GRADUATES EXIT SURVEY Fall 2016
THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY IN CAIRO DATA ANALYTICS AND INSTITUITIONAL RESEARCH http://www.aucegypt.edu/about/data-analytics-and-institutional-research EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Graduate Student Exit Survey is to assess opinions of graduate students about their experience at AUC. The Graduate Student Exit Survey was developed by the Office of Data Analytics and Institutional Research (DAIR) and the Office of Graduate Studies.
DAIR emailed the survey invitations to 203 graduate students on February 2, 2017. The survey remained accessible until March 3rd, 2017, and four email reminders were sent throughout this period. Upon closing the survey, 110 students had completed it, for a response rate of about 54%.
METHODOLOGY AND ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT This report consists of six parts:
Part I: General demographic information presented as frequencies and charts
Part II: Questions regarding graduate students’ academic experience, in addition to the overall students’ rating to some academic aspects presented as frequencies and charts
Part III: Questions regarding graduate students’ rating of their experiences and provided support services presented as frequencies and charts
Part IV: Overall student satisfaction
Part V: Strengths, weaknesses and satisfaction arranged into functional themes and listed by respondents’ major
Part VI: Trends for selected questions
PART I: GENERAL DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
ACADEMIC-RELATED INFORMATION
Q1: PLEASE IDENTIFY YOURSELF (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
ANSWER PERCENTAGE % PERCENTAGE % OPTIONS FREQUENCY (FROM ALL RESPONDENTS 110) (FROM TOTAL RESPONSES TO THIS QUESTION) MISSING AUC Staff Yes 12 10.91% 11.11% 68 No 56 50.91% 51.85% AUC Faculty Yes 6 5.45% 5.56% 61 No 55 50.00% 50.93% Bachelor’s degree from AUC Yes 20 18.18% 18.52% 67 No 47 42.73% 43.52% Bachelor's degree from a Yes 60 54.55% 55.56% university in Egypt other than No 80 AUC 20 18.18% 18.52% Bachelor's degree from a Yes 9 8.18% 8.33% 62 university outside Egypt No 53 48.18% 49.07% Master's degree (MA/MSC) from Yes 102 92.73% 94.44% 105 AUC No 3 2.73% 2.78% Master's degree from a Yes 7 6.36% 6.48% university in Egypt other than No 60 AUC 53 48.18% 49.07% Master's degree from a Yes 4 3.64% 3.70% 60 university outside Egypt No 56 50.91% 51.85% Ph.D. from a university in Egypt Yes 3 2.73% 2.78% 57 No 54 49.09% 50.00% Ph.D. from a university outside Yes 0 0.00% 0.00% 57 Egypt No 57 51.82% 52.78%
Students' Identification
Master's degree (MA/MSC) from AUC 94.4% Bachelor's degree from a university in Egypt other than AUC 55.6% Bachelor’s degree from AUC 18.5% AUC Staff 11.1% Bachelor's degree from a university outside Egypt 8.3% Master's degree from a university in Egypt other than AUC 6.5% AUC Faculty 5.6% Master's degree from a university outside Egypt 3.7% Ph.D. from a university in Egypt 2.8% Ph.D. from a university outside Egypt 0.0%
IF YOU ARE NOT AN AUC ALUMNI, PLEASE SPECIFY THE NAME AND THE LOCATION OF YOUR UNDERGRADUATE INSTITUTION
UNIVERSITY COUNT Faculty of Pharmacy Ain Shams University 1 AASTMT 1 Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University 1 Ahram Canadian University, 6 of October, Egypt 1 Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University 1 Ain shams university , faculty of Al Alsun 1 faculty of pharmacy-Ain Shams university 1 Ain Shams University, Cairo 4 Faculty of science Cairo university 1 Al-Azhar University 1 Future University in Egypt 1 Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt 2 Georgetown University 1 Cairo University 6 King AbdulAziz University, Saudi Arabia 1 Cairo University - Egypt 1 Minufiya University 1 Cairo University in Giza, Egypt 1 Misr International University (MIU), Cairo 1 Cairo University, Faculty of Economic and Political Science 1 October 6 University / Egypt 1 Duke University 1 Sadat Academy for Management Sciences 1 Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University 1 Tanta University 1 Faculty of Commerce and Business Admin., Helwan University 1 The British University in Egypt 2 Faculty of Commerce English Section, Ain Shams University 1 The German University in Cairo 3 Faculty of Commerce, Ain Shams University 1 The Hashemite University, Jordan 1 Faculty of Commerce, English section, Ain Shams University 1 University of California-Berkeley, USA 1 Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Cairo University, Giza 1 Veterinary medicine cairo University 1 Faculty of engineering- Cairo University 1 Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University 1 Faculty of medicine, zagazig University 1
Q2: FULLTIME/ PART TIME STUDENT STATUS: PLEASE CHECK WHAT IS APPLICABLE FOR YOU
PERCENTAGE % ANSWER OPTIONS FREQUENCY (FROM TOTAL RESPONSES TO THIS QUESTION – 108) Full-time Student 62 57.4% Part-time Student 46 42.6% Total 108 Missing 2
Percentage of Full-time/ Part-time Students
Full-time student - 3 courses per semester Part-time student - less than 3 courses
42.6
57.4
Q3: STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC PROGRAMS
PERCENTAGE % Journalism & Mass Communication 7 6.7% (FROM TOTAL RESPONSES MA in Public Administration 5 4.8% PRIMARY ACADEMIC PROGRAM COUNT TO THIS QUESTION - 105) MA of Laws 4 3.8% Arabic Language Institute 2 1.9% Master in Public Policy 6 5.7% Arabic Studies 1 1.0% Master of Business Administration 11 10.5% Biotechnology 8 7.6% Master of Global Affairs 3 2.9% Center for Arabic Study Abroad 0 0.0% Master of Public Policy & 7 6.7% Chemistry 1 1.0% Administration Community Psychology 0 0.0% Mechanical Engineering 4 3.8% Computer Science 4 3.8% Middle East Studies 1 1.0% Computing 0 0.0% Migration and Refugee Studies 0 0.0% Construction Engineering 6 5.7% Nanotechnology 1 1.0% Counseling Psychology 0 0.0% PhD in Applied Science 0 0.0% Economics 2 1.9% PhD in Engineering 0 0.0% Economics in International 0 0.0% Physics 1 1.0% Development Political Science 6 5.7% Egyptology & Coptology 0 0.0% Product Development and Systems 0 0.0% Electronics Engineering 1 1.0% Management English & Comparative Literature 2 1.9% Robotics, Control & Smart Systems 2 1.9% Environmental Engineering 2 1.9% Sociology Anthropology 4 3.8% Environmental System Design 0 0.0% Teaching Arabic As a Foreign 2 1.9% Family and Child Counseling 0 0.0% Language Finance 1 1.0% Teaching English As a Foreign 2 1.9% Gender and Women's Studies in ME 1 1.0% Language History 0 0.0% TV. & Digital Journalism 0 0.0% International & Comparative Total 105 6 5.7% Education Missing 5 International & Comparative Law 2 1.9% International Human Rights Law 0 0.0%
Students' Primary Academic Programs
Master of Business Administration 11% Biotechnology 8% Master of Public Policy & Administration 7% Journalism & Mass Communication 7% Political Science 6% Master in Public Policy 6% International & Comparative Education 6% Construction Engineering 6% MA in Public Administration 5% Sociology Anthropology 4% Mechanical Engineering 4% MA of Laws 4% Computer Science 4% Master of Global Affairs 3% Teaching English As a Foreign Language 2% Teaching Arabic As a Foreign Language 2% Robotics, Control & Smart Systems 2% International & Comparative Law 2% Environmental Engineering 2% English & Comparative Literature 2% Economics 2% Arabic Language Institute 2% Physics 1% Nanotechnology 1% Middle East Studies 1% Gender and Women's Studies in ME 1% Finance 1% Electronics Engineering 1% Chemistry 1% Arabic Studies 1%
