DOCSLIB.ORG

Compilation of Comments for Public Policy Forum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Compilation of Comments for Public Policy Forum OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY Compilation of E-Mailed Comments for Public Access Policy Forum Part 1 Compiled on February 1st 2010 I am in favor of Open Access after a reasonable time period ... so as to not disrupt current practices and divert research funding to satisfy the needs of only a few researchers that do not have immediate access thru their organization. It costs money to maintain an effective peer review system as shown by responsible society publishers ... such as the APS, ACS, RSC, etc. Dana L. Roth Millikan Library Caltech Please mandate public access for federally-funded research. The taxpayers are footing the bill, let's see what we're getting. Open access advances research and saves the time of researchers, too! -Jodi Schneider I am pleased to have an opportunity to comment: I am frustrated that research that has been funded publicly (through CDC, VA Administration, etc) is only available online by paying for the service. That means that I, as a taxpayer, are paying for the research and paying again for the benefit of reading it. This seems patently unfair. The problem for me is exacerbated by the fact that I have limited income. I am on social security disability and a VA disability compensation claim and thus my resources are very limited. I live on about $30K a year which, while adequate, is not a lot. In the course of preparing my VA claim there are many articles published by the VA or those working for the VA that can only be viewed by going to a university library collection (for which there is often a charge) or by buying a copy of the article from one of the many publication services that have found a way to make money selling the tax-funded research back to the public (who paid for it in the fist place). The price of these articles is not cheap. Often it is in excess of $20. Given that the service provided for the $20 is a few minutes access to an existing document. That prices seems excessive. 2 I would hope that some provision could be made for research funed directly by government or conducted by those on the government payroll (e.g. The VA, NIH) could be made available to taxpayers for a small reproduction or download fee. Thanks again for the opportunity to comment. John Dowd Alan I. Leshner, CEO, AAAS OSTP e-mail comment on Open access to peer reviewed pulished papers. This includes aside commentary based upon my personal experience with related issues. SEE ATTACHMENT (MicroSoft Office Word Document) Michael R. Himes [Note: No document attached] Dear Sir or Madam, We respectfully request an extension of the January 7, 2010 deadline for comment submissions. Because of the holiday season, this short time period does not allow for thoughtful responses from the society and scholarly publishers that will be affected by the proposed changes. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Nina Tristani Director of Publications American Public Health Association (APHA) Hello! I've been working with a colleague (user ID dgraves) to try and help 3 her post a comment to http://blog.ostp.gov/2009/12/10/policy-forum-on-public-access-to-federally-funded-research- implementation/, but haven't had any luck. Her post is below. She tried Safari, IE and Firefox on Mac and PC, but came up with a blank screen each time, and the post never went through. She even deleted some of the URL strings, but it still wouldn't go through. I understand she'll be emailing the post to you with a request to make public. In the meantime, would you please advise on these technical challenges? Thank you!!! Jennifer The issue of versions is an important one. While access to the final published version of an article is preferable, access to the authors’ peer-reviewed manuscript is an acceptable substitute. It should be clearly identified as such, and include a link to the final published article. Agencies should also follow the practice established by NIH and other research funders of encouraging publishers to replace the author’s peer-reviewed manuscript with the published edition if they so choose. Requiring access to the authors’ final manuscript is a common practice for research funders with public access policies. (See http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/juliet/). The practice evolved as a mechanism to protect subscriptions and balance the need for journal publishers to earn a return on their investment in the copyediting, formatting and other value-added services that they may put into the final published version. While some have raised concerns that the author’s manuscript may contain errors or omissions that are only corrected during the copyediting process, the reality is that many journal publishers already have programs that routinely provide access to the author’s manuscript on their own Web site prior to the journal’s publication. These programs have been in use for years, and frequently cite the faster time to publication as a benefit to scholarly society members as well as to the wider scientific community. Some examples of publishers in a wide variety of disciplines who do this include: The American Diabetes Association http://care.diabetesjournals.org/papbyrecent.shtml The American Geophysical Union http://www.agu.org The American Meteorological Society http://ams.allenpress.com 4 The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association http://jslhr.asha.org/papbyrecent.dtl The Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry http://www.setacjournals.org The American Physiological Society, http://www.the-aps.org/publications/articles_in_press.htm The evolution of Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) has also provided an industry-accepted