DOCSLIB.ORG

Best Performing Yacht

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Best Performing Yacht BEST PERFORMING YACHT Awarded to the yacht having the best corrected average speed Whitebread 23 Peconic Bay Sailing Association | October 08, 2016 [View in Media Format] [View With Divisions] PHRF Spinnaker (40 boats) (top) Series Standing - 1 race scored Information is final Regatta results last updated: Sunday, October 09, 2016 9:32:43 AM CDT Yacht Pos Sail Boat Rating Skipper Club Corrected Av Cor.Speed Pos 1 944 Firefly 117 Meredith Carroll [3A] Ocyc 05:17:03 4.504021448 1 2 13812 OSPREY 116 george martin [2B] SHYC, BYC 05:27:01 4.366749911 2 24 Boogie 136 Jody LoCascio [3A] Breakwater 05:33:20 4.284 3 Van YC 3 USA 4224 Barleycorn -3 Brendan Brownyard Shelter I. 05:37:59 4.225060407 4 [1A] YC 4 5 123 PURPLE 48 LEE OLDAK [1B] BREAKWAT 05:38:00 4.224852071 5 HAZE ER YC 6 USA 360 Big Boat 69 Bud Rogers [1B] Breakwater 05:39:44 4.203296703 6 1248 USA1248 117 William Ricketson SIYC 05:40:38 4.192191017 7 [3A] 7 8 80 Seventh 120 Greg Ames [3A] Breakwater 05:42:02 4.175031673 8 Heaven 41782 R JMS 125 Rich Spitzenberger MSSA 05:45:10 4.13713182 9 [2B] 9 10 33 Cloud9 84 John Sommi [2A] Shelter 05:45:12 4.136732329 10 Island 11 23262 Twiga 116 David Esseks [2B] N/A 05:45:14 4.136332915 11 12 60909 Bravo 39 Sedgwick Ward [1A] Shelter 05:46:19 4.123393811 12 Island Yacht 13 USA 329 HOOCH 90 James Reichel [2A] South Bay 05:46:37 4.119824975 13 Cruising 14 156 JT9D 90 Paul Rendich [2A] South Bay 05:46:47 4.117844956 14 Cruising Yacht Pos Sail Boat Rating Skipper Club Corrected Av Cor.Speed Pos 15 52455 Renegade 47 Jeffrey Pribor [1A] Shelter 05:50:32 4.073792316 15 Island 16 51888 Cleo 69 Ray Pepi [1B] Breakwater 05:53:55 4.007671079 16 YC 17 369 Skoot 69 Jim Vos [1B] Breakwater 05:56:19 4.034848128 17 18 7 Team 68 james sanders [1B] pbsa 06:00:04 3.967777778 18 Tonic 19 50732 Swans' 107 Christopher DiSunno Breakwater 06:04:48 3.914473684 19 Way [2B] Yacht Club 20 2510 Shamrock 171 Bob Voekel [3B] pbsa 06:13:49 3.820054394 20 1328 Faster, 120 Beth Fleisher [3A] Southold 06:16:34 3.79215721 21 Pussycat! Yacht Club 21 & PBSA 22 60488 Kathryn 72 Jeffrey Butler [1B] MSSA 06:21:39 3.741648107 22 274 The Gossip 69 Liam and Steve Kenny byc 06:23:59 3.718911411 23 [1B] 23 24 33948 Zoop! 129 Paul Kreiling [3A] PBSA 06:26:59 3.690081399 24 102 Privateer -9 Richard Fleischman NYYC-PJYC- 06:27:00 3.689922481 25 [1A] MSSA 25 102 China 144 Richard Davies [2B] Royal 06:27:46 3.682627009 26 Clipper Anglesey 26 Yacht Club 27 2127 Back Beat 171 Gary Senft [3B] PBSA 06:29:14 3.668750535 27 28 22545 Raggamuffi 146 John Baker [2B] MSSA 06:30:38 3.654042989 28 n 29 401 Lunatic 126 Bill & Rob Lehnert Old Cove 06:31:03 3.651706943 29 Fringe [2B] 30 1294 Skilligalee 120 Tom Samuels [3A] PBSA 06:36:31 3.60136186 30 84 84 123 Erik Langendal [3A] SIYC NO TIME 31 31 31 GBR 1874 LL Overproof 36 Stephen Guyer [1A] PBSA NO TIME 31 31 40253 orion 129 bryan coon [2B] lhyc/kyc NO TIME 31 31 478 Trading 96 Thomas Wacker [2A] OCYC NO TIME 31 Places 31 10796 Jul Bocken 131 James Eklund [2B] Shelter NO TIME 31 Island YC 31 2199 Sea 213 Mahlon Russell [3B] PBSA NO TIME 31 Breeze 31 USA 538 SineWave 171 Paul Zinger [3B] Shelter NO TIME 31 Island Yacht Yacht Pos Sail Boat Rating Skipper Club Corrected Av Cor.Speed Pos 31 60115 Two Potato 65 Kenneth Wright [1B] Breakwater NO TIME 31 39516 Avalanche 30 Craig Albrecht [1A] Port NO TIME 31 Washington 31 YC 31 790 Easterly 142 David Kriegel [2B] SIYC NO TIME 31 PHRF Non Spinnaker (35 