,347,500 $3,691,900 $3,859,400 790 Capital Expenditures $97,898,000 $4,894,900 $4,894,900 $4,894,900 $4,894,900 $4,894,900 $4,894,900 $4,894,900 $4,894,900 791 Educational Expenditures $70,106,500 $0 $0 $0 $245,300 $903,300 $1,587,500 $1,887,100 $1,979,000 792 793 NET FISCAL IMPACT $873,771,200 ($4,894,900) $4,102,600 ($1,359,200) $12,205,900 $17,370,800 $19,723,900 $20,555,200 $21,403,500 794

Page 27 BC DEF GHIJM N O P Q R S T 7 8 ASSUMPTION ASSUMPTION TOTAL 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 9 (2010$) Column 2 (2012-2041) Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 795 796 DEDICATED REVENUE STREAMS (NON-GENERAL FUND REVENUE) 797 798 NEIGHBORHOOD INVESTMENT FUND 799 800 PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUES - NEIGHBORHOOD INVESTMENT FUND 801 803 Total Personal Property Tax Collected $3.400 per $100 AV $10,812,940 $0 $0 $0 $193,170 $254,599 $274,889 $288,940 $299,711 804 Neighborhood Investment Fund Revenues 17.4% $0 $0 $0 $33,612 $44,300 $47,831 $50,276 $52,150 805 TOTAL PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUE - NEIGHBORHOOD INVESTMENT FUND $1,881,452 $0 $0 $0 $33,612 $44,300 $47,831 $50,276 $52,150 806 807 TOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD INVESTMENT FUND REVENUE $1,881,452 $0 $0 $0 $33,612 $44,300 $47,831 $50,276 $52,150 808 809 810 CONVENTION CENTER FUND 811 812 MEALS TAX - CONVENTION CENTER FUND Total Effective Restaurant SF 813 814 Total Restaurant Sales On-Site $0 $0 $0 $1,043,347 $2,149,294 $2,213,773 $2,280,186 $2,348,592 815 816 Meals Tax Revenues (on-site restaurants) 1.00% Effective Rate to Convention Center Fund $839,052 $0 $0 $0 $10,433 $21,493 $22,138 $22,802 $23,486 817 818 Total Restaurant Expenditures Off-Site from Residents $0 $0 $0 $66,816 $196,551 $324,116 $393,714 $434,072 819 820 Total Effective Residential Meals Tax Revenues 1.00% Effective Rate to Convention Center Fund $0 $0 $0 $668 $1,966 $3,241 $3,937 $4,341 821 822 TOTAL MEALS TAX REVENUE - CONVENTION CENTER FUND $999,890 $0 $0 $0 $11,102 $23,458 $25,379 $26,739 $27,827 823 834 TOTAL CONVENTION CENTER FUND REVENUE $999,890 $0 $0 $0 $11,102 $23,458 $25,379 $26,739 $27,827 835 836 837 INDIRECT/INDUCED EMPLOYMENT 838 Type SAM 839 IMPLAN Categories 840 Indirect/Inducted Construction Jobs 34,37 1.309 938 0 557 206 92 45 17 18 2 841 TOTAL INDIRECT/INDUCED CONSTRUCTION JOBS 938 0 557 206 92 45 17 18 2 842 843 Indirect/Induced Full Time Employment 844 Office 394, 396, 397 1.358 1,103 0 0 0 904 1,103 1,103 1,103 1,103 845 Retail [In-Line] 325, 327, 328, 330, 419, 421 1.145 10 0 0 0 6 10 10 10 10 846 Restaurants 413 1.138 2 0 0012222 847 Retail [Grocery] 324 1.158 16 0 0 0 16 16 16 16 16 849 TOTAL INDIRECT/INDUCED FULL-TIME JOBS (EXCLUDING CONSTRUCTION) 1,132 0 0 0 927 1,132 1,132 1,132 1,132 850 851 INDIRECT GROSS OUTPUT SALES TAX REVENUE 852 Indirect Only 853 Retail [In-Line] On-site Sales: Categories $0 $0 $0 $5,660,156 $10,582,318 $10,899,788 $11,226,782 $11,563,585 854 Indirect Impact 325, 327, 328, 330, 419, 421 0.2530 $104,651,102 $0 $0 $0 $1,432,019 $2,677,327 $2,757,646 $2,840,376 $2,925,587 855 856 Restaurants On-site Sales: Categories $0 $0 $0 $1,043,347 $2,149,294 $2,213,773 $2,280,186 $2,348,592 857 Indirect Impact 413 0.2410 $21,228,009 $0 $0 $0 $263,967 $543,771 $560,085 $576,887 $594,194 858 859 Retail [Grocery] On-site Sales $0 $0 $0 $25,909,776 $26,687,069 $27,487,681 $28,312,311 $29,161,681 860 Indirect Impact 324 0.2950 $266,858,699 $0 $0 $0 $6,555,173 $6,751,828 $6,954,383 $7,163,015 $7,377,905 864 865 TOTAL GROSS OUTPUT SALES TO THE DISTRICT 95% Taxable Sales $373,100,920 $0 $0 $0 $7,838,601 $9,474,280 $9,758,508 $10,051,264 $10,352,802 866 867 TOTAL ESTIMATED INDIRECT SALES TAX REVENUES 6.00% $22,387,000 $0 $0 $0 $470,000 $568,000 $586,000 $603,000 $621,000 868

Page 28 BC DEF GHIJM N O P Q R S T 7 8 ASSUMPTION ASSUMPTION TOTAL 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 9 (2010$) Column 2 (2012-2041) Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 869 INDIRECT/INDUCED INCOME TAX 870 871 Office Type SAM Multiplier 872 Total Employees 0 0 0 2,526 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 873 Average Employee Income $80,734 $83,157 $85,651 $88,221 $90,867 $93,593 $96,401 $99,293 874 Total Employee Income - DC 35% Emp. living in DC $0 $0 $0 $78,003,321 $97,973,668 $100,912,878 $103,940,265 $107,058,472 875 Indirect/Induced Labor Income 0.580 $0 $0 $0 $45,241,926 $56,824,728 $58,529,469 $60,285,353 $62,093,914 876 Income Tax from Indirect/Induced Labor Income 6% Blended Income Tax Rate $134,160,483 $0 $0 $0 $2,714,516 $3,409,484 $3,511,768 $3,617,121 $3,725,635 877 878 Retail [In-Line] 879 Total Employees 0 0 04072727272 880 Average Employee Income $28,008 $28,848 $29,713 $30,605 $31,523 $32,469 $33,443 $34,446 881 Total Employee Income - DC 85% Emp. living in DC $0 $0 $0 $1,036,848 $1,938,508 $1,996,663 $2,056,563 $2,118,260 882 Indirect/Induced Labor Income 0.564 $0 $0 $0 $584,782 $1,093,318 $1,126,118 $1,159,902 $1,194,699 883 Income Tax from Indirect/Induced Labor Income 6% Blended Income Tax Rate $2,564,132 $0 $0 $0 $35,087 $65,599 $67,567 $69,594 $71,682 884 885 Restaurants 886 Total Employees 0 0 0 9 18 18 18 18 887 Average Employee Income $24,189 $24,914 $25,662 $26,431 $27,224 $28,041 $28,882 $29,749 888 Total Employee Income - DC 85% Emp. living in DC $0 $0 $0 $202,201 $416,533 $429,029 $441,900 $455,157 889 Indirect/Induced Labor Income 0.520 $0 $0 $0 $105,144 $216,597 $223,095 $229,788 $236,682 890 Income Tax from Indirect/Induced Labor Income 6% Blended Income Tax Rate $507,338 $0 $0 $0 $6,309 $12,996 $13,386 $13,787 $14,201 891 892 Retail [Grocery] 893 Total Employees 0 0 09999999999 894 Average Employee Income $32,676 $33,656 $34,666 $35,706 $36,777 $37,880 $39,017 $40,187 895 Total Employee Income - DC 85% Emp. living in DC $0 $0 $0 $3,014,746 $3,105,189 $3,198,344 $3,294,295 $3,393,124 896 Indirect/Induced Labor Income 0.610 $0 $0 $0 $1,838,995 $1,894,165 $1,950,990 $2,009,520 $2,069,805 897 Income Tax from Indirect/Induced Labor Income 6% Blended Income Tax Rate $4,491,889 $0 $0 $0 $110,340 $113,650 $117,059 $120,571 $124,188 905 906 Construction 907 Total Employees 0 1,803 666 298 145 56 58 8 908 Average Employee Income $73,945 $76,163 $78,448 $80,801 $83,225 $85,722 $88,294 $90,943 909 Total Employee Income - DC 40% Emp. living in DC $0 $54,935,259 $20,891,480 $9,627,558 $4,824,939 $1,933,888 $2,057,283 $289,386 910 Indirect/Induced Labor Income 0.609 $0 $33,455,573 $12,722,912 $5,863,183 $2,938,388 $1,177,738 $1,252,885 $176,236 911 Income Tax from Indirect/Induced Labor Income 6% Blended Income Tax Rate $3,455,215 $0 $2,007,334 $763,375 $351,791 $176,303 $70,664 $75,173 $10,574 912 913 TOTAL ESTIMATED INDIRECT/INDUCED INCOME TAX REVENUE $145,179,057 $0 $2,007,334 $763,375 $3,218,042 $3,778,032 $3,780,445 $3,896,247 $3,946,280 914 915 TOTAL INDIRECT/INDUCED REVENUES $167,566,057 $0 $2,007,334 $763,375 $3,688,042 $4,346,032 $4,366,445 $4,499,247 $4,567,280 916

Page 29 BC DEU V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 9 (2010$) Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20 10 11 ESCALATIONS 12 Revenues 3.0% 1.344 1.384 1.426 1.469 1.513 1.558 1.605 1.653 1.702 1.754 1.806 13 Commercial 3.0% 1.344 1.384 1.426 1.469 1.513 1.558 1.605 1.653 1.702 1.754 1.806 14 Residential 3.0% 1.344 1.384 1.426 1.469 1.513 1.558 1.605 1.653 1.702 1.754 1.806 15 Expenditures 3.0% 1.344 1.384 1.426 1.469 1.513 1.558 1.605 1.653 1.702 1.754 1.806 16 17 DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 18 19 Residential 20 Delivery (Units) 365000000000 21 Cumulative Units 751 756 756 756 756 756 756 756 756 756 756 22 23 For-Rent Residential 24 Delivery (Units) 00000000000 25 Cumulative Units 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 26 27 Apartments - Market Rate 28 Delivery (Units) 00000000000 29 Cumulative Units 304 304 304 304 304 304 304 304 304 304 304 34 35 Senior Apartments - ADU 36 Delivery (Units) 00000000000 37 Cumulative Units 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 38 43 For-Sale Residential 44 Delivery 365000000000 45 Cumulative GSF 361 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 46 47 Townhomes - Market Rate 48 Delivery (Units) 00000000000 49 Cumulative Units 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 50 51 Townhomes - WDU 52 Delivery (Units) 00000000000 53 Cumulative Units 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 58 59 Condo - WDU 60 Delivery (Units) 365000000000 61 Cumulative Units 186 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 62 63 Commercial 64 Delivery (GSF) 00000000000 65 Cumulative GSF 1,104,697 1,104,697 1,104,697 1,104,697 1,104,697 1,104,697 1,104,697 1,104,697 1,104,697 1,104,697 1,104,697 66 67 Office 68 Delivery (GSF) 00000000000 69 Cumulative GSF 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 70 71 Retail, Restaurant, & Grocery 72 Delivery (GSF) 00000000000 73 Cumulative GSF 77,835 77,835 77,835 77,835 77,835 77,835 77,835 77,835 77,835 77,835 77,835 74 75 Retail (In-line) 76 Delivery 00000000000 77 Cumulative GSF 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 78 79 Restaurants 80 Delivery 00000000000 81 Cumulative GSF 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 82 83 Retail [Grocery] 84 Delivery 00000000000 85 Cumulative GSF 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 86 93

Page 30 BC DEU V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 9 (2010$) Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20 94 EMPLOYEE RATIOS 95 Office 300 GSF per Employee 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 97 Vacancy Rate 10.0% 98 99 Retail [In-Line] 350 GSF per Employee 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 101 Vacancy Rate 10.0% 102 103 Restaurants 250 GSF per Employee 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 105 Vacancy Rate 10.0% 106 107 Retail [Grocery] 450 GSF per Employee 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 109 Vacancy Rate 0.0% 114 115 HOUSEHOLD RATIOS 116 117 Apartments - Market Rate 1.9 Residents per Household 549 549 549 549 549 549 549 549 549 549 549 118 Occupancy Rate 95.0% 122 123 Senior Apartments - ADU 1.5 Residents per Household 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 124 Occupancy Rate 95.0% 128 129 Townhomes - Market Rate 2.6 Residents per Household 412 412 412 412 412 412 412 412 412 412 412 130 131 Townhomes - WDU 2.6 Residents per Household 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 134 135 Condo - WDU 1.9 Residents per Household 354 363 363 363 363 363 363 363 363 363 363 136 137 CONSTRUCTION VALUE (HARD COSTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SALES) 138 139 Apartments - Market Rate 140 Construction Costs per Unit $229,934 per SF $309,012 $318,282 $327,831 $337,666 $347,796 $358,230 $368,976 $380,046 $391,447 $403,191 $415,286 141 Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 142 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 00000000000 143 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 00000000000 150 151 Senior Apartments - ADU 152 Construction Costs per Unit $262,840 per SF $353,236 $363,833 $374,748 $385,990 $397,570 $409,497 $421,782 $434,435 $447,468 $460,892 $474,719 153 Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 154 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 00000000000 155 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 00000000000 163 164 Townhomes - Market Rate 165 Construction Costs per Unit $269,219 per SF $361,807 $372,661 $383,841 $395,357 $407,217 $419,434 $432,017 $444,977 $458,327 $472,076 $486,239 166 Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 167 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 00000000000 168 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 00000000000 169 170 Townhomes - WDU 171 Construction Costs per Unit $223,718 per SF $300,658 $309,677 $318,968 $328,537 $338,393 $348,545 $359,001 $369,771 $380,864 $392,290 $404,059 172 Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 173 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 00000000000 174 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 00000000000 181

Page 31 BC DEU V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 9 (2010$) Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20 182 Condo - WDU 183 Construction Costs per Unit $266,360 per SF $357,966 $368,704 $379,766 $391,159 $402,893 $414,980 $427,430 $440,252 $453,460 $467,064 $481,076 184 Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 185 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 00000000000 186 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 00000000000 187 188 Total Residential Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 189 Total Residential FTE Construction Jobs 00000000000 190 191 Office 192 Construction Costs per GSF $348 /FAR SF $468 $482 $497 $512 $527 $543 $559 $576 $593 $611 $629 193 Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 194 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 00000000000 195 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 00000000000 196 197 Retail [In-Line] 198 Construction Costs per GSF $270 /GSF $363 $374 $385 $397 $409 $421 $434 $447 $460 $474 $488 199 Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 200 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 00000000000 201 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 00000000000 202 203 Restaurants 204 Construction Costs per GSF $270 /GSF $363 $374 $385 $397 $409 $421 $434 $447 $460 $474 $488 205 Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 206 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 00000000000 207 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 00000000000 208 209 Retail [Grocery] 210 Construction Costs per GSF $270 /GSF $363 $374 $385 $397 $409 $421 $434 $447 $460 $474 $488 211 Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 212 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 00000000000 213 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 00000000000 220 221 Total Commercial Construction Value - 2 Years Prior to Delivery $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 222 Total Commercial FTE Construction Jobs 00000000000 223 224 Total Construction Value - 2 Years Prior to Delivery $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 225 Total FTE Construction Jobs 00000000000 226 227 228 ASSESSED VALUE 229 230 PROJECT VALUE - UNIMPROVED LAND BASE 231 Unimproved Land Base Value per Acre $1,654,238 /Acre $2,223,158 $2,289,852 $2,358,548 $2,429,304 $2,502,183 $2,577,249 $2,654,566 $2,734,203 $2,816,230 $2,900,716 $2,987,738 232 233 Land Takedown 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 234 Cumulative Land Takedown 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 235 236 Cumulative Development of Unimproved Land 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 237 238 Remaining Land Area - Taken Down & Unimproved 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 239 Remaining Value of Unimproved Land Base $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 240 241 Total Value of Unimproved Land $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 242 243 INTERIM PROJECT VALUE BASED ON CONSTRUCTION COST 244 245 Residential 246 Apartments - Market Rate 247 Units Under Construction 00000000000 248 Under Construction Value $229,934 /Unit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 253 254 Senior Apartments - ADU 255 Units Under Construction 00000000000 256 Under Construction Value $262,840 /Unit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 261 262 Townhomes - Market Rate 263 Units Under Construction 00000000000 264 Under Construction Value $269,219 /Unit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 265 266 Townhomes - WDU 267 Units Under Construction 00000000000 268 Under Construction Value $223,718 /Unit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Page 32 BC DEU V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 9 (2010$) Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20 273 274 Condo - WDU 275 Units Under Construction 00000000000 276 Under Construction Value $266,360 /Unit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 277 278 Total Residential Units Under Construction 00000000000 279 Total Residential Project Value Under Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 280 281 Retail 282 Office 283 GSF Under Construction 00000000000 284 Under Construction Value $348 /FAR SF $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 285 286 Retail (In-line) 287 GSF Under Construction 00000000000 288 Under Construction Value $270 /FAR SF $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 289 290 Restaurants 291 GSF Under Construction 00000000000 292 Under Construction Value $270 /FAR SF $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 293 294 Retail [Grocery] 295 GSF Under Construction 00000000000 296 Under Construction Value $270 /FAR SF $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 301 302 Total Commercial GSF Under Construction 00000000000 303 Total Commercial Project Value Under Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 304 305 Total Interim Project Value Based on Construction Cost $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 306 307 PROJECT VALUE BASED ON INCOME APPROACH 308 309 Residential 310 Apartments - Market Rate 311 Units Completed 304 304 304 304 304 304 304 304 304 304 304 312 Developed Units Assessed Value $238,444 /Unit $97,416,283 $100,338,771 $103,348,935 $106,449,403 $109,642,885 $112,932,171 $116,320,136 $119,809,741 $123,404,033 $127,106,154 $130,919,338 317 318 Senior Apartments - ADU 319 Units Completed 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 320 Developed Units Assessed Value $125,431 /Unit $14,496,940 $14,931,848 $15,379,803 $15,841,197 $16,316,433 $16,805,926 $17,310,104 $17,829,407 $18,364,289 $18,915,218 $19,482,675 325 326 Townhomes - Market Rate 327 Units Completed 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 328 Developed Units Assessed Value $483,333 /Unit $101,331,295 $104,371,234 $107,502,371 $110,727,442 $114,049,265 $117,470,743 $120,994,866 $124,624,711 $128,363,453 $132,214,356 $136,180,787 329 330 Townhomes - WDU 331 Units Completed 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 332 Developed Units Assessed Value $346,957 /Unit $8,859,337 $9,125,118 $9,398,871 $9,680,837 $9,971,262 $10,270,400 $10,578,512 $10,895,868 $11,222,744 $11,559,426 $11,906,209 337 338 Condo - WDU 339 Units Completed 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 340 Developed Units Assessed Value $308,241 /Unit $79,121,668 $81,495,318 $83,940,177 $86,458,382 $89,052,134 $91,723,698 $94,475,409 $97,309,671 $100,228,961 $103,235,830 $106,332,905 341 342 Total Residential Units Completed 756 756 756 756 756 756 756 756 756 756 756 343 Total Residential Project Value - Completed $301,225,523 $310,262,288 $319,570,157 $329,157,262 $339,031,979 $349,202,939 $359,679,027 $370,469,398 $381,583,480 $393,030,984 $404,821,914

Page 33 BC DEU V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 9 (2010$) Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20 344 345 Retail 346 Office 347 GSF Completed 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 348 Developed GSF Value $400 /GSF $552,006,641 $568,566,840 $585,623,846 $603,192,561 $621,288,338 $639,926,988 $659,124,797 $678,898,541 $699,265,498 $720,243,463 $741,850,766 349 350 Retail (In-line) 351 GSF Completed 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 352 Developed GSF Value $356 /GSF $13,443,942 $13,847,260 $14,262,678 $14,690,559 $15,131,275 $15,585,214 $16,052,770 $16,534,353 $17,030,384 $17,541,295 $18,067,534 353 354 Restaurants 355 GSF Completed 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 356 Developed GSF Value $356 /GSF $2,389,185 $2,460,860 $2,534,686 $2,610,727 $2,689,048 $2,769,720 $2,852,811 $2,938,396 $3,026,548 $3,117,344 $3,210,864 357 358 Retail [Grocery] 359 GSF Completed 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 360 Developed GSF Value $222 /GSF $13,349,569 $13,750,056 $14,162,558 $14,587,435 $15,025,058 $15,475,810 $15,940,084 $16,418,286 $16,910,835 $17,418,160 $17,940,705 365 366 Total Commercial Project Value Completed $581,189,337 $598,625,017 $616,583,768 $635,081,281 $654,133,719 $673,757,731 $693,970,463 $714,789,577 $736,233,264 $758,320,262 $781,069,870 367 368 Total Project Value Based on Income Approach $882,414,860 $908,887,306 $936,153,925 $964,238,543 $993,165,699 $1,022,960,670 $1,053,649,490 $1,085,258,975 $1,117,816,744 $1,151,351,246 $1,185,891,783 369 370 REVENUES 371 372 REAL PROPERTY REVENUES 373 374 Assessed Value of Unimproved Land $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 375 Value Subject to Real Property Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 376 Real Property Tax - Unimproved Land $5.000 per $100 AV $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 377 378 Assessed Value of Commercial Uses Under Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 379 Value Subject to Real Property Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 380 Real Property Tax - Commercial Uses Under Construction $1.850 per $100 AV $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 381 Real Property Tax - Commercial Uses Under Construction $1.650 per $100 AV $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 382 Total Real Property Tax - Commercial Uses Under Const. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 383 384 Assessed Value of Residential Uses Under Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 385 Value Subject to Real Property Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 386 Real Property Tax - Residential Uses Under Const. $0.850 per $100 AV $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 387 388 Assessed Value of Commercial - Completed $581,189,337 $598,625,017 $616,583,768 $635,081,281 $654,133,719 $673,757,731 $693,970,463 $714,789,577 $736,233,264 $758,320,262 $781,069,870 389 Value Subject to Real Property Tax $581,189,337 $598,625,017 $616,583,768 $635,081,281 $654,133,719 $673,757,731 $693,970,463 $714,789,577 $736,233,264 $758,320,262 $781,069,870 390 Real Property Tax - Commercial Uses - Completed $1.850 per $100 AV $10,746,003 $11,068,563 $11,400,800 $11,743,004 $12,095,474 $12,458,518 $12,832,454 $13,217,607 $13,614,315 $14,022,925 $14,443,793 391 Real Property Tax - Commercial Uses - Completed $1.650 per $100 AV $49,500 $49,500 $49,500 $49,500 $49,500 $49,500 $49,500 $49,500 $49,500 $49,500 $49,500 392 Total Real Property Tax - Completed Commercial Uses $10,795,503 $11,118,063 $11,450,300 $11,792,504 $12,144,974 $12,508,018 $12,881,954 $13,267,107 $13,663,815 $14,072,425 $14,493,293 393 394 Assessed Value of Residential Uses - Completed $301,225,523 $310,262,288 $319,570,157 $329,157,262 $339,031,979 $349,202,939 $359,679,027 $370,469,398 $381,583,480 $393,030,984 $404,821,914 395 Owner Occupied Condos 80% owner occupied units 153 153 153 153 153 153 153 153 153 153 153 396 Owner Occupied Townhomes 80% owner occupied units 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 397 Homestead Exemption $67,500 per Unit $19,764,000 $19,764,000 $19,764,000 $19,764,000 $19,764,000 $19,764,000 $19,764,000 $19,764,000 $19,764,000 $19,764,000 $19,764,000 398 Value Subject to Real Property Tax $281,461,523 $290,498,288 $299,806,157 $309,393,262 $319,267,979 $329,438,939 $339,915,027 $350,705,398 $361,819,480 $373,266,984 $385,057,914 399 Real Property Tax - Residential Uses - Completed $0.850 per $100 AV $2,392,423 $2,469,235 $2,548,352 $2,629,843 $2,713,778 $2,800,231 $2,889,278 $2,980,996 $3,075,466 $3,172,769 $3,272,992 400 401 TOTAL REAL PROPERTY REVENUES $13,187,926 $13,587,298 $13,998,652 $14,422,346 $14,858,752 $15,308,249 $15,771,231 $16,248,103 $16,739,281 $17,245,194 $17,766,285 402 403 PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUES 404 405 Resident-Driven Personal Property Tax Revenues 406 Personal Property Tax Revenues per Resident $24 per resident $32 $33 $34 $35 $36 $37 $38 $39 $40 $41 $43 407 Total Residents 1,487 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 408 Total Resident-Driven Personal Property Tax Revenues $47,102 $48,812 $50,276 $51,785 $53,338 $54,938 $56,586 $58,284 $60,032 $61,833 $63,688 409 410 Employee-Driven Personal Property Tax Revenues 411 Personal Property Tax Revenues per Employee $60 per employee $81 $83 $86 $88 $91 $94 $96 $99 $102 $105 $108 412 Total Employees 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 413 Total Employee-Driven Personal Property Tax Revenues $263,773 $271,686 $279,837 $288,232 $296,879 $305,785 $314,959 $324,407 $334,140 $344,164 $354,489 426 427 TOTAL PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUE $310,875 $320,498 $330,113 $340,016 $350,217 $360,723 $371,545 $382,691 $394,172 $405,997 $418,177 428 Funds Directed to Neighborhood Investment Fund 17.4% $54,092 $55,767 $57,440 $59,163 $60,938 $62,766 $64,649 $66,588 $68,586 $70,644 $72,763 429 TOTAL PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUE - GENERAL FUND $256,783 $264,731 $272,673 $280,854 $289,279 $297,957 $306,896 $316,103 $325,586 $335,354 $345,414 430

