ANIMAL PEOPLE News for People Who Care About Animals

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ANIMAL PEOPLE News for People Who Care About Animals Anti-chaining activist is busted for saving a dog ALTOONA, Pa.––Tammy Sneath Grimes, founder of the national anti-chaining organization Dogs Deserve Better, was released from police custody in East Freedom, Pennsylvania, at 2 a.m. on September 12, 2006, about 12 hours after she removed a seri- ously debilitated chained dog she called Doogie from the yard of East Freedom residents Steve and Lori Arnold. “I’m out,” on unsecured $50,000 The Haile Selassie Zoo in Ethiopia is overdue for upgrade. See page 6. (Einat Danieli) bail, Grimes e-mailed to ANIMAL PEOPLE, Tammy Grimes & Doogie. (Dogs Deserve Better) for whom she is a part-time assistant web site shepherd/Labrador mix Jake. They claim he is developer. Charged with theft, receiving stolen 19 years old, an extraordinary age for either Thai coup may hit wildlife traffic property, criminal mischief, and criminal tres- breed. The Arnolds told news media that the dog was in the condition he was in because he is B A N G K O K ––The September set for September 23, was rescheduled for pass, Grimes remained convinced she had done arthritic and they had hesitated to have him 20, 2006 Thai military coup postponed for September 29. the right thing. euthanized. They said they had given him six days the already long delayed return of Another seven orangutans are “I will not take this lying down,” aspirin for pain relief. 41 smuggled orangutans from Thailand to suffering from hepatitis, the Jakarta Post Grimes pledged. The first veterinarian to examine the Indonesia. Still, Wildlife Friends Found- reported on September 16. Indonesia has The criminal trespass and criminal dog after Grimes took him, Nour Hassane of ation Thailand founder Edwin Wiek told refused to accept them, at least until after mischief counts were dismissed at a September the Veterinary Hospital of Altoona, “didn’t members of the Asian Animal Protection they recover. 21 preliminary hearing, as about 75 Grimes hesitate when asked, based on his experience Network, “We believe that under the new “The Borneo Orangutan Survival supporters demonstrated outside. Grimes is to and to a reasonable degree of veterinary certain- rule the conservation of wildlife will Foundation and Wildlife Friends, who stand trial on the charges of theft and receiving ty, if Jake was neglected or abused,” wrote improve.” were to facilitate the repatriation for the stolen property on November 27. The Arnolds call the elderly German (continued on page 15) The repatriation flight, orginally (continued on page 19) ANIMAL PEOPLE News For People Who Care About Animals October 2006 Volume XVI, #8 Above: Goats grab a bite in flooded Orissa. Below: Street cow swims through Surat. (Photos by Sherry Grant & PfA/Mumbai.) Could carbon monoxide gas + chambers make a comeback? + Are the surging numbers of danger- monoxide, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and ous dogs entering animal shelters retarding decompression chambers were used to kill ani- progress toward abolishing gas chambers? mals in high volume. The Dayton gas chamber Warren Cox began to wonder in May was used to kill specific animals whom some 2004 when he arrived for a stint as interim of the staff considered too dangerous to han- executive director at the Montgomery County dle. Cox mentioned to ANIMAL PEOPLE Animal Shelter in Dayton, Ohio, and found a his concern that the influx of bigger, more carbon monoxide chamber that only a few days dangerous dogs might bring gassing back––not before was still in sporadic use. because it is safer than sodium pentobarbital Having managed more than two injection, but because it is perceived as safer dozen shelters since 1952, Cox knew he was by poorly trained personnel. Ameri-can looking at an anachronism. The Dayton cham- Humane had specifically noted poor training at ber had supposedly been decommissioned the Montgomery County Animal Shelter. years earlier. The Dayton Daily News p u b - “Ohio is definitely the last bastion of lished exposés of gassing in nearby Fayette the carbon monoxide box. When I think car- County and Darke County in 1995 and 1997 bon monoxide, I think Ohio,” shelter manage- without apparent awareness that animals were ment consultant and euthanasia trainer Doug still gassed right there in Dayton. Fakkema told ANIMAL PEOPLE [SEE “HARSH MONSOONS TEST RESCUERS,” PAGE 11.] Continued gassing at the Mont- But Cox was not the first to mention gomery County Animal Shelter came to light to ANIMAL PEOPLE a suspicion that as result of a September 2003 complaint to gassing might be returning to common use, if Walking horse industry quick-steps county officials by veterinarian Sue Rancurello not public acceptance, and the shelter person- and shelter volunteer Jodi Gretchen, and was nel who have mentioned it, though mostly after failed USDA soring inspections discontinued after a shelter