Carting Away the Oceans Greenpeace.Org Table of Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Carting Away the Oceans Greenpeace.Org Table of Contents Carting Away the Oceans greenpeace.org Table of Contents Written by: Casson Trenor State of the Oceans 4 Greenpeace is an independent campaigning organization that acts to The Role of Supermarkets 5 expose global environmental problems and achieve solutions that are essential How Far We’ve Come 6–7 to a green and peaceful future. What Consumers Can Do 8 Published April 2010 by What Supermarkets Must Do 9 Greenpeace USA Supermarket Score Card 10 702 H Street NW Suite 300 Washington, DC 20001 Tel/ 202.462.1177 Supermarket Profiles 12–34 Fax/ 202.462.4507 Call to Action 35 Printed with 100% Wind Power Recycled Post-Consumer Waste Processed Chlorine Free Paper book design by Andrew Fournier Cover Photo: © Alex Hofford / Greenpeace greenpeace.org © Greenpeace/ Robert Meyers State of the Oceans The Role of Supermarkets The crisis in our oceans continues Over the past seven months, Greenpeace has Supermarkets are one of our strongest connec- patronization of pirate fishing and to provide engaged in a direct campaign to expose the tions to the oceans. Our relationship with fish is more information to the customer at point-of- unabated. In spite of overwhelming practices of one of the worst historical perform- largely one of predator and prey, and for most purchase. Retailers must also begin evidence and strong warnings from ers in Carting Away the Oceans rankings: Trader Americans, grocery stores are the preferred to participate more actively in the Pushing the Envelope: Joe’s. In August 2009, the company’s lack of a hunting grounds. In the United States, consum- political process; they must use their Target the most respected members of the sustainable seafood policy, misleading labeling ers buy about half of their seafood at the fish massive buying power to leverage Target has risen to the scientific community, we continue to practices, and unsustainable inventory items counter, but conservation efforts in this arena positive change in our oceans and to top of the Carting Away plunder our seas with impunity. led Greenpeace to initiate a series of online and have a history of bypassing retail operations support governmental initiatives that on-the-ground actions addressing the company’s and concentrating on the individual shopper. will create marine protected areas the Oceans rankings by embracing challenges that Seafood merchants persist in focusing on large, unacceptable behavior. Now, eight months later, Unfortunately, this method alone will not reduce (MPAs) and other measures integral other retailers dismiss as predatory fish, such as cod, sharks, and tuna, we find ourselves victorious and cautiously opti- pressure on our fish stocks to acceptable to a sensible, ecosystem-based while globally, populations of these ecologically mistic. Trader Joe’s has reformed to a significant levels—rather, the supermarkets themselves fisheries management approach. impractical or impossible. important fish have dropped by 90 percent. degree. The company is reportedly discussing a must begin to participate in the global ocean Lastly, responsible retailers should The company’s recent Bycatch remains a scandalous problem: each partnership with a reputable third party to help conservation movement. demonstrate their commitment to implementation of seafood in making sustainable decisions. Trader Joe’s is this process by removing key red standards that preclude day, an enormous portion of the world’s total Retailers have a tremendous amount of power in also crafting a public sustainable seafood policy list species from their inventories the sale of any farmed seafood catch is tossed over the sides of fishing the seafood industry. Over the past three years, boats due to inefficient, indiscriminate fishing and redesigning its labeling, and it has already immediately. If we are to save our salmon whatsoever sent discontinued several of its former red list items, we have seen several large chains begin to oceans from destruction by over- methods. The worst of the worst, bottom trawl- engage in proactive, thoughtful actions: discon- shockwaves through the ing, is responsible for 80 percent of all bycatch such as orange roughy and red snapper. exploitation, we cannot continue to aquaculture industry. Target tinuing objectionable projects, participating in sell unsustainable species like shark, incurred globally. has vowed to continue This incredible victory was the result of actions sector-wide conservation initiatives, and creating orange roughy, and hoki. There is a Thankfully, we are beginning to see a change taken by tens of thousands of people across the sustainable seafood policies that will enable better way to sell seafood, and it is improving the sustainability in this troubling trend. Little by little, the United country who demanded change. These activists stores to continue to sell seafood in an ethical time for progressive retailers to take of its seafood operation; no States retail sector is waking up to the reality of took up the call and confronted Trader Joe’s and