Page 34 BC DEU V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 9 (2010$) Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20 431 SALES TAX REVENUES 432 433 CONSTRUCTION SALES 434 Commercial Construction (2 Yrs Prior to Delivery) % of improvement 435 Commercial Improvement Value (hard costs minus labor) 85% of Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 436 % Materials and Purchased in the District 45% of Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 437 Retail Sales Tax Rev (Commercial Construction) 6.00% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 438 439 For-Rent Residential Construction (2 Yrs. Prior to Delivery) % of improvement 440 Residential Improvement Value (hard costs minus labor) 75% of Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 441 % Materials and Purchased in the District 30% of Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 442 Retail Sales Tax Rev (Residential Construction) 6.00% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 443 444 For-Sale Residential Construction (2 Yrs. Prior to Delivery) % of improvement 445 Residential Improvement Value (hard costs minus labor) 60% of Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 446 % Materials and Purchased in the District 30% of Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 447 Retail Sales Tax Rev (Residential Construction) 6.00% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 448 449 RETAIL ON-SITE SALES 450 Effective Retail SF 451 Retail [In-Line] 25,322 25,322 25,322 25,322 25,322 25,322 25,322 25,322 25,322 25,322 25,322 452 Retail [Grocery] 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 453 Total Effective Square Feet 70,022 70,022 70,022 70,022 70,022 70,022 70,022 70,022 70,022 70,022 70,022 454 455 Retail Sales Sales/SF 456 Retail [In-Line] $350 per GSF 11,314,968 11,654,417 12,004,049 12,364,171 12,735,096 13,117,149 13,510,663 13,915,983 14,333,463 14,763,467 15,206,371 457 Retail [Grocery] $500 per GSF 1,501,827 1,546,881 1,593,288 1,641,086 1,690,319 1,741,029 1,793,259 1,847,057 1,902,469 1,959,543 2,018,329 458 459 Total Sales $12,816,794 $13,201,298 $13,597,337 $14,005,257 $14,425,415 $14,858,178 $15,303,923 $15,763,041 $16,235,932 $16,723,010 $17,224,700 460 Retail Sales Tax Rev (On-Site Retail) 6.00% $769,008 $792,078 $815,840 $840,315 $865,525 $891,491 $918,235 $945,782 $974,156 $1,003,381 $1,033,482 461 462 RETAIL SALES FROM RESIDENTS 463 Residential Taxable Sales % Spent on Retail (Excluding Food) 464 Apartments - Market Rate 20% $6,055,929 $6,237,607 $6,424,735 $6,617,477 $6,816,002 $7,020,482 $7,231,096 $7,448,029 $7,671,470 $7,901,614 $8,138,662 466 Senior Apartments - ADU 30% $1,255,694 $1,293,365 $1,332,166 $1,372,131 $1,413,295 $1,455,693 $1,499,364 $1,544,345 $1,590,675 $1,638,396 $1,687,548 468 Townhomes - Market Rate 20% $5,393,277 $5,555,075 $5,721,728 $5,893,379 $6,070,181 $6,252,286 $6,439,855 $6,633,051 $6,832,042 $7,037,003 $7,248,113 469 Townhomes - WDU 30% $722,803 $744,487 $766,822 $789,827 $813,521 $837,927 $863,065 $888,957 $915,625 $943,094 $971,387 471 Condo - WDU 30% $6,293,504 $6,648,925 $6,848,393 $7,053,845 $7,265,460 $7,483,424 $7,707,927 $7,939,165 $8,177,340 $8,422,660 $8,675,340 472 473 Total Retail Taxable Sales 95% taxable $18,735,147 $19,455,487 $20,039,151 $20,640,326 $21,259,536 $21,897,322 $22,554,241 $23,230,869 $23,927,795 $24,645,629 $25,384,997 474 Retail Expenditures Made Off-Site, In DC 60% $11,241,088 $11,673,292 $12,023,491 $12,384,196 $12,755,721 $13,138,393 $13,532,545 $13,938,521 $14,356,677 $14,787,377 $15,230,998 475 Total Residential Sales Tax Revenues 9.00% $1,011,698 $1,050,596 $1,082,114 $1,114,578 $1,148,015 $1,182,455 $1,217,929 $1,254,467 $1,292,101 $1,330,864 $1,370,790 476 477 ALCOHOL SALES ON-SITE 478 Alcohol Sales Sales/SF 479 Retail [In-Line] $350 per GSF 00000000000 480 Grocery Store $500 per GSF 1,117,500 1,117,500 1,117,500 1,117,500 1,117,500 1,117,500 1,117,500 1,117,500 1,117,500 1,117,500 1,117,500 481 Total Sales $1,117,500 $1,117,500 $1,117,500 $1,117,500 $1,117,500 $1,117,500 $1,117,500 $1,117,500 $1,117,500 $1,117,500 $1,117,500 482483 Sales Tax from Alcohol Sales 9.00% $100,575 $100,575 $100,575 $100,575 $100,575 $100,575 $100,575 $100,575 $100,575 $100,575 $100,575 484 ALCOHOL SALES FROM RESIDENTS 485 Residential Taxable Sales - Alcohol %Spent on Alcohol 486 Apartments - Market Rate 1% $302,796 $311,880 $321,237 $330,874 $340,800 $351,024 $361,555 $372,401 $383,573 $395,081 $406,933 488 Senior Apartments - ADU 1% $41,343 $42,584 $43,861 $45,177 $46,532 $47,928 $49,366 $50,847 $52,372 $53,944 $55,562 490 Townhomes - Market Rate 1% $269,664 $277,754 $286,086 $294,669 $303,509 $312,614 $321,993 $331,653 $341,602 $351,850 $362,406 491 Townhomes - WDU 1% $23,798 $24,512 $25,247 $26,005 $26,785 $27,588 $28,416 $29,269 $30,147 $31,051 $31,983 493494 Condo - WDU 1% $207,212 $218,914 $225,481 $232,246 $239,213 $246,389 $253,781 $261,395 $269,236 $277,313 $285,633 495 Total Alcohol Taxable Sales 80% taxable $675,851 $700,515 $721,530 $743,176 $765,472 $788,436 $812,089 $836,451 $861,545 $887,391 $914,013 496 Alcohol Expenditures Made Off-Site, In DC 30% taxable $202,755 $210,154 $216,459 $222,953 $229,641 $236,531 $243,627 $250,935 $258,463 $266,217 $274,204 497 Total Residential Alcohol Sales Tax Revenues 9.00% $18,248 $18,914 $19,481 $20,066 $20,668 $21,288 $21,926 $22,584 $23,262 $23,960 $24,678 498 499 TOTAL SALES TAX REVENUE $1,899,529 $1,962,163 $2,018,011 $2,075,534 $2,134,783 $2,195,809 $2,258,666 $2,323,409 $2,390,094 $2,458,779 $2,529,525 500 501 MEALS TAX 502 Restaurants 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 503 Total Restaurant Sales $400 per GSF $2,419,049 $2,491,621 $2,566,370 $2,643,361 $2,722,662 $2,804,341 $2,888,472 $2,975,126 $3,064,380 $3,156,311 $3,251,000 504 Prepared Foods at Grocery 5% $1,501,827 $1,546,881 $1,593,288 $1,641,086 $1,690,319 $1,741,029 $1,793,259 $1,847,057 $1,902,469 $1,959,543 $2,018,329 505 Meals Tax Revenues (on-site restaurants) 9.0% $352,879 $363,465 $374,369 $385,600 $397,168 $409,083 $421,356 $433,996 $447,016 $460,427 $474,240 506 507 Residential Meals Tax Revenues 508 Total Taxable Sales $18,735,147 $19,455,487 $20,039,151 $20,640,326 $21,259,536 $21,897,322 $22,554,241 $23,230,869 $23,927,795 $24,645,629 $25,384,997 509 Meals at Eating Places % of Retail Spending 3.4% $635,436 $659,868 $679,664 $700,054 $721,055 $742,687 $764,967 $787,916 $811,554 $835,900 $860,978 510 % of Expenditures Off-Site & in DC 75.0% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 511 Restaurant Expenditures Made Off-Site $476,577 $494,901 $509,748 $525,040 $540,791 $557,015 $573,726 $590,937 $608,665 $626,925 $645,733 512 Total Effective Residential Meals Tax Revenues 9.00% Effective Rate to Ge $42,892 $44,541 $45,877 $47,254 $48,671 $50,131 $51,635 $53,184 $54,780 $56,423 $58,116 513 514 TOTAL MEALS TAX REVENUE $395,771 $408,006 $420,246 $432,854 $445,839 $459,215 $472,991 $487,181 $501,796 $516,850 $532,356

Page 35 BC DEU V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 9 (2010$) Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20 515 525 DEED RECORDATION/TRANSFER TAX 526 527 Land Taken Down (Acres) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 528 Land Sale - Assessed Value per Acre $1,654,238 $2,223,158 $2,289,852 $2,358,548 $2,429,304 $2,502,183 $2,577,249 $2,654,566 $2,734,203 $2,816,230 $2,900,716 $2,987,738 529 Total Land Sales and Transaction Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 530 531 Deed Recordation/Transfer Tax on Land Sale 2.90% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 532 533 New Owner Occupied Unit Sales - Under $400k 534 Townhomes - Market Rate $483,333 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 535 Townhomes - WDU $346,957 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 537 Condo - WDU $308,241 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 538 539 Owner Occupied Households in Turnover 540 Townhomes - Market Rate 6.7% turnover per yr 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 541 Townhomes - WDU 3.0% turnover per yr 11111111111 543 Condo - WDU 3.0% turnover per yr 56666666666 544 545 Value of Housing Unit Sales in Turnover - Under $400K 546 Townhomes - Market Rate $483,333 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 547 Townhomes - WDU $346,957 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 549 Condo - WDU $308,241 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 550 551 Recordation/Transfer Tax, Properties under $400k 2.20% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 552 553 New Owner Occupied Unit Sales - Over $400k 554 Townhomes - Market Rate $483,333 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 555 Townhomes - WDU $346,957 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 557 Condo - WDU $308,241 $14,953,842 $2,042,205 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 558 559 Owner Occupied Households in Turnover 560 Townhomes - Market Rate 6.7% turnover per yr 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 561 Townhomes - WDU 3.0% turnover per yr 11111111111 563 Condo - WDU 3.0% turnover per yr 56666666666 564 565 Value of Housing Unit Sales in Turnover - Over $400K 566 Townhomes - Market Rate $483,333 $6,760,724 $6,963,546 $7,172,452 $7,387,626 $7,609,254 $7,837,532 $8,072,658 $8,314,838 $8,564,283 $8,821,211 $9,085,848 567 Townhomes - WDU $346,957 $265,780 $273,754 $281,966 $290,425 $299,138 $308,112 $317,355 $326,876 $336,682 $346,783 $357,186 569 Condo - WDU $308,241 $1,865,553 $2,383,593 $2,518,205 $2,593,751 $2,671,564 $2,751,711 $2,834,262 $2,919,290 $3,006,869 $3,097,075 $3,189,987 570 571 Recordation/Transfer Tax, Properties over $400k 2.90% $691,531 $338,230 $289,206 $297,882 $306,819 $316,023 $325,504 $335,269 $345,327 $355,687 $366,358 572 573 TOTAL DEED RECORDATION/TRANSFER TAX REVENUE $691,531 $338,230 $289,206 $297,882 $306,819 $316,023 $325,504 $335,269 $345,327 $355,687 $366,358 574 575 INCOME TAX 576 577 EMPLOYEE INCOME 578 579 Office 580 Number of Employees 300 GSF/Employee 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 581 Average Employee Income $76,100 $102,272 $105,340 $108,500 $111,755 $115,108 $118,561 $122,118 $125,782 $129,555 $133,442 $137,445 582 Taxable Employee Income 80% taxable $81,818 $84,272 $86,800 $89,404 $92,086 $94,849 $97,695 $100,625 $103,644 $106,753 $109,956 583 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 584 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $5,754 $5,963 $6,178 $6,399 $6,627 $6,862 $7,104 $7,353 $7,610 $7,874 $8,146 585 % of Employees Living in Washington D.C. 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 586 Employee Income Tax Revenue $6,204,529 $6,429,481 $6,661,180 $6,899,831 $7,145,642 $7,398,826 $7,659,606 $7,928,210 $8,204,872 $8,489,833 $8,783,343 587 588 Retail [In-Line] 589 Number of Employees 350 GSF/Employee 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 590 Average Employee Income $26,400 $35,479 $36,544 $37,640 $38,769 $39,932 $41,130 $42,364 $43,635 $44,944 $46,293 $47,681 591 Taxable Employee Income 80% taxable $28,384 $29,235 $30,112 $31,015 $31,946 $32,904 $33,891 $34,908 $35,955 $37,034 $38,145 592 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $1,503 $1,554 $1,607 $1,661 $1,717 $1,774 $1,833 $1,894 $1,957 $2,022 $2,089 593 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 594 % of Employees Living in Washington D.C. 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 595 Employee Income Tax Revenue $92,428 $95,570 $98,806 $102,139 $105,572 $109,108 $112,750 $116,502 $120,366 $124,346 $128,445 596 597 Restaurants 598 Number of Employees 250 GSF/Employee 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 599 Average Employee Income $22,800 $30,641 $31,561 $32,507 $33,483 $34,487 $35,522 $36,587 $37,685 $38,815 $39,980 $41,179 600 Taxable Employee Income 80% taxable $24,513 $25,248 $26,006 $26,786 $27,590 $28,417 $29,270 $30,148 $31,052 $31,984 $32,943 601 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $1,271 $1,315 $1,360 $1,407 $1,455 $1,505 $1,556 $1,609 $1,663 $1,719 $1,777 602 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 603 % of Employees Living in Washington D.C. 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 604 Employee Income Tax Revenue $19,443 $20,118 $20,813 $21,530 $22,267 $23,027 $23,810 $24,616 $25,446 $26,301 $27,182 605

Page 36 BC DEU V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 9 (2010$) Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20 606 Retail [Grocery] 607 Number of Employees 450 GSF/Employee 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 608 Average Employee Income $30,800 $41,393 $42,634 $43,913 $45,231 $46,588 $47,985 $49,425 $50,908 $52,435 $54,008 $55,628 609 Taxable Employee Income 80% taxable $33,114 $34,108 $35,131 $36,185 $37,270 $38,388 $39,540 $40,726 $41,948 $43,206 $44,503 610 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $1,787 $1,846 $1,908 $1,971 $2,036 $2,103 $2,172 $0 $0 $0 $0 611 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,262 $2,366 $2,473 $2,583 612 % of Employees Living in Washington D.C. 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 613 Employee Income Tax Revenue $150,869 $155,902 $161,086 $166,425 $171,924 $177,589 $183,423 $190,965 $199,733 $208,765 $218,068 623 624 Construction 625 Construction Employee - FTE Jobs 00000000000 626 Average Income - Construction Employees $69,700 $93,671 $96,481 $99,376 $102,357 $105,428 $108,590 $111,848 $115,203 $118,660 $122,219 $125,886 627 Average Taxable Income 80% taxable $74,937 $77,185 $79,500 $81,885 $84,342 $86,872 $89,478 $92,163 $94,928 $97,775 $100,709 628 Construction Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 629 Construction Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $5,170 $5,361 $5,558 $5,760 $5,969 $6,184 $6,406 $6,634 $6,869 $7,111 $7,360 630 % of Employees Living in Washington D.C. 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 631 Total Const. Employee Income Tax Rev. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 632 633 Total Employees 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 634 Total Employees - Excluding Construction 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 635 Total Employee Income Tax Revenue $6,467,269 $6,701,070 $6,941,885 $7,189,924 $7,445,405 $7,708,550 $7,979,589 $8,260,292 $8,550,417 $8,849,245 $9,157,038 636 638637 HOUSEHOLD INCOME 639 Apartments - Market Rate 640 Number of Households 289 289 289 289 289 289 289 289 289 289 289 641 Average Household Income $78,016 $104,846 $107,992 $111,232 $114,569 $118,006 $121,546 $125,192 $128,948 $132,816 $136,801 $140,905 642 Taxable Household Income 80% taxable $83,877 $86,393 $88,985 $91,655 $94,404 $97,237 $100,154 $103,158 $106,253 $109,441 $112,724 643 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 644 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $5,930 $6,143 $6,364 $6,591 $6,824 $7,065 $7,313 $7,568 $7,832 $8,102 $8,382 645 Household Income Tax Revenue $1,712,456 $1,774,226 $1,837,850 $1,903,382 $1,970,881 $2,040,404 $2,112,013 $2,185,770 $2,261,740 $2,339,989 $2,420,585 654 655 Senior Apartments - ADU 656 Number of Households 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 657 Average Household Income $37,654 $50,604 $52,122 $53,686 $55,296 $56,955 $58,664 $60,424 $62,236 $64,103 $66,027 $68,007 658 Taxable Household Income 80% taxable $40,483 $41,698 $42,948 $44,237 $45,564 $46,931 $48,339 $49,789 $51,283 $52,821 $54,406 659 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 660 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $2,241 $2,344 $2,451 $2,560 $2,673 $2,789 $2,909 $3,032 $3,159 $3,290 $3,424 661 Household Income Tax Revenue $183,095 $191,529 $200,216 $209,163 $218,380 $227,872 $237,649 $247,720 $258,093 $268,777 $279,781 670 671 Townhomes - Market Rate 672 Number of Households 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 673 Average Household Income $128,625 $172,861 $178,047 $183,389 $188,890 $194,557 $200,394 $206,406 $212,598 $218,976 $225,545 $232,311 674 Taxable Household Income 80% taxable $138,289 $142,438 $146,711 $151,112 $155,646 $160,315 $165,124 $170,078 $175,181 $180,436 $185,849 675 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 676 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $10,555 $10,907 $11,270 $11,645 $12,030 $12,427 $12,836 $13,257 $13,690 $14,137 $14,597 677 Household Income Tax Revenue $1,646,514 $1,701,526 $1,758,187 $1,816,549 $1,876,661 $1,938,577 $2,002,351 $2,068,037 $2,135,694 $2,205,381 $2,277,159 678 679 Townhomes - WDU 680 Number of Households 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 681 Average Household Income $93,200 $125,253 $129,011 $132,881 $136,867 $140,973 $145,203 $149,559 $154,045 $158,667 $163,427 $168,330 682 Taxable Household Income 80% taxable $100,202 $103,208 $106,305 $109,494 $112,779 $116,162 $119,647 $123,236 $126,933 $130,741 $134,664 683 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 684 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $7,317 $7,573 $7,836 $8,107 $8,386 $8,674 $8,970 $9,275 $9,589 $9,913 $10,246 685 Household Income Tax Revenue $139,027 $143,882 $148,882 $154,033 $159,338 $164,802 $170,430 $176,227 $182,197 $188,347 $194,682

Page 37 BC DEU V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 9 (2010$) Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20 694 695 Condo - WDU 696 Number of Households 186 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 697 Average Household Income $82,800 $111,276 $114,615 $118,053 $121,595 $125,242 $129,000 $132,870 $136,856 $140,961 $145,190 $149,546 698 Taxable Household Income 80% taxable $89,021 $91,692 $94,442 $97,276 $100,194 $103,200 $106,296 $109,485 $112,769 $116,152 $119,637 699 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 700 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $6,367 $6,594 $6,828 $7,068 $7,316 $7,572 $7,835 $8,106 $8,385 $8,673 $8,969 701 Household Income Tax Revenue $1,185,583 $1,259,414 $1,304,072 $1,350,071 $1,397,449 $1,446,248 $1,496,512 $1,548,283 $1,601,607 $1,656,532 $1,713,104 702 703 Total Residents 1,487 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 704 Total Households 732 737 737 737 737 737 737 737 737 737 737 705 Total Household Income Tax Revenue $4,866,675 $5,070,576 $5,249,208 $5,433,198 $5,622,708 $5,817,903 $6,018,954 $6,226,037 $6,439,332 $6,659,026 $6,885,311 706 707 TOTAL INCOME TAX REVENUE $11,333,944 $11,771,647 $12,191,093 $12,623,122 $13,068,113 $13,526,453 $13,998,543 $14,486,329 $14,989,749 $15,508,271 $16,042,349 708 709 PARKING TAX REVENUE 710 711 Average Annual Revenue per Space (Monthly & Public) $2,279 $3,063 $3,155 $3,249 $3,347 $3,447 $3,551 $3,657 $3,767 $3,880 $3,996 $4,116 712 Total Income-Generating Parking Spaces 0 00000000000 713 714 Total Parking Revenues $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 715 716 Parking Tax Revenue 12% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 717 718 TOTAL PARKING TAX REVENUES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 719 720 721 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES 722 723 Miscellaneous Revenues (See Appendix) 724 Per Employee $1,011 $1,359 $1,400 $1,442 $1,485 $1,530 $1,576 $1,623 $1,672 $1,722 $1,774 $1,827 725 No. Employees $3,270 $3,270 $3,270 $3,270 $3,270 $3,270 $3,270 $3,270 $3,270 $3,270 $3,270 726 Misc Rev (Employee) $4,445,303 $4,578,662 $4,716,022 $4,857,502 $5,003,227 $5,153,324 $5,307,924 $5,467,162 $5,631,176 $5,800,112 $5,974,115 727 728 Per Resident $640 $860 $886 $913 $940 $968 $997 $1,027 $1,058 $1,090 $1,123 $1,156 729 No. Residents 1,487 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 730 Misc Rev (Resident) $1,279,475 $1,325,919 $1,365,696 $1,406,667 $1,448,867 $1,492,333 $1,537,103 $1,583,216 $1,630,713 $1,679,634 $1,730,023 731 732 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES $5,724,778 $5,904,581 $6,081,718 $6,264,170 $6,452,095 $6,645,658 $6,845,027 $7,050,378 $7,261,889 $7,479,746 $7,704,138 733 734 TOTAL REVENUES $33,490,200 $34,236,600 $35,271,600 $36,396,800 $37,555,700 $38,749,400 $39,978,800 $41,246,800 $42,553,700 $43,900,000 $45,286,400 735 Real Property Tax $13,187,900 $13,587,300 $13,998,700 $14,422,300 $14,858,800 $15,308,200 $15,771,200 $16,248,100 $16,739,300 $17,245,200 $17,766,300 736 Personal Property Tax $256,800 $264,700 $272,700 $280,900 $289,300 $298,000 $306,900 $316,100 $325,600 $335,400 $345,400 737 Sales Tax $1,899,500 $1,962,200 $2,018,000 $2,075,500 $2,134,800 $2,195,800 $2,258,700 $2,323,400 $2,390,100 $2,458,800 $2,529,500 738 Meals Tax $395,800 $408,000 $420,200 $432,900 $445,800 $459,200 $473,000 $487,200 $501,800 $516,900 $532,400 740 Deed Recordation/Transfer Tax $691,500 $338,200 $289,200 $297,900 $306,800 $316,000 $325,500 $335,300 $345,300 $355,700 $366,400 741 Income Tax $11,333,900 $11,771,600 $12,191,100 $12,623,100 $13,068,100 $13,526,500 $13,998,500 $14,486,300 $14,989,700 $15,508,300 $16,042,300 742 Parking Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 743 Miscellaneous Revenues $5,724,800 $5,904,600 $6,081,700 $6,264,200 $6,452,100 $6,645,700 $6,845,000 $7,050,400 $7,261,900 $7,479,700 $7,704,100 744

Page 38 BC DEU V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 9 (2010$) Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20 745 EXPENDITURES 746 747 MISC./NON-EDUCATIONAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES (SEE APPENDIX) 748 749 Expenditures Per Employee $476 $639.25 $658.42 $678.18 $698.52 $719.48 $741.06 $763.29 $786.19 $809.78 $834.07 $859.09 750 No. Employees 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 751 Op. Expenditures (Employee) $2,090,508 $2,153,223 $2,217,820 $2,284,355 $2,352,885 $2,423,472 $2,496,176 $2,571,061 $2,648,193 $2,727,639 $2,809,468 752 753 Per Resident $986 $1,325 $1,365 $1,406 $1,448 $1,491 $1,536 $1,582 $1,630 $1,679 $1,729 $1,781 754 No. Residents 1,487 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 755 Op. Expenditures (Resident) $1,970,457 $2,041,982 $2,103,242 $2,166,339 $2,231,329 $2,298,269 $2,367,217 $2,438,233 $2,511,380 $2,586,722 $2,664,324 756 757 TOTAL MISC./NON-EDUC OPERATING EXPENDITURES $4,060,965 $4,195,205 $4,321,062 $4,450,694 $4,584,214 $4,721,741 $4,863,393 $5,009,295 $5,159,574 $5,314,361 $5,473,792 758 759 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 760 761 Land Development & Infrastructure Costs $5,159,037 per acre $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 762 Value of Phase 1 Land Takedown $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 763 Net Land Development Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 764 765 Annual Payment on 20 Year Bond 5.0% Interest Rate $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 766 Cumulative Bond Payments $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 767 768 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 $4,894,860 769 770 EDUCATIONAL EXPENDITURES 771 772 Pupil Generation 773 Apartments - Market Rate 0.24 per household 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 775 Senior Apartments - ADU 0.00 per household 00000000000 777 Townhomes - Market Rate 0.35 per household 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 778 Townhomes - WDU 0.35 per household 77777777777 780 Condo - WDU 0.07 per household 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 781 782 Total On-Site Pupils 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 783 784 School Expenditures per Pupil $10,752 per pupil $14,450 $14,883 $15,330 $15,789 $16,263 $16,751 $17,254 $17,771 $18,304 $18,853 $19,419 785 786 TOTAL SCHOOL OPERATING EXPENDITURES $2,074,923 $2,142,157 $2,206,422 $2,272,614 $2,340,793 $2,411,017 $2,483,347 $2,557,847 $2,634,583 $2,713,620 $2,795,029 787 788 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES $11,030,800 $11,232,300 $11,422,400 $11,618,200 $11,819,900 $12,027,600 $12,241,600 $12,462,000 $12,689,100 $12,922,900 $13,163,700 789 Misc./Non-Educational Operating Expenditures $4,061,000 $4,195,200 $4,321,100 $4,450,700 $4,584,200 $4,721,700 $4,863,400 $5,009,300 $5,159,600 $5,314,400 $5,473,800 790 Capital Expenditures $4,894,900 $4,894,900 $4,894,900 $4,894,900 $4,894,900 $4,894,900 $4,894,900 $4,894,900 $4,894,900 $4,894,900 $4,894,900 791 Educational Expenditures $2,074,900 $2,142,200 $2,206,400 $2,272,600 $2,340,800 $2,411,000 $2,483,300 $2,557,800 $2,634,600 $2,713,600 $2,795,000 792 793 NET FISCAL IMPACT $22,459,400 $23,004,300 $23,849,200 $24,778,600 $25,735,800 $26,721,800 $27,737,200 $28,784,800 $29,864,600 $30,977,100 $32,122,700 794

