Reserve Silica Responsiveness Summary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Responsiveness Summary Report November 16, 2018 Public Meeting, Agreed Order, and Public Participation Plan For Reserve Silica Reclamation Site 26000 Black Diamond-Ravensdale Road Ravensdale, WA 98051 Prepared by Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 3190 160th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 January 29, 2020 Publication and Contact Information This plan is available on the Department of Ecology’s website at: https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/gsp/Sitepage.aspx?csid=4728 For more information contact: Northwest Regional Office 3190 160th Ave SE Bellevue WA 98008 425-649-7052 Washington State Department of Ecology — www.ecology.wa.gov • Headquarters, Olympia 360-407-6000 • Northwest Regional Office, Bellevue 425-649-7000 • Southwest Regional Office, Olympia 360-407-6300 • Central Regional Office, Union Gap 509-575-2490 • Eastern Regional Office, Spokane 509-329-3400 To request ADA accommodation including materials in a format for the visually impaired, call Ecology at 425-649-7000 or visit https://ecology.wa.gov/accessibility. People with impaired hearing may call Washington Relay Service at 711. People with speech disability may call TTY at 877-833-6341. Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Status Update on Site Separation .................................................................................................... 4 Public Participation Comments....................................................................................................... 6 Liability Comment .......................................................................................................................... 9 Site Definition Comments............................................................................................................... 9 Groundwater Hydrology Comments ............................................................................................. 17 Chemicals of Potential Concern Comments ................................................................................. 20 Seismic Comment ......................................................................................................................... 23 Treatment System Comment......................................................................................................... 24 List of Attachments ....................................................................................................................... 25 Attachment 1 ................................................................................................................................. 26 Attachment 2 ................................................................................................................................. 27 Attachment 3 ................................................................................................................................. 28 Attachment 4 ................................................................................................................................. 29 Attachment 5 ................................................................................................................................. 30 Attachment 6 ................................................................................................................................. 31 Attachment 7 ................................................................................................................................. 32 Attachment 8 ................................................................................................................................. 33 Attachment 9 ................................................................................................................................. 34 Introduction The Department of Ecology (Ecology) and potentially liable persons (PLPs)1 Reserve Silica Corporation (Reserve Silica) and Holcim (US) Inc. (Holcim) held a public meeting on November 16, 2018, to discuss the status and planned remediation approach for the Reserve Silica Corporation site. Ecology held a 30-day public comment period (November 5th through December 7th 2018) on the draft Agreed Order (AO) and Public Participation Plan (PPP). This Responsiveness Summary addresses the draft Agreed Order; reference the draft AO (Attachment 1) when reviewing the comments below. The draft Agreed Order stipulated that the PLPs prepare a Remedial Investigation (RI) and Feasibility Study (FS) for the site, in accordance with WAC 173-340-350 and Ecology Publication Numbers 16-09-006 (Remedial Investigation Checklist) and 16-09-007 (Feasibility Study Checklist). Ecology requests the RI and FS be prepared as separate documents. The RI should be a comprehensive document for the site that describes the history, previous environmental investigations, previous and ongoing cleanup actions, additional characterization, and Conceptual Site Model for the site. The RI should include sufficient detail to develop and evaluate cleanup alternatives in the subsequent FS report. The approved RI will define the site boundary, the chemicals of concern (COCs), and the cleanup standards for the Site. The PLPs are encouraged to consider the public comments during the development of the Reserve Silica Reclamation site RI Work Plan (RI Work Plan) and the RI report. Ecology categorized the public comments as public participation, site definition, groundwater hydrology, chemicals of potential concern (COPCs), seismic concerns, and treatment system comments. Ecology’s expectations and response to these comments are described in the following sections. Status Update on Site Separation Reserve Silica and Holcim entered into an Agreed Order with Ecology on December 16, 2019 for the investigation and cleanup of contamination on the Reserve Silica Reclamation site in accordance with Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA). The Reserve Silica Corporation site was renamed as the Reserve Silica Reclamation site (Facility/Site ID 2041, Cleanup Site ID 4728, website: https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/gsp/Sitepage.aspx?csid=4728 ) on November 18, 2019. The Reserve Silica Plant site (Facility/Site ID 19532, Cleanup Site ID 15125, website: https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/gsp/Sitepage.aspx?csid=19532 ) was identified as a new site on November 18, 2019 and listed on the Confirmed and Suspected Contaminated Sites List on December 24, 2019. Reserve Silica plans to independently investigate and cleanup the Reserve Silica Plant site in accordance with MTCA. Discussion of the site separation are discussed below. 1 On March 5, 2018, Ecology determined that BNSF Railway is also a PLP for the site, but BNSF Railway has declined to participate in the implementation of this Agreed Order. 4 The current site configuration for the Reserve Silica Plant Site and Reserve Silica Reclamation Site is below. Silica Cleanup Site Overview Plant Site -- 1 1 Reclamation Site 1,000 Feet .. - ,. Preliminary Boundary DEPARTMENT OF ~- -_ -~ Property Boundary ECOLOGY State of Washington 5 Public Participation Comments Ecology intends to allow public review of the RI Work Plan, and hold formal public comment periods for the RI and the FS. The Draft Cleanup Action Plan (DCAP) will also undergo a public comment period. However, the scope of work under this Agreed Order covers the RI/FS activities up to and including submittal of the Agency Review Preliminary DCAP to Ecology. The DCAP public comment period will occur after the work of this Agreed Order is complete. Ecology will receive quarterly progress reports and will update the public by providing periodic brief oral presentations at regularly scheduled Greater Maple Valley Unincorporated Area Council (GMVUAC) meetings or upon request. Public comment 1: GMVUAC Comment 3 (Attachment 5) The Draft Agreed Order and Public Participation Plan should be amended to include a required public comment period regarding and relating to the forthcoming Work Plan, so that members of the Public have an opportunity to review and comment on it before it is implemented as part of the RI/Feasibility Study. To ensure the Public Participation Plan includes public notice and an opportunity for the public to submit comments to Ecology on the draft Work Plan before it is finalized, we suggest the following modified excerpt from Ecology’s November 30, 2018, e-mail be included in the final Public Participation Plan: "The proposed RI Work Plan will be made available to the public for review and comment before it is finalized and implemented. Because Work Plans are generally not subject to formal public review and comment, in addition to posting notice on its Document Repository for Reserve Silica Corporation website the Department will send a Notice of Draft Work Plan Availability to only those individuals and entities who have submitted written comments on the Draft Agreed Order and/or Public Participation Plan. The Department will consider all public comments received and appropriately include such comments in the final Work Plan." We wish to continue an open dialogue with Ecology officials on Reserve Silica Site cleanup. Thank you in advance for your careful consideration of our comments. Ecology response to Public comment 1: Ecology revised the Public Participation Plan by adding the following paragraphs under the heading “Public comment periods”: “Ecology will send a notice of availability of the Remedial Investigation Work Plan to those individuals who submitted
Recommended publications
  • Role of Fertilizer and Micronutrient Applications on Arsenic, Cadmium, and Lead Accumulation in California Cropland Soils

