DOCSLIB.ORG

Durack, Peter Drew, Biographical Collection.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Durack, Peter Drew, Biographical Collection.Pdf Australian Wednesday 16/7/2008 Brief: PARLWA-ES Page: 7 Section: General News Region: National Circulation: 133,000 Type: National Size: 136.86 sq.cms. Published: MTWTF Copyright Agency Limited (CAL) licensed copy Ref: 38848529 West Australian Wednesday 16/7/2008 Brief: PARLWA-WA Page: 6 Section: General News Region: Perth Circulation: 203,328 Type: Capital City Daily Size: 110.37 sq.cms. Published: MTWTFS- Ref: 38852743 West Australian Friday 18/7/2008 Brief: PARLWA-WA Page: 46 Page 1 of 2 Section: Other Region: Perth Circulation: 203,328 Type: Capital City Daily Size: 564.03 sq.cms. Published: MTWTFS- Ref: 38941712 West Australian Friday 18/7/2008 Brief: PARLWA-WA Page: 46 Page 2 of 2 Section: Other Region: Perth Circulation: 203,328 Type: Capital City Daily Size: 564.03 sq.cms. Published: MTWTFS- Ref: 38941712 News and Features - Timelines Mild sheet-anchor of Fraser era Tony Stephens 912 words 21 July 2008 The Sydney Morning Herald First 14 English © 2008 Copyright John Fairfax Holdings Limited. The obituary of Peter Durack, the former attorney-general (July 21), should have included the Human Rights Commission Act 1981 among the legislation for which he was responsible. He also returned as the Opposition's deputy leader in the Senate 1990-92. PETER DURACK 1926-2008 PETER DURACK was a paradox. He was a mild-mannered man who rarely said an unkind word about anyone and appeared to disdain the aggressive cut and thrust of Australian politics, yet he made politics his career. He was a mediocre communicator who sounded like a suburban solicitor, but became a barrister and the nation's attorney-general. He was no good at the political numbers game but became one of the longest-serving senators, at 22 years, and deputy leader of the Coalition in the Senate for nine years. He said on his retirement: "I accept the fact that I'm a fairly conservative lawyer, I guess." Yet, at least with hindsight from beyond the Howard government years, much of his work was in the liberal, rather than conservative, tradition. Peter Drew Durack, who has died at 81, was a member of the pioneering family of Patrick Durack who drove cattle from their home in Goulburn to south-west Queensland before resettling in the East Kimberley in 1883. Patrick's granddaughters, Mary and Elizabeth, were Peter's cousins. Mary wrote the family story in Kings in Grass Castles (1959); Elizabeth, a painter, revealed in 1997 that, among her oeuvre, were paintings thought to have been by Eddie Burrup, an Aboriginal artist. Peter's father, J. P. Durack, was a king's counsel who raised his son as a Catholic - he lapsed later - and sent him to Christian Brothers College and Aquinas College in Perth. Peter then took an honours degree in law at the University of Western Australia, where he was a debater, co-founder of the Liberal Club and president of National Union of University Students. A Rhodes Scholar in 1949, he graduated in law at Oxford, practised for a while in London and returned to Perth, to the law and politics. In the years before the state's resources boom, Durack thought so few opportunities existed that he might move east. Politics, however, soon offered opportunity. He won the state seat of Perth from Labor in 1965, lost it in 1968 and became state president of the Liberal Party. He entered the Senate in 1971, saw Gough Whitlam's Labor Party overturn 23 years of conservative power in 1972, and the Coalition's return three years later. Malcolm Fraser made Durack minister for repatriation (now Veterans Affairs) in 1976. After Bob Ellicott's resignation in 1977, Durack became attorney-general. Tactically and temperamentally, Durack was quite different to the more dramatic attorneys-general who had preceded him, including Ellicott, Lionel Murphy, Tom Hughes and Garfield Barwick. He was not the pushy type. Physically slow-moving and phlegmatic, he seemed humourless to outsiders, although he was wryly amused by the goings-on around him. His role in legislation became important to the Fraser government. Durack was involved in preparing the two-airline agreement, broadcasting and television legislation, changes to copyright law, to administrative appeals, the powers of federal police and ASIO and the constitutional settlement with the states on offshore sovereignty. He worked on the Acts Interpretation Act, aimed at instructing judiciary to take a broader view of the purpose of legislation, against a literal interpretation. He fought against the extraterritorial pretensions of US antitrust laws, for the ending of appeals to the Privy Council and for early freedom-of-information legislation. 