From the Evasion of Degradation to Ubiquitin-Dependent Protein Stabilization

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

From the Evasion of Degradation to Ubiquitin-Dependent Protein Stabilization cells Review From the Evasion of Degradation to Ubiquitin-Dependent Protein Stabilization Yamen Abu Ahmad † , Avital Oknin-Vaisman † , Eliya Bitman-Lotan † and Amir Orian * Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, R-TICC, Technion-IIT, Efron St. Bat-Galim, Haifa 3109610, Israel; [email protected] (Y.A.A.); [email protected] (A.O.-V.); [email protected] (E.B.-L.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +972-547558047 † These authors contributed to this work equally. Abstract: A hallmark of cancer is dysregulated protein turnover (proteostasis), which involves pathologic ubiquitin-dependent degradation of tumor suppressor proteins, as well as increased oncoprotein stabilization. The latter is due, in part, to mutation within sequences, termed degrons, which are required for oncoprotein recognition by the substrate-recognition enzyme, E3 ubiquitin ligase. Stabilization may also result from the inactivation of the enzymatic machinery that mediates the degradation of oncoproteins. Importantly, inactivation in cancer of E3 enzymes that regulates the physiological degradation of oncoproteins, results in tumor cells that accumulate multiple active oncoproteins with prolonged half-lives, leading to the development of “degradation-resistant” cancer cells. In addition, specific sequences may enable ubiquitinated proteins to evade degradation at the 26S proteasome. While the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway was originally discovered as central for protein degradation, in cancer cells a ubiquitin-dependent protein stabilization pathway actively translates transient mitogenic signals into long-lasting protein stabilization and enhances the activity of key oncoproteins. A central enzyme in this pathway is the ubiquitin ligase RNF4. An intimate Citation: Abu Ahmad, Y.; Oknin-Vaisman, A.; Bitman-Lotan, E.; link connects protein stabilization with tumorigenesis in experimental models as well as in the clinic, Orian, A. From the Evasion of suggesting that pharmacological inhibition of protein stabilization has potential for personalized Degradation to Ubiquitin-Dependent medicine in cancer. In this review, we highlight old observations and recent advances in our Protein Stabilization. Cells 2021, 10, knowledge regarding protein stabilization. 2374. https://doi.org/10.3390/ cells10092374 Keywords: ubiquitin; proteasome; degron; heterotypic-Ub chains; E3 ubiquitin ligases; degradation; protein-stabilization; degradation-resistant tumors; RNF4; STUbL; oncoproteins; cancer Academic Editor: Francois-Michel Boisvert Received: 11 August 2021 1. Overview Accepted: 4 September 2021 Published: 9 September 2021 The dynamic stability of proteins, which is a fundamental concept in biology, was discovered by Rudolph Schonheimer [1]. It is, however, well known that proteomes exhibit Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral a wide range of protein half-lives [2]. While some intracellular proteins are extremely with regard to jurisdictional claims in long-lived (LLPs; [3]), many regulatory proteins degrade rapidly, exhibiting a half-life of published maps and institutional affil- only minutes. In this study, we relate to protein abundance/stabilization and to changes in iations. protein half-life that are determined by regulated degradation rather than by the biophys- ical structural properties of the protein. A central system that mediates ATP-dependent degradation of proteins is the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS; [4–6]). The degradation rate of a given protein is not, however, fixed; it is physiologically dynamic and dramatically affected by post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation, hydroxylation, acety- Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. lation, SUMOylation, and methylation, that may directly effects degrons [7]. For example, κ α This article is an open access article upon immune challenge, signal-induced phosphorylation of the inhibitory protein, I B , distributed under the terms and converts the extremely stable protein into a rapidly degraded phospho-protein, enabling conditions of the Creative Commons immune response [8,9]. Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// Protein stability depends on intrinsic structures within the targeted proteins, called creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ degrons, as well as on enzymes that mediate the ubiquitination of the protein substrate. 