Penology: Treatment of Delinquency and Module No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

SUBJECT FORENSIC SCIENCE Paper No. and Title PAPER No. 2: Criminology and Law MODULE No. 35: Penology: Treatment of delinquency and Module No. and Title Correctional Institutes Module Tag FSC_P2_M35 FORENSIC SCIENCE PAPER No.2: Criminology and Law MODULE No. 35: Penology: Treatment of delinquency and Correctional Institutes TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Learning Outcomes 2. Introduction 3. Salient Features of Penology 4. Theories of Punishments 5. Correctional Administration in India 6. Prison Reforms in India 7. Contemporary Correctional Approach 8. Constitutive Penology 9. Summary FORENSIC SCIENCE PAPER No.2: Criminology and Law MODULE No. 35: Penology: Treatment of delinquency and Correctional Institutes 1. Learning Outcomes After studying this module, you will be able to know about- The significance of Penology The types of Punishment Theories The features of Traditional and modern penological approaches 2. Introduction Any act or omission violating the law of the land is known as crime. Evenly, crimes are consequence of several factors and reasons, as Aristotle says „man is social animal‟. The origin of the punishment is way back since the human inception. There are countless myths and traditions which were followed by the civilized people which are studied under Criminology. Criminology is one of the emerging subjects during the 19th and 20th century. It contains an organized set of information and observations of law breakers, crimes and the treatment of law breakers. It has many sub branches which makes this knowledge as academic subject. One of the main branches is Penology and Correctional Administration. Penology is a study of punishments and the origin of the subject can be traced way back in 1834, by Francis Lieber, a German American to denote a system of administrating punishment to the convicted offenders. Before this the Italian Criminologist Cesare Beccaria wrote “Essays on Crime and Punishments” which was published in 1764. After this there was sudden focus turned on punishments and their effects on human life. The main works had done by the John Howard, Elizabeth Fry, Mary Carpenter and Sir William Crofton on prison reforms. In recent times there is huge turmoil on harsh punishments and abolition of Capital punishment. But every society has three reactions as Siddique explains „the first is the traditional reaction, of a universal nature, which can be termed as the punitive approach‟. Further he says, „this type of person is bad and dangerous and the approach is to inflict punishment on the offender in order to protect the society from his onslaughts‟. And the second is „the criminal is victim of circumstances‟ for this he says „criminal is sick person requires treatment‟. And the third and final is „preventive approach‟ instead of focusing the attention on particular offender, seeks to FORENSIC SCIENCE PAPER No.2: Criminology and Law MODULE No. 35: Penology: Treatment of delinquency and Correctional Institutes eliminate those conditions which are responsible for crime causation‟. To understand this one must go through the defections. Mr. Francis Lieber says „Penology is that branch of criminal science which occupies itself, or ought to do so, with punishment and the criminal; not with the definition of crime, the subject of accountability and the providing of the crime, which belong to the criminal law and the penal process. Dr. P K Sen states that, „Penology ought to lay down the fundamental principles to guide the state or sovereign authority in framing of its scheme of punishment‟. While, M S Sabnis describes penology to be a body of systematized knowledge of management of penal measures and penal institutions so designed that a minority among people who dare violates the established norms of individual and social conduct and behavior codified as law by a given society at a given time and place are kept out of circulation for the certain order to enable the rest of society which is predominantly law-abiding, to constitute its socially useful activity without let or hindrance. 3. Salient Features of Penology Crime statistics have been a part of the discourse of the state for over hundreds of years, but the development of statistical methods permits the devising of concepts and strategies that allow direct relations between penal approach and the population. Although crime strategy, criminal procedure, and criminal sanctioning have been influenced by such social utility analysis, there is no explanation on the criminal law that is equivalent to the body of social utility analysis for doctrine of tort law. Nor has stringent accountability in the criminal law achieved anything like the recognition of related no- fault principles in tort law. Possibly because the criminal law is so firmly rooted in a focus on the individual, these developments have come late to criminal law and penology. The traditional sociological criminology has focused on the relationship between individuals and communities. Its central concerns have been the causes and correlates of delinquent and criminal behavior, and