ARTICLE 103

, as (Saville) var. kenaica, var. kenaica Key words: Carex Historical collections North America Smut fungi Anthracoidea heterospora ). It Kukkonen var. Kukkonen var. but again without further treatment IMA · VOLUME 4 · NO 1: 103–109 NO 1: 4 · · VOLUME FUNGUS IMA Carex sect. Dornera ( are contrasted and species are contrasted kenaica› O" >‚?MEU< & >>}< 3 " For light microscopy (LM), hand-cut sections of sori var. var. Episporium compressae, ellipsoideae, nunquam angulater. ?‚M>U3;€EM< it in Anthracoidea munitum.” Zambettakis (1978) included “Anthracoidea heterospora taxa, in both and later under excluded or invalidly published cases without detailed observations. and taxonomic status of Cintractia carpophila nov. comb.”, but without any indication of the basionym or a comb.”, but without any indication nov. rendering the reference to the place of its valid publication, Kukkonen (1963) combination invalid (Art. 41.5). Likewise, this fungus to be a and Piepenbring (2000) considered member of Anthracoidea, decisions. and any formal nomenclatural and taxonomic two places in his Vánky (2012) included this smut in › MATERIALS AND METHODS MATERIALS Sori and spore characteristics were studied using dried herbarium material deposited in DAOM, S, and WRSL. Specimens were examined either by light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) or only by light microscopy (LM). or small pieces of sori were mounted in lactic acid, heated and to provide a detailed characterization of this smut fungus as it lacks a detailed description and any iconography. Anthracoidea Carex micropoda

comb. nov., and assigned comb. nov., Anthracoidea kenaica Dornera et al. 2013), but Carex sect. , a neglected taxon described from Alaska more than half a century from , a neglected taxon described collected in the Kenai as a distinct species, as a distinct species, species. kenaica ; ; ; kenaica is such a neglected var. var. , belonging to Anthracoidea var. var. Anthracoidea

subsp. micropoda " . Currently, 106 species are accepted in this 106 species are accepted . Currently, section Leiosporae were recently included in molecular systematic were recently included in molecular systematic is the most species-rich of smut fungi is the most species-rich genus of smut Cintractia carpophila Carex micropoda

+" Cintractia carpophila Cyperaceae Anthracoidea Carex pyrenaica Anthracoidea ;; EM< is reallocated to the genus is reallocated to the genus Article info:%›>‚#E?>U€*›E<#E?>U€Œ›>?E?>U to # ; discussed. © 2013 International Mycological Association © 2013 International Mycological conditions: distribute and transmit the work, under the following are free to share - to copy, You Attribution: Abstract: '#~%—8Œ*%!—L‚Œ!+U>+<>EŒ€author e-mail: [email protected] #Œ= var. kenaica „!' var. carpophila of Cintractia The identity Non-commercial:No derivative works:Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work, which can be found at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode. Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author’s moral rights. permission from the copyright holder. as a distinct species of Anthracoidea species micropoda as a distinct Carex smut on American (syn. sect. Callistachys) (Murray 2002a). Savile (1952) provided the following description of Cintractia carpophila taxon name and a likely candidate to be a distinct member of of Œ*" species, et al. 2007, Bauer studies (Hendrichs et al. 2005, Begerow et al. 2013, Vánky et al. 2007, Lutz et al. 2012, Savchenko et al. 2013), but sequence data are not available for the vast Distinct species could still be hidden under different majority. generic names, especially under historical names that have Œ=historical names should be critically re-examined in addition E?>E % to any comprehensive molecular studies directed to the description of novel genus (Denchev & Denchev 2011a, 2011b, 2012, Vánky 2011b, genus (Denchev & Denchev 2011a, Vánky 2012, Savchenko Abbasi 2011, & " publications for some putative plants reported in different species are likely to species complexes suggests that more morphological exist, some of which may be well-delimited species that could species, while others are probably cryptic Some species of be uncovered by molecular methods. Anthracoidea Anthracoidea on INTRODUCTION doi:10.5598/imafungus.2013.04.01.10 VOLUME 4 · NO. 1

