Share Transfer Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Share Transfer Report Convenience Translation Share Transfer Report Report of Linde Intermediate Holding AG, Munich, as majority shareholder of Linde Aktiengesellschaft, Munich, on the requirements to transfer the Minority Shareholdersʼ shares in Linde Aktiengesellschaft to Linde Intermediate Holding AG and the adequacy of the cash settlement according to Sec. 62 para. 5 sentence 8 German Transformation Act (Umwandlungsgesetz) in conjunction with Sec. 327c para. 2 sentence 1 German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz) November 1, 2018 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 5 2. Description of Linde plc Group, Linde AG and Linde Intermediate ......................................... 7 2.1 Group Structure of Linde plc Group ............................................................................. 7 2.2 Information on Linde AG ............................................................................................. 8 2.2.1 Company History ..................................................................................................... 8 2.2.2 Registration, Registered Office, Financial Year and Business Purpose .................. 8 2.2.3 Nominal Capital, Shareholders and Stock Exchange Trading ................................. 9 2.2.4 Executive Bodies and Representation .................................................................... 13 2.2.5 Business Activities, Group Structure and Major Holdings .................................... 14 2.2.6 Business Development and Performance Situation ............................................... 16 2.2.7 Employees and Codetermination ........................................................................... 21 2.3 Information on Linde Intermediate ............................................................................. 22 2.3.1 Registration, Registered Office, Financial Year and Business Purpose ................ 22 2.3.2 Nominal Capital and Shareholder Structure .......................................................... 22 2.3.3 Executive Bodies and Representation .................................................................... 23 2.3.4 Previous Activities ................................................................................................. 23 2.3.5 Business Performance and Results of Linde Intermediate ..................................... 24 2.4 Information on Linde plc as Parent Company ............................................................ 24 2.4.1 Registration, Registered Office, Financial Year and Business Purpose ................ 24 2.4.2 Nominal Capital and Shareholder Structure .......................................................... 25 2.4.3 Executive Bodies and Representation .................................................................... 26 2.5 Further Companies of Linde plc Group ...................................................................... 26 2.5.1 Praxair, Inc. and Zamalight Holdco LLC .............................................................. 26 2.5.2 Linde Holding GmbH ............................................................................................ 27 2.6 Business Activities of Linde plc Group ...................................................................... 29 3. Acquisition of the Majority Shareholding in Linde AG by Linde Intermediate ...................... 29 3.1 Exchange Offer by Linde plc to the Shareholders of Linde AG ................................. 29 3.2 Transfer of Linde AG Shares to Linde Intermediate .................................................. 30 3.3 Current Shareholding .................................................................................................. 30 4. Major Reasons for the Merger and the Squeeze-Out of the Minority Shareholders ................ 30 4.1 Simplification of the Group Structure ......................................................................... 30 4.2 Cost Saving, Flexibility and Transaction Safety ......................................................... 31 4.3 More Efficient Integration into Linde plc Group ........................................................ 31 4.4 No obligation to prepare a dependency report ............................................................ 33 -2- 4.5 Withdrawal of the Listing ........................................................................................... 33 5. Alternatives for the Planned Merger, in Connection with Which a Squeeze-Out of Minority Shareholders Occurs ................................................................................................. 33 6. Requirements for the Squeeze-Out of the Minority Shareholders ........................................... 35 6.