boats) (top) Series Standing - 1 race scored Information is final Regatta results last updated: Saturday, October 08, 2016 5:31:14 PM CDT Yacht Pos Sail Boat Rating Skipper Club Corrected Pos 1 12876 Bellatrix 207 Joseph gaites [6A] Sag Harbor 05:06:25 4.170791406 1 YC 2 34822 First light 204 Michael Drobet [6A] PBSA 05:10:36 4.114616871 2 111 Windsong 186 Frederic Endemann OCYC 05:11:55 4.097248197 3 [5B] 3 3 23563 moonshado 185 Gary Doroski [5B] PBSA 05:11:55 4.097248197 3 w 4 68 Silent 183 Bill Coster [5A] PBSA 05:13:19 4.078940369 4 Passage 146 Tidelines 186 Robert McIlvian [5B] Peconic Bay 05:14:55 4.058216459 5 Sailing 5 Association 6 144 Live Wire 86 Michael Canuso [4A] PBSA 05:23:07 3.95522773 6 /OSC 7 4457 Spindrift 136 WILLIAM RICH [4B] PBSA 05:24:57 3.932912756 7 8 51469 IMPULSE 98 Andrew Baris [4A] PBSA 05:26:14 3.917441504 8 9 23941 Yawateg 169 Peter Kreiling [4B] PBSA 05:35:36 3.808104887 9 10 41406 Between 107 Jeff Barnett [4A] PBSA 05:36:00 3.803571429 10 The 841 Simpatico 277 Brian Andrews [6B] Peconic Bay 05:44:03 3.71457637 11 Sailing 11 Assoc. Yacht Pos Sail Boat Rating Skipper Club Corrected Av Cor.Speed Pos 12 1026 Varuna 178 Peter Dinkel [5A] SIYC 05:50:27 3.646739906 12 13 425 Patriarch 277 Roger Rose [6B] PBSA 05:55:09 3.598479516 13 III 51122 Upbeat 108 Stefan Feuerabendt Orient Yacht 05:58:29 3.565019294 14 [4A] Club 14 15 113 True Love 240 Tom Garber [6B] PBSA 06:00:46 3.542455881 15 16 5310 Second 244 Artie Bortz [6B] PBSA 06:10:26 3.449703077 16 Wind 17 43804 Buccaneer 220 Richard Tiernan [6A] Shelter 06:12:26 3.43148662 17 Island Yacht 18 700 Wayne's 238 Wayne Turett [6B] Manhattan 06:12:29 3.431025997 18 World Yacht Club 19 22 Jedzieboat 238 gregory colt [6B] none 06:12:50 3.427805096 19 20 1614 Catalina 215 Paul Kekalos [6A] n/a 06:26:54 3.303179116 20 30 21 2001 VIII + Vi 190 Bill Miller [6A] PBSA 06:28:32 3.289293068 21 22 100 Mercy 178 Bryant McElroy [5A] ELYC 06:35:10 3.234078448 22 151 Harbor 170 Donald Sweeney [5A] Locust Point 06:37:36 3.214285714 23 Lights YC 23 186 Vamoose 147 Samuel Coleman [5A] Breakwater 06:41:45 3.181082763 24 Sag 24 Harbor 25 72 PrincessJ 156 Angelo Lettieri [4B] none 06:43:12 3.169642857 25 26 575 Time in a 198 William Hale [6A] East End 07:00:46 3.037312842 26 Bottle Rowing 27 210 Resolution 202 David Kilbride [6A] PBSA NO TIME 27 NA Far Star 135 Charles Dlhopolsky NA NO TIME 27 [4B] 27 27 USA110 FiveEast 95 Frank Sess [4A] Frank Sess NO TIME 27 203 Gleam 186 Barbara Butterworth PBSA NO TIME 27 [5B] 27 27 41731 TRUE 161 RICHARD LIND [4B] Shelter NO TIME 27 BLUE Island YC 27 57 HOUND 196 Jerry zisfein [6A] none NO TIME 27 148 Optimistic 186 Bill Archer [5B] Peconic Bay NO TIME 27 Sailing 27 Association Yacht Pos Sail Boat Rating Skipper Club Corrected Av Cor.Speed Pos 27 B Maria 112 Xavier Amador [4A] BVI West NO TIME 27 Cristina End Yacht Multihull (3 boats) (top) Series Standing - 1 race scored Information is provisional and subject to modification Regatta results last updated: Saturday, October 08, 2016 5:33:01 PM CDT Yacht Pos Sail Boat Rating Skipper Club Corrected Pos 1 401 No. 3 38.4 Michael Bartolotta2 SYC 05:34:29 3.820818177 1 2 550 No.1 38.4 Michael Bartolotta3 SYC NO TIME 2 2 338 No.7 38.4 Michael Bartolotta SYC NO TIME 2 Notes - Scoring System is RRS Low Point 2013-2016 - Finishes in [brackets] denote throwouts - Click on race number to view detailed race information. Information is provisional and subject to modification Registration Problems or Questions? Visit our Support Desk | View Our Privacy Policy Powered by US SAILING Regatta Network® | Online Sailing Event Registration and Management Services. © 2016 Regatta Network, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Regatta Network is a registered Trademark of Regatta Network Inc..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Capacity Grants.Gov Application Guide
