PROPOSED EXTENSIONS TO FARMILO PRIMARY SCHOOL

EXTENDED PHASE 1 SURVEY

A report to:

Nottinghamshire County Council Property Group County Hall West Bridgford NG2 7QP

By:

B J Collins – Protected Species Surveyors Ltd Elvina Cottage Wilson's Lane Morton Southwell Nottinghamshire NG25 0UF Tel: (01636) 830058 www.bjcollins.co.uk

October 2014 Proposed new classrooms, Farmilo Primary School. Extended Phase I Habitat Survey

CONTENTS

Executive Summary ...... 3 1. Introduction ...... 4 2. Site Description ...... 4 3. Methodology ...... 7 3.1 Baseline Ecological Conditions ...... 7 3.2 Desk Study ...... 7 3.3 Site Survey ...... 7 3.4 Baseline Evaluation Criteria ...... 8 4. Baseline Ecological Conditions ...... 9 4.1.1 Desk Study ...... 9 4.1.2 Protected/ Notable Floral or Faunal Species ...... 9 4.2 Site Survey - Phase 1 Habitats ...... 10 4.2.1 Habitat Types ...... 10 4.2.2 Habitat Descriptions ...... 10 4.2.4 Protected/ Notable Species ...... 15 5. Ecological Evaluation ...... 16 5.1 Designated Nature Conservation Sites ...... 16 5.1.1 Statutory Sites ...... 16 5.2 Habitats ...... 16 Table 1: Summary of Ecological Evaluation of the Habitats on the Site ...... 16 5.3 Protected/ Notable Species ...... 17 5.3.1 Floral Species ...... 17 5.3.2 Faunal Species ...... 17 5.4 Main Potential Ecological Issues/ Impacts ...... 18 6. Recommendations ...... 18 6.1 Introduction ...... 18 6.2 Mitigation Recommendations ...... 18 6.3 Compensation Recommendations ...... 19 7. Further Survey Recommendations ...... 19 8. References ...... 19 Appendix 1: Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey Plan ...... 20 Appendix 2: Protected Species Legislation ...... 21 Appendix 3: Desktop Study Results...... 22

2 Prepared by B J Collins ‒ Protected Species Surveyors Ltd. Tel: (01636) 830058 Proposed new classrooms, Farmilo Primary School. Extended Phase I Habitat Survey

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

An extended phase 1 habitat survey, extended to include an assessment of trees and buildings for bat roost potential as well as an assessment of the wider school site for other protected species, was carried out to the buildings, sports field and playgrounds of the Farmilo Primary school. The surveys were carried out to assess any potential ecological impact from proposed new classrooms.

The survey identified no habitats of any scarcity which will be affected by the proposed new classroom structures. The most valuable habitat features affected by the existing proposals are the mature hybrid black poplar trees, only for the potential for nesting birds. Likewise any impact on the boundary hedgerows would also pose a risk of impact on breeding birds.

The clasp structure of the school does support some features which could support bat roosting. The desktop study finds no evidence of any roosting historically. Currently there is no impact upon the elevations of the school buildings from the proposed new classrooms.

There are no trees within the footprint of any of the development proposals which are veteran or approaching veteran status. None of the trees were found to have any potential to support roosting bats. All of the trees support potential for nesting birds.

The school grounds offer limited refuge for terrestrial mammals. The key habitat is that described in paragraph 2 above, the hedgerow features and in particular the hedgerow that is positioned at the far eastern side of the site, creating a boundary between the playing field and the adjacent arable land. This has potential habitat to support hedgehogs, although no actual animals were observed. There is no potential for sett building habitat for badgers given the high level of disturbance of the playing fields. There is therefore a very limited risk that animals could stray into the development zone overnight whilst foraging on the playing field. To ensure all eventualities are covered some precautionary mitigation is specified for specific phases of the construction project.

There are no Local Wildlife Sites (LWS) that are close to the boundary of the school; therefore none will be affected by any of the works .

The conclusions of the survey are that if site clearance can be carried out outside of the nesting bird season then there is no requirement for further survey. If however site clearance is proposed within the nesting season then a precautionary inspection of trees should be carried out by a suitably qualified ecologist/ornithologist.

3 Prepared by B J Collins ‒ Protected Species Surveyors Ltd. Tel: (01636) 830058 Proposed new classrooms, Farmilo Primary School. Extended Phase I Habitat Survey

1. INTRODUCTION

This report has been prepared by B J Collins – Protected Species Surveyors Limited for The Property Group of Nottinghamshire County Council. The report presents the findings of a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal of affected school buildings and grounds associated with Farmilo Primary School in Pleasley, , Nottinghamshire.