4.0/). A recent systemic analysis of primary tumors established that stabilizing mutations in Cells 2021, 10, 2374. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10092374 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/cells CellsCells2021 2021, 10, ,10 2374, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of2 17 of 16 degronsA recent and systemic inactivating analysis mutations of primary in ubiquitin tumors established ligases (E3), that which stabilizing mediate mutation the recognitions in ofdegrons such degrons, and inactivating are driving mutations events in tumorigenesisubiquitin ligases [10 (E3),]. Active which stabilization, mediate the recogni- or limited proteolysis,tion of such also degrons, depends are driving on the type events of ubiquitinin tumorigenesis chains catalyzed [10]. Active on stabilization, the protein substrates. or lim- Inited addition, proteolysis, a ubiquitin-dependent also depends on proteinthe type stabilization of ubiquitin pathway chains catalyzed actively stabilizes on the protein proteins insubstrates. cancer. This In addition, pathway isa ubiquitin-dependent situated upstream to protein and independent stabilization of thepathway machinery actively involved sta- inbilizes their proteins degradation. in cancer. A central This pathway enzyme inis thissituated pathway upstream is the to ubiquitin and independent ligase RNF4 of the [11 ]. Inmachinery this review, involved we address in their several degradation. aspects A of cent proteinral enzyme stabilization. in this First,pathway we discussis the ubiqui- cases of proteintin ligase stabilization RNF4 [11]. that In this result review, from we mutations address in several degrons aspects or inactivation of protein ofstabilization. the enzymes thatFirst, mediate we discuss the cases degradation of protein of stabilization these proteins. that Second,result from we mutati focusons on casesin degrons of protein or stabilizationinactivation of that the stem enzymes from that active mediate ubiquitin-dependent the degradation of protein these proteins. stabilization, Second, which we is highlyfocus on relevant cases of to protein cancer (Figurestabilization1). that stem from active ubiquitin-dependent protein stabilization, which is highly relevant to cancer (Figure 1). FigureFigure 1. 1.Mechanisms Mechanisms of of protein protein stabilization. stabilization. Schematic Schematic diagram diagram for for mechanisms mechanisms resulting resulting in in protein protein stabilization stabilization that that are are discussed in this review, see text for details. discussed in this review, see text for details. 2. Evading Recognition I: Protein Stabilization Due to Lacking or Mutated Degrada- 2. Evading Recognition I: Protein Stabilization Due to Lacking or Mutated Degradationtion Signals Signals DegronsDegrons areare shortshort amino-acid sequences sequences that that determine determine the the stability stability of ofproteins. proteins. They They areare divided divided accordingaccording to their position position on on th thee protein protein substrate substrate to to N-terminal, N-terminal, C-terminal, C-terminal, andand internalinternal degrons.degrons. The biochemical nature nature of of the the N- N- and and C-terminal C-terminal degrons degrons and and the the enzymaticenzymatic pathways pathways dedicateddedicated to the the recognitio recognitionn thereof thereof are are discussed discussed in in detail detail in ina recent a recent reviewreview by by Varshavsky Varshavsky [12 [12],], who who also also discovered discovered the the contribution contribution ofof N-terminalN-terminal degronsdegrons to proteinto protein stability stability in 1986in 1986 [13 [13].]. InternalInternal degronsdegrons serve as recognition recognition motifs motifs for for the the diverse diverse group group of of E3 E3 ubiquitin ubiquitin ligasesligases [[14].14]. Internal Internal degrons degrons were were initially initially thought thought to mediate to mediate only the only docking the docking and phys- and physicalical interaction interaction between between the substrate the substrate and the and E3 theubiquitin E3 ubiquitin ligases ligasesthat catalyze that catalyze their ubiq- their ubiquitinationuitination and andsubsequent subsequent degra degradation.dation. However, However, it is now it is clear now that clear these that motifs these motifsalso contain sequences