Tartous Governorate: 1

TARTOUS GOVERNORATE: 1. POPULATION CATEGORIES 27 831,522 201,782 0 0 0

Number of In Besieged/ Militarily In Hard-to-reach Severity Total population People in Need IDPs Returnees sub-districts encircled locations locations

melborp oN melborp 0 0 0 0 0 0 melborp roniM melborp 61 220,381 999,81 0 0 0 melborp etaredoM melborp 9 716,513 153,67 0 0 0 To be melborp rojaM melborp 2 388,233 updated 234,601 0 0 0 melborp ereveS melborp 0 0 0 0 0 0 melborp lacitirC melborp 0 0 0 0 0 0

melborp cihportsataC melborp 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jablah Beit 2. SECTOR SEVERITY RANKING BY SUB-DISTRICT Qteilbiyyeh Yashout Dalyeh Tell Salhib

Anaza Jeb Tawahin Ramleh Taleen Banyas

Qadmous Hamam Rawda Wasil Baramanet Elmashayekh Masyaf Qumseyyeh

Sheikh Wadi Soda Badr El-oyoun Khawabi Dweir Jneinet Raslan Ein

S e a Tartous Raslan Halaqim Sibbeh Oj

Mediterranean TARTOUS Hamin Dreikish P Shin Mashta Arwad Ras Elhiu Qabu El-Khashufeh Safita Bariqiyeh Shin Kherbet Nasra Severity ranks Elmaaza No data Hawash 1 - Minor problem Sisniyyeh 2 - Moderate problem Safsafa 3 - Major problem Hameidiyyeh Tall Kalakh Hadideh 4 - Severe problem # Kareemeh 5 - Critical problem * Besieged locations, Sep 2017 6 - Catastrophic problem ! Military encircled locations, Sep 2017

3. CONFLICT INCIDENTS Number of reported conflict incidents by type (from 1 January 2015 to 31 July 2017)

10 Airstrike HFA* HWF* IED*/Explosion

- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 5102 6102 7102 HFA - Handheld fire arms; HWF - Heavy weapon fire; IED - Improvised explosive device TARTOUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

HIGHLIGHTS

• 241 communities were covered in Tartous governorate with one or more protection issues. • 81% of covered communities reported domestic violence as occurring, 76% reported harassment as occurring and 74% reported housing, land and property issues and family separation as occurring. • Domestic violence was described as a “very common” issue for one or more population groups by 7% of covered communities and as a “common” issue for one or more population groups by 17% of covered communities. 13% of covered communities described sexual harassment as a “common issue” for one or more population groups. • Women (65%) and adolescent girls (64%) were groups most affected by harassment, that was described a happening “sometimes” for these populations groups by respectively 65% and 64% of covered communities. • 64% of covered communities identified relying on humanitarian assistance as a coping mechanism that was “sometimes” used by one or more population groups, while accessing local community support were also described as used “sometimes” (63%) by one or more population groups. • 66% of covered communities described children dropping out of school to work as a coping mechanism “sometimes” used by one or more population groups and 55% mentioned early marriage as a coping mechanism “sometimes” used by one or more population groups. • Movement restrictions were reported as occurring in 35% of covered communities. Out of those, 73% covered communities identified checkpoints and 69% lack of identity documents among reasons, while men (71%), people without civil documentation (62%) and boys (60%) were mentioned as the most affected groups by movement restrictions. • Needs for protection services were identified for all population groups, in particular care mechanisms/services for elderly persons (83% covered communities reported it was needed but not present for one or more population groups), recreational activities (72% covered communities reported it was needed but not present for one or more population groups) and women and girls centers (69% covered communities reported it was needed but not present for one or more population groups). • 37% of covered communities reported concerns with humanitarian assistance. Out of the total covered, 72 indicated that the assistance delivered was not “what the community needed”, 65 communities mentioned the request for documentation to access assistance as a concern and 54 mentioned discrimination/exclusion. • Among covered communities having reported lack/loss of civil documentation as occurring, 60% indicated “loss” among causes while 73% identified “restricted freedom of movement” and 60% reported the inability to register birth/marriage/death among consequences. • Among documents that were described as difficult to obtain in in covered communities having reported lack/loss of civil documentation as occurring, passport (39%) and travel authorization document (35%) were mentioned. • 74% of covered communities reported housing, land and property issues as occurring. Out of those, 17% mentioned “disputed ownership” as a common HLP concern and 62% mentioned “rental disputes” as an HLP concern happening “sometimes”.

