DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Record-House. 10~9

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congressional Record-House. 10~9 1903. CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE. 10~9 These figures, in connection with others that I have quoted dur­ Repm·t of salmon canneries in Alaska to1· the year 1901-Continued. ing the course of these remarks, are of sufficient magnitude to show that the trade and colli-Derce and productions of Alaska Name of cannery. Owned by- Location. Oases. Value. have passed beyond infantile and experimental stage Hereafter no statement of our nation's trade, her commerce, or Taku Harbor Can- San Juan Fishing Talm Harbor .. 25,500 $16,500 h er r ~s8urc e s will be complete that does not include the T~ryitory nery. and Packing Co. of Alaska. V Ugashuk River _______ Red Salmon Pack- UgashukRiver 8,500 28,000 FISHIXG INDUSTRY OF ALASKA. ing Co. Nusbagak Cannery .. Columbia River Nushaguk 24,284 86,612 The general public living outsiue of Alaska have no adequate Packing .Ass'n. River. conception of the magnitude .of the fishing industry and fish­ Nushaguk Saltery ____ Alaska Fishing and ...... do--------- 5,287 17,000 canning operations in Alaska. Canned salmon is now recognized Tonka. Cannery_------ P.Pc~~~.Y,~·co ___ Wrangell N ar-_ 19,432 60,632 e>erywhere as one of the staple food products of the world. rows. Alaska probably produces nine-tenths of the canned-salmon prod­ Kell Bay Cannery ____ Union P. Co ____ ---- Kell Bay---···- 20, 1)89 68,000 Lake Bay Cannery ___ Cross Sound P. Co. 18,84.9 36,212 net of the world, and a very superior quality of fish it is, too. Metlakahtla Cannery. Mctlakahtla Indus. ·hO:Ja~:Kuo.·=== 23,000 09,000 I attach hereto certain statistics regarding the salmon industry Co. of Alaska, and the location of the salmon canneries of Alaska. NushagakR. Cannery· Alaska-Portland Nushagak 20,667 74,4.00 P.A. Rive!". The statement for the year 1891 is quite complete, but, as the Do.-----_----- ____ Alaska Salmon _____ do_----- ____ 17,700 63,720 Treasury Department are now making up the report for the year Ass'n. of 1902, I can only attach a summary of the report fo1· the year Nnshagak R. Saltery. C.E.Whitncy&Co . ...•. do-·-------- 20,5~0 65,000 Ideal Cove Saltery ___ Muir Glacier P. Co. Ideal Cove _____ 1,76:5 5,300 last past. Saakaar Salterli ___ .. _ C. F. Brockman--·- Saakaar ________ 525 2,320 An examination of these figures show that in the year 1891 this Thorne Ba-y Sa tery __ R. C. Bell ___________ Thorne Bay ____ 1,M.:o 4 8H5 single industry in Alaska put out a product whose aggregate value Point Barrie Saltery _ F. C. Sepp ---------- Point Barrie. __ 467 1:12'.3 Etoline Island Saltery J.O.Frey ---------- Etoline Island_ 185 648 amounted to almost $7,000,000, while there was an increase this McHenry Inlet Salt- J. 0. Oallbreath ____ McHem-y Inlet 480 1,800 last year of $1,741,506, making the aggregate value of their prod­ uct for the year 1902 $8,667,673. s!i{b. Arm Saltery .. Jacob Louth.-----· Moira Sound. __ 216 1, 7?.6 Eagle Harbor Saltery Oliver Smith--··-- Eagle Harbor .. 1,375 3,750 These figures give some idea of the magnitude of this one in­ Copper Harbor Salt- Craig Millar---·--- Coppor Harbor 1,760 5,500 dustry. Surely a land that is producing such great results in this ery. line of industry is entitled to be represented on this floor, in order PritchardsCove Fish- Great Northern Union Bay _____ --------- --------- that this industry may be suitably protected and safeguarded, ery. Fishmq Co. Beechers Pass Can- R~er-"V arnockP. Beechers Pass _ --------- -- ..................... when we are considering legislation in reference thereto. nery. 0. Port Althorpe Saltery Perrl Hinkle ______ Port Althorpe _ --·------ Report of salmon canneries in Alaska for the year 1901. Bartlett Bay Cannery Icy Straits P. Co __ Bartlett Bay __ . --------- Talrn Point Fishe:i)" __ ____ .do _____ --------- Ta.ku Inlet _____ Sundry (estimated __ Salteries not re- 5,000 17,500 Name of cannery. Owned by- Location. Cases. Value. ported. ----·- ------ ---·-- ------ TotaL. _________ 2,076,661 6, 028,167 Bristol Bay Canning Alaska Packers' Nus hag a k --------- --------- ------ ·-··-- -- ... ------- ------ ---·-------- Oo. Assocmtion. River. Alaska Packing Co ________ do-------------- _____ do---------- 180,080 $GOO, 916 Arctic Packing Co ____ ..••. do------------·- _____ do---------------------------- TREASURY DEPARTMENT, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY, Do----------------- _____ do-------------- Naknek River_ 75,430 264,320 DmBION OF SPEOIAL AGENTS, Gun.rd:ian Cannery--- _____ do ___________________ do __________ ------------------ Washington, Janua,-y 16, lfJ03. UgashukFishing Sta ______ dO---·---------- Uga.shuk River 40,864 ll0,029 Ron. FRANCIS W. CUSHMAN, M. 0., Bering Sea Cannery _______ do-------------- _____ do------ .•.. --------- --------- Washington, D. C. Point Roberts Pack- .•••. dO---·---------- Kogginng ______ 107,84.0 377,728 DEAR S1R: Responding to yotrr request I herewith hand you the S!l.lient ing Co. (2). figures of tho salmon pack of Alaska for the season of 1902: Tot..'l.l number of Hor~hoe F. and M. _____ do---·---------- _____ do---··------·---------------- canneries, 64i....,.total number of salteries, 18, located all a~ong the coast of Co. Alaska from wales Island, southeast Alaska, to Bristol Bay (Bering Sea), a Egagek Fishing Sta __ .....do-------------- Egagek -------- 31,740 ll0,090 distance, in round numbers, of 3,000 mil s. Total number of salmon taken, Chignik Bay Pack. Co. _____ do-------------- Chignik Bay___ 40,681 14.~,882 36,265,056; total number of cases, 2,558,297· total number of barrels, 25,384; A.litakPacking Co---- ••••. do ______________ Alitak__________ 41,614 145,049 total valuation, $8,667,673; total tax payable, $105,808.13; increase this year.\ Karluk Packing Co ________ do------------- Karluk_________ 196,667 690,311 9 canneries and 12 salteries; total capitalization~ $'.25.799,500j valuation or Alaska Improvement _____ do---·---------- _____ do----··---- --------- --------- plants, $6,406,750; total number of hands employea, 13,822, whites, 7,5H7; Chi­ Co. nese, 5,366; natives, 2,675; wages paid $4,000,~; tin pla.te used, $1,383,680; ves­ Arctic Fishing Co---- _____ do---···---··-·- Kussilof _______ _ 31,082 108,787 sels employed, 19:3, steamers, 125, sail, GS,i increase of pack over ~ast year, Pacific Packing Co--- _____ do-------------- Odiak ---------- 40,665 142,3'27 5M,65!lca.ses; increase of value of output, ::;1,741,506. ptf:.mid Harbor Pg. _____ do-------------- P~~d liar- 30,709 107,481 Respectfully, yours, H. M. KUTCHIN, ' Special Agent. Glacier Packing Co ... _____ do-------------- Wrangell______ 59,027 177,081 A~~~almon and .•.•. do-------------- Loring--------· 89,423 2G5,839 Speaking of the salmon industry of Alaska, I desire to call to Whalers' Chignik Pac.P.andNav.Co ChignikBay .. _ 85,516 117,203 the attention of this House, as a most forcible illustration of the Canne~ need for a Delegate from Alaska on this floor, a little recent his­ Hume C 'gnik Can- -----do-------------- _____ do---------- 29,927 104,838 ne:ry. tory: During the first session of this present Congress the gentle­ Orca Cannery-------- _____ do ______________ Orca----------- 00,530 120,549 man from New York [Mr. SULZER] called up before this House Renal Ca.nne~---·--- _____ do ______________ Kenai---------- 17,025 59,152 for consideration a bill which he claimed with great force and Whalers' Uya Can- .....do-------------· Uyak Bay--···- 50,593 166,007 if nery. earnestness was destined, enacted into law, to protect and en­ Hume Ur._ak Oannery •.