Ii(

50302 Federal Register I Vol. 55. No. 234 I Wednesday. December 5. 1990 I Rules and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the comments to Docket No. 26242 did not address any issue related to the Backgrnuud Federal Aviation Administration proposal. see On June 21.1988. the FAA published a 14 CFR Part 91 final rule which requires aircraft: Issues SF>"-R..J [Dockel No. 26242, SFAR No, 621 operating within Mode C veil airspace to The commenters identified the "'z.- \A be equipped with an operable Mode C following issues in response to the RIN 212D-AD52 transponder (53 FR 23356). Aircraft nol proposals~ . originally certificated with an engine­ (a) The reliefproposed is nat. Suspension of Certain Aircraft driven electrical system or nol adequate. The commenters favored a Op~rationsFrom the Transponder subsequently certified with such a general exclusion of aircraft operations With Automallc Pressure Altitude system installed, balloons. and gliders from the Mode C transponder equipment Reporting Capability Requirement are excluded from this requiremenlThe requirement in the airspace from the AGENCY: Federal Aviation Mode C transponder requirement surface up to 2,500 or 3,500 feet above Administration (FAA). DOT. resulted from regulatory proceedings ground level [ACL) underneath Mode C initiated under Notice 8&-2 (53 FR 4306: ~ ACTION: Final rule. "$"eil airspace. February 12. 1988.) (b) The specified altitudes sh"uldbe SUMMARY: This Special Federal Aviation On May 25.1990. the FAA published .. uniform. These commenters believed Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRMl Regulation [SFAR) suspends, until the't 8 common altitude should be December 30, 1993. certain provisions of which proposed to suspend.. until .specified for all of the listed . t,e regulation which require the December 30. 1993. the Mode C lcJ Other airports within the TCA veil instaUation and use of automatic transponder equipment requirements foc should be listed. A few commenters altitude reporting (Mode C) certain aircraft operations in the vicinity st&ted that certain additional airports of approximately 300 airports in the transponders (Mode C rule). This should be included In the list of airports. outlaying area of Mode C ....,ils {55 FR suspension provides access to specified (d) A Jist ofoirports for certoin TCA 's outlying airports within 30 miles of a 21722: otice No. 90-16). The FAA had determined that operations of aircraI1 fit/ere omittedfrom the proposal. terminal control area (TC.J\) primary fej Operations between two e'(cluded (Mode C veil) for aircraft without without Mode C transponders could be accommodated safely provided such airports within the same TeA Mode C Mode C transponders. The FAA believes veil shouldbe permitted. that the operation of an aircraft without operations are conducted in areas nol currently within ATe radar coverage. (f) The speCIfied oltitudes ond the 1.5­ .a Mode C transponder.can be safely nauticalmile radius from excluded accommodated provided that the The proposal identified those airports: {l} Alt which.operations \\'ithin a 1.5~ airport is too restrictive. Some operation is conducted in areas not commenters believed that limiting the currently within air traffic control (ATCl nautical mile radius of the airport. and along the most direct route between that exclusion to a 1.5~nautical mile radius radar coverage and not predominantly from a listed airport would be too inst~ll airport and the outer boundary of the used by aircraft required to and restrictive for 8 pilot and that use traffic alert and collision avoidance Mode C veil, at or below a specified altitude. cannot be detected by ATe determining a distance of 1.5 miles from systems [TCAS) equipment. This role an airport would be difficult. Other identifies approximately 300 airports al 'radar. and (2) are not served by aircraft required to be equipped with TCAS. commenters were concerned that the which operations by.aircr:aft not specified altitudes. such as 1.000 feet equipped with Mode e transponders can Comments to the NPRM AGL. would not afford pilots sufficient be conducted at and below a specified The comment perjod for Notice No. mS'fgin for maneuvering. altitude: (1) Within a 2-nautical mile 90-16 elOpired on ~uly 24. 1990. The FAA Ie) The proximity ofHernando County radius of a listed airport; and (Z) along 8 received 81 comments to the proposaL Airport (Tampa veil) to a military ,direct route between that airport andt.'e the majority of which were favorable. .training route may compromise safety. outer boundary of the Mode e veil. The However:, ,m~st ,commenters believed Th-e Air Force commented that the FAA expects that radar coverage in that the proposal did not go far enough .ex'Clusion of the Mode e transponder 'Yeil'ai~space 'Some Mode .c will improve 'Wi th ,regar-d to providing access to equipment requirement for operations in as a resu" of scheduled. radar system air:P0[lts and .Iocations within Mode C the vicinity of Hernando County Airport. upgrades. After new.radar systems are veil airspace. The Aircraft Owners and Brooks\~lle. FL, would impact the in service. the FAA may conduct field 'Pilols AsoociatftJD (AOPA). the quality of traffic advisory service its evaluations to reassess the actual radar Exper.imental A1rcraft Association pUots routinely receive from Tampa coverage in appropriate areas. Based on (F.EA). lhe Air Lioe Pilols Association Approach Control. those reassessments. the FAA. after (ALPA). the Soaring Society of America further rulemaking. may extend the (SSA). the D~partment of the Air Fnrce. Discussion of- Issues period that the Mode C transponder the Ohio Department of Transportation. 10) The reliefproposed is not () requirement will be suspended for local aviation organizations and adequate. Most df the commenters N operations at certain airports on a case· businesses. and private citizens were ~n believed that Ihe FAA should provide by-case basis. general support of the proposal bul access for aircraft without Mode C DATES: December 5, 1990. SFAR No. 62 provided ~uggestions and comments. transponders to all airports or locations explrefi December 30. 1993. The Department of the Army. although within Mode e veil airspace, and that FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: generally in support of the concept of the FAA should therefore exclude the Mr. Richard K. Kagehiro. Air Traffie providing access for aircraft without airspace from the surface up_ to 2.500 or Rules Branch. ATP-230. Federal Mode C transponder equipment to 3.500 feet AGI. from the Mode C Aviation Administration. 800 certain airports within the Mode C vcil transponder requirement. The FAA has Independence Avenue SW., opposed the proposal on the basis that maintained that safety is enhanced by Washington. DC 20591. telephone(202) Army airports and locanons should be the Mode C role because the operation 267--1l783. included in the list of airports. Se\'enof of..~1