standard mechanism to facilitate the identification, location, and linking of electronic articles and manuscripts, as well for components of these articles (images, graphs, etc.) , and is important to consider. ------------------------------------- Jennifer McLennan Director of Communications SPARC To the OSTP: I tried several times to post a comment on the OSTP public access blog yesterday, but was unable to do so. I saw an error note on the website when I used Internet Explorer, which I will reproduce here. Webpage error details http://blog.ostp.gov/2009/12/10/policy-forum-on-public-access-to-federally-funded-research- implementation/ Rather than continue to fight a balky web page :), I am sending my comments here. If you can post them, please do so; otherwise, please accept my input! Here it is: The issue of versions is an important one. While access to the final published version of an article is preferable, access to the authors' peer-reviewed manuscript is an acceptable substitute. It should be clearly identified as such, and include a link to the final published article. Agencies should also follow the practice established by NIH and other research funders of encouraging publishers to replace the author's peer-reviewed manuscript with the published edition if they so choose. Requiring access to the authors' final manuscript is a common practice for research funders with public access policies. (See http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/juliet/). The practice evolved as a mechanism to protect subscriptions and balance the need for journal publishers to earn a return on their investment in the copyediting, formatting and other value-added services that they may put into the final published version. 5 While some have raised concerns that the author's manuscript may contain errors or omissions that are only corrected during the copyediting process, the reality is that many journal publishers already have programs that routinely provide access to the author's manuscript on their own Web site prior to the journal's publication. These programs have been in use for years, and frequently cite the faster time to publication as a benefit to scholarly society members as well as to the wider scientific community. Some examples of publishers in a wide variety of disciplines who do this include: The American Diabetes Association http://care.diabetesjournals.org/papbyrecent.shtml The American Geophysical Union http://www.agu.org/contents/journals/ViewPapersInPress.do?journalCode=GL The American Meteorological Society http://ams.allenpress.com/perlserv/?request=get-static&name=papers_appear The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association http://jslhr.asha.org/papbyrecent.dtl The Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry http://www.setacjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-toc-aop&issn=1552-8618 The American Physiological Society, http://www.the-aps.org/publications/articles_in_press.htm The evolution of Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) has also provided an industry-accepted standard mechanism to facilitate the identification, location, and linking of electronic articles and manuscripts, as well for components of these articles (images, graphs, etc.) , and is important to consider. Diane J. Graves University Librarian and Professor Trinity University San Antonio, TX To whom it may concern, On behalf of the American Society of Agronomy, the Crop Science Society of America and the Soil Science Society of America, I am writing to request an extension of the comment period regarding access to publicly funded research. I understand that the White House Roundtable on Scholarly Publishing will issue their report the first week of January - with just a day or two between that report 6 coming out and the OSTP deadline. At minimum, scholarly publishers should have time to review this report prior to providing formative comments to OSTP with regard to public access. Additionally, the Council of Scientific Society Presidents (CSSP), of which our Societies are active participants, will be hosting a meeting of e-publishers in May, 2010 and plans to issue a report. This report has tremendous potential to provide additional valuable insights into Open Access and scholarly publishing based on the publishing activities of a wide variety of scientific societies.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MICHAEL SWETNAM ALAN MOGHISSI, Phd ALAN LESHNER, Phd HEATHER JOSEPH January 22, 2014
    SEMINAR REPORT The Economics of Open Access: International and Domestic Implications Featured Speakers MICHAEL SWETNAM ALAN MOGHISSI, PhD ALAN LESHNER, PhD HEATHER JOSEPH January 22, 2014 C IN MA ST O IT T B U O T POTOMAC INSTITUTE FOR P E POLICY STUDIES F O R G 901 N. Stuart St. Suite 200 S P IE O D Arlington, VA 22203 LICY STU The Potomac Institute for Policy Studies gratefully acknowledge par- ticipants’ contributions included in this event report. Please note that the transcript has been edited for publication. The Institute and Potomac Institute Press cannot assume responsibil- ity for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use; the view and opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Potomac Institute for Policy Studies or Potomac Institute Press. Copyright © 2014 Potomac Institute for Policy Studies 901 N. Stuart St, Suite 200 Arlington, VA, 22203 www.potomacinstitute.org Telephone: 703.525.0770; Fax: 703.525.0299 Email: [email protected] POTOMAC INSTITUTE PRESS TABLE OF CONTENTS CReST 4 AGENDA 5 OPENING REMARKS 6 INTRODUCTION 8 PANEL TRANSCRIPT 9 OPEN DISCUSSION TRANSCRIPT 19 SPEAKER BIOGRAPHIES 40 POTOMAC INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES 45 CReST The Center for Revolutionary Scientific Thought (CReST) at the Potomac Institute for Policy Studies brings together individuals from a variety of backgrounds to enable a comprehensive outlook of science and technology (S&T) futures from academic and policy perspectives. CReST intends to: 1) develop new ideas, 2) formulate strategies on how to achieve revolutionary gains in S&T, 3) provide a discussion forum to address political, ethical, legal and social issues related to S&T, and 4) inform the public and policymakers about the most pressing issues and concerns regarding the future of S&T.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Access Policies for Science and Technology Funding Ag