Table 1. Spore size range, and mean spore sizes with standard deviation of Anthracoidea kenaica specimens examined in this study. Spore size range (μm) Average spore size with Specimen standard deviation (μm) >L<?ME?<ME><& >|>/>‚&><E/>V $%**ŒŠŒˆE‚>}<> >E?M>V<M>|< J.A. Calder 6229'*‹#E|>?|M ARTICLE >V?ME?<MEE?&>E?M >}E/>U&>‚>/>| %% +U‚‚|EM >|?ME?< >L?M><?ME?<ME>?& >|E/>V&><E/>| $%**%ŒŒEE*>}>LJ.M. Macoun (DAOM >>E?M>V<M>|< 66925)

>LV?ME?<MEE?& >|</>E&><}/>L Canada, British Columbia, Bella Coola, Mt. Fougner, 23 Aug. 1956, J.A. >U|<M>}? Calder, J.A. Parmelee & R.L. Taylor (DAOM 70101)

to boiling point and cooled, then examined under a Nikon %“#"; Eclipse 80i light microscope. LM micrographs were taken outside the limits of resolution of Savile’s light microscope. with a Nikon DS-Fi1 camera. Spores were measured using  NIS-Elements BR v. 3.0 imaging software. Spore size range, of Savile (1952) to consider this smut as distinct. However, mean spore size, and standard deviation of 50 measured  ;" ">}‚U >"; however, did not formally make the transfer. Accordingly, a " new combination is necessary. plane view and measurements were adjusted to the nearest ?<3%— groups distinguished by Savile (1952): (1) small-sized spores, >UME>MEU&}M>VME?3€E+—>?ME> 3€ U +— >|MUU & *%;#Œ=comb. nov. >UME|3 MycoBank: MB804512 For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), spores taken >ME directly from dried specimens were dusted onto carbon tabs Basionym: Cintractia carpophila var. kenaica Savile, Can. J. + Bot. 30: 419 (1952). " + Synonym: Anthracoidea heterospora var. kenaica (Savile) Cressington sputter-coater and viewed under a Hitachi Zambett., Bull. trimest. Soc. mycol. Fr. 94: 177 (1978), S-4700 scanning electron microscope, with a working nom. inval. (Art. 41.5). distance of ca. 11 mm. SEM micrographs were taken in the Laboratory of Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy Type: USA: Alaska: Kenai Peninsula, Head of Palmer Creek and Microanalysis at the Institute of Geological Sciences of Valley, 60°49’N, 149°33’W, on Carex micropoda (syn. Carex $; pyrenaica subsp. micropodaE‚>}<>J.A. Calder 6229 '*‹#E|>?|M% +U‚‚|EM

RESULTS Description: %;\ ;>M><; Detailed morphological characteristics of the holotype, by a silvery membrane and perigynium that later ruptures isotype, and two non-type specimens of Cintractia carpophila revealing agglutinated spores, powdery on the surface, the sori var. kenaica are embraced in the species description and are partly hidden by the perigynium and scales. Sori develop >ME " around reduced achenes that are consecutively surrounded holotype was typical of species of Anthracoidea in that by a thin dark layer of the remnants of achene epidermis, a the spores were produced directly on the outer surface of hyaline layer of sporogeneous hyphae with young spores, a $+ ; layer of gradually maturing dark spores, and a thin membrane in sterile stroma, a characteristic of Cintractia (Kukkonen %\ 1963, Kukkonen & Vaissalo 1964, Piepenbring 2000). brown, reddish brown to dark brown, quite regular in shape " and size, globose, subglobose or broadly ellipsoidal, small, Anthracoidea, as was suggested in other studies (Kukkonen >L?M><?ME?<MEE? & >>E?M>|<ME?< 3 ‡; >}‚U « >}V| Œ E??? " /%'>|</><&><‚/>V3n = 200/4], rarely enclosed were uniform in shape and size ranges between collections €;>?M>< " > #  Cintractia 3 carpophila var. kenaica matched well the short description +;EM< given by Savile (1952), although the spore surface was €; not smooth as stated in the protologue, but smooth or !#;; ; !# ; ; SEM.