4. PROTECTION ISSUES a. Occurrence of protection issues i. Analysis coverage (Number of communities covered in the analysis and number of those communities reporting occurrence of protection issues)

Covered in the analysis Reported as occurring (at least sometimes) Total number of communities in the Governorate 459

239 237 235 232 220 235 217 230 225 220 225 221 191 177 162 173 173 138 147 142 127 118 62 59- 0 0

ii. Percentage of covered communities reporting protection issues as occurring Domestic violence 81%

Harassment 76%

Housing/land/property issues 74%

Family separation 74%

Child labour preventing school attendance 72%

Economic exploitation 64%

Early marriage 62%

Lack/loss of civil documents 62%

Sexual harassment 56%

Sexual violence 54%

Kidnapping/Abduction 28%

Child recruitment 27%

Explosive hazards* 0%

*For explosive hazards indicator: this % applies to communities located in sub-districts where 99% of conflict incidents in the country, have taken place since January 2015. TARTOUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES b. Overview of Protection issues with frequency of occurrence i. Graphs showing percentage out of communities that were covered in the analysis, using two different aggregation options across population groups

HIGHEST FREQUENCY occurrence as per one or more population groups Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

19% 28% 26% 24% 26% 38% 36% 38% 44% 46%

73% 72%

57% 40% 58% 41% 17% 54% 67% 67% 64% 24% 57% 21% 57% 14% 0% 13% 10% 8% 6% 8% 9% 4% 3% 5% 0% 4% 6.4% 3.6% 0.8% 0.5% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 0.9% 1.7% 0.9% 2.2% 0.9% 2.7% Child labour preventing Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil Sexual harassment Sexual violence school attendance issues documents

AVERAGE FREQUENCY across population groups

19% 28% 26% 24% 26% 38% 36% 38% 44% 46% 73% 72%

71% 71% 50% 48% 69% 25% 61% 61% 72% 71% 26% 61% 10% 0% 3% 1% 1% 2% 0% 2% 5% 2% 1% 1% 6% 6% 0.4% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% Child labour preventing Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil Sexual harassment Sexual violence school attendance issues documents ii. Graphs showing percentage out of communities that were covered in the analysis, by population group

Persons with disabilities

57% 60% 63% 67% 70% 70% 80% 79% 77% 91% 92% 88%

36% 29% 19% 18% 8% 7% 36% 0% 37% 28% 12% 30% 18% 6% 2% 1% 1% 4% 0% 0% 4% 2% 0% 0% 2% 5% 0.0% 0.0% 1.3% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.4% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% Child labour preventing Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil Sexual harassment Sexual violence school attendance issues documents TARTOUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

ii. Graphs showing percentage out of communities that were covered in the analysis, by population group- contd

Men Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

30% 45% 39% 43% 62% 74% 74% 78% 82%

50% 63% 20% 34% 0% 59% 24% 56% 20% 15% 8% 4% 3% 4% 0% 2% 2% 1% 1% 3% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.8% 0.0% 0.5% 0.5% Domestic violence Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property issues Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil documents Sexual harassment Sexual violence

Women

22% 33% 29% 42% 46% 45% 48% 49%

82%

65% 41% 42% 53% 63% 65% 50% 0% 15% 53% 9% 9% 7% 4% 0% 3% 4% 3% 2% 2% 3.8% 0.9% 0.0% 0.4% 1.3% 0.5% 0.4% 0.0% 1.3% 1.4% Domestic violence Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property issues Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil documents Sexual harassment Sexual violence

Adolescent boys

29% 38% 52% 51% 64% 63% 75% 71% 73% 71% 71% 83%

57% 52% 21% 44% 30% 14% 22% 22% 13% 27% 0% 46% 25% 35% 8% 5% 6% 3% 2% 3% 0% 2% 5% 2% 2% 1% 0.8% 0.5% 3.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.5% 1.3% 0.4% 1.4% 0.9% Child labour preventing Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil Sexual harassment Sexual violence school attendance issues documents TARTOUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

ii. Graphs showing percentage out of communities that were covered in the analysis, by population group- contd

Adolescent girls Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

29% 33% 39% 52% 53% 61% 66% 66% 59% 75% 88% 83%

50% 38% 32% 32% 57% 30% 44% 64% 11% 14% 0% 23% 15% 32% 5% 6% 7% 7% 1% 4% 4% 0% 4% 1% 1% 1% 0.8% 0.0% 3.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 1.3% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 2.2% 1.8% Child labour preventing Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil Sexual harassment Sexual violence school attendance issues documents Boys

