^ Ö N A U * Pages 2629-2666 A ' * litteraT FEDERAL REGISTER

VOLUME Î9 ^ O /iftE O ^ NUMBER 37

Washington, Friday, February 21, 1964

Contents

AGRICULTURAL MARKETING Service to Huron, S. Dak.; post­ Guadalupe Valley Telecasting ponement of prehearing con­ Co., Inc., and Victoria Tele­ SERVICE ference______2657 vision.______l______2657 Rules and Regulations La Fiesta Broadcasting Co. and M i d-C i t i e s Broadcasting Fruit grown in Arizona and Cali­ COMMERCE DEPARTMENT Corp______2658 fornia: See Maritime Administration. TVUE Associates, Inc., and Handling limitations: United Artists Broadcasting, Lemons______,r _____ 2645 EDUCATION OFFICE I n c ______2658 Navel oranges______2643 Notices Walley, James E. (2 docu­ Valencia oranges (2 docu­ ments) ______2659, 2660 ments) ______2643, 2644 Federal financial assistance in Shipments limitation; grape­ construction of noncommercial fruit______2644 educational television broad­ FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE Limes: cast facilities; applications ac­ CORPORATION cepted for filing______2656 ; quality and size______2645 Rules and Regulaflorts Import prohibition______2646 EMERGENCY PLANNING OFFICE Crop insurance, 1961 and succeed­ Proposed Rule Making Notices ing years: Milk in St. Louis, Mo., marketing Peas, canning and freezing____ 2642 area; suspension of certain pro­ Schnitzler, William F.; statement W heat — — ______2642 visions ______2651 of business interests____ — 2662 AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION See also Agricultural Marketing Rules and Regulations Service; Federal Crop Insur­ Airworthiness directives: Notices ance Corporation. Boeing Models 707 and 720 Agreements filed for approval: Rules and Regulations Series aircraft______2641 American Export Lines, Inc., Parity price determinations; alsike General Dynamics Models 22, et al______j______2660 clover and mustard seeds 2641 22M, 30 and 30A aircraft— __ 2641 Hartnett, C. A., et al______2661 Notices Standard instrument approach p ro ced u res; miscellaneous FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION Federal Crop Insurance Corpora­ amendments______2631 Notices tion; organization, functions, Proposed Rule Making and procedures______2654 Colorado; lands withdrawn in Airworthiness directives: Project 400; correction-______2661 ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION Lockheed Models 188A and 188C Northwestern Public Service Co.; Series aircraft______2651 application______2661 Notices Schleicher Models Ka-6 and American Radiator & Standard K-8 gliders______2651 Sanitary Corp.; issuance of fa­ FOOD AND DRUG cility export license ______265.7 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION Notices CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD Rules and Regulations Food additives; filing of petitions: Proposed Rule Making American Cyanamid Co. <2 Schedule of fees; effective date 2647 Alaskan air carriers; classifica­ docum en ts)______2656 tion and exemption______2652 Notices Betz Laboratories, Inc______2656 Notices Hearings, etc.: Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co____ 2656 Columbia Basin Microwave Co_ 2657 Wyandotte Chemicals Corp. ; Accident near Elkton, M d.; hear­ Coosa Valley Radio Co. and Rayonier, Inc______2656 in g ------Rome Broadcasting Corp____ 2657 (Continued on next page) 2629 2630 CONTENTS

HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND INTERSTATE COMMERCE LAND MANAGEMENT BUREAU WELFARE DEPARTMENT COMMISSION Notices See Food and Drug Administra­ Rules and Regulations Alaska; filing of plat of survey tion; Education Office. and opening of public lands___ 2653 Annual reports: California; partial termination of Lessors to railroads______2646 proposed withdrawal and reser­ Motor carriers: INTERAGENCY TEXTILE vation of lands______2653 Class I carriers of property___ 2646 Grazing lease rentals; supple­ ADMINISTRATING: COMMITTEE Class n carriers of property__ 2647 mentary rate schedules______2654 Notices Class I carriers of passengers- 2647 Certain cotton textile products Notices MARITIME ADMINISTRATION produced or manufactured in Fourth section applications for Rules and Regulations Philippines; entry or with­ relief______2664 Federal Port Controllers and Act­ drawal from warehouse______2662 Motor carrier transfer proceed­ ing Federal Port Controllers; ings------* 2664 appointment and delegations of authority______2649 INTERIOR DEPARTMENT LABOR DEPARTMENT Port facilities; restrictions upon See also Land Management Bu­ transfer, change in use, or terms reau. See Labor Standards Bureau. governing utilization______2648 Notices SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Buffalo Lake National Wildlife LABOR STANDARDS BUREAU COMMISSION Refuge; jurisdiction over cer­ Notices tain lands transferred from Notices Agriculture Department to In­ William Spencer and Son Corp.; Hearings, etc.: terior Department______2654 order granting variation______2663 Allegheny Power System, Inc 2662 Mitchell, Charles S.; statement of New England Electric System changés in financial interests 2654 et al______2662 Codification Guide The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published in today's issue. A cumulative list of parts affected, covering the current month to date, appears at the end of each issue beginning with the second issue of the month. A cumulative guide is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lists the parts and sections affected by documents published since January 1, 1964, and specifies how they are affected. 7 CFR 47 CFR 5------2641 1— ------— 2647 Now Available 401 (2 documents)______2642 13------2647 907 ______2643 21------/ 2647 908 (2 documents)______2643,2644 CODE OF FEDERAL 23_------2647 909 ------______r__ 2644 910..:______. 2 „ — ______2645 25------2647 REGULATIONS 911______2645 61— 63______2647 (As of January 1, 1964) 944— ______2646 66______2647 P roposed R u l e s : 73------2647 The following pocket supplements are now 1062______2651 74— ------;— — ______2647 available: 81------S______2647 Titles 10-11______$0.40 14 CFR 83------2647 Title 26 (Parts 300-499). _ .40 85------2647 97 [N e w !------2631 Title 32 (Parts 400-589). _ .45 507 (2 documents)______2641 87------2647 89------2647 Title 32 (Parts 590-699).. .70 P roposed R u l e s : Title 46 (Parts 1—145).__ .45 231______2652 91— . .. — ------2647 292— ______2652 93------2647 Title 49 (Parts 0-70)____ .40 95------2647 302______2652 A cumulative checklist of CFR issuances for 507 (2 documents) ______2651 97— ______2647 1964 appears in the first issue of each month under Title 1.

32A CFR Order from Superintendent of Documents, 49 CFR OMA (Ch. XIX) : Government Printing Office, Washington, M A —TP M -1 ______2648 120______2646 D.C., 20402 MA-TPM-Del. 1______2649 205 (3documents) ______2646,2647

Published daily, except Sundays, Mondays, and days following official Federal holidays, FEDEMLifl®ISTER by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General S erv­ ices Administration, pursuant to the authority contained in the Federal Register Act, Telephone WOrth 3-3261 c£/ahtpQ^ approved July 26, 1935 (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C., ch. 8B), under regulations prescribed by the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register, approved by the President. Distribution is made only by th e Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402. The F ederal R eg ister will be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $1.50 per month or $15.00 per year, payable in advance. The charge for individual copies (minimum 15 cents) varies in proportion to the size of the issue. Remit check or money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402. The regulatory material appearing herein is keyed to the Code o f F ederal R e g u la t io n s , which is published, under 50 titles, pur­ suant to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as amended August 5, 1953. The Code o f F ederal R e g u l a t io n s is sold by the Superin­ tendent of Documents. Prices of books and pocket supplements vary. There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the F ederal R eg iste r, or the Code o f F ederal R eg u la tio n s. Rules and Regulations

Title 14— AERONAUTICS AND SPACE Chapter I— Federal Aviation Agency SUBCHAPTER F— AIR TRAFFIC AND GENERAL OPERATING RULES [NEW] [Beg. Docket No. 3080; Amdt. 361] PART 97— STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES [NEW] Miscellaneous Amendments The amendments to the standard Instrument approach procedures contained herein are adopted to become effective when indicated in order to promote safety. The amended procedures supersede the existing procedures of the same classifi­ cation now in effect for the airports specified therein. For the convenience of the users, the complete procedure is republished in this amendment indicating the changes to the existing procedures. As a situation exists which demands immediate action in the interests of safety in air commerce, I find that compliance with the notice and procedure provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act is impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective within less than 30 days from publication. In view of the foregoing and pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator (24 F.R. 5662), Part 97 [N ew ] (14 CFR Part 97 [N ew ]) is amended as follows: 1. By amending the following low or medium frequency range procedures prescribed in § 97.11(a) to read:

L F R Standard instr u m e n t A pproach P rocedure

Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet M S L . Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. , „ , .. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type Is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be In accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches »hull bo made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Minimum 2-engine, Course and Condition From— T o — altitude more than distance 65 knots More than (feet) 65 knots or less 65 knots

MLD-VOR M D - F L R ...... - Direct______* 10,000 T -d n ...... - ...... 3500-3 3500-3 3500-3 C -dn ______3500-3 3500-3 3500-3 A - d n „ ...... 4000-4 4000-4 4000-4

Procedure turn S side W crs, 273° Outbnd, 093° Inbnd, 9500' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 9000'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 130°— 3.3 miles. „ ...... ______.___ . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minim um s or if landing not accomplished within 3.3 miles after passing M D -L F R , make right turn climbing to 11,000' on W crs w ithin 20 miles. Caution: High terrain all quadrants. City, Malad City; State, Idaho; Airport Name, Malad City; Kiev., 4503'; Fac. Class., SBRAZ; Ident., M D ; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 5; Eff. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. 4; Dated, 17 N ov. 62

T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 200-J3 C -dn ...... 500-1 600-1 600-1)3 A -d n ______800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn W side N W crs, 337° Outbnd, 157° Inbnd, 1700' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1200'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 144°—3.7 miles. . _ . _ If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.7 miles after passing M V L F R , climb to 1700' on BE crs within 10 miles, then reverse crs returning to M V L F R . H old SE M V- L F R , 1-minute, right turns, Inbnd crs 324®. N ote: Night operations authorized on E -W and N W-SE runways only. City, M illville; State, N.J.; Airport Name, M illville Municipal; Elev., 87'; Fac. Class., S B R A Z : Ident., M V ; Procedure No. 1, Am dt. 8; Eff. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Am dt. N o. 7; Dated, 11 Aug. 62

BEA VO R ' " .. SJ L F R ...... D ire c t..______2000 T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 20043 SJ L F R ...... 2000 C -d n ______500-1 500-1 500-133 Elliott L F In t*. . S.T t.KB (final) 1500 A -d n ______800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn W side of crs 297° Outbnd, 117° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over Park R B n (SZ L O M ) on final approach crs, 1500'; over SJ L F R , 12Q0'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 194®—3.4 miles. • ...... If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.4 miles after passing SJ L F R , clim b to 2000' direct to SE LO M , or when directed b y A T C , climb to 2000' on S crs S J -L F R within 10 miles of SJ L F R . Caution: Terrain and trees to 691' immediately N and N E of airport. Other changes: Deletes transitions from S Z I R B n, T M L F R , SE L O M , and B F L O M . ’ Elliott Int: Int 170® bearing from Boeing, Wash. LO M and N W crs Seattle LFR . MSA: 000®-090°— 6400', 090°-135°—5500', 135®-270°—2900', 270°-360°—2000'. City, Seattle; State, Wash.: Airport Nam e, Seattle-Tacoma International; Elev., 428'; Fac. Class., S A B R A Z ; Ident., SJ; Procedura N o. 1, A m dt. 18; E ff. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. 17; Dated, 26 Jan. 63

2631 2632 RULES AND REGULATIONS

2. By amending the following automatic direction finding procedures prescribed in § 97.11(b) to read: ADF Stand ard I n s t b u m b n t A p p s o a c b P rocedure Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet M S L . Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorised b y the Administrator of the Federal A viation Agency. In itial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Gelling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Course and Minimum From— T o — 2-engine, distance altitude Condition (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

C L E R B n ____ LOM ...... D irect______3000 T -d n ______300-1 300-1 20O-H CLE VOR_... Louis In t (final) D irect______3000 C -d n ...... 400-1 500-1 500-l)£ Vermillion Int. LOM ...... Via STG VOR 3000 S-dn-SL & R 400-1 400-1 400-1 R-308 and X! LE A -d n ...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 IL S SL S W

M entor In t___ L O M ______. . . . . Via CLE VOR 3000 R-072 and C L E ILS SL Loc ers. C L E V O R — . LOM...... D irect______3000 Louis In t_____ LOM (final).... D irect...... 2200

Radar transitions and vectoring authorized in accordance with approved radar patterns. W hen used in lieu of procedure turn, alignment on final approach heading within 10 miles of final approach fix is required. Procedure turn S side ofers, 234° Outbnd, 054° Inbnd, 3000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach ers, 2200'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 054°—3.9 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minlmums or if landing not accomplished within 3.9 miles after passing LO M , make left climbing turn to 3000' on S T G V O R R-360 intercept and proceed Outbnd on C X R R-285 to Crib Int, hold E 1-minute right turns. Caution: T V towers approximately 1970' approximately 6 miles ESE of airport. City, Cleveland; State, Ohio; Airport Name, Cleveland-Hopkins; Elev., 792'; Fac. Class., LO M ; Ident., CL; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 6; Eft. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. ■—• No. 5; Dated, 25 M ay 63

3000 300-1 300-1 20043 Via STG VOR 3000 C-d ...... 700-1)3 700-1)3 700— R-183 and S T G C -n ...... 700-2' ~ 700-2 700-2 ' V O R R-036. A -d n ...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 C L E R B n ______3000 Verm ilion I n t ...... Stadium RBn...... Via CLE RBn.__ 3000

Radar transitions and vectoring authorized in accordance with approved radar patterns. When used in lieu of procedure turn, alignment on final approach heading within 10 miles of final approach fix is required. Procedure turn N side of crs, 054° Outbnd, 234° Inbnd, 3000' within 10 miles of Stadium RB n. M inim um altitude over facility on final approach crs, 3000' Crs and distance, facility to airport, 234°—6.9 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within'6.9 miles after passing SU M RBn, make right climbing turn to 3000' direct to C L E V O R . H old S W 1-minute right turns, 069° Inbnd. Caution: T V towers approximately 1970' approximately 6 miles ESE of airport. City, Cleveland; State, Ohio; Airport Name, Cleveland-Hopkins; Elev., 792'; Fac. Class., M H W ; Ident., SUM ; Procedure No. 2, Amdt. 5; Eft. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. 4; Dated, 25 M ay 63

T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 20043 C -dn...... 500-1 500-1 500-i)3 S-dn-25...... 500-1 500-1 500-1 A -d n ...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn N side of crs, 063° Outbnd, 243° Inbnd, 3800' within 10 miles. M inimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 3000'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 243°—4.1 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.1 miles after passing D U J R B n, make a right climbing turn to 3800', return to DUJ RBn. Hold N E 1-minute right turns, 243° Inbnd. City, DuBols; State, Pa.; Airport Name, DuBois-Jefferson County; Elev., 1814'; Fac. Class., BH; Ident., DUJ; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 4; Eff. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. 3; Dated, 24 Aug. 63

Erie V O R ______ER LOM (final)______2000 T -d n ...... — 300-1 300-1 20043 C -dn ...... 500-1 500-1 500-1)3 S-dn-6...... 500-1 500-1 ■ 500-1 A -d n ______800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn S side of crs 239° Outbnd, 059° Inbnd, 2300' within 10 miles. M inim um altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2000'. Crs and distance, facility to airport 059°—3.9 miles. ; If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.9 miles after passing E R LO M , climb to 2300 on 059° heading, make left turn, proceed to E R L O M . H old S W E R L O M , right turns, 1-minute, 059° Inbnd. City, Erie; State, Pa.; Airport Name, Port Erie; Elev., 732'; Fac. Class., LO M ; Ident., ER; Procedure No. 2, Amdt. Orig.; Eff. Date, 29 Feb. 64

F R I N D B ______2900 300-1 300-1 20043 O-dn#...... 600-1 600-1 600—1)3 A -d n ...... 1600-3 1600-3 1600-3

Procedure turn E side of crs, 207° Outbnd, 027° Inbnd, 2900' within. 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1900'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 031°—1.8 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 1.8 miles after passing F R IN D B , climb to 2900 on a crs of 050° from the N D B within 15 miles. Caution: Restricted area R-3602 adjacent to airport N W . Small arms firing range 2.4 miles. N otes: Final approach from holding pattern not authorized. Procedure turn required. Authorized for military use only except by prior arrangement. #A11 circling approaches will be made to the E of the airport. See caution note. City, Fort Riley; State, Kans.; Airport Name, Marshall A A F; Elev., 1062'; Fac. Class., M H W ; Ident., FR I; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 3; Eff. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. 2; Dated, 26 Sept. 59 Friday, February 21, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2633

ADF Standard I n s t r u m e n t A ppr o ac h P rocedure— Continued

Transition Celling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less M ore than M inim um Course and 2-engine, From — T o — altitude Condition distance 65 knots more than (feet) M ore than 65 knots or less 65 knots

T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 200-H C -dn*______400-1 500-1 500-1y S-dn-12*...... • 400-1 400-1 400-1 A-dn®...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn not authorized. . . . vriT'imirm altitude over radar fix# on final^approach crs, 1300 . T f^ n a l riintecfnotestaWished upon ’descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.1 miles after passing radar fix, dim b to 1700' on 130* bearing from H O U R B n within 15 miles or, when directed b y À T C , turn left, clim b to 1600' on 062° bearing from H O U R B n within 20 m ile«. N otes: Radar service required to execute this approach. Radar vectoring to be used to position aircraft on final approach within 15 miles of H O U RBn. Caution: 1232' tower approximately 9 miles SSE of HOU RBn. _ ' . ______, _ Other ehange: Deletes transitions from Areola VH F Int, HOU VOR, Fairbanks V H F Int, and HOU FM , #Radar fix 5.1 miles on 311° bearing from H O U radar antenna. *If radar fix not received, descent below 1300' not authorized. Citv Houston- State Tex : Airport Name, International; Elev., 50'; Fac. Class., SABH; Ident., HOU; Procedure No. 3, Arndt. 3; EfT. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 2; ’ ’ Dated, 11 M a y 63

Direct______7100 T -d n ______300-1 300-1 200-14 Direct______5400 C -dn ...... 500-1 500-1 600-1% S-dn-20...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 A -d n ______800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn N side of crs, 018° Outbnd, 198° Inbnd, 7100' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 5400'. U v isua l^oSact ’ not * establish^0 upon descenTtoauthorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 2.2 miles climb to 7000' on 195° crs, of ID A RBn within 10miles. Other change: Deletes transitions from St. Anthony In t and D B S V O R . City Idaho Falls: State, Idaho; Airport Name, Fanning Field; Elev., 4738'; Fae. Class., SABHZ; Ident, ID A ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 2, Eft. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 1; Dated, 21 July 62

VOR G G L M M ...... Direct______5000 T-dn #...... 300-1 300-1 200-14 G G L M M ...... Direct______8000 C -d n ...... 700-1 700-1 700-1X M PW TRTtp G G L M M ...... Direct______— 6000 S-dn-20...... 700-1 700-1 700-1 A -d n ______800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn N W side of crs 024° Outbnd, 204° Inbnd, 1500' within 20 miles. Beyond 20 miles not authorized. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs 800'. Crs and distance, facility to airport 024°— 0.6miles. . . . . _ T „ .. . . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0.0 mile of GO L M M , turn left, climb to 3000 on 360® crs from O G G L M M within 20 miles, reverse crs, climb to 6000' over L M M , hold N on the 204° Inbnd crs right turns 1-minute. Caution: 570'tower, 4 miles W of airport. #Takeoff minimum Runways 23, 20, and 17 are 600-1 and all aircraft must cross airport under V F R conditions prior to departing on crs. City, Kahului Maui; State, Hawaii; Airport Name, Kahului; Elev., 59'; Fac. Class, M H (L M M ); Ident, GG; Procedure No. I, Arndt. Orig.; Elf. Date, 29 Feb. 64

L E L O M ...... Direct...... 2600 T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 200-\4 L E L O M ...... —...... Direct______2600 C -dn ...... 400-1 500-1 600-114 LE LOM (final),...... Direct______2000 S-dn-4...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 L E L O M ..'...... — Direct...... 2500 A -d n ...... — 800-2 800-2 800-2 Via R-264 L E X 2500 VOR.

Procedure turn N side of crs, 222° Outbnd, 042° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles (nonstandard due more favorable terrain). Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2000'. . Crs and distance, facility to airport, 042°—3.5 miles. . » * »'* * * »> . , - If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.5 miles after passing L E LO M , climb to 2800 on crs 042° to the Fayette Int, hold N , 1-minute right turns, 222° Inbnd. City, Lexington; State, Ky.; Airport Name, Blue Grass Field; E lev, 978'; Fac Class, H W ; Ident, LE ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 4; Eff. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 3; Dated, 22 Sept. 62

T -d n ...... - 300-1 300-1 2 0 0 -K C -d n...... 600-1 600-1 600-1H A -d n ...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn E side of crs 221° Outbnd, 041° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1000 '. Facility on airport. If visual contact not established upon deseent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0.0 mile after passing P UK RBn, make a climbing left turn to 2000' return to P U K RB n. Hold S W 1-minute right turns, 041° Inbnd. City, Paducah: State, Ky.; Airport Name, Barkley Field; E lev, 407'; Fae. Class, B M H ; Ident, P U K ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 1; Eff. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 2 Sept. 61

H R V O R . P I R R B n ...... - D irect...... 3600 T -d n *______300-1 300-1 2Û0-K C -d ...... 400-1 500-1 BOO-114 C -n ...... 400-1K m - i i 4 500-2 S-dn-25.— ...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 A -d n ___ _— 800-2 800-2 800-2

Hpcsdure turn N . side of crs, 089° Outbnd, 269° Inbnd, 3600' within 10 miles, ■,**% Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2600'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 269°— 2.9miles. - ¿nnn/ visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 2.9 miles after passing R B n make left climbing turn to ww on 241° bearing from the P IR RBn within 20 miles. w otes : Final approach from holding pattern not authorized. Procedure turn required. MSA: 000°-360°, 3400V . When weather is less than 400-1, aircraft taking off N W make left clim bing turn to 2500' on 241° bearing from P I R R B n. City, Pierre; State, S. Dak.; Airport Name, Pierre Municipal; E lev, 1742'; Fac. Class, SBH; Ident, P IR ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 1; Eff. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 26 Oct. 63 2634 RULES AND REGULATIONS

A D F Stand ard I n s t r u m e n t A p pr o a c h P rocedure— C on tin u ed

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minim um M ore than Course and altitude Condition 2-engine, From— T o — more than distance (feet) 65 knots M ore than or less 65 knots 65 knots

LOM...... - , ______Direct...... 3000 T -d n *._—...... 300-1 300-1 200-H LOM ______Direct-______2500 C -d n...... 500-1 600-1 600-1)4 S-dn-13-...... 500-1 500-1 500-1 A -d n ...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 The following minimum applies for aircraft equipped with V O R after passing T O P -V O R R-230: S-dn-13...... - 400-1 400-1 400-1

Radar vectoring to final approach crs authorized. .... _ „ _. , , , , . ~ Procedure ttim N side of crs, 305® Outbnd, 125° Inbnd, 2500' within 10 miles of TO P RBn. Nonstandard due traffic. M inim um altitude over T O P R B n on final approach crs, 2100'. notestf^Ushed^upon^eswnt to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.9 miles after passing T O P RBn, climb to 2600' on 126° crs within 15 miles or, when directed by A TC . (1) turn left, climbing to 2600', proceed to TO P VOR; (2) turn left, climbing to 2500'and return to TO P LOM . N o te s: Aircraft executing missed approach may be radar controlled after being reidentified. Approach from holding pattern at TO P LO M not authorized. Procedure turn required. , ,• • „ . *N o reduction in 2-engine or less takeoff minimums authorized w ith IL S inoperative. Citv. Topeka; State, Kans.; Airport Name, Phillip Billard Municipal; Elev., 880'; Pac. Class., M H W ; Ident., TO P; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 16; Efif. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 15; Dated, 3 Aug. 63 3. By amending tiie following very high frequency omnirange (VOR) procedures prescribed in § 97.11(c) to read:

VO R Standard I n s t r u m e n t A ppr o ac h P rocedure

Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet M S B . Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. , ... , „ __, , . . . . If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, iiniftsa an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized b y the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. In itial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition v Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than Course and 2-engine, altitude Condition From— T o - distance more than (feet) 65 knots More than 65 knots or less 65 knots

Direct...... 3000 T -d n ______300-1 300-1 200-14 Direct...... 3000 C -dn ...... 400-1 500-1 500-1)4 Direct...... 3000 S-dn-36L______400-1 400-1 400-1 Direct______3000 A -d n ...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 Direct______2200 Strongsville VO R ______- Direct...... 3000

Radar transition and vectoring authorized in accordance with approved radar patterns. W hen used in lieu of procedure turn, alignment on final approach heading within 5 miles of Brunswick In t is required. ... ___ - Procedure turn E side of crs, 195° Outbnd, 015° Inbnd, 3000' within 10 miles of STG VO R. M inim um altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2200'. to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4:5 miles after passing STG -VO R, make left climb­ ing turn to 3000' direct to C L E -V O R , hold S W 1-minute right turns, 069° Inbnd. C a u t io n - T V towers approximately 1970' approximately 6 miles ESE of airport. ¡»Brunswick Int.; In t C L E V O R R-123 and Strongsville V O R R-195. City Cleveland; State, Ohio; Airport Name, Cleveland-Hopkins; Elev., 792'; Fac. Class., BVOR; Ident., STG; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 5; Eff. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt., 3 ’ No. 4; Dated 25 May 63

FRT VOR 2900 T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 200-14 Fort Riley Int. n -dn** 700-1 700-1 700-114 S-dn-4...... 700-1 700-1 700-1 1600-3 1600-3 1600-3

Procedure turn S side of crs, 213° Outbnd, 033° Inbnd, 2900' within 10 miles. Tvrinimnm altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2600'.

ff^isual con ta^n ^estab toh ^u ^o^eT ^n U o authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 6.3 miles after passing VOR, climb to 2900' m i R-045

With(^.UTiONfSRestricted area R-3602 adjacent to airport N W . Small arms firing range 2.4 miles N . N ote: Authorized for military use only except by prior arrangement. **AU circling approaches will be made to the E of the airport. See caution note. Citv Fort Rilev- State Kans.; Airport Name, Marshall A A F; Elev., 1062'; Fac. Class., L-VO R; Ident., FR I; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 1; Eff. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. Orig.; Dated, 6 Feb. 60

