<<

Journal of Geosciences / Geologie en Mijnbouw 81 (1): 1-8 (2002)

A large new from the Upper of The Netherlands

RudiW. Dortangs1, Anne S. Schulp12, EricW.A. Mulder3, JohnW.M. Jagt1, Hans H.G. Peeters1 & DouweTh. de Graaf 1 Natuurhistorisch Museum , PO Box 882, NL 6200 AW Maastricht, The Netherlands. 2 corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected] 3 Museum Natura Docet, Oldenzaalsestraat 39, NL 7591 GL Denekamp, The Netherlands.

Manuscript received: December 2001; accepted: March 2002 (^

Abstract

We report the discovery of a new of marine , a mosasaur, from the Upper Cretaceous () of The Netherlands. saturator sp. nov. is represented by an almost complete skull and much of the postcranial skeleton, and is one of the largest discovered to date. The stout skull and extremely massive jaws are more powerfully built than in any other known mosasaur. Bite marks, the partial disarticulation and scattering of the skeleton, and the presence of associated teeth of and Plicatoscyllium suggest extensive scavenging by .

Keywords: Mosasaurs, Prognathodon, Maastrichtian, Upper Cretaceous, The Netherlands.

Introduction Maastricht area since 1957 (Kruytzer, 1957). The specimen was discovered by one of the authors Mosasaur remains have been known as rare discover­ (RWD) in the calcarenites of the upper Lanaye Mem­ ies from the Maastrichtian type area since 1766 ber (Gulpen Formation, Late Maastrichtian, Belem- (Bardet & Jagt, 1996). Historically, these nitella junior Zone) at the ENCI-Maas- played an important part in the development of the tricht B.V. quarry (Fig. 1), south of the city of Maas­ concept of extinction by the French anatomist Baron tricht, and adjacent to the type section of the Maas­ G. Cuvier. Other known from the Maastricht­ trichtian Stage (Schioler et al., 1997). Strontium-iso­ ian type area include plesiosaurs, crocodiles, tope curve fitting (Vonhof & Smit, 1996) suggests an and (Mulder et al., 1998). This, combined age of 66,1 million (Ma). The specimen in­ with an excellent stratigraphic control and the gener­ cludes an almost complete skull, the greater portion ally superb state of preservation of its vertebrate fos­ of the neck and trunk, elements of the pectoral girdle sils, has made the Maastrichtian type area a classic and the forelimb, and 12 disarticulated pygal and site in the history of palaeontology. Despite the ever- caudal vertebrae. A fair number of shed teeth increasing collecting efforts of a large group of ama­ were discovered associated with the skeleton, and sev­ teur palaeontologists around Maastricht, discoveries eral elements display post-mortem shark bite marks. of articulated mosasaur material from the type Maas­ trichtian remain extremely rare. Description

Here we describe the partial skeleton of the first rea­ Mosasaur genera known from the Maastricht area so sonably complete mosasaur to be reported from the far included , Leiodon, , Plate-

Netherlands Journal of Geosciences / Geologie en Mijnbouw 81(1) 2002 1

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.14, on 27 Sep 2021 at 05:46:46, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016774600020515 80 m

Meerssen Member yi-wvvwr>. ANY

Nekum Member

Emael Member

Schiepers- berg Memb, Gronsveld MAA, Member

Valkenburg Member -P. saturator

Lanaye Member

Lixhe 3 Member

Lixhe 2 Member B :~ 0 m

Fig. 1. Location of the ENCI-Maastricht B.V. quarry, 3 km south of the city of Maastricht, The Netherlands (A) and stratigraphic position of the specimen (B).

carpus and (Kuypers et al., 1998). We Locality refer the present discovery to the Prognathodon, ENCI-Maastricht B.V. quarry, 3 km S of Maastricht, making it the first unambiguous record of this genus The Netherlands (50°49'N latitude, 5°41'E longi­ from the Maastrichtian type area. Several autapomor- tude). phies distinguish this specimen from previously de­ scribed species of Prognathodon, leading us to desig­ Material nate a new species: Near-complete skull, articulated cervical and anterior dorsal vertebrae with cervical and dorsal , isolated Prognathodon saturator sp. nov. pygal and caudal vertebrae, scapula-coracoid and scattered elements of . Etymology saturator (): he who gives satisfaction (both to Diagnosis Maastrichtian sharks as well as Recent palaeontolo­ A large and massively built mosasaur. Quadrate mas­ gists). sive, lacking the ala ridge dorsolateral^ on the anteri­ or face of the ala and the thin, high crest on the dorsal Holotype median ridge, found in other members of the genus. NHMM 1998141 (collections of Natuurhistorisch Dentaries relatively tall with a prominently concave Museum .Maastricht, The Netherlands). dorsal dental margin. Ventral margin of slight­ ly convex. Zygosphenes and zygantra present.