42% 55% 67% 70% 71% 70% 74% 75% 87% 89% 84%

42% 19% 26% 25% 25% 19% 12% 12% 10% 0% 42% 14% 31% 6% 4% 1% 1% 3% 0% 2% 4% 0% 1% 5% 0.0% 0.0% 2.6% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.4% 0.9% 1.3% 0.4% 1.4% 0.9% Child labour preventing Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil Sexual harassment Sexual violence school attendance documents Girls

45% 54% 67% 67% 74% 71% 68% 71% 83% 90% 84%

39% 23% 42% 29% 23% 23% 9% 12% 16% 26% 0% 15% 31% 7% 6% 3% 1% 1% 2% 0% 4% 3% 0% 1% 4.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.9% 0.4% 2.3% 0.9% Child labour preventing Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil Sexual harassment Sexual violence school attendance documents TARTOUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

c. Analysis per protection issue across population groups (with frequency of occurrence) CHILD LABOUR PREVENTING SCHOOL ATTENDANCE i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Jablah! Qteilbiyyeh Beit Yashout ! ! Dalyeh Tell ! LATTAKIA Salhib Muhradah !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! ! ! ! Jeb ! ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Banyas! ! ! ! Tawahin! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taleen ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !Hamam ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Rawda! ! ! ! Wasil ! HAMA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qumseyyeh! ! ! Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Baramanet! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmashayekh! ! ! ! ! ! ! S e a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi ! ! ! ! Sheikh ! ! El-oyoun ! ! ! ! Soda Badr! Mediterranean ! ! ! ! ! ! Khawabi ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jneinet ! ! Harbanifse ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir ! ! ! Raslan! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Halaqim ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish Oj ! ! ! ! ! !Sibbeh! Tartous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taldu ! Hamin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! P! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Mashta ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elhiu! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Arwad ! ! Ras ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qabu ! ! ! El-Khashufeh! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Safita ! ! Bariqiyeh! ! ! Kherbet ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Taldu ! ! ! ! Nasra Elmaaza ! ! ! Shin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hawash ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HOMS ! ! Sisniyyeh! ! ! ! !! ! ! Frequency of occurrence Safsafa ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Never happens ! ! ! ! ! ! Tall Sometimes ! ! Hadideh Kherbet ! Kalakh Tin Noor ! Hameidiyyeh ! Common issue ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Kareemeh Al Quasir ! Very common issue ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Not covered in analysis Al Quasir

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

28% 28% 29%

61% 70% 74% 80%

58% 57% 69%

32% 26% 23% 18% 14% 13% 3% 5% 4% 3% 2% 0.4% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Aggregated (average Aggregated (highest Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with frequency) frequency) disabilities TARTOUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

CHILD RECRUITMENT i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Jablah! Qteilbiyyeh Beit Yashout ! ! Dalyeh Tell ! LATTAKIA Salhib Muhradah !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! ! ! ! Jeb ! ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Banyas! ! ! ! Tawahin! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taleen ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !Hamam ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Rawda! ! ! ! Wasil ! HAMA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qumseyyeh! ! ! Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Baramanet! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmashayekh! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi ! ! ! ! Sheikh ! ! El-oyoun S e a ! ! ! ! Soda Badr! ! ! ! ! ! ! Khawabi ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jneinet ! ! Harbanifse Mediterranean ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir ! ! ! Raslan! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Halaqim ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish Oj ! ! ! ! ! !Sibbeh! Tartous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taldu ! Hamin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! P! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Mashta ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elhiu! ! Arwad ! ! !Ras ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qabu ! ! ! El-Khashufeh! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Safita ! ! Bariqiyeh! ! ! Kherbet ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Taldu ! ! ! ! Nasra Elmaaza ! ! ! Shin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hawash ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HOMS ! ! Sisniyyeh! ! ! ! !! ! ! Frequency of occurrence Safsafa ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Never happens ! ! ! ! ! ! Tall Sometimes ! ! Hadideh Kherbet ! Kalakh Tin Noor ! Hameidiyyeh ! Common issue ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Kareemeh Al Quasir ! Very common issue ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Not covered in analysis Al Quasir

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group) Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