PROCEDURE CANCELLED, EFFECTIVE 29 FEB. 1964. Citv Houston; State, Tex.; Airport Name, International; Elev., 50'; Fac. Class., H -B V O R TAC ; Ident., HOU; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 8; Eff. Date, 4 May 63; Sup. Amd . 3 ’ No. 7; Dated, 7 Apr. 62 Friday, February 21, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2635

VOR- Standard I nstrum ent A pproach Procedure— C on tin u ed

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less M inim um M ore than Course and From— T o - Condition 2-engine, distance altitude (feet) 66 knots M ore than more than 66 knots or less 651mots

6-mile P M P flT (R-107)__ VOR (final)______1200 T - d n * ...... 300-1 300-1 200-14 C -dn ______600-1 600-1 600-lPi S-dn-27...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 A - d n „ ______800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn N side of crs, 107° Outbnd, 287° Inbnd, 1900' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1200'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 287°— 3.0 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.0 miles after passing M E M -V O R , climb to 1800' on R-287 within 16 miles or, when directed by A T C , turn left and climb to 1900' on R-220 within 16 miles. N ote: When authorized by A T C , D M E may be used from R-055 through R-195 within 26 miles at 1900' to position aircraft for a straight-in approach with the elimination of the procedure turn. M SA: 000°-090°, 2300'; 090°-180°, 1700'; 180°-270°, 1700'; 270°-360°, 2300'. ♦Air Carrier N ote: Takeoff with less than 200-14 not authorized on Runway 14-32. City. Memphis; State, Tenn.; Airport Name, Memphis Metropolitan; Elev., 331'; Fac. Class., B V O R TAC ; Ident., M E M ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 16; Eff. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. N o. 14; Dated, 11 Jan. 64

T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 200-14 C -d n ...... 400-1 600-1 600-114 S-dn-4-.______400-1 400-1 400-1 A -d n ______800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn E side of crs, 221° Outbnd, 041° Inbnd, 2000' w ithin 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1600'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 04l°— 4.0 miles. I f visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.0 miles after passing P U R V O R , make a clim bing left turn to 2000', return to P U K V O R . H old S W 1-minute right turns, 041° Inbnd. City, Paducah; State, Ky.; Airport Name, Barkley Field: Elev., 407'; Fac. Class., BVOR; Ident., P U K ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 4; Eff. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 3; Dated, 26 Aug. 61

PTR PRn P I R V O R ...... D irect.______3600 T -d n *...... 300-1 300-1 200-14 C -d...... 400-1. 600-1 GOO-114 C -n ...... 400-114 GOO-114 600-2 S-dn-26...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn N side of crs, 075° Outbnd, 266° Inbnd, 3600' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 3200'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 255°—4.8 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing m inim um s or if landing not accomplished within 4.8 miles after passing PIR -V O R , climb to 4000' on R-241 PIR -V O R within 20 miles. MSA: 000°-360°, 3400'. , ♦When weather is less than 400-1 aircraft taking oft N W make left climbing turn-to 2600' on R-241 prior to departing on crs. City, Pierre; State, 8. Dak.; Airport Nam e, Pierre Municipal; Elev., 1742'; Fac. Class., M -B V O R ; Ident., P I R ; Procedure N o. 1, Arndt. 6; Eff. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 6; Dated, 26 Oct. 63

T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 200-14 O-dn______600-1 600-1 600-114 S-dn-22...... 600-1 600-1 600-1 A -d n ...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar vectoring to final approach crs authorized. Procedure turn N side of crs, 030° Outbnd, 210° Inbnd, 2600' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2300'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 210°— 4.9 miles. _ If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.9 miles after passing T O P -V O R , climb to 2600 on R-165 within 20 miles or, when directed b y A T O , turn left, climb to 2600' and return to T O P -V O R . . .- . . . j. N otes: Aircraft executing missed approach may be radar controlled after being reidentified. N o reduction In two-engine or less takeofi minimums authorized with IL8 inoperative. Other change: Deletes transition from T O P R B n City, Topeka; State, Kans.; Airport Name, Phillip Billard Municipal; Elev., 880'; Fac. Class., B V O R TAC ; Ident., TO P; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 6; Eff. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 6; Dated, 3 Aug. 63

Lee V H F In t___ V L D - V O R ...... Direct.. ______1800 T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 20044 C -d n ______600-1 500-1 600-1)4 S-d-35______400-1 400-1 NA S-n-35______NA NANA A -dn ______800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance w ith approved patterns. Procedure turn E side of crs, 186° Outbnd, 006° Inbnd, 1800' w ithin 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1200'. Crsand distance, facility to airport, 006°— 5.7 miles. . . . „ , _ „ - _ ■ , . . «visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing miTihnmna or if landing not accomplished within 6.7 miles after passing V LD -V O R , turn left, climb to 1800' on R-346 within 20 miles o f the V L D -V O R . N ote: No lights on Runway 12-30. , „ Caution: Air carrier night landing not authorized on Runway 36 and night takeoff not authorized on Runway 17. Unlighted trees 1000 from approach end of Runway 38. MSA: 000°-090°, 1600'; 090°-180°, 1600'; 180°-270°, 1600'; 270°-360°, 1600'. Oity, Valdosta; State, Ga.; Airport Name, Valdosta Municipal; Elev., 204'; Fac. Class., B VO R ; Ident., V LD ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 11; Eff. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. N o. 10; Dated, 11 Jan. 64 2636 RULES AND REGULATIONS

4. By amending the following terminal very high frequency omnirange (TerVQR) procedures prescribed in § 97.13 to read:

T erminal VOR Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure

Bearings, headings, courses and radlals are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are In feet M S L . Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise Indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles ^ ^ , If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, It shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by; the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. M inim um altitudes shall correspond w ith those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than Course and 2-engine, From— T o - altitude Condition distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

TH A m n V O R ...... D irect______6500 T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 200-H VOR ...... Direct______6200 C - d n ...... 500-1 500-1 500-i H S-dn-2...... 500-1 500-1 500-1 A -d n ...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn W side ers, 205° Outbnd, 026° Inbnd, 6200' within 10 miles. Nonstandard due to high terrain E. M inim um altitude over facility on final approach ers, 5200'. Crs and distance, breakoft point to Runway 2, 020°— 1.0 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0.0 mile after passing ID A -V O R , climb to 7000' on B-012 within 10 miles. Other changes: Deletes transitions from St. Anthony In t and D B S V O R . C ity, Idaho Falls; State, Idaho; A irport Nam e, Fanning Field; E lev., 4738'; Fac. Class., B V O R ; Ident., ID A ; Procedure N o. T erV O R -2, Arndt. 6; E ff. Date, 20 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 5; Dated, 20 Apr. 63

ID A R B n ...... V O R ...... 6500 T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 200-H TDA RRn (final) ______5400 C -d n * _____ 500-1 500-1 500-1)$ S-dn—20*______400-1 400-1 400-1 800-2 8Ö0-2 800-2

Procedure turn N side of crs. 012° Outbnd, 192° Inbnd, 6200' within 10 miles. M inim um altitude over ID A R B n on final approach crs, 5400'; over V O R , 5100'. Crs and distance, breakoff point to Runway 20,200°—0.5 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0.0 mile of ID A -V O R , climb to 7000' on R-195 ID A- V O R w ithin 10 miles. Other changes: Deletes transitions from St. Anthony Int and DBS-VOR. * *A D F or Z marker equipment required for descent below 5400'. City, Idaho Falls; State, Idaho; Airport Name, Fanning Field; Elev., 4738'; Fac. Class., BVO R; Ident., ID A ; Procedure No. TerVOR-20, Arndt. 3; Eff. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 2; Dated 21 July 1962 5. By amending the following very high frequency omnirange-distance measuring equipment (VOR-DME) procedures prescribed in § 97.15 to read: V O R -D M E Standard I nstrument A pproach P rocedure

Bearings, headings, courses and radlals are m agnetic.. Elevations and altitudes are in feet M S B . Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized b y the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. In itial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than Course and From — T o — 2-engine, distance altitude Condition more than (feet) 65 knots More than 65 knots or less 65 knots

Fairbanks V H F In t...... 4.5-mile D M E fix (final)...... 1500 T -dn 300-1 300-1 200-/4 C -dn*...... 400-1 500-1 500-1)3 A -d n *______800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance w ith approved patterns. Procedure turn W side of crs 306° Outbnd, 126° Inbnd, 1800' w ithin 10 miles. Beyond 10 miles not authorized. M inim um altitude over 4.5-mile D M E fix on final approach crs 1500'. Course and distance, 4.5-mile D M E fix to airport 126°— 4.5 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0.0 mile of H O U VO R, climb to 2200' on HOU VOR R-171 within 15 miles. N ote: Radar fix 5.1 miles on 311° bearing from H O U radar antenna m ay be used in lieu of 4.5-mile D M E fix. Caution: 1232' tower approximately 11 miles SSE of VO R. •If neither 4.5-mile D M E fix or radar fix received on final, descent below 1500' not authorized. City, Houston; State, ; Airport Name, Houston International; Elev., 50'; Fac. Class., H -BVO R TAC; Ident., HOU; Procedure No. VOR/DME No. 1, Arndt. Orig.; Eff. Date, 29 Feb. 64

8-mile fix R-123. O T M V O R .__ Direct.. 2400 T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 200-/4 O T M V O R ___ 4-mile fix R-303. Direct.. 1500 C -dn ...... 400-1 500-1 600-1)3 S-dn-32______400-1 400-1 400-1 A-dn.-;...... — 800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn N side of crs 123° Outbnd, 303° Inbnd, 2600' within 10 miles. M inim um altitude over facility on final approach crs 2400'. Crs and distance, facility to airport 303°—35.7 miles. - , If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minim um s or if landing not accomplished at 6.7-mile D M E fix R-303, make right turn climb to 2600 and return to OTM VOR. N ote: W hen authorized b y A T C , D M E m ay be used via 8-mile D M E arc at 2600' altitude between O T M R-015 clockwise to R-140 to position aircraft for final approach w ith the elimination o f procedure turn. City, Ottumwa; State, Iowa; Airport Name, Ottumwa Municipal; Elev., 845'; Fac. Class., BVO R TAC; Ident., OTM ; Procedure No. VOR/DME No. 1, Arndt. Orig.; Efl. Date, 29 Feb. 64 Friday, February 21, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2637

V O R -D M E Standard I n s t r u m e n t A p pr o ac h P rocedure

Transition Celling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less M inim um M ore than 2-engine, Course and altitude Condition From— T o — distance more than (feet) 66 knots M ore than 65 knots or less 66 knots

B F F VOR ...... Direct______6400 T-dn #...... 300-1 300-1 *20044 3-mile fix R-246...... Direct...... 4500 C -d n...... 400-1 600-1 500-1)4 8-rln—2 3 ______400-1 400-1 400-1 800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn N side of crs 066° Outbnd, 246° Inbnd, 5600' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude oyer facility on final approach crs 6400'. R visual w n ^ ^ n o te ^ ^ te h e ^ u p o n descentTo authorised landing minimums or if landing not accomplished at 4.8-mile D M E fix R-246 make right turn clim bing to 6600.

^ N ote:^Vhen authorized b y A T C , D M E m ay be used via 10-mile D M E arc at 6100' altitude from all directions to position aircraft for final approach w ith the elimination of procedure turn. „ „ .. , . . Caution: 6144' tower 7.6 miles N W o f airport. ♦Air Carrier N ote: 300-1 required Runway 23. . . . #IFR flight planned to SW, W SW , or N W after takeoff climb on heading 260° until 6000' before departing on crs. City Scottsbluff; State, Nebr.; Airport Name, Scottsblufl Municipal; Elev., 3965'; Fac. Class., B VO R TAC ; .Ident., BFF; Procedure No. VOR/DME No. 1, Arndt. Orig.; * Kif, Date, 29 Fob* 6. By amending the following instrument landing system procedures prescribed in § 97.17 to read:

t t.s Stand ard I n s t r u m e n t A p pr o ac h P rocedure

Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnet.ie Elevations and altitudes are in feet M S B . Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical rniifts u nSs otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. . , ...... Han instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an aDDroach is conduct«^ in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches Shan ^ nu&e over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Minimum 2-engine, Course and altitude Condition From— T o — distance more than (feet) 65 knots More than 66 knots or less 66 knots

CLE RBn LOM ...... Direct______3000 T -d n ** 300-1 300-1 20044 C.1M VOR D irect______3000 C -dn...... 400-1 600-1 600-1)4 L O M ______...... V ia S T Q V O R 3000 S-dn-5L% *...... 20044 200-44 20044 R-309 and ILS A -d n ...... 600-2 600-2 600-2 5L front crs. L O M (final)...... - ...... Direct______2200 LOM—__ —...... - ...... V ia C L E V O R 3000 R-072 and ILS 6L loc. crs.

Badar transitions and vectoring authorized in accordance with approved radar patterns. When used in lieu of procedure turn, alignment on final approach heading within 10 miles of final approach fix is required. Procedure turn 8 side of S W crs, 234° Outbnd, 064° Inbnd, 3000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 2200'. — Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at O M , 2080'—3.9 miles; at M M , 1020 —0.6 mile. „ _ _ „ 0— , . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, make left climbing turn to 3000 on S TG -V O R R-360, inter­ cept and proceed Outbnd on C X R R-285 to Crib In t, hold E 1-minute right turns. Caution: T V towers approximately 1970' approximately 6 miles ESE of airport. *400-% required when glide slope not utilized. _ . . . — ,, . , . . . . %Runway visual range 2600' also authorized for landing on Runway 6L, provided all components of the ILS, high-intensity runway hghts, approach lights, condenser discharge flashers, outer compass locator, and all related airborne equipment are in satisfactory operating condition. Descent below 989' shall not be made unless visual contact with the approach lights has been established or the aircraft is clear o f clouds...... ,...... ,... "Runway visual range 2600' also authorized for takeoff on Runway 6L in lieu of 20044 when 20044 authorized, providing high-intensity runway lights are operational. City, Cleveland; State, Ohio; Airport Name, Cleveland-Hopkins; Elev., 792'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-C LE ; Procedure No. ILS-5L, Arndt. 23; Eft. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 22; Dated, 26 M ay 63

Mentor Int___ .... D irect______3000 T -d n ______300-1 300-1 20044 Sharon Int— „ „ Via STG VOR 3000 C-dn#*...... 400-1 500-1 500-1)4 R-183 and STG S-dn-23R#*...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 V O R R-036. A -d n ...... — 800-2 800-2 800-2 CLE RBn...... D irect...... 3000 Vermilion Int____ Stadium RBn ______V ia C L E R B n ... 3000

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance w ith approved patterns, When used in lieu of procedure turn, alignment on final approach heading within 10 miles of final approach fix is required. R B n Inbnd final until 4-mile radar fix received. UJWU u w ra „ „„ ...... ^ ...... ______„ _____miles after passing radar fix or 6.9 miles after passing SUM RBn, make right climbing turn to 3000' direct to C LE VO R, hold SW 1-minute right turns, 069° Inbnd. Caution: T V towers approximately 1970' approximately 6 miles ESE of airport. N ote: Four-mile radar fix not provided b y A T C unless weather is 700-1)4 or below. »When radar fix not available, 700-1)4 minimums w ill apply. Descend to landing minimum after passing 4-mile radar fix. City, Cleveland; State, Ohio; Airport Nam e, Cleveland-Hopkins; Elev., 792'; Fac. Class., IL S ; Ident., I- C L E ; Procedure N o. ILS-23R , Arndt. 14; Eff. Date, 29 Feb. 64T Sup. Arndt. No. 18; Dated, 26 M ay 63

No. 37----- 2 2638 RULES AND REGULATIONS

I L S Standard I n s t r u m e n t A ppr o ac h P rocedure)— C on tin u ed

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Course and Minim um From— T o— Condition 2-engine, distance altitude (feet) 65 knots M ore than more than or less 65knot3 65 knots

Chagrin Falls Int Brecksville RBn. Direct______3000 T -d n ..-. 300-1 300-1 200-% Vennilion In t____ Brecksville RBn. ViaCLE RBn... 3000 C -dn___ 400-1 500-1 500-1% Sharon In t------Brecksville RBn. Via STG VOR 3000 S-dn-27* 300-% 300-% 300-% R-183and STG A -d n ___ 600-2 600-2 600-2 V O R R-061. Cleveland VOR.. Brecksville RBn. Via CLE VOR 3000 R-084. M entor In t ...... Brecksville RBn. Direct______3000

Radar transition and vectoring authorized in accordance with approved radar patterns. W hen used in lieu of a procedure turn, alignment on final approach heading within 10 miles of final approach fix is required. - v Procedure turn N side of crs, 097° Outbnd, 277° Inbnd, 3000' within 10 miles of Brecksville RBn. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 3000'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM , 2230'—4.4 miles; at M M , 1030'—0.6 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums of if landing not accomplished within 4.4 miles after passing OM , make left climbing turn to 3000' direct to C L E V O R , hold S W 1-minute right turns, 069° Inbnd. Caution: T V towers approximately 6 miles ESE of airport, approximately 1970'. *400-1 required when glide slope not utilized. City, Cleveland; State, Ohio; Airport Name, Cleveland-Hopkins; Elev., 792': Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-C E E ; Procedure No. ILS-27, Arndt. 4; Efl. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 3; Dated, 14 Dec. 61

Justin In t.. Direct- _ ..... 2000 T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 * 200-% Keller Int## OM (final) ...... 2000 C -d n ______600-1 600-1 600-1% Joshua In t.. O M ’ Via F T W I L S . __ **2200 8-dn-17#...... 300-% 300-% 300-% A -d n ...... 600-2 600-2 600-2

**Radar terminal area transition altitude 2000' within 20 miles of radar site (Greater Southwest International Airport). Radar control will provide 1000' vertical clearance within a 3-mile radius or 500' vertical clearance within a 3- to 5-mile (inclusive) radius of 1749' T V tower 6 miles SE; 1679' tower 7 miles SE; 2349' T V tower 24 miles ESE of airport. / Radar vectoring may be used to position A/C for final approach within 5 miles N of RBn with elimination of procedure turn. Procedure turn E side of crs 354° Outbnd, 174° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles of O M . Beyond 10 miles not authorized. Nonstandard due to A T C requirements. M inim um altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2000'. M inim um altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 2000'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at O M 2000'—3.5 miles, at M M 950'—0.6 mile. I f visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, climb to 2000' on S crs IL S within 20 miles. *300-1 required for takeoff Runways 9-27 and 13-31. #600-% required when glide slope not utilized. ##Keller In t: In t of F T W IL S N C R S and E W X R-040 or G S W R-300—M A A to determine intersection, 8000'. A ir Carrier N ote: Reduction in landing minimum not authorized on cargo or ferry flights. Caution: 956' grain elevator 1.5 miles N and 990' grain elevator 1.9 miles N of airport. City, Fort Worth; State, Tex.; Airport Name, Meacham Field; Elev., 692'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-F T W ; Procedure No. ILS-17, Arndt. 14; Eft. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Am dt. No. 13; Dated, 4 Jan. 64

L E X V O R .. . T.TT. T.Î1M 2600 T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 200-% M cAfee In t___ L E L O M ...... 2500 C-dn______400-1 500-1 500-1% Ricbmond Int. L E L O M ...... Direct______2600 S-dn-4*...... 300-% 300-% 300-% Chaplin In t— Keene In t______Via R-264 L E X 2500 A -d n ______. . . 600-2 600-2 600-2 VOR. Keene In t----- LE LOM (final)...... Direct______2000

Procedure turn N . side of crs, 222° Outbnd, 042° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles (nonstandard due to more favorable terrain). Minimum altitude at glide slope int Inbnd, 2000'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at O M 2000'—3.5 miles, at M M 1190'—0.5 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, climb to 2800' on crs 042° to the Fayette Int. Hold N, 1- minute right turns, 222° Inbnd. 042° Outbnd. Caution: Glide slope point of touchdown approximately 1450' in from approach end of runway. *400-1 required when glide slope not utilized. C itv. Lexington: State, K y .; Airport Name, Blue Grass Field; Elev., 978'; Fac. Class., IL S ; Ident., I- L E X ; Procedure N o. ILS -4, A m dt. 4; Eft. Date, 29 Feb 64; Sup. Amdt. N o. 3; Dated, 22 Sept. 62

Park RBn (LOM ) ...... 2000 T-dn##...... 300-1 300-1 200- Bainbridge LF Int 500-1% SJ L F R ...... Park RBn (LOM )--. 2000 C -d n ...... 500-1 600-1 Park RBn (LOM) .. 2000 S-dn-16%#...... 200-% 200-% 200-% S E A V O R ...... 600-2 P A E V O R ...... Part nun (T.OM) 2000 600-2 600-2 Burton VH F Int_ Part PUn (T.ORD 2000 Lofall VHF Int— Park RBn (LOM )...... D irect______2000

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn W side of crs, 338° Outbnd, 158° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles. Final approach from holding pattern at Park RBn not authorized, procedure turn required. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception inbnd, 1700'...... Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of Runway at OM , 1700'—4.1 miles*; at M M , 644'—0.6 mile.* . „ .. „,Ll1 ... If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, climb to 1700' direet to SE LO M . Continue cliniD on u» 158° Outbnd, 338° Inbnd within 10 miles of SE LO M or, when directed by A T C , turn right, climb to 2000' on R-225 SEA V O R to Burton Int. Caution: Terrain and trees to 591' imm ediately N and N E of airport. %400-1 required when glide slope not utilized. •Distance indicated is to the displaced threshold. . . .. j „ nwr #Runway visual range (R V R ) 2600' also authorized for landing on Runway 16, provided that all components of the high-intensity runway lights, approach lights, amaeu»» discharge flashers, outer compass locator, and all related airborne equipment are in satisfactory operating condition. Descent below 628' shall not be made unless viaua contact w ith the approach lights has been established or the aircraft is clear of clouds. __ « „ „ d ##Runway visual range 2600' also authorized for takeoff on Runway 16 in lieu o f 200-% when 200-% authorized, providing bigh-intenslty runway lights are operational. City Seattle; State, Wash.; Airport Name, Seattle-Tacoma International; Elev., 428'; Fac. Class., ILS ; Ident., I-SZI; Procedure No. ILS-16, Amdt. Orig.; Efl. Date, 29 Feb. 64 Friday, February 21, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2639

ILS Standard I n s t r u m e n t A p pr o a c h P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimum«

2-engine or less Minimum M ore than Course and altitude Condition 2-engine, Prom — T o — distance (feet) 65 knots M ore than more than 65 knots or less 66 knots

SE L O M ...... D irect______2000 T-dn##...... 300-1 300-1 200-H SE L O M ...... D irect______2000 C -d n ______600-1 600-1 800-1*3 SE LOM (final)...... D irect_____;______1600 S-dn-34#%...... 200-H 20O-J3 200-*3 SE L O M ...... D irect__. ______2000 A -d n ...... 600-2 600-2 600-2 SE L O M ...... D irect______2000

Radar vectoring authorised in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn E side of ers, 188° Outbnd, 338° Inbnd, 1700' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception inbnd, 1600'. ; Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM , 1885—4.0 miles; at M M , 660 —0.6 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorised landing mlnlmums or if landing not accomplished, clim b to 2000' direct to Park R B n. Continue d im b on ers 838° Outbnd, 188° Inbnd within 10 miles Park RBn or, when directed by A T C , turn left, climb to 2000' on R-225 SEA-VO R to Burton Int. Caution: Terrain and trees to 891'immediately N and N E of airport. , If visual contact not established upon descent to authorised landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, climb to 2000' direct to Park RBn (SZ LO M ). Continue dimb on ers 338° Outbnd, 158° Inbnd within 10 miles Park RBn (SZ LO M ) or, when directed by A T C , turn left, climb to 2000' on R-225 SEA VO R to Burton Int. Other change: Deletes transition from Park RB n. •Transition to Fairgrounds In t authorised from M cChord A F B R B n on ers 020°, 200v. % 400-1 required when glide slope not utilised. IRunway visual range (R V R ) 2600' also authorised for landing on Runway 34, provided that all components of the ILS, high-intensity runway lights, approach lights, condenser discharge flashers, outer compass locator, and all related airborne equipment are in satisfactory operating condition. Descent below 628' shall not be made unless visual contact with the approach lights has been established or the aircraft is clear of clouds. «Runway visual range 2600' also authorized for takeofl on Runway 34 in lieu of 200-J3 when 200-13 authorized, providing high intensity runway lights are operational MSA: 315°-045°, 2300f; 045°-135®, 8700'; 135°-225*, 3000'; 225°-315°, 3500'. Citv Seattle: State. Wash.; Airport Nam e, Seattle-Tacoma International; E lev., 428'; Fac. Class., IL S ; Ident., I-S E A ; Procedure N o. ILS-34, Arndt. 22; EH. Date, 29 Feb. 64; - " Sup. Arndt. No. 21; Dated, 28 July 63

L O M ...... Direct______2700 T -d n *...... 300-1 300-1 200-*3 L O M —...... D irect______2700 C-dn______600-1 600-1 600-1*3 L O M ...... Direct______2700 S-dn-3#**...... 200-}^ 200-M 200-*3 L O M ...... Direct______2700 A -d n ...... 600-2 600-2 600-2

Procedure turn S side S W ers 206® Outbnd, 026° Inbnd, 2700' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude at glide slope int Inbnd, 2600'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM , 2826'—3.7 miles; at M M , 1623'—0.5 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, climb to 2700' on N E ers of IL S within 20 miles. Cautio n: Tow er 1628'1.6 miles N E of L O M . - •300-1 required for takeofl Runway 15. #500-1 required when glide slope not utilized. **400-J3 authorized for aircraft equipped to receive IL S and V O R simultaneously and R-168 FS D , identified on final when gttde slope not utilized. fBestland Int.: Int FSD VO R R-160 and 115® bearing from FS LO M . {Lennox Int.: Int FSD VO R R-222 and 267° bearing from FS LO M . MSA: 000°-090®, 2800'; 090°-180®, 3400'; 180°-360®, 3000'. City, Sioux Falls; State, S. D ak.; Airport Nam e, Foss Field; Elev., 1428';-Fac. Class., IL S ; Ident., I-F S D ; Procedure N o. ILS -3, Arndt. 9; E ff. Date, 29 Feb. 64 or upon commissioning of approach lights; Sup. Arndt. No. 8; Dated, 11 Jan. 64

L O M ...... D irect______3000 T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 200-3-3 TOP V O R ... L O M ...... Direct______2800 600-1 600-1 600-1*3 S-dn-13*...... 300 300-J3 300-Ji” A -d n ...... 600-2 600-2 600—2