Page 39 BC DEU V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 9 (2010$) Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20 795 796 DEDICATED REVENUE STREAMS (NON-GENERAL FUND REVENUE) 797 798 NEIGHBORHOOD INVESTMENT FUND 799 800 PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUES - NEIGHBORHOOD INVESTMENT FUND 801 803 Total Personal Property Tax Collected $3.400 per $100 AV $310,875 $320,498 $330,113 $340,016 $350,217 $360,723 $371,545 $382,691 $394,172 $405,997 $418,177 804 Neighborhood Investment Fund Revenues 17.4% $54,092 $55,767 $57,440 $59,163 $60,938 $62,766 $64,649 $66,588 $68,586 $70,644 $72,763 805 TOTAL PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUE - NEIGHBORHOOD INVESTMENT FUND $54,092 $55,767 $57,440 $59,163 $60,938 $62,766 $64,649 $66,588 $68,586 $70,644 $72,763 806 807 TOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD INVESTMENT FUND REVENUE $54,092 $55,767 $57,440 $59,163 $60,938 $62,766 $64,649 $66,588 $68,586 $70,644 $72,763 808 809 810 CONVENTION CENTER FUND 811 812 MEALS TAX - CONVENTION CENTER FUND 813 814 Total Restaurant Sales On-Site $2,419,049 $2,491,621 $2,566,370 $2,643,361 $2,722,662 $2,804,341 $2,888,472 $2,975,126 $3,064,380 $3,156,311 $3,251,000 815 816 Meals Tax Revenues (on-site restaurants) 1.00% Effective Rate to Convent $24,190 $24,916 $25,664 $26,434 $27,227 $28,043 $28,885 $29,751 $30,644 $31,563 $32,510 817 818 Total Restaurant Expenditures Off-Site from Residents $476,577 $494,901 $509,748 $525,040 $540,791 $557,015 $573,726 $590,937 $608,665 $626,925 $645,733 819 820 Total Effective Residential Meals Tax Revenues 1.00% Effective Rate to Convent $4,766 $4,949 $5,097 $5,250 $5,408 $5,570 $5,737 $5,909 $6,087 $6,269 $6,457 821 822 TOTAL MEALS TAX REVENUE - CONVENTION CENTER FUND $28,956 $29,865 $30,761 $31,684 $32,635 $33,614 $34,622 $35,661 $36,730 $37,832 $38,967 823 834 TOTAL CONVENTION CENTER FUND REVENUE $28,956 $29,865 $30,761 $31,684 $32,635 $33,614 $34,622 $35,661 $36,730 $37,832 $38,967 835 836 837 INDIRECT/INDUCED EMPLOYMENT 838 839 IMPLAN Categories 840 Indirect/Inducted Construction Jobs 34,37 00000000000 841 TOTAL INDIRECT/INDUCED CONSTRUCTION JOBS 00000000000 842 843 Indirect/Induced Full Time Employment 844 Office 394, 396, 397 1,103 1,103 1,103 1,103 1,103 1,103 1,103 1,103 1,103 1,103 1,103 845 Retail [In-Line] 325, 327, 328, 330, 419, 421 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 846 Restaurants 413 22222222222 847 Retail [Grocery] 324 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 849 TOTAL INDIRECT/INDUCED FULL-TIME JOBS (EXCLUDING CONSTRUCTION) 1,132 1,132 1,132 1,132 1,132 1,132 1,132 1,132 1,132 1,132 1,132 850 851 INDIRECT GROSS OUTPUT SALES TAX REVENUE 852 853 Retail [In-Line] On-site Sales: Categories $11,910,493 $12,267,807 $12,635,842 $13,014,917 $13,405,364 $13,807,525 $14,221,751 $14,648,403 $15,087,856 $15,540,491 $16,006,706 854 Indirect Impact 325, 327, 328, 330, 419, 421 $3,013,355 $3,103,755 $3,196,868 $3,292,774 $3,391,557 $3,493,304 $3,598,103 $3,706,046 $3,817,227 $3,931,744 $4,049,697 855 856 Restaurants On-site Sales: Categories $2,419,049 $2,491,621 $2,566,370 $2,643,361 $2,722,662 $2,804,341 $2,888,472 $2,975,126 $3,064,380 $3,156,311 $3,251,000 857 Indirect Impact 413 $612,020 $630,380 $649,292 $668,770 $688,833 $709,498 $730,783 $752,707 $775,288 $798,547 $822,503 858 859 Retail [Grocery] On-site Sales $30,036,531 $30,937,627 $31,865,756 $32,821,728 $33,806,380 $34,820,572 $35,865,189 $36,941,145 $38,049,379 $39,190,860 $40,366,586 860 Indirect Impact 324 $7,599,242 $7,827,220 $8,062,036 $8,303,897 $8,553,014 $8,809,605 $9,073,893 $9,346,110 $9,626,493 $9,915,288 $10,212,746 864 865 TOTAL GROSS OUTPUT SALES TO THE DISTRICT $10,663,386 $10,983,287 $11,312,786 $11,652,169 $12,001,735 $12,361,787 $12,732,640 $13,114,619 $13,508,058 $13,913,300 $14,330,699 866 867 TOTAL ESTIMATED INDIRECT SALES TAX REVENUES $640,000 $659,000 $679,000 $699,000 $720,000 $742,000 $764,000 $787,000 $810,000 $835,000 $860,000 868

Page 40 BC DEU V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 9 (2010$) Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20 869 INDIRECT/INDUCED INCOME TAX 870 871 Office 872 Total Employees 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 873 Average Employee Income $102,272 $105,340 $108,500 $111,755 $115,108 $118,561 $122,118 $125,782 $129,555 $133,442 $137,445 874 Total Employee Income - DC 35% Emp. living in DC $110,270,227 $113,578,333 $116,985,683 $120,495,254 $124,110,112 $127,833,415 $131,668,417 $135,618,470 $139,687,024 $143,877,635 $148,193,964 875 Indirect/Induced Labor Income $63,956,731 $65,875,433 $67,851,696 $69,887,247 $71,983,865 $74,143,381 $76,367,682 $78,658,713 $81,018,474 $83,449,028 $85,952,499 876 Income Tax from Indirect/Induced Labor Income 6% Blended Income Tax Rate $3,837,404 $3,952,526 $4,071,102 $4,193,235 $4,319,032 $4,448,603 $4,582,061 $4,719,523 $4,861,108 $5,006,942 $5,157,150 877 878 Retail [In-Line] 879 Total Employees 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 880 Average Employee Income $35,479 $36,544 $37,640 $38,769 $39,932 $41,130 $42,364 $43,635 $44,944 $46,293 $47,681 881 Total Employee Income - DC 85% Emp. living in DC $2,181,808 $2,247,262 $2,314,680 $2,384,120 $2,455,644 $2,529,313 $2,605,193 $2,683,348 $2,763,849 $2,846,764 $2,932,167 882 Indirect/Induced Labor Income $1,230,540 $1,267,456 $1,305,479 $1,344,644 $1,384,983 $1,426,533 $1,469,329 $1,513,408 $1,558,811 $1,605,575 $1,653,742 883 Income Tax from Indirect/Induced Labor Income 6% Blended Income Tax Rate $73,832 $76,047 $78,329 $80,679 $83,099 $85,592 $88,160 $90,805 $93,529 $96,335 $99,225 884 885 Restaurants 886 Total Employees 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 887 Average Employee Income $30,641 $31,561 $32,507 $33,483 $34,487 $35,522 $36,587 $37,685 $38,815 $39,980 $41,179 888 Total Employee Income - DC 85% Emp. living in DC $468,812 $482,876 $497,362 $512,283 $527,652 $543,481 $559,786 $576,579 $593,877 $611,693 $630,044 889 Indirect/Induced Labor Income $243,782 $251,096 $258,628 $266,387 $274,379 $282,610 $291,089 $299,821 $308,816 $318,080 $327,623 890 Income Tax from Indirect/Induced Labor Income 6% Blended Income Tax Rate $14,627 $15,066 $15,518 $15,983 $16,463 $16,957 $17,465 $17,989 $18,529 $19,085 $19,657 891 892 Retail [Grocery] 893 Total Employees 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 894 Average Employee Income $41,393 $42,634 $43,913 $45,231 $46,588 $47,985 $49,425 $50,908 $52,435 $54,008 $55,628 895 Total Employee Income - DC 85% Emp. living in DC $3,494,917 $3,599,765 $3,707,758 $3,818,990 $3,933,560 $4,051,567 $4,173,114 $4,298,307 $4,427,257 $4,560,074 $4,696,877 896 Indirect/Induced Labor Income $2,131,900 $2,195,857 $2,261,732 $2,329,584 $2,399,472 $2,471,456 $2,545,600 $2,621,968 $2,700,627 $2,781,645 $2,865,095 897 Income Tax from Indirect/Induced Labor Income 6% Blended Income Tax Rate $127,914 $131,751 $135,704 $139,775 $143,968 $148,287 $152,736 $157,318 $162,038 $166,899 $171,906 905 906 Construction 907 Total Employees 00000000000 908 Average Employee Income $93,671 $96,481 $99,376 $102,357 $105,428 $108,590 $111,848 $115,203 $118,660 $122,219 $125,886 909 Total Employee Income - DC 40% Emp. living in DC $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 910 Indirect/Induced Labor Income $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 911 Income Tax from Indirect/Induced Labor Income 6% Blended Income Tax Rate $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 912 913 TOTAL ESTIMATED INDIRECT/INDUCED INCOME TAX REVENUE $4,053,777 $4,175,390 $4,300,652 $4,429,672 $4,562,562 $4,699,439 $4,840,422 $4,985,635 $5,135,204 $5,289,260 $5,447,938 914 915 TOTAL INDIRECT/INDUCED REVENUES $4,693,777 $4,834,390 $4,979,652 $5,128,672 $5,282,562 $5,441,439 $5,604,422 $5,772,635 $5,945,204 $6,124,260 $6,307,938 916

Page 41 BC DEAF AG AH AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 9 (2010$) Year 21 Year 22 Year 23 Year 24 Year 25 Year 26 Year 27 Year 28 Year 29 Year 30 Year 31 10 11 ESCALATIONS 12 Revenues 3.0% 1.860 1.916 1.974 2.033 2.094 2.157 2.221 2.288 2.357 2.427 2.500 13 Commercial 3.0% 1.860 1.916 1.974 2.033 2.094 2.157 2.221 2.288 2.357 2.427 2.500 14 Residential 3.0% 1.860 1.916 1.974 2.033 2.094 2.157 2.221 2.288 2.357 2.427 2.500 15 Expenditures 3.0% 1.860 1.916 1.974 2.033 2.094 2.157 2.221 2.288 2.357 2.427 2.500 16 17 DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 18 19 Residential 20 Delivery (Units) 00000000000 21 Cumulative Units 756 756 756 756 756 756 756 756 756 756 756 22 23 For-Rent Residential 24 Delivery (Units) 00000000000 25 Cumulative Units 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 26 27 Apartments - Market Rate 28 Delivery (Units) 00000000000 29 Cumulative Units 304 304 304 304 304 304 304 304 304 304 304 34 35 Senior Apartments - ADU 36 Delivery (Units) 00000000000 37 Cumulative Units 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 38 43 For-Sale Residential 44 Delivery 00000000000 45 Cumulative GSF 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 46 47 Townhomes - Market Rate 48 Delivery (Units) 00000000000 49 Cumulative Units 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 50 51 Townhomes - WDU 52 Delivery (Units) 00000000000 53 Cumulative Units 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 58 59 Condo - WDU 60 Delivery (Units) 00000000000 61 Cumulative Units 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 62 63 Commercial 64 Delivery (GSF) 00000000000 65 Cumulative GSF 1,104,697 1,104,697 1,104,697 1,104,697 1,104,697 1,104,697 1,104,697 1,104,697 1,104,697 1,104,697 1,104,697 66 67 Office 68 Delivery (GSF) 00000000000 69 Cumulative GSF 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 70 71 Retail, Restaurant, & Grocery 72 Delivery (GSF) 00000000000 73 Cumulative GSF 77,835 77,835 77,835 77,835 77,835 77,835 77,835 77,835 77,835 77,835 77,835 74 75 Retail (In-line) 76 Delivery 00000000000 77 Cumulative GSF 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 78 79 Restaurants 80 Delivery 00000000000 81 Cumulative GSF 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 82 83 Retail [Grocery] 84 Delivery 00000000000 85 Cumulative GSF 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 86 93

Page 42 BC DEAF AG AH AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 9 (2010$) Year 21 Year 22 Year 23 Year 24 Year 25 Year 26 Year 27 Year 28 Year 29 Year 30 Year 31 94 EMPLOYEE RATIOS 95 Office 300 GSF per Employee 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 97 Vacancy Rate 10.0% 98 99 Retail [In-Line] 350 GSF per Employee 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 101 Vacancy Rate 10.0% 102 103 Restaurants 250 GSF per Employee 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 105 Vacancy Rate 10.0% 106 107 Retail [Grocery] 450 GSF per Employee 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 109 Vacancy Rate 0.0% 114 115 HOUSEHOLD RATIOS 116 117 Apartments - Market Rate 1.9 Residents per Household 549 549 549 549 549 549 549 549 549 549 549 118 Occupancy Rate 95.0% 122 123 Senior Apartments - ADU 1.5 Residents per Household 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 124 Occupancy Rate 95.0% 128 129 Townhomes - Market Rate 2.6 Residents per Household 412 412 412 412 412 412 412 412 412 412 412 130 131 Townhomes - WDU 2.6 Residents per Household 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 134 135 Condo - WDU 1.9 Residents per Household 363 363 363 363 363 363 363 363 363 363 363 136 137 CONSTRUCTION VALUE (HARD COSTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SALES) 138 139 Apartments - Market Rate 140 Construction Costs per Unit $229,934 per SF $427,745 $440,577 $453,795 $467,408 $481,431 $495,874 $510,750 $526,072 $541,854 $558,110 $574,853 141 Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 142 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 00000000000 143 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 00000000000 150 151 Senior Apartments - ADU 152 Construction Costs per Unit $262,840 per SF $488,961 $503,629 $518,738 $534,300 $550,329 $566,839 $583,845 $601,360 $619,401 $637,983 $657,122 153 Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 154 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 00000000000 155 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 00000000000 163 164 Townhomes - Market Rate 165 Construction Costs per Unit $269,219 per SF $500,826 $515,851 $531,326 $547,266 $563,684 $580,594 $598,012 $615,953 $634,431 $653,464 $673,068 166 Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 167 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 00000000000 168 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 00000000000 169 170 Townhomes - WDU 171 Construction Costs per Unit $223,718 per SF $416,181 $428,666 $441,526 $454,772 $468,415 $482,467 $496,941 $511,850 $527,205 $543,021 $559,312 172 Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 173 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 00000000000 174 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 00000000000 181

Page 43 BC DEAF AG AH AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 9 (2010$) Year 21 Year 22 Year 23 Year 24 Year 25 Year 26 Year 27 Year 28 Year 29 Year 30 Year 31 182 Condo - WDU 183 Construction Costs per Unit $266,360 per SF $495,508 $510,373 $525,684 $541,455 $557,699 $574,430 $591,662 $609,412 $627,695 $646,526 $665,921 184 Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 185 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 00000000000 186 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 00000000000 187 188 Total Residential Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 189 Total Residential FTE Construction Jobs 00000000000 190 191 Office 192 Construction Costs per GSF $348 /FAR SF $648 $667 $687 $708 $729 $751 $774 $797 $821 $845 $871 193 Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 194 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 00000000000 195 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 00000000000 196 197 Retail [In-Line] 198 Construction Costs per GSF $270 /GSF $503 $518 $533 $549 $566 $583 $600 $618 $637 $656 $676 199 Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 200 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 00000000000 201 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 00000000000 202 203 Restaurants 204 Construction Costs per GSF $270 /GSF $503 $518 $533 $549 $566 $583 $600 $618 $637 $656 $676 205 Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 206 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 00000000000 207 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 00000000000 208 209 Retail [Grocery] 210 Construction Costs per GSF $270 /GSF $503 $518 $533 $549 $566 $583 $600 $618 $637 $656 $676 211 Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 212 Total Construction Hours 9.7 per $1K const. value 00000000000 213 Total FTE Construction Jobs 2025 hours/year 00000000000 220 221 Total Commercial Construction Value - 2 Years Prior to Delivery $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 222 Total Commercial FTE Construction Jobs 00000000000 223 224 Total Construction Value - 2 Years Prior to Delivery $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 225 Total FTE Construction Jobs 00000000000 226 227 228 ASSESSED VALUE 229 230 PROJECT VALUE - UNIMPROVED LAND BASE 231 Unimproved Land Base Value per Acre $1,654,238 /Acre $3,077,370 $3,169,691 $3,264,782 $3,362,725 $3,463,607 $3,567,515 $3,674,541 $3,784,777 $3,898,320 $4,015,270 $4,135,728 232 233 Land Takedown 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 234 Cumulative Land Takedown 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 235 236 Cumulative Development of Unimproved Land 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 237 238 Remaining Land Area - Taken Down & Unimproved 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 239 Remaining Value of Unimproved Land Base $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 240 241 Total Value of Unimproved Land $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 242 243 INTERIM PROJECT VALUE BASED ON CONSTRUCTION COST 244 245 Residential 246 Apartments - Market Rate 247 Units Under Construction 00000000000 248 Under Construction Value $229,934 /Unit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 253 254 Senior Apartments - ADU 255 Units Under Construction 00000000000 256 Under Construction Value $262,840 /Unit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 261 262 Townhomes - Market Rate 263 Units Under Construction 00000000000 264 Under Construction Value $269,219 /Unit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 265 266 Townhomes - WDU 267 Units Under Construction 00000000000 268 Under Construction Value $223,718 /Unit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Page 44 BC DEAF AG AH AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 9 (2010$) Year 21 Year 22 Year 23 Year 24 Year 25 Year 26 Year 27 Year 28 Year 29 Year 30 Year 31 273 274 Condo - WDU 275 Units Under Construction 00000000000 276 Under Construction Value $266,360 /Unit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 277 278 Total Residential Units Under Construction 00000000000 279 Total Residential Project Value Under Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 280 281 Retail 282 Office 283 GSF Under Construction 00000000000 284 Under Construction Value $348 /FAR SF $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 285 286 Retail (In-line) 287 GSF Under Construction 00000000000 288 Under Construction Value $270 /FAR SF $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 289 290 Restaurants 291 GSF Under Construction 00000000000 292 Under Construction Value $270 /FAR SF $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 293 294 Retail [Grocery] 295 GSF Under Construction 00000000000 296 Under Construction Value $270 /FAR SF $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 301 302 Total Commercial GSF Under Construction 00000000000 303 Total Commercial Project Value Under Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 304 305 Total Interim Project Value Based on Construction Cost $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 306 307 PROJECT VALUE BASED ON INCOME APPROACH 308 309 Residential 310 Apartments - Market Rate 311 Units Completed 304 304 304 304 304 304 304 304 304 304 304 312 Developed Units Assessed Value $238,444 /Unit $134,846,918 $138,892,326 $143,059,096 $147,350,869 $151,771,395 $156,324,537 $161,014,273 $165,844,701 $170,820,042 $175,944,643 $181,222,982 317 318 Senior Apartments - ADU 319 Units Completed 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 320 Developed Units Assessed Value $125,431 /Unit $20,067,155 $20,669,169 $21,289,245 $21,927,922 $22,585,760 $23,263,332 $23,961,232 $24,680,069 $25,420,471 $26,183,085 $26,968,578 325 326 Townhomes - Market Rate 327 Units Completed 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 328 Developed Units Assessed Value $483,333 /Unit $140,266,211 $144,474,197 $148,808,423 $153,272,676 $157,870,856 $162,606,982 $167,485,191 $172,509,747 $177,685,039 $183,015,590 $188,506,058 329 330 Townhomes - WDU 331 Units Completed 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 332 Developed Units Assessed Value $346,957 /Unit $12,263,395 $12,631,297 $13,010,236 $13,400,543 $13,802,559 $14,216,636 $14,643,135 $15,082,429 $15,534,902 $16,000,949 $16,480,977 337 338 Condo - WDU 339 Units Completed 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 340 Developed Units Assessed Value $308,241 /Unit $109,522,892 $112,808,579 $116,192,836 $119,678,621 $123,268,980 $126,967,049 $130,776,061 $134,699,343 $138,740,323 $142,902,533 $147,189,609 341 342 Total Residential Units Completed 756 756 756 756 756 756 756 756 756 756 756 343 Total Residential Project Value - Completed $416,966,571 $429,475,568 $442,359,835 $455,630,630 $469,299,549 $483,378,536 $497,879,892 $512,816,288 $528,200,777 $544,046,800 $560,368,204

Page 45 BC DEAF AG AH AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 9 (2010$) Year 21 Year 22 Year 23 Year 24 Year 25 Year 26 Year 27 Year 28 Year 29 Year 30 Year 31 344 345 Retail 346 Office 347 GSF Completed 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 1,026,862 348 Developed GSF Value $400 /GSF $764,106,289 $787,029,478 $810,640,362 $834,959,573 $860,008,361 $885,808,611 $912,382,870 $939,754,356 $967,946,986 $996,985,396 $1,026,894,958 349 350 Retail (In-line) 351 GSF Completed 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 28,135 352 Developed GSF Value $356 /GSF $18,609,560 $19,167,847 $19,742,882 $20,335,169 $20,945,224 $21,573,581 $22,220,788 $22,887,412 $23,574,034 $24,281,255 $25,009,693 353 354 Restaurants 355 GSF Completed 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 356 Developed GSF Value $356 /GSF $3,307,190 $3,406,406 $3,508,598 $3,613,856 $3,722,272 $3,833,940 $3,948,958 $4,067,427 $4,189,450 $4,315,133 $4,444,587 357 358 Retail [Grocery] 359 GSF Completed 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 360 Developed GSF Value $222 /GSF $18,478,926 $19,033,294 $19,604,293 $20,192,421 $20,798,194 $21,422,140 $22,064,804 $22,726,748 $23,408,551 $24,110,807 $24,834,131 365 366 Total Commercial Project Value Completed $804,501,966 $828,637,025 $853,496,136 $879,101,020 $905,474,050 $932,638,272 $960,617,420 $989,435,943 $1,019,119,021 $1,049,692,592 $1,081,183,369 367 368 Total Project Value Based on Income Approach $1,221,468,537 $1,258,112,593 $1,295,855,971 $1,334,731,650 $1,374,773,599 $1,416,016,807 $1,458,497,312 $1,502,252,231 $1,547,319,798 $1,593,739,392 $1,641,551,574 369 370 REVENUES 371 372 REAL PROPERTY REVENUES 373 374 Assessed Value of Unimproved Land $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 375 Value Subject to Real Property Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 376 Real Property Tax - Unimproved Land $5.000 per $100 AV $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 377 378 Assessed Value of Commercial Uses Under Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 379 Value Subject to Real Property Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 380 Real Property Tax - Commercial Uses Under Construction $1.850 per $100 AV $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 381 Real Property Tax - Commercial Uses Under Construction $1.650 per $100 AV $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 382 Total Real Property Tax - Commercial Uses Under Const. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 383 384 Assessed Value of Residential Uses Under Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 385 Value Subject to Real Property Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 386 Real Property Tax - Residential Uses Under Const. $0.850 per $100 AV $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 387 388 Assessed Value of Commercial - Completed $804,501,966 $828,637,025 $853,496,136 $879,101,020 $905,474,050 $932,638,272 $960,617,420 $989,435,943 $1,019,119,021 $1,049,692,592 $1,081,183,369 389 Value Subject to Real Property Tax $804,501,966 $828,637,025 $853,496,136 $879,101,020 $905,474,050 $932,638,272 $960,617,420 $989,435,943 $1,019,119,021 $1,049,692,592 $1,081,183,369 390 Real Property Tax - Commercial Uses - Completed $1.850 per $100 AV $14,877,286 $15,323,785 $15,783,679 $16,257,369 $16,745,270 $17,247,808 $17,765,422 $18,298,565 $18,847,702 $19,413,313 $19,995,892 391 Real Property Tax - Commercial Uses - Completed $1.650 per $100 AV $49,500 $49,500 $49,500 $49,500 $49,500 $49,500 $49,500 $49,500 $49,500 $49,500 $49,500 392 Total Real Property Tax - Completed Commercial Uses $14,926,786 $15,373,285 $15,833,179 $16,306,869 $16,794,770 $17,297,308 $17,814,922 $18,348,065 $18,897,202 $19,462,813 $20,045,392 393 394 Assessed Value of Residential Uses - Completed $416,966,571 $429,475,568 $442,359,835 $455,630,630 $469,299,549 $483,378,536 $497,879,892 $512,816,288 $528,200,777 $544,046,800 $560,368,204 395 Owner Occupied Condos 80% owner occupied units 153 153 153 153 153 153 153 153 153 153 153 396 Owner Occupied Townhomes 80% owner occupied units 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 397 Homestead Exemption $67,500 per Unit $19,764,000 $19,764,000 $19,764,000 $19,764,000 $19,764,000 $19,764,000 $19,764,000 $19,764,000 $19,764,000 $19,764,000 $19,764,000 398 Value Subject to Real Property Tax $397,202,571 $409,711,568 $422,595,835 $435,866,630 $449,535,549 $463,614,536 $478,115,892 $493,052,288 $508,436,777 $524,282,800 $540,604,204 399 Real Property Tax - Residential Uses - Completed $0.850 per $100 AV $3,376,222 $3,482,548 $3,592,065 $3,704,866 $3,821,052 $3,940,724 $4,063,985 $4,190,944 $4,321,713 $4,456,404 $4,595,136 400 401 TOTAL REAL PROPERTY REVENUES $18,303,008 $18,855,833 $19,425,243 $20,011,735 $20,615,822 $21,238,032 $21,878,907 $22,539,009 $23,218,914 $23,919,217 $24,640,528 402 403 PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUES 404 405 Resident-Driven Personal Property Tax Revenues 406 Personal Property Tax Revenues per Resident $24 per resident $44 $45 $47 $48 $49 $51 $52 $54 $56 $57 $59 407 Total Residents 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 408 Total Resident-Driven Personal Property Tax Revenues $65,599 $67,567 $69,594 $71,682 $73,832 $76,047 $78,329 $80,679 $83,099 $85,592 $88,160 409 410 Employee-Driven Personal Property Tax Revenues 411 Personal Property Tax Revenues per Employee $60 per employee $112 $115 $118 $122 $126 $129 $133 $137 $141 $146 $150 412 Total Employees 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 413 Total Employee-Driven Personal Property Tax Revenues $365,123 $376,077 $387,359 $398,980 $410,950 $423,278 $435,976 $449,056 $462,527 $476,403 $490,695 426 427 TOTAL PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUE $430,723 $443,644 $456,954 $470,662 $484,782 $499,325 $514,305 $529,734 $545,626 $561,995 $578,855 428 Funds Directed to Neighborhood Investment Fund 17.4% $74,946 $77,194 $79,510 $81,895 $84,352 $86,883 $89,489 $92,174 $94,939 $97,787 $100,721 429 TOTAL PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUE - GENERAL FUND $355,777 $366,450 $377,444 $388,767 $400,430 $412,443 $424,816 $437,561 $450,687 $464,208 $478,134 430

