DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Record United States of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 107Th CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congressional Record United States of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 107Th CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 107th CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 147 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, JUNE 13, 2001 No. 82 Senate The Senate met at 9 a.m. and was The legislative clerk read as follows: tional requirements with regard to the inte- called to order by the President pro A bill (S. 1) to extend programs and activi- gration of education technology resources. Hollings amendment No. 798 (to amend- tempore [Mr. BYRD]. ties under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. ment No. 358), to permit States to waive cer- PRAYER tain testing requirements. Pending: Gregg (for Santorum) amendment No. 799 The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John Jeffords amendment No. 358, in the nature (to amendment No. 358), to express the sense Ogilvie, offered the following prayer: of a substitute. of the Senate regarding science education. Lord God of hope, this is a day for op- Kennedy (for Dodd) amendment No. 382 (to amendment No. 358), to remove the 21st cen- The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under timism and courage. Set us free of any the previous order, there will now be 40 negative thinking or attitude. There is tury community learning center program from the list of programs covered by per- minutes for closing debate on the enough time today to accomplish what formance agreements. Santorum amendment No. 799 and the You have planned. We affirm that You Biden amendment No. 386 (to amendment Hollings amendment numbered 798. are here and that we are here by Your No. 358), to establish school-based partner- Mr. KENNEDY. Mr. President, as we divine appointment. We also know ships between local law enforcement agen- resume consideration of the education cies and local school systems, by providing from experience that it is possible to authorization bill, we have 40 minutes limit Your best for our Nation. With- school resource officers who operate in and around elementary and secondary schools. of debate on the Santorum and Hol- out Your help we can hit wide of the Leahy (for Hatch) amendment No. 424 (to lings amendments concurrently, with mark, but with Your guidance and amendment No. 358), to provide for the estab- two rollcall votes at approximately 9:40 power we cannot fail. You have lishment of additional Boys and Girls Clubs this morning, and votes throughout the brought our Nation to this place of of America. day, as well into the evening, as the Helms amendment No. 574 (to amendment prosperity and blessing. You are able Senate works to complete action on to bless us if we will trust You and No. 358), to prohibit the use of Federal funds by any State or local educational agency or the education bill this week. If the bill work together as fellow patriots. Fill school that discriminates against the Boy is completed on Thursday, there will be this Chamber with Your Presence, in- Scouts of America in providing equal access no rollcall votes on Friday. vade the mind and heart of each Sen- to school premises or facilities. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The ator, and give this Senate a day of effi- Helms amendment No. 648 (to amendment Senator from Pennsylvania, Mr. No. 574), in the nature of a substitute. ciency and excellence for Your glory. SANTORUM. We thank You in advance for a truly Dorgan amendment No. 640 (to amendment No. 358), expressing the sense of the Senate AMENDMENTS NOS. 798 AND 799 great day. You are our Lord and Sav- that there should be established a joint com- Mr. SANTORUM. Mr. President, I iour. Amen. mittee of the Senate and House of Represent- rise to talk about my amendment f atives to investigate the rapidly increasing which will be voted on in roughly 40 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE energy prices across the country and to de- minutes. This is an amendment that is termine what is causing the increases. a sense of the Senate. It is a sense of The Honorable ROBERT C. BYRD led Hutchinson modified amendment No. 555 the Pledge of Allegiance, as follows: (to amendment No. 358), to express the sense the Senate that deals with the subject of intellectual freedom with respect to I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the of the Senate regarding the Department of United States of America, and to the Repub- Education program to promote access of the teaching of science in the class- lic for which it stands, one nation under God, Armed Forces recruiters to student directory room, in primary and secondary edu- indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. information. cation. It is a sense of the Senate that Feinstein modified amendment No. 369 (to f does not try to dictate curriculum to amendment No. 358), to specify the purposes anybody; quite the contrary, it says RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME for which funds provided under subpart 1 of part A of title I may be used. there should be freedom to discuss and The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under Reed amendment No. 431 (to amendment air good scientific debate within the the previous order, the leadership time No. 358), to provide for greater parental in- classroom. In fact, students will do bet- is reserved. volvement. ter and will learn more if there is this Clinton modified amendment No. 516 (to f intellectual freedom to discuss. amendment No. 358), to provide for the