DOCSLIB.ORG

Binocular Rivalry and Visuospatial Ability in Individuals with Schizophrenia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Binocular Rivalry and Visuospatial Ability in Individuals with Schizophrenia BINOCULAR RIVALRY AND VISUOSPATIAL ABILITY IN INDIVIDUALS WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA Karen R. Heslop Bachelor of Nursing Graduate Diploma (Social Science – Counselling) Master of Education (Adult and Workplace) A Thesis submitted as fulfilment for Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Psychology and Counselling Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation Queensland University of Technology 2012 Keywords A1 allele, backward masking, Benton’s Judgment of Line Orientation, binocular rivalry, dopamine, schizophrenia, Taq1A i Abstract Visual abnormalities, both at the sensory input and the higher interpretive levels, have been associated with many of the symptoms of schizophrenia. Individuals with schizophrenia typically experience distortions of sensory perception, resulting in perceptual hallucinations and delusions that are related to the observed visual deficits. Disorganised speech, thinking and behaviour are commonly experienced by sufferers of the disorder, and have also been attributed to perceptual disturbances associated with anomalies in visual processing. Compounding these issues are marked deficits in cognitive functioning that are observed in approximately 80% of those with schizophrenia. Cognitive impairments associated with schizophrenia include: difficulty with concentration and memory (i.e. working, visual and verbal), an impaired ability to process complex information, response inhibition and deficits in speed of processing, visual and verbal learning. Deficits in sustained attention or vigilance, poor executive functioning such as poor reasoning, problem solving, and social cognition, are all influenced by impaired visual processing. These symptoms impact on the internal perceptual world of those with schizophrenia, and hamper their ability to navigate their external environment. Visual processing abnormalities in schizophrenia are likely to worsen personal, social and occupational functioning. Binocular rivalry provides a unique opportunity to investigate the processes involved in visual awareness and visual perception. Binocular rivalry is the alternation of perceptual images that occurs when conflicting visual stimuli are presented to each eye in the same retinal location. The observer perceives the opposing images in an alternating fashion, despite the sensory input to each eye remaining constant. Binocular rivalry tasks have been developed to investigate ii specific parts of the visual system. The research presented in this Thesis provides an explorative investigation into binocular rivalry in schizophrenia, using the method of Pettigrew and Miller (1998) and comparing individuals with schizophrenia to healthy controls. This method allows manipulations to the spatial and temporal frequency, luminance contrast and chromaticity of the visual stimuli. Manipulations to the rival stimuli affect the rate of binocular rivalry alternations and the time spent perceiving each image (dominance duration). Binocular rivalry rate and dominance durations provide useful measures to investigate aspects of visual neural processing that lead to the perceptual disturbances and cognitive dysfunction attributed to schizophrenia. However, despite this promise the binocular rivalry phenomenon has not been extensively explored in schizophrenia to date. Following a review of the literature, the research in this Thesis examined individual variation in binocular rivalry. The initial study (Chapter 2) explored the effect of systematically altering the properties of the stimuli (i.e. spatial and temporal frequency, luminance contrast and chromaticity) on binocular rivalry rate and dominance durations in healthy individuals (n=20). The findings showed that altering the stimuli with respect to temporal frequency and luminance contrast significantly affected rate. This is significant as processing of temporal frequency and luminance contrast have consistently been demonstrated to be abnormal in schizophrenia. The current research then explored binocular rivalry in schizophrenia. The primary research question was, “Are binocular rivalry rates and dominance durations recorded in participants with schizophrenia different to those of the controls?” In this second study binocular rivalry data that were collected using low- and high- strength binocular rivalry were compared to alternations recorded during a monocular rivalry task, the Necker Cube task to replicate and advance the work of iii Miller et al., (2003). Participants with schizophrenia (n=20) recorded fewer alternations (i.e. slower alternation rates) than control participants (n=20) on both binocular rivalry tasks, however no difference was observed between the groups on the Necker cube task. Magnocellular and parvocellular visual pathways, thought to be abnormal in schizophrenia, were also investigated in binocular rivalry. The binocular rivalry stimuli used in this third study (Chapter 4) were altered to bias the task for one of these two pathways. Participants with schizophrenia recorded slower binocular rivalry rates than controls in both binocular rivalry tasks. Using a ‘within subject design’, binocular rivalry data were compared to data collected from a backward- masking task widely accepted to bias both these pathways. Based on these data, a model of binocular rivalry, based on the magnocellular and parvocellular pathways that contribute to the dorsal and ventral visual streams, was developed. Binocular rivalry rates were compared with