DOCSLIB.ORG

Gauteng Environmental Management Framework

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gauteng Environmental Management Framework GAUTENG PROVINCIAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK Note: (GPEMF) This document is formatted for A3 printing. Where information is adequately contained in existing documents it is referred to and attached in Section C (only on CD) Environmental Management Framework It is important to note that the main product is the interactive GIS Viewer. The focus of the GPEMF is to provide a product that makes information available in a systematic and useful manner to the Report benefit of all environmental management and development role players in Gauteng. August 2014 Produced by the Environomics Project Team, including: Environomics CC MetroGIS (Pty) Ltd. Enquiries should be addressed to: EnviroGIS (Pty) Ltd. Simon Mafu David Hoare Consulting CC e-mail: [email protected] N R M Consulting Tel: 011 2493395 © Gauteng Province, Agiculture and Rural Development, 2014. All rights in respect to this document and the GIS Viewer are reserved. Please note that the information used in the GPEMF belongs to various data custodians. Their rights must be respected and original information must be obtained from such custodians. 1 The report consists of two sections. The table of contents for Section B 4.1. The assessment of the landscape character ............................................................................................. 14 follows at the end of Section A. The sections can be used separately. 4.2. General information (topography, hydrology and protected areas) ........................................................ 14 4.3. Terrain morphology .................................................................................................................................. 14 Section A: Introduction and Status Quo (Abbreviated) 4.4. Land cover/broad land use patterns ......................................................................................................... 15 4.5. Visual assessment ..................................................................................................................................... 15 Table of Contents 4.6. Landscape value / scenic quality ............................................................................................................... 15 Section A: Introduction and Status Quo (Abbreviated) ............................................................................................. 2 4.7. Landscape / land use character ................................................................................................................ 15 List of figures ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 5. Climate precipitation ........................................................................................................................................ 17 List of tables ................................................................................................................................................................ 4 5.1. Temperature ............................................................................................................................................. 17 List of graphs ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 5.2. Sunshine .................................................................................................................................................... 17 List of diagrammes ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 5.3. Clouds........................................................................................................................................................ 18 Abbreviations .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 5.4. Precipitation .............................................................................................................................................. 18 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 5.5. Humidity .................................................................................................................................................... 18 1.1. The purpose of the EMF .............................................................................................................................. 7 5.6. Dew point .................................................................................................................................................. 18 1.2. The EMF area .............................................................................................................................................. 7 5.7. Wind .......................................................................................................................................................... 19 1.3. Project structures ........................................................................................................................................ 7 6. Climate change ................................................................................................................................................. 