•• _do-------------- _____ do---·-- ___ _ 83,479 ll7,221 courage the salmon industry in Alaska and replenish the supply Huntersnay.Oannery _____ do------------·- Hunters Bay __ _ 62,000 185,000 of that most valuable fish. The bill was most violently attacked NushagaklhverCan- -----dO-------------- Nus hag a k 76,774 257,192 nery. River. on this floor. I do not pause at this time to undertake to prove QuadraBayCannery_ ..•.. do-------------- QuadraBay ___ _ 35,141 105, (XX) that the bill was good or that it was bad. Petersburg Cannery. _____ do-----------·-- Petersburg ___ _ 58,500 2'26,200 The point I make is that while we were trying to discuss that Sitkoh Bay Cannery_ ..... do-------------- Sitkoh Bay---· 60,000 171,900 bill on this floor half a dozen members spoke on each side of Sant::.t. Rita Cannery ....... do-------------- Dundas Bay __ _ 21,750 70,000 Talru Fish Co. Can- -----dO--------·--··- Port Snet- 14,574 47,712 this question, each one giving his version of the conditions that nery:. tisham. existed in Alaska; each of these statements were widely at vari­ Taku Pack. Co. Can- _____ do--·----·------ Taku Inlet..... 27,000 78,000 ance with the others, and could not all have been correct; and ncry. yet each member relied on his understanding of conditions in ¥~~ret ca::a~~ Pi~- =====~g ==~====:::::: =~~l~~~~~: 19,39726 536 Alaska as his justi:Q.cation for his vote on that measure. Now, Cannery. • no one can blame this House if we make a mistake when we have Thlinket8ant&Anna -----dO---···-------- SantaAnnaln- 24,983 87,4-W Cannery. let. acted according to the best light we have. But when we have an 0 87,500 opportunity to get more light and fail to avail ourselves of it, ~;Jclf!Ir ~~ryc~n.:· -NortA.~'k8:sa.i:- I~c~k":River: ~:~ 81,550 then we lay ourselves open to the just criticism of mankind. nery,No.1. mon Co. KvicliaJ;: River Can- _____ do __ ------------ _____ do------____ 23,4.00 81,900 On the occasion of that debate if we had had a well-informed nery.No.2. Delegate from Alaska on this floor, think how much light he could Naknek Cannery ____ _ Naknek Pack.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In the United States District Court for the District of Alaska
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA ERIC FLORES, Petitioner, vs. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Case No. 2:15-cv-00002-SLG Respondents. ORDER OF DISMISSAL On April 24, 2015, Eric Flores, a self-represented resident of Texas, filed a class action Petition to Challenge the Constitutionality of the First Amendment, an Application to Waive Prepayment of the Filing Fee, and a Motion to Transfer his case to the District of Columbia.1 Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1915 requires the Court to review the action, and to dismiss if the action “(i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.”2 1 Dockets 1, 3, 5, 6. 2 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 n. 10 (9th Cir. 2000) (“Congress inserted 1915(e)(2) into the in forma pauperis statute, and we must follow this clear statutory direction.”); Calhoun v. Stahl, 254 F.3d 845 (9th Cir. 2001) (“The district court . properly concluded that Calhoun’s [non-prisoner] complaint should not be allowed to proceed. See 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(iii) (requiring dismissal of in forma pauperis proceedings that seek monetary relief against immune defendants).”); Bilal v. Driver, 251 F.3d 1346, 1348 (11th Cir. 2001) (Under section § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) . “dismissal is now mandatory. [T]he complaint now may .