The area of the overall school grounds comprises approximately 1.8 hectares in plan area. The survey area comprises the entire site within the school boundary fence.

The proposal for the school is new classrooms in two specific positions, centred upon the National Grid References of SK 51185 63772 and the other at SK 51255 63768. The survey also considered a potential for new sports surfaces on the existing area of playing field to the eastern side of the school grounds. The timescales for the proposed development works are unknown at this stage.

The Preliminary Ecological Appraisal comprised an Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey and protected species scoping survey which were carried out by a suitably qualified and experienced ecologist. A desktop study was carried out in support of the ecological assessment.

The aim of the Preliminary Ecological Appraisal was to carry out an assessment of the existing ecological value of the site, to identify potential ecological issues/impacts (constraints and opportunities) associated with the proposed new classrooms and make recommendations for general mitigation, compensation, enhancement and further surveys, as appropriate.

2. SITE DESCRIPTION

Photographs of the site are provided within the text to identify key areas and the Phase 1 Habitat Map is provided in Appendix 1.

The survey area comprises the affected sections of school "Portakabin" building and grounds.

This includes the temporary classroom structure and immediately adjacent landscape to the north of the north elevation of the existing school complex. It includes the area of landscape to the east of the eastern elevations of the school complex, directly adjacent to the tarmac playground. Finally it includes an assessment of the wider site to take into account proposed new access to the school and the potential for new sports surfaces on the adjacent playing field.

The assessment then included the school elevations and trees, assessing the potential for these features to support bat roosting.

The complex comprises a range of single-storey and two-storey clasp buildings creating a large central school area with a single-storey extension to the south-east corner. These CLASP buildings are constructed from sections of precast concrete panels and sections in-filled with aluminium window frames of glass and steel panels. The buildings are covered with flat felt roofs. There is a rudimentary aluminium bargeboard detail at the eaves sealing the wall/roof junction.

4 Prepared by B J Collins ‒ Protected Species Surveyors Ltd. Tel: (01636) 830058 Proposed new classrooms, Farmilo Primary School. Extended Phase I Habitat Survey

Photograph 1 – general view of the school buildings from the north-east, from the playground to the rear.

Photograph 2 – The temporary school building on the north boundary of the north school elevation, showing the area for one site for the proposed classroom extension.

5 Prepared by B J Collins ‒ Protected Species Surveyors Ltd. Tel: (01636) 830058 Proposed new classrooms, Farmilo Primary School. Extended Phase I Habitat Survey

Photograph 3 – The proposed location for the new classroom building on the interface between the tarmac playground and the amenity grassland play area.

Photograph 4 – view of the amenity grassland and the north eastern side of the school complex

6 Prepared by B J Collins ‒ Protected Species Surveyors Ltd. Tel: (01636) 830058 Proposed new classrooms, Farmilo Primary School. Extended Phase I Habitat Survey

3. METHODOLOGY

3.1 Baseline Ecological Conditions The ecological baseline was established through desk study and site survey as outlined below.

3.2 Desk Study A desktop study for records of protected species and designated sites was commissioned from the Nottinghamshire Biological and Geological Records Centre (NBGRC).

The following websites were also reviewed:

http://info.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/insightmapping (for information on local nature conservation sites)

3.3 Site Survey Survey Area

The survey area is the landscape directly affected by the proposed locations for the two new classrooms, the potential new access through the north-west corner of the school grounds and the sports field, to cover the potential for new sports surfaces. The survey area also includes for the external elevations of the school buildings outside of the proposed development area, allowing an assessment of any bat use of the buildings.

Survey Methodology - Habitats

The Extended Phase-1 habitat survey methodology was adopted for the site. This involved systematically walking over the site and classifying each parcel of land on the basis of vegetation into one of approximately 90 habitat types (JNCC 2003). Notes were made on the structure and composition of habitats. A search for any invasive non-native species such as Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica) and Himalayan balsam (Impatiens glandulifera) was also carried out.

Target notes were used to record any habitats or features of particular interest and any sightings, signs or evidence of protected or notable faunal species or any potential habitat for such species, as detailed below:

The suitability of habitats was assessed for nesting birds;

The suitability of habitats was assessed for terrestrial mammals, specifically hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus);

Trees within the site, those mature enough to provide features for roosting bats. Landscape features such as specimen trees and shrubs were assessed for their potential suitability for their value for bat foraging and commuting;

The suitability of habitats was assessed for amphibians.

The ideal time to carry out an Extended Phase-1 habitat survey is during the plant growing season (i.e. April-September) and this is also when most animals are active.

