Calumet Bioblitz Species List FINAL

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Calumet Bioblitz Species List FINAL Calumet BioBlitz Species List with Sites Wolf Egger's Nike Missile Scientific Name Common Name Type Sites Powderhorn Lake Woods Site #sites Achnanthes sp.1 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Amphora sp.1 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Anabaena flos-aquae ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Anabaena spiroides ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Ankistrodesmus falcatus ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Aphanocapsa sp.1 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Aphanothece gelatinosa ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Botryococcus sp.1 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Calothrix sp.2 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Ceratium hirundinella ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Chamaesiphon sp.1 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Chlamydomonas sp.1 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Chlamydomonas sp.2 ALGAE Powderhorn and Wolf Lake xx 2 Chlamydomonas sp.3 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Cladophora glomerata ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Closterium sp.1 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Closterium sp.2 ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Cocconeis placentula ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Coelastrum cambriam ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Coelastrum microporum ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Coelosphaerium sp. ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Cosmarium sp.1 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Cosmarium sp.2 ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Cosmarium sp.3 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Cosmarium sp.4 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Cymbella sp.1 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Cymbella sp.2 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Denticula sp.1 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Epithemia sp.1 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Euastrum sp.1 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Eudorina elegans ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Euglena acus ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Fragilaria capucina ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Fragilaria crotenensis ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Gloeocapsa punctata ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Gloeocapsa sp.2 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Gloeocystis sp.1 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Gloeothece rupestris ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Gomphosphaeria sp.1 ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Gyrosigma sp.1 ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Lyngbya birgei ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Mastogloia sp.1 ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Melosira varians ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Microcytis sp.1 ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Mougeotia sp.1 ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Mougeotia sp.2 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Wolf Egger's Nike Missile Scientific Name Common Name Type Sites Powderhorn Lake Woods Site #sites Navicula sp.1 ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Navicula sp.2 ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Naviculaceae ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Netrium sp.1 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Nitzschia sp.1 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Nostoc paludosum ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Oedogonium sp.1 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Oscillatoria limosa ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Oscillatoria sp.1 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Oscillatoria subbrevis ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Oscillatoria tenuis ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Pediastrum boryanum ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Pediastrum duplex ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Pediastrum simplex ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Phacus segretti ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Phacus sp.1 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Phacus sp.2 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Phormidium retzii ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Pleodorina sp.1 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Radiococcus sp.1 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Radiofilum conjunctivum ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Rhopalodia gibba ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Scenedesmus arcuatus ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Scenedesmus quadricauda ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Scenedesmus