responsible manner far into the future. the reins and lead the industry away doubt there are even more directly through phone calls, letters, e-mails, from the environmentally negligent impressive feats yet to come the situation. Certain seafood markets are start- Other retailers, however, have yet to get on in-store demonstrations, and a number of practices that have literally brought from this company. ing to make positive choices about how seafood board. These industry laggards continue to should be caught, sold, and labeled. There is still other creative tactics. Eventually, the company us to the brink of catastrophe. responded to the pressure from its customer ignore the writing on the wall and refuse to a tremendous amount of progress to be made, reform their behavior, electing instead to sling however, and we cannot stop now. base, and we were rewarded with a store that, while still a long way from perfect, has made unsustainable species without compunction. As the Carting Away the Oceans project moves tremendous strides toward a more responsible These kinds of irresponsible actions bespeak forward, a schism is emerging among the seafood operation. a general disregard for our planet, our shared largest US seafood retailers. It is becoming resources, and our future. Companies that act clear that certain markets—such as Wegmans, Consumers deserve to be able to purchase this way do not merit our patronage. seafood from retailers that care about the Target, and Whole Foods—are deeply invested Greenpeace calls upon all seafood retailers to in making better decisions and providing safer, condition of our oceans and that properly steward our marine resources. The days of enact strong, effective, sustainable seafood more sustainable seafood options for their policies that will reduce pressure on flagging customers. At the same time, an opposite, selling fish with no regard for the environment are over. Companies have two choices—they can fish stocks and help heal our ailing oceans. dismal truth has become impossible to ignore: Intolerably destructive practices, such as bottom there are many seafood retailers that have yet to implement strong seafood policies and become leaders, or they can ignore reality and continue trawling and other high-bycatch fishing methods, take any responsibility for the seafood they sell, must be called out by name as unacceptable or for the damage they are doing to our oceans. their unsustainable seafood practices until many popular seafood items are no longer available. within these policies, which need to set guide- And increasingly, if they choose the latter course, lines that preclude purchasing fish from unsus- they will reap the wrath of a consumer public that tainable operations. These policies must also has simply had enough. include protocols that increase overall transpar- ency within the chain of custody, both to reduce © Greenpeace/ Adam Hunger page 4 Greenpeace April 2010 page 5 The Greenpeace campaign against Trader Joe’s comes to a successful conclusion as the company agrees to implement strong sustainability measures throughout its seafood operation page 7 March 2010 • ALDI partners with Sustainable Fisheries Partnership to develop new seafood policy • Target announces it will stop selling all farm-raised salmon February 2010 • Safeway partners with FishWise, drops grouper and monkfish • Trader Joe’s unofficially discontinues the sale of orange roughy January 2010 Second update of Carting Away the Oceans is released Top 5 Stores: (1) Wegmans (2) Ahold USA (3) Whole Foods (4) Target (5) Safeway December 2009 Bottom 5 Stores: (16) Winn-Dixie (17) Trader Joe’s (18) Meijer (19) Price Chopper (20) H.E. Butt • Wegmans publishes sustainable seafood policy; drops Atlantic halibut and orange roughy June 2009 • Target introduces in-store promotion of sustainable seafood • Wegmans asks U.S. State Department to curb pirate fishing May 2009 • Wal-Mart drops swordfish, shark and frozen orange roughy • Safeway removes red snapper from their stores In 2010, we find we ourselves theon cuspof major change.In 2010, A handfulof visionary companies begun have use sustainability to and environmental responsibility to distinguish themselves from their competitors. Unsustainable species orange like roughy and shark are disappearing from seafood sections a steady Over at clip. half twenty the top of seafood retailers in the United crafted States have seafood policies some degree, to reigned that have, in unsustainable sourcing practices. Companies and Whole Safeway like Foods are joining forces with independent third-party environmental groups FishWise like and the Aquarium Monterey Bay theirin order improve operations to better and sustainable to promote seafood to their customers. And on the Carting the Oceans Away scorecard, while still we await that firstretailer to achievethe green“Good” the of sectorrankings, halfof the companies analyzed in the report These attained now have statistics a “Pass.” indicate incredible progress. Certainly there is still a great deal be done, work of to the seafood retail important but it’s recognize to come. far how Truly, have we a moment not soon.