20 1.3.1. The project team (PT) ......................................................................................................................... 7 6.1. Description ................................................................................................................................................ 20 1.3.2. The project management team (PMT) ................................................................................................ 7 6.2. Climate change and biodiversity ............................................................................................................... 20 1.3.3. The project steering committee (PSC) ................................................................................................ 7 6.3. Climate change and hydrology ................................................................................................................. 20 1.3.4. The project reference group (PRG) ..................................................................................................... 8 6.4. Climate change and agriculture ................................................................................................................ 21 1.4. The project schedule ................................................................................................................................... 9 7. Hydrology .......................................................................................................................................................... 22 2. Geology soils and landscape character ............................................................................................................. 11 7.1. Catchments ............................................................................................................................................... 22 2.1. Abbreviated description............................................................................................................................ 11 7.2. Rivers, wetlands and dams ....................................................................................................................... 22 3. Land capability potential including soils ........................................................................................................... 12 7.3. River health .............................................................................................................................................. 22 3.1. Abbreviated description............................................................................................................................ 12 8. Geohydrology .................................................................................................................................................... 22 3.1.1. High potential agricultural land – municipalities .............................................................................. 13 8.1. Fractured aquifers ..................................................................................................................................... 22 4. Landscape character ......................................................................................................................................... 14 8.2. Karst aquifers ............................................................................................................................................ 23 2 8.3. Intergranular and fractured aquifers ........................................................................................................ 24 14.3. Population density ................................................................................................................................ 34 9. Acid mine water ................................................................................................................................................ 24 14.4. Unemployment ....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Meso-Archaean and Palaeo-Proterozoic Sedimentary Sequence Stratigraphy of the Kaapvaal Craton
    Marine and Petroleum Geology 33 (2012) 92e116 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Marine and Petroleum Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/marpetgeo Meso-Archaean and Palaeo-Proterozoic sedimentary sequence stratigraphy of the Kaapvaal Craton Adam J. Bumby a,*, Patrick G. Eriksson a, Octavian Catuneanu b, David R. Nelson c, Martin J. Rigby a,1 a Department of Geology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa b Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Canada c SIMS Laboratory, School of Natural Sciences, University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury Campus, Richmond, NSW 2753, Australia article info abstract Article history: The Kaapvaal Craton hosts a number of Precambrian sedimentary successions which were deposited Received 31 August 2010 between 3105 Ma (Dominion Group) and 1700 Ma (Waterberg Group) Although younger Precambrian Received in revised form sedimentary sequences outcrop within southern Africa, they are restricted either to the margins of the 27 September 2011 Kaapvaal Craton, or are underlain by orogenic belts off the edge of the craton. The basins considered in Accepted 30 September 2011 this work are those which host the Witwatersrand and Pongola, Ventersdorp, Transvaal and Waterberg Available online 8 October 2011 strata. Many of these basins can be considered to have formed as a response to reactivation along lineaments, which had initially formed by accretion processes during the amalgamation of the craton Keywords: Kaapvaal during the Mid-Archaean. Faulting along these lineaments controlled sedimentation either directly by Witwatersrand controlling the basin margins, or indirectly by controlling the sediment source areas. Other basins are Ventersdorp likely to be more controlled by thermal affects associated with mantle plumes.