that enable stabilizing signals [15–17]. Among the first degrons to be also contain sequences that enable stabilizing signals [15–17]. Among the first degrons to identified was the Delta motif, a stretch of 27 amino acids that is present in the c-Jun proto- be identified was the Delta motif, a stretch of 27 amino acids that is present in the c-Jun oncogene and is required for its ubiquitin-dependent degradation. This motif is not pre- proto-oncogene and is required for its ubiquitin-dependent degradation. This motif is not sent in v-Jun, the oncogenic viral protein, or in its closely related JunD, which exhibits a present in v-Jun, the oncogenic viral protein, or in its closely related JunD, which exhibits a longer half-life [18,19]. longer half-life [18,19]. Another example of a short recognition motif is a motif present in P53 tumor sup- Another example
Recommended publications
  • ONCOGENOMICS Through the Use of Chemotherapeutic Agents
    Oncogene (2002) 21, 7749 – 7763 ª 2002 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0950 – 9232/02 $25.00 www.nature.com/onc Expression profiling of primary non-small cell lung cancer for target identification Jim Heighway*,1, Teresa Knapp1, Lenetta Boyce1, Shelley Brennand1, John K Field1, Daniel C Betticher2, Daniel Ratschiller2, Mathias Gugger2, Michael Donovan3, Amy Lasek3 and Paula Rickert*,3 1Target Identification Group, Roy Castle International Centre for Lung Cancer Research, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool L3 9TA, UK; 2Institute of Medical Oncology, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland; 3Incyte Genomics Inc., 3160 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, California, CA 94304, USA Using a panel of cDNA microarrays comprising 47 650 Introduction transcript elements, we have carried out a dual-channel analysis of gene expression in 39 resected primary The lack of generally effective therapies for lung cancer human non-small cell lung tumours versus normal lung leads to the high mortality rate associated with this tissue. Whilst *11 000 elements were scored as common disease. Recorded 5-year survival figures vary, differentially expressed at least twofold in at least one to some extent perhaps reflecting differences in sample, 96 transcripts were scored as over-represented ascertainment methods, but across Europe are approxi- fourfold or more in at least seven out of 39 tumours mately 10% (Bray et al., 2002). Whilst surgery is an and 30 sequences 16-fold in at least two out of 39 effective strategy for the treatment of localized lesions, tumours, including 24 transcripts in common. Tran- most patients present with overtly or covertly dissemi- scripts (178) were found under-represented fourfold in nated disease.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Supporting Information for a Microrna Network Regulates
    Supporting Information for A microRNA Network Regulates Expression and Biosynthesis of CFTR and CFTR-ΔF508 Shyam Ramachandrana,b, Philip H. Karpc, Peng Jiangc, Lynda S. Ostedgaardc, Amy E. Walza, John T. Fishere, Shaf Keshavjeeh, Kim A. Lennoxi, Ashley M. Jacobii, Scott D. Rosei, Mark A. Behlkei, Michael J. Welshb,c,d,g, Yi Xingb,c,f, Paul B. McCray Jr.a,b,c Author Affiliations: Department of Pediatricsa, Interdisciplinary Program in Geneticsb, Departments of Internal Medicinec, Molecular Physiology and Biophysicsd, Anatomy and Cell Biologye, Biomedical Engineeringf, Howard Hughes Medical Instituteg, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA-52242 Division of Thoracic Surgeryh, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada-M5G 2C4 Integrated DNA Technologiesi, Coralville, IA-52241 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Email: [email protected] (M.J.W.); yi- [email protected] (Y.X.); Email: [email protected] (P.B.M.) This PDF file includes: Materials and Methods References Fig. S1. miR-138 regulates SIN3A in a dose-dependent and site-specific manner. Fig. S2. miR-138 regulates endogenous SIN3A protein expression. Fig. S3. miR-138 regulates endogenous CFTR protein expression in Calu-3 cells. Fig. S4. miR-138 regulates endogenous CFTR protein expression in primary human airway epithelia. Fig. S5. miR-138 regulates CFTR expression in HeLa cells. Fig. S6. miR-138 regulates CFTR expression in HEK293T cells. Fig. S7. HeLa cells exhibit CFTR channel activity. Fig. S8. miR-138 improves CFTR processing. Fig. S9. miR-138 improves CFTR-ΔF508 processing. Fig. S10. SIN3A inhibition yields partial rescue of Cl- transport in CF epithelia.