104 IMA FUNGUS Anthracoidea kenaica comb. nov. on Carex micropoda ARTICLE

Fig. 1. Anthracoidea kenaica on Carex micropoda. A. Sori in the ovaries (S F-36682). B."; achene surrounded by spores (DAOM 28108). C–D. Enlarged area close to the achene surface (DAOM 28108). E."'*‹# 28108). F.ˆ'*‹#E|>?|*;›MM MM8›*ª>8ª?3

Additional specimens examined: Canada: British Columbia: Bella Host and distribution: On Carex micropoda (Carex sect. Coola, Mt. Fougner, on Carex micropoda, 23 Aug. 1956, J.A. Calder, Dornera€ˆ8ˆ$%** J.A. Parmelee & R.L. Taylor'*‹#V?>?>MUSA: Alaska: St. Paul, Pribilof Island, on Carex micropoda, 22 Aug. 1914, J.M. Macoun Notes›"Cintractia carpophila var. kenaica (DAOM 66925). " Uredo carpophila

VOLUME 4 · NO. 1 105 ARTICLE

Fig. 2. Anthracoidea kenaica on Carex micropoda (S F-36682). A–C.%!#; indicated by arrows. D–E. Spores seen by SEM. F.%%“#8›*M“ª>?3 ªU3

%%>}?U\ >}‚<Ÿ>>}U<U>' replacement of Uredo caricis Pers. (Nannfeldt & Lindeberg 2011 (Art. 39.1). Vánky (2012) considered Uredo carpophila 1965) and is therefore illegitimate and to be rejected as an illegitimate name, which is correct, but also as a nomen (Art. 52.1). Consequently, the name Cintractia carpophila nudum, which is not correct, since Schumacher (1903) (Schum.) Liro (Liro 1938), based on Uredo carpophila, is also ;›O$ illegitimate. Also, Liro’s treatment cannot constitute a valid ;$ˆŒ description of a new species to be attributed to him alone due % EE<  ˆ P to the absence of a Latin diagnosis (Nannfeldt & Lindeberg Furthermore, Vánky (2012) considered the name Cintractia