evaluation by from the Midwest and South, have hardly all American Humane affirmed the obsolescence been from Ohio. N A S H V I L L E––Between allegedly “in a more consistent manner.” of gassing. Concern that gassing may regain “sored” horses and sore losers, walking horse Soring, explained Pat Raia of T h e “Two top administrators at the acceptance tends to take note of rapidly rising competition burst into national view as never Horse, “is a practice whereby horses are sub- Montgomery County Animal Shelter were insurance costs at shelters that receive large before in late August 2006. But the attention jected to deliberate skin lacerations around removed,” the Dayton Daily News reported, in numbers of potentially dangerous dogs, lead- was almost all embarrassing to breeders and their hooves or the application of caustic part for “using carbon monoxide instead of ing to economic pressure to use “no contact” exhibitors in a business whose excesses, a chemicals such as diesel fuel, kerosene, or lethal injection to euthanize more than the rec- handling methods, such as prevail in Japan. generation ago, prompted passage of the fed- lighter fluid to irritate their forelegs, thereby ommended number of animals.” Recent shelter surveys have found eral Horse Protection Act a year before the achieving higher stepping animation,” exag- Cox had the carbon monoxide cham- that pit bull terriers alone make up 20-25% of passage of the Animal Welfare Act. gerating the “big lick” gait for which walking ber removed. But Cox also took note of who the dogs entering U.S. shelters, and 40-50% of The Tennessee Walking Horse horses are known. used it, and why. Throughout the first half of the dogs who are killed: 10 times more pit bull National Celebration championship competi- “Horses can also be sored by having Cox’s long career in shelter work, carbon (continued on page 6) tion in Shelbyville was cancelled on August nails driven into the ‘frog’ on the bottoms of 26 after USDA inspectors disqualified seven their hooves, “ added Nashville Tennessean of the 10 finalists for alleged soring violations staff writer Brad Schrade, “or by being made of the Horse Protection Act. For the first time to wear overly heavy horseshoes that can pull in the 67-year history of the event, it named the hoof off the leg. In an effort to make the no grand champion. pain stop, the horses step high in a reaction to The National Celebration reportedly the soring agents, federal officials say.” brings as much as $38.5 million a year into In practical terms, the Frist recom- Shelbyville. mendation would mean that the looser inter- U.S. Senate Majority Leader Bill pretations of the less experienced inspectors Frist (R-Tennessee) on September 7 asked who supervise local and regional walking USDA undersecretary Bruce Knight to “clari- horse shows would prevail over the judgement fy” the USDA definition of soring to enable of the experts who govern the top events. inspectors to enforce the Horse Protection Act (continued on page 9) 2 - ANIMAL PEOPLE, October 2006 + + ANIMAL PEOPLE, October 2006 - 3 Editorial Voting to help animals On midterm election day, November 2, 2006, depending on the will of the U.S. Who a person votes for is less important than explaining to the candidate why he/she electorate, both the House of Representatives and the Senate may shift from Republican to got the vote. If animal advocates vote for someone but the someone isn’t aware of having the Democratic control. President George W. Bush, a Republican, will remain in the White support, the vote has much less influence. House until 2008, but history suggests that if either the House or the Senate goes to the Informing losing candidates why they lost votes is also worthwhile, especially Democrats––or both––the outcome for the next two years will probably be much better for ani- before elections so that they have a chance to amend their positions, but also afterward. The mals than if either party controlled all three elected branches of the federal government. actual candidate may never run for office again––or may come back with a different platform. That possibility alone should be sufficient incentive to get pro-animal voters out to The person most likely to be influenced, however, is the campaign manager. Campaign man- the polls in the many closely contested districts, even where neither candidate has a record on agers often are hired professionals, who represent many candidates over the years, and often animal issues that especially inspires either support or opposition. Pro-animal voters will obvi- they learn their jobs by representing losing candidates. Influencing a young campaign manag- ously want to support strongly pro-animal candidates of either party, and oppose those with er who made a good showing on the losing side may at times be more valuable, eventually, anti-animal records, as indicated by the legislative scorecards published by such organizations than influencing a winning candidate whose term is brief.