    [Show full text]
  • 1-35556 3-8 Padp1 Layout 1
    Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA August Vol. 566 Pretoria, 3 2012 Augustus No. 35556 PART 1 OF 3 N.B. The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for the quality of “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes AIDS HELPLINE: 0800-0123-22 Prevention is the cure G12-088869—A 35556—1 2 No. 35556 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 3 AUGUST 2012 IMPORTANT NOTICE The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for faxed documents not received due to errors on the fax machine or faxes received which are unclear or incomplete. Please be advised that an “OK” slip, received from a fax machine, will not be accepted as proof that documents were received by the GPW for printing. If documents are faxed to the GPW it will be the senderʼs respon- sibility to phone and confirm that the documents were received in good order. Furthermore the Government Printing Works will also not be held responsible for cancellations and amendments which have not been done on original documents received from clients. CONTENTS INHOUD Page Gazette Bladsy Koerant No. No. No. No. No. No. Transport, Department of Vervoer, Departement van Cross Border Road Transport Agency: Oorgrenspadvervoeragentskap aansoek- Applications for permits:.......................... permitte: .................................................. Menlyn..................................................... 3 35556 Menlyn..................................................... 3 35556 Applications concerning Operating
    [Show full text]
  • Kloof-Driefontein Complex (KDC) Technical Short Form Report 31 December 2011
    Kloof-Driefontein Complex (KDC) Technical Short Form Report 31 December 2011 2 Salient features ¨ Mineral Resources at 63.8 Moz (excluding Tailing Storage Facility ounces of 3.7 Moz). ¨ Mineral Reserves at 13.7 Moz (excluding Tailing Storage Facility ounces of 2.9 Moz). ¨ Safe steady state production strategy driving quality volume. ¨ Accelerate extraction of higher grade Mineral Reserves to bring value forward. ¨ Optimise surface resources extraction strategy. ¨ Long-life franchise asset anchoring gold production to 2028 (17 years). The KDC has a world class ore body with long-life Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (17 years) which has produced in excess of 181 Moz from the renowned Witwatersrand Basin, the most prolific gold depository in the world. Geographic location KDC West Mining Right KDC East Mining Right Carletonville Pretoria Johannesburg Welkom Kimberley Bloemfontein Durban KDC East = Kloof G.M. Port Elizabeth KDC West = Driefontein G.M. Cape Town Gold Fields: KDC Gold Mine – Technical Short Form Report 2011 3 Geographic location IFC 1. Overview 1. Overview Page 1 Gold Fields Limited owns a 100% interest in GFI Mining South Africa (Pty) Limited (GFIMSA), which holds a 100% interest in KDC (Kloof- 2. Key aspects Page 2 Driefontein Complex). The mine is situated between 60 and 80 kilometres west of 3. Operating statistics Page 3 Johannesburg near the towns of Westonaria and Carletonville in the Gauteng Province of Page 4 South Africa. KDC is a large, well-established 4. Geological setting and mineralisation shallow to ultra-deep level gold mine with workings that are accessed through, 12 shaft 5. Mining Page 7 systems (five business units – BU’s) that mine various gold-bearing reefs from open ground 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Appropriate Procedures Towards and After Closure of Underground Gold Mines from a Water Management Perspective
    THE DEVELOPMENT OF APPROPRIATE PROCEDURES TOWARDS AND AFTER CLOSURE OF UNDERGROUND GOLD MINES FROM A WATER MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVE Report to the WATER RESEARCH COMMISSION by W Pulles, S Banister and M van Biljon on hehalf of PULLES HOWARD & DE LANGE INCORPORATED RISON GROUNDWATER CONSULTING cc WRC Report No: 1215/1/05 ISBN No: 1-77005-237-2 MARCH 2005 Disclaimer This report emanates from a project financed by the Water Research Commission (WRC) and is approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the WRC or the members of the project steering committee, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A need was identified by the Water Research Commission to undertake research into the issue of mine closure planning from a water management perspective in the