performance on the Benton’s Judgment of Line Orientation task, in individuals with schizophrenia compared to healthy controls (Chapter 5). The Benton’s Judgment of Line Orientation task is widely accepted to be processed within the right cerebral hemisphere, making it an appropriate task to investigate the role of the cerebral hemispheres in binocular rivalry, and to investigate the inter-hemispheric switching hypothesis of binocular rivalry proposed by Pettigrew and Miller (1998, 2003). The data were suggestive of intra-hemispheric rather than an inter-hemispheric visual processing in binocular rivalry. Neurotransmitter involvement in binocular rivalry, backward masking and Judgment of Line Orientation in schizophrenia were investigated using a genetic indicator of dopamine receptor distribution and functioning; the presence of the Taq1 iv allele of the dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) receptor gene. This final study (Chapter 6) explored whether the presence of the Taq1 allele of the DRD2 receptor gene, and thus, by inference the distribution of dopamine receptors and dopamine function, accounted for the large individual variation in binocular rivalry. The presence of the Taq1 allele was associated with slower binocular rivalry rates or poorer performance in the backward masking and Judgment of Line Orientation tasks seen in the group with schizophrenia. This Thesis has contributed to what is known about binocular rivalry in schizophrenia. Consistently slower binocular rivalry rates were observed in participants with schizophrenia, indicating abnormally-slow visual processing in this group. These data support previous studies reporting visual processing abnormalities in schizophrenia and suggest that a slow binocular rivalry rate is not a feature specific to bipolar disorder, but may be a feature of disorders with psychotic features generally. The contributions of the magnocellular or dorsal pathways and parvocellular or ventral pathways to binocular rivalry, and therefore to perceptual awareness, were investigated. The data presented supported the view that the magnocellular system initiates perceptual awareness of an image and the parvocellular system maintains the perception of the image, making it available to higher level processing occurring within the cortical hemispheres. Abnormal magnocellular and parvocellular processing may both contribute to perceptual disturbances that ultimately contribute to the cognitive dysfunction associated with schizophrenia. An alternative model of binocular rivalry based on these observations was proposed. v Table of Contents Keywords ...................................................................................................................... i Abstract ........................................................................................................................ ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................ xii List of Tables ............................................................................................................. xiv List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................. xvi Statement of Original Authorship ............................................................................. xix Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................... xx CHAPTER 1: Literature Review - Visual Processing In Schizophrenia and Binocular Rivalry ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Schizophrenia ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Perceptual Disturbances in Schizophrenia .......................................................... 3 1.3 Delusional Experiences ....................................................................................... 4 1.3.1 Disorganised thoughts and behaviour. .....................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Is Wrong with the No-Report Paradigm and How to Fix It Ned Block New York University Correspondence: [email protected]
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PhilPapers Forthcoming in Trends in Cognitive Sciences What is wrong with the no-report paradigm and how to fix it Ned Block New York University Correspondence: [email protected] Key words: consciousness, perception, rivalry, frontal, global workspace, higher order Abstract Is consciousness based in prefrontal circuits involved in cognitive processes like thought, reasoning, and memory or, alternatively, is it based in sensory areas in the back of the neocortex? The no-report paradigm has been crucial to this debate because it aims to separate the neural basis of the cognitive processes underlying post-perceptual decision and report from the neural basis of conscious perception itself. However, the no-report paradigm is problematic because, even in the absence of report, subjects might engage in post-perceptual cognitive processing. Therefore, to isolate the neural basis of consciousness, a no-cognition paradigm is needed. Here, I describe a no-cognition approach to binocular rivalry and outline how this approach can help resolve debates about the neural basis of consciousness. Acknowledgement: Thanks to Jan Brascamp, Susan Carey, Thomas Carlson, David Carmel, David Chalmers, Christof Koch, Hakwan Lau, Matthias Michel, Michael Pitts, Dawid Potgieter and Giulio Tononi for comments on an earlier version. What is the Neural Basis of Consciousness? In recent years the scientific study of consciousness (see Glossary) has focused on finding the neural basis of consciousness in the brain. There are many theories of the neural basis of consciousness, but in broad strokes theories tend to divide on whether consciousness is rooted in the ‘front’ or the ‘back’ of the brain.