it has sought to develop intervention strategies designed to correct delinquents and decrease the likelihood of deviant behavior. According to the distinguished criminologist Donald Taft, Penology is a technique of punishment and reform of criminals. It is the function of the criminology to formulate affections and construction technique to keep and maintain social peace and security. The aims and objectives of these techniques are to suppress crime and criminal. Penology FORENSIC SCIENCE PAPER No.2: Criminology and Law MODULE No. 35: Penology: Treatment of delinquency and Correctional Institutes helps in establishing and managing the institution of reforms, probation and correction. Besides, helping the reform of criminals, Penology also helps in bringing about social harmony and peace. Penology formulates and applies certain collective principles for the reform of society in general of criminals in particular. 4. Theories of Punishments 4.1 Retribution Theory Retribution is first theory of punishment. Its main aim is the offender should receive the as much pain and suffering as inflicted by him on his victim to assuage the angry sentiments of the victim and the community. The victim plays an important role to punish the offender. This type of practices uses to take place during the ancient and medieval period of times. During those days there were no penal policies and king was the head of the state, it‟s much easier to understand when its puts this way „An eye for an eye‟ and „a tooth for tooth‟. Everything was on base of the revenge and vengeance. Most of the victims use to punish the offenders by themselves. 4.2 Deterrent Theory Deterrent or deterrence means something that deters somebody or something, restrain anyone from taking action, to discourage somebody from taking action or prevent something happening especially by making people feel afraid or anxious. Making cautious to the offenders that if he commits crime he would be imprisoned or corporal punishments in public, this creates fear in wrong doers. In this theory strict punishment are given so that it is an example for offenders and they may not commit crime. 4.3 Preventive Theory As Krishna says preventive philosophy of punishment is based on the proposition “not to avenge crime but to prevent it”. If, a criminal is confined, executed or otherwise incapacitated, such punishment will deny the criminal ability or opportunity to commit further crimes and prevent the society from that future harm (Krishna). FORENSIC SCIENCE PAPER No.2: Criminology and Law MODULE No. 35: Penology: Treatment of delinquency and Correctional Institutes This theory promotes the punishment to keep the offender away from the society, which will ultimately decree the criminal activities in the community. Bluntly it says, keep dangerous person in prison or excommunicate. 4.4 Reformative Theory This theory claims that a criminal can be reformed into a good citizen as law abider by giving him competent treating during his imprisonment period. He is in need of a doctor- cum-guide and not of the jailer. Offenders are treated more like a patient who is suffering from the psychological and social problems. He must evaluate his behavior with helps of the experts to be normal person again. 4.5 Rehabilitation Theory The last and the most contemporary theory of punishment is rehabilitation. After serving the sentence the offender should get back to the society. To live his life with dignity the prison department and with association of NGO‟s they provide them a place in the society. These practices are very necessary to set an example that offender can also relive their previous life without any stigma and pressure. 5. Correctional Administration in India Punishing the offenders is the primary function of all civil societies. Prisons are known to have existed throughout the history. Existence of prisons can be traced back to the ancient period. It was supposed that arduous isolation and custodial measures would reform the offenders. In early India, prisons functioned on the principles of custodial care. With the contention that a prison is for confinement and not for punishment, prisons were concerned merely with holding prisoners while they waited for trial. During the medieval and early British periods, emphasis came to be laid on retribution and deterrence aspects of punishment. In 1836 the first Indian Jail committee was formed to report the conditions of the Indian jails. It accounts the real picture of Indian jail. The horrible condition of prisoners and corruption prevalent in staff of the jail but it didn‟t make any suggestions for the improvement of the conditions of the prison in whole. Later in 1846 the first central jail was established in Agra. FORENSIC SCIENCE PAPER No.2: Criminology and Law MODULE No. 35: Penology: Treatment of delinquency and Correctional Institutes The first Jail Manual was framed in 1870 by the recommendation of the 1864 committee and the significant changes were the segregation of the male and female prisoners, adults from children, civil offenders from criminal offenders started to practice.
Recommended publications
  • Four Models of the Criminal Process Kent Roach