South African gold mining industry. Initially a project was conceived that was based on undertaking a more detailed study on the development of a coherent and integrated closure planning process for a case study region – the Klerksdorp-Orkney-Stilfontein-Hartebeestfontein (KOSH) area. This approach was eventually abandoned due to the unwillingness of the gold mines in this region (other than Anglogold) to participate in the project. The project methodology was subsequently modified and approved by the project Steering Committee to rather study the complete South African gold mining industry and develop a closure planning methodology that would have application throughout the industry. In support of such an industry-wide study, an assessment would be undertaken of the current status of closure planning contained within the mine EMPRs.
    [Show full text]
  • Gauteng No Fee Schools 2021
    GAUTENG NO FEE SCHOOLS 2021 NATIONAL NAME OF SCHOOL SCHOOL PHASE ADDRESS OF SCHOOL EDUCATION DISTRICT QUINTILE LEARNER EMIS 2021 NUMBERS NUMBER 2021 700910011 ADAM MASEBE SECONDARY SCHOOL SECONDARY 110, BLOCK A, SEKAMPANENG, TEMBA, TEMBA, 0407 TSHWANE NORTH 1 1056 700400393 ALBERTINA SISULU PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY 1250, SIBUSISO, KINGSWAY, BENONI, BENONI, 1501 EKURHULENI NORTH 1 1327 24936, CNR ALEKHINE & STANTON RD, PROTEA SOUTH, 700121210 ALTMONT TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL SECONDARY JOHANNESBURG CENTRAL 1 1395 SOWETO, JOHANNESBURG, 1818 2544, MANDELA & TAMBO, BLUEGUMVIEW, DUDUZA, NIGEL, 700350561 ASSER MALOKA SECONDARY SCHOOL SECONDARY GAUTENG EAST 1 1623 1496 2201, MAMASIYANOKA, GA-RANKUWA VIEW, GA-RANKUWA, 700915064 BACHANA MOKWENA PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY TSHWANE WEST 1 993 PRETORIA, 0208 22640, NGUNGUNYANE AVENUE, BARCELONA, ETWATWA, 700400277 BARCELONA PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY GAUTENG EAST 1 1809 BENONI, 1519 577, KAALPLAATS, BARRAGE, VANDERBIJLPARK, 700320291 BARRAGE PRIMARY FARM SCHOOL PRIMARY SEDIBENG WEST 1 317 JOHANNESBURG, 1900 11653, LINDANI STREET, OLIEVENHOUTBOSCH, CENTURION, 700231522 BATHABILE PRIMARY FARM SCHOOL PRIMARY TSHWANE SOUTH 1 1541 PRETORIA, 0175 700231530 BATHOKWA PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY 1, LEPHORA STREET, SAULSVILLE, PRETORIA, PRETORIA, 0125 TSHWANE SOUTH 1 1081 25, OLD PRETORIA ROAD BAPSFONTEIN, BAPSFONTEIN, 700211276 BEKEKAYO PRIMARY FARM SCHOOL PRIMARY EKURHULENI NORTH 1 139 BENONI, BENONI, 1510 2854, FLORIDA STREET, BEVERLY HILLS, EVATON WEST, 700320937 BEVERLY HILLS SECONDARY SCHOOL SECONDARY SEDIBENG WEST 1 1504
    [Show full text]
  • Threats and Opportunities for Post-Closure Development in Dolomitic
    Threats and opportunities for post-closure development in dolomitic gold mining areas of the West Rand and Far West Rand (South Africa) – a hydraulic view Part 3: Planning and uncertainty – lessons from history EJ (Leslie) Stoch* and Frank Winde North West University, Potchefstroom Campus, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom, 2520, South Africa Abstract Mining is exposed to geological uncertainty as well as to economic forces beyond its control, such as commodity prices and exchange rates that govern profitability. Predictions of future scenarios in mining areas are thus inherently difficult and unreliable. This uncertainty is exacerbated by the long time periods required for pro-active planning of post-mining developments often spanning several decades. This paper presents examples from a gold mining area in the Far West Rand (South Africa) illustrating the variance between predicted scenarios and reality. The facts are embedded in a historical recount of events crucial for the design and approval of mine-closure plans, as well as post-mining development. It is argued that historical arrangements and data need to be understood and preserved in order to avoid the repetition of (costly) mis- takes made in the Far West Rand. Owing to the pivotal role of water in the semi-arid area and the fact that some of the most important groundwater resources of South Africa were impacted on by deep-level mining, this paper in 3 parts adopted a largely hydraulic perspective. The loss of ‘institutional memory’ and local expertise has been identified as the main threat to planning. Part 3 presents an attempt to counteract such loss by providing an account of the events of 5 decades, as wit- nessed by the first author.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Proceedings 2006