sp.1 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Scenedesmus sp.2 ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Scenendesmus longus ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Scenendesmus sp.3 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Spirogyra sp.1 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Spirogyra sp.2 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Spirulina princeps ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Spirulina subsalsa ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Staurastrum sp.1 ALGAE Powderhorn and Wolf Lake xx 2 Synedra acus ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Synedra sp.1 ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Trachelomonas hispida ALGAE Powderhorn x 1 Volvox avreus ALGAE Wolf Lake x 1 Accipiter cooperii Cooper's Hawk BIRDS Powderhorn and Wolf Lake xx 2 Actitis macularia Spotted Sandpiper BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Agelaius phoeniceus Red-winged Blackbird BIRDS Egger's Woods, Nike Missile Site, xxx x Powderhorn, and Wolf Lake 4 Aix sponsa Wood Duck BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Anas clypeata Northern Shoveler BIRDS Egger's Woods x 1 Anas crecca Green-winged Teal BIRDS Egger's Woods and Powderhorn xx 2 Anas discors Blue-winged Teal BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Wolf Egger's Nike Missile Scientific Name Common Name Type Sites Powderhorn Lake Woods Site #sites Anas platyrhynchos Mallard BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Anas rubripes Black Duck BIRDS Egger's Woods and Wolf lake xx 2 Archilochus colubris Ruby-throated BIRDS Egger's Woods, Nike Missile Site, xxx x Hummingbird Powderhorn, and Wolf Lake 4 Ardea herodias Great Blue Heron BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Bombycilla cedrorum Cedar Waxwing BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Branta canadensis Canada Goose BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Bubo virginianus Great Horned Owl BIRDS Wolf Lake x 1 Buteo jamaicensis Red-tailed Hawk BIRDS Egger's Woods, Nike Missile Site, xxx x Powderhorn, and Wolf Lake 4 Butorides striatus Green Heron BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Calidris melanotos Pectoral Sandpiper BIRDS Egger's Woods and Wolf Lake xx 2 Calidris minutilla Least Sandpiper BIRDS Egger's Woods and Powderhorn xx 2 Calidris pusilla Semipalmated BIRDS Egger's Woods x Sandpiper 1 Cardinalis cardinalis Northern Cardinal BIRDS Egger's Woods, Nike Missile Site, xxx x Powderhorn, and Wolf Lake 4 Carduelis tristis American Goldfinch BIRDS Egger's Woods, Nike Missile Site, xxx x Powderhorn, and Wolf Lake 4 Carpodacus mexicanus House Finch BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Catharus ustulatus Swainson's Thrush BIRDS Wolf Lake x 1 Ceryle alcyon Belted Kingfisher BIRDS Wolf Lake x 1 Chaetura pelagica Chimney Swift BIRDS Egger's Woods, Nike Missile Site, xxx x Powderhorn, and Wolf Lake 4 Charadrius semipalmatus Semipalmated Plover BIRDS Powderhorn x 1 Charadrius vociferus Killdeer BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Chlidonias niger Black Tern BIRDS Wolf Lake x 1 Chordeiles minor Common Nighthawk BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Cistothorus palustris Marsh Wren BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Coccyzus americanus Yellow-billed Cuckoo BIRDS Wolf Lake x 1 Colaptes auratus Northern Flicker BIRDS Egger's Woods, Nike Missile Site, xxx x Powderhorn, and Wolf Lake 4 Columba livia Rock Dove BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Contopus borealis Olive-sided Flycatcher BIRDS Powderhorn x 1 Contopus virens Eastern Wood Pewee BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Corvus brachyrhynchos Common Crow BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Wolf Egger's Nike Missile Scientific Name Common Name Type Sites Powderhorn Lake Woods Site #sites Cyanocitta cristata Blue Jay BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Cygnus olor Mute Swan BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Dendroica magnolia Magnolia Warbler BIRDS Egger's Woods x 1 Dendroica petechia Yellow Warbler BIRDS Egger's Woods and Wolf Lake xx 2 Dendroica virens Black-throated Green BIRDS Egger's Woods x Warbler 1 Dolichonyx oryzivorus Bobolink BIRDS Wolf Lake x 1 Dumetella carolinensis Gray Catbird BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Egretta alba Great Egret BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Egretta caerulea Little Blue Heron BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Empidonax flaviventris Yellow-bellied Flycatcher BIRDS Egger's Woods and Powderhorn xx 2 Empidonax minimus Least Flycatcher BIRDS Egger's Woods and Wolf Lake xx 2 Empidonax sp. Flycatcher BIRDS Egger's Woods and Wolf Lake xx 2 Empidonax traillii Willow Flycatcher BIRDS Egger's Woods and Wolf Lake xx 2 Falco sparverius American Kestrel BIRDS Egger's Woods and Wolf Lake xx 2 Fulica americana American Coot BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Gallinula chloropus Common Moorhen BIRDS Egger's Woods x 1 Geothlypis trichas Common Yellowthroat BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Hirundo rustica Barn