106 IMA FUNGUS Anthracoidea kenaica comb. nov. on Carex micropoda

carpophila var. kenaica also as illegitimate, but the varietal et al. E??}  U ARTICLE name Cintractia carpophila var. kenaica is legitimate since an \ ; side, which may be interpreted as a weak internal swelling. was originally placed under an illegitimate species name. By contrast, internal swellings of Anthracoidea kenaica are Similarly, Cintractia carpophila var. verrucosa Savile (Savile prominent and clearly visible in LM. Anthracoidea externa is 1952), was accepted as a legitimate varietal name that was morphologically distinct in having absolutely smooth spores elevated to the species rank as Anthracoidea verrucosa surrounded by a thick mucilaginous sheath, a thicker spore %; „ „ >}VV  E?>E " wall without internal swellings, and occurrence on species of the name Cintractia carpophila var. kenaica is used here to Carex sect. Filifoliae (Mastrogiuseppe 2002). Anthracoidea elevate this taxon to species rank. macranthae differs from A. kenaica as it has completely "A. kenaica is Carex micropoda, but in smooth spores with prominent and common hyaline caps addition Savile (1952) assigned a single smut collection \ on Carex deweyana (in Carex sect. Deweyanae€ „— of internal swellings, a somewhat thinner spore wall, and 2002) to his concept of Cintractia carpophila var. kenaica. in occurring on Kobresia (Guo & Wang 2005). Although Zambettakis (1978) included two SEM pictures of spores not discussed in the protologue, the occurrence of a from a specimen on C. deweyana and they are distinctly mucilaginous sheath in the form of hyaline caps is the most verrucose, unlike spores of specimens on C. micropoda. valuable diagnostic character of Anthracoidea macranthae. Indeed, the Anthracoidea on Carex deweyana represents " M Anthracoidea deweyanae (Denchev to A. externa. & Denchev 2012). Anthracoidea kenaica was previously Anthracoidea nardinae appears to be most similar to A. reported from the type locality on the Kenai Peninsula and kenaica. It is distinguished by nearly smooth spores, a thicker two other collections from the same region (Savile 1952). spore wall, fewer internal swellings, and occurrence on Carex Here the smut is newly reported from Pribilof Island (AK) sect. Nardinae#E??E"A. nardinae # 8ˆ€ is C. nardina, but Kukkonen (1963) assigned this smut to two ˆ collections on C. elynoides, which belongs to a different Carex section (sect. Filifoliae" Anthracoidea on C. elynoides‡OŒ%ˆ DISCUSSION Carex elynoides Holm n. sp., near Pagosa Peak, Aug. 1899, leg. C.F. Baker”, WRSL s.n., extracted from the isotype of C. Cintractia carpophila var. kenaica cannot be treated as a elynoides in WRSL (phanerogamic herbarium)], had globose, synonym or variety of Anthracoidea heterospora since this >L<?M>}<& species is different in having spores with better developed >>?M>E?M>V<3;/%'>VE/>E&>L|/>V3n = >ME<3 ?M><3 plants belonging to Carex sect. Phacocystis (Vánky 2012). smooth without mucilaginous sheath], though different from It can be assigned to Anthracoidea sect. Angulosporae those studied by Kukkonen, revealed a complete absence (Kukkonen 1963). In contrast, the morphology of Anthracoidea of internal swellings typical of A. nardinae. It could be yet kenaica is characteristic of members of Anthracoidea sect. another distinct species or a form of A. externa without a Leiosporae, which includes species with smooth or very hyaline sheath. ; >}‚U ~ Anthracoidea scirpi is distinguished from A. kenaica by section, Anthracoidea kenaica may be comparable only the minutely punctate spores, which are usually surrounded ; Anthracoidea species having spores similar in size \ ;; thicker spore wall, the absence of internal swellings, and surface: A. elynae, A. externa, A. macranthae, A. nardinae, occcurrence on Trichophorum species (Vánky 1994, 2012). and A. scirpi" Differences between smut specimens in the ovaries these species include differences in wall thickness, the of Carex micropoda and all aforementioned Anthracoidea presence and the number of internal swellings, and the species from sect. Leiosporae support A. kenaica as a distinct presence of a hyaline mucilaginous sheath enclosing the species specialised to a host in Carex sect. Dornera. Except spores. Furthermore, all of them are restricted to host species for the host of A. scirpi, host plants of these Anthracoidea belonging to different sections of Carex, or to different genera ‘; (Kobresia, Trichophorum), which could be used as supportive the tribe Cariceae Oˆ $ ˆP taxonomic characters. Characters used to discriminate these which includes Carex subgen. Psyllophora p.p., Kobresia, ;Anthracoidea from A. kenaica"E and Uncinia (Starr & Ford 2009). Whether this may indicate a contrasted and discussed below. close evolutionary relation between members of Anthracoidea Anthracoidea elynae is distinguished from A. kenaica by sect. Leiosporae is uncertain, and the problem remains open the mostly smooth spores with a thicker wall, fewer internal for future studies using molecular methods. In a recent swellings, a more or less evident mucilaginous sheath, and molecular phylogenetic study, by Hendrichs et al. (2005), occurrence on Kobresia"A. elynae the only accessioned smooth-spored species, A. elynae, are weakly visible in LM (Savile 1952, Kukkonen 1961, was recovered as sister to the verrucose-spored species A. >}}LE?>E"“# curvulae on Carex curvula, which is also a member of the Romanian collection did not report internal swellings (Parvu Oˆ$ˆP