Recommended publications
  • Meat and Morality: Alternatives to Factory Farming
    J Agric Environ Ethics (2010) 23:455–468 DOI 10.1007/s10806-009-9226-x Meat and Morality: Alternatives to Factory Farming Evelyn B. Pluhar Accepted: 30 November 2009 / Published online: 18 December 2009 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Scientists have shown that the practice of factory farming is an increasingly urgent danger to human health, the environment, and nonhuman animal welfare. For all these reasons, moral agents must consider alternatives. Vegetarian food production, humane food animal farming, and in-vitro meat production are all explored from a variety of ethical perspectives, especially utilitarian and rights- based viewpoints, all in the light of current U.S. and European initiatives in the public and private sectors. It is concluded that vegetarianism and potentially in-vitro meat production are the best-justified options. Keywords Factory farming Á Humane farming Á In-vitro meat production Á Rights theory Á Utilitarianism Á Vegetarianism factory farming (FAK-tuh-ree FAHR-ming) noun: an industrialized system of producing meat, eggs, and milk in large-scale facilities where the animal is treated as a machine (Wordsmith 2008) After several years of receiving ‘‘A Word for the Day’’ from a dictionary service, the author was interested to see the above definition pop up in the email inbox. The timing was perhaps not coincidental. In spring 2008, the Pew Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Production completed a two-year investigation of factory- farming practices in the United States. At the end of its 1,100-page report, the Commission recommended a ten-year timeline for the termination of the most intensive production techniques, including battery cages, gestation crates, and force- feeding birds to harvest their fatty livers for foie gras (Hunger Notes 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Reportable in the Supreme Court of India Civil
    1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5387 OF 2014 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.11686 of 2007) Animal Welfare Board of India …. Appellant Versus A. Nagaraja & Ors. …. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5388 OF 2014 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.10281 of 2009) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5389-5390 OF 2014 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.18804-18805 of 2009) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5391 OF 2014 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.13199 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5392 OF 2014 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.13200 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5393 OF 2014 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.4598 of 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5394 OF 2014 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 12789 of 2014) (@ SLP(C) CC…4268 of 2013) Page 1 2 WRIT PETITION (C) NO.145 OF 2011 AND T.C. (C) Nos.84, 85, 86, 97, 98 and 127 of 2013 K.S. Radhakrishnan, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. We are, in these cases, concerned with an issue of seminal importance with regard to the Rights of Animals under our Constitution, laws, culture, tradition, religion and ethology, which we have to examine, in connection with the conduct of Jallikattu, Bullock-cart races etc. in the States of Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra, with particular reference to the provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 (for short ‘the PCA Act’), the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Jallikattu Act, 2009 (for short “TNRJ Act”) and the notification dated 11.7.2011 issued by the Central Government under Section 22(ii) of the PCA Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Cruelty on Animals and Related Rights
    PJAEE, 17 (6) (2020) CRUELTY ON ANIMALS AND RELATED RIGHTS Maithili Chaudhury1, Nilanjan Chakraborty2 1,2 Asst. Professer, Faculty of Legal Studies, Siksha O Anusandhan Email: [email protected], [email protected] Maithili Chaudhury, Nilanjan Chakraborty: Cruelty On Animals And Related Rights -- Palarch’s Journal Of Archaeology Of Egypt/Egyptology 17(6). ISSN 1567-214x Keywords: Animal Rights, Animal Husbandry, Anti-cruelty ethic, Social Ethic ABSTRACT Businesses and occupations must remain consistent with social ethics or risk losing their freedom. An important social ethical issue that has arisen over the past four decades is animal welfare in various areas of human use. The ethical interest of the society has outgrown the conventional morality of animal cruelty, which originated in biblical times and is embodied in the laws of all civilized societies. There are five major reasons, most notably the substitution of husbandry-based agriculture with industrial agriculture, for this new social concern. This loss of husbandry to industry has threatened the traditional fair contract between humans and animals, leading to significant animal suffering on four different fronts. Because such suffering is not caused by cruelty, it was necessary to express social concerns with a new ethic for animals. Since ethics is based on pre-existing ethics rather than ex nihilo, society has looked for its properly modified ethics for humans to find moral categories that apply to animals. This concept of legally encoded rights for animals has emerged as a plausible vehicle for reform. The paper provides brief summary of the animal welfare board of India, legal capacity in order to possess rights and tries to establish relation between legal personhood and rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Jallikattu (Part-II) What the Future Portends for Tamil Nadu