2008 Factiva, Inc. All rights reserved. One view of his tenure from 1977 until Labor won under Bob Hawke in 1983 was that he was a man of principle with a fine legal mind and a considerable contributor in cabinet. Another view was that most of what he achieved would have been achieved by any attorney-general. However, his appointments of Ronald Wilson, William Deane and Gerard Brennan to the High Court suggest that Durack was more liberal than conservative. According to a popular story of the time, after Durack would slowly analyse in cabinet a particular problem, another minister would ask Ellicott: "What's he saying, Bob?" Ellicott would say: "He's saying you can't do it." Frank Costigan's 1982 royal commission report on bottom-of-the-harbour tax avoidance schemes and organised crime attacked the Crown Solicitor's office for which Durack was responsible, particularly the Perth office. Its negligence, Costigan said, permitted the law to be disregarded. Durack said he didn't know all that the office was doing, or not doing. Critics, including some on his own political side, pointed to the Westminster system of parliamentary responsibility and called on him to resign. Durack resisted and had a heart attack. The government lost office the next year. In opposition John Howard dumped Durack from the Liberal leadership team in 1987. After John Hewson became Liberal leader, he made Durack shadow attorney-general but, when the Liberals left him off the ticket for the half-Senate election in 1993, Durack resigned from the shadow ministry. His Liberal opponents said his age was against him, but factionalism in the west had more to do with it. Peter Durack is survived by his wife, Isabel, an historian, and their two children, Anne and Philip, both lawyers, and four grandchildren. Document SMHH000020080720e47l0001s 2008 Factiva, Inc. All rights reserved. News Tributes for respected politician 215 words 16 July 2008 The Advertiser 2 - Metro 35 English Copyright 2008 News Ltd. All Rights Reserved FORMER federal Liberal senator Peter Durack, who died at the weekend, was a remarkable person who may have never uttered an unkind word about anyone, former prime minister Malcolm Fraser said yesterday. Senator Durack, attorney-general in the Fraser government from 1977 to 1983 and one of Western Australia's longest serving senators, died at his Perth home on Sunday, aged 81. He held the Senate seat from 1971 to his retirement in 1993. Mr Fraser said Mr Durack had always been one of the most valuable people in Cabinet who contributed immensely to the political life of the country. A member of the pioneering Durack family, his contribution was made outside ``the more traditional Australian sense'' of pioneering, Mr Fraser said. His appointments of people like Sir Ronald Wilson, Sir William Deane and Sir Francis Brennan to the High Court had shown he was a broad-minded ``true liberal''. ``There was nothing conservative about him,'' Mr Fraser told ABC Radio. Former federal Liberal MP and West Australian Fred Chaney said Mr Durack was a man of principle who was ``one of the best political and legal minds I have ever worked with''. A funeral will be held for Mr Durack in Perth on Thursday. ADV-20080716-2-035-114210 Document ADVTSR0020080716e47g0000a 2008 Factiva, Inc. All rights reserved..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ceremonial Sitting of the Tribunal for the Swearing in and Welcome of the Honourable Justice Kerr As President
