DOCSLIB.ORG

Livability Assessment & Recommendations Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Livability Assessment & Recommendations Report 2014 Gateway Community Livability Assessment & Recommendations Report GRAND LAKE, COLORADO This report prepared by The Conservation Fund in collaboration with the Federal Highway Administration. Federal Lands Livability Initiative REPORT PREPARED BY: CONSERVATION LEADERSHIP NETWORK The Conservation Fund (TCF) is a national non-profit environmental organization that has protected over 7 million acres of land and water in all 50 states. Working with community, government and business partners, TCF strives to balance economic and environmental goals. TCF’s Conservation Leadership Network is a team of experts that brings diverse professionals together to forge conservation solutions. The Conservation Leadership Network assists communities plan for the future, connect regions, develop leaders, and balance nature and commerce. IN COLLABORATION WITH: The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides stewardship over the construction, maintenance and preservation of the Nation’s highways, bridges and tunnels. FHWA also conducts research and provides technical assistance to state and local agencies in an effort to improve safety, mobility, and livability and encourage innovation. Cover photos courtesy of (counter-clockwise): Town of Grand Lake, Grand Lake Yacht Club, The Conservation Fund, and Town of Grand Lake. Copyright provided for photos throughout document, those not attributed are courtesy of The Conservation Fund (Kendra Briechle & Katie Allen) and are taken in and around Grand Lake, Colorado, Rocky Mountain National Park, and Arapaho National Recreation Area. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2009, the U.S. Department of Transportation, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development created the Partnership for Sustainable Communities “to help improve access to affordable housing, more transportation options, and lower transportation costs while protecting the environment in communities nationwide” (http://www.sustainablecommunities.gov). Through the goals of this partnership, the federal government has committed significant resources and attention to implementing livability in state and local governments. This Federal Lands Livability Initiative, a research project led by the Federal Highway Administration’s Federal Lands Highway Program, is an extension of the Partnership for Sustainable Communities and provides an opportunity to direct attention to livability beyond urban areas and focus on America’s gateway communities—communities that exist in close proximity to public land. Gateway communities are often affected by decisions made by managers of the surrounding public lands. The decisions of leaders of gateway communities similarly may affect the management of resources on adjacent public lands. Gateway communities also often support public lands by offering unique recreational and cultural heritage experiences and providing essential services, such as food and lodging, to visitors. Transportation access between gateway communities and neighboring public lands is integral to health and viability of each. Hence, special emphasis is made on transportation for the Federal Lands Livability Initiative. Livability in gateway communities relies heavily on the coordinated decision-making and partnership between community leaders and public land managers. This Livability Assessment and Recommendations report is the result of an evaluation of natural, cultural, physical (infrastructure), commercial, and economic health of the gateway community and surrounding landscape, and their relationship to six principles of livability: 1. Provide more transportation choices for residents, workers, and visitors. 2. Promote equitable, affordable housing and lodging choices that meet the needs of residents, workers and visitors. 3. Enhance economic competitiveness by valuing the public lands and natural, cultural, recreational, and environmental assets associated with the gateway community. 4. Support existing gateway communities and sustain their unique character. 5. Coordinate policies and leverage investments within the community and between the gateway community and public lands. 