Meeting of the GCZMA

INDEX to the 56 to 58th Minutes of the Meetings of Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority (GCZMA)

Sr. No. Particulars Page Nos. 1. 56th Meeting of the GCZMA. 2-8

2. 57th Meeting of the GCZMA 9-25

3. 58th Meeting of the GCZMA 26 -29

4. 59 th Meeting of the GCZMA 30 -50

MIUTES FOR THE 56 TH GCZMA MEETIG OF THE GOA COASTAL ZOE MAAGEMET AUTHORITY TO BE HELD O 25 / 08 / 2010.

56.1

Item o. 1 (Construction / Reconstruction / Development in CRZII Area).

Case o. 1

Proposed construction of residential building in Chalta o. 7,8,23,24 & 4 of P.T. sheet o. 65 of Vasco city, Mormugao Taluka, by Mr. Mario J. Alvares (GCZMA/S/1011/ 18 ).

Decision: Approved, subject that the construction should be in accordance with the local building byelaws and in accordance with TCP/MPDA and local authority guidelines.

Case o.2

Proposed repair and renovation and addition on ground and first floor to the existing house in Chalta o. 28, 29 & 30 of P.T. sheet o. 12 of Panaji city, Tiswadi Taluka, by Mr. Dharmanand Verekar (GCZMA//1011/28).

Decision: Approved, subject that the construction should be in accordance with the local building byelaws and in accordance with TCP/NGPDA and local authority guidelines.

Case o.3

Proposed repair and renovation to the existing house in Chalta o. 34, 37 of P.T. sheet o. 4 of Panaji city, Tiswadi Taluka, by Mrs. Filomena Costa (GCZMA//1011/33).

Decision: Approved, subject to the construction should be in accordance with the local building byelaws and in accordance with TCP/NGPDA and local authority guidelines.

56.2

Item o. 2 (Repair & Renovation/Development in CRZIII Area).

Case o. 1

Proposed repairs and renovation of existing house (Collapsed) in Sy. o. 5/7 of Maxem Loliem village, Canacona Taluka, by Mrs. Inacinha Fernandes (GCZMA/S/1011/16).

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same. This house was broken during the flash floods last year.

Case o. 2

Proposed repairs and renovation of existing house in Sy. o. 5/7 of Loliem village, Canacona Taluka, by Mr. Victor Dias (GCZMA/S/1011/17).

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.This house was broken during the flash floods last year.

Case o. 3

Proposed repairs and renovation of existing Bhatti (Distillery) in Sy. o. 130/13 of Agonda village, Canacona Taluka, by Mr. Heraldo Fernandes (GCZMA/S/1011/23).

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 4

Proposed repairs and renovation of the existing house in Sy.o. 174/19 of Calangute Village, Bardez Taluka, by Mr. Joao F. Fernandes, Cruz Fernandes, Severina Fernandes( GCZMA//0910/23).

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 5

Proposed repairs and renovation of the existing house in Sy.no. 207/4 of Calangute Village, Bardez Taluka, by Mr. Maria D.Gonsalves, Mr. Bruno A. Gonsalves( GCZMA//09 10/35).

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o.6

Proposed repairs of existing house in Sy. o. 132/9 of agorcemPalolem Village, Canacona Taluka, by Smt. Laxmi Vishram Pagi ( GCZMA/S/1011/26).

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o.7

Proposed repairs of existing house in Sy. o. 132/21 of agorcemPalolem Village, Canacona Taluka, by Mr. Molu R.. Gaonkar ( GCZMA/S/1011/27).

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 8

Proposed repairs and renovation of the existing house in Sy. no. 61/7 of agorcemPalolem Village, Canacona Taluka, by Mr. Cruz Rodrigues( GCZMA/S/0910/54).

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o.9

Proposed repair and renovation to the existing house in survey no. 261/8 of Calangute village Bardez taluka, Mrs. atalina Fernandes & Mr. Velly Fernandes (GCZMA//10 11/10)

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 10

Proposed repair to the existing structure (G+1) in survey no. 318/2, 4 of Calangute village Bardez Taluka, M/s. Synapse Information Services Pvt. Ltd. (GCZMA//1011/26)

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 11

Proposed repair and renovation to the existing house in survey no. 173/1L of Poinguinim village of Canacona taluka, by Mr. Joaquim Dias (GCZMA/S/1011/19)

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 12

Proposed Reconstruction/repair and renovation to the existing house in survey o. 35/0 of Siridao village Tiswadi taluka, Mr. Antonio Pires (GCZMA//1011/ 25 )

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 13

Proposed repairs and renovation/alternation to the existing house in Survey o. 4/1 of Village Baiguinim, Tiswadi Taluka ,by Parneeta Muppana. (GCZMA//1011/24) Decision: Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

. Case o. 14 Proposed Reconstruction/repairs and renovation to the existing house in Survey o. 207/5(Part) of Village Borim, Ponda Taluka, by Deepa J. Miringkar.(GCZMA//1011/34) Decision: Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 15

Proposed repairs and renovation to the existing two structures in Survey o. 197/1G of Village ReisMagos, Bardez Taluka, by Mario Walter Fernandes (GCZMA//1011/36) Decision: Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

56.3

Item o. 3 (Wire fencing/Bio fencing/compound wall)

Case o. 1

Proposed construction of compound wall in Chalta o. 41 of PTS. o. 86 of Vasco city, Mormugao Taluka, by Our Lady of Desterro Church (GCZMA/S/0910/22)

Decision: Approved, subject to the condition that any traditional access should not be blocked and also subject to the construction should be in accordance with the local building bye laws and in accordance with TCP/MPDA and local authority guidelines.

Case o. 2

Proposed construction of compound wall in Chalta o. 2 of PTS o. 175 of Vasco city, Mormugao taluka, by M/s. Mormugao Port Trust (GCZMA/S/1011/21)

Case o.3

Proposed construction of compound wall/wire Mesh Fencing in survey o. 16/1(Part) and 14/3(Part) of Cortalim village of Mormugao taluka, by Mr. Dominic Rodrigues,(GCZMA/S/1011/24)

Decision: Approved, subject to the condition that any traditional access should not be blocked. Wire fencing/ Bio fencing is permitted within CRZ-III area.

Case o. 4

Reconstruction of existing gate at Raj Bhavan in chalta o. 1 of PTS. o. 168 of Panaji city Tiswadi taluka, by Chief Architect (PWD), Altinho, PanajiGoa (GCZMA//1011/30)

Decision: Approved on account of security reasons, subject to the condition that any traditional access should not be blocked

56.4

Item o. 4 (Other development / construction of jetty / Repair of barges / DryDocks / Regularisation etc.)

Case o. 1

Permission for berthing and operation of motor yatch/motor boats the property abutting Sy.o. 31/4 of Penha da Franca in Bardez taluka, by Mr. Agnelo J. Fernandes,(GCZMA//1011/27)

Decision: The GCZMA members opined that there exists a bird sanctuary and thick mangroves within buffer area of the wildlife eco-sensitive area. The GCZMA members where not infavour of that the proposal and opined that prior approval from Forest Department should be obtained

Case o. 2

Permission for laying GAIL 24” dia Pipeline & OFC across ala in South Goa District, by GAIL (India) Limited, (GCZMA//1011/ 12).

Decision: After presentation done by the officials of GAIL (India), Ltd., it was decided to approve the proposal for laying GAIL 24” dia pipeline & OFC., subject to Compensatory Afforestation of the mangrove species be carried out in consultation with Forest Department, over thrice the area lost. Similarly a monitoring group should be set up to monitor the pipe laying process in such eco-sensitive and vulnerable areas.

Case o. 3

Permission for setting up of Reverse Osmosis Water Generation Plant at IS HASA at Dabolim, by Commanding Officer, IS HASA Dabolim(GCZMA/S/1011/10)

Decision: Deferred, More details are required from the project proponent as regards to the development sought to be carried out in the matter. It is suggested that rain water harvesting should be undertaken

Case o. 4

Extension of Jetty 50 mts. towards Betim side for Fisheries Complex Malim and joining of space between the jetty and Auction shed by Fisheries Department (GCZMA//1011/17)

Decision: The detail presentation was given by Directorate of Fisheries, where Dr. Sharmila Monteiro was present. GCZMA members raised a queries on impact of flow of water, congestion and constriction of the river, reclamation of the area, sea level rise impacts on account of the proposed extension of jetty. It was also decided that Fisheries Department should undertake a Rapid EIA study and place the matter to GCZMA.

Case o. 5

Proposed OC for floating pontoon jetty and undertaking barge repairs along the riverside adjoining in Survey o. 41/2 of Village Vagurbem of Ponda Taluka, by M/s. Sudarshan Dry Docks (GCZMA//0910/67)

Decision: Deferred, as there is a pending SCN for alleged violation of CRZ Notification, 1991in the same Sy Nos. The matter to be taken up after disposing the SCN

Case o. 6

Proposed regularization of barge loading jetty bearing Sy. o. 58/1 of Sirsaim Village, Bardez Taluka by M/s. Anant V. Sarmalkar (GCZMA/S/389).

Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle.

56.5

Item o. 5 (Cases of Roads / Public Access / Land Acquisition and Development by Government Departments)

Case o. 1

Improvement and black topping from Dhawalkhajan to Borim in V.P.Agonda in Canacona Taluka, (GCZMA/S/0809/50).

Decision: Approved, in public interest.

56.6

Item o. 6 (Additional Item)

Case o. 1

Land Acquisition for widening of approach roads leading to various beaches in Mandrem Constituency in Pernem Taluka by Asst. Engineer (PWD) Siolim (GCZMA//0910/38).

Decision: Approved, in public interest

Case o. 2

Regularization of the reconstructed structure in bearing survey o.25/6(Part) of Assagao village, Bardez taluka, by Mr. Audumbar Sirsaikar(GCZMA//0809/74).

Decision: Deferred, Matter to be heard. Both complainant and project proponent should be present.

Case o. 3

Shack Policy 201011

Decision: Member Secretary briefed the GCZMA members about the proposal received from Tourism Department on shacks. Whereby they have proposed to maintain same number of shack like last year, due to the condition imposed by GCZMA last year to freeze number of shack. Director (Tourism) explained that there are few additional request for putting up shacks in other areas. MS, GCZMA explained the matter in Vikas Bhagat V/s. GCZMA in Hon’ble High Court, regarding shack on beaches at Palolem. It appears that during highest high tide in the month of December/January, water level goes beyond Tourism Department allotted shacks. Hence they fall between LTL and HTL. GCZMA Members where of the view that such a situation of shack, in LTL and HTL should not be allowed. As regard the other matter GCZMA decided to defer the issue to the next meeting.

*******************************

MIUTES FOR THE 57 TH GCZMA MEETIG OF THE GOA COASTAL ZOE MAAGEMET AUTHORITY HELD O 16 / 12 / 2010.

57.1

Item o. 1 (Construction/Reconstruction/Development in CRZII Area).

Case o. 1

Proposed construction of residential/commercial building in Chalta o. 24 of P.T. sheet o. 136 of Vasco city, Mormugao Taluka, by Mr. Chandrakant S.. Pednekar (GCZMA/S/10 11/ 33).

Decision: Approved, subject that the construction should be in accordance with the local building byelaws and in accordance with TCP/MPDA and local authority guidelines.

Case o.2

Proposed construction of first floor to the existing residential house in Chalta o. 7, 241, 242, 243 of P.T. sheet o. 172 of Vasco city, Mormugao Taluka, by Mr. Mohammad B. Bepari (GCZMA/S/0910/32 ).

Decision: Approved, subject that the construction should be in accordance with the local building byelaws and in accordance with TCP/MPDA and local authority guidelines.

Case o.3

Proposed construction of residential building and in Chalta o. 261 of P.T. sheet o. 152 of Vasco city, Mormugao Taluka, by Mr. Gustavo de Souza (GCZMA/S/1011/ 31).

Decision: Approved, subject that the construction should be in accordance with the local building byelaws and in accordance with TCP/MPDA and local authority guidelines.

Case o.4

Proposed construction of commercial centre in Chalta o. 83 of P.T. sheet o. 104 of Vasco city, Mormugao Taluka, by M/s. Pisces Exim India Pvt. Ltd. (GCZMA/S/1011/35 ).

Decision: Approved, subject that the construction should be in accordance with the local building byelaws and in accordance with TCP/MPDA and local authority guidelines.

Case o.5

Proposed reconstruction/ renovation of existing Marina bar and restaurant in Chalta o. 34 of P.T. sheet o. 135 of Vasco city, Mormugao Taluka, by Mormugao Municipal Council (GCZMA/S/1011/ 34).

Decision: Approved, subject that the construction should be in accordance with the local building byelaws and in accordance with TCP/MPDA and local authority guidelines.

Case o.6

Proposed repair/ renovation of existing house and addition of first floor in Chalta o. 47of P.T. sheet o. 4 of Panaj city, Tiswadi Taluka, by by Omkar P. Herlekar(GCZMA//10 11/42).

Decision: Approved, subject that the construction should be in accordance with the local building byelaws and in accordance with TCP/NGPDA and local authority guidelines.

Case o.7

Proposed reconstruction of existing house in Chalta o. 9of P.T. sheet o. 3 of Panaj city, Tiswadi Taluka, by Smt. Maria Jonefina Piedade Fernandes & Others(GCZMA//10 11/41).

Decision: Approved, subject that the construction should be in accordance with the local building byelaws and in accordance with TCP/NGPDA and local authority guidelines.

57.2

Item o. 2 (Repair & Renovation/Development in CRZIII Area).

Case o. 1

Proposed repairs and renovation of existing house in Sy. o. 27/0 of Sirideo village, Tiswadi Taluka, by Mr. John D’Souza (GCZMA//1011/43).

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 2

Proposed repairs and renovation of existing house / structure in Sy. o. 58/1(Part) of Assagao village, Bardez Taluka, by Mr. Rajiv . Rekhi C/o Brahmand Dabolkar (GCZMA//1011/ 46).

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 3

Proposed repairs and renovation of the existing house in Sy. o. 25/1 of Assagao village, Bardez Taluka, by Mr. Prakash alias Chokha Chodankar (GCZMA//1011/32).

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 4 Proposed repairs and renovation of the existing house in Sy. o. 67/3 of Chicalim village, MormugaoTaluka, by Mr. Urbano Rodrigues(GCZMA/S/1011/ 38).

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same. Case o. 5 Proposed repairs and renovation of the existing house in Sy. o. 412/9 of Tivim village, Bardez Taluka, by Smt. Eve Vaz (GCZMA//1011/31).

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 6

Proposed repairs and renovation of the existing house in Sy.no. 49/3 of Velsao Village, Mormugao Taluka, by Mrs. Perpetua Anita Dourado Rodrigues( GCZMA/S/1011/28).

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 7

Proposed repairs and renovation to the existing house in Survey o. 112/7 of Village Candolim; Mr. Tahir Isani.(GCZMA//1011/38) Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 8

Proposed repairs and renovation of existing house in Sy. o. 85/24 of ReisMagos village, Bardez Taluka, by Mr. Govind R. aik & Mrs. MadhuraV.aik (GCZMA / / 1011 /53).

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 9

Proposed repairs and renovation of existing structures in Sy. os. 340/1, 354/2,355,356/7,356/8 and 353/5 of Anjuna village, Bardez Taluka, by Mr. Kewal Singh Virk (GCZMA / / 1011 /51)

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 10

Proposed repair and renovation to the existing house in survey no. 128/24 of Calangute village Bardez taluka, Mr. Suresh Savardekar (GCZMA//1011/49)

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 11

Proposed repair and renovation to the existing house in survey no. 125/2 of Candolim village Bardez Taluka, Mr. Malcolm D. Pedder (GCZMA//1011/47)

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 12

Proposed repair and renovation to the existing house in survey no. 156/1 of Calangute village Bardez Taluka, by Piedade Vital (GCZMA//1011/48)

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 13

Proposed repair and renovation to the existing house in survey o. 248/9 of Calangute village Bardez Taluka, Mr. Tukaram S. korgaonkar (GCZMA//1011/52)

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 14

Proposed repair and renovation to the existing house in survey o. 113/23 of Siolim village Bardez taluka, Mr. Vassudev P. Garudi (GCZMA//1011/44)

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o.15

Proposed repair and renovation to the existing house in survey no. 117/4B & 3 of Morjim village Pernem Taluka, by Mr. Damaciano F. D’Souza (GCZMA//1011/ )

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 16

Proposed repair and renovation to the existing structure in survey o. 5/7 of Issorcim village of Mormugao taluka, by Mr. Lourenco Rodrigues (GCZMA//1011/37)

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 17

Proposed repair of existing structure/house in Sy. o. 41/1 of Colva, Salcete Taluka by Mr. Thomas Rodrigues(GCZMA/S/1011/39)

Decision: Approved for repairs of the existing structure/house, subject to the condition that same plinth size is maintained.

57.3

Item o. 3 (Wire fencing/Bio fencing/compound wall)

Case o. 1

Proposed wire fencing in Sy.no. 8/7A of Pale village, Mormugao taluka, by Mrs. aseem Sheikh (GCZMA/S/1011/36)

Decision: Approved, subject to the condition that any traditional access should not be blocked and also subject to the condition that construction should be in accordance with the local building bye laws and in accordance with TCP/MPDA and local authority guidelines.

57.4

Item o. 5 (Other development / construction of jetty / Repair of barges / DryDocks / Regularisation etc.)

Case o. 1

Clearance for strengthening of existing jetty of Village Sarmanas, Taluka Bicholim (GCZMA//1011/ 54)

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle for strengthening of existing jetty as per same size, height and design.