    FOSAF THE FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN FLYFISHERS PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10 TH YELLOWFISH WORKING GROUP CONFERENCE STERKFONTEIN DAM, HARRISMITH 07 – 09 APRIL 2006 Edited by Peter Arderne PRINTING & DISTRIBUTION SPONSORED BY: sappi 1 CONTENTS Page List of participants 3 Press release 4 Chairman’s address -Bill Mincher 5 The effects of pollution on fish and people – Dr Steve Mitchell 7 DWAF Quality Status Report – Upper Vaal Management Area 2000 – 2005 - Riana 9 Munnik Water: The full picture of quality management & technology demand – Dries Louw 17 Fish kills in the Vaal: What went wrong? – Francois van Wyk 18 Water Pollution: The viewpoint of Eco-Care Trust – Mornē Viljoen 19 Why the fish kills in the Vaal? –Synthesis of the five preceding presentations 22 – Dr Steve Mitchell The Elands River Yellowfish Conservation Area – George McAllister 23 Status of the yellowfish populations in Limpopo Province – Paul Fouche 25 North West provincial report on the status of the yellowfish species – Daan Buijs & 34 Hermien Roux Status of yellowfish in KZN Province – Rob Karssing 40 Status of the yellowfish populations in the Western Cape – Dean Impson 44 Regional Report: Northern Cape (post meeting)– Ramogale Sekwele 50 Yellowfish conservation in the Free State Province – Pierre de Villiers 63 A bottom-up approach to freshwater conservation in the Orange Vaal River basin – 66 Pierre de Villiers Status of the yellowfish populations in Gauteng Province – Piet Muller 69 Yellowfish research: A reality to face – Dr Wynand Vlok 72 Assessing the distribution & flow requirements of endemic cyprinids in the Olifants- 86 Doring river system - Bruce Paxton Yellowfish genetics projects update – Dr Wynand Vlok on behalf of Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • MINERAL RESOURCES and MINERAL RESERVES REPORT 2017 This Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Report Should Be Read in Conjunction with Our Other 2017 Reports
    MINERAL RESOURCES AND MINERAL RESERVES REPORT 2017 This Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Report should be read in conjunction with our other 2017 reports. This report, together with the other reports produced for the financial year from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2017, covers Sibanye-Stillwater’s progress and achievements in delivering on our strategic objectives and commitment to creating stakeholder value. The full set of 2017 reports and all supplementary documents are available on the corporate website at http://reports.sibanyestillwater.com/2017/ SUMMARISED REPORT INTEGRATED ANNUAL 2017 AND NOTICE OF REPORT 2017 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING ANNUAL FINANCIAL COMPANY FINANCIAL REPORT 2017 STATEMENTS 2017 Front cover photograph of 2017 Krugerrand provided courtesy of Rand Refinery (Pty) Limited b Sibanye-Stillwater CONTENTS SECTION 01 SECTION 03 GROUP OVERVIEW UNITED STATES REGION P3 Introduction P91 Overview P4 Regional location P93 Location P5 Fundamental notes P94 Legal considerations P6 Corporate governance and compliance P94 Competent Persons declaration and consent P8 Group summary PLATINUM GROUP METALS P96 Introduction SECTION 02 P101 2E PGM consolidated Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Statement SOUTHERN AFRICA REGION P11 Overview OPERATIONS P13 Location P103 Stillwater and East Boulder P14 Legal considerations PROJECTS P14 Competent Persons declaration and consent P109 Altar GOLD P111 Marathon P16 Introduction P21 Gold and Uranium Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Statement SECTION 04 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
    [Show full text]
  • 1214 Final Report SF 10 03 06-CS
    AN ASSESSMENT OF SOURCES, PATHWAYS, MECHANISMS AND RISKS OF CURRENT AND POTENTIAL FUTURE POLLUTION OF WATER AND SEDIMENTS IN GOLD-MINING AREAS OF THE WONDERFONTEINSPRUIT CATCHMENT Report to the WATER RESEARCH COMMISSION Compiled by Henk Coetzee Council for Geosience Reference to the whole of the publication should read: Coetzee, H. (compiler) 2004: An assessment of sources, pathways, mechanisms and risks of current and potential future pollution of water and sediments in gold-mining areas of the Wonderfonteinspruit catchment WRC Report No 1214/1/06, Pretoria, 266 pp. Reference to chapters/sections within the publication should read (example): Wade, P., Winde, F., Coetzee, H. (2004): Risk assessment. In: Coetzee, H (compiler): An assessment of sources, pathways, mechanisms and risks of current and potential future pollution of water and sediments in gold-mining areas of the Wonderfonteinspruit catchment. WRC Report No 1214/1/06, pp 119-165 WRC Report No 1214/1/06 ISBN No 1-77005-419-7 MARCH 2006 Executive summary 1. Introduction and historical background The eastern catchment of the Mooi River, also known as the Wonderfonteinspruit, has been identified in a number of studies as the site of significant radioactive and other pollution, generally attributed to the mining and processing of uraniferous gold ores in the area. With the establishment of West Rand Consolidated in 1887 gold mining reached the Wonderfonteinspruit catchment only one year after the discovery of gold on the Witwatersrand. By 1895 five more gold mines had started operations in the (non-dolomitic) headwater region of the Wonderfonteinspruit as the westernmost part of the West Rand goldfield.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Ecosystems in South Africa: Descriptions and Maps