Radar vectoring to final approach ers authorized. Procedure turn N side of ers, 305® Outbnd, 125° Inbnd, 2800' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 2100'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at L O M 2030'—3.9 miles; at M M 1078'—0.6 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, climb to 2600' on SE ers of ILS within 1C miles or, when directed by A TC , turn left, climbing to 2600', proceed to T O P V O R or turn left, climbing to 2800' and return to T O P LO M . N otes: Aircraft executing missed approach may be radar controlled after being xeiaentified. Approach from holding pattern at TOPLOM notauthorlzed. Procedure turn required. * 4 0 0 - required when operating under the provisions o f inoperative IL S components. N o reduction in 2-engine or less takeofl minimums authorized with IL S inopera­ tive. City, Topeka; State, Kans.; Airport Name, Phillip Billard Municipal; Elev., 880'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-T O P; Procedure No. ILS-13, Arndt. 17; Eff. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 16; Dated, 3 Aug. 63

TOP- O R .. 2600 T-dn*. ______300-1 300-1 2 0 0 -M TOP L O M ...... Direct . . . 2600 C-dn ______800-1 600-1 600-1J3 S-dn-31______600-1 600-1 600-1 A -d n ------800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar vectoring to final approach ers authorized. Procedure turn E side of ers, 125® Outbnd, 305° Inbnd, 2600' within 10 miles. No glide slope. Minimum altitude over Powerhouse In t on final approach ers, 1700'. Crs and distance, Powerhouse In t to airport, 306°—2.9 miles. h visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 2.9 miles after passing Powerhouse Int, climb to 2700' ® xt 018 ILS within 20 miles or, when directed by ATC* turn right, proceed direct to TO P-V O R , climbing to 2600'. N otes: 1. Aircraft executing missed approach may be radar controlled after being reidentifled. 2. Procedure authorized only for aircraft equipped to simultaneously rece2* ILS and VOR. 8. Approach from bolding pattern at Powerhouse Int not authorized. Procedure turn required. No reduction in 2-engine or less takeofl minimum»! authorized w ith IL S Inoperative. City, Topeka; State, Kans.; Airport Name, Phillip Billard Municipal; Elev., 880'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-TO P; Procedure No. ILS-81, Arndt. 7; Efl. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. N o. 6; Dated, 3 Aug. 63 2640 RULES AND REGULATIONS

IL S Standard in s t r u m e n t A ppr o ac h P rockdorb—Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-englne or less M inim um More than Course and From— T o — Condition 2-engine, distance altitude (feet) 65 knots M ore than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

Shell Rock Int____ Lrtivr (final) ______Direct______2300 T -d n ___ 300-1 300-1 200-% N e w Hartford In t. LOM ...... D irect...... 2300 C -d n .... 400-1 500-1 500-1% W averly In t______LOM ...... - ...... 2300 S-dn-12* 200-% 200-% 200-% ALO-VOR ______LOM ______Direct______2300 A -d n ___ 600-2 600-2 600-2 Reinbeck In t___ _ LOTVT 2300

Procedure turn W side of crs, 303° Outbnd, 123° Inbnd, 2300' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 2300'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at LO M , 2239'—4.5 miles; at L M M , 1060'—0.5 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished', climb to 2500' on the A LO -V O R R-094 within 20 miles or, when directed by A TC , (1) climb to 2500' on the A LO -V O R R-141 within 20 miles, (2) climb to 2500' on SE crs of ILS within 10 mile. M S A : 000°-090°, 2300'; 090°-180°, 3100'; 180°-360°, 2400'. *400-% required when glide slope not utilized. City, Waterloo; State, Iowa; Airport Name, Waterloo Municipal; Elev., 870'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-A LO ; Procedure No. ILS-12, Amdt. 4; Eff. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 3; Dated, 30 Nov. 63 7. By amending the following radar procedures prescribed in § 97.19 to readr

Radar Standard I nstrument A pproach P rocedure

Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet, M S L . Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. I f a radar instrument approach is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altltude(s) shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below. Positive identification must be estab­ lished with the radar controller. From initial contact with, radar to final authorized landing minimums, the instructions of the radar controller are mandatory except when (A ) visual contact is established on final approach at or before descent to the authorized landing minimums, or (B ) at pilot’s discretion if it appears desirable to discontinue the approach, except when the radar controller m ay direct otherwise prior to final approach, a missed approach shall be executed as provided below when (A ) communication on final approach is lost for more than 5 seconds during a precision approach, or for more than 30 seconds during a surveillance approach; (B ) directed by radar controller; (C ) visual contact is not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums; or (D ) if landing is not accomplished.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum .More than Course and From— T o — altitude Condition ' 2-englne, distance more than (feet) 65 knots M ore than 65 knots or less 65 knots

0°...... 360°...... 3000

S-dn-5L*...... 200-% 200-% 200-% A -d n ...... 600-2 600-2 600-2

Surveillance approach

T -d n @ ...... 300-1 300-1 200-% C/S-dn-all...... 400-1 500-1 500-1% A -d n ...... 800-2 800-2 - 800-2

If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished runway 9: make left climbing turn to 3000' on STG-VOR R-360, intercept and proceed Outnbd on C X R -V O R R-285 to Crib Int. Hold E 1-minute, right turns. A ll other Runways, make climbing turn to 3000', direct to CLE VOR. H old W 1-minute right turns, 098° Inbnd. C aution: T V towers approximately 1970' approximately 6 miles E8E of airport. *R un w ay visual range 2600' also authorized for landing on Runway 5L; providing all components o f the P A R , high-intensity runway lights, condenser discharge flashers, outer compass locator, and all related airborne equipment are operating satisfactorily. Descent below 989' shall not be made unless visual contact with approach lights has been established or the aircraft is clear of clouds. ©Runway visual range 2600' also authorized for takeoff on Runway 5L when 200-% is authorized, providing high intensity runway lights are operational. City, Cleveland; State, Ohio; Airport Name, Cleveland-Hopkins; Elev., 792'; Fao. Class, and Ident., Cleveland Radar; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 11; Eff. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. 10; Dated, 12 Jan. 63

3100 T -dn 300-1 300-1 **300-1

#Precision approach ' \ V C -d *...... 600-1 600-1 600-1% C - n * . . - ...... 600-2 600-2 600-2 S-d-4-22...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 S-n-4______400-2 400-2 400-2 S-n-22...... 500-2 500-2 500-2 A -d n ...... 1500-3 1500-3 1600-3

#Surveillance approach

C -d *...... 600-1 600-1 600-1% C -n *...... 600-2 600-2 600-2 S-d-4-22...... 600-1 600-1 600-1 S-n-4-22...... 600-2 600-2 600-2 A -d n ______1500-3 1500-3 1500-3

If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished Rnwy 4: Turn right climbing to 3100' on 050° crs F R IN D B within 15 miles. R n w y 22: Turn left climbing to 3100' on 050° crs F R I N D B within 15 miles. N otes: Authorized for m ilitary use only except b y prior arrangement. Cautio n: Restricted area R-3602 adjacent to airfield N W . Small arms firing ranges 2.4 miles N of airfield. *Circling approaches will be made E of the airfield. . “ Takeoff minimums 200-% en Runway 22 only. #Caution: On approach to Runway 4 do not descend below 2100' until radar advises passing 1786' tower 5.0 miles SW of airport. City, Fort Riley; State, Kans.; Airport Name, Marshall U.S. A A F ; Elev., 1062': Fac. Class, and Ident., Marshall Radar; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 2; Efl. Date, 29 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. 1; Dated, 19 Jan. 63 Friday, February 21, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2641

These procedures shall become effec­ tanks against penetration by lightning not correspond throughout the operational range or if there is any evidence of binding tive on the dates specified therein. strikes the following is required: (a) Apply bonded laminate panels of 0.010 or slippage in the operation of the aileron These amendments are made under clad aluminum sheet and glass cloth scrim trim tab control knob and dial, rework the the authority of sections 307(c), 313(a), (approximately 20 by 36 inches) covering the aircraft per (b)(1) and (b)(2) before fur­ and 601 of the Federal Aviation Act of upper and lower wing surfaces over the entire ther flight. After compliance with para­ 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1348(c), 1354(a), 1421; plan form area of thé left and right-hand graph (b ) the checks required by this para­ 72 Stat. 749, 752, 775). fuel vent surge tanks between the front and graph may be discontinued. rear spars and from Wing Stations 939.312 (b ) Within 1,500 hours’ time in service Issued in Washington, D.C., on Janu­ to 959.312. Prepare wing surfaces and apply after the effective date of this AD unless ary 23, 1964. panels in accordance with Boeing Document the modification has already been accom­ G . S. M oore, D6-8191. plished: Director, Flight Standards Service. (b) The rework shall be done in accord­ (1) Pin the aileron trim drum shaft to the ance with Boeing Service Bulletin No. 1642 shaft gear and the aileron trim tab dial to FFU. Doc. 64-907; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; dated June 22, 1962, or an equivalent means the aileron trim tab gear per General Dy- 8:45 a.m.j approved by the Engineering and Manufac­ namics/Convair 880 Service Bulletin No. 27- turing Branch, FAA Western Region, Los 27, 880M Service Bulletin No. 27-34, or 990 Angeles, California. Service Bulletin No. 27-52, as applicable, Chapter III— Federal Aviation Agency (Boeing Service Bulletin No. 1642 dated or an FAA Western Region Engineering and Manufacturing Branch approved equivalent. SUBCHAPTER C— AIRCRAFT REGULATIONS June 22, 1962, covers this same subject.) (2) Conduct a visual inspection of the [Reg. Doc. No. 4014; Amdt. 689] This amendment shall become effective aileron trim tab dial gear and hub of the February 21,1964. PART 507— AIRWORTHINESS support within the aileron and rudder trim (Secs. 313(a), 60lr603; 72 Stat. 752, 775, 776; gearbox assembly and if there is any evidence DIRECTIVES 49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421,1423) that the gear teeth on the aileron trim tab dial gear are damaged or there is any evi­ Boeing Models 707 and 720 Series Issued in Washington, D.C., on Feb­ dence that the inside of the rim of the aile­ Aircraft ruary 18,1964. ron trim tab dial gear is rubbing the hub G. S. M oore, of the support, rework the hub of the sup­ As a result of a continuing investiga­ Director, Flight Standards Service. port and replace any damaged aileron trim tion of the destruction of a Boeing 707 tab dial gear with a new gear in accordance airplane, possibly due to an explosion of [F.R. Doc. 64-1695; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; with General Dynamics/Convair 888 Service a fuel tank, an airworthiness directive is 8:45 am .] Bulletin No. 27-70, 880M Service Bulletin being issued as a precautionary measure No. 27-37 or 990 Service Bulletin No. 27-62, as applicable, or an FAA Western Region to require the installation of bonded [Reg. Docket No. 3030; Amdt. 688] Engineering and Manufacturing Branch ap­ laminate panels of thin aluminum sheet proved equivalent. and glass cloth scrim covering the upper PART 507— AIRWORTHINESS (General Dynamics/Convair 880 Service and lower wing surfaces over the plan DIRECTIVES Bulletins Nos. 27-27 and 27-70, 880M Serv­ form area of the left- and right-hand ice Bulletins Nos. 27—34 and 27—37 and 990 fuel vent surge tanks of Boeing Models General Dynamics Models 22, 22M, Service Bulletins Nos. 27—52 and 27—62 cover 707 and 720 Series aircraft. The purpose 30 and 30A Aircraft this same subject.) of this laminate is to provide increased A proposal to amend Part 507 of the This amendment shall become effec­ armoring protection over the surge tanks Regulations of the Administrator to tive M arch 23,1964. to prevent penetration of the skin by include an airworthiness directive re­ (Secs. 313(a), 601, 603 ; 72 Stat. 752, 775, 776; lightning strikes. Laboratory tests quiring inspection of the aileron trim 49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423) have indicated that the present wing skin gearbox assembly and rework or replace­ Issued in Washington, D.C., on Febru­ over the surge tanks is not sufficient to ment on General Dynamics Models 22, ary 17,1964. prevent penetration of the skin by a high 22M, 30, and 30A aircraft was published energy lightning strike. A laminate of G. S. M oore, in 29 F.R. 108. aluminum and glass cloth scrim provides Director, Flight Standards Service. Interested persons have been afforded sufficient additional armor type protec­ an opportunity to participate in the mak­ [FJt. Doc. 64-1697; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; tion to prevent such penetration. Opera­ ing of the amendment. No objections 8:45 a.m.] tors are to begin incorporation of the were received. modification as soon as practicable, but In consideration of the foregoing, and in no event will they be permitted to pursuant to the authority delegated to exceed a maximum of 1,000 hours’ time 'm e by the Administrator (25 F.R. 6489), Title 7— AGRICULTURE in service from the effective date of the AD. § 507^10(a) of Part 507 (14 CFR Part Subtitle A— Office of the Secretary of 507), is hereby amended by adding the As a situation exists which demands Agriculture following new airworthiness directive: immediate adoption of this regulation in [Amdt. 13] the interest of safety, it is found that G e n e r a l D y n a m ic s . Applies to all Models notice and public procedure hereon are 22, 22M, 30 and 30A aircraft. PART 5— DETERMINATION OF PARITY Compliance required as indicated. impracticable and good cause exists for To prevent slipping of the aileron trim PRICES making this amendment effective upon tab dial assembly in relation to the cable Alsike Clover Seed and Mustard Seed publication in the F ederal R egister. drum within the aileron and rudder trim In consideration of the foregoing, and gearbox assembly; tp insure that the gear The regulations of the Secretary of pursuant to the authority delegated to teeth on the aileron trim tab dial gear are Agriculture with respect to the determi­ me by the Administrator (25 F.R. 6489), not damaged; and to ascertain that the in­ nation of parity prices (21 F.R. 761, as 1507.10(a) of Part 507 (14 C FR Part side rim of the aileron trim tab dial gear is amended; 7 CFR 5.1-5.6) are amended 507), is hereby amended by adding the not rubbing against the sides of the hub of the aileron and rudder trim gear box, accom­ as hereinafter specified in order to dis­ following new airworthiness directive: plish the following: continue the calculation of parity prices Boeing. Applies to all Models 707 and 720 (a ) Within 500 hours’ time in service after for alsike clover seed and mustard seed. Series aircraft. the effective date of this AD, and thereafter 1. In § 5.2, the paragraph under the Compliance required as soon as the modi- at intervals not to exceed 500 hours’ time centerhead “Seed Crops” is amended by ™ lon can be scheduled but not later than in service from the last check, perform an deleting the words “alsike clover and 1,000 hours’ time in service after the effective operational check (see Maintenance Manual) unless already accomplished. to determine that the aileron trim tab dial “mustard”. W ith in seven days after the effective date of indicator and the aileron trim tab deflections 2. In § 5.4, the paragraph under the this AD, each operator shall submit to his correspond throughout the operational centerhead “Seed Crops” is amended by assigned FAA principal maintenance in- range and that the aileron trim tab control deleting the words “alsike clover” .and pector for approval, a schedule for accom- knob and dial work properly without evidence “mustard”. of the modification, of binding or slippage. If there is any evi­ provide increased armoring protection dence that the aileron trim tab dial indi­ (Sec. 301, 52 Stat. 38, as amended; 7 U.S.C. the wing skin over the fuel vent surge cator and the aileron trim tab deflections do 1301) 2642 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Done at Washington, D.C., this 18th § 401.3 Application for insurance. following the cancellation date for that crop day of February 1964. year in (i) any county in Montana and any (a ) V * * county in North Dakota and South Dakota O rville L. F reeman, (2) In counties where wheat is an in which Insurance is not limited to spring Secretary of Agriculture. insurable crop an application for in­ wheat only on the county actuarial table surance on wheat may be filed until the and in Modoc and Siskiyou Counties, Cali­ [F.R. Doc. 64-1740; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; fornia, if he does not haye an interest in 8:50 am .] March 31 following the closing date in all counties in Montana, in any county any winter wheat crop seeded for harvest in such county in that crop year, as determined in North Dakota and South Dakota in by the Corporation, and (ii) any county in Chapter IV— Federal Crop Insurance which insurance is not limited to spring Idaho, Oregon, Utah, and Washington in Corporation, Department of Agri­ wheat only on the county actuarial which insurance is not limited to spring culture table, in Klamath and Linn Counties, wheat only on the county actuarial table [Amdt. 66] Oregon, in Modoc and Siskiyou Counties, and a premium rate has been established on California, in Bannock, Bonneville, Cari­ an irrigated basis, if he does not have an PART 401— FEDERAL CROP bou, Cassia, Franklin, Fremont, and interest in any winter wheat crop seeded for harvest in such county in that crop year, as Madison Counties, Idaho, in Cache INSURANCE determined by the Corporation. County, Utah, and in Adams, Franklin, Subpart— Regulations for the 1961 and Grant Counties, Washington, but in § 401.17 [Amended] and Succeeding Crop Years any such case for the first wheat crop 6. Section 7 of the barley endorse­ M iscellaneous A mendm ents year of the contract, winter wheat in all ment shown in § 401.17 of this chapter of such counties and spring wheat is amended, effective beginning with the Pursuant to the authority contained planted on land which is nonirrigated in 1965 crop year, by changing the period in the Federal Crop Insurance Act, as Bannock, Bonneville, Caribou, Cassia, at the end of that portion of the section amended, the above-identified regula­ Franklin, Fremont, and Madison Coun­ tions are amended in the following preceding the table to a colon and by ties, Idaho, and in Adams, Franklin, and adding the following to such portion: respects: Grant Counties, Washington, will not And provided, further, That in any county 1. That portion of the second sentencebe insured : in Idaho, Oregon, and Washington in which of paragraph (a) of § 401.3 of this chap­ ***** ter, beginning with “(2)” and ending insurance is not limited to spring barley with a colon, is amended, effective be­ § 401.32 [Amended] only on the county actuarial table and a premium rate has been established on an ginning with the 1964 crop year; and 3. Section 2 of the wheat endorsement irrigated basis, an insured may cancel his the portion of the table following para­ shown in § 401.32 of this chapter is barley crop insurance contract for any crop graph (a) of § 401.3 of this chapter un­ amended effective beginning with the year any time prior to the December 31 fol­ der the heading “Wheat” and pertaining 1964 crop year by adding two sentences lowing the cancellation date for that crop year, if he does not have an interest in any to Idaho is amended effective beginning at the end thereto reading as follows: winter barley crop seeded for harvest in such with the 1964 crop year. The amended '‘Insurance on winter wheat under the portions read as follows: county in that crop year as determined by irrigated practice will not be provided to the Corporation. any insured during the 1964 crop year § 401.3 Application for insurance. (Secs. 506, 516, 52 Stat. 73, as amended, 77, in Cache County, Utah. Insurance on (a ) * * * as amended; 7 U.S.C. 1506, 1516) spring planted wheat under the irrigated (2) In counties where wheat is an practice will not be provided for the Adopted by the Board of Directors on insurable crop an application for in­ 1964 crop year to insureds in Cache February 14, 1963. surance on wheat may be filed until the County, Utah, with a contract in force March 31 following the closing date in [ seal] E arll H. N ik k e l , during the 1963 crop year or who file an all counties in Montana, in any county Secretary, Federal Crop application prior to February 25, 1964, in North Dakota and South Dakota in Insurance Corporation. unless such insureds elect prior to March which insurance is not limited t6 spring 31, 1964, to include irrigated spring Approved: February 18,1964, wheat only on the county actuarial planted wheat as an insurable practice table, in Klamath and Linn Counties, C harles S. M u r p h y , under the contract.” Oregon, in Modoc and Siskiyou Counties, Under Secretary. 4. In subsection 8 of the wheat en­ [F.R. Doc. 64-1711; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; California, in Bannock, Bonneville, Cari­ dorsement shown in § 401.32 of this bou, Cassia, Franklin, Fremont, and 8:46 a.m.] chapter, the table at the end thereof is Madison Counties, Idaho, in Cache amended effective beginning with the County, Utah, and in Grant County, 1964 crop year by amending the portion [Amdt. 67] Washington, but in any such case for of the table pertaining to Idaho to read the first wheat crop year of the contract, PART 401-— FEDERAL CROP as follows: winter wheat in all of such counties and INSURANCE •spring wheat planted on land which is nonirrigated in Bannock, Bonneville, Term i­ Subpart— Regulations for the 1961 Cancel­ nation Caribou, Cassia, Frank lin, Fremont, and State and county lation date for and Succeeding Crop Years Madison Counties, Idaho, and in Grant date indebt­ edness P eas; C a n n in g and F reezing County, Washington, will not be insured: * * * * * Pursuant to the authority contained in Idaho: the Federal Crop Insurance Act, as (dosing dates) Idaho County and all Idaho counties lying north thereof____ M ar. 15 Oct. 31 amended, the above-identified regula­ A ll Idaho comities lyin g south o f tions are amended effective beginning Idaho County except Bing­ Idaho County and ail Idaho counties ly­ ham, Canyon, Gooding, Jeffer­ with the 1964 crop year for canning and ing north thereof : October 31. son, Jerome, Lincoln, M in i­ freezing peas in the following respects: doka, and Twin Falls Counties. Mar. 15 Ail Idaho counties lying south of Idaho Sept. 15 Bingham, Canyon, Gooding, § 401.3 [Amended] County except Bingham, Canyon, Good­ Jefferson, Jerome, Lincoln, ing, Jefferson, Jerome, Lincoln, Minidoka, Minidoka, and Twin Falls 1. The portion of the table following and Twin Falls Counties: September 15. Counties...... _...... Dec. 31 Mar. 31 paragraph (a ) of § 401.3 of this chapter Bingham, Canyon, Gooding, Jefferson, Jer­ under the heading “Canning and Freez­ ome, Lincoln, Minidoka, and Twin Falls 5. The second proviso of section 8 ofing Peas” is amended effective beginning Counties: March 31. the wheat endorsement shown . in with the 1964 crop year for canning and 2. That portion of the second sentence§ 401.32 of this chapter is amended ef­ freezing peas to read as follows: fective beginning with the 1965 crop of paragraph (a) of § 401.3 of this chap­ (Closing dates) ter,'beginning with “(2)” and ending year to read as follows: CANNING AND FREEZING PEAS with a colon, is amended, effective be­ And provided, further, That an insured ginning with the 1965 crop year to read may cancel his wheat crop insurance for any Minnesota and Wisconsin------Apr, 15 as follows: crop year any time prior to the December 31 All other States______Mar. 1 Friday, February 21, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2643