    Four Models of the Criminal Process Kent Roach

    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 89 Article 5 Issue 2 Winter Winter 1999 Four Models of the Criminal Process Kent Roach Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Kent Roach, Four Models of the Criminal Process, 89 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 671 (1998-1999) This Criminology is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/99/8902-0671 THM JOURNAL OF QMINAL LAW& CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 89, No. 2 Copyright 0 1999 by Northwestem University. School of Law Psisd in USA. CRIMINOLOGY FOUR MODELS OF THE CRIMINAL PROCESS KENT ROACH* I. INTRODUCTION Ever since Herbert Packer published "Two Models of the Criminal Process" in 1964, much thinking about criminal justice has been influenced by the construction of models. Models pro- vide a useful way to cope with the complexity of the criminal pro- cess. They allow details to be simplified and common themes and trends to be highlighted. "As in the physical and social sciences, [models present] a hypothetical but coherent scheme for testing the evidence" produced by decisions made by thousands of actors in the criminal process every day.2 Unlike the sciences, however, it is not possible or desirable to reduce the discretionary and hu- manistic systems of criminal justice to a single truth.
  • Guilt, Dangerousness and Liability in the Era of Pre-Crime

    Guilt, Dangerousness and Liability in the Era of Pre-Crime

    Please cite as: Getoš Kalac, A.M. (2020): Guilt, Dangerousness and Liability in the Era of Pre-Crime – the Role of Criminology? Conference Paper presented at the 2019 biannual conference of the Scientific Association of German, Austrian and Swiss Criminologists (KrimG) in Vienna. Forthcoming in: Neue Kriminologische Schriftenreihe der Kriminologischen Gesellschaft e.V., vol. 118, Mönchengladbach: Forum Verlag Godesberg. Guilt, Dangerousness and Liability in the Era of Pre-Crime – the Role of Criminology? To Adapt, or to Die, that is the Question!1 Anna-Maria Getoš Kalac Abstract: There is no doubt that, in terms of criminal policy, we have been living in an era of pre-crime for quite some time now. Whether we like it or not, times have changed and so has the general position on concepts of (criminal) guilt, dangerousness and liability. Whereas once there was a broad consensus that penal repression, at least in principle, should be executed in a strictly post-crime fashion, nowadays same consensus has been reached on trading freedom (from penal repression) for (promised) security, long before an ‘actual crime’ might even be committed. In this regard the criminalisation of endangerment and risks only nomotechnically solves the issue of ‘actual’ vs. ‘potential’ crimes – in essence it merely creates a normative fiction of pre-crime crimes, whereas in reality ‘actual crimes’ do not exist at all. The starting point of criminalisation has clearly shifted away from the guilt of having committed a crime, to the mere dangerousness of potentially committing a crime, which potential as such is purely hypothetical and beyond the grasp of empirical proof.
  • The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections

    The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections

    Berkeley Law Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship 1-1-1992 The ewN Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications Malcolm M. Feeley Berkeley Law Jonathan Simon Berkeley Law Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/facpubs Recommended Citation Malcolm M. Feeley and Jonathan Simon, The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications , 30 Criminology 449 (1992), Available at: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/facpubs/718 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE NEW PENOLOGY: NOTES ON THE EMERGING STRATEGY OF CORRECTIONS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS* MALCOLM M. FEELEY University of California at Berkeley JONATHAN SIMON University of Michigan The new penology argues that an important new language of penology is emerging. This new language, which has its counterparts in other areas of the law as well, shifts focus away from the traditional concerns of the criminal law and criminology, which have focused on the individual, and redirects it to actuarial consideration of aggregates. This shift has a number of important implications: It facilitates development of a vision or model of a new type of criminal process that embraces increased reliance on imprisonment and that merges concerns for surveillance and custody, that shifts away from a concern with punishing individuals to managing aggregates of dangerous groups, and that affects the training and practice of criminologists.
  • Criminology and the Criminologist Marvin E

    Criminology and the Criminologist Marvin E

    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 54 Article 3 Issue 2 June Summer 1963 Criminology and the Criminologist Marvin E. Wolfgang Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Marvin E. Wolfgang, Criminology and the Criminologist, 54 J. Crim. L. Criminology & Police Sci. 155 (1963) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. CRIMINOLOGY AND THE CRIMINOLOGIST MARVIN E. WOLFGANG The author is Associate Professor of Sociology in the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. He is also Director of a basic research project entitled "The Measurement of Delinquency." Dr. Wolfgang is the author of Patterns in Criminal Homicide, for which he received the August Vollmer Research Award in 1960, and is President of the Pennsylvania Prison Society. As a former Guggen- heim Fellow in Italy, he collected material for an historical analysis of crime and punishment in the Renaissance. In this article Dr. Wolfgang explores the meaning of the terms "criminology" and "criminol- ogist." Recognizing that these terms have been used with great varieties of meaning since Lombroso, and that in the United States criminology has had primarily a sociological orientation, the author poses the question whether criminology can be considered an autonomous, separate discipline of knowledge. He examines the interrelationships between criminology and other fields, and the di- versity of present-day approaches to the study of crime and criminals.
  • Predictive Models for Law Enforcement

