DOCSLIB.ORG

Washington Record Book

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Washington Record Book Miscellaneous Consecutive Road Wins All-Time Largest Margin of Defeat National Championships 16 1990-1992 69 California (3-72) ..................................... 1921 1960 Helms Foundation 10 1979-1981 58 Miami (7-65) ........................................... 2001 1984 Football News; Berryman; National 58 Oregon (0-58) ......................................... 1973 Championship Foundation*; Longest Losing Streak 56 USC (0-56) .............................................. 2008 1990 FACT* 15 2007-2009 52 Alabama (0-52) ...................................... 1975 1991 USA Today/CNN; UPI/National Football 50 Michigan (0-50) ..................................... 1953 Foundation; Football Writers; Sports Consecutive Games Scoring 48 UCLA (0-48) ............................................ 1967 Illustrated; Berryman; Billingsley; DeVold, 259 1981-2004 48 USC (0-48) .............................................. 1929 Dunkel; FACT*; FB News; Matthews; 48 Nebraska (7-55)..................................... 1998 National Championship Foundation*; Consecutive Shutouts 47 California (7-54) ..................................... 2003 Sagarin 8 Nov. 14, 1908-Nov. 13, 1909; 46 Notre Dame (0-46) ................................ 1948 *Selected multiple national champions Nov. 5, 1910-Nov. 4, 1911 Attendance Conference Championships Consecutive Games Shutout Home Games 1916 Pacific Coast 3 1906, 1917, 1920, 1948 Season Total 503,341 in 2003 (7 games) 1919 Pacific Coast (tie) 445,896 in 1995 (6 games) 1925 Pacific Coast Consecutive Non-Losing Seasons Home Game 76,125 vs. Army, 1995 1936 Pacific Coast 27 1977-2003 Home Average 71,395 in 1987 (7 games) 1959 AAWU (tie) 16 1901-1916 74,316 in 1995 (6 games) 1960 AAWU 1963 AAWU Consecutive PATs Made All Games 1977 Pacific-8 Total 111, 1976-79 Season Total: 783,123 in 2007 (13 games) 1980 Pacific-10 Games 42, 1977-81 800,667 in 2003 (12 games) 1981 Pacific-10 726,774 in 1995 (11 games) 1990 Pacific-10 All-Time Largest Margin of Victory Season Average: 60,240 in 2007 (13 games) 1991 Pacific-10 120 Whitman (120-0) .................................... 1919 66,722 in 2003 (12 games) 1992 Pacific-10 (tie) 108 Willamette (108-0)................................. 1925 66,070 in 1995 (11 games) 1995 Pacific-10 (tie) 100 Whitworth (100-0) ................................. 1913 Away Game: 111,491 at Michigan, 2002 2000 Pacific-10 (tie) 96 Col. Puget Sound (96-0) ....................... 1924 Bowl Game: 105,611 vs. Iowa, 1982 Rose 90 Fort Wordon (90-0)................................ 1911 Unbeaten, Untied Teams 77 Whitman (77-0) ...................................... 1931 Top 10 Home Attendance Marks 1909 7-0-0 73 Col. Puget Sound (80-7) ....................... 1925 1910 6-0-0 73 Col. Puget Sound (73-0) ....................... 1929 No. Year Opponent Attendance 1911 7-0-0 72 California (72-0) ..................................... 1915 1. 1995 Army 76,125 1912 6-0-0 71 Whitman (71-0) ...................................... 1944 1913 7-0-0 2. 1997 Arizona State 74,986 3. 2007 Ohio State 74,927 1915 7-0-0 Modern Largest Margin of Victory 4. 2003 Washington State 74,549 1991 12-0-0 66 Oregon (66-0) ......................................... 1974 5. 