Q4: DUAL DEGREES
• 6 students reported that they are enrolled in a secondary program, 2 of which reported their secondary program the same as the primary program. • Reported dual degrees for the 6 students were as follows:
Construction Construction Economics in Journalism & Biotechnology Engineering Engineering Economics International Mass Comm Development
Journalism Middle East & Mass Master in Master in Studies Public Policy Public Policy Sociology Master in Comm Anthropology Public Policy
Legend
Q5: YEAR OR SEMESTER STUDENT ENROLLED AS A GRADUATE ANSWER OPTIONS FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE % Fall 2008 5 4.90% Spring 2009 2 1.96% Fall 2009 2 1.96% Spring 2010 7 6.86% Fall 2010 2 1.96% Spring 2011 2 1.96% Fall 2011 5 4.90% Spring 2012 9 8.82% Summer 2012 0 0.00% Fall 2012 7 6.86% Spring 2013 4 3.92% Fall 2013 16 15.69% Spring 2014 10 9.80%
ANSWER OPTIONS FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE % Fall 2014 31 30.39% Total 102 Missing 8
First Year Enrollment
30.39%
15.69%
8.82% 9.80% 6.86% 6.86% 4.90% 4.90% 3.92% 1.96% 1.96% 1.96% 1.96% 0.00%
Fall 2008 Spring 2009 Fall 2009 Spring 2010 Fall 2010 Spring 2011 Fall 2011 Spring 2012 Summer Fall 2012 Spring 2013 Fall 2013 Spring 2014 Fall 2014 2012
Q6: STUDENTS’ NATIONALITY
PERCENTAGE % Students' Nationality (FROM TOTAL REPSPONSES ANSWER OPTIONS COUNT 107) Iraq 1 0.93% Egypt 90.65% Jordan 1 0.93% United States of America 2.80% Kenya 1 0.93% Spain 0.93% Kuwait 1 0.93% Saudi Arabia 0.93% Nigeria 1 0.93% Nigeria 0.93% Saudi Arabia 1 0.93% Spain 1 0.93% Kuwait 0.93% United States of America 3 2.80% Kenya 0.93% Egypt 97 90.65% Jordan 0.93% Total 107 Iraq 0.93% Missing 3
Q6: STUDENTS’ COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
PERCENTAGE % (FROM TOTAL RESPONSES Students' Country of Origin ANSWER OPTIONS COUNT 102) Colombia 1 0.98% Egypt 89.22% Iraq 1 0.98% Saudi Arabia 2.94% Jordan 1 0.98% United States of America 1.96% Kuwait 1 0.98% Nigeria 1 0.98% Pakistan 0.98% Pakistan 1 0.98% Nigeria 0.98% United States of America 2 1.96% Kuwait 0.98% Saudi Arabia 3 2.94% Jordan 0.98% Egypt 91 89.22% Iraq 0.98% Total 102 Colombia 0.98% Missing 8
Q7: STUDENTS’ GENDER
PERCENTAGE % (FROM TOTAL RESPONDENTS ANSWER OPTIONS COUNT TO THIS QUESTION – 114) Male 42 38.9% 38.9% 61.1% Female 66 61.1% Total 108 Missing 2 Male Female
Q8: STUDENTS’ AGE RANGE
PERCENTAGE % (FROM TOTAL RESPONSES TO THIS Students' Age Range COUNTRY OF ORIGIN COUNT QUESTION 109) Under 25 7 6.42% 25-29 37.61%
25-29 41 37.61% 30-34 33.03% 30-34 36 33.03% 35-45 18.35% 35-45 20 18.35% Under 25 6.42% Over 45 5 4.59% Total 109 Over 45 4.59% Missing 1
FUTURE ACADEMIC CAREER PLANS
Q9: FOR MA/MS STUDENTS: DO YOU INTEND TO PURSUE A PH.D. PROGRAM?
PERCENTAGE MA/MS Students' Intention to Pursue a PH.D. (FROM TOTAL RESPONSES TO THIS ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES QUESTION 104) Yes 56 53.8% Don't know 41 39.4% Intending 53.8% No 7 6.7% Don't know 39.4% Total 104 Not Intending 6.7% Missing 6
IF YOUR ANSWER IS "YES", WHICH INSTITUTION(S) AND PHD PROGRAM(S) YOU WISH TO JOIN?
The American University in Cairo (1) • I want to join school of science and engineering at AUC to pursue PhD degree in applied sciences
Travel Abroad (23) • Westminister university in the UK • Applied Linguistics, Birmingham • I joined the PhD program at University of Houston, TX, USA • Economics in Lund University • international and comapritive development • European universities will be my main focus • Harvard University • School of Economics and Law in UK or The European Institute in • Coloumbia University, Berkely, John Hopkins Italy • Targeting institutions in Canada, USA, Germany and Australia, • I am planning to go abroad, most probably a program related to Programs of Computer Science in computer vision and machine urban development and,or geography. learning • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health - PhD • University of montreal Concentration in Health & Public Policy, University of Illinois • QUT Ph.D in creative industry Department of Communication - PhDPhd. Program in Electronics • Smart Grids and communication or Biomedical engineering • London School of Economics, PhD in Economics • Law in uk • ETH Zurich, PhD in Mechanical Engineering • Lancaster University • Lse, ucl or kings in london for a phd i international law • MD_PhD program at Harvard or MIT
• Duke University, University of Michigan, Brown University, UC • In Germany, any phD program that is related to political mass Berkeley, Anthropology media
Undecided (15)
• no phd programs suitable in Egypt. Looking for part time phd program abroad. Leicester• Harvard University Law School in UK is on top of my list for a phd in media policy. • Still searching • Not decided yet. • Haven't decided yet. • UK • Still looking for opportunities. Most probably Miami University. • I have not decided yet. • Still searching • Still dont know • Not sure yet • Construction Engineering program. Institution still under consideration. • NA • Undecided • not yet decided
Other (11) • Ain Shams University • Cairo University • DBA • chemistry • PHD in linguistics from faculty of Al-alsun, Ain Shams University • PhD in Environmental Engineering • Education • Mechanical engineering • a program on urban studies • Anthropology • Cairo University or Sadat Academy
Students' PhD plans
Study Abroad 23 Undecided 15 Other 11 AUC 1
Q10: FOR PH.D STUDENTS: ARE YOU ENROLLED IN AUC'S PH.D PROGRAM?
PERCENTAGE Ph.D Students Enrolled at AUC (FROM TOTAL RESPONSES TO THIS ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES QUESTION 14) Yes 3 21.43% No 78.57% No 11 78.57% Total 14 Yes 21.43% Missing 96
Only three students reported the time taken to complete their Ph.D programs; one reported 5-years, one reported 6-years & one reported 7-years completion tim.
AUC TUITION COVERAGE
Q11: HOW DID YOU COVER THE COST OF YOUR TUITION AT AUC?
PERCENTAGE Total 103
(FROM TOTAL RESPONSES TO 7 ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES THIS QUESTION 103) Missing Personal fund 60.2% 62 AUC Tuition Coverage AUC Financial aid (work study/assistantships or 22.3% 23 Personal fund 60.20% tuition discount) AUC Fellowship 51.50% AUC Fellowship 51.5% 53 AUC Financial aid (work… 22.30% AUC Staff/Faculty 14.6% 15 AUC Staff/Faculty Scholarship 14.60% Scholarship Outside donor (Ford Foundation,… 12.60% Outside donor (Ford Federal Student AID (FAFSA) 1.90% Foundation, Fulbright, your 12.6% 13 employer, etc.) Commercial bank loans 0.0% 0 Federal Student AID (FAFSA) 1.9% 2
Other (Please specify) • Youssef Jameel public leadership fellowship • Youssef Jameel Followship for 4 years, then personal fund for 2 Only reported other sources of funding (5) years. • Yousef Jameel fellowship • parents fund • Mo Ibrahim foundation
EMPLOYMENT INFORMATION
Q13: STUDENTS’ EMPLOYMENT STATUS
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES PERCENTAGE Students' Employment Status Employed full time 74 68.5% 3.7% Employed full time Employed part time 13 12.0% 15.7% Employed part time Seeking employment 17 15.7% 12.0% Unemployed 4 3.7% 68.5% Seeking employment Total 108 Unemployed Missing 2
Q14: HAS YOUR AUC GRADUATE DEGREE HAD A POSITIVE IMPACT ON YOUR SALARY?
ANSWER PERCENTAGE Has your AUC graduate degree had a positive impact on RESPONSES (FROM TOTAL RESPONSES TO THIS your salary? CHOICES QUESTION 109) Yes 30 27.5% 33.0% 27.5% No 43 39.4% Not Applicable 36 33.0% 39.4% Total 109 Missing 1 Yes No Not Applicable
Q15: HOW MUCH WORK EXPERIENCE DID YOU HAVE WHEN YOU STARTED YOUR GRADUATE PROGRAM?
