DOCSLIB.ORG

Ella Bay Integrated Resort Coordinator-General's Report on The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ella Bay Integrated Resort Coordinator-General's Report on The Ella Bay Integrated Resort Coordinator-General’s report on the environmental impact statement November 2012 © State of Queensland. Published by Queensland Government, November 2012, 63 George Street, Brisbane Qld 4000. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of information. However, copyright protects this publication. The State of Queensland has no objection to this material being reproduced, made available online or electronically but only if it is recognised as the owner of the copyright and this material remains unaltered. Copyright inquiries about this publication should be directed to [email protected] or in writing to: Administrator (Crown Copyright and Other IP), Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning, PO Box 15517, City East, Qld 4002. The Queensland Government is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders of all cultural and linguistic backgrounds. If you have difficulty understanding this publication and need a translator, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 131 450 and ask them to telephone the Queensland Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning on 132 523. Disclaimer: This report contains factual data, analysis, opinion and references to legislation. The Coordinator-General and the State of Queensland make no representations and give no warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness or suitability for any particular purpose of such data, analysis, opinion or references. You should make your own enquiries and take appropriate advice on such matters. Neither the Coordinator-General nor the State of Queensland will be responsible for any loss or damage (including consequential loss) you may suffer from using or relying upon the content of this report. By using or relying on such information you agree to indemnify the Coordinator-General and the State of Queensland against any loss arising out of or in relation to your use or reliance. Contents Synopsis........................................................................................................vii 1. Introduction ............................................................................................ 1 2. About the project.................................................................................... 3 2.1. The proponent..........................................................................................3 2.2. Project description....................................................................................3 2.3. Project rationale .....................................................................................12 3. Impact assessment process ................................................................ 15 3.1. Overview ................................................................................................15 3.2. Significant project declaration ................................................................15 3.3. Controlled action ....................................................................................16 3.4. Terms of reference.................................................................................16 3.5. Review of the EIS...................................................................................16 3.6. Supplementary information ....................................................................18 4. Project approvals ................................................................................. 20 4.1. Local approvals ......................................................................................20 4.2. State approvals ......................................................................................20 4.3. Australian Government approvals..........................................................21 5. Environmental impacts......................................................................... 23 5.1. Social, economic and planning impacts .................................................23 5.2. Infrastructure impacts.............................................................................40 5.3. Fauna and flora ......................................................................................63 5.4. Acid sulfate soils ..................................................................................104 5.5. Weed and pest management ...............................................................105 5.6. Visual amenity......................................................................................107 5.7. Sustainability ........................................................................................109 6. Environmental management plan ...................................................... 111 6.1. Overview ..............................................................................................111 6.2. Coordinator-General’s conclusions ......................................................112 7. Matters of national environmental significance .................................. 113 7.1. Introduction ..........................................................................................113 7.2. Controlling provisions...........................................................................113 7.3. Assessment process ............................................................................114 7.4. Description of the proposed action.......................................................114 7.5. Places affected by the proposed action ...............................................116 7.6. World Heritage properties ....................................................................116 7.7. Listed threatened species and ecological communities .......................147 7.8. Offsets..................................................................................................179 8. Conclusion ......................................................................................... 181 Ella Bay Integrated Resort: Coordinator-General’s report on the environmental impact statement - iii - Appendix 1. Stated conditions .............................................................. 183 Appendix 2. Conditions to be attached to a development approval for the commencement of environmentally relevant activities ............................................................................ 199 Appendix 3. Proponent commitments ................................................... 207 Appendix 4. Outstanding universal values for the Wet Tropics of Queensland World Heritage Area ..................................... 223 Appendix 5. Outstanding universal values for the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area ................................................. 