DOCSLIB.ORG

Ineffabilis Deus” (1854) Translated: Presentation of a Parallel Corpus and Analysis of 19Th Century Ibero-Romance Varieties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ineffabilis Deus” (1854) Translated: Presentation of a Parallel Corpus and Analysis of 19Th Century Ibero-Romance Varieties The papal bull “Ineffabilis Deus” (1854) translated: presentation of a parallel corpus and analysis of 19th century Ibero-Romance varieties Johannes Kabatek (University of Zurich) Keywords: Parallel corpus, minority languages, Ibero-Romance, standardization, 19th century. In 1854, Pope Pius IX proclaimed the bull “Ineffabilis Deus” about the immaculate conception of the virgin Mary, a Latin document of theological and philosophical argumentation with an extension of 4476 tokens in the original version. During the following years, the French priest Marie-Dominique Siré collected translations of the text into the languages of the world. He compiled more than 300 translations, among which 55 into European languages and varieties. Several of these languages did not count on elaborated written traditions in the 19th century, so that in these cases the text is a pioneering piece of elaborated prose. The whole collection of manuscripts was donated by Siré to the Pope and has been part of the Vatican library for more than 150 years without ever having been studied linguistically. The contribution will consist in a) the presentation of the project of an online parallel corpus of the text of the bull. This corpus will be built up step-by step, starting with European languages and varieties. It will allow access to annotated transcriptions of the text as well as to the digitized original documents. The first step to be presented will consist of 20 European languages and varieties. b) the presentation of four versions of the text in order to show how the corpus may be used for linguistic analysis. I will choose the Ibero-Romance varieties Catalan (Central Catalan as well as Catalan from Mallorca), Asturian and Galician. In all four cases, the traditions of written prose in the 19 century at the moment when the bull is translated are scarce. Only in one of the four cases, the Asturian translation, the community of speakers becomes aware of the existence of the text, whereas in the other cases the translations remain unknown. I will analyse four dimensions of the texts (orthography, morphological unity, lexical variety and clause linkage) in. In all of these fields, the translations show a surprising degree of standardization: the orthography appears as rather systematic, morphology as rather unified, the lexicon offers a high degree of diversity and the clause-linking techniques show a wide range of aggregative as well as integrative techniques (Kabatek/Obrist/Vincis 2010). On the other hand, the corpus allows for interlinguistic comparison of features of the respective languages in their diachronic state of the mid 19th century. I will compare some morphosyntactic features (clitic positions, differential object marking and possessive constructions) in order to show the potential of analysis the parallel corpus offers. References: Busto, Xuan Carlos (2002), “Presencia de la llingua asturiana fuera d’Asturies en colecciones documentales ya obres impreses (sieglu XIX)”, Revista de Filoloxía Asturiana 2, 97- 154. Duval-Arnould, Louis (2002), “La collection “Sire” de la Bibliothèque vaticane”, en: AA.VV., Miscellanea Bibliothecae Apostolicae Vaticanae IX: 115-168. Ferrando i Francés, Antoni / Amorós, Miquel Nicolás (2011), Historia de la llengua catalana, Barcelona, Editorial UOC. Hannesschläger, Ingonda (1998), “Übersetzungen der Bulle Ineffabilis Deus”, en: AA. VV., Meisterwerke Europäischer Kunst. 1200 Jahre Erzbistum Salzburg 138: 235-237. Kabatek, Johannes / Obrist, Philipp / Vincis, Valentina (2010), “Clause-linkage techniques as a symptom of discourse traditions: methodological issues and evidence from Romance languages”, in: Heidrun Dorgeloh / Anja Wanner (eds.): Syntactic Variation and Genre, Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter, 247-275. Raible, Wolfgang (2001), “Linking clauses”, en: Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher y Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and Language Universals/ Sprachtypologie und sprachliche Universalien/ La typologie des langues et les universaux linguistiques – An International Handbook/ Ein internationales Handbuch/ Manuel international, Berlin/New York, de Gruyter: 590–617. Siré, Marie-Dominique (1866), “Traduzione in tutte le lingue della Bolla Ineffabilis, colla quale Sua Santità il Papa Pio IX proclamò domma di fede l’Immacolata Concezione di Maria santissima”, in La Civiltà Cattolica, 17/7/IV, 729-737. Solà, Joan, et al. (2008), Gramàtica del català contemporani, Barcelona, Editorial Empúries, Vol 1. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Role of Mary in the Work of Redemption: Seven Key Moments