PERCENTAGE ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES (FROM TOTAL RESPONSES TO THIS QUESTION 109) Less than 3 years 36 33.03% 3-5 years 31 28.44% 6-10 years 29 26.61% 11-15 years 7 6.42% More than 15 years 6 5.50% Total 109 Missing 1
Work Experience at the Time of Starting the Program 33.03% 28.44% 26.61%
6.42% 5.50%
Less than 3 years 3-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years More than 15 years
PART II: ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE
STUDENTS’ EXPERIENCE WITH WRITING A THESIS
Q16: IS WRITING A THESIS PART OF YOUR DEGREE? ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES PERCENTAGE Yes 83 86.5% No 13 13.5% Total 96 Missing 14
Q17: IF YOUR ANSWER IN THE PREVIOUS QUESTION IS "YES', PLEASE INDICATE YOUR LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE FOLLOWING:
VERY WEIGHTED SATISFIED NEUTRAL DISSATISFIED VERY DISSATISFIED N/A TOTAL SATISFIED AVERAGE a. Availability to identify a Count 34 34 7 7 3 1 86 1.05 suitable thesis supervisor % Percentage of Total 39.53% 39.53% 8.14% 8.14% 3.49% 1.16%
b. Availability of a thesis Count 42 30 8 4 1 1 86 1.27 supervisor % Percentage of Total 48.84% 34.88% 9.30% 4.65% 1.16% 1.16%
c. Availability of readers Count 30 28 14 7 1 4 84 0.99 % Percentage of Total 35.71% 33.33% 16.67% 8.33% 1.19% 4.76%
d. Quality of thesis supervision Count 34 36 9 3 3 1 86 1.12 % Percentage of Total 39.53% 41.86% 10.47% 3.49% 3.49% 1.16%
e. Supervisor feedback Count 36 32 12 4 1 1 86 1.15 provided in a timely manner % Percentage of Total 41.86% 37.21% 13.95% 4.65% 1.16% 1.16%
f. Resources availability Count 38 33 9 3 1 2 86 1.24 % Percentage of Total 44.19% 38.37% 10.47% 3.49% 1.16% 2.33%
g. Support in data collection Count 26 26 19 3 1 11 86 0.97 % Percentage of Total 30.23% 30.23% 22.09% 3.49% 1.16% 12.79%
h. Information about copyright Count 30 31 17 2 1 5 86 1.07 % Percentage of Total 34.88% 36.05% 19.77% 2.33% 1.16% 5.81%
i. Information about Count 34 29 13 0 1 8 85 1.23 Institutional Review Board % Percentage of Total (IRB) 39.53% 33.72% 15.12% 0.00% 1.16% 9.30%
Students' Satisfaction with the Thesis Experience
a. Availability of suitable thesis supervisors 39.53% 39.53% 8.14%
b. Availability of your thesis supervisor for consultation 48.84% 34.88% 4.65%
c. Availability of readers 35.71% 33.33% 8.33%
d. Quality of thesis supervision 39.53% 41.86% 3.49%
e. Supervisor feedback provided in a timely manner 41.86% 37.21% 4.65%
f. Resources availability 44.19% 38.37% 3.49%
g. Support in data collection 30.23% 30.23% 3.49%
h. Information about copyright 34.88% 36.05% 2.33% i. Information about Institutional Review Board (IRB) for the Protection of Human subjects… 39.53% 33.72% 0.00%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Very satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied
Students' Weighted Average Satisfaction with Thesis Experience
Availability of your thesis supervisor for consultation 1.27 Resources availability 1.24 Information about Institutional Review Board (IRB) for the Protection of Human subjects… 1.23 Supervisor feedback provided in a timely manner 1.15 Quality of thesis supervision 1.12 Information about copyright 1.07 Availability of suitable thesis supervisors 1.05 Availability of readers 0.99 Support in data collection 0.97
Q18: HOW HELPFUL WAS/WERE YOUR SUPERVISOR(S) FOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES?
NOT VERY NOT HELPFUL AT WEIGHTED VERY HELPFUL HELPFUL TOTAL HELPFUL ALL AVERAGE a. Identification of a Count 48 29 9 1 87 3.43 thesis/dissertation research % Percentage of 55.17% 33.33% 10.34% 1.15% topic Total b. Support in writing a Count 41 36 7 3 87 3.32 thesis/dissertation proposal % Percentage of 47.13% 41.38% 8.05% 3.45% Total c. Support in research Count 40 31 13 3 87 3.24 methodology % Percentage of 45.98% 35.63% 14.94% 3.45% Total d. Evaluation of thesis Count 43 30 10 4 87 3.29 progress % Percentage of 49.43% 34.48% 11.49% 4.60% Total e. Mentoring and academic Count 50 29 7 1 87 3.47 advising % Percentage of 57.47% 33.33% 8.05% 1.15% Total f. Information about IRB Count 39 33 10 2 84 3.30 % Percentage of 46.43% 39.29% 11.90% 2.38% Total
Helpfulness of Thesis Supervisor a. Identification of a thesis/dissertation research topic 55.17% 33.33% 10.34%
b. Support in writing a thesis/dissertation proposal 47.13% 41.38% 8.05%
c.support in research methodology 45.98% 35.63% 14.94%
d. Evaluation of thesis progress 49.43% 34.48% 11.49%
e. Mentoring and academic advising 57.47% 33.33% 8.05%
f. Information about IRB 46.43% 39.29% 11.90%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Very helpful Helpful Not very helpful Not helpful at all
Weighted Average of Helpfulness of Thesis Supervisor
Mentoring and academic advising 3.47
Identification of a thesis/dissertation research topic 3.43
Support in writing a thesis/dissertation proposal 3.32
Information about IRB 3.30
Evaluation of thesis progress 3.29
support in research methodology 3.24
Q19: PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS RELATED TO THE THESIS SUBMISSION SUPPORT
YES NO TOTAL Have you submitted your thesis to turnitin to check for Count 58 28 86 plagiarism? % Percentage of Total 67.44% 32.56% Have you submitted copies of the pre-final draft to thesis Count 85 1 86 supervisor and readers as directed? % Percentage of Total 98.84% 1.16% Have you uploaded a soft copy of your thesis to the AUC Count 77 9 86 DAR Repository? % Percentage of Total 89.53% 10.47%
Thesis Submission Support
a. Have you submitted your thesis to turnitin to check for plagiarism? 67.44% 32.56%
b. Have you submitted copies of the pre-final draft to thesis supervisor and readers 98.84% 1.16% as directed?
c. Have you uploaded a soft copy of your thesis to the AUC DAR Repository? 89.53% 10.47%
Yes No
OVERALL ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE
Q20: IF YOU ATTENDED ANY OF THE FOLLOWING WORKSHOPS, PLEASE INDICATE THE LEVEL OF USEFULLNESS
NOT WEIGHTED VERY NOT USEFUL USEFUL AT N/A TOTAL AVERAGE USEFUL USEFUL ALL (-2 TO 2) a. Academic integrity and Count 24 37 3 4 18 86 1.09 research ethics % from total responses 27.91% 43.02% 3.49% 4.65% 20.93% b. Presentation skills Count 11 24 2 2 37 76 1.03 % from total responses 14.47% 31.58% 2.63% 2.63% 48.68% c. Thesis proposal writing Count 13 30 5 1 28 77 1.00 % from total responses 16.88% 38.96% 6.49% 1.30% 36.36% d. Research methodology Count 14 14 4 2 42 76 1.00 % from total responses 18.42% 18.42% 5.26% 2.63% 55.26% e. Literature review and Count 22 16 3 1 35 77 1.31 abstract % from total responses 28.57% 20.78% 3.90% 1.30% 45.45% f. Library research Count 15 30 3 0 29 77 1.19 guidance % from total responses 19.48% 38.96% 3.90% 0.00% 37.66% g. Statistical package Count 4 7 2 2 57 72 0.60 (SPSS, survey monkey, % from total responses etc ...) 5.56% 9.72% 2.78% 2.78% 79.17% h. How to apply for Ph.D Count 0 6 2 1 62 71 0.22 % from total responses 0.00% 8.45% 2.82% 1.41% 87.32% i. Grant proposal writing Count 3 6 1 1 58 69 0.82 % from total responses 4.35% 8.70% 1.45% 1.45% 84.06%
Usefulness of Academic Workshops
a. Academic integrity and research ethics 27.91% 43.02% 3.49%
b. Presentation skills 14.47% 31.58% 2.63%
c. Thesis proposal writing 16.88% 38.96% 6.49%
d. Research methodology 18.42% 18.42% 5.26%
e. Literature review and abstract 28.57% 20.78% 3.90%
f. Library research guidance 19.48% 38.96% 3.90% g. Statistical package (SPSS, survey monkey, etc ...) 5.56% 9.72% 2.78%
h. How to apply for Ph.D 8.45% 2.82%
i. Grant proposal writing 4.35% 8.70% 1.45%
Very useful Useful Not useful Not useful at all
Weighted Average Usefulness of Academic Workshops Rating
Literature review and abstract 1.31
Library research guidance 1.19
Academic integrity and research ethics 1.09
Presentation skills 1.03
Research methodology 1
Thesis proposal writing 1
Grant proposal writing 0.82
Statistical package (SPSS, survey monkey, etc ...) 0.6
How to apply for Ph.D 0.22
WHICH OF THESE WORKSHOPS WOULD YOU RECOMMEND TO YOUR FELLOW COLLEAGUES AS THE MOST USEFUL?