con- I will read this sense of the Senate. It BETTER EDUCATION FOR duct of a study concerning the health and is simply two sentences—frankly, two STUDENTS AND TEACHERS ACT learning impacts of sick and dilapidated pub- rather innocuous sentences—that hope- The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under lic school buildings on children and to estab- lish the Healthy and High Performance fully this Senate will embrace: the previous order, the Senate will now Schools Program. ‘‘It is the sense of the Senate that— resume consideration of S. 1, which the Cantwell modified amendment No. 630 (to ‘‘(1) good science education should prepare clerk will report. amendment No. 358), to provide for addi- students to distinguish the data or testable ∑ This ‘‘bullet’’ symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by a Member of the Senate on the floor. S6147 . S6148 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE June 13, 2001 theories of science from philosophical or re- age in science classrooms across this lina will be able to be here. He spoke ligious claims that are made in the name of country. I frankly don’t see any down last night on his amendment, and he science; and side to this discussion—that we are can do it with more eloquence and ‘‘(2) where biological evolution is taught, standing here as the Senate in favor of more persuasively than can I. But I the curriculum should help students to un- derstand why this subject generates so much intellectual freedom and open and fair told him, since I support his amend- continuing controversy, and should prepare discussion of using science—not philos- ment, I would be pleased to try to be a the students to be informed participants in ophy and religion within the context, fill-in for him. public discussions regarding the subject. within the context of science but I see my colleague is now here. I say It simply says there are disagree- science—as the basis for this deter- to the Senator from South Carolina ments in scientific theories out there mination. that I will be delighted to follow him, that are continually tested. Our knowl- I will reserve the remainder of my if he is ready to speak. edge of science is not absolute, obvi- time. I have a couple of other speakers Mr. President, I yield to the Senator ously. We continue to test theories. I anticipate will come down and talk from South Carolina. I will follow my Over the centuries, there were theories about this amendment, and I want to colleague. that were once assumed to be true and leave adequate time. I yield the floor. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Does have been proven, through further rev- The PRESIDING OFFICER. Who the Senator from South Carolina seek elation of scientific investigation and yields time? recognition? The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Who testing, to be not true. The Senator from South Carolina. One of the things I thought was im- yields time? Mr. WELLSTONE addressed the Mr. HOLLINGS. I thank the distin- portant in putting this forward was to Chair. guished Chair. make sure the Senate of this country, The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Mr. President, this Senate, and I say obviously one of the greatest, if not the Senator from Minnesota. it advisedly and respectfully, in a greatest, deliberative bodies on the Mr. WELLSTONE. I thank the Chair. sense, we are the best off-Broadway face of the Earth, was on record saying The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Who show. We engage in these charades, set we are for this kind of intellectual yields time? up these straw men and then knock freedom; we are for this kind of discus- Mr. KENNEDY. Mr. President, do I them down, taking the credit for being sion going on; it will enhance the qual- understand correctly the Senator from so effective politically. ity of science education for our stu- Minnesota has the time from Senator We say we have a surplus; we don’t dents. HOLLINGS? have a surplus. The CBO projected in I will read three points made by one Mr. WELLSTONE. That is correct. March a $23 billion surplus for this fis- of the advocates of this thought, a man Mr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Understanding the Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals
    UNDERSTANDING THE INTELLIGENT DESIGN CREATIONIST MOVEMENT: ITS TRUE NATURE AND GOALS A POSITION PAPER FROM THE CENTER FOR INQUIRY OFFICE OF PUBLIC POLICY AUTHOR: BARBARA FORREST, Ph.D. Reviewing Committee: Paul Kurtz, Ph.D.; Austin Dacey, Ph.D.; Stuart D. Jordan, Ph.D.; Ronald A. Lindsay, J. D., Ph.D.; John Shook, Ph.D.; Toni Van Pelt DATED: MAY 2007 ( AMENDED JULY 2007) Copyright © 2007 Center for Inquiry, Inc. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for noncommercial, educational purposes, provided that this notice appears on the reproduced materials, the full authoritative version is retained, and copies are not altered. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the Center for Inquiry, Inc. Table of Contents Section I. Introduction: What is at stake in the dispute over intelligent design?.................. 1 Section II. What is the intelligent design creationist movement? ........................................ 2 Section III. The historical and legal background of intelligent design creationism ................ 6 Epperson v. Arkansas (1968) ............................................................................ 6 McLean v. Arkansas (1982) .............................................................................. 6 Edwards v. Aguillard (1987) ............................................................................. 7 Section IV. The ID movement’s aims and strategy .............................................................. 9 The “Wedge Strategy” .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • John Hughes' Family Films and Seriality