    Jallikattu (Part-II) What the future portends for Tamil Nadu. (N.T.Ravindranath) Dated: 03-04-2017 Hearing petitions filed by Animal Welfare Society of India (AWSI), PETA and other animal rights organizations against Tamil Nadu government’s ordinance allowing Jallikattu in Tamil Nadu, the Supreme Court of India on January 31, 2017 refused to stay the ordinance. However, the court expressed its displeasure over the developments in Tamil Nadu by severely criticizing the state government for its failure to control the law and order situation in the state while trying to implement the court directive on Jallikattu. The court’s decision was welcomed by all sections of people in Tamil Nadu as it defused tension and prevented a renewed flare-up in Tamil Nadu. However, the final verdict in the case is yet to be delivered. The Jallikattu is a rural bull-taming sport conducted only in five southern districts of Madurai, Theni, Thiruchirapally, Pudukottai and Dindigul in Tamil Nadu. This harvest sport is generally held in the month of January as part of the harvest festival ‘Pongal’. Though this event is held only in a few villages of five southern districts of Tamil Nadu, it is quite a popular rural sport attracting a large number of villagers. The bulls participating in the game rarely get injured. But many brave men who participate in this dare-devil event get injured every year and some of them get killed also. But people of Tamil Nadu still love this sport and they are very angry over the ban on Jallikattu imposed on it by the Supreme Court in 2014, in response to the demands and objections raised by some animal rights activists.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Legislation by the Animal Law Committee A. 142
    REPORT ON LEGISLATION BY THE ANIMAL LAW COMMITTEE A. 142 M. of A. L. Rosenthal AN ACT to amend the Education Law, in relation to animal hatching projects. THIS LEGISLATION IS APPROVED WITH A RECOMMENDATION I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED LAW Assembly Bill No. 1421 would amend the Education Law to add a new paragraph 5 to subdivision c of section 809 to prohibit school districts, school principals, administrators, and teachers from requiring, permitting, or conducting a lesson or experimental study “using an animal in a hatching project in any such school or during any activity conducted under the auspices of such school whether or not the activity takes place on the premises of such school.” II. BACKGROUND A “hatching project” refers to an educational lesson in which fertilized chicken or duckling eggs are kept by students, usually in classroom incubators, to be hatched within one to four weeks. Teachers use school hatching projects as a way to teach students about life cycles of birds and embryonic development.2 Fertilized eggs for school hatching projects are sold, rented, or donated to schools from various sources, including some local offices of Cornell Cooperative Extension in New York,3 1 The full text of the bill, with accompanying memorandum, is available at https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/? default_fld=&leg_video=&bn=A00142&term=&Summary=Y&Memo=Y&Text=Y. (All websites last February 15, 2021.) 2 Cornell Cooperative Extension of Westchester County, Incubation & Embryology, http://westchester.cce.cornell.edu/4-h-youth-development/incubation-embryology. 3 E.g., Cornell Cooperative Extension of Suffolk County, Incubation & Embryology (Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book Collection at the Veggie Center FAR from COMPLETE, THIS LIBRARY of VEGETARIAN SOURCES SHOWS the BREADTH of OUR CULTURE
    2 WHAT YOU’LL FIND AT THE VEGETARIAN CENTER OF NYC: A RESOURCE GUIDE The Vegetarian Center is the If you’re a vegetarian, we’ve brightest jewel in VivaVegie’s got the answers! education and outreach crown. The Vegetarian Center of NYC is a unique clearinghouse for information. On a daily basis, it receives numerous The VivaVegie Society has a solid history of service to phone calls and walk-in visits from inquisitive people in- the vegetarian community. Since 1991 it has distributed terested in the vegetarian lifestyle. People are always tens of thousands of copies of its hallmark publication, grateful for what the center has to offer them, usually “101 Reasons Why I’m a Vegetarian” by Pamela free of charge. Rice. It has continuously published its journal, The Viva- Vine, for over 10 years. It has been tireless in its dedication This place is here for you. to creative and effective vegetarian street outreach. Hun- Today we vegetarians have a place to call home—a fa- dreds of people, and perhaps thousands, have adopted cility that is there strictly on our behalf. In the long run, the vegetarian lifestyle because of the efforts of the group. the center will grow into whatever the vegetarian com- VivaVegie’s proudest accomplishment, however, has munity of New York City decides it should be. VivaVegie been the opening of its Vegetarian Center. Here is a has laid a foundation. The challenge for us as a com- place that focuses on projecting the vegetarian point of munity is to come together and build this center into a view as its primary mission.