7 Prepared by B J Collins ‒ Protected Species Surveyors Ltd. Tel: (01636) 830058 Proposed new classrooms, Farmilo Primary School. Extended Phase I Habitat Survey

Survey Methodology - Bat Scoping Survey

The school buildings comprise a clasp design of precast concrete sections and aluminium window infill. This construction detail is occasionally selected by roosting bats. To assess the actual or potential use of the school building by roosting bats a survey was implemented. This was completed utilising the scoping survey methodology. For this the buildings were examined by an experienced, licensed bat worker (Natural license number: CLS001867). Equipment used included a powerful torch, binoculars and camera. The purpose of the search was to identify features that could be potential roost sites for bats and to examine the building for evidence of bat use. It then searched for actual evidence of roosting principally comprising droppings, but also for signs such as staining, worn surfaces and the bats themselves (alive or dead).

Survey Details

Barry J Collins MSc MCIEEM carried out both elements of the survey on the 14th October 2014.

Survey Limitations

There were no limitations with access to examine all elements of the proposed new facilities.

Only a single daytime assessment of the site was made and no systematic surveys, beyond the limited scoping survey required, to establish the presence of bats, breeding birds or amphibians. As such, a lack of evidence of a protected species does not necessarily indicate an absence of the species, such as potential bat roosting within the active season and species typical of the area including hedgehog.

3.4 Baseline Evaluation Criteria Where relevant the evaluation was made with reference to the statutory protection afforded to species and habitats. Legal protection does not always correspond to conservation value. Some species (e.g. badger) are protected for reasons of animal welfare rather than conservation.

8 Prepared by B J Collins ‒ Protected Species Surveyors Ltd. Tel: (01636) 830058 Proposed new classrooms, Farmilo Primary School. Extended Phase I Habitat Survey

4. BASELINE ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS

4.1.1 Desk Study Designated Nature Conservation Sites

a) Statutory sites

There are no Special Areas of Conservation (SACs), Special Protection Areas (SPAs) or Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) located alongside the boundaries of the buildings or grounds.

b) Non-statutory sites

There are no Local Wildlife Sites immediately adjacent to the school grounds. There are however a range of Local Wildlife Sites identified by the desktop study within 2 km of the school grounds. These encircle the school and adjacent landscape, the nearest is Pleasley Trail, a section of dismantled railway with notable areas of open habitat and mature scrub and a botanical value, located some 970 m from the centre of the school grounds and the site of the former Sherwood Colliery Site, which is a former colliery spoil heap supporting a rich assemblage of breeding birds, located 1.9 km to the south-east.

There will be no impact upon these areas from the proposed works at the school.

4.1.2 Protected/ Notable Floral or Faunal Species The desktop study identified some 27 records of bats within 2 km of the school grounds. Seven of these were bat roosts but none were within a kilometre of the school complex. There is therefore no record of bat roosting within the fabric of the school.

The study contains two records for badger, both being over 1.5 km from the boundary of the school. The school does back onto open farmland and therefore there is a potential for this species to be present in the immediate vicinity. As a result mitigation is described later in this report.

There were only two records of common amphibians from the 2 km survey area. These were of common toad (Bufo bufo) and common frog (Rana temporaria). Amphibians were considered to be under recorded within the dataset, rather than the lack of records being due to a lack of common amphibians in the immediate countryside.

There were no reptile records. Reptiles are not considered to be a constraint to the new classrooms.

9 Prepared by B J Collins ‒ Protected Species Surveyors Ltd. Tel: (01636) 830058 Proposed new classrooms, Farmilo Primary School. Extended Phase I Habitat Survey

4.2 Site Survey - Phase 1 Habitats

4.2.1 Habitat Types The following Phase-1 habitat types were recorded on the site:

 Amenity Grassland (J1.2)

 Hedgerows (J2.2)

 Scattered Trees (A.3)

 Introduce shrub (J1.4)

 Building (J3.6)

The distribution and extent of these Phase-1 habitat types recorded are described below and the location of any relevant 'target notes' are shown in Appendix 2. Habitat and target note descriptions are then provided below. In the text species are referred to using their English names and scientific names. Nomenclature follows Stace, 1997.

The school grounds border open countryside and therefore there is a greater potential for wildlife of the countryside to utilise the school grounds

4.2.2 Habitat Descriptions a) Amenity grassland (JNCC Code: J1.2)

As is identified within the habitat plan in Appendix 1 the principal habitat that is located across the site is amenity grassland. This comprises the habitat surrounding footpaths and hard-standings, as well as below tree canopies and the principal landscape feature covering the entire playing field.

