2014 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL Scorecard

2014 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL scorecard

second Session of the 113th Congress

LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS scorecard.lcv.org LCV Board of directors *

JOHN H. ADAMS GEORGE T. FRAMPTON, JR. REUBEN MUNGER Natural Resources Defense Council Covington & Burling, LLP Vision Ridge Partners, LLC PAUL AUSTIN WADE GREENE, HONORARY BILL ROBERTS Conservation Minnesota & Rockefeller Family & Associates Corridor Partners, LLC Conservation Minnesota Voter Center RAMPA R. HORMEL LARRY ROCKEFELLER BRENT BLACKWELDER, HONORARY Enlyst Fund American Conservation Association Friends of the Earth JOHN HUNTING, HONORARY THEODORE ROOSEVELT IV, THE HONORABLE SHERWOOD L. John Hunting & Associates HONORARY CHAIR BOEHLERT MICHAEL KIESCHNICK Barclays Capital The Accord Group CREDO Mobile LAURA TURNER SEYDEL, VICE CHAIR THE HONORABLE CAROL BROWNER, MARK MAGAÑA Turner Foundation CHAIR GreenLatinos TRIP VAN NOPPEN Center for American Progress PETE MAYSMITH Earthjustice BRENDON CECHOVIC Conservation Colorado KATHLEEN WELCH Western Conservation Foundation WINSOME MCINTOSH, HONORARY Corridor Partners, LLC CARRIE CLARK The McIntosh Foundation REVEREND LENNOX YEARWOOD North Carolina League of Conservation Voters WILLIAM H. MEADOWS III Hip Hop Caucus MANNY DIAZ The Wilderness Society Lydecker Diaz

LCV Issues & Accountability Committee *

BRENT BLACKWELDER MARK MAGAÑA TRIP VAN NOPPEN Friends of the Earth GreenLatinos Earthjustice THE HONORABLE CAROL BROWNER REUBEN MUNGER WESLEY WARREN Center for American Progress Vision Ridge Partners, LLC Natural Resources Defense Council RUTH HENNIG KERRY SCHUMANN The John Merck Fund Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters

LCV scorecard Advisory Committee *

CAROL ANDRESS MARTY HAYDEN JOSHUA SAKS Environmental Defense Fund Earthjustice National Wildlife Federation ANNA AURILIO CRAIG LASHER BEN SCHREIBER Environment America Population Action International Friends of the Earth ROBERT COWIN ELISE RUSSELL LIGUORI CINDY SHOGAN Union of Concerned Scientists National Parks Conservation Association Alaska Wilderness League ROBERT DEWEY BRIAN MOORE SCOTT SLESINGER Defenders of Wildlife National Audubon Society Natural Resources Defense Council MAUREEN DROUIN MELINDA PIERCE KATE WALL Maine League of Conservation Voters Sierra Club The Humane Society of the United States EDIE GILLISS ALAN ROWSOME Washington Conservation Voters The Wilderness Society

* Organizations are shown for identification purposes only he nonprofit League of Conservation Voters (LCV) has contents published a National Environmental Scorecard every Congress since 1970, the year it was founded by leaders of 1. Analysis the environmental movement following the first Earth Day. LCVT works to turn environmental values into national, state and local Overview of the 2nd priorities. Session of the 113th This edition of the National Environmental Scorecard provides objec- Congress 2 tive, factual information about the most important environmental legis- Voting Summary 4 lation considered and the corresponding voting records of all members of the second session of the 113th Congress. This Scorecard represents the consensus of experts from about 20 respected environmental and con- 2. Senate Scores servation organizations who selected the key votes on which members of Congress should be scored. LCV scores votes on the most important issues Vote Descriptions 8 of the year, including energy, climate change, public health, public lands Senate Votes 10 and wildlife conservation, and spending for environmental programs. The votes included in this Scorecard presented members of Congress with a real choice and help distinguish which legislators are working for environ- 3. House Scores mental protection. Except in rare circumstances, the Scorecard excludes Vote Descriptions 17 consensus action on the environment and issues on which no recorded votes occurred. House Votes 28 Dedicated environmentalists and national leaders volunteered their time to identify and research crucial votes. We extend special thanks to our Board of Directors, Issues & Accountability Committee, and Scorecard Advisory Committee for their valuable input. 20052014 overview Overview

The American public’s growing concern about climate change in 2014 stands in stark contrast to the anti-environment agenda and votes of the U.S. House of Representatives, as detailed in this year’s National Environmental Scorecard. Fortunately, the House’s breathtaking attacks on our air, water, lands, and wildlife were blocked by our allies in the U.S. Senate, who grew even more vocal this year about the urgency of addressing climate change. We were also thrilled by the progress made by Presi- dent Barack Obama, who continued using his executive authority to build on his historic record on climate change and other environmental priorities.

Again this year, the impacts of climate change broke re- Republican leadership of the House has chosen the pol- cords, further motivating the American people to call luters’ agenda. So much so, in fact, that many other 2014 for climate action. 2014 registered as the hottest year on votes warranted inclusion and would have been included in Earth since record-keeping began in 1880, punctuating a a typical year, but did not make the top 35 votes. trend that includes 14 of the 15 hottest years recorded this Just as they did in the last several years, the House seem- century. This warming is just one of the many impacts of ingly left no environmental issue untouched in 2014. There dangerous carbon pollution—including rising sea levels, were attacks on our cornerstone environmental laws, like ocean acidification, and drought in some areas and flood- the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, National Environ- ing in others—each of which was detailed in this year’s mental Policy Act and the Endangered Species Act. There National Climate Assessment, the most comprehensive were votes to legislatively approve the dirty and dangerous and authoritative scientific report ever produced about Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, to dramatically expand climate’s impacts on the United States and our econ- risky oil drilling off our beaches and on public lands, and omy. This growing evidence of climate change helped to prevent new parks from being created. Basic science it- mobilize more than 300,000 people to march this fall self was not spared, as the House voted against an amend- in New York City and tens of thousands more in cities ment affirming the scientific consensus of man-made cli- around the world. mate change and in favor of blocking the EPA’s ability to In spite of these developments, the House of Represen- use the best peer-reviewed science when determining levels tatives continued its assault on the environment for the of pollution that protect public health. While our allies in fourth year in a row. Indeed, the 35 House votes included the Senate successfully blocked these attacks, they serve as in this Scorecard are tied with 2011 and 2012 for the most a harbinger of the anti-environment agenda we can expect votes ever scored, with the second highest total—28 votes— from both chambers of the 114th Congress, now jointly having come in 2013. This is a trend—year after year the led by climate change deniers.

2 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 1. Analysis 3 - - - - - The environmental administration’s progress this year Looking ahead, we remain steadfast in our commit- our in steadfast remain we ahead, Looking - respon are which plants, of fleet existing power nation’s of one-third for gas greenhouse all domestic sible - emis As part commitment to lead sions. of Obama’s President the Unit- change, climate addressing international efforts made a historic joint announcement ed States and China and energy, and clean on climate steps pledging to take to contribution Obama pledged U.S. a $3 billion President Fund to help developing Climate the international Green the impacts ofcountries cope with change. climate limited climate to action.wasn’t and The the EPA Army Corps Engineers of jointly released Rule a Clean Water thatprotect wetlands would and small streams pol from lution or destruction, or lution safeguarding that approxi waters million117 mately Americans clean for on drinking rely And President Obamawater. used his authority pro to tect several stunning landscapes Western as National Monuments and expand the existing Pacific Remote Is lands Marine National Monument into the largest ma rine preserve that in is off the limits world commercial to resource extraction. of challenge the greatest - ment to addressing our time, cli pressing other on progress making as well as change, mate to grateful are We health issues. and public environmental for and the Obama administration our allies in Congress - anti-environ leadership’s opposing the House Republican to stop than ever ment agenda and will count on them more of polluter attacks And the inevitable 114th Congress. the with the Obama to work to continuing look forward we on solutions progress more even to make administration that benefit the American people and the environment. ------is testa is era—fell short the of 60 Citizens United While legis had the the to votes Senate have not may taking histor Obama continued his part, President For Thanks the to stalwart leadership Majority of Leader ment to thement to fact that worthwhile legislation much stood chanceno in the an from opposition of face anti-environ that That not ment minority. attempts say to were is not made. But sense common legislation extend to clean ener gy tax credits reduce or the influence corporationsbig of and other special interest in polluters our elections—a the to anti-environmental contributor major turn Con of gress in the post- needed. votes another or the on environment, way one late that did not ourstop allies in both chambers speaking from more out forcefully than the on ever need address to climate change. thanMore 30 Senatorsthe to took Senate floor in March urgeto action climate on change as part a historic, of all- night session dubbed “Up At Climate.” rally a May for in the Senate, hundreds attendees of and than more 30 Members Congress of all programmed their smartphones ringto simultaneously symbolically to “Sound the Alarm Climate for Action.” - other envi and advance change climate ic steps to address Agen- Protection Environmental The priorities. ronmental ambitious proposal issued a common sense yet cy (EPA) the first for Plan to establish, as the Clean Power known our national limits on carbon pollution from time ever, Harry Reid, the most of House-passed anti-environment legislation reached never the Senate floor. attacksThose defeated, were thatas such a bill a vote did ap for to come the XL Keystone prove pipeline. Indeed, the small number included votes inof this Senate Scorecard year’s

| scorecard.lcv.org · LCV Scorecard Environmental National 2014 Voting Summary

2014 state averages

STATE SENATE HOUSE Alabama 10 13 Alaska 20 3 Arizona 20 48 Arkansas 40 4 California 80 66 Colorado 70 38 senate Connecticut 80 96 Delaware 80 77 Florida 40 33 Georgia 0 27 Hawaii 70 83 Idaho 20 3 Illinois 50 59 Indiana 30 23 Iowa 40 49 Kansas 10 4 Kentucky 10 21 Louisiana 30 11 Maine 40 94 Maryland 80 83 Massachusetts 80 96 Michigan 80 37 Minnesota 80 46 House Mississippi 0 30 Missouri 20 23 Montana 60 0 Nebraska 20 5 Nevada 40 49 New Hampshire 40 96 New Jersey 80 57 New Mexico 80 61 New York 70 73 North Carolina 30 27 North Dakota 20 0 Ohio 40 27 Oklahoma 10 3 Oregon 80 71 Pennsylvania 30 28 Rhode Island 80 94 South Carolina 0 16 South Dakota 60 3 Tennessee 20 22 Texas 10 28 Utah 20 7 Vermont 80 91 Virginia 70 25 Washington 80 57 West Virginia 40 14 Wisconsin 50 38 Wyoming 20 3

4 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 1. Analysis 5

a s

eorgi Cramer Cramer G

ah nsa a nia Heller · Ut Tennessee Messer · a Ka a Duffy d Johnson Johnson Collins · Cruz kot Da orth and Maryl Rubio · Rubio eva s Missouri Rice · N N a onsin Indiana Texas c aine Pennsylv ex M T kot Da North Grassley · Grassley Wis lorida a F Burr · a arolin Blunt · Palazzo · Palazzo ow I LaMalfa · Campbell · Inhofe · Inhofe Woodall · Woodall Vitter · Vitter Daines · outh C ma a arolin S ana Missouri ho ana Coats · a Mississippi a Georgi Murkowski · Murkowski Cantor · Brat · Cantor · Brat a aliforni ouisi Graham · Scott · Graham a orth C orth C ana L Okl Mont N sk ndi a I Al a Virgini Paul · Paul a arolin Walberg · Walberg Miller · Southerland · Yoho · DeSantis · Posey · · Posey · DeSantis · Yoho Miller · Southerland ky Ayotte · Ayotte a Portman · Portman Mullin · Lankford · Mullin · Lankford outh C outh hio Cochran · Wicker · · Wicker Cochran c entu S Scalise · Boustany · Fleming · Cassidy · Scalise · Boustany · Fleming O Sessions · pshire Florid Byrne · Rogers · Byrne · Rogers K Michigan ama ama ab ew Ham ew Oklahoma ouisiana Hunter · Hoeven · Hoeven Harris · Chambliss · Isakson · Chambliss · Brady · Weber · Flores · Olsen · Farenthold · Sessions · · Olsen · Farenthold · Flores · Weber · Brady Moran · Moran Bishop · Chaffetz · Bishop · Chaffetz · Bilirakis · Clawson · Radel · · Radel · Clawson Bilirakis Lowest House Delegations: Alaska 3% · Idaho 3% · 0% · Montana 0% · North Dakota 4% · · Arkansas 3% 3% · Wyoming Oklahoma 3% · South Dakota 5% · Utah 7% 4% · Nebraska Kansas 0: of House Scores Alab L owest Senate Delegations:Lowest Senate 0% 0% · South Carolina 0% · Mississippi Georgia below 10: Senate Scores Al Mississippi N Hartzler · Long · Smith · · · Fincher · Blackburn · Black · DesJarlais Roe Toomey · Toomey

Andrews Andrews Beatty · and Maryl Tsongas · Tsongas Ohio Kildee · Levin Kildee · Levin DeGette · shington Wa Deutch · Frankel · · · Frankel Deutch a Braley · Braley New Jersey Cartwright · husetts ac owa I ania Michigan Florid ado Color Mass Price · Adams · Shea-Porter · Shea-Porter Swalwell · Eshoo · Lofgren · · Eshoo · Lofgren Swalwell Pennsylv Bishop · Meng · Jeffries · Tonko · · Tonko Bishop · Meng · Jeffries a arolin ork O’Rourke · Doggett · O’Rourke Pocan nd low scores low and high te a aliforni New Y C Texas onsin orth C North c New Hampshire Johnson Wis a Larson · DeLauro · Esty · Larson · DeLauro Cohen · Grijalva · Grijalva Bonamici · DeFazio · Bonamici · DeFazio Titus · Quigley · Schakowsky · Foster · · Foster Quigley · Schakowsky ticut c a ad nd low scores house high and low 2014 2014 sen a 2014 kot Da outh · Pallone · Pascrell · · Pascrell · Pallone McDermott · Oregon Tennessee Nev Conne Illinois a Arizon House Scores above 95: above House Scores Highest House Delegations: · 96% Hampshire 96% · New Connecticut 96% · Massachusetts 91% Maine 94% · Rhode Island 94% · Vermont S Senate Scores of 100: Senate Scores Highest Senate Delegations:Highest · 80% 80% · Delaware 80% · Connecticut California 80% · · Michigan 80% Maryland 80% · Massachusetts 80% · Mexico 80% · New Jersey 80% · New Minnesota · 80% · Rhode Island 80% · Vermont 80% Oregon 80% Washington Maffei · Higgins · Maffei Kennedy · Capuano · Lynch · Keating · · Keating · Lynch · Capuano Kennedy Schiff · Sherman · Waxman · Roybal-Allard · Takano · Hahn · · · Takano · Roybal-Allard Schiff · Sherman · Waxman · · Davis · Lowenthal Loretta Sánchez, Sarbanes · Cummings · Van Hollen · Sarbanes · Cummings · Van | scorecard.lcv.org · LCV Scorecard Environmental National 2014 rating the leadership of environmental committees

SENATE COMMITTEE CHAIR SCORE RANKING MEMBER SCORE Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Stabenow (MI) 80 Cochran (MS) 0 Appropriations Mikulski (MD) 80 Shelby (AL) 20 Commerce, Science and Transportation Rockefeller (WV) 60 Thune (SD) 20 Energy and Natural Resources Wyden (OR)* 80 Murkowski (AK) 0 Landrieu (LA)* 60 Environment and Public Works Boxer (CA) 80 Vitter (LA) 0 SENATE COMMITTEE LEADER AVERAGE CHAIRS 73 RANKING MEMBERS 8

HOUSE COMMITTEE CHAIR SCORE RANKING MEMBER SCORE Agriculture Lucas (OK-03) 6 Peterson (MN-07) 11 Appropriations Rogers, Harold (KY-05) 3 Lowey (NY-17) 94 Energy and Commerce Upton (MI-06) 6 Waxman (CA-33) 97 Natural Resources Hastings, Doc (WA-04) 3 DeFazio (OR-04) 100 Science, Space, and Technology Smith, Lamar (TX-21) 3 Johnson, Eddie Bernice (TX-30) 91 Transportation and Infrastructure Shuster (PA-09) 6 Rahall (WV-03) 29 HOUSE COMMITTEE LEADER AVERAGE CHAIRS 5 RANKING MEMBERS 70

*Senator Landrieu was selected as Chair of the Energy and Natural Resource Committee when Senator Wyden became Chair of the Senate Finance Committee.

party leaders’ scores

Senate DEMOCRATS SCORE REPUBLICANS SCORE Reid (NV), Majority Leader 80 McConnell (KY), Minority Leader 20 Durbin (IL), Majority Whip 80 Cornyn (TX), Minority Whip 20 Schumer (NY), Conference Vice Chair 80 Thune (SD), Conference Chair 20

LEADERSHIP AVERAGE 80 LEADERSHIP AVERAGE 20

House DEMOCRATS SCORE REPUBLICANS SCORE Boehner* (OH-08), Speaker of the House N/A Pelosi (CA-12), Minority Leader 91 Cantor (VA-07), Majority Leader** 0 Hoyer (MD-05), Minority Whip 91 McCarthy, Kevin (CA-23), Majority Leader/Majority Whip** 3 Scalise, Steve (LA-01), Majority Whip** 0 Clyburn (SC-06), Assistant Minority Leader 91 McMorris Rodgers (WA-05), Conference Chairman 6 Becerra (CA-34), Caucus Chairman 94 Lankford (OK-05), Policy Committee Chairman 0

LEADERSHIP AVERAGE 92 LEADERSHIP AVERAGE 2

* The Speaker of the House votes at his discretion. ** Represenative Scalise replaced Representive McCarthy as Majority Whip following Representative Cantor’s resignation as Majority Leader.