73% 73% 75% 88% 87% 90% 91%

25% 24% 21% 11% 12% 9% 8% 1% 3% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0.0% 0.5% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Aggregated (average Aggregated (highest Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with disabilities frequency) frequency) TARTOUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

EARLY MARRIAGE i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Ja!blah Qteilbiyyeh Beit Yashout ! ! Dalyeh Tell ! LATTAKIA Salhib Muhradah !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! ! ! ! Jeb ! ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! B!anyas ! ! ! Taw!ahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taleen ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !Hamam ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! R!awda ! ! ! Wasil ! HAMA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qum!seyyeh ! ! Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Barama!net ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmashaye!kh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi ! ! ! ! Sheikh M e d i t e r r a n e a n ! ! El-oyoun ! ! ! ! Soda Badr! S e a ! ! ! ! ! ! Khawabi ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jneinet ! ! Harbanifse ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir ! ! ! Ra!slan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! R! a!slan! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Halaqim ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish Oj ! ! ! ! ! !Sib!beh Tartous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taldu ! Hamin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! P! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Mashta ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! E!lhiu! Arwad ! ! !Ras ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qabu ! ! ! El-Kh!ashufeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Safita ! ! Bariqiye!h ! ! Kherbet ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Taldu ! ! ! ! Nasra Elmaaza ! ! ! Shin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hawash ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HOMS ! ! S!isniyyeh ! ! ! !! ! ! Frequency of occurrence Safsafa ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Never happens ! ! ! ! ! ! Tall Sometimes ! ! Hadideh Kherbet ! Kalakh Tin Noor ! Hameidiyyeh ! Common issue ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Kareemeh Al Quasir ! ! Very common issue ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Not covered in analysis Al Quasir

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

38% 38% 39%

71% 83% 89% 92%

61% 57% 57%

27% 16% 10% 7% 1% 5% 2% 4% 1% 1% 1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Aggregated (average Aggregated (highest Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with disabilities frequency) frequency) TARTOUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

ECONOMIC EXPLOITATION i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Ja!blah Qteilbiyyeh Beit Yashout ! ! Dalyeh Tell ! LATTAKIA Salhib Muhradah !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! ! ! ! Jeb ! ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! B!anyas ! ! ! Taw!ahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taleen ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !Hamam ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! R!awda ! ! ! Wasil ! HAMA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qum!seyyeh ! ! Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Barama!net ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmashaye!kh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi ! ! ! ! Sheikh M e d i t e r r a n e a n ! ! El-oyoun ! ! ! ! Soda Badr! S e a ! ! ! ! ! ! Khawabi ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jneinet ! ! Harbanifse ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir ! ! ! Ra!slan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! R! a!slan! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Halaqim ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish Oj ! ! ! ! ! !Sib!beh Tartous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taldu ! Hamin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! P! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Mashta ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! E!lhiu! Arwad ! ! !Ras ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qabu ! ! ! El-Kh!ashufeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bariqiye!h ! Safita ! ! ! Kherbet! ! ! ! ! Taldu ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Nasra Elmaaza ! ! ! Shin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hawash ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HOMS ! S!isniyyeh ! ! ! !! ! Frequency of occurrence Safsafa ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Never happens ! ! ! ! ! ! Tall Sometimes ! ! Hadideh Kherbet ! Kalakh Tin Noor ! Hameidiyyeh ! Common issue ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Kareemeh Al Quasir ! ! Very common issue ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Not covered in analysis Al Quasir

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

36% 36% 45% 42% 52% 60% 66% 71% 71%

54% 61% 50% 53% 44% 36% 30% 25% 26% 8% 2% 4% 4% 3% 4% 3% 2% 4% 0.5% 1.4% 1.4% 0.9% 0.9% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest frequency) disabilities frequency) TARTOUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