The grassland present is typical amenity grassland with the sward dominated by Perennial Rye- grass (Lolium perenne) and White Clover (Trifolium repens). The grassland also contained a range of other grasses including Cock's-foot (Dactylis glomerata), Yorkshire fog (Holcus lanatus), Red fescue species (Festuca rubra) and Annual Meadow-grass (Poa annua) with common forbs including Daisy (Bellis perennis), Ribwort plantain (Plantago lanceolata), Dandelion (Taraxacum officinale agg), Hoary Plantain (Plantago media), Ragwort (Senecio jacobaea), Germanda speedwell (Veronica chamaedrys), Creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens), Dove's-foot crane's-bill (R) (Geranium molle) and Cat's-ear (Hypochoeris radicata).

10 Prepared by B J Collins ‒ Protected Species Surveyors Ltd. Tel: (01636) 830058 Proposed new classrooms, Farmilo Primary School. Extended Phase I Habitat Survey

Photograph 5 – showing a section of amenity grassland in the north-east corner of the school grounds where the proposed new access is located. In this area the grassland support six of the species listed above.

b) Hedgerows (JNCC Code: J2.2)

There were a range of different hedgerows all associated with the boundary of the school grounds. All four sides supported some extent of hedgerow that whilst classified as defunct provides a continuous leaf canopy. On the western elevation, the entrance to the site there is a Hawthorn hedgerow which show signs of being planted in relatively recent history. This contains five hedgerow species including Hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna), Blackthorn (Prunus spinosa), Field Maple (Acer campestre), Hazel (Corylus avellana) and privet (Ligustrum ovalfolium). This covers the southern half of this boundary, the north is formed by the steel security fence as can be observed in photograph 5 above. The northern hedgerow comprises a new section of security fence surrounding the relatively recent "Sure-start" building outside of the survey area. The hedgerows alongside the fence also show some signs of relative immaturity. There is a short run of hedgerow which joins onto the western security fence. This contains the same range of species identified for the western hedge. Beyond this is the security fencing which surrounds the new building and then beyond a defunct hedge comprising remnant hedgerow species including goat willow (Salix caprea), Ash (Fraxinus excelsior), Elder (Sambucus nigra) and Hawthorn.

The eastern boundary hedge comprises a healthy managed structure principally supporting Hawthorn.

The southern boundary hedge is also defunct with large sections of hedge missing. The eastern side comprises mostly security fence with occasional garden shrub or hedgerow. The Western section comprises a mixed hedgerow of principally Hawthorn, showing signs of regular management, and including species such as Sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus), Holly (Ilex aquifolium), Elder and Bramble (Rubus fruticosa).

11 Prepared by B J Collins ‒ Protected Species Surveyors Ltd. Tel: (01636) 830058 Proposed new classrooms, Farmilo Primary School. Extended Phase I Habitat Survey

Photograph 6 – showing the boundary hedgerows with the southern hedgerow to the left and the northern hedgerow in the distance.

d) Scattered trees (JNCC Code: A3)

The site supports a range of mature specimen deciduous trees, in particular on the north-east boundary of the school grounds. Overall the area is dominated by a cluster of mature hybrid black poplar trees (Populus x canadensis). In the area to the west of the Portakabin there are a total of eight of these trees along with two semi-mature oaks (Quercus robur). To the west of the Portakabin there are four number hybrid black poplar and a single immature oak.

None of the trees were found to support any cavities or crevices suitable for roosting bats. One of the poplars to the west of the Portakabin supported a bird nest box, target note T2.

The hybrid black poplars provide potential bird nesting habitat.

12 Prepared by B J Collins ‒ Protected Species Surveyors Ltd. Tel: (01636) 830058 Proposed new classrooms, Farmilo Primary School. Extended Phase I Habitat Survey

Photograph 7 – showing the small copse of hybrid black poplar to the west of the Portakabin

e) Introduced Shrub (JNCC Code: J 1.4)

This habitat was not extensive across the school grounds. There was a small area to the front of the school adjacent to the car park and school entrance. This area of introduced shrub provided some value to wildlife, principally an opportunity for breeding birds to use the dense shrub canopy as a potential nesting habitat.

The shrubbery is dominated by Pyracantha ornamental shrub species.

Photograph 8 – the area of ornamental shrubbery to the entrance to the school

13 Prepared by B J Collins ‒ Protected Species Surveyors Ltd. Tel: (01636) 830058 Proposed new classrooms, Farmilo Primary School. Extended Phase I Habitat Survey

f) Building and Hard-standing (JNCC Code: J3.6)

As detailed previously in the report the buildings comprise a clasp detail finished with precast concrete sections. Where the concrete sections join there is gap of approximately 20 mm which is designed to be in-filled with a waterproof sealant strip. The search, utilising binoculars and high power torch, identified that the strip regularly finished before the top of the section at the wall/roof junction. As a result there was an access into the cavity behind the precast concrete sections.