6 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 7 2014 Senate Vote Descriptions

1. Undermining Flood Insurance Reform Representative Michael Grimm (R-NY) sponsored H.R. 3370, the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014, which would repeal and delay key provisions of the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012. Artificially discounted flood insurance rates have led to the development and destruction of floodplains. By undermining steps to increase flood insurance premiums to market- based levels, H.R. 3370 would encourage further floodplain development and lead to the destruction of wetlands, forests, and other habitats that help mitigate flood damage, which will only be made worse by climate change. On March 13, the Senate passed H.R. 3370 by a vote of 72-22 (Senate roll call vote 78). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. President Obama signed H.R. 3370 into law on March 21.

2. Clean Energy Tax Credits Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-OR) offered a substitute amendment to H.R. 3474, the Hire More Heroes Act of 2014, which would extend dozens of tax incentives, including vital clean energy tax credits. The package of tax extenders, known collectively as the Expiring Provisions Improvement Reform and Efficiency (EXPIRE) Act, would extend several energy efficiency incentives and the Production Tax Credit (PTC), which is particularly critical to the continued growth of wind energy. Clean energy tax credits like the PTC have a proven track record of increasing investment, decreasing costs, creating jobs, and reducing pollution. On May 15, the Senate rejected the motion to end debate and proceed to the EXPIRE Act by a vote of 53-40 (60 votes were needed to invoke cloture; Senate roll call vote 157).YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. President Obama signed a shorter-term tax extenders package that included the PTC into law on December 19; however, this only extended tax credits through the end of 2014.

3. Environmental Review in Transportation Rebuilding Senator Pat Toomey (R-PA) offered an amendment to H.R. 5021, the Highway and Transportation Funding Act of 2014, which would exempt the post-disaster rebuilding of transportation infrastructure that was closed for safety reasons from any environmental reviews, approvals, licensing, or permitting. In doing so, the amendment would threaten the environment and public health and roll back bedrock environmental laws like the Clean Water Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, and the Endangered Species Act, even though these laws already provide flexibility and waivers for emergency situations. On July 29, the Senate rejected the Toomey amendment by a vote of 47-50 (Senate roll call vote 247). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

8 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 4. Democracy for All Constitutional Amendment Senator Tom Udall (D-NM) sponsored S.J. Res. 19, an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections. This resolution would be a historic step toward reducing the influence of big corporations and other special interest polluters in our elections and restoring the voice of the American people. While amendments to the Constitution are of serious consequence and should not be taken lightly, the dramatic increase of money in politics since the disastrous Citizens United U.S. Supreme Court decision has allowed special interests to spend unlimited amounts of money to protect their ability to pollute our air and water. On September 11, the Senate rejected the motion to end debate and proceed to S.J. Res. 19 by a vote of 54-42. (60 votes were needed to invoke cloture; Senate roll call vote 261). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

5. Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Senators John Hoeven (R-ND) and Mary Landrieu (D-LA) sponsored S. 2280, a bill to automatically approve the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, which would transport the world’s dirtiest oil through the American heartland to an international shipping port on the Gulf Coast where it would be exported. Keystone XL would lead to a significant expansion of tar sands development, unleashing massive amounts of carbon pollution and threatening surrounding communities, ecosystems, and watersheds including the Ogallala aquifer, which provides drinking water for millions of Americans. Despite these threats, Keystone XL would create just 35 permanent jobs and would not enhance American energy independence. S. 2280 would short circuit the federal approval process, eliminating the State Department’s ability to assess whether the pipeline is in the national interest and the President’s authority to ultimately approve or reject the project. On November 18, the Senate rejected S. 2280 by a vote of 59-41 (60 votes were needed for passage; Senate roll call vote 280). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 9 senate votes

KEY LCV SCORES a = Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote s = Absence (counts as negative)

Sessions, J. (R) 0 11 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Shelby (R) 20 22 15 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Alaska Begich (D) 40 67 74 ✘ a ✘ a ✘ Murkowski (R) 0 28 20 ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ Arizona Flake (R) 20 22 10 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ McCain (R) 20 28 22 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Arkansas Boozman (R) 20 17 8 a  ✘ ✘ ✘ Pryor (D) 60 56 63 ✘ a a a ✘ California Boxer (D) 80 94 90  a a a a Feinstein (D) 80 89 89 ✘ a a a a Colorado Bennet (D) 60 83 88 ✘ a a a ✘ Udall, M. (D) 80 89 96 ✘ a a a a Connecticut Blumenthal (D) 80 94 93 ✘ a a a a Murphy, C. (D) 80 94 95 ✘ a a a a Delaware Carper (D) 80 89 81 a a a a ✘ Coons (D) 80 89 93 ✘ a a a a Florida Nelson (D) 80 83 67 ✘ a a a a Rubio (R) 0 6 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

10 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 2. senate scores

11 Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Pipeline Sands Tar XL Keystone

f ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a Democracy for All Constitutional Amendment Constitutional All for Democracy

e ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a

Transportation Rebuilding Transportation Environmental Review in in Review Environmental

d ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  

a a a a a Clean Energy Tax Credits Tax Energy Clean

c ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘   

a a a a a a a Undermining Flood Insurance Reform Insurance Flood Undermining

b ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

  a a a a Lifetime

% 7 7 5 9 9 6 11 21 51 10 10 25 83 85 92 59 89 54 113th Congress 113th 6 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11

17 17 % 22 67 67 89 89 94 94

LCV SCORES LCV 2014 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % 20 20 20 20 20 80 80 80 60 60 60 (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (counts as negative) (counts s a onnell aii Ineligible to vote Ineligible to Pro-environment action Pro-environment action Anti-environment cC rassley urbin w itter isch oberts rapo hambliss oats aul chatz andrieu aho sakson L V P oran, Jerry Moran, R M G Harkin Donnelly C Kirk C R D Hirono S I C ouisiana = = Absence = = owa senate votes senate

L Kentucky ns Ka I Indiana Illinois Id Ha gia Geor

s ✘ KEY

| scorecard.lcv.org · LCV Scorecard Environmental National 2014 i a senate votes

KEY LCV SCORES a = Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote s = Absence (counts as negative)

Collins (R) 0 50 65 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ King, A. (I) 80 89 89 ✘ a a a a Maryland Cardin (D) 80 94 91 ✘ a a a a Mikulski (D) 80 89 84 ✘ a a a a Massachusetts Markey (D) 80 80 94 ✘ a a a a Warren (D) 80 94 94 ✘ a a a a Michigan Levin, C. (D) 80 94 81 ✘ a a a a Stabenow (D) 80 94 86 ✘ a a a a Minnesota Franken (D) 80 94 93 ✘ a a a a Klobuchar (D) 80 94 92 ✘ a a a a Mississippi

Cochran (R) 0 22 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Wicker (R) 0 22 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Missouri

Blunt (R) 0 17 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ McCaskill (D) 40 67 71  a ✘ a ✘ Montana Tester (D) 60 83 86 ✘ a a a ✘ Walsh (D) 60 60 60 ✘ a a a ✘ Nebraska Fischer (R) 20 17 17 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Johanns (R) 20 22 11 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

12 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 2. senate scores

13 Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Pipeline Sands Tar XL Keystone

f ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a Democracy for All Constitutional Amendment Constitutional All for Democracy

e ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 

a a a a a a a a a a

Transportation Rebuilding Transportation Environmental Review in in Review Environmental

d ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a Clean Energy Tax Credits Tax Energy Clean *

c ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 

a a a a a a a a a a a Undermining Flood Insurance Reform Insurance Flood Undermining

b ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  Lifetime

8 12 61 91 91 14 22 23 82 93 93 93 96 94 80 80 113th Congress 113th 6 11

17 17 61 % 22 78 89 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 80

LCV SCORES LCV 2014 0 0 0 0 0 % 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 60 60 40 (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) a o (counts as negative) (counts . a ork ad Ineligible to vote Ineligible to Pro-environment action Pro-environment action Anti-environment enendez illibrand dall, T. eid, H. ortman haheen P Heitkamp Hoeven Brown, S Burr Hagan Schumer G U Booker M Heinrich Ayotte S R Heller = = Absence = = senate votes senate

Ohio kot h Da Nort h Carolina Nort New Y New Mexic New Jersey New Hampshire Nev

* Senator Reid initially voted pro-environment but switched his vote for procedural reasons. s ✘ KEY

| scorecard.lcv.org · LCV Scorecard Environmental National 2014 i a senate votes

KEY LCV SCORES a = Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote s = Absence (counts as negative)

2014 113th Congress Lifetime Clean Energy Tax Credits Undermining Flood Insurance Reform Environmental Review in Democracy for All Constitutional Amendment Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Transportation Rebuilding % % % b c d e f Oklahoma Coburn (R) 20 6 9 a ✘ ✘  ✘ Inhofe (R) 0 6 5  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Oregon Merkley (D) 80 94 98 ✘ a a a a Wyden (D) 80 94 90 ✘ a a a a Pennsylvania Casey (D) 60 78 90 ✘ a a a ✘ Toomey (R) 0 6 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Rhode Island Reed, J. (D) 80 89 96 ✘ a a a a Whitehouse (D) 80 89 97 ✘ a a a a South Carolina

Graham, L. (R) 0 22 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Scott, T. (R) 0 0 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ South Dakota Johnson, Tim (D) 100 94 73 a a a a a Thune (R) 20 11 13 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Tennessee Alexander (R) 20 28 19 a ✘  ✘ ✘ Corker (R) 20 17 16 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Texas Cornyn (R) 20 11 6 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Cruz (R) 0 11 11 ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘

14 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 2. senate scores

15 Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Pipeline Sands Tar XL Keystone

f ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a Democracy for All Constitutional Amendment Constitutional All for Democracy

e ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a

Transportation Rebuilding Transportation Environmental Review in in Review Environmental

d ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a Clean Energy Tax Credits Tax Energy Clean

c ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  

a a a a a a a Undermining Flood Insurance Reform Insurance Flood Undermining

b ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a Lifetime

% 7

6 12 14 10 82 97 93 95 89 89 45 94 90 113th Congress 113th 6 6 11 11 11

% 78 78 33 83 94 94 94 94 94

LCV SCORES LCV 2014 % 20 20 20 20 20 20 80 80 80 80 80 80 60 60 (I) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) . (counts as negative) (counts ton . onsin c shing Ineligible to vote Ineligible to Pro-environment action Pro-environment action Anti-environment urray anchin antwell ockefeller nzi anders ah ee, M eahy g yomin E Barrasso Baldwin Johnson, R R M M Kaine Warner C L S Hatch L = = Absence = = senate votes senate

W Wis irginia V West Wa Virginia Vermont Ut

s ✘ KEY

| scorecard.lcv.org · LCV Scorecard Environmental National 2014 i a 16 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 2014 House Vote Descriptions

1. Superfund Cleanup Representative Cory Gardner (R-CO) sponsored H.R. 2279, the Reducing Excessive Deadline Obliga- tions Act of 2013, which would significantly reduce the number of cleanups of toxic waste sites, putting communities and the environment at risk through increased exposure to dangerous pollutants. H.R. 2279 weakens the Superfund law and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the law governing the disposal of hazardous wastes. This reckless legislation would also limit liability for polluters and waste taxpayer dollars by transferring the financial burden of cleaning up Superfund sites from the polluter to the federal government. On January 9, the House approved H.R. 2279 by a vote of 225-188 (House roll call vote 10). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

2. Climate Change & Public Lands Representative Rush Holt (D-NJ) offered an amendment to H.R. 3590, the Sportsmen’s Heritage and Recreational Enhancement (SHARE) Act of 2013, which would allow the Interior Secretary to consider the effects of climate change when making decisions related to conservation and recreation on public lands. Through droughts, warmer temperatures, raging wildfires, and other impacts, climate change is already affecting lands and wildlife across the country. On February 5, the House rejected the Holt amendment by a vote of 181-242 (House roll call vote 39). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

3. Public Lands Assault Representative Bob Latta (R-OH) sponsored H.R. 3590, the Sportsmen’s Heritage and Recreational Enhancement (SHARE) Act of 2013, which contains harmful measures undermining the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Wilderness Act, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The bill includes language that could allow the use of motorized vehicles, road construction, and other forms of development within protected wilderness areas, and it blocks input from public stakeholders in National Wildlife Refuge management decisions. This legislation also includes provisions that would weaken the EPA’s ability to regulate toxic lead in ammunition and adds new exemptions for chemicals used in fishing equipment. Additionally, this bill would undermine the Endangered Species Act and Marine Mammal Protection Act by allowing the importation of polar bear trophies from Canada, which encourages hunters to kill protected species in other countries and then seek legal waivers from Congress after the fact. On February 5, the House approved H.R. 3590 by a vote of 268-154 (House roll call vote 41). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. On July 10, the Senate failed to invoke cloture on legislation containing many of these provisions, S. 2363, the Bipartisan Sportsmen’s Act of 2014.

2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 17 4. California Water Resources Representative David Valadao (R-CA) sponsored H.R. 3964, the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Emergency Water Delivery Act, which would eliminate state and federal environmental protections for California’s rivers, threaten water quality in California’s Bay-Delta estuary, and undermine the reliability of the state’s water supplies. This bill would derail implementation of a bipartisan package of water policy reform bills adopted in 2009 and would eliminate desperately-needed protections for salmon and native fisheries, putting thousands of fishing jobs at risk. This legislation prioritizes the interests of large agribusinesses and uses California’s current low water supplies as an excuse to weaken federal and state environmental laws, when the real driver is the historic drought afflicting the state. On February 5, the House approved H.R. 3964 by a vote of 229-191 (House roll call vote 50). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

5. Broad Attack on Lands & Wildlife Representative Jeff Miller (R-FL) sponsored H.R. 2954, the Public Access and Lands Improvement Act, which would promote harmful logging and greatly hinder the National Park Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and the U.S. Forest Service in their implementation of conservation strategies that protect threatened species. The legislation includes provisions that would undermine conservation protections at Cape Hatteras National Seashore and obstruct reviews of grazing leases that are critical in protecting imperiled species such as the greater sage-grouse. It also requires harmful salvage logging on over 150,000 acres of the Stanislaus National Forest, which was impacted by the California Rim Fire, and impedes the public’s ability to seek administrative and judicial review. On February 6, the House approved H.R. 2954 by a vote of 220-194 (House roll call vote 54). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

6. Assault on Public Protections Representative George Holding (R-NC) sponsored H.R. 2804, the Achieving Less Excess in Regulation and Requiring Transparency (ALERRT) Act of 2014, which would undermine our nation’s ability to set health, safety and environmental standards. Specifically, H.R. 2804 would add a six-month delay to most rules essential to protecting the health, safety, and welfare of the American public, and it would force agencies to engage in a “race to the bottom” to pick the rule that is least costly to industry rather than the rule that will best protect public health. H.R. 2804 mandates wasteful new analyses that hold up life-saving agency actions and weakens the ability of citizens to prod agencies to follow the law. On February 27, the House approved H.R. 2804 by a vote of 236-179 (House roll call vote 78). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

7. Undermining Flood Insurance Reform Representative Michael Grimm (R-NY) sponsored H.R. 3370, the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014, which would repeal and delay key provisions of the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012. Artificially discounted flood insurance rates have led to the development and destruction of floodplains. By undermining steps to increase these premiums to market-based

18 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV levels, H.R. 3370 will encourage further floodplain development and lead to the destruction of wetlands, forests, and other habitats that help mitigate flood damage, which will only be made worse by a changing climate. On March 4, the House passed H.R. 3370 by a vote of 306-91 (House roll call vote 91). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate subsequently passed H.R. 3370 and President Obama signed this legislation into law on March 21.

