FREEDOM of INFORMATION ACT Previously Released

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FREEDOM of INFORMATION ACT Previously Released FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT Previously released information / disclosure log FY 2015–2016 NOTES Logs are updated at the end of each quarter Questions are produced in their original format TOPIC PAGE 1ST QUARTER 1) Abduction 4 2) Various questions relating to recruitment 6 3) Bribery 7 4) International sale of goods 7 5) Scandalising the court 8 6) Various questions relating to IT provision 8 7) Electoral law 10 8) Interpreting and drafting laws 11 9) Execution of deeds and documents 11 10) Criminal code 12 1 2ND QUARTER 11) Artworks 13 12) Various questions relating to ICT provision 14 13) Payments to the Confederation of British Industry 15 14) Outraging public decency 15 15) Report on Consent in Sex Offences 18 16) Firearms scoping consultation paper 18 17) Firearms law 19 18) Procedure for repealing Acts of Parliament 20 19) Crimes committed with antique firearms 21 3RD QUARTER 20) Firearms 24 21) Abusive conduct by UK courts (1) 26 22) Abusive conduct by UK courts (2) 29 23) High Court's Jurisdiction in Relation to Criminal Proceedings 29 24) Statutory Obligations of the Law Commission 30 25) Mobile Device Usage and Hardware (Mobile Telephones/Smartphones and Touch Screen Tablets) 32 26) Community Service Orders 35 27) Firearms 36 28) Statutory Obligations of the Law Commission 37 29) Life insurance 40 30) Various statutes and judicial decisions 40 31) Statutory Obligations of the Law Commission 44 32) Taxis project 47 33) ICT/Digital/Business Change Programmes and Strategy 48 2 4TH QUARTER 34) Consent in criminal law 49 35) Procurement and contracts 49 36) Public Records Act 1958 and other Acts (outcome of internal review) 50 37) Rule of law 58 38) Improvement of legislation 59 39) Changes to various Acts 60 40) Sentencing law 62 41) Newspaper and copyright licensing 64 3 1ST QUARTER Topic 1) Abduction Date of Response 02/04/15 Details of Request I am writing to make a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act. I think it is important to examine the data that supports this new legislation in order to properly understand the issue of ‘abduction’ within the UK. In your document: Simplification of Criminal Law: Kidnapping and Related Offences IA No: LAWCOM0040 it outlines some data that we would like broken down. Firstly we would like clarification as to whether the new law will have the ability to affect: UK mum/dads who are abducting IN to the UK? (ie they are UK Expat parents wanting to return home to UK from other countries) Or Foreign parents living in the UK (like Poles / Romanians etc) living in the UK abducting OUT of the UK to go home. Or whether it has the scope to affect both cases In the document it says: The 220 wrongful retentions in 2013 involved 305 children, 145 of which were in a jurisdiction which is a member of the Hague Convention, while 75 were to non-Hague Convention jurisdictions. Are these 145 cases regarding retentions IN the UK or in a foreign country outside of the UK? Are the retentions by primary carers? Are there any allegations of abuse (domestic violence, emotional abuse, financial abuse etc)? In addition it also says: According to this data there were 220 wrongful retentions in 2013 which would suggest that there were around 550 occurrences of child abduction in 2013 in total. On average, around 19% of children are returned voluntarily following international abduction. Again - Are these 550 cases regarding retentions IN the UK (so children are habitually resident elsewhere) or outside the UK in a foreign country? Or both? Are the retentions by primary carers? Are the ‘abductors’ nationals of the country they have abducted to? Are the retentions by mothers or fathers? Are there any allegations of abuse (domestic violence, emotional abuse, financial abuse etc)? We think that it is vital to know who this new law has the potential to affect as it could have devastating consequences for the affected families. If you could provide the answer to our FOI ASAP we would really appreciate it, 4 Answer Our final recommendations on kidnapping and related offences were published in our report, Simplification of the Criminal Law: Kidnapping and Related Offences (the Report), on 19 November 2014. This report marked the end of our work on this project. We are now awaiting the Government's response on implementation. As a point of clarification, the Report does not make any recommendation to change the application of the Hague Convention. This was not within the remit of our project which was limited to the domestic criminal offences of kidnapping, false imprisonment and child abduction. Further, the Law Commission recommendations relating to child abduction are not to replace common law with