Academic integrity and research ethics (6) Library research guidance (4) Presentation skills (5) Statistical package (SPSS, survey monkey, etc ...) (1) Thesis proposal writing (4) How to apply for Ph.D (0) Research methodology (3) Grant proposal writing (1) Literature review and abstract (8)
Workshop Recommendations
Literature review and abstract 8 Academic integrity and research ethics 6 Presentation skills 5 Thesis proposal writing 4 Library research guidance 4 Research methodology 3 All 3 Statistical package 1 Grant proposal writing 1 None 1
Q21: PLEASE RATE THE QUALITY OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING:
WEIGHTED VERY EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR POOR N/A TOTAL AVERAGE GOOD (1 TO 5) a. Your academic advising Count 35 35 15 9 3 0 97 3.93 % Percentage of Total 36.08% 36.08% 15.46% 9.28% 3.09% 0.00% b. The graduate program Count 21 48 16 9 3 0 97 3.77 curriculum % Percentage of Total 21.65% 49.48% 16.49% 9.28% 3.09% 0.00% c. Opportunities for Count 34 43 10 7 2 0 96 4.04 interaction with faculty % Percentage of Total 35.42% 44.79% 10.42% 7.29% 2.08% 0.00% d. Opportunities to work Count 31 29 15 12 5 5 97 3.75 with diverse groups in team % Percentage of Total 31.96% 29.90% 15.46% 12.37% 5.15% 5.15% projects e. Opportunities to do Count 41 27 16 3 9 1 97 3.92 research in your area of % Percentage of Total 42.27% 27.84% 16.49% 3.09% 9.28% 1.03% interest f. Availability of courses you Count 16 37 27 9 7 1 97 3.48 needed % Percentage of Total 16.49% 38.14% 27.84% 9.28% 7.22% 1.03% g. Scheduling of your Count 23 38 26 7 3 0 97 3.73 graduate courses % Percentage of Total 23.71% 39.18% 26.80% 7.22% 3.09% 0.00% h. Academic standard of Count 28 37 20 8 2 1 96 3.85 your peers in the program % Percentage of Total 29.17% 38.54% 20.83% 8.33% 2.08% 1.04% i. Resources for research Count 42 37 11 4 0 2 96 4.24 % Percentage of Total 43.75% 38.54% 11.46% 4.17% 0.00% 2.08% j. Library hours Count 47 31 13 4 0 2 97 4.27 % Percentage of Total 48.45% 31.96% 13.40% 4.12% 0.00% 2.06%
Student Ratings regarding Quality of Academic Experience
a. Your academic advising 36.08% 36.08% 15.46% b. The graduate program curriculum 21.65% 49.48% 16.49% c. Opportunities for interaction with faculty 35.42% 44.79% 10.42% d. Opportunities to work with diverse groups in team projects 31.96% 29.90% 15.46% e. Opportunities to do research in your area of interest 42.27% 27.84% 16.49% f. Availability of courses you needed 16.49% 38.14% 27.84% g. Scheduling of your graduate courses 23.71% 39.18% 26.80% h. Academic standard of your peers in the program 29.17% 38.54% 20.83% i. Resources for research 43.75% 38.54% 11.46% j. Library hours 48.45% 31.96% 13.40%
Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
Average Rating Weight of Academic Experiences
Library hours 4.27 Resources for research 4.24 Opportunities for interaction with faculty 4.04 Your academic advising 3.93 Opportunities to do research in your area of interest 3.92 Academic standard of your peers in the program 3.85 The graduate program curriculum 3.77 Opportunities to work with diverse groups in team projects 3.75 Scheduling of your graduate courses 3.73 Availability of courses you needed 3.48
Q22: PLEASE INDICATE THE EXTENT TO WHICH YOUR GRADUATE EDUCATION AT AUC IS ENHANCING THESE SKILLS.
WEIGHTED TO A GREAT TO SOME NOT AT AVERAGE EXTENT EXTENT ALL TOTAL (1 TO 3) a. Become an expert in your field Count 36 57 4 97 2.33 % Percentage of Total 37.11% 58.76% 4.12% b. Be up to date with the latest research Count 52 39 6 97 2.47 techniques % Percentage of Total 53.61% 40.21% 6.19% c. Write quality papers ready for Count 50 38 9 97 2.42 publication % Percentage of Total 51.55% 39.18% 9.28% d. Present research results to an audience Count 45 41 9 95 2.38 of peers or at a conference % Percentage of Total 47.37% 43.16% 9.47% e. Write grant proposals Count 19 44 29 92 1.89 % Percentage of Total 20.65% 47.83% 31.52% f. Supervise others Count 35 40 21 96 2.15 % Percentage of Total 36.46% 41.67% 21.88% g. Become a qualified teacher Count 37 44 15 96 2.23 % Percentage of Total 38.54% 45.83% 15.63% h. Collaborate with a team Count 56 30 11 97 2.46 % Percentage of Total 57.73% 30.93% 11.34% i. Become a team leader Count 45 37 14 96 2.32 % Percentage of Total 46.88% 38.54% 14.58% j. Understand the principles of ethical Count 76 18 3 97 2.75 conduct in research % Percentage of Total 78.35% 18.56% 3.09% k. Keep up with current advances in your Count 58 32 7 97 2.53 field % Percentage of Total 59.79% 32.99% 7.22%
The Extent to which Graduate Education at AUC Enhances Students' Skills
a. Become an expert in your field 37.11% 58.76% 4.12% b. Be up to date with the latest research methods 53.61% 40.21% 6.19% c. Write quality papers ready for publication 51.55% 39.18% 9.28% d. Present research results to an audience of peers or at a conference 47.37% 43.16% 9.47% e. Write grant proposals 20.65% 47.83% 31.52% f. Supervise others 36.46% 41.67% 21.88% g. Become a qualified teacher 38.14% 45.36% 15.46% h. Collaborate with a team 57.73% 30.93% 11.34% i. Become a team leader 46.88% 38.54% 14.58% j. Understand the principles of ethical conduct in research 78.35% 18.56% 3.09% k. Keep up with current advances in your field 59.79% 32.99% 7.22%
To a great extent To some extent Not at all
Weighted Average Skill Enhancement
Understand the principles of ethical conduct in research 2.75 Keep up with current advances in your field 2.53 Be up to date with the latest research methods 2.47 Collaborate with a team 2.46 Write quality papers ready for publication 2.42 Present research results to an audience of peers or at a conference 2.38 Become an expert in your field 2.33 Become a team leader 2.32 Become a qualified teacher 2.23 Supervise others 2.15 Write grant proposals 1.89
PART III: STUDENTS RATING OF THEIR EXPERIENCE AND THE PROVIDED SUPPORT SERVICES
Q23: OVERALL, AS A GRADUATE STUDENT AT AUC, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE FOLLOWING?
WEIGHTED EXCELLENT VERY GOOD GOOD FAIR POOR TOTAL AVERAGE a. Your academic experience Count 37 47 9 3 1 97 4.20 % Percentage of Total 38.14% 48.45% 9.28% 3.09% 1.03%
b. Your student life Count 33 33 21 8 2 97 3.90 experience % Percentage of Total 34.02% 34.02% 21.65% 8.25% 2.06%
c. Your personal Count 37 40 15 4 1 97 4.11 development opportunities % Percentage of Total 38.14% 41.24% 15.46% 4.12% 1.03%
d. Your professional Count 32 36 18 10 1 97 3.91 development opportunities % Percentage of Total 32.99% 37.11% 18.56% 10.31% 1.03%
e. Quality of instruction in Count 37 41 15 2 2 97 4.12 your courses % Percentage of Total 38.14% 42.27% 15.46% 2.06% 2.06%
f. Quality of your courses Count 28 39 23 6 1 97 3.90 % Percentage of Total 28.87% 40.21% 23.71% 6.19% 1.03%
g. Academic mentoring Count 36 35 18 6 2 97 4.00 support % Percentage of Total 37.11% 36.08% 18.56% 6.19% 2.06%
Student Ratings
a. Your academic experience 38.14% 48.45% 9.28%
b. Your student life experience 34.02% 34.02% 21.65%
c. Your personal development opportunities 38.14% 41.24% 15.46% d. Your professional development opportunities 32.99% 37.11% 18.56%
e. Quality of instruction in your courses 38.14% 42.27% 15.46%
f. Quality of your courses 28.87% 40.21% 23.71%
g. Academic mentoring support 37.11% 36.08% 18.56%
Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
Weighted Average Student Ratings
Your academic experience 4.20
Quality of instruction in your courses 4.12
Your personal development opportunities 4.11
Academic mentoring support 4.00
Your professional development opportunities 3.91
Quality of your courses 3.90
Your student life experience 3.90
Q24: PLEASE RATE THE QUALITY OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING SUPPORT SERVICES
WEIGHTED VERY EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE POOR N/A TOTAL AVERAGE GOOD (1 TO 6) a. Graduate Students Count 16 27 21 6 1 0 90 4.72 Academic Workshops % Percentage of Total 17.78% 30.00% 23.33% 6.67% 1.11% 0.00% b. Conference, Research and Count 16 20 12 6 3 1 90 4.64 Study Abroad Support Grants % Percentage of Total 17.78% 22.22% 13.33% 6.67% 3.33% 1.11% c. Bus Transportation schedule Count 17 16 18 8 0 3 90 4.53 % Percentage of Total 18.89% 17.78% 20.00% 8.89% 0.00% 3.33% d. Food service availability Count 9 23 25 14 4 3 87 4.13 % Percentage of Total 10.34% 26.44% 28.74% 16.09% 4.60% 3.45% e. Medical department Count 13 17 17 5 2 0 89 4.63 services % Percentage of Total 14.61% 19.10% 19.10% 5.62% 2.25% 0.00% f. Social activities for Graduate Count 9 12 18 13 2 4 90 4.02 students % Percentage of Total 10.00% 13.33% 20.00% 14.44% 2.22% 4.44% g. Services of the student Count 10 9 10 3 1 1 88 4.62 counseling center % Percentage of Total 11.36% 10.23% 11.36% 3.41% 1.14% 1.14% h. Services of the student Count 10 5 11 4 1 1 89 4.50 mentoring unit % Percentage of Total 11.24% 5.62% 12.36% 4.49% 1.12% 1.12% i. Career Center Count 14 13 19 4 3 3 89 4.39 % Percentage of Total 15.73% 14.61% 21.35% 4.49% 3.37% 3.37% j. Internship opportunities Count 9 9 10 11 3 3 89 4.02 % Percentage of Total 10.11% 10.11% 11.24% 12.36% 3.37% 3.37% k. Teaching assistantship Count 16 17 14 15 1 3 90 4.35 opportunities % Percentage of Total 17.78% 18.89% 15.56% 16.67% 1.11% 3.33% l. Work study opportunities Count 10 17 12 5 3 1 90 4.48 % Percentage of Total 11.11% 18.89% 13.33% 5.56% 3.33% 1.11% m. E-mail and internet services Count 53 19 10 2 2 1 89 5.33 % Percentage of Total 59.55% 21.35% 11.24% 2.25% 2.25% 1.12% n. WiFi services on campus Count 44 24 11 5 2 1 90 5.15 % Percentage of Total 48.89% 26.67% 12.22% 5.56% 2.22% 1.11% o. Photocopy & printing Count 28 24 23 6 5 1 90 4.70
WEIGHTED VERY EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE POOR N/A TOTAL AVERAGE GOOD (1 TO 6) services on campus % Percentage of Total 31.11% 26.67% 25.56% 6.67% 5.56% 1.11% p. Athletics department Count 16 17 8 3 0 1 89 4.96 % Percentage of Total 17.98% 19.10% 8.99% 3.37% 0.00% 1.12% q. Payment of stipend for Count 19 13 12 9 2 2 89 4.56 fellows % Percentage of Total 21.35% 14.61% 13.48% 10.11% 2.25% 2.25% r. Public lectures and Seminars Count 14 26 31 3 1 2 90 4.56 % Percentage of Total 15.56% 28.89% 34.44% 3.33% 1.11% 2.22% s. Graduate Student Count 8 13 19 5 2 0 88 4.43 Association % Percentage of Total 9.09% 14.77% 21.59% 5.68% 2.27% 0.00%
Rating of the Quality of Support Services
a. Graduate Students Academic Workshops 17.78% 30.00% 23.33% 6.67% b. Conference, Research and Study Abroad Support Grants 17.78% 22.22% 13.33% 6.67% c. Bus Transportation schedule 18.89% 17.78% 20.00% 8.89% d. Food service availability 10.34% 26.44% 28.74% 16.09% e. Medical department services 14.61% 19.10% 19.10% 5.62% f. Social activities for Graduate students 10.00% 13.33% 20.00% 14.44% g. Services of the student counseling center 11.36% 10.23% 11.36% 3.41% h. Services of the student mentoring unit 11.24% 5.62% 12.36% 4.49% i. Career Center 15.73% 14.61% 21.35% 4.49% j. Internship opportunities 10.11% 10.11% 11.24% 12.36% k. Teaching assistantship opportunities 17.78% 18.89% 15.56% 16.67% l. Work study opportunities 11.11% 18.89% 13.33% 5.56% m. E-mail and internet services 59.55% 21.35% 11.24% 2.25% n. WiFi services on campus 48.89% 26.67% 12.22% 5.56% o. Photocopy & printing services on campus 31.11% 26.67% 25.56% 6.67% p. Athletics department 17.98% 19.10% 8.99% 3.37% q. Payment of stipend for fellows 21.35% 14.61% 13.48% 10.11% r. Public lectures and Seminars 15.56% 28.89% 34.44% 3.33% s. Graduate Student Association 9.09% 14.77% 21.59% 5.68%