which would result in an operation designate other airports at which the Mode e transponder equipment beyond a 2-nautical~mile radius of the operations may be suspended from the requirement until December 30. 1993. airport. Similarly, the FAA is adding Mode C transponder requirements if The Special Federal Aviation Regulation clarifying language to allow an aircraft those evaluations detennine that suc.h operator to proceed on other than the operations are Dot within adar This SFAR permits the operation of an most direct and expeditious routing coverage. aircraft to and from designated airports between a listed airport and the outer Proposed and Folure TeA's within the Mode e veil without a Mode boundary of the Mode C veil when so C transponder. A list of airports at directed by ATC. A list of airports and specified which operations without 8 Mode C With regard to the altitudes for each altitudes below which aircraft transponder will be permitted is airport, tbe FAA believes that the operations will be excluded from the contained in this SFAR The Mode C specified altitudes provide sufficient Mode e transponder requirement for the transponder requirement will be maneuvering rpom and allow for proposed Washington Tri-Area TCA reinstated for aircraft operations to and operation in compliance with the . Mode C veils is included in this SFAR. from the designated airports after minimum safe altitude provisions of Should the proposed Washington Tri­ December 3D, 1993. However. the FAA § 91.119. However. should the pilot of an Area TCA be established, the effective may conduct field e"aluations to aircraft determine that the operation at date of the suspension of the Mode C reassess the radar coverage within or below the specified altitude is unsafe transponder requirements for operations certain TeA Mode C veils on a site-by­ due to meteorological conditions. in the vicinity of the listed airports "·",ill site basis after new radar systems are in aircraft operating characteristics. or be coincident with the effective date of service. Based on those reassessments, other factors. then the pilot should seek the establishment of tbat TCA. The list the FAA may extend the period that the relief from the Mode C transponder of airports within the proposed Mode e transponder requirement will be requirement via the ATC authorization Washington Tri-Area TeA Mode e veil suspended for operations at certain process. at which operations will be excluded airports on a case-by-case basis through (g) The proximity ofHernando County from the Mode C transponder further rulemaking. . a requirement contains a number of Airport (Tampa veil) to military Aircraft operations without a Mode C airports which ere also included in the training route may compromise safety. lransponder will be permitted within a list of airports for the current Tbe Air Force commented that the 2-nautical mile radius of a designated exclusion of the Mode C transponder Washington TCA Mode C veil. However. should the Washington Tri­ airport from the surface up to a specified equipment requirement for operations in altitude. Additionally, aircraft the vicinity of Hernando County Airport Area TCA be adopted. the current operations without a Mode C would impact the quality of the traffic Washington TCA would be revoked and transponder will be permitted along the advisory service its pilots routinely replaced by the Washington Tri-Area most direct route between that receive from Tampa Approach Contro1. TCA. The suspension of the Mode C designated airport and the boundary of The FAA does not agree with this transponder requirement for aircraft the Mode C veil, at and below the comment because only those operations operations at the airports specified for at. to, and from Hernando County the proposed Washington Tn-Area TCA specified altitude. The routing must be Airport that are: (1) Within 30 miles of will coincide with the effective date of consistent with established traffic Tampa : and (2) not the Washington Tri-Area TCA, should patterns. noise abatement procedures. within ATC radar coverage. will be that TCA become effective. and safety. This SFAR and the excluded from the Mode C transponder With regard to future proposed TCA's. designation of altitudes for each airport. equipment requirement. Therefore. the a list of airports and specified altitudes however. are not intended to supersede FAA does not believe that the Air Force below which aircraft operations would the provisions of § 91.119, Minimum safe is routinely receiving traffic advisories be excluded from the Mode C altitudes. Routings to and from each with respect to these aircraft since such transponder requirement will airport are intentionally unspecified to aircraft would not be detected by ATC accompany any notice of proposed permit the pilot. complying with rad8J'. Excluding operations in the rulemaking for each proposed TCA. The § 91.119, to avoid operating over vicinity of Hernando County Airport inclusion of the list of airports in the obstructions. noise-sensitive areas. etc. from the Mode e transponder NPRM for the proposed TCA will allow Further, should the pilot of an aircraft requirement should have no impact on the public to fully consider the impact of intending to operate into or out of an the quality of traffic advisory service the proposed TCA and Mode C veil on airport listed in this SFAR determine provided by ATC. aircraft operations; provide the public that the operation at or below the with the-opportunity to comment on the specified altitude is unsafe due to ATe Radar System Improvements list of airports and specified altitudes: meteorological conditions, aircraft The FAA expects the radar coverage and allow for full consideration of such ­ operating characteristics. or other in some Mode e veil airspace to comments along with other comments to factors. the pilot should seek relief from improve as a result of the scheduled the proposed TCA. If the proposed TCA the Mode e transponder requirement via upgrading of rddar systems at each TeA is adopted, then a final rule amending the ATe authorization process. location. After new radar systems are in this SFAR will be published with an Aircraft operations at, to. or from the service. the FAA may conduct field effective data coincident with the listed airports will be suspended from evaluations to reassess actual radar effective .date of the new TCA. The final the Mode e transponder requirement coverage on a site-by-site basis. Those rule amendment to this SFAR wHl list until December 30. 1993. This time reassessments may result in future those airports within the new TCA period will accommodate the scheduled . proposed rulemaking to: (1) Extend the -Mode e veilat.which aircraft operations upgrading of present ATe radar systems period that the Mode C transponder at antl belowthe specified altitude at each TCA airport and an evaluation requirement is to be suspended if the within a 2-nautical mile radius ·of an period to determine the extent of radar evaluations indicate that aircraft airporland along a direct route between coverage within each Mode C veil as a operations at a designated airport are that airport and tbe outer boundary of result ofradar system enhancements. still not within radar coverage; or (2J the Mode C veil will be suspended from Based on the results of these Federal Register I Vol. 55. No. ·234 I Wednesday, December 5. 1990 I Rules and R"8ulations 503iJ5

evaluations. the period that the Mode C sodery. In Rddition, this rule will not veil and currenUy autholized to operate transponder requirement w~1l be . impose!' significant costs on the a'Jiation without a Mode C transponder will have suspended for operations at certain community (namely, fixed based little· incentive to relocate since: (1) The airports may be extended on a sit~-by­ operiitors). This assessment Is based on ATC authorization contains those site basis by further rulemaking. raaonale contained in the following conditions and provisions neces~8;-y for Operations of aircraft without Mode C discus$ion for each of these groups. safe operation and the operator has transponders at airpcrts not listed by For the FAA, this rule will not impose agreed to comply with those provisions; this ule will continue to be safely additional costs for either personnel or and (2) th..e renewal process for an accommodated in accordance with cquipnlent. The acquisition of new radar existing authorization is less existing provisions for individual ATC tracking systems is a routine (',ost of cumbersome than the first-time authorizations. upgrading FAA equipment and will not authorization process. Furthermore, the occur as a result of this rule. In