227 Appendix 6. Proposed vegetation clearing and offsets ......................... 231 Appendix 7. Machinery of government change..................................... 235 Acronyms and abbreviations ...................................................................... 237 Glossary ..................................................................................................... 239 Figures Figure 2.1 Project location (Longitude: 1728’S Latitude: 14604’E)........................4 Figure 2.2 Proposed project master plan ..................................................................6 Figure 2.3 Ella Bay Road proposed alignment..........................................................9 Figure 2.4 Proposed precinct staging......................................................................10 Figure 2.5 Proposed precinct staging plan..............................................................11 Figure 5.1 Approved erosion prone area widths at Ella Bay ...................................28 Figure 5.2 Proposed Ella Bay precinct plan ............................................................33 Figure 5.3 Proposed Ella Bay conservation zones..................................................35 Figure 5.4 Local area traffic management in Flying Fish Point ...............................43 Figure 5.5 Proposed wildlife fencing and accessibility through Ella Bay.................60 Figure 5.6 Conservation status of vegetation communities and clearing ................77 Figure 5.7 Proposed Ella Bay revegetation staging plan ........................................90 Tables Table 3.1 Overview of EIS process........................................................................15 Table 3.2 Public and agency comments received on the EIS................................17 Table 3.3 Public and agency comments recvied on the SEIS ...............................19 Table 5.1 Threatened fauna species identified during 2006 and 2008 surveys...................................................................................................64 Table 5.2 Threatened fauna not identified by surveys with the potential to occur ......................................................................................................65 Table 5.3 Threatened species identified in Queensland database search ............66 Table 5.4 Plant species in the Ella Bay area..........................................................71 Table 5.5 Regional ecosystems in the project area ...............................................73 Table 5.6 Cassowary habitat clearing and isolation...............................................79 Table 5.7 Regional ecosystems to be cleared on site (approximate) ....................85 Table 5.8 Regional ecosystems to be cleared for access road..............................86
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Executive Summary
    Ella Bay Integrated Resort Ella Bay Integrated Resort Proposal Environmental Impact Statement Proposal Environmental Impact Statement Executive Summary Ella Bay Development – Environmental Impact Statement Executive Summary – PAGE 0 / February 2007 Ella Bay Integrated Resort Proposal Environmental Impact Statement Executive Summary Ella Bay Developments Pty Ltd proposes to transform an existing 450-hectare operating cattle station into a fully master-planned, integrated tourism and residential lifestyle community, proceeding in stages over a ten to fifteen year period at an estimated cost of $1.81 billion. With the opportunity to set new benchmarks for sustainable development worldwide, the proposed development will incorporate: - 540 residences with ocean or rainforest views located around an 18-hole golf course, - four five-star resort precincts with prime ocean frontage and beach access, - a village precinct comprising mixed retail, professional services, offices, and restaurants and dining, - an educational precinct comprising a proposed St Peter’s Lutheran College international school, sports centre and church, - a proposed sustainable development research institute in partnership with James Cook University and The University of Queensland, - a ‘signature’ championship 18-hole golf course, and - associated public infrastructure. Designed to promote self-sufficiency (particularly in relation to energy, water and sewerage management), it is proposed that all infrastructure will be delivered in a manner which sets new standards in
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Administration of the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Reporting Period 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014)
    Report on the administration of the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (reporting period 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014) Prepared by: Department of Environment and Heritage Protection, Department of National Parks, Recreation, Sport and Racing and Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry. © State of Queensland, 2014. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en If you need to access this document in a language other than English, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 131 450 and ask them to telephone Library Services on +61 7 3170 5470. This publication can be made available in an alternative format (e.g. large print or audiotape) on request for people with vision impairment; phone +61 7 3170 5470 or email <[email protected]>. October 2014 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Nature Conservation Act 1992—departmental administrative responsibilities
    [Show full text]
  • Ella Bay Integrated Resort Project: Initial Advice Statement
    Ella Bay A Master Planned Integrated Tourism Community Initial Advice Statement Enquiries: Ric Grosvenor – John Holland Services Warren Witt – Oasis Development Amended: August 2005 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 3 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Proponent..................................................................................................... 6 2.0 The Project ..................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Location........................................................................................................ 7 2.3 Access ......................................................................................................... 14 2.4 Staging / Timing......................................................................................... 16 3.0 Infrastructure ............................................................................................... 17 3.1 Water & Sewerage ..................................................................................... 17 3.2 Public Swimming Facility ......................................................................... 17 3.4 Telecommunications.................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • I Is the Sunda-Sahul Floristic Exchange Ongoing?