Page 46 BC DEAF AG AH AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 9 (2010$) Year 21 Year 22 Year 23 Year 24 Year 25 Year 26 Year 27 Year 28 Year 29 Year 30 Year 31 431 SALES TAX REVENUES 432 433 CONSTRUCTION SALES 434 Commercial Construction (2 Yrs Prior to Delivery) % of improvement 435 Commercial Improvement Value (hard costs minus labor) 85% of Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 436 % Materials and Purchased in the District 45% of Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 437 Retail Sales Tax Rev (Commercial Construction) 6.00% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 438 439 For-Rent Residential Construction (2 Yrs. Prior to Delivery) % of improvement 440 Residential Improvement Value (hard costs minus labor) 75% of Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 441 % Materials and Purchased in the District 30% of Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 442 Retail Sales Tax Rev (Residential Construction) 6.00% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 443 444 For-Sale Residential Construction (2 Yrs. Prior to Delivery) % of improvement 445 Residential Improvement Value (hard costs minus labor) 60% of Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 446 % Materials and Purchased in the District 30% of Construction Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 447 Retail Sales Tax Rev (Residential Construction) 6.00% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 448 449 RETAIL ON-SITE SALES 450 Effective Retail SF 451 Retail [In-Line] 25,322 25,322 25,322 25,322 25,322 25,322 25,322 25,322 25,322 25,322 25,322 452 Retail [Grocery] 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 453 Total Effective Square Feet 70,022 70,022 70,022 70,022 70,022 70,022 70,022 70,022 70,022 70,022 70,022 454 455 Retail Sales Sales/SF 456 Retail [In-Line] $350 per GSF 15,662,562 16,132,439 16,616,412 17,114,904 17,628,351 18,157,202 18,701,918 19,262,975 19,840,865 20,436,091 21,049,173 457 Retail [Grocery] $500 per GSF 2,078,879 2,141,246 2,205,483 2,271,647 2,339,797 2,409,991 2,482,290 2,556,759 2,633,462 2,712,466 2,793,840 458 459 Total Sales $17,741,441 $18,273,684 $18,821,895 $19,386,552 $19,968,148 $20,567,193 $21,184,208 $21,819,735 $22,474,327 $23,148,556 $23,843,013 460 Retail Sales Tax Rev (On-Site Retail) 6.00% $1,064,486 $1,096,421 $1,129,314 $1,163,193 $1,198,089 $1,234,032 $1,271,053 $1,309,184 $1,348,460 $1,388,913 $1,430,581 461 462 RETAIL SALES FROM RESIDENTS 463 Residential Taxable Sales % Spent on Retail (Excluding Food) 464 Apartments - Market Rate 20% $8,382,822 $8,634,307 $8,893,336 $9,160,136 $9,434,940 $9,717,988 $10,009,528 $10,309,814 $10,619,108 $10,937,682 $11,265,812 466 Senior Apartments - ADU 30% $1,738,174 $1,790,319 $1,844,029 $1,899,350 $1,956,330 $2,015,020 $2,075,471 $2,137,735 $2,201,867 $2,267,923 $2,335,960 468 Townhomes - Market Rate 20% $7,465,557 $7,689,524 $7,920,209 $8,157,815 $8,402,550 $8,654,626 $8,914,265 $9,181,693 $9,457,144 $9,740,858 $10,033,084 469 Townhomes - WDU 30% $1,000,529 $1,030,544 $1,061,461 $1,093,305 $1,126,104 $1,159,887 $1,194,684 $1,230,524 $1,267,440 $1,305,463 $1,344,627 471 Condo - WDU 30% $8,935,600 $9,203,668 $9,479,778 $9,764,171 $10,057,096 $10,358,809 $10,669,573 $10,989,661 $11,319,350 $11,658,931 $12,008,699 472 473 Total Retail Taxable Sales 95% taxable $26,146,547 $26,930,944 $27,738,872 $28,571,038 $29,428,169 $30,311,014 $31,220,345 $32,156,955 $33,121,664 $34,115,314 $35,138,773 474 Retail Expenditures Made Off-Site, In DC 60% $15,687,928 $16,158,566 $16,643,323 $17,142,623 $17,656,902 $18,186,609 $18,732,207 $19,294,173 $19,872,998 $20,469,188 $21,083,264 475 Total Residential Sales Tax Revenues 9.00% $1,411,914 $1,454,271 $1,497,899 $1,542,836 $1,589,121 $1,636,795 $1,685,899 $1,736,476 $1,788,570 $1,842,227 $1,897,494 476 477 ALCOHOL SALES ON-SITE 478 Alcohol Sales Sales/SF 479 Retail [In-Line] $350 per GSF 00000000000 480 Grocery Store $500 per GSF 1,117,500 1,117,500 1,117,500 1,117,500 1,117,500 1,117,500 1,117,500 1,117,500 1,117,500 1,117,500 1,117,500 481 Total Sales $1,117,500 $1,117,500 $1,117,500 $1,117,500 $1,117,500 $1,117,500 $1,117,500 $1,117,500 $1,117,500 $1,117,500 $1,117,500 482483 Sales Tax from Alcohol Sales 9.00% $100,575 $100,575 $100,575 $100,575 $100,575 $100,575 $100,575 $100,575 $100,575 $100,575 $100,575 484 ALCOHOL SALES FROM RESIDENTS 485 Residential Taxable Sales - Alcohol %Spent on Alcohol 486 Apartments - Market Rate 1% $419,141 $431,715 $444,667 $458,007 $471,747 $485,899 $500,476 $515,491 $530,955 $546,884 $563,291 488 Senior Apartments - ADU 1% $57,229 $58,946 $60,714 $62,536 $64,412 $66,344 $68,334 $70,384 $72,496 $74,671 $76,911 490 Townhomes - Market Rate 1% $373,278 $384,476 $396,010 $407,891 $420,127 $432,731 $445,713 $459,085 $472,857 $487,043 $501,654 491 Townhomes - WDU 1% $32,942 $33,930 $34,948 $35,997 $37,077 $38,189 $39,335 $40,515 $41,730 $42,982 $44,271 493494 Condo - WDU 1% $294,202 $303,028 $312,119 $321,482 $331,127 $341,061 $351,292 $361,831 $372,686 $383,867 $395,383 495 Total Alcohol Taxable Sales 80% taxable $941,433 $969,676 $998,767 $1,028,730 $1,059,592 $1,091,379 $1,124,121 $1,157,844 $1,192,580 $1,228,357 $1,265,208 496 Alcohol Expenditures Made Off-Site, In DC 30% taxable $282,430 $290,903 $299,630 $308,619 $317,877 $327,414 $337,236 $347,353 $357,774 $368,507 $379,562 497 Total Residential Alcohol Sales Tax Revenues 9.00% $25,419 $26,181 $26,967 $27,776 $28,609 $29,467 $30,351 $31,262 $32,200 $33,166 $34,161 498 499 TOTAL SALES TAX REVENUE $2,602,394 $2,677,448 $2,754,754 $2,834,380 $2,916,394 $3,000,869 $3,087,877 $3,177,496 $3,269,804 $3,364,881 $3,462,810 500 501 MEALS TAX 502 Restaurants 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 503 Total Restaurant Sales $400 per GSF $3,348,530 $3,448,986 $3,552,456 $3,659,029 $3,768,800 $3,881,864 $3,998,320 $4,118,270 $4,241,818 $4,369,072 $4,500,145 504 Prepared Foods at Grocery 5% $2,078,879 $2,141,246 $2,205,483 $2,271,647 $2,339,797 $2,409,991 $2,482,290 $2,556,759 $2,633,462 $2,712,466 $2,793,840 505 Meals Tax Revenues (on-site restaurants) 9.0% $488,467 $503,121 $518,214 $533,761 $549,774 $566,267 $583,255 $600,753 $618,775 $637,338 $656,459 506 507 Residential Meals Tax Revenues 508 Total Taxable Sales $26,146,547 $26,930,944 $27,738,872 $28,571,038 $29,428,169 $30,311,014 $31,220,345 $32,156,955 $33,121,664 $34,115,314 $35,138,773 509 Meals at Eating Places % of Retail Spending 3.4% $886,807 $913,411 $940,813 $969,038 $998,109 $1,028,052 $1,058,894 $1,090,661 $1,123,380 $1,157,082 $1,191,794 510 % of Expenditures Off-Site & in DC 75.0% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 511 Restaurant Expenditures Made Off-Site $665,105 $685,058 $705,610 $726,778 $748,582 $771,039 $794,170 $817,995 $842,535 $867,811 $893,846 512 Total Effective Residential Meals Tax Revenues 9.00% Effective Rate to Ge $59,859 $61,655 $63,505 $65,410 $67,372 $69,394 $71,475 $73,620 $75,828 $78,103 $80,446 513 514 TOTAL MEALS TAX REVENUE $548,326 $564,776 $581,719 $599,171 $617,146 $635,660 $654,730 $674,372 $694,603 $715,441 $736,905

Page 47 BC DEAF AG AH AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 9 (2010$) Year 21 Year 22 Year 23 Year 24 Year 25 Year 26 Year 27 Year 28 Year 29 Year 30 Year 31 515 525 DEED RECORDATION/TRANSFER TAX 526 527 Land Taken Down (Acres) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 528 Land Sale - Assessed Value per Acre $1,654,238 $3,077,370 $3,169,691 $3,264,782 $3,362,725 $3,463,607 $3,567,515 $3,674,541 $3,784,777 $3,898,320 $4,015,270 $4,135,728 529 Total Land Sales and Transaction Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 530 531 Deed Recordation/Transfer Tax on Land Sale 2.90% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 532 533 New Owner Occupied Unit Sales - Under $400k 534 Townhomes - Market Rate $483,333 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 535 Townhomes - WDU $346,957 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 537 Condo - WDU $308,241 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 538 539 Owner Occupied Households in Turnover 540 Townhomes - Market Rate 6.7% turnover per yr 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 541 Townhomes - WDU 3.0% turnover per yr 11111111111 543 Condo - WDU 3.0% turnover per yr 66666666666 544 545 Value of Housing Unit Sales in Turnover - Under $400K 546 Townhomes - Market Rate $483,333 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 547 Townhomes - WDU $346,957 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 549 Condo - WDU $308,241 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 550 551 Recordation/Transfer Tax, Properties under $400k 2.20% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 552 553 New Owner Occupied Unit Sales - Over $400k 554 Townhomes - Market Rate $483,333 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 555 Townhomes - WDU $346,957 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 557 Condo - WDU $308,241 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 558 559 Owner Occupied Households in Turnover 560 Townhomes - Market Rate 6.7% turnover per yr 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 561 Townhomes - WDU 3.0% turnover per yr 11111111111 563 Condo - WDU 3.0% turnover per yr 66666666666 564 565 Value of Housing Unit Sales in Turnover - Over $400K 566 Townhomes - Market Rate $483,333 $9,358,423 $9,639,176 $9,928,351 $10,226,202 $10,532,988 $10,848,977 $11,174,447 $11,509,680 $11,854,971 $12,210,620 $12,576,938 567 Townhomes - WDU $346,957 $367,902 $378,939 $390,307 $402,016 $414,077 $426,499 $439,294 $452,473 $466,047 $480,028 $494,429 569 Condo - WDU $308,241 $3,285,687 $3,384,257 $3,485,785 $3,590,359 $3,698,069 $3,809,011 $3,923,282 $4,040,980 $4,162,210 $4,287,076 $4,415,688 570 571 Recordation/Transfer Tax, Properties over $400k 2.90% $377,348 $388,669 $400,329 $412,339 $424,709 $437,450 $450,574 $464,091 $478,014 $492,354 $507,125 572 573 TOTAL DEED RECORDATION/TRANSFER TAX REVENUE $377,348 $388,669 $400,329 $412,339 $424,709 $437,450 $450,574 $464,091 $478,014 $492,354 $507,125 574 575 INCOME TAX 576 577 EMPLOYEE INCOME 578 579 Office 580 Number of Employees 300 GSF/Employee 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 581 Average Employee Income $76,100 $141,568 $145,815 $150,190 $154,696 $159,337 $164,117 $169,040 $174,111 $179,335 $184,715 $190,256 582 Taxable Employee Income 80% taxable $113,255 $116,652 $120,152 $123,757 $127,469 $131,293 $135,232 $139,289 $143,468 $147,772 $152,205 583 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 584 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $8,427 $8,715 $9,013 $9,319 $9,635 $9,960 $10,295 $10,640 $10,995 $11,361 $11,737 585 % of Employees Living in Washington D.C. 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 586 Employee Income Tax Revenue $9,085,659 $9,397,044 $9,717,771 $10,048,120 $10,388,379 $10,738,845 $11,099,826 $11,471,636 $11,854,601 $12,249,054 $12,655,341 587 588 Retail [In-Line] 589 Number of Employees 350 GSF/Employee 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 590 Average Employee Income $26,400 $49,112 $50,585 $52,103 $53,666 $55,276 $56,934 $58,642 $60,401 $62,213 $64,080 $66,002 591 Taxable Employee Income 80% taxable $39,289 $40,468 $41,682 $42,933 $44,221 $45,547 $46,914 $48,321 $49,771 $51,264 $52,802 592 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $2,157 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 593 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $0 $2,240 $2,343 $2,449 $2,559 $2,672 $2,788 $2,907 $3,031 $3,157 $3,288 594 % of Employees Living in Washington D.C. 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 595 Employee Income Tax Revenue $132,667 $137,736 $144,082 $150,618 $157,351 $164,285 $171,427 $178,784 $186,361 $194,166 $202,205 596 597 Restaurants 598 Number of Employees 250 GSF/Employee 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 599 Average Employee Income $22,800 $42,415 $43,687 $44,998 $46,348 $47,738 $49,170 $50,645 $52,165 $53,730 $55,342 $57,002 600 Taxable Employee Income 80% taxable $33,932 $34,950 $35,998 $37,078 $38,191 $39,336 $40,516 $41,732 $42,984 $44,273 $45,601 601 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $1,836 $1,897 $1,960 $2,025 $2,091 $2,160 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 602 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,244 $2,347 $2,454 $2,563 $2,676 603 % of Employees Living in Washington D.C. 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 604 Employee Income Tax Revenue $28,089 $29,024 $29,986 $30,978 $31,999 $33,051 $34,331 $35,912 $37,540 $39,217 $40,945 605

Page 48 BC DEAF AG AH AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 9 (2010$) Year 21 Year 22 Year 23 Year 24 Year 25 Year 26 Year 27 Year 28 Year 29 Year 30 Year 31 606 Retail [Grocery] 607 Number of Employees 450 GSF/Employee 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 608 Average Employee Income $30,800 $57,297 $59,016 $60,786 $62,610 $64,488 $66,423 $68,416 $70,468 $72,582 $74,760 $77,002 609 Taxable Employee Income 80% taxable $45,838 $47,213 $48,629 $50,088 $51,591 $53,138 $54,733 $56,375 $58,066 $59,808 $61,602 610 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 611 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $2,696 $2,813 $2,933 $3,057 $3,185 $3,317 $3,452 $3,592 $3,736 $3,884 $4,036 612 % of Employees Living in Washington D.C. 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% 613 Employee Income Tax Revenue $227,649 $237,518 $247,683 $258,154 $268,938 $280,046 $291,486 $303,271 $315,408 $327,910 $340,787 623 624 Construction 625 Construction Employee - FTE Jobs 00000000000 626 Average Income - Construction Employees $69,700 $129,663 $133,552 $137,559 $141,686 $145,936 $150,314 $154,824 $159,469 $164,253 $169,180 $174,256 627 Average Taxable Income 80% taxable $103,730 $106,842 $110,047 $113,349 $116,749 $120,252 $123,859 $127,575 $131,402 $135,344 $139,404 628 Construction Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 629 Construction Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $7,617 $7,882 $8,154 $8,435 $8,724 $9,021 $9,328 $9,644 $9,969 $10,304 $10,649 630 % of Employees Living in Washington D.C. 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 631 Total Const. Employee Income Tax Rev. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 632 633 Total Employees 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 634 Total Employees - Excluding Construction 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 635 Total Employee Income Tax Revenue $9,474,065 $9,801,322 $10,139,523 $10,487,869 $10,846,666 $11,216,226 $11,597,071 $11,989,603 $12,393,911 $12,810,347 $13,239,278 636 638637 HOUSEHOLD INCOME 639 Apartments - Market Rate 640 Number of Households 289 289 289 289 289 289 289 289 289 289 289 641 Average Household Income $78,016 $145,132 $149,486 $153,971 $158,590 $163,347 $168,248 $173,295 $178,494 $183,849 $189,364 $195,045 642 Taxable Household Income 80% taxable $116,106 $119,589 $123,176 $126,872 $130,678 $134,598 $138,636 $142,795 $147,079 $151,491 $156,036 643 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 644 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $8,669 $8,965 $9,270 $9,584 $9,908 $10,241 $10,584 $10,938 $11,302 $11,677 $12,063 645 Household Income Tax Revenue $2,503,600 $2,589,104 $2,677,174 $2,767,886 $2,861,320 $2,957,556 $3,056,680 $3,158,777 $3,263,937 $3,372,252 $3,483,816 654 655 Senior Apartments - ADU 656 Number of Households 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 657 Average Household Income $37,654 $70,048 $72,149 $74,313 $76,543 $78,839 $81,204 $83,640 $86,150 $88,734 $91,396 $94,138 658 Taxable Household Income 80% taxable $56,038 $57,719 $59,451 $61,234 $63,071 $64,963 $66,912 $68,920 $70,987 $73,117 $75,310 659 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 660 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $3,563 $3,706 $3,853 $4,005 $4,161 $4,322 $4,488 $4,658 $4,834 $5,015 $5,201 661 Household Income Tax Revenue $291,116 $302,791 $314,816 $327,201 $339,959 $353,099 $366,633 $380,573 $394,931 $409,720 $424,953 670 671 Townhomes - Market Rate 672 Number of Households 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 673 Average Household Income $128,625 $239,281 $246,459 $253,853 $261,468 $269,312 $277,392 $285,714 $294,285 $303,114 $312,207 $321,573 674 Taxable Household Income 80% taxable $191,425 $197,167 $203,082 $209,175 $215,450 $221,913 $228,571 $235,428 $242,491 $249,766 $257,259 675 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 676 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $15,071 $15,559 $16,062 $16,580 $17,113 $17,663 $18,229 $18,811 $19,412 $20,030 $20,667 677 Household Income Tax Revenue $2,351,089 $2,427,238 $2,505,671 $2,586,457 $2,669,667 $2,755,373 $2,843,650 $2,934,576 $3,028,229 $3,124,692 $3,224,049 678 679 Townhomes - WDU 680 Number of Households 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 681 Average Household Income $93,200 $173,379 $178,581 $183,938 $189,456 $195,140 $200,994 $207,024 $213,235 $219,632 $226,221 $233,007 682 Taxable Household Income 80% taxable $138,704 $142,865 $147,151 $151,565 $156,112 $160,795 $165,619 $170,588 $175,706 $180,977 $186,406 683 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 684 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $10,590 $10,943 $11,308 $11,683 $12,070 $12,468 $12,878 $13,300 $13,735 $14,183 $14,645 685 Household Income Tax Revenue $201,206 $207,926 $214,848 $221,978 $229,321 $236,885 $244,675 $252,699 $260,964 $269,477 $278,246

Page 49 BC DEAF AG AH AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 9 (2010$) Year 21 Year 22 Year 23 Year 24 Year 25 Year 26 Year 27 Year 28 Year 29 Year 30 Year 31 694 695 Condo - WDU 696 Number of Households 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 697 Average Household Income $82,800 $154,032 $158,653 $163,413 $168,315 $173,365 $178,566 $183,923 $189,440 $195,124 $200,977 $207,007 698 Taxable Household Income 80% taxable $123,226 $126,923 $130,730 $134,652 $138,692 $142,853 $147,138 $151,552 $156,099 $160,782 $165,605 699 Retail Income Tax, $10,000 - $40,000 $400.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 700 Retail Income Tax, $40,000 + $2,200.00 $9,274 $9,588 $9,912 $10,245 $10,589 $10,942 $11,307 $11,682 $12,068 $12,466 $12,876 701 Household Income Tax Revenue $1,771,373 $1,831,390 $1,893,208 $1,956,880 $2,022,462 $2,090,012 $2,159,588 $2,231,252 $2,305,066 $2,381,094 $2,459,402 702 703 Total Residents 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 704 Total Households 737 737 737 737 737 737 737 737 737 737 737 705 Total Household Income Tax Revenue $7,118,384 $7,358,449 $7,605,717 $7,860,402 $8,122,729 $8,392,924 $8,671,226 $8,957,877 $9,253,127 $9,557,235 $9,870,466 706 707 TOTAL INCOME TAX REVENUE $16,592,449 $17,159,772 $17,745,240 $18,348,271 $18,969,394 $19,609,151 $20,268,297 $20,947,480 $21,647,038 $22,367,583 $23,109,744 708 709 PARKING TAX REVENUE 710 711 Average Annual Revenue per Space (Monthly & Public) $2,279 $4,240 $4,367 $4,498 $4,633 $4,772 $4,915 $5,062 $5,214 $5,371 $5,532 $5,698 712 Total Income-Generating Parking Spaces 0 00000000000 713 714 Total Parking Revenues $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 715 716 Parking Tax Revenue 12% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 717 718 TOTAL PARKING TAX REVENUES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 719 720 721 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES 722 723 Miscellaneous Revenues (See Appendix) 724 Per Employee $1,011 $1,882 $1,938 $1,996 $2,056 $2,118 $2,181 $2,247 $2,314 $2,384 $2,455 $2,529 725 No. Employees $3,270 $3,270 $3,270 $3,270 $3,270 $3,270 $3,270 $3,270 $3,270 $3,270 $3,270 726 Misc Rev (Employee) $6,153,339 $6,337,939 $6,528,077 $6,723,919 $6,925,637 $7,133,406 $7,347,408 $7,567,830 $7,794,865 $8,028,711 $8,269,573 727 728 Per Resident $640 $1,191 $1,227 $1,264 $1,301 $1,340 $1,381 $1,422 $1,465 $1,509 $1,554 $1,601 729 No. Residents 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 730 Misc Rev (Resident) $1,781,924 $1,835,382 $1,890,443 $1,947,157 $2,005,571 $2,065,738 $2,127,710 $2,191,542 $2,257,288 $2,325,007 $2,394,757 731 732 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES $7,935,263 $8,173,321 $8,418,520 $8,671,076 $8,931,208 $9,199,144 $9,475,119 $9,759,372 $10,052,153 $10,353,718 $10,664,329 733 734 TOTAL REVENUES $46,714,500 $48,186,300 $49,703,100 $51,265,800 $52,875,000 $54,532,800 $56,240,300 $57,999,500 $59,811,200 $61,677,400 $63,599,400 735 Real Property Tax $18,303,000 $18,855,800 $19,425,200 $20,011,700 $20,615,800 $21,238,000 $21,878,900 $22,539,000 $23,218,900 $23,919,200 $24,640,500 736 Personal Property Tax $355,800 $366,500 $377,400 $388,800 $400,400 $412,400 $424,800 $437,600 $450,700 $464,200 $478,100 737 Sales Tax $2,602,400 $2,677,400 $2,754,800 $2,834,400 $2,916,400 $3,000,900 $3,087,900 $3,177,500 $3,269,800 $3,364,900 $3,462,800 738 Meals Tax $548,300 $564,800 $581,700 $599,200 $617,100 $635,700 $654,700 $674,400 $694,600 $715,400 $736,900 740 Deed Recordation/Transfer Tax $377,300 $388,700 $400,300 $412,300 $424,700 $437,500 $450,600 $464,100 $478,000 $492,400 $507,100 741 Income Tax $16,592,400 $17,159,800 $17,745,200 $18,348,300 $18,969,400 $19,609,200 $20,268,300 $20,947,500 $21,647,000 $22,367,600 $23,109,700 742 Parking Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 743 Miscellaneous Revenues $7,935,300 $8,173,300 $8,418,500 $8,671,100 $8,931,200 $9,199,100 $9,475,100 $9,759,400 $10,052,200 $10,353,700 $10,664,300 744