addition. FAA does not believe that significant. Regulatory Evaluation Summary this rule will not require the FAA to hire Dum.bers of GA aircraft without Mode C IntroJucl..'on additional personnel. This is because transponders will relocate from outside the temporary suspension of the Morle C This sectian summarizes the full a Mvde C veil to a designated airport b'aneponder requirement is exp~ctf!d to Mod~ regulatori evaluallon prepared by the within a even. This is because enhance air traffic control (ATC) t..iis rule wiB only allow aircraft without FAA which provides more detailed operation efficiency by eliminating the information on €s imates of the potential Mode C transponders to operate from nt::ed for ATC authorizations at the the sUIface up to a spt:cifjed altitude economic consequences of this final subj~ct designated airports. This action nl1~. This summary and the full withL'l a 2.0 nautical mile radius of a will reduce the demand on ATe designated airport and along the mest evaluation quantify. to the extent personnel and equipment resources. practicHble. estimated costs to the direct route between that airport and the This rule will not have an adverse boundary 01 the Mode C veil. Although private sector, consumers, Federal, State impact on aviation safety. The FAA and local governments, as well as this rule will provide greater access to a believes that access to certain outlying Mode C veil, the FAA believes that this anticipated benefits. GA airports by aircraft without Mode C Exacutive Order 12291. dated at:tion will not provide much of an transponders can be accommodated incentive for GA aircraft operators to February 17. 1961. directs Federal without diminishing Mode C safety agencies to promulgate new regulations relocate. This assessment is further benefits. provided the operation is supported by the belief that the vast or modify existing regulations only if conducted outside r3dar coverage. l)otential benefits to society for each majority of GA aircraft operators When aircraft operations are confined required to have Mode C transponders regulatory change outweigh potential exclusively to areas of no radar costs. The order also I'equireo the will have acqnired them by December cover3gc, many of the safety benefits of 30, 1990. This is whan the requirement preparation of a Regulatory Impact the Mode C rule cannot be realized. Analysis of all "major" rules except for such equipment at Airport Radar Future enhancement of the radar Service Areas goes into effect. li'lose responding to emergency tracking system is expected to increase situations or other narrowly defined radar coverage. thus extending the The FAA recognizes the possibility exigencies. A "mJjor" rule is one that is Mode C benefits to more areas outside that lost revenues incurred by some likely to result in an annual effect on the of the current radar coverage. The rnos outside of the Mode C veil could economy of $100 million or more. a sc.hecluled installation of the new rad~r be offset by revenue gains on the part of major increase in consumer costs, a ~racking systems at all TeA primary FBOs inside the veil. However, there is significant adverse effect on airports is expected to be completed in much unr.ertainty associated with this competition. or highly controversial. ahout three years, The Mode C possibility due to a lack of infot'mation The FAA has determined that this rule transponder requirerr..ent will be eoncerning the level of competition will not be "'major" as defined in the reinstated for aircraft operations to and among mas inside and outside of the executive order. Therefore, a fuB from the designated airports after Mode C veils throughout the United regulatory analysis. that includes the December 30. 1993. After new radar States. For example, in any given state. identification and evaluation of cost systems dre in sendee, the FAA may the market structure inside of the Mode reducing alternatives to the fmal rule, conduct field evaluations to reassess C veil could resemble a spatial has not been prepared. Instead, the actual radar coverage. Those monopoly. in which unit prices for agency has prepared a more concise reassessments may result in future services rendered by FBDs will be documcmt termed a regulatory proposed l'ulemaking to amend the higher than that of a more competitive evaluation that analyzes only this rule suspension period for operation at market structure located outside of the without identifying alternatives. In certain airports. veil. If some aircraft operator were to addition to a summary of the regulatory For the aviation community, the FAA relocate from areas of higher evaluation. this section also contains an anticipates no significant costs will be compelition to areas of lower final regulatory flexibility det~rmination incurred by fixed base operators [I1l0sJ competition among FEOs those required by the t980 Regulatory as the result of this rule. Fixed base operators may incur higher charges for Flexihility Act (Pub. L 96-354J and an operators represent the most likely services rendered. For those operators international trade impact assessment." group to potentially incur costs. These who elect to relocate, it can be assumed If the resder desires more detailed costs will be in the form of lost revenues to be in their best interest to do so. economic information than this from the relocation of GA ·aircraft Thus, any additional higher FHD charges summary cont~ins. then he/she ,should without Mode C transponders as a result aircraft operators incur as the result of consult the full regulatory evaluation of this acticn. However. it is' the relocating will be at least offset by those contained in the docket. informed opinion of FAA personnel that factors that prompted their decision to any potential cost impact on mas will relocate. The net change in revenue Benefit and, Cost Analysis be insignificant. The FAA believes that among mas may not be offsetting Costs. This final rule is not expected GA aircraft operators based at non­ because of differences in Unit prices 10 impo~e costs on either the FAA or designated airports within a Mode C charged. While it is not known to what 50306 Federal Register I Vol. 55, No, 234·/ Wednesday, December 5, 1990 I Rules and Regulations extent revenue gains and losses will be may have."s significant economic Environmental Err.c," offset among FBOs. the FAA, impact on a substantial number of small This SFAR relieveS the requirement nonetheless. believes that lhe cost entilies:' This small entities that could impact~ on FEDs will nol be significant for an aircraft to be equipped with a be potentially affected by the Mode C transponder ",-hen operating atl for those reasons stated in the previous implementation of the rule are air taxi to/from certain airports within 8 Mooe paragraphs. operators and fixed based operators Benefits. This final rule is expected to -C veH. This action does not -establish (FBOs). specific operating procedures, nor does .generate potential benefits in the form of In terms of air taxi operators, no cost increased convenience to GA aircraft it limit the operation of an aircraft to 8 impact are anticipated by this rule. This operators (without Mode C specific route. Routings to and from each assessment is based on the FAA's transponders) and enhanced operation airport are intentionally unspecified to efficiency toFAA air traffic controt. estimation that these oIJeT8 tors are permit the pilot to avoid operating over For GA aircraft operators, this rule is already equipped with Mode C obstructions. noise-sensitive areas, etc. expected to generate potential benefits transponders. They are, in aU likelihood. and remain in .compliance with § 91.119. in the form of increased convenience. based at airports within the Mode C veil Therefore, this SFAR accommodates the