SuperFoiler Design Introduction 9 January 2017 Prepared by: Ferdinand van West SuperFoiler - Design General Arrangement

M&M SuperFoiler PRINCIPAL DIMENSIONS

LOA: 7.97 m Main Hull Length: 7.90 m Outriggers Length: 4.50 m Beam: 5.15 m Rig Height from DWL: 13.04 m Draft: 1.52 m Number of Crew: 3 Sailing Weight: 350 kg

Mainsail Area BIG: 32.6 m2 Mainsail Area SML: 27.6 m2 Jib Area BIG: 9.3 m2 Jib Area SML: 7.8 m2

Foil Configuration: 3-Point Foiler; L-Daggerboards and T- Rudders

Construction: Mainhull, Outriggers and Beams: CarbonFiber Prepreg with Nomex Honey comb sandwich Core Foils and Rudders: Carbon Fiber high modulus Prepreg Autoclaved Cured Rig: : Carbon Fiber high modulus Prepreg Autoclaved Cured Sails: Doyle Sails Stratis

Expected Performance ~40 knots Top Boatspeed ~12 knots Foilborne Boatspeed 5 knots Foilborne Windspeed Downwind 7 knots Foilborne Windpspeed Upwind

Copyright 2017 - Morrelli & Melvin Design & Engineering, Inc. 2 SuperFoiler - Design Background

Background The SuperFoiler concept was developed by the Morrelli & Melvin Design Team (M&M) through the combination of numerous ideas and innovations. The project was initiated by the project founders Bill and Jack Macartney, who simply requested that we develop the most exciting 3 person inshore “sail racer” possible, giving the design team a lot of to develop a concept like no other… fast, foil-borne, and eye-catching to the public.

The project started after the 34th ’s Cup where course-racing foiling multihulls were introduced mainstream to the public and other production foiling multihulls followed. M&M were responsible for leading the team that developed the AC72 concept and Class Rules of the 34th America’s Cup, and were part of the design team at Emirates who lead the America’s Cup into foiling.

For the following 35th America’s Cup, M&M once again lead the team that developed the concept and class rules and the one-design components of the AC62 which finally turned into the AC50. This influx of research and ideas brought the motivation to re-evaluate the conventional with foils in an attempt to provide maximum efficiency for a pure foil-borne Sail-Racing Machine, which lead us to the configuration of the SuperFoiler.

Copyright 2017 - Morrelli & Melvin Design & Engineering, Inc. 3 SuperFoiler - Design Concept Development

First Conceptional Sketches done by M&M August 2014 and final geometries delivered starting mid-2016

Copyright 2017 - Morrelli & Melvin Design & Engineering, Inc. 4 SuperFoiler - Design Innovations

End-plated Electronic Push-button Solid Meshed Wishbone-boom Mainsail and Unconventional Platform design with Center Controls. For Active Trampoline Jib Hull and Outriggers Control of the Lift with an integrated stepped-hull shape produced by the ‘Y’ Split Shrouds Daggerboards and T- Passive Adaptive Daggerboard attached to the Rudders Rake Control for in flight mode transom and forward Copyright 2017 - Morrelli & Melvin Design & Engineering, Inc. 5 beam SuperFoiler – M&M Design Tools Computational Design Methodology

VPP – Velocity Performance Prediction Solution of force balance requires matrices of data modules for all primary Hydro and Aero components. CFD – Computational Fluid Dynamics