Recommended publications
  • OSB Representative Participant List by Industry
    OSB Representative Participant List by Industry Aerospace • KAWASAKI • VOLVO • CATERPILLAR • ADVANCED COATING • KEDDEG COMPANY • XI'AN AIRCRAFT INDUSTRY • CHINA FAW GROUP TECHNOLOGIES GROUP • KOREAN AIRLINES • CHINA INTERNATIONAL Agriculture • AIRBUS MARINE CONTAINERS • L3 COMMUNICATIONS • AIRCELLE • AGRICOLA FORNACE • CHRYSLER • LOCKHEED MARTIN • ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS • CARGILL • COMMERCIAL VEHICLE • M7 AEROSPACE GROUP • AVICHINA • E. RITTER & COMPANY • • MESSIER-BUGATTI- CONTINENTAL AIRLINES • BAE SYSTEMS • EXOPLAST DOWTY • CONTINENTAL • BE AEROSPACE • MITSUBISHI HEAVY • JOHN DEERE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES • • BELL HELICOPTER • MAUI PINEAPPLE CONTINENTAL • NASA COMPANY AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS • BOMBARDIER • • NGC INTEGRATED • USDA COOPER-STANDARD • CAE SYSTEMS AUTOMOTIVE Automotive • • CORNING • CESSNA AIRCRAFT NORTHROP GRUMMAN • AGCO • COMPANY • PRECISION CASTPARTS COSMA INDUSTRIAL DO • COBHAM CORP. • ALLIED SPECIALTY BRASIL • VEHICLES • CRP INDUSTRIES • COMAC RAYTHEON • AMSTED INDUSTRIES • • CUMMINS • DANAHER RAYTHEON E-SYSTEMS • ANHUI JIANGHUAI • • DAF TRUCKS • DASSAULT AVIATION RAYTHEON MISSLE AUTOMOBILE SYSTEMS COMPANY • • ARVINMERITOR DAIHATSU MOTOR • EATON • RAYTHEON NCS • • ASHOK LEYLAND DAIMLER • EMBRAER • RAYTHEON RMS • • ATC LOGISTICS & DALPHI METAL ESPANA • EUROPEAN AERONAUTIC • ROLLS-ROYCE DEFENCE AND SPACE ELECTRONICS • DANA HOLDING COMPANY • ROTORCRAFT • AUDI CORPORATION • FINMECCANICA ENTERPRISES • • AUTOZONE DANA INDÚSTRIAS • SAAB • FLIR SYSTEMS • • BAE SYSTEMS DELPHI • SMITH'S DETECTION • FUJI • • BECK/ARNLEY DENSO CORPORATION
    [Show full text]
  • The 2007 (Summer)
    LAWDRAGONLAWDRAGON 500 500LEADING DEALMAKERS IN AMERICA w B Y K ATRINA D EWEY e fter a second-year summer stint review with Manufacturers Hanover financ- at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton ings. Within a year, he was on the team han- & Garrison in 1979, Robert Spatt dling Seagrams’ multi-billion dollar hostile A was ready to take the New York bids for St. Joe Minerals Corp. and then for law scene by storm. Conoco against DuPont. Beware the bite of First, though, there was the matter of rent the M&A bug. to pay on an overpriced New York apart- A few more years and Spatt, as an associate ment. He and his high school sweetheart, representing the financial advisor, was part of Lisa, had married before his third year at watershed deals in M&A’s early history, Michigan Law School, and after graduation including the Texaco battle with Pennzoil to had leased a small three-room apartment buy Getty Oil and the Allied/Bendix/Martin opposite Lincoln Center. Marietta “Pac-Man” deal. Small space, killer view. The first billion-dollar leveraged buyout? His classmates took the summer off to Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.’s 1984 acqui- study for the bar exam, and maybe climb sition of Wometco, a diversified company the Alps, while Rob and Lisa took a week to whose holdings included cable operations move from Ann Arbor, Mich., to New York. and other media. At birth, Spatt’s son Mark The next Monday, Spatt reported to work was given an infant t-shirt, ‘Wometco Kid,’ at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, juggling bar commemorating his father’s Lamaze lapses.