Excellent Very Good Good Average Fair Poor
Weighted Average Rating of Support Services
E-mail and internet services 5.33 WiFi services on campus 5.15 Athletics department 4.96 Graduate Students Academic Workshops 4.72 Photocopy & printing services on campus 4.70 Conference, Research and Study Abroad Support Grants 4.64 Medical department services 4.63 Services of the student counseling center 4.62 Public lectures and Seminars 4.56 Payment of stipend for fellows 4.56 Bus Transportation schedule 4.53 Services of the student mentoring unit 4.50 Work study opportunities 4.48 Graduate Student Association 4.43 Career Center 4.39 Teaching assistantship opportunities 4.35 Food service availability 4.13 Internship opportunities 4.02 Social activities for Graduate students 4.02
PART IV: OVERALL STUDENT SATISFACTION
Q25: OVERALL, INDICATE YOUR LEVEL OF SATISFACTION AS A GRADUATE STUDENT AT AUC
PERCENTAGE Overall Satisfaction Level ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES (FROM TOTAL RESPONSES TO THIS QUESTION 92) Very satisfied 34 37.0% Satisfied 55.4% Satisfied 51 55.4% Very satisfied 37.0% Neutral 4 4.3% Dissatisfied 3 3.3% Neutral 4.3% Very dissatisfied 0 0.0% Dissatisfied 3.3% Total 92 Very dissatisfied 0.0% Missing 18
Q12: WOULD YOU RECOMMEND AUC TO A FRIEND OR COLLEAGUE CONSIDERING YOUR FIELD OF STUDY?
PERCENTAGE Would You Recommend AUC to a friend considering (FROM TOTAL RESPONSES TO ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES THIS QUESTION 107) your field of study? Definitely 55 51.4% Probably 34 31.8% Definitely 51.4% Maybe 16 15.0% Probably 31.8% Definitely not 2 1.9% Maybe 15.0% Total 107 Definitely not 1.9% Missing 13
PART V: STRENGTHS, WEAKNESSES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT
STRENGTHS, WEAKNESSES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT REPORTED BY THEME (QUESTIONS 26, 27 & 28) Strengths
THEME COMMENT MAJOR Academic Experience Strong colleagues Some great professors Up to date with latest scientific Computer Science research topics Good system Supportive department at solving students problems Good envirnoment for innovation The academic experience and the exposure to researches. Construction Engineering The diversity of courses The strength of the majority of the professors Master of Business Admin. Developing the ability to work with different types of people through the team work Enhancing Presentation Skills Reading and analyzing published research papers The constant help available The Courses The lectures Master of Global Affairs Courses, quality of professors, being up to date with global and local news and Master in Public Administration policy issues Availability for funds and scholarships for graduate students Academic writing, research excellence, and high quality publications Mechanical Engineering Decent quality of education capitalizing on well-established and strong faculty Political Science members from around the world, while maintaining the culture of the region. Academic Program the program is unique and the first of its kind " Sustainable development". the Sustainable Development best 2 courses I took were basic concepts and applications for social and environmental policies: by Aisha Saad Cities structures and dynamics: Mona Abaza Academic Program: Elective The elective courses outside my department Journalism & Mass Courses Communication Diversity AUC's diversity warmth and standards of peers and instructors Master in Public Policy Facilities: Library The Library Experience Journalism & Mass Communication Faculty Being taught be professional professors in the field, and being surrounded by Computer Science active and hard working students Most of the professors are unique in their field; moreover, academic or Executive MBA professional materials are always up-to-date
my thesis supervisor, and freedom to chose what ever topic i want Journalism & Mass Communication Professional instructors Latest knowledge Master of Business Admin. communication with professors Masters in Public Administration exposed to well educated and high calibers faculty Masters in Public Administration My interaction with some professors who truly motovated me to fulfill my Middle East Studies potential The richness of knowledge my professors contributed in every class Migration and Refugee Studies Faculty I enjoyed working and studying with a group of talented and caring colleagues, Teaching English to Speakers of Faculty & Students most of whom were different from me in many ways, but we all got along really Other Language well and respected each other's opinions and tastes. It was also an honor to take classes led by experts in their respective fields - Dr. Plumlee has been especially inspirational to me. Financial Assistance & Being granted conference grants to be exposed to the research community PhD in Applied Science Research worldwide. Learning Experience 1- It was a great chance to meet AUC professors and staff and share their Biotechnology experiences. 2- AUC was a great opportunity to conduct research. 3- AUC provided me with all resources and facilities needed for my research. 1- some of the graduate courses were useful and helpful 2- Professors are Construction Engineering cooperative with strong academic and scientific level 3- Reseach tools are largely provided 4- New campus is awsome 5- Email service is great 6- Events and ceremonies are well organized 7- Generally, the surrendered atmosphere is supporting and motivating Diversity, professional and personal development opportunities, reputable Masters in Public Administration organization to have a graduate degree from. The exposure to a such diversified community from peers to AUC qualified staff, Masters in Public Administration as well to well articulated curricula. The experience has with no doubt strengthen several skill such as public speaking skills, presentation, and research methodology. 1- Academic experience; 2- Practical experience; 3- Research methods PhD in Engineering experience; 4- Writing well-performed papers ; 5- Learning a lot of software programs; 6- Working well in team work. AUC has provided a unique academic sphere in which one were able to know, to Sociology Anthropology question, to learn, and to be a knowledge seeker. being updated with the latest trends in the field. Opportunities to teach abroad Teaching Arabic as a Foreign
through related emailing lists. Encouragement by professors for further Language development Other Had strong academic background that was suitable for the program Economics Being exposed to new areas in my field of experience Journalism & Mass Communication Everything Master of Public Policy & Adm. Research The ability of using research tools and enhancing the academic writing skill in Biotechnology addition to gaining the experience in the lab work. enhanced my writing and research skills Educational Leadership To some extent enhancement in the research skills Masters International and Comparative Law I have learned to collect data and work on a research Mechanical Engineering Research skills Robotics, Contrl & Smart Syst Skills: Presentation writing and presentation skills Chemistry Skills: Presentation & Facilities: _Enhancing presentation and communication skills through course presentations Teaching English to Speakers of Library _E-library was time saving and user-friendly, especially for people who work full Other Language time and cannot be physically present at the university for long hours. _Availability of readers and supervisors for thesis writers. Skills: Reading & Writing Reading and writing skills Master of Public Policy & Adm. Skills: Research & Presentation enhanced my ability to conduct research enhanced my presentation skills better Robotics, Contrl & Smart Syst team working the ability to present ideas and research results Staff & Resources Advising and resourses International & Comparative Education
Weaknesses
THEME COMMENT MAJOR Academic Experience 1- Fees are increasing in an incredible rates 2- Some graduate courses are not Construction Engineering provided 3- Social and sportive activities for graduates are missing 4- Registration services are not well organized (Fair) I had better expectations for the learning/academic experience. Masters in Public Administration Academic Program content of courses Chemistry Core course scheduling was problematic causing delays in finalization of program Economics courses need to be more diverse to match diverse needs Educational Leadership -The research methods courses and understanding data analysis methodologies. International & Comparative -practically integrating courses to authentic projects. Education Little gained knowledge, not a lot of critical thinking, classic theories only, very Journalism & Mass little interaction with other disciplines despite the importance of such Communication interactions, disappointing thesis supervision, discussions are very Egypt-centric and Cairo-centric, a lot of the courses were super easy anyone can pass even if they didn't really learn much, no clear guidance in thesis process the unavailability of some courses in mass communication Journalism & Mass Communication Courses not egyptionized enough and more field work is needed Master in Public Policy Some courses need to be updated and others need to be given early in the Master in Public Policy program such as the research methods, qualitative and quantitative analysis courses. Also the program stated that students can choose either quantitaive or qualitative, however students of MPP or MPA should have the knowledge of both and should take both compulosry. Also some courses in my decipline are extremely important but lacked the needed tools for teaching and enhancing the capabilities of students, such as the policy analysis and program evaluation. First, I suggest that this course should be two; policy analysis course and another for program evaluation. Second, there should be standard case studies used as tools to train students on policy analysis and in different policy areas. Out of the 15 courses I studied, I recall at least 5 courses that were a complete Master of Business Admin. waste of time because of the extremely poor quality and ability of the instructors. unavailability of the adviser and prejudging the quality of student performance. Master of Public Policy & Adm. lack of courses Masters in Public