1995 USC 74,421 58 UC Santa Barbara (65-7)...................... 1971 6. 1997 Washington State 74,268 Unbeaten Teams 57 Oregon (63-6) ......................................... 1951 7. 2000 Miami (Fla.} 74,157 1895 4-0-1 55 Texas El-Paso (55-0)............................. 1982 8. 1995 Washington State 74,144 1908 6-0-1 54 Arizona (54-0) ........................................ 1991 9. 2001 Michigan 74,080 1914 6-0-1 54 Oregon (54-0) ......................................... 1977 10. 1995 Oregon 74,054 1916 6-0-1 53 Kansas State (56-3) .............................. 1991 1991 12-0-0 51 Montana (58-7) ...................................... 1951 50 Idaho (53-3 ............................................. 2001 Longest Winning Streaks 49 Two Times 39 1908-1914 22 1990-1992 Division I Longest Unbeaten Streaks 12 2000-2001 No. Wins Ties Team Years Ended by Score 12 1914-1916 1. 63 59 4 Washington 1907-17 California 27-0 10 1981-1982 (post 1945) 2. 56 55 1 Michigan 1901-05 Chicago 2-0 3. 50 46 4 California 1920-25 Olympic Club 15-0 Longest Unbeaten Streaks 4. 48 47 1 Oklahoma 1953-57 Notre Dame 7-0 63* 1907-1917 (59-0-4) 48 47 1 Yale 1885-89 Princeton 10-0 22 1990-1992 (22-0-0) 14 1924-1925 (12-0-2) Division I Longest Home Winning Streaks 12 2000-2001 (12-0) Wins Team Years Ended by Score 10 1922-1923 (9-0-1) 1. 58 Miami (Fla.) 1985-94 Washington 38-20 10 1981-1982 (10-0-0) 2. 57 Alabama 1963-82 Southern Miss. 38-29 * NCAA Record 3. 56 Harvard 1890-95 Boston AA 0-0 4. 50 Michigan 1901-07 Pennsylvania 6-0 Consecutive Home Wins 5. 47 Nebraska 1991-98 Texas 20-16 44 1908-1917 6. 44 Washington 1908-17 Oregon State 0-0 17 1999-2002 7. 42 Texas 1968-76 Houston 30-0 17 1991-1993 8. 40 Notre Dame 1907-18 Great Lakes 7-7 15 1981-1983 9. 38 Notre Dame 1919-27 Minnesota 7-7 10. 37 Yale 1904-08 Brown 10-10 37 Yale 1900-03 Princeton 11-6 37 Florida State 1992-01 Miami (Fla.) 49-27 15 Washington Record Book — Team Single Game Miscellaneous Punt Returns Long Scoring Drive (Plays) – 19 at Oregon, 2005; vs. California, 2002; at California, Punt Returns – 9 vs. Montana, 1951; 9 vs. BYU, 1998 1975; vs. Oregon in 1955 Punt Return Yards – 166 vs. California, 1998 Long Scoring Drive (Yards) – 99 vs. Stanford, 1999; vs. Wash. St., 2001; Punt Return Yards Per Attempt – (min. 3) 36.3 vs. Kansas St., 1991 (3 att., 109 yds.) vs. San Jose State, 2004 Punt Returns for Touchdowns – 2 vs. Oregon, 1984 Long Scoring Drive (Time) – 9:52 at Oregon, 2005 Long One Play Scoring Drive (Yards) – 91 yards vs. San Jose State, 1994 Kickoff Returns Time of Posession – 41:52 vs. Florida (Freedom Bowl), 1989 Kickoff Returns – 10 at UCLA, 1973 Kickoff Return Yards – 258 vs. UCLA, 1998 Rushing Kickoff Return Yards Per Attempt – (min. 3) 47.0 vs. BYU, 1986 (3 att., 141 yds.) Rushing Yards – 559 vs. San Jose State, 1996 Kickoff Returns for Touchdowns – 2 vs. Utah, 1959 Rushing Attempts – 80 at Washington State, 1956 Fewest Rushing Yards – (-13) vs. Stanford, 1971 Punting Fewest Rushing Attempts – 15 at Southern California, 1989 Punts – 12 at Arizona State, 1983 Rushing Yards Per Attempt – 13.3 vs. Washington State, 1950 Fewest Punts – 0 vs. UCLA, 1962; vs. Wyoming, 2002 Fewest Rushing Yards Per Attempt – (-0.5) vs. Stanford, 1971 Punting Average – (Min. 5) 54.6 at Colorado, 1959 (7 att., 382 yds.) Rushing Touchdowns – 8 vs. Oregon, 1951 Passing Penalties Pass Attempts – 68 