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC LAW 85-508-JULY 7, 1958 339 Public Law 85-508 an ACT to Provide for the Admission of the State of Alaska Into the Union
    i2 STAT.] PUBLIC LAW 85-508-JULY 7, 1958 339 Public Law 85-508 AN ACT July 7, 1958 To provide for the admission of the State of Alaska into the Union. ta R. 7999—] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Alaska, siaie- United States of America in Congress assemhled. That, subject to the hood. provisions of this Act, and upon issuance of the proclamation required by section 8 (c) of this Act, the State of Alaska is hereby declared to be a State of the United States of America, is declared admitted into the Union on an equal footing with the other States in all respects whatever, and the constitution formed pursuant to the provisions of the Act of the Territorial Legislature of Alaska entitled, "An Act to provide for the holding of a constitutional convention to prepare a constitution for the State of Alaska; to submit the con­ stitution to the people for adoption or rejection; to prepare for the admission of Alaska as a State; to make an appropriation; and setting an effective date", approved March 19, 1955 (Chapter 46, Session Laws of Alaska, 1955), and adopted by a vote of the people of Alaska in the election held on April 24, 1956, is hereby found to be republican in form and in conformity with the Constitution of the United States and the principles of the Declaration of Independence, and is hereby accepted, ratified, and confirmed. SEC. 2. The State of Alaska shall consist of all the territory, Territory,, together with the territorial waters appurtenant thereto, now included in the Territory of Alaska, SEC.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Seal and Fur Company. Letter from the Secretary of the Interior
    University of Oklahoma College of Law University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 5-4-1888 Alaska Seal and Fur Company. Letter from the Secretary of the Interior, transmitting the Annual Report of the Governor of Alaska upon the operations of the Alaska Seal and Fur Company. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/indianserialset Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation H.R. Exec. Doc. No. 297, 50th Cong., 1st Sess. (1888) This House Executive Document is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 by an authorized administrator of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 50TH CoNGRESS, L HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. J Ex. Doc. 1st Session. f t No. 297. ALASKA SEAL AND FUR COMPANY. LETTER FROM THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, TRANSMITTING The annual report of the governor of Alaska upon the operations of the Alaska Seal and Fur Company. MAY 4, 1888.-Referred to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries and ordered to be printed. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Washington, May 2, 1888. SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith a report to Congress by the governor of Alaska of the result of his inquiry into the operations of the Alaska Seal and Fur Company (Alaska Commercial Company), as required of him by sectiou5 of the act of May 17, 1884, entitled "An act providing a civil government for Alaska." Very respectfully, WM.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court District of Alaska 222 W. 7Th Avenue, Box 4, Rm 229 Anchorage, Alaska 99513
    United States District Court District of Alaska 222 W. 7th Avenue, Box 4, Rm 229 Anchorage, Alaska 99513 www.akd.uscourts.gov Position: Case Administrator II, Job# USDC 20-02 (Permanent, Part-time) (20 hours per week) Opening Date: August 26, 2020 Closing Date: September 9, 2020, or open until filled Starting Salary: $23,654 - $38,475 (CL 25, Step 1-61)* *Depending on qualifications and experience Location: Fairbanks, Alaska The United States District Court for the District of Alaska is seeking qualified applicants for the position of Case Administrator in Fairbanks, Alaska. The Case Administrator monitors the progression of civil and criminal cases and related proceedings. They receive and review incoming court documents with conformity with federal and local rules, and perform customer service and cashier duties for the purpose of providing procedural