Swallow BIRDS Egger's Woods, Nike Missile Site, xxx x Powderhorn, and Wolf Lake 4 Hydroprogne caspia Caspian Tern BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Icterus galbula Baltimore Oriole BIRDS Egger's Woods, Nike Missile Site, xxx x Powderhorn, and Wolf Lake 4 Icterus spurius Orchard Oriole BIRDS Egger's Woods x 1 Larus argentatus Herring Gull BIRDS Egger's Woods and Wolf Lake xx 2 Larus delawarensis Ring-billed Gull BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Melanerpes carolinus Red-bellied Woodpecker BIRDS Egger's Woods x 1 Melanerpes erythrocephalus Red-headed BIRDS Wolf Lake x Woodpecker 1 Mergus cucullatus Hooded Merganser BIRDS Wolf Lake x 1 Mniotilta varia Black-and-white Warbler BIRDS Egger's Woods x 1 Molothrus ater Brown-headed Cowbird BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Myiarchus crinitus Great Crested BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Flycatcher Lake 3 Wolf Egger's Nike Missile Scientific Name Common Name Type Sites Powderhorn Lake Woods Site #sites Myiopsittaca monachus Monk Parakeet BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Nycticorax nycticorax Black-crowned Night BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Heron Lake 3 Pandion haliaetus Osprey BIRDS Wolf Lake x 1 Parus atricapillus Black-capped Chickadee BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Passer domesticus House Sparrow BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Passerina cyanea Indigo Bunting BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Lake 3 Petrochelidon pyrrhonota Cliff Swallow BIRDS Wolf Lake x 1 Phalacrocorax auritus Double-crested BIRDS Egger's Woods, Powderhorn, and Wolf xxx Cormorant Lake 3 Pheucticus ludovicianus Rose-breasted Grosbeak BIRDS Egger's Woods and Wolf Lake xx 2 Picoides pubescens
Recommended publications
  • Table of Contents
    New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau DRED – Division of Forests & Lands PO Box 1856 – 172 Pembroke Road, Concord, NH 03302-1856 (603) 271-2215 Comparison of Alternative Wetland Assessment Methods at Five Restoration Sites in New Hampshire March 2013 A report prepared by the New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau DRED Division of Forests & Lands, Concord, NH Completed under EPA Grant # CD-96155401 A Quick Overview of the NH Natural Heritage Bureau's Purpose and Policies The New Hampshire Native Plant Protection Act The Natural Heritage database contains (RSA 217-A) declared that native plants should information about more than 7,000 plant, animal, be protected and conserved for human need and and natural community occurrences in New enjoyment, the interests of science, and the Hampshire. economy of the state. The state maintains and enhances populations of native plants to insure their perpetuation as viable ecosystem In addition, Natural Heritage develops and components. implements measures for the protection, conservation, enhancement, and management of native New Hampshire plants. State agencies The Natural Heritage Bureau administers the assist and cooperate with the Natural Heritage Native Plant Protection Act. Natural Heritage Bureau to carry out the purposes of the Native collects and analyzes data on the status, location, Plant Protection Act. The Natural Heritage and distribution of rare or declining native plant Bureau also assists and advises the private sector species and exemplary natural communities in upon request. the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Autonomous Onboard Science Data Analysis for Comet Missions
    AUTONOMOUS ONBOARD SCIENCE DATA ANALYSIS FOR COMET MISSIONS David R. Thompson(1), Daniel Q. Tran(1), David McLaren(1), Steve A. Chien(1), Larry Bergman(1), Rebecca Castaño(1), Richard Doyle(1), Tara Estlin(1), Matthew Lenda(1), (1) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr. Pasadena, CA 91109, USA Email: [email protected], all others [email protected] Figure 1. Plume detection by identifying the nucleus. Left: computational edge detection. Center: a convex hull of edge points. Right: bright areas outside the nucleus are plumes. Image credit: NASA/JPL/UMD. ABSTRACT active geologic processes including scarps and outflows [1]. Its surface undergoes continuous modification, Coming years will bring several comet rendezvous with visible change during the years between two missions. The Rosetta spacecraft arrives at Comet flybys. The EPOXI flyby of comet Hartley 2 shows 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko in 2014. Subsequent skyscraper-size spires, flat featureless plains that outgas rendezvous might include a mission such as the H O, regions of rough and mottled texture, bands of proposed Comet Hopper with multiple surface landings, 2 various shapes, and diverse surface albedo. Comets’ as well as Comet Nucleus Sample Return (CNSR) and active areas range from 10-90%, changing over time Coma Rendezvous and Sample Return (CRSR). These and distance to the sun. They manifest as both localized encounters will begin to shed light on a population that, jets and diffuse regions (Figure 1). Still more exotic, despite several previous flybys, remains mysterious and recently discovered “active asteroids” suggest that poorly understood.