2. The headnote and that portion pub­ cedure, and postpone the effective date Order No. 908, as amended (7 CFR Part lished in § 401.38 preceding section 1 of of this section until 30 days after pub­ 908; 27 F.R. 10089), regulating the the canning and freezing pea endorse­ lication hereof in the F ederal R egister handling of Valencia oranges grown in ment is amended effective beginning with (5 U.S.C. 1001-1011) because the time Arizona and designated part of Cali­ the 1964 crop year to read as follows: intervening between the date when in­ fornia, effective under the applicable formation upon which this section is provisions of the Agricultural Marketing § 401.38 The canning and freezing pea based became available and the time Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 endorsement (applicable in all states when this section must become effective U.S.C. 601-674), and upon the basis of except Minnesota and Wisconsin). in order to effectuate the declared policy the recommendations and information The provisions of this canning and of the act is insufficient, and a reason­ submitted by the Valencia Orange Ad­ freezing pea endorsement, which shall be able time is permitted, under the cir­ ministrative Committee, established un­ applicable in all states except Minnesota cumstances, for preparation for such der the said amended marketing agree­ and Wisconsin, are as follows: effective time; and good cause exists for ment and order, and upon other avail­ ***** making the provisions hereof effective able information, it is hereby found that 3. The headnote and that portion pub­ as hereinafter set forth. The committee the limitation of handling of such Va­ lished in § 401.41 preceding section 1 of held an open meeting during the current lencia oranges, as hereinafter provided, the canning and freezing pea endorse­ week, after givingdpe notice thereof, to will tend to effectuate the declared policy ment is amended effective beginning with consider supply iind market conditions of the act. the 1964 crop year to read as follows: for navel oranges and the need for regu­ (2) It is hereby further found that it lation; interested persons were afforded is impracticable and contrary to the pub­ § 401.41 The canning and freezing pea an opportunity to submit information lic interest to give preliminary notice, endorsement (applicable only in engage in public rule-making procedure, Minnesota and Wisconsin). and views at this meeting; the recom­ mendation and supporting information and postpone the effective date of this The provisions of this canning and for regulation during the period specified section until 30 days after publication freezing pea endorsement (applicable herein were promptly submitted to the hereof in the F ederal R egister (5 U.S.C. only in the States of Minnesota and W is­ Department after such meeting was held; 1001-1011) because the time interven­ consin) for the 1964 and succeeding crop the provisions of this section, including ing between the date when information years are as follows: its effective time, are identical with the upon which this section is based be­ * * * • • aforesaid recommendation of the com­ came available and the time when this (Secs. 506, 516, 52 Stat. 73, as amended, 77, mittee, and information concerning such section must become effective in order as amended; 7 U.S.C. 1506, 1516) provisions and effective time hass been to effectuate the declared policy of the disseminated among handlers of such act is insufficient, and a reasonable time Adopted by the Board of Directors on is permitted, under the circumstances, February 14, 1964. navel oranges; it is necessary, in order to effectuate the declared policy of the for preparation for such effective time; [SEAL] EARLL H. N lK K E L , act, to make this section effective during and good cause exists for making the V Secretary, the period herein specified; and com­ provisions hereof effective as hereinafter Federal Corp Insurance Corporation. pliance with this section will not require set forth. .The committee held an open meeting during the past week, after Approved: February 18, 1964. any special preparation on the part of persons subject hereto which cannot be giving due notice thereof, to consider Charles S. M u r p h y , completed on or before the effective date supply and market conditions for Valen­ Under Secretary. hereof. Such committee meeting was cia oranges and the need for regulation; [Fit. Doc. 64-1712; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; held on February 19, 1964. interested persons were afforded an op­ 8:46 a.m.] (b ) Order. (1) The respective quan­portunity to submit information and tities of navel oranges grown in Arizona views at this meeting; the recommenda­ tion and supporting information for reg­ and designated part of California which ulation during the period specified herein Chapter IX— Agricultural Marketing may be handled during the period be­ were promptly submitted to the Depart­ Service (Marketing Agreements and ginning at 12:01 a.m., P.s.t., February 23, ment after súch meeting was held; the Orders; Fruits, Vegetables, Tree 1964, and ending at 12:01 a.m., P.s.t., provisions of this section, including March 1, 1964, are hereby fixed as Nuts), Department of Agriculture its effective time, are identical with the follows : [Navel Orange Reg. 52] aforesaid recommendation of the com­ (1) District 1: 725,000 cartons; mittee, and information concerning such (ii) District 2: 425,000 cartons; PART 907— NAVEL ORANGES provisions and effective time has been (iii) District 3: Unlimited movement; GROWN IN ARIZONA AND DESIG­ disseminated among handlers of such (Iv) District 4: Unlimited movement. NATED PART OF CALIFORNIA Valencia oranges; it is necessary, in (2) As used in this section, “handled,” order to effectuate the declared policy of “District 1,” “District 2,” “District 3,” Limitation of Handling the act, to make this section effective “District 4,” and “carton” have the same during the period herein specified; and § 907.352 Navel Orange Regulation 52. meaning as when used in said amended compliance -with this section will not (a) Findings. (1) Pursuant to themarketing agreement and order. require any special preparation on the marketing agreement, as amended, and (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. part of persons subject hereto which Order No. 907, as amended (7 C F R Part 601-674) cannot be completed on or before the 907; 27 F.R. 10087) , regulating the han­ Dated: February 20, 1964. effective date hereof. Such committee dling of navel oranges grown in Arizona meeting was held on February 11, 1964. P a u l A. N ic h o l s o n , and designated part of California, effec­ (b ) Order. (1) During the period be­ Deputy Director, Fruit and tive under the applicable provisions of ginning at 12:01 a.m., P.s.t., February 23, the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Vegetable Division, Agricul­ tural Marketing Service. 1964, and ending at 12:01 a.m., P.s.t., Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601- January 31,1965, no handler shall handle 674), and upon the basis of the recom­ [F.R. Doc. 64^1803; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; any Valencia oranges grown in District mendations and information submitted 11:32 a.m.] 3 which are a size smaller than 2.32 by the Navel Orange Administrative inches in diameter, which shall be the Committee, established under the said [Valencia Orange Reg. 6s#/ largest measurement at a right angle to amended marketing agreement and or­ PART 908— V A L E N C IA ORANGES a straight line running from the stem to der, and upon other available informa­ GROWN IN ARIZONA AND DES­ the blossom end of the fruit, except, that tion, it is hereby found that the limita­ not to exceed 5 percent, by count, of the tion of handling of such navel oranges IGNATED PART OF CALIFORNIA oranges in any type of container may as hereinafter provided will tend to ef­ Limitation of Handling measure smaller than 2.32 inches in fectuate the declared policy of the act. diameter: Provided, That in addition to (2) it is hereby further found that § 908.369 Valencia Orange Regulation such tolerance each handler may, during n if.. ^Practicable and contrary to the 69. each Calendar week of the aforesaid pe­ public interest to give preliminary no- (a ) Findings: (1) Pursuant to theriod, handle a quantity of such oranges, ce, engage in public rule-making pro­ marketing agreement, as amended, and which are smaller than 2.32 inches in 2644 RULES AND REGULATIONS diameter but not smaller than 2.20 inches portunity to submit information and that the limitation of shipments of in diameter, except not to exceed 5 per­ views at this meeting; the recommen­ grapefruit, as hereinafter provided, will cent, by count, of oranges smaller than dation and supporting information for tend to effectuate the declared policy of 2.20 inches in diameter shall be permitted regulation during the period specified the act. in any container of oranges which are herein were promptly submitted to the (2) It is hereby further found that smaller than 2.32 inches in diameter, Department after such meeting was it is impracticable and contrary to the equal to, but not in excess of, 10 percent held; the provisions of this section, in­ public interest to give preliminary notice, of (i) the weekly allotment issued to such cluding its effective time, are identical engage in public rule-making procedure! handler when volume regulation is in ef­ with the aforesaid recommendation of and postpone the effective date of this fect, or (ii) 10 percent of the weekly vol­ the committee, and information con­ section until 36 days after publication ume handled by such handler when vol­ cerning such provisions and effective thereof in the F ederal R egister (5 U.S.C. ume regulation is not in effect. time has been disseminated among 1661-1611), because the time intervening (2) As used in this section, “handle,” handlers of such Valencia oranges; it is between the date when information upon “handler,” and “District 3” shall have the necessary, in order to effectuate the de­ which this section is based became avail­ same meaning as when used in the said clared policy of the act, to make this able and the time when this section must amended marketing agreement and order. section effective during the period herein become effective in order to effectuate (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. specified; and compliance with this sec­ the declared policy of the act is insuffi­ 601-674) tion will not require any special prepara­ cient, and a reasonable time is per­ tion on the part of persons subject hereto mitted, under the circumstances, for Dated: February 18, 1964. which cannot be completed on or before preparation for such effective date. The P aul A. N ic h o lso n , the effective date hereof. Such commit­ Administrative Committee held an open Deputy Director, Fruit and Veg­ tee meeting was held on February 19, meeting on February 13, 1964, to con­ etable Division, Agricultural 1964. sider recommendations for a regulation, Marketing Service. (b ) Order. (1) The respective quanti­after giving due notice of such meeting, ties of Valencia oranges grown in Ari­ [F.R. Doc. 64r-1741; Filed, Feta. 20, 1964; and interested persons were afforded an 8:50 a.m.] zona and designated part of California opportunity to submit their views at this which may be handled during the period meeting; the recommendation and sup­ [Valencia Orange Reg. 70] beginning at 12:61 a.m., P.s.t., February porting information for regulation dur­ 23, 1964, and ending at 12:61 a.m., P.s.t., ing the period specified herein were PART 908— V A L E N C IA ORANGES March 1, 1964, are hereby fixed as promptly submitted to the Department GROWN IN ARIZONA AND DESIG­ follows: after such open meeting; necessary sup­ NATED PART OF CALIFORNIA (1) District 1 : Unlimited movement; plemental economic and statistical in­ (ii) District 2: Unlimited movement; formation upon which this recommended Limitation of Handling (iii) District 3: 65,666 cartons. section is based were received by the § 908.370 Valencia Orange Regulation (2) As used in this section, “handled,” Fruit Branch on February 18, 1964; in­ 70. "handler,” “District 1,” “District 2,” formation regarding the provisions of the “District 3,” and “carton” have the same section recommended by the commit­ (a ) Findings. (1) Pursuant to the meaning as when used in said amended tee has been disseminated to shippers of marketing agreement, as amended, and marketing agreement and order. grapefruit, grown as aforesaid, and this Order No. 908, as amended (7 CFR Part section, including the effective time 908; 27 F.R. 10089), regulating the (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. thereof, is identical with the recommen­ handling of Valencia oranges grown in 601-674) dation of the committee; it is necessary, Arizona and designated part of Califor­ Dated: February 26, 1964. in order to effectuate the declared policy nia, effective under the applicable pro­ of the act, to make this section effective visions of the Agricultural Marketing P aul A. N icholson, on the date hereinafter set forth; and Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 Deputy Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division, Agricul­ compliance with this section will not Ü.S.C. 601-674), and upon the basis of require any special preparation on the the recommendations and information tural Marketing Service. part of persons subject thereto which submitted by the Valencia Orange Ad­ [F.R. Doc. 64-1804; Filed, Feta. 20, 1964; cannot be completed on or before the ministrative Committee, established un­ 11:32 a.m.] effective date hereof. der th$ said amended marketing agree­ (b ) Order. (1) During the period be­ ment and order, and upon other available [Grapefruit Reg. 15] ginning at 12:61 a.m., P.s.t., February information, it is hereby found that the 23,1964, and ending at 12:61 a.m., P.s.t., limitation of handling of such Valencia PART 909— GRAPEFRUIT GROWN IN M arch 15, 1964, no handler shall handle: oranges, as hereinafter provided, will ARIZONA; IN IMPERIAL COUNTY, (i) From the State of California or tend to effectuate the declared policy of the State of Arizona to any point out­ the act: CALIF.; AND IN THAT PART OF side thereof any grapefruit of any variety (2) It is hereby further found that it RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIF., SITU­ grown in the State of Arizona; in Im­ is impracticable and contrary to the ATED SOUTH AND EAST OF WHITE perial County, California; or in that part public interest to give preliminary notice, WATER, CALIF. of Riverside County, California, situated engage in public rule-making procedure, south and east of White Water, Cali­ and postpone the effective date of this Limitation of Shipments fornia, unless such grapefruit grade at section until 30 days after publication § 909.315 Grapefruit Regulation 15. least U.S. No. 2: Provided, That any such hereof in the F ederal R egister (5 U.S.C. grapefruit may have scars to the extent 1001-1011) because the time intervening (a ) Findings. (1) Pursuant to the permitted by the U.S. No. 3 grade: Pro­ between the date when information upon marketing agreement, as amended, and vided further, That, included in the tol­ which this section is based became avail­ Order No. 909, as amended (7 CFR Part erances for defects permitted by such able and the time when this section 909), regulating the handling of grape­ grade not more than 5 percent, by count, must become effective in order to effec- fruit grown in the State of Arizona; in shall be allowed for grapefruit having tuaté the declared policy of the act is Imperial County, California; and in that peel more than one inch in thickness at insufficient, and a reasonable time is per­ part of Riverside County, California, the stem end, measured from the flesh mitted, under the circumstances, for situated south and east of White Water, to the highest point of the peel; or preparation for such effective time; and California, effective under the applica­ (ii) From the State of California or good cause exists for making the pro­ ble provisions of the Agricultural Mar­ the State of Arizona to any point in visions hereof effective as hereinafter set keting Agreement Act of 1937, as Zone 1 or Zone 2 any grapefruit,, forth. The committee held an open amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), and upon grown as aforesaid, which measure meeting during the current week, after the basis of the recommendations of the less than 3Wig inches in diameter, giving due notice thereof, to consider Administrative Committee (established except that a tolerance of 5 percent,; supply and market conditions for Valen­ under the aforesaid amended marketing by count, of grapefruit smaller than tn cia oranges and the need for regulation; agreement and order), and Upon other foregoing minimum size shall be per- interested persons were afforded an op­ available information, it is hereby found «ttVi I a T« fn lo v o n n o qViP.II fofi 8

(c) “Federal Port Controller” means Order MA-TPM-1, dated October 31, Title 32A— NATIONAL DEFENSE, the Maritime Administration Coast Di­ 1963. For all ports not listed in said rector or the person appointed by the Appendix A, said application and copies APPENDIX Maritime Administrator, or his designee, thereof shall be' filed *n the office of the to act as local or area Federal Port Con­ Maritime Administration Coast Director Chapter XIX— Office of the Maritime troller under his direction and super­ for the coast on which the port is located, Administrator, Department of Com­ vision and upon his behalf in any desig­ except that for Great Lakes ports, and merce nated port or group of ports. ports of Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and (d) “Executive Council” means the the Virgin Islands, said application and [General Order MA-TPM-1] advisory body to the Maritime Adminis­ copies thereof shall be filed in the office trator, or his designee. of the Maritime Administrator, Official M A-TPM -1— RESTRICTIONS UPON (e) “Port Utilization Committee” Headquarters. THE TRANSFER, CHANGE IN USE, means the advisory body to the Federal (d) The Federal Port Controller may OR TERMS GOVERNING UTILIZA­ Port Controller. require the applicant to submit reason­ TION OF PORT FACILITIES ( f ) “Transfer” means to sell, lease, able proof of statements made in sup­ trade, lend, give, relinquish title or pos­ port of the application, and may make It is deemed necessary during the ex­ session to, or to physically transfer in such investigation as may be reasonably istence of the unlimited national emer­ any other way. necessary for proper disposition of the gency and threat of war proclaimed by S ec. 2. Restrictions on the transfers, application; and the Federal Port Con­ the President, by reason of the short sup­ troller shall not be required to make any ply of domestic port facilities, to regu­ changes in use or terms governing utili­ zation of “port facilities. Except as other­ disposition of the application unless and late, allocate, and promote the availa­ until such reasonable proof has been sub­ bility, use, and distribution of port wise provided in this order, and irrespec­ tive of the terms of any contract or other mitted; Provided, That the disposition facilities for the preferential handling of any such application by the Federal of civil defense and defense traffic; and commitment: (a) No person shall transfer, and no Port Controller shall not be delayed for for the maintenance of the essential more than 60 days from the date of the civilian economy. In the formulation of person shall accept transfer of, any port facility unless such transfer has been filing thereof for the purpose of com­ this order, consultation with industry pleting any such investigation. representatives, including trade associa­ approved by the Federal Port Controller. (e) Any application may be referred to tion representatives, has been had and (b) No person shall use any port fa­ cility for any purpose or use other than the Port Utilization Committee by the consideration has been given to their Federal Port Controller on his own mo­ recommendations. that for which it was being used on the day preceding the effective date of this tion or on the request of any member of Accordingly, it is hereby ordered, the Port Utilization Committee. In That; order, unless such change in purpose or use has been approved by the Federal either case the advice and recommenda­ SBC. Port Controller. tions of the Port Utilization Committee 1. Definitions. (c) No person shall change or alter shall be given careful consideration by 2. Restrictions on transfers, changes In the terms or conditions under which any the Federal Port Controller. use, or terms governing utilization of port facility was being operated or used (f) The Federal Port Controller may port facilities. approve the application in whole or in 3. Application for approval; place of filing; on the day preceding the effective date investigations; reference to Port Utili­ of this order, unless, such change has part when he deems the action covered zation Committee; disposition by been approved by the Federal Port Con­ by the application, to the extent ap­ Federal Port Controller; request for troller. proved, is in the interests of the war ef­ review; reference to Executive Coun­ fort, national defense, or the mainte­ S ec. 3. Application for approval; place cil; disposition by Maritime Admin­ nance of the essential civilian economy. of filing; investigation; reference to Port istrator, or his designee. (g) Any applicant aggrieved by the Utilization Committee; disposition by 4. Exemptions. action of the Federal Port Controller in 5. Applicability. Federal Port Controller; request for re­ disapproving in whole or in part his ap­ 6. Communications. view; reference to Executive Council; plication may request, in writing, that 7. Effective Date. disposition by Maritime Administrator, such action be reviewed by the Maritime or his designee, (a) Application for ap­ Au t h o r it y : The provisions of this M A - Administrator, or his designee. The proval of a transfer of, or change in use TPM-1 issued under 72 Stat. 1799; 23 F.R. written request shall contain a state­ 4991; 5 U.S.C. 133z-15 fn; as amended by of, or change in terms governing utiliza­ ment of the reasons why the action of P L . 85-763, 72 Stat. 861, and E.O. 10773 (July tion of, any port facility shall be in writ­ the Federal Port Controller should be 1, 1958; 23 F.R. 5061), as amended by E.O. ing, and shall contain the following in­ reversed or modified. Any written re­ 10782 (Sept. 6, 1958; 23 F.R. 6971); and E.O. formation: 10999 (February 16,1962; 62 F.R. 1805). quest for review of the action of a Fed­ ( 1 ) Name, address, and principal place eral Port Controller may be referred of business of applicant ; • S ection 1. Definitions. As used in to the Executive Council by the Maritime (2) Specific description and location this order, or in any order, regulation, Administrator, or his designee, on his of port facility involved ; or approval, issued hereunder, the term: own motion or on the request of any ( 3 ) Name, address, and principal place (a) “Person” means any individual, member of the Executive Council. In of business of owner and/or operator of partnership, corporation, association, either case the advice and recommenda­ such port facility ; joint stock company, business trust, or tions of the Executive Council shall be other organized group of persons, or any (4) Present use of such port facility; given careful consideration by the Mari­ trustee, receiver, assignee, or personal (5) Proposed use of port facility; and time Administrator, or his designee. The representative, and includes any depart­ (6) A statement of the reasons why Maritime Administrator, or his designee, ment, agency, or corporation of the such transfer, change in use, or change will review the application on the record United States, any State, or any political, in terms, is in the interests of the war made before the Federal Port Controller governmental, or legal entity. effort, national defense, or the mainte­ and will dispose of the application on its (b) “Port facility” means any land, nance of the essential civilian economy. merits in accordance with the standards (b) The application shall be signed by pier, wharf, dock, shed, warehouse, hereinabove set forth. loading or unloading equipment, floating the applicant or by any lawfully author­ equipment or other structure or me­ ized agent or representative of the ap­ S ec. 4. Exemptions. The provisions chanical device used in connection with plicant who is familiar with the facts of this order shall not apply to any port the transshipment of persons and prop­ stated therein. facility owned by or organic to any erty between domestic carriers and car­ (c) The application and two clear agency or department of the United riers engaged in coastwise, intercoastal, copies thereof shall be filed in the office States as of the effective date of this and overseas transportation, or with the of the Federal Port Controller of the order. handling, preservation, or storage of port in which the port facility is located freight incidental to such transship­ for those ports listed in Appendix A to S ec. 5. Applicability. The provisions ment. Maritime Administration Delegation of this order shall be applicable to the Friday, February 21, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2649

States of the United States, Puerto Rico the powers of the Maritime Administra­ 4. This order is effective during the and the Virgin Islands. tor as they are set forth in Annex 1 (Out­ existence of a state of civil defense emer­ line Plan for Local Port Control in Time gency proclaimed by the President of Sec. 6. Communications. Communi­ of National Emergency or W ar) to Mari-, the United States or by concurrent reso­ cations concerning thi sorder should re­ time Administration “Manual for the lution of Congress and when so directed fer to “Maritime Administration General Emergency Utilization and Control of by or on behalf of the Maritime Adminis­ Order MA-TPM-1”, and should be ad­ United States Ports,” (April 1960) and trator or in the absence of such specific dressed to the Maritime Administrator, in Maritime Administration General direction immediately upon occurrence Official Headquarters. Order MA-TPM-1 “Restrictions Upon of a national emergency due to enemy Sec. 7. Effective date. This order is the Transfer, Change in Use, or Terms attack. effective during the existence of a state Governing Utilization of Port Facilities”, Issued at Washington, D.C., this 31st of civil defense emergency proclaimed and as they may be set forth in any re­ day of October 1963. by the President of the United States or vision or amendment thereto or in any J. W . G ttlick, by concurrent resolution of Congress and other Maritime Administration Order Acting Maritime Administrator. when so directed by or on behalf of the pertaining to the emergency utilization Maritime Administrator or in the absence and control of United States ports. F ebruary 14, 1964. of such specific direction, immediately A p p e n d ix A ( R e v is e d ) upon occurrence of a national emergency APPOINTMENT OF ACTING FEDERAL PORT CONTROLLERS due to enemy attack.

Issued at Washington, D.C., this 31st State Ports Acting Federal Port ControUers day of October 1963. J. W . G u l ic k , Director, State Docks Department. Ketchikan______City Manager, City of Ketchikan. Acting Maritime Administrator. City Manager, City of Kodiak. M ayor, C ity of Juneau. F e b r u a r y 14,1964. Mayor, City of Sitka. Mayor, City of Seward. [F.R. Doc. 64-1744; Piled, Feb. 20, 1964; Port Manager, Port of Anchorage. 8:51 ajn .] General Manager, Los Angeles Board of Harbor Com­ missioners.1 General Manager, Long Beach Board of Harbor Com­ missioners. [Delegation Order M A-TPM -1 ] Port Director, San Francisco Port Authority.* Executive Director, Board of Port Commissioners, City of Oakland. MA-TPM-DEL. 1— APPOINTMENT OF City Manager, City of Alameda. FEDERAL PORT CONTROLLERS AND Manager, General Affairs Division, Parr-Richmond Terminal Company. ACTING FEDERAL PORT CONTROL­ Port Director, Port of Redwood City. San D iego___".______Director, San Diego Unified Port District. LERS; DELEGATIONS OF AUTHOR­ Port Director, Port of Stockton. ITY Secretary-Surveyor, State Board of Harbor Commis­ sioners for Hum boldt Bay. New London Harbormaster. Pursuant to Executive Order 10902 New Haven Harbormaster. of January 9, 1961; Executive Order Bridgeport Harbormaster. Delaware (see Pennsylvania). 10999 of February 16,1962; The National Jacksonville______Managing Director, Jacksonville Port Authority. Plan for Civil Defense and Defense General Manager, Canaveral Port Authority. Manager, Fort Pierce Port Authority. Mobilization (October 1958) and Annex Port Director, Port of Palm Beach. 34 (National Transportation Plan) Port Manager, Broward County Port Authority. thereto; and Maritime Administration Port Director, Metropolitan Dade County Seaport Department. “Manual for the Emergency Utilization Port Manager, Hillsborough County Port Authority. and Control of United States Ports” Chairman, Port St. Joe Port Authority. Panama City Harbormaster. (April 1960) : Port Director, Pensacola Port Authority. It is hereby ordered, As follows: Executive Director, Ports Authority. General Manager, Brunswick Port Authority. 1. Each person who, on the effective Chief, Harbors Division, Department of Transporta­ date hereof, holds a designation by the tion, State of Hawaii, Port Director, Department of the Port of Chicago, Secretary of Commerce as a member of City of Chicago. the National Defense Executive Re­ Director of the Port, Board of Commissioners of the serve—Port Unit and a national emer­ Port of N e w Orleans. Executive Director, Greater Baton Rouge Port Com­ gency assignment as a Federal Port mission. Controller, is hereby appointed Federal Port Director, Port of Lake Charles, Lake Charles Harbor and Terminal District. Port Controller for his predesignated General Manager, Maine Port Authority. area of responsibility. Executive Director, Maryland Port Authority. Executive Director, Massachusetts Port Authority. 2. In port areas listed in Appendix A Director, Department of Public Works, Division below, each person who, on the effective of Waterways, Commonwealth of Massachusetts. date hereof, is the duly appointed, quali­ Chairman, Fall River Port Authority. Executive Director, Detroit-Wayne County Port fied, and acting local public official hold­ Commission. ing the position designated in said ' Ap­ Duluth (including Superior, Port Director, Seaway Port Authority of Duluth. Wisconsin). pendix A, or his successor in function, is Port Director, Gulfport State Port Authority. hereby appointed acting Federal Port New Jersey (See New York and Pennsylvania). Controller for the ocean port or ports New York Harbor (Includ­ Executive Director, the Port of New York Authority. named therein and shall function unless ing New York and New Jersey areas thereof). or until relieved by a duly appointed and General Manager, Albany Port District Commis­ qualified Federal Port Controller. Dur­ sion. ing any period of functioning as said Executive Director, Niagara Frontier Port Author­ ity. acting Federal Port Controller, such per­ Executive Director, Port of Oswego Authority. son may, simultaneously therewith, con­ -Port Director, Rochester-Monroe County Port Authority. tinue to hold the position designated in Operations Manager, State Ports said Appendix A. Authority—W ilming ton. Morehead Oity.______Operations Manager, North Carolina State Ports w .à Tllere is hereby delegated to each Authority—Morehead City. federal Port Controller or Acting Fed­ O hio______„ Cleveland.. - - Director, Department of Port Control, City of Cleveland. eral Port Controller appointed hereunder General Manager, Toledo-Lucas County Port ne authority to perform, within his area Authority. 1 responsibility, the duties and exercise See footnotes at end of table. 2650 RULES AND REGULATIONS

A p b e n d i x A ( R e v i s e d )*—Continued APPOINTMENT OF ACTING FEDERAL PORT CONTROLLERS----C o n tin u e d

State Ports Acting Federal Port Controllers

Oregon...... Portland.— ______General Manager, The Commission of Public Docks, Portland, Oregon.* Astoria.______Manager, Port of Astoria. Coos B ay____ — i ___ — Manager, Port of Coos Bay. Pennsylvania... Delaware River (Including Executive Director, Delaware River Port Authority. Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware). E rie.— ______Port Director, Port Commission, City of Erie. Puerto Rico.... All ports of Puerto Rico____ Executive Director, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Port Authority. Rhode Island... Providence______.___ Port Agent, Department of Public Works, City of Providence. .. Charleston______Operations Manager, South Carolina State Ports Authority. Georgetown..______Local Manager, South Carolina State Ports Au­ thority. Port R oyal___. ______—— Local Manager, South Carolina State Ports Au­ thority. T ex a s...... Galveston-Texas City ______Port Director, Galveston Wharves. Houston...... -T_____ General Manager, Harris County Houston Ship Channel Navigation District. Port Arthur______...... Executive Vice President, Port Arthur Chamber of Commerce. Orange______.... _____ Port Director, Orange County Navigating and Port District. Beaumont______.... General Manager, Port of Beaumont Navigation District o f Jefferson County. Corpus Christi...... Port Director, Nueces County Navigation District Port of Corpus Christi. Freeport...... General Manager, Brazos River Harbor Navigation District of Brazoria County. Brownsville______General Manager and Director of the Port, Browns­ ville Navigation District of Cameron County. Port Isabel______Director of the Port, Port Isabel-San Benito Naviga­ tion District of Cameron County. Virginia______Hampton Roads....______Executive Director, State Ports Authority. R ich m on d..______Chairman, Port of Richmond Advisory Commission. Alexandria/Upper Potomac Director of Planning and Urban Renewal,'Planning River. Commission, City of Alexandria. Virgin Islands. St. Thom as...... Harbor Master, Department of Commerce Marine and Aviation Services. Government of the Virgin Islands of the U nited States. Washington... Seattle______General Manager, P ort of Seattle. * Port' Angeles___ Manager, Port of Port Angeles. Bellingham____ Manager, Port of Bellingham. Anacortes______Manager, Port of Anacortes. E verett______Manager, Fort of Everett. Tacoma_____... Terminal Division Manager, Port of Tacoma. Olym pia____... Manager, Port of Olympia. WUlapa Harbor. Manager, Port of WUlapa Harbor. Grays Harbor... Manager, Port of Grays Harbor. Vancouver...... Manager, Port of Vancouver. Longview ______Manager, Port of Longview. Wisconsin. Milwaukee...__ Municipal Port Director, Board of Harbor Com­ missioners, C ity of Milwaukee. Green B ay_____ Port Director, Brown County Board of Harbor Commissioners. Superior (see Duluth, M in ­ nesota).