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................... 35 6.2 Legal Form of the Entities Involved, Conclusion of a Merger Agreement, Stake of Linde Intermediate .................................................................................................. 38 6.3 Statement That a Squeeze-Out of the Minority Shareholders Shall Take Place in Connection with the Merger ....................................................................................... 39 6.4 Display of Documents in the Business Premises of Linde Intermediate, Publication, Submission of the Merger Agreement .................................................... 39 6.5 Determination of the Adequate Cash Settlement ........................................................ 41 6.6 Share Transfer Report of the Majority Shareholder .................................................... 42 6.7 Audit of the Adequacy of the Cash Settlement ........................................................... 42 6.8 Warranty Declaration of a Credit Institute .................................................................. 42 6.9 Making Available Documents in Order to Prepare the General Meeting ................... 44 6.10 Transfer Resolution of the General Meeting of Linde AG; Maintaining the Three-Month Period .................................................................................................... 45 6.11 Registration with the Commercial Register ................................................................ 46 6.11.1 Transfer Resolution ................................................................................................ 46 6.11.2 Merger .................................................................................................................... 47 7. Consequences of the Transfer of the Minority Shareholdersʼ Shares ...................................... 47 7.1 Transfer of the Shares to the Majority Shareholder .................................................... 47 7.2 Entitlement of the Minority Shareholders to an Adequate Cash Settlement .............. 48 7.3 Technical Banking Aspects and Payment of the Cash Settlement .............................. 49 7.4 Withdrawal of the Listing ........................................................................................... 49 7.5 Tax Consequences for the German Minority Shareholders of Linde AG ................... 50 7.5.1 Treatment as Disposal of Shares ............................................................................ 50 7.5.2 Determining the Capital Gains or Losses .............................................................. 51 8. Explanation and Justification of the Adequacy of the Cash Settlement .................................. 55 8.1 Preface ........................................................................................................................ 55 8.2 Calculation and Determination of the Cash Settlement Pursuant to Sec. 327b Para. 1 German Stock Corporation Act ...................................................................... 55 8.2.1 Capitalized Earnings Value of Linde AG .............................................................. 56 8.2.2 Stock Market Price and Reference Period ............................................................. 56 8.2.3 Summary ................................................................................................................ 58 9. Review of the Adequacy of the Cash Settlement ..................................................................... 58 -3- Annexes Annex 1: Deposit confirmation of UniCredit Bank AG dated October 31, 2018 concerning the number of shares in Linde AG held by Linde Intermediate Holding AG Annex 2: Deposit confirmation of Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft dated October 31, 2018 concerning the number of treasury shares held by Linde AG Annex 3: Ad hoc release by Linde AG dated April 25, 2018 concerning the intention of Linde plc, Linde AG and Praxair, Inc., to carry out a squeeze-out at Linde AG following the completion of the merger Annex 4: Letter of Linde Intermediate Holding AG to the executive board of Linde AG dated November 1, 2018 (transfer request of Linde Intermediate Holding AG according to Sec. 62 para. 5 German Transformation Act in conjunction with Sec. 327a para. 1 sentence 1 German Stock Corporation Act) Annex 5: Notarized merger agreement between Linde Intermediate Holding AG and Linde Aktiengesellschaft dated November 1, 2018 Annex 6: Expert opinion of Ernst & Young GmbH on the company value of Linde Aktiengesellschaft and on the determination of an adequate cash settlement according to Sec. 327b para. 1 German Stock Corporation Act on the valuation date December 12, 2018
Recommended publications
  • Are Accruals During Initial Public Offerings Opportunistic?