Case o. 2

Clearance for strengthening of existing jetty of village Surla, Taluka Bicholim (GCZMA//1011/55)

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle for strengthening of existing jetty and a conveyor belt system. Subject to the conditions of Compensatory afforestation of mangrove species to be carried out in consultation with Forest Department.

Case o. 3

Proposed OC to install pumping system and to discharge cooling water after suitable treatment into River Mandovi at survey no. 33 of Amona village, Bicholim taluka. (GCZMA//1011/57)

Decision: Deferred. This matter to be decided alongwith the personal hearing in the matter of Shri Khemlo Sawant v/s Sesa Goa Ltd.

Case o. 4

Proposed repair of existing jetty and setting up of mobile Conveyor belt and dredging in Sy. os. 141/0 145/0, 146/0, 147/0 of avelim village, Bicholim Taluka by M/s. Muktar logistics (IDIA)Pvt. Ltd.(GCZMA//1011/)

Decision: Deferred, it was decided to refer the proposal to the Village Panchayat for their views and put up in the next meeting.

Case o. 5

Clearance/Renewal for loading jetty in survey no. 48/0 of Curchorem village, Quepem Taluka by M/s. Agencia Commercial Maritima (GCZMA/S/0809/25)

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs of existing jetty and strengthening of retaining wall.

Case o. 6

Proposed reconstruction of commercial complex cum Office building in Sy. o. 31/4(Part) & 32(Part) of Village CasabedeSanquelim, Bicholim taluka by Sanquelim Municipal Council. (GCZMA//1011/29).

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle,

Case o. 7

Permission for berthing and operation of motor yatch/motor boats the property abutting Sy. o.31/4 of Penha da Franca in Bardez Taluka, by Mr. Agnelo J. Fernandes (GCZMA//1011/ 27).

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle, subject to the condition that the activity should not in any manner hamper the environment or violate the eco-sensitive area at site. Only temporary wooden structure are permitted to be erected.

Case o. 8

Proposed CRZ Clearance for Construction of Ice Plant in survey o. 76/P of Penhada Franca Village, Bardez Taluka, by M/s. Mandovi Fishermen, Coop Marketing Society Malim, Fisheries Complex, BetimGoa. (GCZMA//1011/61).

Decision: The activity like Ice plant is permitted as per CRZ Notification for the existing fishing activity. The matter regarding regularizing the 03 structures erected should be decided separately by GCZMA sub-committee. On deciding the above matters, approval be conveyed.

Case o. 9

Proposed OC for floating pontoon jetty and undertaking barge repairs along riverside adjoining Sy. o. 41/2 of village vaghurme, Ponda. by M/s. Sudarshan Dry Docks (GCZMA//0910/67)

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle, to undertake the said activity only.

57.5

Item o. 6 (Cases of Roads / Public Access / Land Acquisition and Development by Government Departments)

Case o.1

oC for Land AcquisitionAcquisition for implementation of the Sewerage scheme for Taleigao, Dona Paula and Caranzalem

Decision: Approved, in public interest.

57.6 Personal hearings: Case 1: in the matter of Chicalim Villagers Action Committee & Goa Foundation v/s State of Goa, GCZMA and others regarding permission granted to M/s. Pinky Shipyard at Chicalim.

Adv. E.O. Mendes present on behalf of M/s Pinky Shipyard. Dr. Borkar and Mr. Rui Araujo present on behalf of CVAC. CVAC sought time to respond and sought the NIO references / recommendations on the issue. Counsel for M/s Pinky Shipyard opposed the grant of additional time and sought for conclusion of the hearing. GCZMA members informed both the parties to place their arguments on the merits of the case and the Writ Petition which they have filed.

GCZMA decided that even though CVAC prayer for adjournment was devoid of substance, but in view of natural justice and directions of High Court; it opportunity of hearing, tentatively on 07/01/2011 (Friday) at 3.00 pm. Both the parties were also asked to file their written submissions along with copy of the Writ Petition. They were also asked to file advance copies of submission to other party before next date of hearing and also file counter reply if consider necessary.

Goa Foundation who has sought time through written application has been granted additional time.

Case 2: In the matter of the compliant filed by Shri. Khemlo Sawant, against illegal operation of jetties by M/s. Sesa Goa at Amona, Bicholim – Goa.

Mr/ Khemlo Sawant complainant in the matter present. Adv. Ramani and officers of M/s Sesa Goa present. Mr. Sawant explained, in brief, his grievances and detailed that the operations of loading / unloading of mineral ore on the two jetties at Amona is illegal as the jetties are itself illegal with the construction being carried out without any permissions from the authorities concerned. He claimed that all certificates given by M/s Sesa Goa have been fabricated and are bogus in nature.

Adv. Ramani stated that the matter or complaint is made is in respect of two jetties where mineral ore transportation takes place. He stated that jetties are permitted from 1969 by the Captain of Ports and that they have undertaken renovation of the jetties in 1987. As per the Captain of Ports rules they have paid dues for use of riverine land on 24/10/1996.

When GCZMA questioned the veracity of 1969, Captain of Ports letter and plans annexed to it, approved if any, it was informed that the plans have been misplaced in their Office and during transmission period since last 40 years and that they would provide the same after search.

Adv. Ramani denied the charges made by Shri Khemlo Sawant while the complainant further alleged that the Company is generating fraudulent documents. He pointed out to the plan for dredging in which police case is filed.

GCZMA directed M/s Sesa Goa, to provide relevant documents, approved plans of jetties for construction (1969) and repairs (1987) and other documents. Hearing adjourned to the next date.

57.7 Any other matters.

1. MS, GCZMA explained the functioning of GCZMA since the last meeting held on 29/08/2010 and the decisions taken during that time. Dr. A. G. Untawale, Member, GCZMA sought information on the complaints made regarding illegal felling of mangroves at entrance to Panaji,Merces and Ribander. Besides the illegal cutting of sand dune vegetation at Miramar. MS, informed that the Police complaint has been filed and Dy. Collector (Tiswadi) is currently inquiring in the matter.

2. Chairman (GCZMA) brought to the notice the matter regarding CRZ issues raised during security Co-Ordination Meeting on Coastal Security Chaired by Hon’ble Home Minister. It was explained the GCZMA has taken necessary steps in consultation with Director

(Panchayats). Various matters regarding illegal construction in Canacona beach belt have been stayed either by Appellate Authority or the Hon’ble High Court and they are currently sub- judice. In Canacona there are temporary wooden structures and tents / shacks put up by traditional inhabitants which are permissible activities and which the Police are seeking removal citing security concerns and law and order problems. Chairman (GCZMA) directed that appropriate reply be send to Home Department highlighting the facts in these cases.

3. MS, GCZMA sought the approval of GCZMA to constitute a teams of 03 members of GCZMA each to conduct spot inspections or violation and direct action immediately at site under the authority of GCZMA. All such decisions taken would be ratified in the ensuring meetings of GCZMA full body. This was approved. GCZMA decided to review the 05 member sub- committee to hear all cases pertaining to violations of CRZ with full authority of GCZMA on fortnightly basis. The decisions shall be ratified in the next ensuing GCZMA meeting and orders issued thereafter.

57.8 Additional Items

57.8.1

Item o. 1 (Construction/Reconstruction/Development in CRZII Area).

Case o. 1

Proposed reconstruction of building in Chalta o. 31 of P.T. sheet o. 88 of Vasco city, Mormugao Taluka, by Mr. Allan E. Dias (GCZMA/S/1011/ 51).

Decision: Approved, subject that the construction should be in accordance with the local building byelaws and in accordance with TCP/MPDA and local authority guidelines

Case o.2

Proposed construction of residential building in Chalta os. 227 & 228 of P.T. sheet o. 152 of Vasco city, Mormugao Taluka, by Mr. Sagar Gurudas ayak (GCZMA/S/1011/52).

Decision: Approved, subject that the construction should be in accordance with the local building byelaws and in accordance with TCP/MPDA and local authority guidelines

Case o. 3

Proposed construction of new office building for works division (Bldg.), PWD at Patto Panaji and in Chalta os. 35 & 36 of PTS o. 34 of Panaji city, Tiswadi Taluka.(GCZMA//1011/64)

Decision: Approved, subject that the construction should be in accordance with the local building byelaws and in accordance with TCP/NGPDA and local authority guidelines

57.8.2

Item o. 2 (Repair & Renovation/Development in CRZIII Area).

Case o. 1

Proposed repairs and renovation of existing house in Sy. o. 82/11 of agorcemPalolem village, Canacona Taluka, by Mr. Ravi Y. Komarpant (GCZMA/S/1011/40).

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 2

Proposed repairs and renovation of existing house in Sy. o. 83/2 of agorcemPalolem village, Canacona Taluka, by Mr. Mariano Fernandes (GCZMA/S/1011/41).

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 3

Proposed repairs and renovation of existing house in Sy. o. 5/9 of Loliem village, Canacona Taluka, by Mr. Gonzalo Vicente Pinto (GCZMA/S/1011/43).