statute but simply amending already existing statute, namely, the Child Abduction Act 1984. Our recommendation is “the offence under section 1 of the Child Abduction Act 1984 should be amended to include the case where the connected person, having taken or sent the child out of the UK with appropriate consent, keeps or retains that child outside the UK without the appropriate consent or in breach of the conditions of the consent given." We therefore make this recommendation in relation to connected persons taking from the UK and retaining them outside the UK, rather than in relation to connected persons bringing their child into the UK. In a case concerning a non-UK parent living in the UK removing a child from the UK to go to their country of origin, the application of our recommendation would depend on the facts of each case, particularly the connection of the parties to the UK. In relation to the data included in our impact assessment: The figure of 145 can be broken down as follows: 96 cases (66%) were retentions out of the UK (ie children were retained in a foreign country); 43 cases (30%) were children retained in the UK (ie children were habitually resident elsewhere); and 6 cases (4%) had no UK jurisdiction. We will be amending the impact assessment to reflect this breakdown. Please note that this data does not reflect every single case as the figures are supplied by Reunite International who can only account for those cases that are reported to their advice line. The figure of 550 was calculated on the basis of “40% of total child abductions” involve retention abroad. The figure of 40% was provided by Reunite International. Any further breakdown of these figures will need to be sought from Reunite International directly as we do not have that information. The Law Commission relies on this information as illustrative of the number of occurrences of child retention in Hague Convention terms in order to give an indication of the potential impact of our recommended new offence. As you will see in the impact assessment, these figures were not used in our cost/benefit analysis of the new offence. The data “on average, around 19% of children are returned voluntarily following international abduction” was obtained from the following text: Rhona Shuz The Hague Child Abduction Convention: A Critical Analysis (2013), page 37. We hope that this provides you with the assistance you seek. 5 Topic 2) Various questions relating to recruitment Date of Response 02/04/15 Details of Request Freedom Of Information Enquiry Q1. In last 2 years has your organisation used external recruitment agencies to hire for permanent or contract roles? Q2. In list format what are the five highest paid external recruitment agencies with the total amount paid in the last 2 years? Q3. What is the fee structure charged for the five highest paid vacancies by the above five external recruitment agencies and the roles that were hired for? Example: Office Manager - Salary £20,000 Fees paid 15% of salary = Total recruitment fees paid £3000. Q4. For the coming year what live vacancies does the organisation currently have for permanent or contract roles, please list these vacancies with the following; Current or future positions and an exact salary figure What type of positions are they? (Contract or Permanent) Who is the hiring manager, please provide their full details: Full name, Telephone number, Email, Job Title and Department Q5. On which websites are these jobs advertised? Please clearly provide a link/list to where these jobs are advertised. Q6. What is the process to selecting new recruitment agencies? Please provide the procurement process for selecting new recruitment agencies and what date is this conducted and by whom? Please provide full contact details. Q7. Is there a purchase threshold below which allows the organisation to use external recruitment agencies which are not on any preferred supplier arrangements or contracts without going through a formal tender process? Answer Your Freedom of Information Enquiry about our recruitment services was passed to me to answer. I have had to pass some of this on to our procurement team, as some of the questions may have Commercially Sensitive material. As soon as I get an answer back from them I will respond to you. I do apologise for any delay. 6 Topic 3) Bribery Date of Response 13/04/15 Details of Request I am currently completing my BSC (Honours) in Quantity Surveying Consultancy in the School of Civil Engineering & Construction, at Kingston University. I am currently conducting a research of my dissertation entitled: “The Impact of the Bribery Act 2010 in the construction Industry.” I would be most grateful, given your position and expertise, if you could kindly complete the short questionnaire. I have attached it below. It should take no longer than 5 minutes to complete.