> W ill function simultaneously as Acting Controller-in-Charge for the Los Angeles-Long Beach port complex. * W ill function simultaneously as Acting Controller-in-Charge for the San Francisco Bay port complex. * W ill function simultaneously as Acting Controller-in-Charge for the listed Columbia River ports and Vancouver and Longview, Washington, and Acting Federal Fort Controller with respect to all other port facilities on the Columbia River. * W ill function simultaneously as Acting Controller-in-charge for the listed Puget Sound ports and Acting Federal Port Controller w ith respect to all other port facilities, on Puget Sound. [F.R. Doc. 64-1745; Piled, Feb. 20, 1964; 8:51 a.m.] it was proposed to require inspection of spections may be discontinued when the in­ the upper wing planks on Lockheed ternal inspection program prescribed by (b) departm ent o f agriculture is initiated. Models 188A and 188C aircraft having Agricultural (b) Within the next 900 hours’ time in Marketing Service 5,000 hours’ time in service. Subsequent service after the effective date of this AD, 17 CFR Part 1062 1 to issuance of the proposal, it was de­ unless accomplished within 2,100 hours’ time termined by metallurgical evaluation of in service prior to the effective date of this MILK IN ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI, crack areas, that the cracks were not of AD, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed MARKETING AREA a fatigue nature and probably were 3,000 hours’ time in service, internally in­ caused by mishandling during manu­ spect the wing planks by X-ray or visual means in accordance with Section 2.B. of Notice of Proposed Suspension of facture or in service. It is believed that Lockheed Service Bulletin 88/SB-600 or PAA Certain Provisions of Order once a crack forms in the area evaluated, approved equivalent. growth will continue from the inner to (c) Any cracks found during the accom­ Notice is hereby given that, pursuant outer surface and in a spanwise direction plishment of (a) or (b) shall be repaired to the provisions of the Agricultural as would a fatigue crack. The original before further flight in accordance with the Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as proposal applied to all aircraft that had Lockheed Electra Structural Repair Manual, amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the sus­ accumulated 5,000 hours’ time in service. Section 57-2-1, or an equivalent approved pension of certain provisions of the order by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Since the cracks have been shown to be regulating the handling of milk in the Branch, PAA Western Region. of other than fatigue origin, this AD St. Louis, Missouri, marketing area is (d ) The repetitive inspections of (b ) may must apply to all 188 A and C aircraft. be discontinued for those aircraft which ex­ being considered for the month of Feb­ Thë repetitive 3,000-hour interval in­ hibit no signs of cracks 6,000 hours’ time ruary 1964. spection has been retained in the AD. in service after the initial internal inspec­ The provisions proposed to be sus­ It is felt that repetitive inspections total­ tion is accomplished. pended are: (e) For aircraft on which cracks are de­ ing 6,000 hours will result in the detec­ (1) In the opening paragraph of tected and repaired in accordance with (c), tion of all damaged aircraft. Therefore, § 1062.10(b), the numeral “ (1 ),” and “no the repetitive inspections of (b) may be dis­ the initial proposal is hereby withdrawn less than 20 percent of”, and continued if no cracks are detected 6,000 and this new notice of proposed rule hours’ time in service after the repair is (2) Subparagraph (1) of § 1062.10(b) making is substituted therefore which is accomplished. relating to shipping requirements for applicable to all Lockheed Models 188A (f) Upon request of the operator, an FAA pooling of country plants. and 188C Series aircraft. maintenance inspector, subject to prior ap­ This action has been requested by two proval of the Chief, Engineering and'Manu­ Interested persons are invited to par­ major cooperative associations serving facturing Branch, PAA Western Region, may ticipate in the making of the proposed the market to maintain pool plant status adjust the repetitive inspection intervals for certain country plants for Febru­ rule by submitting such written data, specified in this AD to permit cb>a{fliance at views or arguments as they may desire. ary 1964, and to facilitate the orderly an established inspection period of fh

Communications should identify the reg­ (b) On Model K-8 all serial numbers up to lations (14 C FR Part 302) by amending ulatory docket number and be submitted and including Serial Number 8117, within 25 § 302.1(a) (1 ) to clarify the applicability in duplicate to the Federal Aviation hours’ time in service after the effective date of this AD, visually inspect with at least a of Part 302 to Alaskan air carriers Agency, Office of the General Counsel, 3-power magnifying glass, the welds between Interested persons were invited to par­ Attention: Rules Docket, 800 Independ­ the bearing bracket for the airbrake flap ticipate in the rule making proceeding by ence Avenue SW., Washington, D.C., cross shaft lever and fuselage main frame. the submission of ten (10) copies of writ­ 20553. All communications received on If faulty welds or cracks in the weld are ten data, views, or arguments pertaining or before March 23, 1964, will be consid­ found, modify the bracket before further thereto, addressed to the Docket Section, ered by the Administrator before taking flight as provided for in Schleicher Modifica­ Civil Aeronautics Board, Washington! tion No. 10 dated October 25, 1962. action upon the proposed rule; The pro­ D.C., 20428, on or before February 24 (Schleicher Modification No. 7 for Model posals contained in this notice may be Ka-6, dated September 13, 1962, Modification 1964. changed in the light of comments re­ No. 9 for Model K -8 dated September 13, 1962, A request has been received from sev­ ceived. All comments will be available and Modification No. 10 for Model K-8 dated eral of the Alaskan carriers that the time both before and after the closing date for October 25, 1962, pertain to this same sub­ for filing such data, views or arguments comments, in the rules docket for exam­ ject.) be extended to March 9, 1964, in order ination by interested persons. that certain data and statistical infor­ Issued in Washington, D.C., on Febru­ This amendment is proposed under the mation now in preparation may be ob­ ary 17, 1964. authority of Sections 313(a), 601 and 603 tained from Alaska for submission for the G. S. M oore, of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (72 consideration of the Board. The under­ Director, Flight Standards Service. Stat. 752, 775, 776; 49 U.S.C. 1354(a), signed finds that it is in the public inter­ 1421,1423). [F.R. Doc. 64-1699; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; est that said data and statistical infor­ In consideration of the foregoing, it is 8:45 ajn .] mation be submitted, and that the date proposed to amend 1 507.10(a) of Part for the reception thereof be extended to 507 (14 CFR Part 507), by adding the M arch 9,1964. following airworthiness directive: Accordingly, pursuant to authority S c h l e ic h e r . Applies to Models Kar-6 and CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD delegated under section 7.3C of Public K—8 gliders. Notice PN-15, dated July 3, 1961, the . Compliance required as indicated. [ 14 CFR Parts 231, 292, 302 1 undersigned hereby extends the date for Cracks and faulty welds have been found [Docket No. 14979] submitting comments on the subject pro­ at the Joint fitting welded to the airbrake posal until M arch 9, 1964. A ll relevant push-pull rod and in the weld between the matter in communications received on or bearing bracket for the airbrake flap cross CLASSIFICATION AND EXEMPTION OF shaft lever and the fuselage main frame. ALASKAN AIR CARRIERS before that date will be considered by the (a) On Model Kar-6 all serial numbers up Board before taking action on this pro­ to and including Serial Number 6067 and Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rule posal. Copies of such communications Model K-8 all serial numbers up to and in­ Making will be available for examination by in­ cluding Serial Number 8098, within 25 hours’ terested persons in the Docket Section of time in service after the effective date of this F ebruary 18, 1964. the Board, Room 711, Universal Building, AD, visually Inspect for cracks in the joint The Board in 29 F.R. 612 and by cir­ 1825 Connecticut Avenue NW., Washing­ fitting welded to the airbrake push and pull ton, D.C., upon receipt thereof. rod with at least a 3-power magnifying glass. culation of a notice of proposed rule (1) I f cracks are found at the fitting welded making, EDR-64 and PDR-23, dated (Sec. 204(a) and 1001 of the Federal Aviation to the airbrake push-pull rod in either Models January 20,1964, gave notice that it had Act of 1958; 72 Stat. 743, 788; 49 U.S.C. 1324 K a-6 or K -8 gliders, replace the push-pull under consideration (a) revising Part and 1481 ) rod with a modified part as provided for in 292 of the Board’s Economic Regulations Schleicher Modification No. 7 dated Septem­ (14 C FR Part 292) as set out in the pro­ By the Civil Aeronautics Board. ber 13, 1962, for Model Ka-6 and Modification posed rule thereto attached, (b) amend­ No. 9 dated September 13, 1962, for Model [ seal] A rthur H. Shams, ing Part 231 of the Board’s Economic K-8 before further flight. Associate General Counsel, Regulations (14 C F R Part 231) by add­ (2) If the inspection in (a ) reveals no Rules and Special Counsel Division. cracks, instaU the modified push-puU rod ing a footnote to § 231.5(b) cross-refer­ within 50 hours’ time in service after the encing it to Part 292 and (c) amending [F.R. Doc. 64-1761; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; effective date of this AD. . Part 302 of the Board’s Procedural Regu­ 8:51 a.m.] Notices

Sec. 31, Lot 3, Sy2N»4 Lot 5. S y2 Lot 5, Sy2 varies from sandy loam, covered by vege­ departm ent o f t h e in t e r io r Lot 8, Lot 12, and EV^SEi/4; table mould in the low elevations, to bare Sec. 32, Si/2NEi4, W'/2SWy4, and NWV4 rock and shale on the slopes. U nder­ Bureau of Land Management SE%; growth consists of alder clumps at the Sec. 34, NE14NE&; CALIFORNIA Sec. 35, NE% NE% , and N ‘/2NWy4. lower elevations. T. 20 N„ R. 12 E„ 3. Subject to any existing valid rights, Notice of Partial Termination of Pro­ Sec. 1, Lot 1, SWi4SW%, Ei/2SWy4, and the provisions of existing withdrawals, posed Withdrawal and Reservation N^SE% ; and the requirements of applicable law, Sec. 10, SE& SE 14 ; the above-described land is hereby of Lands Sec. 12, NW i4NW % ; opened to filing applications, selections F ebruary 13,1964. Sec. 22, Lots 2 and 7, N W ^N E^, S^N E ^, and locations in accordance with the fol­ and Ey.SEi/4; Notice of an application Serial No. Sec. 27, Lot 6, NW>/4NEi/4 (except Pat. Min. lowing : Sacramento 068417, filed by the United Lot 78 and Pat. M.S. 5792A); NE& NW ^ a. Applications and selections under States Department of Agriculture, for (except Pat. M.S. 5792A, M.S. 5792B, and the nonmineral public land laws may withdrawal and reservation of lands was Pat. Min. Lots 71 and 78); SW^4NW% be presented to the Acting Manager, published in F it. Doc. 62-2399 on Page (except Pat. Min. Lot 78); SE^NW^4 Anchorage Land Office, beginning on the 2387 of the issue for M arch 13,1962, with (except Pat. Min. Lots 39, 71, and 78); date of this order. Such applications, and NW%SW% (except Pat. Min. Lots a correction notice published in F.R. Doc. selections and offers will be considered as 77 and 78); 62-3332 in the issue for April 5,1962, Vol. filed on the hour and respective dates Sec. 29, SW1/4SW14; 27, No. 67, Page 3297. The applicant Sec. 30. Lot 4. Ni/2NE^SW^4, SW 14 NE14 shown for the various classes enumerated agency has cancelled its application inso­ SW 14 , N i/2 SE % NE 14 SW V4, and SE% SE% ; in the following paragraphs: far at it involves the lands described be­ Sec. 32, N W & N E 14 , and N^NWyfc. (1) Applications by persons having low. Therefore, pursuant to the regula­ T. 20 N., R. 13 E., prior existing valid settlement rights, tions contained in 43 C FR Part 295, such Sec. l.N W ^SW i/4; preference rights conferred by existing lands will be at 10:00 a.m., M arch 26, Sec. 2, SE%SE%; laws, or equitable claims subject to 1964, relieved of the segregative effect of Sec. 4, Si/2SWi4; allowance and confirmation will be ad­ Sec. 5, Lot 4, Ni/2SW%, S E ^ S W ^ , and the hereinbefore mentioned application. judicated on the facts presented in sup­ sy 2 SEiA; The lands terminated a re : Sec. 6, Lots 3 and 4; port of each claim or right, All appli­ Mo u n t Dia b lo M e r id ia n , Ca l if o r n ia Sec.8,Ny2NEi,4; cations presented by persons other than Sec. 9, Ny2NEi,4; those referred to in this paragraph will TAHOE NATIONAL FOREST Sec. 10, E% NE% ; be subject to the applications and claims S ta te Highway 49, Roadside Zone Sec. 11, Ni/2NEi4, SWV4NEi/4, Sy2SWi4 mentioned in this paragraph. NWy4,and SE%NW%. (2) All valid applications and selec­ A strip of land 200 feet on each side of T 21 N R 13 E tions under the nonmineral public land the centerline of California Highway No. 49 Sec. 31, N%SE}4SW}4, SW^SE^SWi/i, through the following legal subdivisions: Ni/2SWy4SEi4, and SE&SE&. laws presented prior to 10:00 a.m. on T. 18 N., R. 8 E., March 2, 1964, will be considered as Sec. 33.SE&SW&. The areas to be eliminated within the simultaneously filed at that hour. T. 19 N„ R. 8 E., roadside zone aggregate approximately Rights under such applications and se­ Sec. 24, NE%SE%; 2,037 acres, more or less. lections filed after that hour will be gov­ Sec.25, SW 14SW 14 . erned by the time of filing. The lands T, 19 N., R. 9 E., J o h n E. C l u t e , Sec. 1, NE&SW&, S%SW%, and SWy4 Acting Manager, Land Office, will also be open to mining location at SEft; Sacramento. that date and hour. Sec. 10, EyaSW%, Ny2SE%, and SE%SE%; 4. Persons claiming preference rights Sec. 11.NE&NE&, Sy2NE & , N ‘/2SWV4, [P.R. Doc. 64-1717; Piled, Feb. 20, 1964; based upon valid settlement, statutory and NW%SE^4; 8:46 a.m.] preference or equitable claims must en­ Sec. 12,NW%NWV4; Sec. 15, NW%; close properly corroborated statements Sec. 16, Sy2NE%, S E & N W % ; Ei/2W»/2N W & ALASKA in support of their applications, setting NW & SW ^, Ey2NWy4NW54SW‘/4, NE*4 forth all facts relevant to their claims. NW&SWJ4, S1/2NW»4SW»4, NEV4SW14, Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey and Detailed rules and regulations governing andNi/aSE^; applications which may be filed pursuant Sec. 17, N W ^ N E ^ ; Order Providing for Opening of Public Lands to this notice can be found in Title 43 of Sec-18, Sy2 Lot 7, T*ya , Lot 8, N^NE^4, and the Code of Federal Regulations. SWy4NE%; F e b r u a r y 14, 1964. Sec. 19, Lots 1 , 2 , and 6 , Sy2 Lot 7, SW% 5. Applications for these lands, which „ NE»/4, and N y2 SEI4 . 1. Plat of extension survey of the lands shall be filed in the Land Office at T. 19 N., R. 10 E., described below will be officially filed in Anchorage, Alaska, shall be acted upon Sec. 4, Lot 3, and S ^ N W ^ ; the Anchorage Land Office, Anchorage, in accordance with the regulations con­ Sec. 5, Sy2SE%NE%, SW % NE% , Sy2N W ^ , Alaska, effective at 10:00 a.m. M arch 2, tained in § 295.8 of Title 43 of the Code NW^NW^SW^, W&NE&NW&Swk, 1964. of Federal Regulations to the extent such NW^ E y 4 NW y48 Wy4, and Ni/aSW ^SE^ S e w a r d M e r id ia n regulations are applicable. Applications Sec- 6, Lots 5 and 6 , Sy2 NE%, SEWNW^, T. U N ., R. 2 W., under the homestead and homesite laws Sec. 4: Lots 1/2, 3, 4, Sy2Ny2, S W ^ , SE14 shall be governed by the regulations con­ j T ->n*1/£ VflA’ and N ^SEy4. j 20 N., R. 10 E., Sec. 5: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, Sy2Ny2, S W & , SE14 tained in Parts 64, 65, and 166 of Title 43, Sec. 33, Lots 1,8,15,16, and 17; Sec. 7: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, Ey2W ^, NE%, SE^ Sec. 8: All , of the Code of Federal Regulations. Sec 34, Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, WV2 Lot 6. Inquiries concerning these lands 10, and Lot 14; Sec. 9: All Sec.35,SEy4NEi4; Sec. 18: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, Ey2wy2, NE%, SE& shall be addressed to the Acting Man­ ager, Anchorage Land Office, 555 Cor­ L f , 6’ Ny2 Nw y4, sei/4 n w i /4, Containing 3,777.66 acres. ! T and Ny2s E y4. dova Street, Anchorage, Alaska. 1-20N.,R. 11 E,f 2. This land is located in the Chugach Sec.25, SE& SW & , and S ^S E i4 ; Mountains approximately 15 miles south­ A l J. H o l l e y , Sec. 26, Si£SW}4 ; * east of Anchorage, Alaska. Little Rabbit, Acting Manager. SEy8-’ Ni/2SEi4 , and SW% Rabbit, and Potter Creeks flow north­ [P.R. Doc. 64-1706; Piled, Peb. 20, 1964; westerly draining the sections. The soil 8:45 am .] No. 37- 2653 2654 NOTICES

GRAZING LEASE RENTALS Production Act of 1950, as amended, and by and holds office at the pleasure of the Executive Order 10647 of November 28, Secretary of Agriculture. Supplementary Rate Schedules 1955, the following changes have taken S ec. 5. Offices of the Corporation— F ebruary 17,1964. place in my financial interests during the past six months: (a ) Principal office. The principal of­ Pursuant to the provisions of 43 CFR fice of the Federal Crop Insurance Cor­ 160.14, a notice was published on page (1) None. poration is at Washington, D.C., 20250 (2) None. 1742 of the F ederal R egister of February in the South Agriculture Building. The 22, 1963, which provided a revised graz­ (3) None. (4) None. principal office is composed of the Office ing rental rate tabulation. This tabula­ of the M anager and six divisions. tion was developed on the basis of a This statement is made as of February (1) Office of the Manager. The Office value of 30 cents per animal unit month 8,1964. of the M anager is composed of the Man­ of forage. The rental rates specified Dated: February 10,1964. ager and his immediate staff, including a shall continue to be in effect and shall Deputy Manager. Within established be applicable to all land administered C harles S. M itchell. policies and regulations, the Manager is pursuant to section 15 of the Taylor [F.R. Doc. 64-1710; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; responsible for the executive direction, Grazing Act with the following excep­ 8:46 a.m.] coordination, and control of the Corpo­ tion: ration’s programs and activities, and Wyoming. the determination or approval of For the Northeast LU (Land Utiliza­ methods and procedures to be used. tion) Project the tabulation of rates DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (2) Divisions. The six divisions and shall be modified to reflect a value of 57 Office of the Secretary the functions which they perform, with­ cents per animal unit month of forage. in established policies and regulations This will continue the basis of charges [Arndt. 4] and subject to the supervision of the for this area that has heretofore been Manager, are as follows: established under provisions of the Bank- FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE CORPORATION (i) Actuarial Division. Formulates head-Jones Farm Tenant Act of July and advises management on actuarial 22,1937. Organization, Functions and policies of the Corporation; establishes Since this notice serves to continue the Procedures insurance coverages and rates for crops current level of charges it is effective insured; develops actuarial formulas and immediately. Former Part 400, Chapter IV, Title 7 techniques for measuring insurance Twenty-five percent of all monies col­ (7 CFR 1946 Supp. 400; 7 CFR 1947 Supp. risks; devises methods for accumulating lected, when appropriated by Congress, 400) as amended (19 F.R. 5414), is hereby statistical data for actuarial analyses; shall be available for range improve­ revised and amended in its entirety to develops and issues actuarial procedures, ments. read as follows: instructions and forms; provides techni­ The minimum rental on a lease shall S u b p a r t A—Organization cal and policy direction of field and be $1 per annum. One cow or one-half Sec. Branch Office actuarial functions. horse or five sheep constitute one animal 1. Creation. (ii) Claims Management Division. unit for the purpose of computation of 2. Stock. Plans, directs and coordinates loss ad­ grazing rentals. 3. Management. justment work; devises and installs pro­ 4. Board of Directors. Charles H. S toddard, cedures, forms and techniques to effect 6. O ffices of the Corporation. Director, 6. Availability of information and records. uniform adjustment of losses; develops Bureau of Land Management. 7. Delegations of authority affecting crop in­ and installs programs for the selection, surance contracts. training and evaluation of field employ­ [F.R. Doc. 64-1707; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; ees performing loss adjustment work; 8:46 am .] S u b p a r t B— F u n c t io n s a n d P rocedures trains field supervisory personnel; con­ 8. Crops insured. ducts investigations of controversial Office of the Secretary Subpart A— O rganization claims and furnishes assistance to the [Order No. 2843, Amdt. No. 1] Office of the General Counsel and U.S. Section 1. Creation. The Federal Attorneys for defense of suits against BUFFALO LAKE NATIONAL WILDLIFE Crop Insurance Corporation was created the Corporation and for prosecution of REFUGE February 16, 1938, by the Federal Crop suits by the Corporation. Insurance Act (7. U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) Jurisdiction Over Certain Lands Trans­ (iii) Program Development and Re­ and is an agency within the United States search Division. Plans and revises in­ ferred From Agriculture Department Department of Agriculture. surance programs; develops regulations to Interior Department Sec. 2. Stock. All capital stock of the and provisions of insurance contracts; Section 4 (b) of Order 2843 is amended Federal Crop Insurance Corporation is provides recommendations on expansion to change the word “Lakes” to “Lake” owned by the United States. to additional crops and counties; pre­ to read as follows: pares, coordinates, and issues operating Sec. 3. Management. The manage­ procedures and forms for use at county, S ec. 4. Lands to be administered by the ment of the Federal Crop Insurance Cor­ state and branch levels; directs con­ Bureau of Sport Fisheries. poration is vested in the Board of tinuing research and analysis of the ***** Directors, subject to the general super­ Corporation’s operations; develops and (b) Tierra Blanca Project (TX-LU- vision of the Secretary of Agriculture. maintains cost of crop production in­ 21), Randall County, containing approxi­ The M anager of the Corporation is its formation ; coordinates material for pres­ mately 7,677 acres. These lands will be chief executive officer, and he is ap­ entation to Board of Directors; prepares administered as the Buffalo Lake Na­ pointed by and holds office at the pleas­ annual report to Congress. tional Wildlife Refuge. ure of the Secretary of Agriculture. - (iv) Sales Management Division. De­ Under the general supervision of the S tewart L. U dall, velops and directs salés promotion and Board, the Manager is responsible for Secretary of the Interior. business maintenance plans, including the general direction and supervision of preparation of educational materials and F ebruary 15,1964. all activities of the Corporation. sales aids; establishes programs and [F.R. Doc. 64-1718; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; Sec. 4. Board of Directors. The Fed­ standards for selection, training and 8:47 a.m.] eral Crop Insurance Act provides that evaluation of field sales personnel; trains the Board of Directors shall consist of area, state and district directors and sales CHARLES S. MITCHELL the Manager of the Corporation, two trainers in training techniques and meth­ other persons employed in the Depart­ ods; establishes annual minimum busi­ Statement of Changes in Financial ness quotas by districts and devises re­ Interests ment of Agriculture, and two persons experienced in the insurance business porting systems to permit a continous In accordance with the requirements who are not otherwise employed by the review and analysis of sales activities and of section 710(b)(6) of the Defense Government. The Board is appointed progress. Friday, February 21, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2655