EXPLOSIVE HAZARDS i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Ja!blah Qteilbiyyeh Beit Yashout ! ! Dalyeh Tell ! LATTAKIA Salhib Muhradah !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! ! ! ! Jeb ! ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! B!anyas ! ! ! Taw!ahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taleen ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !Hamam ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! R!awda ! ! ! Wasil ! HAMA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qum!seyyeh ! ! Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Barama!net ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmashaye!kh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi ! ! ! ! Sheikh M e d i t e r r a n e a n ! ! El-oyoun ! ! ! ! Soda Badr! S e a ! ! ! ! ! ! Khawabi ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jneinet ! ! Harbanifse ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir ! ! ! Ra!slan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! R! a!slan! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Halaqim ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish Oj ! ! ! ! ! !Sib!beh Tartous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taldu ! Hamin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! P! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Mashta ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! E!lhiu! Arwad ! ! !Ras ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qabu ! ! ! El-Kh!ashufeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Safita ! ! Bariqiye!h ! ! Kherbet ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Taldu ! ! ! ! Nasra Elmaaza ! ! ! Shin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hawash ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! Frequency of occurrence ! ! ! ! ! ! HOMS ! ! S!isniyyeh ! ! ! ! !! ! ! Never happens Safsafa ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sometimes ! ! ! ! ! ! Tall Common issue ! ! Hadideh Kherbet ! Kalakh Tin Noor ! Hameidiyyeh ! Very common issue ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Kareemeh Al Quasir ! ! Not covered in analysis ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Community in sub-district that has not reported high intensity conflict in last 2 years Al Quasir

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group) Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest frequency) disabilities frequency) TARTOUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

FAMILY SEPARATION i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Ja!blah Qteilbiyyeh Beit Yashout ! ! Dalyeh Tell ! LATTAKIA Salhib Muhradah !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! ! ! ! Jeb ! ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! B!anyas ! ! ! Taw!ahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taleen ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !Hamam ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! R!awda ! ! ! Wasil ! HAMA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qum!seyyeh ! ! Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Barama!net ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmashaye!kh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi ! ! ! ! Sheikh M e d i t e r r a n e a n ! ! El-oyoun ! ! ! ! Soda Badr! S e a ! ! ! ! ! ! Khawabi ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jneinet ! ! Harbanifse ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir ! ! ! Ra!slan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! R! a!slan! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Halaqim ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish Oj ! ! ! ! ! !Sib!beh Tartous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taldu ! Hamin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! P! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Mashta ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! E!lhiu! Arwad ! ! !Ras ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qabu ! ! ! El-Kh!ashufeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Safita ! ! Bariqiye!h ! ! Kherbet ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Taldu ! ! ! ! Nasra Elmaaza ! ! ! Shin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hawash ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HOMS ! ! S!isniyyeh ! ! ! !! ! ! Frequency of occurrence Safsafa ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Never happens ! ! ! ! ! ! Tall Sometimes ! ! Hadideh Kherbet ! Kalakh Tin Noor ! Hameidiyyeh ! Common issue ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Kareemeh Al Quasir ! ! Very common issue ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Not covered in analysis Al Quasir

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

26% 26% 33% 39% 51% 52% 55% 54% 63%

67% 72% 63% 59% 46% 44% 42% 42% 37%

6% 2% 2% 3% 2% 4% 2% 4% 0% 0.4% 0.4% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest frequency) disabilities frequency) TARTOUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

HARASSMENT i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Ja!blah Qteilbiyyeh Beit Yashout ! ! Dalyeh Tell ! LATTAKIA Salhib Muhradah !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! ! ! ! Jeb ! ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! B!anyas ! ! ! Taw!ahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taleen ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !Hamam ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! R!awda ! ! ! Wasil ! HAMA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qum!seyyeh ! ! Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Barama!net ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmashaye!kh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi ! ! ! ! Sheikh M e d i t e r r a n e a n ! ! El-oyoun ! ! ! ! Soda Badr! S e a ! ! ! ! ! ! Khawabi ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jneinet ! ! Harbanifse ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir ! ! ! Ra!slan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! R! a!slan! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Halaqim ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish Oj ! ! ! ! ! !Sib!beh Tartous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taldu ! Hamin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! P! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Mashta ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! E!lhiu! Arwad ! ! !Ras ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qabu ! ! ! El-Kh!ashufeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Safita ! ! Bariqiye!h ! ! Kherbet ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Taldu ! ! ! ! Nasra Elmaaza ! ! ! Shin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hawash ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HOMS ! ! S!isniyyeh ! ! ! !! ! ! Frequency of occurrence Safsafa ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Never happens ! ! ! ! ! ! Tall Sometimes ! ! Hadideh Kherbet ! Kalakh Tin Noor ! Hameidiyyeh ! Common issue ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Kareemeh Al Quasir ! ! Very common issue ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Not covered in analysis Al Quasir

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

24% 24% 29% 29%

64% 67% 67% 74% 70%

67% 71% 65% 30% 64% 24% 25% 29% 29% 8% 6% 5% 2% 4% 5% 4% 3% 4% 1.3% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 1.7% 0.0% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest frequency) disabilities frequency) TARTOUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