    [Show full text]
  • ARC News a Newsletter from the Animal Rights Coalition
    AARRCC NNEEWWSS The Poultry Issue The Poultry Issue Fall 2007 A publication of the Animal Rights Coalition to promote a compassionate world A Day in a Life in the City with Chickens by Mary Britton Clouse, Chicken Run Rescue It’s just before sunrise. Classical music seeps softly from the clock radio. The floor creaks as I step out of bed and the roosters stir from their sleep just below in our basement. Wings slap a warning that the first crow will come from Roseman – ARK-A-ARK-A-ARKGGG in his old, gravelly voice. We’ve been hearing that crow for almost five years now. Young Bing, named after Bing Crosby, chimes in with a melodious and melancholy greeting that sounds much like the first few notes of the Air Force anthem “Off We Go” – an appropriate way to start a day. I dress and pad downstairs. I sing a good morning song A beautiful day at Chicken Run Rescue to my beautiful birds as I tug on the lights. All seven girls are already up and pacing at their pen door, anxious to Rosco gets his eye drops for a slight infection. Roseman trundle up the stairs to the shed door and outside and see gets a half tablet of Baytril for a persistent foot infection. what garden snacks are left from yesterday’s treats. They Bing has just recovered from a very serious and unsolved have been thinking about them all night. Several also illness, perhaps from some toxic berry he found in the have plans to lay eggs in a little while.
    [Show full text]
  • UPC Fall 2018 Poultry Press
    Volume 28, Number 2 Fall 2018 Poultry compassionate and respectful treatmentPress of domestic fowl Promoting the Celebrating 28 years of dedicated activism for domestic fowl United Poultry Concerns promotes compassion and respect for chickens, turkeys, and other domestic fowl. UPC# 11656 Photo of Alisa and Amber at our Sanctuary in Machipongo, VA. United Poultry Bird Watching: Observational Journals & Bird Feeders Level: Grades 2 to 6 Duration: Four to Six Weeks Chicken Talk: The Language ofHumane Chickens Education Committee-United Federation of Teachers is unit explores the problems with classroom chick-hatching projects and By Karen Davis presents a variety of alternative projects for young students that focus on bird- Concerns Please visit our exhibit watching activities. e goal is to involve young students in the exciting and highly Our rooster, Glippie, sings on the roof of his motivating study of birds in their natural environments while developing their house, adding to the music of the yard a steady, skills of precise observation, recording, and analysis of what they see and hear, both quiet trill. Living with chickens has made verbally and pictorially. Here are/. two Activities from the unit. For the entire unit, go to me realize how tuneful and talkative these www.upc-online.org/hatching fascinating birds are. e language of chickens is an essential part of their personalities and of I. Activity: Observational Journals their highly developed social life. Chickens start P.O. Box 150 talking even before they are born. Your bird unit will rely on your students’ observational skills, so an observational journal Hatching is very helpful.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulations Concerning the Private Possession of Big Cats
    Regulations Concerning the Private Possession of Big Cats Austria • Brazil • Canada • China • Costa Rica • Denmark • England • Greece India • Israel • Japan • Lebanon • Malaysia • Mexico • Norway Russian Federation • South Africa • Spain Thailand • Turkey • Vietnam European Union June 2013 The Law Library of Congress, Global Legal Research Center (202) 707-6462 (phone) • (866) 550-0442 (fax) • [email protected] • http://www.loc.gov/law Contents Comparative Analysis......................................................................................................................1 Austria..............................................................................................................................................6 Brazil..............................................................................................................................................11 Canada............................................................................................................................................18 China..............................................................................................................................................25 Costa Rica ......................................................................................................................................29 Denmark.........................................................................................................................................34 England ..........................................................................................................................................35
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Projdoc.Pdf
    ! VINE Sanctuary Rooster Project! Why?! As many as 60 roosters each month unsuccessfully seek refuge at sanctuaries where there is no more room for roosters. Unwanted or homeless roosters who do not find refuge at sanctuaries are euthanized, !slaughtered, or abandoned to fend for themselves. ! How?! We will both increase the collective capacity of sanctuaries to offer refuge to roosters AND intervene in !the causes of rooster homelessness, as follows:! I. Increase collective capacity of sanctuaries! A. Open a new satellite sanctuary just for roosters! B. Set up an online rooster “wiki” for sanctuaries! C. Provide a rooster rehabilitation and care manual to sanctuaries! D. Provide on-site technical assistance to sanctuaries! E. Provide material assistance to sanctuaries! II. Reduce rooster homelessness! A. Educate the public about roosters in order to counter the stereotypes about roosters that both engender cockfighting and lead people to reject roosters as companion animals! B. Discourage the purchase of chicks from hatcheries! C. Promote alternatives to backyard hen keeping for eggs (adoption of “spent” hens as companion animals, veganic home gardening, backyard refuges for wild birds, etc.)! ! D. Increase the knowledge of humane authorities and local humane societies! When?! We will open the new satellite sanctuary, set up the wiki for sanctuaries, and publish the handbook on rooster rehabilitation and care within three months of securing funds. The remaining elements of the !project will be rolled out over the next nine months.! About VINE ! VINE Sanctuary is an LGBTQ-led farmed animal refuge that works for social and environmental justice as well as for animal liberation.