6. Value communities, neighborhoods and landscapes and the area’s natural, cultural heritage, and recreational assets that foster social, economic, and public health. i A Livability Assessment Team, comprised of representatives of The Conservation Fund and the Federal Highway Administration, gathered information from background materials, community leaders, stakeholders, and site visits to provide this assessment as a tool to assist Grand Lake, Colorado, and its public land partners support and enhance livability in their area. RMNP ANF © Grand Lake Chamber of Commerce GRAND LAKE, COLORADO—GATEWAY TO ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK The gateway community of Grand Lake, Colorado and its partner, the Rocky Mountain National Park, were selected from the pool of applicants due to their demonstrated commitment to partnership with surrounding public land managers and recent efforts to invest in livability improvements. Rocky Mountain National Park and the neighboring Arapaho National Forest and Arapaho National Recreation Area share borders with the town of Grand Lake, which has led to a long-time partnership in the management and maintenance of public land in and around the town and shared responsibility for parking lots, boat access, day-use areas, trailheads, and other facilities. As a key example, Grand Lake manages Arapaho National Recreation Area’s Point Park and provides bathroom servicing, snow removal, and reservations, allowing ANRA to benefit by not having to budget for day-to-day operations and maintenance and keeping Point Park fee-free area. Grand Lake community residents, in partnership with the town and the U.S. Forest Service, have taken the initiative to raise and leverage funds to improve access and facilities to meet ADA regulations at Point Park. Additionally, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation ii (BOR) operates their Colorado Big Thompson Project in Grand Lake and RMNP and the town have an agreement with BOR to manage BOR land at the east end of the lake for recreational use. In March 2013, the town of Grand Lake hosted a downtown assessment from Downtown Colorado, Inc., a process partially sponsored by the USDA Rural Development’s Rural Community Development Initiative and completed in collaboration with the Colorado Office of Economic Development and International Trade and the Colorado Department of Local Affairs. This project was completed separate from the Livability Assessment. Project staff worked with community leaders and stakeholders to provide observations and recommendations for supporting local businesses and overall vibrancy of the downtown area. Because having a thriving downtown area is a key component of community livability, many of the recommendations of the 2013 Downtown Assessment are echoed throughout this report. The assessment visit to Grand Lake, Colorado was conducted September 17–20, 2013. The Livability Assessment Team appreciated the opportunity to learn about Grand Lake and engage in discussions about livability with residents, stakeholders, and community leaders. Most notably, team members were impressed by the continued mutual support between the town of Grand Lake and surrounding public lands and the great sense of pride residents and visitors have for the town and its qualities and amenities. KEY OBSERVATIONS Over the course of the four-day site visit in Grand Lake, review of area plans and materials, and other interviews and research, the Livability Assessment Team made the following observations regarding key opportunities and challenges associated with livability: Key elements that define Grand Lake include the rustic charm of the downtown area and the natural beauty of the surrounding landscapes, both of which are highly valued by residents and visitors. The downtown is compact, walkable, and attractive—a great destination. Sustainable recreational activities are abundant and attract visitors to support the local economy. The peak seasonality of these activities in the summer and winter helps area businesses succeed, however; there is great need to support initiatives that will help Grand Lake grow into a year-round destination and a thriving economy. The majority of residents are second homeowners, which drives up home prices. There is a need for affordable housing for those who want to live and work in Grand Lake year-round or during peak seasons. Federal policy and regulation restricting recreational use and access on federal lands has perceived impacts on tourism and the local economy. iii PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS Based on our findings, the Livability Assessment Team offers the following priority recommendations. These recommendations and others are expanded in the report. Capture data associated with livability. Qualitatively and quantitatively demonstrating the need for improvements is key to leveraging partnerships and investments. Data should be collected regarding recreational users (number of bicyclists, runners, snowmobilers, cross-country skiers, etc.), economic impacts of sustainable tourism industry (lodging, services, outfitting, etc.), housing supply and gaps, and traffic patterns and flow between town and public lands. Strategically prioritize short- and long-term projects for implementation. Grand Lake, in partnership with its surrounding public lands, has made tremendous strides and undertaken a great deal of planning to identify a range of potential