    [Show full text]
  • Visible Binocular Beats from Invisible Monocular Stimuli During Binocular Rivalry Thomas A
    Brief Communication 1055 Visible binocular beats from invisible monocular stimuli during binocular rivalry Thomas A. Carlson and Sheng He When two qualitatively different stimuli are presented in rivalry [14–16]. Random dot stereograms can be seen at the same time, one to each eye, the stimuli can either superimposed on, but not interacting with two orthogonal integrate or compete with each other. When they gratings engaged in rivalry, a phenomenon that Wolfe compete, one of the two stimuli is alternately termed ‘trinocular vision’ [5]. Hastorf and Myro also suppressed, a phenomenon called binocular rivalry reported that form and color rivalry could be de-coupled [1,2]. When they integrate, observers see some form of from one another ([17]; and see [5,18] for a general review). the combined stimuli. Many different properties (for Nevertheless, there are also challenges to the coexistence example, shape or color) of the two stimuli can induce of stereopsis and rivalry, particularly for the claim that they binocular rivalry. Not all differences result in rivalry, can be perceived at the same spatial location [6,7]. however. Visual ‘beats’, for example, are the result of integration of high-frequency flicker between the two During the experiment, an observer’s left eye was pre- eyes [3,4], and are thus a binocular fusion phenomenon. sented with a red triangle facing left and the right eye a It remains in dispute whether binocular fusion and green triangle facing right (each side of the triangle rivalry can co-exist with one another [5–7]. Here, we extended 2.1° visual angle), and each was illuminated, report that rivalry and beats, two apparently opposing respectively, with red or green light-emitting diodes (LEDs) phenomena, can be perceived at the same time within from behind a plastic diffuser.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromostereo.Pdf
    ChromoStereoscopic Rendering for Trichromatic Displays Le¨ıla Schemali1;2 Elmar Eisemann3 1Telecom ParisTech CNRS LTCI 2XtremViz 3Delft University of Technology Figure 1: ChromaDepth R glasses act like a prism that disperses incoming light and induces a differing depth perception for different light wavelengths. As most displays are limited to mixing three primaries (RGB), the depth effect can be significantly reduced, when using the usual mapping of depth to hue. Our red to white to blue mapping and shading cues achieve a significant improvement. Abstract The chromostereopsis phenomenom leads to a differing depth per- ception of different color hues, e.g., red is perceived slightly in front of blue. In chromostereoscopic rendering 2D images are produced that encode depth in color. While the natural chromostereopsis of our human visual system is rather low, it can be enhanced via ChromaDepth R glasses, which induce chromatic aberrations in one Figure 2: Chromostereopsis can be due to: (a) longitunal chro- eye by refracting light of different wavelengths differently, hereby matic aberration, focus of blue shifts forward with respect to red, offsetting the projected position slightly in one eye. Although, it or (b) transverse chromatic aberration, blue shifts further toward might seem natural to map depth linearly to hue, which was also the the nasal part of the retina than red. (c) Shift in position leads to a basis of previous solutions, we demonstrate that such a mapping re- depth impression. duces the stereoscopic effect when using standard trichromatic dis- plays or printing systems. We propose an algorithm, which enables an improved stereoscopic experience with reduced artifacts.
    [Show full text]
  • How Does Binocular Rivalry Emerge from Cortical
    HOW DOES BINOCULAR RIVALRY EMERGE FROM CORTICAL MECHANISMS OF 3-D VISION? Stephen Grossberg, Arash Yazdanbakhsh, Yongqiang Cao, and Guru Swaminathan1 Department of Cognitive and Neural Systems and Center for Adaptive Systems Boston University 677 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02215 Phone: 617-353-7858 Fax: 617-353-7755 Submitted: July, 2007 Technical Report CAS/CNS-2007-010 All correspondence should be addressed to Professor Stephen Grossberg Department of Cognitive and Neural Systems Boston University 677 Beacon Street Boston, MA 02215 Phone: 617-353-7858/7857 Fax: 617-353-7755 Email:[email protected] 1 SG was supported in part by the National Science Foundation (NSF SBE-0354378) and the office of Naval Research (ONR N00014-01-1-0624). AY was supported in part by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR F49620-01-1-0397) and the Office of Naval Research (ONR N00014-01-1-0624). YC was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF SBE-0354378). GS was supported in part by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR F49620-98-1-0108 and F49620-01-1-0397), the National Science Foundation (NSF IIS-97-20333), the Office of Naval Research (ONR N00014-95-1-0657, N00014- 95-1-0409, and N00014-01-1-0624), and the Whitaker Foundation (RG-99-0186). Abstract Under natural viewing conditions, a single depthful percept of the world is consciously seen. When dissimilar images are presented to corresponding regions of the two eyes, binocular rivalry may occur, during which the brain consciously perceives alternating percepts through time. How do the same brain mechanisms that generate a single depthful percept of the world also cause perceptual bistability, notably binocular rivalry? What properties of brain representations correspond to consciously seen percepts? A laminar cortical model of how cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 generate depthful percepts is developed to explain and quantitatively simulate binocular rivalry data.