Speed:10, Leeway:2, Heel:0, Sink:1.1, Trim:0, FoilExt:2.8, FoilYaw:0, FoilCant:0, FoilRake:4, Rudder:0, Elevator:0, FoilxOffset:0, RudderxOffset:0 dLeeway:0.0000, dDive:0.0000, FInflowAxes = [-438, -1353, 5317] N, MInflowAxes = [-4457, -282, -475] Nm 0.7 8000 Foil: SF28_L_P15C (weissinger) Section(s): MM16 168 27OR2RH4, MM125 201 87(OR)(remapped t C 7 C 6 0.6 7000 Area = 0.3330m2 AreaX = 0.0162m2 AreaY = 0.0558m2 AreaZ = 0.2334m2 Aerodynamic platform optimization Span(E1) = 1.6369 AspectRatio(E1) = 8.0473 Mirror(E1) = -1.00 6000 0.5 CL = 0.3181, CD = 0.0257, CDi(E1) = 0.0104 e(E1) = 0.3841 L/D(E1) = 13.83, L/Di(E1) = 30.53 5000 F = [-391, -1368, 5317] N FSI - Fluid Structure|F| = 5504 NInteraction 0.4 |FL| = 5428 N |FD| = 438 N 4000 |FDpar| = 215 N Initial fluid-structure|FDind| = interaction178 N are run in 3D lifting line tool.0.3 Fintersection = 0 N Fspray = 14 N Fwave = 31 N 3000 2 0.2

2000

CL (In pink,CL 0.1 * vLocal / vRef) Lift (normal LifttoN/m free-stream) (normal 0.1 1000 1.5 0 0 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 Root -> Tip

1 0.0135 40 Elevator geometric study and optimization 0.013 35 z 0.5 0.0125 30

0.012 25

0 0.0115 20 CDv

0.011 15 Wave Drag N/m Wave Drag

-0.5 0.0105 10

0.01 5

-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.0095 0 y 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 Root -> Tip FEA - FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS Global platform loading and Design point validation for foil forces structural optimization

Hull hydrodynamic VPP input matrix

Copyright 2017 - Morrelli & Melvin Design & Engineering, Inc. 6 SuperFoiler – Design Fluid Structure Interactions

Platform stiffness is critical to foil angle control and Higher therefore, the overall performance of the boat Stress through a wide range of sailing conditions and loads. Concentration

Finite Element Mesh >200 distinct ply regions for iterations Load Testing Validation of Main Daggerboard Copyright 2017 - Morrelli & Melvin Design & Engineering, Inc. 7 which ultimately translated into construction drawings SuperFoiler – Design Features Platform – Pitch Stability

Main Benefits New Platform Design

❖ Aerodynamically lower drag ❖ Structural Efficiency - center-hull functions as a structural spine ❖ Weight - significant lighter ❖ Minimum storage space onshore ❖ Look/Perception

M&M Pitchpole Analysis Program

The new platform design concept has been carefully evaluated in M&M’s pitch pole analysis program. M&M has a good database for reference information which include previous M&M designs like the America’s Cup Concepts AC50, AC72, the Nacra F20, SL33, TF10,.... etc

“POINT OF NO RETURN”

Typical Pitch-pole vs Recovery Moments graph indicating available energy and point of no return at negative net moment Copyright 2017 - Morrelli & Melvin Design & Engineering, Inc. 8 SuperFoiler – Design Features Aerodynamically Optimized Configuration

INCREASED RIGHTING MOMENT from End- Plated Sail Plan up to 4%

Integrated sail plan & platform geometry optimize overall aerodynamics

❖ Main & jib ‘End-Plated' to platform ❖ ‘End-Plate’ effect results in lower drag, increased thrust, and greater speed ❖ Lower Platform Drag ❖ Airfoil beam geometry ❖ Partially solid trampoline ❖ Main Beam corner fairings ❖ Aerodynamically fine-tuned deck layout

Copyright 2017 - Morrelli & Melvin Design & Engineering, Inc. 9 SuperFoiler – Design Features Daggerboard control system – ACTIVE

Upper Bearing Fore/Aft Displacement

Daggerboard Rake RudderRake Rotation Rotation

The SuperFoiler has two different systems: a passive (no human input) and an active (human input) daggerboard rake control system. The geometric design of the daggerboards incorporates passive-adaptive stability characteristics as a function of vertical immersion. However, the daggerboard and elevator rake do need to be trimmed to the optimum setting for each true wind speed and boat heading to obtain the nominal lift for force balance at obtained boatspeed. The Battery Bank active control system includes: Good for 3-4 hours of Racing ACTIVE SYSTEM – PUSH BUTTON CONTROL ❖ Human Machine Interface (HMI) ❖ Timer Functions ❖ 2x Daggerboard Electromechanical Actuators ❖ 2x Rudder Electromechanical Actuators ❖ 4x Motor Electronic Speed Controllers ❖ Master Controller ❖ Battery Bank