Prior to this role. GA aircraft operators. which faU within the radar coverage of . operation of an aircraft in compliance without Mode C transponders, could ATC. with existing safety and environmental operate at an airport within the Mode C In terms of FBOs. the FAA eslimates requirements and procedures and does veil but outside of ATe radar coverage that this rule will not impose significant not alter or supersede those only after recei\omg ATe authorization. costs. This assessment is based on the requi£.ements. The FAA's experience Howe\'er, certaln aspects of the belief that GA aircraft operators are not with the granting of authorizations since authorization pt9cess are inefficient and likely to impose lost revenues on FBOs the adoption ofthe Mode C transponder time consuming because authorizations by relocating from airports outside.of requirement indicates !:hat there Vvill not can only be gra.qted on a case-by-case the Mode C veil or undesignated be a large number ofairccaft operating basis. This undesirable situation was airports 'Yithin the Mod~ C veil to at anyone airport under the authority of true for both affected GA operators and designated airports .specified in this rule. this rule. For these reasons, the FAA the FAA. The convenience 'Of this ntle Although the rule provides greater concludes that the adoption of this .ru'le is categorically excluded from the will be the temporary relief from the access to a Mode C veil, the FAA requirement for further environmental burden of obtaining ATC authorizations believes that thi. rule does not provide that sometimes confronts GA aircraft review or aasessment pursuant to FAA GA aircraft operaton with much of en operators who wish to fly to and from Order 1050.1D, Policies and Procedures incentive to relocate. This assessment is the designated airports without Mode C for Considering Environmental Impacts. transponders. further supported by the belief that the For FAA air traffic control {ATe). this vast majority of those GA aircraft Conclusion rule will provide benefits in the form of operators required to have Mode C For the reasons discussed in the enhanced operation efficiency. Such transponders will acquire them by preamble. and based on the findings in enhanced efficiency will be the December 30, 1990 (Phase if of the Mode the Regulatory Flexibility Deterntinatioo temporary relief on ATC from assigning C rule for AirPort Radar Service Areas). and the International Tcade Impact authorizations during busy periods. This Therefore. the FAA believes that this Analysis. the FAA has determined thai action will better allow ATC 10 rule wil1 not have a significant economic this regulation isnot major under temporarily allocate its personnel.and impact on substantial number of small Executive Order lZ291.ln addition, the equipment resources to more productive entities. FAA certifies that this regulation will functions. International Trade Impact Assessment not have 8 significant economic impact. Although the benefits of this rule have positive ornegative, on a :substantial not been quantified. they are expected This rule will not have an effect on the number ofsmall entities11Dder the to be substantial for both the flying sale offoreign aviation products cOr criteria ofthe Regulatory Flexibility Act. public and the FAA. services in the United States, nor will it This l'egulatioo is -considered significant Conclusion have an effect on the sale of us. under DOT Regulatory Polici..and products -orservi.ce3 in foreign countries. Procedures (44 PR 11034; February 26. This rule is not expected to impose This is because this rule will neither 1979). costs on either the FA..o\ or society. In impose costs on aircraft operators nor addition. this rule will not impose List nf Subjects in 14 CPR Pari 91 aircraft manufacturers {U.S. or foreign) significant costs on the aviation that will result in a competitive Aircraft, Air traffic control, Automatic community {FBOsl. The FAA estimates disadvantage to either. altitude reporting equipment, Aviation that this rule will potentially generate safety. Mode C veil. Tenninal control substantial benefits such as increased Federalism Determination area. Transponder. convenience to some GA aircraft operators a.nd increased operation The regulations adopted herein will The Amendment effiCiency to FAA air traIfc control. not have substantial direct effects on tho States. on the relationship between the .For the reasons set forth in the Thus, the FAA firmly believes that thIa preamble. the Federal Aviation rule is cost-beneficial. National Government and the States. or on the distribution ofpower and . Administration amends part 01 of the Regulatory Flexibility Determination responsibilities among the various levels Federal Regulations {14 CPR part 911 as follow.: The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1960 of government.-Therefore, in accordance (RFAj was enacted to ens...re that small with Executive Order 12612. it is PART 91-GENERALOPSIATING AND entities are not unnecessarily and determined that this final rule will not FLIGHT RULES disproportionately burdaned by have sufficient federaliBm implications Government regulations. Tbe RFA ·to warrant the preparatiqn of 8 . 1. The authority citation for part 91. requires agencies to review roles that Federalism Assessment continues to read as follows: Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 5, 1990 / Rules and Regulations 50307

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 1301(7}. t303. l:H4, AO. 1J:48., l.l52 through 1J55. 1401, 1421ldS ____/_,,_""'_t._n_.m_e I--A_'_P_I_'O_~ Airport name Arpt 10 (AGl) tilllenued by Pub. 1.. 100-223), 1422 through 1431,1471,1172.1502, 13l0. 1522, and 2121 Gable Br"lr-ch Aitport. Haral· SGAO 1,500 Wilhelm Airport, KannapolIS. 6NC2 2.500 throush 2125; Articles 12, 29. 31, aDd 32(a} of son, GA. NC. t~e Con....ention on International CivH Coorgia lite Flite Ultra/ighl 31GA 1,SOO }. viation (61 Slat. 1180J; 42 U,S.C. 4321 e! seq.; A.ifport, Acworth, GA. F O. 11514: Puh. L. 100-202: 49 U.s.C. l00[g) Grlffin·SpaIdM1g County All­ 6A2 1,500 (Revist'd Pub. L. 97--4-to9. JOlnUalj' 12. 1983). port, Gr.tf'", GA. (4) Airports within a 3D-nautical·mile """""ard Pr ate Aitport. Jack· GA02 1,500 radius of the Chicago-O'Hara son.GA Z. By adwng Special Federal Aviation Internationdl Airport. r.~gulation No. 62 to read as follows: Newnan Coweta County Air­ ceo 1.soo port, Newnan, GA. ~:)("AR No. 6Z-5uspension of Certain Peach State AItpor1.. William- 3GA7 1.500 Aircraft Operations from the ~,GA . AO. P~e Farm Airport, Oxford. 2GA1 1,500 Airpof1 name ArP,1 10 (AGl) TransponJer with Automatic Pressure GA. Altituce Reportillll C.pabihty Pn-.'ers AJrport, HoUonville, GA31 1,500 Aurora Munic;paI AKport, Ch... AAA GA. 1.200 Requirement. cagolAurora. IL S & S landIng Strip Airport. 8GA6 1.500 Alfred G.. Airport. Section 1. For purposes of this SFAR: Gliffln, GA. Oonaid de III1 1,200 AntioCh. IL fa) Thp. :l.nd Newbury- 282 PI....,.. AIrport. Wat.:kegan, flo port, MA. 8 1d expeditious routing, or on e routing Wormley Airport. Oswego. IL...• 85Ll 1,200 OlfPcted by ATe, between an airport Plymouth Municipal Airport., IPYM Plymouth, MA. --- !;sted 'u secliun 2 of this SFAR and the T3.unton Municipal Airport, TAN outcr bou"-dary uf the Mode Ceil Ti3UfltO'l, MA. I 30·nautic~)-milp Ii.rspace overlying that airport, Ul'lkno"",'o F~d Alrpoft. 1MAS (51 i'Jrports wilhin a ('onsistent with established traffic S00li'lborough. MA. , radius of the Cleveland-Hopkins p..tttcrns, nOlDa abatement procedures. lntcmational Airport. (JIG safety. (1) Airports within a 30-nauticaI-mile Section Z. Effective until December 30, - r .dius of the Charlotte/Douglas All. 1.;93. Airports at which the provisions of I'lte : ational Airport. Airp:xtname AlP! 10 (AGl) , 91.215(b)(2) do not apply.