Administration Not focused enough on a certain topic Mechanical Engineering Unavailability of some graduate courses Mechanical Engineering _ Unavailability of some courses (were not offered for 6 successive semesters) Teaching English to Speakers of although they were in the catalog (i.e.; curriculum design). _Very limited Other Language summer course offerings (only one course was offered and there were not any summer offerings in summer, 2016). _ Unavailability of exchange programs with other universities outside Egypt especially in the US, which could have added to the value and richness of the program. Other departments for example have exchange programs with UCLA and University of Texas. I do wish that more general Applied Linguistics courses were offered, but perhaps Teaching English to Speakers of because the department size is so small, it is not possible to offer more at the Other Language moment. As I mentioned earlier in the survey, I have much more of an interest in research-related work (either more general non-pedagogy language-research or ESL research) rather than an interest in teaching in the classroom. I wish that more courses in the MA TESOL program could be offered for those who prefer behind-the-scenes research and development. It would also be helpful to learn more about how to bridge theory and practice, when certain individuals are more comfortable with the former and others with the latter (i.e. looking beyond the single teacher-researcher in the classroom, to how researchers/agencies work with practitioners/academic institutions). Administrative Issues Bad management of university resources inside departments Low budget for Computer Science research and graduate studies research grants. Some routine work of papers. Master of Public Policy & Adm. Discrimination Some level of discrimination against particular student groups. Low stipend rates Computer Science to fellows. Exams the comprehensive exams Journalism & Mass Communication Faculty There was a lack of professors in the field of Islamic studies, which makes the Arabic Studies options in the choice of the supervisor low. There is a need for more professors with more specific specializations in this field. I did face a lot of obstacles in dealing with my supervisor. In my point of view we Biotechnology apply to graduate problems so we can continue our learning process in each field. The feed back that i always got from my supervisor is always negative feedback. It was not pleasant experience at all dealing with my supervisor as i always got the feeling whenever i ask a question is that i m stupid and this is not the purpose of
me continuing my education i have applied for graduate studies to learn not to feel i m asking stupid question always. The thesis experience was really not good. Although from all the other courses the professors were extremely helpful and always are there to provide us with the needed information and knowledge. Very complicated law professors Masters International and Comparative Law Some professors who did not succeed in inspiring students Middle East Studies not all the professors are good enough Sustainable Development Grading System, Research & The high dependency of the course grading on group work versus actual studying Master of Business Admin. Faculty and research Research weakness Some of the professors were not qualified enough to teach None None that is very obvious Master of Global Affairs I didn't realize any substantial weaknesses Executive MBA NA Sociology Anthropology Other They are personal weaknesses Biotechnology Time management Robotics, Contrl & Smart Syst Research very little exposure to industry support for research and thesis writing not Robotics, Contrl & Smart Syst available from very early Schedule SCHEDULES SOMETIMES DOESN'T MATCH THE NEEDS Masters in Public Administration Student Engagement No team work in our research since we are very few and each one is working in a PhD in Applied Science separate field with a professor. Professors do not cooperate in joint research work that enable their students to work jointly. Student Life As a graduate I had no time to participate in the universities activities Construction Engineering Support Services: Academic Diversity of courses and available information Masters in Public Advising Administration Academic advising should be more emphasized. Political Science Support Services: Food Outlet Food Options :) Journalism & Mass Communication
Suggestions for Improvement
THEME COMMENT MAJOR Academic Program Develop programs that would suit full time working graduate students Extend Arabic Studies hours of rare books library Supply more work experience programs and student involvement in projects if possible (for Art history students in the islamic arts and architecture department) Core courses should be run both in the Fall and in Spring terms Economics JRMC department must advance the student's way of thinking. Level of many Journalism & Mass students after graduation is not significantly different than the level of the layman. Communication Teaching mush involve critical thinking, must avoid being Egypt-centric must focus on a variety of time eras not just the past few years. Students after graduation will have a very small amount of knowledge about Arab or international media and are only introduced to a small amount of books and journal articles. JRMC must avoid cliché arguments and must include a lot more in theory. We studied none of the media theories from the left, we were not introduced to the work of Gramsci or Chomsky for example and we rarely studies media in relevance to other disciplines. This is very crucial in media studies. I even took a graduate course in media and psychology which introduced us to none of the psychological theories and concepts. This to me was troubling, i would sometimes be learning more from my own personal readings than from class. I took elective courses in Political Science, Refugee Studies and History, all three were significantly different than my experience with JRMC and i learned amazing things from these three courses, things that actually make a paradigm shift in my thinking and analytical skills and the amount of reading in these courses surpasses the amount of reading in my JRMC classes. The debates in these classes touched on so many countries other than Egypt and tackled different disciplines. Students looking for a learning experience can truly benefit from such classes but not much from JRMC classes. On another note: Why does the AUC have a huge photo of Elbaradei? Why would a respectable university have a photo of a specific political figure? I mean the revolution photos are great but Elbaradei, really? Why him? Either the AUC puts huge photos of many political figures or put none of them. This partisan spirit is rude and a cause of concern. provide more phd programs to include humanities, public policy, and JRMC. Journalism & Mass Communication Stated above. Master in Public Policy adding modern and new courses Masters in Public
Administration The public administration program needs to be restructured in a way that is Masters in Public consistent with a particular vision for its graduates. For example, If you want to Administration graduate professionals and practitioners in the fields of public administration and development, then you must structure the courses and the professors you select around that objective. Some of the professors have very good academic experience with little professional and practical experience, and they keep teaching courses that are practical in nature. The masters program needs to be more focused in my department not just a Mechanical Engineering collection of courses like an undergraduate _Providing a PHD and an MA degree in linguistics, since the university has a Teaching English to Speakers department of applied linguistics. of Other Language Some possible courses for consideration in the future: Linguistics: - Phonetics and Teaching English to Speakers Phonemics - Morphology - Syntax - Semantics - Psycholinguistics Language and of Other Language Culture: - Ethnography - Culture and Literacy Pedagogical Theory and Development: - Historical Foundations of Language Pedagogies - Curriculum Development - ESL Materials Development Administration Issues Quality checking on resources utilization Computer Science Very expensive Construction Engineering Costs of Graduates studies are becoming extremely expensive. Nanotechnology Diversity Please don't limit the availability of master degree to staff members in one program. Master of Public Policy & Adm. Administrative Issues Reduce the AUC beaurocracy, and either provide training to the admin team on how MBA to manage a program, communication and writings skills and customer satisfaction. Exams i think the program will be much better if we canceled the comprehensive exams as Journalism & Mass we already are required to register for a thesis. so its either to have a thesis or Communication comprehensive Facilities: Labs Computer Science major needs more test bed labs to facilitate practical experiments PhD in Applied Science for graduate research. AsPhD students, we need more variations of courses to select from. Each semester we had to submit a petition to open a new course since we have already taken all the Masters courses. Faculty Change law department professors Masters International and Comparative Law need more incentives to attract a diverse range of professors from abroad to enrich Sustainable Development the range of knowledge
Change law department professors Masters International and Comparative Law Financials & Diversity Improve income/stipend for fellows. Accept diversity and allow every eligible Computer Science student to become a fellow/teaching assistant. Library Learning environment in library needs to be improved seriously. As far as I know, POLS most foreign students do not go to library to study. We always complain about it. Too noisy. None Thanks! Master of Public Policy & Adm. Thanks for the enriching experience i had in your university. Masters in Public Administration Nothing Robotics, Contrl & Smart Syst Thank you Sociology Anthropology Research -Including an advanced research course as a requirement for graduation International & Comparative Education It would be useful to stress on enhancing research methodology tools and skills. As Masters in Public for the public policy and administration department, there is a necessity to take Administration more into consideration the egyptian setting and it is vital to propose more practicum courses. thesis and research guidance to be available from the very beginning the ability to Robotics, Contrl & Smart Syst choose from more than 1 supervisor for your thesis better regulation for the TA duties Schedule more classes at 5:00 p.m. Masters in Public Administration Support Services: Food Outlet This semester Food options improved, but it is not enough. AUC community is big Journalism & Mass and food options are not an extra thing. It is essential because many students, Communication professors, and staff spend long days on the campus. So, a variety of affordable good food is highly needed.