    [Show full text]
  • Entomology of the Aucklands and Other Islands South of New Zealand: Lepidoptera, Ex­ Cluding Non-Crambine Pyralidae
    Pacific Insects Monograph 27: 55-172 10 November 1971 ENTOMOLOGY OF THE AUCKLANDS AND OTHER ISLANDS SOUTH OF NEW ZEALAND: LEPIDOPTERA, EX­ CLUDING NON-CRAMBINE PYRALIDAE By J. S. Dugdale1 CONTENTS Introduction 55 Acknowledgements 58 Faunal Composition and Relationships 58 Faunal List 59 Key to Families 68 1. Arctiidae 71 2. Carposinidae 73 Coleophoridae 76 Cosmopterygidae 77 3. Crambinae (pt Pyralidae) 77 4. Elachistidae 79 5. Geometridae 89 Hyponomeutidae 115 6. Nepticulidae 115 7. Noctuidae 117 8. Oecophoridae 131 9. Psychidae 137 10. Pterophoridae 145 11. Tineidae... 148 12. Tortricidae 156 References 169 Note 172 Abstract: This paper deals with all Lepidoptera, excluding the non-crambine Pyralidae, of Auckland, Campbell, Antipodes and Snares Is. The native resident fauna of these islands consists of 42 species of which 21 (50%) are endemic, in 27 genera, of which 3 (11%) are endemic, in 12 families. The endemic fauna is characterised by brachyptery (66%), body size under 10 mm (72%) and concealed, or strictly ground- dwelling larval life. All species can be related to mainland forms; there is a distinctive pre-Pleistocene element as well as some instances of possible Pleistocene introductions, as suggested by the presence of pairs of species, one member of which is endemic but fully winged. A graph and tables are given showing the composition of the fauna, its distribution, habits, and presumed derivations. Host plants or host niches are discussed. An additional 7 species are considered to be non-resident waifs. The taxonomic part includes keys to families (applicable only to the subantarctic fauna), and to genera and species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Predatory Mite (Acari, Parasitiformes: Mesostigmata (Gamasina); Acariformes: Prostigmata) Community in Strawberry Agrocenosis
    Acta Universitatis Latviensis, Biology, 2004, Vol. 676, pp. 87–95 The predatory mite (Acari, Parasitiformes: Mesostigmata (Gamasina); Acariformes: Prostigmata) community in strawberry agrocenosis Valentîna Petrova*, Ineta Salmane, Zigrîda Çudare Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, Miera 3, Salaspils LV-2169, Latvia *Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected]. Abstract Altogether 37 predatory mite species from 14 families (Parasitiformes and Acariformes) were collected using leaf sampling and pit-fall trapping in strawberry fi elds (1997 - 2001). Thirty- six were recorded on strawberries for the fi rst time in Latvia. Two species, Paragarmania mali (Oud.) (Aceosejidae) and Eugamasus crassitarsis (Hal.) (Parasitidae) were new for the fauna of Latvia. The most abundant predatory mite families (species) collected from strawberry leaves were Phytoseiidae (Amblyseius cucumeris Oud., A. aurescens A.-H., A. bicaudus Wainst., A. herbarius Wainst.) and Anystidae (Anystis baccarum L.); from pit-fall traps – Parasitidae (Poecilochirus necrophori Vitz. and Parasitus lunaris Berl.), Aceosejidae (Leioseius semiscissus Berl.) and Macrochelidae (Macrocheles glaber Müll). Key words: agrocenosis, diversity, predatory mites, strawberry. Introduction Predatory mites play an important ecological role in terrestrial ecosystems and they are increasingly being used in management for biocontrol of pest mites, thrips and nematodes (Easterbrook 1992; Wright, Chambers 1994; Croft et al. 1998; Cuthbertson et al. 2003). Many of these mites have a major infl uence on nutrient cycling, as they are predators on other arthropods (Santos 1985; Karg 1993; Koehler 1999). In total, investigations of mite fauna in Latvia were made by Grube (1859), who found 28 species, Eglītis (1954) – 50 species, Kuznetsov and Petrov (1984) – 85 species, Lapiņa (1988) – 207 species, and Salmane (2001) – 247 species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • AND BODY of CICADA": IMPRESSIONS of the LANTERN-FLY (HEMIPTERA: FULGORIDAE) in the VILLAGE of Penna BRANCA" BAHIA STATE, BRAZIL