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 4

Proposed repairs and renovation of existing house in Sy. o. 137/10 of Agonda village, Canacona Taluka, by Mrs. Fatima Fernandes (GCZMA/S/1011/45).

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 5

Proposed repairs and renovation of existing house in Sy. o. 124/15 of agorcemPalolem village, Canacona Taluka, by Mr. Francisco Fernandes (GCZMA/S/1011/30).

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 6

Proposed repairs and renovation of existing house in Sy. o. 19/3 of Pale village, Mormugao Taluka, by Smt. Antonetta Fernandes (GCZMA/S/1011/ 47).

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 7

Proposed repairs and renovation of the existing house in Sy. o. 230/15 of Mandrem village, Pernem Taluka, by Mr. aresh K. Raina C/o Mr. Albert D’Souza (GCZMA//10 11/66).

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 8 Proposed reconstruction/repairs and renovation of existing structure in Sy. o. 119/3 of Morjim village, Pernem Taluka, By Mr. Prabhakar S. aik (GCZMA//0910 /54) Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 9 Proposed reconstruction/repairs and renovation of existing structure in Sy. o. 230/15A of Madrem village, Pernem Taluka, By Mrs. R.R. Borkar (GCZMA//0809/76) Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 10 Proposed repairs and renovation of the existing house bearing o. 353 in Sy. o. 119/1013 of Agonda village, Canacona Taluka, by Mrs. Sarita Sanjay Bandekar (GCZMA/S/10 11/42).

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 11 Proposed repairs and renovation of the existing house bearing o. 170 in Sy. o. 36/5 & 6 of agorcemPalolem in CanaconaTaluka, Mr. Anthony/Antonio Manuel Gracias (GCZMA/S/1011/25) Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 12

Proposed repairs and renovation of existing house and wire fencing bearing no. 253 in Sy. o. 185/33 of Morjim village, Pernem Taluka, by Mr. Pradip M. Ambiye (GCZMA / / 1011 /56).

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 13

Proposed repairs and reconstruct of existing ruin house in Sy. o. 272/7 of Madrem village, Pernem Taluka, by Mrs. Piedade Fernandes (GCZMA / / 1011 /45).

Decision : Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovations granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 14

Proposed repair existing compound wall and strengthening of retaining wall of the creek in survey no. 138/1(Part) of Benaulim village Salcete taluka, USI/ITF (GCZMA/S/1011/48)

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle,

Case no. 15

Proposed repairs of bund wall/retaining wall in Sy. o. 96/14 of Arambol Village, Pernem Taluka, by Laximikant Y. Parsekar (GCZMA//1011/67)

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle,

57.8.3

Item o. 3 (Wire fencing/Bio fencing/compound wall)

Case o. 1

Proposed wire fencing in Sy.o. 31/1 of agorcemPalolem village, Canacona taluka, by Mr. Vijay Pai khot (GCZMA/S/1011/49)

Decision: Approved, subject to the condition that any traditional access should not be blocked. Wire fencing/bio fencing is permitted within CRZ-III area.

57.8.4

Item o. 5 (Other development / construction of jetty / Repair of barges / DryDocks / Regularisation/Dredging etc.)

Case o. 1

Regularisation of existing old ship repair yard in Cortalim village, Mormugao Taluka, by Shaparia Dock and Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd. (GCZMA/S/1011/12)

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle,

Case o. 2

Proposed construction of barge repairs and construction of Marine Vessels in Sancoale village, Mormugao Taluka by Framen Shipping Pvt. Ltd. (GCZMA/S/1011/11)

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle, subject to the condition that no permanent construction /reclamation / land filling allowed in the river area.

Case o. 3

Proposed dredging of the river Mandovi near existing jetty in Survey o.17/4 of Kttombi village, Bicholim taluka, by M/s. Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd.(GCZMA//0910/06)

Decision: Approved, subject to the condition that dredged material should not be dumped within No Development Zone area (NDZ) of the river Mandovi.

Case o. 4

Proposed dredging across the sand bar at the mouth of river Chapora, Captain of Ports

Decision: Approved, subject to the condition that dredged material should not be dumped within No Development Zone area (NDZ) of the river Chapora.

Case o. 5

Proposed dredging in the vicinity of St. PedroDiwar ferry route in the Mandovi River.

Decision: Approved, subject to the condition that dredged material should not be dumped within No Development Zone area (NDZ) of the river Mandovi.

57.8.5

Item o. 6 (Cases of Roads / Public Access / Land Acquisition and Development by Government Departments)

Case o. 1

Land Acquisition for construction of road from Goval to uvem in V.P. Cola of Canacona Taluka.(GCZMA/S/1011/53)

Decision: Approved, in public interest.

Case o. 2

Land Acquisition for widening of existing road from Cocochin bar to taligao road junction via Karo sankiv bridge including construction of bridges (2nos) at Karo sankov in St. cruz Constituency by Asst. Engineer, PWD(GCZMA//1011/65)

Decision: Approved, in public interest.

Case o. 3

Construction of anti sea erosion works at Arambol Beach V.P. Arambol, by Executive Engineer (WRD), Panaji (GCZMA//1011/62)

Decision: Approved,

Case o. 4

Proposed Acquisition of land for construction of road to Dadeshwar Temple at arva VP Sao Mathias, Tiswadi Taluka in property bearing survey nos. 3/1(P), 46/3(P), 5(P),7/1(P),2(P),3(P) & 4(P)

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle,

57.8.6 Other matters.

Case no. 1 : Matter of India Oil Corporation, construction of retail outlet / shopping unit at M/s Heera Petroleum pump, Panaji.

MS, GCZMA explained the matter pursuant to the LAQ in Assembly. From the records available in file and the reply filed by IOC and petrol pump owner is it seen that, approval has been obtained from all Authorities. The area is in CRZ-II of CCP. This construction is on landward side of existing structure. GCZMA decided to drop the show cause notice and permit occupancy of the structure constructed. No additional constructions are allowed and fencing is required to be erected on mangrove side to prevent any damage to mangroves. No land filling allowed.

Case no. 2 : Matter of construction of Residential Complex at Colva village in Sy. no. 58/1, 2, 3 and 5 of Shri Agnel Alcasoas.

MS, GCZMA explained that the construction at site was approved in 1994 and construction commend for the 1 st phase of the complex which got completed. When 2 nd phase was to be constructed, TCP informs that the project proponent that the area is just touching 500 mts. CRZ line. The site was inspected by Engineer Pascoal Noronha, Member (GCZMA) who has seeen that the construction part on the landward side of the 500 m line. Since it is an ongoing construction, GCZMA decided to permit the same subject to the approval conveyed by TCP, as during the relevant time of approval, project site was totally outside 500 mts. CRZ area.

Case no. 3 : Matter of delineation of the land mass in river Zuari of M/s Crystal Island at Quelossim, Cortalim.

CRZ line was demarcated for the said land mass (island like structure) at Quellosim of M/s Crystal Island Ltd. The site was inspected jointly by Dr. Simon de Souza and DSLR. The area is low lying paddy (not cultivated) and marshy. It is eco-sensitive zone with mangroves fringe. M/s Crystal Island have sought to correct the delineation as given earlier.

GCZMA discussed the request and have found no substantive grounds enough to change / alter the delineation. Request rejected.

Case no. 4 : Additional shacks as per request of Director (Tourism).

MS, GCZMA and Director (Tourism) explained the request made by Hon’ble MLA’s of Siolim ( for 2 shacks at Anjuna / Vagator) and Mandrem ( for shacks at Gaudewada, Morjim). They explained that space for shacks are available and that some more can be permitted. It was

24 seen that the matter of shacks is presently before the Hon’ble High Court and that the number of shacks have been frozen for 03 years.

It was decided that spot site inspection should be carried out GCZMA sub-committee and matter referred to Hon’ble High Court with site feasibility report.

Case no. 5 : In the matter of permission granted for dry dock for one Mr. Raymond D’Sa, D’Sa Engineering at Cortalim.

MS, GCZMA explained that approval was conveyed by GCZMA for construction of dry- dock to one M/s D’Sa Engineering. The adjacent dry dock owner, M/s Vipul Shipping complained that M/s D’Sa Engineering has encroached in his area and that the dry dock is being built in riverine area besides there is no access to the land. GCZMA office held the approval in abeyance. Replies have been received from D’Sa Engineering. It is seen that Captain of Ports has allowed use of riverine land.

It was decided that spot inspection should be conducted by GCZMA sub-committee and approval reconveyed after confirming factual details at site.

Case no. 6: In the matter of illegal construction of road in the property of M/s Suvarna Bandekar and M/s Heritage Builders at Sernabatim in Sy. no. 16/4 by Mr. Govec Cardozo

MS, GCZMA explained the matter of complaints made regarding illegal construction in aforesaid area by the said Cardozo. The Dy. Collector (Salcete) report also indicate fresh road being made without approvals. This is a serious NDZ violation.