    [Show full text]
  • An Essential Mediator of Trichostatin A-Induced Tumor-Selective Killing in Human Cancer Cells
    Cell Death and Differentiation (2010) 17, 109–118 & 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1350-9047/10 $32.00 www.nature.com/cdd Ubiquitin B: an essential mediator of trichostatin A-induced tumor-selective killing in human cancer cells PWu1,2, Y Tian1,2, G Chen1, B Wang1, L Gui1,LXi1,XMa1, Y Fang1, T Zhu1, D Wang1, L Meng1,GXu1, S Wang1, D Ma*,1 and J Zhou*,1 Although histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) are emerging as a new class of anticancer agents, the mechanism of tumor- selective killing by HDACi is not well understood. We used suppression of mortality by antisense rescue technique (SMART) to screen the key genes responsible for the tumor-selective killing by trichostatin A (TSA). Twenty-four genes were identified, the most significant of which was ubiquitin B (UbB). The expression of UbB was selectively upregulated by TSA in tumor cells, but not non-malignant cells. Further observation indicated that TSA induced a substantial dissipation of mitochondrial transmembrane potential, release of cytochrome c into the cytosol, and proteolytic cleavage of caspases-3/9 in HeLa cells, which was apparently mediated by ubiquitylation and the subsequent degradation of mitochondrial membrane proteins including BCL-2 and MCL-1. In contrast, knockdown of UbB expression inhibited the TSA-induced apoptotic cascade by abolishing TSA-induced ubiquitylation and the subsequent degradation of mitochondrial membrane proteins. Furthermore, apicidine, another HDACi, exhibited activity similar to that of TSA. Interestingly, TSA induced UbB-dependent proteasomal degradation of BCR–ABL fusion protein in K562 leukemic cells. Thus, our findings highlight the essential role of UbB and UbB- dependent proteasomal protein degradation in HDACi-induced tumor selectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2. Significantly Differentially Regulated Genes in Term Compared with Second Trimester Amniotic Fluid Supernatant
    Appendix 2. Significantly Differentially Regulated Genes in Term Compared With Second Trimester Amniotic Fluid Supernatant Fold Change in term vs second trimester Amniotic Affymetrix Duplicate Fluid Probe ID probes Symbol Entrez Gene Name 1019.9 217059_at D MUC7 mucin 7, secreted 424.5 211735_x_at D SFTPC surfactant protein C 416.2 206835_at STATH statherin 363.4 214387_x_at D SFTPC surfactant protein C 295.5 205982_x_at D SFTPC surfactant protein C 288.7 1553454_at RPTN repetin solute carrier family 34 (sodium 251.3 204124_at SLC34A2 phosphate), member 2 238.9 206786_at HTN3 histatin 3 161.5 220191_at GKN1 gastrokine 1 152.7 223678_s_at D SFTPA2 surfactant protein A2 130.9 207430_s_at D MSMB microseminoprotein, beta- 99.0 214199_at SFTPD surfactant protein D major histocompatibility complex, class II, 96.5 210982_s_at D HLA-DRA DR alpha 96.5 221133_s_at D CLDN18 claudin 18 94.4 238222_at GKN2 gastrokine 2 93.7 1557961_s_at D LOC100127983 uncharacterized LOC100127983 93.1 229584_at LRRK2 leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 HOXD cluster antisense RNA 1 (non- 88.6 242042_s_at D HOXD-AS1 protein coding) 86.0 205569_at LAMP3 lysosomal-associated membrane protein 3 85.4 232698_at BPIFB2 BPI fold containing family B, member 2 84.4 205979_at SCGB2A1 secretoglobin, family 2A, member 1 84.3 230469_at RTKN2 rhotekin 2 82.2 204130_at HSD11B2 hydroxysteroid (11-beta) dehydrogenase 2 81.9 222242_s_at KLK5 kallikrein-related peptidase 5 77.0 237281_at AKAP14 A kinase (PRKA) anchor protein 14 76.7 1553602_at MUCL1 mucin-like 1 76.3 216359_at D MUC7 mucin 7,
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanisms of Up-Regulation of Ubiquitin-Proteasome Activity in The
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.23.003053; this version posted March 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Mechanisms of up-regulation of Ubiquitin-Proteasome activity in the absence of NatA dependent N-terminal acetylation Ilia Kats1,2, Marc Kschonsak1,3, Anton Khmelinskii4, Laura Armbruster1,5, Thomas Ruppert1 and Michael Knop1,6,* 1 Zentrum für Molekulare Biologie der Universität Heidelberg (ZMBH), DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, Im Neuenheimer Feld 282, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. 2 present address: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany 3 present address: Department of Structural Biology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA. 4 Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Ackermannweg 4, 55128 Mainz, Germany. 5 present address: Centre for Organismal Studies (COS), Im Neuenheimer Feld 360, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany 6 Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. * corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract N-terminal acetylation is a prominent protein modification and inactivation of N-terminal acetyltransferases (NATs) cause protein homeostasis stress. Using multiplexed protein stability (MPS) profiling with linear ubiquitin fusions as reporters for the activity of the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) we observed increased UPS activity in NatA, but not NatB or NatC mutants. We find several mechanisms contributing to this behavior. First, NatA-mediated acetylation of the N-terminal ubiquitin independent degron regulates the abundance of Rpn4, the master regulator of the expression of proteasomal genes.