{1} Airports within 8 3O-nautical-mile A~ron 1 All Fulton, Inlernatiooa AKA 1,300 "dius of The Williem B. Hartsfield Airport name Arpt 10 (AGl) Airport. Akrt)l1. OH. fo.tJanla,Interndtianal Airport. I B,1dl:s Airport. NewblJry. OH.... • OOH 1.300 - lletecsky Airport. Auburn 8010 1,300 Arant Airport. VfLngate. NC .... INca 2,500 .. Centa.·,OH• B;adley Oularnat'oOna! Airport. NC29 2,500 All. Hannum ~ Streetsboro, 6SOH 1.300 Airport Mme Arpt 10 China Glove. NC. (AGl) 00. rllE',,1ef Mt.Jf'licipal SAO 2.500 1,300 GtSSo'er, SC. ""-- Kent State Univ9r'Slty Airport, 1G3 Kent. OH. Arf AC"es Airport. Woodstock. SGA4 1,500 C,ltna GrQ\.9 Airport. China 76A 2.500 GA. Grove, NC. lOst Nation A;.port. Wi. lNN 1,300 B & l Strip Airport. Hollon- GA29 1,500 Goodnight's Airport, Kanna· 2NGa 2,500 laughby. OH. 'lille, GA. polis. ~C. Mills AIrport. Mantua, 00...... 0H06 1,300 Camfield Airport, McConouQh, GA36 1.500 I\'lapp Airport. Marshville, NC. 3NC4 2.500 Portage County A.lrport, Ra* 29G 1,300 GA. lJ;ke Norman Airport. "A 2.500 venna, OH. C,'>bb County.McCollum Field AYV 1,500 Mooresville, NC. Stoney's _. Ravenna, 0132 1.300 Airport. Mariena, GA, lancaster County '.irport, lKA 2,500 OH. Covir.gton Municipal Airport. 9A1 1,500 lancaster, SC. Wasdworth Municipal, Airport. 3G3 1,300 Cclvingbn. GA. little Mountain Airport, 66A 2.500 Wadsworth, OH.

['l!amond A Ranch Ailport, 3GAS _1.500 DenvE"', NC. .~ Villa Rica, GA. long Island AIrport, long NC26 2,500 Dresden Airport, Newnan, GA.. GA79 1,500 Island. NC. E;agles Landing Airport. Wll· 5GA3 1,500 l-.1iller Alfpott. Moores....Hle, NC .. 8A2 2.500 (6) Airports within 8 30-nautical-mila Iiamson, GA. US Heliport, Wingate. NC ...... NC56 2,500 r.dius of the DaUas/Fort Worth Fagundes Field Airport. Hal· 6GM 1.500 unity Aerodrome Airport, Lan- SC76 2.500 alson, GA. cester, SC. International Airport. 5030II Federal Register I Vol 55, No 234 ( Wednesday, December.5 1990 ( Rules and Regulations

Alt. Airport name Alpt. m Alt. Airport name Arpt. Airport Ar,pt. 10 An. IAGL) to (AGL) name IAGl\

Beggs Aanch/AJerJo Airport, nelS ",800 Colorado Antique Field Air· 8C07 1.200 Ainswonh Ajrport, Oevetand, 0T6 1,200 Aledo. TX. port, Niwot, CO. TX. __Sange<. n<- TA2S ',BOO Comanche Awfietd Arport, 36 1,200 Biggin Hta AKport, Hoc1dey, {)TA3 1.200 Bird Dog Field AIrport. Krum. TA48 1,800 Strasburg, CO. TX. TX. Comanche LtveskK:k AWport, S9CO 1,200 Cleveland MoolcipaI Ail'por1, 6R3 1.200 Boe-WrinIde hport, Azkl, TX_ 28T$ 1,800 Strasburg, CO. DevElIand, TX. Flying V Airport. Sanger. TX. __ 71XS 1,800 Ay:ng J Ranch Airport, E't'ef- 2700 1.200 Fay Ranch Airport, cedar OT2 1,200 Gfaham Ranch Airport, TX44 1.800 green, CO. lane, TX. celina. IX. Frederick·Firestone Airport cose 1,200 Freeman S'roperty Airport, 61T 1,200 Haire Airport. Bolivar, TX _.... TX33 1.800 Strip Airport, Frederick, CO. Katy, TX. Hartlee Field Airport, Demon, 1F3 1.~ Ftonliet Airstrip AAport. 84CO 1,200 Gum island Mport, Dayton, 3T6 1,200 TX. Mead,CO. TX. Hawkin's Ra.nch Strip AirPort. TA02 1.800 Hoy AIrStrip Aupo:rt. Bennett, 7600 1.200 Harblcan AMpark Airpof\ 9XS9 ',200 Rhome, IX. CO. Katy, TX. J & S Airport, Bennett, CO __ m14 '.2CO Horseshoe lake Aiport. lC24 ',800 Harold Freeman Farm Airport, 8XSl 1,200 ~nger, TX. KugeJ.Slrcng Airport. Platte- 27V 1.200 Katy, TX. tronhead Airport, Sanger. lX... 158 1.800 rile. CO. Hotfpaw Airport. teaty, TX ._.... 59T land Airport. Keenesburg, Coa2 '.200 u!CO Kezar Air Ranch Ail'port, 61F '.800 HOl'"n.Kaly Hawk International 57T 1,200 Spring(DWn. lX. co. Airport, 'Katy, TX. lindys Airpark Airport. 7003 t.200 lane Field Airport. Sanger. 58F t.BOO Hudson.. CO. HOloston-Hull Aiq)ort. Hous- SGR 1,200 TX. ton. Tlt Marshdale STOL.. Evergreen. COS2 1.200 Log Cabin Airport, Aledo, TX _. IX16 1.000 CO. Hooston-Southwest Airport. AXH 1,200 Houston. Lone Star AirparK Airport, T:l2 1.600 Meyer Ranch Airport. Conifer.. 5C06 , ,.200 TX. _.~ S~ Oer'l1on, TX. CO. King Air Airport. Katy. TX.... 1.200 lake Bay Galt Qeve. OT5 Rhome Meadows Airpo(!, T512 t.800 Parkland Airport, Erie, CO...... 7COO 1.200 Airport, ',200 Rhome, IX. Pine View Airport Elizabeth. 02V 1,200 I&od. TX. Richards Airport, Krum, TX ...• ~ TA47 1.800 CO. Lake Bonanze Airport, Mont· 33TA 1,200 Tallows ReId Airport, Celina. 79TS l.800 Platte Valley Airport. Hudson. 18V 1,200 gomey. IX. IX. CO. RW J Airpark Airport, Bay· 54T.X 1.200 Tri~ S Airport. Aledo. TX._._ 42XS 1,800 Rancho 0 Aereo Airport, OSCQ 1.200 lown, lX. Warshun Ranch Airport. 4TA~ 1.000 Mead,CO. Westhemer Air Park AIrport, 5TA4 Denton, TX. I Spickard Farm Airport. Byers, 5C04 1.200 Hous:on. TX. Windy HiU AUpott, Denlon. DC 46XS 1.800 00. Aero Country Airport, McKln- TXOS 1,400 Vance Brand Airport, lorig- 2V2 1,200 oey, IX. mor:ll,CO. (11) Airports within a 3(}-nauticaJ-mHe Bailey Airport, Midlothian, TX. 7TX8 1,400 Yodet Airstrip Airport. Ben· c009 1,200 Bransom farm Airport. Butte- TX42 ',400 nett, CO. I radius of the Kansas City International son, rx. Airport. Carroll Air Park Airport, De F66 1.1t(){) Solo. TX. ------,-----,..-- (6) Airporls 'within a 30-nauticat-mile _name Carroll lake-Vtew AirpOrt, 70TS 1.400 Arpt. ro All Venus, TX. radius of the Detroit Metropolitan (AGt) Eagle's Nesl Eslates Airport, 2T36 1,400 Wa}'Ile County Airport, Ovitla, TX. Amelia Earhart Airport. AlCru- KS9 UlOO Flying B Ranch Airport, TS71 1,400 son,1