    Review of Accounting Studies, 3, 175–208 (1998) c 1998 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. Manufactured in The Netherlands. Are Accruals during Initial Public Offerings Opportunistic? SIEW HONG TEOH [email protected] University of Michigan Business School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1234 T. J. WONG Hong Kong University of Science and Technology GITA R. RAO Colonial Management Associates Abstract. We find evidence that initial public offering (IPO) firms, on average, have high positive issue-year earnings and abnormal accruals, followed by poor long-run earnings and negative abnormal accruals. The IPO- year abnormal, and not expected, accruals explain the cross-sectional variation in post-issue earnings and stock returns. The results are robust with respect to alternative abnormal accruals and earnings performance measures. IPO firms adopt more income-increasing depreciation policies when they deviate from similar prior performance same industry non-issuers, and they provide significantly less for uncollectible accounts receivable than their matched non-issuers. The results taken together suggest opportunistic earnings management partially explains the new issues anomaly. Accrual accounting provides managers with discretion in the reporting of earnings. This allows financial reports to reflect managerial information about underlying economic con- ditions more accurately than is possible with a strictly mechanical reporting rule. However, if in some circumstances managers wish to mislead investors, discretion provides greater scope for obscuring true underlying firm performance. The incentives to manage earnings may be especially strong when the firm is planning to sell shares to the market, as in an initial public offering (IPO). IPOs are a major corporate event as evidenced by the size of the IPO market.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion of Theoretical-Practical Aspects of Squeeze Out
    Littera Scripta, 2019, Volume 12, Issue 1 Discussion of theoretical-practical aspects of squeeze out Iveta Sedlakova, Katarina Kramarova, Ladislav Vagner University of Zilina, The Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, Univerzitna 1, Zilina 010 01, Slovak Republic Abstract The presented article has mainly a nature of theoretical discussion on the issue of squeeze out. The squeeze out entitles a majority shareholder to exercise his rights to buy out remaining shares of an offeree company. It a specific transaction mechanism with an impact on shareholders, offeree company, procedural regulation of the transfer of ownership rights arising from shares, methodological aspects of determining a squeeze out price of shares of minority shareholders, efficiency of capital markets etc. In case of Slovakia, the squeeze out has been used for more than one decade, however the number of such kind transactions is low. The main objective of the article is to point on specifics of that transaction and methodological aspects of determination of a general value of shares as a criterion of a fair price relying on basic attributes of procedural regulation of squeeze out in Slovakia, synthesis of knowledge from empirical studies, existing legal and financial theory as well practical experience one of the authors. Keywords: consideration, fair price, general value, share, squeeze out Introduction Determining the value of a company (business valuation), parts of a company, its assets or other property is not a new instrument from the view of the Slovak (or Czechoslovak) economy. Its existence was already evident at a time when our economy had the feature of central planned economy.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Calculate Goodwill – and Why It Exists
    How to Calculate Goodwill – and Why It Exists Would You Like a Write-Up with Your Plug? This Video: We Haven’t Covered This Before?!! I was looking at this channel the other day and realized that we had videos on Negative Goodwill and Purchase Price Allocation for Noncontrolling Interests… But nothing on a far more basic topic: how to calculate Goodwill in the first place! This Video: We Haven’t Covered This Before?!! Also, we get a surprising number of questions about this topic, even though there’s detailed coverage of it in our guides and courses… and lots of articles online! So, here goes, starting with why Goodwill exists and a simple example: Why Goodwill Exists • SHORT ANSWER: Goodwill is an accounting construct that exists because in M&A deals, Buyers almost always pay more than what Sellers’ Balance Sheets are worth (i.e., Assets – Liabilities) • The Buyer “gets” all the Seller’s Assets and Liabilities, so that makes its Balance Sheet go out of balance when a deal closes • We create Goodwill to fix this imbalance and ensure that Assets = Liabilities + Equity on the Combined Balance Sheet • Basic Calculation: Goodwill = Equity Purchase Price – Seller’s Common Shareholders’ Equity + Seller’s Existing Goodwill +/- Other Adjustments to Seller’s Balance Sheet Why Goodwill Exists – Simple Example • EX: Buyer pays $1000 in Cash for the Seller, and the Seller has $1500 in Assets, $600 in Liabilities, and Common Equity of $900 • Next: Seller’s Common Equity is written down in the deal, and the Buyer’s Assets go down by $1000, then up
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Value Added (EVA™)
    UBS Global Research Valuation Series Economic Value Added (EVA™) EVA™: Use and abuse EVA™ is increasingly used for corporate and management appraisal and evaluation. The approach has gained so much popularity that it is now influencing the style, content and focus of sell-side research. While EVA™ can provide some useful insights into companies, as can many other techniques, it has shortcomings that should not be overlooked. ÆEVA™is based on a very simple concept; if a company earns a return that is greater than expected, then value has been added. In each year, the EVA™ is the difference between the actual and expected return (return spread) multiplied by the invested capital. The return spread and EVA™ are used as performance indicators. In addition, the total value added is the sum of all future annual EVA™s (in present value terms) and if this is added to the invested capital, it gives the total value of the company. ÆIn practice, the returns earned and the invested capital are based on accounting data where as the return demanded by investors is based on market (or economic) data. Consequently, EVA™ measures the difference between accounting and economic data and can, therefore, be influenced by different accounting practices and by management ‘adjustments’ to accounting information. Management may be incentivised to do this given that reward structures may be linked to EVA™. In an attempt to address these problems, a multitude of adjustments need to be made to the accounting data but these are often judgmental and restricted by the level of accounting disclosure.