    [Show full text]
  • Tengelmann Delivers Solid Results
    The international marketing magazine for fresh produce buyers in Europe By Steven Maxwell Thursday 2nd September 2010, 15:44 GMT Tengelmann delivers solid results German group benefits from strong performance of domestic businesses, but says US subsidiary is �under pressure� erman grocery retail group economic crisis. However, the group said that the US retail G Tengelmann has reported a 2.6 per sector remained “constantly under cent increase in turnover for its With a workforce of 20,959 employed at pressure” as a result of the global economic 2009 financial year compared with the 660 branches, the supermarkets operated crisis, underlining recent press reports that same period a year before, in spite of what by the group’s Kaiser’s Tengelmann division A&P plans to close 25 stores as part of a it described as recession-related “pressure” managed to equal their previous year’s plan aimed at restoring profitability to the in several of its markets. results, generating sales of €2.58bn. business. The group, which operates a network of However, Mr Haub admitted that Tengelmann continues to hold a 15 per cent 4,519 stores in 16 European countries as well Tengelmann had “not yet overcome” stake in discounter Netto after selling its as the US, recorded sales totaling €11.34bn challenges in the business, adding that the Plus subsidiary to the company in 2009, for the year, which its managing partner, sale of branches in the Rhine-Main region while it is currently awaiting approval from Karl-Erivan Haub, said reflected a growth in was “part of an extensive project to restore authorities in Romania and Bulgaria for the sales and profits.
    [Show full text]
  • As Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 11, 1998
    AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON JUNE 11, 1998 REGISTRATION NO. 333-48309 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON D.C. 20549 ---------------- AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO FORM S-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 ---------------- EURONET SERVICES INC. (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER) DELAWARE 6099 74-2806888 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) ---------------- HORVAT U. 14-24 1027 BUDAPEST HUNGARY 011-361-224-1000 (ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF REGISTRANT'S PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES) CT CORPORATION SYSTEM 1633 BROADWAY NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10019 (212) 664-7666 (NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AGENT FOR SERVICE) ---------------- COPIES TO: ARNOLD R. WESTERMAN, ESQ. JAMES M. BARTOS, ESQ. ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN, PLLC SHEARMAN & STERLING 1050 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, N.W. 199 BISHOPSGATE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036 LONDON EC2M 3TY ENGLAND ---------------- APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement. If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, please check the following box. [_]
    [Show full text]
  • Q3 2009 Master:New Magazive Layout V4 Copy
    Quarter 3 / 2009 insights from global retailers in this issue... Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Follett, Gordmans, Under Armour, Eldorado, University of Parma, Mahaveer Wines, Sensormatic do Brasil Eletronica Ltda., Terry White Chemists also... Now Asian Retailers Can Achieve Better Inventory Management Welcome to a new edition of In-Store, your gateway to the latest trends, news, and insights in global retail. As the retail cli- mate evolves, so does technology. In today’s tough economic times, more and more retailers are investing in retail solutions that maximize profitability, improve shrink and help them be better positioned for future growth. This issue takes you on a worldwide journey, showcasing some of the world’s leading retailers. Experience first-hand as they share business challenges and successes they have achieved through implementing different in-store electronic security technologies. We greatly value your feedback. If you have comments or ideas for stories you would like featured in future editions, please email us at [email protected]. Stay tuned... there’s plenty more In-Store! 2 The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company Adds Over 400 Stores to a Growing Base of More Than 16,000 Stores Worldwide Currently Monitored by Sensormatic® Analytics to Help Control Shrink and Boost Profits In today’s tough economic times, more solution. According to Don Terreri A&P’s and more retailers are investing in busi- senior director of asset protection, “The ness intelligence to help control shrink Sensormatic Analytics suite helps meet and boost their profits. Recently The Great both our short-term and long-term objec- Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company (A&P), a tives, offering us solutions that can moni- leading U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Magazine Template