at USC, 1998 Penalties – 18 at Oregon State, 1976 Fewest Pass Attempts – 2 vs. California, 1964 Fewest Penalties – 0 vs. Stanford, 1948; 0 at Washington State, 1960 Pass Completions – 38 at USC, 2002 Penalty Yards – 163 at California, 1959 Fewest Pass Completions – 0 vs. California, 1965; vs. Oregon, 1962; at Illinois, 1951 Fewest Penalty Yards – 0 vs. Stanford, 1948; 0 at Washington State, 1960 Passing Yards – 455 vs. Arizona, 2001 Fewest Passing Yards – 0 vs. Cal, 1965; vs. Ore., 1962; vs. Cal, 1948; at Illinois, 1951 Fumbles Touchdown Passes – 6 vs. UCLA, 1970 Fumbles – 11 at Oregon, 1969 Completion Percentage (20 att.) — .857 (18 for 21) vs. San Jose State, 1993 Fumbles Lost – 7 at USC, 1956 Completion Percentage (30 att.) — .818 (27 for 33) vs. Michigan,1983 Passes Had Intercepted – 8 at UCLA, 1969 Yards per Attempt – 17.1 vs. Michigan (Rose Bowl), 1993 Fewest Yards per Attempt – 0.7 at Oregon, 1973 Single-Game Defense Yards Per Completion – 30.0 at Calfornia, 1999 Fewest Yards Per Completion – 7.1 vs. Arizona, 1984 Rushing Defense Scoring Fewest Rushing Attempts – 20 vs. Oregon State, 1987; 20 vs. Oregon, 1999 Points – 120 vs. Whitman, 1919 (all-time); 66 vs. Oregon, 1974 (modern) Fewest Rushing Yards – (- 50) vs. Pacific, 1981 Points by Quarter – 1st Qtr. – 28 vs. Idaho, 1969 Most Rushing Yards Lost – 115 vs. California, 1972 2nd Qtr. – 30 vs. Oregon State, 1989 Fewest Rushing Yards Per Attempt – (- 1.88) vs. BYU, 1986 3rd Qtr. – 28 vs. Indiana, 2003; 28 vs. Stanford, 1981 vs. Oregon, 1974 Pass Defense 4th Qtr. – 30 vs. UCLA, 1970 Fewest Pass Attempts – 2 at California, 1965 Touchdowns – 9 vs. Oregon, 1974; 9 vs. UC-Santa Barbara, 1971; 9 vs. Fewest Pass Completions – 0 at Indiana, 1978 Oregon, 1951; 9 vs. Montana, 1951 Fewest Passing Yards – 0 at Indiana, 1978; at Oregon State, 1991 Field Goals – 5 at Washington State, 2002; vs. Houston, 1985 Lowest Average per Passing Attempt (15 att.) – 1.0 vs. Oregon State, 1975 Field Goal Attempts – 8 at Washington State, 2002 Lowest Average per Completion (10 comp.) – 6.4 at Oregon, 2004 Extra Points – 9 vs. Oregon, 1974; 9 vs. UC Santa Barbara, 1971 Extra Point Attempts – 9 vs. Oregon, 1974; 9 vs. UC Santa Barbara, 1971 Interceptions Combined Points – 120 vs. Whitman, 1919 Interceptions – 9 vs. Oregon, 1952 Points in a Half – Overall – 45 at Oregon State, 1999; 45 vs. Northwestern, 1980 Interception Yards – 213 vs. Oregon, 1952 1st Half – 45 at Oregon State, 1999; 45 vs. Northwestern, 1980 Interception Returns for Touchdowns – 2 vs. Michigan State, 1997; at Stanford, 2nd Half – 42 vs. Oregon, 1974; 42 at Illinois, 1971 1978; vs. Utah, 1959; at Oregon State, 1999; vs. Oregon State, 2002 First Downs Total Defense First Downs – 36 vs. Wyoming, 2002 Fewest Total Offensive Yards Allowed – 42 vs. Montana, 1951 Fewest First Downs – 2 vs. California, 1948 (all-time); 3 vs. Oregon, 1984 (modern) Fewest Total Offensive Attempts Allowed – 37 vs. Oregon State, 1953 Rushing First Downs – 27 vs. Idaho, 1956 Fewest Rushing First Downs – 0 at USC, 1989; at UCLA, 2001 First Downs Passing First Downs – 26 vs. Wyoming, 2002 Fewest First Downs – 2 vs. Oregon, 1974 Fewest Passing First Downs – 0 on 13 occasions, last vs.Stanford, 1967 Penalty First Downs – 7 vs.
Recommended publications
  • National Awards National Football Foundation Post-Season & Conference Honors