(v) Administrative Division. Plans, Alabama, Florida, Georgia: Room 733, Aronov tion with respect to crop insurance may directs, and performs the administrative Building, 474 South Court Street, Mont­ request such information from the office gomery, Alabama, 36104. management work of the Corporation, for his county, from the State Director California: 424 North Broadway, Fresno, Cali­ for his state, or from the Manager, Fed­ including personnel management, orga­ fornia, 93701. nization analyses, property, supply, and Colorado, Wyoming: Room 306, New Custom eral Crop Insurance Corporation, United space management, and records and House Building, Denver, Colorado, 80202. States Department of Agriculture, Wash­ communications management. Illinois: Room 213, U.S. Post Office and ington, D.C. 20250. Records of the (vi) Budget and Finance Division. Courthouse, Springfield, Illinois, 62701. Corporation, including those maintained Plans, directs, and coordinates the fiscal, Indiana, Michigan: Room 422, Park Building, in the field offices, are available for ex­ budget, and accounting activities of the 611 North Park Avenue, Indianapolis, amination in accordance with the rules Indiana, 46204. issued by the Secretary of Agriculture Corporation with respect to both capital Iowa: Room 205, Federal Office Building, and administrative funds; makes cost West Fifth and Court Streets, Des Moines, (7 C FR 1.1 et seq .). analyses; formulates premium collection Iowa, 50309. S ec. 7. Delegations of authority affect­ policy and procedure. Kansas: 417 Humboldt, Manhattan, Kansas, ing crop insurance contracts. The au­ (b) Branch Office. The Branch Office 66502. thority delegated by this section to act on Minnesota: Room 1129, Post Office Building, is located at 8930 W ard Parkway, K an ­ behalf of the Corporation in matters af­ St. Paul, Minnesota, 55101. sas City, Missouri, 64141. It is under the fecting crop insurance contracts shall be immediate supervision of the Branch O f­ , , : Room 610, Milner Building, 200 South Lamar Street, exercised in accordance with established fice Manager, who is under the direction Jackson, Mississippi, 39201. policies and procedures and subject to the of the Manager of the Corporation. This Missouri: 605 South Massachusetts Avenue, supervision and direction of the Man­ office is a national service office. It per­ Sedalia, Missouri, 65302. ager. This delegation of authority shall forms the accounting functions of the Montana: Room 414, Bank Electric Building, not preclude the Manager from exercis­ Corporation, including administrative Lewistown, Montana, 59457. ing the same authority whenever he Nebraska: Room 303, Post Office Building, and program cost accounts, develops deems it necessary under the circum­ statistical information on insurance pro­ Lincoln, Nebraska, 68508. North Carolina: Room 322, 1330 St. Mary’s stances. grams, prepares premium notices, sched­ Street Office Building, Raleigh, North Caro­ (a ) Delegations to State Directors. ules indemnities for payment, receives lina, 27605. Each State Director, in the state or states and deposits premiums, prepares statis­ North Dakota: 400 Universal Building, served by his office, is authorized to: ac­ tical and financial reports, cancels or Fargo, North Dakota, 58102. cept or reject applications for crop in­ adjusts debts under Public Law 518 (12 Ohio: Room 300, Bryson Building, 700 Bry- surance; cancel crop insurance contracts den Road, Columbus, Ohio, 43215. U.S.C. 1150 et seq.), and serves as the in accordance with their terms (but the Oklahoma: Agricultural Center Office Build­ central supply and distribution center for voidance of a contract for the misrepre­ forms and procedures. ing, Stillwater, Oklahoma, 74074. South Carolina: Seventh Floor, Federal Office sentation or fraud of an insured is re­ (c) Area Offices. There are four area Building, 901 Sumter Street, Columbia, served to the Manager); agree with an offices, each under the supervision of an South Carolina, 29202. insured for the division of his insured Area Director. These Area Directors are South Dakota: 239 Wisconsin Avenue SW., acreage in a county into two or more in­ directly responsible to the M anager for Huron, South Dakota, 57350. surance units, where a crop insurance the operation of program functions, in­ , : Room 518, U.S. Court­ endorsement so provides; agree to a cluding sales, actuarial and loss adjust­ house, Nashville, Tennessee, 37203. Texas, New Mexico: USD A Building, College transfer of interest in an insurance con­ ment, in the states comprising the areas. tract; approve or disapprove claims for They are as follows: Station, Texas, 77841. Virginia, Pennsylvania, Maryland: County indemnities, and make all determinations 1. North Central Area office at Room. 203, Agriculture Building, Kenbridge, Vir­ incidental thereto with respect to the Ü.S. Post Office and Courthouse, Springfield, ginia, 23944. production to be counted and the value Illinois, 62701, serving the states of Illinois, Washington, Idaho, Oregon, Utah: 845 Bon thereof as provided in the policy and the Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Marche Building, Spokane, Washington, various endorsements; determine the 99201. and Wisconsin. person to whom an indemnity should be 2. Southeast Area office at Unit M, Castle Wisconsin: 3536 University Avenue, Madi­ Park, Valdosta, Georgia, 31603, serving the son, Wisconsin, 53705. paid, in the event of the death, incompe­ states of Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, tency or disappearance of the insured; Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, (e) County Offices. M eld offices serv­determine the insured acreage and in­ North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Caro­ ing one or more counties are established terest or declare the insured acreage to lina, Tennessee, and Virginia. to administer the crop insurance pro­ be zero where the insured fails to file an 3. ' Southwest Area office at Room 209, 121gram at the local level. Some of these acreage report or files an acreage report South 4th Street, Manhattan, Kansas, 66502, offices are staffed by regular employees which is found to be erroneous; anti de­ serving the states of - California, Colorado, of the Corporation.- Others are staffed termine the time when the planting erf Kansas, Missouri, New Mexico, Oklahoma, by agents under contract with the Corpo­ an insured crop is generally completed in Texas, and Wyoming. ration. These offices are charged with a county. i- Northwest Area office at Suite 600, the responsibility Of selling and servic­ (b ) Delegation to fleldman. The Provident Life Insurance Building, 316 ing crop insurance contracts. They re­ fieldman (sometimes known as “ad­ North Fifth Street, Bismarck, North Dakota, ceive and process applications for in­ juster”) assigned to make an inspection 58501, serving the states of Idaho, Montana, surance, acreage reports, premiums, of insured acreage, after notice of loss Nebraska, North Dakota, Oregon, South notices o f loss, and notices of cancella­ and a request by the insured for con­ Dakota, Utah, and Washington. tion for crop insurance contracts. The sent to put such acreage to another use, county actuarial table, which shows the (d) State Offices. There are 23 state is authorized to give such consent on premium rates and coverages available behalf of the Corporation in accordance offices serving 36 states in which crop in­ and the insurable and uninsurable acre­ with the policy and the applicable en­ surance is presently offered. Each office age in the county, is on file in the County dorsement. *s under the supervision of a State p irec- Office and available for public inspection. Subpart B —Functions and P rocedure wr. who is responsible for the general Changes in insurance contracts to be ef­ S e c . 8. Crops insured, (a) The Fed­ administration of the statewide opera­ fective for a coming crop year are also eral Crop Insurance Act, as amended (7 tions of sales, servicing and loss adjust­ filed in the County Office and are avail­ U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) authorizes the Cor­ ment. The State Director is responsible able for public inspection. Forms, which poration to insure crops against un­ "th e work of the County Offices, and are required to be used in connection with avoidable losses on an experimental basis ® this he is assisted by district directors crop insurance contracts, may be ob­ tained at the County Offices on request. for the purpose of determining the most nd supervisors assigned to specified practical plan, terms, and conditions of ounties. District directors and/or crop The location of the office serving any county may be obtained from its state insurance for agricultural commodities. .sjjrance supervisors supervise the work Crop insurance may be offered each year office. neldmen, county office employees and in not to exceed 100 counties in addition ? t8 agents. The State Offices, with the S e c . 6. Availability of information and to the number of counties in which such tates which they serve, are as follows: records. Any person desiring informa­ insurance was offered in the preceding 2656 NOTICES

year. Insurance may be offered on not Cyanamid Company, Agricultural Di­ WYANDOTTE CHEMICALS CORP- more than three agricultural commodi­ vision, P.O. Box 400, Princeton, New RAYONIER, INC. ties in addition to those previously in­ Jersey, proposing the amendment of sured each year, except that other agri­ § 121.208(d) by changing the phrase Notice of Filing of Petition Regarding cultural commodities may be included in “treatment of bacterial swine enteritis” Food Additives multiple crop insurance (insurance on in table 2, item 2, column “Indications two or more agricultural commodities for use” to read: treatment of bacterial Pursuant to the provisions of the Fed­ under one contract with a producer). choleraesuis.” This amendment would eral Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec Insurance within the limitation set forth serve only to identify the causative 4 0 9 (b )(5 ), 72 Stat. 1786; 21 U.S.C. 348 above is now offered on wheat, cotton, agent. (b )(5 )), notice is given that a petition flax, corn, tobacco, dry edible beans, (F A P 1289) has been filed jointly by Dated: February 17,1964. citrus, soybeans, barley, peaches, grain Wyandotte Chemicals Corporation, 1609 sorghum, oats, rice, raisins, peanuts, M alcolm R. S tephens, Biddle Avenue, Wyandotte, Michigan, peas, potatoes, apples, cherries, tomatoes, Assistant Commissioner and Rayonier, Inc., 161 East 42d Street! safflower, and combined (multiple) for Regulations. New York 17, New York, proposing that crops. [F.R. Doc. 64-1720; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; § 121.2507 Cellophane be amended to pro­ (b) Regulations governing current in­ 8:47 a.m.] vide for the use of polyoxypropylene- surance programs may be found in the polyoxyethylene block polymers (mo­ F ederal R egister and in Title 7, Code of lecular weight 1,900-9,000) as adjuvants Federal Regulations, Parts 401 through BETZ LABORATORIES, INC. employed during the processing of cellu­ 406. lose pulp used in the manufacture of Notice of Filing of Petition Regarding food-packaging cellophane base sheet. Approved by the Board of Directors on Food Additives February 14,1964. Dated: February 17, 1964. Pursuant to the provisions of the Fed­ M alcolm R. S tephens, [SEAL] EARLL H. N lK K E L , eral Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec. Assistant Commissioner Secretary, Federal Crop 409(b)(5), 72 Stat. 1786; 21 U.S.C. 348 Insurance Corporation. (b) (5 )), notice is given that a petition for Regulations. [F.R. Doc. 64-1723; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; Issued this 18th day of February 1964. (FAP 1300) has been filed by Betz Lab­ oratories, Inc., Gillingham and Worth 8:48 a.m.] C harles S. M u r p h y , Streets, Philadelphia 24, Pa., proposing Under Secretary. that § 121.2505 Slimicides be amended as Office of Education [F.R. Doc. 64-1713; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; follows: 8:46 am .] 1. By inserting alphabetically in the FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE IN list of slime-control substances in para­ CONSTRUCTION OF NONCOM­ graph (c) the new item “Bisitrichloro- MERCIAL EDUCATIONAL TELE- methyl) sulfone.V VISION BROADCAST FACILITIES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDU­ 2. By inserting alphabetically in the list of adjuvant substances in paragraph Notice of Applications Accepted for CATION, AND WELFARE (d) the new item “lV,N-Dimethylforma- Filing Food and Drug Administration mide.” Notice is hereby given that effective Dated: February 17, 1964. with this publication the following de­ AMERTCAN CYANAMID CO. scribed applications for Federal financial M alcolm R. S tephens, Notice of Filing of Petition Regarding assistance in the construction of non­ Assistant Commissioner commercial educational television broad­ Food Additives for Regulations. cast facilities are accepted for filing in Pursuant to the provisions of the Fed­ [F.R. Doc. 64-1721; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; accordance with 45 CFR 60.7; eral Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec. 8:48 a.m.] Mohawk-Hudson Council on Educa­ 409(b)(5), 72 Stat. 1786; 21 U.S.C. 348 tional Television, Inc., Riverside School, (b) (5 )), notice is given that a petition GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO. P.O. Box 17, Schenectady 5, New York, (FAP 1319) has been filed by American File No. 49, to expand and improve the Cyanamid Company, Berdan Avenue, Notice of Filing of Petition Regarding facilities of the noncommercial educa­ Wayne, New Jersey, 07470, proposing the Food Additives tional station on issuance of a regulation to provide for Channel 17, Schenectady, New York. the safe use of sodium dioctyl sulfo- Pursuant to the provisions of the Fed­ Washington State University, Pull­ succinate as an emulsifier and/or surface eral Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec. man, Washington, File No. 50, to improve active agent in the manufacture of ar­ 409(b)(5), 72 Stat. 1786; 21 U.S.C. 348 the facilities of the noncommercial edu­ ticles or components of articles intended (b )(5 )), notice is given that a petition cational television broadcasting station fo r use in contact with food. (FAP 1333) has been filed by The Good­ KWSC-TV operating on channel 10, year Tire & Rubber Company, Akron 16, Pullman, Washington. Dated: February 17,1964. Ohio, proposing that paragraph (c) (5) of Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Edu­ M alcolm R. S tephens, § 121.2520 Adhesives be amended by in­ cation, 720 East Fourth Street, Charlotte, Assistant Commissioner serting alphabetically in the list “Com­ North Carolina, 28202, File No. 51, for for Regulations. ponents of Adhesives” the following new the establishment of a new noncommer­ [F.R. Doc. 64-1719; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; items : cial educational television broadcasting 8:47 a.m.] Alkylated (C4 and/or C8) phenols. station on channel 42, Charlotte, North Butylated, styrenated cresois. Carolina. Diaryl-p-phenylenediamine, where the aryl Board of Trustees, University of Ala­ AMERICAN CYANAMID CO. group may be phenyl, tolyl, or xylyl. bama, Drawer B, University, A labam a, Sodium dimethyldithiocarbamate. File No. 52, to expand the facilities of the Notice of Filing of Petition Regarding Styrenated phenol. University of Alabama, Production Cen­ Food Additive Chlortetracycline Dated: February 17,1964. ter of the Alabama State Network. Auburn University, Auburn, A labam a, Pursuant to the provisions of the Fed­ M alcolm R. S tephens, File No. 53, to expand the facilities of the eral Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec. Assistant Commissioner Auburn Uniyersity, Production Center of 409(b)(5), 72 Stat. 1786; 21 Ü.S.C. 348 for Regulations. the Alabama State Network. (b )(5 )), notice is given that a petition [F.R. Doc. 64-1722; Filed, Feb. 20. 1964; University of Nebraska, 12th and R (FAP 1269) has been filed by American 8:48 a.m.] Streets, Lincoln 8, Nebraska, File No. 54, Friday, February 21, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2657 to improve the facilities of the non­ pursuant to the provisions of the Fed­ It further appearing that there are no commercial television broadcasting sta­ eral Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, objections to the immediate favorable tion K U O N -T V , channel 12, Lincoln, that the prehearing conference in the consideration of the motion for continu­ Nebraska. above-entitled proceeding now assigned ance, and good cause for granting the f Nebraska Educational Television Com- to be held February 26, 1964, is hereby same having been shown; [mission, 12th and R Streets, Lincoln, postponed to March 3, 1964, to be held It is ordered, This the 13th day of Feb­ Nebraska, File No. 55, for the establish­ at 10 a.m. (e.s.t.) in Room 911, Universal ruary 1964, that the motion for continu­ ment of a new noncommercial educa­ Building, Connecticut and Florida Ave­ ance is granted and the evidentiary hear­ tional television broadcasting station on nues NW., Washington, D.C., before the ing in the above-entitled proceeding now [channel 3, Lexington, Nebraska. undersigned examiner. scheduled for February 17, 1964, is post­ poned to a date to be specified at a fur­ I South Central Educational Broadcast- Dated at Washington, D.C., Febru­ ther prehearing conference; and ling Council, Hershey, Pennsylvania, Pile ary 17,1964. I No. 56, for the establishment of a new It is further ordered, That a prehear­ [noncommercial educational television [ seal] R obert L. P ark, ing conference in the above-entitled pro­ broadcasting station on channel 65, Hearing' Examiner. ceeding will be held on Tuesday, Febru­ [Hershey, Pennsylvania. [P.R. Doc. 64-1746; Piled, Peb. 20, 1964; ary 18, 1964, beginning at 10:00 a.m. in [ Any interested person may, pursuant 8:51 ara.] the offices of the Commission, W ashing­ [to 45 CFR 60.8, within 30 calendar days ton, D.C. [from the date of this publication, file Released: February 17, 1964. [comments regarding the above applica­ [Docket No. SA-376] tions with the Director, Educational ACCIDENT NEAR ELKTON, MD. Federal Communications (Television Facilities Program, U.S. Office Commission, [of Education, Washington, D.C., 20202. Notice of Hearing [ seal] B en F. W aple, Secretary. (76 Stat. 64,47 U.S.C. 390) In the matter of investigation of ac­ cident involving aircraft of United [P.R. Doc. 64-1731; Piled, Peb. 20, 1964; R aymond J. Stanley, States Registry N 709PA, which occurred 8:49 a.m.] Director, Educational Television near Elkton, Maryland on December 8, Facilities Program, U.S. Office 1963: of Education. [Docket N ob. 15260, 15261; FCC 64M-131] Notice is hereby given that an Acci­ [F.R. Doc. 64-1724; Piled, Feb. 20, 1964; dent Investigation Hearing on the above COOSA VALLEY RADIO CO. AND 8:48 ajn .] matter will be held commencing at 1:30 ROME BROADCASTING CORP. p.m. (local time) on February 24, 1964, in the North Roof Garden of the Adelphia Order Continuing Hearing ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION Hotel, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. In re applications of Coosa Valley [Docket No. 50-215] Dated this 21st day of January 1964. Radio Company, Rome, Georgia, Dpcket No. 15260, File No. BPH-4108; Rome [ seal] D onald W. M adole, Broadcasting Corporation, Rome, Geor­ AMERICAN RADIATOR & STANDARD Hearing Officer. SANITARY CORP. gia, Docket No. 15261, File No. BPH-4136, [F.R. Doc. 64-1798; Piled, Peb. 20, 1964; for construction permits. Notice of Issuance of Facility Export 10:46 a.m.] A prehearing conference in the above- License entitled proceeding having been held as scheduled on February 13,1964, Please take notice that no request for It is ordered, This 13th day of February a formal hearing having been filed fol­ FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 1964, that the procedural ground rules lowing the publication of notice of pro­ established at said conference are hereby posed action in the Federal R egister on COMMISSION approved and that the transcript thereof, January 28, 1964 (29 F.R. 1423), the [Docket Nos. 14318,14319; FCC 64M-133] incorporated herein by reference with the Atomic Energy Commission has issued same force and effect as if set forth at License No. XRr-49 to American Radiator COLUMBIA BASIN MICROWAVE CO. length, shall control as to any question & Standard Sanitary Corporation au­ Order Continuing Hearing bearing on the established ground rules; thorizing export of a nuclear reactor to and Queen Mary College (University of Lon­ In re Applications of Columbia Basin It is further ordered, That the hearing don), London, England. The notice of Microwave Company : For renewal of the herein, presently scheduled to commence proposed action described the reactor as license for station KOY40, a facility in on M arch 16, 1964, is continued to 10:00 a 10 watt, water-moderated, graphite- the Domestic Public Point-to-Point Mi­ a.m„ April 13, 1964. reflected Model U T R -B teaching and re­ crowave Radio Service at Ephrata, search nuclear reactor. Washington, Docket No. 14318, File No. Released: February 14,1964. 1464-C1-R-61; for consent to assignment Dated at Bethesda, Md., this 13th day Federal Communications of the license for station KOY40, a fa­ of February 1964. Commission, cility in the Domestic Public Point-to- [seal] B en F. W aple, For the Atomic Energy Commission. Point Microwave Radio Service at Eph­ Secretary. Eber R. P rice, rata, Washington from Patricia Hughes, Assistant Director, Division d/b as Columbia Basin Microwave Com­ [P.R. Doc. 64-1708; Piled, Peb. 20, 1964; 8:46 ajn.] of Licensing and Regulation. pany to Columbia Basin Microwave Com­ pany, Inc., Docket No. 14319, File No. IF.R. Doc. 64-1700; Piled, Feb. 20, 1964; 4082-C1—AL-61. 8:45 a.m.] [Docket Nos. 15225, 15226; PCC 64R-91] The Hearing Examiner having under consideration a motion for continuance GUADALUPE VALLEY TELECASTING filed February 12, 1964, by the above- CO.r INC., AND VICTORIA TELE­ CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD entitled applicant requesting that the VISION evidentiary hearing now scheduled for [Docket 14875 etc.] February 17, 1964, be postponed pend­ Memorandum Opinion and Order SERVICE TO HURON, S. DAK. ing a further prehearing conference to Amending Issues be scheduled for February 18, 1964; and Notice of Postponement of Prehearing It appearing that-the postponement is In re applications of Guadalupe Valley Conference needed to enable the applicant to comply Telecasting Co., Inc., Victoria, Texas, with a Commission request for addi­ Docket No. 15225, File No. BPCT-3153; In accordance with the request of John tional information and for the Commis­ Marjorie S. Frels and Rubin S. Frels, d/b ber îf n ’ attorney for the Huron C ham - sion to évalué the information when re­ as Victoria Television, Victoria, Texas, ox commerce, notice is hereby given, ceived; and Docket No. 15226, File No. BPCT-3163; 2658 NOTICES