Recommended publications
  • PUBLIC RECORDS ACT 1958 (C
    PUBLIC RECORDS ACT 1958 (c. 51)i, ii An Act to make new provision with respect to public records and the Public Record Office, and for connected purposes. [23rd July 1958] General responsibility of the Lord Chancellor for public records. 1. - (1) The direction of the Public Record Office shall be transferred from the Master of the Rolls to the Lord Chancellor, and the Lord Chancellor shall be generally responsible for the execution of this Act and shall supervise the care and preservation of public records. (2) There shall be an Advisory Council on Public Records to advise the Lord Chancellor on matters concerning public records in general and, in particular, on those aspects of the work of the Public Record Office which affect members of the public who make use of the facilities provided by the Public Record Office. The Master of the Rolls shall be chairman of the said Council and the remaining members of the Council shall be appointed by the Lord Chancellor on such terms as he may specify. [(2A) The matters on which the Advisory Council on Public Records may advise the Lord Chancellor include matters relating to the application of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to information contained in public records which are historical records within the meaning of Part VI of that Act.iii] (3) The Lord Chancellor shall in every year lay before both Houses of Parliament a report on the work of the Public Record Office, which shall include any report made to him by the Advisory Council on Public Records.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Implementation of Law Commission Recommendations
    Report on the implementation of Law Commission recommendations July 2018 Cm 9652 Report on the implementation of Law Commission recommendations Presented to Parliament by the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice by Command of Her Majesty July 2018 Cm 9652 © Crown copyright 2018 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] ISBN 978-1-5286-0610-3 CCS0618946492 07/18 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Report on the implementation of Law Commission recommendations Contents Introduction 3 Scope of the report 4 Recommendations that have been implemented 5 Recommendations that have not yet been implemented 8 (i) Recommendations in the process of implementation 8 (ii) Recommendations awaiting a Government decision on implementation 10 Decisions taken not to implement 24 1 Report on the implementation of Law Commission recommendations 2 Report on the implementation of Law Commission recommendations Introduction I am pleased to present this report on the implementation of Law Commission recommendations. It is the seventh annual report to be presented following the passing of the Law Commission Act 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Access to Court Records – Terms of Reference
    ACCESS TO COURT RECORDS – TERMS OF REFERENCE The Commission will review the existing rules governing access to Court records and make proposals for any changes that are necessary and desirable. In particular the Commission is asked to consider: 1 What documentation held by a court or tribunal (hard copy and other) should form part of the court record and in particular what administrative documents are included. 2 What should be the principles and rules upon which access to court records, can be granted or withheld and specifically: (a) What is the relationship between these principles and rules and those underpinning the Official Information Act 1982, the Archives Act 1957 and the Privacy Act 1993 (b) How does the format of the court record, whether it be hard copy or electronic or other, affect any of these principles or require additional considerations? (c) Should there be special rules when requests for access are: (i) by accredited news media; or (ii) for research and statistical purposes (d) Should there be a single access code across and within all court and tribunal jurisdictions or specific codes (e) What are the principles upon which fees for accessing court and Tribunal records should be fixed? C:\Documents and Settings\TMcGlennon\Desktop\Consultation draft post peer review.doc 29/03/2006 12:22 1 3 What should be the principles and rules governing disclosure of documentation held by a Court or Tribunal which is not part of a court record? 4 What should be the principles and rules under which court staff operates when handling access requests.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Implementation of Law Commission Proposals
    Report on the implementation of Law Commission proposals March 2012 Report on the implementation of Law Commission proposals Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 3A of the Law Commissions Act 1965 as amended by section 1 of the Law Commission Act 2009. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 22 March 2012 HC 1900 London: The Stationery Office £6.25 © Crown copyright 2012 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or e-mail: [email protected] Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected]. This publication is available for download at www.official-documents.gov.uk and on our website at www.justice.gov.uk ISBN 9780102976304 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID 2482610 03/12 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Report on the implementation of Law Commission proposals Contents Introduction 3 Scope of the report 4 Proposals that have been implemented 5 Proposals that have not yet been implemented 6 Decisions taken not to implement 14 1 Report on the implementation of Law Commission proposals 2 Report on the implementation of Law Commission proposals Introduction I am pleased to present this report which relates to the implementation of Law Commission proposals.