    Comments of the Association of Research Libraries Concerning “Public Access Policies for Science and Technology Funding Agencies across the Federal Government” Submitted to the Office of Science and Technology Policy, January 15, 2010 Summary Thank you for the opportunity to comment on “Public Access Policies for Science and Technology Funding Agencies Across the Federal Government.” Enhancing public access to federally funded research results has been and continues to be a priority for the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) and its member libraries. We very much appreciate the interest and focus of the Office of Science and Technology Policy in stimulating a public discussion regarding the benefits of enhancing public access to federally funded research. ARL supports enhanced access to federally funded research resources because such policies are integrally tied to and support the mission of higher education and scholarship. ARL believes that extending public access policies to federally funded research to other science and technology agencies will be a central component of President Obama’s transparency and open Government initiative. We fully support such an extension. ARL is an association of 124 research libraries in North America. These libraries directly serve 4.2 million students and faculty and spend $1.3 billion annually on information resources of which 45% (in 2008) is spent of electronic resources. New investments in cyber and information infrastructure are critical components to advancing science and education and spurring innovation. Reports such as the National Academies report, Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future, reflect the pressing need to ensure an environment that is conducive to enabling the United States to meet the global challenges of the 21st century.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of the News: Texas
    THE STATE OF THE NEWS: TEXAS GOOGLE’S NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE JOURNALISM INDUSTRY #SaveJournalism #SaveJournalism EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Antitrust investigators are finally focusing on the anticompetitive practices of Google. Both the Department of Justice and a coalition of attorneys general from 48 states and the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico now have the tech behemoth squarely in their sights. Yet, while Google’s dominance of the digital advertising marketplace is certainly on the agenda of investigators, it is not clear that the needs of one of the primary victims of that dominance—the journalism industry—are being considered. That must change and change quickly because Google is destroying the business model of the journalism industry. As Google has come to dominate the digital advertising marketplace, it has siphoned off advertising revenue that used to go to news publishers. The numbers are staggering. News publishers’ advertising revenue is down by nearly 50 percent over $120B the last seven years, to $14.3 billion, $100B while Google’s has nearly tripled $80B to $116.3 billion. If ad revenue for $60B news publishers declines in the $40B next seven years at the same rate $20B as the last seven, there will be $0B practically no ad revenue left and the journalism industry will likely 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 disappear along with it. The revenue crisis has forced more than 1,700 newspapers to close or merge, the end of daily news coverage in 2,000 counties across the country, and the loss of nearly 40,000 jobs in America’s newsrooms.
    [Show full text]
  • Enabling Research Through Open Access Policies
    THE SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING & ACADEMIC RESOURCES COALITION 21 Dupont Circle NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 296-2296 www.arl.org/sparc Enabling Research through Open Access Policies Heather Joseph, Executive Director SPARC Washington, DC USA The Issue • Funders invest in research with the expectation that it will result in improvements to the public good. • They increasingly recognize that dissemination is an essential component of the research process. • Research is cumulative - it advances through sharing results. The value of an investment in research is maximized only through use of its findings. www.arl.org/sparc 2 The Issue • Too often, the research results (either publicly or privately funded ) are simply not widely available to the community of potential users. • Internet provides new opportunity to bring information broader audience at virtually no marginal cost, and use it new, innovative ways. Result: Call for new framework designed to allow research results to be more easily accessed and used. www.arl.org/sparc 3 Without Open Access But Article Isn’t Available….. Usability is Key “By open access, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search or link to the full text of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software or use them for any other lawful purpose…” - The Budapest Open Access Initiative www.arl.org/sparc 6 Greater Access is a Policy Concern “Governments would boost innovation and get a better return on their investment in publicly funded research by making research findings more widely available….