    7. SF424A Budget 7.1 Enter Budget information on the SF 424a You must complete the required fields on each page of the SF 424a for the specified grant program, which includes attaching a budget justification (See 7.X Budget Justification, of this section). Only list one program (i.e. Smith-Lever, Hatch, etc.) per SF424a. Budget information is for the upcoming Fiscal year. 7.2 Enter information on Section A, Budget Summary, Line 1 (a) Grant Program function of Activity: Enter the capacity program RFA title under which the application is being submitted (e.g. Smith-Lever, Hatch; Hatch Multistate; Section 1444; Section 1445 Evans Allen; McIntire-Stennis; or Animal Health Disease Research) (b) Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Number (CFDA): Enter the CFDA number for the program. Reminder, extension CFDAs changed in FY 2019; see https://nifa.usda.gov/resource/10500- change for more information. (c) Estimated Unobligated Funds – Federal: Enter the amount of Federal carry over funds from the previous FY. For Smith-lever, since funds may be carried over up to 5 years, this will be the cumulative amount of carry-over from previous FY’s. (d) Estimated Unobligated Funds – Non Federal: Enter the amount of matching funds (Non Federal share) being carried over; funds reported are from the corresponding FY to the Federal award. (e) New or Revised Budget – Federal: Enter the amount from Appendix A in the appropriate capacity RFA. (f) New or Revised Budget – Non Federal: Enter the required match, if applicable. If you are submitting a matching waiver request with the application, enter the amount of match that would be required if the waiver is approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Subtitle 22A-6B
    Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies TITLE 22a. Environmental Protection Agency Department of Environmental Protection Subject Assessment of Civil Penalties Inclusive Sections §§ 22a-6b-1—22a-6b-701 CONTENTS Assessment of Civil Penalties Sec. 22a-6b-100—22a-6b-701. Repealed Administrative Civil Penalty Sec. 22a-6b-1. Authority Sec. 22a-6b-2. Purpose Sec. 22a-6b-3. Definitions Sec. 22a-6b-4. Procedures Sec. 22a-6b-5. Scope of issues at hearing Sec. 22a-6b-6. Burden of proof Sec. 22a-6b-7. Commissioner’s powers Sec. 22a-6b-8. Method and schedule for calculating an administrative civil penalty Sec. 22a-6b-9. Assessment of administrative civil penalty—penalty recalculation Sec. 22a-6b-10. Settlement conferences Sec. 22a-6b-11. Assessment of administrative civil penalty—resolu - tion of penalty notice prior to completion of settle - ment conference Sec. 22a-6b-12. Assessment of administrative civil penalty—resolu - tion of penalty notice after settlement conference but prior to hearing Sec. 22a-6b-13. Assessment of administrative civil penalty—resolu - tion of penalty notice by consent order Sec. 22a-6b-14. Final decision on a penalty notice Sec. 22a-6b-15. Payment of penalties Revised: 2015-3-6 R.C.S.A. §§ 22a-6b-1—22a-6b-701 - I- Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies TITLE 22a. Environmental Protection Department of Environmental Protection §22a-6b-3 Assessment of Civil Penalties Assessment of Civil Penalties Sec. 22a-6b-100—22a-6b-701. Repealed Repealed May 29, 2007. Administrative Civil Penalty Sec. 22a-6b-1. Authority Sections 22a-6b-1 to 22a-6b-15, inclusive, shall be known as the department’s Administrative Civil Penalty Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 I-0104 2020 Schedule SB Instructions