    Predictive Models for Law Enforcement

    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Final Report: Predictive Models for Law Enforcement Author(s): Donald E. Brown Document No.: 197634 Date Received: November 2002 Award Number: 1998-IJ-CX-K010 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. School of Engineering and Applied Science Department of system University ofVirginia 15 1 Engineer’s Way and Information P.O. Box 400747 Engineering CharlotteSMue,va 22!3044747 1?%3f NIJ Grant 984J-CX-KO10 Donald E. Brown Professor and Chair Department of Systems and Information Engineering PROPERTY OF National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS) Box 6000 Rockvilie, MD 20849-6000 --+-@-’-- Approved By: Date: __ This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Introduction Predictive Methods for Law Enforcement Law enforcement agencies have increasingly acquired database management systems (DMBS) and geographic information systems (GIS) to support their law enforcement efforts. These agencies use such systems to monitor current crime activity and develop collaborative strategies with the local communities for combating crime.
  • Theories of Punishment: Changing Trends in Penology

    Theories of Punishment: Changing Trends in Penology

    International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT) ISSN: 2249 – 8958, Volume-8, Issue-6S3, September 2019 Theories of Punishment: Changing Trends in Penology Sagar Shelke, Jyoti Dharm ABSTRACT---From the ancient time it is the fundamental includes qualitative research of various national and duty of the state to protect its citizens. The quantum of international books, and journals on the same topic. punishment used to be based on the theories of punishment. It The researcher would like to draw everyone‟s attention to has been observed in the modern times with the advent of the plight of the victim and justice to the victims. administration of justice that there has been a shift from traditional punishments to the new trending concern of 1] The theories of punishment are proving to be victimology. The focus is now on the victim’s plight and giving ineffective to curb down the crime rate. him fair justice and compensation. This paper contains various 2] More attention is given to the reformation of criminal theories of punishment and the elaboration of whether it’s which is less effective. effective in modern times. 3] The main sufferer of the crime that is victim is ignored in the process as focus remains on the criminal. KEYWORDS: theories of punishment, retributive, deterrent, 4] Steps are required to be taken to make the victim preventive, reformative. secure. I. INTRODUCTION III. FINDINGS In society we can see people of different sects and class. As not all the fingers are same, in the society too, there are From the time old to punish the criminal and to prevent citizens who abide by the law and others who flung the laws him to commit the crime again, the main purpose for for their evil motive.
  • Bias In, Bias out Sandra Mayson Assistant Professor of Law University of Georgia School of Law, Smayson@Uga.Edu

    Bias In, Bias out Sandra Mayson Assistant Professor of Law University of Georgia School of Law, [email protected]

    Digital Commons @ Georgia Law Scholarly Works Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2019 Bias In, Bias Out Sandra Mayson Assistant Professor of Law University of Georgia School of Law, [email protected] University of Georgia School of Law Research Paper Series Paper No. 2018-35 Repository Citation Sandra G. Mayson, Bias In, Bias Out , 128 Yale L.J. 2218 (2019), Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/fac_artchop/1293 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Works by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. Please share how you have benefited from this access For more information, please contact [email protected]. SANDRA G. MAYSON Bias In, Bias Out abstract. Police, prosecutors, judges, and other criminal justice actors increasingly use al- gorithmic risk assessment to estimate the likelihood that a person will commit future crime. As many scholars have noted, these algorithms tend to have disparate racial impacts. In response, critics advocate three strategies of resistance: (1) the exclusion of input factors that correlate closely with race; (2) adjustments to algorithmic design to equalize predictions across racial lines; and (3) rejection of algorithmic methods altogether. This Article’s central claim is that these strategies are at best superficial and at worst counter- productive because the source of racial inequality in risk assessment lies neither in the input data, nor in a particular algorithm, nor in algorithmic methodology per se. The deep problem is the nature of prediction itself. All prediction looks to the past to make guesses about future events.
  • Paper Iii Comparative Criminal Procedure & Penology