GCZMA directed that spot inspection should be conducted by GCZMA sub-committee and road removed. Other inspection to be carried out and action taken.

*********

MIUTES OF THE 59 TH GCZMA MEETIG (SUBCOMMITTEE) OF THE GOA COASTAL ZOE MAAGEMET AUTHORITY HELD O 23/05/2011 (Monday) at 4:00 p.m. and 25 / 05 / 2011 (Wednesday) at 3.30 p.m. in the conference hall of the DSTE, SaligaoGoa.

59.1 Personal Hearing in cases referred by Hon’ble High Court of Bombay at Goa

59.1.1 Ms. Lucille D’Souza v/s (a) GCZMA & (b) Ravindra Jana ……. W.P. o. 294 of 2010 ………. In the matter of demolition of unauthorized portion of Club Tito’s &Club Mambo’s at Calangute

Decision: Adv. Brijesh Sardessai appearing for David D’Souza/ Lucille D’Souza was present and seeks time for presenting the case after 03/06/2011. Adv. Bhupesh Prabhudessai, appearing for Ravindra Jana was present and states that he has no objection for adjourning the hearing. Adv. B. Sardessai was directed to remain present with all the document for the next hearing. Advance copies of any written submission to be provided by the parties.

59.1.2 Mr. Prakash B. Sardessai v/s GCZMA ……. W.P. o. 290 of 2010 …… in the matter of illegal reclamation of land filling in river portion Sy. o. 30/1, Cortalim ( near M/s Sardessai Engg. Workshop)

Proceedings: Mr. Prakash Sardessai present in person alongwith Adv. Vishwesh Sardessai. Mr. Prakash Sardessai states that he has brought along documents issued by the DSLR in which he claims that the area concerned is a sapal owned by the Private Party Mr. Tarai and taken on lease by Don Bosco and part of which is occupied V.M. Salgaonkar Shipyard. This land bears Sy. o. 5676 which is part of old survey records. He claims only part of it has been surveyed under the new survey records for which he has obtained a plan from the DSLR of the whole area which is marked at exhibit ‘D’ to W.P. o. 390. The new survey plan is submitted alongwith the reply as Annexure VIII. For the purpose of indication he says that he has interpolated the plan to resize it as per the scale, given at Annexure VIII. Member sought for clarifications regarding the Annexures and the details of the areas marked in the Annexures VI, VII & VIII visàvis the interpolated drawing submitted by Shri Sardessai, reference through the old cadastral survey document. Clarification were given by Shri Sardessai as to the extend of the land in possession with M/S Sardessai Engineering works. Mr. Sardessai further submits that in the year 1971 captain of Ports has granted in access to 9000 sq. mtrs for the purpose of shipyard. He states that subsequently Captain of Ports has been claiming rent as port dues and also sought for resurvey or survey records from the DSLR as per this plans and permission granted in 1971. Plan is at page 95 attached to W.P. o. 390 on a specific question pertaining to the use of river front not exceeding 9000 as mentioned in the Captain of Ports letter dated 9 th July 1971 Mr. Sardessai states that the area of 9000 sq. mtrs. was already existing as reclaimed in 1971 itself further he states that permission to bank the barges is in the water portion which is the rivers front and not the river front for which permission has been granted to him. He states that Captain of Ports has confirmed construction of Shipyard on 9970 sq. mtrs before the Hon’ble High Court and Supreme Court details are in his reply. In his submission a letter dated 7 th June 1993 from Assistant Survey and Settlement officer addressed to Captain of Ports in which it is mentioned that no old survey is conducted during Portuguese period in respect of S. o. 30/1(the copy Xeroxed and taken on records). He further states that he does not agree with the finding with Dy.

Collector and SDO Mormugao in respect of area denoted as 3150 in excess of 9000. He categorically submits that there is not violation of CRZ violation as in force and that he aggrieved by the extensive damage done to him. 03 photographs were shown to Mr. Prakash Sardessai which he denies to be his property and he states that these photographs are fabricated.

The hearing concluded for Orders before the GCZMA.

Decision: After perusing all the records of the case the documents produced and relied upon by Shri Prakash Sardessai including the orders passed by this Authority dated 27/02/2009 and 25/03/2010 including the order dated 19/10/2010 in W.P. o. 390/2010; the members concluded that there has been illegal reclamation of 3150 sq. mts by encroaching upon the river Zuari, as confirmed in the report of the Deputy Collector & SDO (Mormugao) the contentions made out by the said Shri Prakash Sardessai regarding reclamation carried out prior to 1991 and use of 9000 sq. mts of river front for the purpose of dry dock have been clearly clarified in GCZMA’s earlier orders dated 27/02/2009 and 25/03/2010. The earlier decision of the GCZMA is retaliated. Orders to be issued accordingly.

59.1.3 Ms/ Ingrid Ryna Fernandes v/s (a) GCZMA (b) Constance Alex Fernandes ……… W.P. o. 329 of 2010 …… in the matter of alleged illegal construction of new structure behind existing house in Sy. o. 238/20B, Calangute.

Proceeding: In the matter of Adv. Rohit Bras D’sa appearing for Ms. Ingrid Ryna Fernandes present. The petitioner Ms. Ingrid Ryna Fernandes also present Shri Constance Alex Fernandes is also present in person. Adv. Rohit Bras D’sa states and submits that Shri Constance Alex Fernandes has undertaken complete reconstruction of the existing structure at a site and he stated and submits that the construction / reconstruction which has been undertaken is in total violation of the approvals conveyed by the GCZMA which speaks of repairs and renovation in terms of the Hon’ble High Court Orders in W.P. o. 422 of 1998. It is his case that no reconstruction/construction or new construction of whatsoever nature can be put up in CRZIII areas until the Orders of the Hon’ble High Court in MCA o. 427 of 2007 in W.P. o. 422 of 1998 are complied with. He states that Shri Constance Alex Fernandes has undertaken a new construction by demolishing completely the existing structure from its very footing / foundation and has replaced the entire character of the structure itself. He further states that not only is this is a complete new construction but, assuming it to be construction which can be permitted it is still constructed far beyond the existing plinth size / area of the existing structure for which repairs / renovation was earlier granted by the GCZMA. He further submits with reference to a site inspection report of the Office of Senior Town Planner, Mapusa (page 36 of W.P.) in which an additional store room has been constructed admeasuring 9.61 sq. mtrs. which is not having any approval from any Authority concerned. Adv. Rohit Bras D’sa draws attention of the Authority to a report prepared by Mr. Bhobe at page 5 of the writ which indicates the stage wise details of the progress of the construction being made. It is the submission of the Authority that independent clarification of the report shall be undertaken. It is his point in conclusion that due approval from TCP board should have been taken since it is the matter in reconstruction which is a new development in terms of DPR 1971.

Mr. Constance Alex Fernandes request for time to present his case with the help of a legal aid and his counsel. Adv. Rohit Bras D’sa has no objection for this presentation and he would like to excuse himself during the course of the subsequent in course of this subsequent hearing time granted accordingly.

Decision: Matter be posted in the first week of June and due notices shall be served.

It is further ordered the site inspection shall be conducted by the Authority including ground level mapping and verification of documents / permissions.

59.2 Decision on site inspections carried out of cases of violation

59.2.1 Ramesh Hotel at Utorda, Majorda ……… in respect of complaint filed by one Mr. Ligorio Pereira .

Decision: Site Inspection was examined and compliance status pursuant to the GCZMA earlier direction for removal of stone pitched wall and the compliance of the High Court Order in the matter of Maharani Guest House was established. The Project Proponent desires to put up a concrete wall on the landward side of the property to prevent rain water from entering the basement of the structure at site. The Project proponent desires to provide natural drainage access for the storm water at site.

Members perused the details and concluded that the project proponent can carry out the activity as per the plans approved for time being as requested. Stop Work Order/ Show Cause otice stands discharged for this purpose only.

59.2.2 Complaint against illegal road constructed by Armando Cardozo in the property of Hermitage Builders and arayan R. Bandekar in Sy. o. 16/4, 16/4A of Sernabatim

Decision: Deferred. As Eng. Pascoal oronha was unable to remain present for the hearing and he had some submission to be made before the members of the Authority as to what he observed when present for the Site Inspection.

59.3 Cases of Show Cause otices in which reports have been received from Dy. Collectors & SDM concerned.

59.3.1 Kamal Kudnekar, Calangute. Sr ame of the file Village/ Violation Distance o from HTL Sy. o.

1. Mrs. Kamal 132/10 Illegally construction of a house next Within CRZ Kudnekar Calangute to old house, illegal Construction of a Limits well.

Decision: Upon discussion of the case with the GCZMA and after going through the records and the Summary Inquiry Report from the Office of the Deputy Collector, it is decided to drop the Show Cause otice.

59.3.2 Silvester Fernandes, Agonda.

Sr ame of the file Village/ Violation Distance o from HTL Sy. o.