    Role of Fertilizer and Micronutrient Applications on Arsenic, Cadmium, and Lead Accumulation in California Cropland Soils

    Role of Fertilizer and Micronutrient Applications on Arsenic, Cadmium, and Lead Accumulation in California Cropland Soils Final Report Submitted to California Department of Food and Agriculture Andrew C. Chang, Albert L. Page, and Natalie J. Krage Department of Environmental Sciences University of California Riverside, California November 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………………………………ii LIST OF FIGURES………………………………………………………………………………iv LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………………………………...viii SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS………………………………………………………….….x INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………...1 LITERATURE REVIEW………………………………………………………….. …………….8 Background Concentrations of Trace Elements …………………………........................ 8 Trace Elements in Fertilizers…………………………………………………………….10 Effects of Fertilizer Application on Trace Element Contents of Soils and Crops…….....13 Food Chain Transfer……………………………………………………………………. 21 Methods of Sample Digestion …………………………………………….……………..24 MATERIALS AND METHODS………………………………………………………………. 29 Sampling Strategy……………………………………………………………………….29 Soil Sample Collection……………………………………………………………….….32 Field Soil Sampling Procedure……………………………………………………….….33 Elemental Determination………………………………………………….......................35 Quality Control/Quality Assurance………………………………………………………35 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS………………………………………………………………..38 Accuracy, Precision, and Background Interference…………………………………...…38 Benchmark Soils…………………………………………………………….……..…….42 Cropland Soils………………………………………………………………………..…..53 ii Arsenic, Cadmium, Lead,
  • LANDFILL and LANDSPREADING HAZARDS Laurel E