    Update to Instructions as a Result of The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 An individual may claim a medical care insurance subtraction under sec. 71.05 (6) (b) 19., 35., or 38., Wis. Stats., less any amount that is paid with a premium assistance credit under section 36B of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 9662 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (Public Law 117-2) provides that any amount of excess advance premium tax credit received over the amount of premium tax credit allowed does not need to be repaid on the federal income tax return. As a result, the amount of the medical care insurance subtraction should not be increased by any amount reported on line 2 of federal Schedule 2 (Form 1040). If the taxpayer has already filed their return to claim the amount of premium assistance credit paid on line 2 of federal Schedule 2 (Form 1040) and that amount was used to increase the amount of their medical care insurance subtraction, the taxpayer must file an amended 2020 Wisconsin income tax return to report the reduced amount of medical care insurance subtraction. The department cannot make the adjustment for the taxpayer because we do not have the detail of the amounts entered on the Medical Care Insurance Worksheet from page three of these instructions. If the taxpayer has not yet filed their 2020 Wisconsin income tax return, they should not enter an amount on line 7 of Worksheet 1 or line 4 of Worksheet 2 when figuring the amount of medical care insurance subtraction allowed.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,865,395 B2 Sep 28, 1999, Now Pat No. 6591.245, Which Is a (7) ABSTRACT
    US007865395 B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,865,395 B2 Kluget al. (45) Date of Patent: Jan. 4, 2011 (54) MEDIA CONTENT NOTIFICATION VLA (56) References Cited COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS (75) Inventors: John R. Klug. Evergreen, CO (US); 4,654,482 A 3/1987 DeAngelis Thad D. Peterson, Atlanta, GA (US) (73) Assignee: Registrar Systems LLC, Denver, CO (Continued) (US) FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this DE 4440419 A1 * 5, 1996 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 Continued U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. (Continued) (21) Appl. No.: 10/444,856 OTHER PUBLICATIONS 1-1. About Netscape, Netscape, Firefly, and VeriSign Propose Open (22) Filed: May 22, 2003 Prefiling Standard (OPS) to Enable Broad Personalization of Internet Services, (printed May 28, 1997), 3 pages. (65) Prior Publication Data US 2003/0195797 A1 Oct. 16, 2003 (Continued) Primary Examiner Mary Cheung Related U.S. Application Data (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm Dorsey & Whitney LLP (63) ContinuationSep 28, 1999, of now application Pat No. No. 6591.245, 09/407,000, which filed is on a (7) ABSTRACT ity of E.d R The notification system identifies media content based on 89.5s 998, now abandone f Sa1 E. personal preferences of individual users and provides notifi S. s fil d a y of application No. cation of identified media content to the users. In one embodi 995.837. ed on Feb. 2, 1996, now Pat. No. 5,790, ment, the system (100) includes a number of user nodes (102.
