Leopoldina News 6|2017
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Leopoldina news 6|2017 Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – German National Academy of Sciences Halle (Saale), 8 December 2017 Klimawandel Diskussionspapier der Leopoldina stößt Debatte an Climate change and raw materials Symposium on human rights and science INTERVIEW P. 2 NEW MEMBERS P. 4 SYMPOSIUM P. 6 Discussion on Trust in Machine learning and reproductive medicine sciences artificial intelligence Interview with Class IV presentation and Partnership with Claudia Wiesemann symposium South Korean academy 06|2017 // LEOPOLDINA NEWS 2 Editorial Dear members and friends of the Leopoldina, A reproductive medicine act The academy can look back for Germany on an event- ful year with Interview with Claudia Wiesemann, German Ethics Council diverse topics. I would like to emphasise some of them as examples. Statements and discussion papers co- vered fundamental questions that re- quired in-depth scientific advice. For example, one statement called for a broader base for evolution biology in education. The debate on responsible handling of new ways to change the genetic material was actively shaped by the Leopoldina through publications and events and was a key topic of this year’s annual meeting. The recently published discussion paper “A repro- ductive medical act for Germany”, whose authors believe that the legal Claudia Wiesemann is the Director of the Institute for Ethics and History of Medicine at University provisions in this area are in urgent Medical Center Göttingen, and Deputy Chairperson of the German Ethics Council. Her research interests need of reform, has seen a strong include reproductive medicine in Germany. Photo: German Ethics Council, Photografer: Reiner Zensen and constant response (see the interview opposite). In October 2017, a group of experts from medicine methods have changed. We have Leopoldina presented a discussion paper a better impression of the medical and How society changes with digitalisati- entitled “A reproductive medicine act for social consequences of these technologies on was a key topic this year, as was Germany” calling for a new legal regu- and evaluate them differently today than whether science should make lation of reproductive medicine. Prof. we did previously. The law is simply out- greater efforts to enter into a trusting Dr Claudia Wiesemann is one of the co- dated in several aspects. dialogue with people, to promote the authors and explains the situation in an acceptance of scientific findings. interview. Which major areas should the reproduc- tive medicine act govern? At an international level, the scientific Ms Wiesemann, you co-wrote the Leopol- Wiesemann: The definition of the em- academies of the G20 states, headed dina discussion paper for a reproductive bryo, on which the embryo protection act up by Leopoldina, brought improving medicine act in Germany. What was the is based, should be updated, as it is based the global healthcare provision onto impetus for this? on obsolete concepts of cell biological and the agenda at this year’s G20 summit Claudia Wiesemann: We were repea- moleculargenetic processes of fertilisati- in Hamburg. Moreover, the inter- tedly confronted with the fact that the on and the early embryonic development. national cooperation was enhanced current provisions of the reproductive Provisions intended to protect the embryo with effective stimuli in the Western medicine act are in need of reform, as the in vitro have an adverse effect on the em- Balkan process and also with many embryo protection act only incorporates bryo during the pregnancy. For example, symposia with partner academies. some of the reproductive technologies there is a higher rate of multiple pregnan- that are now possible, and governs others cies in Germany, as two or three embryos Together with future questions, insufficiently. Reproductive medical ex- are often transferred. That entails a high- these topics will be a challenge perts and the couples affected often ope- er risk of premature delivery. By contrast, and motivation for the academy rate in legal grey areas. That is highly un- countries like England or Sweden use the in the next year. satisfactory. technology of transferring only one selec- ted embryo, that which has developed best The embryo protection act is from 1990. and can therefore significantly reduce the Wiesemann: The law is almost 30 rate of multiple pregnancies. years old, society has changed significant- ly since then. The views on what makes up a family have changed. Reproductive CONTINUE ON PAGE 3 06|2017 // LEOPOLDINA NEWS 3 CONTINUED FROM PAGE 2 Donating sperm cells is permitted, egg no longer needs them. discussed openly. cell donation is prohibited. Why should How was the discussion paper received What are the next steps of the working that change? by the public? group? Wiesemann: It was suspected that the Wiesemann: The response was great, Wiesemann: We are currently prepa- so-called split motherhood would result the press took the topic very seriously. ring a statement which goes