Page 50 BC DEAF AG AH AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 9 (2010$) Year 21 Year 22 Year 23 Year 24 Year 25 Year 26 Year 27 Year 28 Year 29 Year 30 Year 31 745 EXPENDITURES 746 747 MISC./NON-EDUCATIONAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES (SEE APPENDIX) 748 749 Expenditures Per Employee $476 $884.87 $911.41 $938.76 $966.92 $995.93 $1,025.80 $1,056.58 $1,088.28 $1,120.92 $1,154.55 $1,189.19 750 No. Employees 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 751 Op. Expenditures (Employee) $2,893,752 $2,980,565 $3,069,982 $3,162,081 $3,256,944 $3,354,652 $3,455,291 $3,558,950 $3,665,719 $3,775,690 $3,888,961 752 753 Per Resident $986 $1,834 $1,889 $1,946 $2,004 $2,064 $2,126 $2,190 $2,256 $2,323 $2,393 $2,465 754 No. Residents 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 755 Op. Expenditures (Resident) $2,744,253 $2,826,581 $2,911,378 $2,998,720 $3,088,681 $3,181,342 $3,276,782 $3,375,085 $3,476,338 $3,580,628 $3,688,047 756 757 TOTAL MISC./NON-EDUC OPERATING EXPENDITURES $5,638,005 $5,807,146 $5,981,360 $6,160,801 $6,345,625 $6,535,993 $6,732,073 $6,934,035 $7,142,057 $7,356,318 $7,577,008 758 759 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 760 761 Land Development & Infrastructure Costs $5,159,037 per acre $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 762 Value of Phase 1 Land Takedown $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 763 Net Land Development Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 764 765 Annual Payment on 20 Year Bond 5.0% Interest Rate $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 766 Cumulative Bond Payments $4,894,860 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 767 768 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES $4,894,860 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 769 770 EDUCATIONAL EXPENDITURES 771 772 Pupil Generation 773 Apartments - Market Rate 0.24 per household 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 775 Senior Apartments - ADU 0.00 per household 00000000000 777 Townhomes - Market Rate 0.35 per household 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 778 Townhomes - WDU 0.35 per household 77777777777 780 Condo - WDU 0.07 per household 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 781 782 Total On-Site Pupils 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 783 784 School Expenditures per Pupil $10,752 per pupil $20,002 $20,602 $21,220 $21,856 $22,512 $23,187 $23,883 $24,600 $25,338 $26,098 $26,881 785 786 TOTAL SCHOOL OPERATING EXPENDITURES $2,878,880 $2,965,246 $3,054,204 $3,145,830 $3,240,205 $3,337,411 $3,437,533 $3,540,659 $3,646,879 $3,756,285 $3,868,974 787 788 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES $13,411,800 $8,772,300 $9,035,600 $9,306,600 $9,585,800 $9,873,400 $10,169,600 $10,474,700 $10,789,000 $11,112,600 $11,446,000 789 Misc./Non-Educational Operating Expenditures $5,638,000 $5,807,100 $5,981,400 $6,160,800 $6,345,600 $6,536,000 $6,732,100 $6,934,000 $7,142,100 $7,356,300 $7,577,000 790 Capital Expenditures $4,894,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 791 Educational Expenditures $2,878,900 $2,965,200 $3,054,200 $3,145,800 $3,240,200 $3,337,400 $3,437,500 $3,540,700 $3,646,900 $3,756,300 $3,869,000 792 793 NET FISCAL IMPACT $33,302,700 $39,414,000 $40,667,500 $41,959,200 $43,289,200 $44,659,400 $46,070,700 $47,524,800 $49,022,200 $50,564,800 $52,153,400 794

Page 51 BC DEAF AG AH AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 9 (2010$) Year 21 Year 22 Year 23 Year 24 Year 25 Year 26 Year 27 Year 28 Year 29 Year 30 Year 31 795 796 DEDICATED REVENUE STREAMS (NON-GENERAL FUND REVENUE) 797 798 NEIGHBORHOOD INVESTMENT FUND 799 800 PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUES - NEIGHBORHOOD INVESTMENT FUND 801 803 Total Personal Property Tax Collected $3.400 per $100 AV $430,723 $443,644 $456,954 $470,662 $484,782 $499,325 $514,305 $529,734 $545,626 $561,995 $578,855 804 Neighborhood Investment Fund Revenues 17.4% $74,946 $77,194 $79,510 $81,895 $84,352 $86,883 $89,489 $92,174 $94,939 $97,787 $100,721 805 TOTAL PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUE - NEIGHBORHOOD INVESTMENT FUND $74,946 $77,194 $79,510 $81,895 $84,352 $86,883 $89,489 $92,174 $94,939 $97,787 $100,721 806 807 TOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD INVESTMENT FUND REVENUE $74,946 $77,194 $79,510 $81,895 $84,352 $86,883 $89,489 $92,174 $94,939 $97,787 $100,721 808 809 810 CONVENTION CENTER FUND 811 812 MEALS TAX - CONVENTION CENTER FUND 813 814 Total Restaurant Sales On-Site $3,348,530 $3,448,986 $3,552,456 $3,659,029 $3,768,800 $3,881,864 $3,998,320 $4,118,270 $4,241,818 $4,369,072 $4,500,145 815 816 Meals Tax Revenues (on-site restaurants) 1.00% Effective Rate to Convent $33,485 $34,490 $35,525 $36,590 $37,688 $38,819 $39,983 $41,183 $42,418 $43,691 $45,001 817 818 Total Restaurant Expenditures Off-Site from Residents $665,105 $685,058 $705,610 $726,778 $748,582 $771,039 $794,170 $817,995 $842,535 $867,811 $893,846 819 820 Total Effective Residential Meals Tax Revenues 1.00% Effective Rate to Convent $6,651 $6,851 $7,056 $7,268 $7,486 $7,710 $7,942 $8,180 $8,425 $8,678 $8,938 821 822 TOTAL MEALS TAX REVENUE - CONVENTION CENTER FUND $40,136 $41,340 $42,581 $43,858 $45,174 $46,529 $47,925 $49,363 $50,844 $52,369 $53,940 823 834 TOTAL CONVENTION CENTER FUND REVENUE $40,136 $41,340 $42,581 $43,858 $45,174 $46,529 $47,925 $49,363 $50,844 $52,369 $53,940 835 836 837 INDIRECT/INDUCED EMPLOYMENT 838 839 IMPLAN Categories 840 Indirect/Inducted Construction Jobs 34,37 00000000000 841 TOTAL INDIRECT/INDUCED CONSTRUCTION JOBS 00000000000 842 843 Indirect/Induced Full Time Employment 844 Office 394, 396, 397 1,103 1,103 1,103 1,103 1,103 1,103 1,103 1,103 1,103 1,103 1,103 845 Retail [In-Line] 325, 327, 328, 330, 419, 421 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 846 Restaurants 413 22222222222 847 Retail [Grocery] 324 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 849 TOTAL INDIRECT/INDUCED FULL-TIME JOBS (EXCLUDING CONSTRUCTION) 1,132 1,132 1,132 1,132 1,132 1,132 1,132 1,132 1,132 1,132 1,132 850 851 INDIRECT GROSS OUTPUT SALES TAX REVENUE 852 853 Retail [In-Line] On-site Sales: Categories $16,486,907 $16,981,514 $17,490,960 $18,015,689 $18,556,159 $19,112,844 $19,686,229 $20,276,816 $20,885,121 $21,511,674 $22,157,025 854 Indirect Impact 325, 327, 328, 330, 419, 421 $4,171,188 $4,296,323 $4,425,213 $4,557,969 $4,694,708 $4,835,550 $4,980,616 $5,130,035 $5,283,936 $5,442,454 $5,605,727 855 856 Restaurants On-site Sales: Categories $3,348,530 $3,448,986 $3,552,456 $3,659,029 $3,768,800 $3,881,864 $3,998,320 $4,118,270 $4,241,818 $4,369,072 $4,500,145 857 Indirect Impact 413 $847,178 $872,593 $898,771 $925,734 $953,506 $982,112 $1,011,575 $1,041,922 $1,073,180 $1,105,375 $1,138,537 858 859 Retail [Grocery] On-site Sales $41,577,584 $42,824,911 $44,109,659 $45,432,948 $46,795,937 $48,199,815 $49,645,809 $51,135,184 $52,669,239 $54,249,316 $55,876,796 860 Indirect Impact 324 $10,519,129 $10,834,703 $11,159,744 $11,494,536 $11,839,372 $12,194,553 $12,560,390 $12,937,201 $13,325,317 $13,725,077 $14,136,829 864 865 TOTAL GROSS OUTPUT SALES TO THE DISTRICT $14,760,620 $15,203,438 $15,659,541 $16,129,328 $16,613,207 $17,111,604 $17,624,952 $18,153,700 $18,698,311 $19,259,261 $19,837,038 866 867 TOTAL ESTIMATED INDIRECT SALES TAX REVENUES $886,000 $912,000 $940,000 $968,000 $997,000 $1,027,000 $1,057,000 $1,089,000 $1,122,000 $1,156,000 $1,190,000 868

Page 52 BC DEAF AG AH AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP 7 8 ASSUMPTION 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 9 (2010$) Year 21 Year 22 Year 23 Year 24 Year 25 Year 26 Year 27 Year 28 Year 29 Year 30 Year 31 869 INDIRECT/INDUCED INCOME TAX 870 871 Office 872 Total Employees 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 3,081 873 Average Employee Income $141,568 $145,815 $150,190 $154,696 $159,337 $164,117 $169,040 $174,111 $179,335 $184,715 $190,256 874 Total Employee Income - DC 35% Emp. living in DC $152,639,783 $157,218,976 $161,935,545 $166,793,612 $171,797,420 $176,951,343 $182,259,883 $187,727,679 $193,359,510 $199,160,295 $205,135,104 875 Indirect/Induced Labor Income $88,531,074 $91,187,006 $93,922,616 $96,740,295 $99,642,504 $102,631,779 $105,710,732 $108,882,054 $112,148,516 $115,512,971 $118,978,360 876 Income Tax from Indirect/Induced Labor Income 6% Blended Income Tax Rate $5,311,864 $5,471,220 $5,635,357 $5,804,418 $5,978,550 $6,157,907 $6,342,644 $6,532,923 $6,728,911 $6,930,778 $7,138,702 877 878 Retail [In-Line] 879 Total Employees 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 880 Average Employee Income $49,112 $50,585 $52,103 $53,666 $55,276 $56,934 $58,642 $60,401 $62,213 $64,080 $66,002 881 Total Employee Income - DC 85% Emp. living in DC $3,020,132 $3,110,736 $3,204,058 $3,300,180 $3,399,185 $3,501,161 $3,606,196 $3,714,382 $3,825,813 $3,940,588 $4,058,805 882 Indirect/Induced Labor Income $1,703,355 $1,754,455 $1,807,089 $1,861,302 $1,917,141 $1,974,655 $2,033,894 $2,094,911 $2,157,759 $2,222,491 $2,289,166 883 Income Tax from Indirect/Induced Labor Income 6% Blended Income Tax Rate $102,201 $105,267 $108,425 $111,678 $115,028 $118,479 $122,034 $125,695 $129,466 $133,349 $137,350 884 885 Restaurants 886 Total Employees 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 887 Average Employee Income $42,415 $43,687 $44,998 $46,348 $47,738 $49,170 $50,645 $52,165 $53,730 $55,342 $57,002 888 Total Employee Income - DC 85% Emp. living in DC $648,945 $668,414 $688,466 $709,120 $730,393 $752,305 $774,874 $798,121 $822,064 $846,726 $872,128 889 Indirect/Induced Labor Income $337,451 $347,575 $358,002 $368,742 $379,805 $391,199 $402,935 $415,023 $427,473 $440,298 $453,507 890 Income Tax from Indirect/Induced Labor Income 6% Blended Income Tax Rate $20,247 $20,855 $21,480 $22,125 $22,788 $23,472 $24,176 $24,901 $25,648 $26,418 $27,210 891 892 Retail [Grocery] 893 Total Employees 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 894 Average Employee Income $57,297 $59,016 $60,786 $62,610 $64,488 $66,423 $68,416 $70,468 $72,582 $74,760 $77,002 895 Total Employee Income - DC 85% Emp. living in DC $4,837,783 $4,982,916 $5,132,404 $5,286,376 $5,444,967 $5,608,316 $5,776,566 $5,949,863 $6,128,359 $6,312,209 $6,501,576 896 Indirect/Induced Labor Income $2,951,048 $3,039,579 $3,130,766 $3,224,689 $3,321,430 $3,421,073 $3,523,705 $3,629,416 $3,738,299 $3,850,448 $3,965,961 897 Income Tax from Indirect/Induced Labor Income 6% Blended Income Tax Rate $177,063 $182,375 $187,846 $193,481 $199,286 $205,264 $211,422 $217,765 $224,298 $231,027 $237,958 905 906 Construction 907 Total Employees 00000000000 908 Average Employee Income $129,663 $133,552 $137,559 $141,686 $145,936 $150,314 $154,824 $159,469 $164,253 $169,180 $174,256 909 Total Employee Income - DC 40% Emp. living in DC $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 910 Indirect/Induced Labor Income $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 911 Income Tax from Indirect/Induced Labor Income 6% Blended Income Tax Rate $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 912 913 TOTAL ESTIMATED INDIRECT/INDUCED INCOME TAX REVENUE $5,611,376 $5,779,717 $5,953,108 $6,131,702 $6,315,653 $6,505,122 $6,700,276 $6,901,284 $7,108,323 $7,321,572 $7,541,220 914 915 TOTAL INDIRECT/INDUCED REVENUES $6,497,376 $6,691,717 $6,893,108 $7,099,702 $7,312,653 $7,532,122 $7,757,276 $7,990,284 $8,230,323 $8,477,572 $8,731,220 916

Page 53 OUTLINE OF TESTIMONY Shalom Baranes Shalom Baranes Associates

I. Introduction and Experience

II. Overall Site Planning Considerations

III. Healthcare Facility Description and Design

IV. Streetscape Improvements, Circulation, and Access

V. Conclusions

OUTLINE OF TESTIMONY Matthew Bell, AIA Christian Calleri, AIA Ehrenkrantz Eckstut & Kuhn/Perkins Eastman

I. Introduction and Experience

II. History and Description of McMillan Site

III. Site Planning Considerations

IV. Development Overview and Review of Plans

A. Master Plan

B. Parks and Open Spaces

C. Community Center Building

V. Conclusion

2 #27702560_v1 OUTLINE OF TESTIMONY Anne Corbet Vision McMillan Partners

I. Introduction and Experience

II. History of McMillan Site

III. Development Team and Selection Process

IV. Project History and Development Goals

V. Development Parameters

A. Comprehensive Plan Amendments

B. Historic Preservation Review

C. Coordination with City Agencies and Preservationists

VI. Community Outreach Process

A. Advisory Neighborhood Commission

B. Community Meetings with Councilmember McDuffie

C. History of Discussions with Community

VII. Public Benefits and Project Amenities

VIII. Conclusion

3 #27702560_v1 OUTLINE OF TESTIMONY Emily Eig EHT Traceries, Inc.

I. Introduction and Experience

II. Physical Description and Historic Context of Site

III. Evaluation of Preservation Status

IV. Compatibility of New Construction

V. Conclusion

4 #27702560_v1 OUTLINE OF TESTIMONY David Jameson David Jameson Architects

I. Introduction and Experience

II. Overall Site Planning Considerations

III. Project Description of Multi-Family/Retail Facility

IV. Project Program and Design

a. Multi-Family Component

b. Retail Component

V. Streetscape Improvements, Circulation, and Access

VI. Conclusions

5 #27702560_v1 OUTLINE OF TESTIMONY Jair Lynch Jair Lynch Development Partners

I. Introduction and Experience

II. Project Team

III. Multi-Family/Retail Program and Design

IV. Access and Circulation

V. Development Goals and Relation to Surrounding Community

VI. Conclusions

6 #27702560_v1 OUTLINE OF TESTIMONY Jack F. McLaurin, AIA Lessard Group Architects

I. Introduction and Experience

II. Overall Site Planning Considerations

III. Project Description of Multi-Family/Retail Facility

IV. Project Program and Design

a. Multi-Family Component

b. Retail Component

V. Streetscape Improvements, Circulation, and Access

VI. Conclusions

7 #27702560_v1 OUTLINE OF TESTIMONY Jeff Miller Office of the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development

I. Introduction

II. History of the Project

III. Disposition of Land and Benefits to the District

IV. Extensive Coordination with City Agencies and Preservationists

V. Public Benefits and Project Amenities

VI. Conclusions

8 #27702560_v1 OUTLINE OF TESTIMONY George Sexton George Sexton Associates Lighting Designer

I. Introduction and Experience

II. Overall Site Plan Considerations

III. Lighting Scope and Design

IV. Conclusions

9 #27702560_v1 OUTLINE OF TESTIMONY Steven E. Sher Director of Zoning and Land Use Services Holland & Knight, LLP

I. Introduction and Experience

II. Role in Development Process

III. Site and Location Description

A. Overview of Site, Vicinity, and Land Use/Zoning

B. Site Planning – Size, Lot Configuration, Topography

IV. Discussion of Project Components

a. Overall Site Plan

b. Design Scheme

c. Project Density

d. Market Acceptance of Product

V. Conclusions

10 #27702560_v1 OUTLINE OF TESTIMONY Aakash Thakkar EYA

I. Introduction and Experience

II. Project Team

III. Multi-Family/Retail Program and Design

IV. Access and Circulation

V. Development Goals and Relation to Surrounding Community

VI. Conclusions

11 #27702560_v1 OUTLINE OF TESTIMONY Daniel B. VanPelt Robert Schiesel Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc.

I. Introduction and Experience

II. Project Background

III. Description of Studies and Discussions with DDOT

IV. Assessment and Evaluation

V. Summary and Conclusions

12 #27702560_v1 OUTLINE OF TESTIMONY Jim Voelzke MV+A Architects

I. Introduction and Experience

II. Overall Site Planning Considerations

III. Project Description of Multi-Family/Retail Facility

IV. Project Program and Design

a. Multi-Family Component

b. Retail Component

V. Streetscape Improvements, Circulation, and Access

VI. Conclusions

13 #27702560_v1 OUTLINE OF TESTIMONY Adam Weers Trammell Crow Company

I. Introduction and Experience

II. Project Team

III. Health Care Facility Program and Design

IV. Access and Circulation

V. Development Goals and Relation to Nearby Health Care Facilities

VI. Conclusions

14 #27702560_v1 OUTLINE OF TESTIMONY Thomas Woltz, FASLA, PLA, NZILA Jeffrey Aten, ASLA, PLA Nelson Byrd Woltz Landscape Architects

I. Introduction and Experience

II. Review of Landscape Design Within Project

III. Review of Streetscape and Pedestrian Experience

IV. Conclusions

15 #27702560_v1 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia

Case No. 10-23 26C Matthew J. Bell, FAIA Matthew Bell has been a practicing architect and professor of architecture for over Principal 20 years. His national and international architectural and urban design experience ranges from small-scale buildings and studies for existing neighborhoods to the design and implementation of new towns, campuses and cities. Creating a diverse portfolio of work has led Matt to develop unique insights into the urban-environment and design-issue challenges facing our cities, towns, and suburbs.

As Professor at the University of Maryland’s School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation, Matt’s focus is on town planning, urban design and leading the urban design curriculum at all levels of the program. He also directs the school’s efforts in the revitalization of Castellamare di Stabia, Italy, which has included projects for a new archaeological park, infill development for the historic center and transit- oriented development.

Education Cornell University, Master of Architecture in Urban Design, 1989 University of Notre Dame, Bachelor of Architecture, 1983

Licensing and Memberships Matt is a Registered Architect licensed in the District of Columbia, Maryland and New York. He is a Charter Member of the Congress for the New Urbanism, former President, of the Neighborhood Design Center of Baltimore, Maryland (1997-1998), former Director, of the Mayor’s Institute on City Design Northeast (1994-1999), and, the Vice President of Restoring Ancient Stabia, Castellamare di Stabia, Italy (2003-Present). Matt has also contributed to the American Architectural Foundation’s Forum on Urban School Design.

Teaching University of Maryland School of Architecture Professor with Tenure, 2007-Present Associate Professor with Tenure, 1989-2007 University of Miami, Part-time & Visiting Appointments Cornell University, Department of Architecture, Lecturer and Visiting Critic

Awards Learning By Design Grand Prize Award, Excellence in Educational Facility Design, School Without Walls Senior High School, 2010. American Institute of Architects/Committee for Architecture Education, Educational Facility Design Awards Program Citation, School Without Walls Senior High School, 2010. Design Share, Merit Award, School Without Walls Senior High School, 2008 American Institute of Architects, National Honor Award for Regional and Urban Design, The Aventiene, 2007. AARP and the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), Livable Communities Award, Collegetown at West End, 2007. American Planning Association, Virginia Chapter, Outstanding Master Plan, Eisenhower East Small Area Plan, 2004. American Institute of Architects, Potomac Valley Chapter, Honor Award, National Cathedral Master Plan, 2000. American Institute of Architects, Urban Design Honor Award, Bahçesehir, Turkey, 1999. Congress for the New Urbanism, Charter Award, King Farm, 2000. Matthew J. Bell, FAIA Selected Experience Principal Large Scale Design

Hull Street Corridor Revitalization Plan Biscayne Landing Richmond, Virginia Miami, Florida Master plan for an auto-oriented street. The community will offer a variety Through redesigned street sections, of housing types, including high-rise massing varieties, and a plan for new condominiums, villas, townhouses development strategically placed along a and mid-rise lofts, located around a corridor, the design will guide a gradual vibrant Town Center, filled with shops, transformation of the street, which will entertainment and restaurants. The connect a series of new open spaces and entire development will overlook lush existing neighborhoods. mangroves and the thriving wildlife habitat of the Oleta River State Park - the McMillan largest urban park in Florida. Washington, District of Columbia The proposed 1.8 M sf development is Crown Farm Neighborhood• anchored at the north by medical office Gaithersburg, Maryland uses and will significantly transform Crown Farm is a transit-oriented the adjacent neighborhoods, bringing community of distinct neighborhoods jobs, workforce housing and great interconnected by parks, woodlands public places to a much treasured local and walkable streets in close proximity landmark; the plan involves reuse of to a state-of-the art high school, high- unique historic resources, above ground quality retail and a Light Rail Station. The and below, as well as the creation of proposed plan allows for approximately a series of new parks, a retail street, a half the population to live within two piazza, and housing types throughout the blocks of the transit station and more 25 acre site. than 70% live within walking distance.

Shady Grove Master Plan Southwest Waterfront Bethesda, Maryland Washington, District of Columbia The 95 acre site at the western terminus The design for the new riverfront of the DC Metro Red Line is turned from neighborhood incorporates restaurants a bus parking facility into a thriving urban and shops with new residences above, a neighborhood centered around a series hotel, cultural attractions, marinas and of parks, various public square types, and ten acres of parks and open space. The immediate access to the metro. A variety maritime heritage of the waterfront will of densities and housing typologies mixed be celebrated through the preservation of with offices and retail define different existing resources and the reactivation of neighborhoods within the design. the water’s edge.

Metro Green Line, TOD Anacostia Waterfront Initiative• Prince George’s County, Maryland Washington, District of Columbia Transit oriented development action A new waterfront plan reconnects the plan for four southern green line metro important asset of the waterfront to the stops at Southern Avenue; Naylor Road, adjacent neighborhoods and provides Suitland and Branch Avenue for the for a new waterfront park system, public planning department of the M-NCPPC amenities along the waterfront, and in order to stimulate growth to a well improved pedestrian circulation to sports defined urban development plan. venues on the site. Matthew J. Bell, FAIA Selected Experience (continued) Principal Armed Forces Retirement Home• City of Bahçesehir, Master Plan• Washington, District of Columbia Phase II Preliminary design concepts for the Bahçesehir, Turkey development of 77 acres of this property. The design was guided by the idea that The proposed concept involves a mixture the form of cities and towns should of adaptive reuse and sensitive new support and nurture the qualities of civic development, retaining and building life and community. The scheme includes upon the general character of the site and a vast range of residential buildings, surrounding parcels. 10,000 sm. of commercial retail and office space. Arverne By-The-Sea• Rockaways, New York Collegetown Master Plan• This award-winning design knits together Atlanta, Georgia the subway and the sea, creating The plan is for a mixed-use neighborhood a unique transit-based beachfront including 900 plus residential units community. The radial plan orients located in the SW area of the plan and each of the neighborhoods around the an additional 1,000 units for the area to previously underutilized subway station. the NE.