    [Show full text]
  • Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020
    Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Nic Newman with Richard Fletcher, Anne Schulz, Simge Andı, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Supported by Surveyed by © Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2020 4 Contents Foreword by Rasmus Kleis Nielsen 5 3.15 Netherlands 76 Methodology 6 3.16 Norway 77 Authorship and Research Acknowledgements 7 3.17 Poland 78 3.18 Portugal 79 SECTION 1 3.19 Romania 80 Executive Summary and Key Findings by Nic Newman 9 3.20 Slovakia 81 3.21 Spain 82 SECTION 2 3.22 Sweden 83 Further Analysis and International Comparison 33 3.23 Switzerland 84 2.1 How and Why People are Paying for Online News 34 3.24 Turkey 85 2.2 The Resurgence and Importance of Email Newsletters 38 AMERICAS 2.3 How Do People Want the Media to Cover Politics? 42 3.25 United States 88 2.4 Global Turmoil in the Neighbourhood: 3.26 Argentina 89 Problems Mount for Regional and Local News 47 3.27 Brazil 90 2.5 How People Access News about Climate Change 52 3.28 Canada 91 3.29 Chile 92 SECTION 3 3.30 Mexico 93 Country and Market Data 59 ASIA PACIFIC EUROPE 3.31 Australia 96 3.01 United Kingdom 62 3.32 Hong Kong 97 3.02 Austria 63 3.33 Japan 98 3.03 Belgium 64 3.34 Malaysia 99 3.04 Bulgaria 65 3.35 Philippines 100 3.05 Croatia 66 3.36 Singapore 101 3.06 Czech Republic 67 3.37 South Korea 102 3.07 Denmark 68 3.38 Taiwan 103 3.08 Finland 69 AFRICA 3.09 France 70 3.39 Kenya 106 3.10 Germany 71 3.40 South Africa 107 3.11 Greece 72 3.12 Hungary 73 SECTION 4 3.13 Ireland 74 References and Selected Publications 109 3.14 Italy 75 4 / 5 Foreword Professor Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Director, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (RISJ) The coronavirus crisis is having a profound impact not just on Our main survey this year covered respondents in 40 markets, our health and our communities, but also on the news media.
    [Show full text]
  • Paywalls: Monetizing Online Content∗
    Paywalls: Monetizing Online Content∗ Adithya Pattabhiramaiah† S. Sriram‡ Puneet Manchanda§ Oct, 2018 ABSTRACT In recent years, many providers of news and entertainment have been exploring the possibility of monetizing online content. In the context of newspapers, the paywall instituted by the New York Times starting in March 2011 is a well-publicized case in point. While the premise behind paywalls is that the subscription revenue can potentially be a new source of income, the externalities that might arise as a consequence of this pricing change are unclear. We study two potential externalities of newspaper paywalls and compare them against the new direct subscription revenue generated. The first externality that we consider is the effect of a paywall on the engagement of its online reader base. The second externality is the spillover effect on the print version of the newspaper. If readers view print and online versions of a newspaper as substitutes, increasing the price of the latter is likely to increase the demand for the former. Moreover, many newspaper paywalls offer bundles wherein print subscribers are provided free access to the online newspaper. Therefore, the value that a reader derives from the print subscription could be higher subsequent to the erection of the paywall. As a result, paywalls are likely to have a positive spillover effect on print subscription, and consequently, circulation. We document the sizes of the two externalities for the New York Times paywall and compare them with the direct subscription revenue generated. We comment on implications for newspapers and online content providers who are seeking mechanisms to monetize digital content.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2.5% Commitment
    The 2.5% Commitment David W. Lewis Dean of the IUPUI University Library [email protected] September 11, 2017 © 2017 David W. Lewis. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license The Commitment: Every academic library should commit to contribute 2.5% of its total budget to support the common infrastructure needed to create the open scholarly commons. Academic Libraries and the Open Scholarly Commons In the end, libraries can point out the fact that their future role actually points in in two, apparently opposite, yet deeply complementary directions: on the one hand, they plunge deeply into the local production scenes since they aim at systematically sweeping, storing, preserving, and curating all that is produced in their hosting institution; at the same time, the libraries, with their sister institutions, are involved in the task of ensuring a vibrant knowledge-nurturing life for their documents: they will circulate, be discoverable, be interoperable, be evaluated, etc. With the first function, each library ensures its safe and strong function within its host institution; with the second function, the libraries connect to bring the knowledge infrastructure that we all really need. — Jean-Claude Guédon1 In the Internet era information will be free, the only question remaining is who pays for that freedom. — Kalev Leetaru2 The two quotes define one of the primary challenges academic libraries currently face. Jean- Claude Guédon in his Budapest Open Access Initiative 15 Statement nicely describes the world that needs to be created, what Locan Dempsey nicely framed as moving form an “Outside-In” strategy to an “Inside-Out” strategy.3 What we, as the academic library community, want to create is an open scholarly commons that will be digital and distributed with colleges, universities, cultural heritage organizations, scholarly societies, foundations, and governments hosting the content created, funded, or of interest to them in repositories that would make the content openly available to the world.