    [Show full text]
  • UBE3B Is a Mitochondria-Associated E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Whose Activity Is Modulated by Its Interaction with Calmodulin to Respond to Oxidative Stress
    UBE3B is a mitochondria-associated E3 ubiquitin ligase whose activity is modulated by its interaction with Calmodulin to respond to oxidative stress by Andrea Catherine Braganza B.S. Biotechnology, Rochester Institute of Technology, 2008 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2015 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE-MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY This dissertation was presented by Andrea Catherine Braganza It was defended on August 21st, 2015 and approved by Chairperson: Sruti Shiva, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology Bruce Freeman, Ph.D., Professor and Chair, Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology Jing Hu, M.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology Jeffrey Brodsky, Ph.D., Professor, Department of Biological Sciences Sarah Berman, M.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Department of Neurology Dissertation Advisor: Robert W. Sobol, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology ii Copyright © by Andrea Catherine Braganza 2015 iii UBE3B is a mitochondria-associated E3 ubiquitin ligase whose activity is modulated by its interaction with Calmodulin to respond to oxidative stress Andrea Catherine Braganza, Ph.D. University of Pittsburgh, 2015 Recent genome-wide studies found that patients with hypotonia, developmental delay, intellectual disability, congenital anomalies, characteristic facial dysmorphic features, and low cholesterol levels suffer from Kaufman oculocerebrofacial syndrome (also reported as blepharophimosis-ptosis-intellectual disability syndrome). The primary cause of Kaufman oculocerebrofacial syndrome (KOS) is autosomal recessive mutations in the gene UBE3B. However, to date, there are no studies that determine the cellular or enzymatic function of UBE3B.
    [Show full text]
  • Genomic Portrait of a Sporadic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Case in a Large Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1 Family
    Journal of Personalized Medicine Article Genomic Portrait of a Sporadic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Case in a Large Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1 Family Giovanna Morello 1,2, Giulia Gentile 1 , Rossella Spataro 3, Antonio Gianmaria Spampinato 1,4, 1 2 3 5, , Maria Guarnaccia , Salvatore Salomone , Vincenzo La Bella , Francesca Luisa Conforti * y 1, , and Sebastiano Cavallaro * y 1 Institute for Research and Biomedical Innovation (IRIB), Italian National Research Council (CNR), Via Paolo Gaifami, 18, 95125 Catania, Italy; [email protected] (G.M.); [email protected] (G.G.); [email protected] (A.G.S.); [email protected] (M.G.) 2 Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Pharmacology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy; [email protected] 3 ALS Clinical Research Center and Neurochemistry Laboratory, BioNeC, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy; [email protected] (R.S.); [email protected] (V.L.B.) 4 Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy 5 Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, Arcavacata di Rende, 87036 Rende, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] (F.L.C.); [email protected] (S.C.); Tel.: +39-0984-496204 (F.L.C.); +39-095-7338111 (S.C.); Fax: +39-0984-496203 (F.L.C.); +39-095-7338110 (S.C.) F.L.C. and S.C. are co-last authors on this work. y Received: 6 November 2020; Accepted: 30 November 2020; Published: 2 December 2020 Abstract: Background: Repeat expansions in the spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 (SCA1) gene ATXN1 increases the risk for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), supporting a relationship between these disorders.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-UBB Monoclonal Antibody, Clone WV-2 (DCABH-2016) This Product Is for Research Use Only and Is Not Intended for Diagnostic Use