    The Role of Mary in the Work of Redemption: Seven Key Moments R O B E R T F ASTIGGI , P H .D. Professor of Systematic Theology , Sacred Heart Major Seminary Introduction The role of the Blessed Virgin Mary in the economy of salvation is rooted in the mystery of the Incarnation. God chose to unite creation to himself by becom- ing incarnate ex Maria virgine.1 The eternal plan for the created cosmos, therefore, includes the Blessed Mother. The role of Mary in the economy of salvation is, therefore, not something marginal but central. In fact, the Blessed Virgin Mary is part of God’s plan from all eternity. The theology of Marian co-redemption un- folds in seven key moments: 1) Mary’s predestination as the Co-redemptrix; 2) Mary’s Immaculate Conception; 3) Mary’s free consent to be the Mother of the Word Incarnate at the Annunciation; 4) Mary’s union with her Son “in the work of salvation” from “the time of Christ’s virginal conception up to His death”;2 5) Mary’s union with Christ’s passion and her offering of her crucified Son to the Fa- ther; 6) Mary’s glorious assumption body and soul into heaven; 7) Mary’s ongoing maternal mediation of the grace with and under Christ, the one Mediator. Each of these moments deserves individual attention, but all of them combine to illuminate Mary’s essential role in the work of redemption. 1. Mary’s predestination as Mother of the Redeemer and Co- redemptrix Mary was predestined to be the Mother of the Incarnate Word.
    [Show full text]
  • The Message of Lourdes
    The Message of Lourdes What Our Lady told Bernadette We call the “Message of Lourdes” the midst of our poverty and failures. The two worlds gestures and words that were Grotto is not only a place where exist on exchanged between the Blessed Virgin something happened – a geographical our earth. Mary and Bernadette Soubirous, at the place – it is also a place where God When Grotto of Massabielle, during the time of gives us a sign by revealing his heart Jesus, in the eighteen apparitions. This message and our heart. the can be heard as: God is love and he Gospel, It is a place where God leaves us a loves us as we are. invites us message, a message that is nothing to On February 11, 1858 Bernadette, her other than that of the Gospel. God discover sister Toinette and a friend of theirs, comes to tell us that he loves us – this the Jeanne, went looking for wood in the is the heart of the Message of Lourdes, Kingdom meadows and came to “the place where and he loves us as we are with all our of Heaven, the canal rejoins the River Gave”. They successes but also with all our wounds, he invites were in front of the Grotto of our weaknesses and our limitations us to Massabielle. Toinette and Jeanne ON FEBRUARY 18, 1858 : SOME discover in our world, as it is, “another crossed the icy water, crying out with EXTRAORDINARY WORDS world.” Wherever love exists, God is the cold; Bernadette hesitated to do present. this because of her chronic asthma.
    [Show full text]
  • The Immaculate Conception in Ecumenical Perspective
    32 THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION IN ECUMENICAL PERSPECTIVE By DONALD G. DAWE HE POPULAR presupposition of ecumenical dialogue is that ~ we should start with the easy matters first and proceed ]1 slowly, if at all, to the more difficult questions. This IL approach has served the ecumenical dialogue on marian questions well up to this point. Common exploration of~scripture has swept away much misunderstanding. Historical studies of the protestant reformers, their piety and theology, have shown a deep and widespread concern for Mary that had been lost by their later followers. While rejoicing in these discoveries, one is always left with the stubborn realization that we do not live in the first century, or the sixteenth century, but the twentieth century. Our theological questions, our ecumenical concerns and our piety are shaped by the traditions of the Church as it exists today. Therefore we need to look at the traditions that have shaped the Churches of today as they search for the meaning of Mary. When we leave historical and biblical studies to look at contem- porary marian devotion and theology, we are painfully aware of the depth and seriousness of conflict. Nowhere is this more evident than in considering the two great marian definitions that have been crucial to modern Roman Catholicism -- the promulgation of the dogma of the Immaculate Conception in 1854 and the dogma of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary in 1950. Suddenly we find ourselves transported from the realm of the familiar, where agree- ment lies close to the surface, into those most difficult and painful questions, where deep and threatening differences become evident.