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Blue Ridge Park Way DIRECTORY TRAVEL PLANNER
    65 TH Edition Blue Ridge Park way www.blueridgeparkway.org DIRECTORY TRAVEL PLANNER Includes THE PARKWAY MILEPOST Biltmore Asheville, NC Exit at Milepost 388.8 Grandfather Mountain Linville, NC Exit at Milepost 305.1 Roanoke Star and Overlook Roanoke, VA Exit at Milepost 120 Official Publication of the Blue Ridge Parkway Association The 65th Edition OFFICIAL PUBLICATION BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY ASSOCIATION, INC. P. O. BOX 2136, ASHEVILLE, NC 28802 (828) 670-1924 www.blueridgeparkway.org • [email protected] COPYRIGHT 2014 NO Portion OF THIS GUIDE OR ITS MAPS may BE REPRINTED WITHOUT PERMISSION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINTED IN THE USA. Some Parkway photographs by William A. Bake, Mike Booher, Vicki Dameron and Jeff Greenberg © Blue Ridge Parkway Association Layout/Design: Imagewerks Productions: Arden, NC This free Directory & Travel PROMOTING Planner is published by the 500+ member Blue Ridge TOURISM FOR Parkway Association to help Chimney Rock at you more fully enjoy your Chimney Rock State Park Parkway area vacation. MORE THAN Members representing attractions, outdoor recre- ation, accommodations, res- Follow us for more Blue Ridge Parkway 60 YEARS taurants, shops, and a variety of other services essential to information and resources: the traveler are included in this publication. When you visit their place of business, please let them know www.blueridgeparkway.org you found them in the Blue Ridge Parkway Directory & Travel Planner. This will help us ensure the availability of another Directory & Travel Planner for your next visit
    [Show full text]
  • Packets to the Board
    Carroll County Government Additional Appropriation Worksheet – FY2011 Appropriation for: The Carroll County School Board requests the Carroll County Board of Supervisors appropriate the following grant and/or additional funds, which have become available, to the categories listed below in the 2010-2011 Carroll County School Operational Budget. The revenue account number will be determined by the VA DOE’s OMEGA system when funds are released. Date Approved by Board of Supervisors: 12/14/2010 Revenue Source: Sch Fund - Federal Funds - 3-205 (acct to be determined) $692,441.00 Expenditure line item to be adjusted (include account number): Sch Fund – Undistributed Sch Exp 4-205-060000-999 $692,441.00 Expenditure Budget Adjustment made by: ___________________________________ Date: ______________________ November 11, 2010 The Carroll County Board of Supervisors held their regular monthly meeting on, November 11, 2010 in the Board Meeting Room of the Carroll County Governmental Center. Present were: Dr. Thomas W. Littrell David V. Hutchins W.S. “Sam” Dickson Andrew S. Jackson N. Manus McMillian Gary Larrowe, County Administrator Nikki Shank, Assistant Administrator Ronald L. Newman, Assistant Administrator Dr. Littrell called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Dr. Littrell told that we would like to recognize Randy Webb who is here with the FFA from the high school. CARROLL COUNTY FFA Mr. Webb told that it is a pleasure to be here and they wanted to give thanks for the support and contribution that the Board made. He told that the students have worked hard and he would like to turn it over to the Chapter President.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildland Fire Cultural Resources Management Plan for Rocky Mountain National Park
    WILDLAND FIRE CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK Robert Brunswig, Ph.D., William Butler, Ph.D. and David Diggs, Ph.D. Center for Engaged Research & Civic Action University of Northern Colorado Greeley, Colorado 80639 2010 Prepared for Rocky Mountain National Park, National Park Service, under CESU Task Agreement J1526095317 Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Outcomes of the Developing Strategies…Workshop…………………………………..2 Current Status of the RMNP Fire Management Plan as Related to Park Cultural Resources…………………………………………………………………………………4 Legal, Policy, and Practice Considerations Associated with a Cultural Resource Component of the RMNP Fire Management Plan…………………………………….6 Recommendation for Revising Condition Assessments and ASMIS Procedures…………9 Native American Consultation…..