2 Netherlands Journal of Geosciences / Geologie en Mijnbouw 81(1) 2002

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.14, on 27 Sep 2021 at 05:46:46, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016774600020515 Fig. 2. Prognathodon saturator sp. nov. (NHMM 1998141). (A) Skull with . (B) Dorsal vertebrae (RogierTrompert Medical Art).

Description served, with only the left side of the wide temporal ar­ cade missing. The temporal region and braincase are The skull (Fig. 2A) is near-complete with the excep­ all very stout compared to other species of Prognatho­ tion of the anterior portions of the premaxilla and the don. Both the cervical and dorsal vertebrae (Fig. 2A, dentaries, which have been lost during quarrying pri­ B) have large and functional zygosphene-zygantrum or to the discovery. Although most of the anterior complexes. The almost completely preserved scapula marginal teeth are missing, the inclination of the pre­ and coracoid are tightly fused. Characters shared with served roots of the first and second dentary teeth sug­ other members of the genus include the low number gests that P. saturator had procumbent teeth, a condi­ of teeth in comparison to other mosasaurs (14 den­ tion similar to P. solvayi (Lingham-Soliar & Nolf, tary, probably 12 maxillary, 6 pterygoid); pterygoid 1990). The dorsal margin of the dentary is concave; teeth almost of equal size to marginal teeth and the the ventral margin of the maxilla is slightly convex. fusion of the suprastapedial and infrastapedial pro­ The marginal teeth are massive, and generally smooth cesses on the quadrate. and rounded, as opposed to the facetted and laterally compressed teeth in most other mosasaurs. The Phylogenetic analysis is extremely tall and massive, even more so Phylogenetic analysis confirms the new species' posi­ than those of other members of the genus. The equal­ tion within Prognathodon (Fig. 4 and Table 1). Syna- ly massive pterygoid contains 6 large, only moderately pomorphies supporting inclusion in (as recurved teeth. The well-preserved left quadrate (Fig. defined by Bell, 1997) include the presence of fused 3) is robust. The greater part of the skull roof is pre­ haemal arches; a prominent supraorbital process of

Table 1. Phylogenetic data, as added to Bell (1997).

Prognathodon saturator (NHMM 1998141)

???00 ??110 ?1101 01011 10111 ???10 0000? ???20 ?? 111 01010 10000 01100 00101 ??3?? 2101? ?0100 10100 01201 0?10? 01001 2110? ???01 ??0?? ?1??? ????? ???2? ????? ????? ??

Prognathodon solvayi (IRScNB R33)

00?00 00110 00101 01010 10111 11?10 ?0005 0?120 ? 1111 01010 01001 01000 001?? ??41? 20011 10100 ?000? 01201 ??10? 0?00? 2?10? ????? ????? ?11?? ????? ????? ????? ????? 5?

Netherlands Journal of Geosciences/ Geologie en Mijnbouw 81(1) 2002 3

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.14, on 27 Sep 2021 at 05:46:46, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016774600020515 Fig. 3. Quadrate of Prognathodon saturator sp. nov. (NHMM 1998141) in frontal (A), lateral (B) and medial (C) view (RogierTrompert Med­ ical Art).