VOLUME 4 · NO. 1 107 Vánky (1994, 2012) Kukkonen (1963) Nannfeldt (1979) Vánky (1994, 2012) Guo & Wang Guo & Wang (2005) Vánky (2012) this study Kukkonen (1963) Kukkonen (1963) 2012) ARTICLE often covered by a gelatinous sheath Kukkonen (1963) often covered by gelatinous sheaths \ absent, or at most, rare no data no data \ often around the entire spore hyaline caps common on the \ rarely enclosed by a thin mucilaginous sheath sheath sheath no datamore or less evident hyaline sheath Vánky (1994, Nannfeldt (1979) . Leiosporae slightly verrucose smooth or very minutely punctate smooth, sometimes obscurely dotted dotted by hardly discernible dots almost smooth or sometimes obscurely punctate smooth smooth ; punctate in LM, verruculose in SEM smooth, seldom dotted usually covered by a gelatinous dotted \ species. less clear internal swellings clear internal swellings absent swellings weak internal swellings internal swellings Anthracoidea >ME<MU absent>MU >MU ca . 2 >MU>MU >M>< EM< >ME<MU Ÿ>MEMU ; >‚M>VMELME<&>EME? MEU >VMEU&>LME> >‚MEEMEU&>?M >>ME?ME> >‚MEU&>UME?ME> >‚MEEMEU&>UME? ME> >|<ME?<&>U‚ 1 >|M>}<&>UM>V< ? absent >LM>>EM>|<ME?< >>ME? ?VME< absent absolutely smooth always covered by a gelatinous >VME>&>< absent apparently smooth present in most of the spores Vánky (2012) >LM>‚MEEME<&}M >?ME?MEE >LM>‚MEEME‚ EMU weak but frequent almost smooth, only >VMEEME<&>LM>|< >ME<MU >MU

, Anthracoidea kenaica , T. ) ( Carex sect. K. sibirica , ( Carex sect. ( Carex sect. ), ? Carex elynoides ) ) Kobresia humilis, K. laxa, pumilum Nardinae ( Carex sect. Filifoliae Kobresia macrantha Dornera Filifoliae macrolepis, K. myosuroides K. schoenoides, smirnovii 1 Host plants taken from Vánky (2012), but at least some of them may harbour different Host plants taken from Vánky (2012), but at least some of them may harbour different Anthracoidea scirpi cespitosum Trichophorum Anthracoidea nardinae Carex nardina Anthracoidea macranthae Anthracoidea kenaica Carex micropoda Anthracoidea elynae Anthracoidea externa {‚[; Table 2. Host plants and morphological characters of Table Species Host plant(s) Spores (μm) (μm) Wall Internal swellings Spore ornamentation Mucilaginous sheath References 1