8. Climate Change Science Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) offered an amendment to H.R. 3826, the Electricity Security and Affordability Act, which would require Congress to accept the scientific findings that man-made carbon pollution contributes to climate change and that climate change has a wide range of negative effects. 2014 was the hottest year on record and communities across the U.S. are already feeling the impacts of climate change, ranging from costly droughts to deadly forest fires to more severe storms. On March 6, the Schakowsky amendment was rejected 190-221 (House roll call vote 103). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

9. Carbon Pollution House Energy and Power Subcommittee Chairman Ed Whitfield (R-KY) sponsored H.R. 3826, the Electricity Security and Affordability Act, which would prevent the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from limiting carbon emissions from power plants, the nation’s largest source of the pollution driving climate change. The devastating impacts of climate change are occurring right outside our windows in the form of more frequent and severe weather events like droughts, wildfires, floods, and storms. Climate change also threatens public health by increasing smog, which triggers asthma attacks and is especially dangerous for children and those with heart or lung disease. The U.S. already places limits on mercury, arsenic, particulate matter, lead and other pollution from power plants, but this extreme legislation would ensure that power plants remain free to release unlimited amounts of carbon pollution into our air. On March 6, the House approved H.R. 3826 by a vote of 229-183 (House roll call vote 106). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

10. Attacking Public Input & Environmental Review Representative Tom Marino (R-PA) sponsored H.R. 2641, the Responsibly and Professionally Invigorating Development (RAPID) Act of 2013, which would severely undermine the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compromising the quality of environmental reviews and interfering with the public’s right to provide input in the management of public resources. H.R. 2641 would set arbitrary review deadlines and restrict the range of project alternatives that federal agencies can consider. It would also jeopardize the integrity of the decision-making process by allowing project sponsors to prepare environmental review documents, which is a conflict of interest. Moreover, while presented as an effort to increase timeliness and efficiency, the RAPID Act could actually lead to delays by forcing stakeholders into court preemptively simply to preserve their right to judicial review. On March 6, the House approved H.R. 2641 by a vote of 229-179 (House roll call vote 113). NO IS THE PRO- ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 19 11. Toxic Mining Waste Representative Bill Johnson (R-OH) sponsored H.R. 2824, the Preventing Government Waste and Protecting Coal Mining Jobs in America Act, which would nullify safeguards that prevent the dumping of dangerous mining waste into our waterways. The bill would eliminate a commonsense Reagan- era rule requiring a 100-foot buffer zone around waterways to protect them from toxic coal mining waste, and it would reinstate a 2008 rule that was recently struck down in federal court. The 2008 rule would exempt the most destructive mining practices from the buffer requirement, leaving streams and waterways vulnerable to sludge and other mining debris, especially in the Appalachian region. H.R. 2824 would also prohibit states from taking additional steps to protect communities from surface coal mining operations. On March 25, the House approved H.R. 2824 by a vote of 229-192 (House roll call vote 141). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate did not act on this legislation.

12. Preventing New Parks House Public Lands and Environmental Regulation Subcommittee Chairman Rob Bishop (R-UT) sponsored H.R. 1459, the Ensuring Public Involvement in the Creation of National Monuments Act, which would gut America’s most important conservation tool, the Antiquities Act. The bill would undermine the President’s authority under the Antiquities Act to protect historical, cultural, and natural sites by designating them as National Monuments, and would therefore serve as the biggest rollback of our nation’s ability to conserve land in more than a century. With Congress refusing to advance dozens of locally-supported bills—from members of both parties—that would create new national parks and other conservation areas, a vote for H.R. 1459 amounts to a vote in favor of preventing new parks from being created. On March 26, the House approved H.R. 1459 by a vote of 222-201 (House roll call vote 147). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

13. Big Oil Budget House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) sponsored H. Con. Res. 96, the Fiscal Year 2015 Budget Resolution, which would slash funding far beyond the already crippling sequestration levels for important priorities such as national parks, environmental safeguards, infrastructure, and health and energy research. While making drastic cuts to programs that protect our air, water, and open spaces, the Ryan budget would continue billions of dollars in subsidies to the oil industry and lower Big Oil’s tax bill even further by reducing corporate income tax rates. It would even sell lands that belong to the American public to benefit private energy companies. On April 10, the House approved H. Con. Res. 96 by a vote of 219-205 (House roll call vote 177). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

14. Blocking Climate Action in Trade Agreements Representative Mark Meadows (R-NC) offered an amendment to H.R. 4660, the Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2015, which would prohibit any funds in the bill from being used to negotiate or enter into a trade agreement that includes a limit on carbon pollution.

20 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV This amendment would limit the administration’s ability to work with other nations to address climate change, which poses a severe threat to our economy, health, and environment. On May 30, the House approved the Meadows amendment by a vote of 226-179 (House roll call vote 267). NO IS THE PRO- ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Meadows amendment was not included in H.R. 83, the FY 15 spending deal (also referred to as the CRomnibus), which was signed into law by President Obama on December 16.

15. Military Investments in Advanced Biofuels Representative Paul Gosar (R-AZ) offered an amendment to H.R. 4870, the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2015, which would prohibit any funds in the bill from being used to replace petroleum-based fuels with advanced drop-in biofuels. The Department of Defense is the single largest energy user in the nation, and investing in renewable biofuels significantly reduces pollution and the military’s carbon footprint. Advanced biofuels also enhance American energy security by giving the military more fuel options and reducing its dependence on oil. On June 20, the House rejected the Gosar amendment by a vote of 205-208 (House roll call vote 334). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

16. Gutting Pipeline Review House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI) sponsored H.R.3301, the North American Energy Infrastructure Act, a bill that would effectively exempt cross-border pipelines from the National Environmental Policy Act. H.R. 3301 would narrow environmental review to the cross-border segment of proposed pipelines, would instate default approval of any cross-border pipeline within 120 days of completion of the review, and would also exempt any modifications to existing pipelines from review. H.R. 3301 undermines the federal government’s ability to fully assess the environmental impacts of proposed pipelines. On June 24, the House approved H.R.3301 by a vote of 238-173 (House roll call vote 354). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

17. Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Exports Representative Cory Gardner (R-CO) sponsored H.R. 6, the Domestic Prosperity and Global Freedom Act, which would entirely cut the Department of Energy (DOE) out of the approval process for liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports to most of the world. Expanded LNG exports would lead to increased fracking, which is not properly regulated, pollutes our air and our water, and is connected to a number of health problems for people living nearby fracking operations. By automatically granting DOE approval for LNG exports to all 159 countries that are members of the World Trade Organization, rather than just the 20 countries with whom the U.S. has a Free Trade Agreement, H.R. 6 would eliminate the agency’s ability to consider the full range of impacts these exports could have on public health and the environment. On June 25, the House approved H.R. 6 by a vote of 266-150 (House roll call vote 359). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 21 18. National Ocean Policy Representative Alan Lowenthal (D-CA) offered an amendment to H.R.4899, the Lowering Gasoline Prices to Fuel an America That Works Act of 2014, which would strike language in the underlying bill prohibiting the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement from coordinating with coastal states, the public, and other stakeholders on programs and plans to ensure the safe and productive use of our nation’s oceans and Great Lakes. The National Ocean Policy, created by an Executive Order, directs government agencies with differing mandates to work together to improve ocean health and also ensures that all competing interests, including conservationists, fishermen, scientists, shipping companies, port managers, energy developers, and those who live and work in ocean communities all have a voice in creating solutions for the many problems facing our oceans. On June 26, the House rejected the Lowenthal amendment by a vote of 179-232 (House roll call vote 361). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

19. Offshore Drilling Subsidies Representative Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) offered an amendment to H.R.4899, the Lowering Gasoline Prices to Fuel an America That Works Act of 2014, which would require companies to renegotiate leases that require no payment of royalties to the United States before bidding on new leases authorized by the underlying bill. This amendment closes a key royalty payment loophole and would save taxpayers billions of dollars. On June 26, the House rejected the Blumenauer amendment by a vote of 179-229 (House roll call vote 364). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

20. Big Oil Giveaway House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Doc Hastings (R-WA) sponsored H.R. 4899, the Lowering Gasoline Prices to Fuel an America That Works Act, which would prioritize drilling on our public lands and waters over other activities such as hiking, hunting, and fishing. Such a mandate subverts the multiple uses our public lands have historically been managed for, and it would harm businesses that comprise our nation’s $646 billion outdoor recreation economy. The bill would also put the Atlantic and California coasts at risk of an oil spill by expanding risky offshore drilling to these areas while increasing perverse incentives for more drilling by directing additional revenue from federally-owned oil resources to coastal states. On June 26, the House approved H.R. 4899 by a vote of 229-185 (House roll call vote 368). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

21. Clean Energy Funding Representative Bradley Byrne (R-AL) offered an amendment to H.R. 4923, the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2015, which would eliminate all funding in the bill for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE). DOE-led clean energy programs have helped drive innovation in energy technologies while significantly reducing the costs of these technologies. The Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy supports critical solar, wind, efficiency, and clean vehicle programs that help create jobs, reduce pollution, and increase our energy security. On July 9, the House rejected the Byrne amendment by a vote of 110-310 (House roll call vote 376). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. 22 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 22. Social Cost of Carbon Representative James Lankford (R-OK) offered an amendment to H.R. 4923, the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2015, which would force federal agencies to turn a blind eye to the economic costs of climate change. Climate change already costs communities billions of dollars each year across the country, and this anti-science amendment would prevent the government from considering the costs of extreme weather and other climate change impacts or the savings from government actions to improve energy efficiency and reduce carbon pollution. On July 10, the House approved the Lankford amendment by a vote of 227-191 (House roll call vote 389). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Lankford amendment was not included in H.R. 83, the FY 15 spending deal (also referred to as the CRomnibus), which was signed into law by President Obama on December 16.

23. Light Bulb Efficiency Standards Representative Michael Burgess (R-TX) offered an amendment to H.R. 4923, the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2015, which would prevent the Department of Energy (DOE) from implementing or enforcing commonsense energy efficiency standards for light bulbs. Rolling back these standards, which were enacted in 2007 with strong bipartisan and industry support, would threaten jobs, cost consumers money, and worsen pollution. It would also allow foreign manufacturers to sell old, inefficient light bulbs in the United States, which is unfair to domestic manufacturers who have already invested millions of dollars in plants that can produce more efficient bulbs that meet the standards. On July 10, the House approved the Burgess amendment by a vote of 226-193 (House roll call vote 393). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Burgess amendment was included in H.R. 83, the FY 15 spending deal (also referred to as the CRomnibus), which was signed into law by President Obama on December 16.

24. Attack on Clean Water Representative Doug LaMalfa (R-CA) offered an amendment to H.R. 4923, the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2015, which would undermine the Clean Water Act and jeopardize the waters Americans depend on for drinking, swimming, fishing, and flood protection. This amendment would repeal part of the Clean Water Act that currently provides limited exemptions for normal, on-going farm practices and discharges of dredged or fill material related to the maintenance of drainage ditches, and expand these exemptions in a way that would encourage new wetland and stream destruction. For example, a highway department cleaning out a maintenance ditch could dump excess material into a pristine lake, filling it in or obstructing its water flow without requiring any review under the law. On July 10, the House approved the LaMalfa amendment by a vote of 239-182 (House roll call vote 394). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. A modified version of the LaMalfa amendment was included in H.R. 83, the FY 15 spending deal (also referred to as the CRomnibus) signed into law by President Obama on December 16.

2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 23 25. Impacts of Climate Change Representative David McKinley (R-WV) offered an amendment to H.R. 4923, the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2015, which would prevent federal agencies from assessing the costs and dangers posed by climate change. This extreme anti-science amendment would make it more difficult for agencies to take part in studying or planning for the increase in extreme weather associated with climate change. It would also block these agencies from participating in the National Climate Assessment, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and any analysis of the cost of carbon pollution. On July 10, the House passed the McKinley Amendment by a vote of 229-188 (House roll call vote 397). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The McKinley amendment was not included in H.R. 83, the FY 15 spending deal (also referred to as the CRomnibus), which was signed into law by President Obama on December 16.

26. Assault on Clean Energy & Clean Water House Energy and Water Development Appropriations Subcommittee Chair Michael Simpson (R- ID) introduced H.R. 4923, the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2015, which moves us backward on energy and environmental policy by slashing funding for renewable energy and energy efficiency while boosting funding for dirty fossil fuel and nuclear generation technologies. Although the impacts of climate change are already being felt around the country, this bill attacks the science of climate change as well as the government’s ability to assess the real costs of climate change impacts and the benefits of improving energy efficiency and limiting carbon pollution. In addition, the bill contains damaging policy riders that would limit the Army Corps of Engineers’ ability to safeguard the waters Americans depend on for drinking, swimming, fishing, and flood protection. On July 10, the House approved H.R. 4923 by a vote of 253-170 (House roll call vote 402). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. H.R. 83, the FY 15 spending deal (also referred to as the CRomnibus), which was signed into law by President Obama on December 16, included higher funding levels for renewable energy and energy efficiency; however, it also included several harmful policy riders.

27. Using Best Available Science Representative Rush Holt (D-NJ) offered an amendment to H.R. 4315, the Endangered Species Transparency and Reasonableness Act, which would remove the requirement in the underlying bill that causes data submitted by state, county, or tribal governments, whether by experts or not, to supersede that offered by the federal government and be considered the “best scientific and commercial data available.” This underlying requirement would undermine the federal government’s ability to use the best data when assessing a given project’s environmental impact. On July 29, the Holt amendment was

24 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV defeated by a vote of 204-215 (House roll call vote 461). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

28. Attack on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Doc Hastings (R-WA) sponsored H.R. 4315, the Endangered Species Transparency and Reasonableness Act, which would undermine the Endangered Species Act. H.R. 4315 would waste precious taxpayer resources by mandating expensive online databases that would only serve to increase bureaucracy and stand in the way of a balanced approach to conservation. It would also jeopardize the use of legitimate science by allowing any data submitted to agencies from states, tribes or counties to be dubbed the best available science – even if there wasn’t a single scientist involved in the process. Moreover, it would limit the ability of American citizens to obtain counsel and challenge illegal government activities, undermining public involvement from across the political spectrum. On July 29, the House approved H.R. 4315 by a vote of 233-190 (House roll call vote 463). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

29. Pesticides Pollution Representative Bob Gibbs (R-OH) sponsored H.R. 935, the Reducing Regulatory Burdens Act of 2014, which would undermine the Clean Water Act by preventing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from protecting waterways from the direct application of pesticides that can contaminate drinking water, harm aquatic species, and negatively impact the food chain. H.R. 935 would render ineffective the Clean Water Act pesticide general permit, which took effect in 2011 and laid out commonsense practices for applying pesticides directly to waters under the jurisdiction of the Clean Water Act. The pesticide general permit allows for spraying to combat vector-borne diseases such as the West Nile virus, and it has had no significant effect on farming practices. On July 31, the House approved H.R. 935 by a vote of 267-161 (House roll call vote 470). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

30. Assault on the Clean Water Rule Representative Steve Southerland (R-FL) sponsored H.R. 5078, the Waters of the United States Regulatory Overreach Protection Act of 2014, which would allow the continued dumping of pollution into our small streams and wetlands by preventing the Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers from moving forward with their proposed Clean Water Rule. This commonsense rule would clarify Clean Water Act protections for the small streams, wetlands, headwaters, and tributaries that impact the drinking water of over 117 million Americans, support businesses and recreation, and are crucial habitat for wildlife. H.R. 5078 would stop this rule in its tracks, closing the public comment period and ensuring the voices of polluters trump demands for clean water. H.R. 5078 also prohibits the EPA and the Army Corps from ever developing any “substantially similar” rule or guidance to protect these crucial waterways. On September 9, the House approved H.R. 5078 by a vote of 262-152 (House roll call vote 489). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action

2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 25 on this legislation.