Airport name Arpt 10 Aft Balle Plaine Airport, Belle 7Y7 1,200 (AGLI Plaine. MN. (22) Airports within a ao-nautical·mile

Car1elon AIrport, Stanton. MN o. radius of the Seattle-Tacoma SYN 1.200 <>;nns Mpori. Wes' GrOVd, 76N 1,000 Empire F",m Sirip Airport. MN15 1.200 PA. International AiJl)ort. Bbngards, MN. Hammonlon Municipal Air- N61 1,000 Flying M Ranch AirpoIt. Rob- 78WI 1,200 pon, Hammonton. NJ. erts, WI. Alt. LJ Cain Airport. Bridgeton. NJ. NsO 1,000 Aifport name Arpt 10 Johl1SOn Airport. Rocldord, MV86 I 1,200 New london Airport. New N01 1,000 (AGLI MN. London, PA. River Falls Airport. Ril/er Y53 1,200 W"'e Sky Airpark AIrport, N39 1,000 A

(2J) Airports within a 30·nautical-mile I (25) Effective upon the establishment I Alt radius of the Tampa International of the Washington Tri-Area TeA: A.qxxl nama Arpt 10 tAGL} Airport. Airports within a 3D-nautical-mile radius + +.::.:=c'- of the VvTashington National Airport, Wright Field Airport, Chester- MOll 2,000 Airport, town, MD. A~es Airport. Warrenton. 3VA2 1.500 Airport name Arpt 10 M. (AGL) Baltimore-Washington International VA. Airport. and Dulles lnternatioDCil B~rch Hollow Airport, Hals- WOO 1,sao Hernando, County Airport, SKV 1,500 Airport. boro. VA. Brooks~ille. FL Flying Circus Aerodrome Ail- 3VA3 1.500 Lakctand Municipal AIrport, LAl 1,500 porl, Warrenton, VA. AIt Fo. was Aifport, Warrenton, 15VA 1.500 Lakeland, FL Airport name Arpt Ie: Zephyrhills Ml.micipal A,rpOr1, ZPH 1.500 (AGL) VA, Zephyrhills, Flo Hartwood Airport, Somerville, awe 1,500 Albrecht Airstrip Airport, Long M046 2,000 VA. Groan, MO. Horse r:eathers Airport, Mid- 53VA 1,500 (24) Effective until the eslablishment Armacost Farms Airport, MD38 2,000 land, VA. ' Hampst83d. MD. Krens Farm Alrport, Hillsboro, 14VA 1,500 of the Washington Tri-Area TeA or Barnes Airport, lisbon, MD.•..... MD47 2,000 VA. December 30. 1993. whichever occurs 9ay Bridge Airport, Stevens- 1 '/Yzq 2.000 Scott Airpar1l. AIrport, Lovetts- VA61 1,500 rust: Airports within a ao-nautical-mile ville, MO. t ville, VA. Carroll County Aifport, West- . WS~ 2,000 The Grass Patch Airport. Lo- VA62 1.500 radius of the Washington National I mins!Of, MO. vel1svillo, VA. Airport and Andrews Air Force Base Castle Marina Airport, Ches- 0'1.'6 2,000 Wainut Hill Aifport, Calverton, 58VA 1;500 Airport. ler, MD. I VA. Clearview Airpart< Airport. 2W2 2,000 Warrenton Air Park Airport, 9WO 1,sao Westminster, MD. Warrenton, VA. Alt , Laytonsville, WSO 2,000 Warrenton-Fauquier Airport, W66 1.500 Airport name ArptlD (AGL) MD. I Warreil1on, VA. Fallston Aiq:ort, Fallston. MD... W42 2,000 Whitman Strip Airport, Ma- OV5 1.500 Faux-Burhans Airport, Frede!· 3M(X) 2,000 Bames Airport, usbon. MD...... M047 2,000 nassas, VA. ick. MO. . Bay Bridge Airport, Stevens- W29 2,000 Aqua-tand/Cliffton Skypark 2W8 1.000 Forest Hill AIrport. Forest Hill. M031 2,000 vilie, MD. Airport, NOWblJlQ, MD. MD. Caslle MaTina Airport. Ches- OW6 Buds Feny Airport. Indian M03.9 1.000 2.000 Fort Detrick Helipad ~frpor1, MD32 2,000 MD. Head, MO. ter, Fort Detrick (Frederick), 2,000 Burgess Field Airport, River- 3WI 1,000 Davis Airport. laytonsville, WSO MD. MD, side, MD. Fredorick Municipal Airport, FOK 2.000 FrQf'llont Akport. Kemptown, MO<1 , ~,OOO Chimney View Airport, Fred- 5VA5 1.000 Fredenck, MO. enc,",sburg, VA. MD. , Fremont Airport, Kemptown, M041 2.000 Kentmorr Airpark Airport. Ste- 3W3 2,000 Holly Spnngs Farm Airport. MOSS 1.000 MD. f'Janjemoy, MD. vensvillf3, MD. Good Neighbor Farm Airport. M074 2.000 A!