    [Show full text]
  • Definitions Attributed to Goodwill in the Economic
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE ECOFORUM provided by Ecoforum Journal (University of Suceava, Romania) [Volume 6, Issue 3(13), 2017] DEFINITIONS ATTRIBUTED TO GOODWILL IN THE ECONOMIC LITERATURE AND CONCEPTUAL DELIMITATIONS REGARDING THE WAY OF VALUATION AND EXPOSURE OF THIS PATRIMONIAL COMPONENT IN THE BALANCE SHEET Cristina-Gabriela LELIUC COSMULESE Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, [email protected], Veronica GROSU Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania [email protected], Elena HLACIUC Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania [email protected] Abstract The purpose of this paper is to provide an exhaustive perspective on the evolution over time of the definition of the goodwill. The present paper is part of the research done in the doctoral thesis and we consider it very important to have a complete understanding of the concept studied to develop it further. In our demarche we used a chronological analysis and we revised definitions from the late 1800s to today. At the same time, it is desired to clarify and analyze the concept of goodwill both from the point of view of the accounting literature and the economic practice (regarding the evaluation and exposure of this patrimonial component in the balance sheet) and to a lesser extent in the legal aspect. Definitions are given by prominent researchers of time, published in magazines and books of a high rank or offered by international accounting commissions. In our opinion, this study is beneficial to researchers in the idea that it offers a complete picture of its concept and history, being a study focusing on the international accounting of goodwill in the past, present and future.
    [Show full text]
  • Squeeze-Outs and Freeze-Outs in Limited Liability Companies
    Washington University Law Review Volume 73 Issue 2 Limited Liability Companies January 1995 Squeeze-Outs and Freeze-Outs in Limited Liability Companies Franklin A. Gevurtz University of the Pacific Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the Business Organizations Law Commons Recommended Citation Franklin A. Gevurtz, Squeeze-Outs and Freeze-Outs in Limited Liability Companies, 73 WASH. U. L. Q. 497 (1995). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol73/iss2/5 This F. Hodge O'Neal Corporate and Securities Law Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SQUEEZE-OUTS AND FREEZE-OUTS IN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES FRANKLIN A. GEVURTZ* I. INTRODUCTION In only six years since the Internal Revenue Service gave its blessing to the limited liability company (LLC), statutes providing for this new business entity have spread across the country. Presently, all but a few states have such laws.2 With its combination of limited liability for the owners and partnership-style flow-through tax treatment, the LLC provides an attractive option for closely held businesses.3 Indeed, it is not beyond the realm of reality to suggest that before too long the LLC may largely render the partnership, limited partnership and closely held corporation obsolete. While this new business form raises many questions, a most appropriate one for this symposium is to consider the prospects for squeeze-outs and freeze-outs in LLCs.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Combinations and Changes in Ownership Interests
    25263 bd IFRS3 IAS27:25263 IFRS3/IAS27 bd 4/7/08 10:02 Page a Business combinations and changes in ownership interests A guide to the revised IFRS 3 and IAS 27 Audit.Tax.Consulting.Financial Advisory. 