HOUSING, LAND AND PROPERTY ISSUES i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Ja!blah Qteilbiyyeh Beit Yashout ! ! Dalyeh Tell ! LATTAKIA Salhib Muhradah !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! ! ! ! Jeb ! ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! B!anyas ! ! ! Taw!ahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taleen ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !Hamam ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! R!awda ! ! ! Wasil ! HAMA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qum!seyyeh ! ! Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Barama!net ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmashaye!kh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi ! ! ! ! Sheikh M e d i t e r r a n e a n ! ! El-oyoun ! ! ! ! Soda Badr! S e a ! ! ! ! ! ! Khawabi ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jneinet ! ! Harbanifse ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir ! ! ! Ra!slan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! R! a!slan! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Halaqim ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish Oj ! ! ! ! ! !Sib!beh Tartous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taldu ! Hamin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! P! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Mashta ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! E!lhiu! Arwad ! ! !Ras ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qabu ! ! ! El-Kh!ashufeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Safita ! ! Bariqiye!h ! ! Kherbet ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Taldu ! ! ! ! Nasra Elmaaza ! ! ! Shin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hawash ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HOMS ! ! S!isniyyeh ! ! !! ! ! Frequency of occurrence Safsafa ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Never happens ! ! ! ! ! ! Tall Sometimes ! ! Hadideh Kherbet ! Kalakh Tin Noor ! Hameidiyyeh ! Common issue ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Kareemeh Al Quasir ! ! Very common issue ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Not covered in analysis Al Quasir

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

26% 26% 30% 46%

73% 75% 70%

64% 71% 63% 50%

25% 23% 28% 9% 8% 2% 3% 2% 1% 2% 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% Aggregated (average Aggregated (highest Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Persons with disabilities frequency) frequency) TARTOUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

KIDNAPPING i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Ja!blah Qteilbiyyeh Beit Yashout ! ! Dalyeh Tell ! LATTAKIA Salhib Muhradah !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! ! ! Jeb ! ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! B!anyas ! ! ! Taw!ahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taleen ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !Hamam ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! R!awda ! ! ! Wasil ! HAMA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qum!seyyeh ! ! Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Barama!net ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmashaye!kh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi ! ! ! ! Sheikh M e d i t e r r a n e a n ! ! El-oyoun ! ! ! ! Soda Badr! S e a ! ! ! ! ! ! Khawabi ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jneinet ! ! Harbanifse ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir ! ! ! Ra!slan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! R! a!slan! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Halaqim ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish Oj ! ! ! ! ! !Sib!beh Tartous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taldu ! Hamin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! P! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Mashta ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! E!lhiu! Arwad ! ! !Ras ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qabu ! ! ! El-Kh!ashufeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Safita ! ! Bariqiye!h ! ! Kherbet ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Taldu ! ! ! ! Nasra Elmaaza ! ! ! Shin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hawash ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HOMS ! ! S!isniyyeh ! ! ! !! ! ! Frequency of occurrence Safsafa ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Never happens ! ! ! ! ! ! Tall Sometimes ! ! Hadideh Kherbet ! Kalakh Tin Noor ! Hameidiyyeh ! Common issue ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Kareemeh Al Quasir ! ! Very common issue ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Not covered in analysis Al Quasir

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

72% 72% 74% 82% 83% 83% 84% 84% 88%

21% 20% 26% 15% 14% 15% 14% 15% 12% 4% 4% 1% 2% 2% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0.4% 2.2% 1.8% 0.4% 1.3% 0.9% 1.3% 0.9% 0.4% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest frequency) disabilities frequency) TARTOUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