    [Show full text]
  • FRINGE (September 2008 – January 2013) 5 Seasons, 100 Episodes
    FRINGE (September 2008 – January 2013) 5 Seasons, 100 Episodes 1. 1-1 09 Sep 08 Pilot 2. 1-2 16 Sep 08 The Same Old Story 3. 1-3 23 Sep 08 The Ghost Network 4. 1-4 30 Sep 08 The Arrival 5. 1-5 14 Oct 08 Power Hungry 6. 1-6 21 Oct 08 The Cure 7. 1-7 11 Nov 08 In Which We Meet Mr. Jones 8. 1-8 18 Nov 08 The Equation 9. 1-9 25 Nov 08 The Dreamscape 10. 1-10 02 Dec 08 Safe 11. 1-11 20 Jan 09 Bound 12. 1-12 27 Jan 09 The No-Brainer 13. 1-13 03 Feb 09 The Transformation 14. 1-14 10 Feb 09 Ability 15. 1-15 07 Apr 09 Inner Child 16. 1-16 14 Apr 09 Unleashed 17. 1-17 21 Apr 09 Bad Dreams 18. 1-18 28 Apr 09 Midnight 19. 1-19 05 May 09 The Road Not Taken There's More than One of 20. 1-20 12 May 09 Everything 21. 2-1 17 Sep 09 A New Day in the Old Town 22. 2-2 24 Sep 09 Night of Desirable Objects 23. 2-3 01 Oct 09 Fracture 24. 2-4 08 Oct 09 Momentum Deferred 25. 2-5 15 Oct 09 Dream Logic 26. 2-6 05 Nov 09 Earthling 27. 2-7 12 Nov 09 Of Human Action 28. 2-8 19 Nov 09 August 29. 2-9 03 Dec 09 Snakehead 30. 2-10 10 Dec 09 Grey Matters 31.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Bend-Contour-Free Dislocation Imaging Via Diffraction Contrast STEM
    Towards bend-contour-free dislocation imaging via diffraction contrast STEM Yuanyuan Zhua,*, Colin Ophusb, Mychailo B. Toloczkoa, and Danny J. Edwardsa a. Energy and Environment Directorate, Nuclear Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, USA b. National Center for Electron Microscopy, Molecular Foundry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA Abstract Dislocation imaging using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has been an invaluable tool for characterizing crystallographic defects in metals. Recent advances in electron microscopy techniques have allowed for new dislocation imaging techniques to be devised. Compared to conventional TEM imaging, diffraction contrast imaging scanning transmission electron microscopy (DCI STEM) can provide better defect contrast with almost negligible bend contour artifacts, enabling more effective analysis of dislocation structures. Here we outline a simple procedure to help set up DCI STEM experiments, using a body-centered cubic HT-9 ferritic/martensitic alloy as an example. To study the behavior of dislocation imaging in STEM mode, we compared the imaging parameters in DCI STEM mode to corresponding conventional TEM images. We found that using a few milliradians of STEM convergence and collection semi-angles, S and S, alleviates bend contours by averaging out the rocking-curve oscillation in reciprocal space. Practical guidelines regarding STEM parameters and specimen orientation and thickness are provided for DCI STEM dislocation imaging. Lastly, we show that coupling DCI STEM with spectrum images of Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy and of Energy-dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy offers a comprehensive characterization of crystallographic defects and chemical information of complex microstructures. Keywords: STEM, Dislocation image, Diffraction contrast, Reciprocity, Bend contour 1.