These areas are often positively selected by roosting bats, and in particular by the pipistrelle species. The surrounds of the school buildings were searched for any evidence of bat roosting and there was none found. A desktop study was commissioned in order to identify if there was any previously recorded bat roost within the school buildings, there was none recorded and as previously reported no roost of this species known from the immediate vicinity.

The search of the temporary classroom, the Portakabin, failed to find any potential bat roosting feature.

The plans show that the proposed new classroom building will have a direct impact upon the existing temporary classroom only. Therefore the proposed new classrooms as shown will not have an impact upon roosting bats.

If there is a proposal to alter the plans and to extend adjacent to one of the concrete section elevations then further bat survey work will be required.

Photograph 9– example of gaps between the clasp wall structures which offer the potential for bats to roost.

14 Prepared by B J Collins ‒ Protected Species Surveyors Ltd. Tel: (01636) 830058 Proposed new classrooms, Farmilo Primary School. Extended Phase I Habitat Survey

4.2.3 Target Notes

There was only one target note identified by the ecological survey relevant to the proposed new classroom installations. The locations for this potential is shown within the phase 1 habitat plan in Appendix 2 of this report

T1 – There is a potential for nesting birds to utilise the dense introduced shrub on the front of the school. There is also a potential for birds to nest within the mature hybrid black poplar trees and areas of dense hedgerow around the perimeter. There is also at least two nest boxes located on tree trunks within the grounds.

4.2.4 Protected/ Notable Species a) Plants

No protected or notable plant species were noted during the survey.

b) Amphibians

There was no ponds on the site and no breeding habitat available for amphibians. Apart from the boundary hedgerows, there were no other habitat features considered ideal for the species. Most of the site is unsuitable for amphibians.

c) Terrestrial Mammals, Hedgehog and urban Badger

The search of the boundary hedgerows, which border onto agricultural land and the wider countryside, did not locate any evidence of badger setts. Further to this there were no signs within the hedge bottoms of any badger activity, there were no mammal paths typical of badger leading away from any hedgerow and there were no tell-tale signs such as latrines. The desktop study identified only two badger records and none of those were within 1.5 km of the school grounds. The risk of encountering badgers is considered limited but with open countryside adjacent there is precautionary actions specified.

Likewise the hedge bottoms do have some potential to support hedgehog. There was no actual evidence of hedgehog identified in the area but this feature was considered suitable for the species. As a result there are some precautionary actions specified, to ensure all eventualities are covered.

d) Bats

There was no evidence of any bat roosting located by the scoping search. There were no records on the desktop study to suggest bats are roosting in the school buildings.

However, there is considered to be some potential for this species to roost in the future within the school buildings, in the defects identified within this report. To this end if any further development affects any of the concrete sectional clasp building elevations then a precautionary bat survey by a suitably qualified ecologist is required in advance of any demolition works.

Despite the maturity of the trees present, there were no trees located on the proposed footprint for the school grounds that had any potential to offer habitat for roosting bats.

e) Birds

As reported within the Target note section, there is the potential for birds to nest within the hedgerows, the area of introduced shrub and the mature canopy of the hybrid black poplars. As a result precautionary actions are specified within this document.

15 Prepared by B J Collins ‒ Protected Species Surveyors Ltd. Tel: (01636) 830058 Proposed new classrooms, Farmilo Primary School. Extended Phase I Habitat Survey

g) Reptiles

The site is not suitable for reptiles.

5. ECOLOGICAL EVALUATION

5.1 Designated Nature Conservation Sites

5.1.1 Statutory Sites There are no statutory designated nature conservation sites (e.g. SACs, SPAs or SSSI) adjacent to the survey site. There is no Local Wildlife Site located adjacent to the school grounds.

5.2 Habitats The ecological evaluation of the habitats on the site is summarised in Table 1 below. The habitats recorded on the site are relatively common and most of the area is ranked of low ecological value. There were then a few limited features which were considered to offer moderate value for their potential to support nesting birds. There was also considered to be some potential for bats to roost within school buildings, although the proposed classroom constructions are away from this particular habitat feature. Therefore there is no specific mitigation for habitats as it is included within the species relevant section.

Table 1: Summary of Ecological Evaluation of the Habitats on the Site Habitat Reason for Valuation

Low Value

Amenity grassland Common habitat that is intensively managed. Provides limited habitat for faunal species.

Hardstanding Provides poor potential habitat for faunal species.

Fences The steel security fence detail provides poor habitat for wildlife

Moderate Value

Introduced shrub The shrubbery located at the entrance to the school offers potential for nesting birds, although close to the school entrance there is likely to be significant human disturbance.

Specimen trees The canopy of the mature hybrid black poplars is considered to offer potential bird nesting habitat. There are also at least two timber bird nest boxes fixed to trees which have a good potential for use over the nesting season.