    Saint Joseph’s University, Summer 2010 Achieving a First: SJU’s Personal Connections to Professor and Students Doneene Damon ‘89 Rebuilding Haiti Feed the Hungry FROM THE PRESIDENT A little more than five years ago, Saint Joseph’s University embarked on Plan 2010: The Path to Preeminence, an ambitious strategic plan that would enable us to be recognized as the Northeast’s preeminent Catholic comprehensive university. Now, with so many of Plan 2010’s initiatives accomplished, we look forward to the coming decade from a position of academic and financial strength. Our academic position has been affirmed by the tremendous achievements of our talented faculty and students. U.S. News & World Report recently ranked the Erivan K. Haub School of Business Executive MBA program 20th in the nation. Additionally, over the past two years, four graduating seniors in the College of Arts and Sciences were awarded Fulbright English Teaching Assistantships, among other prestigious scholarships. There is also wonderful news about graduates enrolled in the Jesuit Volunteer Corps (JVC). Saint Joseph’s tied with Gonzaga University for having the highest number of alumni participants in the JVC. I am immensely proud that 16 alumni have committed to one year of living and working for others. Our successes do not mean that we will rest on our laurels, however. Saint Joseph’s is blessed with a robust planning culture, and after more than a year of intensive data gathering and planning, a framework for Plan 2020: Gateway to the Future has crystallized. The bold steps we take as we continue to expand our goals will focus on Plan 2020’s five initiatives: academic distinction and a transformative student experience; mission and diversity; global and community engagement; alumni involvement; and financial health.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution
    The Single ÆTii/rAzet Review SUBSERIES II: IMPACT ON SERVICES Volvime A: Distribution The Single AíarJcet Revie%v IMPACT ON SERVICES DISTRIBUTION The Single Market Review series Subseries I — Impact on manufacturing Volume: 1 Food, drink and tobacco processing machinery 2 Pharmaceutical products 3 Textiles and clothing 4 Construction site equipment 5 Chemicals 6 Motor vehicles 7 Processed foodstuffs 8 Telecommunications equipment Subseries II — Impact on services Volume: 1 Insurance 2 Air transport 3 Credit institutions and banking 4 Distribution 5 Road freight transport 6 Telecommunications: liberalized services 7 Advertising 8 Audio-visual services and production 9 Single information market 10 Single energy market 11 Transport networks Subseries III —Dismantling of barriers Volume: 1 Technical barriers to trade 2 Public procurement 3 Customs and fiscal formalities at frontiers 4 Industrial property rights 5 Capital market liberalization 6 Currency management costs Subseries IV — Impact on trade and investment Volume: 1 Foreign direct investment 2 Trade patterns inside the single market 3 Trade creation and trade diversion 4 External access to European markets Subseries V — Impact on competition and scale effects Volume: 1 Price competition and price convergence 2 Intangible investments 3 Competition issues 4 Economies of scale Subseries VI —Aggregate and regional impact Volume: 1 Regional growth and convergence 2 The cases of Greece, Spain, Ireland and Portugal 3 Trade, labour and capital flows: the less developed regions 4 Employment, trade and labour costs in manufacturing 5 Aggregate results of the single market programme Results of the business survey EUROPEAN COMMISSION The S ingle ¿kícir/cet Review MPACT ON SERVICES DISTRIBUTION The Single /Harteet Review SUBSERIES II: VOLUME 4 OFFICE FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES This report is part of a series of 39 studies commissioned from independent consultants in the context of a major review of the Single Market.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Powers of Retailing 2021 Contents