    [Show full text]
  • EXAMINING the POST-TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION of LUNATIC FRINGE (Lfng) in the MOUSE SEGMENTATION CLOCK
    EXAMINING THE POST-TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION OF LUNATIC FRINGE (Lfng) IN THE MOUSE SEGMENTATION CLOCK DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Kanu Wahi Graduate Program in Molecular Genetics The Ohio State University 2016 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Susan Cole, Advisor Dr. Keith Slotkin Dr. Robin Wharton Dr. Dawn Chandler Copyright by Kanu Wahi 2016 Abstract Somitogenesis is a developmental process in vertebrates involving periodic formation of somites that bud from an unsegmented region known as the pre-somitic mesoderm (PSM) and give rise to the axial skeleton and skeletal muscle in the developed organism. The process of somitogenesis is regulated by a "segmentation clock" that times somite formation and is evolutionarily conserved among vertebrates. Genes, such as Lunatic fringe (Lfng), are required for normal clock function in chickens, mice and humans and exhibit rapid cyclic expression in the PSM with a period that matches the rate of somite formation. To maintain rapid oscillations, especially in the posterior PSM, it is hypothesized that the Lfng transcript should be promptly degraded to ensure its clearance of from cells before the next round of oscillation begins. The 3’UTR of Lfng contains number of conserved sequences that could regulate Lfng expression at the post transcriptional level. In this study we explore the post- transcriptional regulation of the Lfng transcript by the Lfng 3’UTR in the context of the segmentation clock. The Lfng 3'UTR has binding sites for microRNAs (miRNAs), such as miR-125a and miR-200b that are known to affect transcript stability via the 3’UTR.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dash to “Message” in the Age of Plains and Prairie Territories Opening up to Euro- American Settlement
    Talking Politics: The Substance of Style from Abe to “W” Michael Silverstein PRICKLY PARADIGM PRESS CHICAGO 1 No doubt about it. Abraham Lincoln gets the prize among United States presidents for the sheer concentrated political power of his rhetoric. When he set his—actual, own—mind to preparing his text, he © 2003 Michael Silverstein could come up with gems such as his Second All rights reserved. Inaugural and, of course, his 272-word “Dedicatory Remarks” at Gettysburg. Even his extemporaneous public and private talk, transcribed, shows great verbal Prickly Paradigm Press, LLC ability. Now Mr. Lincoln had no Yale or Harvard 5629 South University Avenue degree as a credential of his education. But he under- Chicago, Il 60637 stood the aesthetic—the style, if you will—for sum- moning to his talk the deeply Christian yet rationalist www.prickly-paradigm.com aspirations of America’s then four-score-and-seven- year-old polity. Striving to realize this complex style, ISBN: 0-9717575-5-0 he polished it and elaborated its contours. He embod- LCCN: 2002115993 ied the style. So much so, that Lincoln’s great later 2 3 texts, like the late, great man himself, now belong to seemed not quite successfully to be hiding something. the ages. They form part of the liturgy of what These days his paranoid Oval Office ravings—replete Robert Bellah has termed America’s “civil religion.” with loads of f- and n-words!—circulate in public, And Americans ever since have at least offi- transcribed from tapes slowly seeping out of an cially identified masterly political accomplishment archival sewerful of I-told-you-so conversational with public stylistic communication in the shadow of sludge (the shit has hit his erstwhile fans, as it were!).