    [Show full text]
  • Animals in the Public Debate: Welfare, Rights, and Conservationism in India Daniela Berti
    Animals in the Public Debate: Welfare, Rights, and Conservationism in India Daniela Berti To cite this version: Daniela Berti. Animals in the Public Debate: Welfare, Rights, and Conservationism in India. Reli- gions, MDPI, 2019, 10 (8), pp.475. 10.3390/rel10080475. hal-02291943 HAL Id: hal-02291943 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02291943 Submitted on 19 Sep 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. religions Article Animals in the Public Debate: Welfare, Rights, and Conservationism in India Daniela Berti National Centre for Scientific Research, 75016 Paris, France; [email protected] Received: 16 June 2019; Accepted: 5 August 2019; Published: 13 August 2019 Abstract: This paper proposes a survey of the many ways in which people look at and deal with animals in contemporary India. On the basis of ethnographic research and of multiple written sources (judgments, newspapers, websites, legal files, activist pamphlets, etc.), I present some of the actors involved in the animal debate—animal activists, environmental lawyers, judges, and hunter-conservationists—who adopt different, though sometimes interconnected, approaches to animals. Some of them look at animals as victims that need to be rescued and treated in the field, others fight for animals in Parliament or in Court so that they can be entitled to certain rights, others are concerned with the issue of species survival, where the interest of the group prevails on the protection of individual animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Law & Policy Program
    HARVARD ANIMAL LAW & POLICY PROGRAM HARVARD LAW SCHOOL Annual Report Fiscal Year 2017 July 1, 2016 – June 30, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Part One: Report of Activities 2 A. Summary of the Academic Year 2016–2017 2 1. Executive Summary 2 2. Research, Scholarship, and Activities 3 a. Program Mission and Areas of Inquiry 3 b. Research, Scholarship, and Project Activities 3 i. Professor Kristen Stilt 3 ii. Academic Fellow, Delcianna Winders 4 iii. Policy Fellow, Alice DiConcetto 5 iv. Farmed Animal Law & Policy Fellow, Peter Brandt 5 v. Graduate Scholar, Jessica Eisen 6 c. Conferences 7 i. The Animal Welfare Act at Fifty Conference 7 ii. The Ivy League Vegan Conference at Harvard University 8 d. Academic Workshops 9 i. The Animal Welfare Act at Fifty Workshop 9 ii. Animal Agriculture from the Middle East to Asia Workshop 9 e. Other Events 11 3. Contributions to HLS Teaching Program 12 4. Participation of HLS Students in Program Activities 14 a. ALPP Student Travel Grants 14 b. Mentoring and Guidance 14 c. ALPP Student Writing Prize 16 5. Faculty Participation 17 6. Other Contributions to the HLS Community 17 a. Faculty Director, Kristen Stilt 18 b. Executive Director, Chris Green 18 7. Law Reform and Advocacy 19 a. Faculty Director, Kristen Stilt 19 b. Executive Director, Chris Green 21 c. Academic Fellow, Delcianna Winders 23 8. Connections to the Profession & Public Outreach 25 a. Faculty Director, Kristen Stilt 26 b. Executive Director, Chris Green 27 9. Collaboration with Other Schools and Departments at HLS & Harvard University 30 a.
    [Show full text]