for construction permits for new televi­ [Docket Nos. 14411, 14412; FCC 64M-134] signed and would be expected to serve sion broadcast stations. the needs and interests of the proposed 1. The Review Board has before it for LA FIESTA BROADCASTING CO. AND MID-CITIES BROADCASTING CORP. service area. consideration a petition to enlarge issues, TVUE Associates, Inc., now requests filed by Marjorie S. Frels and Rubin S. Order Scheduling Hearing that the quoted issues be made applj. Frels, d.b.a. Victoria Television (Frels) cable, as well, to United Artists. In sup- on December 26, 1963.1 In re applications of J. R. Earnest and port thereof, it alleges that United! 2. By Commission Order (FCC 63- John A. Flache, d.b.a. La Fiesta Broad­ Artists proposes to operate from i;3o 1086) released December 3, 1963, the casting Company, Lubbock, Texas, p.m. to 7:00 p.m., M onday through Sat­ applications of Frels and Guadalupe Val­ Docket No. 14411, File No. BP-14116,* urday, for 33 hours a week, and that over ley Telecasting Co., Inc. (Guadalupe) Mid-Cities Broadcasting Corporation, 20 hours a week or in excess of 60 percent for a new television broadcast station Lubbock, Texas, Docket No. 14412, File of the total time will be devoted to fea­ to operate on Channel 19, Victoria, Texas, No. BP-15073; for construction permits. ture length motion pictures or entertain- were designated for consolidated hearing As a result of agreements reached on ment film.3 It does not make any allega­ on various issues including the standard the record of a prehearing conference tions that United Artists made no effort comparative issue. Frels now seeks the held this date in the above-entitled mat­ to ascertain the needs of Houston, or addition of issues to permit a comparison ter: It is ordered, This 14th day of Feb­ that the programing proposed by United of the areas and populations to be served ruary 1964, that: Artists would not meet those needs. If by the respective applicants. Attached 1. Exhibits shall be exchanged on or the requested issues are not added as to I to Frels’ petition is an engineering study before April 15,1964, United Artists, petitioner submits that) which shows differences in Grade A, 2. The names of witnesses or their pos­ these issues should, in all fairness, be I Grade B, and City Grade coverage of the sible alternates shall be exchanged on or deleted as to itself. two proposals. Guadalupe has not filed before April 15,1964. 2. The inclusion in the designation! an opposition to the petitioner’s request. 3. Counsel shall participate in an in­ Order of programing issues as to peti-i The Broadcast Bureau supports Frels’ re­ formal conference, without reporter or tioner was prompted by the extremely) quest but contends that reference to the the Hearing Examiner, on or about April unique character of petitioner’s program) City Grade signal should be deleted be­ 22, 1964, to discuss matters alluded to in proposals, viz., 50-second programs fol-| cause the relevancy of such signal has not the prehearing conference of today and lowed by 10-second commercial or) been shown. which need not be repeated herein, and noncommercial spot announcements! 3. In view of the alleged differences in 4. The hearing, heretofore not sched­ throughout most of its operating hours.! coverage between the two proposals, the uled, is hereby scheduled to commence Such a radical departure from the usual) issues specified below are being added. at 10:00 a.m. on M ay 11, 1964, in the type of programing warrants, in and of) See Publix Television Corp., FCC 59-646, Commission’s offices in Washington, D.C., itself, an inquiry such as that called fori 18 RR 771 (1959). The request for an or such other city as the Chief Hearing by the designated issues. United Artists’f issue concerning City Grade signal will Examiner shall prescribe. programing proposals are not, in our] be denied inasmuch as the principal city Released: February 17, 1964. judgment, so radically different from the] of Victoria would receive such signal from current programing in the Houston area] each of the applicants. See Cleveland F ederal Communications as to require an inquiry similar to that) Broadcasting, Inc., FCC 64R-41, released Commission, specified with respect to the petitioner’s) January 24,1964; § 73.685(a) of the Com­ [ seal] B en F. W aple, application. Thus, as is pointed out by] mission’s rules. Secretary. the Broadcast Bureau, United Artiste] Accordingly, it is ordered, This 17th [F.R. Doc. 64-1732; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; would devote 78.6 percent of its typical) day of February 1964, That the petition 8:49 am .] broadcast week to entertainment; the] to enlarge issues, filed December 26,1963, three existing Houston television stations] by Marjorie S. Frels and Rubin S. Frels, devote 66.94 percent, 79.9 percent, and] d.b.a. Victoria Television, is granted to [Docket Nos. 15212,15213; FCC 64R-89] 80.8 percent, respectively, to entertain-] the extent indicated herein, and in all TVUE ASSOCIATES, INC., AND UNITED ment. The fact that most of the enter-] other respects denied, and the issues in ARTISTS BROADCASTING, INC. tainment proposed by United Artists] this proceeding are enlarged by the addi­ consists of motion pictures is not a dis-J tion of the following issues: Memorandum Opinion and Order languishing feature. (a) To determine the location of the Amending Issues 3. Petitioner also requests that a legal] proposed Grade A and Grade B contours qualification issue be added as to appli-J of the applicants in this proceeding. In re applications of TVUE Associates, cant United Artists Broadcasting, Inc.| Inc., Houston, Texas, Docket No. 15212, (b) To determine, on a comparative on the ground that the latter’s applica­ File No. BPCT-3161; United Artists basis, the areas and populations of the tion does not include sufficient informal Broadcasting, Inc., Houston, Texas, respective Grade A and Grade B con­ tion to permit a determination that at) Docket No. 15213, File No. BPCT-3166; tours which may reasonably be expected least 75 percent of the voting stock of] for construction permits for new tele­ to receive actual service from the appli­ the parent corporation, United Artists vision broadcast stations. cants’ proposed operations. Corporation, is owned by United States 1. By Order, FCC 63-1022, released citizens. The application shows that 25] (c ) In the event the proof under issues November 5,1963, the Commission desig­ percent of the applicant’s outstanding! (a) and (b) above shall establsh that nated the instant applications for hear­ stock is owned by the officers and direcj either applicant will bring actual serv­ ing on the following issues, among tors of the parent corporation, and thaw ice to areas and populations not served oth ers:1 all of these individuals are United States! by its competitor, to determine the num­ 2. To determine the efforts made by citizens. O f the remaining 75 percent,f ber of services, if any, presently available TVUE Associates, Inc., to ascertain the the application shows that approxi-j to such areas and populations. needs and interests of the area it pro­ mately 14.5 percent is in the hands o j Released: February 18, 1964. poses to serve. investment houses which are holdina 3. To determine whether the program such shares as nominees for investors! F ederal Communications proposal of TVUE Associates, Inc., is de- Commission, •Petitioner also notes that United Artist* [ seal] B en F. W aple, 1 The Review Board has before it for con­ ias filed applications for construction per*] Secretary. sideration the following pleadings: Motion to aits for television stations at C levelan.1 modify, delete, and enlarge issues, filed Nov. )hio, and Boston, Massachusetts, and t w [F.R. Doc. 64-1729; Filed, Feb. 20. 1964; 26, 1963, by TVUE Associates, Inc.; Opposi­ uch applications propose to devote m rw 8:48 a.m.] tion, filed Dec. 20, 1963, by United Artists han 40 percent of their broadcast time I Broadcasting, Inc.; Broadcast Bureau’s op­ eature films. Petitioner makes no eia I 1 Also before the Board are the Broadcast position, filed Dec. 20, 1963; and Reply by hat the three United Artists proposals arej Bureau’s comments, filed Jan. 6, 1964. petitioner, filed Jan. 10, 1964. therwise similar. Friday, February 21, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2659 having accounts with such firms. The 99 percent of the stockholders had do­ the hearing issues set forth below are application shows that 35 of the 7,000 mestic mailing addresses, and it conclud­ added; stockholders have mailing addresses out­ ed that “Public Service should be re­ It is further ordered, T hat the issues side the United States, and that these 35 quired to submit proof concerning the in this proceeding are enlarged by the stockholders own two-tenths of one per­ citizenship of the stockholders of Na­ addition of the following issues: cent of the outstanding stock. The tional Airlines.” To determine whether a grant of the application also shows that at the appli­ 6. The information made available by application of United Artists Broad­ cant’s request, its parent corporation’s United Artists is insufficient to permit a casting, Inc., would be consistent with stock transfer agent sent letters to one determination that it is legally qualified the provisions of section 310(a) (5) of hundred of the parent corporation’s to be a licensee of the Commission. Al­ the Communications Act of 1934, as stockholders, selected at random, for in­ though United Artists contends that the amended. formation concerning their citizenship; Commission “has consistently accepted” To determine whether a grant of the all of the 93 who responded indicated the type of showing it has made, it cites application of United Artists Broadcast­ that they were American citizens. no authority which supports that con­ ing, Inc., would be consistent with the 4. The Broadcast Bureau opposes the tention. In Powel Crosley, Jr., ABC- provisions of § 73.636 of the Commission’s addition of a legal qualification issue, Paramount Merger and Westinghouse rules. stating that it is its view that the appli­ Radio Stations, Inc., supra, the showings Released : February 18,1964. cant has made a reasonable showing that were substantially more extensive than its ownership meets the requirements of that made by United Artists. In the F ederal C ommunications section 310(a) of the Communications one case in which the Commission de­ C o m m is s io n , Act of 1934, as amended. United Artists termined that an insufficient showing [ s e a l ] B e n F. W a p l e , also opposes the addition of a legal quali­ had been made, WKAT, Inc., supra, the Secretary. fication issue, stating that “Obviously, a showing was weaker than that made by [F.R. Doc. 64-1730; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; complete survey of the citizenship of all United Artists. In view of the require­ 8:48 a.m.] 7,000 stockholders is an impossible bur­ ment of section 310(a) of the Communi­ den”, and that “for many years, the cations Act of 1934, as amended, we [Docket No. 15339; FCC 64r-121] Commission has consistently accepted think it is incumbent upon United Artists the type of showing made by United to make a showing which provides a JAMES E. WALLEY (KAOR) Artiste in applications of publicly-held reasonable basis for determining the corporations”, citing Westinghouse Radio percentage of its stock that is held by Memorandum Opinion and Order Stations, Inc., 10 R R 878, 951-954 (1955). American citizens. This can be done Designating Application for Hear­ 5. What United Artists regards as an either by using the methods employed in ing on Stated Issues 1 “impossible burden” was not so regarded Powel Crosley, Jr. and ABC-Paramount by Aviation Corp., which sent letters to Merger Case, or the methods employed In re application of James EL Walley all of its 40,000 stockholders inquiring in Westinghouse Radio Stations, Inc. In (K A O R ), Oroville, California, Docket No. of their citizenship. See Powel Crosley, the event United Artists employs the 15339, File No. BP-15814, has 1340 kc, ! Jr., 11PC C 1,3 R R 6 (1945). Param ount sampling method, it should show the pre­ 250 w, U, Class IV, requests 1340 kc, 250 Pictures Corporation undertook a similar cise basis for selecting its samples, and w, 1 kw-LS, U, Class TV ; for construction survey by having its stock transfer agent be in a position to demonstrate that the permit. < [ make inquiry of all of its stockholders method it used was designed to avoid 1. The Commission has before it for concerning their citizenship. A B C -Para­ sampling errors and would reach a rep­ consideration (a) the above-captioned mount Merger Case, 8 R R 541,580 (1953). resentative cross-section of the stock­ application; (b) a “Petition to Deny” Neither of these cases implies, however, holders.* filed July 8, 1963, by Kelly Broadcasting that a survey of all stockholders is es­ 7. In Integrated Communications Sys­ Co., licensee of Station KCRA, Sacra­ sential. In Westinghouse Radio Stations* tems, Inc. of Massachusetts, cited in mento, California (KCRA, hereinafter) ; Inc., supra, cited by United Artists in its footnote 3, the Commission also desig­ and Cc) an “Opposition to Petition to I opposition, a survey of all stockholders nated an issue to determine whether a Deny” filed July 22, 1963 by James E. was not undertaken; yet the Commission grant of United Artists’ application Walley (applicant, hereinafter). determined that Westinghouse was legal­ would be consistent with the multiple 2. KCRA alleges that the applicant’s ly qualified. In that case, however, a fa r ownership rule (§ 73.636). The reason proposal would cause objectionable inter­ more sophisticated sampling was under­ for the inclusion of such issue was the ference (20 kc removed) to its existing taken (see paragraph 88 of the findings) fact that a “significant portion of the operation in an area of 11.6' square miles than has been undertaken by United voting stock of United Artists Corpora­ affecting 2,587 persons or 0.25 percent of Artiste. For example, there was a “pre­ tion is owned by holding companies, the population within the normally pro­ selection” of all stockholders holding nominees, or others, for and on behalf tected primary service area. Accordingly, wore than one-half of one percent of the of persons unknown.” These reasons we find that KCRA is a “party in inter­ stock and inquiries were made of each of apply with equal force in the instant est” within the meaning of section 309 teem to determine their citizenship. proceeding, and the Review Board will, (d) (1) of the Communications Act of Such preselection was regarded as es­ therefore, on its own motion, add an 1934, as amended. National Broadcast­ sential so that no sampling error would issue to determine whether a grant of ing Company, Inc., (K O A) v. F.C.C., 319' attach to groups which represent more United Artists’ application would be con­ U.S. 239 (1943). than one-half of one percent of the total sistent with § 73.636 of the rules. 3. Based on its attached engineering outstanding stock. In addition, the re- Accordingly, it is ordered, This 17th affidavit, KCRA further alleges a viola­ ®«ning stockholders were classified into day of February 1964, that the motion tion of § 3.37 (now § 73.37) of the Com­ tenous groupings, e.g., individuals, to modify, delete and enlarge issues, filed mission’s rules in that the proposed 25 ~®®ks, nominees, etc., and each of these November 26, 1963, by TVue Associates, mv/m contour of the applicant would ®°ups was assigned a certain number of Inc., is denied except to the extent that overlap its 2 mv/m contour. KCRA con­ iteares to be sampled; the number as- cedes that the Commission, in granting "kfled was in proportion to the total 8 Subsequent to the filing of the petition the construction permit for the appli­ umber of shares held by each group. under consideration herein, the Commission, cant’s present facilities, waived the afore­ ri(r e[ refinements, which need not be in Integrated Communications System, Inc. mentioned rule. However, it is asserted that the extent of the overlap would be no» e<*’ were employed in selecting the of Massachusetts, FCC 64-96, released Feb. increased and that the special circum­ On +lnsuto y hom inquiries would be sent. 12, 1964, indicated that it was not satisfied a record made in an evi­ with the statistical validity of the survey stances then prevailing have changed, thereby eliminating the justification for l l y hearing, the Commission con- on which United Artists relied for its rep­ the waiver. MF* that at least 75 percent of W est- resentation that a grant of its operation would be consistent with Section 310(a) (5) 4. In opposition, the applicant ac­ ifjehouse’s outstanding stock was owned of the Communications Act of 1934, as knowledges that the proposal would iL 1 ed States Citizens. In W K A T , amended. The Commission, therefore, desig­ cause additional interference to KCRA’s * ” , 471 (1954), the Commission nated an issue like the first of the two Issues existing operation but claims that it is de I ihsufficient a showing that at least which we are adding herein. minimis. W ith respect to the alleged vio- 2660 NOTICES lation of § 73.37, the applicant points out hearing, Docket No. 14644. Accordingly, 250 watt Class IV stations in the event that KCRA’s own expert witness, in a the Bay Shore Broadcasting Company they are subsequently authorized to in­ previous hearing, testified that the inter­ will be made a party to this proceeding. crease power to 1000 watts. ference to KCRA would properly be de­ In view of the foregoing, except as in­ Permittee shall submit with the appli- scribed as ordinary adjacent channel in­ dicated by the issues specified below, cation for license, antenna resistance terference— 1:30 desired to undesired the applicant is legally, technically, fi­ measurements made in accordance with signal ratio under § 73.182 of the rules— nancially, and otherwise qualified to § 73.54 of the Commission’s rules. and that the type of interference pro­ construct and operate as proposed. It is further ordered, That, to avail scribed by § 73.37 resulting from the non­ However, the Commission is unable to themselves of the opportunity to be selectivity of broadcast receivers, exter­ make the statutory finding that a grant heard, the applicant and parties re­ nal and internal cross-modulation, would of the application would serve the public spondent herein, pursuant to § 1.221(c) not occur. The applicant concludes that interest, convenience, and necessity, and of the Commission’s rules, in person or the proposal would cause adjacent chan­ is of the opinion that the application by attorney, shall, within 20 days of the nel interference in an area surrounding must be designated for hearing on the mailing of this Order, file with the Com­ its own transmitter located some 61 miles issues set forth below. mission in triplicate, a written appear­ from KCRA; that it would in no way It is ordered, That, pursuant to section ance stating an intention to appear on “create a new type of interference . . . 309(e) of the Communications Act of the date fixed for the hearing and pre­ of the kind which § 73.37 was designed to 1934, as amended, the application is des­ sent evidence on the issues specified in prevent”; and, in this regard, that there ignated for hearing, at a time and place this Order. is no evidence of complaints from lis­ to be specified in a subsequent Order, It is further ordered, That the appli­ teners. The applicant cites Bridgeport upon the following issues: cant herein shall, pursuant to section 311 Broadcasting Co., 28 FCC 464 (1960) as 1. To determine the areas and popula­ (a) (2) of the Communications Act of an instance where the Commission al­ tions which may be expected to gain or 1934, as amended, and § 1.594 of the lowed a power increase in the face of lose primary service from the proposed Commission’s rules, give notice of the existing 2 and 25 mv/m overlap. operation of Station KAOR and the hearing, within the time and in the man­ 5. The Commission finds that the pro­ availability of other primary service to ner prescribed in such rule, and shall posal would, in fact, cause additional such areas and populations. advise the Commission of the publica­ interference to the existing operation of 2. To determine whether the proposed tion of such notice as required by § 1.594 KCRA, which, although slight, would operation of Station KAOR would cause (g ) of the rules. result in an indirect modification of objectionable interference to Stations Adopted: February 12,1964. KCRA’s license. Accordingly, the ap­ KCRA and KAHR, Sacramento and plication will be designated for hearing Redding, California, respectively, or any Released: February 14,1964. and the licensee of KCRA made a party other existing standard broadcast sta­ F ederal C ommunications to the proceeding. We will also include tions, and, if so, the nature and extent C o m m is s io n , thereof, the areas and populations af­ a § 73.37 issue. Although no engineering [ s e a l ] B e n F. W a p l e , data have been submitted to show that fected thereby, and the availability of Secretary. interference due to non-selectivity of other primary service to such Areas and receivers or cross-modulation would populations. [P.R. Doc. 64-1709; Piled, Peb. 20, 1964; 8:46 a.m.] occur, we find that neither the Act nor 3. To determine whether the proposed the rules promulgated thereunder re­ operation of Station KAOR would cause quire such a showing. KCRA, in its objectionable interference to the pro­ [Docket No. 15339; FCC 64M-135] engineering exhibit has delineated the posal, Pile No. BP-14113, of the Bay extent to which the area of overlap Shore Broadcasting Company, for a new JAMES E. WALLEY (KAOR) would increase and, at this juncture, station at Hayward, California, or any Order Scheduling Hearing nothing further is required. W here spe­ existing broadcast stations, and, if so, cific facts have been alleged showing a the nature and extent thereof, the areas In re application of James E. Walley violation of § 73.37 we will not, prior to and populations affected thereby and the (KAOR), Oroville, California, Docket blearing, impose on KCRA the additional availability of other primary service to No. 15339, File No. BP-15814; for con­ burden of demonstrating that the pro­ such areas and populations. struction permit. posal would cause the type of harm 4. To determine whether the proposed It is ordered, This 17th day of Feb­ which the rule was designed to preclude. operation of Station KAOR would violate ruary 1964, that Millard F. French will While it is true that power increases have § 73.37 of the Commission’s rules with re­ preside at the hearing in the above- been permitted in the face of existing 2 spect to 2 and 25 mv/m overlap with entitled proceeding which is hereby and 25 mv/m overlap,1 the Commission Station KCRA and, if so, whether cir­ scheduled to commence on April 16,1964, has always given interested parties the cumstances exist which would warrant a in Washington, D.C.: And it is further opportunity to be heard in an eviden­ waiver of said section. ordered, That a prehearing conference in tiary hearing.3 5. To determine, in the light of the the proceeding will be convened by the 6. In addition to the interference evidence adduced pursuant to the fore­ presiding officer at 9:00 a.m., March 10, noted in paragraph 5 above, it appears going issues, whether a grant of the 1964. that the applicant’s proposal would cause instant application would serve the pub­ Released: February 17,1964. objectionable adjacent channel interfer­ lic interest, Convenience, and necessity. F ederal C ommunications ence to the existing operation of Sta­ It is further ordered, That the Peti­ tion KAHR, Redding, California. Ac­ tion to Deny filed July 8, 1963, by Kelly C o m m is s io n , cordingly, an issue with respect thereto Broadcasting Co., is granted to the ex­ [ s e a l] B e n F. W a p l e , Secretary. will be included and the licensee of Sta­ tent indicated above and is denied in all tion KAHR will be made a party to the other respects. [F.R. Doc. 64-1733; Piled, Peb. 20, 1964; proceeding ordered below. It is further ordered, That Nina N. 8:49 ajn .] 7. It also appears that the proposed Kelly, Robert E. Kelly, and Jon S. Kelly, operation of Station KAOR involves d.b.a. Kelly Broadcasting Co., High mutual interference with the proposal Fidelity Stations, Inc., licensees of Sta­ FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION of Bay Shore Broadcasting Company, tions KCRA and KAHR, respectively, Pile No. BP-14113, for a new station in and Bay Shore Broadcasting Company, AMERICAN EXPORT LINES, INC., applicant for a new station at Hayward, Hayward, California. The KAOR ap­ California, are made parties to the ET AL. plication was not timely filed with the proceeding. Notice of Agreement Filed for Bay Shore proposal and for that reason It is further ordered, That, in the event Approval was not consolidated with the latter in of a grant of the above-captioned appli­ cation, the construction permit shall con­ Notice is hereby given that the f ° l ^ ! 1 Bridgeport Broadcasting, supra. tain the following conditions: ing described agreement has been hi 2 Raritan Valley Broadcasting Co., Inc. Permittee shall accept such interfer­ with the Commission for approval pur' (W C T C ), 22 R.R. 653. ence as may be imposed by other existing suant to section 15 of the Shipping ac , ¡Friday, February 21, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2661

[1916 (39 Stat. 733, 75 Stat. 763; 46 U.S.C, Hartnett receives 66% percent of the gust 1,1963 and published in the F ederal 0 1 4 ) • - '5.!- gross fee earned. R egister August 31, 1963 (F.R. Doc. 63- I Agreement No. 8005-4, between Am er­ Agreement No. FF-1376 between I. C. 9395; 28 F.R. 9657-58), make the follow­ ican Export Lines, Inc., American Steve­ Harris & Co., party (a) and Dorf Inter­ ing corrections in the extreme left col­ dores, Inc., Bay Ridge Operating Com­ national, Inc. of Michigan, party (b), umn, at top of page 9658: pany, et al., modifies approved Agree­ both of Detroit, Mich., is an arrangement Delete: „ ment No. 8005, as amended, which pro­ whereunder party (a) will receive and T. 38 N., R. 9 W., process the mail of party (b), entering vides (1) for establishment and main­ Sec. 1, lot 2. tenance of rates, charges, classifications, and clearing merchandise, showing T. 39 N., R. 9 W., Lyles, regulations and practices with re- party (b) as Importer of Record and Sec. 36, NEKSWi/4. Ipect to services of loading and unloading forwarding in the name of party (b). bf cargo onto and from trucks, lighters, I. C. Harris & Co. will receive 80 percent G o r d o n M . G r a n t , tend barges in the Port of Greater New of gross fees, less usual expenses. Acting Secretary. [York and vicinity and (2) for the fixing Agreement No. FF-1377 between Geo. [F.R. Doc. 64-1703; Filed. Feb. 20, 1964; of free time and demurrage, rates and Wm. Rueff, Inc., New Orleans, Louisiana, 8:45 a.m.] ¡charges only in the trades not covered party (a) and J. W. Hampton, Jr. & Co., [by an approved section 15 agreement. Inc., New Orleans, Louisiana, party (b ), [Docket No. E-7148] fThe purpose of the modification is to is an arrangement whereby party (b) [amend Agreement No. 8005, as amended, will pay rent for space in office of party NORTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE CO. [by providing for (1) a clarification of the (a) and party (b) will have its own Notice of Application ¡Conference's tariff-publishing authority phone. The forwarding work of party F e b r u a r y 14,1964. [for loading and unloading lighters; (2) (b) will be done by party (a). Party Take notice that on February 7, 1964, authorization of a tariff for free time and (b) will pay a weekly retainer to party an application was filed with the Federal [demurrage on export cargo; (3) authori­ (a) and also a share of yearly net profit. Power Commission pursuant to section zation of a tariff for sorting of import Agreement No. FF-1391 between J. P. 204 of the Federal Power Act by North­ [cargo; (4) providing for abstention from Harle Forwarding Co., Houston, Texas, western Public Service Company (Ap­ [any conference tariff except the truck and Krennerich & Harle, Inc., New plicant) , incorporated under the laws of Eoading/unloading tariff. Orleans, Louisiana, is an arrangement the State of Delaware and qualified as a I Interested parties may inspect the whereunder the companies complete for­ foreign corporation to do business in the ■agreement and obtain copies thereof at warding functions for each other. For­ State of South Dakota and as a domesti­ [the Bureau of Domestic Regulation, warding and service fees will be divided cated corporation in the State of Ne­ [Federal Maritime Commission, W ashing­ as agreed. Ocean freight compensation braska, seeking an order authorizing the ton, D.C., 20573, or may inspect a copy will also be divided as agreed. The com­ issuance of an additional 236,474 shares [at the offices of the District M anagers of panies will participate in advertising and of common stock, par value $7 per share Ithe Commission in New York, N.Y., New promotion work and share costs thereof. to be issued pro rata to existing holders [Orleans, La., and San Francisco, Calif., J. P. Harle Forwarding Co. will keep of capital stock of the Applicant. Ac­ [and may submit to the Secretary, Federal books for Krennerich & Harle, Inc., and cording to the application, Applicant [Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C., receive reimbursement for same. The proposes (1) to increase the number of [20573, within 20 days after publication companies may lend each other person­ authorized shares of its common stock [of this notice in the F ederal R eg ister , nel and be reimbursed accordingly. from 800,000 shares to 1,500,000 shares [written statements with reference to the Interested persons may inspect these and the par value thereof from $3 to $7 [agreement and their position as to ap­ agreements and obtain copies thereof at per share, and (2) to split its 709,423 proval, disapproval, or modification, to­ the Bureau of Domestic Regulation, Fed­ shares of outstanding common stock on gether with a request for hearing, should eral Maritime Commission, Washington, a hearing be desired. a four-for-three basis by reclassifying D.C., dr at the Commission's field offices the presently outstanding common stock By order of the Federal Maritime at: so that each share thereof will be Commission. 45 Broadway, New York, N.Y., 10006. changed into one and one-third shares of T h o m a s L ist, 180 New Montgomery Street, San Fran­ common stock of the par value of $7 per Secretary. cisco, Calif., 94105. share. Federal Office Building South, 600 South According to the Applicant, the change February 18, 1964. Street— Room 835 (P.O. Box 80550), New Orleans, La., 70130. in the reclassification and split of the [F.R. Doc. 64-1725; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; Company’s common stock will be ac­ 8:48 a.m.] They may submit to the Secretary, complished by an amendment to its cer­ Federal Maritime Commission, Washing­ tificate of incorporation to be submitted C. A. HARTNETT ET AL. ton, D.C., 20573, within twenty days after to the vote of the common stockholders publication of this notice in the F ederal at its annual meeting on April 21, 1964. Notice of Agreements Filed for R eg iste r , written statements with refer­ The application states that if the amend­ Approval ence to the agreement and their approval, ment is approved by holders of a ma­ disapproval, or modification together jority of outstanding common stock, and I Notice is hereby given that the follow­ with request for hearing should such the necessary regulatory authorizations e d agreements have been filed with the hearing be desired. have been obtained, the proposed amend­ [Federal Maritime Commission for ap- Dated: February 18,1964. ment will become effective upon the filing Proval pursuant to section 15 of the and recording of a certificate of amend­ nS?ing Act> 1916* <75 Stat. 763 and 46 By the Federal Maritime Commission. ment of certificate of incorporation in ac­ fri-oiw ****'• ^ parties involved are cordance with Delaware law on or about gttgible to operate as independent ocean T h o m a s L i s i , Secretary. April 22, 1964, and the certificates evi­ K ht forwarders pursuant to section 44 dencing the additional shares will be is­ pi the Shipping Act, 1916. [F.R. Doc. 64-1726; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; sued as soon as practicable thereafter. 8:48 a.m.] Icnn 6Se agreements are non-exclusive According to the Applicant, the Lh>v.ra”ve worlcinS arrangements under amendment will increase the aggregate Ifrmr^ .?ne Party may perform freight par value of the outstanding common lionvarding services for the other. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION stock in the amount of $4,493,010. The In5re!inent No- FF-1378 between C. A. COLORADO proposed amendment to the certificate of ID»!*« rU Boston, Massachusetts, and incorporation provides that this increase [vnri?eSj Turner & Co., New York, New Lands Withdrawn in Project No. 400; will be effected by transferring to the I an arrangement whereby C. A. Finding and Order; Correction common stock capital account the sum of Performs certain freight for- $64,614 from the Company’s Miscellane­ [co ^ ac^v*ties for Davies, Turner & O ctober 21, 1963. ous paid-in capital account and the bal­ L ? ! the name and letterhead of In the finding and order under section ance of $4,428,396 from the premium on Turner & Co. In return C. A. 24 of the Federal Power Act, issued Au­ stock account. No. 37— -5 2662 NOTICES

Any person desiring to be heard or beginning May 31, 1963, and extending Allegheny proposes to make a cash make any protest with respect to said through May 30, 1964. capital contribution of $500,000 to its! The United States Government has now application should on or before the 12th wholly-owned subsidiary company, Cum. ’ agreed to allow entry of an additional 145,000 day of March, 1964, file with the Federal pounds in Category 63 (T.S.U.S.A. Nos. 382.03 berland Valley Electric Company (“Cum. Power Commission, Washington, D.C., 77 and 380.03 63 o n ly ), effective May 81,1963, berland”), which in turn will pay, at 20426, petitions or protests in accord­ which would raise to 700,000 pounds the level maturity (March 19,1964), its unsecured ance with the rules of practice and pro­ of restraint for the twelve-month period be­ promissory note in the face amount of cedure of the Commission (CFR 1.8 or ginning May 31,1963. $500,000 payable to Allegheny. Accordingly, you are directed to increase to 1.10). The application is on file with The proposed contribution will be 700,000 pounds the amount of cotton textile credited to the capital surplus of Cum­ the Commission and available for public products in Category 63 (T.S.U.S.A. Nos. berland and will have the effect of con­ inspection. 382.03 77 and 380.03 63 only), produced or manufactured in the Philippines, which may verting its short-term debt into common J o s e ph H . G u t r id e , be entered into the United States for con­ stock equity. Secretary. sumption or withdrawn from warehouse for The expense to be incurred in connec­ [F.R. Doc. 64-1704; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; consumption during the twelve-month period tion with the proposed transaction is 8:45 a.m.] beginning May 31, 1963, and extending estimated not to exceed $500. through May 30, 1964. It is represented that no State com­ A detailed description of Category 63 was mission and no Federal commission, published in the F ederal R egister on Octo­ ber 1, 1963 (28 F JR. 10551). other than this Commission, has juris­ INTERAGENCY TEXTILE All other directives given in the letters re­ diction over the proposed transaction. ferred to above remain unchanged. Notice is further given that any in­ This letter will be published in the F ed­ terested person may, not later than ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE er a l R e g iste r. March 10, 1964, request in writing that CERTAIN COTTON TEXTILE PROD­ Sincerely yours, a hearing be held on such matter, stat­ UCTS PRODUCED OR MANUFAC­ F r a n k l in D. R o o sevelt, Jr., ing the nature of his interest, the rea­ TURED IN THE PHILIPPINES Acting Secretary of Commerce, and sons for such request, and the issues of Acting Chairman, President’s Cab­ fact or law raised by said amended dec­ Limitation on Entry or Withdrawal inet Textile Advisory Committee. laration which he desires to controvert; From Warehouse [F.R. Doc. 64-1727; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; or he may request that he be notified if 8:48 a.m.] the Commission should order a hearing F e b r u a r y 18, 1964. thereon. Any such request should be addressed: Secretary, Securities and Ex­ There is published below a letter dated change Commission, Washington, D.C., February 18, 1964, from the Chairman OFFICE OF EMERGENCY 20549. A copy of such request should be of the President’s Cabinet Textile Ad­ served personally or by mail (air mail if visory Committee to the Commissioner PLANNING the person being served is located more of Customs, authorizing entry of an ad­ than 500 miles from the point of mail­ ditional 145,000 pounds of cotton textile WILLIAM F. SCHNITZLER ing) upon declarant at the above-stated products in Category 63, produced or address, and proof of service (by affida­ manufactured in the Philippines, for the Appointee’s Statement of Business vit or, in case of an attorney at law, by twelve-month period beginning May 31, Interests certificate) should be filed contempo­ 1963, and ending M ay 30, 1964. Other The following statement lists the names raneously with the request. At any time directives concerning entry of thèse and concerns required by subsection 710 after said date, the amended declaration, goods appeared in the F ederal R egister (b) (6) of the Defense Production Act of as filed or as it may be further amended, on August 27, 1963 (28 F.R. 9399), on 1950, as amended. may be permitted to become effective as October 24,1963 (28 F.R. 11436), on Jan­ provided in Rule 23 of the general rules uary 14,1964 (29 F.R. 334), and on Jan­ No changes since last statement published September 24, 1963 (28 F JR. 10369). and regulations promulgated under the uary 28, 1964 (29 F.R. 1427). Act, or the Commission may grant ex­ Dated: November 18, 1963. J am e s S. L ove, Jr., emption from such rules as provided in Chairman, Interagency Textile W il l ia m F. S c h n it zl e r . Rules 20(a) and 100 thereof or take such other action as it may deem appropriate. Administrative Committee, [F.R. Doc. 64-1705; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; and Deputy to the Secre­ 8:45 a.m.] For the Commission (pursuant to dele­ tary of Commerce for Textile gated authority). Programs. [ seal] O rval L. D uB ois, T h e Secr e tar y o f C o m m e r c e SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Secretary. p r e s id e n t ’s c a b in e t t e x t il e a d v iso r y [F.R. Doc. 64-1701; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; COMMITTEE COMMISSION 8:45 ajn.] Washington 25, D.C., [File No. 70-4191] February 18,1964. [File No. 70-4190] ALLEGHENY POWER SYSTEM, INC. NEW ENGLAND ELECTRIC SYSTEM C ommissioner o f Cu s t o m s , D e p a r t m e n t o f t h e T r e a s u r y , Notice of Proposed Intrasystem ET AL. Washington, D.C. Capital Contribution Notice of Filing Regarding Issue and D ear M r . C ommissioner : This letter sup­ F e b r u a r y 17, 1964. plements and amends my letter to you of Sale of Promissory Notes by Sub­ August 14, 1963, published in the F ederal Notice is hereby given that Allegheny sidiary Companies to Banks and/or R egister on August 27, 1963 (28 F.R. 9399), Power System, Inc. (“Allegheny”) , 320 Holding Company of October 21, 1963, published in the F ederal Park Avenue, New York, New York, R egister on October 24, 1963 ( 28 F.R. 11436), 10022, a registered holding company, has F ebruary 17, 1964. of January 6, 1964, published in the F ederal filed a declaration and amendments Notice is hereby given that a joint ap­ R egister on January 14, 1964 (29 F.R. 334), and of January 22, 1964, published in the thereto with this Commission pursuant plication-declaration has been filed with F ederal R egister on January 28, 1964 (29 F R . to the Public Utility Holding Company this Commission pursuant to the Pubnc 1427), regarding restraints on imports of Act of 1935 (“Act”) , designating section Utility Holding Company Act of l^ 8 cotton textile products in Category 63, pro­ 12(b) of the Act and Rule 45 thereunder (“Act” ) by New England Electric Sys­ duced or manufactured in the Philippines. as applicable to the proposed transaction. tem (“N E E S ”) , 441 Stuart Street, Boston In those letters you were directed to prohibit All interested persons are referred to the 16, Massachusetts, a registered ko1“5?« entry for consumption and withdrawal from amended declaration, on file at the office company, and certain of its public-utuiiy warehouse for consumption of cotton textile products in Category 63 (T.S.U.S.A. Nos. of the Commission, for a statement of the subsidiary companies (“the b°rr0^ _ 382.03 77 and 380.03 63 only) in excess of proposed transaction which is sum­ companies” ) , namely* Central Massacn 555,000 pounds for the twelve-month period marized below. setts Gas Company ("Central Mass. . Friday, February 21, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2663