…………………………………………………….10 Recommendations on Native American Consultation…………………………………...11 The Archeologist’s Role in Park Fire Management………………………………….11 Recommendations for Integration of Archeologists in Fire Activities…………………..12 Effects of Fire and Fire Management Actions on Cultural Resources……………..13 Recommendations for Archeological Site Fire Procedures……………………………..14 The Use of GIS in Cultural Resource Protection during Fire Management Activities and Planning………………………………………………………………..16 Recommendation on the Survey of Unsurveyed Park Areas Subject to GIS Predicted High Probability of Archeological Site Occurrence..…………………………………..21
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain
    Rocky Mountain Administrative History CHAPTER XII: INHOLDINGS, CONCESSIONS AND BOUNDARY EXTENSIONS When created in 1915, Rocky Mountain National Park contained within its 229,062 acres of land over 11,000 acres of private inholdings. These inholdings consisted primarily of patented lands, based on Homestead, Timber and Stone, and Pre-emption entries, and of a number of irrigation ditches, reservoirs and mineral claims in the name of private parties and corporations. [1] On the west side of the Continental Divide, the private land holdings extended from Lulu City to Grand Lake. On the east side they were located principally in Moraine Park, Hallowell Park, and Beaver Meadows. Most of the land suitable for human use, including every meadow, was privately owned. Then as a result of subsequent boundary extensions, an additional 2,000 acres of private land became incorporated within the Park. Yet by 1965, the total amount of inholdings had been reduced through government purchases and exchanges to 2,300 acres. [2] What follows is the story of the land purchases, the boundary extensions and adjustments, and the people affected by these actions during the Park's first 50 years. A subordinate part of the story concerns changes in Park concession policies and some road building activities made possible or necessary by land and visitor developments. Initially, the Park administration granted permits for continued operation of the six hotels, lodges and camps that had operated on federal land when the Park lands had been part of the Colorado National Forest. [3] At the same time, there were nine other hotels within the Park's boundaries, all located on private property and therefore not under the jurisdiction of the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Outdoors Plan 2018 BRINGING VIRGINIA the BENEFITS of OUTDOOR RECREATION Virginia Outdoors Plan 2018 BRINGING VIRGINIA the BENEFITS of OUTDOOR RECREATION
    Virginia Outdoors Plan 2018 BRINGING VIRGINIA THE BENEFITS OF OUTDOOR RECREATION Virginia Outdoors Plan 2018 BRINGING VIRGINIA THE BENEFITS OF OUTDOOR RECREATION 600 EAST MAIN STREET 24TH FLOOR RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23219 MATTHEW J. STRICKLER SECRETARY OF NATURAL RESOURCES CLYDE E. CRISTMAN DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR DANETTE POOLE PLANNING AND RECREATION RESOURCES DIRECTOR The preparation of this plan was financed in part through a Land and Water Conservation Fund planning grant. The plan was approved by the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, under the provisions for the Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (Public Law 88-578). The Commonwealth of Virginia is an equal opportunity employer. INTRODUCTION Virginia Board of Conservation and Recreation W. Bruce Wingo, Chair Andrew C. Jennison Patricia A. Jackson, Vice Chair Kat Maybury Vincent M. Burgess Harvey B. Morgan Nancy Hull Davidson Esther M. Nizer Danielle Heisler Vivek Shinde Patil, PhD Dexter C. Hurt ONE VACANCY Acknowledgements Citizens Input from citizens, private partners and organizations who attended one of 42 public meetings held across the Commonwealth was instrumental to developing this plan. Planning District Commissions and Regional Councils Staff enabled extensive public outreach and identified featured regional projects in this plan. State and Federal Agencies Cooperative relationships with sister natural resource agencies, along with state health and tourism agencies, are essential to outdoor recreation and land conservation. Technical Advisory Committee An array of stakeholders and representatives from outdoor recreation and conservation interests helped shape the plan and continue to provide direction and vision for outdoor recreation and land conservation. Deanna Beacham Carl Espy Ursula Lemanski Mark Smith Liz Belcher John R.