    National Awards National Football Foundation Post-Season & Conference Honors

    NATIONAL AWARDS National Football Foundation Coach of the Year Selections wo Stanford coaches have Tbeen named Coach of the Year by the American Football Coaches Association. Clark Shaughnessy, who guid- ed Stanford through a perfect 10- 0 season, including a 21-13 win over Nebraska in the Rose Bowl, received the honor in 1940. Chuck Taylor, who directed Stanford to the Pacific Coast Championship and a meeting with Illinois in the Rose Bowl, was selected in 1951. Jeff Siemon was inducted into the College Football Hall of Fame in 2006. Hall of Fame Selections Clark Shaughnessy Chuck Taylor The following 16 players and seven coaches from Stanford University have been selected to the National Football Foundation/College Football Hall of Fame. Post-Season & Conference Honors Player At Stanford Enshrined Heisman Trophy Pacific-10 Conference Honors Ernie Nevers, FB 1923-25 1951 Bobby Grayson, FB 1933-35 1955 Presented to the Most Outstanding Pac-10 Player of the Year Frank Albert, QB 1939-41 1956 Player in Collegiate Football 1977 Guy Benjamin, QB (Co-Player of the Year with Bill Corbus, G 1931-33 1957 1970 Jim Plunkett, QB Warren Moon, QB, Washington) Bob Reynolds, T 1933-35 1961 Biletnikoff Award 1980 John Elway, QB Bones Hamilton, HB 1933-35 1972 1982 John Elway, QB (Co-Player of the Year with Bill McColl, E 1949-51 1973 Presented to the Most Outstanding Hugh Gallarneau, FB 1938-41 1982 Receiver in Collegiate Football Tom Ramsey, QB, UCLA 1986 Brad Muster, FB (Offensive Player of the Year) Chuck Taylor, G 1940-42 1984 1999 Troy Walters,
  • Annual Individual Statistical Leaders (Includes Bowl Games)

    Annual Individual Statistical Leaders (Includes Bowl Games)

    Annual Individual Statistical Leaders (includes bowl games) ANNUAL RUSHING LEADERS 1979 Charles White 11 332 2050 6.2 G TCB NYG AVG. 1980 Marcus Allen 10 354 1563 4.4 1925 Mort Kaer 11 105 576 5.5 1981 Marcus Allen 12 433 2427 5.6 1926 Mort Kaer 8 155 852 5.5 1982 Todd Spencer 10 141 596 4.4 1927 Morley Drury 9 223 1163 5.2 1983 Michael Harper 10 151 685 4.5 1928 Don Williams 8 173 681 3.9 1984 Fred Crutcher 12 307 1155 3.8 1929 Russ Saunders 11 185 972 5.3 1985 Ryan Knight 9 195 732 3.8 1930 Orv Mohler 10 145 983 6.8 1986 Ryan Knight 12 148 536 3.6 1931 Gus Shaver 11 199 936 4.7 1987 Steven Webster 10 239 1109 4.6 1932 Cotton Warburton 10 115 420 3.7 1988 Aaron Emanuel 7 108 545 5.1 1933 Cotton Warburton 11 149 885 5.9 1989 Ricky Ervins 12 269 1395 5.2 1934 Inky Wotkyns 10 133 588 4.4 1990 Mazio Royster 11 235 1168 5.0 1935 Nick Pappas 10 102 414 4.1 1991 Deon Strother 11 129 614 4.8 1936 Davie Davis 9 141 501 3.6 1992 Estrus Crayton 12 183 700 3.8 1937 Amby Schindler 8 134 599 4.5 1993 Shawn Walters 13 156 711 4.6 1938 Grenny Lansdell 11 118 462 3.9 1994 Shawn Walters 11 193 976 5.1 1939 Grenny Lansdell 10 154 742 4.8 1995 Delon Washington 12 236 1109 4.7 1940 Bobby Robertson 8 146 667 4.6 1996 LaVale Woods 12 119 601 5.1 1941 Bobby Robertson 9 120 483 4.0 1997 Delon Washington 11 125 444 3.6 1942 Mickey McCardle 11 96 413 4.3 1998 Chad Morton 11 199 985 4.9 1943 Eddie Saenz 10 71 445 6.3 1999 Chad Morton 12 262 1141 4.4 1944 Don Burnside (Doll) 10 70 428 6.1 2000 Sultan McCullough 12 227 1163 5.1 1945 Ted Tannehill 11 99 574 5.8 2001 Sultan McCullough 6 115 410 3.6 1946 Art Battle 9 69 296 4.3 2002 Sultan McCullough 13 179 814 4.5 1947 Don Doll 9 57 246 4.3 1948 Don Doll 10 67 265 3.9 ANNUAL PASSING LEADERS 1949 Bill Martin 9 128 357 2.8 G PA PC INT Pct.
  • Guide Lo Res .Pdf