    AUSCRIPT AUSTRALASIA PTY LIMITED ABN 72 110 028 825 Level 22, 179 Turbot Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 PO Box 13038 George St Post Shop, Brisbane QLD 4003 T: 1800 AUSCRIPT (1800 287 274) F: 1300 739 037 E: [email protected] W: www.auscript.com.au TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS O/N H-59979 ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL CEREMONIAL SITTING OF THE TRIBUNAL FOR THE SWEARING IN AND WELCOME OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE KERR AS PRESIDENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE KERR, President THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE KEANE, Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Australia THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE BUCHANAN, Presidential Member DEPUTY PRESIDENT S.D. HOTOP DEPUTY PRESIDENT R.P. HANDLEY DEPUTY PRESIDENT D.G. JARVIS THE HONOURABLE R.J. GROOM, Deputy President DEPUTY PRESIDENT P.E. HACK SC DEPUTY PRESIDENT J.W. CONSTANCE THE HONOURABLE B.J.M. TAMBERLIN QC, Deputy President DEPUTY PRESIDENT S.E. FROST DEPUTY PRESIDENT R. DEUTSCH PROF R.M. CREYKE, Senior Member MS G. ETTINGER, Senior Member MR P.W. TAYLOR SC, Senior Member MS J.F. TOOHEY, Senior Member MS A.K. BRITTON, Senior Member MR D. LETCHER SC, Senior Member MS J.L REDFERN PSM, Senior Member MS G. LAZANAS, Senior Member DR I.S. ALEXANDER, Member DR T.M. NICOLETTI, Member DR H. HAIKAL-MUKHTAR, Member DR M. COUCH, Member SYDNEY 9.32 AM, WEDNESDAY, 16 MAY 2012 .KERR 16.5.12 P-1 ©Commonwealth of Australia KERR J: Chief Justice, I have the honour to announce that I have received a commission from her Excellency, the Governor General, appointing me as President of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hon. RJ Ellicott QC Way He Did Not Think Pro P E R Entering Into Partnership
    A D D R E S S E S The Hon. R J Ellicott QC: 50 years at the Bar A speech delivered when he moved to Elizabeth by The Hon. Justice R V Gyles B a y. He is pre s e n t l y AO at a dinner to celebrate C h a i rman of Life Education Ellicott QC’s 50 years at the Australia, which does much Ba r , Westin Sydney, 17 good work with dru g November 2000 education programmes for Australian school students. ou can take the boy out He spent 14 years in of the bush, but not the public life as solicitor- Ybush out of the boy. general, a Member of the Bob Ellicott was born House of Representatives, in and raised in Moree, the various ministerial son of a shearer turn e d p o rtfolios, and as a Federal wool classer. Rural intere s t s C o u rt judge. have been one abiding He had, and has, a theme of his life. Since his genuine fascination for days as a junior barr i s t e r, he public affairs. He re s i g n e d has owned rural pro p e rt i e s f rom the Bench in part (not always with Colleen’s because he retained this full approval). When in i n t e rest and did not wish to comparative penury whilst shut himself out of in public service, he p a rticipation in public issues persuaded Trevor Morling and public debate in the to subsidise his interest by The Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir R Wilson Lecture Single Space
    SIR RONALD WILSON LECTURE 19 MAY 2011 THE DELIVERY OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE: BUILDING ON THE PAST TO MEET THE CHALLENGES OF THE FUTURE INTRODUCTION Mr President, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen. It is a very great honour to have been asked to deliver the Sir Ronald Wilson Lecture this year, although I appreciate that I am very much the second choice, and that I only got the gig because his Honour the Chief Justice is in Europe, attending a Court of the Future Program on courthouse design in the perhaps over-optimistic expectation that what he learns will be useful when, or if, the Supreme Court is provided with new accommodation of an appropriate standard to go with the 1903 Courthouse and to replace our tenancy in the former Royal Commission into WA Incorporated premises in an office building in the city. Of course, the mention of those premises recalls another link to Sir Ronald Wilson who, with the Hon Justice Kennedy, seconded from the Court, and the then recently retired judge, the Hon Peter Brinsden QC, served on that Royal Commission, which made such momentous findings on a wide range of Government activities and the people involved in them. I feel particularly intimidated when I observe that previous presenters of this lecture include people such as Sir Ronald himself, the Rt Hon Lord MacKay of Clashfern, the Rt Hon Sir Ninian Stephen, the Rt Hon Sir Zelman Cowen, Justice Michael Kirby, as he then was, and others, including local luminaries, the Hon Justice Robert French, as he then was, the Hon Justice Carmel McLure, Chief Judge Antoinette Kennedy, and the Hon Justice Michael Barker.
    [Show full text]
  • Situating Women Judges on the High Court of Australia: Not Just Men in Skirts?