STRENGTHS, WEAKNESSES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT REPORTED BY MAJOR
Arabic World Studies
WEAKNESSES (1) Faculty There was a lack of professors in the field of Islamic studies, which makes the options in the choice of the supervisor low. There is a need for more professors with more specific specializations in this field.
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (1) Academic Program Develop programs that would suit full time working graduate students Extend hours of rare books library Supply more work experience programs and student involvement in projects if possible (for Art history students in the islamic arts and architecture department)
Biotechnology
STRENGTHS (2) Learning Experience 1- It was a great chance to meet AUC professors and staff and share their experiences. 2- AUC was a great opportunity to conduct research. 3- AUC provided me with all resources and facilities needed for my research. Research The ability of using research tools and enhancing the academic writing skill in addition to gaining the experience in the lab work.
WEAKNESSES (2) Faculty I did face a lot of obstacles in dealing with my supervisor. In my point of view we apply to graduate problems so we can continue our learning process in each field. The feed back that i always got from my supervisor is always negative feedback. It was not pleasant experience at all dealing with my supervisor as i always got the feeling whenever i ask a question is that i m stupid and this is not the purpose of me continuing my education i have applied for graduate studies to learn not to feel i m asking stupid question always. The thesis experience was really not good. Although from all the other courses the professors were extremely helpful and always are there to provide us with the needed information and knowledge. Other They are personal weaknesses
Chemistry STRENGTHS (1) Skills: Presentation writing and presentation skills
WEAKNESSES (1) Academic Program content of courses
Computer Science STRENGTHS (2) Academic Experience Strong colleagues Some great professors Up to date with latest scientific research topics Good system Supportive department at solving students problems Good envirnoment for innovation Faculty Being taught be professional professors in the field, and being surrounded by active and hard working students
WEAKNESSES (2) Administration Issues Bad management of university resources inside departments Low budget for research and graduate studies research grants. Discrimination Some level of discrimination against particular student groups. Low stipend rates to fellows.
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (2) Administration Issues Quality checking on resources utilization Financials & Diversity Improve income/stipend for fellows. Accept diversity and allow every eligible student to become a fellow/teaching assistant.
Construction Engineering STRENGTHS (2) Academic Experience The academic experience and the exposure to researches. Learning Experience 1- some of the graduate courses were useful and helpful 2- Professors are cooperative with strong academic and scientific level 3- Reseach tools are largely provided 4- New campus is awsome 5- Email service is great 6- Events and ceremonies are well organized 7- Generally, the surrendered atmosphere is supporting and motivating
WEAKNESSES (2) Academic Experience 1- Fees are increasing in an incredible rates 2- Some graduate courses are not provided 3- Social and sportive activities for graduates are missing 4- Registration services are not well organized (Fair) Student Life As a graduate I had no time to participate in the universities activities
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (1) Administration Issues Very expensive
Economics STRENGTHS (1) Other Had strong academic background that was suitable for the program
WEAKNESSES (1) Academic Program Core course scheduling was problematic causing delays in finalization of program
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (1) Academic Program Core courses should be run both in the Fall and in Spring terms
Educational Leadership STRENGTHS (1) Research enhanced my writing and research skills
WEAKNESSES (1) Academic Program courses need to be more diverse to match diverse needs
Executive MBA STRENGTHS (1) Faculty Most of the professors are unique in their field; moreover, academic or professional materials are always up- to-date
WEAKNESSES (1) None I didn't realize any substantial weaknesses
International & Comparative Education STRENGTHS (1) Staff & Resources Advising and resourses
WEAKNESSES (1) Academic Program -The research methods courses and understanding data analysis methodologies. -practically integrating courses to authentic projects.
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (1) Research -Including an advanced research course as a requirement for graduation
Journalism & Mass Communication STRENGTHS (4) Academic Program: Elective Courses The elective courses outside my department Facilities: Library The Library Experience Faculty my thesis supervisor, and freedom to chose what ever topic i want Other Being exposed to new areas in my field of experience
WEAKNESSES (4) Academic Program Little gained knowledge, not a lot of critical thinking, classic theories only, very little interaction with other disciplines despite the importance of such interactions, disappointing thesis supervision, discussions are very
Egypt-centric and Cairo-centric, a lot of the courses were super easy anyone can pass even if they didn't really learn much, no clear guidance in thesis process Academic Program the unavailability of some courses in mass communication Exams the comprehensive exams Support Services: Food Outlet Food Options :)
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (4) Academic Program JRMC department must advance the student's way of thinking. Level of many students after graduation is not significantly different than the level of the layman. Teaching mush involve critical thinking, must avoid being Egypt-centric must focus on a variety of time eras not just the past few years. Students after graduation will have a very small amount of knowledge about Arab or international media and are only introduced to a small amount of books and journal articles. JRMC must avoid cliché arguments and must include a lot more in theory. We studied none of the media theories from the left, we were not introduced to the work of Gramsci or Chomsky for example and we rarely studies media in relevance to other disciplines. This is very crucial in media studies. I even took a graduate course in media and psychology which introduced us to none of the psychological theories and concepts. This to me was troubling, i would sometimes be learning more from my own personal readings than from class. I took elective courses in Political Science, Refugee Studies and History, all three were significantly different than my experience with JRMC and i learned amazing things from these three courses, things that actually make a paradigm shift in my thinking and analytical skills and the amount of reading in these courses surpasses the amount of reading in my JRMC classes. The debates in these classes touched on so many countries other than Egypt and tackled different disciplines. Students looking for a learning experience can truly benefit from such classes but not much from JRMC classes. On another note: Why does the AUC have a huge photo of Elbaradei? Why would a respectable university have a photo of a specific political figure? I mean the revolution photos are great but Elbaradei, really? Why him? Either the AUC puts huge photos of many political figures or put none of them. This partisan spirit is rude and a cause of concern. Academic Program provide more phd programs to include humanities, public policy, and JRMC. Exams i think the program will be much better if we canceled the comprehensive exams as we already are required to register for a thesis. so its either to have a thesis or comprehensive Support Services: Food Outlet This semester Food options improved, but it is not enough. AUC community is big and food options are not an extra thing. It is essential because many students, professors, and staff spend long days on the campus. So, a variety of affordable good food is highly needed.