    Guide Lo Res .Pdf

    Contents 2018 Schedule Quick Facts Alphabetical Roster ......................................................................1 Date Opponent Time Location • Founded ......................................Stanford, Calif. • 1891 Numerical Roster .........................................................................2 8.31 San Diego State.................................................... 6 p.m. Nickname • Colors ...........................Cardinal • Cardinal and White Class Roster ..................................................................................3 9.8 USC* ................................................................ 5:30 p.m. Enrollment .................... 7,062 (undergraduate) • 9,368 (graduate) Position Roster .............................................................................4 9.15 UC Davis ............................................................. 11 a.m. Stadium ......................................................(50,424 • natural grass) Geographical Roster ....................................................................5 9.22 at Oregon* ................................................................TBA Conference .......................................................................Pacific-12 Academic Majors Roster...............................................................6 9.29 at Notre Dame ................................................ 4:30 p.m. President .......................................................Marc Tessier-Lavigne @Twitter Roster ............................................................................7
  • University of Nevada, Reno Quarterback Value Forecasting And

    University of Nevada, Reno Quarterback Value Forecasting And

    University of Nevada, Reno Quarterback Value Forecasting and Fixing the NFL Draft’s Market Failure A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Economics by Trevor M. Wojcik Dr. Mark Nichols/Thesis Advisor December, 2010 THE GRADUATE SCHOOL We recommend that the thesis prepared under our supervision by TREVOR MICHAEL WOJCIK entitled Quarterback Value Forecasting And Fixing The NFL Draft’s Market Failure be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Mark Nichols, Phd, Advisor Sankar Mukhopadhyay, Phd, Committee Member Rahul Bhargava, Phd, Graduate School Representative Marsha H. Read, Ph. D., Associate Dean, Graduate School December, 2010 i Abstract The National Football League (NFL) is a business that is worth nearly $7 billion annually in revenue. That makes it the largest money making sport in the United States. The revenue earned by each franchise is dependent upon the repeated success of the team. A commonly held belief is that for a franchise to be successful you must have an elite Quarterback. This thesis uses NFL data and for the 2000-2008 seasons to determine the role that Quarterback performance plays in team success. With the determination that Quarterbacks are important to NFL team success the question becomes how does a franchise effectively obtain the best player. The NFL player draft is the most commonly used method for teams to find their Quarterback of the future. The problem is that the success rate for drafting Quarterbacks is very low. In this thesis I have determined a more statistical approach to determining whether a drafted Quarterback will be successful.
  • The Following Players Comprise the College Football Great Teams 2 Card Set

    The Following Players Comprise the College Football Great Teams 2 Card Set

    COLLEGE FOOTBALL GREAT TEAMS OF THE PAST 2 SET ROSTER The following players comprise the College Football Great Teams 2 Card Set. The regular starters at each position are listed first and should be used most frequently. Realistic use of the players below will generate statistical results remarkably similar to those from real life. IMPORTANT: When a Red "K" appears in the R-column as the result on any kind of running play from scrimmage or on any return, roll the dice again, refer to the K-column, and use the number there for the result. When a player has a "K" in his R-column, he can never be used for kicking or punting. If the symbol "F-K" or "F-P" appears on a players card, it means that you use the K or P column when he recovers a fumble. Players in bold are starters. If there is a difference between the player's card and the roster sheet, always use the card information. The number in ()s after the player name is the number of cards that the player has in this set. See below for a more detailed explanation of new symbols on the cards. 1971 NEBRASKA 1971 NEBRASKA 1972 USC 1972 USC OFFENSE DEFENSE OFFENSE DEFENSE EB: Woody Cox End: John Adkins EB: Lynn Swann TA End: James Sims Johnny Rodgers (2) TA TB, OA Willie Harper Edesel Garrison Dale Mitchell Frosty Anderson Steve Manstedt John McKay Ed Powell Glen Garson TC John Hyland Dave Boulware (2) PA, KB, KOB Tackle: John Grant Tackle: Carl Johnson Tackle: Bill Janssen Chris Chaney Jeff Winans Daryl White Larry Jacobson Tackle: Steve Riley John Skiles Marvin Crenshaw John Dutton Pete Adams Glenn Byrd Al Austin LB: Jim Branch Cliff Culbreath LB: Richard Wood Guard: Keith Wortman Rich Glover Guard: Mike Ryan Monte Doris Dick Rupert Bob Terrio Allan Graf Charles Anthony Mike Beran Bruce Hauge Allan Gallaher Glen Henderson Bruce Weber Monte Johnson Booker Brown George Follett Center: Doug Dumler Pat Morell Don Morrison Ray Rodriguez John Kinsel John Peterson Mike McGirr Jim Stone ET: Jerry List CB: Jim Anderson TC Center: Dave Brown Tom Bohlinger Brent Longwell PC Joe Blahak Marty Patton CB: Charles Hinton TB.
  • 2018 Washington Football Information