    Article Title ‘Give people what they expect’: John Hughes’ Family Films and Seriality in 1990s Hollywood Author Details: Dr Holly Chard [email protected] Biography: Holly Chard is Lecturer in Contemporary Screen Media at the University of Brighton. Her research focuses on the U.S. media industries in the 1980s and 1990s. Her recent and forthcoming publications include: a chapter on Macaulay Culkin’s career as a child star, a monograph focusing on the work of John Hughes and a co- authored journal article on Hulk Hogan’s family films. Acknowledgements: The author would like to thank Frank Krutnik and Kathleen Loock for their invaluable feedback on this article and Daniel Chard for assistance with proofreading. 1 ‘Give people what they expect’: John Hughes’ Family Films and Seriality in 1990s Hollywood Keywords: seriality, Hollywood, comedy, family film Abstract: This article explores serial production strategies and textual seriality in Hollywood cinema during the late 1980s and early 1990s. Focusing on John Hughes’ ‘high concept’ family comedies, it examines how Hughes exploited the commercial opportunities offered by serial approaches to both production and film narrative. First, I consider why Hughes’ production set-up enabled him to standardize his movies and respond quickly to audience demand. My analysis then explores how the Home Alone films (1990-1997), Dennis the Menace (1993) and Baby’s Day Out (1994) balanced demands for textual repetition and novelty. Article: Described by the New York Times as ‘the most prolific independent filmmaker in Hollywood history’, John Hughes created and oversaw a vast number of movies in the 1980s and 1990s.1 In a period of roughly fourteen years, from the release of National Lampoon’s Vacation (Ramis, 1983) to the release of Home Alone 3 (Gosnell, 1997), Hughes received screenwriting credits on twenty-seven screenplays, of which he produced eighteen, directed eight and executive produced two.
    [Show full text]
  • Fruit of the Poison Tree: a First Amendment Analysis of the History and Character of Intelligent Design Education Todd R
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Minnesota Law Review 2006 Fruit of the Poison Tree: A First Amendment Analysis of the History and Character of Intelligent Design Education Todd R. Olin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Olin, Todd R., "Fruit of the Poison Tree: A First Amendment Analysis of the History and Character of Intelligent Design Education" (2006). Minnesota Law Review. 22. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/22 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Minnesota Law Review collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OLIN_3FMT 04/24/2006 10:41:43 AM Note Fruit of the Poison Tree: A First Amendment Analysis of the History and Character of Intelligent Design Education Todd R. Olin∗ During a press conference on August 1, 2005, a reporter asked President George W. Bush his opinion as to whether the theory of Intelligent Design should be taught alongside evolu- tion in public schools.1 “Bush avoided a direct answer, constru- ing the question instead as a fairness issue: ‘you’re asking me whether or not people ought to be exposed to different ideas, and the answer is yes.’”2 That simple exchange has refueled a national debate in the popular media, the academic world, and the courts over the propriety of teaching evolution and other theories of human origin in public schools.3 But the question remains: does teaching the theory of Intelligent Design in pub- lic school science classrooms violate the separation of church ∗ J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment Anxiety: Parenting Culture, Adolescence and the Family Film in the US
    Abstract Attachment anxiety: parenting culture, adolescence and the family film in the US Many authors have noted a connection between notions of childhood and understandings of parenting; however, debates have focused only on adults and their behaviour. This article interrogates the child’s position in contemporary parenting culture using the Hollywood family film to explore how the cultural constructions of childhood and parenting may influence one another. The article analyses the reception of the family film of the 1990s and its representations of families and children to note a cultural response to the previous decade’s “discovery” of the pre-teen demographic. This response highlighted the incompatibility of young adolescence and attachment parenting, constructing a new childhood ideal which returned the child to assumptions of vulnerability. Keywords: Parenting culture, attachment, childhood, adolescence, Hollywood, family film Over the past three decades, a number of authors have examined western parenting culture. Among the most influential is Sharon Hays, who identified a dominant ideology of “intensive mothering” and explained it as the result of a series of social developments beginning with “the earliest discovery of childhood innocence in Western Europe” (1996Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press., p. 22). The relationship between changes in notions of childhood and changes in understandings of parenting has been noted by several other authors, who linked contemporary parenting culture with “the way society regards children. Babies and infants are seen as both intensely vulnerable and highly impressionable – above all to parental influence” (Furedi, 2001Furedi, F. (2001). Paranoid parenting: Abandon your Anxieties and be a good parent.