    Is the Sunda-Sahul floristic exchange ongoing? A study of distributions, functional traits, climate and landscape genomics to investigate the invasion in Australian rainforests By Jia-Yee Samantha Yap Bachelor of Biotechnology Hons. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2018 Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation i Abstract Australian rainforests are of mixed biogeographical histories, resulting from the collision between Sahul (Australia) and Sunda shelves that led to extensive immigration of rainforest lineages with Sunda ancestry to Australia. Although comprehensive fossil records and molecular phylogenies distinguish between the Sunda and Sahul floristic elements, species distributions, functional traits or landscape dynamics have not been used to distinguish between the two elements in the Australian rainforest flora. The overall aim of this study was to investigate both Sunda and Sahul components in the Australian rainforest flora by (1) exploring their continental-wide distributional patterns and observing how functional characteristics and environmental preferences determine these patterns, (2) investigating continental-wide genomic diversities and distances of multiple species and measuring local species accumulation rates across multiple sites to observe whether past biotic exchange left detectable and consistent patterns in the rainforest flora, (3) coupling genomic data and species distribution models of lineages of known Sunda and Sahul ancestry to examine landscape-level dynamics and habitat preferences to relate to the impact of historical processes. First, the continental distributions of rainforest woody representatives that could be ascribed to Sahul (795 species) and Sunda origins (604 species) and their dispersal and persistence characteristics and key functional characteristics (leaf size, fruit size, wood density and maximum height at maturity) of were compared.
    [Show full text]
  • Ella Bay Road Design and Environmental Management Report
    Ella Bay Integrated Resort Proposal SEIS Submission Response Volume Four Ella Bay Road Design and Environmental Management Report Executive Summary This report is a road and environment design document with a primary aim of providing information for approvals under the EPBC Act and Wet Tropics Management Authority (WTMA) permit for Satori Resorts Ella Bay Pty Ltd for the action Ella Bay Integrated Resort Development Proposal (EPBC 2005/2159). The report provides the design and key environmental values for the proposed upgrade of Ella Bay Road from Flying Fish Point to Ella Bay. It is based on work completed for the EIS, and Supplementary EIS and subsequent studies contained in the SEIS Submission Response. The report summarises all relevant design and environmental advice and sets out the design criteria Ella Bay Road upgrade is required to provide suitable level of access for the Ella Bay Integrated Resort Development. Ella Bay Road is a long established gravel road which services the Seahaven Prawn Farm, visitors to Ella Bay National Park and access to Ella Bay property with a length of approximately 4km. The road winds through World Heritage Area Zone C around Heath Point Headland and is under the control of Wet Tropics Management Authority for construction and management approvals of the World Heritage Area (WHA) section. This report provides detailed road and environmental design covering road alignment, cross- section, clearing envelope, storm water treatment, fauna and flora mitigation and monitoring, and operational management and monitoring. Road concept and staging The road implementation differs from that proposed in the EIS & SEIS; Stage 1 of Ella Bay Road upgrade will be completed at the start of the Ella Bay Development and Stage 2 Flying Fish Point Bypass will be initiated once a trigger point of 1,000 vehicles per day has been reached.
    [Show full text]
  • Location-Specific Assessment
    Location-specific assessment Objective To provide information on location-specific considerations in the Marine Park within the permission system. Target audience Primary: Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority officers assessing applications for permission. Secondary: Groups and individuals applying for permission; interested members of the public. Purpose 1. Permission decisions contribute to maintaining and enhancing the condition of locations in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park that have site-specific legislation or policies. Table of Contents Related legislation / standards / policy ..................................................................................... 