information and collection court fees. REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES: • Open and process new appeals and appeal related documents. Process opinions and close appeals. Make summary entries on all documents and proceedings. • Check for prior or prohibited filing. Verify attorney’s authority to practice. • Inform customers of required fees, receive payments and issue receipts. Process credit card payments for filed documents. • Create and process new case files. Docket initial events. Retrieve files and make copies of records for court personnel, attorneys or others. Certify court documents and ensure data quality. • Prepare, ship, and retrieve records from the appropriate Federal Records Center. Scan, copy, file and pick-up, and sort mail. Process e-mail received by electronic filers. Maintain court files. • Assist the public with electronic filing. Answer calls assisting attorneys and pro se litigants with filing questions and case status.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska TABLE of CONTENTS
    United States Sentencing Commission Statistical Information Packet Fiscal Year 2018 District of Alaska TABLE OF CONTENTS Figure A Federal Offenders by Type of Crime 1 Figure B Distribution of Primary Drug Type in Federal Drug Cases 2 Table 1 Distribution of Federal Offenders by Type of Crime 3 Table 2 Guilty Pleas and Trials in Each Circuit and District 4 Table 3 Guilty Pleas and Trials by Type of Crime 7 Table 4 Sentence Type by Type of Crime (National) 8 Table 5 Sentence Type by Type of Crime (District) 9 Table 6 Incarceration Rate of U.S. Citizen Offenders Eligible for Non-Prison Sentences by Type of Crime 10 Table 7 Sentence Length by Type of Crime 11 Table 8 Sentence Imposed Relative to the Guideline Range 12 Table 9 Sentence Imposed Relative to the Guideline Range in Each Circuit and District 13 Table 10 Sentence Imposed Relative to the Guideline Range by Type of Crime 16 Figure A FEDERAL OFFENDERS BY TYPE OF CRIME1 Fiscal Year 2018 National Drugs 28.1% Immigration 34.4% Firearms 10.8% Fraud/Theft/ Embezzlement Child 9.5% Pornography 2.0% Robbery Other 2.5% Money Sexual Abuse Laundering 9.2% 1.5% 1.9% Alaska Fraud/Theft/ Embezzlement 15.2% Robbery Drugs 4.6% 34.0% Money Laundering 4.6% Other 6.1% Sexual Abuse 2.5% Child Pornography 9.6% Firearms 23.4% The National figure includes the 69,425 cases reported to the Commission. The Drugs category includes trafficking and simple possession. The District of Alaska figure includes the 197 cases reported to the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • DISTRICT of ALASKA June 14, 2018
    DISTRICT OF ALASKA June 14, 2018 DISTRICT OF ALASKA’S REPORT TO THE NINTH CIRCUIT (2017-2018) By Mary B. Pinkel, LRCC Alaska Representative LAWYER REPRESENTATIVES The District of Alaska has four lawyer representatives: Andrea Hattan, an Assistant United States Attorney in Anchorage; Jamie McGrady, an Assistant Federal Defender in Anchorage; Richard Monkman, a private practitioner in Juneau; and Mary Pinkel, an Assistant Attorney General for the State of Alaska in Anchorage. Darrel Gardner, an Assistant Federal Defender, serves as the chair of the Lawyers Representative Coordinating Committee (LRCC) for the Ninth Circuit and as the Vice-President of the Federal Bar Association of the Ninth Circuit. Contact information for the Alaska District’s Lawyer Representatives is as follows: (1) Andrea Hattan, Assistant United States Attorney; (907) 271-5071; [email protected]; (2) Jamie McGrady, Assistant Federal Defender; (907) 646-3400; [email protected]; (3) Richard Monkman; (907)586-5880; [email protected]; and (4) Mary Pinkel, Assistant Attorney General; (907) 269-5190; [email protected]. JUDICIAL NEWS The Alaska District Court, under the leadership of Chief Judge Timothy Burgess, is in the planning process for a new courthouse, is revising both the local civil and criminal rules, and is in the process of hiring a new full-time Magistrate Judge. Judge Sharon Gleason has been working steadfastly with a local committee of attorneys to revise the local civil rules. She anticipates that the draft proposed new rules will be circulated for comment later this summer and that the revised rules will be in place by December 1, 2018, the date amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure become effective.