    [Show full text]
  • Privacy, Openness and Archives in the Public Domain
    Northumbria Research Link Citation: Silvanus, Genevieve (2018) Privacy, openness and archives in the public domain. Doctoral thesis, Northumbria University. This version was downloaded from Northumbria Research Link: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/39779/ Northumbria University has developed Northumbria Research Link (NRL) to enable users to access the University’s research output. Copyright © and moral rights for items on NRL are retained by the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. Single copies of full items can be reproduced, displayed or performed, and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided the authors, title and full bibliographic details are given, as well as a hyperlink and/or URL to the original metadata page. The content must not be changed in any way. Full items must not be sold commercially in any format or medium without formal permission of the copyright holder. The full policy is available online: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/policies.html Privacy, openness and archives in the public domain Genevieve Laura Silvanus PhD 2018 Privacy, openness and archives in the public domain Genevieve Laura Silvanus A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Northumbria at Newcastle for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Research undertaken in the Faculty of Engineering & Environment October 2018 Abstract This research investigates the issues surrounding access to archives at non-national archives in England with a multi-stakeholder perspective. Using a combination of focus groups with non-managerial archivists, academic researchers, non-professional family and local historians and a series of semi-structured interviews with leading experts, it attempts to show the issues in the “real world” rather than an idealised one.
    [Show full text]
  • Vellum: Printing Record Copies of Public Acts
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 07451, 15 August 2018 Vellum: printing record By Richard Kelly copies of public Acts Inside: 1. Printing record copies of public Acts 2. Establishing the practice of printing on vellum 3. Proposals to change the practice 4. Decision to change practice 5. Further information www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 07451, 15 August 2018 2 Contents Summary 3 1. Printing record copies of public Acts 5 1.1 The Parliamentary Archives 5 2. Establishing the practice of printing on vellum 6 2.1 First Report of the Select Committee on Printing 6 Ingrossment and inrolment 6 Alternatives 7 2.2 Resolution of the House of Lords and the report of the Clerk Assistant 9 2.3 House of Lords resolutions 9 2.4 House of Commons amendments 10 2.5 Final ingrossments and first prints 10 Public Acts 10 Private Acts 11 3. Proposals to change the practice 12 3.1 1999 debates and history 12 3.2 House of Commons Administration Committee report 2015-16 13 3.3 Parliamentary Questions 13 3.4 Another Commons debate on vellum 15 3.5 Cabinet Office intervention 16 3.6 Commons debate on Record Copies of Acts, 20 April 2016 17 4. Decision to change practice 20 4.1 Lords response to Commons Vote 20 4.2 House of Commons Commission response 20 4.3 Final Act to be printed on vellum 20 5. Further information 21 5.1 Historic Hansard 21 5.2 Freedom of Information requests 21 Cover page image copyright: Abolition of Slave Trade 1807 by UK Parliament 3 Vellum: printing record copies of public Acts Summary Record copies of public Acts, passed since the beginning of the 2015 Parliament, have been printed on archival paper, with front and back vellum covers.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Implementation of Law Commission Proposals
    Report on the implementation of Law Commission proposals March 2012 Report on the implementation of Law Commission proposals Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 3A of the Law Commissions Act 1965 as amended by section 1 of the Law Commission Act 2009. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 22 March 2012 HC 1900 London: The Stationery Office £6.25 © Crown copyright 2012 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or e-mail: [email protected] Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected]. This publication is available for download at www.official-documents.gov.uk and on our website at www.justice.gov.uk ISBN 9780102976304 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID 2482610 03/12 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Report on the implementation of Law Commission proposals Contents Introduction 3 Scope of the report 4 Proposals that have been implemented 5 Proposals that have not yet been implemented 6 Decisions taken not to implement 14 1 Report on the implementation of Law Commission proposals 2 Report on the implementation of Law Commission proposals Introduction I am pleased to present this report which relates to the implementation of Law Commission proposals.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory System in the UK
    Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados Centro de Documentação e Informação Coordenação de Biblioteca http://bd.camara.gov.br "Dissemina os documentos digitais de interesse da atividade legislativa e da sociedade.” Hansard Research Scholars Programme Summer 2010 Regulatory Quality and the Regulatory System in the UK Cintia Costa de Abreu London, 2010 “If you have ten thousand regulations, you destroy all respect for the law.” Winston Churchill 2 Executive Summary Regulatory quality is one of the core principles for good governance today, and is usually considered an essential instrument for development. However, in order to make good regulation it is necessary to have an institutional architecture to support it and ensure that the necessary measures are taken. With this in mind, this paper attempts to identify how the British regulatory institutions have developed in the last years to contribute to better regulation in the country as well as what still needs to be done. 1 1 This is the final paper presented at the conclusion of a 3 month programme organized by the Hansard Society in which apart from the Democracy and Public Policy classes at LSE, I was able to work as an intern in the Law Commission and the Better Regulation Executive. My research is based on published and non-published articles and documents as well as on the experience of working in those organizations, participating of meetings and seminars and interviewing people from the UK Parliament, the Parliamentary Counsel, the Law Commission and BRE. 3 Table of Contents Chapter 1 1. Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………… 04 1.1. Regulation and Regulatory System ……………………………………………….…… 04 1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime (International Co-Operation) Act 2003
    Source: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/32 Crime (International Co-operation) Act 2003 2003 CHAPTER 32 An Act to make provision for furthering co-operation with other countries in respect of criminal proceedings and investigations; to extend jurisdiction to deal with terrorist acts or threats outside the United Kingdom; to amend section 5 of the Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981 and make corresponding provision in relation to Scotland; and for connected purposes. [30th October 2003] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— PART 1 MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS CHAPTER 1 MUTUAL SERVICE OF PROCESS ETC. Service of overseas process in the UK 1Service of overseas process (1)The power conferred by subsection (3) is exercisable where the Secretary of State receives any process or other document to which this section applies from the government of, or other authority in, a country outside the United Kingdom, together with a request for the process or document to be served on a person in the United Kingdom. (2)This section applies— (a)to any process issued or made in that country for the purposes of criminal proceedings, (b)to any document issued or made by an administrative authority in that country in administrative proceedings, (c)to any process issued or made for the purposes of any proceedings on an appeal before a court in that country against a decision in administrative proceedings, (d)to any document issued or made by an authority in that country for the purposes of clemency proceedings.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration's Paper on Enhancing the Operation Model for the Law
    CB(4)365/17-18(03) For discussion on 20 December 2017 Legislative Council Panel on Administration of Justice and Legal Services Enhancing the operation model for the Law Reform Commission in Hong Kong PURPOSE 1. This paper briefs Members on the preliminary outcome of the study conducted by the Law Reform Commission of Hong Kong ("the LRC study") to consider various options to enhance the efficiency and operation of the LRC, including examining the experience of law reform agencies in other jurisdictions. Members' views are sought on the options and preliminary conclusions from the study to assist the Department of Justice in considering the way forward. BACKGROUND (a) Introduction 2. In the context of administration of justice, the Law Reform Commission of Hong Kong (LRC) plays an important role in the development and promotion of effective law reform. The remit of the LRC, which is a non-statutory advisory body established in 1980, is to consider for reform such aspects of the law as are referred to it by the Secretary for Justice (who is the ex officio Chairman) or the Chief Justice (who is also an ex officio member of the LRC). The aim of any LRC reference is to consider the law in a specified area and, where appropriate, present well considered proposals to the Government. 3. As the process of law reform has been in operation for quite some time, it is considered desirable to review the process with a view to exploring possible options to enhance the efficiency and operation of the LRC. The purpose of the LRC study is to consider, with reference to the experience of various law reform agencies in other jurisdictions, whether the structure and operations of the LRC should be improved, and if so, to identify possible measures and options for reform.