2. Silvester 120/23 Illegal construction of safety tanks for Within Fernandes toilet CRZ Agonda Limits

59.3.3 Valentin M. Fernandes, Morjim.

Sr ame of the Village/ Violation Distance from HTL o file Sy. o.

3. Valentin M. 187/3,4,5,7, Illegal construction of illegal Within 500 mts from Fernandes huts. the HTL Morjim

59.3.4 Mhablu Pagi, Agonda, Canacona Goa.

Sr ame of the Village/ Violation Dzstance from HTL o file Sy. o.

4. Mhablu Pagi 124/10 Illegal construction of a toilet Within CRZ Limits Agonda

Decision: Upon discussion of the case with the GCZMA and after going through the records and the Summary Inquiry Report from the Office of the Deputy Collector, it is decided to direct the concerned

Village Panchayat / Municipal Council to carry out a site inspection to ascertain if the toilet has been removed /demolished and submit ATR and place it for the next meeting.

59.3.5 Carmelito Rodrigues & Fatima Rodrigues, Agonda, Canacona Goa.

Sr ame of the file Village/ Violation Distance o from HTL Sy. o.

5. Carmelito Rodrigues 103/6 Illegal construction of rooms Within CRZ & Fatima Rodrigues Agonda and house Limits

59.3.6 Prabhakar Pagi, Palolem, CanaconaGoa.

Sr ame of the Village/ Violation Distance o file from HTL Sy. o.

6. Prabhakar 118/26 Nagorcem Illegal construction of Plinth Within CRZ Pagi Palolem foundation Limits

Decision: Decision: Upon discussion of the case with the GCZMA and after going through the records and the Summary Inquiry Report from the Office of the Deputy Collector, it is decided to direct the concerned Village Panchayat / Municipal Council to carry out a site inspection to ascertain if the toilet has been removed /demolished and submit ATR and place it for the next meeting.

59.3.7 Silvester Fernandes, Canacona

Sr ame of the Village/ Violation Distance o file from HTL Sy. o.

7. Silvester 120/23 Illegal construction of plinth foundation Within CRZ Fernandes of huts, shacks & kitchen Limits Agonda

Decision: Upon discussion of the case with the GCZMA and after going through the records and the Summary Inquiry Report from the Office of the Deputy Collector, it is decided to direct the concerned

Village Panchayat / Municipal Council to carry out a site inspection to ascertain if the toilet has been removed /demolished and submit ATR and place it for the next meeting.

59.3.8 Armando Diniz, Canacona.

Sr ame of the Village/ Violation Distance o file from HTL Sy. o.

8. Armando 124/13 & 151/1 Illegal construction of plinth Within CRZ Diniz Agonda foundation of a hut. Limits

Decision: Upon discussion of the case with the GCZMA and after going through the records and the Summary Inquiry Report from the Office of the Deputy Collector, it is decided to direct the concerned Village Panchayat / Municipal Council to carry out a site inspection to ascertain if the toilet has been removed /demolished and submit ATR and place it for the next meeting.

59.3.9 Caitano D’Costa, Canacona.

Sr ame of the Village/ Violation Distance o file from HTL Sy. o.

9. Caitano 123/3, 123/4, Illegal construction of plinth Within CRZ D’Costa 151/1 Agonda foundation of a huts, shops & shacks. Limits

59.3.10 Madhav D. Pagi, Canacona.

Sr ame of the Village/ Violation Distance o file from HTL Sy. o.

10. Madhav D 121/11 Illegal construction of plinth Within CRZ Pagi foundation of shops Limits Agonda

Decision: Upon discussion of the case with the GCZMA and after going through the records and the Summary Inquiry Report from the Office of the Deputy Collector, it is decided to direct the concerned

Village Panchayat / Municipal Council to carry out a site inspection to ascertain if the toilet has been removed /demolished and submit ATR and place it for the next meeting.

59.3.11 Shrikant Pagui, Velsao

Sr ame of the Village/ Violation Distance o file from HTL Sy. o.

11. Shrikant 12/14 Pale Illegal construction of house/rooms Within CRZ Pagui Limits Velsao

59.3.12 Gajanan Pagui, Agonda.

Sr ame of the Village/ Violation Distance from o file HTL Sy. o.

12. Gajanan 36/9 Patnem Illegal construction of a Within 200 mts Pagui structure (shop) from HTL

59.3.13 Ida D’Souza, Candolim.

Sr ame of the Village/ Violation Distance o file from HTL Sy. o.

13. Smt. Ida Vaddy Illegal Construction of i)Ground + Within 500 to D’Souza one house, ii)House of Ground Floor, Candolim from HTL iii)Car parking, iv)Water tank Storage, v)Well vi)Compound wall

59.4 Any other matters. 59.4.1 Fencing done by Department of Tourism on the Betim Side under Mandovi bridge was appreciated by the Authority.

Decision: The Authority decided to request the Department of Tourism to continue the fencing in its property from RD workshop to Malim Fishing Jetty.

59.4.2 Mangroves behind KTC Bus Stand: Members expressed concern over the alleged destruction of mangroves by the construction of road adjoining the exit of KTC bus stand, Panaji right up to the sewerage plant of PWD at Patto. It is seen that the requisite 50 mts buffer has not been maintained from the prescribed mangrove growth at site.

Decision: It has been decided that an inquiry needs to be conducted in the matter for which appropriate notices should be issued to EDC and other authorities concerned.

59.4.2.1 The Complaint received from the Captain of Ports Department, Panaji Goa, with reference to the massive Earth Cutting at Survey o. 41/2 at Vagurbem, in Ponda Taluka carried out by Rudresh aik.

Decision: The Authority decided that a site inspection which is scheduled should verify the discrepancy brought to its notice. After conducting the Site inspection, if any violations are noticed; than Show Cause otice and Stop Work Order has to be issued and earlier approval granted for floating pontoons and undertaking barge repairs along the riverside should be withdrawn.

59.5 Personal Hearing in cases referred by Hon’ble High Court of Bombay at Goa.

59. 5. 1 Franky Monteiro, Loutolim v/s (a) GCZMA & (20 others ……. W.P. o. 3 of 2011 ………. In the matter of illegal shipyards, workshops and jetties, in village Loutolim.

Decision: Deferred. As it was informed to this office that the Petitioner Shri Franky Monteiro is not in town and will be back in the first week of June. This matter has been adjourned for the next meeting.

59. 5. 2 Cases of MPT in W.P. o. 231 of 2010, W.P. o. 120 of 2009 and W.P. o. 766 of 2010……… (Deputy Collector of Mormugao to present )

Decision: Deferred. As the Deputy Collector of Mormugao sought leave stating is inability to remain present for the hearing. Hence matter adjourned for the next meeting.

59.6. Site inspections for repairs / renovations, new projects and minor developmental works.

59.6.1

Item o. 1 (Construction/Reconstruction/Development in CRZII Area).

Case o. 1

Proposed construction of residential building in plot o. 9 and in Chalta o. 4,25,16 & 17 of P.T. sheet o. 65 of Vasco city, Mormugao Taluka, by Mrs. Maria Jorgina Adelaide Alvares e Barreto (GCZMA/S/1112/ ).

Decision: Approved , subject that the construction should be in accordance with the local building byelaws and in accordance with TCP/MPDA and local authority guidelines.

Case o. 2

Proposed construction of residential building in plot o. 10 and in Chalta o. 4,25,16 & 17 of P.T. sheet o. 65 of Vasco city, Mormugao Taluka, by Mrs. Maria Jorgina Adelaide Alvares e Barreto (GCZMA/S/1112/ ).

Decision: Approved, subject that the construction should be in accordance with the local building byelaws and in accordance with TCP/MPDA and local authority guidelines.

Case o.3

Proposed construction of residential building and in Chalta o. 151 & 207 of P.T. sheet o. 156 of Vasco city, Mormugao Taluka, by Mr. Moreno Fernandes (GCZMA/S/1011/ 78).

Decision: Approved, subject that the construction should be in accordance with the local building byelaws and in accordance with TCP/MPDA and local authority guidelines.

Case o.4

Proposed residential building in Chalta o. 4 of P.T. sheet o. 108 of Panaji city, Tiswadi Taluka, by M/s. Mafcon Builders (GCZMA//1112/ ).

Decision: Approved, subject that the construction should be in accordance with the local building byelaws and in accordance with TCP/MPDA and local authority guidelines.

Case o.5

Proposed reconstruction/extension of an existing old residential house in Chalta o. 22 & 23 of P.T. sheet o. 2 of Panaj city, Tiswadi Taluka, by Mr. Yogesh Damania (POA Holder).(GCZMA//1112/ ).

Decision: Approved, subject that the construction should be in accordance with the local building byelaws and in accordance with TCP/MPDA and local authority guidelines.

59.6.2

Item o. 2 (Repair & Renovation/Development in CRZIII Area).