    [Show full text]
  • The Four Dogmas of the Blessed Virgin Mary and The
    JMJ Why do Catholics consider Mary to be so important? The Church’s principal teachings about the Blessed Virgin Mary Presentation by James F. Gontis Chief reasons that it is important to know the truth about Mary are that: - Knowing the truth about the Blessed Mother helps us to know the truth about her Son, Jesus, the Redeemer of mankind. - Mary always leads us to Jesus. - To help people, be they your children, other family members, students in your classes or programs, other Catholics, non-Catholics, etc. deepen in the truth and can help them along on the path to salvation. I. What are the four Marian dogmas? A. Mother of God B. Immaculate Conception C. Perpetual Virginity D. Assumption II. Mother of God A. Jesus is God, Mary is Jesus’ mother, thus Mary is the Mother of God. B. This dogma was first defined at the Council of Ephesus in A.D. 431. This is an example of the Church protecting the whole truth about Christ, which had been denied by Nestorius, Patriarch of Constantinople. C. Patriarch/Bishop Nestorius claimed that Mary only gave birth to the human Jesus, but not the divine Jesus and therefore should not be called the Mother of God. This essentially makes Jesus into two persons rather than one person. You can see how distorting the truth about Mary, even more importantly distorts the truth about Jesus. D. Mary gave birth to the person of Jesus. Jesus is a divine person with two natures – divine and human. What is the difference between person and nature? E.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary's Immaculate Conception by Father William G. Most in Teaching
    Mary's Immaculate Conception by Father William G. Most In teaching that Mary was conceived immaculate, the Catholic Church teaches that from the very moment of her conception, the Blessed Virgin Mary was free from all stain of original sin. This simply means that from the beginning, she was in a state of grace, sharing in God's own life, and that she was free from the sinful inclinations which have beset human nature after the fall. History of the Doctrine There are two passages in Scripture which point us to this truth. We look first at Genesis 3.15, in which we see the parallel between Mary and Eve of which the early Church Fathers already spoke: "I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her seed: he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel." The Jews saw this passage as referring to the struggle between Christ and Satan, and so the Church see in "the woman" a prophetic foreshadowing of the Virgin Mary (Vatican II, Lumen gentium, # 55). If there is to be complete enmity between the woman and the serpent, then she never should have been in any way subject to him even briefly. This implies an Immaculate conception. We can also reason from the text of Lk 1:28, in which the angel calls her "full of grace". If we can validate the translation--we can, and will do so, shortly--then in this verse we can see even more strongly the complete enmity with the serpent--for God's grace is complete opposed to Satan's reign.
    [Show full text]
  • VENERABLE POPE PIUS XII and the 1954 MARIAN YEAR: a STUDY of HIS WRITINGS WITHIN the CONTEXT of the MARIAN DEVOTION and MARIOLOGY in the 1950S
    INTERNATIONAL MARIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON, OHIO In affiliation with the PONTIFICAL FACULTY OF THEOLOGY "MARIANUM" The Very Rev. Canon Matthew Rocco Mauriello VENERABLE POPE PIUS XII AND THE 1954 MARIAN YEAR: A STUDY OF HIS WRITINGS WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE MARIAN DEVOTION AND MARIOLOGY IN THE 1950s A Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Licentiate of Sacred Theology with Specialization in Mariology Director: The Rev. Thomas A. Thompson, S.M. Marian Library/International Marian Research Institute University ofDayton 300 College Park Dayton OH 45469-1390 2010 To The Blessed Virgin Mary, with filial love and deep gratitude for her maternal protection in my priesthood and studies. MATER MEA, FIDUCIA MEA! My Mother, my Confidence ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My sincerest gratitude to all who have helped me by their prayers and support during this project: To my parents, Anthony and Susan Mauriello and my family for their encouragement and support throughout my studies. To the Rev. Thomas Thompson, S.M. and the Rev. Johann Roten, S.M. of the International Marian Research Institute for their guidance. To the Rev. James Manning and the staff and people of St. Albert the Great Parish in Kettering, Ohio for their hospitality. To all the friends and parishioners who have prayed for me and in particular for perseverance in this project. iii Goal of the Research The year 1954 was very significant in the history of devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary. A Marian Year was proclaimed by Pope Pius XII by means of the 1 encyclical Fulgens Corona , dated September 8, 1953.