    Paper Iii Comparative Criminal Procedure & Penology

    PAPER III COMPARATIVE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE & PENOLOGY: TREATMENT OF OFFENDERS 1. Organisation of Courts and Prosecuting Agencies 1.1. Hierarchy of criminal courts and their jurisdiction 1.1.1. Nyaya Panchayats in India 1.1.1.1. Panchayats in tribal areas 1.2. Organisation of prosecuting agencies for prosecuting criminals 1.2.1. Prosecutors and the police 1.3. Withdrawal of prosecution. 2. Pre-trial Procedure. 2.1 Arrest and questioning of the accused. 2.2 The rights of the accused 2.3 The evidentiary value of statements/ article seized/ collected by the police 2.4 Rights to counsel 2.5. Role of the prosecutor and the judicial officer in investigation 3. Trial Procedure. 3.1 The accusatory system of trial and the inquisitorial system 3.2 Role of the judge, the prosecutor and defence attorney in the trial. 3.3 Admissibility and inadmissibility of evidence 3.4 Expert evidence 3.5. Plea bargaining 4. Preventive Measures in India 4.1. Provisions in the Criminal Procedure Code 4.2. Special enactments 1 5. Introductory 5.1. Definition of Penology 6. Theories of Punishment 6.1. Retribution 6.2. Utilitarian prevention: Deterrence 6.3. Utilitarian: Intimidation 6.4. Behavioural prevention: Incapacitation 6.5. Behavioural prevention: Rehabilitation - Expiation 6.6. Classical Hindu and Islamic approaches to punishment. 7. The Problematic of Capital Punishment 7.1. Constitutionality of Capital Punishment 7.2. Judicial attitudes towards Capital Punishment in India - An inquiry through the statute law and case law. 7.3. Law Reform Proposals 8. Imprisonment 8.1. The state of India's jails today 8.2.
  • U.S. DEPARTMENT of JUSTICE LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION' NA Tlonal CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFERENCE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C

    U.S. DEPARTMENT of JUSTICE LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION' NA Tlonal CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFERENCE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C

    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. I~STlTUT DE RECHERCHE OES NAT/OtiS UNITED NATIONS SOCIAL UltlES SUR LA DEFENSE SOCIALE DEFENCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE •• ) UNSDRU ;. IrL: U.CUIO - £8.&UI - 65.74.37 VIA ClUllA, £7 ~f. 10 00180 ROME .. !TAL Y This microfiche was produced from documents received for inclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since NCJRS cannot exercise control over the physical condition of the documents submitted, the individual frame quality will vary. The resolution '~hart on this frame may be used to evaluate the ,document quality. BIJ3LIOGRAPHY \ 1.0 POLICE AIlMINTSTRATION --1.1 -- IIIII 1,8 111111.25 111111.4 111111.6 IN MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NA110NAL' BUREAU OF STANDARDS-1963-A EUROPE Microfilming procedures used to create this fiche comply with the standards set forth in 41CFR 101·11.504 • Points of view or opinions stated in this document are Fobruary, 1975 those of the author[s) and do not repres'8nt the official position or policies of the U.S. Department 0,' Justice. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION' NA TlONAl CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFERENCE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20531 r"-- --~---- ' .. • D a ,t,e f jim' ed~ \12/5/75 ' ----,-.... --'-''"'-- . l'oleQraphlc ad :t,t:" : '" ••• ~ , ~ .. "" .. • 2. I Alderson, J.C. Tho police we deserve. London, Wolfe Publishing Co., 1973, 158 p. i i nella Repubblica Federalc Tedesca (The police I Bonatesta, V. Lo forze di pol z a bl') R BGegna dell' Arma dei Carabinieri " Antuofermo, A. I nuovi compiti della polizia giustiziaria secondo la legge-delega .
  • Sardar Patel University of Police, Security and Crimnal Justice Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

    Sardar Patel University of Police, Security and Crimnal Justice Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