Great Streets• Collegetown Square• Washington, District of Columbia Atlanta, Georgia A comprehensive strategy encompassing This important phase of the Collegetown 22 miles of roadway to utilize public Master Plan establishes Collegetown investments in infrastructure, streetscape Square, the town center. The initial phase improvements, land use planning, and includes retail around the square at the development assistance to catalyze private ground floor, a mixture of residential investment that improves neighborhood building types, a 125-room inn, and a quality of life and creates a physical new neighborhood community center. environment opportune for expanded retail, housing, employment, services, and Collegetown at West End• other community needs. Atlanta, Georgia The plan establishes small, interior Crystal City Redevelopment Plan• parked blocks, walkable, tree-lined Arlington, Virginia streets with parallel parking, a system A mixed-use urban neighborhood of connected small and large residential developed on the principles of the super parks, a variety of housing types, and a block next to Reagan National Airport town center. and just south of downtown Washington DC in Arlington, VA. David Taylor Research Center• Annapolis, Maryland DC Ballpark Site Evaluation Study• The proposed redevelopment envisions Washington, District of Columbia the design and construction of a state- A comprehensive review 32 potential of-the-art high technology campus sites in the city that could be considered situated at the mouth of the Severn River, for a ballpark, further study on how the overlooking the U.S. Naval Academy and final two preferred sites offer the greatest historic Annapolis. potential for economic development associated with a new ballpark district. Matthew J. Bell, FAIA Selected Experience (continued) Principal Uptown District Master Plan• Van Dorn District• Washington, District of Columbia Alexandria, Virginia A new vision for the heart of the The planning area is transformed from its historically African-American cultural current suburban, auto-oriented character district around the Howard Theater and into an active urban community with U Street. smaller blocks and landscaped streets designed for pedestrians and new transit East Campus Town Center• services. College Park, Maryland A series of master plan studies which Nannie Helen Burroughs Avenue focused on providing sites for housing, Streetscape• research and retail development Washington, District of Columbia integrated the area with the campus The Nannie Helen Burroughs Avenue proper and provided clear direction public realm will integrate functional and about how new development could be decorative arts, in order to convey the intelligently and sensitively integrated with surrounding neighborhoods’ legacy as an the surrounding context. historically self-reliant African American community, while exploiting proximity Eisenhower East, Master Plan• to the Anacostia Waterfront Eastern Alexandria, Virginia Parklands and Marvin Gaye Park. A master plan that accommodates over 16 million sf of retail, residential King Farm, Plan & Implementation• and office space. The plan features an Rockville, Maryland interconnected system of neighborhood The plan is based upon older small squares, public plazas and parks, all towns and residential areas and provides woven together by a new street network. an interconnected street network with alleys, streets and boulevards designed to Georgia Avenue - Petworth Metro• promote the sharing of the street by both Station Site the pedestrian and the automobile. Washington, District of Columbia A new master plan for the Georgia New East Baltimore Community• Avenue corridor, one of the oldest retail Baltimore, Maryland and residential corridors in the Nations A new neighborhood for living, working Capital. Long considered the poor cousin and shopping in one integrated place, of residential/retail areas in the city, the emphasizing existing street and block city’s initiative will remake the city into a networks. The new neighborhood will series of neighborhoods, each with their create a seamless joining of the Johns own retail center, and renovated or new Hopkins University’s Hospital Campus housing stock. and town; connecting with the future transit station at north, existing housing Mt. Vernon Square District Plan• at east and future development along Washington, District of Columbia Broadway. A new and exciting vision for the district that meets the challenges of future National Cathedral Close growth, accommodates the growing Master Plan• needs of current residents and connects Washington, District of Columbia the many surrounding neighborhoods The master plan for the National together into a Mount Vernon Square that Cathedral Close in Washington, DC becomes the next great neighborhood for coordinates the future growth needs the Nation’s Capital. for the diverse groups and institutions occupying the site with a thoughtful plan that respects the history of the site. Matthew J. Bell, FAIA Selected Experience (continued) Principal New River at Las Olas• George Washington University Fort Lauderdale, Florida Mt. Vernon Campus Plan• This mixed-use development along the Washington, District of Columbia banks of New River will transform and A campus plan that will accommodate revitalize downtown Fort Lauderdale, targeted growth in student residences, giving it a new skyline and making it a academic facilities and support services distinctive destination. that will serve the university in its next period of expansion. The new plan Hill East Waterfront supports a vision that enhances the Public Reservation 13• historic existing campus and guides the Washington, District of Columbia thinking for new facilities, campus entries A new plan for the 67-acre Hill East and gateways, circulation and program Waterfront neighborhood on Capitol relocation. Hill in our Nation’s Capitol. The plan will transform the area from an isolated George Washington University Foggy campus of aging and abandoned Bottom Campus Master Plan• buildings and large parking lots to a Washington, District of Columbia new mixed- use waterfront community of The plan provides for the university the streets, parks and public spaces. necessary growth over the next twenty years — to accommodate both its student Pratt Institute Historic housing and academic programming Preservation Master Plan• needs — on the Foggy Bottom campus, Brooklyn, New York as well as significant, tangible benefits The plan includes an inventory of to the campus and neighborhood buildings, landscapes and structures with community. architectural, historical and/or cultural significance. Harper Community College Master Plan• George Mason University Palatine, Illinois North Sector Plan• A plan to realize Harper’s vision as a Fairfax, Virginia leading 21st-century Community College, The new plan for the North Sector is recognizing the needs of an increasingly designed to change the character from diverse student body for campus places one of surface parking and automobiles that enhance the college experience, to one of a vibrant pedestrian-oriented including a new campus center. campus community. The plan provides a welcoming new face for the Mason Johns Hopkins University campus. New gateways link the interior of Belward Campus• the campus with the local community. Montgomery County, Maryland A concept plan for the future of the Johns George Mason University Hopkins Belward Research Campus and Southwest Sector Plan• surrounding greater Shady Grove Life Fairfax, Virginia Science Center that offers a new vision The master plan creates a flexible for the development of state-of-the-art framework for growth that can respond applied research in a thriving, mixed-use to changing circumstances. At the core of community. the plan is the transformation of a 109- acre site, currently dominated by surface parking lots, into a mixed-use campus village. Matthew J. Bell, FAIA Selected Experience (continued) Principal St. Johns College Master Plan• University Woods at Catholic University• Annapolis, Maryland Washington, District of Columbia Creation of a plan that builds upon the The design establishes a framework of college’s unique culture and curriculum streets and blocks organized to promote and enhances the landscape and provides a balance of automobile and pedestrian new opportunities for infill construction movement throughout the site area. A that reinforce that larger vision and small college town “main street,” connects with scale details of the campus. the western entry to the CU campus and becomes the organizing spine of the SUNY Binghamton development along Harewood Street. Campus Site Improvements• Binghamton, New York A site improvements plan for this 700- acre campus, home of one of the four University Centers of the State of New York system.

SUNY New Paltz Site and Landscape Master Plan• New Paltz, New York A long-range, comprehensive vision including a framework to integrate existing buildings, potential sites for development, outdoor places, and vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems for the 226-acre campus.

SUNY New Paltz Facilities Master Plan• New Paltz, New York The Facilities Master Plan for the campus documents current building conditions, establishes program needs for facilities to support the College’s mission and goals, and advances new building and open space design concepts for the future of the campus.

University of Maryland, East Campus Mixed-use Urban Design• College Park, Maryland Plan to develop a college town environment modeled on the great American college towns, on land the university owned east of US Route One. Matthew J. Bell, FAIA Principal

SELECTED WORK Collegetown Master Plan• Atlanta, Georgia Large Scale Design Collegetown Square• Hull Street Corridor Revitalization Plan Atlanta, Georgia Richmond, Virginia Collegetown at West End• McMillan Atlanta, Georgia Washington, District of Columbia David Taylor Research Center• BIOGRAPHY Shady Grove Master Plan Annapolis, Maryland Matthew Bell has been a practicing Bethesda, Maryland architect and professor of architecture Uptown District Master Plan• for over 20 years. His national and Metro Green Line, TOD Washington, District of Columbia international architectural and urban Prince George’s County, Maryland design experience ranges from small- East Campus Town Center• scale buildings and studies for existing Biscayne Landing College Park, Maryland neighborhoods to the design and Miami, Florida implementation of new towns, campuses Eisenhower East, Master Plan• and cities. Creating a diverse portfolio Crown Farm Neighborhood• Alexandria, Virginia of work has led Matt to develop unique Gaithersburg, Maryland insights into the urban-environment and Georgia Avenue - Petworth Metro• design-issue challenges facing our cities, Southwest Waterfront Station Site towns, and suburbs. Washington, District of Columbia Washington, District of Columbia

Anacostia Waterfront Initiative• Mt. Vernon Square District Plan• EDUCATION Washington, District of Columbia Washington, District of Columbia Cornell University, Master of Architecture in Urban Design, 1989 Armed Forces Retirement Home• Van Dorn District• University of Notre Dame, Bachelor of Washington, District of Columbia Alexandria, Virginia Architecture, 1983 Arverne By-The-Sea• Nannie Helen Burroughs Avenue Rockaways, New York Streetscape• LICENSING & MEMBERSHIPS Washington, District of Columbia Matt is a Registered Architect licensed in Great Streets• the District of Columbia, Maryland and Washington, District of Columbia King Farm, Plan & Implementation• New York. He is a Charter Member of Rockville, Maryland the Congress for the New Urbanism, Crystal City Redevelopment Plan• former President, of the Neighborhood Arlington, Virginia New East Baltimore Community• Design Center of Baltimore, Maryland Baltimore, Maryland (1997-1998), former Director, of the DC Ballpark Site Evaluation Study• Mayor’s Institute on City Design Northeast Washington, District of Columbia National Cathedral Close (1994-1999), and, the Vice President of Master Plan• Restoring Ancient Stabia, Castellamare di City of Bahçesehir, Master Plan• Washington, District of Columbia Stabia, Italy (2003-Present). Matt has also Phase II contributed to the American Architectural Bahçesehir, Turkey Foundation’s Forum on Urban School Design. Matthew J. Bell, FAIA Selected Experience (continued) Principal New River at Las Olas• Fort Lauderdale, Florida University of Maryland, East Campus Mixed-use Urban Design• Hill East Waterfront College Park, Maryland Public Reservation 13• Washington, District of Columbia University Woods at Catholic University• Washington, District of Columbia Pratt Institute Historic Preservation Master Plan• Brooklyn, New York

George Mason University North Sector Plan• Fairfax, Virginia

George Mason University Southwest Sector Plan• Fairfax, Virginia

George Washington University Mt. Vernon Campus Plan• Washington, District of Columbia

George Washington University Foggy Bottom Campus Master Plan• Washington, District of Columbia

Harper Community College Master Plan• Palatine, Illinois

Johns Hopkins University Belward Campus• Montgomery County, Maryland

St. Johns College Master Plan• Annapolis, Maryland

SUNY Binghamton Campus Site Improvements• Binghamton, New York

SUNY New Paltz Site and Landscape Master Plan• New Paltz, New York

SUNY New Paltz Facilities Master Plan• New Paltz, New York Christian Calleri, AIA Christian Calleri’s passion for public spaces and public architecture has enabled him Associate to deliver a wide range of services for federal, institutional, commercial, urban design and restoration projects. Over the course of his career, he has provided architectural and interior design, programming, technical detailing and construction administration for both large and small scale projects.

Education University of Maryland, Master of Architecture, 2001 State University of New York at Buffalo, Bachelor of Professional Studies in Architecture, 1998

Memberships Mr. Calleri is a registered architect in Washington, DC.

Selected Experience Large Scale Design Hull Street Corridor Richmond, Virginia McMillan An auto oriented street that excludes Washington, District of Columbia pedestrians and divides populations The proposed 1.8M sf of development is was in need of a new vision. Through anchored at the north by medical office redesigned street sections, massing uses and will significantly transform varieties and a plan for new development the adjacent neighborhoods, bringing strategically placed along a corridor, jobs, workforce housing and great that has very little development pressure public places to a much treasured local at the moment, will guide a gradual landmark. A large component of the transformation of the street into a plan involves reuse of very unique historic beautiful and functional boulevard which resources, both above ground and will connect a series of new open spaces below, as well as the creation of a series and existing neighborhoods into an of new parks, a retail street, a piazza, updated functional and thriving urban different housing types and experiences fabric. throughout the 25 acre site. Shady Grove Master Plan* Crown Farm Neighborhood Bethesda, Maryland Gaithersburg, Maryland The 95 acre site at the western terminus Crown Farm is a transit-oriented of the DC Metro Red Line is turned from community of distinct neighborhoods a bus parking facility into a thriving interconnected by parks, woodlands urban neighborhood centered around and walkable streets in close proximity a series of parks, various public square to a state-of-the art high school, high- types and immediate access to the quality retail and a Light Rail Station. The metro. A variety of densities and housing proposed plan allows for approximately typologies mixed with offices and retail half the population to live within two define different neighborhoods within the blocks of the transit station and more design, all connected and rationalized by than 70% live within walking distance. a new street grid and open space plan.

Metro Green Line, TOD Brookland Manor Vision Studies Prince George’s County, Maryland Washington, District of Columbia Project Designer for the team that developed a transit oriented development Arlington County Courthouse Plaza* action plan for four southern green line Arlington, Virginia metro stops at Southern Avenue; Naylor Redevelopment of the Courthouse Plaza Road, Suitland and Branch Avenue to improve circulation and security while for the planning department of the designing a more dramatic entry as M-NCPPC in order to stimulate growth to befitting a courthouse. a well defined urban development plan. Christian Calleri, AIA Selected Experience (continued)

Associate Higher Education

University of Virginia: New Classroom Building Addition* Charlottesville, Virginia Project Architect and Construction Administrator for new Classroom Building added to historic McKim Mead and White Building on Jefferson’s Lawn, a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

University of Michigan Law School* Ann Arbor, Michigan Project Architect and Designer of the new Law School employing the collegiate gothic style.

Other

The National Archives Building Entry* Washington, District of Columbia The redesign of the interior entry sequence to this historic building in a National Historic Building.

• Designates work completed prior to joining Perkins Eastman Christian Calleri, AIA Associate

SELECTED WORK

Large Scale Design

McMillan Washington, District of Columbia

Crown Farm Neighborhood Gaithersburg, Maryland

BIOGRAPHY Metro Green Line, TOD Christian Calleri’s passion for public spac- Prince George’s County, Maryland es and public architecture has enabled him to deliver a wide range of services for Hull Street Corridor federal, institutional, commercial, urban Richmond, Virginia design and restoration projects. Over the course of his career, he has provided Shady Grove Master Plan* architectural and interior design, pro- Bethesda, Maryland gramming, technical detailing and con- struction administration for both large and Brookland Manor Vision Studies small scale projects. Washington, District of Columbia

EDUCATION Arlington County Courthouse Plaza* University of Maryland, Master of Arlington, Virginia Architecture, 2001 State University of New York at Buffalo, Higher Education Bachelor of Professional Studies in Architecture, 1998 University of Virginia: New Classroom Building Addition* LICENSING & MEMBERSHIPS Charlottesville, Virginia Mr. Calleri is a registered architect in Washington, DC. University of Michigan Law School* Ann Arbor, Michigan

Other

The National Archives Building Entry* Washington, District of Columbia

• Designates work completed prior to joining Perkins Eastman

1121 5th Street, NW Phone: (202) 393‐1199 Washington, DC 20001 Email: [email protected]

EMILY HOTALING EIG President and Chief Executive Officer

Emily Eig is the founder and president of EHT Traceries, a women‐owned company incorporated in the State of Maryland and headquartered in Washington, D.C. As the head of EHT Traceries, she combines management of a fifteen‐person firm with her work as an architectural historian and preservation consultant. Her technical knowledge is focused on late 19th‐ and 20th‐century buildings, and includes a thorough understanding of current historic preservation issues. Her work with federal and local architecture is well known and she has worked in the District of Columbia, Maryland, Virginia, New York, Texas, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Illinois, Michigan, and Hawaii.

AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY & COMMITMENT TO EACH PROJECT

Ms. Eig specializes in public, institutional, military, religious, commercial, theater, and residential architecture, as well as the history of city planning and 20th century cultural landscape. Her expertise in historic and contemporary documentation, construction techniques, building materials, on‐site investigation complements her ability to provide creative preservation solutions for individual resources as well as within large‐scale settings. As a preservation planner, she provides direction for compatible new design related to historic buildings and historic districts, advises on the interpretation of preservation laws and regulations, and regularly assisting owners, developers, architects, and preservation technicians with the interpretation and analysis of historic buildings. Her strength related to handling complex projects, including public‐private partnerships, is well known .

Ms. Eig has served as Project Architectural Historian and Preservation Planning Consultant for numerous major historic projects in Washington, DC and in other cities around the US. In these roles, she has directed research; prepared Historic Structures Reports and Historic Preservation Plans; advised on local and federal preservation reviews including Determination of Eligibility and Section 106 Memorandum of /Programmatic Agreements; guided efforts to rehabilitate historic buildings using the Secretary of Interior’s Standards; and advised on the design compatibility of major new additions to historic buildings and new construction in historic districts. She works on a regular basis with the DC State Historic Preservation Office.

She is a considered an expert in architectural history, resource evaluation, preservation planning, federal and state Historic Preservation Certification processes, Section 106 mitigation, and the Secretary of Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Ms. Eig meets professional qualifications prescribed by the Secretary of the Interior (36 CFR 61 ‐ Appendix A). She has been accepted as an expert witness before the D.C. Historic Preservation Review Board, the Montgomery County (MD) Historic Preservation Commission, the Prince George’s County (MD) Historic Preservation Commission; the Old Georgetown (DC) Board; the Coral Gables (FL) Historic Preservation Commission; the DC Mayor's Agent for Historic Preservation; the DC Zoning Commission; the DC Board of Zoning Adjustment; Superior Court of the District of Columbia; the National Capital Planning Commission; the Maryland‐National Capital Park and Planning Commission; and the Commission of Fine Arts. She has appeared before the Montgomery County (MD) Board of Appeals as a member of the County’s Historic Preservation Commission. Ms. Eig has served on a number of Urban Land Institute panels, and is currently a member of the City of Baltimore Urban Design and Architectural Review Panel, the Dean’s Advisory Board for the Dean of the University School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation, and sits on the University of Maryland’s Department of Historic Preservation’s Technical Advisory Committee. ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia

Case No. 07-13D 14D1 Emily Hotaling Eig Page 2

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE

Selected Historic Preservation Planning related to Master Plans in Washington, DC • McMillan Park (McMillan Sand Filtration Plant) • St. Elizabeths East • Armed Forces Retirement Home‐Washington • Southeast Federal Center (The Yards) • The George Washington University • The University of Maryland in Baltimore.

Selected preservation projects in Washington, DC include: • Randall School (Rubell/Telesis Partnership), Bing Thom and Associates, 2010 ‐ • Residential Embassy Building (Embassy of the People’s Republic of China), Philip Esocoff and Associates) 2008 ‐ 2010 • Spanish Cultural Center, (Embassy of Spain), KCCT 2008 – 2009; 2011 • Chancery of the Embassy of the Republic of South Africa (Embassy of South Africa), Davis Brody Bond, 2009 ‐. • Howard Theatre (Howard Theatre Restoration) Martinez+Johnson Architecture, 2008 – 2012 • Georgetown Library, (D.C. Public Library), Martinez+Johnson Architecture, 2008 ‐ 2010 • C&P Telephone Warehouse (NPR), Hickok Cole Associates 2008 ‐ 2013 • Arena Stage, (Arena Stage), Bing Thom Associates, 2003‐2004; 2007 • Studio Theatre, (Studio Theatre) William Bonstra Associates, 2002‐2005

Selected Sections 106, 110, and 111 projects include: • Union Station – Washington, DC (FRA/USRC/USInvestco) GTM Architects, 2010 ‐ ongoing • Southeast Federal Center (Forest City Washington) Shalom Baranes Associates, 2003‐07; 2010 • O Street Market (Roadside Development) Shalom Baranes Associates, 2010 ‐ 2013 • Progression Place (Four Points Development) Eric Colbert Architects, 2010 ‐ • AFRH Cultural Resource Manager (AFRH) 2008 ‐ • AFRH Master Plan (Jones Lang LaSalle for GSA) with Koetter Kim, 2003‐2008 • National Law Enforcement Museum (National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund) Davis Buckley Architects and Planners, 2005‐ 2008 • Naval Station Great Lakes, Great Lakes, IL (Forest City Military Communities, Inc.), 2004‐2006 • Ford’s Theater Society Educational Center (Ford Theatre Society), Martinez+Johnson Architecture, 2010‐2012 • Ford’s Theatre, (Ford Theatre Society/National Park Service) ASD, Inc., 2003‐2004

Selected preservation projects around the United States include: • Loew’s Kings Theatre, Brooklyn, NY (ACE Enterprises), Martinez+Johnson, 2010 ‐ • Saenger Theatre, New Orleans, LA (ACE Enterprises), Martinez+Johnson, 2009 ‐ • Goldwin Smith Hall, NY (Cornell University) Koetter Kim and Associates, 2008‐ • Plaza Theatre, El Paso, TX (Community Foundation of El Paso) Martinez+Johnson, 2001‐2006 • Mississippi State University Riley Center for Education and Performing Arts, Martinez+Johnson| Architecture, 2002‐2007

EDUCATION

The George Washington University, Washington, DC Master of Arts in Teaching in Museum Education, 1975; Field of study: Architectural History

ZONING COMMISSION Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts District of Columbia Bachelor of Arts, Fine Arts (Art History), cum laude with departmental honors, 1974. Case No. 07-13D Honors Thesis: Urban Open Space: A Comparison of Lafayette Square and Judiciary Square14D1 4435 Wisconsin Ave. NW #410 DAVID JAMESON, FAIA Washington, DC 20016 Exhibitions

“Stalling Detritus” installation, Longview Gallery, Washington, DC 2010 “The City and The World” The European Centre for Architecture, Madrid, Spain 2010 AR Awards for Emerging Architecture Exhibition Tour Germany, Hungary, Korea 2007-2008 “AR Awards” Royal Institute of British Architects London, England November 2007 “New World Architecture” Royal Institute of Irish Architects, Dublin, Ireland November 2006 “Distillation” Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia November 2006 “21 : 4 : 21” Washington, DC 2003 Juries

Architect Magazine Annual Design Review 2013 National Building Museum Interschool Design Competition 2011 AIA Virginia Society Virginia Society Prize 2009 / 1999 AIA Northeastern Pennsylvania Design Awards 2009 AIA North Carolina Design Awards 2009 AIA Buffalo McKinley House Design Competition 2009 AIA Utah Design Awards 2008 AIA Housing Awards 2008 AIA / HUD Secretary Awards 2008 AIA New England Design Awards 2007 Lectures University of Arkansas Fay Jones School of Architecture “What’s Next” February 2013 AIA San Antonio “The Work of David Jameson Architect” February 2012 Catholic University of America “(A)scalar Interchange” November 2011 NC State, Raleigh, North Carolina “The Work of David Jameson Architect” October 2011 Marywood University, Scranton, Pennsylvania “Distillation and Recent Work” 2011 University Texas School of Architecture “Distillation and Recent Work” October 2010 AIA DC “Current Projects” September 2010 National Building Museum “Spotlight on Design” December 2009 AIA Buffalo / Western New York “Between Janus” March 2009 Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia “Distillation” November 2006 AIA Virginia Society “Classicism vs. Modernism” May 2006 Critic / Academia Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Guest Critic 2013 U.S. General Services Administration, National Peer Program 2012 - present Catholic University of America, Adjunct Faculty 2011 University of Virginia, Guest Critic 2011 Carnegie Mellon University School of Architecture, Guest Critic 2009 Columbia University Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation, Guest Critic 2009 Yale School of Architecture, Guest Critic 2009 Washington-Alexandria Architecture Consortium, Adjunct Professor 2009 U.S. Department of Energy Solar Decathlon, Virginia Tech Entry 2009 Education Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA Bachelor of Architecture 1991 Work History

David Jameson Architect 13

Hugh Newell Jacobsen Architect 5 DAVID JAMESON, FAIA: SUMMARY INFORMATION

Recipient of a 2013 American Architecture Award: NaCl, Kensington Residence

Recipient of a 2012 American Architecture Award: Tea House, Jigsaw, Graticule, Barcode

Recipient of a 2012 International Architecture Award: Tea House

Recipient of a 2012 Institute Honor Awards for Interior Architecture: Record House Revisited

Recipient of a 2011 AIA SPP Honor Award for Architecture: Tea House

Recognized in 2010: Architectural Digest “AD100”, Wallpaper Magazine “Fab 40”, Residential Architect “ra50”

Recipient of the 2010 American Architecture Award: House on Hoopers Island

Recipient of the 2010 International Architecture Award: House on Hoopers Island and Black White Residence

Recipient of a 2009 Institute Honor Awards for Interior Architecture: Jigsaw

Recipient of a 2009 Institute Housing Awards: House on Hoopers Island

Recipient of a 2007 Architectural Review AR Award for Emerging Architecture: Eastern Market Row House

Elevated in 2006 to the AIA College of Fellows

Recipient of a 2006 American Architecture Award from the Chicago Athenaeum: Eastern Market Row House

Recipient of a 2006 AIA SPP Honor Award for Architecture: Eastern Market Row House

Recipient of the 2004 AIA Young Architects Award

Recipient of sixty-eight AIA State Awards for Design Excellence These awards were conferred by AIA Washington DC, AIA Virginia Society, and AIA Maryland Society.