    Journal of Ethnobiology 23-46 SpringiSummer 2003 UHEAD OF SNAKE, WINGS OF BUTTERFL~ AND BODY OF CICADA": IMPRESSIONS OF THE LANTERN-FLY (HEMIPTERA: FULGORIDAE) IN THE VILLAGE OF PEnnA BRANCA" BAHIA STATE, BRAZIL ERALDO MEDEIROS COSTA-NElO" and JOSUE MARQUES PACHECO" a Departtll'rtl?nto de Cit?t1Cias BioMgicasr Unh:rersidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Km 3, BR 116, Campus Unirl£rsitario, eEP 44031-460, Ferra de Santana, Bahia, Brazil [email protected],br b DepartmHemo de Biowgifl Evolutim e Ecologia, Unit:rersidade Federal de Rod. Washington Luis, Km 235, Caixa Postal 676, CEP 13565~905, Sao Silo Paulo, Brazil r:~mail: [email protected] To the memory of Darrell Addison Posey (1947-2001) ABSTRACT.-Four aspects of the ethnoentomology of the lantern-fly (Fulgora la­ temari" L., 1767) were studied in Pedra Branca, Brazil. A total of 45 men and 41 women were consulted through open-ended interviews and their actions were observed in order to document the wisdom, beliefs, feelings, and behaviors related to the lantern-fly. People/s perceptions of the ex.temal shape of the insect influence its ethnotaxonomy, and they may categorize it into five different ethnosemantic domains, VilJagers a.re familiar with the habitat and food habits of the lantern- fly; they it lives on the trunk of Simarouba sp. (Simaroubaceae} by feeding on sap with aid of its 'sting: The culturally constructed attil:tldes toward this insect are that it is a fearsome organism that should be extlimninated .vhenever it is found because it makes 'deadly attacks.' on plants and human beings.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • R E P O R T S
    I LLINOIS NATURAL HISTORY S U RVE Y R e p o r t s Winter 2006 No. 386 I N S I D E 24 Hours: The 2005 Busey Woods BioBlitz Mapping Owned, What brings more than 50 sci- systematics research of a poorly nearly 68% of the total number Managed, or Leased entists together with interested known family of fl ies (Therevi- of species identifi ed at Allerton? Properties of the Il- amateurs and the general public dae) that are not only present in Part of the answer goes to the linois Department of for a 24-hour extravaganza to Illinois, but found worldwide. root of why biodiversity studies Natural Resources see how many species could be The database was fi rst used at the are important and why so many 2 identifi ed from a 59-acre urban Allerton BioBlitz in 2001 where specialists are needed to do this natural area? The 2005 Busey 1,949 species were identifi ed work. Biologists working during New INHS Space Woods BioBlitz, which ran from nearly 3,000 observations the blitz were under no illusion Facilities from noon on June 24 to noon recorded during a 24-hour period that they would identify all of the 3 the following day, was species to be found in sponsored by the Urbana those 59 acres, and in (Illinois) Park District and fact, no one knew how Energy Impact of supported by a grant from many species might be Compact Development the Illinois Department there, because no one vs. Sprawl (Urban Ecology III) of Natural Resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Agile Science Operations David R
    Agile Science Operations David R. Thompson Machine Learning and Instrument Autonomy Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Engineering Resilient Space Systems Keck Institute Study, July 31 2012. A portion of this research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Copyright 2012 California Institute of Technology. All Rights Reserved; U. S. Government Support Acknowledged. Image: Hartley 2 (EPOXI), NASA/JPL/UMD Jet Propulsion Laboratory / California Institute of Technology / Solar System Exploration Directorate 1 Agenda Motivation: science at primitive bodies Critical Path Analysis and reaction time A survey of onboard science data analysis Case study – how could onboard data analysis impact missions? Image: Hartley 2 (EPOXI), NASA/JPL/UMD Jet Propulsion Laboratory / California Institute of Technology / Solar System Exploration Directorate 2 Primitive bodies Jet Propulsion Laboratory / California Institute of Technology / Solar System Exploration Directorate 3 Typical encounter (Lutetia 21, Rosetta) Jet Propulsion Laboratory / California Institute of Technology / Solar System Exploration Directorate 4 Primitive bodies: key measurements Reproduced from Castillo-Rogez, Pavone, Nesnas, Hoffman, “Expected Science Return of Spatially-Extended In-Situ Exploration at Small Solar System Bodies,” IEEE Aerospace 2012. Jet Propulsion Laboratory / California Institute of Technology / Solar System Exploration Directorate