    Global Powers of Retailing 2021 Contents Top 250 quick statistics 4 Global economic outlook 5 Top 10 highlights 8 Impact of COVID-19 on leading global retailers 13 Global Powers of Retailing Top 250 17 Geographic analysis 25 Product sector analysis 32 New entrants 36 Fastest 50 38 Study methodology and data sources 43 Endnotes 47 Contacts 49 Acknowledgments 49 Welcome to the 24th edition of Global Powers of Retailing. The report identifies the 250 largest retailers around the world based on publicly available data for FY2019 (fiscal years ended through 30 June 2020), and analyzes their performance across geographies and product sectors. It also provides a global economic outlook, looks at the 50 fastest-growing retailers, and highlights new entrants to the Top 250. Top 250 quick statistics, FY2019 Minimum retail US$4.85 US$19.4 revenue required to be trillion billion among Top 250 Aggregate Average size US$4.0 retail revenue of Top 250 of Top 250 (retail revenue) billion 5-year retail Composite 4.4% revenue growth net profit margin 4.3% Composite (CAGR Composite year-over-year retail FY2014-2019) 3.1% return on assets revenue growth 5.0% Top 250 retailers with foreign 22.2% 11.1 operations Share of Top 250 Average number aggregate retail revenue of countries where 64.8% from foreign companies have operations retail operations Source: Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. Global Powers of Retailing 2021. Analysis of financial performance and operations for fiscal years ended through 30 June 2020 using company annual reports, press releases, Supermarket News, Forbes America’s largest private companies and other sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Post Pesach Supermarket Shopping Tzvi H Haber 5775-2015 Edition
    Post Pesach Supermarket Shopping Tzvi H Haber 5775-2015 Edition There is much ado every year as to where one can shop immediately following Pesach, how long the restrictions apply for and to what products. I hope this is found to be enlightening. My goal is not to issue a halachic decision wiith this article, rather to present the fact on the ground. For a final psak please consult your Rav, who may appreciate you bringing some of these facts to his attention. In order to properly understand the halachic implications we must first elucidate the basic supermarket structure. The general chain supermarket model is as follows: Manufacturer → Distributor → Supermarket Warehouse → Individual Supermarket In terms of Halacha, Chametz that was owned by a Jew on Pesach is forbidden. ‘Chametz’, for the purpose of this exercise, is a product that contains a kezayis (1.1 fluid ounces) of Chametz and more than 1/60th of the final cooked product is Chametz. Therefore, if any company in the chain is owned by a Jew, and owned the Chametz on Pesach, it would be forbidden to eat after Pesach. Publicly held companies that have a partial Jewish ownership are the subject of Rabbinic dispute, but the commonly accepted view is that of the Zecher Yitzchak (8) that although significant minority shareholders are required to sell their Chametz shares before Pesach it does not render the Chametz forbidden after Pesach. (How to define significant is a conversation unto itself and beyond the scope of this article). Now the facts: Manufacturers Manufacturers obviously vary from product to product but almost all products found in the average supermarket are manufactured by publicly held companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Post Pesach Supermarket Shopping
    Post Pesach Supermarket Shopping There is much ado every year as to where one can shop immediately following Pesach, how long the restrictions apply for and to what products. I hope this is found to be enlightening. In order to properly understand the halachic implications we must first elucidate the basic supermarket structure. The general chain supermarket model is as follows: Manufacturer → Distributor → Supermarket Warehouse → Individual Supermarket In terms of Halacha, Chametz that was owned by a Jew on Pesach is forbidden. ‘Chametz’, for the purpose of this exercise is a product with either a kezayis (1.1 fluid ounces) of Chametz or more than 1/60th of the final cooked product is Chametz. Therefore, if any company in the chain is owned by a Jew, and owned the Chametz on Pesach, it would be forbidden to eat on Pesach. Publicly held companies that have a partial Jewish ownership are the subject of Rabbinic dispute, but the commonly accepted view is that of the Zecher Yitzchak (8) that although minority shareholders are required to sell their Chametzdike shares before Pesach it does not render the Chametz forbidden after Pesach. Now the facts: Manufacturers obviously vary from product to product but almost all products found in the average supermarket are manufactured by publicly held companies. Distributors buy tremendous amounts of food from the Manufacturers and then distribute to the national chains. C&S Wholesale Grocers is a wholesale distributor of food and grocery store items. With headquarters in Keene, New Hampshire, C&S is the twelfth largest privately held company in the United States, as listed in 2008 by Forbes.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Information Form of Metro Inc
    ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM OF METRO INC. Financial year ended September 29, 2018 December 13, 2018 Table of contents FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION 1 1. INCORPORATION 1 1.1. INCORPORATION OF THE ISSUER 1 1.2. INTERCORPORATE RELATIONSHIPS 2 2. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS OVER THE PAST THREE YEARS 2 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS 6 3.1. BUSINESS OF THE CORPORATION 6 3.2. PRODUCTS, BRANDS AND SERVICES 9 3.3. BANNER SERVICES 10 3.4. HUMAN RESOURCES 10 3.5. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 11 3.6. COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT 11 3.7. SEASONALITY 11 3.8. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 11 3.9. SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES 12 3.10. REGULATIONS 13 3.11. LOAN OPERATIONS 13 3.12. RISK FACTORS 13 4. DIVIDENDS 14 5. SHARE CAPITAL STRUCTURE 14 6. MARKET FOR SECURITIES 14 6.1. TRADING PRICE AND VOLUME 14 6.2. CREDIT RATINGS AND DEBTS 14 6.3. PRIOR SALES 17 7. ESCROWED SECURITIES AND SECURITIES SUBJECT TO CONTRACTUAL RESTRICTION ON TRANSFER 17 8. DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS 18 8.1. NAME, OCCUPATION AND SECURITY HOLDING 18 8.2. CEASE TRADE ORDERS, BANKRUPTCIES, PENALTIES OR SANCTIONS 20 8.3. CONFLICT OF INTEREST 21 9. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 21 10. PERSONS WITH AN INTEREST IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS 22 11. TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR 22 12. MATERIAL CONTRACTS 22 13. INTEREST OF EXPERTS 22 13.1. NAME OF EXPERTS 22 13.2. INTEREST OF THE CORPORATION’S EXTERNAL AUDITORS 22 14. INFORMATION ON THE AUDIT COMMITTEE 22 15. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 22 SCHEDULE A - INFORMATION ON THE AUDIT COMMITTEE 24 SCHEDULE B - MANDATE OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE 26 N.B.: All disclosures in this Annual Information Form are as of September 29, 2018 unless otherwise indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Did Wal-Mart Fail in Germany?
    IWIM - Institut für Weltwirtschaft und Internationales Management IWIM - Institute for World Economics and International Management Why did Wal-Mart fail in Germany? Andreas Knorr and Andreas Arndt Materialien des Wissenschaftsschwerpunktes „Globalisierung der Weltwirtschaft“ Band 24 Hrsg. von Andreas Knorr, Alfons Lemper, Axel Sell, Karl Wohlmuth Universität Bremen Why did Wal-Mart fail in Germany? Andreas Knorr and Andreas Arndt Andreas Knorr, Alfons Lemper, Axel Sell, Karl Wohlmuth (Hrsg.): Materialien des Wissenschaftsschwerpunktes „Globalisierung der Weltwirtschaft“, Bd. 24, Juni 2003, ISSN 0948-3837 (ehemals: Materialien des Universitätsschwerpunktes „Internationale Wirtschaftsbeziehungen und Internationales Management“) Bezug: IWIM - Institut für Weltwirtschaft und Internationales Management Universität Bremen Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaft Postfach 33 04 40 D- 28334 Bremen Telefon: 04 21 / 2 18 - 34 29 Telefax: 04 21 / 2 18 - 45 50 E-mail: [email protected] Homepage: http://www.iwim.uni-bremen.de Abstract Clearly dominating the US retail market, Wal-Mart expanded into Germany (and Eu- rope) in late 1997. Wal-Mart’s attempt to apply the company’s proven US success for- mula in an unmodified manner to the German market, however, turned out to be nothing short of a fiasco. Upon closer inspection, the circumstances of the company’s failure to establish itself in Germany give reason to believe that it pursued a fundamentally flawed internationalization strategy due to an incredible degree of ignorance of the specific features of the extremely competitive German retail market. Moreover, instead of attracting consumers with an innovative approach to retailing, as it has done in the USA, in Germany the company does not seem to be able to offer customers any com- pelling value proposition in comparison with its local competitors.
    [Show full text]