    2018 Washington Football Information

    2018 Washington Football Information 2018 Husky Football Quick Facts Table Of Contents Location ..............................................................................Seattle, Wash., 98195 2018 Quick Facts .......................................................................................... 1 Enrollment .............. 46,165 (Seattle campus; total graduate and undergraduate) 2018 Husky Football SPRING Roster .....................................................2-3 Nickname .................................................................................................. Huskies 2018 Husky Football Coaching Staff ......................................................... 4 Colors ................................................................................................Purple & Gold 2017 Season Statistics ...........................................................................5-21 Conference ............................................................................................. Pacific-12 2017 Game-By-Game Box Scores ......................................................22-47 President ......................................................................................Ana Mari Cauce UW Team Records ................................................................................48-59 Director of Athletics .................................................................... Jennifer Cohen UW Individual Records ......................................................................60-104 Faculty Representative ....................................................................Frank
  • Crowdsourcing and Human Computation Course Projects: Amazon Mechanical Turk

    Crowdsourcing and Human Computation Course Projects: Amazon Mechanical Turk

    Lecture 22: CS 5306 / INFO 5306: Crowdsourcing and Human Computation Course Projects: Amazon Mechanical Turk • Payments: – Put $20 on account – Get reimbursed by Information Science – If you need more $ contact me • Try simple task – (Should have requester account) Types of Crowdsourcing • Overt – Collecting (Amazon Reviews) – Labor Markets (Amazon Mechanical Turk) – Collaborative Decisions (Prediction Markets) – Collaborative Creation (Wikipedia) – Smartest in the Crowd (Contests) – Games with a Purpose • Covert / Crowd Mining – Web page linkage, search logs, social media, collaborative filtering • Dark side of crowdsourcing and human computation • Collective intelligence in animals Types of Crowdsourcing • Overt – Collecting (Amazon Reviews) – Labor Markets (Amazon Mechanical Turk) – Collaborative Decisions (Prediction Markets) – Collaborative Creation (Wikipedia) – Smartest in the Crowd (Contests) – Games with a Purpose • Covert / Crowd Mining – Web page linkage, search logs, social media, collaborative filtering • Dark side of crowdsourcing and human computation • Collective intelligence in animals Mammon and the Archer • mammon: “material wealth or possessions especially as having a debasing influence” (Mirriam Webster Dictionary) Mammon and the Archer • mammon: “material wealth or possessions especially as having a debasing influence” (Mirriam Webster Dictionary) • archer? Mammon and the Archer Why? Great Rose Bowl Hoax • 1961 Rose Bowl • Washington Huskies vs Minnesota Golden Gophers • Half-time show: Card stunt Great Rose Bowl
  • Sportsnews1961january Dece