31. Big Polluter Giveaway Representative Lee Terry (R-NE) sponsored H.R. 2, the American Energy Solutions for Lower Costs and More American Jobs Act, a package of more than a dozen bills – all of which had already passed the House. H.R. 2 amounts to a huge giveaway to big polluters and threatens the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the landscapes that support our outdoor economy. The bill also thwarts progress on climate change and compromises communities’ ability to weigh in on projects in their own backyards. H.R. 2 would gut the EPA’s ability to limit carbon pollution from power plants. It would disregard due process and endanger public health and the environment in order to rush a decision on the dirty and dangerous Keystone XL pipeline. It would also elevate drilling above all other uses on our public lands, including hiking, fishing, and hunting, subverting the multiple uses that have guided public lands management and threatening outdoor recreation-related businesses and communities that depend on this industry. On September 18, the House approved H.R. 2 by a vote of 226-191 (House roll call vote 515). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

32. Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Representative Bill Cassidy (R-LA) sponsored H.R. 5682, a bill to automatically approve the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, which would transport the world’s dirtiest oil through the American heartland to an international shipping port on the Gulf Coast where it would be exported. Keystone XL would lead to a significant expansion of tar sands development, unleashing massive amounts of carbon pollution and threatening surrounding communities, ecosystems, and watersheds including the Ogallala aquifer, which provides drinking water for millions of Americans. Despite these threats, Keystone XL would create just 35 permanent jobs and would not enhance American energy independence. H.R. 5682 would short circuit the federal approval process, eliminating the State Department’s ability to assess whether the pipeline is in the national interest and the President’s authority to ultimately approve or reject the project. On November 14, the House approved H.R. 5682 by a vote of 252-161 (House roll call vote 519). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate rejected similar legislation forcing approval of the Keystone XL pipeline, S. 2280, on November 18.

33. Attack on Scientific Integrity Representative Chris Stewart (R-UT) sponsored H.R.1422, the EPA Science Advisory Board Reform Act, which would undermine the ability of the EPA’s Science Advisory Board to provide independent scientific advice to the agency. H.R. 1422 would undermine the integrity of the Science Advisory Board by allowing industry participation and making it more difficult for subject experts to serve on the Board. H.R. 1422 would also impose new burdens on the Board that would delay necessary public health and environmental protections. On November 18, the House approved H.R.1422 by a vote of 229-191 (House roll call vote 525). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on

26 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV this legislation.

34. Attack on Sound Science Representative David Schweikert (R-AZ) sponsored H.R. 4012, the Secret Science Reform Act of 2014, which would cripple the ability of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to use the best available science in setting critical public health safeguards. H.R. 4012 would severely restrict the scope of scientific studies that the EPA is able to use when setting health standards by prohibiting the use of peer-reviewed studies with confidential health information. This type of study is the basis for the best research on the effects of pollution on people. On November 19, the House approved H.R. 4012 by a vote of 237-190 (House roll call vote 528). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

35. Undermining Clean Air Protections Representative Steve Scalise (R-LA) sponsored H.R. 4795, the Promoting New Manufacturing Act, which would undermine clean air protections by exempting newly permitted industrial facilities from certain air quality standards required under the Clean Air Act. H.R. 4795 would lead to increased air pollution, threaten public health, create unclear procedural requirements for businesses, and delay the permitting process. On November 20, the House approved H.R. 4795 by a vote of 238-172 (House roll call vote 531). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 27 house votes

KEY LCV SCORES a = Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote s = Absence (counts as negative)

Superfund Cleanup Climate Change & Public Lands Public Lands Assault California Water Resources Broad Attack on Lands & Wildlife Assault on Public Protections Undermining Flood Insurance Reform Climate Change Science Carbon Pollution Attacking Public Input & Toxic Mining Waste Preventing New Parks Big Oil Budget 2014 Environmental Review 113th Congress Lifetime % %% b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# Alabama 1 Byrne (R) 0 0 0 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 2 Roby (R) 3 2 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 3 Rogers, Mike D. (R) 0 0 8 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 4 Aderholt (R) 3 3 4  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘       ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 5 Brooks, M. (R) 3 3 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 6 Bachus, S. (R) 3 2 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  7 Sewell (D) 77 76 78 a a ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a ✘  a ✘ a a ✘ Alaska AL Young, D. (R) 3 3 9 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  ✘ ✘ Arizona 1 Kirkpatrick (D) 69 65 67 a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a  a     a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a 2 Barber (D) 83 78 78 a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a 3 Grijalva (D) 97 94 95 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 4 Gosar* (R) 3 3 8 ✘    ✘      ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 5 Salmon (R) 3 5 12 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 6 Schweikert (R) 3 5 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 7 Pastor (D) 86 83 83 a a a a a      a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 8 Franks (R) 6 8 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 9 Sinema (D) 83 81 81 a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ aaaaaaaaaaa ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ Arkansas 1 Crawford (R) 6 5 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘     ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 2 Griffin (R) 3 2 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 3 Womack (R) 3 2 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 4 Cotton (R) 3 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ California 1 LaMalfa (R) 0 0 0 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 2 Huffman (D) 94 97 97 a a  a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 3 Garamendi (D) 77 86 88  a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a

* Representative Gosar missed a number of votes due to hip surgery.

28 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 3. house scores

29 Undermining Clean Air Protections Air Clean Undermining

✘ ✘  Attack on Sound Science Sound on Attack

✘ ✘ Attack on Scientiﬁc Integrity Scientiﬁc on Attack



a a Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Pipeline Sands Tar XL Keystone ✘

house votes Big Polluter Giveaway Polluter Big

a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a Assault on the Clean Water Rule Water Clean the on Assault

3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3% ✘  Pesticides Pollution Pesticides

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Attack on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Act Species Endangered the on Attack

✘ ✘ ✘ Using Best Available Science Available Best Using

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a Assault on Clean Energy & Clean Water Clean & Energy Clean on Assault

2^ 2& 2* 2( ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a Impacts of Climate Change Climate of Impacts



a Attack on Clean Water Clean on Attack

✘

Light Bulb Eciency Standards Eciency Bulb Light Social Cost of Carbon of Cost Social

✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ Clean Energy Funding Energy Clean

     

a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a Big Oil Giveaway Oil Big scorecard.lcv.org

2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2%

| a a a a a a a a a

O shore Drilling Subsidies Drilling O shore LCV

✘ ·

National Ocean Policy Ocean National ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘

aaaaaaaaaaa a Liqueﬁed Natural Gas (LNG) Exports (LNG) Gas Natural Liqueﬁed Scorecard

✘ ✘ 1& 1* 1(      Gutting Pipeline Review Pipeline Gutting

a Military Investments in Advanced Biofuels Advanced in Investments Military



Environmental

Blocking Climate Action in Trade Agreements Trade in Action Climate Blocking ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 1$ 1% 1^ a a a a a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaa National

2014 a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘     a a a a a a a            ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘    a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘   a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 78 67 95 2 5 2 8 2 5 2 5 3 8 3 9 3 8 3 4 5 5 5 12 5 8 5 7 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 8 81 81 78 78 76 83 83 97 97 65 86 88 94 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 6 6 0 0 0 77 77 83 83 97 86 69 94 (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) s a a Gosar* Salmon Schweikert Pastor Franks Sinema Crawford Griffin Womack Cotton LaMalfa Huffman Garamendi Byrne Roby D. Mike Rogers, Aderholt M. Brooks, Bachus, S. Sewell D. Young, Kirkpatrick Barber Grijalva ama ans Representative Gosar missed a number of votes due to hip surgery. sk * ab a 1 1 1 1 7 7 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 5 8 5 6 9 6 4 4 4 AL Ark a Californi Al Al a Arizon house votes

KEY LCV SCORES a = Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote s = Absence (counts as negative)

Superfund Cleanup Climate Change & Public Lands Public Lands Assault California Water Resources Broad Attack on Lands & Wildlife Assault on Public Protections Undermining Flood Insurance Reform Climate Change Science Carbon Pollution Attacking Public Input & Toxic Mining Waste Preventing New Parks Big Oil Budget 2014 Environmental Review 113th Congress Lifetime % %% b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 4 McClintock (R) 6 6 6  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 5 Thompson, M. (D) 94 95 92 a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 6 Matsui (D) 94 95 96 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a a a a a a a a 7 Bera (D) 89 90 90 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a 8 Cook (R) 3 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 9 McNerney (D) 94 92 92 a a a a  a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 10 Denham (R) 3 3 8 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a  ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 11 Miller, George (D) 83 83 88 a a  a a a ✘ a a a a a  a a a a    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 12 Pelosi (D) 91 90 92 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a  a a  aaaaaaaaaaaaaa 13 Lee, B. (D) 91 94 96 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa   a a a a 14 Speier (D) 94 89 87 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a  aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 15 Swalwell (D) 97 95 95 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 16 Costa (D) 34 35 48 ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  a ✘  17 Honda (D) 94 92 97 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa  a a 18 Eshoo (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 19 Lofgren (D) 97 95 92 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 20 Farr (D) 91 89 94 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ ✘ a a a a a 21 Valadao (R) 3 2 2 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 22 Nunes (R) 6 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 23 McCarthy (R) 3 2 3 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 24 Capps (D) 94 95 96 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a a a a a 25 McKeon (R) 3 2 7 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘   ✘ ✘  26 Brownley (D) 94 94 94 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a a a a a a a a 27 Chu (D) 91 94 97 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a   aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 28 Schiff (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 29 Cárdenas (D) 91 92 92 a a a a a a   a a a a a a a a ✘ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 30 Sherman (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 31 Miller, Gary (R) 6 3 3 ✘     ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘   ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘   ✘ ✘ ✘

30 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 3. house scores

31 Undermining Clean Air Protections Air Clean Undermining

  Attack on Sound Science Sound on Attack

✘

a a Attack on Scientiﬁc Integrity Scientiﬁc on Attack

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 

a Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Pipeline Sands Tar XL Keystone 

a a a a house votes Big Polluter Giveaway Polluter Big

   

a a a a a Assault on the Clean Water Rule Water Clean the on Assault

3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3% ✘  

a a a a a a Pesticides Pollution Pesticides

✘ ✘ ✘  Attack on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Act Species Endangered the on Attack

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Using Best Available Science Available Best Using

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Assault on Clean Energy & Clean Water Clean & Energy Clean on Assault

2^ 2& 2* 2( ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a Impacts of Climate Change Climate of Impacts

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a Attack on Clean Water Clean on Attack

✘ ✘

a Light Bulb Eciency Standards Eciency Bulb Light

✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ Social Cost of Carbon of Cost Social

✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 

aaaaaaaaaaaaaa Clean Energy Funding Energy Clean



a a a a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Big Oil Giveaway Oil Big scorecard.lcv.org

2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2%

| aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

O shore Drilling Subsidies Drilling O shore LCV

a a National Ocean Policy Ocean National

    

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a a a a Liqueﬁed Natural Gas (LNG) Exports (LNG) Gas Natural Liqueﬁed Scorecard

✘ ✘ 1& 1* 1( Gutting Pipeline Review Pipeline Gutting

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Military Investments in Advanced Biofuels Advanced in Investments Military

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 

Environmental

Blocking Climate Action in Trade Agreements Trade in Action Climate Blocking ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 1$ 1% 1^  a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa National

2014 ✘  a a   ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a aa a a aa a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a aa a a a a aa a a aa a a aa a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a aa a a a a a a a aa a a a a aa a a aa a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘   a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  a   a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘     a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  a a aa a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a a a a aa a a aa a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a 87 97 97 92 92 92 48 96 96 94 2 2 2 3 2 7 3 3 3 8 3 4 3 3 6 6 35 83 88 97 97 97 97 97 97 92 92 92 92 92 95 95 95 95 95 95 89 89 94 94 96 94 94 90 90 90 3 3 3 3 3 6 6 6 91 91 91 91 91 83 97 97 97 97 97 89 34 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Honda Eshoo Lofgren Farr Valadao Nunes McCarthy Capps McKeon Brownley Chu Schiff Cárdenas Sherman Gary Miller, Matsui Bera Cook McNerney Denham George Miller, Pelosi Lee, B. Speier Swalwell Costa McClintock M. Thompson, 7 8 5 6 9 4 11 17 31 13 21 12 18 15 19 16 14 10 27 23 22 25 28 26 29 24 30 20 house votes

KEY LCV SCORES a = Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote s = Absence (counts as negative)

Superfund Cleanup Climate Change & Public Lands Public Lands Assault California Water Resources Broad Attack on Lands & Wildlife Assault on Public Protections Undermining Flood Insurance Reform Climate Change Science Carbon Pollution Attacking Public Input & Toxic Mining Waste Preventing New Parks Big Oil Budget 2014 Environmental Review 113th Congress Lifetime % %% b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 32 Napolitano (D) 83 84 90 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a      aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 33 Waxman (D) 97 95 92 aaaaaaaaaaaaa  aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 34 Becerra (D) 94 95 92 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a  aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 35 Negrete McLeod (D) 77 75 75 a a a a a a ✘    a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a    36 Ruiz (D) 89 87 87  a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a 37 Bass (D) 94 87 88 a a a a a  ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 38 Sánchez, Linda (D) 91 95 91  a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa  a a a a 39 Royce (R) 3 5 12 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 40 Roybal-Allard (D) 97 94 94 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 41 Takano (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 42 Calvert (R) 3 2 7 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 43 Waters (D) 91 94 90 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a  aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ 44 Hahn (D) 97 97 94 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 45 Campbell (R) 0 0 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘   ✘  ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘     46 Sanchez, Loretta (D) 97 97 89 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 47 Lowenthal (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 48 Rohrabacher (R) 6 5 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 49 Issa (R) 3 2 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 50 Hunter (R) 0 2 3 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 51 Vargas (D) 94 92 92 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ aaaaaaaaaaa 52 Peters, S. (D) 86 92 92 a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ 53 Davis, S. (D) 97 97 96 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Colorado 1 DeGette (D) 97 94 96 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 2 Polis* (D) 77 79 88 a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a a       aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 3 Tipton (R) 6 5 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 4 Gardner (R) 3 3 8 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  5 Lamborn (R) 6 6 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘

* Representative Polis missed a number of votes due to paternity leave.