    SARDAR PATEL UNIVERSITY OF POLICE, SECURITY AND CRIMNAL JUSTICE JODHPUR, RAJASTHAN, INDIA M.A. /M.Sc. in Applied Criminology SYLLABUS From the Academic Year 2015 - 2016 Onwards 1 SARDAR PATEL UNIVERSITY OF POLICE, SECURITY AND CRIMNAL JUSTICE, JODHPUR, RAJASTHAN, INDIA M.A. /M. Sc. in Applied Criminology From the academic year 2015 - 2016 onwards Scheme, Regulations and Syllabus Title of the course M.A/M.Sc in Applied Criminology Duration of the course Two Years under Semester Pattern. Eligibility Graduate in any discipline with minimum 55% marks. (5% relaxation for SC/ST/PH candidates) Total Credit Points: 100 Structure of the programme This Master’s programme will consist of: a. Major courses and Specialization courses (Any one specialization) which are compulsory for all students; b. I Semester: 5 Major Papers & 1 Practical Paper (22 Credits) II Semester: 4 Major Papers, 1 Specialization Paper (Elective), 2- Practical Papers, Winter Internship (to be commenced at the ending of I semester and finished at beginning of II Semester) (27 Credits) III Semester: 1 Major Paper (compulsory to all), 4 major papers-from chosen specialization (compulsory) (31 Credits) 1- Practical Paper (Specialization), Summer Internship (to be commenced at the ending of II semester and finished at beginning of III Semester) Theory Papers: Each theory paper comprises 4 Contact hours / week. 4 Contact Hours = 2 Lectures+ 1 Tutorial+ 1 Seminar Practical Paper : The Subject called ‘Practical Paper’ may include any of the/some of the following activities such as Institutional field visits(for practical) & debate on particular issues or article writing on particular issues related to the subject / subject related discussion on short-films/ field based case-study etc.
  • The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications*

    The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications*

    THE NEW PENOLOGY: NOTES ON THE EMERGING STRATEGY OF CORRECTIONS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS* MALCOLM M. FEELEY University of California at Berkeley JONATHAN SIMON University of Michigan The new penology argues that an important new language of penology is emerging. This new language, which has its counterparts in other areas of the law as well, shifts focus away from the traditional concerns of the criminal law and criminology, which have focused on the individual, and redirects it to actuarial consideration of aggregates. This shift has a number of important implications: It facilitates development of a vision or model of a new type of criminal process that embraces increased reliance on imprisonment and that merges concerns for surveillance and custody, that shifts away from a concern with punishing individuals to managing aggregates of dangerous groups, and that affects the training and practice of criminologists. It is often observed that penal ideology and practice became more con- servative during the 1970s and 1980s (trends that may well continue in the 1990s). As important as this shift in the political valence of penal policy has been, it is only one part of a deeper change in conception--discourse, objec- tives, and techniques-in the penal process. These shifts have multiple and independent origins and are not reducible to any one reigning idea (e.g., get- ting tough on criminals). Despite their different origins, the elements of this emerging new conception have coalesced to form what may be thought of as a new strategic formation in the penal field, which we call (for lack of a more descriptive term) the new penology.I * An earlier version of this paper was originally presented at the California Conference on Growth and Its Impact on Correctional Policy, University of California at Berkeley, June 1992.
  • Use of the Indeterminate Sentence in Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation

    Use of the Indeterminate Sentence in Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation

    USE OF THE INDETERMINATE SENTENCE IN CRIME PREVENTION AND REHABILITATION T HE philosophy that originally underlay the science of penology is clearly indicated by the fact that the treatment of criminal offenders is, even today, still widely characterized as "punishment"--connoting the exaction of a penalty primarily, if not exclusively, in retribution for the offense committed." There has developed in more recent times, ' This largely inaccurate usage of the word "punishment" betrays the agonized development of the science of penology. Although countless authors and numerous so- called theories have contributed to the heritage of contemporary criminology, perhaps the Neo-Classic and Italian theories have enjoyed the greatest following. SALEiLLES, THE INDIVIDUALIZATION OF PUNISHMENT (19ii), is an extremely thorough and scholarly treatment of this historical development in penology. ULLMAN, THE MaI- EVAL IDEA OF LAW (1946), provides an equally learned insight into an earlier period. Beccaria, Bentham, and Fuerbach were prominent contributors to the eighteenth century Classic theory, the fundamental basis of which was to prescribe for each crime a sanction which theoretically outweighed the temptation to commit it, such sanction to be im- posed objectively without regard to the personality of the offender. This principle was interpreted by Beccaria to mean that punishment should be based upon the seriousness of the offense, regardless of who committed it, but also should be prompt, certain, and as lenient as possible consistent with the protection of the community. Bogen, "Justice" v. "Individualized Treatment" in the Juvenile Court, 35 J. Cim. L., C. & P.S. 249 (1944). For interesting biographical sketches, see Geis, Pioneers in qriminology- Bentham, 46 J.