    Sportsnews1961january Dece

    " UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND ATHLETICS MINNEAPOLIS 14 i-~'HHHHHHHHHHHHH'~-lHHHHHHHHHHl* 1961 GOIF BROCHURE "The Gophers" The Schedule March 2(}.21 Rice at Houston, Texas April 26 Carleton Here May 6 Iowa, Wisconsin at Iowa City May 19-20 Conference Meet at Bloomington, Ind. June 19-24 NCAA Meet at Lafayette, Ind. 1960 Minnesota Golf Results Minn. Opp. 23t St. Thomas 3} 16~ Maca1ester l~ 17 Hamline 1 29 Iowa 25 15 Wisconsin 21 27 Wisconsin 201. 22 Northwestern 13 181 Iowa 171 20 Alumni 10 21 Minneapolis Golf Club 15 Placed Fourth in Conference Meet *****i'MHHHh\~<iHHHH.YHHP,******",HHHHHHHfo This brochure was prepared by the Sports Information Office, University of Minnesota. For further information contact Otis'J. Dypwick, Sports Information Director, Room 208 Cooke Hall, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 14, Minnesota. - 2·- 1961 MINNESOTA GOLF PROSPECTS "Minnesota's golf outlook is the brightest in years.IV That optimistic statement is how veteran Gopher coach Les Bolstad views his team's prospects for the 1961 season. riAnything can happen in the Big 10, but we're aiming for as high as we can go,a Bolstad declares. Biggest factors in the rosy outlook, according to Bolstad, are experience and balance. The Gophers top four men, Gene Hansen, Capt. Carson Herron, Rolf Deming, and Jim Pfleider are extremely well matched, and Bolstad says he can't chose between them as to excellence. The other members of the squad's top six are Harry Newby and Les Peterson. Bolstad hopes his squad will continue the great improvement demonstrated last year when the Gophers catapulted from ninth to fourth place and almost finished second.
  • 2011 GN CFL Wk15 01-01 Cover

    2011 GN CFL Wk15 01-01 Cover

    2011 CANADIAN FOOTBALL LEAGUE · GAME NOTES Winnipeg Blue Bombers at Hamilton Tiger-Cats October 7, 2011 7:30 PM ET CFL Gm: 61 Wk # 15 WPG (8-5) HAM (7-6) Head Coach: Paul LaPolice 12-19-0 Head Coach: Marcel Bellefeuille 26-31-0 Projected Starters * 2011 CFL Statistics Projected Starters * 2011 CFL Statistics Offence St Yr GP No Yds Avg TD Offence St Yr GP No Yds Avg TD C 60 KHAN, Ibrahim N 8 13 C 53 DEWIT, Mark N 6 4 G 57 LABATTE, Brendon N 4 13 G 67 DYAKOWSKI, Peter N 4 13 G 62 MORLEY, Steven N 6 13 G 65 ROTTIER, Simeon N 3 13 T 59 DOUGLAS, Andre I 2 13 T 56 JOHNSON, Belton I 5 8 T 69 JANUARY, Glenn I 5 13 T 60 JIMENEZ, Jason I 1 12 SB 15 HARGREAVES, Aaron N 4 12 23 234 10.2 0 SB 8 THIGPEN, Marcus I 1 13 18 286 15.9 2 SB 81 WATSON, Cory N 2 13 55 690 12.5 1 SB 88 STALA, Dave N 9 13 39 545 14.0 7 WR 82 EDWARDS, Terrence I 7 13 47 858 18.3 8 WR 80 WILLIAMS, Chris I 1 12 53 859 16.2 5 WR 84 DENMARK, Clarence I 1 12 45 578 12.8 4 WR 15 MACKAY, Glenn N 3 13 4 37 9.3 0 WR 84 CARR, Greg I 2 6 28 369 13.2 1 WR 86 MANN, Maurice I 5 8 32 326 10.2 2 Car Yds Avg TDCar Yds Avg TD RB 19 GARRETT, Chris I 2 1 11 76 6.9 1 RB 22 COBOURNE, Avon I 6 13 163 788 4.8 8 Pct Yds INT TDPctYdsINTTD QB 4PIERCE, Buck I 7 12 64.7 2,680 13 12 QB 5 GLENN, Kevin I 11 13 62.6 2,915 10 19 As starter - CFL: 30-20-1 vs Opp: 8-4 As starter - CFL: 60-60-1 vs Opp: 4-5 Defence St Yr GP DT QS Int FR Defence St Yr GP DT QS Int FR DT 93 ORAMASIONWU, Don N 2 13 14 3 0 1 DT 90 MULLINDER, Luc N 8 6 2 0 0 0 DE 92 TURNER, Bryant I189100 DT 98 STEELE, Eddie N 1 13 20 1 0 1 DE 56 KASHAMA,
  • 1 Drafting the Best Future NFL Quarterback Decision Making in A