    LANDFILL and LANDSPREADING HAZARDS Laurel E

    JulyJuly 2009 2009 | | Volume Volume 11 11 | | Number Number 4 4 LANDFILLLANDFILL AND AND LANDSPREADINGLANDSPREADING HAZARDSHAZARDS American Water Resources Association AWRA ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP VISIBILITY | DISCOUNTS | IMPACT AWRAINTRODUCEDTHEASSOCIATEMEMBERSHIPIN2007FORORGANIZATIONSANDCOMPANIESTHATWANT TOBEVISIBLEAMONGAWRAMEMBERSANDCONSTITUENTGROUPS.THEREISNOBETTERWAYTOGETTHE WORDOUTABOUTYOURCOMPANYTHANTOBECOMEANAWRAASSOCIATEMEMBER! JOIN TODAY! ALREADYAREGULARMEMBER?ADDANASSOCIATEMEMBERSHIPANDGAINUNPARALLEDVISIBILTY! HERE’SWHATYOU’LLGET: YOURCORPORATELOGOROTATINGONAWRA’SHOMEPAGE EXTENSIVELISTINGINAWRA’SEXCLUSIVEVIRTUALEXHIBITHALL (MORETHAN12,000VISITSINJUNEALONE!) DISCOUNTSONEXHIBITSPACE DISCOUNTSONJOBPOSTINGS DISCOUNTSONPUBLICATIONS DISCOUNTSONADVERTISINGINWATERRESOURCESIMPACT WATERRESOURCESIMPACTFORYOUANDUPTO10OTHEREMPLOYEES VISIT WWW.AWRA.ORG TO JOIN NOW! FULLYEAR(JAN1ͲDEC31)ASSOCIATEMEMBERSHIP$500| HALFYEAR(JUL1ͲDEC31)ASSOCIATEMEMBERSHIP$250 EXHIBIT SPACE AVAILABLE! AWRAHASLIMITEDSPACEAVAILABLEATITSUPCOMINGCONFERENCES TAKEADVANTAGEOFTHEMANYEXHIBITORPERKSANDRESERVEYOURSPACETODAY! 2009AWRAANNUALWATERRESOURCESCONFERENCE NOVEMBER9Ͳ12,2009|SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 2010AWRASPRINGSPECIALTYCONFERENCE GISANDWATERRESOURCESVI MARCH29Ͳ31,2010|ORLANDO,FL ATAWRACONFERENCES,EXHIBITORSAREANINTEGRALPARTOFTHECONFERENCEEXPERIENCE.EXHIBITSARENEARTHE CONFERENCEACTION,ANDTHEOPENINGNETWORKINGRECEPTION,ALLCOFFEEBREAKS,ANDPOSTERSESSIONSTAKEPLACE AMONGSTTHEEXHIBITS. YOUR EXHIBIT INCLUDES: ONECOMPLIMENTARYREGISTRATION(ASECONDBOOTHREPCANATTENDFORONLY$200)
  • Food Safety Issues for Mineral and Organic Fertilizers

    Food Safety Issues for Mineral and Organic Fertilizers

    CHAPTER TWO Food Safety Issues for Mineral and Organic Fertilizers Rufus L. Chaney Contents 1. Introduction 52 2. Concentrations of Trace Elements in Fertilizers and Soil Amendments 53 3. Risk Assessment Pathways 57 4. Natural Controls on Trace Element Transfer from Soil to Plants 58 5. Element Risks 59 5.1. Selenium 59 5.2. Molybdenum 60 5.3. Cobalt 61 5.4. Cadmium 62 5.5. Lead 83 6. Trace Elements in Other Common Soil Amendments 84 6.1. Manure 84 6.2. Limestone 85 6.3. Steel production fume waste 86 6.4. Gypsum 86 7. Long-Term Reactions of Trace Elements in Soils 87 8. Other Elements in Fertilizers and Soil Amendments of Possible 89 Concern 8.1. Fluoride 89 8.2. Radionuclides 92 8.3. Arsenic 94 9. Monitoring and Control of Trace Elements in Mineral Fertilizers 97 10. Need for Regulatory Enforcement on Composition of Soil 98 Amendments References 99 Senior research Agronomist, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Environmental Management and Byproducts Utilization Lab, BARC-West, Beltsville, MD, USA Advances in Agronomy, Volume 117 2012 Published by Elsevier Inc. ISSN 0065-2113, All rights reserved. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394278-4.00002-7 51 52 Rufus L. Chaney Abstract Fertilizers and other soil amendments are required to maintain soil fertility, but some may be naturally rich in trace elements, or contaminated. As part of the overall consideration of using fertilizers and soil amendments, one should consider the levels of trace elements present in relation to soil, plant, and food-chain processes (precipitation, adsorption, chelation) which promote or alleviate trace element risks.
  • The Ire Journal