    [Show full text]
  • Amusementtodaycom
    KINGS ISLAND’S 40th ANNIVERSARY – PAGES 19-22 TM Vol. 16 • Issue 3 JUNE 2012 Two traditional parks turn to Zamperla for thrill factor AirRace takes flight at Utah’s Lagoon Massive Black Widow swings into historic Kennywood Park FARMINGTON, Utah — Inspired by what they saw at Co- STORY: Scott Rutherford ney Island’s Luna Park last year, Lagoon officials called upon [email protected] Zamperla to create for them a version of the Italian ride manu- WEST MIFFLIN, Pa. — facturer’s spectacular AirRace attraction. Guests visiting Kennywood Just as with the proptype AirRace at Luna Park, Lagoon’s Park this season will find new ride replicates the thrill and sensations of an acrobatic air- something decidedly sinister plane flight with maneuvers such as banks, loops and dives. lurking in the back corner of Accommodating up to 24 riders in six four-seater airplane- Lost Kennywood. The park’s shaped gondolas, AirRace combines a six-rpm rotation with a newest addition to its impres- motor driven sweep undulation that provides various multi- sive ride arsenal is Black vectored sensations. The gondolas reach a maximum height of Widow, a Zamperla Giant 26 feet above the ground while ‘pilots’ feel the acceleration of Discovery 40 swinging pen- almost four Gs, both right-side-up and inverted. The over-the- dulum ride. shoulder restraint incorporated into the seats holds riders during Overlooking the the simulated flight, and with a minimum height requirement of final swoop turn of the just 48 inches, AirRace is one of Lagoon’s most accessible family Phantom’s Revenge and the thrill rides.
    [Show full text]
  • Adrenaline Peak Debuts As First High-Profile Ride for Oaks Park
    INSIDE: 2018 What's New Guide TM & ©2018 Amusement Today, Inc. PAGES 46-49 May 2018 | Vol. 22 • Issue 2 www.amusementtoday.com Vekoma Rides acquired Adrenaline Peak debuts as first by Sansei Technologies high-profile ride for Oaks Park VLODROP, Netherlands and OSAKA, Japan — Dutch Gerstlauer supplies roller coaster manufacturer Vekoma Rides Manufactur- first Euro-Fighter ing B.V., based in Vlodrop, the Netherlands, was acquired March 30 by Sansei Technologies, Inc., a publicly traded steel coaster in Japanese company listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Pacific Northwest With the 100 percent acquisition of Vekoma (100 percent AT: Tim Baldwin of the shares will be taken over), Sansei will increase its [email protected] global market share in the field of designing, supplying and installing roller coasters. Headquartered in Osaka, PORTLAND, Ore. — For Japan, and active in the global entertainment equipment 113 years, Oaks Park has quiet- industry, Sansei achieved a turnover of around 29,122 mil- ly operated nestled into a small lion Yen (US$278 million) in 2017, largely from the sale of portion of parkland alongside attractions to amusement parks and dynamic stage instal- the Willamette River. Its roller lations to theaters. skating rink has long been one Adrenaline Peak features three inversions: a vertical loop, a The collaboration with Sansei is the beginning of a new of the most famous attractions cutback and a heartline roll. COURTESY OAKS PARK chapter in Vekoma’s development. Since 2001, Vekoma has in the park. Throughout its steadily grown into an innovative manufacturer of roller years of operation, a good mix been sprinkled into the lineup Peak opened to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • 14. Mount Rogers Planning Region Local Action Plan Summary
    14. MOUNT ROGERS PLANNING REGION LOCAL ACTION PLAN SUMMARY WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN AND LOCAL SUMMARIES OVERVIEW Wildlife Action Plan Virginia is fortunate to contain a wide variety of natural resources and landscapes that provide Virginians with a range of benefits, services, and economic opportunities. Natural resource conservation in Virginia, as in most states, is implemented by government agencies, non- governmental organizations, private institutions, academic institutions, and private citizens. These groups work to enhance the quality of life within the Commonwealth by conserving Virginia’s air, land, water, and wildlife. Adequate funding and human capital needed to manage and conserve these valuable resources are not always available. In 2005, Virginia’s conservation community first came together to maximize the benefits of their actions and created the state’s first Wildlife Action Plan (Action Plan). It was written to prioritize and focus conservation