    [Show full text]
  • “Best of Quora 2010-2012”
    Best of Quora 2010–2012 © 2012 Quora, Inc. The content in this book was selected by Marc Bodnick, John Clover, Kat Li, Alecia Morgan, and Alex Wu from answers written on Quora between 2010 and 2012. This book was copyedited by Kat Li and Alecia Morgan. This book was designed by David Cole and Tag Savage. www.quora.com CONTENTS food 13 Why is it safe to eat the mold in bleu cheese? 16 How do supermarkets dispose of expired food? 19 If there were ten commandments in cooking what would they be? 20 Why do American winemakers produce mostly varietals, while French winemakers produce blends? 21 Why are the chocolate chips in chocolate chip ice cream gener- ally “chocolate-flavored chips”? education 25 What is one thing that you regret learning in medical school? 27 How does a star engineering high school student choose amongst MIT, Caltech, Stanford, and Harvard? 29 Are general requirements in college a waste of time? international 33 Is Iraq a safer place now compared to what it was like during Saddam Hussein's regime? 36 Is Islam misogynistic? 39 Do the Chinese people currently consider Mao Zedong to be evil or a hero? 40 Why do so many Chinese learners seem to hate Dashan (Mark Rowswell)? 49 How do Indians feel when they go back to live in India after living in US for 5+ years? 55 Is it safe for a single American woman to travel in India? 58 If developing countries are growing faster than developed countries, why wouldn't you invest most of your money there? 60 What is it like to visit North Korea? 65 What are some common stereotypes about
    [Show full text]
  • PMC Canada, UK PMC & Pubmed Central Why Pubmed Central Canada?
    PubMed Central Canada & Faculty Perspectives: Open Access to Health Research at York University Rajiv Nariani Science Librarian, York University Libraries CLA 2012 National Conference 1st June 2012 [email protected] PMC Canada, UK PMC & PubMed Central Why PubMed Central Canada? • Question: How do we strengthen PMC Canada? – How can it be unique? – Users perspectives about this online archival repository of published, peer-reviewed health and life sciences research publications • UK PMC & PubMed Central: Guides Timelines: PMC, UK PMC, PMCC National Institute of Health Research, UK PMCC (officially) PMCC NIH NIH (Voluntary) UKPMC - PubMed Central Classic (Mandatory) UK PMC (current) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Wellcome Trust CIHR Cancer Research, UK British Heart Foundation, Arthritis Research Campaign Launched 28th April 2010 CIHR Policy on Open Access to Research Compliance to CIHR Policy on OA Know your Journal! - Is the journal open access? DOAJ, PMC Journal list Address Copyright - Does the journal permit archiving? See (e.g. CARL Author SHERPA/RoMEO database Addendum) --------------------------------- - Notify publisher of CIHR policy - Amend agreement and retain rights Deposit in Open Access Archive Publish in an OA Journal - Fees are an eligible - PMCC expense - Institutional Repository http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/docs/PMCC_tutorial_ppt.pdf Journal List: CIHR Policy Compliance http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/journals/ Promoting PMC Canada launch at YUL CIHR funding & York University CIHR publications:
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 and the Information Space Boosting the Democratic Response
    January 2021 | GLOBAL INSIGHTS COVID-19 and the Information Space Boosting the Democratic Response EDITED BY Dean Jackson FEATURING ESSAYS BY Dean Jackson Dapo Olorunyomi Vladimir Rouvinski Andrea Kendall-Taylor Will Moy Joan Donovan Renée DiResta Mallory Knodel COVID-19 and the Information Space: Boosting the Democratic Response Table of Contents Key Insights ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 “Sickness and Health in the Information Space: Reflections from the First 10 Months of COVID-19” by Dean Jackson ............................................................................ 5 “Surviving the Pandemic: The Struggle for Media Sustainability in Africa” by Dapo Olorunyomi ....................................................................................................................................................................... 11 “Authoritarian Disinformation: A COVID Test for Latin America’s Information Space” by Vladimir Rouvinski ............................................................................................................................... 17 “Mendacious Mixture: The Growing Convergence of Russian and Chinese Information Operations” by Andrea Kendall-Taylor ............................................................................................ 22 “Scaling Up the Truth: Fact-Checking Innovations and the Pandemic” by Will Moy .........................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Open Access to Research Outputs Policy