32 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 3. house scores

33 Undermining Clean Air Protections Air Clean Undermining

✘ ✘ 

Attack on Sound Science Sound on Attack Attack on Scientiﬁc Integrity Scientiﬁc on Attack

   Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Pipeline Sands Tar XL Keystone    

a a a a house votes Big Polluter Giveaway Polluter Big



a a a a a a a Assault on the Clean Water Rule Water Clean the on Assault

3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3% ✘ ✘

Pesticides Pollution Pesticides

Attack on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Act Species Endangered the on Attack Using Best Available Science Available Best Using

a a a a a a a a a a a Assault on Clean Energy & Clean Water Clean & Energy Clean on Assault

2^ 2& 2* 2( ✘ ✘ Impacts of Climate Change Climate of Impacts

aaaaaaaaaaa Attack on Clean Water Clean on Attack

✘

Light Bulb Eciency Standards Eciency Bulb Light Social Cost of Carbon of Cost Social

✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Clean Energy Funding Energy Clean



a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Big Oil Giveaway Oil Big scorecard.lcv.org

2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2%

| aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

O shore Drilling Subsidies Drilling O shore LCV

· 

National Ocean Policy Ocean National

a a a a a a a a Liqueﬁed Natural Gas (LNG) Exports (LNG) Gas Natural Liqueﬁed Scorecard

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1& 1* 1( Gutting Pipeline Review Pipeline Gutting

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘       Military Investments in Advanced Biofuels Advanced in Investments Military

✘      

Environmental a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Blocking Climate Action in Trade Agreements Trade in Action Climate Blocking ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 1$ 1% 1^    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a aa a a a a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a a a a a National

2014 ✘   a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘    a a aa a a aa a a a a aa a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a aa a a a a a a aa a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a aa a a aa a a a aa a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a  a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘   a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a aa a a aa a a a a a a aa a a aa a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaa a aa a a aa a a a a a a a a 91 92 88 92 88 89 96 94 2 7 22 4 3 3 8 5 11 5 9 5 12 6 5 0 7 75 75 87 87 87 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 79 92 92 92 92 95 95 95 84 90 94 96 94 94 94 90 3 3 3 3 6 6 6 0 0 91 91 77 77 83 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 89 86 94 94 94 (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Campbell Loretta Sanchez, Lowenthal Rohrabacher Issa Hunter Vargas S. Peters, S. Davis, DeGette Polis* Tipton Gardner Lamborn Napolitano Waxman Becerra McLeod Negrete Ruiz Bass Linda Sánchez, Royce Roybal-Allard Takano Calvert Waters Hahn 1 3 2 5 4 51 41 37 33 52 32 53 35 38 47 39 36 34 43 42 45 48 49 46 50 44 40 ado Color house votes

KEY LCV SCORES a = Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote s = Absence (counts as negative)

Superfund Cleanup Climate Change & Public Lands Public Lands Assault California Water Resources Broad Attack on Lands & Wildlife Assault on Public Protections Undermining Flood Insurance Reform Climate Change Science Carbon Pollution Attacking Public Input & Toxic Mining Waste Preventing New Parks Big Oil Budget 2014 Environmental Review 113th Congress Lifetime % %% b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 6 Coffman (R) 3 3 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 7 Perlmutter (D) 77 79 81 a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a  a a a ✘ a a a  a a a a a a a ✘ a a  a a ✘ Connecticut 1 Larson, J. (D) 97 97 91 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 2 Courtney (D) 94 94 96 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a a a a a 3 DeLauro (D) 97 97 96 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 4 Himes (D) 94 95 95 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 5 Esty (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Delaware AL Carney* (D) 77 84 89 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a       a a ✘ a a a a a a Florida 1 Miller, J. (R) 0 2 7 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 2 Southerland (R) 0 0 4 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 3 Yoho (R) 0 2 2 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 4 Crenshaw (R) 3 2 8 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 5 Brown, C. (D) 89 90 86 a a ✘ a a a  a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a 6 DeSantis (R) 0 3 3 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  7 Mica (R) 3 2 7 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 8 Posey (R) 0 2 6 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 9 Grayson (D) 91 94 95 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 10 Webster (R) 3 3 8 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 11 Nugent (R) 3 3 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 12 Bilirakis (R) 0 2 12 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 13 Jolly** (R) 12 12 12 i i i i i i i i i i ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 14 Castor (D) 91 90 93 a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa  a a a a a 15 Ross (R) 3 5 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 16 Buchanan (R) 9 5 20 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 17 Rooney (R) 3 2 8 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘

* Representative Carney missed a number of votes due to a death in his family. ** Representative Jolly was sworn in on March 13 following the death of Representative Young on October 18, 2013.

34 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 3. house scores

3 Undermining Clean Air Protections Air Clean Undermining

✘ 

Attack on Sound Science Sound on Attack Attack on Scientiﬁc Integrity Scientiﬁc on Attack

a a Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Pipeline Sands Tar XL Keystone 

house votes Big Polluter Giveaway Polluter Big

a a a a a Assault on the Clean Water Rule Water Clean the on Assault

3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3% 

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Pesticides Pollution Pesticides

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Attack on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Act Species Endangered the on Attack Using Best Available Science Available Best Using

a a a a a a a a a a a a a Assault on Clean Energy & Clean Water Clean & Energy Clean on Assault

2^ 2& 2* 2( ✘

Impacts of Climate Change Climate of Impacts Attack on Clean Water Clean on Attack

✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ Light Bulb Eciency Standards Eciency Bulb Light

a Social Cost of Carbon of Cost Social

✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘

a a a a a a a Clean Energy Funding Energy Clean

      

a a a a a a a a a Big Oil Giveaway Oil Big scorecard.lcv.org

2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘

O shore Drilling Subsidies Drilling O shore LCV

· 

National Ocean Policy Ocean National

a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Liqueﬁed Natural Gas (LNG) Exports (LNG) Gas Natural Liqueﬁed Scorecard

✘ ✘ 1& 1* 1( Gutting Pipeline Review Pipeline Gutting

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a a a a a a a a Military Investments in Advanced Biofuels Advanced in Investments Military

✘

Environmental

Blocking Climate Action in Trade Agreements Trade in Action Climate Blocking ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1$ 1% 1^ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a a a a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa National

2014  a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ i i i i i i i i i i a a a a aa a a a aa a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a 81 91 93 95 89 96 2 8 2 7 22 2 8 22 7 6 2 12 3 5 3 3 3 8 3 5 5 6 5 20 0 4 12 12 79 97 97 97 97 95 95 84 94 94 96 90 90 86 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 91 91 77 77 97 97 97 89 94 94 (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) a are cticut Coffman Perlmutter Crenshaw C. Brown, DeSantis Mica Posey Grayson Webster Nugent Bilirakis Jolly** Castor Ross Buchanan Rooney Larson, J. Larson, Courtney DeLauro Himes Esty Carney* J. Miller, Southerland Yoho w a 1 1 7 7 3 3 2 2 5 8 5 6 9 6 4 4 11 17 13 12 15 16 14 10 AL Conne Del Florid house votes

KEY LCV SCORES a = Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote s = Absence (counts as negative)

Superfund Cleanup Climate Change & Public Lands Public Lands Assault California Water Resources Broad Attack on Lands & Wildlife Assault on Public Protections Undermining Flood Insurance Reform Climate Change Science Carbon Pollution Attacking Public Input & Toxic Mining Waste Preventing New Parks Big Oil Budget 2014 Environmental Review 113th Congress Lifetime % %% b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 18 Murphy, P. (D) 71 76 76 a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ 19 Clawson* (R) 0 0 0 iiiiiiiiiiiii i i i ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 19 Radel* (R) 0 7 7 ✘ iiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii 20 Hastings (D) 89 90 85 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a  aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘  a a a a 21 Deutch (D) 97 97 94 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 22 Frankel (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 23 Wasserman Schultz (D) 94 86 92 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa  a a a a 24 Wilson, F. (D) 89 92 88 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaa  ✘ a a a a a a a a  25 Diaz-Balart (R) 3 3 13 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 26 Garcia (D) 80 79 79 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ a  a a a a ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a 27 Ros-Lehtinen (R) 3 5 34 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ Georgia 1 Kingston (R) 3 3 9 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ a ✘ ✘  ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 2 Bishop, S. (D) 43 41 48 a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ 3 Westmoreland, L. (R) 3 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 4 Johnson, H. (D) 91 94 94 a a a a a a ✘ a  a a  a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 5 Lewis (D) 91 90 92 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a   aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 6 Price, T. (R) 3 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a   ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 7 Woodall (R) 0 2 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 8 Scott, A. (R) 6 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 9 Collins, D. (R) 3 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 10 Broun (R) 6 8 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 11 Gingrey (R) 6 8 5  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 12 Barrow (D) 31 27 45 a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 13 Scott, D. (D) 89 89 80 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a 14 Graves, T. (R) 3 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘

* Representative Clawson was sworn in on June 25 following the resignation of Representative Radel on January 27.

36 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 3. house scores

3 Undermining Clean Air Protections Air Clean Undermining

✘ ✘ 

Attack on Sound Science Sound on Attack Attack on Scientiﬁc Integrity Scientiﬁc on Attack

✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Pipeline Sands Tar XL Keystone ✘ ✘ 

a a a a a a a a house votes Big Polluter Giveaway Polluter Big

 

a a a a a a Assault on the Clean Water Rule Water Clean the on Assault

3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3% ✘

a a Pesticides Pollution Pesticides

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Attack on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Act Species Endangered the on Attack

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Using Best Available Science Available Best Using

 

a a a a a aa a a a a a a a Assault on Clean Energy & Clean Water Clean & Energy Clean on Assault

2^ 2& 2* 2( ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Impacts of Climate Change Climate of Impacts



a Attack on Clean Water Clean on Attack

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Light Bulb Eciency Standards Eciency Bulb Light Social Cost of Carbon of Cost Social

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Clean Energy Funding Energy Clean

a a a a a a a a a a Big Oil Giveaway Oil Big scorecard.lcv.org

2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2%

| a a a a

O shore Drilling Subsidies Drilling O shore LCV

· 

National Ocean Policy Ocean National ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a Liqueﬁed Natural Gas (LNG) Exports (LNG) Gas Natural Liqueﬁed Scorecard

✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 1& 1* 1( 

a Gutting Pipeline Review Pipeline Gutting

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  Military Investments in Advanced Biofuels Advanced in Investments Military

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Environmental a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

2014  a a a a a  a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘   ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘   a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ iiiiiiiiiiii ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  iiiiiiiiiiiii a a a a a a a a a aa a a a aa a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a 92 92 88 45 48 94 80 7 7 2 5 3 13 3 9 3 4 5 5 5 4 5 34 5 5 5 5 8 5 8 5 0 0 41 27 76 76 97 97 97 79 79 92 89 86 94 94 90 90 85 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 6 6 6 0 0 0 31 71 91 91 97 97 89 89 89 43 94 80 (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Murphy, P. Murphy, Westmoreland, L. Westmoreland, Johnson, H. Lewis T. Price, Woodall A. Scott, D. Collins, Broun Gingrey Barrow D. Scott, T. Graves, Clawson* Radel* Hastings Deutch Frankel Schultz Wasserman F. Wilson, Diaz-Balart Garcia Ros-Lehtinen Kingston S. Bishop, 1 7 3 2 5 8 6 9 4 11 13 12 21 18 19 19 14 10 27 23 22 25 26 24 20 gia Geor house votes

KEY LCV SCORES a = Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote s = Absence (counts as negative)

Superfund Cleanup Climate Change & Public Lands Public Lands Assault California Water Resources Broad Attack on Lands & Wildlife Assault on Public Protections Undermining Flood Insurance Reform Climate Change Science Carbon Pollution Attacking Public Input & Toxic Mining Waste Preventing New Parks Big Oil Budget 2014 Environmental Review 113th Congress Lifetime % %% b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# Hawaii 1 Hanabusa (D) 71 81 89 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a          a a a a a a 2 Gabbard (D) 94 95 95  a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Idaho 1 Labrador (R) 3 5 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 2 Simpson (R) 3 2 7 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ Illinois 1 Rush* (D) 66 67 78        a a a a a a a   a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a   a a a a 2 Kelly, R. (D) 94 95 95 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a a a a 3 Lipinski (D) 86 87 89 a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a ✘ a a a 4 Gutierrez (D) 94 92 90 a a a a a a  a a a a a a a  aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 5 Quigley (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 6 Roskam (R) 6 5 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 7 Davis, D. (D) 91 89 91 a a a a a  ✘ a a a a a a a  aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 8 Duckworth (D) 80 83 83 a a a a a a ✘ a a a  a a aaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a a a a     9 Schakowsky (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 10 Schneider (D) 86 90 90 a a a a a a ✘    a a a aaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a a a a a a a a 11 Foster (D) 97 94 87 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 12 Enyart (D) 66 68 68 a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  a a a 13 Davis, R. (R) 9 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 14 Hultgren (R) 6 5 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 15 Shimkus (R) 6 6 7 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 16 Kinzinger (R) 3 3 6 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 17 Bustos (D) 80 79 79 a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ a  a a a 18 Schock (R) 6 3 8 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ a ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ Indiana 1 Visclosky (D) 91 90 78 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a 2 Walorski (R) 3 2 2 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘

* Representative Rush missed a number of votes due to an illness in his family and was on official leave of absence from the House of Representatives during much of 2014.

38 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 3. house scores

Undermining Clean Air Protections Air Clean Undermining

Attack on Sound Science Sound on Attack Attack on Scientiﬁc Integrity Scientiﬁc on Attack

a a a a a a a a a Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Pipeline Sands Tar XL Keystone ✘      

a a a a house votes Big Polluter Giveaway Polluter Big

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a Assault on the Clean Water Rule Water Clean the on Assault

3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3% ✘   

a a a a a a Pesticides Pollution Pesticides

✘ ✘ Attack on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Act Species Endangered the on Attack

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Using Best Available Science Available Best Using

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Assault on Clean Energy & Clean Water Clean & Energy Clean on Assault

2^ 2& 2* 2( ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a Impacts of Climate Change Climate of Impacts

a a a a Attack on Clean Water Clean on Attack

✘

Light Bulb Eciency Standards Eciency Bulb Light Social Cost of Carbon of Cost Social

✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ Clean Energy Funding Energy Clean

        

a a a a a a a a Big Oil Giveaway Oil Big scorecard.lcv.org

2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2%

O shore Drilling Subsidies Drilling O shore LCV

National Ocean Policy Ocean National ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Liqueﬁed Natural Gas (LNG) Exports (LNG) Gas Natural Liqueﬁed Scorecard

✘ ✘ 1& 1* 1( 

a a a a a a a a a Gutting Pipeline Review Pipeline Gutting

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Military Investments in Advanced Biofuels Advanced in Investments Military

   

Environmental a a a a

Blocking Climate Action in Trade Agreements Trade in Action Climate Blocking ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1$ 1% 1^ a a a a a a a a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a aaaaaaaaaaaa a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a a a a a National

2014 ✘ a a a ✘  a a a  a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘    a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a aa a a a a a a a aa a a aa a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘   a a  a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘         a a a a a a a a a aa a a aa a a aa a a a a a a aa a a aa a a a aa a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a 91 87 78 78 89 89 90 2 2 2 7 3 6 3 8 5 9 5 8 5 6 6 6 6 7 81 87 67 83 83 97 97 97 97 79 79 92 95 95 95 95 89 68 68 94 90 90 90 3 3 3 3 6 6 9 6 6 71 91 91 97 97 97 86 86 66 66 94 94 94 80 80 (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Duckworth Schakowsky Schneider Foster Enyart R. Davis, Hultgren Shimkus Kinzinger Bustos Schock Visclosky Walorski Labrador Simpson Rush* R. Kelly, Lipinski Gutierrez Quigley Roskam D. Davis, Hanabusa Gabbard aii w aho 1 1 1 1 7 3 2 2 2 2 8 5 9 6 4 11 17 13 12 15 18 16 14 10 Indiana Ha Id Illinois house votes

KEY LCV SCORES a = Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote s = Absence (counts as negative)

Superfund Cleanup Climate Change & Public Lands Public Lands Assault California Water Resources Broad Attack on Lands & Wildlife Assault on Public Protections Undermining Flood Insurance Reform Climate Change Science Carbon Pollution Attacking Public Input & Toxic Mining Waste Preventing New Parks Big Oil Budget 2014 Environmental Review 113th Congress Lifetime % %% b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 3 Stutzman (R) 3 5 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘    ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 4 Rokita (R) 6 5 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 5 Brooks, S. (R) 3 2 2 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 6 Messer (R) 0 2 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 7 Carson (D) 94 94 91 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a  aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 8 Bucshon (R) 3 3 6 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 9 Young, T. (R) 6 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ Iwo a 1 Braley (D) 97 94 90 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 2 Loebsack (D) 86 84 86 a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a 3 Latham (R) 6 5 8 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 4 King, S. (R) 6 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Kansas 1 Huelskamp (R) 3 5 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 2 Jenkins, L. (R) 3 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 3 Yoder (R) 6 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 4 Pompeo (R) 3 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘        ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Kentucky 1 Whitfield (R) 9 8 14 ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 2 Guthrie (R) 3 3 8  ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 3 Yarmuth (D) 94 92 94 a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 4 Massie (R) 11 13 13 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 5 Rogers, H. (R) 3 3 9 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 6 Barr (R) 6 5 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ Louisiana 1 Scalise (R) 0 2 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 2 Richmond* (D) 63 63 71 a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a a  a ✘ a a a       a a a ✘ a ✘ a a  3 Boustany (R) 0 2 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘

* Representative Richmond missed a number of votes due to an illness in his family.

