Lower Juba Sub-National Food Security Cluster Meeting
30th January 2014
SOMALIA Agenda Standing items 1. Introductions 2. Review and agreement of previous minutes 3. Review/follow-up actions from previous meeting 4. Access constraints 5. Presentation of district level information by response objective, activity and planned versus actual 6. Review of gaps per district and Response Discussion 7. AOB SOMALIA
Access Constraints & Implications on Operations
To be completed for every meeting
SOMALIA Review of FSC Responses for Lower Juba (December 2013)
SOMALIA Cluster Members Responses by Response Priority
Region Improved Access Livelihood Investment Safety Net Responses No. No. No. No. No. Reached No. Reached Reported Reached Reported Reported Lower Juba 0 4 23,046 5 15,000 1
SOMALIA District Level Response i) Improved Access to Food & Safety Nets
Region District Emergency Safety Net Relief Responses Assistance Cash (Food/Cash/Vou cher Lower Juba Afmadow 0 0 Badhadhe 0 0
Jamaame 0 0 Kismayo 0 15,000
SOMALIA District Level Response Safety Net Activity Breakdown – Planned and Actual -
TB/HIV/Household TB/HIV Hospital TSFP Region District Wet Feeding Support Support
Planned Actual Planned Actual Planned Actual Planned Actual Lower Afmadow 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Juba Badhadhe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jamaame 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kismayo 57,500 15,000 300 0 1,800 0 0 0
SOMALIA District Level Response Livelihood Investment
Livelihood Region District investment Lower Juba Afmadow 22,896
Badhadhe 0
Jamaame 0
Kismayo 150
SOMALIA District Level Response ii) Livelihood Investment Activity Breakdown
Region District Assets
Lower Juba Afmadow 22,896 Badhadhe 0 Jamaame 0 Kismayo 150
SOMALIA District Level Response ii) Livelihood Investment Activity Breakdown - Planned and Actual -
Region District Assets Seed Distribution
Planned Actual Planned Actual Lower Juba Afmadow 10,950 22,896 5,787 0
Badhadhe 1,140 0 0 0
Jamaame 0 0 0 0
Kismayo 8,136 150 88,590 0
SOMALIA Gap Analysis: Improved Access and Safety Net Afmadow Responses
L . J U B A Jamame Legend
District Boundary KISMAAYO Region Boundary Kismayo Dec. Improved Access and Safety Net Percentage 0 to 10 percent Badhadhe 10 to 25 percent 25 to 50 percent 50 to 75 percent 75+ percent
SOMALIA Gap Analysis:
Afmadow Livelihood Investment Assets U
L . J U B A Responses Legend U Region Capital Jamame District Boundary Region Boundary December Livelihood Assets GAP
U KISMAAYO Gap magnitude Kismayo U < 20.000 U 20.000 to 100.000
> 100.000 U U Badhadhe December Livelihood Assets Percentage 0 to 10 percent 10 to 25 percent 25 to 50 percent 50 to 75 percent SOMALIA 75+ percent Gap Analysis: Livelihood Afmadow Investment Inputs’ Responses L . J U B A L . J U B A Jamame Legend Region Capital District Boundary Region Boundary Kismayo KISMAAYO December Livelihood input GAP Pecentage U 0 to 20,000 U 20,000 to 100,000
U >100,000 Badhadhe U December Livelihood inputs Percentage 0 to 10 percent 10 to 25 percent 25 to 50 percent SOMALIA 50 to 75 percent 75+ percent Any Other Business
SOMALIA