    [Show full text]
  • 6769 Shary & Smith.Indd
    ReFocus: The Films of John Hughes 66769_Shary769_Shary & SSmith.inddmith.indd i 110/03/210/03/21 111:501:50 AAMM ReFocus: The American Directors Series Series Editors: Robert Singer, Frances Smith, and Gary D. Rhodes Editorial Board: Kelly Basilio, Donna Campbell, Claire Perkins, Christopher Sharrett, and Yannis Tzioumakis ReFocus is a series of contemporary methodological and theoretical approaches to the interdisciplinary analyses and interpretations of neglected American directors, from the once-famous to the ignored, in direct relationship to American culture—its myths, values, and historical precepts. The series ignores no director who created a historical space—either in or out of the studio system—beginning from the origins of American cinema and up to the present. These directors produced film titles that appear in university film history and genre courses across international boundaries, and their work is often seen on television or available to download or purchase, but each suffers from a form of “canon envy”; directors such as these, among other important figures in the general history of American cinema, are underrepresent ed in the critical dialogue, yet each has created American narratives, works of film art, that warrant attention. ReFocus brings these American film directors to a new audience of scholars and general readers of both American and Film Studies. Titles in the series include: ReFocus: The Films of Preston Sturges Edited by Jeff Jaeckle and Sarah Kozloff ReFocus: The Films of Delmer Daves Edited by Matthew Carter and Andrew Nelson ReFocus: The Films of Amy Heckerling Edited by Frances Smith and Timothy Shary ReFocus: The Films of Budd Boetticher Edited by Gary D.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Washington University St. Louis: Open Scholarship Washington University Law Review Volume 83 Issue 1 2005 Is It Science Yet?: Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution Matthew J. Brauer Princeton University Barbara Forrest Southeastern Louisiana University Steven G. Gey Florida State University Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Education Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Religion Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Matthew J. Brauer, Barbara Forrest, and Steven G. Gey, Is It Science Yet?: Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution, 83 WASH. U. L. Q. 1 (2005). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol83/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Washington University Law Quarterly VOLUME 83 NUMBER 1 2005 IS IT SCIENCE YET?: INTELLIGENT DESIGN CREATIONISM AND THE CONSTITUTION MATTHEW J. BRAUER BARBARA FORREST STEVEN G. GEY* TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES SOCIAL LEARNING and PEER EFFECTS in CONSUMPTION: EVIDENCE from MOVIE SALES Enrico Moretti Working Pape
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES SOCIAL LEARNING AND PEER EFFECTS IN CONSUMPTION: EVIDENCE FROM MOVIE SALES Enrico Moretti Working Paper 13832 http://www.nber.org/papers/w13832 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 March 2008 I thank Jerome Adda, David Ahn, Raj Chetty, Roger Gordon, Bryan Graham, David Levine, Robert McMillan, Stefano Della Vigna and seminar participants at Bank of Italy, Berkeley, Cornell, Chicago GSB, Nuremberg, LSE, Crest-Paris, Regensburg, San Diego, UCL and Zurich for helpful comments. I am grateful to Stefano Della Vigna, and Phillip Leslie for sharing their box office data. Gregorio Caetano, Mariana Carrera, Ashley Langer, David Klein and Erin Metcalf provided excellent research assistance. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2008 by Enrico Moretti. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Social Learning and Peer Effects in Consumption: Evidence from Movie Sales Enrico Moretti NBER Working Paper No. 13832 March 2008 JEL No. J0,L15 ABSTRACT Using box-office data for all movies released between 1982 and 2000, I test the implications of a simple model of social learning in which the consumption decisions of individuals depend on information they receive from their peers.