School building The concrete clasp sectional detail of the school provides some potential roost habitat for bats. Although currently outside of the proposed classroom construction and with no evidence of actual roosting present.

High Value

None There were no habitats on the site considered to offer high value for wildlife

16 Prepared by B J Collins ‒ Protected Species Surveyors Ltd. Tel: (01636) 830058 Proposed new classrooms, Farmilo Primary School. Extended Phase I Habitat Survey

5.3 Protected/ Notable Species1

5.3.1 Floral Species None of the plant species recorded from the site are listed on Schedule 8 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended).

5.3.2 Faunal Species a) Amphibians

None of the habitats on site were considered to offer an ideal resource for amphibians. Most of the habitats were hostile to this group. Therefore there is no mitigation specified.

b) Terrestrial Mammals - Badger and Hedgehog

The site is considered to offer no potential sett building habitat for badgers. Some limited precautionary actions are specified given the location of the school grounds adjacent to open countryside.

The site does have some habitat features that are suitable for hedgehog, this is principally associated with the hedgerow features. There is therefore a small chance that a foraging animal could come into contact with the excavation phase of any building works and therefore precautionary best practice mitigation is specified.

c) Bats

The school buildings in general offer some roost potential for bats. Currently none of the new classroom constructions will affect any external elevation of the school. If any future scheme has any impact upon the external concrete sectional elevations, then a suitably qualified bat ecologist should be consulted to ensure there is no bat roosting associated.

d) Birds

The vast majority of the site is considered to offer poor potential for nesting birds, due to the open nature of the habitats present. The variance to this is the potential bird nesting habitat provided by the hedgerows, where they provide a dense enough canopy, the small shrub bed adjacent school entrance and the canopy of the mature hybrid black poplar trees. There is also potential for birds to use nest boxes which have been installed onto the tree trunks for this purpose. As a result precautionary actions are required and specified.

e) Reptiles

There is no record of reptiles from the local area. Given the lack of habitat provided by the school grounds there will be no impact upon reptiles from the extension proposals.

1 Protected species legislation is provided in Appendix 2.

17 Prepared by B J Collins ‒ Protected Species Surveyors Ltd. Tel: (01636) 830058 Proposed new classrooms, Farmilo Primary School. Extended Phase I Habitat Survey

5.4 Main Potential Ecological Issues/ Impacts The main potential ecological issues/impacts that are directly associated with the proposed sitings for new classrooms and potential new access are (i) harm to nesting birds/loss of nesting bird habitat from any hybrid black poplar tree removal or removal of timber bird boxes (ii) risk of harm to hedgehog when excavation works commence, if the species is foraging across the school grounds.

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1 Introduction Examination of the possible expansion positions and comments on the plans (entitled BN1, August 14) identify that consideration has been given to avoid any landscape or ecological impacts. In particular the avoidance of the loss of mature deciduous trees. In accordance with guidance and best practice documentation if losses are unavoidable then mitigation and compensation measures should be proposed for any adverse ecological effects.

6.2 Mitigation Recommendations

6.2.1 Hedgerow, Trees and Shrubs (Mitigation and Best Practice) The impact upon trees within the grounds and on the footprint of the proposed new classrooms has been limited wherever possible. If there are any trees to be removed then, if this is to take part during the bird breeding season (mid-March to September annually) then a precautionary inspection of the tree should be taken before they are removed.

It is anticipated that the classroom constructions will take place over the summer school holidays. This is close to the end of the breeding bird season, although there will be species such as pigeon (Columba sp.) still nesting during this period

The loss of any of these trees should be compensated by the planting of new native species.

6.2.2 Bats (Further Survey Requirements) None of the proposed new classroom locations has any potential impact upon any feature with the potential to support bat roosting. This is as the only potential bat habitat located was associated with the concrete sectional elevations of the clasp school buildings. There is no proposal to impact upon any of these elevations.

The search of the school building did not identify any current bat roosting.

6.2.3 Terrestrial Mammals - Hedgehog and urban Badger (Best Practice) There was no significant impact upon terrestrial mammals identified by the ecology survey. There are some precautionary actions in case species such as hedgehogs are foraging across the school grounds during the evening.

In the short-term, and during the site clearance and foundation/service trenches excavation period, if any hedgehogs are found in any excavations left overnight then they should be transferred to the base of the hedgerow at the far eastern boundary of the playing fields. Further to this if any trenches dug during work activities are to be left open over night, then they must be left with a sloping end or ramp to allow any hedgehog that may fall in a route to escape.