108 IMA FUNGUS Anthracoidea kenaica comb. nov. on Carex micropoda

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Murray DF (2002b) Carex Linnaeus sect. Nardinae " ARTICLE Mackenzie in N.L. Britton et al. In: Flora of North America North I thank Andrew M. Minnis (Center for Forest Mycology Research, of Mexico 23›<‚|M<‚}„›‹$;Œ #$%*;*— Naczi RFC (2002) Carex sect. Deweyanae"#— Poland) for her assistance with the SEM micrographs, and the Mackenzie in N.L. Britton et al. In: Flora of North America North '*‹# % ~/%! " of Mexico 23›UE>MUE<„›‹$;Œ study was supported in part by the Polish Ministry of Science and „*>}VV"Anthracoidea (Ustilaginales) on Higher Education (grant no. 2 P04G 019 28) and through the statutory Carex subgen. Vignea with special regard to the Nordic species. fund of the W. Szafer Institute of Botany of the Polish Academy of Botaniska Notiser 130›U<>MUV< Sciences, Kraków, Poland. „ * >}V} Anthracoidea (Ustilaginales) on Nordic Cyperaceae-Caricoideae, a concluding synopsis. Symbolae Botanicae Upsalienses 22U›>ML> REFERENCES „ * ! 8 >}‚< " ovariicolous species of Cintractia on Swedish Caricoideae. 8 / !— # Œ= #  ‹ E??V  " Carex sect. Acutae Fr. sensu Kük. Svensk Flamingomyces and Parvulago, new genera of marine smut fungi Botanist Tidskrift 59›>|}ME>? (). Mycological Research 111›>>}}M>E?‚ Œ; # Œ; *“ ˆ ˆ 8+" ! Œ # 8 ' % # 8 / E??V ‡OE??‚P‰ * E??}$;Anthracoidea elynae hypothesis of Ustilaginomycotina based on multiple gene ustilospores. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca analyses and morphological data. Mycologia 98›}?‚M}>‚ 37›L>MLL ';ˆ#';""E?>>Anthracoidea eburneae, sp. nov. Œ=#E?>E"Cintractia disciformis› (). Mycologia Balcanica 8›|UM|< and synonymy of a southern Asian smut parasitic on Carex sect. '; ˆ# '; "" E?>> Anthracoidea melanostachyae Aulocystis. IMA Fungus 3›U}MLU sp. nov. (Anthracoideaceae). Mycologia Balcanica 8›><< Œ # E???" Cintractia s.l. (Ustilaginales, '; ˆ# '; "" E?>E „ V ). Nova Hedwigia 70›E|}MUVE Mycotaxon 121›LEU Guo L, Wang SR (2005) A new species and a new record of Anthracoidea caricis-meadii is a new North American smut Anthracoidea (Ustilaginales) from China. Mycotaxon 93› ><}M fungus on Carex sect. Paniceae. Mycologia 105›>|>M>}U 162. Savile DBO (1952) A study of the species of Cintractia on Carex, Š # 8 ' 8 / ‹ E??< " Kobresia, and Scirpus in North America. Canadian Journal of genus Anthracoidea (Basidiomycota, Ustilaginales): a molecular Botany 30›L>?MLU< !%$'„*ŸMycological Schumacher CF (1803) Enumeratio plantarum in partibus Saellandiae Research 109›U>ML? septentrionalis et orientalis. Part 2. Copenhagen: Brummer.  >}‚> " Cintractia parasiting % / 8* E??} Œ ; Cariceae Kobresia species. Canadian Journal of Botany 39›><‚L (Cyperaceae): current knowledge and future directions. Botanical  >}‚U " Anthracoidea Review 75›>>?M>UV (Ustilaginales). Annales Botanici Societatis Zoologicae Botanicae Vánky K (1994) European Smut Fungi. Stuttgart: G. Fischer Verlag. Fennicae ‘Vanamo’ 34U›>M>EE Vánky K (2012) Smut Fungi of the World. St Paul, MN: American   " >}‚L * Phytopathological Society Press. spore formation in a smut. Annales Botanici Fennici 1›EU‚MEL} Vánky K, Abbasi M (2011) Anthracoidea songorica sp. nov. on Carex !  >}U| ' $  Annales Academiae songorica from Iran. Rostaniha 12›>|>M>|< Scientiarum Fennicae, Serie A, 42>›>MVE? Vánky K, Shivas RG, Barrett MD, Lutz M (2013) Eriocortex eriocauli, !— #  Œ= # E?>E Shivasia gen. nov. for the gen. et sp. nov. () from Australia. Mycobiota Australasian smut Ustilago solida that historically shifted through 1›}M>‚ ;IMA Fungus 3›>LUM>?}ME‚? of Mexico 23›<‚‚M<‚|„›‹$;Œ Murray DF (2002a) Carex Linnaeus sect. Dornera Heuffel. In: Flora of North America North of Mexico 23›

VOLUME 4 · NO. 1 109