    [Show full text]
  • Solemnity of the Immaculate Conception - December 8 I Will Put Enmity Between You and the Woman, and Between Your Seed and Her Seed
    Solemnity of the Immaculate Conception - December 8 I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her seed. ~ Genesis 3:15 N HIS PLAN FOR THE SALVATION tion. Chronologically, Mary’s con- of humanity, God desired ception happened before salvation I the cooperation of a crea- had come into the world. But God ture. From all eternity, he could redeem Mary in this way be- had chosen Mary of Nazareth to cause he is outside of time. be the mother of his Son. In order Every human being needs to to be a pure and unstained vessel, be redeemed by Jesus Christ. from the first moment of her con- We begin life in a state of origi- ception, Mary was preserved from nal sin and then receive redemp- all sin. This is known as the Im- tion by Baptism and the act of maculate Conception. Immaculate faith. Mary, on the other hand, simply means without sin. was created and redeemed in the In the sixth month the angel Gabri- same moment. Since she was free el was sent from God to a city of Gali- from the inclination to sin (which lee named Nazareth, to a virgin betrothed is the result of original sin), Mary to a man whose name was Joseph, of the remained free from sin throughout house of David; and the virgin’s name her life. Her Immaculate Concep- The Blessed Virgin Mary and her mother, was Mary. And he came to her and said, Anne, late 19th century lithograph tion allowed her to be completely “Hail, O favored one, the Lord is with open to God’s grace, and so, she you!” (Lk 1:26-28).
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Schism the Church Divided New Realities Part IV
    The Great Schism The Church Divided New Realities Part IV Events, Causes and Controversies The Church of Two Different Worlds which led to the Church’s division East and West Church and the Crusades Orthodox Isolation • Crusades … 1096. • Much of the Orthodox world was overrun by Arab conquest by • Greeks massacre Latins in Constantinople … 1182. the end of the 7th century. • Western feeling becomes … crusades can only be successful if – Rise of Mohammed 632 Byzantine Emperor is replaced by a Latin Emperor. • Antioch falls 637 • Jerusalem falls 638 • Constantinople sacked by Crusaders … 1204. • Alexandria falls 642 • Fourth Crusade • Latin bishops placed throughout the East … Eastern bishops • Constantinople stood alone in the east for over 800 years. have little authority although they are permitted to continue in – Constantinople survived until 1453 and did not emerge from Moslem office. control until after World War I. th • Constantinople restored to “Byzantines” … 1261. • The Orthodox Church was forced to be (in the 20 century) what • Michael VIII Palaeologus becomes emperor. it had been in the 7th century … but with lesser influence. 1 Scholasticism Orthodox Isolation In the west, Scholasticism … the first great departure. • The Orthodox Christian world, because of subservience to th • “Scholastic” principles were developing in the west in the 10 century. Moslem rule, therefore, missed: • St. Anselm (1033-1109) to St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274). – Scholasticism (11th -13th cent) • Cathedral schools were developing into colleges and universities. – Renaissance (13th -16th) • By 1200, theology had moved from the cloister to the classroom. – Protestant Reformation (16th cent) • “Truth” was being codified in abstract “scientific theology.” – Enlightenment (18th) • Every pope between 1100 and 1300 was a lawyer.