25263 bd IFRS3 IAS27:25263 IFRS3/IAS27 bd 4/7/08 10:02 Page b Contacts Global IFRS leadership team IFRS global office Global IFRS leader Ken Wild [email protected] IFRS centres of excellence Americas Robert Uhl [email protected] Asia Pacific Hong Kong Melbourne Stephen Taylor Bruce Porter [email protected] [email protected] Europe-Africa Copenhagen Johannesburg London Paris Jan Peter Larsen Graeme Berry Veronica Poole Laurence Rivat [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Deloitte’s www.iasplus.com website provides comprehensive information about international financial reporting in general and IASB activities in particular. Unique features include: • daily news about financial reporting globally. • summaries of all Standards, Interpretations and proposals. • many IFRS-related publications available for download. • model IFRS financial statements and checklists. • an electronic library of several hundred IFRS resources. • all Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu comment letters to the IASB. • links to several hundred international accounting websites. • e-learning modules for each IAS and IFRS – at no charge. • complete history of adoption of IFRSs in Europe and information about adoptions of IFRSs elsewhere around the world. • updates on developments in national accounting standards. 25263 bd IFRS3 IAS27:25263 IFRS3/IAS27 bd 4/7/08 10:02 Page c Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Summary of major changes 1 1.2 Convergence of IFRSs and US GAAP 3 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Roadmap to Initial Public Offerings
    A Roadmap to Initial Public Offerings 2019 The FASB Accounting Standards Codification® material is copyrighted by the Financial Accounting Foundation, 401 Merritt 7, PO Box 5116, Norwalk, CT 06856-5116, and is reproduced with permission. This publication contains general information only and Deloitte is not, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. Deloitte shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this publication. As used in this document, “Deloitte” means Deloitte & Touche LLP, Deloitte Consulting LLP, Deloitte Tax LLP, and Deloitte Financial Advisory Services LLP, which are separate subsidiaries of Deloitte LLP. Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of our legal structure. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting. Copyright © 2019 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. Other Publications in Deloitte’s Roadmap Series Business Combinations Business Combinations — SEC Reporting Considerations Carve-Out Transactions Consolidation — Identifying a Controlling Financial Interest Contracts on an Entity’s Own Equity
    [Show full text]
  • Vantage Towers AG
    Prospectus dated March 8, 2021 Prospectus for the public offering in the Federal Republic of Germany of 88,888,889 existing ordinary registered shares with no par value (Namensaktien ohne Nennbetrag) from the holdings of the Existing Shareholder, of 22,222,222 existing ordinary registered shares with no par value (Namensaktien ohne Nennbetrag) from the holdings of the Existing Shareholder, with the number of shares to be actually placed with investors subject to the exercise of an Upsize Option upon the decision of the Existing Shareholder, in agreement with the Joint Global Coordinators, on the date of pricing, and of 13,333,333 existing ordinary registered shares with no par value (Namensaktien ohne Nennbetrag) from the holdings of the Existing Shareholder in connection with a possible over-allotment, and at the same time for the admission to trading on the regulated market (regulierter Markt) of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange (Frankfurter Wertpapierbörse) with simultaneous admission to the sub- segment of the regulated market with additional post-admission obligations (Prime Standard) of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange (Frankfurter Wertpapierbörse) of 505,782,265 existing ordinary registered shares with no par value (Namensaktien ohne Nennbetrag) (existing share capital), each such share with a notional value of EUR 1.00 in the Company’s share capital and full dividend rights as of April 1, 2020 of Vantage Towers AG Düsseldorf, Germany Price Range: EUR 22.50 – EUR 29.00 International Securities Identification Number (ISIN): DE000A3H3LL2 German Securities Code (Wertpapierkennnummer, WKN): A3H 3LL Common Code: 230832161 Ticker Symbol: VTWR Joint Global Coordinators BofA Securities Morgan Stanley UBS Joint Bookrunners Barclays Berenberg BNP PARIBAS Deutsche Bank Goldman Sachs Jefferies TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I.