the prefrontal; the greatly expanded posterior wing of considerably more massive. The Early P. the coronoid; a high, thin surangular coronoid but­ stadtmani (see Kass, 1999; Kass & Smith, 2001) dif­ tress and equidimensional condyles of anteriormost fers from P. saturator in having a much more slender trunk vertebrae. Although haemal arches that are 1,5 dentary and coronoid and recumbent anteriormost times longer than neural arches of the same dentary teeth. Prognathodon waiparaensis (see Welles & are considered a synapomorphy in Mosasaurinae Gregg, 1971) also differs from P. saturator in having a (Bell, 1997), this condition is reversed in the present much more slender dentary, with a nearly straight specimen with haemal arches barely longer than the dorsal dental margin and an elongate posterior neural arches. Synapomorphies linking the present mandibular unit inclined at almost 45°. Prognathodon specimen with Prognathodon and Plesiotylosaurus in­ giganteus (see Lingham-Soliar & Nolf, 1990) can be clude anterior pterygoid teeth that approach the size distinguished from P. saturator by its straight dorsal of marginal teeth. dental margin, small coronoid, rectangular posterior The analysis was based on the phylogenetic revi­ mandibular unit with short and blunt retroarticular sion of the North American and Adriatic Mosa- process and a considerably less massive quadrate. sauroidea by Bell (1997), to which we added data on Phylogenetic trees, rooted in liodontus, the specimen described here and on the holotype were generated using PAUP* (Swofford, 2000) and (IRScNB 33) of the Early Maastrichtian P. solvayi (see analysed using MacClade (Maddison & Maddison, Lingham-Soliar & Nolf, 1990).Three other species of 2000). A branch-and-bound search yielded six equal­ Prognathodon, viz. P. waiparaensis, P. giganteus and P. ly most parsimonious trees of 128 steps (consistency stadtmani were not included in this analysis, because index 0,62; retention index 0,76). Of the total of 142 data available were too limited to warrant a meaning­ characters (all unordered and unweighted), 61 were ful comparison, but attribution of the present speci­ phylogenetically informative within Mosasaurinae. men to P. stadtmani, P. waiparaensis or P. giganteus can be excluded with confidence, on the following Discussion grounds. Prognathodon saturator may be differentiated from these congeners in being much larger than any The robust quadrate, the large temporal arcade and previously recorded Prognathodon and generally being the stout mandible of P. saturator suggest this

4 Netherlands Journal of Geosciences / Geologie en Mijnbouw 81(1) 2002

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.14, on 27 Sep 2021 at 05:46:46, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016774600020515 https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Downloaded from parsimonious tree(length Fig. mosasaur. tion interpreted exerted saurs previously describedquadrates an adaptatio could achievebitforcesunparallelle suprastapedial of phagous Globidensdakotensis P. culature measurements 0,27, followed cade length Netherlands Journa l (1975) calculated 0 .0 .a CO to P. saturator lida dontus (YP) 4. https://www.cambridge.org/core Cladogramshowingposition saturator O •Hi on to to in lida dontus (KU) The thisboneduringbiting.Compared severalmosasaursusing hasa / O JS to Q. CO CO O > CO by and overallskullengthratio. onthe is quadrates lida by and of counteract . ratiosimilar evenmorestronglybuilt.Russell P. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016774600020515 the Geosciences infrastapedialprocesses, Lingham-Soliar O a overtoni CO CO Prognathodonbothhavefused 128

reconstructedskull).Thelever ­ oorevillensis relativepower lida . IPaddress: steps,consistencyindex0,62retention0,76). ofthe O 4S CO CO Q. the

of //da opython at / hadthe Geologie to Prognathodon 0,22. of strongverticalforces CD "O P. globidensinemosa- 170.106.33.14 CD CO

Globidensini,that /Ob akotensis & overtoni(based the The ofthejaw en highestratio Nolf(1990) e> T3 •S byan c CO CD Mijnbouw81(1)200 2 temporal

muchlarger lob labamaensis saturator The , on a 27 Sep2021 at05:46:46 ••& CL CO 5 c CO 0 0 a to 3 condi­ tothe duro-

other lesi losa mus­ sp. ar­ as of on nov.within 0, rog er CD hod 3/7 rapax 0. rine turtl()from Maastrichtian seas, nation with pathologies suggestinghealedbitemark(NHMM have resulted age provided mandible length is up size rang collections; sell, 1967;Lingham-Soliar suggest tha c- CD 14 , subjectto theCambridgeCore termsofuse,available at in

the rog hodion overtoni Having Various estimate to %ofthe preparation)available, Mosasaurinaedepicting these ! a s (B v. 10 d c o c the of 2,90m the a the bythe CO "0 I z CO Dd 0 possiblepreyitems ina o P CD c CD o c CO detaileddescription mostpowerfuljawspresen bodylength.With relativelyshort length of140cm,and longturtles. extremelypowerfulbite. € o o o c and strong o CO CD CO CD 3 a CO of of Prognathodon the withexamples themandiblrepresents .CO CO o 3 CD c CO CO CO o CO CD CO CD a 3 &Nolf, jaw preferredhypothesis itsno the and musculature of Maastrichtareawith CO Q. c o o CO CD CO CD 3 a CO > of assuming 1990;Kass, talldentarywould P. a unlikelythat thesespecimens allometry(Rus­ saturatorranged reconstructed I 3 CO CO CD CO CD 3 a CO CD of large in a of .to a. -Q inthe c o c o o CO CD a CO CD C 3 combi­ similar 6equally 1999) ma­ 10- the a. 0) CO O CO CD a 3 5 Fig. 5. Original position of skeletal remains at the quarry. Scale bar equals 100 cm.