    Athabasca University Policy Open Access to Research Outputs Policy Policy Sponsor: Provost and Vice-President Academic Policy Contact: Manager, Research Services Policy Number: N/A Effective Date: June 13, 2014 Approval Group: Governors of Athabasca University Approval Date: June 13, 2014, Motion # 190-05 Review Date: Annual Procedure: Open Access to Research Outputs Procedures Purpose To promote the diffusion of research by making research outputs accessible to the widest possible audience and at the earliest possible opportunity. Definitions Digital repository A virtual space wherein digital materials are deposited and preserved for future use. Open Access Available to the user, via the Internet without restriction and without charge. Researcher Anyone who conducts research activities. Includes, but is not limited to, academics, tutors, undergraduate and graduate students, post-doctoral fellows and other personnel involved directly or indirectly in research, including, but not limited to research assistants/associates, technical and support staff, adjunct professors, visiting professors, and institutional administrators. June 8, 2020 Page 1 of 3 Research outputs Include, but are not limited to, full-text publications and research data. Sponsor An external entity that enters into a written agreement with AU to provide financial or other support for research activities. Policy Statements 1. As a publicly funded institution, Athabasca University (AU) supports open access to research outputs. 2. Researchers are encouraged to make the results of their research permanently accessible online, through peer-reviewed open access journals, monographs or textbooks, or through institutional digital repositories or archival systems. 3. Researchers are obliged to comply with the open access publication policy of their research sponsor(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Heather Joseph, Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC) U.S
    ISBN: 978-9920-36-568-0 Dépôt légal: 2018MO4831 Open Access to Science: Foundations, Issues and Dynamics حرية النفاذ إلى العلم: اﻷسس والرهانات والديناميكيات Libre Accès à la Science : fondements, enjeux et dynamiques Publication de la 1ère version de l’E-book : Novembre 2018 Publication de la version complétée de l’E-book : Octobre 2019 Publication de la version papier : Décembre 2019 Les opinions exprimées dans la série n’engagent que leurs auteurs. La série est protégée par la licence Creative Commons BY-NC-SA : - Toute reproduction ou traduction, même partielle, de l’œuvre ou de l’une de ses composantes, est conditionnée par la citation de la source et de(s)nom(s)d’auteur(s) [BY] ; - Aucun profit commercial ne peut en être tiré sans autorisation des responsables de l’édition [NC] ; - Tout partage devrait être fait à l’identique [SA]. Information and Communication Sciences E-book Series Editrice Nozha Ibnlkhayat ISBN : 978-9920-36-568-0 Dépôt légal : 2018MO4831 Information and Communication Sciences: E-book Series 3rd International Colloquium on Open Access Open Access to science: Foundations, Issues and Dynamics Le libre accès à la science : Fondements, enjeux et dynamiques Rabat, 28-30 Novembre 2018 Organisateurs Coordinateurs Nozha Ibnlkhayat Wahid Gdoura Editrice : Nozha Ibnlkhayat Editeurs associés : Ahmed Abdelilah Bachr Adnane Benchakroun Ounsa Roudiès Comité scientifique 3e Colloque International sur le Libre Accès « icoa2018» Abdallaoui Maan Najia, ESI, Maroc GamouhNadjia, UC2, Algérie Al Ghamidi Saad, URS, Arabie Saoudite Gdoura Wahid, ISD, UM, Tunisie AmrousNaila, ESI, Maroc Ghaouti Loubna, UL, Canada Anwar Adil, EMI, UM5R, Maroc Guédon Jean Claude, UM, Canada Bachr Ahmed Abdelilah,ESI, Maroc Heather Joseph, Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC) U.S.
    [Show full text]