    [Show full text]
  • Depth Inversion Despite Stereopsis: the Appearance of Random-Dot Stereograms on Surfaces Seen in Reverse Perspective
    Perception, 1979, volume 8, pages 135-142 Depth inversion despite stereopsis: the appearance of random-dot stereograms on surfaces seen in reverse perspective John I Yellott, Jr, Jerry L Kaiwi Cognitive Science Group, School of Social Sciences, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California 92717, USA Received 20 October 1977, in revised form 18 October 1978 Abstract. Inside-out relief masks of faces can be depth-inverted (i.e. seen in reverse perspective) during close-up binocular viewing. If a random-dot stereogram is projected onto such a mask, stereopsis can be achieved for the stereogram, and its depth planes are correctly seen while the mask itself, including the region covered by the stereogram, is simultaneously perceived as depth- inverted. This demonstration shows that binocular depth inversion cannot be explained by a complete loss of stereoscopic information (e.g. through monocular suppression), or by a process analogous to pseudoscopic viewing whereby retinal disparities are incorporated into perception, but with their signs uniformly reversed. 1 Introduction Reversible perspective is probably most often thought of in connection with ambiguous pictures like the Necker cube (figure la), but it is also well-known that depth reversals can sometimes be experienced with solid objects, and with far more dramatic perceptual consequences. [Gregory (1970) describes these in detail; Helmholtz (1925) reviews references back to 1712, and Hochberg (1972) and Robinson (1972) review the modern literature, which is surprisingly thin.] In this note we use 'depth inversion' to refer specifically to this second kind of reversible perspective, in which real objects (rather than depicted ones) are perceived, from the standpoint of depth, as inside-out, so that their concave surfaces appear convex and vice versa.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of 3DTV Displays: Techniques and Technologies
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS FOR VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 17, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 2007 1647 A Survey of 3DTV Displays: Techniques and Technologies Philip Benzie, Member, IEEE, John Watson, Senior Member, IEEE, Phil Surman, Ismo Rakkolainen, Klaus Hopf, Hakan Urey, Member, IEEE, Ventseslav Sainov, and Christoph von Kopylow (Invited Paper) Abstract—The display is the last component in a chain of ac- both vertical and horizontal parallax and several viewers are able tivity from image acquisition, compression, coding transmission to see a 3-D image that exhibits no accommodation/convergence and reproduction of 3-D images through to the display itself. rivalry. However, the principal disadvantages of these displays There are various schemes for 3-D display taxonomy; the basic are: the images are generally transparent, the hardware tends categories adopted for this paper are: holography where the image to be complex and non-Lambertian intensity distribution cannot is produced by wavefront reconstruction, volumetric where the be displayed. Multiple image displays take many forms and it is image is produced within a volume of space and multiple image likely that one or more of these will provide the solution(s) for the displays where two or more images are seen across the viewing first generation of 3DTV displays. field. In an ideal world a stereoscopic display would produce Index Terms—Holography, TV, 3-D displays. images in real time that exhibit all the characteristics of the original scene. This would require the wavefront to be reproduced accurately, but currently this can only be achieved using holo- graphic techniques. Volumetric displays provide both vertical and I.