allometry as previously published estimates, the pre­ 1999). When the remaining parts of the skeleton were sent specimen could have measured from 10 up to still connected with ligaments, the skeleton was par­ just over 14 m./? saturator probably did not reach the tially covered with relatively coarse material, evi­ lengths attained by the largest individuals of Mosa- denced by current-aligned belemnites and caudal ele­ saurus hqffmanni [for which lengths up to 17,6 m ments washed against the skull. The premaxilla and (Lingham-Soliar, 1995) have been calculated], but is anteriormost portions of the dentaries, along with still one of the largest marine reptiles known from the part of the tail, were lost to quarrying prior to the dis­ Maastrichtian type area, and certainly the most mas­ covery of the specimen. sively built species. Acknowledgements Taphonomy Funding for the recovery was provided by Natuur- The present specimen provides an interesting tapho- monumenten, Mondriaan Foundation, the City of nomic case history. We consider age or disease to have Maastricht, the Prins Bernhard Cultuurfonds and the been the most likely cause of death of this specimen, as marine predators capable of bringing down an ani­ mal of this size are unknown from the type Maas­ trichtian. The degree of articulation (Fig. 5) suggests that the animal reached the sea floor soon after its death, where it was scavenged by sharks prior to final burial. Indirect evidence of shark scavenging includes the presence of shed teeth of Squalicorax and Pli- catoscyllium amongst the skeletal remains of the mosasaur. The teeth show no evidence of having been attacked by stomach acids, excluding the possibility that the teeth were in the mosasaur's stomach. The number of shark teeth recovered is too high to be ex­ plained by background abundance. Moreover, the fact that groups of teeth are all of the same size class and colour would also rule out such an interpretation. The various bite marks on the skeleton (Fig. 6) form direct evidence of shark scavenging. The few remain­ ing portions of the appendicular skeleton were found disarticulated, which corresponds to previously re­ ported patterns of scavenging on large marine reptiles

(Kass, 1999; Schwimmer et al., 1997; Everhart, Fig. 6. Bite marks on ribs.

6 Netherlands Journal of Geosciences / Geologie en Mijnbouw 81(1) 2002

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.14, on 27 Sep 2021 at 05:46:46, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016774600020515 100 cm

Fig. 7. Reconstruction of Prognathodon saturator sp. nov.The premaxilla is reconstructed after Prognathodon solvayi (Rogier Trompert Medical Art, outline silhouette courtesy of DanVarner).

Province of Limburg. We thank ENCI-Maastricht for Rogier Trompert Medical Art, Maastricht, by B.V. and Convoi B.V. for support, the volun­ J.-M. Luursema, M. Oberendorff, M. Spinder and R. teers from the Nederlandse Geologische Vereniging, Trompert. Dan Varner contributed the painting in Afd. Limburg and the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Fig. 8. for assistance in the field, and P. Bultynck and A. Dhondt for allowing access to the collections of the IRScNB (Brussels).Thanks are due to M. Everhart, J. Smit and D. Varner for helpful comments during preparation of the manuscript. Drawings of the speci­ men and the reconstruction (Fig. 7) were prepared

Fig. 8. Artist's impression of the carcass oi Prognathodon saturator sp. nov. being scavenged by Squalicorax and Plicatoscyllium sharks (DanVarner).