LACK/LOSS OF CIVIL DOCUMENTS i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Ja!blah Qteilbiyyeh Beit Yashout ! ! Dalyeh Tell ! LATTAKIA Salhib Muhradah !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! ! ! ! Jeb ! ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! B!anyas ! ! ! Taw!ahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taleen ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !Hamam ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! R!awda ! ! ! Wasil ! HAMA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qum!seyyeh ! ! Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Barama!net ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmashaye!kh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi ! ! ! ! Sheikh M e d i t e r r a n e a n ! ! El-oyoun ! ! ! ! Soda Badr! S e a ! ! ! ! ! ! Khawabi ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jneinet ! ! Harbanifse ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir ! ! ! Ra!slan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! R! a!slan! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Halaqim ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish Oj ! ! ! ! ! !Sib!beh Tartous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taldu ! Hamin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! P! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Mashta ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! E!lhiu! Arwad ! ! !Ras ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qabu ! ! ! El-Kh!ashufeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Safita ! ! Bariqiye!h ! ! Kherbet ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Taldu ! ! ! ! Nasra Elmaaza ! ! ! Shin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hawash ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HOMS ! ! S!isniyyeh ! ! !! ! ! Frequency of occurrence Safsafa ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Never happens ! ! ! ! ! ! Tall Sometimes ! ! Hadideh Kherbet ! Kalakh Tin Noor ! Hameidiyyeh ! Common issue ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Kareemeh Al Quasir ! ! Very common issue ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Not covered in analysis Al Quasir

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

38% 38% 43% 45% 63% 66% 67% 67% 70%

61% 57% 56% 53% 35% 32% 31% 31% 30%

1% 4% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.9% 0.4% 0.4% 0.0% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest disabilities frequency) frequency) TARTOUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE i. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

19% 19% 22% 38% 33% 42% 45% 57% 62%

57% 71% 65% 50% 52% 42% 39% 36% 34% 17% 9% 14% 12% 12% 10% 8% 6% 3% 4.3% 0.9% 6.4% 3.8% 3.0% 3.0% 2.6% 1.3% 0.0% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest frequency) disabilities frequency)

SEXUAL VIOLENCE i. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

46% 46% 49% 59% 71% 75% 71% 82% 77%

41% 42% 22% 32% 23% 48% 15% 19% 19% 10% 7% 7% 6% 3% 6% 5% 6% 5% 1.8% 0.0% 2.7% 0.5% 1.4% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest disabilities frequency) frequency)

SEXUAL HARASSMENT i. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

44% 44% 48% 53% 71% 68% 78% 74% 79%

40% 41% 38% 23% 50% 22% 19% 13% 20% 18% 9% 5% 7% 6% 7% 6% 1% 2% 2.2% 0.4% 3.6% 0.5% 1.3% 1.4% 1.4% 2.3% 0.9% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest disabilities frequency) frequency) TARTOUS GOVERNORATE COPING MECHANISMS

5. COPING MECHANISMS i. Analysis coverage Number of communities covered in the analysis and number of communities reporting use of coping mechanism (i.e. used at least “sometimes” or more)

Total number of communities in Governorate Covered in the analysis Reported as used (at least sometimes) 459

238 239 239 238 232 237 220 219 203 185 180 181 148 115 121 59 0 Begging Children dropping out of Engaging in illegal Restricting movements of Relying on humanitarian Accessing community Local/community support Early marriage school to work activities (i.e theft, women and girls assistance services (community smuggling) centres, women centres)

ii. Percentage of covered communities reporting the use of coping mechanisms by frequency of occurrence Across population groups Graph a: Taking the highest frequency of occurrence at community level

0% 0% 3% 4% 15% 23% Never used 38% 64% 52% 48% Always used 66% 57% 73% Sometimes used 63% 55% Commonly used

Commonly used 43% 44% Sometimes used

Always used 40% 23% 32% Never used 17% 4% 11% 7% 6% 3% 4% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% Begging Children Early marriage Engaging in Restricting Relying on Accessing community Local/community dropping out of illegal activities movements of humanitarian services (community support school to work (i.e theft, women and girls assistance centres, women smuggling) centres)

Graph b: Taking the average frequency of occurrence at community level

0% 1% 15% 6% 7% 23% Never used 38% 52% 48% Always used 73% Sometimes used 69% 75% Commonly used 67%

Commonly used Sometimes used

Always used 67% 56% 46% Never used 44% 23% 16% 24% 10% 18% 4% 6% 6% 3% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% Begging Children Early marriage Engaging in Restricting Relying on Accessing community Local/community dropping out of illegal activities movements of humanitarian services (community support school to work (i.e theft, women and girls assistance centres, women smuggling) centres) TARTOUS GOVERNORATE COPING MECHANISMS

ii. Percentage of covered communities reporting the use of coping mechanisms by frequency of occurrence -contd By population groups

Men 0% 1% 3% 4% 19% 49% Never used 59% 59% Always used 65% Sometimes used Commonly used

Commonly used Sometimes used 67% 43% 38% 38% 29% Always used 11% Never used 3% 6% 0% 2% 3% Begging Engaging in illegal Relying on Accessing community Local/community activities (i.e theft, humanitarian services (community support smuggling) assistance centres, women centres)