    Situating Women Judges on the High Court of Australia: Not Just Men in Skirts? Kcasey McLoughlin BA (Hons) LLB (Hons) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, the University of Newcastle January 2016 Statement of Originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to the final version of my thesis being made available worldwide when deposited in the University's Digital Repository, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Kcasey McLoughlin ii Acknowledgments I am most grateful to my principal supervisor, Jim Jose, for his unswerving patience, willingness to share his expertise and for the care and respect he has shown for my ideas. His belief in challenging disciplinary boundaries, and seemingly limitless generosity in mentoring others to do so has sustained me and this thesis. I am honoured to have been in receipt of his friendship, and owe him an enormous debt of gratitude for his unstinting support, assistance and encouragement. I am also grateful to my co-supervisor, Katherine Lindsay, for generously sharing her expertise in Constitutional Law and for fostering my interest in the High Court of Australia and the judges who sit on it. Her enthusiasm, very helpful advice and intellectual guidance were instrumental motivators in completing the thesis. The Faculty of Business and Law at the University of Newcastle has provided a supportive, collaborative and intellectual space to share and debate my research.
    [Show full text]
  • Eureka Street Is Published Fortnightly Online, a Minimum of 24 Times Per
    18 October 2007 Volume: 17 Issue: 20 Politics is a team sport John Warhurst ...........................................1 The human rights cost of intelligence activities Bill Calcutt ............................................. 4 A key role for Australia in Burma’s democratisation Tony Kevin .............................................8 Burma’s new generation political activists Carol Ransley and Toe Zaw Latt ............................. 11 Echoes of Calwell in Sudanese refugee cut David Holdcroft ......................................... 15 Building relationships settles refugees Michele Gierck .......................................... 18 Nothing new in cynicism towards politicians Brian Matthews ......................................... 21 Gutted kiwis eat humble pie Peter Matheson ......................................... 25 Kevin Rudd’s political cowardice Scott Stephenson ....................................... 29 Sir Ronald Wilson’s life in compartments Frank Brennan .......................................... 33 Playwrights finger reality missed by politicians Richard Flynn .......................................... 37 Death and birth set cerebral thriller in motion Tim Kroenert ........................................... 40 Perhaps dying isn’t hard after all Peter Matheson and Cassandra O’Loughlin ...................... 43 Keeping families safe from violence Trish McNamara ........................................ 45 Eureka Street is published fortnightly Responsibility for editorial content is online, a minimum of 24 times
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15 the Return of the Repressed
    Chapter 15 The Return of the Repressed XTINCTION in philosophy is not forever. Any opinion or argument, no matter how finally it seems to have been hunted Edown and refuted into oblivion, has the chance of being redis- covered by a new generation eager for novelties. In this chapter, we examine the revival of two old philosophies once thought well off the agenda: idealism and Catholic natural law philosophy. They have not been seen much in philosophy departments, but have flourished in, respectively, literature departments and the High Court of Australia. As we saw in chapter 6, David Stove wrote that idealism, the doc- trine that everything is mind-dependent, was sustained by what he identified as the ‘Worst argument in the world’: We can know things only as they are related to us/under our forms of perception and un- derstanding/in so far as they fall under our conceptual schemes, etc, so, we cannot know things as they are in themselves. In Berkeley’s version, ‘we cannot have trees-outside-the-mind in mind without them being in mind, so there cannot be trees outside the mind (or if there could be, they could not be thought of). That argument did not vanish with the 1890s. We saw in chapter 11 that John Burnheim adopted an ‘inevitably partisan’ reading of the Sydney disturbances on the grounds that philosophy ‘rests not on ultimate truths, but on a reading of our specific historical situation’ (that is, we cannot know things except through our specific historical situation, therefore we cannot know things as they are in themselves).