2 Commonwealth – Statutory instruments .................................................................................. 2 Remote Natural Area ....................................................................................................................... 2 Designated areas ............................................................................................................................. 3 Designated Shipping Areas ............................................................................................................ 3 Special Management Areas ........................................................................................................... 3 Restricted Access SMA ............................................................................................................... 3 Maritime Cultural Heritage Protection SMA ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Zoning Plan 2003
    REPORT ON THE GREAT BARRIER REEF MARINE PARK ZONING PLAN 2003 Further Information For further information on the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Zoning Plan 2003 or the management of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, please refer to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority website www.gbrmpa.gov.au or contact one of the following offices: Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority 2-68 Flinders Street John Gorton Building King Edward Terrace TOWNSVILLE QLD 4810 PARKES ACT 2600 PO Box 1379 PO Box 791 TOWNSVILLE QLD 4810 CANBERRA ACT 2601 Phone: 07 4750 0700 Phone: 02 6274 1922 Facsimile: 07 4772 6093 Facsimile: 02 6274 1509 Freecall: 1800 990 177 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority - Regional Offices Cairns Mackay Rockhampton 51 The Esplanade 43 River Street 130 Victoria Parade CAIRNS QLD 4870 MACKAY QLD 4740 ROCKHAMPTON QLD 4700 PO Box 6091 PO Box 94 PO Box 6091 CAIRNS QLD 4870 MACKAY QLD 4740 ROCKHAMPTON QLD 4702 Phone: 07 4051 7132 Phone: 07 4951 3454 Phone: 07 4921 4055 Facsimile: 07 4051 9744 Facsimile: 07 4951 3487 Facsimile: 07 4921 4034 Pre-proofed version, November 2005 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. Report on the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Zoning Plan. Bibliography. ISBN 1 876945 37 0. 1. Zoning - Queensland - Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. 2. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (Qld.). I. Title. 333.916409943 ii Foreword This document provides an overview of the preparation and information that assisted the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority to make the decisions that resulted in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Zoning Plan 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Cassowary Assessment: Volumes I - III
    Ella Bay Integrated Resort Development Table Of Contents VOLUME III – POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS (PVA) CHAPTER 10 CASSOWARY POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS 2 10.1 What is PVA?………………………………………………………….. 2 10.2 The use of PVA in Impact Assessment……………………..………..…. 3 10.3 Defining the study boundaries ………………..…………………….……..… 4 10.1.3 Spatial context of Ella Bay Integrated Resort (EBIR) ……………... 4 CHAPTER 11 METHODOLOGY 7 11.1 Size of Graham-Seymour Range cassowary population……………………… 7 11.2 The PVA simulation package………………………….……………………… 10 11.3 Input parameters for PVA Models………………..….……………………… 10 11.3.1 Iterations and years of population projection………… ……………... 12 11.3.2 Mortality rates……………………………………… ……………... 12 11.3.3 Natural catastrophes………………………………… ……………... 12 11.4 Modelled scenarios………………………………..….……………………… 15 CHAPTER 12 RESULTS 18 12.1 MODEL 1 – GRAHAM-SEYMOUR RANGE AS A CONNECTED 18 POPULATION…...… 12.1.1 Model 1 - summary………………………………… ……………... 21 12.2 MODEL 2 – GRAHAM RANGE AND SEYMOUR RANGE AS ISOLATED 22 POPULATIONS…...… 12.2.1 Model 2 - summary………………………………… ……………... 24 12.3 MODEL 3 –ISOLATED SEYMOUR RANGE POPULATION…………....… 25 12.3.1 Model 2 - summary………………………………… ……………... 27 12.3 SUMMARY OF ALL MODELS...… 27 1 L. A. Moore - Ella Bay Cassowary Assessment: Volumes I - III CHAPTER 13 OTHER IMPACTS OPERATING ON CASSOWARY 31 POPULATION 13.1 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS 0N COASTAL CASSOWARIES…….....… 31 13.2 OTHER IMPACTS OUTSIDE ELLA BAY INTEGRATED RESORT.....… 33 13.3 MITIGATION ACTIONS TO CONTAIN POPULATION DECLINE….....… 36 CHAPTER 14 REPORT SUMMARY 37 14.1 CAVEAT………………………………………………………………….....… 38 List of Tables Table 7 Estimated population sizes………………………………………………….. 9 Table 8 Baseline PVA input parameters……………………………………………... 11 Table 9 Percentage mortality rates……………………………………………………….. 14 Table 10 PVA models – Graham-Seymour Range cassowaries…………….…………….