Case o. 1

Proposed repairs and renovation of existing house in Sy. o. 120/6 of Oxel village, Bardez Taluka, by Smt. Bhanumati Vaigankar (GCZMA//1011/76).

Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovation granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 2

Proposed repairs and renovation of existing two houses / structures in Sy. o. 203/1 of Calangute village, Bardez Taluka, by Shri Anacleto C. Gonsalves (GCZMA//1011/ ).

Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovation granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 3

Proposed reconstruction of the existing structures (22 nos.) in Sy. o. 340/1, 354/2, 355, 356/7(Part), 356/8 & 353/5 of Anjuna village, Bardez Taluka, by Mr. Kewal Singh Virk (GCZMA//1112/01).

Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle, permission for reconstruction granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same and in accordance with TCP and local authority guidelines.

Case o. 4 Proposed repairs of the existing residential house in Chalta o. 5D & 5(Part) of PTS o. 165 of Panaji city Tiswadi Taluka by Mr. agues S. Cascar (GCZMA//1011/ 82).

Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovation granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 5 Proposed reconstruction of the existing buildings in Sy. o. 258/4 of Calangute village, Bardez Taluka, by M/s. Acron Developers Pvt Ltd. (GCZMA//1112/ ).

Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle, permission for reconstruction granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same and in accordance with TCP and local authority guidelines.

Case o. 6

Proposed repairs and renovation of the existing house in Sy.no. 134/5D of agorcemPalolem Village, Canocana Taluka, by Mr. Kistodio D’Mello (GCZMA/S/1011/71).

Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovation granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 7

Proposed reconstruction to the existing house in Survey o. 148/1 of Village Cola, Canocana Taluka by Mr. S.V. Balaram.(GCZMA/S/1112/ ) Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle, permission for reconstruction granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same and in accordance with TCP and local authority guidelines.

Case o. 8

Proposed repairs and renovation of existing house in Sy. o. 257/8 of Cola village, Canacona Taluka, by Mrs. Maria J. Fernandes (GCZMA / S / 1112 /).

Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovation granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 9

Proposed repairs to the existing house in survey no. 137/10 of Agonda village Canacona taluka, Mr. Piedade T. Fernandes (GCZMA/S/1112/ )

Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovation granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 10

Proposed repair and renovation to the existing house in survey no. 69/1 of agorcem Palolem village Canacona Taluka, Mr. Frederic Carvalho (GCZMA/S/1011/70)

Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovation granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 11

Proposed repair and renovation to the existing house in survey no. 69/1 of agorcem Palolem village Canacona Taluka, Mr. Zacarias Carvalho (GCZMA/S/1011/72)

Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovation granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 12

Proposed repair and renovation to the existing house in survey no. 102/3B of Agonda village Canacona Taluka, Mr. Mateus M.J. Fernandes (GCZMA/S/1011/76)

Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovation granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 13

Proposed repair and renovation to the existing house in survey no. 69/2 of agorcem Palolem village Canacona Taluka, Mrs. elly Carvalho (GCZMA/S/1011/75)

Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovation granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 14

Proposed repair and renovation to the existing house in survey no. 134/5B of agorcem Palolem village Canacona Taluka, Mr. Mathew D’Mello (GCZMA/S/1011/73)

Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovation granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 15

Proposed repair and renovation to the existing house in survey no. 117/10,11 of agorcem Palolem village Canacona Taluka, Mrs. Escalanta Rodrigues (GCZMA/S/1011/68)

Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovation granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 16

Proposed repair and renovation to the existing house in survey no. 118/2 of agorcem Palolem village Canacona Taluka, Mr. Francis Paulo D’Silva (GCZMA/S/1011/63)

Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovation granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 17

Proposed repair and renovation to the existing house in survey no. 190/1 of Poinguinim village Canacona Taluka, Mr. Deepak Salgaonkar (GCZMA/S/1011/ )

Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovation granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 18

Proposed repair and renovation to the existing house in survey no. 176/1E of Poinguinim village Canacona Taluka, Mrs. Fatima Barreto (GCZMA/S/1011/66)

Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovation granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 19

Proposed repair and renovation to the existing house in survey no. 84/6A of agorcem Palolem village Canacona Taluka, M/s. Castle house (GCZMA/S/1011/67)

Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovation granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same .

Case o. 20

Proposed repairs to the existing house in survey no. 18/2 of Pale village Mormugao Taluka, by Shri Kushali aik (GCZMA/S/1011/50)

Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovation granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 21

Proposed repair and renovation to the existing house in survey o. 26/1 of Camurlim village Bardez taluka, Mr. Damodaar S. Valvoikar (GCZMA//1112/ )

Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovation granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same.

Case o. 22

Proposed reconstruction to the existing house in survey no. 271/1 of Mandrem village Pernem Taluka, by Mr. Vijay Govekar (GCZMA//1112/ )

Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovation granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same and in accordance with TCP and local authority guidelines.

Case o. 23

Proposed reerection to the existing structure in survey no. 36/18 of Rachol village Salcete Taluka, by V.P. Rachol (GCZMA//1112/ )

Decision: Approved from CRZ angle, permission for repairs and renovation granted subject to the condition that the plinth and FAR remain the same and in accordance with TCP/MPDA and local authority guidelines.

59.6.3

Item o. 3 (Wire fencing/Bio fencing/compound wall)

Case o. 1

Proposed wire fencing in Sy.no. 98/9(P),98/16,98/17 & 98/18 of agorcemPalolem village, Canacona taluka, by Mr. Santosh Tubki Associates (GCZMA/S/1011/74)

59.6.4

Item o. 4 (Other development / construction of jetty / Repair of barges / DryDocks / Regularisation etc.)

Case o. 1

Proposed repair of existing jetty and setting up of mobile Conveyor belt and dredging in Sy. no. 145 of avelim village, Bicholim Taluka by M/s. Muktar logistics (IDIA)Pvt. Ltd.(GCZMA//1011/60)

Decision: Approved, from CRZ angle for strengthening of existing jetty, conveyor belt system and dredging, subject to the conditions of Compensatory afforestation of mangrove species to be carried out in consultation with Forest Department. Dredging material should not be dumped within o Development Zone area (DZ) of the river Mandovi.

Case o. 2

Proposed construction of Dry dock in survey nos. 43/1,3,4 of Cortalim village, Mormugao Taluka by Ms. Ferromar Shipping Pvt. Ltd.(GCZMA/S/1011/79)

Decision : Deferred, The subcommittee members opined that more detail to be required. Matter to be place in next meeting alongwith detailed documents and photographs of the proposed site.

59.6.5

Item o. 5 (Cases of Roads / Public Access / Land Acquisition and Development by Government Departments)

Case o. 1

OC for construction of Ganesh Visarjan shade at aroa near Ferry Ramp in Survey o. 2/2 of arva village, Tiswadi Taluka by V.P. SaoMatias (GCZMA//1011/ ).

Decision : Approved.

Case o. 2

Land Acquisition of a additional land in Survey o. 124/4 of Village Saleri(ear Bridge) of Cola village, Canacona Taluka by Fisheries Department GCZMA/S/0910/22.

Decision: Approved, in public interest.

Case o. 3

Construction of jetty at Panaji near new Mandovi Bridge for Coastal Security Police by Director General of Police (GCZMA//1011/40).

Decision: Deferred. The matter requires further analysis for determining the extent of the jetty, location including navigation chanel, siltation at site, wave movement, Police has been requested to co ordinate with the Authority concerned and convey a joint meeting to sort out the issue involved.

Case o. 4

Proposed construction of road within property and in Sy.o. 98/9 at Tembewada village agorcem, Palolem in, Canacona Taluka by Santosh Tubki (GCZMA/S/1011/80)

Decision: Approved.

Case o. 5

Proposed construction of et mending shed at Tarchibhat, Siolim by Directorate of Fisheries

(GCZMA//1011/86).

Decision : Deferred.

Case o. 6

Proposed OC for constructing of platform with RCC pipes for San Joao traditional boat festival place opposite St. Anthony’s Church in V.P. Siolim Marna by Public works Department (GCZMA//1011/85).

Decision : Deferred.

Case o. 7

Proposed repair/strengthening of retaining wall on the bank of river Chapora and laying of pavers blocks/tiles and temporary plastic sheet shed in survey o. 165/1 of Siolim village, Bardez Taluka.(GCZMA//617)

Decision : Approved.

Matter placed for discussion

1. Joquim Fernandes, Mandrem, Pernem Taluka…… an application for repairs and renovation has been received by the Applicant Mr Joaquim Fernandes the site was inspected by Dr. A. G. Untawale, Member (GCZMA). Subsequently an objection has been received by Mrs Adalin V. Britto. Decision: Deferred, The subcommittee members opined that more details with regards to the documents to be obtained form the applicant.