Granite State Electric Company (“Gran­ The borrowing companies, as well as Rules 20(a) and 100 thereof or take such g e ) , Lawrence Gas Company (“Law­ Mass Electric and NEPCO, may prepay other action as it may deem appropriate. rence”), Lynn Gas Company (“Lynn their notes to banks, in whole or in part, For the Commission (pursuant to dele­ |Gas”), Mystic Valley Gas Company with borrowings from NEES, or vice gated authority). (“Mystic Valley”), North Shore Gas versa. Any note issued to NEES for such Company (“North Shore”), Northamp­ prepayment of a note to a bank will bear [ s e a l ] O rval L. D u B o is , ton Gas Light Company (“Northampton interest at the prime rate or the interest Secretary. Gas”), Norwood Gas Company (“Nor- rate on the note being prepaid, which­ [F.R. Doc. 64-1702; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; Iwood”), and Wachusett Gas Company ever is lower, but at the prime rate after 8:45 a.m.] [(“Wachusett”). N EE S and the borrow­ the maturity date of the note being pre­ ing com panies have designated sections 6 paid. In the case of a note issued to a (a), 6(b), 7, 9(a), 10, and 12 of the Act bank for such prepayment of a note to [and Rules 42(b) (2), 45(b) (1), and 50(a) NEES, if the interest rate on the new note DEPARTMENT OF LABOR (2) th ereu nd er as applicable to the pro- being issued exceeds that of the note be­ jposed transactions. A ll interested per- ing prepaid, NEES will credit the com­ Bureau of Labor Standards ; sons are referred to the joint application- pany involved with an amount equal to [No. MSVAR 8] ; declaration for a statement of the trans- the difference between such interest pay­ j actions therein proposed, which are sum- ments for the period from the date of the WILLIAM SPENCER AND SON CORP. Imarized as follows: issuance of such new note to the matur­ Order Granting Variation The borrowing companies propose to ity date of the note being prepaid. issue, from time to time through Decem­ In the event of any permanent financ­ Name and address of applicant. Pu r­ ber 31,1964, unsecured promissory notes ing by any of the borrowing companies, suant to section 41(d) of the Longshore­ to banks and/or to NEES in an aggre­ the proceeds therefrom, in excess of men’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensa­ gate face amount not to exceed $22,225,- amounts used for refunding other secu­ tion Act (44 Stat. 1444, as amended, 33 000 at any one time outstanding. Shown rities at par or the principal amount U.S.C. 941(d)) and the provisions of 29 below for each of the borrowing com­ thereof, will be applied to payment of its C FR 1504.5 and 1507.6, a variation from panies is the maximum face amount of short-term note indebtedness then out­ particular provisions of 29 CFR Part 1504 notes to be issued and outstanding at any standing, and the maximum of short­ is hereby granted to William Spencer , one time, to the designated banks and/ term note indebtedness to be outstand­ and Son Corporation, 19 Rector Street, or to NEES. ing at any one time proposed herein will New York 6, New York. be reduced by the amount of such pay­ Provisions of 29 CFR Part 1504 varied. Borrowing company Banks Banks or ment. The provision of 29 CFR 1504.93(a)(1) NEES Incidental services in connection with requiring the making of tests to deter­ the proposed note issues will be per­ mine that dangerous concentrations of Central Mass...... I $1,330,000 formed at cost by New England Power carbon monoxide do not develop, is varied Granite ...... , V * $3,300,000 Lawrence...... I >3,055,000 Service Company, an affiliated service insofar as it is applicable to the com­ Lvnn Gas >1,800/000 y . y ...... company. The cost will not exceed an pany’s operations aboard covered lighters Mystic Valiev >6,250,000 at steamship and other terminals in the North Shore...... » 2,720,000 estimated $400 for each applicant- Northampton Gas » 1,060,000 declarant. Port of New York, subject to the stated Norwood...... « 1,400,000 The filing states that appropriate ac­ conditions herein. Wachusett...... 11,310,000 tion has been taken by the Public Util­ Condition of variation. Testing of the 16,465,000 5, 760,000 ities Commission of New Hampshire with atmosphere for carbon monoxide content respect to the notes proposed to be is­ in covered lighters at the Port of New ‘ First National C ity Bank, N e w York , N .Y . sued by Granite and that no further ac­ York in which internal combustion en­ ! National Bank o f Boston, Mass. «NEES only. tion by any commission, other than this gines are being used in the operations Commission, is necessary to carry out of William Spencer and Son Corporation, At January 1,1964, the borrowing com­ the proposed transactions. is not required when all of the following panies had outstanding an aggregate of Notice is further given that any in­ conditions are met: $18,790,000 face amount of notes due to terested person may, not later than (1) The internal combustion engine banks and/or to NEES. The proceeds March 10, 1964, request in writing that powered lift trucks or other vehicles are from the proposed borrowings will be a hearing be held on such matter, stat­ being run on and off the lighter with ; used by the respective borrowing com­ ing the nature of his interest, the reasons each successive load. panies to pay such notes at or before the for such request, and the issues of fact (2) All doors and, where possible, maturity thereof and to provide new or law raised by said joint application- other openings on the covered lighter ! money for construction expenditures or declaration which he desires to contro­ are open to provide free natural wCimburse its treasury therefor. vert; or he may request that he be ventilation. NEES also proposes to acquire, from notified if the Commission should order (3) The length of the operation in­ time to time through December 31, 1964, a hearing thereon. Any such request volving the use of internal combustion , unsecured promissory notes from its should be addressed: Secretary, Secu­ engines on the lighter does not exceed subsidiary companies, Massachusetts rities and Exchange Commission, Wash­ two hours. wectnc Company ( “Mass Electric” ) and ington, D.C., 20549. A copy of such re­ This variation is conditioned on the new England Power Company ( “N E P - quest should be served personally or by facts that the large number of lighters n . » evidence loans to these com- mail (air mail if the person being served worked at thè same time at a number mes in a face amount not exceeding is located more than 500 miles from the of locations creates a hardship in ac­ °* $3,000,000 at any one point of mailing) upon the applicants- complishing the testing for carbon Tho ° utstanding f or each company. declarants at the above-stated address, monoxide content, and that previous t ^ te s that such notes will be and proof of service (by affidavit or, in tests have indicated that under the con­ f Ji®“ ?ursllant to the exemption af- case of an attorney at law, by certificate) ditions stated there is no danger of ex­ 6 ( h v ! i * the ?rst sentence of Section cessive carbon monoxide concentration. ^b) of the Act. should be filed contemporaneously with the request. At any time after said date, Period of variation. The variation cnmno^°tes to he issued by the borrowing the joint application-declaration, as filed shall be effective Until terminated. Sée a n S S r ^ wel1 as by Mass Electric or as it may be amended, may be granted 29CFR1507.il. ceed K ?’ W U b6ar interest n°t ex- and permitted to become effective as Signed at Washington, D.C., this 17th Percent the prime rate (presently 4 y2 provided in Rule 23 of the general rules day of February 1964. timeofic annum) in effect at the and regulations promulgated under the o n 7 vln Uance/:wm mature in less than A r t h u r W . M o t l e y , in tbe date of issuance and Act, or the Commission may grant ex­ Director, 1965 nr?rt !£n ?n or prior M arch 31, emption from its rules under the Act as Bureau of Labor Standards. in wholpd w 1} be prepayable at any time, provided in Rules 20(a) and 100 thereof [F.R. Doc. 64-1716; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; or in part, without premium. or take such other action as provided in 8:46 ajn.l 2664 NOTICES

MC 102339 Sub 1, issued November 16, vania-New York State line. John J,j INTERSTATE COMMERCE 1953, to Vern Bertelsen, Underwood, Brady, Jr., 75 State Street, Albany 7 ! Iowa, authorizing the transportation of N.Y., attorney for applicants. COMMISSION building materials, feeds, agricultural No. M C -F C 66638. By order of Pebru-1 implements, and farm machinery and ary 14, 1964, the Transfer Board ap­ [Notice No. 944] parts, over irregular routes, between proved the transfer to Bost Truck Serv- j MOTOR CARRIER TRANSFER Underwood, Iowa, and points within 15 ice, Inc, 1134 North 11th Street, Mur- PROCEEDINGS miles of Underwood, on the one hand, physboro, HI., of the operating rights in and, on the other, Omaha, Nebr. certificate in No. M C 36854, issued March F e b r u a r y 18,-1964. No. M C-FC 66601. By order of Febru­ 6, 1958, to W . J. Bost and W . E. Bost, a Synopses of orders entered pursuant ary 13, 1964, the Transfer Board ap­ partnership, doing business as Bost to section 212(b) of the Interstate Com­ proved the transfer to Gladys M. Brown, Truck Service, 1134 North 11th Street, merce Act, and rules and regulations pre­ doing business as Lawrence & Mason Murphysboro, HI., authorizing the trans­ scribed thereunder (49 CFR Part 179), Tours, Box 7705, Tonasket, Wash., of portation, over regular routes, of: Gen-j appear below: License No. MC 12683, issued February eral commodities, excluding household As provided in the Commission’s spe­ 16, 1959, to Gladys M. Lawrence and goods, commodities in bulk, and other cial rules of practice any interested per­ Susie S. Mason, a partnership, doing specified commodities, between specified son may file a petition seeking recon­ business as Lawrence & Mason Tours, points in Hlinois and Missouri. sideration of the following numbered West 1417 14th Avenue, Spokane, Wash., [ s e a l ] H arold D. M cCoy, proceedings within 20 days from the date authorizing the brokerage operations in Secretary. of publication of this notice. Pursuant connection with transportation by motor \A to section 17(8) of the Interstate Com­ vehicle of passengers and their baggage, [F.R. Doc. 84-1738; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964; merce Act, the filing of such a petition in special and charter operations, in 8:50 a.m.] will postpone the effective date of the round-trip tours, beginning and ending order in that proceeding pending its dis­ at Spokane, Wash., and extending to FOURTH SECTION APPLICATIONS position. The matters relied upon by points in the United States. Lawrence petitioners must be specified in their W. Thayer, 902 Paulsen Building, Spo­ FOR RELIEF petitions with particularity. kane, Wash., 99201, attorney for appli- F ebruary 18,1964. j No. MC-FC 66523. By order of Febru­ Protests to the granting of an applica­ ary 13, 1964, the Transfer Board ap­ No. MC-FC 66606. By order of Feb­ tion must be prepared in accordance proved the transfer to Charles G. ruary 13, 1964, the Transfer Board ap­ with Rule 1.40 of the general rules of Benincasa, Rockville Centre, N.Y., of the proved the transfer to Sonny’s Truck practice (49 C FR 1.40) and filed within operating rights issued by the Commis­ Repairs, Inc., Glenmont, New York, of 15 days from the date of publication of sion August 5, 1963, under certificate in Certificate No. M C 118632, issued October this notice in the F ederal R egister. No. MC 117696, to Louis Maiello, Flush­ 30, 1959, to Irving A. Klink, doing busi­ ing, N.Y., authorizing the transportation, ness as Sonny’s Garage, Glenmont, N.Y., L o n g - a n d -S h o r t H aul over irregular routes, of homing pigeons, authorizing the transportation over ir­ F S A N o. 38826: Class and commodify] in seasonal operations, during the pe­ regular routes of wrecked and disabled rates from and to Lubec, Marne. Filed] riod extending from March 1 to October motor vehicles, in truckaway service, re­ by Traffic Executive Association-Eastern] 15, of each year, from New York, N.Y., quiring the use of wrecker equipment, Railroads, agent (E.R. No. 2704), fori to Wilmington, Del., Bristol, Pa., and between points in Vermont, New Jersey, interested rail carriers. Rates on various Woodbridge, Rahway, Elizabeth, Tren­ Massachusetts, and Connecticut, on the commodities (except coal and coke and] ton, Princeton, and New Brunswick, N.J. one hand, and, on the other, Syracuse, rates determined on basis of mileage] Morris Honig, 150 Broadway, New York Glenmont, Albany, and New York, N.Y.; scales applying from and to individual] 38, N.Y., attorney for applicants. between points in New York, on the one points), between Lubec, Me., on the one] No. MC-FC 66538. By order of Feb­ hand, and, on the other, New York, N.Y.; hand, and points in the United States] ruary 13, 1964, the Transfer Board ap­ between points in that part of New York, and Canada, on the other. proved the transfer to Lester H. Warfel, on, east, and south of a line beginning Grounds for relief: New station. ] Quarryville, Pa., of the operating rights at the junction of the northern boundary F S A No. 38827: Sheet steel to New OH in certificate in No. MC 44616, issued line of New York, N.Y., and the Hudson leans, La. Filed by Illinois Freight Asso«] September 14,1960 to Benjam in S. W a r­ River, and extending along the east bank ciation, agent (No. 229), for interested fel, Quarryville, Pa., authorizing the of the Hudson River to Albany, N.Y., rail carriers. Rates on lithographed transportation, over irregular routes, of and thence along New York Highway 2 sheet steel, in carloads, from Chicago, agricultural commodities, fertilizer and to the New York-Massachusetts State Chicago Heights, and Joliet, HI., to New] materials, oyster shells, feeds and m er­ line, on the one hand, and, on the other, Orleans, La. J chandise dealt in by retail grocery and points in Vermont, and points in that Grounds for relief: Carrier competH hardware stores, between Peach Bottom, part of Connecticut and Massachusetts Greene, Pen Hill, Hensel, and Texas, Pa., on and west of U.S. Highway 5; and be­ T ariff: Supplement 3 to Hlinois Freigha • ______4. T P f 1033. 1 and Baltimore, Md. Bernard N. Ginge- tween Albany, N.Y.» on the one hand, rich, Quarryville, Pa., applicant’s rep­ and, on the other, points in that part of By the Commission. resentative. Pennsylvania on and east of a line be­ No. M C-FC 66596. By order of Febru­ ginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey [ s e a l ] H arold D. M cC o y , Secretary. 1 ary 13, 1964, the Transfer Board ap­ State line and extending along U.S. proved the transfer to Rue O. Hough, Highway 611 to Scranton, Pa., and thence [F.R. Doc. 64-1739; Filed, Feb. 20, 1964;i Underwood, Iowa, of certificate in No. along UJS. Highway 11 to the Pennsyl­ 8:50 a.m.] tFriday, February 21, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2665

CUMULATIVE CODIFICATION GUIDE— FEBRUARY The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published to date during February.

3 CFR . Pa8e 7 CFR— Continued Page 9 CFR— Continued Page P roclamations: P roposed R u l e s — Continued P roposed R u l e s : I 3572______1717 1033 ______2002, 2349, 2460 17— ______- ______1696 3573...... 23 27 1034 ______2002, 2349, 2460 18— ______1657,1696, 2560 3574 ------2475 1035 ______2002,2349, 2460, 2462 27______1696 E xecutive O rd ers: 1036 ______2002,2460,2462 76______2606 Nov. 26, 1921 (See P L O 3326) _ 2423 1037 ______2002, 2460 Apr. 4, 1922 (See P L O 3326) — 2423 1038 ______2102, 2460 12 CFR Apr. 17, 1926 (See P L O 3326) - 2423 1039 ______.>______1______2102, 2460 1______2419 Peb. 23,1928 (See P L O 3323) _ 1723 1040 ___ 2002, 2460, 2462 9_____ L______1719 9993 (See EO 11140)------1637 1041.______2002, 2460, 2462 204______1796, 2447 10031 (See EO 11140) ______1637 1042 ______2002,2460, 2462 210______2447 10280 (See EO 11140)______1637 1043 ______2002, 2460, 2462 213____ 2448 10354 (See EO 11140)______1637 1044— ______2002, 2460 215______— ______— 2448 10497 (See EO 11140)______1637 1045 ______2102, 2460 13 CFR 1046 ______2002, 2460 10506 (See EO 11140)______1637 120— ______— 2486 1047 _.______2002,2460, 2462 10810 (See EO 11142)______1^2479 121______— ______2593 10881 (See EO 11142)______2479 1048 ______2002, 2460, 2463 11140 _ 16 3 7 1049 ______1656,2002, 2460, 2463 14 CFR 11141 ______2 4 7 7 1050 ______2102, 246044______1719 11142 ______2479 1051.______* ______2102,2460 71 [N éW l______1841-1844, 5 CFR 1061 ______2102, 2460 2306-2308, 2336, 2337, 2419, 2420, 1062 ______2102, 2460, 2463, 2651 2487, 2488, 2593, 2594. 213.. ______— 1835,1836, 2301 1063 ______2102, 2460 73 [N e w ]______2594 352______2301 1064 ______2102, 2460 93 [N e w ]______2556 511______— ______2447 1065 ______2204, 2461 97 [N e w ]____ 2.____ 1781,1845, 2369, 2631 534______:______2447 1066 ______2204, 2461, 2463 129 [N e w ]— ______1719 539______2377 1067 ______2102, 2460, 2463 133 [N e w ]______1850 591.. . . ______2447 1068 ...... ______2102, 2460 221______2556 7 CFR 1069 ______2102, 2460 507______— 1680, 5_____ 2641 1070 ------2102, 2460 1721, 1850, 2309, 2338, 2377, 2557, 26______2593 1074— — ______2204, 2461 2594, 2641. 51------1794, 2555 1072 ______2204, 2461, 2463 P roposed R u l e s : 52.------2481, 2483 1073 ______2204, 2461 1— ...... — ______2349 319------2329 1074 ______2204, 2461 4b______1692 401------1795, 2642 1075.______2204, 2461, 2463 11______2467 722....------2301, 2302 1076------— ______2204, 2461 71 [N e w ]______1693-1696, 724______1639.1641 1078— ______2102, 2460 2312, 2350-2353, 2505-2509, 2560, 775 ------2302, 2485 1079_____ r ______2102, 2460 2607,2608. 776 ------2329 1090_____ 2002, 2460, 2463 75 [N e w ]______2509 868______2330 1094______2102, 2460 99 [N e w ]______2560 905______2303 2304 1096 ______2102, 2460,2463 231______2652 907 -- 1642,1643, 1719, 2304, 2485] 2643 1097 ___ 2102, 2460 241______— 1658,1737 908 ------2643, 2644 1098— ______2002,2460, 2463 292______2652 ¡5______2644 1099______2102, 2460 302— ______2652 * ®...... 1643, 2305, 2486, 2645 1101 ______2002,2460,2463 507______1739, 1102 ______2102, 2460 2313,2509,2561, 2609, 2651 1103 ______2102, 2460, 2461 £ ------2646 1104 ------i___ 2204, 2461 15 CFR m l ------— " 2331 1105— ______2102, 2460, 2461 365______2595 370 ______2449 L464------2305 1106 ______2204,2461 ¡Proposed Rules: 1107 ______2102,2460,2461 371______2338, 2449 373______2338, 2449 7 2 9 .. ------2466 1108 ______2102, 2460 377______2449 7 3 0 .. ------1853 1120______2204, 2461,2464 379 ______— 2449 9 1 6 .. ______1736 1125 ______2204,2461,2464 380 ______2449 9 8 7 .. — ______1737 1126 ______2204, 2461, 2464, 2465 . . 399______2450 1001 ______1646 1127 ------2204, 2461 1002. ______1646 1128 ______2204,2461,2464 16 CFR 1003. 1129 ------2204, 2461,2464 1646.2002, 2460 13______1644, 1004. 1130 ______2204,2461,2464 ______1646 1721, 1796-1799, 2339, 2341, 2379- 1005. 1131 ------—— ______2204, 2461,2464 _____ 2002, 2460 2381, 2450, 2451,2488-2490, 2595- 1006. 1132 ______:1 .:______2204,2461,2464 ------1646 2597. 1007. 1133 ------2204, 2461, 2464 ______1646 P roposed R u l e s : 1008. 1134______2204, 2461, 2465 2002.2460.2461 67______2428, 2610 1009. 2002.2460.2462 1135 ------2204, 2461, 2465 1011. 303______2429 _____ 2002,2460 1136 ---- -i.______2204, 2461 1013. _____ 2002,2460 1137 ______2204, 2461, 2465 17 CFR 1014., ______1646 1138 ______1656, 2204, 2461,230 2465 ____ 2420 1015 ______1646 231 ____ 2490 1016.. 9 CFR 1646.2002, 2460 240______2420 1030.. 29------1679 _____ 2102,2460 250______2420 1031. 74------1851, 2378 2102.2460.2462 78------1679,1719 260— 2420 1032.. _____ 2102,2460 201------1795 270______2420 2666 FEDERAI REGISTER

Page 18 CFR Pftge 29 CFR 43 CFR— Continued Page] 141______2494 526______1722 P u b l ic L and O rders: 260______2494 531______3012______2332 2424 P roposed R ttles: 782______3321 ______1840 1722 141______2512 3322 ______17231 260______2512 30 CFR 3323 ______1723Î Ch. m ______2312 P roposed R u l e s : 3324 ______14______2344 2423 19 CFR 3325 _a.______2423 31 CFR 3326 ______2423 I ------2333, 2598 3327 ______3— ______2335 316-_____ 1645 2424 3328 ______2448 I I ------2335 32 CFR 3329 ______18 ______2335 244« 155______------— 2310 3330 ______19-______2336 2449 719______1803 P roposed R u l e s : 21------2336 1001_____ 1680,1836, 2494 161______2427 24______2309, 2336 1002______1837, 2495 31______2336 1003_____ 1681.1838, 2496 46 CFR 20 CFR 1005______1838 171______1690, 1691] 309______1______25 __ 2599 1007_____ 1682.1838, 2499 ------25581 P roposed R ules: 422______1799 1009______1682 1012 - ______1682, 2500 35______1646 21 CFR 1013 ______1839 45______2426 3------— ------2557 1014 ______2500 78____ 1______1646 8------1801 1015 ______1840 97______164« 19 ------1802, 2539 1016 _ ____ 1840, 2501 534______1853 25------2382 1054_____ 1689,1840, 2501 47 CFR 45------;______2383 1057— ______2502 120------1802 15______------25581 121------2309,2382, 2384, 2540, 2557 32A CFR P roposed R ules: 141d______.______1802 O M A (C h . x r x ) : 1______1660,2647 3______191------*,______1802, 2310 M A -T P M -1 _____ 2648 ______2385] 13— ______P roposed R u l e s : MA-TPM-Del. 1 2649 2647 17------2609 21______2647 33 CFR 23— ______2647 29------1807 202 37______1807 2384 25______2647 203. 61-63______121------1807,1808, 2505 2384 2647 207. 66______146—146c______2505 2384 2647 146e______I______2505 36 CFR 7 3 „ ______1 7 3 9 , 2428,2647 74______311 2510,2647 22 CFR 2422 81______2647] 42------2540 P roposed R u l e s : 83___— ______2647 24 CFR 1______1736, 2453 85______26471 2______87______1808,2647 207______2422 ___ 2456 7____ T______89______...... 2647] 213___ 2422 ___ 2427 91______2647] 221______2422 41 CFR 93______2647 25 CFR 1-5— ______1690 95______2647 131------2541 5-16______2490 97______2647] 221------2494 8- 4— ______1690 49 CFR P roposed R u l e s : 8 -11______1690 120______264® 34...... 2426 9 - 7______1835 170______2543) 221------1736 9-15______1835 205______2559, 2646,2647 9-56______26 CFR 1645 P roposed R u l e s : 14-1______1— ------2599 2452 131______1746! ______2561 P roposed R u l e s : 43 CFR 170______1------I______2342 63______1803 50 CFR 186------1725 101______3 3 ______1691, 201------1725,1852 1805, 2543 140______2338, 2543 1723, 1724, 1805, 1806, 2424,2425, 28 CFR 192______„ „ 2502 2604, 2605. 0______1644 200______2502 260______1840l

Latest Edition in the sériés o f . • • PUBLIC PAPERS OF THE PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES John F. Kennedy, 1962

Contains verbatim transcripts of the President’s news conferences and speeches and full texts of messages to Congress and other materials released by the White House during the period January 1-December 31, 1962. Among the 557 items in the bode are: special messages to the Congress on education, national health needs, and foreign aid; reports to the American people concerning the state of the national economy, nuclear testing and dis­ armament, and the Cuban crisis; joint statements with leaders of foreign gov­ ernments; and a special interview with representatives of the radio and television networks in which the President reviewed some of the highlights of his first 2 years in office. A valuable reference source for scholars, reporters of current affairs and the j io 8 pages P r ic e : events of history, historians, librarians, and Government officials.

VOLUM ES of PUBLIC PAPERS of the PRESIDENTS currently available: Contents:

HARRY S. TRUMAN: • Messages to the Congress 1945______$5.50 • Pnblie speeches 1946______$6.00 1947______— $5.25 « News conferences D W IG H T D. EISENHOWER: • Radio and television reports to the 1953------$6.75 1957______$6.75 American people 1954------______$7.25 1958------___ $8.25 1955_____------$6.75 1959------___ $7.00 • Remarks to Informal groups 1956------...... $7.25 1960-61-______$7.75 • Public letters JO H N F. K E N N E D Y: 1961— ______— $9.00 1962______$9.00

Volumes are published annually, soon after the close of each year. Order from the: Superintendent o f Documents# Earlier volumes are being issued periodically, beginning with 1945. Government Printing Office# Washington, D.C., 20402