    [Show full text]
  • The Accountability of the Courts Year 12 Teacher Resource
    Francis Burt Law Education Programme THE ACCOUNTABILITY OF THE COURTS YEAR 12 TEACHER RESOURCE This resource addresses the following Year 12 Stage 3 Politics and Law syllabus item: 3B: The accountability of the courts through the appeals process through parliamentary scrutiny and legislation through transparent processes and public confidence through the censure and removal of judges Part A: Introduction, Appeals and Legislation Possible Preliminary Discussion Points a) Discuss what the term ‘the accountability of the courts’ actually means. b) In what ways should judges be held accountable? c) What problems may occur if the accountability of the judiciary was the task of the executive arm of government? Introduction “The independence of the judiciary lies at the heart of the rule of law and hence of the administration of justice itself. The essence of judicial independence is that the judge in carrying out his judicial duties, and in particular in making judicial decisions, is subject to no other authority than the law.... In particular, the judiciary should be free from the control of the executive government or of any department or branch of it.”1 “No judge could be expected to carry out judicial tasks with impartiality if one side in the dispute had the power to dismiss that judge, move the judge out of office or reduce his or her salary or could cause its elected representatives to do so. The issue was put succinctly by Australia’s former Chief Justice, Murray Gleeson, in a Boyer Lecture in December 2000 when he declared: ‘The ultimate test of public confidence in the judiciary is whether people believe that in a contest between a citizen and government they can rely upon an Australian court to hold the scales of justice evenly.’”2 “That the purpose of judicial independence was not to provide a benefit to the judiciary but to enable the judicial system to function fairly with integrity and impartiality”3 was indicated by Western Australia’s Chief Justice, the Honourable Wayne Martin AC, at a conference in New Zealand in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Who's That with Abrahams
    barTHE JOURNAL OF THE NSWnews BAR ASSOCIATION | SUMMER 2008/09 Who’s that with Abrahams KC? Rediscovering Rhetoric Justice Richard O’Connor rediscovered Bullfry in Shanghai | CONTENTS | 2 President’s column 6 Editor’s note 7 Letters to the editor 8 Opinion Access to court information The costs circus 12 Recent developments 24 Features 75 Legal history The Hon Justice Foster The criminal jurisdiction of the Federal The Kyeema air disaster The Hon Justice Macfarlan Court NSW Law Almanacs online The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina The Hon Justice Ward Saving St James Church 40 Addresses His Honour Judge Michael King SC Justice Richard Edward O’Connor Rediscovering Rhetoric 104 Personalia The current state of the profession His Honour Judge Storkey VC 106 Obituaries Refl ections on the Federal Court 90 Crossword by Rapunzel Matthew Bracks 55 Practice 91 Retirements 107 Book reviews The Keble Advocacy Course 95 Appointments 113 Muse Before the duty judge in Equity Chief Justice French Calderbank offers The Hon Justice Nye Perram Bullfry in Shanghai Appearing in the Commercial List The Hon Justice Jagot 115 Bar sports barTHE JOURNAL OF THE NSWnews BAR ASSOCIATION | SUMMER 2008-09 Bar News Editorial Committee Cover the New South Wales Bar Andrew Bell SC (editor) Leonard Abrahams KC and Clark Gable. Association. Keith Chapple SC Photo: Courtesy of Anthony Abrahams. Contributions are welcome and Gregory Nell SC should be addressed to the editor, Design and production Arthur Moses SC Andrew Bell SC Jeremy Stoljar SC Weavers Design Group Eleventh Floor Chris O’Donnell www.weavers.com.au Wentworth Chambers Duncan Graham Carol Webster Advertising 180 Phillip Street, Richard Beasley To advertise in Bar News visit Sydney 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Governor-General
    Chapter Eight The Role of the Governor-General Sir David Smith, KCVO, AO My brief is to speak about the role of the Governor-General, as we know that office today. I shall speak about the history of the office, about the duties of the office, and about current proposals to alter the Australian Constitution by changing its provisions relating to the office. Foremost among the reasons given for constitutional change is the claim that the republic will give us an Australian Head of State. This claim is as mischievous as it is dishonest. Its success is dependent on the notorious ignorance of the vast majority of Australians about their Constitution. 1 The truth is that Australia has two Heads of State. The Queen is our symbolic Head of State, the Governor-General is our constitutional Head of State, and we have had Australians in the office of Governor-General since Lord Casey's appointment in 1965. The claim that the Governor-General is our constitutional Head of State is not some bizarre theory dreamed up for the purposes of the current debate, for it has been so since the beginning of federation, and there is much supporting evidence, both anecdotal and legal. A Canadian Governor-General, Lord Dufferin, described a Governor-General as a constitutional Head of State in a speech given in 1873. 2 Even Paul Keating referred to the Governor-General as our Head of State in the very speech in which he announced in Parliament on 7 June, 1995 his Government's proposals for the republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeing Visions and Dreaming Dreams Judicial Conference of Australia