Copyright 2017 - Morrelli & Melvin Design & Engineering, Inc. 10 SuperFoiler – Design Features Daggerboard control system – PASSIVE

Passive Adaptive system The L-daggerboards on the SuperFoiler are automatically adjusted by a unique mechanical passive adaptive rake system in combination with the passive geometric stability of the foil. The purpose of this system is to automatically adjust Daggerboard Rake as a function to BoatSpeed and Flight Height above the water. Cassette Fore/Aft Displacement

Front View Reaction Force @ Upper Bearing Daggerboard Rake Rotation

Flight Heave Height

WL Sway

Copyright 2017 - Morrelli & Melvin Design & Engineering, Inc. 11 SuperFoiler – Design Features Modes of Sailing – Non Foiling

“SkiffCat” When sailing with the Center Hull wetted, the SuperFoiler can be categorized as a hybrid of a skiff and LATERAL AERO SWAY a multihull, a ‘SkiffCat’. As you start out sailing the SuperFoiler at low speeds, the idea is to accelerate similar to a skiff, balancing the boat on its Center Hull with zero heel and the OutRiggers out of the water (see Max. Available Righting figure). As boatspeed starts increasing, dynamic lift is Moment with no Vertical Lift generated on the Main Daggerboard to leeward which produced by the Daggerboard 850kg*m translates to more righting moment available to sheet the sails harder and generate more thrust from the rig, further increasing speed. When the SuperFoiler reaches 12 knots of boatspeed, enough vertical Lift can be developed from the Main Daggerboard to overcome the total combined mass of the boat and crew and the SuperFoiler transitions to fully foiling, lifting up and flying above the water with no wetted hull area.

RIGHTING MOMENT * SUPERFOILER MASS HEELING MOMENT SUPERFOILER * CREW MASS * LATERAL SWAY FORCES MASS * Daggerboard HEAVE

CREW MASS Water Surface

RUDDER SWAY

RUDDER SWAY

OutRiggers DBD SWAY BOUYANCY

Center Hull DBD HEAVE T-Rudders

2 Main Daggerboard Daggerboard Heave or VERTICAL LIFT = ½*ρ*Area*CL * speed Copyright 2017 - Morrelli & Melvin Design & Engineering, Inc. 12 SuperFoiler – Design Features Modes of Sailing – FULL fOILING

Rudder Elevators: ❖ T-rudders provide pitch stability when foiling or LATERAL AERO SWAY non-foiling ❖ This improves control and dampens motion in all conditions

Benefit of Differential Elevator Rake: ❖ Rudders can generate additional righting moment if desired, by creating a down-force on the windward Maximum Righting Moment 2320 kg-m and up to 3140 Elevator. kg-m with ElevatorRake Differential ❖ Rudder differential was an important feature of the in the last America’s Cup.

RIGHTING MOMENT HEELING MOMENT *SUPERFOILER MASS * LATERAL SWAY FORCES *CREW MASS * DAGGERBOARD HEAVE *RUDDER HEAVE

CREW MASS

DBD HEAVE Green Graph; Maximum allowed rudder- Water Surface rake differential of 3 degrees, increase performance of 9-11% RUDDER SWAY

T-Rudders SUPERFOILER MASS

Red Graph; Elevators on both sides in sync (same rudder rake) DBD SWAY Extra RIGHTING RUDDER HEAVE RUDDER HEAVE (with Rudder Differential) (with Rudder Differential) MOMENT from Elevator Differential Rake Copyright 2017 - Morrelli & Melvin Design & Engineering, Inc. 13 SuperFoiler - Design From Concept to Reality

Concept to Reality - SuperFoiler Sailing in Sydney Harbor for the first time in April 2017 photo credit: Andrea Francolini

Copyright 2017 - Morrelli & Melvin Design & Engineering, Inc. 14