efforts to prevent species from declining to the point where they become threatened or endangered (DGIF 2005). The 2015 Action Plan is an update of the original Plan. The Action Plan must address eight specific elements mandated by Congress. They are: 1. Information on the distribution and abundance of species of wildlife, including low and declining populations as the state fish and wildlife agency deems appropriate, that are indicative of the diversity and health of the state’s wildlife; and 2. Descriptions of locations and relative condition of key habitats and community types essential to conservation of species identified in (1); and 3. Descriptions of problems which may adversely affect species identified in (1) or their habitats, and priority research and survey efforts needed to identify factors which may assist in restoration and improved conservation of these species and habitats; and 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Marks Start of Safety Seminars
    INSIDE: IAAPA Attractions Expo 2016 recap TM & ©2017 Amusement Today, Inc. SEE SECTION B January 2017 | Vol. 20 • Issue 10 www.amusementtoday.com Mark Moore Memorial Fundraiser tops $322,490 National Roller Coaster Museum plans new building honoring Moore; industry donations ongoing The Mark Moore Memorial Fundraiser kicked off Nov. 17, at IAAPA Attractions Expo 2016 with a $100,000 donation from Uremet, the company founded by the late Mark Moore. On hand to receive the generous donation were several board members of the National Roller Coaster Museum & Archives (NRCMA), along with representatives from Uremet and Moore's family. The fundraising campaign — still ongo- ing — has since welcomed additional donations, bringing in $322,490 total as of press time. NRCMA is proposing to double the size of its current archive facility. 4SEE STORY/HOW TO DONATE, PAGE 46 2017 MARKS START OF SAFETY SEMINARS AT: Pam Sherborne time," said AIMS Executive Director Karen [email protected] Oertley regarding the increase in sessions on active shooters and terrorism. NORTH AMERICA — As 2017 gets un- AIMS International is a non-profit organi- derway, so do the various annual seminars zation dedicated to industry safety. It consists focusing on safety, maintenance, certification of manufacturers, suppliers, organizations and education. and individuals that have an interest in sup- Here is a preview of five upcoming key plying products or services to the amusement seminars: industry. In early December, Oertley said seminar AIMS Safety Seminar registration was ahead of last year during the Orlando, Fla. same time period. Holly Coston is the AIMS Jan. 8-13, 2017 seminar manager and Karen Strahl is the cer- Holly Coston (left), AIMS The 2017 AIMS Safety Seminar will offer tification manager.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Issue, 2008 Gathering of Clan Ewing
    Journal of Clan Ewing SPECIAL ISSUE 2008 Gathering of Clan Ewing Winchester, Virginia September 18-21, 2008 Published by: Clan Ewing in America www.ClanEwing.org Clan Ewing in America 17721 Road 123 Cecil, Ohio 45821 www.ClanEwing.org CHANCELLOR David Neal Ewing DavidEwing93 at gmail dot com PAST CHANCELLORS 2004 - 2006 George William Ewing GeoEwing at aol dot com 1998 - 2004 Joseph Neff Ewing Jr. JoeNEwing at aol dot com 1995 - 1998 Margaret Ewing Fife 1993 - 1995 Rev. Ellsworth Samuel Ewing OFFICERS Chair Treasurer Secretary Mary Ewing Gosline Jane Ewing Weippert Eleanor Ewing Swineford Mary at Gosline dot net ClanEwing at verizon dot net louruton at futura dot net BOARD OF DIRECTORS David Neal Ewing George William Ewing Joseph Neff Ewing Jr. DavidEwing93 at gmail dot com GeoEwing at aol dot com JoeNEwing at aol dot com Mary Ewing Gosline Robert Hunter Johnson Mary at Gosline dot net ClanEwing at verizon dot net James R. McMichael William Ewing Riddle Jill Ewing Spitler JimMcMcl at gmail dot com Riddle at WmERiddle dot com JEwingSpit at aol dot com Eleanor Ewing Swineford Beth Ewing Toscos louruton at futura dot net 1lyngarden at verizon dot net ACTIVITY COORDINATORS Archivist Genealogist Journal Editor Betty Ewing Whitmer James R. McMichael William Ewing Riddle AirReservations at hotmail dot com JimMcMcl at gmail dot com Riddle at WmERiddle dot com Membership Merchandise Web Master Jill Ewing Spitler John C. Ewin William Ewing Riddle JEwingSpit at aol dot com JCEwin2004 at yahoo dot com Riddle at WmERiddle dot com Journal of Clan Ewing Special Issue 2008 Gathering September 2008 Published by: Clan Ewing in America, 17721 Road 123, Cecil, Ohio 45821.