Recipient of thirty-three AIA Component Awards for Design Excellence These awards were conferred by AIA Northern Virginia and AIA Baltimore.

Winner of forty-one national design competitions Competitions included programs sponsored by the AIA, residential architect magazine and The Chicago Athenaeum.

Winner of nine international design competitions Competitions included programs sponsored by Architectural Review and European Center for Architecture Art & Design.

President and Design Principal of David Jameson Architect The firm was founded in the fall of 2001.

Recipient of 2004 Virginia Tech College of Architecture and Urban Studies Outstanding Alumni Award This annual award is given to one alumnus in recognition of significant contributions to architecture and design.

Work published in over two hundred design publications Periodicals included Architectural Record, Architectural Review, Architectural Digest, Metropolis, Azure, Metropolitan Home, Interior Design, residential architect, Diseñart (Spain), Trends (New Zealand), Plan (Ireland) , Noi That (Vietnam), Hinge Magazine (Hong Kong), Interni (Italy), C3 (South Korea), AD (Germany), Architecture Update (India) Artravel (France).

Member of AIA Northern Virginia Board of Directors and Small Firms Committee Chair, 2004-2009 The Small Firms Committee mission is to expand the knowledge of 1-10 person firms. He has worked to communicate the value of design excellence to the public. He has volunteered as a class leader for the AIA Architects in the Schools program to advance the knowledge of elementary school children about architecture and design. JACK MCLAURIN EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT | AIA, CGP, NCARB

Jack F. McLaurin, Principal, leads Lessard’s Single-Family and Townhome Division with projects ranging from large single-family suburban residences to high-density urban infill developments. He has 27 years of professional experience, including 17 with Chris Lessard. His in-depth understanding of both construction and architectural practice enables him to produce high-level design while being sensitive to cost. This unique combination of talent and experience results in developments which sell quickly and reap profits for his clients. EDUCATION BACHELOR OF ARCHITECTURE Jack focuses on the development of long-term client relationships Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1987 by providing superior service. His clients encompass both small and large volume American East Coast developers and builders, as REGISTRATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS well as, national builders and developers. He participates actively REGISTERED ARCHITECT throughout the various planning, design and construction phases and DC, VA, MD, NY, NJ, CT, MA, DE, PA, NC, SC FL, GA, OH, IL, TX, AL, MO, RI lends his land planning, zoning, value engineering and construction expertise to each project. Additionally, he has thorough knowledge NCARB CERTIFIED of market influences, competitive product, land values and socio- National Council of Architectural Registration Board economic factors, helping his clients position their product in the CERTIFIED GREEN PROFESSIONAL marketplace and maintain long-term value. As a result, he enjoys National Association of Home Builders many repeat assignments from loyal clients. His portfolio includes UNIVERSAL DESIGN CERTIFICATE HOLDER award-winning single family and townhome communities in the Virginia Housing Development Authority (VHDA) greater Washington, DC metropolitan area, projects in Southern ORGANIZATIONS Virginia and Coastal Delaware as well as several public housing and AMERICAN INSITUTUTE OF ARCHITECTS (AIA) affordable housing communities in urban areas. INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL (ICC) NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILLDERS (NAHB) MARYLAND NATIONAL CAPITAL BUILDING ASSOCIATION (MNCBIA) NORTHERN VIRGINIA BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION (NVBIA)

SELECTED AWARDS CHATHAM SQUARE - 14 National & Regional Awards BRYAN SQUARE - 6 National & Regional Awards SYMPHONY PARK TOWNHOMES - 10 National & Regional Awards OLD TOWN VILLAGE - 12 National & Regional Awards NATIONAL PARK SEMINARY - 12 National & Regional Awards FORD’S LANDING - 7 National & Regional Awards lessard D E S I G N Jack McLaurin, Executive Vice President | AIA, GGP, NCARB

METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON, DC FALLSGROVE EXPERIENCE 445 Units —Rockville, MD

WHEATON METRO TOWNHOMES ARTHUR CAPPER MIXED-USE, TOWNHOMES, 75 Units —Wheaton, MD CONDOMINIUMS & APARTMENTS 277 Units — Washington, DC JAMES BLAND MIXED INCOME REDEVELOPMENT 395 Units — Alexandria, VA BRYAN SQUARE CONDOMINIUMS & TOWNHOMES 68 Units — Washington, DC EVANS FARM CONDOMINIUMS & SINGLE FAMILY HOMES CHATHAM SQUARE MIXED-INCOME TOWNHOMES 125 Units — McLean, VA & PUBLIC HOUSING THE BROWNSTONE TOWNHOMES AT PARK POTOMAC 152 Units — Washington, DC 150 Units Potomac, MD CANAL PARK RESIDENCES POTOMAC GREENS TOWNHOMES 34 Units — Washington, DC 229 Units — Potomac, MD CHANCELLOR’S ROW TOWNHOMES CLARENDON PARK TOWNHOMES 237 Units — Washington, DC 87 Units — Arlington, VA CAPITOL QUARTERS TOWNHOMES GLEBE PARK TOWNHOMES 208 Units — Washington, DC 80 Units — Arlington, VA HOPE VI CAPPER CARROLLSBURG PUBLIC HOUSING 152 Units / Homes — Washington, DC ADDITIONAL RELEVANT EXPERIENCE PARKSIDE 118 Units — Washington, DC ACTON’S LANDING SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, TOWNHOMES & CONDOMINIUMS HYATTSVILLE MIXED-USE ARTS DISTRICT & MULTI-FAMILY Annapolis, MD RESIDENCES Approx. 300 Units — Hyattsville, MD PENINSULA ON INDIAN RIVER BAY TOWNHOMES Millsboro, DE MACARTHUR COURT RESIDENCES 37 Units— Washington, DC GHAZIABAD SINGLE FAMILY VILLAS Ghaziabad, India HARRISON SQUARE TOWNHOMES 98 Units —Washington, DC CUSTOM RESIDENCE Middleburg, VA SYMPHONY PARK TOWNHOMES 120 Units —Bethesda, MD CUSTOM RESIDENCE Severn, MD

lessard D E S I G N

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS

STEVEN EDWARD SHER DIRECTOR OF ZONING AND LAND USE SERVICES HOLLAND & KNIGHT, LLP

EDUCATION:

Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, 1969, Bachelor of Arts (Urban Studies and Political Science) Cornell University, 1971, Master of Regional Planning

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:

Director of Zoning and Land Use Services, Holland & Knight, LLP 2000 - present Director of Zoning Services, Wilkes, Artis, Hedrick & Lane, Chartered 1985 - 2000 Executive Director, Zoning Secretariat, District of Columbia 1977 - 1985 Deputy Director, Zoning Division, Municipal Planning Office, District of Columbia 1975 - 1977 Acting Secretary to the Board of Zoning Adjustment, District of Columbia 1976 Urban Planner, D.C. Zoning Commission, D.C. Office of Planning and Management, D.C. Municipal Planning Office 1972 - 1975 Renewal Coordinator, District of Columbia Zoning Commission 1972 - 1973 Acting Secretary to the District of Columbia Zoning Commission 1972 Project Planner, District of Columbia Zoning Commission 1971 - 1972 Planning Intern, Frederick P. Clark Associates, Planning and Development Consultants 1970 Research Intern, Brooklyn Linear City Development Corporation 1969

APPEARED AS EXPERT WITNESS:

District of Columbia Zoning Commission District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment District of Columbia Historic Preservation Review Board District of Columbia Mayor's Agent for D.C. Law 2-144 Zoning Hearing Examiner, Montgomery County, Maryland Montgomery County (Maryland) Planning Board U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia Superior Court of the District of Columbia

AREAS OF INTEREST AND/OR SPECIALIZATION:

Land use planning Zoning, subdivision and other control of land use Urban design Urban transportation planning

ORGANIZATIONS:

American Planning Association (1971-present) Greater Washington Board of Trade (1986-2000) Planning and Development Committee (Vice-Chairman for Zoning and Regulatory Affairs) (1987-8) Community Development Bureau Steering Committee (1987-9) PUD Task Force (Chairman) (1987) Comprehensive Plan Task Force (1987-8) Downtown Revitalization Committee Housing Team (1988) Mayor's Commission on Downtown Housing (1988-89) Downtown Partnership Downtown Development District Task Force (1989-90) Lambda Alpha (honorary land economics society) (1990-present) Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Metropolitan Development Citizens Advisory Committee (1997-2004) District of Columbia Comprehensive Plan Assessment Task Force (2002- 2003) District of Columbia Comprehensive Plan Revision Task Force (2004-2006) District of Columbia Zoning Advisory Committee (2003-2008) District of Columbia Zoning Review Task Force (2007-present)

LECTURES/SEMINAR PRESENTATIONS:

District of Columbia Association of Realtors District of Columbia Building Industry Association

2 #27235173_v1

D.C. Bar/Georgetown University Law School Continuing Legal Education Capitol Hill Realtors American University Real Estate Alumni District of Columbia Apartment and Office Building Association

3 #27235173_v1 Daniel B. VanPelt, P.E., PTOE Vice President and Principal

Mr. VanPelt’s wide range of traffic and transportation project experience includes: traffic impact studies, site access and circulation planning, functional parking lot and garage design, parking demand analysis, corridor studies, campus master planning, major data collection efforts, loading dock design, intersection improvement design, signal design, signing and pavement marking design, and expert witness testimony. He has worked for public, private and institutional sector clients throughout the United States and has worked internationally on projects in the United Arab Emirates, China, Venezuela, Brazil and Mexico.

Education Master of Science in Civil Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis Bachelor of Science in Physics, Bethany College

Professional Registrations Licensed Professional Engineer – Virginia #0402 037160, Pennsylvania #PE074759, Maryland #36413, District of Columbia #PE904669, and West Virginia #18288; Registered Professional Traffic Operations Engineer

Registered Professional Traffic Operations Engineer

Professional Associations Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE); Society for College and University Planning (SCUP); International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC); American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE); NAIOP Northern Virginia; and Lambda Alpha International Land Economics Honor Society

Publications ITE webinar presenter for “Multi-Modal School Site Planning, Design and Transportation for Primary Grades K-8.” 2010 “Lots to Learn; Don’t let parking and traffic problems sink your entertainment business,” Casino Journal, December 2003, p. 28.

Representative Experience

CAMPUSES AND MASTER PLANS Mr. VanPelt has developed transportation master plans, demand management plans, construction management plans, circulation studies, and parking studies for a number of universities, schools and institutions including the American University Campus Plan, Washington, DC; Georgetown University Campus Plan, Washington, DC; Howard University Campus Plan, Washington, DC; Indiana University Campus Plan, Bloomington, IN; IUPUI Campus Plan, Indianapolis, IN; Calhoun Street East-Waterfront Area Plan, Charleston, SC; US Capitol Complex Master Plan, Washington, DC; The Capitol Visitor Center, Washington, DC; Cannon House Office Building Renewal, Washington, DC; Princeton University Campus Framework Plan, Princeton, NJ; Yale University Medical District, New Haven, CT; Hartford Strategic Framework, Hartford, CT; The National Cathedral Campus Plan, Washington, DC; The Bullis School, Potomac, MD; Alexandria Country Day School, Alexandria, VA; and The Phillips Collection, Washington, DC.

MIXED-USE AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS Mr. VanPelt has prepared traffic studies, parking analysis, site access planning, loading access design, site circulation planning and signal designs for projects including: Monument Ballpark, Washington, DC; Monaco I/II and Sanremo, Jersey City, NJ; Children’s Museum and Air Rights Buildings at L’Enfant Plaza, Washington, DC; Shamrock Business Center, Painesville, OH; Auyare I/II and Hacienda Santa Cruz, Caracas,ZONING Venezuela; COMMISSION Oaklawn in District of Columbia

Case No. 07-13D 14D4

Daniel B. VanPelt, P.E., PTOE Page 2

Leesburg, Leesburg, VA; Dubai International Finance Center, Dubai, UAE; 5th & K Streets NW, Washington, DC; and Journal Square Centre, Jersey City, NJ.

HOSPITALITY AND ENTERTAINMENT Mr. VanPelt has worked on numerous hospitality and entertainment sites throughout North and South America. Projects include the St. Regis Mohawk Casino, Monticello, NY; Turning Stone Casino Resort, Verona, NY; Gaylord Texan, Grapevine, TX; Gaylord National Harbor, Prince George’s County, MD; Mohegan Sun Casino Resort, Uncasville, CT; W Mexico City, Polanco, Mexico D.F.; Meskwaki Casino, Tama, IA; Marriott Orlando World Center, Orlando, FL; the Connecticut Convention Center, Hartford, CT; and Pikes Peak International Raceway, Colorado Springs, CO.

SHOPPING CENTERS AND MALLS Mr. VanPelt has prepared traffic, parking, site access and site circulation studies for grocery stores, lifestyle centers, power centers, regional centers and urban retail including the Citadel Harris Teeter, Washington, DC; Mondawmin Mall Redevelopment, Baltimore, MD; DC USA Target and Best Buy, Washington, DC; Trotwood Town Center, Trotwood, OH; The Avenue Viera, Viera, FL; The Avenue Carriage Crossing, Collierville, TN; Woodbridge Center, Woodbridge, New Jersey; Kendall Town Center, Miami, FL; Summerlin Mall, Summerlin, NV; Chicago Premium Outlets, Aurora, IL; North Georgia Premium Outlets, Dawsonville, GA; Park Meadows Mall, Denver, CO; Owings Mills Mall, Owings Mills, MD; and Kittery Premium Outlets, Kittery, ME.

OFFICE AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS Mr. VanPelt has worked on office and residential development projects involving site planning and access planning as well as the design of both traffic signals and parking garage facilities. Projects have included 1700 K Street NW, Washington, DC; City View Condos, Washington, DC; Westmoreland House at Huntington Metro, Alexandria, VA; Balmoral Residential, Prince William County, VA; Red Cedar, Loudoun County, VA.

PARKING STUDIES AND PARKING GARAGE DESIGN Mr. VanPelt has performed parking needs studies and garage planning for projects such as the Dubai International Finance Center, Dubai, UAE; National Cathedral Bus Garage Design, Washington, DC; City View Condos, Hyattsville, MD; ER One Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; and Ronald Reagan National Airport, Arlington, VA.

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES Mr. VanPelt has conducted numerous traffic impact studies in support of rezoning, subdivision, site plan approvals and EIS applications for large and small residential, commercial, office retail and institutional developments. His work includes experience in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Virginia, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Connecticut and the District of Columbia.

DATA COLLECTION STUDIES Mr. VanPelt has conducted large-scale data collection efforts including traffic counts, pedestrian counts, vehicle classification counts, speed studies and origin-destination studies. Examples include managing a long-term data collection program for the New Jersey DOT in northern New Jersey and supervising data collection efforts at both the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.

MEDICAL CAMPUS AND OFFICES Mr. VanPelt has provided transportation master planning and traffic studies for a variety of medical facilities, including The Ohio State University Medical Center in Columbus, OH; Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis/Clarian Medical Center in Indianapolis, IN; Sibley Hospital in Washington, DC; Reston Hospital in Reston, VA; and the ER-1 scalable prototype major emergency facility at Washington Hospital Center in Washington, DC.

ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia

Case No. 07-13D 14D4

Robert B. Schiesel, P.E. Project Manager

Mr. Schiesel possesses significant transportation engineering and planning experience in both the public and private sectors. His experience includes multimodal analyses of large mixed-use plans and campuses, traffic impact studies, parking studies, traffic and parking forecasting, queuing analysis, traffic simulation, transportation demand management, and intelligent transportation systems planning. Projects Mr. Schiesel has been involved with include entertainment complexes, universities, churches, small and large commercial facilities, residential developments, government facilities and mixed-use developments.

Education Master of Science: Civil Engineering, May 2000, University of Virginia: Charlottesville, Virginia; Bachelor of Science: Civil Engineering, May 1998, University of Virginia: Charlottesville, Virginia.

Professional Registrations Licensed Professional Engineer - Virginia #0402038965

Professional Associations Member, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Member, Society for College and University Planning; Member, Midwest Campus Parking Association (MCPA).

Professional Presentations “Campuses For All: Integrating Pedestrian and Vehicular Movement on Campus”, SCUP North Central 2006 Regional Conference

Representative Experience

CAMPUSES AND MASTER PLANNING Mr. Schiesel has developed transportation master plans, demand management plans, circulation studies, and parking studies for a number of University, Federal Agency and Hospital campuses, including The Holton-Arms School, the US Capitol House Office Buildings, Washington, DC; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; The George Washington University, Washington DC; The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, The National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University, Bloomington, IN; Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN; American University, Washington DC; and Howard University, Washington DC.

MULTI-MODAL ANALYSIS Mr. Schiesel specializes in considering all modes while planning transportation system, including during the following projects; Nationals Ballpark Bicycle Valet, Washington, DC; DC Bike Master Plan, Washington DC, 10th Street Mobility Plan, Bloomington, IN; and The Ohio State University Crosswalks Study, Columbus, OH

Robert B. Schiesel Page 2

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES Mr. Schiesel has conducted numerous traffic impact studies in support of rezoning, subdivision, site plan approvals and EIS applications for large and small residential, commercial, office retail and institutional developments. His work includes experience in Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia.

MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENTS Mr. Schiesel has provided transportation planning and engineering services for several large urban mixed-use developments, including: The Yards (former South East Federal Center), Washington, DC; CityCenterDC (former Convention Center Site) Washington, DC; Innovation Town Center, Manassas, VA; Parkside Mixed-Use Development, Washington DC; Southwest Waterfront, Washington DC, and Poplar Point, Washington, DC.

ENTERTAINMENT AND EVENT CENTERS Mr. Schiesel has worked on numerous entertainment sites and event center, including as the lead transportation planner for Nationals Park in Washington DC. Other projects include Memorial Stadium, Bloomington, IN; Turning Stone Casino Resort, Verona, NY; and Meskwaki Casino, Tama, IA.

MEDICAL FACILITIES Mr. Schiesel has provided transportation planning services for a variety of medical facilities, including The Ohio State University Medical Center in Columbus, OH; Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis/Clarian Medical Center in Indianapolis, IN; Sibley Hospital in Washington, DC; Parkside Health Center in Washington, DC, and the University of Virginia Health Sciences District, Charlottesville, VA.

Education FASLA, PLA, NZILA Thomas Woltz, Masters in Architecture, 1996 Principal and Owner Masters in Landscape Architecture, 1997 University of Virginia Thomas Woltz is the owner of Nelson Byrd Woltz Landscape Architects where he began working Charlottesville VA in 1997 upon completion of Master degrees in Architecture and Landscape Architecture. Working Bachelor of Science in Architecture, 1990 between offices in Virginia, New York, and San Francisco, he has led designs for a broad range of with three majors: Architectural Design, projects in the United States and abroad including the National Arboretum of New Zealand; The Studio Art and Architectural History, Peggy Guggenheim Sculpture Garden in Venice, Italy; Monticello, a National Historic Landmark and University of Virginia, Charlottesville VA the home of Thomas Jefferson in Albemarle County VA; and the multi-award winning Orongo Station Stewardship Plan, Poverty Bay, New Zealand. Current work includes projects at Hudson Yards, New Professional Affiliations Fellow, American Society York City; Memorial Park, Houston; Devonian Botanic Garden, Alberta, Canada; and Cornwall Park, of Landscape Architects Auckland, New Zealand. New Zealand Institute of During the past 18 years of practice, Woltz has forged a body of work that integrates the beauty and Landscape Architects function of built form and craftsmanship with an understanding of complex biological systems and The Cultural Landscape Foundation restoration ecology that has yielded hundreds of acres of reconstructed wetlands, reforested land, Board of Directors, 2006-present native meadows, and flourishing wildlife habitat. His design work infuses places where people live, New York Municipal Arts Society work, and play with narratives of the land that inspire stewardship. Many of these projects focus Board of Directors, 2011-present on restoration of damaged ecological infrastructure within working farmland and create models of Recent Professional Awards biodiversity and sustainable agriculture. The work of NBW has been recognized with over 80 national New York School of Interior Design, and regional awards and been published widely. The firm has worked in 22 states and 9 countries. Thomas N. Armstrong III Award, 2012 ASLA Council of Fellows investiture, SELECT EXPERIENCE Class of 2011 - among the highest honors achieved in the profession of Hudson Yards, New York NY Landscape Architecture Memorial Park, Houston TX New York Horticultural Society Award for Centennial Park, Nashville TN Excellence, 2011 Columbia College, Columbia SC Commerce School Rouss Hall Courtyards, University of Virginia, Charlottesville VA Monticello Stewardship Plan Study, Albemarle County VA Bok Tower, Lake Wales FL The Peggy Guggenheim Sculpture Garden, Venice, Italy Devonian Botanic Garden, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada Brooklyn Navy Yard Naval Hospital Cemetery Memorial Landscape, NY EPA’s Greening America’s Capitals, Hartford CT

RECENT LECTURES AND SYMPOSIA ASLA National Conference, Boston MA “Beauty and Performance”, November 2013 Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Science, New Haven CT “Integration of Architecture, Engineering and Landscape in Sustainable Design”, January 2013 University of Oregon Fuller Lecture, Eugene “Sustenance by Design: Agricultural production and ecological services in the work of Nelson Byrd Woltz”, October 2012 ASLA National Conference, Phoenix AZ “Reconstructing the Arboreal Ark: Evolving Design Directions for Public Gardens”, October 2012 ASLA National Conference, San Diego CA “Restoration Ecology in Agrarian Landscapes”, October 2011 Johnson & Johnson Global Strategic Design Office: The Salon Speaker Series, New York NY, “Global/Local”, October 2011 Park Pride 10th Annual Parks & Greenspace Conference, Atlanta GA; keynote speaker “Working Landscapes: Urban and Rural Parkland Solutions from Around the Globe”, March 2011 Education ASLA, PLA Jeffrey G. Aten, Masters Degree in Architecture, 2004 Senior Associate Masters in Landscape Architecture, 2004 University of Virginia , Charlottesville VA

Jeff Aten joined Nelson Byrd Woltz in the fall of 2004 after earning his masters degree at the Bachelor of Arts in Environmental Studies, 1996 University of Virginia. Projects at NBW include the Wolong Giant Panda Reserve in Sichuan, University of Vermont, Burlington VT China; an award winning master plan for the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena; Professional Luck Stone Architectural Design Centers in Richmond and Sterling, VA; Anthony Fokker Licensed Landscape Architect in Business Park in Schiphol, the Netherlands; and the landscape master plan and development State of Virginia for Watercolor’s 500-acre community on the Gulf Coast of Florida. Jeff has also led master planning and built project efforts for NBW’s ConAg Studio throughout Virginia. He is currently the Senior Project Manager for the landscape portion of the McMillan Filtration Site Master Plan in Washington DC, Summit Bechtel National Scouting Reserve in Glen Jean, West Virginia and Memorial Park in Houston.