    Seeing Visions and Dreaming Dreams Judicial Conference of Australia Colloquium Chief Justice Robert French AC 7 October 2016, Canberra Thank you for inviting me to deliver the opening address at this Colloquium. It is the first and last time I will do so as Chief Justice. The soft pink tones of the constitutional sunset are deepening and the dusk of impending judicial irrelevance is advancing upon me. In a few weeks' time, on 25 November, it will have been thirty years to the day since I was commissioned as a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia. The great Australian legal figures who sat on the Bench at my official welcome on 10 December 1986 have all gone from our midst — Sir Ronald Wilson, John Toohey, Sir Nigel Bowen and Sir Francis Burt. Two of my articled clerks from the 1970s are now on the Supreme Court of Western Australia. One of them has recently been appointed President of the Court of Appeal. They say you know you are getting old when policemen start looking young — a fortiori when the President of a Court of Appeal looks to you as though he has just emerged from Law School. The same trick of perspective leads me to see the Judicial Conference of Australia ('JCA') as a relatively recent innovation. Six years into my judicial career, in 1992, I attended a Supreme and Federal Courts Judges' Conference at which Justices Richard McGarvie and Ian Sheppard were talking about the establishment of a body to represent the common interests and concerns of judges, to defend the judiciary as an institution and, where appropriate, to defend individual judges who were the target of unfair and unwarranted criticisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Papers on Parliament No. 18
    Papers on Parliament No. 18 December 1992 Parliament: Achievements and Challenges Papers on Parliament is edited and managed by the Research Section, Department of the Senate. All inquiries should be made to: The Director of Research Procedure Office Senate Department Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 Telephone: (06) 277 3057 The Department of the Senate acknowledges the assistance of the Department of the Parliamentary Reporting Staff. ISSN 1031-976X Cover design: Conroy + Donovan, Canberra Parliament: Achievements and Challenges This issue of Papers on Parliament brings together in published form the six lectures given in the period June!November 1992 in the Senate Department's Occasional Lecture series. Contributors to this issue Senator the Hon. Terry Aulich, a widely experienced member of Senate committees, is Chairman of the Senate Standing Committee on Employment, Education and Training. Before his election to the Senate in 1984 he was a member of the Tasmanian House of Assembly and held a number of ministerial positions. Bill Blick is First Assistant Secretary, Government Division, in the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet. He is responsible for advising the Prime Minister on parliamentary matters and has worked with the Management Advisory Board project on accountability in the Commonwealth public sector. Senator Bruce Childs, who was first elected to the Senate in 1981, has served as chair and as a member of a number of Senate Committees. His present appointments include those of Chairman of Estimates Committee A and of the Senate Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology. Senator the Hon. Peter Durack, QC , was first elected to the Senate in 1971 and is now its longest- serving member.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice Ronald Sackville*
    AUSTRALIAN LAWYERS AND SOCIAL CHANGE (AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY) WELCOMING ADDRESS by: Justice Ronald Sackville* National Museum of Australia, Canberra 22 – 24 September 2004 *Judge, Federal Court of Australia It is my great honour, as one of the few surviving participants in the 1974 Australian Lawyers and Social Change Conference, to welcome you to this gathering on the same theme. The two conferences, although thirty years apart, share characteristics in common, other than their name. One is a stellar line-up of presenters and commentators. (I can plausibly deny any implicit element of self-congratulation in that comment, since a re-reading of Australian Lawyers and Social Change 1, which published the papers and commentaries from the 1974 Conference, confirms that I was neither a presenter nor a commentator, but merely a participant in the discussion, playing the role of a youthful serial pest.) Consider some of those making presentations at the 1974 Conference. The opening paper, ‘ The Most Dangerous Branch? The High Court and the Constitution in a Changing Society’ 2 was delivered by Gareth Evans, then a not so humble senior lecturer in law. It is true that in 1974 he was well on the path that led to the glittering prize of high political office, but he still had only one Gareth to his name. The first commentator on Gareth Evans’ plea for a more policy oriented constitutional jurisprudence in the High Court was one William Deane QC, who appeared to accept cheerfully Gareth Evans’ description of practising lawyers as an ‘essentially narrow profession’. 3 Mr Deane, however, was quite unable to accept Gareth Evans’ regret that one could not find in the pages of the Commonwealth Law Reports ‘the racy dogmatism that is so characteristic of the United States Supreme Court’.
    [Show full text]