into greater in special and significant identity prob- The interest groups also welcomed our detail on the topics only mentioned in the lems for the child. However, according to initiative. That is important as childless discussion paper. It analyses the social empirical studies, that is not the case. couples are unwilling to go public. They and reproductive medical development in In this context, egg cell donation is not do not want to share such intimate infor- recent decades, reveals shocking deficits fundamentally different from sperm do- mation on themselves, and protect their in regulation and describes the ethical and nation, which is permitted. This unequal partner and child. People who turn to re- legal problems that result for the stake- treatment of women and men is no longer productive medicine are still stigmatised. holders. This will lead to the recommen- acceptable. They are sometimes assumed to be using dations for a reproductive medicine act. such techniques unscrupulously, as it The legal aspects for social freezing are were. And yet most want ethically correct What do you want from politics? virtually unclarified – a new trend in solutions. Wiesemann: It would be important if which egg cells are frozen in reproductive the parties in the coalition agreement medical centres. Politics has a problem with the topic. jointly undertook to tackle a reproductive Wiesemann: Social freezing is not cur- Why? medicine act to find a remedy for the cur- rently subject to legal provisions. That is Wiesemann: It is about two very fun- unsatisfactory, as certain standards must damental questions: How do we handle DISCUSSION PAPER REPRODUCTIVE be complied with. In the interest of the the embryo in vitro? The topic of human MEDICINE (GERMAN) woman, the couple and the future child, dignity plays an important role. The other regulations are needed to govern how long question is which forms of family are to be BENJAMIN HAERDLE INTERVIEWED CLAUDIA these gametes can be frozen and what is to promoted in society. Both problems in- WIESEMANN happen to the egg cells when the woman volve fundamental problems that must be Global Young Academy plans activities This GYA Executive Committee (EC) in early October at Leopoldina was about a mentoring programme for refugee and endangered young scientists, which the Global Young Academy (GYA) is currently developing based on the initiative of some of its members together with a series of partners. The Academy also plans to pub- lish white papers on biodiversity and the availability of Open Research Software in the coming months. In addition, the GYA will also continue to support its constantly growing global network of national young academies and expand its Science Leader- ship Programmes in Asia and Africa, which have been very successful to date. And in the flagship project Global State of Young Scientists, the interview phase will start soon in 14 African countries. The two Co- Chairs of GYA and nine more EC members used this only personal meeting of their one-year term of office to consult the GYA Advisory Board virtually. At a Networking Dinner with representatives from state and national politics, initial ideas were develo- ped for the anniversary meeting planned The Executive Committee of the Global Young Academy met at Leopoldina to discuss future activities. for 2019 in Halle (Saale). (amg) Photo: GYA 06|2017 // LEOPOLDINA NEWS 4 Trust in sciences Leopoldina lecture and symposium of Class IV - Humanities, Social and Behavioural Sciences This years Class IV symposium in mid- November focused on the topic “Trust in the sciences”. Prof. Dr Andreas The new members of Class IV Diekmann ML, Provisional Spokesman of Class IV, hosted the event together with the Secretary of Class IV, Prof. Dr Frank Rösler ML. In the Leopoldina lecture on the pre- vious evening, Prof. Dr Martin Weber ML (Mannheim/Germany) asked “Can we trust our own expectations for invest- ments on the stock exchange? Financial perspectives on the decision-making be- haviour of investors.” Before an investor invests in an asset, they generally form an expectation of the development of its value. Studies prove that the formation of this expectation can be influenced. If we ask how the rate or return on an asset will develop, investors are more optimistic with regard to the profit development. By contrast, with visual information on the past value development, investors reacted more pessimistically to profit charts than to price charts. According to Weber, an understanding of the risk among inves- tors is more difficult. Visual representa- On November 15, the new members of Class IV received their membership certificates. tions are more intuitive than descriptions. From left to right: Leopoldina Secretary-General Prof. Jutta Schnitzer-Ungefug (Halle/Ger- People should know that when reading up many), Prof. Moritz Epple ML (Frankfurt am Main/Germany), Prof. Stephan Hartmann ML on investments. The investor’s own perso- (Munich/Germany), Prof. Wolfgang Schön ML (Munich/Germany), Leopoldina President nality profile is also relevant; people who Prof.