Select Experience CHOP Schuylkill Avenue Pre-Schematic Design, Philadelphia PA McMillan Sand Filtration Site Mixed Use Development, Washington DC Summit Bechtel National Scouting Reserve, Glen Jean VA Devonian Botanic Garden, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada California Institute of Technology Landscape Development Plan, Pasadena CA Wolong Giant Panda Center, Sichuan, China Luck Stone Architectural Design Centers, Richmond and Sterling VA Martha Jefferson Hospital new campus, Charlottesville VA Anthony Fokker Business Park, Schiphol, The Netherlands Watercolor, Walton County FL Charles Luck Design Center, Richmond VA Silver Lake Natural Recreation Area Master Plan, Prince William County VA

Recent Lectures ASLA National Conference, Boston MA “Fire, Water, and Pixels: Catalyzing Ecological Resilience for Cultural Landscapes”, November 2013 ROBERT A GORDON MARCIA D FOSTER DANIELLE MCDANIELS 2903 N CAPITOL ST NE 2905 N CAPITOL ST NE 2901 N CAPITOL ST NE WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1018 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1018 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1018

FAUSTO N LAMBOGLIA PERRY LEE JONES JAMES TERBURG 2909 N CAPITOL ST NE 2911 N CAPITOL ST NE 301 27TH ST NW WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1018 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1018 WASHINGTON, DC 20037

MACK L DAVIS L F WILLOUGHBY FRANK H BRADLEY 2915 N CAPITOL ST NE C/O WILLOUGHBY REAL ESTATE CO 2913 N CAPITOL ST NE WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1018 809 MASSACHUSETTS AVE NE, NE WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1018 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-6015

WAYOLA HARRIS MAMIE L LEFTWICH CHARLES H MITZ 2703 N CAPITOL ST NE 2705 N CAPITOL ST NE 2701 N CAPITOL ST NE WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1016 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1016 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1016

ELIZABETH H JONES STUART LONG JOHNNY BYNUM 2709 N CAPITOL ST NE 410 5THSTNE 2707 N CAPITOL ST NE WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1016 APT24 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1016 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-5253

JAMES E WILLIAMS II MARY E YOUNG LAWRENCE J NEWTOWN 2715 N CAPITOL ST NE 6746 OLIVERS SHOP RD 2713 N. CAPITOL ST, NE WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1016 BRYANTOWN, MD 20637 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1016

ROBERT T BARNES ARTHUR RICHARDSON SR ROBYNN M NICHOLS 2805 N CAPITOL ST NE 2807 N CAPITOL ST NE 2803 N CAPITOL ST NE WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1017 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1017 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1017

JOSEPH TYSON RASHIDA L HART ANDREW H KELLER 2811 N CAPITOL ST NE 2813 N CAPITOL ST NE 31 U ST NE WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1017 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1017 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1390

ROSIE H THOMAS FRED D WRIGHT BARRINGTON S NICHOLAS TRUSTEES 1413 TAYLOR ST NW 2817 N CAPITOL ST NE 2601 N CAPITOL ST NE WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1015 WASHINGTON, DC 20011-5509 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1017

1 #26523136_v1 AMPARO NUNEZ ARTHUR KINKEAD TRUSTEE BEVERLY D BROOKS 2603 N CAPITOL ST NE 2605 N CAPITOL ST NE 2607 N CAPITOL ST NE WASHINGTON,DC 20002-1015 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1015 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1015

YVONNE P JOHNSON KEITH L TALLEY KENYAN MCDUFFIE 2611 N CAPITOL ST NE 2613 N CAPITOL ST NE 2609 N CAPITOL ST NE WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1015 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1015 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1015

JOAN W HOLTON PEARLINE A ENNIS KAREN M DANIELS 2617 N CAPITOL ST NE 2619 N CAPITOL ST NE 8901 TRUBADOR DR WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1015 CLINTON, MD 20735-2480 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1015

ELEANOR M FARAR TIANA DYER MICHAEL A HARRIS 2535 N CAPITOL ST NE 3425 LONDONLEAF LN 2621 N CAPITOL ST NE WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1078 LAUREL, MD 20724-2902 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1015

ROMAN HUGOS AMY TRENKLE KAREN O HUTCHISON 2541 N CAPITOL ST NE 2543 N CAPITOL ST NE 7709 HENNEPIN CT WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1078 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1078 HANOVER, MD 21076-1761

BYONG C CHO MARK A HARRIS BYONG C CHO 6913 TIMBER CREEK CT PO BOX 7391 6913 TIMBER CREEK CT CLARKSVILLE, MD 21029-1748 WASHINGTON, DC 20044-7391 CLARKSVILLE, MD 21029-1748

RICARDO F TAYLOR JANIA M OTEY JAMES K MCCLOSKEY 2509 N CAPITOL ST NE PO BOX 77484 2507 N CAPITOL ST NE WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1014 WASHINGTON, DC 20013-8484 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1014

ROBERT P SESSOMS GEORGE MANOLATOS JAMES F BERDINE 2515 N CAPITOL ST NE 2517 N CAPITOL ST NE 2513 N CAPITOL ST NE WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1014 WASHINGTON, DC 20002 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1014

LYNETTE A GARNER MICHAEL DAVIS MARY BEATRICE D YOUNGER 2521 N CAPITOL ST NE 2523 N CAPITOL ST NE 2519 N CAPITOL ST NE WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1014 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1014 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1014

2 #26523136_v1 ETHEL M WRIGHT ARTHUR KINKEAD TRUSTEE THOMAS ENGELMAN 4238 7TH AVE 2527 N CAPITOL ST NE 2529 N CAPITOL ST NE WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1014 TEMPLE, PA 19560-1802 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1014

LEO DUNKLIN LAVERNE D PATTERSON MICHAEL L NELSON 8 CHANNING ST NE 2500 3RD ST NE 2531 N CAPITOL ST NE WASHINGTON, WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1004 ASHINGTON, DC 20002-1022 DC 20002-1014

KAWANNE M FOMAN MOHAMMED G RASHED M A MOHAMED 2423 N CAPITOL ST NE 2425 N CAPITOL ST NE 2421 N CAPITOL ST NE WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1012 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1012 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1012

2429 NORTH CAPITOL LLC ROSALIND M PARKER GLORIA CARTER 931 S ST NW 3001 HAWTHORNE DR NE 2427 N CAPITOL ST NE WASHINGTON, DC 20001-4115 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1001 WASHINGTON, DC 20002

BRUNO MUSCOLINO GARY M HOLLAND ARLEAN LEUND 3005 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3007 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3003 HAWTHORNE DR NE # 3003 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1001 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1001 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1001

JESSELYN R LONG AFRAH ABEL HAMID AL-NAJJAR 3013 ELEANOR M SPELL 3011 HAWTHORNE DR NE HAWTHORNE DR NE # 3013 3009 HAWTHORNE DR NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1001 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1001 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1001

MARY A GILL JOHN NEWMAN LADUN MOREJR 3000 GENTAIN CT NE 3002 GENTAIN CT NE 3015 HAWTHORNE DR NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1012 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1012 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1001

IRENE L BAILEY PHILLIP G HOOVER BRENDA BRITTAIN TH 3006 GENTAIN CT NE 320 E 46 ST, APT25E 3004 GENTAIN CT NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1012 NEW YORK, NY 10017-3057 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1012

LISA KIM TIRSO DOCENTES ELAINE C WONG 3012 GENTAIN CT NE # 3012 3014 GENTAIN CT NE 3409 24TH ST NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1012 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1012 WASHINGTON, DC 20018-2951

3 #26523136_v1 RHONDA SINGLETON SHELLEY D HAYES THOMAS PINDER JR .17 BRYANTS NURSERY RD 3018 GENTAIN CT NE 3020 GENTAIN CT NE SILVER SPRING, MD 20905-3840 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1012 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1012

KANYI M MASEMBWA SHAUNA K BURNETT STAGEY WOOLFORK 9407 WEAVER ST PO BOX 77383 3026 GENTAIN CT NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1012 SILVER SPRING, MD 20901-3656 WASHINGTON, DC 20013-8383

TONI FLORENCE GLADYS J YELDELL AMY E JALLAH 4823 BLAGDEN AVE NW 3032 GENTAIN CT NE 3028 GENTAIN CT NE WASHINGTON, DC 20011-3715 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1012 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1012

SYDNEY M KNIGHT JANINE L HIGHTOWER JEAN W BAILEY 3036 GENTAIN CT NE 3038 GENTAIN CT NE # 3038 3034 HAWTHORNE DR NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1049 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1049 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1012

JANINE A HARMON MARY U GOLDRING STEPHANIE R DAILEY 3019 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3021 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3017 HAWTHORNE DR NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1001 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1001 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1001

STEPHAN C KARPOWICZ VICTOR E POWER KELLEY N WILSON 3025 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3027 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3023 HAWTHORNE DR NE # 3023 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1001 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1001 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1001

DONNA R WALTON LAVERN ARRINGTON CHRISTIAN L KOSTKO 3031 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3033 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3029 HAWTHORNE DR NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1002 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1002 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1002

KRISTINA FAULK JAMES ADAMS MARIE W HANBERRY 3037 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3039 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3035 HAWTHORNE DR NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1002 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1002 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1002

CAROLYN E HACKETT VALETA SUTTON TESFA WUBE 3143 HAWTHORNE ST NW 3045 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3041 HAWTHORNE DR NE WASHINGTON, DC 20008-3540 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1002 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1002

4 #26523136_v1 ANDRIS L SAUNDERS ELLA B SPRAGGINS REGINA HAMPTON 3049 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3051 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3047 HAWTHORNE DR NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1002 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1002 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1002

VICTORIA ROQUE ROBIN C BRANNIGAN LELSIE R COURTS 3055 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3057 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3053 HAWTHORNE DR NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1002 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1002 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1002

LAURYL D JACKSON DENICE EASTERLING KELLEY WILSON 3063 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3061 HAWTHORNE DR NE 1211 RHODE ISLAND AVE NW WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1002 WASHINGTON, DC 20005-4416 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1002

IMELDA F HACKETT-FELTON ALICE FRAY FARANA J ABDUL 3069 HAWTHORNE DR NE PO BOX 25 3067 HAWTHORNE DR NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1015 HYATTSVILLE, MD 20781-0025 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1015

HATSHEPSITU H TULL PAUL W COOK CHRISTINA L BRIDGEPORT 3071 3073 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3075 HAWTHORNE DR NE HAWTHORNE DR NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1015 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1015 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1015

L M DELEE MATTHEW G CLARKE KEVIN F MOLLOY 3801 LITTLETON ST 3081 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3077 HAWTHORNE DR NE SILVER SPRING, MD 20906-4238 WASHINGTON, DC 20017 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1015

EDMUND C FLEET CLARA Y DAVID IDA B GARNER 3608 ALABAMA AVE SE 3087 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3083 HAWTHORNE DR NE WASHINGTON, DC 20020-2426 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1015 WASHINGTON, DC

ROBERT L DILLARD JR ROBINSON FARIA KELLEY WILSON 3091 HAWTHORNE DR NE # 3091 3093 HAWTHORNE DR NE 1211 RHODE ISLAND AVE NW WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1015 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1013 WASHINGTON, DC 20005-4416

R P EPPS RAYMOND A PEREZ FENTRESS TARA J 1775 N PORTAL DR NW 3099 HAWTHORNE DR NE PO BOX 8253 WASHINGTON, DC 20012-1014 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1013 SILVER SPRING, MD 20907-8253

5 #26523136_v1 CHERYL A WAGNER LINDA J SCOTT ALICIA WHISONANT 3105 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3101 HAWTHORNE DR, NE 3103 HAWTHORNE DR NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1040 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1040 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1040

ALFRED J COLEMAN III VALETA E SUTTON TONDALAYA HAMILTON 3109 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3045 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3107 HAWTHORNE DR NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1040 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1002 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1040

JOHN A BOOKER JR KIM B FARLEY MOIRA MATTHEW C/O WTFCU 3117 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3113 HAWTHORNE DR NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1040 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1040 3015 UNIVERSITY BLVD W

KENSINGTON, MD 20895-1936

THERESA WATERS JUANEULA M BURT 3 lALWYN H GRANADY 3121 HAWTHORNE DR NE 123 HAWTHORNE DR NE 242 LYNCROFT RD WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1040 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1040 'NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10804-4121

SUSAN VANDERPOOL BEVERLY R ALLEN RICHARD A HIND 3131 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3125 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3127 HAWTHORNE DR, NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1041 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1040 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1040

LUDMILA MORKOVINA GWENDOLYN M HINES RENEE S KINDER 3135 HAWTHORNE DR NE # 3135 3137 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3133 HAWTHORNE DR NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1041 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1041 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1041

JOEL HAAS OUSAINOU MBENGA MARTIN L FRIEDMAN 3141 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3143 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3139 HAWTHORNE DR NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1041 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1041 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1041

SHEWANA D SKINNER CURLEYADEFOE ORLANDO TAYLOR 1525 TRINIDAD AVE NE 3149 HAWTHORNE DR NE C/O UNIT 3145 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-2813 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1041 3145 HAWTHORNE DR NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1041

TONIA SCHAFFER ANN P BROOKS JANICE L SANDERS 3153 HAWTHORNE DR NE # 3153 3155 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3151 HAWTHORNE DRNE #3151 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1041 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1051 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1040

6 #26523136_v1 ROBERT JAMISON OBIE D WITCHER FRANK K BRYANT 3159 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3161 HAWTHORNE DR NE C/O UNIT 3157 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1051 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1051 ;3157 HAWTHORNE DR NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1051

V M CORREA TERRI JOHNSON WYLIE WHISONANT JR 8738 COLD PLAIN CT 3167 HAWTHORNE DR NE 3163 HAWTHORNE DR NE SPRINGFIELD, VA 22153-2422 WASHINGTON, DC 20017 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1051

MAXINEAPOTTS PATRICIA MANN RODNEY PRATT 2423 KILLDEER ST 4520 SCULPTURE CT 3169 HAWTHORNE DR NE NEW ORLEANS, LA 70122-4315 OCEANSIDE, CA 92057-6808 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1051

WYLETTIE JACKSON 4 MARY RENKO AARON J KELLEY 10 HAWTHORNE CT NE # 10 S HAWTHORNE CT NE # 6 338 VARNUM PL NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1044 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1044 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-2101

A M RICHARDSON AUSTIN E GALLOW ANTOINETTE W ALEXANDER 14 HAWTHORNE CT NE 16 HAWTHORNE CT NE 12 HAWTHORNE CT NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1047 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1047 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1044

WILLIAM H HAWKINS JR TURNER LEVI ROSALEEN B HAUGH 22 HAWTHORNE CT NE 1824 BAY ST SE 20 HAWTHORNE CT NE # 20 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1047 WASHINGTON, DC 20003-2509 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1047

GAYNOR JABLONSKI MARY A HANSON WENDY Y COVAY 26 HAWTHORNE CT NE 28 HAWTHORNE CT NE # 28 24 HAWTHORNE CT NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1047 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1047 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1047

GINAV FERGUSON HOWARD W HARDY IMEE G VILLAiRIN 32 HAWTHORNE CT NE 34 HAWTHORNE CT NE 30 HAWTHORNE CT NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1047 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1047 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1047

LINDA L WASHINGTON-SCOTT VENITA E PHILLIPS VIRGINIA A WHITE 38 HAWTHORNE CT NE 40 HAWTHORNE CT NE 36 HAWTHORNE CT NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1047 WASHINGTON, DC 20017- WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1047

7 #26523136_v1 SARAH L PITT NANZO T COLEY WILLIAM R EDWARDS 44 HAWTHORNE CT NE 46 HAWTHORNE CT NE 42 HAWTHORNE CT NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1047 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1047 WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1047

ROBERT ROACH HAVANNA A FRANKLIN BETTY L FORD ST 2421 1 ST NW 2423 1ST ST NW 251618THSTNE WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1019 WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1019 WASHINGTON, DC 20018-1307

ALVIN C HARPER DONALD M MCKINNON VIRGINIA H COTHRAN 2427 1ST ST NW 2429 1ST ST NW 613 FENWICK DR SAN ANTONIO, TX 78239-2534 WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1019 WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1019

MARY JUDD MINNIE B DAVIS 2417 1ST STREET LLC 2428 N CAPITOL ST NW 2426 N CAPITOL ST NW 9385 JUHASZ DR WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1013 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1013 GREAT FALLS, VA 22066-2026

JOHNSON W DOERUE INC MIMID ATKINS GEORGE H FALK JR 2422 N CAPITOL ST NW 2420 N CAPITOL ST NW 2424 N CAPITOL ST NW WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1013 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1013 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1013

KENDELL KELLY COMELIA R SANFORD DANIEL J PICARD 2418 N CAPITOL ST NW 66 CHANNING ST NW 64 CHANNING ST NW WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1030 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1013 WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1030

RAZIEH JAVAHERI ROGER C FIELDS MICHELLE R FAUNTROY-COATES 60 CHANNING ST NW 58 CHANNING ST NW 62 CHANNING ST NW WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1030 WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1030 WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1030

RAYMOND M TAYLOR WALTER T FAUNTROY JAMES T POWELL 56 CHANNING ST NW 54 CHANNING ST NW 2 CHANNING ST NW WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1030 WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1030 WASHINGTON, DC 20001-

MELINDA PAVIN KENNETH P WILLIAMS MARK KING 2221 I ST NW 48 CHANNING ST NW 46 CHANNING ST NW WASHINGTON, DC 20037-2241 WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1030 WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1030

8 #26523136_v1 JOSEPH CLARK SHAHIN T SHIKHALIYEV COLETTE D JOHNSON 1401 KALMIARDNW 42 CHANNING ST NW 40 CHANNING ST NW WASHINGTON, DC 20012-1417 WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1030 WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1030

ASALEE F RIPPY LIFE 36 CHANNING STREET LLC 34 CHANNING STREET NW LLC 38 CHANNING ST NW 36 CHANNING ST NW 9385 JUHASZ DR WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1030 WASHINGTON, DC 20001 GREAT FALLS, VA 22066-2026

SHERRESE M SMITH ABDULLAHI B ALI LISA HICKS 32 CHANNING ST NW 30 CHANNING ST NW 28 CHANNING ST NW WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1030 WASHINGTON, DC 20001 WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1030

JAMES T MCDOWELL ROBERT L HARROLD ELLA M HENSON 26 CHANNING ST NW 24 CHANNING ST NW 22 CHANNING ST NW WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1030 WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1030 WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1030

SAMUEL A PAYNE WARD NORRIS J GREEN SR BEREKET MELAKU 18 CHANNING ST NW 16 CHANNING ST NW 1228 HALF ST SW WASHINGTON, DC 20001 WASHINGTON, DC 20001 WASHINGTON, DC 20023

WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER GLENWOOD CEMETERY RANDAL L EDISON C/O REAL ESTATE SERVICES 2219 LINCOLN RD NE WASHINGTON, DC 20002-1123 14 CHANNING ST NW 106 IRVING ST NW STE 301 WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1030 WASHINGTON, DC 20010-2927

JONATHAN C BALCOM DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA EFOSA S OGBEBOR 2419 1ST ST NW 1133 N CAPITOL ST NE, #307 8831 LOTTSFORD RD APT 409 LARGO, MD 20774-4866 WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1019 WASHINGTON, DC 20002-7561

ARI B WILDER Advisory Neighborhood Commission 1B Advisory Neighborhood 2008 DAYTON ST 2000 14th St, NW #100B Commission 5E SILVER SPRING, MD 20902-4220 Washington, DC 20009 c/o C.Dianne Barnes, 5E09 41 Adams St. NW Washington, DC 20001

Advisory Neighborhood Commission 5A ANC 5E e-mail: [email protected] PO Box 29546 Washington, DC 20017

9 #26523136_v1 BEFORE THE ZONING COMMISSION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FORM 116 – HEARING FEE CALCULATOR Pursuant to §3041 of DCMR Title 11, the following hearing fees shall be paid when the Zoning Commission schedules a public hearing on a petition or application. In the case of a petition or application combining two (2) or more actions on this form, the fee charged shall be the greatest of all the fees computed separately. Please show ALL computations.

A department, office, or agency of the Government of the District of Columbia is not required to pay a hearing fee where the property is owned by the agency and the property is to be occupied for a government building or use.

PLEASE COMPLETE, SIGN, AND RETURN THIS FORM WITH PAYMENT TO THE OFFICE OF ZONING.

MAP AMENDMENT Pursuant to §3041.1 of DCMR Title 11, if the Commission schedules a public hearing on a petition or application for an amendment to the Zoning Map, prior to advertisement of the hearing, the petitioner/applicant shall pay a hearing fee in accordance with the following schedule:

Petition or Application for Rezoning to any: Fee Unit Total R-1, R-2, or R-3 District, for each acre (43,560 ft.2) or part of an acre $650.00 R-4 or R-5-A District, for each acre (43,560 ft.2) or part of an acre $1,625.00 R-5-B District, for each acre (43,560 ft.2) or part of an acre $3,250.00 R-5-C, R-5-D, or R-5-E District, for each acre (43,560 ft.2) or part of an acre $6,500.00 SP, W, or CR District, for each 20,000 ft.2 or part of that area $2,600.00 C-1 or C-2 District, for each 10,000 ft.2 or part of that area $1,625.00 C-3, C-4, or C-5 District, for each 10,000 ft.2 or part of that area $3,250.00 C-M or M District, for each 20,000 ft.2 or part of that area $2,600.00 TOTAL Notes:  For any overlay district, the fee shall be computed in accordance with the requirement for the underlying zone  The maximum hearing fee for rezoning to any Residence District (R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, or R-5 is $50,000  For an application that proposes rezoning to more than one (1) zone district or is in the alternative, the fee shall be the total of the amounts for the area devoted to each proposed district or alternative computed separately

TEXT AMENDMENT

Pursuant to §3041.3 of DCMR Title 11, if the Commission schedules a public hearing on a petition for an amendment to the text of the Zoning Regulations, prior to the advertisement of the hearing, the petitioner shall pay a hearing fee in accordance with the following schedule: Petition Fee Unit Total Each section proposed to be added, deleted, or amended $325.00 TOTAL Note:  The maximum hearing fee for a text amendment to the Zoning Regulations Is $1,300

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), AIR SPACE DEVELOPMENT, OR ANY OTHER REVIEW OF A SPECIFIC SITE PLAN OR BUILDING PLAN

Pursuant to §3041.4 of DCMR Title 11, if the Commission schedules a public hearing on an application for approval of a planned unit development, air space development, or any other action where review of a specific site plan or building plan is required, prior to the advertisement of the hearing, the applicant shall pay a hearing fee in accordance with the following schedule: Application Fee Unit Total For each 100 ft.² of gross floor area (GFA), or part thereof, included in the application devoted to dwelling units, and the immediate area needed to serve $7.00 that dwelling unit For each 100 ft.² of GFA, or part thereof, included in the application devoted to any use other than a dwelling unit and the immediate area needed to serve $13.00 that dwelling unit TOTAL 2415646464 Note:  There is no charge for the hearingPLEASE on the secondCONTINUE stage of TOa two SIDE-stage TWO PUD application OF THIS FORM

Exhibit No. Case No.

FORM 116 – HEARING FEE CALCULATOR – Side 2

MODIFICATION TO AN APPROVED PUD, AIR SPACE DEVELOPMENT, OR ANY OTHER REVIEW OF A SPECIFIC SITE PLAN OR BUILDING PLAN Pursuant to §3041.6 of DCMR Title 11, if the Commission schedules a public hearing on an application for a modification to an approved planned unit development, air space development, or any other review of a specific site or building plan, prior to the advertisement of the hearing, the applicant shall pay a hearing fee in accordance with the following schedule: Request for Modification Fee Total 26% of original hearing fee or Modification to a previously approved case $1,300, whichever is greater TOTAL

FEE OF PETITION/APPLICATION

Pursuant to §3041.4 of DCMR Title 11, in the case of a petition or application combining two (2) or more actions on this form, the fee charged shall be the greatest of all the fees computed separately. Below, please list the total fee for each action requested and enter the fee of the greatest fee calculated. Type of Petition/Application Total

Map Amendment

Text Amendment

PUD, air space development, or any other review of a specific site plan or building plan

Modification to an approved PUD, air space development, or any other review of a specific site or building plan

GREATEST OF CALCULATED FEES

CERTIFICATION

I/We certify that the information on this form is true and correct to the best of my/our knowledge, information and belief. Any person(s) using a fictitious name or address and/or knowingly making any false statement on this application/petition is in violation of D.C. Law and subject to a fine of not more than $1,000 or 180 days imprisonment or both. (D.C. Official Code § 22-2405)

Name: D Signature: Date: D

OFFICIAL USE ONLY: Office of Zoning Determination

Based upon review of the petitioner’s/applicant’s supplemental filing and the information contained on this form:

 the calculated fee is accepted as submitted

 the calculated fee requires adjustment (requires new Form 116 – Hearing Fee Calculator Form)

Signature: Date: D If you need a reasonable accommodation for a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) or Fair Housing Act, please complete a Form 155 - Request for Reasonable Accommodation.

District of Columbia Office of Zoning 441 4th Street, N.W. Ste. 200-S, Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 727-6311 * (202) 727-6072 fax * www.dcoz.dc.gov * [email protected]

BEFORE THE ZONING COMMISSION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS FOR THE HEARING FEE CALCULATOR MAP AMENDMENT

SAMPLE: A petition for a map amendment to rezone a property at 1624 Q Street, N.W, from the DC/R-5-B to the DC/C-2-B Zone District.

Petition or Application for rezoning to any: Fee Unit Total R-1, R-2, or R-3 District, for each acre (43,560 ft.2) or part of an acre $650.00 R-4 or R-5-A District, for each acre (43,560 ft.2) or part of an acre $1,625.00 R-5-B District, for each acre (43,560 ft.2) or part of an acre $3,250.00 R-5-C, R-5-D, or R-5-E District, for each acre (43,560 ft.2) or part of an acre $6,500.00 SP, W, or CR District, for each 20,000 ft.2 or part of that area $2,600.00 C-1 or C-2 District, for each 10,000 ft.2 or part of that area $1,625.00 1 $1,625.00 C-3, C-4, or C-5 District, for each 10,000 ft.2 or part of that area $3,250.00 C-M or M District, for each 20,000 ft.2 or part of that area $2,600.00 TOTAL $1,625.00

TEXT AMENDMENT

SAMPLE: A request for a text amendment to §§ 701.4(q), 701.5, and 701.7 of the Zoning Regulations. Petition Fee Unit Total Each section proposed to be added, deleted, or amended - with a maximum $325.00 3 $975.00 hearing fee of $1,300 TOTAL $975.00

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AND RELATED MAP AMENDMENT

SAMPLE: An application for a consolidated review and approval of a Planned Unit Development (“PUD”) and a related zoning map amendment to rezone a 45,031 ft.2 property from the R-2 and C-1 Districts to the C-2-A District. The PUD contains approximately 92,700 ft.2 of gross floor area. The project includes approximately 84,600 ft.2 of gross floor area devoted to residential uses, and 8,100 ft.2 of gross floor area devoted to a mix of commercial uses. Petition or Application for Rezoning to any: Fee Unit Total R-1, R-2, or R-3 District, for each acre (43,560 ft.2) or part of an acre $650.00 R-4 or R-5-A District, for each acre (43,560 ft.2) or part of an acre $1,625.00 R-5-B District, for each acre (43,560 ft.2) or part of an acre $3,250.00 R-5-C, R-5-D, or R-5-E District, for each acre (43,560 ft.2) or part of an acre $6,500.00 SP, W, or CR District, for each 20,000 ft.2 or part of that area $2,600.00 C-1 or C-2 District, for each 10,000 ft.2 or part of that area $1,625.00 5 $8,125.00 C-3, C-4, or C-5 District, for each 10,000 ft.2 or part of that area $3,250.00 C-M or M District, for each 20,000 ft.2 or part of that area $2,600.00 TOTAL $8,125.00*

Application Fee Unit Total For each 100 ft.² of gross floor area (GFA), or part thereof, included in the application devoted to dwelling units, and the immediate area needed to serve $7.00 846 $5,922.00 that dwelling unit For each 100 ft.² of GFA, or part thereof, included in the application devoted to any use other than a dwelling unit and the immediate area needed to serve $13.00 81 $1,053.00 that dwelling unit TOTAL $6,975.00* * Please note the fee to be paid on this PUD is the greater of the two calculated amounts - $8,125.00.