    [Show full text]
  • How State Legislation Is Seeking to Redefine Academic Freedom to Permit Intelligent Design in the Classroom, 112 W
    Volume 112 Issue 2 Article 10 January 2010 Opportunistic Evolution: How State Legislation is Seeking to Redefine Academic rF eedom to Permit Intelligent Design in the Classroom Crystal Canterbury West Virginia University College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr Part of the Education Law Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Crystal Canterbury, Opportunistic Evolution: How State Legislation is Seeking to Redefine Academic Freedom to Permit Intelligent Design in the Classroom, 112 W. Va. L. Rev. (2010). Available at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr/vol112/iss2/10 This Student Work is brought to you for free and open access by the WVU College of Law at The Research Repository @ WVU. It has been accepted for inclusion in West Virginia Law Review by an authorized editor of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Canterbury: Opportunistic Evolution: How State Legislation is Seeking to Rede OPPORTUNISTIC EVOLUTION: HOW STATE LEGISLATION IS SEEKING TO REDEFINE "ACADEMIC FREEDOM" TO PERMIT "INTELLIGENT DESIGN" IN THE CLASSROOM 1. IN TROD U CTION .................................................................................... 546 II. ACADEMIC FREEDOM: PROFESSIONAL AND JUDICIAL IN TERPRETA TION ................................................................................. 549 A. The Adoption and Interpretation of Academic Freedom by A m erican A cadem ics .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download Evolution Versus the People
    No. 161 “. the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them” (II Corinthians 4:4). May 2002 EVOLUTION VERSUS THE PEOPLE by Henry M. Morris* President Bush’s important Elementary strongly endorsed by such key Democrats and Secondary Education Bill, H.R. 1, as Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd, and was signed into law (P. L. 107–110) on passed the Senate by a vote of 91–8. The January 8, 2002. It contained the follow- bill itself passed by 87–10. It had previ- ing statement, representing the “sense” ously passed the House. The Senate/ of the Congress.1 House Conference Committee then was The Conferees recognize that a qual- subjected to much negative pressure by ity science education should prepare the evolutionary establishment and finally students to distinguish the data and moved the amendment in the Conference testable theories of science from re- Report to a place in the “Joint Explana- ligious or philosophical claims that tory Statement.” However, it left its lan- are made in the name of science. guage essentially unchanged. Where topics are taught that may Eugenie Scott, representing the evo- guarantee controversy (such as bio- lutionary establishment, put an evolution- logical evolution) the curriculum ary “spin” on this statement, interpreting should help students to understand it to say that “teachers do not have to al- the full range of scientific views that ter how they teach evolution as a result exist, why such topics may gener- of the Education Bill.”2 ate controversy, and how scientific Most others, however, including Sena- discoveries can profoundly affect tor Santorum himself, understand it dif- society.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Chapter
    FINAL-1 Sat, Nov 30, 2019 4:06:52 PM tvupdateYour Weekly Guide to TV Entertainment For the week of December 8 - 14, 2019 A new chapter Jacqueline Toboni stars in “The L Word: Generation Q” INSIDE •Sports highlights Page 2 •TV Word Search Page 2 •Family Favorites Page 4 •Hollywood Q&A Page14 Showtime is rebooting one of its most beloved shows with “The L Word: Generation Q,” premiering Sunday, Dec. 8. The series features the return of original “The L Word” stars Jennifer Beals (“Flashdance,” 1983), Leisha Hailey (“Dead Ant,” 2017) and Katherine Moennig (“Ray Donovan”), as well as a few new faces, including Jacqueline Toboni (“Grimm”), Arienne Mandi (“The Vault”) and Leo Sheng (“Adam,” 2019). To advertise here WANTED MOTORCYCLES, SNOWMOBILES, OR ATVS GOLD/DIAMONDS please call ✦ 40 years in business; A+ rating with the BBB. ✦ For the record, there is only one authentic CASH FOR GOLD, Bay 4 (978) 946-2375 Group Page Shell PARTS & ACCESSORIES We Need: SALESMotorsports & SERVICE 5 x 3” Gold • Silver • Coins • Diamonds MASS. MOTORCYCLEWANTED1 x 3” We are the ORIGINAL and only AUTHENTIC SELLBUYTRADEINSPECTIONS CASH FOR GOLD on the Methuen line, above Enterprise Rent-A-Car at 527 So. Broadway, Rte. 28, Salem, NH • 603-898-2580 1615 SHAWSHEEN ST., TEWKSBURY, MA Open 7 Days A Week ~ www.cashforgoldinc.com 978-851-3777 WWW.BAY4MS.COM FINAL-1 Sat, Nov 30, 2019 4:06:53 PM COMCAST ADELPHIA 2 Sports Highlights Kingston CHANNEL Atkinson ESPN NESN Sunday 8:00 p.m. TNT Basketball NBA Football NCAA Division I Hockey NCAA Dartmouth at Salem Londonderry 9:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Barcode Call Number 101 Dalmatians 31027150427413 DVD-O 101 Dalmatians II Patch's London Adventure 31027150151013 D 101 Da
