11: THE REMAINDER AND FACTOR THEOREM
Solving and simplifying polynomials Thus, from arithmetic, we know that we can express a In our study of quadratics, one of the methods used to dividend as: simplify and solve was factorisation. For example, we may solve for x in the following equation as follows: Dividend = (Quotient ´ Divisor) + Remainder 2 x + 5x + 6 = 0 When there is no remainder, � = 0, and the divisor is (x + 3)(x + 2) = 0 now a factor of the number, so x + 3 = 0,⇒ x = −3
x + 2 = 0 ⇒ x = −2 Dividend = Quotient ´ Factor
Hence, x = −3 or −2 are solutions or roots of the The process we followed in arithmetic when dividing quadratic equation. is very similar to what is to be done in algebra. Examine the following division problems in algebra A more general name for a quadratic is a polynomial and note the similarities. of degree 2, since the highest power of the unknown is two. The method of factorisation worked for Division of a polynomial by a linear expression quadratics whose solutions are integers or rational We can apply the same principles in arithmetic to numbers. dividing algebraic expressions. Let the quadratic For a polynomial of order 3, such as function �(�) represent the dividend, and (� − 1) the x3 + 4x2 + x − 6 = 0 the method of factorisation may divisor, where also be applied. However, obtaining the factors is not �(�) = 3� − � + 2 as simple as it was for quadratics. We would likely have to write down three linear factors, which may Quotient 3x + 2 prove difficult. In this section, we will learn to use the 2 Dividend remainder and factor theorems to factorise and to solve x −1 3x − x + 2 polynomials that are of degree higher than 2. − (3x2 − 3x)
Divisor 2x 2 + Before doing so, let us review the meaning of basic − (2x − 2) terms in division. 4 Remainder Terms in division We are familiar with division in arithmetic.
From the above example, we can deduce that: 3� − � + 2 = (3� + 2)(� − 1) + 4 Quotient 15 ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ Dividend 32 489 Dividend Quotient Divisor Remainder 32 Divisor 169 Consider (� − 1) = 0, 160 �(�) = (3� + 2) × 0 + 4 = 4 9 Remainder But, (� − 1) = 0 implies that � = 1 The number that is to be divided is called the dividend. Thewww.faspassmaths.com dividend is divided by the divisor. Therefore, when � = 1, �(�) = 4 or �(1) = 4. The result is the quotient and the remainder is what is left over. We can conclude that when the polynomial 3� − � + 2 From the above example, we can deduce that: is divided by (� − 1), the remainder is 489 = (15 × 32) + 9 �(1) = 4 ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ Dividend Quotient Divisor Remainder We shall now perform division using a cubic polynomial as our dividend.
Copyright © 2019. Some Rights Reserved. www.faspassmaths.com Pg 1 of 7 2 We can conclude that when the polynomial x +14x + 25 3 2 2� − 3� + 4� + 5 x − 2 x +12x − 3x + 4 is divided by (� + 2), the remainder is − (x3 − 2x2 ) �(−2) = −31 14x2 − 3x + 4 − (14x − 28x) The Remainder Theorem for divisor (� − �) 25x + 4 From the above examples, we saw that a polynomial −(25x − 50) can be expressed as a product of the quotient and the divisor plus the remainder: 54 3� − � + 2 = (3� + 2)(� − 1) + 4
From the above example, we can deduce that: � + 12� − 3� + 4 = (� + 14� + 25)(� − 2) + 54 � + 12� − 3� + 4 = (� + 14� + 25)(� − 2) + 54 ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ 2� − 3� + 4� + 5 = (2� + � + 18)(� + 2) − 31 Dividend Quotient Divisor Remainder
We can now formulate the following expression Consider (� − 2) = 0, f (x) Q(x) �(�) = (� + 14� + 25) × 0 + 54 = 54 where, is a polynomial whose quotient is and whose remainder is R when divided by (x − a) . But, (� − 2) = 0 implies that � = 2 fx()= Qx ()´- ( x a )+ R
Therefore, when � = 2, �(�) = 54 or �(2) = 54. If we were to substitute � = � in the above expression, We can conclude that when the polynomial then our result will be equal to �, the remainder when � + 12� − 3� + 4 the divisor, (� − �) is divided by the polynomial, is divided by (� − 2), the remainder is �(�). �(2) = 54 We are now able to state the remainder theorem. Now consider another example of a cubic polynomial divided by a linear divisor. The Remainder Theorem If is any polynomial and is divided f (x) f (x) 2 by , then the remainder is 2x + 7x +18 (x − a) fa(). x + 2 2x3 − 3x2 + 4x + 5 The validity of this theorem can be tested in any of − (2x3 + 4x2 ) the equations above, for example: − 7x2 + 4x + 5 − (7x2 −14x) 1. When 3� − � + 2 was divided by (� − 1), the remainder was 4. 18x + 5 −(18x + 36) According to the remainder theorem, the remainder − 31 can be computed by substituting � = 1 in �(�) �(�) = 3� − � + 2 �(1) = 3(1) − 1 + 2 From the above example, we can deduce that: �(1) = 4 2� − 3� + 4�www.faspassmaths.com+ 5 = (2� + � + 18)(� + 2) − 31 ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ 2. When � + 12� − 3� + 4 was divided by Dividend Quotient Divisor Remainder (� − 2), the remainder was 54.
Consider (� + 2) = 0, According to the remainder theorem, the remainder �(�) = (2� + � + 18) × 0 − 31 = −31 can be computed by substituting � = 2 in �(�)
�(�) = � + 12� − 3� + 4 But, (� + 2) = 0 implies that � = −2 �(2) = (2) + 12(2) − 3(2) + 4 Therefore, when � = −2, �(�) = −31 or �(2) = 8 + 48 − 6 + 4 �(−2) = −31. �(2) = 54
Copyright © 2019. Some Rights Reserved. www.faspassmaths.com Pg 2 of 7 The above rule is called the Factor Theorem, it is a 3. When 2� − 3� + 4� + 5 was divided by special case of the Remainder Theorem, when � = 0. (� + 2) the remainder was −31. The validity of this theorem can be tested by substituting � = 1 in each of the above functions. According to the remainder theorem, the remainder can be computed by substituting � = −2 in �(�) �(�) = 3� − � − 2 �(�) = 8� − 10� − � + 3