    [Show full text]
  • Twentieth Annual Report 1984-85
    Scottish Law Commission (SCOT. LAW COM. No. 98) TWENTIETH ANNUALREPORT 1984-85 Laid before Parliament by the Lord Advocate under Section 3(3) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 20th November 1985 EDINBURGH HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE £4.90 net 20 The Scottish Law Commission was set up by section2of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law of Scotland. The Commissioners are: The Honourable Lord Maxwell, Chairman, Mr. R. D. D. Bertram, W.S., Dr. E. M. Clive, Mr. J. Murray, Q.C., Sheriff C. G. B. Nicholson, Q.C. The Secretary of the Commission is Mr. R. Eadie. Its offices are at 140 Causewayside, Edinburgh EH9 1PR. ISBN 0 10 202086 8 SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 15TH JUNE 1985 To: The Right Honourable the Lord Cameron of Lochbroom, Q.C., Her Majesty's Advocate In accordance with section 3(3) as read with section 6(2) of the Law Commissions Act 1965, as amended,' we have the honour to submit this the Twentieth Annual Report of the Scottish Law Commission. (Signed) PETER MAXWELL, Chairman R. D. D. BERTRAM E. M. CLIVE JOHN MURRAY GORDON NICHOLSON R. EADIE, Secretary 2 September 1985 'Transfer of Functions (Secretary of State and Lord Advocate) Order 1972 (S.I. 1972, No. 2002). ... B 111 TWENTIETH ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS Paragraph Page PREFACE . ix PART I GENERAL SURVEY OF THE PAST YEAR . 1.1 1 Our report on diligence and debtor protection . 1.1 1 Reports and consultative documents published .
    [Show full text]
  • Fourteenth Report: Draft Statute Law Repeals Bill
    The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission (LAW COM. No. 211) (SCOT. LAW COM. No. 140) STATUTE LAW REVISION: FOURTEENTH REPORT DRAFT STATUTE LAW (REPEALS) BILL Presented to Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor and the Lord Advocate by Command of Her Majesty April 1993 LONDON: HMSO E17.85 net Cm 2176 The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission were set up by the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the Law. The Law Commissioners are- The Honourable Mr. Justice Brooke, Chairman Mr Trevor M. Aldridge, Q.C. Mr Jack Beatson Mr Richard Buxton, Q.C. Professor Brenda Hoggett, Q.C. The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr Michael Collon. Its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WClN 2BQ. The Scottish Law Commissioners are- The Honourable Lord Davidson, Chairman .. Dr E.M. Clive Professor P.N. Love, C.B.E. Sheriff I.D.Macphail, Q.C. Mr W.A. Nimmo Smith, Q.C. The Secretary of the Scottish Law Commission is Mr K.F. Barclay. Its offices are at 140 Causewayside, Edinburgh EH9 1PR. .. 11 THE LAW COMMISSION AND THE SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION STATUTE LAW REVISION: FOURTEENTH REPORT Draft Statute Law (Repeals) Bill To the Right Honourable the Lord Mackay of Clashfern, Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain, and the Right Honourable the Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Q.C., Her Majesty's Advocate. In pursuance of section 3(l)(d) of the Law Commissions Act 1965, we have prepared the draft Bill which is Appendix 1 and recommend that effect be given to the proposals contained in it.
    [Show full text]