    Title Barcode Call Number 101 Dalmatians 31027150427413 DVD-O 101 dalmatians II Patch's London adventure 31027150151013 D 101 dalmatians II Patch's London adventure 31027150427421 DVD-O 20 fairy tales 31027150332779 J DVD T A cat in Paris 31027150324552 JDVD-C A Charlie Brown Thanksgiving 31027150308191 C A Charlie Brown valentine 31027150431993 J DVD C A Cinderella story 31027150508006 J DVD-C A dog's way home 31027150336366 J DVD D A very merry Pooh year 31027100103544 W A wrinkle in time 31027150286017 W Abominable 31027150337182 J DVD A Adventure time The suitor 31027150330112 J DVD A Air Bud seventh inning fetch 31027150146823 A Air buddies 31027150385355 A Aladdin 31027100101845 VC FEATURE Alexander and the terrible, horrible, no good, very bad day 31027150331177 J DVD A Alice in Wonderland 31027150429179 DVD-A Alice in Wonderland 31027150431175 DVD-A Aliens in the attic 31027150425854 A Alvin and the chipmunks batmunk 31027150508196 J DVD-A Alvin and the chipmunks Chipwrecked 31027150507065 DVDJ-A Alvin and the chipmunks Christmas with the chipmunks 31027150504039 JDVD-C Alvin and the Chipmunks Road chip 31027150332738 J DVD A Alvin and the Chipmunks the squeakquel 31027150333330 J DVD A Anastasia 31027150508345 DVDJ-A Angelina Ballerina All dancers on deck 31027150288492 J DVD A Angelina Ballerina Mousical medleys 31027150327423 J DVD A Angelina ballerina Ultimate dance collection 31027150507214 DVDJ-A Angry birds toons Season one, volume two 31027150330047 J DVD A Angry birds toons Volume 1 31027150329148 J DVD A Annie 31027150385074 JDVD -A Another Cinderella story 31027150325872 J DVD A Arthur stands up to bullying 31027150327506 J DVD ART Atlantis, the lost empire 31027150290738 J DVD A B.O.B.'s big break 31027150333355 J DVD B Baby Looney Tunes Volume 3 Puddle Olympics 31027150386346 B Balto Wings of change 31027150304364 BALTO Barbie in the Nutcracker 31027150388789 B Barbie The Pearl Princess 31027150330088 J DVD B Barney A very merry Christmas 31027150503726 DVD-J Batman & Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Does ID Want to Sneak Creationism Through the "Back Door" (Into Science and Schools)?
    FAQ: Does ID want to Sneak Creationism through the "Back Door" (into science and schools)? The Short Answer: Of course our answer to this question is "no." ID proponents are very clear about what they want: (1) for legitimate scientific critiques of evolution to be taught and (2) for teachers to be free to teach the evidence supporting intelligent design, if they want to do so. This is the sort of question where no matter how you answer it, some people will never be convinced. That's because this is the sort of issue where its proof is hidden--it has to do with covert motives which are often unseen--not with what people actually say or do. Intelligent design theory cannot make reference to the supernatural, and thus it does not advocate teaching religion or creationism in the classroom. The Long Answer: ID proponents are very clear about what they want to do. Consider these quotes from ID proponents about how to teach origins science: "Teach Darwin's elegant theory. But also discuss where it has real problems accounting for the data, where data are severely limited, where scientists might be engaged in wishful thinking and where alternative even "heretical" explanations are possible." (Michael Behe, "Teach Evolution and Ask Hard Questions;"New York Times, August 13, 1999, Friday, Page A21, Editorial Desk) "What educators in Kansas and elsewhere should be doing is to "teach the controversy." Of course students should learn the orthodox Darwinian theory and the evidence that supports it, but they should also learn why so many are skeptical, and they should hear the skeptical arguments in their strongest form rather than in a caricature intended to make them look as silly as possible." (Phillip Johnson, The Wedge of Truth, pg.
    [Show full text]