40 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 3. house scores

4 Undermining Clean Air Protections Air Clean Undermining



Attack on Sound Science Sound on Attack Attack on Scientiﬁc Integrity Scientiﬁc on Attack

a a a a a Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Pipeline Sands Tar XL Keystone ✘ ✘

house votes Big Polluter Giveaway Polluter Big

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a Assault on the Clean Water Rule Water Clean the on Assault

3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3% ✘  Pesticides Pollution Pesticides

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Attack on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Act Species Endangered the on Attack

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Using Best Available Science Available Best Using

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a Assault on Clean Energy & Clean Water Clean & Energy Clean on Assault

2^ 2& 2* 2( ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Impacts of Climate Change Climate of Impacts

Attack on Clean Water Clean on Attack Light Bulb Eciency Standards Eciency Bulb Light

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘    Social Cost of Carbon of Cost Social

✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘         Clean Energy Funding Energy Clean

     

a a a a a a a a a a Big Oil Giveaway Oil Big scorecard.lcv.org

2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2%

O shore Drilling Subsidies Drilling O shore LCV

· ✘ ✘

National Ocean Policy Ocean National



a a a Liqueﬁed Natural Gas (LNG) Exports (LNG) Gas Natural Liqueﬁed Scorecard

✘ 1& 1* 1( Gutting Pipeline Review Pipeline Gutting

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a Military Investments in Advanced Biofuels Advanced in Investments Military



Environmental a a a a a

2014  a ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘   a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘  a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a 71 94 22 2 2 2 5 2 5 3 6 3 4 3 9 3 4 3 4 3 8 5 7 5 7 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 8 5 5 8 14 13 13 92 63 84 86 94 90 94 91 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 6 6 6 6 6 6 9 0 0 0 11 97 63 86 94 94 (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) s Stutzman Rokita S. Brooks, Messer Carson Bucshon T. Young, Braley Jenkins, L. Yoder Pompeo Whitfield Guthrie Yarmuth Massie H. Rogers, Barr Scalise Richmond* Boustany Loebsack Latham King, S. Huelskamp a 1 1 1 1 7 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 5 5 8 6 6 9 4 4 4 4 ouisiana owa I Kentucky L ns Ka house votes

KEY LCV SCORES a = Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote s = Absence (counts as negative)

Superfund Cleanup Climate Change & Public Lands Public Lands Assault California Water Resources Broad Attack on Lands & Wildlife Assault on Public Protections Undermining Flood Insurance Reform Climate Change Science Carbon Pollution Attacking Public Input & Toxic Mining Waste Preventing New Parks Big Oil Budget 2014 Environmental Review 113th Congress Lifetime % %% b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 4 Fleming (R) 0 2 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 5 McAllister (R) 3 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 6 Cassidy (R) 0 0 8 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘   ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘    Maine 1 Pingree (D) 94 95 94 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a 2 Michaud (D) 94 94 92 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a a a a a Maryland 1 Harris (R) 0 0 4 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 2 Ruppersberger (D) 91 90 85  a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 3 Sarbanes (D) 97 95 96 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 4 Edwards (D) 94 95 96 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a  aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 5 Hoyer (D) 91 87 80 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘  aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 6 Delaney (D) 91 90 90 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ 7 Cummings (D) 97 97 94 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 8 Van Hollen (D) 97 97 98 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Masch s a usetts 1 Neal (D) 94 95 91 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa  a a a a 2 McGovern (D) 94 95 98 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa  a a a 3 Tsongas (D) 97 97 94 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 4 Kennedy (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 5 Clark, K. (D) 94 94 94 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa  a a a a a 6 Tierney (D) 94 95 97 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa  a a a a a 7 Capuano (D) 97 97 95 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 8 Lynch (D) 97 97 95 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 9 Keating (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Michigan 1 Benishek (R) 6 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 2 Huizenga (R) 3 3 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 3 Amash (R) 11 14 15 ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘

42 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 3. house scores

43 Undermining Clean Air Protections Air Clean Undermining

✘

a Attack on Sound Science Sound on Attack

✘ Attack on Scientiﬁc Integrity Scientiﬁc on Attack

✘ ✘ ✘   

a a a Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Pipeline Sands Tar XL Keystone  

a a a a house votes Big Polluter Giveaway Polluter Big



a a aa a a a a a a Assault on the Clean Water Rule Water Clean the on Assault

3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%  

a a a a a a Pesticides Pollution Pesticides

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Attack on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Act Species Endangered the on Attack Using Best Available Science Available Best Using

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘   Assault on Clean Energy & Clean Water Clean & Energy Clean on Assault

2^ 2& 2* 2( ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a Impacts of Climate Change Climate of Impacts



Attack on Clean Water Clean on Attack

Light Bulb Eciency Standards Eciency Bulb Light Social Cost of Carbon of Cost Social

✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ Clean Energy Funding Energy Clean

a Big Oil Giveaway Oil Big scorecard.lcv.org

2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2%

O shore Drilling Subsidies Drilling O shore LCV

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa National Ocean Policy Ocean National



aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Liqueﬁed Natural Gas (LNG) Exports (LNG) Gas Natural Liqueﬁed Scorecard

✘ ✘ ✘ 1& 1* 1(

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Gutting Pipeline Review Pipeline Gutting

✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  Military Investments in Advanced Biofuels Advanced in Investments Military

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Environmental a

Blocking Climate Action in Trade Agreements Trade in Action Climate Blocking ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 1$ 1% 1^  aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa National

2014  ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  a a aa a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a a a a aa a a aa a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  a a aa a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a a a a aa a a aa a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 91 97 92 95 95 98 98 96 96 94 94 94 80 2 5 3 7 3 3 5 5 0 4 0 8 14 15 87 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 95 95 95 95 95 95 94 94 94 90 85 90 90 3 3 6 0 0 0 11 91 91 91 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) and Van Hollen Van Neal McGovern Tsongas Kennedy Clark, K. Tierney Capuano Lynch Keating Benishek Huizenga Amash Michaud Harris Ruppersberger Sarbanes Edwards Hoyer Delaney Cummings Fleming McAllister Cassidy Pingree usetts ach ss 1 1 1 1 7 7 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 8 5 8 5 5 6 9 6 6 4 4 4 Ma Michigan Maine Maryl house votes

KEY LCV SCORES a = Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote s = Absence (counts as negative)

Superfund Cleanup Climate Change & Public Lands Public Lands Assault California Water Resources Broad Attack on Lands & Wildlife Assault on Public Protections Undermining Flood Insurance Reform Climate Change Science Carbon Pollution Attacking Public Input & Toxic Mining Waste Preventing New Parks Big Oil Budget 2014 Environmental Review 113th Congress Lifetime % %% b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 4 Camp (R) 6 5 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 5 Kildee (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 6 Upton (R) 6 5 29 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 7 Walberg (R) 0 3 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 8 Rogers, Mike (R) 3 3 8 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 9 Levin (D) 97 97 90 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 10 Miller, C. (R) 6 5 13 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 11 Bentivolio (R) 3 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 12 Dingell (D) 89 90 75 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a  aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa  a a a a  13 Conyers (D) 94 94 80  a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 14 Peters, G. (D) 91 92 90 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ ✘ a a a a a a Minnesota 1 Walz (D) 77 81 81 a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a a  a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a 2 Kline, J. (R) 6 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 3 Paulsen (R) 11 10 17 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 4 McCollum (D) 89 90 92 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 5 Ellison (D) 89 92 93 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 6 Bachmann (R) 3 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 7 Peterson (D) 11 13 36 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 8 Nolan (D) 80 83 82 a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a  a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a Mississippi 1 Nunnelee* (R) N/A N/A 2 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 2 Thompson, B. (D) 89 86 78 a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a ✘ a a a 3 Harper (R) 3 3 4 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 4 Palazzo (R) 0 2 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ Missouri 1 Clay (D) 86 89 88 a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a  aaaaaaaaaaaa   a a a a a a a 2 Wagner (R) 3 3 3 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘  ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘

* Representative Nunnelee missed a majority of votes due to illness and was not given a score for 2014. He passed away on February 6, 2015.

44 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 3. house scores

45 Undermining Clean Air Protections Air Clean Undermining



Attack on Sound Science Sound on Attack Attack on Scientiﬁc Integrity Scientiﬁc on Attack

a a a a a a a a a Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Pipeline Sands Tar XL Keystone ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

house votes Big Polluter Giveaway Polluter Big

a a a a a a Assault on the Clean Water Rule Water Clean the on Assault

3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3% ✘ 

a a a a a a a a Pesticides Pollution Pesticides

✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a Attack on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Act Species Endangered the on Attack

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Using Best Available Science Available Best Using

 

a a a Assault on Clean Energy & Clean Water Clean & Energy Clean on Assault

2^ 2& 2* 2( ✘ Impacts of Climate Change Climate of Impacts

a a a a a Attack on Clean Water Clean on Attack

✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ Light Bulb Eciency Standards Eciency Bulb Light

 Social Cost of Carbon of Cost Social

✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ Clean Energy Funding Energy Clean

a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a Big Oil Giveaway Oil Big scorecard.lcv.org

2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2%

O shore Drilling Subsidies Drilling O shore LCV

National Ocean Policy Ocean National

✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘      Liqueﬁed Natural Gas (LNG) Exports (LNG) Gas Natural Liqueﬁed Scorecard

1& 1* 1(  Gutting Pipeline Review Pipeline Gutting

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a Military Investments in Advanced Biofuels Advanced in Investments Military

✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  

Environmental aaaaaaaaaaaa a a a a a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a

Blocking Climate Action in Trade Agreements Trade in Action Climate Blocking ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1$ 1% 1^     aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa National

2014 ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘    a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘  a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a aa a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 2 75 78 92 88 90 90 2 5 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 33 5 8 5 9 5 13 5 29 6 6 13 36 81 81 10 17 83 82 97 97 97 92 92 93 89 86 94 80 90 90 N/A 3 3 3 3 3 6 6 6 6 0 0 11 11 91 77 97 97 89 89 89 89 86 94 80 N/A (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) a Camp Kildee Kline, J. Kline, Paulsen McCollum Ellison Bachmann Peterson Nolan Nunnelee* B. Thompson, Harper Palazzo Clay Wagner Upton Walberg Mike Rogers, Levin C. Miller, Bentivolio Dingell Conyers G. Peters, Walz 1 1 1 7 7 3 3 2 2 2 5 8 5 8 6 6 9 4 4 4 11 13 12 14 10 Mississippi Missouri Minnesot house votes

KEY LCV SCORES a = Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote s = Absence (counts as negative)

Superfund Cleanup Climate Change & Public Lands Public Lands Assault California Water Resources Broad Attack on Lands & Wildlife Assault on Public Protections Undermining Flood Insurance Reform Climate Change Science Carbon Pollution Attacking Public Input & Toxic Mining Waste Preventing New Parks Big Oil Budget 2014 Environmental Review 113th Congress Lifetime % %% b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 3 Luetkemeyer (R) 6 5 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 4 Hartzler (R) 0 2 4 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  ✘ ✘     ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 5 Cleaver (D) 80 75 85  a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a  aaaaaaaaaaaa   a ✘ a a a a a 6 Graves, S. (R) 6 6 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘   ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 7 Long (R) 0 2 4 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 8 Smith, J. (R) 0 2 2 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ Montana AL Daines (R) 0 2 2 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ Nebraska 1 Fortenberry (R) 6 5 20 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  2 Terry (R) 6 5 8 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 3 Smith, Adrian (R) 3 3 6 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ Nevada 1 Titus (D) 97 95 95 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 2 Amodei (R) 3 3 3 ✘     ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 3 Heck, J. (R) 6 10 9  ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 4 Horsford (D) 89 73 73 a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a ✘ a a a a a New Hampshire 1 Shea-Porter (D) 97 97 96 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 2 Kuster (D) 94 95 95 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a a a a a New Jersey 1 Andrews* (D) 100 94 91 a a a a a i i i i i i i i iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii 1 Norcross* (D) 75 75 75 iiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ✘ a a a 2 LoBiondo (R) 37 32 61 a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 3 Runyan (R) 9 13 15 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 4 Smith, C. (R) 29 29 65 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘  ✘ ✘ 5 Garrett (R) 3 6 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 6 Pallone (D) 97 87 96 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 7 Lance (R) 6 13 25 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

* Representative Norcross was sworn in on November 12 following the resignation of Representative Andrews on February 18.

46 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 3. house scores

4 Undermining Clean Air Protections Air Clean Undermining

 Attack on Sound Science Sound on Attack

✘ ✘ Attack on Scientiﬁc Integrity Scientiﬁc on Attack



a a a Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Pipeline Sands Tar XL Keystone ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

house votes Big Polluter Giveaway Polluter Big

a a a a a a a a a a a a Assault on the Clean Water Rule Water Clean the on Assault

3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3% ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a Pesticides Pollution Pesticides

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a Attack on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Act Species Endangered the on Attack

✘

a Using Best Available Science Available Best Using

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘    

a a a a Assault on Clean Energy & Clean Water Clean & Energy Clean on Assault

2^ 2& 2* 2(

Impacts of Climate Change Climate of Impacts

Attack on Clean Water Clean on Attack Light Bulb Eciency Standards Eciency Bulb Light

✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ Social Cost of Carbon of Cost Social

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  Clean Energy Funding Energy Clean

✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘

a a a a a a a a Big Oil Giveaway Oil Big scorecard.lcv.org

2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% ✘

| a a

O shore Drilling Subsidies Drilling O shore LCV

· 

a a a a a a

National Ocean Policy Ocean National Liqueﬁed Natural Gas (LNG) Exports (LNG) Gas Natural Liqueﬁed Scorecard

1& 1* 1(     Gutting Pipeline Review Pipeline Gutting

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Military Investments in Advanced Biofuels Advanced in Investments Military

✘ ✘

Environmental a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaa a

Blocking Climate Action in Trade Agreements Trade in Action Climate Blocking ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1$ 1% 1^ iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii   aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa National

2014  ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ i i i i i i i i a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘     a ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  iiiiiiiiiiiii  a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a aa a a a a a 61 85 96 96 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 4 3 6 3 3 5 20 5 8 5 5 6 10 6 5 13 15 13 25 10 9 75 75 75 73 73 87 32 97 29 65 95 95 95 95 94 91 3 3 3 9 6 6 6 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 75 37 97 97 97 29 89 94 80 100 (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) a sk a ana Amodei Heck, J. Horsford Shea-Porter Kuster Andrews* Norcross* LoBiondo Runyan Smith, C. Garrett Pallone Lance Graves, S. Graves, Long Smith, J. Daines Fortenberry Terry Smith, Adrian Titus Luetkemeyer Hartzler Cleaver ad 1 1 1 1 1 7 7 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 5 8 5 6 6 4 4 4 AL New Hampshire New Jersey Mont Nebra Nev house votes

KEY LCV SCORES a = Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote s = Absence (counts as negative)

Superfund Cleanup Climate Change & Public Lands Public Lands Assault California Water Resources Broad Attack on Lands & Wildlife Assault on Public Protections Undermining Flood Insurance Reform Climate Change Science Carbon Pollution Attacking Public Input & Toxic Mining Waste Preventing New Parks Big Oil Budget 2014 Environmental Review 113th Congress Lifetime % %% b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 8 Sires (D) 94 92 89 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a a 9 Pascrell (D) 97 97 92 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 10 Payne (D) 94 94 94 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa  a a a 11 Frelinghuysen (R) 9 10 39 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 12 Holt (D) 94 81 96 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa  New Mexico 1 Lujan Grisham, M. (D) 86 87 87 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a  a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a 2 Pearce (R) 6 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 3 Luján, B. (D) 91 92 95 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a New York 1 Bishop, T. (D) 97 94 95 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 2 King, P. (R) 9 11 17 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 3 Israel (D) 94 94 96 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 4 McCarthy, C.* (D) N/A N/A 80  a  a a a a a a       a a a a a ✘ a   5 Meeks (D) 91 89 88 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a  aaaaaaaaaaaaa  a a a a a 6 Meng (D) 97 94 94 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 7 Velázquez (D) 91 94 92 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a  aaaaaaaaaaaaa  a a a a a 8 Jeffries (D) 97 94 94 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 9 Clarke, Y. (D) 86 90 91 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a    a a a a a a a a a  a a a a a 10 Nadler (D) 94 95 96 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa  11 Grimm (R) 9 11 12 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘     ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 12 Maloney, C. (D) 91 94 8 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ aaaaaaaaaaaa  a a a a a 13 Rangel (D) 63 78 81 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a        a      a a a a a a a a a 14 Crowley (D) 91 94 94  a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a  aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 15 Serrano (D) 94 94 90 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a  aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 16 Engel (D) 91 92 92 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ aaaaaaaaaaaa  a a a a a 17 Lowey (D) 94 95 93 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a a a a a a a a

* Representative McCarthy missed a majority of votes due to illness and was not given a score for 2014.