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Jobs Program Application & Guidelines
    Quality Jobs Program Application & Guidelines Published January 2021 OKLAHOMA BUSINESS INCENTIVES AND TAX GUIDE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020 Welcome to the 2020 Oklahoma Business Incentives and Tax Information Guide. The rules, legislation and appropriations related to taxes and incentives are very dynamic, and as changes occur, this Tax Guide will be updated. We encourage you to refer often to this on-line tax guide, as well as the various included hyperlinks, to get the most current information. TABLE OF CONTENTS CASH PAYMENT INCENTIVES ......................................................................................................................................5 THE OKLAHOMA QUALITY JOBS PROGRAM ...........................................................................................................5 VETERANS INCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................5 CLAW BACK PROVISION ..........................................................................................................................................5 PAYROLL THRESHOLD REQUIREMENT ....................................................................................................................5 QUALITY JOBS PROGRAM QUALIFYING INDUSTRIES ..............................................................................................6 SMALL EMPLOYER QUALITY JOBS PROGRAM ........................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS AMONG HETEROGENEOUS COUNTRIES with SOCIAL PREFERENCES Charles D
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS AMONG HETEROGENEOUS COUNTRIES WITH SOCIAL PREFERENCES Charles D. Kolstad Working Paper 20204 http://www.nber.org/papers/w20204 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 June 2014 Comments from Werner Güth, Kaj Thomsson and Philipp Wichardt and discussions with Gary Charness and Michael Finus have been appreciated. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2014 by Charles D. Kolstad. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. International Environmental Agreements among Heterogeneous Countries with Social Preferences Charles D. Kolstad NBER Working Paper No. 20204 June 2014 JEL No. H40,H41,Q5 ABSTRACT Achieving efficiency for many global environmental problems requires voluntary cooperation among sovereign countries due to the public good nature of pollution abatement. The theory of international environmental agreements (IEAs) in economics seeks to understand how cooperation among countries on pollution abatement can be facilitated. However, why cooperation occurs when noncooperation appears to be individually rational has been an issue in economics for at least a half century. The problem is that theory suggests fairly low (even zero) levels of contribution to a public good and high levels of free riding.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Sand Supply to Coachella Valley Fringe-Toed Lizard (Uma Inornata) Habitat in the Northern Coachella Valley, California
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Long-Term Sand Supply to Coachella Valley Fringe-Toed Lizard (Uma inornata) Habitat in the Northern Coachella Valley, California Water-Resources Investigations Report 02–4013 COVER PHOTOGRAPH June 21, 1978. View of Mount San Gorgonio from the Bermuda Dunes, Coachella Valley (photograph by Phil Medica, used with permission). Long-term Sand Supply to Coachella Valley Fringe-toed Lizard Habitat in the Northern Coachella Valley, California By Peter G. Griffiths, Robert H. Webb, Nicholas Lancaster, Charles A. Kaehler, and Scott C. Lundstrom U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 02-4013 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Tucson, Arizona 2002 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: Regional Research Hydrologist U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Information Services 345 Middlefield Road Building 810 Menlo Park, CA 94025 Box 25286, Federal Center http://water.usgs.gov/nrp Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Download Document
    South Lanarkshire Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Energy iv February 2016 7948 GIS 103 xi Legend SLC Boundary Study Area 15km buffer viii Scottish Local Authority Boundaries vii Regional Landscape Areas (from 1999 Glasgow and Clyde Valley LCA) iii - Clyde and Ayrshire Basins Moorlands iv - Central Plateau Moorlands vi - Southern Uplands vii - Clyde Basin Farmlands viii - Inner Clyde Valley x - Southern Uplands Foothills xi - Pentland Hills iii x vi Figure 3.3 Regional Landscape Character Areas Km ± 0 2.5 5 10 This map is reproduced from Ordinance Survey material with the permission of Ordinance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationary Office © Crown Copyright 2016. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. AL 100017966 STC7 URBAN STC7 LTH6 URBAN STC7 STC9 STC8 STC8 3 STC8 STC7 STC7 LTH5 STC11 STC18 STC3 3 STC11 STC7 STC3 URBAN 3 URBAN U LTH2 STC11 U LTH1 STC9 STC7 STC5 LTH3 STC12 STC5 STC7 STC11 STC8 South Lanarkshire 3 URBAN STC8 2 LTH2 LTH2 Landscape Capacity Study STC7 STC5 6A 6 STC6 STC7 U 6 for Wind Energy BDR1 STC5 1 iv 5B U 6C 5 February 2016 7948 GIS 104 6C 6A STC8 5A 1 1 5 6A 1 Legend 5A xi BDR8 5 12 6 SLC Boundary U U 1 2 6 2A 6 Study Area 15km buffer STC18 viii 6A Scottish Local Authority Boundaries vii 6 6 4A Landscape Character 5 5C BDR3 1 - Urban Fringe Farmland 4 5 6B 5 9 11 2 - Incised River Valley 2A - Incised River Valley Broad Valley Floor 2 10 3 - Broad Urban Valley U BDR22 AYS20 6 5A 4 BDR11 4 - Rolling Farmland 5 6A 4 4 6A 4 5 4A
    [Show full text]