    [Show full text]
  • A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies
    A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies Randolph Blake Vanderbilt Vision Research Center Vanderbilt University Nashville TN 37240 USA running head: Binocular Rivalry email: [email protected] voice: 615-343-7010 FAX: 615-343-5029 Binocular Rivalry Abstract. Among psychologists and vision scientists, binocular rivalry has enjoyed sustained interest for decades dating back to the 19th century. In recent years, however, rivalry’s audience has expanded to include neuroscientists who envision rivalry as a “tool” for exploring the neural concomitants of conscious visual awareness and perceptual organization. For rivalry’s potential to be realized, workers using this “tool” need to know details of this fascinating phenomenon, and providing those details is the purpose of this article. After placing rivalry in a historical context, I summarize major findings concerning the spatial characteristics and the temporal dynamics of rivalry, discuss two major theoretical accounts of rivalry (“eye” vs “stimulus” rivalry) and speculate on possible neural concomitants of binocular rivalry. key words: binocular rivalry, suppression, conscious awareness, neural model, perceptual organization 1. Introduction The human brain has been touted as the most complex structure in the known universe (Thompson, 1985). This may be true, but despite its awesome powers the brain can behave like a confused adolescent when it is confronted with conflicting visual messages. When dissimilar visual stimuli are imaged on corresponding retinal regions of the two eyes, the brain lapses into an unstable state characterized by alternating periods of perceptual dominance during which one visual stimulus or the other is seen at a time. This confusion is understandable, for the eyes are signalling the brain that two different objects exist at the same location in space at the same time.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking Into the Light: Reinventing the Apparatus in Contemporary Art
    Looking into the Light: Reinventing the Apparatus in Contemporary Art CHRISTOPHER HANDRAN Bachelor of Visual Arts in Fine Art Bachelor of Arts (Visual Arts) Honours Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements of the degree Master of Arts (Research) 2013 School of Visual Arts | Faculty of Creative Industries | Queensland University of Technology Keywords Apparatus Dispositif Olafur Eliasson Vilém Flusser Carsten Höller Phenomenology Photomedia Pipilotti Rist Video Installation ii Abstract This practice-led research explores the ‘apparatus’ in relation to its mediation of experience in contemporary art. Drawing on the thought of Vilém Flusser, a model of the apparatus is developed. Technical images such as photography, film and video, are dependent on the apparatus for their production and dissemination, yet the apparatus itself is often hidden or obscured in both the experience of the work and the discourse that surrounds it. I propose that in making or modifying apparatuses that are part of the viewing experience, artists produce specific modes of spectatorship. Using the framework of the apparatus as an interpretive lens, these modes of spectatorship are considered in works by Carsten Höller, Pipilotti Rist and Olafur Eliasson. The research identifies key practice strategies that foreground the apparatus both in the production of work and in its presentation. These strategies are developed and articulated in the context of my own practice and explored through creative works in the exhibition ‘Complex Experience.’ The research therefore
    [Show full text]
  • Cholinergic Modulation of Binocular Vision
    5208 • The Journal of Neuroscience, July 1, 2020 • 40(27):5208–5213 Development/Plasticity/Repair Cholinergic Modulation of Binocular Vision Yasha Sheynin,1 Pedro Rosa-Neto,3 Robert F. Hess,1* and Elvire Vaucher2* 1McGill Vision Research, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec H3G 1A4, Canada, 2Laboratoire de Neurobiologie de la Cognition Visuelle, École d’Optométrie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec H3T 1P1, Canada, and 3Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec H4H 1R3, Canada The endogenous neurotransmitter acetylcholine (ACh) is known to affect the excitatory/inhibitory (E/I) balance of primate visual cortex, enhancing feedforward thalamocortical gain while suppressing corticocortical synapses. Recent advances in the study of the human visual system suggest that ACh is a likely component underlying interocular interactions. However, our understanding of its precise role in binocular processes is currently lacking. Here we use binocular rivalry as a probe of interocular dynamics to determine ACh’s effects, via the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) donepezil, on the binocular visual system. A total of 23 subjects (13 male) completed two crossover experimental sessions where binocular rivalry measurements were obtained before and after taking either donepezil (5 mg) or a placebo (lactose) pill. We report that enhanced cholinergic potentiation attenuates perceptual suppression during binocular rivalry, reducing the overall rate of interocular competition while enhancing the visibility of superimposition mixed percepts. Considering recent evidence that perceptual suppression during binocular rivalry is causally modulated by the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA, our results suggest that cholinergic activity counteracts the effect of GABA with regards to interocular dynamics and may modulate the inhibitory drive within the visual cortex.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovering Stereo Vision by Squashing Virtual Bugs in a Virtual Reality Rstb.Royalsocietypublishing.Org Environment
    Recovering stereo vision by squashing virtual bugs in a virtual reality rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org environment Indu Vedamurthy1,†, David C. Knill1, Samuel J. Huang1,†, Amanda Yung1, 4 1,3,† 1,2 4 Research Jian Ding , Oh-Sang Kwon , Daphne Bavelier and Dennis M. Levi 1Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, Cite this article: Vedamurthy I, Knill DC, NY 14627-0268, USA 2 Huang SJ, Yung A, Ding J, Kwon O-S, Bavelier Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland 3School of Design and Human Engineering, UNIST, Ulsan 689-798, South Korea D, Levi DM. 2016 Recovering stereo vision by 4School of Optometry and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA squashing virtual bugs in a virtual reality DML, 0000-0002-5350-8639 environment. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371: 20150264. Stereopsis is the rich impression of three-dimensionality, based on binocular http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0264 disparity—the differences between the two retinal images of the same world. However, a substantial proportion of the population is stereo-deficient, and Accepted: 9 March 2016 relies mostly on monocular cues to judge the relative depth or distance of objects in the environment. Here we trained adults who were stereo blind or stereo- deficient owing to strabismus and/or amblyopia in a natural visuomotor One contribution of 15 to a theme issue task—a ‘bug squashing’ game—in a virtual reality environment. The subjects’ ‘Vision in our three-dimensional world’.