48 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 3. house scores

4 Undermining Clean Air Protections Air Clean Undermining

  Attack on Sound Science Sound on Attack

  Attack on Scientiﬁc Integrity Scientiﬁc on Attack

a a a a a a a Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Pipeline Sands Tar XL Keystone ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 

house votes Big Polluter Giveaway Polluter Big

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Assault on the Clean Water Rule Water Clean the on Assault

3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%     

a a a a a a Pesticides Pollution Pesticides

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Attack on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Act Species Endangered the on Attack Using Best Available Science Available Best Using

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Assault on Clean Energy & Clean Water Clean & Energy Clean on Assault

2^ 2& 2* 2( ✘ ✘ ✘

Impacts of Climate Change Climate of Impacts

Attack on Clean Water Clean on Attack

Light Bulb Eciency Standards Eciency Bulb Light Social Cost of Carbon of Cost Social

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘      Clean Energy Funding Energy Clean

     

a a a a a a a a a a a a Big Oil Giveaway Oil Big scorecard.lcv.org

2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2%

| a a

O shore Drilling Subsidies Drilling O shore LCV

National Ocean Policy Ocean National

      

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a Liqueﬁed Natural Gas (LNG) Exports (LNG) Gas Natural Liqueﬁed Scorecard

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1& 1* 1(

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaa Gutting Pipeline Review Pipeline Gutting

   

a Military Investments in Advanced Biofuels Advanced in Investments Military



Environmental a a a a a a

Blocking Climate Action in Trade Agreements Trade in Action Climate Blocking ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1$ 1% 1^         aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a aaaaaaaaaaaa a a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa National

2014 ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a aa a a aa a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a aa a a aa a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘   a a a a a a a a a a aa a a aa a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a aa a a aa a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a 81 92 92 88 93 39 95 95 89 96 80 5 4 11 17 11 12 81 96 10 78 87 87 97 92 92 92 92 95 95 89 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 90 94 94 8 94 94 94 96 90 91 N/A 6 9 9 9 91 91 91 91 91 91 97 97 97 97 63 86 86 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 N/A (R) (R) (R) (R) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) o ork Sires Pascrell McCarthy, C.* McCarthy, Meeks Meng Velázquez Jeffries Y. Clarke, Nadler Grimm C. Maloney, Rangel Crowley Serrano Engel Lowey Payne Frelinghuysen Holt Lujan Grisham, M. Pearce Luján, B. T. Bishop, King, P. Israel 1 1 7 3 3 2 2 5 8 8 6 9 9 4 11 11 17 13 12 12 15 16 14 10 10 New Mexic New Y house votes

KEY LCV SCORES a = Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote s = Absence (counts as negative)

Superfund Cleanup Climate Change & Public Lands Public Lands Assault California Water Resources Broad Attack on Lands & Wildlife Assault on Public Protections Undermining Flood Insurance Reform Climate Change Science Carbon Pollution Attacking Public Input & Toxic Mining Waste Preventing New Parks Big Oil Budget 2014 Environmental Review 113th Congress Lifetime % %% b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 18 Maloney, S. (D) 83 81 81 a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a 19 Gibson, C. (R) 54 49 38 a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ 20 Tonko (D) 97 95 96 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 21 Owens (D) 51 51 55 a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ 22 Hanna (R) 11 11 17 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘      a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 23 Reed, T. (R) 3 3 6 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 24 Maffei (D) 97 92 93 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 25 Slaughter (D) 94 90 90 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a  aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 26 Higgins (D) 100 97 93 aaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 27 Collins, C. (R) 3 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘    ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ North Carolina 1 Butterfield (D) 91 89 88 a a a a a  ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a a a a a 2 Ellmers (R) 3 2 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 3 Jones (R) 17 17 23  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘     ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a  ✘ ✘ ✘ 4 Price, D. (D) 97 95 89 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 5 Foxx (R) 3 3 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 6 Coble (R) 3 3 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘  ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘    a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ 7 McIntyre (D) 26 29 50 ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘  ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ 8 Hudson (R) 3 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 9 Pittenger (R) 3 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 10 McHenry (R) 3 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 11 Meadows (R) 3 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 12 Adams* (D) 100 100 100 iiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii a a a a 13 Holding (R) 3 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ North Dakota AL Cramer (R) 0 2 2 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘

* Representative Adams was sworn in on November 12 following the resignation of Representative Watt on January 6.

50 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 3. house scores

51 Undermining Clean Air Protections Air Clean Undermining

✘ ✘ Attack on Sound Science Sound on Attack

✘ ✘ Attack on Scientiﬁc Integrity Scientiﬁc on Attack

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Pipeline Sands Tar XL Keystone ✘ ✘ ✘  

a a a a house votes Big Polluter Giveaway Polluter Big

a a a Assault on the Clean Water Rule Water Clean the on Assault

3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%

a a a a a a a a Pesticides Pollution Pesticides

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Attack on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Act Species Endangered the on Attack

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Using Best Available Science Available Best Using

a a a a a a a a a Assault on Clean Energy & Clean Water Clean & Energy Clean on Assault

2^ 2& 2* 2( ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Impacts of Climate Change Climate of Impacts



a Attack on Clean Water Clean on Attack

✘ ✘ ✘ Light Bulb Eciency Standards Eciency Bulb Light

✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘

a Social Cost of Carbon of Cost Social

✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  Clean Energy Funding Energy Clean

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a aa a a a Big Oil Giveaway Oil Big scorecard.lcv.org

2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% ✘ ✘

O shore Drilling Subsidies Drilling O shore LCV

a a a National Ocean Policy Ocean National ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

  

a a a a a a a a a a Liqueﬁed Natural Gas (LNG) Exports (LNG) Gas Natural Liqueﬁed Scorecard

✘ 1& 1* 1( 

a Gutting Pipeline Review Pipeline Gutting

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘     

a a Military Investments in Advanced Biofuels Advanced in Investments Military

✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 

Environmental a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Blocking Climate Action in Trade Agreements Trade in Action Climate Blocking ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1$ 1% 1^  iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii  a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa National

2014 a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘   ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘     a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘       a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘  a a  a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ iiiiiiiiiiiii  a a a a a aa a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a 38 88 93 96 2 2 2 5 2 3 3 3 3 6 3 3 3 5 3 11 3 3 3 3 3 3 11 17 17 23 51 55 81 81 97 92 93 29 50 95 89 95 89 49 90 90 100 100 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 11 17 51 91 83 97 97 97 26 54 94 100 100 (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) a Maloney, S. Maloney, Gibson, C. Tonko Jones D. Price, Foxx Coble McIntyre Hudson Pittenger McHenry Meadows Adams* Holding Cramer Owens Hanna T. Reed, Maffei Slaughter Higgins C. Collins, Butterfield Ellmers 1 7 3 2 5 8 6 9 4 11 13 12 21 18 19 10 27 23 22 25 26 24 20 AL kot h Da Nort h Carolina Nort house votes

KEY LCV SCORES a = Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote s = Absence (counts as negative)

Superfund Cleanup Climate Change & Public Lands Public Lands Assault California Water Resources Broad Attack on Lands & Wildlife Assault on Public Protections Undermining Flood Insurance Reform Climate Change Science Carbon Pollution Attacking Public Input & Toxic Mining Waste Preventing New Parks Big Oil Budget 2014 Environmental Review 113th Congress Lifetime % %% b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# Ohio 1 Chabot (R) 3 5 16 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 2 Wenstrup (R) 3 5 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 3 Beatty (D) 97 95 95 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 4 Jordan (R) 3 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 5 Latta (R) 3 2 4 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 6 Johnson, B. (R) 6 3 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 7 Gibbs, B. (R) 3 3 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 8 Boehner (R) N/A N/A 2 The Speaker of the House votes at his discretion. The Speaker of the House votes at his discretion. 9 Kaptur (D) 91 87 79 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a  aaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a a a a a a a a 10 Turner (R) 3 5 9 ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 11 Fudge (D) 89 89 91 a a a a a  ✘ a a a a a a a  aaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a a a a 12 Tiberi (R) 6 5 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 13 Ryan, T. (D) 86 89 90 a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a a  a ✘ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 14 Joyce (R) 6 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘  ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 15 Stivers (R) 6 5 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ 16 Renacci (R) 3 3 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ Oklahoma 1 Bridenstine (R) 3 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 2 Mullin (R) 0 0 0 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘  ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  ✘ ✘ 3 Lucas (R) 6 8 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 4 Cole (R) 6 8 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 5 Lankford (R) 0 2 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘     ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ Oregon 1 Bonamici (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 2 Walden (R) 3 2 11 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 3 Blumenauer (D) 94 95 95 a a a a a  a a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa  a a a 4 DeFazio (D) 100 97 90 aaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 5 Schrader (D) 60 65 73 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘

52 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 3. house scores

5 Undermining Clean Air Protections Air Clean Undermining

✘ Attack on Sound Science Sound on Attack

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Attack on Scientiﬁc Integrity Scientiﬁc on Attack

 

a a a Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Pipeline Sands Tar XL Keystone 

house votes Big Polluter Giveaway Polluter Big

a a a a a a a a a Assault on the Clean Water Rule Water Clean the on Assault 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3% ✘

. Pesticides Pollution Pesticides n

io Attack on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Act Species Endangered the on Attack ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

scret i Using Best Available Science Available Best Using s d ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 

a a a a a a a a a a

hi Assault on Clean Energy & Clean Water Clean & Energy Clean on Assault t

2^ 2& 2* 2( ✘ ✘

a a Impacts of Climate Change Climate of Impacts tes a

o Attack on Clean Water Clean on Attack se v

✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘

ou Light Bulb Eciency Standards Eciency Bulb Light e H h 

t Social Cost of Carbon of Cost Social of ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ er

k Clean Energy Funding Energy Clean ea a a a a a a a a a a a

Sp Big Oil Giveaway Oil Big e scorecard.lcv.org

2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% ✘  |

Th O shore Drilling Subsidies Drilling O shore LCV

· 

National Ocean Policy Ocean National ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘

a a a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Liqueﬁed Natural Gas (LNG) Exports (LNG) Gas Natural Liqueﬁed Scorecard

✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ 1& 1* 1( Gutting Pipeline Review Pipeline Gutting

✘ ✘ 

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Military Investments in Advanced Biofuels Advanced in Investments Military

 

Environmental aaaaaaaaaaa

Blocking Climate Action in Trade Agreements Trade in Action Climate Blocking ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 1$ 1% 1^      a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa National

2014

a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ tes at his discretion. tes at a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a o ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a   ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  a a a a The Speaker of the House v ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a aa a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a 2 91 73 79 90 90 2 5 2 11 2 4 3 5 3 5 3 5 5 16 5 5 5 11 5 8 5 9 5 5 5 5 8 5 8 7 6 6 0 0 87 97 97 97 95 95 95 95 65 89 89 N/A 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 6 6 6 6 6 6 0 0 91 97 97 89 86 94 60 100 N/A (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Chabot Wenstrup Beatty Ryan, T. Ryan, Joyce Stivers Renacci Bridenstine Mullin Lucas Cole Lankford Bonamici Walden Blumenauer DeFazio Schrader Jordan Latta Johnson, B. Gibbs, B. Boehner Kaptur Turner Fudge Tiberi gon ahoma 1 1 1 7 3 3 3 2 2 2 5 5 5 8 6 9 4 4 4 11 13 12 15 16 14 10 Ohio Okl Ore house votes

KEY LCV SCORES a = Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote s = Absence (counts as negative)

Superfund Cleanup Climate Change & Public Lands Public Lands Assault California Water Resources Broad Attack on Lands & Wildlife Assault on Public Protections Undermining Flood Insurance Reform Climate Change Science Carbon Pollution Attacking Public Input & Toxic Mining Waste Preventing New Parks Big Oil Budget 2014 Environmental Review 113th Congress Lifetime % %% b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# Pennsylvania 1 Brady, R. (D) 94 92 84 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a a 2 Fattah (D) 86 87 89 a a a a  a ✘ a a a a a a  aaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a a a a a  a a 3 Kelly (R) 3 3 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 4 Perry (R) 3 5 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 5 Thompson, G. (R) 3 3 6 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘     a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 6 Gerlach (R) 6 10 36 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ 7 Meehan (R) 6 6 10 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 8 Fitzpatrick (R) 29 27 44 a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘  ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 9 Shuster (R) 6 8 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 10 Marino (R) 3 5 7 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 11 Barletta (R) 3 3 7 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ 12 Rothfus (R) 3 5 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 13 Schwartz (D) 69 76 90 a     a        aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 14 Doyle (D) 89 86 73 a a a a  a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ aaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a a 15 Dent (R) 3 3 20 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 16 Pitts (R) 6 5 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 17 Cartwright (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 18 Murphy, T. (R) 6 3 10 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ Rhode Island 1 Cicilline (D) 94 95 96 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa  a a a a a 2 Langevin (D) 94 90 95 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a  aaaaaaaaaaaa South Carolina 1 Sanford (R) 9 8 31 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 2 Wilson, J. (R) 3 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  3 Duncan, Jeff (R) 3 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 4 Gowdy (R) 3 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 5 Mulvaney (R) 3 5 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘

54 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 3. house scores

55 Undermining Clean Air Protections Air Clean Undermining

 Attack on Sound Science Sound on Attack

a a Attack on Scientiﬁc Integrity Scientiﬁc on Attack

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 

a a a a a a Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Pipeline Sands Tar XL Keystone ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  

house votes Big Polluter Giveaway Polluter Big

a a a a a a Assault on the Clean Water Rule Water Clean the on Assault

3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%  Pesticides Pollution Pesticides

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Attack on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Act Species Endangered the on Attack Using Best Available Science Available Best Using

a a a a a a a a Assault on Clean Energy & Clean Water Clean & Energy Clean on Assault

2^ 2& 2* 2( ✘ Impacts of Climate Change Climate of Impacts

✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ Attack on Clean Water Clean on Attack

a aaaaaaaaaaaa Light Bulb Eciency Standards Eciency Bulb Light

 Social Cost of Carbon of Cost Social

✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Clean Energy Funding Energy Clean

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a Big Oil Giveaway Oil Big scorecard.lcv.org

2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% ✘

| a

O shore Drilling Subsidies Drilling O shore LCV

National Ocean Policy Ocean National

aaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a Liqueﬁed Natural Gas (LNG) Exports (LNG) Gas Natural Liqueﬁed Scorecard

✘ ✘ 1& 1* 1(     Gutting Pipeline Review Pipeline Gutting

✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  Military Investments in Advanced Biofuels Advanced in Investments Military

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 

Environmental aaaaaaaaaaa

Blocking Climate Action in Trade Agreements Trade in Action Climate Blocking ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1$ 1% 1^   aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a National

2014 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘        a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a    a ✘ ✘ ✘     ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a 73 95 89 84 96 44 90 3 3 3 6 3 7 3 20 3 10 3 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 8 5 7 5 5 5 5 8 31 8 7 6 10 10 36 27 87 76 97 97 92 95 86 90 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 6 6 6 6 6 97 29 89 86 69 94 94 94 (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) and ania Brady, R. Brady, Fattah Schwartz Doyle Dent Pitts Cartwright T. Murphy, Cicilline Langevin Sanford J. Wilson, Duncan, Jeff Gowdy Mulvaney Kelly Perry G. Thompson, Gerlach Meehan Fitzpatrick Shuster Marino Barletta Rothfus 1 1 1 7 3 3 2 2 2 5 5 8 6 9 4 4 11 17 13 12 15 18 16 14 outh Carolina 10 Pennsylv Rhode Isl S house votes

KEY LCV SCORES a = Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote s = Absence (counts as negative)

Superfund Cleanup Climate Change & Public Lands Public Lands Assault California Water Resources Broad Attack on Lands & Wildlife Assault on Public Protections Undermining Flood Insurance Reform Climate Change Science Carbon Pollution Attacking Public Input & Toxic Mining Waste Preventing New Parks Big Oil Budget 2014 Environmental Review 113th Congress Lifetime % %% b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 6 Clyburn (D) 91 86 83 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a ✘ a a a 7 Rice, T. (R) 0 0 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ South Dakota AL Noem (R) 3 3 7 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘  ✘     a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ Tennessee 1 Roe (R) 0 0 3 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 2 Duncan, John (R) 3 5 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 3 Fleischmann (R) 3 3 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 4 DesJarlais* (R) 0 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘           ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 5 Cooper (D) 91 90 80 a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ aaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a a 6 Black, D. (R) 0 0 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 7 Blackburn, M. (R) 0 0 3 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 8 Fincher (R) 0 2 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  9 Cohen (D) 97 97 96 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Texas 1 Gohmert (R) 3 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 2 Poe (R) 3 3 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  3 Johnson, S. (R) 0 2 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘     ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 4 Hall (R) 9 5 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘      5 Hensarling (R) 3 5 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 6 Barton (R) 6 3 7  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘   ✘ ✘ ✘ 7 Culberson (R) 6 8 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ a ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 8 Brady, K. (R) 0 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘   ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 9 Green, A. (D) 74 81 80 a a a a a a ✘    a a a  a ✘ ✘ aaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a  10 McCaul (R) 6 5 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 11 Conaway (R) 3 2 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 12 Granger (R) 6 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 13 Thornberry (R) 3 3 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 14 Weber (R) 0 2 2 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘

* Representative DesJarlais missed a number of votes due to illness.

