Check List 9(5): 1057–1061, 2013 © 2013 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution

n Geographic note on species of the genus Upa (: Tiphiidae, Thynninae) in the Atlantic Forest,

istributio Brazil Kimsey, 1991 D

Cíntia Eleonora Lopes Justino 1*, Eduardo Fernando dos Santos 2 and Fernando Barbosa Noll 1 raphic g eo 1 Universidade Estadual de São Paulo, Institituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas de São José do Rio Preto, Department of Zoology and G

n Botany, Cristóvão Colombo, 2265. CEP 15054-000. São José do Rio Preto, SP., Brazil. o

2 Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Department of Biology, Avenue Bandeirantes, 3900. CEP otes * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

N 14040-901. Ribeirão Preto, SP., Brazil.

Abstract: Upa Kimsey is a poorly known genus of Tiphiidae with seven species. This genus has records in forest areas and in this paper we present new records to four species. All specimens were collected by malaise traps in four areas of Atlantic Rain Forest and three of Atlantic Semi-deciduous forest, mainly from high and mid-elevations. The new records indicate that species of Upa are not as rare as others genera of Tiphiidae, which are virtually unknown in many Neotropical regions.

Neotropical Tiphiidae has been highly neglected in

. altitudeSP - 24°18’18”S; and three 48°21’55”W of Atlantic, 854m Semi-deciduous altitude; (4) forest: Estação (1) fora gener the Neotropicalal way (Genise Thynninae and Kimse and describey, 1991; severalKimsey genera, 1991, Ecológica Juréia-Itatins, SP - 24°31’06”S; 47°12’06”W, 19m among1992) Geniseof them and the Kimsegenusy Upa (1991) Kimsey. highlight Posteriorly, such pr Kimseyoblem Barretos, SP - 20°29’05” S; 48°49’21” W, 477m altitude; seven species from Eastern and Southeastern South altitude.(2) União Upa Paulista, tridentata SP - 20°55’16”(Figure 1) S;and 49°55’34” U. nasuta W (Figure, 450m (1996) described other species and nowadays Upait includes shows 2)altitude; occur in(3) the Ma Braziliantão, SP - 21°37’14”Atlantic Forest S; 48°32’14” and Parana W, 502Forest m strong sexual dimorphism, with apterous females and provinces, while U. longispina America (Kimsey 1996). Like other Thynninae, U. porteri (Figure 4) to the latter. but species biology is virtually unknown. of Upa Species distribution maps (Figure(Figure 5) were 3) is prepared restricted with to iswinged essentially males based (Genise on the and male Kimse morphology,y 1991; Kimse sincey females 1996), the PANMAP first pr (Diepenbroekovince, and et al. 2000). The type locality of are known only for U. porteri Kimsey and U. impressiceps U. nasuta (Turner). was incorrectly displayed in the distribution All species of this genus have been recorded only in (São José do Barreiro, SP - 22º 46’25.1” S; 44º forested areas, with four of them: U. nasuta Kimsey, U. located13’49.5” in W) the interior of the São Paulo State. However, it is longispina Kimsey, U. ligulata Kimsey, and U. porteri Kimsey locatedmap pr esentednear to the by BrazilianKimsey coastline(1996), indicating (Figure 5). that it is known only from the type locality. The type locality of Upa The specimens used in this study were deposited in nasuta is Brazil: São Paulo, Serra da Bocaina, S. J. Barreiros, the Hymenoptera Collection at the Department of Zoology U. longispina is from Brazil: São Paulo, H. Florestal, U. and Botany of the São Paulo State University, in São José ligulata is from Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul, Arroio Arapua, do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil, and in the Hymenoptera and U. porteri is from Argentina: Corrientes, Las Marias Collection at the Museum of Zoology of the University of Herein, we present new records of U. longispina, U. nasuta, U. porteri and U. tridentata Kimsey made using a stereomicroscope Leica MZ 16 coupled to a from(Kimsey the Atlantic1996). Forest, Brazil. São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. Identification of species was The Atlantic Forest is composed of two main phytophysiognomies: Atlantic Rain Forest and Atlantic digital camera Leica DFC 295. Images were captured using Semi-deciduous Forest (Morellato and Haddad 2000). the software Leica Aplication Suitte (LAS) Version 3.8 These phytophysiognomies correspond respectively to treatmentand the construction was performed of the in finalPhotoshop®. images w as done by the the Brazilian Atlantic Forest Province and Parana Forest software Some A studiesuto Montage suggest Pro thatVersion the 5.03.0061. Parana Subregion Posterior Province + angustifolia Forest Province, which is historically related to the Andean Region (Vanin form the Parana Subregion proposed by Morrone (2006) for the Neotropical Region. while others indicate historical relationships with the All specimens were collected with Malaise traps in four 1976; Roig-Alsina 1989; Morrone and Lopretto 1994), areas of Atlantic Rain Forest: (1) Núcleo Picinguaba - Parque ParanaAmazonian Subregion Subregion and the(Costa Andean 2003; Region Sigrist is establishedand Carvalho; by groups2009). withIn som amphinotice cases, close distribution, relationships such asbetw Thynninae.een the Estadual da Serra do Mar, SP - 23°20’10”S; 44°50’15”W, However, the lack of complete phylogenetic studies for 100m altitude; 23°17’43”S; 44°47’56.24”W, 840m altitude; Thynninae, and the lack of information on its fauna from (2) Estação Ecológica de Boracéia, SP - 23°21’55’’S; 45°50’47”W, 660m altitude; (3) Parque Estadual Intervales, 1057 Justino et al. | Geographic note on the genus Upa the Amazonian Subregion restrict the prediction of any Malaise traps, but species of Upa were never collected. inference. Upa Moreover, searches for species of this genus were done by monotypy and the description presented the most in Tiphiidae collection of various institutions, and they was described in Genise and Kimsey (1991) were never found. In this way, we could conclude that Upa described six new species of Upa and showed distribution is really restricted to the Atlantic Forest, mainly to high fordistinctive the species. features However for thethere genus. are no Lat diagnosticer, Kimse charactersy (1996) or synapomorphies to delimit the genus, which complicate addition, such records indicate that species of Upa are not rare,and mid-eleand thatvations, the Thynninae as suggest fauna,ed asby wellKimse othery (1996). groups Inof Several other Atlantic Rain Forest areas between Santa Hymenoptera Aculeata (Santos and Noll 2010), of several Catarinatheir identification. and Paraíba States were also sampled using South American regions is very poorly known.