59.7 Cases of Show Cause otices in which reports have been received from Dy. Collectors & SDM concerned.

59.7.1 Shri. Antonio Fernandes, Utorda, Goa.

Sr ame of Survey o. Type of construction Area in Distance o sq. mts from HTL the Occupier / Village

1 Shri.Antonio 34/1 Utorda Illegal Construction of 100m2 Within Fernandes S/o Late three rooms CRZ limits Natalina Fernandes

In case no DDPS/ILLEGAL.Const/37/2002; filed by the Complainant before the Deputy Collector, South, in its Judgment and Order dated 24 th August 2004, it is revealed that the structures was of more than 15 years old much prior to 1991.

However since the structure existed on site before the CRZ otification 1991 came in force, and is used for residential purpose the same is protected by the CRZ otification 2011. Hence the Show Cause otice can be dropped.

59.7.2 Smt Shanti Fernandes e Ratos wife of Antonio Ratos. Utorda, Salcete, Goa.

Sr ame of Survey o. Type of construction Area in Distance from o sq. mts HTL the Occupier / Village

2 Shanti Fernandes e 34/1, Utorda Illegal construction of 50m2 Within CRZ Ratos. H.no. 188/3 two rooms. limits

Decision: Upon discussion of the case with the GCZMA and after going through the records, documents and the Summary Inquiry Report from the Office of the Deputy Collector, it has been observed that in the Sale Deed executed in the year 1999 clearly indicates that the alleged violator has a mundkarial house in the disputed property.

In case no DDPS/ILLEGAL.Const/39/2002; filed by the Complainant before the Deputy Collector, South, in its Judgment and Order dated 24 th August 2004, it is revealed that the structures was of more than 15 years old much prior to 1991.

59.7.3 Shri. Suresh Kerkar, Utorda, Goa.

Sr ame of Survey o. Type of construction Area in Distance from o sq. mts HTL the Occupier / Village

3 Suresh Kerkar 34/1; Illegal Construction of 50m2 Within CRZ two rooms. limits Utorda

Decision: Upon discussion of the case with the GCZMA and after going through the records, documents and the Summary Inquiry Report from the Office of the Deputy Collector, it has been observed in case no DDPS/Illegal.Const/35/2002; filed by the Complainant before the Deputy Collector, South, in its Judgment and Order dated 24 th August 2004, it is revealed that the structures was of more than 15 years old much prior to 1991.

59.7.4 Shri. Antonio Ratos, Utorda, Goa.

Sr ame of Survey o. Type of construction Area in Distance from o sq. mts HTL the Occupier / Village

4 Antonio Ratos 34/1 Illegal Construction of 2 50m2 Within CRZ House No.188/5. rooms. limits

In case no DDPS/ILLEGAL.Const/36/2002; filed by the Complainant before the Deputy Collector, South, in its Judgment and Order dated 24 th August 2004, it is revealed that the structures was of more than 15 years old much prior to 1991.

59.7.5 Mrs. Estella Lopes, Utorda, Goa.

Sr ame of Survey o. Type of construction Area in Distance o sq. mts from HTL

the Occupier / Village

5 Mrs. Estella Lopes, 34/1 Illegal Construction of 2 50m2 Within Widow of Patric rooms. CRZ limits

Lopes, House No

Decision: Upon discussion of the case with the GCZMA and after going through the records, documents and the Summary Inquiry Report from the Office of the Deputy Collector, it has been observed that in the case no DDPS/ILLEGAL.Const/34/2002; filed by the Complainant before the Deputy Collector, South, in its Judgment and Order dated 24 th August 2004, it is revealed that the structures was of more than 15 years old much prior to 1991. Moreover the letter issued by the V.P. of Majorda in the year 25/06/2003 states that the alleged violator has been residing for the last 20 years.

59.7.6 Mrs.Antoneta Lopes, Utorda, Goa.

Sr ame of Survey o. Type of construction Area in Distance o sq. mts from HTL the Occupier / Village

6 Mrs.Antoneta Lopes, 34/1, Utorda, Illegal Const of 2 rooms. 50m2 Within w/o Francisco Lopes CRZ limits

Decision: Upon discussion of the case with the GCZMA and after going through the records, documents and the Summary Inquiry Report from the Office of the Deputy Collector, it has been observed that in the case no DDPS/ILLEGAL.Const/38/2002; filed by the Complainant before the Deputy Collector, South, in its Judgment and Order dated 24 th August 2004, it is revealed that the structures was of more than 15 years old much prior to 1991. Moreover the letter issued by the V.P. of Majorda in the year 25/06/2003 states that the alleged violator has been residing for the last 20 years.

59.7.7 Shri. Pascoal Pereira & Smt. Conceicao Pereira, Utorda, Goa.

Sr ame of Survey o. Type of Area in Distance from o construction sq. mts HTL

the Occupier / Village

1 Pascoal & Conceicao 34/1, Utorda Illegal Const of 75m2 Within 500 mts Pereira House. from HTL

59.7.8 Smt. Kerkar, Utorda, Goa.

Sr ame of Survey o. Type of construction Area in Distance from o sq. mts HTL the Occupier / Village

8 Smt Kerkar, wife of 34/1, Utorda Illegal Const of 2 50m2 Within 500 mts Late Shri Tukaram rooms. from HTL Kerkar

Decision: Upon discussion of the case with the GCZMA and after going through the records, documents and the Summary Inquiry Report from the Office of the Deputy Collector, it has been observed that in the case no DDPS/ILLEGAL.Const/35/2002; filed by the Complainant before the Deputy Collector, South, in its Judgment and Order dated 24 th August 2004, it is revealed that the structures was of more than 15 years old much prior to 1991.

59.7.9 Shri. Ligorio Pereira, Utorda, Goa.

Sr ame of Survey o. Type of construction Area in Distance o sq. mts from HTL the Occupier / Village

9. Mr.Ligorio Pereira, 37/1, Utorda Building of Ground + 2 400m2 Within House No 40. Floors. Area @ 400- sq CRZ limits

mts. (10 rooms)

59.7.10 Shri. Motilal Pagui, Agonda, Goa.

Sr ame of Survey o. Type of construction Area in Distance o sq. mts from HTL the Occupier / Village

10. Motilal Pagui 121/19 Construction of plinth 6.00m2 Within foundation illegal platform of 200 mts Agonda laterite Masonary 20.00m2 from HTL

= 26m2

.59.7.11 Shri. Francis Fernandes, Calangute, Goa.

Sr ame of Survey o. Type of construction Distance from HTL o the Occupier / Village

11. Francis 173/1 & 1736 Illegal construction of the Within 200 mts Fernandes Calangute residential house from HTL

59.8 Any other matters.

59.8.1 Regarding Sand mining / extraction in the State of Goa.

Members expressed their views and opined that the traditional authorized sand extraction activity bears no harm in the riverine / estuarine coastal ecology and infact helps in maintaining the rivers clean thereby preventing environmental degradation of the riverine areas. This sand extraction activity should

49 be capped at its present limit, prohibited at the mouth of the rivers and no unauthorized and over extraction should be permitted. Regular sand extraction, also prevents formation of the sand bars at the mouth of the river, which helps in river navigation process.

As per the CRZ Notification, 2011 the water portion being declared as a CRZ area, sand extraction becomes a prohibited activity. The water portion was not included in CRZ Notification, 1991 and hence the prohibitory clause pertaining to sand mining was not applicable for the activity of sand mining / extraction in the waters (river & estuary regions).

Decision: The Directorate of Mines and Geology should undertake a study to identify plausible effects of traditional sand extraction activity in the riverine / estuarine areas in the State of Goa through Department of Geology of Goa University or any reputed Institute of Higher Education or ational Institute Oceanography, Dona Paula who could also suggest such measures of sustainable extraction, dredging, river bed cleansing process etc. Department of Science, Technology and Environment should also do a similar study in this respect.

Matters regarding reports received from the office of the Deputy Collectors with reference to the Show Cause otice.

Decision: The GCZMA members decided that after the Summary Inquiry Report has been received from the Office of the Deputy Collector, and the alleged violations are not clearly mentioned it has been decided to direct the concerned Village Panchayat / Municipal Council to carry out a site inspection to ascertain if the structure/construction has been removed /demolished and submit ATR and than place it for the meeting of the GCZMA.

59.8.2 Mapping of Sand dunes, Khazan lands and Mangroves on the Goa Coast.

MS. GCZMA explained to the Members, regarding the special provisions in CRZ-V of the CRZ Notification 2011 and the requirement to undertake Mapping of Sand dunes, khazan Lands and mangroves on the Coast/estuaries. The proposal received from the M/s RSI Hyderabad, was placed before the Members. Members noted that M/s RSI Hyderabad had earlier carried out a detail survey of the Coastal structures in terms of directions of Hon’ble High Court.

Decision: It was decided to accept the proposal of M/s RSI Hyderabad for the mapping of sand dunes, khazan Lands and mangroves. The project cost needs to be revised from Rs. 38.00 lakhs, to include estuarine portions also. The Proposal be sent to the Government in this regard.

*************