    Anti-UBB monoclonal antibody, clone WV-2 (DCABH-2016) This product is for research use only and is not intended for diagnostic use. PRODUCT INFORMATION Product Overview Mouse monoclonal to Ubiquitin Antigen Description Function: Ubiquitin exists either covalently attached to another protein, or free (unanchored). When covalently bound, it is conjugated to target proteins via an isopeptide bond either as a monomer (monoubiquitin), a polymer linked via different Lys residues of the ubiquitin (polyubiquitin chains) or a linear polymer linked via the initiator Met of the ubiquitin (linear polyubiquitin chains). Polyubiquitin chains, when attached to a target protein, have different functions depending on the Lys residue of the ubiquitin that is linked: Lys-6-linked may be involved in DNA repair; Lys-11-linked is involved in ERAD (endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation) and in cell-cycle regulation; Lys-29-linked is involved in lysosomal degradation; Lys- 33-linked is involved in kinase modification; Lys-48-linked is involved in protein degradation via the proteasome; Lys-63-linked is involved in endocytosis, DNA-damage responses as well as in signaling processes leading to activation of the transcription factor NF-kappa-B. Linear polymer chains formed via attachment by the initiator Met lead to cell signaling. Ubiquitin is usually conjugated to Lys residues of target proteins, however, in rare cases, conjugation to Cys or Ser residues has been observed. When polyubiquitin is free (unanchored-polyubiquitin), it also has distinct roles, such as in activation of protein kinases, and in signaling. Similarity: Belongs to the ubiquitin family. Contains 3 ubiquitin-like domains. Immunogen Ubiquitin conjugated to BSA Isotype IgG1 Source/Host Mouse Species Reactivity Human Clone WV-2 Purity Protein A purified Purification Purity is >or = 90%.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ubiquitin Gene Expression Pattern and Sensitivity to UBB and UBC Knockdown Differentiate Primary 23132/87 and Metastatic MKN45 Gastric Cancer Cells
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article The Ubiquitin Gene Expression Pattern and Sensitivity to UBB and UBC Knockdown Differentiate Primary 23132/87 and Metastatic MKN45 Gastric Cancer Cells Emanuele Salvatore Scarpa *, Filippo Tasini, Rita Crinelli, Chiara Ceccarini, Mauro Magnani y and Marzia Bianchi y Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, 61029 Urbino (PU), Italy; [email protected] (F.T.); [email protected] (R.C.); [email protected] (C.C.); [email protected] (M.M.); [email protected] (M.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0722-305252 These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 9 July 2020; Accepted: 27 July 2020; Published: 30 July 2020 Abstract: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common and lethal cancers. Alterations in the ubiquitin (Ub) system play key roles in the carcinogenetic process and in metastasis development. Overexpression of transcription factors YY1, HSF1 and SP1, known to regulate Ub gene expression, is a predictor of poor prognosis and shorter survival in several cancers. In this study, we compared a primary (23132/87) and a metastatic (MKN45) GC cell line. We found a statistically significant higher expression of three out of four Ub coding genes, UBC, UBB and RPS27A, in MKN45 compared to 23132/87. However, while the total Ub protein content and the distribution of Ub between the conjugated and free pools were similar in these two GC cell lines, the proteasome activity was higher in MKN45. Ub gene expression was not affected upon YY1, HSF1 or SP1 small interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection, in both 23132/87 and MKN45 cell lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Recurrent Ubiquitin B Silencing in Gynecological Cancers Establishes Dependence on Ubiquitin C
    Recurrent ubiquitin B silencing in gynecological cancers establishes dependence on ubiquitin C Alexia T. Kedves, … , Michael S. Goldberg, William C. Forrester J Clin Invest. 2017;127(12):4554-4568. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI92914. Research Article Genetics Oncology Transcriptional repression of ubiquitin B (UBB) is a cancer-subtype-specific alteration that occurs in a substantial population of patients with cancers of the female reproductive tract. UBB is 1 of 2 genes encoding for ubiquitin as a polyprotein consisting of multiple copies of ubiquitin monomers. Silencing of UBB reduces cellular UBB levels and results in an exquisite dependence on ubiquitin C (UBC), the second polyubiquitin gene. UBB is repressed in approximately 30% of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) patients and is a recurrent lesion in uterine carcinosarcoma and endometrial carcinoma. We identified ovarian tumor cell lines that retain UBB in a repressed state, used these cell lines to establish orthotopic ovarian tumors, and found that