    1 Drafting the Best Future NFL Quarterback Decision Making in A

    Drafting the Best Future NFL Quarterback Decision Making in a Complex Environment Final Project Nick Besh Steve Ellis October 18, 2004 Anyone who has followed the NFL draft knows that drafting a Quarterback in the first round is a hit or miss proposition. Successful college prospects, many who are under classmen fail to go on and have the same success as professionals. There are the “cant- miss” prospects who do go one to become Pro Bowl QB’s, but just as many are total busts. It would appear as if the selection is nothing more than a crap-shoot. Drafting is all about priorities and alternatives. Given that, there must be a way to quantify all of the stats and “gut feelings” of players to select a future NFL star. The description of the NFL draft problem would appear to be a perfect candidate for a complex ratings model using the SuperDecisions software. Analyzing the problem further lead us to our stated goal: Optimize a high selection in the NFL draft by drafting a solid contributor to your team, if not a Pro-Bowl caliber player while at the same time avoiding the selection of a player who can set your franchise back years. This is a critical decision that does not leave much room for error. To achieve our goal, thorough research of all the criteria that would need to be considered when drafting a QB would need to be analyzed. This process led us to nine top level criteria: 1 1. Strength of college experience: Just how valuable was the players experience at this level to his future success? • Sub Criteria: College (big/small), college winning percentage, college years started.
  • 2012 Husky Football

    2012 Husky Football

    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON 2012 HUSKY FOOTBALL www.gohuskies.com Contacts: Jeff Bechthold • (206) 543-2230 • email: [email protected] 2012 HUSKY SCHEDULE / RESULTS WASHINGTON at #3/3 LSU Sept. 1 SAN DIEGO ST. (Pac-12 Networks) W, 21-12 Dawgs Make First Trip To SEC Country Since 1983 Sept. 8 at #3 LSU (ESPN) 4:00 p.m. Sept. 15 PORTLAND STATE (FX) 1:00 p.m. THE GAME: The Washington football team (1-0) travels to face LSU (1-0) this Saturday, the first Sept. 27 STANFORD (ESPN) 6:00 p.m. time the Huskies have played a road game in the Southeastern Conference since the UW visited Oct. 6 at Oregon TBD Baton Rouge in 1983. The Huskies did, however, open the Steve Sarkisian era vs. the Tigers in Oct. 13 USC TBD Seattle in 2009. LSU enters the game ranked No. 3 in both the USA Today coaches’ poll and in the Oct. 20 at Arizona TBD AP Top 25. The Huskies earned 55 points in the latest coaches’ poll, one spot out of the top 25, Oct. 27 OREGON STATE TBD while in the AP rankings, the Huskies picked up 15 points for the equivalent of a No. 32 ranking. Nov. 2 at California (ESPN2) 6:00 p.m. Kickoff at Tiger Stadium is set for 6:05 p.m. CT/4:05 p.m. PT, and the game will air live on ESPN Nov. 10 UTAH TBD television. Washington opened the 2012 season last Saturday night at CenturyLink Field in Seattle Nov. 17 at Colorado TBD by beating San Diego State, 21-12.
  • Bowl History

    Bowl History

    History HUSKIES History 1924 Rose Bowl Washington 14, Navy 14 January 1, 1924 eligible to catch a pass. Bryan delayed, then released and gathered in Abel’s pass, stumbling across the goal line for the touchdown. The Sherman-booted extra point made it 14–14. Washington missed a field goal “by a scant three feet” as time expired and the Huskies Washington had one last chance to win, as the Huskies drove to the 25-yard line with less settled for a 14–14 tie with the heavily favored Midshipmen of the Naval Academy in the 1924 than five minutes to play on a long pass from Abel to Wilson. Washington’s field goal attempt Rose Bowl, played before 40,000 fans. by Leonard Zeil from 24 yards out had the distance but curved left. Navy took over on downs The Huskies, coached to a 10–1 record coming into the game by third-year coach Enoch at the 20, and advanced as far as midfield when the game ended. Bagshaw, had to fight back twice, falling behind 7–0 early and later trailing 14–7 to the well- drilled Middies of Annapolis. The Naval Academy (5–1–1) used a sophisticated passing attack, Attendance a style not seen before on the West Coast, to confuse the Husky defense in the first half. Navy 40,000 completed all 11 passes it attempted in the first half, and hit 14 in a row before the Huskies managed to stop one. Navy completed 16-of-20 for the day. Scoring Navy opened the scoring at the start of the second period on a 20-yard pass from Q Team-Scoring Play (Conversion) quarterback Ira McKee to halfback Carl Cullen.