~arfl. Lanseair Farms Airport, La M097 1,000 Monlgomery County GAl 2.000 Unionville, MO. P16ta, MD. Airport, Gaithersburg, MO. Happy landings Farm Airport, MD73 2,000 Nyce Airport. Moont Victoria, MD84 1.000 Waredaca Farm Airport. M016 2.000 Unionville, MO. MO. Brookeville. MD. Harris Aifport. Still Pond, MO... MD69 2,000 SMypa~ Parks Alrpark AirpOrt, Nania- MD54 1,000 f.qua-landiOiffion 2We \,000 Hfbarc Farm Airport. Ches- M019 2.000 mey. MO. A~ NtM'burg. MO. tertown, MD. Buds Ferry Airport, indian M039 1,000 Kenners1ey Airport. Church MD23 2,000 Pilots Cove A:rport, Tamp- Moo6 1,000 ••nsllille, MO. H....sd. MD. Hill,MD. I BlKgess Field Airport, River- 3W1 1,000 I Kentmorr Airpa."'k Airport, Ste- 3W3 2,000 I Qoanlico MCAF, Quantico. N'fG 1.000 siJe. MD. \fensville. MD. VA. Chinney View Airport, Fred- 5VA5 1,000 MOI"ltgomery County ,Ili"PSfk GAl 2.000 I ste-....art Airport, 5l Michaels., MD64 1,000 ericksburg, VA. Aifport, Gaithersburg, MD. I MD. Holly Springs Farm Airport, MD55 1,000 Ph:Uips AAF, Aberdeen, MO ..... APG 2.000 U.S. Naval WeC!DOOs Genter, NOV 1.000 Nanjemoy. MO. Pond View Private Airport, OM04 2,000 Dahlgren Lab Airport, Dahl- Lanseair Farms Airport, La MOO7· 1,000 Chestertown, MD. gre!'\., VA. Plata, MO. ReseNoir Airport. Finksburg, 1Wa 2,000 Nyce Airport, Mount Victoria, M084 1.000 MD. MD. SCheerer Field Airport, Ches- OWT 2.000 Issued in Washington, DC on Novemb~:, 29, Parks AlrpaJ1t Airport, Nania- MD54 1,000 tertown, MD. 1990. moy, MD. Stolcrest STOL, Urbana, MD.... M075 2,000 Pilois Cove Airport, Tomp- MOOG 1,000 TInse!y Airstrip Airport, Butler, M017 2,000 19mus B. Busey, klnsvUle. MD. MD. Administrator. Quantico MCAF, Quantico, NYG 1,000 W!tlters Airport, Mount Airy, OMD6 2,000 VA. MD. lFR Doc. 90-28502 Fired 11-31)2.90; 4:05 pm! Stewart Airport, 51. Michaels, MD64 1,000 Waredaca Farm Airport. M016 2,000 ~1U.1NG CODE 4910-13-11I MD. Brookeville, MO. U.S. Naval Weapons Center, NDY 1,000 Weide AAF, Edgewood Arse- EOG 2,000 Dahlgren Lab Airport, Dah,.. nat MD. gren, VA. Woodbine Gtiderport, Wood- MOle 2,000 bine, MD. -5li312 Federal Register No. 234 I Wednesday, December fi, 1990 I Rules 8!1d Regulations t'E.PARTMENT OF TRANSP RT of Public Affairs, ATrN: APA-230, 800 anr.ual night review requirement. Ihe bdependence Avenue SW" FAA intitia!cd a review of the 1~ CFR Part 61 WC!shington, DC 20591, or by ca!ling the dOc,uffip.nts and dllta that were llscd to Office of Public Affairs at (2U2J 267­ justify adoption of the requirement. On fi.locket No. 24695; Arndt. No. 61-B9j 348~. Communications must identify the March 27, 1990. the FAA completed a ~f RIN 2120-AAS4 docket number (Docket No, 24.(95) preliminory study of these docum~m!s this final rule. Persons interested in aDd data. As a result of this review tr.e Aml?ndmer.t of Compl;ancp Date for being placed on a mailing list for future FAA has determined that the documents' ft.ni'tua! Fllpht Rev!ew Requirements notices should request a copy of and data sources used by the agency in 1~r Recre3tional Pilots. 2nd Non­ Advisory Circular 11-2A. Nc·tice of the development of the annu, 1~J91 , (/\OPA) petitioned the F.'\A 10 re ..... ise § 61.56[d) of the Federal A\':ation. ADOR~SSES: Comments on this final nile General DiSCU:isiOll of this Fmal Rale Reguletiuns (FAR) by deleting the may be delivered to the Federal annual night review requirement. AOPA Upon preliminary review of the Aviation Administration. Office of the based its request for deletion of the documents and data used in Chief Counsel, Altn: Rules Docket annual flight review requirement on development of the ann'lal night review (AGC-204), Docket No. 24695, 800 accident data which a8con,panjed its requirement, the FAA recogni.zes the lndep2ndence Avenue SW., room 915G, petition. need for further analysis, Therefore. the Washington, DC 20591. Comments By letter dated July 25, 1989, the FAA has determined that it is in Ihe submitted on the fbal mle must be Exoerimental Aircraft Assnciation public interest to delay the compliance marked: Docket No. 24595. Comments (EAA) also petitioned the FAA to delete date of the requirement for an annual may be inspected in room 915G between the E!nnual flight review requirement far flight review under § 61.S6(d) of the FAR 6;::10 a.m, and 5 p,m., weekdays, except recreational pilots and nan-instrument­ until August 31, 1991. Federalholidays. rated private pilots with fewer than 400 Economic Statement FOR FURTHER iNFORMATION CONTACT: hours of flight time as 8 pilot. Thomas Glista, Regulations Branch On July 30, 1989, Secretary of _This final rule extends, until August (.'\F~8S0), GEneral Aviation and Transportation Samuei Skinner spoke at 31,1991, the compliance date for the Commercial Division, 800 Independence EA.l\.'s annual convention at Oshkosh, requirement that recreational pilots and Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20S91: WI. In response to requests from the non-instnunent·rated private pilots with Telephone: (202) 207-ll1S0. aviation community, he promised that fewer than 400 hours of flight time SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the FAA would review the data that was recieve an Bnnual flight review the basis for issuing the annual flight consisting of e minimum of 1 hour each Availability .of Final Rule rp.view rule, of flight and ground instruction. Any person may obtain a copy of this As a result of these and other . The FAA has not been able to identify ,final role by submitting 8 request to the numerous inquiries questioning the any economic impact of this action on Federal Aviation Administration, Office s!lffic~e~~yof the data used to justify the either society or pilots because the data Federal Register I Vol. 55. No. 234 I Wednesday. December 5. 1990 I Rules'and Regulations 50313