inducible expression of a UBC-targeting shRNA led to tumor regression, and substantial long-term survival benefit. Thus, we describe a recurrent cancer-specific lesion at the level of ubiquitin production. Moreover, these observations reveal the prognostic value of UBB repression and establish UBC as a promising therapeutic target for ovarian cancer patients with recurrent UBB silencing. Find the latest version: https://jci.me/92914/pdf RESEARCH ARTICLE The Journal of Clinical Investigation Recurrent ubiquitin B silencing in gynecological cancers establishes dependence on ubiquitin C Alexia T. Kedves,1 Scott Gleim,1 Xiaoyou Liang,1 Dennis M. Bonal,2 Frederic Sigoillot,1 Fred Harbinski,1 Sneha Sanghavi,3 Christina Benander,1 Elizabeth George,1 Prafulla C.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Molecule Inhibitors Confirm Ubiquitin-Dependent Removal of TOP2-DNA Covalent Complexes1
    Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward. Published on June 25, 2020 as DOI: 10.1124/mol.119.118893 This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. 118893 Small molecule inhibitors confirm ubiquitin-dependent removal of TOP2-DNA covalent complexes1 Rebecca L. Swan, Luke L.K. Poh, Ian G. Cowell* and Caroline A. Austin* Newcastle University Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne. NE2 4HH. U.K. (R.L.S., L.L.K.P., I.G.C. & C.A.A.) Downloaded from molpharm.aspetjournals.org at ASPET Journals on October 5, 2021 1This study was supported by Bloodwise [Research Specialist Program Grant No. 12031 and Gordon Piller Studentship 13063]. 1 Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward. Published on June 25, 2020 as DOI: 10.1124/mol.119.118893 This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. 118893 Running title: Ubiquitination is required for TOP2-DNA complex removal Corresponding authors To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dr Ian G. Cowell and Professor Caroline A. Austin Newcastle University Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne. NE2 4HH. United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)191 208 7677 Fax: +44 (0)191 208 7424 Downloaded from Email: [email protected], [email protected] Manuscript information molpharm.aspetjournals.org 36 text pages including references and Figure legends 6 figures 0 tables 54 number of references 193 words in abstract at ASPET Journals on October 5, 2021 932 words in Introduction 1101 words in Discussion Non-standard abbreviations DMSO, Dimethyl sulfoxide; DSB, DNA double-strand break; UAE, ubiquitin activating enzyme, SAE, SUMO activating enzyme; H2AX, histone H2A.X; γH2AX, S-139 phospho-histone H2A.X; TOP2A, DNA Topoisomerase IIα; TOP2B, DNA topoisomerase IIβ; TOP2, DNA topoisomerase 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-UBB Monoclonal Antibody, Clone 4D23 (DCABH-13888) This Product Is for Research Use Only and Is Not Intended for Diagnostic Use
    Anti-UBB monoclonal antibody, clone 4D23 (DCABH-13888) This product is for research use only and is not intended for diagnostic use. PRODUCT INFORMATION Antigen Description This gene encodes ubiquitin, one of the most conserved proteins known. Ubiquitin is required for ATP-dependent, nonlysosomal intracellular protein degradation of abnormal proteins and normal proteins with a rapid turnover. Ubiquitin is covalently bound to proteins to be degraded, and presumably labels these proteins for degradation. Ubiquitin also binds to histone H2A in actively transcribed regions but does not cause histone H2A degradation, suggesting that ubiquitin is also involved in regulation of gene expression. This gene consists of three direct repeats of the ubiquitin coding sequence with no spacer sequence. Consequently, the protein is expressed as a polyubiquitin precursor with a final amino acid after the last repeat. Aberrant form of this protein has been noticed in patients with Alzheimers and Down syndrome. Immunogen Recombinant protein corresponding to human UBB. Isotype IgG1 Source/Host Mouse Species Reactivity Human Clone 4D23 Conjugate Unconjugated Applications Western Blot (Cell lysate); Western Blot (Recombinant protein); ELISA; Flow Cytometry Format Liquid Size 1 ea Buffer In PBS (0.5% protein stabilizer, 0.05% sodium azide) Preservative 0.05% Sodium Azide Storage Store at 4°C. For long term storage store at -20°C.Aliquot to avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Warnings This product contains sodium azide: a POISONOUS AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE which
    [Show full text]