    [Show full text]
  • ©Elliott King, 2018 “The Spectator Makes the Picture”: Optical Illusions
    ©Elliott King, 2018 “The Spectator Makes the Picture”: Optical illusions and Viewer Experience in Dalí’s and Duchamp’s Stereoscopic Works By Elliott H. King Abstract: Dalí and Duchamp shared a well-established interest in perception and optics that included a number of experiments with 3-D optical illusions. Using some of the same historical source materials, plausibly in dialogue, both artists created stereograms and anaglyphs, though ostensibly to different ends. Duchamp’s numerous stereoscopic works, beginning around 1918 and extending to his last pieces in 1968, have been credited variously to his erudite studies of perspective, the fourth dimension, and the viewer’s role in “completing” the artwork; Dalí’s 1970s stereoscopic canvases, by contrast, are generally framed facilely as somewhat gimmicky efforts at achieving heightened illusionism. This essay considers both artists’ stereo works in terms of the viewer experience Duchamp emphasized. I am especially interested in those pieces that create stereoscopic “dissonance” by combining two wholly dissimilar pictures. Though one might readily compare the resulting images to multiple-exposure photographs (as others have done), a viewer’s experience of “dissonant” stereoscopy and single-image photography is distinct. Arguably even more so than in traditional stereoscopy, these “dissonant” stereo works give rise to illusory colors and oscillating figures that underscore the role of the eye and brain in constructing (the illusion of) objective reality – a subject in which both artists, in their particular ways, were deeply invested. 1 Avant-garde Studies Issue 3, Spring/Summer 2018 ©Elliott King, 2018 Among a number of affinities that have come to light thanks especially to the 2017-2018 exhibition Dalí/Duchamp and its accompanying catalogue, both Salvador Dalí and Marcel Duchamp shared an avid interest in perception and 3-D optical illusions, specifically stereoscopy.
    [Show full text]
  • Humans Perceive Binocular Rivalry and Fusion in a Tristable Dynamic State
    The Journal of Neuroscience, October 23, 2019 • 39(43):8527–8537 • 8527 Behavioral/Cognitive Humans Perceive Binocular Rivalry and Fusion in a Tristable Dynamic State X Guillaume Riesen,1 XAnthony M. Norcia,2 and XJustin L. Gardner2 1Interdisciplinary Neuroscience Program, and 2Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 Human vision combines inputs from the two eyes into one percept. Small differences “fuse” together, whereas larger differences are seen “rivalrously” from one eye at a time. These outcomes are typically treated as mutually exclusive processes, with paradigms targeting one or the other and fusion being unreported in most rivalry studies. Is fusion truly a default, stable state that only breaks into rivalry for non-fusible stimuli? Or are monocular and fused percepts three sub-states of one dynamical system? To determine whether fusion and rivalry are separate processes, we measured human perception of Gabor patches with a range of interocular orientation disparities. Observers (10 female, 5 male) reported rivalrous, fused, and uncertain percepts over time. We found a dynamic “tristable” zone spanning from ϳ25–35° of orientation disparity where fused, left-eye-, or right-eye-dominant percepts could all occur. The temporal characteris- tics of fusion and non-fusion periods during tristability matched other bistable processes. We tested statistical models with fusion as a higher-level bistable process alternating with rivalry against our findings. None of these fit our data, but a simple bistable model extended to have three states reproduced many of our observations. We conclude that rivalry and fusion are multistable substates capable of direct competition, rather than separate bistable processes.
    [Show full text]