Master in Public Policy
STRENGTHS (1) Diversity AUC's diversity warmth and standards of peers and instructors
WEAKNESSES (2) Academic Program Courses not egyptionized enough and more field work is needed Academic Program Some courses need to be updated and others need to be given early in the program such as the research methods, qualitative and quantitative analysis courses. Also the program stated that students can choose either quantitaive or qualitative, however students of MPP or MPA should have the knowledge of both and should take both compulosry. Also some courses in my decipline are extremely important but lacked the needed tools for teaching and enhancing the capabilities of students, such as the policy analysis and program evaluation. First, I suggest that this course should be two; policy analysis course and another for program evaluation. Second, there should be standard case studies used as tools to train students on policy analysis and in different policy areas.
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (1) Academic Program Stated above.
Master of Business Admin. STRENGTHS (2) Academic Experience The diversity of courses The strength of the majority of the professors Developing the ability to work with different types of people through the team work Enhancing Presentation Skills Reading and analyzing published research papers Faculty Professional instructors Latest knowledge
WEAKNESSES (2) Academic Program Out of the 15 courses I studied, I recall at least 5 courses that were a complete waste of time because of the extremely poor quality and ability of the instructors. Grading System, Research & Faculty The high dependency of the course grading on group work versus actual studying and research Research
weakness Some of the professors were not qualified enough to teach
Master of Global Affairs STRENGTHS (1) Academic Experience The constant help available The Courses The lectures
WEAKNESSES (1) None None that is very obvious
Master of Public Policy & Adm. STRENGTHS (2) Other Everything Skills: Reading & Writing Reading and writing skills
WEAKNESSES (2) Academic Program unavailability of the adviser and prejudging the quality of student performance. Administration Issues Some routine work of papers.
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (2) Diversity Please don't limit the availability of master degree to staff members in one program. None Thanks!
Masters in Public Administration STRENGTHS (5) Academic Experience Courses, quality of professors, being up to date with global and local news and policy issues Availability for funds and scholarships for graduate students Faculty communication with professors Faculty exposed to well educated and high calibers faculty
Learning Experience Diversity, professional and personal development opportunities, reputable organization to have a graduate degree from. Learning Experience The exposure to a such diversified community from peers to AUC qualified staff, as well to well articulated curricula. The experience has with no doubt strengthen several skill such as public speaking skills, presentation, and research methodology.
WEAKNESSES (4) Academic Experience I had better expectations for the learning/academic experience. Academic Program lack of courses Academic Program Diversity of courses and available information Schedule SCHEDULES SOMETIMES DOESN'T MATCH THE NEEDS
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (6) Academic Program adding modern and new courses Academic Program The public administration program needs to be restructured in a way that is consistent with a particular vision for its graduates. For example, If you want to graduate professionals and practitioners in the fields of public administration and development, then you must structure the courses and the professors you select around that objective. Some of the professors have very good academic experience with little professional and practical experience, and they keep teaching courses that are practical in nature. None Thanks for the enriching experience i had in your university. Research It would be useful to stress on enhancing research methodology tools and skills. As for the public policy and administration department, there is a necessity to take more into consideration the egyptian setting and it is vital to propose more practicum courses. Schedule more classes at 5:00 p.m.
Masters International and Comparative Law STRENGTHS (1) Research To some extent enhancement in the research skills
WEAKNESSES (1) Faculty Very complicated law professors
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (1) Faculty Change law department professors
Mechanical Engineering STRENGTHS (2) Academic Experience Academic writing, research excellence, and high quality publications Research I have learned to collect data and work on a research
WEAKNESSES (2) Academic Program Not focused enough on a certain topic Academic Program Unavailability of some graduate courses
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (1) Academic Program The masters program needs to be more focused in my department not just a collection of courses like an undergraduate
Middle East Studies STRENGTHS (1) Faculty My interaction with some professors who truly motovated me to fulfill my potential
WEAKNESSES (1) Faculty Some professors who did not succeed in inspiring students
Migration and Refugee Studies STRENGTHS (1) Faculty The richness of knowledge my professors contributed in every class
Nanotechnology SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (1) Administration Issues Costs of Graduates studies are becoming extremely expensive.
PhD in Applied Science STRENGTHS (1) Financial Assistance & Research Being granted conference grants to be exposed to the research community worldwide.
WEAKNESSES (1) Student Engagement No team work in our research since we are very few and each one is working in a separate field with a professor. Professors do not cooperate in joint research work that enable their students to work jointly.
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (1) Facilities: Labs Computer Science major needs more test bed labs to facilitate practical experiments for graduate research. AsPhD students, we need more variations of courses to select from. Each semester we had to submit a petition to open a new course since we have already taken all the Masters courses.
PhD in Engineering STRENGTHS (1) Learning Experience 1- Academic experience; 2- Practical experience; 3- Research methods experience; 4- Writing well- performed papers ; 5- Learning a lot of software programs; 6- Working well in team work.
Political Science STRENGTHS (1) Academic Experience Decent quality of education capitalizing on well-established and strong faculty members from around the world, while maintaining the culture of the region.
WEAKNESSES (1) Support Services: Academic advising Academic advising should be more emphasized.
Robotics, Contrl & Smart Syst STRENGTHS (2) Research Research skills Skills: Research & Presentation enhanced my ability to conduct research enhanced my presentation skills better team working the ability to present ideas and research results
WEAKNESSES (2) Other Time management Research very little exposure to industry support for research and thesis writing not available from very early
Sociology Anthropology STRENGTHS (1) Learning Experience AUC has provided a unique academic sphere in which one were able to know, to question, to learn, and to be a knowledge seeker.
WEAKNESSES (1) None NA
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (1) None Thank you
Sustainable Development STRENGTHS (1) Academic Program the program is unique and the first of its kind " Sustainable development". the best 2 courses I took were basic concepts and applications for social and environmental policies: by Aisha Saad Cities structures and dynamics: Mona Abaza
WEAKNESSES (1) Faculty not all the professors are good enough
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (1) Faculty need more incentives to attract a diverse range of professors from abroad to enrich the range of knowledge
Teaching Arabic as a Foreign Language STRENGTHS (1) Learning Experience being updated with the latest trends in the field. Opportunities to teach abroad through related emailing lists. Encouragement by professors for further development
Teaching English to Speakers of Other Language STRENGTHS (2) Faculty & Students I enjoyed working and studying with a group of talented and caring colleagues, most of whom were different from me in many ways, but we all got along really well and respected each other's opinions and tastes. It was also an honor to take classes led by experts in their respective fields - Dr. Plumlee has been especially inspirational to me. Skills: Presentation & Facilities: Library _Enhancing presentation and communication skills through course presentations _E-library was time saving and user-friendly, especially for people who work full time and cannot be physically present at the university for long hours. _Availability of readers and supervisors for thesis writers.
WEAKNESSES (2) Academic Program _ Unavailability of some courses (were not offered for 6 successive semesters) although they were in the catalog (i.e.; curriculum design). _Very limited summer course offerings (only one course was offered and there were not any summer offerings in summer, 2016). _ Unavailability of exchange programs with other universities outside Egypt especially in the US, which could have added to the value and richness of the program. Other departments for example have exchange programs with UCLA and University of Texas. Academic Program I do wish that more general Applied Linguistics courses were offered, but perhaps because the department size is so small, it is not possible to offer more at the moment. As I mentioned earlier in the survey, I have much more of an interest in research-related work (either more general non-pedagogy language-research or ESL research) rather than an interest in teaching in the classroom. I wish that more courses in the MA TESOL program could be offered for those who prefer behind-the-scenes research and development. It would also be helpful to learn more about how to bridge theory and practice, when certain individuals are more comfortable with the former and others with the latter (i.e. looking beyond the single teacher-researcher in the classroom, to how researchers/agencies work with practitioners/academic institutions).
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (2) Academic Program _Providing a PHD and an MA degree in linguistics, since the university has a department of applied linguistics. Academic Program Some possible courses for consideration in the future: Linguistics: - Phonetics and Phonemics - Morphology - Syntax - Semantics - Psycholinguistics Language and Culture: - Ethnography - Culture and Literacy Pedagogical Theory and Development: - Historical Foundations of Language Pedagogies - Curriculum Development - ESL Materials Development
PART VI: TRENDS
OVERALL STUDENT SATISFACTION
Overall Satisfaction with the Graduate Experience 92.40% 90.50%
83.50% 79.50%
Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Fall 2016
I would definitely recommend AUC to my friends considering my field of study
71.30%
56.70% 51.30% 51.40%
Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Fall 2016
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
Students' Employment Status Trend
Fall 2014 70.20% 14.90% 11.70% 3.20%
Spring 2015 54.50% 9.90% 26.40% 9.10%
Fall 2015 53.04% 13.04% 21.74% 12.17%
Spring 2016 58.70% 12.70% 21.40% 7.10%
Fall 2016 68.50% 12.00% 15.70% 3.70%
Employed full time Employed part time Seeking employment Unemployed
INTENTION TO PURSUE A PHD
Percentage of Respondents Intending to Pursue Graduate Studies
55.80% 53.80% 49.40% 38.60%
Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Fall 2016