18 Prepared by B J Collins ‒ Protected Species Surveyors Ltd. Tel: (01636) 830058 Proposed new classrooms, Farmilo Primary School. Extended Phase I Habitat Survey

6.2.4 Nesting Birds (Mitigation) If there is any proposal to fell and remove any of the trees surrounding the current temporary classroom then their removal should be timed to avoid the bird breeding season, which runs from March to September (inclusive). This is to avoid any potential adverse impacts to nesting birds. If it is necessary to carry out the removal of trees and shrubs during the breeding season, then a survey must firstly be carried out by a qualified ecologist. Compensation and enhancements for the loss of bird nesting habitat would then be required.

6.3 Compensation Recommendations

6.3.1 The new classroom proposals The new classroom proposals were not identified as having any significant ecological impact.

7. FURTHER SURVEY RECOMMENDATIONS

7.1 Survey Conclusion So long as tree/shrub habitat clearance works specified earlier within this report can be completed outside of the breeding bird season, then there is no requirement for any further survey implications.

The exception to this is if site clearance works that affect trees or shrubs are planned within the bird breeding season, March to September inclusive. If works are required within this period then a survey must firstly be carried out by a qualified ecologist. Note that discovery of nesting birds at that time could lead to delays in construction works in the vicinity of any active nest. This would effectively result in an exclusion zone for no activities for a 5 m zone around any nest and would have to remain in place until all chicks have hatched and have fledged.

8. REFERENCES

Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management, 2013. Guidelines for Preliminary Ecological Appraisal. CIEEM. Defra, 2007. Hedgerow Survey Handbook: A standard procedure for local surveys in the UK. Defra, London.

Institute of Environmental Assessment 1995. Guidelines for Baseline Ecological Assessment. Chapman and Hall, London.

Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management, 2006. Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment. IEEM.

JNCC, 2003. Handbook for Phase 1 Habitat Survey: a technique for environmental audit. JNCC, Peterborough.

NBGRC Nottingham City Council (2014) Data request for sites and species within a two kilometre radius of Farmilo School.

Insight Mapping Service. available at http://info.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/insightmapping (for information on local nature conservation sites

19 Prepared by B J Collins ‒ Protected Species Surveyors Ltd. Tel: (01636) 830058 Proposed new classrooms, Farmilo Primary School. Extended Phase I Habitat Survey

Appendix 1: Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey Plan

20 Prepared by B J Collins ‒ Protected Species Surveyors Ltd. Tel: (01636) 830058 Proposed new classrooms, Farmilo Primary School. Extended Phase I Habitat Survey

Appendix 2: Protected Species Legislation Bats

All bat species are afforded full protection under UK and European legislation, including the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended), the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 and The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010. Together, this legislation makes it illegal to:

 Intentionally or deliberately take, kill or injure a bat

 Damage, destroy or obstruct access to bat roosts

 Deliberately disturb bats

A bat roost is defined in the legislation as “any structure or place which a bat uses for shelter or protection”. Roosts are protected whether or not bats are present at the time. If a development activity is likely to result in disturbance or killing of a bat, damage to its habitat or any of the other activities listed above, then a licence will usually be required from Natural England.

Birds

The bird breeding season generally lasts from early March to September for most species. All birds are protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act (1981) (as amended) and the Countryside & Rights of Way Act 2000. This legislation makes it illegal, both intentionally and recklessly to:

 Kill, injure or take any wild bird;

 Take, damage or destroy the nest of any wild bird while it is being built or in use;

 Take or destroy the eggs of any wild bird; and

 Possess or control any wild bird or egg unless obtained legally.

Birds listed under Schedule 1 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act (1981) (as amended) (e.g. barn owl) are afforded additional protection, which includes makes it an offence to disturb a bird while it is nest building, or at a nest containing eggs or young, or disturb the dependent young of such a bird.

Western European hedgehog

The West European hedgehog is classified as Least Concern (LC) on the IUCN Red List, listed under Appendix III of the Bern Convention, and listed as a Priority Species under the UK Biodiversity Action Plan. It receives partial protection under Schedule 6 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act (5) and is also protected under the Wild Mammals (Protection) Act 1996

21 Prepared by B J Collins ‒ Protected Species Surveyors Ltd. Tel: (01636) 830058 Proposed new classrooms, Farmilo Primary School. Extended Phase I Habitat Survey

Appendix 3: Desktop Study Results

Farmilo School

22 Prepared by B J Collins ‒ Protected Species Surveyors Ltd. Tel: (01636) 830058 Proposed new classrooms, Farmilo Primary School. Extended Phase I Habitat Survey