56 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 3. house scores

5 Undermining Clean Air Protections Air Clean Undermining

  

Attack on Sound Science Sound on Attack Attack on Scientiﬁc Integrity Scientiﬁc on Attack

✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Pipeline Sands Tar XL Keystone ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

house votes Big Polluter Giveaway Polluter Big

      

a Assault on the Clean Water Rule Water Clean the on Assault

3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3% ✘ Pesticides Pollution Pesticides

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Attack on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Act Species Endangered the on Attack

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Using Best Available Science Available Best Using

  

a Assault on Clean Energy & Clean Water Clean & Energy Clean on Assault

2^ 2& 2* 2(

Impacts of Climate Change Climate of Impacts

Attack on Clean Water Clean on Attack

Light Bulb Eciency Standards Eciency Bulb Light Social Cost of Carbon of Cost Social

✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘           Clean Energy Funding Energy Clean



a a a a a a a Big Oil Giveaway Oil Big scorecard.lcv.org

2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% ✘

O shore Drilling Subsidies Drilling O shore LCV

· 

National Ocean Policy Ocean National

aaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaa Liqueﬁed Natural Gas (LNG) Exports (LNG) Gas Natural Liqueﬁed Scorecard

✘ 1& 1* 1(     Gutting Pipeline Review Pipeline Gutting

✘ ✘ ✘ Military Investments in Advanced Biofuels Advanced in Investments Military



Environmental a

Blocking Climate Action in Trade Agreements Trade in Action Climate Blocking ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 1$ 1% 1^  aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa National

2014 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a   ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘     a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘        a a a a a a a a a a ✘  ✘ ✘   a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘  a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 96 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 5 2 4 3 2 3 5 3 5 3 7 3 3 3 7 5 11 5 7 5 11 5 5 5 6 8 5 6 6 0 3 00 5 3 0 0 81 80 97 86 83 90 80 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 6 6 9 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 91 74 97 (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (D) (D) (D) (D) a Clyburn Gohmert Poe Johnson, S. Hall Hensarling Barton Culberson K. Brady, A. Green, McCaul Conaway Granger Thornberry Weber Rice, T. Rice, Noem Roe Duncan, John Fleischmann DesJarlais* Cooper Black, D. Blackburn, M. Fincher Cohen s a 1 1 7 7 7 3 3 2 2 5 8 5 8 6 9 6 6 9 4 4 11 13 12 14 kot outh Da 10 AL Tex S Tennessee house votes

KEY LCV SCORES a = Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote s = Absence (counts as negative)

Superfund Cleanup Climate Change & Public Lands Public Lands Assault California Water Resources Broad Attack on Lands & Wildlife Assault on Public Protections Undermining Flood Insurance Reform Climate Change Science Carbon Pollution Attacking Public Input & Toxic Mining Waste Preventing New Parks Big Oil Budget 2014 Environmental Review 113th Congress Lifetime % %% b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 15 Hinojosa (D) 63 71 66 a a a a a        a a a ✘ ✘   aaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a  16 O’Rourke (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 17 Flores (R) 0 2 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 18 Jackson Lee (D) 86 84 77 a a a a a a  a a a a a  a a a a a a ✘ a  a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a 19 Neugebauer (R) 3 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 20 Castro (D) 91 94 94 a  a a a a  a a a a a a a a a ✘ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 21 Smith, Lamar (R) 3 5 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 22 Olson (R) 0 0 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘   ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 23 Gallego (D) 74 70 70 a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a a ✘ a a a a ✘ 24 Marchant (R) 3 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 25 Williams (R) 3 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 26 Burgess (R) 3 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 27 Farenthold (R) 0 0 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 28 Cuellar (D) 31 30 48 a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ 29 Green, G. (D) 66 60 64 a a ✘ a a a     a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a a a 30 Johnson, E. (D) 91 92 83 a a a a a a  a a a a a a a a a a a a a  a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a 31 Carter, J. (R) 9 8 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 32 Sessions, P. (R) 0 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 33 Veasey (D) 86 89 89 a a a a a a  a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a a a 34 Vela (D) 69 59 59 a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a  a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a 35 Doggett (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a  a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 36 Stockman (R) 3 3 3  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ Utah 1 Bishop, R. (R) 0 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 2 Stewart (R) 6 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 3 Chaffetz (R) 0 2 4 ✘    ✘ ✘     ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 4 Matheson (D) 23 24 45 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  Vermont AL Welch (D) 91 92 93 a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a a a a a

58 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 3. house scores

5 Undermining Clean Air Protections Air Clean Undermining

✘   Attack on Sound Science Sound on Attack

✘ ✘ Attack on Scientiﬁc Integrity Scientiﬁc on Attack

✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Pipeline Sands Tar XL Keystone ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 

house votes Big Polluter Giveaway Polluter Big

a a a a a a a Assault on the Clean Water Rule Water Clean the on Assault

3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3% ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a Pesticides Pollution Pesticides

✘

a Attack on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Act Species Endangered the on Attack

✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Using Best Available Science Available Best Using

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a Assault on Clean Energy & Clean Water Clean & Energy Clean on Assault

2^ 2& 2* 2( ✘ ✘ ✘

a a Impacts of Climate Change Climate of Impacts

✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘

a a a a a Attack on Clean Water Clean on Attack

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a Light Bulb Eciency Standards Eciency Bulb Light

a a a a a a a a a a Social Cost of Carbon of Cost Social

✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 

a a a a Clean Energy Funding Energy Clean



a a a a a a a a Big Oil Giveaway Oil Big scorecard.lcv.org

2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% ✘

| aaaaaaaaaaaa a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

O shore Drilling Subsidies Drilling O shore LCV

· ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

National Ocean Policy Ocean National

 

a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Liqueﬁed Natural Gas (LNG) Exports (LNG) Gas Natural Liqueﬁed Scorecard

✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1& 1* 1( Gutting Pipeline Review Pipeline Gutting

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘   Military Investments in Advanced Biofuels Advanced in Investments Military

✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘

Environmental a a

Blocking Climate Action in Trade Agreements Trade in Action Climate Blocking ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 1$ 1% 1^   a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a a a National

2014  a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a   ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a aa a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘                 a a a a a a ✘ ✘        ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘     ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a aa a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a 83 45 66 2 3 2 4 2 3 2 5 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 7 5 4 8 6 0 3 0 5 71 97 97 97 97 92 93 92 24 59 59 89 89 84 77 70 70 94 94 30 48 60 64 3 3 3 3 3 3 6 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 91 91 91 74 23 97 97 63 86 86 69 66 (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Hinojosa O’Rourke Cuellar G. Green, Johnson, E. J. Carter, P. Sessions, Veasey Vela Doggett Stockman R. Bishop, Stewart Chaffetz Matheson Welch Flores Jackson Lee Neugebauer Castro Smith, Lamar Olson Gallego Marchant Williams Burgess Farenthold ah 1 3 2 4 17 31 21 15 18 16 19 27 33 32 23 22 35 25 28 36 29 26 24 34 30 20 AL Ut Vermont house votes

KEY LCV SCORES a = Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote s = Absence (counts as negative)

Superfund Cleanup Climate Change & Public Lands Public Lands Assault California Water Resources Broad Attack on Lands & Wildlife Assault on Public Protections Undermining Flood Insurance Reform Climate Change Science Carbon Pollution Attacking Public Input & Toxic Mining Waste Preventing New Parks Big Oil Budget 2014 Environmental Review 113th Congress Lifetime % %% b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# Virginia 1 Wittman (R) 3 3 17 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 2 Rigell (R) 3 5 11 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 3 Scott, R. (D) 94 95 89 a a a a a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 4 Forbes (R) 3 3 6 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 5 Hurt (R) 3 5 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 6 Goodlatte (R) 3 5 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 7 Cantor* (R) 0 2 4 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘  ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ i i i i i i 7 Brat* (R) 0 0 0 iiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 8 Moran, James (D) 91 94 88 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa  a a 9 Griffith (R) 3 3 8 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 10 Wolf (R) 6 13 26 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 11 Connolly (D) 94 95 96 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Wa shington 1 DelBene (D) 89 92 92 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a  a a a a ✘ aaaaaaaaaaa ✘ a a a a a a 2 Larsen, R. (D) 91 90 90 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a  aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 3 Herrera Beutler (R) 11 8 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 4 Hastings, D. (R) 3 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 5 McMorris Rodgers (R) 6 5 5 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 6 Kilmer (D) 83 87 87 a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a     aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 7 McDermott (D) 97 97 91 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 8 Reichert (R) 14 17 43 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a  ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 9 Smith, Adam (D) 80 84 90  a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a  aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa     10 Heck, D. (D) 94 95 95 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa West Virginia 1 McKinley (R) 9 8 8 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 2 Capito (R) 6 5 19 ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 3 Rahall (D) 29 37 62 ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

* Representative Brat was sworn in on November 12 following the resignation of Representative Cantor on August 18.

60 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 3. house scores

Undermining Clean Air Protections Air Clean Undermining Attack on Sound Science Sound on Attack

a a Attack on Scientiﬁc Integrity Scientiﬁc on Attack

 Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Pipeline Sands Tar XL Keystone ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘    

house votes Big Polluter Giveaway Polluter Big

 Assault on the Clean Water Rule Water Clean the on Assault

3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3% i i i i i i

a a a a a a Pesticides Pollution Pesticides

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Attack on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Act Species Endangered the on Attack Using Best Available Science Available Best Using

a a Assault on Clean Energy & Clean Water Clean & Energy Clean on Assault

2^ 2& 2* 2( ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Impacts of Climate Change Climate of Impacts

✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  Attack on Clean Water Clean on Attack

 Light Bulb Eciency Standards Eciency Bulb Light

a Social Cost of Carbon of Cost Social

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ Clean Energy Funding Energy Clean

a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a a a Big Oil Giveaway Oil Big scorecard.lcv.org

2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% ✘ 

O shore Drilling Subsidies Drilling O shore LCV

National Ocean Policy Ocean National

a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a Liqueﬁed Natural Gas (LNG) Exports (LNG) Gas Natural Liqueﬁed Scorecard

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ 1& 1* 1(    

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Gutting Pipeline Review Pipeline Gutting

✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘   Military Investments in Advanced Biofuels Advanced in Investments Military

Environmental a a a a a

2014 ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘  ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a aa a a a aa a a aa a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a aa a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘ a a a a a ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘ ✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘  iiiiiiiiiiiii a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 91 62 96 2 4 3 8 3 3 3 6 3 17 5 19 5 6 5 8 5 5 5 11 8 8 8 10 0 0 17 43 13 26 37 87 87 97 92 92 95 95 95 95 89 84 90 94 88 90 90 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 6 6 6 0 0 11 91 91 14 83 97 29 89 94 94 94 80 (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) ton DelBene R. Larsen, Beutler Herrera D. Hastings, McMorris Rodgers Kilmer McDermott Reichert Smith, Adam Heck, D. McKinley Capito Rahall Forbes Hurt Goodlatte Cantor* Brat* James Moran, Griffith Wolf Connolly Wittman Rigell R. Scott, shing 1 1 1 7 7 7 3 3 3 2 2 2 5 8 5 8 6 9 6 9 4 4 11 10 10 est Virginia West Virginia Wa house votes

KEY LCV SCORES a = Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote s = Absence (counts as negative)

62 scorecard.lcv.org | 2014 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 3. house scores

63 Undermining Clean Air Protections Air Clean Undermining

3% ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a Attack on Sound Science Sound on Attack

3$ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a Attack on Scientiﬁc Integrity Scientiﬁc on Attack

3# ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 

a a Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (KXL) Pipeline Sands Tar XL Keystone 3@ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a house votes Big Polluter Giveaway Polluter Big !

3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a Assault on the Clean Water Rule Water Clean the on Assault )

3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a Pesticides Pollution Pesticides (

2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a Attack on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Act Species Endangered the on Attack *

2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a Using Best Available Science Available Best Using &

2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a Assault on Clean Energy & Clean Water Clean & Energy Clean on Assault ^

2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a Impacts of Climate Change Climate of Impacts %

2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a Attack on Clean Water Clean on Attack $

2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a Light Bulb Eciency Standards Eciency Bulb Light #

2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a Social Cost of Carbon of Cost Social @

2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a Clean Energy Funding Energy Clean !

2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a Big Oil Giveaway Oil Big )

2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a O shore Drilling Subsidies Drilling O shore (

1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a National Ocean Policy Ocean National *

1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a Liqueﬁed Natural Gas (LNG) Exports (LNG) Gas Natural Liqueﬁed &

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1

a a a Gutting Pipeline Review Pipeline Gutting ^

1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a Military Investments in Advanced Biofuels Advanced in Investments Military %

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1

a a a a Blocking Climate Action in Trade Agreements Trade in Action Climate Blocking $ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 a a a | scorecard.lcv.org · LCV Scorecard Environmental National 2014 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘  a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘  a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a 5 5 6 12 41 92 95 89 30 2 2 3 3 8 10 97 89 94 3 3 3 6 9 0 97 89 94 (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (D) (D) (D) . ocan etri yan, P Ryan, P Kind Moore Sensenbrenner P Duffy Ribble Lummis onsin c g yomin 1 7 3 2 5 8 6 4 AL Wis W

ADD MY VOICE TO AMERICA’S ENVIRONMENTAL MAJORITY

Please visit scorecard.lcv.org to view the National Environmental Scorecard

electronically, share it with friends and family, and learn more about how you can join with other environmental activists around the country who are making their voices heard from the statehouse to the White House.

To make an additional contribution to LCV to support our efforts to turn your

environmental values into national priorities, please use the enclosed envelope or visit www.lcv.org/donate.

Thank you for being the voice for the environment. Over 40 years of the most important environmental votes — all at the push of a button. You can now easily see how every member of Congress voted since the launch of LCV’s firstScorecard in 1971 as part of our new interactive National Environmental Scorecard at scorecard.lcv.org.

LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS scorecard.lcv.org

1920 L Street, NW, Suite 800 · Washington, DC 20036 Phone: 202.785.8683 · www.lcv.org

This publication was designed and printed using 100% wind power www.facebook.com/LCVoters and was printed on an alcohol-free press with soy-based inks on 100% recycled stock. www.twitter.com/LCVoters