    Threatened Ecosystems in South Africa: Descriptions and Maps DRAFT May 2009 South African National Biodiversity Institute Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism Contents List of tables .............................................................................................................................. vii List of figures............................................................................................................................. vii 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 8 2 Criteria for identifying threatened ecosystems............................................................... 10 3 Summary of listed ecosystems ........................................................................................ 12 4 Descriptions and individual maps of threatened ecosystems ...................................... 14 4.1 Explanation of descriptions ........................................................................................................ 14 4.2 Listed threatened ecosystems ................................................................................................... 16 4.2.1 Critically Endangered (CR) ................................................................................................................ 16 1. Atlantis Sand Fynbos (FFd 4) .......................................................................................................................... 16 2. Blesbokspruit Highveld Grassland
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers of South Africa Hi Friends
    A Newsletter for Manzi’s Water Wise Club Members May 2016 Rivers of South Africa Hi Friends, This month we are exploring our rivers. We may take them for granted but they offer us great services. Rivers provide a home and food to a variety of animals. You will find lots of plants, insects, birds, freshwater animals and land animals near and in a river. You can say rivers are rich with different kinds of living things. These living things play different roles such as cleaning the river and providing food in the river for other animals. Rivers carry water and nutrients and they play an important part in the water cycle. We use rivers for water supply which we use for drinking, in our homes, watering in farms, making products in factories and generating electricity. Sailing, taking goods from one place to another and water sports such as swimming, skiing and fishing happens in most rivers. Have you ever wondered where rivers begin and end? Well friends, rivers begin high in the mountains or hills, or where a natural spring releases water from underground. They usually end by flowing into the ocean, sea or lake. The place where the river enters the ocean, sea or lake is called the mouth of the river. Usually there are lots of different living things there. Some rivers form tributaries of other rivers. A tributary is a stream or river that feeds into a larger stream or river. South Africa has the following major rivers: . Orange River (Lesotho, Free State & Northern Cape Provinces), Limpopo River (Limpopo Province), Vaal River (Mpumalanga, Gauteng, Free State & Northern Cape Provinces), Thukela River reprinted with permission withreprinted (Kwa-Zulu Natal Province), Olifants River – (Mpumalanga & Limpopo Provinces), Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bronkhorstspruit and Wilge River Conservancy Association (Gca067)
    NOTICE OF OBJECTION AND REQUEST TO BE REGISTERED AS AN INTERESTED OR AFFECTED PARTY IN RESPECT OF THE FOLLOWING EXPLORATION RIGHTS AND ENVIROMENTAL AUTHORISATION APPLICATION: NAME OF APPLICANT: Rhino Oil & Gas PASA REF: 12/3/291ER, 12/3/294, 12/3/295, 12/3/317, 12/3/318 Please note my objection to the abovementioned applications to explore for oil and gas and please register me as an interested or affected party in all applications. NAME: Jackie Nightingale EMAIL ADDRESS: [email protected] REASON FOR Environmental INTEREST: Environmental Health Community Economic ISSUES & CONCERNS: Water Climate Change I reserve my right to elaborate and/or add to these issues and concerns at a later stage. Jackie Nightingale ………………………………………………………………………………. SIGNATURE EMAIL TO: SLR Stella Moeketse [email protected] THE BRONKHORSTSPRUIT AND WILGE RIVER CONSERVANCY ASSOCIATION (GCA067) email : [email protected] contact nr : 082 442 2483 20 Sept 2016 To: The Regional Manager DMR Braamfontein [email protected] [email protected] To : Rhino Oil and Gas Exploration SA Att : SLR [email protected] [email protected] COMMENTS AND OBJECTION – 12/3/294ER - EIR AND EMP FOR AN EXPLORATION RIGHT APPLICATION FOR PETROLEUM PRODUCTS ON VARIOUS FARMS IN THE FREE STATE , MPUMALANGA, GAUTENG – Steynsrus, Frankfort, Petrus Steyn, Heilbron, Vrede,Standerton,Villiers, Oranjeville The Bronkhorstspruit and Wilge River Conservancy Ass is a constituted Association, operating in the greater catchment areas of the Bronkhorstspruit and Wilge river, with 150 concerned members. This Conservancy is affiliated to the Gauteng Conservancy Stewardship Association and The National Conservancy of SA. Although these application areas are far removed from our Conservancy borders, the impact it will have on the environment and health of all living in the said areas, and the probable impact on the wider communities around those areas, and South Africa as a whole, makes this Conservancy and all its members Interested and Affected Parties.
    [Show full text]