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • MVG 21 – Other Grasslands, Herblands, Sedgelands and Rushlands
    NVIS Fact sheet MVG 21 – Other grasslands, herblands, sedgelands and rushlands Australia’s native vegetation is a rich and fundamental • communities and support a large range of species, partly element of our natural heritage. It binds and nourishes as a result of their geographical range, and variation in our ancient soils; shelters and sustains wildlife, protects soils and site conditions streams, wetlands, estuaries, and coastlines; and absorbs • include many plant species capable of vegetative carbon dioxide while emitting oxygen. The National reproduction by rhizomes, or stolons Vegetation Information System (NVIS) has been developed • can comprise associated species that may include and maintained by all Australian governments to provide perennial forbs or/and short-lived ephemeral plants that a national picture that captures and explains the broad proliferate after seasonal or cyclonic rains, to longer-term diversity of our native vegetation. perennials that rely on underground organs such This is part of a series of fact sheets which the Australian as rhizomes Government developed based on NVIS Version 4.2 data to • occur on a range of sites including intermittently provide detailed descriptions of the major vegetation groups inundated depressions, margins of perennial freshwater (MVGs) and other MVG types. The series is comprised of lagoons and brackish tidal or inland wetlands. Ferns tend a fact sheet for each of the 25 MVGs to inform their use by to dominate specific humid areas where the environment planners and policy makers. An additional eight MVGs are is less variable between seasons available outlining other MVG types. • have structurally distinctive features of landscape that provide a variety of habitats for faunal species For more information on these fact sheets, including its limitations and caveats related to its use, please see: • may be associated with an overstorey of scattered and ‘Introduction to the Major Vegetation Group (MVG) isolated trees fact sheets’.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Structure of Mites (Acari: Acariformes and Parasitiformes) in Nests of the Semi-Collared Flycatcher (Ficedula Semitorquata) R
    International Research Journal of Natural Sciences Vol.3, No.3, pp.48-53, December 2015 ___Published by European Centre for Research Training and Development UK (www.eajournals.org) COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF MITES (ACARI: ACARIFORMES AND PARASITIFORMES) IN NESTS OF THE SEMI-COLLARED FLYCATCHER (FICEDULA SEMITORQUATA) R. Davidova, V. Vasilev, N. Ali, J. Bakalova Konstantin Preslavsky University of Shumen, 115, Universitetska Str., Shumen, 9700, Bulgaria. ABSTRACT: The aims of the present paper are to establish the specific structure of communities of prostigmatic and mesostigmatic mites in nests of the semi-collared flycatcher (Ficedula semitorquata) and to compare the fauna with the mites in nests of two other European flycatchers. For analysis of community structure of mites were used the indices: prevalence, relative density, mean intensity and dominance. Mite communities are strongly dominated by the species Dermanyssus gallinae and Ornithonyssus sylviarum, which were found with the highest frequency and dominance. The mite communities are characterized by a large number of subrecedent species. KEYWORDS: Acariformes, Parasitiformes, Nest of Bird, Community Structure INTRODUCTION The nests of different species of birds are an example of a fairly unstable and isolated habitat, with its own dependent on it specific fauna which involves different groups of invertebrate animals. One of the components of this fauna which demonstrates particular abundance is the arthropods, and more specifically, the mites. The studies of Parasitiformes show that mesostigmatic mites living in birds' nests vary both in terms of their species affiliation and the structure of their communities [4, 8]. Highly important with respect to veterinary science and medicine are a number of species, such as Ornithonyssus bursa, Ornithonyssus sylviarum, Dermanyssus gallinae harboured by birds, Ornithonyssus bacoti, harboured by rodents, etc.
    [Show full text]