    [Show full text]
  • October-2003.Pdf
    CONCORDIA JOURNAL Volume 29 October 2003 Number 4 CONTENTS EDITORIALS Editor’s Note ........................................................................ 354 A Faculty Statement ............................................................. 356 Theological Potpourri ........................................................... 358 Theological Observers ............................................................ 363 ARTICLES The Beginnings of the Papacy in the Early Church Quentin F. Wesselschmidt ........................................................ 374 Antichrist?: The Lutheran Confessions on the Papacy Charles P. Arand .................................................................. 392 The Papacy in Perspective: Luther’s Reform and Rome Robert Rosin ........................................................................ 407 Vatican II’s Conception of the Papacy: A Lutheran Response Richard H. Warneck ............................................................. 427 Ut Unum Sint and What It Says about the Papacy: Description and Response Samuel H. Nafzger ............................................................... 447 Papacy as a Constitutive Element of Koinonia in Ut Unum Sint? Edward J. Callahan ............................................................... 463 HOMILETICAL HELPS .................................................................. 483 BOOK REVIEWS ............................................................................... 506 BOOKS RECEIVED ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary
    Bellarmine University ScholarWorks@Bellarmine Undergraduate Theses Undergraduate Works 5-8-2021 The Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary John Klapheke [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bellarmine.edu/ugrad_theses Part of the Catholic Studies Commons, Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Klapheke, John, "The Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary" (2021). Undergraduate Theses. 72. https://scholarworks.bellarmine.edu/ugrad_theses/72 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Works at ScholarWorks@Bellarmine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@Bellarmine. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary by John Klapheke Advisor: Gregory Hillis, Ph.D. Readers: Sr. Angie Shaughnessy, J.D. Rev. Fr. Shayne Duvall Bellarmine University Honors Thesis April 20, 2021 2 + Ad majorem Dei gloriam. Table of Contents: Preface……………………………………………………………………………………………..3 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..3 Development of the Doctrine of the Immaculate Conception………………………………….....5 Preparation for the Definition…………………………………………………………………....23 Definition/Papal Bull………………………………………………………………………….....26 The Immaculate Conception Since Ineffabilis Deus………………………………………….….33 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………….....38 Concluding Prayer to the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary………………...41 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………..42 3 Preface This thesis is dedicated to Jude Margaret Ranney and Isaac Joseph Ranney, two souls gone before ever truly known. We pray that God welcomes these souls into the eternal abode of Heaven and that the parents may be showered with incomprehensible blessing. May the Lord heal the wounds from these precious lives that were gone too soon.
    [Show full text]
  • Ineffabilis Deus Pius IX
    University of Dayton eCommons Marian Reprints Marian Library Publications 1954 023 - Ineffabilis Deus Pius IX Follow this and additional works at: http://ecommons.udayton.edu/marian_reprints Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation IX, Pius, "023 - Ineffabilis Deus" (1954). Marian Reprints. Paper 21. http://ecommons.udayton.edu/marian_reprints/21 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Marian Library Publications at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marian Reprints by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. ABOUT THE DOCUMENT . On February 2, 1849, Pope Pius lX issued an encyclical letter to the patriarchs, primates, archbishops, and bishops of the world in order to gather from every land the tradition of the Universal Church on the dog.ma of the lmmaculale Conception. As a result of this encyclical letter ("Ubi Primufr"), the Pope received 603 letters in return from the Bishops of the world. Only four or five were directly against a definition, and all expressed a willingness to concur in the Pope's decision. A special congregation of theologians was then appointed by rhe Pope to draft the Bull. This group worked more than a year, and there followed a lengthy discussion of the Bull in the presence of twenty-one cardinals. From November 20 to 24, 1854, cardinals, archbishops, and theologians from all over the world held sessions to discuss the final form of the document, Ineffabilis Deus, which solemnly defined the dogma of the lmmaculate Conception. The present translation has been made from the original Latin by Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • MARIAN UNIVERSITY Marian Solemnities, Feasts, and Memorials
    N UNIVE IA RS R IT A Y M I N A D N IA IA N A ND POLIS • I ® On Marian University’s seal you will find the Latin words Sedes Sapientiae meaning “Seat of Wisdom”—wisdom from which all truth flows and which reaches its culmination in Christ, the Wisdom of God, seated upon the lap of Mary in the Incarnation of Jesus Christ. Marian Solemnities, Feasts, and Memorials January 1: Solemnity of the Blessed Virgin Mary, the Mother of God (Holy Day) February 2: Feast of the Presentation of the Lord February 11: Feast of Our Lady of Lourdes March 25: Solemnity of the Annunciation of the Lord May 13: Feast of Our Lady of Fatima May 31: Feast of the Visitation of the Virgin Mary June/July: Memorial of the Immaculate Heart of Mary July 16: Feast of Our Lady of Mount Carmel July 26: Feast of Saint Anne and Saint Joachim (Parents of Mary) August 2: Feast of Our Lady of the Angels of the Portiuncula August 5: Feast of Our Lady of the Snows August 15: Solemnity of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary (Holy Day) August 22: Memorial of the Queenship of Mary September 8: Feast of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary September 12: Feast of the Holy Name of Mary September 15: Memorial of Our Lady of Sorrows October 7: Memorial of Our Lady of the Rosary November 21: Memorial of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary December 8*: Solemnity of the Immaculate Conception (Holy Day) December 12: Feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe Solemnity: Celebration of the highest ranking feast day commemorating the most important mysteries of the faith.
    [Show full text]