Figure 1. Upa tridentata Kimsey. A Face. B Lateral habitus.

Figure 2. Upa nasuta Kimsey. A Face. B Lateral habitus.

1058 Justino et al. | Geographic note on the genus Upa

Figure 3. Upa longispina Kimsey. A Face. B Lateral habitus.

Figure 4. Upa porteri Kimsey. A Face. B Lateral habitus.

1059 Justino et al. | Geographic note on the genus Upa

Figure 5. Distribution map of four species of Upa Kimsey (Hymenoptera: Thynninae). Circles indicate old records and triangles new records.

1060 Justino et al. | Geographic note on the genus Upa

Acknowledgments: Morrone, J.J. 2006. Biogeographic Areas and Transition Zones of Latin America and the Caribbean Islands Based on Panbiogeographic and was supported by São e WPaulo ar Research grateful Fundation to Dr. Car (Fapesp)los Roberto and NationalFerreira Cladistic Analyses of the Entomofauna. Annual Review of Entomology Brandão, curator of the MZUSP’s Hymenoptera collection. This study

LiteratureCounsel of Technological Cited and Scientific Development (CNPq). Decapoda51: 467-494. (Crustacea: Malacostraca) in Southern South America: A Morrone,Panbiogeographic J.J. and Lopretto, Approach. E.C. 1994. Journal Distributional of Biogeography Patterns of freshwater Atlantic Forest of Brazil: a Study of Molecular Phylogeography with Costa,. Small L.P Mammals. 2003. The Journal Historical of Biogeography Bridge Between the Amazon and the Ahora Incluidos en Chirodamus Haliday sensu lato 21: y Revision 97-109. de Diepenbroek, M., Grobe, H. and Sieger, R. 2000. PanMap. http://www. Roig-Alsina,Pompilocalus A. 19 Gen.89. La Nov. P osicion (Hymenoptera, Sistematica Pompilidae). de los GruposRevista Hasta de la pangaea.de/Software/PanMap 30: 71-86. Sociedad Entomológica Argentina Santos, E.F. and Noll, F.B. 2010. Additions to the known distribution of (Tiphiidae, Hymenoptera). Psyche Epipompilus aztecus 47: 3-73.E. excelsus Genise, J. and Kimsey, L. 1991. New Genera of South American ThynninaeAelurus (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae). Psyche: A Journal of Entomology 2010: (Hymenoptera: Tiphiidae: Thynninae). 98: 57-69. Systematic Entomology 16: 1-4. (Cresson, 1869) and (Bradley, 1944) Kimsey, L. 1991. Revision of the South American wasp genus areas of endemism in the tropical South America using Brooks thynninae223 - 237. tiphiidae wasps (Hymenoptera). Systematic Entomology Sigrist,Parsimony M.S. and Analysis Carvalho, (BPA). C.J.B. Biota 200 Neotropica9. Historical relationships among Kimsey, L. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships among the South American Upa (Coleoptera). Arquivos de Zoologia 9: 79-90. (Hymenoptera:Tiphiidae).17: 133–144. Proceedings of the Entomological Society Vanin, A.S. 1976. Taxonomic Revision of the South American Belidae Kimsey,of Washington L. 1996. R evision of the South American Thynnine Genus 28: 1-75. Kimsey, L. 2004. Illustrated keys to genera of the male wasps in the subfamily Thynninae98(1): 55-63.(Hymenoptera: Tiphiidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington Morellato, L.P.C. and Haddad, C.F.B. 2000. Introduction: The Brazilian Received: August 2013 Atlantic Forest. Biotropica 106: 571-585. Accepted: September 2013: Matthew Smart Published online: October 2013 32: 786-792. Editorial responsibility

1061