    [Show full text]
  • A Roadmap to Accounting for Noncontrolling Interests
    A Roadmap to Accounting for Noncontrolling Interests July 2020 The FASB Accounting Standards Codification® material is copyrighted by the Financial Accounting Foundation, 401 Merritt 7, PO Box 5116, Norwalk, CT 06856-5116, and is reproduced with permission. This publication contains general information only and Deloitte is not, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. Deloitte shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this publication. The services described herein are illustrative in nature and are intended to demonstrate our experience and capabilities in these areas; however, due to independence restrictions that may apply to audit clients (including affiliates) of Deloitte & Touche LLP, we may be unable to provide certain services based on individual facts and circumstances. As used in this document, “Deloitte” means Deloitte & Touche LLP, Deloitte Consulting LLP, Deloitte Tax LLP, and Deloitte Financial Advisory Services LLP, which are separate subsidiaries of Deloitte LLP. Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of our legal structure. Copyright © 2020 Deloitte Development LLC. All
    [Show full text]
  • Employee Handbook
    Employee Handbook Goodwill Industries of Northwest Ohio, Inc. A comprehensive vocational rehabilitation facility and workshop. Goodwill Industries of Northwest Ohio, is non-profit organization. Our mission is to assist people with barriers to employment achieve independence Our vision is to demonstrate local, regional, and global leadership in providing life-enhancing services to people with barriers to employment. Goodwill: In the business of changing lives. Accredited by: The commission on Accreditation Of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK - TABLE OF CONTENTS REVISED 7/12 SECTION 1 WELCOME TO GOODWILL PAGE President’s Message .................................................................................................. 1 Goodwill and You ................................................................................................... 2-3 Your Responsibility To Goodwill ................................................................................. 4 Purpose of this Handbook .......................................................................................... 5 SECTION 2 STATEMENTS OF COMPANY POLICY PAGE Equal Employment Opportunity .................................................................................. 1 Harassment and Abuse Policy ................................................................................ 1-2 Substance Abuse Workplace Policy ....................................................................... 3-4 Nepotism, Outside Employment-Conflict of Interest ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mergers & Acquisitions in the US Industrial Gas Business
    Mergers & Acquisitions in the US Industrial Gas Business PART II – THE MAJOR INDUSTRY SHAPERS By Peter V. Anania, Leaders LLC he Industrial Gas (IG) industry has seen tremendous growth a process to separate oxygen in 1880. In 1886 the brothers Brin started over the past 100 years, fueled by rapidly expanding technol- commercially developing the use of oxygen. T ogy in market leading countries that required more mixes of Interestingly, one of BOC’s first mergers — and now its last — was gases (including the exotics), purer gases for high-tech applications, with Linde. In 1906, Linde joined with Brin Oxygen by contributing as well as new applications of traditional gases. With the develop- its British Linde patents. These patents represented a new method for ment of industry in emerging economies, demand for industrial producing oxygen by cryogenic distillation of air. The resulting gases continues to grow worldwide. This is Part II of this series that merged entity was renamed British Oxygen Company or BOC. In the examines mergers and acquisitions activity in the industrial gas busi- 1920s, a process for the large-scale production of liquid oxygen ness. In this feature we look at some of the “majors” and how they allowed the oxygen to be delivered in liquid form by road tanker and have grown over the years through acquisitions. In compiling this greatly expanded its market applications. article, we researched the websites of many of the companies men- BOC’s growth in the first half of the 20th century was achieved tioned herein, had access to the archives of JR Campbell Associates, largely by developing or acquiring rights to new technology and Inc., along with discussions with Buzz Camp- processes, including further improvements in liq- bell, and used The History of Industrial Gases, uefaction and cryogenic cooling in the 1930s.
    [Show full text]