relied upon to promulgate the origina! Interested persons arc invited to under the criteria of Executive Order annual flight re\'jew requirement may submit such comments as they may No~ 12291 but is significant, because of ha\'e been insufficient. The FAA does desire regarding this amendment the number of persons affected and not desire to impose the annual flight Communications should identify the public interest in this issue, under the review requirement until additional data docket number and be submitted in Regulatory Policies and Procedures of and analysis support its need. duplicate to lhe address above. All lhe Department ofTransportation (44 FR communciations received on or before 11034: February 26. 1979J. Reason for No Notice and Immmediate the close of the comment period will be Adoption considered by the Administrator, and List of Subjecls in 14 CFR Part 61 This amendment is being adopted this amendment may be changed in light Aviation safety, Student pilots, without notice and publjc comment of the comments recei\·ed. All comments Eligibility requirements. AeronauticC:l} procedure because delay would have 8 will be available. both before and after knowledge. Operational experience. significant economic impact on the the closing date for comments, in the Cross-country flight pri\'ileges, general aviation community. Large Rules Docket for examination by Limitations. numbers of recreational and pri\Oale interested parties. The Amendment pilots would be required 10 receive 2 Federalism Impact hours, at a minimum. of ground and Accordingly. pari 61 of the Federal flight instruction on a yearly basis al an The amendment adopted herein does Aviation Regulations (]4 CFR part 61) is estimated annual cost of $6.4 million, not have substantial direct effects on the amended as follows: Because the FAA needs more time to States, on the relationship between the determine if this additional requirement national government 8:td the States. or PART 61-CERTIFICATION: PILOTS for instruction is warranted or should be on the distribution of power and AND FLIGHT INSTRUCTORS modified in some manner. requiring responsibilities among the various levels of gQ\'emment. Therefore, in accordance 1. The authority citation for parI 61 these persons to complete an annual continues to read as foHows: review in the interim would constitute with Executive Order 12612, it is an undue burden. detennined that this amendment does . Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a). 1355. not have sufficient federalism 142~, The FAA fmds that notice 2nd public 1422. and 1427; 49 U.S.C. l06(g} implications to warrant preparation of 8 comment for this amendment are (Revised. Pub. L 97-449: January 12, 1983). ·Federalism Assessment. impracticeble and contrary to the public 2. By amended § 61.56 by revising the interest because compliance with the Conclusion introductory text of paragraph (d) to current rule may be an undue burden on This amendment delays tlle read as follows: the general aviation public. In addition, cOffiJ?liance date, until August 31.199], § 61.56 Flight review. because the date bas already rassed on of the annual flight review requirement which the one-year requirement would for recreational pilots and oon­ (d) Except as prodded in paragraph have taken effect. the FAA finds that instrument-rated prh'ate pilots with good cause exists to make this rule (e) of this section. after August 31, fewer than 400 hours of flight time as a 1991-· •• effective in fewer than 30 days. pHot that was established in the If the FAA determines that the annual "Certification of Recreational Pilots and re\"iew is not necess~r.\' or 1..'12t it should Arumal Flight Review Requirements for Issued in Washington. DC. on No\'emher be modified in some manner. a period of Recreational Pilots and Non-Instrument­ 30.1990. time will be required to draft a revision Rated Pilots with Fewer than 400 Hours" James B. Busey. to the recreational pilot rule. to allow final rule. (FAR 61.56{d)) Administrator. time for comment, and then to respond The FAA has determined that this [FR Doc. 9O-28S0l Filed 12-4-90; 8;45 am] to those commrmts in a final rule. amendment is not a major regulation BILUNG CODE "910-13-11

-