Sp Species Date Site Details Distance from site ref (km) Badger Badger 06/08/2008 Debdale Hall Farm, Mansfield 1.92 Badger Badger 04/01/2003 1.93 Bat unidentified bat species 24/10/1991 Yew Tree Cave, Pleasley 1.44 Bat Brown Long-eared 21/09/2002 479, Chesterfield Rd North, Mansfield 0.41 Bat Pipistrelle 04/07/1992 Pleasley 1.21 Bat Pipistrelle 21/09/2010 Pleasley Hill, Mansfield 0.32 Bat Whiskered 21/08/1996 266, Chesterfield Rd North, Mansfield 0.22 Bat Natterer's 1994 Mill No.1, Pleasley Vale 1.26 Bat Natterer's Bat 1990 Mill No.1, Pleasley Vale 1.26 Bat Brown Long-eared 1994 Mill No.2, Pleasley Vale 1.30 Bat Brown Long-eared Bat 1990 Mill No.2, Pleasley Vale 1.30 Bat unidentified bat species 1994 Pleasley Vale 1.34 Bat Pipistrelle 29/06/2000 Chesterfield Rd North, Mansfield 1.77 Bat Pipistrelle 01/07/2002 Chesterfield Rd North, Mansfield 1.77 Bat Pipistrelle 03/07/2002 Chesterfield Rd North, Mansfield 1.77 Bat Pipistrelle 01/07/2000 Chesterfield Rd North, Mansfield 1.84 Bat unidentified bat species 1994 Yew Tree cave, Pleasley Vale 1.44 Bat Noctule 1994 Pleasley Vale 0.85 Bat Brown Long Eared bat 14/05/1994 Mill No.3, Pleasley Vale Mill 1.53 Bat Natterers bat 14/05/1994 Mill No.3, Pleasley Vale Mill 1.53 Bat Daubenton's 1994 River Meden 1.53 Bat unidentified bat species 14/05/1994 Mill No.1, Pleasley Vale Mill 1.53 Bat unidentified bat species 14/05/1994 Water tower, Pleasley Vale Mill 1.53 Bat unidentified bat species 14/05/1994 Boiler House, Plant Room and Pump House, Pleasley1.53 Vale Mill Bat unidentified bat species 14/05/1994 Pump House, Pleasley Vale Mill 1.53 Bat unidentified bat species 14/05/1994 Pump House and Spring Pit, Pleasley Vale Mill 1.53 Bat Pipistrelle bat 1990 Pleasley Vale Mill 1.53 Bat Daubenton's Bat 1990 Pleasley Vale Mill 1.53 Bat Noctule Bat 1990 Pleasley Vale Mill 1.53 Herpetofauna Common Toad 08/06/2008 Ox Close Pit ponds 1.80 Herpetofauna Common Frog 19/03/2011 Oxclose Woodland, Former Sherwood Colliery, Mansfield1.91 Woodhouse Invasive species Fallopia japonica 07/04/2010 Mansfield 0.85 Invasive species Fallopia japonica 07/04/2010 Mansfield 0.64 Invasive species Fallopia japonica 24/02/2007 Mansfield 0.78 Invasive species Fallopia japonica 17/10/2009 Mansfield 1.39 Invasive species Fallopia japonica 31/12/1997 Mansfield Woodhouse 1.93 Mammal Roe Deer 12/11/2011 Oxclose Wood 1.06 Water Beetle Riolus subviolaceus 2002 5/2243 River Meden (Newboundmill Bridge (River Meden,1.77 Newboundmill Br., u/s Pleasley)) Water Beetle Elmis aenea 2002 5/2243 River Meden (Newboundmill Bridge (River Meden,1.77 Newboundmill Br., u/s Pleasley)) Water Beetle Limnius volckmari 2002 5/2243 River Meden (Newboundmill Bridge (River Meden,1.77 Newboundmill Br., u/s Pleasley)) Water Beetle Oulimnius tuberculatus 2002 5/2243 River Meden (Newboundmill Bridge (River Meden,1.77 Newboundmill Br., u/s Pleasley)) Water Vole Water Vole 1999 River Meden 1.36 Water Vole Water Vole 1999 River Meden 1.12 Water Vole Water Vole 1999 River Meden 0.92 Water Vole Water Vole 1999 River Meden 0.86 Water Vole Water Vole 1999 River Meden 1.24 Water Vole Water Vole 15/08/2002 River Meden 1.22 Water Vole Water Vole 28/05/2000 River Meden 1.22 Water Vole Water Vole 1999 River Meden 1.00 Water Vole Water Vole 06/12/2001 River Meden 1.14 Water Vole Water Vole 1999 Moorgate Hollow 1.60 Water Vole Water Vole 1999 River Meden 1.70 Water Vole Water Vole 16/03/2002 Pleasley Mill 1.53 Water Vole Water Vole 1999 River Meden 1.61 Water Vole Water Vole 05/1998 River Meden 1.97

23 Prepared by B J Collins ‒ Protected Species Surveyors Ltd. Tel: (01636) 830058