    [Show full text]
  • PGCPB No. 05-149 File No. DSP-87048/41 R E S O L U T I O N
    PGCPB No. 05-149 File No. DSP-87048/41 R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the Prince George's County Planning Board is charged with the approval of Detailed Site Plans pursuant to Part 3, Division 9 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Prince George's County Code; and WHEREAS, in consideration of evidence presented at a public hearing on June 23, 2005 regarding Detailed Site Plan DSP-87048/41 for Six Flags America, the Planning Board finds: 1. Request: The subject application requests the addition of “The Mammoth” and “The Tornado” waterslides. 2. Development Data Summary EXISTING PROPOSED Zone R-A & R-S R-A & R-S Use(s) Amusement Park Amusement Park Acreage 265.62 265.62 Parcels 1 1 Building Square Footage/GFA NA NA 3. Location: The site is in Planning Area 74A, Council District 6. More specifically, it is located on the north side of Central Avenue, approximately 6,308 feet east of its intersection with Enterprise Road. 4. Surroundings and Use: The subject property is bounded to the north by the residential subdivision known as Woodmore Meadows, Section II; to the west by a PEPCO Transmission right-of-way, the Kettering residential subdivision and vacant land; to the east by Belt Woods, an area of historic and undisturbed forest; and to the south by Central Avenue (MD 214) and the Cameron Grove residential subdivision. 5. Previous Approvals: Previous approvals on the subject site include Final Plat, Liber 8941, Folio 731, Plat Book VJ 183@ Plat No. 051, Detailed Site Plan DSP-87048 (including revisions 1-40), stormwater management concept approval 8607-2005, TCPII/45/98, and Special Exception SE-2635 and Special Exception SE-3400 approved on November 15, 1992, for a commercial recreational attraction as Zoning Ordinance No.
    [Show full text]
  • An Environmental History of the Kawuneeche Valley and the Headwaters of the Colorado River, Rocky Mountain National Park
    An Environmental History of the Kawuneeche Valley and the Headwaters of the Colorado River, Rocky Mountain National Park Thomas G. Andrews Associate Professor of History University of Colorado at Boulder October 3, 2011 Task Agreeement: ROMO-09017 RM-CESU Cooperative Agreement Number: H12000040001 Table of Contents Acknowledgements i Abbreviations Used in the Notes iv Introduction 1 Chapter One: 20 Native Peoples and the Kawuneeche Environment Chapter Two: 91 Mining and the Kawuneeche Environment Chapter Three: 150 Settling and Conserving the Kawuneeche, 1880s-1930s Chapter Four: 252 Consolidating the Kawuneeche Chapter Five: 367 Beaver, Elk, Moose, and Willow Conclusion 435 Bibliography 441 Appendix 1: On “Numic Spread” 477 Appendix 2: Homesteading Data 483 Transcript of Interview with David Cooper 486 Transcript of Interview with Chris Kennedy 505 Transcript of Interview with Jason Sibold 519 i Acknowledgements This report has benefited from the help of many, many people and institutions. My first word of thanks goes to my two research assistants, Daniel Knowles and Brandon Luedtke. Both Dan and Brandon proved indefatigable, poring through archival materials, clippings files, government reports, and other sources. I very much appreciate their resourcefulness, skill, and generosity. I literally could not have completed this report without their hard work. Mark Fiege of Colorado State University roped me into taking on this project, and he has remained a fount of energy, information, and enthusiasm throughout. Maren Bzdek of the Center for Public Lands History handled various administrative details efficiently and with good humor. At the National Park Service, Cheri Yost got me started and never failed to respond to my requests for help.
    [Show full text]