    [Show full text]
  • Opioid & Stimulant Fact Sheet
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: KARA MCCARTHY, 202-307-1241 FRIDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2020 [email protected] OPIOID & STIMULANT FACT SHEET JUSTICE DEPARTMENT AWARDS MORE THAN $340 MILLION TO COMBAT OPIOID AND STIMULANT CRISES The Department of Justice’s Office of Justice Programs awarded grants totaling more than $340 million to help fight the addiction crisis looming over the United States, dramatically impacting crime victims, children, families, first responders and communities at large. Four components within OJP – the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA), the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), the Office for Victims of Crime (OVC) and the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) – provided funds to address the opioid and stimulant crisis. The following grants were awarded to help fight this crisis: Comprehensive Opioid, Stimulant, and Substance Abuse Site-based and Harold Rogers Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs BJA awarded 110 grants totaling more than $147 million to jurisdictions under BJA’s Comprehensive Opioid, Stimulant, and Substance Abuse Site-based Program, which provides financial and technical assistance to state, local and tribal jurisdictions to reduce opioid and stimulant abuse and fatalities, and mitigate impacts on crime victims. Authorized by the 2016 Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act, these programs offer grant awards across three focus areas. Category 1 encourages and supports the development of comprehensive, locally driven responses to the opioid and stimulant epidemics that expand access to supervision, treatment and recovery support services across the criminal justice system; support law enforcement and other first responder diversion programs for non-violent drug offenders; promote education and prevention activities; and address the needs of children impacted by the opioid and stimulant epidemics.
    [Show full text]
  • PSN in Practice II
    PSN in Practice II TABLE OF CONTENTS MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 1 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 3 DISTRICT OF ALASKA 4 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 DISTRICT OF COLORADO 15 DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT 16 DISTRICT OF DELAWARE 19 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 20 MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 22 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 23 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 25 MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 27 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 28 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 30 DISTRICTS OF GUAM AND THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS 31 DISTRICT OF HAWAII 32 DISTRICT OF IDAHO 33 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 35 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 36 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 37 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 38 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 39 NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN DISTRICTS OF IOWA 40 DISTRICT OF KANSAS 41 EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY 42 WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY 43 EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 44 MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 46 WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 47 DISTRICT OF MAINE 49 DISTRICT OF MARYLAND 50 DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS 52 EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 54 WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 56 DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA 57 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI 58 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI 60 EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI 61 WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI 62 DISTRICT OF MONTANA 63 DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA 64 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 65 DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 66 DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
    [Show full text]
  • Black History in the Last Frontier
    Black History in the Last History Black Frontier Black History Black History in the Last Frontier provides a chronologically written narrative to encompass the history of African Americans in in the Last Frontier Alaska. Following an evocative foreword from activist and community organizer, Ed Wesley, the book begins with a discussion of black involvement in the Paciÿc whaling industry during the middle and late-nineteenth century. It then discusses how the Gold Rush and the World Wars shaped Alaska and brought thousands of black migrants to the territory. °e ÿnal chapters analyze black history in Alaska in our contemporary era. It also presents a series of biographical sketches of notable black men and women who passed through or settled in Alaska and contributed to its politics, culture, and social life. °is book highlights the achievements and contributions of Alaska’s black community, while demonstrating how these women and men have endured racism, fought injustice, and made a life and home for themselves in the forty-ninth state. Indeed, what one then ÿnds in this book is a history not well known, a history of African Americans in the last frontier. Ian C. Hartman / Ed Wesley C. Hartman Ian National Park Service by Ian C. Hartman University of Alaska Anchorage With a Foreword by Ed Wesley Black History in the Last Frontier by Ian C. Hartman With a Foreword by Ed Wesley National Park Service University of Alaska Anchorage 1 Hartman, Ian C. Black History in the Last Frontier ISBN 9780996583787 National Park Service University of Alaska Anchorage HIS056000 History / African American Printed in the United States of America Edited by Kaylene Johnson Design by David Freeman, Anchorage, Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • USTP Marijuana Enforcement Actions by District and Chapter for Quarter 2