Netherlands Journal of Geosciences / Geologie en Mijnbouw 81(1) 2002 7

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.14, on 27 Sep 2021 at 05:46:46, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016774600020515 References Mulder, E.W.A., Jagt, J.W.M., Kuypers, M.M.M., Peeters, H.H.G. & Rompen, P., 1998. Preliminary observations on the strati- Bardet, N. & Jagt, J.W.M., 1996. Mosasaurus hoffmanni, le «Grand graphic distribution of marine and terrestrial Animal fossile des Carrieres de Maestricht»: deux siecles d'his- reptiles from the Maastrichtian type area (SE Netherlands, NE toire. Bulletin du Museum national d'Histoire naturelle (4) 18: Belgium). Oryctos 1: 55-64. 569-593. Russell, D.A., 1967. Systematics and Morphology of American Bell, G.L., Jr., 1997. A phylogenetic revision of North American Mosasaurs (Reptilia, Sauria). Peabody Museum of Natural His­ and Adriatic Mosasauroidea. In: Callaway, J.M. & Nicholls, E.L. tory, Bulletin 23: viii+240 pp. (eds): Ancient Marine Reptiles. Academic Press (NewYork/Lon­ Russell, D.A., 1975. A New Species of Globidens from South Dako­ don): 293-332. ta, and a Review of Globidentine Mosasaurs. Fieldiana, Geology Memoirs 33: 235-256. Everhart, M.J., 1999. Evidence of feeding on mosasaurs by the Late Cretaceous lamniform shark, mantelli. Journal Schioler, P., Brinkhuis, L., Roncaglia, L. & Wilson, G.J. 1997. Di- ofVertebrate Paleontology 17(suppl. to 3): 43A-44A. noflagellate biostratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy of the Type Maastrichtian (Upper Cretaceous), ENCI quarry, The Kass, M.S., 1999. Prognathodon stadtmani: (Mosasauridae) A new Netherlands. Marine Micropaleontology 31: 65-95. species from the Mancos Shale (Lower Campanian) of Western . Utah Geological Survey Miscellaneous Publications Schwimmer, D.R., Stewart, J.D. & Williams, G.D., 1997. Scaveng­ 99-1:275-294. ing by Sharks of the Genus Squalicorax in the Late Cretaceous of Kass, M.S. & Smith, D., 2001. Preliminary report on new material . Palaios 12: 71-83. for Prognathodon stadtmani (Mosasauridae). Journal ofVertebrate Swofford, D.L., 2000. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsi­ Paleontology 21 (suppl. to 3): 67A. mony (*and Other Methods) [Version 4.0b8]. Sinauer Associ­ Kruytzer, E.M., 1957. De Mosasaurus van Bemelen. Mosasaurus ates (Sunderland, Massachusetts). hoffmanni Mantell. Natuurhistorisch Maandblad 46: 125-127. Vonhof, H. & Smit, J., 1996. Strontium-isotope stratigraphy of the Kuypers, M.M.M., Jagt, J.W.M., Peeters, H.H.G. & De Graaf, type Maastrichtian and the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary in the D.Th., 1998. Laat-kretaceische mosasauriers uit Luik-Limburg: Maastricht area (SE Netherlands). In: Brinkhuis, H. & Smit, J. Nieuwe vondsten leiden tot nieuwe inzichten. Publicaties van het (eds): The Geulhemmerberg Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary sec­ Natuurhistorisch Genootschap in Limburg, 41: 5-48. tion (Maastrichtian type area, SE Netherlands). Geologie en Mijnbouw 75: 275-282. Lingham-Soliar, T., 1995. Anatomy and functional morphology of the largest known, Mosasaurus hoffmanni Welles, S.P. & Gregg, D.R., 1971. Late Cretaceous marine reptiles (Mosasauridae, Reptilia) from the Upper Cretaceous, Upper of . Records of the Canterbury Museum 9: 1-111. Maastrichtian of the Netherlands. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B347: 155-180. Lingham-Soliar, T. & Nolf, D., 1990. The mosasaur Prognathodon Institutional abbreviations: (Reptilia: Mosasauridae) from the Upper Cretaceous of Bel­ gium. Bulletin de l'lnstitut royal des Sciences naturelles de Bel- gique, Sciences de laTerre 59 (1989): 137-190. IRScNB: Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Maddison, D.R. & Maddison, W.P., 2000. MacClade 4: Analysis of Belgique, Brussels, Belgium phylogeny and character evolution [Version 4.0]. Sinauer Asso­ NHMM: Natuurhistorisch Museum Maastricht, The ciates (Sunderland, Massachusetts, 2001). Netherlands

8 Netherlands Journal of Geosciences / Geologie en Mijnbouw 81(1) 2002

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.14, on 27 Sep 2021 at 05:46:46, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016774600020515