    The Ire Journal

    CONTENTS 17 FOI REPORT THE IRE JOURNAL Don’t wait! Fight proposed medical privacy rules now By Charles Davis TABLE OF CONTENTS JULY/AUGUST 2002 18 HIGHER EDUCATION Stories stop developers from grabbing prime college land 4 Is better journalism profitable? By Sandra Peddie Workshops take direct aim at Newsday quality/bottom line question By Brant Houston 20 – 30 HIDDEN HEALTH HAZARDS 5 NEWS BRIEFS AND MEMBER NEWS CHEMICAL WARFARE Bureaucratic infighting 6 BOARD DEFINES IRE MISSION, cripples public safety effort ADJUSTS COMMITTEE STRUCTURE By Les Zaitz By Cheryl Phillips The (Portland) Oregonian for The IRE Journal RADIOACTIVE WASTE 7 IRE HOLDS SUCCESSFUL ANNUAL Old records reveal history CONFERENCE BY THE BAY of Navy shipyard dumping By The IRE Journal Staff By Lisa Davis SF Weekly 12 LUCRATIVE SPORT International agents make money placing TOXIC EMISSIONS foreign athletes at U.S. schools Cancer rates soar in By Russell Carollo and high-discharge area Christine Willmsen-Vasconez By Scott Streater Dayton Daily News Pensacola News Journal 14 POLICE CONFESSIONS FATEFUL HARVEST Records review shows cops using illegal, Toxic waste found in coercive tactics to nail innocent people ordinary fertilizers By Steve Mills By Duff Wilson Chicago Tribune The Seattle Times 16 ELECTION CHALLENGE More investigations required in key year 31 ANTHOLOGY SHOWS JOURNALISM OFTEN LEADS TO of finance reform SIGNIFICANT CHANGE By Aron Pilhofer By Steve Weinberg The IRE Journal The IRE Journal 32 RED CROSS Disaster leads to questions about handling of ABOUT THE COVER donations What appears to be simple By Norberto Santana Jr. fertilizer is considered a The San Diego Union Tribune hazardous waste by 33 LEGAL CORNER some because of its high Curtailing access to jurors: Judicial regulation of lead content.
  • Chemical Fertilizers Laid on Millions Learned to Roll with Adversity

    Chemical Fertilizers Laid on Millions Learned to Roll with Adversity

    AvatarPersonal Opinion of Sofia Smallstorm June 2015 email: [email protected] PO Box 698, Cardiff CA 92007 Unintelligent Organisms A subscription newsletter This Little Matter of Chemicals to bring you bits and pieces Containing Our Waste that clarify understanding Nature’s Clean-up as I come to learn more Pollution, Dilution, Solution in my own Rabbit Hole Fertilizing the Language discoveries Unintelligent Organisms organic unless I pay the state of California $4K per year to have this privilege. I can call them “botanical,” I can call Well, we all know about organic food versus stuff sprayed them “natural,” even “100% natural,” but I am not allowed with chemical pesticides. Someone sent me a YouTube to call them organic. Unless I pay all over again, even recently which showed bystanders at a Monsanto protest though the importer (located in a different state) has already being interviewed about whether they had heard of had them inspected and declared “certified organic.” Monsanto and GMOs. Few had, if you can believe it (and we can!), although a Russian woman, who also spoke fluent Who writes these rules, we wonder? It could only be the English, said that her countrymen certainly knew a lot about foxy foxes overseeing the henhouse, of course. They get you GMOs and were well aware that they were bad for our going and coming, is another way to put it, and we are by health. The Americans on the scene watching the protest now so used to this we can really only shake our heads. No were the usual teenage layabouts and portly middle-agers, wonder the money is fake, printed out of nothing, for its use not concerned by and even amused at their own ignorance.