    USTP Marijuana Enforcement Actions Formal Actions Informal Inquiries District Chapter 7 Chapter 11 Chapter 12 Chapter 13 All Chapter 7 Chapter 11 Chapter 12 Chapter 13 All District of Alaska 0000010001 District of Arizona 0000000000 Eastern District of Arkansas 0000000000 Western District of Arkansas 0000000000 Central District of California 0000000000 Eastern District of California 0000000000 Northern District of California 0000000000 Southern District of California 0000000000 District of Colorado 1103500011 District of Connecticut 0000000000 District of Columbia 0000000000 District of Delaware 0000000000 Middle District of Florida 0000000000 Northern District of Florida 0000000000 Southern District of Florida 0000000000 Middle District of Georgia 0000000000 Northern District of Georgia 0000000000 Southern District of Georgia 0000000000 District of Guam 0000000000 District of Hawaii 0000000000 District of Idaho 0000000000 Central District of Illinois 0000000000 Northern District of Illinois 0000000000 Southern District of Illinois 0000000000 Northern District of Indiana 0000000000 Southern District of Indiana 0000000000 Northern District of Iowa 0000000000 Southern District of Iowa 0000000000 1 USTP Marijuana Enforcement Actions Formal Actions Informal Inquiries District Chapter 7 Chapter 11 Chapter 12 Chapter 13 All Chapter 7 Chapter 11 Chapter 12 Chapter 13 All District of Kansas 0000000000 Eastern District of Kentucky 0000000000 Western District of Kentucky 0000000000 Eastern District of Louisiana 0000000000 Middle District of Louisiana
    [Show full text]
  • Page 21 TITLE 28—JUDICIARY and JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 81
    Page 21 TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 81 EFFECTIVE DATE All references to fixed terms of holding court were also omitted in order to vest in each district court a Section effective Oct. 26, 1978, see section 604 of Pub. wider discretion and greater flexibility in the disposi- L. 95–521, set out as a note under section 591 of this tion of its business. Such times will now be determined title. by rule of court rather than by statute. See sections 138 CHAPTER 5—DISTRICT COURTS and 141 of this title. AMENDMENTS Sec. 81. Alabama. 1982—Pub. L. 97–164, title I, § 115(c)(3), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 81A. Alaska. Stat. 32, struck out item 142 ‘‘Accommodations at 82. Arizona. places for holding court’’. 83. Arkansas. 1963—Pub. L. 88–139, § 3(a), Oct. 16, 1963, 77 Stat. 248, 84. California. substituted ‘‘Terms abolished’’ for ‘‘Times for holding 85. Colorado. regular terms’’ in item 138, ‘‘Times for holding regular 86. Connecticut. sessions’’ for ‘‘Term continued until terminated’’ in 87. Delaware. item 139, and ‘‘sessions’’ for ‘‘terms’’ in item 141. 88. District of Columbia. 1958—Pub. L. 85–508, § 12(a), July 7, 1958, 72 Stat. 348, 89. Florida. added item 81A. 90. Georgia. SHORT TITLE OF 1978 AMENDMENT 91. Hawaii. 92. Idaho. For short title of Pub. L. 95–408, Oct. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 93. Illinois. 883, as ‘‘Federal District Court Organization Act of 94. Indiana. 1978’’, see note set out under section 1 of this title. 95. Iowa. 96. Kansas. § 81. Alabama 97. Kentucky. Alabama is divided into three judicial districts 98.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Rules (Civil)
    United States District Court District of Alaska Local Civil Rules [Effective December 7, 2018] Contents Local Civil Rule 1.1 Scope and Purpose of Local Rules/Definitions/Civility..................... 1 (a) Scope and Purpose ......................................................................................... 1 (b) Definitions ....................................................................................................... 1 (c) Civility .............................................................................................................. 2 Local Civil Rule 1.2 Access and Citation to Local Rules ................................................. 3 (a) Availability ....................................................................................................... 3 (b) Amendments ................................................................................................... 3 (c) Official Rules ................................................................................................... 3 (d) Citation ............................................................................................................ 3 Local Civil Rule 3.1 Commencement of an Action .......................................................... 3 (a) Civil Cover Sheet ............................................................................................ 3 (b) Identification of Related Cases ........................................................................ 3 (c) Fees/Waiver of Fees ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]