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-18 Report on the Administration of the Nature Conservation Act 1992
    Report on the administration of the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (reporting period 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2018) Prepared by: Department of Environment and Science and Department of Agriculture and Fisheries © State of Queensland, 2018. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Disclaimer This document has been prepared with all due diligence and care, based on the best available information at the time of publication. The department holds no responsibility for any errors or omissions within this document. Any decisions made by other parties based on this document are solely the responsibility of those parties. If you need to access this document in a language other than English, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 131 450 and ask them to telephone Library Services on +61 7 3170 5470. This publication can be made available in an alternative format (e.g. large print or audiotape) on request for people with vision impairment; phone +61 7 3170 5470 or email <[email protected]>. October 2018 ii Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Nature Conservation Act 1992—departmental administrative responsibilities ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plastome Phylogenomics, Systematics, and Divergence Time Estimation of the Beilschmiedia Group (Lauraceae) T ⁎ ⁎ Haiwen Lia,C, Bing Liua, Charles C
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 151 (2020) 106901 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Plastome phylogenomics, systematics, and divergence time estimation of the Beilschmiedia group (Lauraceae) T ⁎ ⁎ Haiwen Lia,c, Bing Liua, Charles C. Davisb, , Yong Yanga, a State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China b Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Herbaria, 22 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA c University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Intergeneric relationships of the Beilschmiedia group (Lauraceae) remain unresolved, hindering our under- Beilschmiedia group standing of their classification and evolutionary diversification. To remedy this, we sequenced and assembled Lauraceae complete plastid genomes (plastomes) from 25 species representing five genera spanning most major clades of Molecular clock Beilschmiedia and close relatives. Our inferred phylogeny is robust and includes two major clades. The first Plastome includes a monophyletic Endiandra nested within a paraphyletic Australasian Beilschmiedia group. The second Phylogenomics includes (i) a subclade of African Beilschmiedia plus Malagasy Potameia, (ii) a subclade of Asian species including Systematics Syndiclis and Sinopora, (iii) the lone Neotropical species B. immersinervis, (iv) a subclade of core Asian Beilschmiedia, sister to the Neotropical species B. brenesii, and v) two Asian species including B. turbinata and B. glauca. The rampant non-monophyly of Beilschmiedia we identify necessitates a major taxonomic realignment of the genus, including but not limited to the mergers of Brassiodendron and Sinopora into the genera Endiandra and Syndiclis, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 September 2013 Mr Trevor Ruthenberg MP Chair Health And
    Queensland Government Department of National Parks, Recreation, Sport and Racing 9 September 2013 Mr Trevor Ruthenberg MP Chair Health and Community Services Committee Parliament House George Street BRISBANE QLD 4000 Email: [email protected] Dear Mr Ruthenberg Thank you for the opportunity for the Department of National Parks, Recreation, Sport and Racing to present at the recent public briefing on the Nature Conservation and Other Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2013 (NCOLA Bill). As part of this briefing there were five questions taken on notice, with a response required from the department by 9 September 2013. I am pleased to provide the following responses to each of these questions to assist the Health and Community Services Committee in its inquiry into the NCOLA Bill. Question #1 The Committee requested information on the average cost of litigation paid per year by the State Government as a result of personal injuries sustained in national parks. The Committee further queried whether the savings from not being sued would go back into infrastructure, upkeep and management of tracks such as the Great Walk in Spring brook or Purlingbrook Falls. Department Response Advice from the department's In-house Legal team confirms it is not possible to provide a realistic average yearly figure for litigation because a large payment amount for a single claim in any one year will skew the statistics. What is expended yearly depends on claims made, claims settled and claims decided in the courts. A difference also exists between the investigation and legal costs that the State incurs and the payout amounts for successful claims.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature Conservation Regulation 1994
    Queensland Nature Conservation Act 1992 Nature Conservation Regulation 1994 Reprinted as in force on 10 June 2005 Reprint No. 4L This reprint is prepared by the Office of the Queensland Parliamentary Counsel Warning—This reprint is not an authorised copy Information about this reprint This regulation is reprinted as at 10 June 2005. The reprint— • shows the law as amended by all amendments that commenced on or before that day (Reprints Act 1992 s 5(c)) • incorporates all necessary consequential amendments, whether of punctuation, numbering or another kind (Reprints Act 1992 s 5(d)). The reprint includes a reference to the law by which each amendment was made—see list of legislation and list of annotations in endnotes. Also see list of legislation for any uncommenced amendments. This page is specific to this reprint. See previous reprints for information about earlier changes made under the Reprints Act 1992. A table of reprints is included in the endnotes. Also see endnotes for information about— • when provisions commenced • editorial changes made in earlier reprints. Dates shown on reprints Reprints dated at last amendment All reprints produced on or after 1 July 2002, hard copy and electronic, are dated as at the last date of amendment. Previously reprints were dated as at the date of publication. If a hard copy reprint is dated earlier than an electronic version published before 1 July 2002, it means the legislation was not further amended and the reprint date is the commencement of the last amendment. If the date of a hard copy reprint is the same as the date shown for an electronic version previously published, it merely means that the electronic version was published before the hard copy version.
    [Show full text]