Women 0% 1% 15% 8% 7%

Never used 63% Always used 74% 75% 66% Sometimes used 73% Commonly used

Commonly used Sometimes used 68% 26% Always used 33% 23% 22% 13% 18% Never used 4% 3% 2% 0% 0% 0% 3% Begging Engaging in Restricting Relying on Accessing community Local/community illegal activities movements of humanitarian services (community support (i.e theft, women and girls assistance centres, women smuggling) centres)

Boys 0% 1% 6% 6% 24% 31% Never used 62% 70% 73% 58% Always used 64% Sometimes used Commonly used

Commonly used 52% Sometimes used 64% 22% 35% 29% 33% 28% 15% Always used 11% Never used 4% 1% 4% 1% 0% 0% 1% 3% Begging Children Early marriage Engaging in Relying on Accessing Local/community dropping out of illegal activities humanitarian community services support school to work (i.e theft, assistance (community centres, smuggling) women centres)

Graph d: Girls 0% 0% 7% 7% 30% 39% Never used 57% 65% Always used 79% 75% 61% 67% Sometimes used Commonly used

Commonly used Sometimes used 53% 54% 31% Always used 31% 40% 19% 22% 14% 26% Never used 3% 3% 7% 2% 3% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% Begging Children dropping Early marriage Engaging in Restricting Relying on Accessing Local/community out of school to illegal activities movements of humanitarian community services support work (i.e theft, women and girls assistance (community centres, smuggling) women centres) iii. Map of top three coping mechanisms used per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)

NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, based on the percentage of communities reporting each option as occurring sometimes or more. They are NOT indicative of the frequency/severity of occurrence. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows more than three options, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentage of communities. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows less than three options, it means that only displayed options were reported.

Ja! blah Beit Yashout ! Qteilbiyyeh COPING MECHANISMS USED PER SUB-DISTRI!CT Dalyeh ! Tell Muhradah ! ! ! ! LATTAKIA Salhib ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ban! yas! Anaza! ! Jeb ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! Taleen ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qumseyy!eh ! H! amam ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! W! asil ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Baramanet Rawda ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA ! Elmashayekh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sh!eikh ! ! Wadi M e d i t e r r a n e a n ! ! ! ! Badr ! El-oyoun S e a ! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir ! ! ! ! ! Sod!a ! ! Harbanifse !! ! ! Raslan ! ! Ein Khawa! bi ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Halaqim ! ! ! ! J! n!einet! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Ras!lan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sibb! eh ! ! ! ! Oj ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taldu H!amin Dreiki!sh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tartous ! R! as ! ! ! Mashta ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Arwad ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elhiu Qabu ! ! ! El-Khashufeh! Kherbet ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ba! riqiyeh ! ! ! Elm! aaza ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Nasra Safita! ! Shin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sisniy!yeh HOMS ! ! ! Hawash ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Safsafa ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! Hameidiyy!eh ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! Kare! emeh Tall ! ! Hadideh Kherbet ! Kalakh ! ! Tin Noor ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Al Quasir

Coping mechanisms used (Top 3 reported by most % communities in the sub-district)

Begging Children dropping out of school to work Early marriage Engaging in illegal activities (i.e theft, smuggling) Restricting movements of women and girls Relying on humanitarian assistance Communities where coping mechanisms used are Accessing community services (community centres, women centres) ! Covered Local/community support ! Not covered in the analysis TARTOUS GOVERNORATE MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS

6. MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS

YES (movement restrictions are NO reported as (movement occurring) restrictions are not 73 reported as 35% occurring) 138 65% a.Causes of movement restrictions i. Analysis coverage Number of communities covered by the analysis and number of communities reporting causes of movement restrictions as occurring

Covered in the analysis Reported as occurring (as least sometimes) Total number of communities in the Governorate 459

209 209 206 207 208 208 208 209

16 52 6 20 48 16 20 28 0 Activities of armed Checkpoints Curfews General violence Lack of identity Presence of explosive Rules imposed by Screening processes groups documents hazards concerned authorities

ii. Percentage of communities reporting causes of movement restrictions (by frequency of occurrence)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

74% 76% 86% 91% 95% 89% 91% 89%

17% 21% 6% 6% 8% 5% 9% 10% 1% 0%2% 1% 2% 2% 0% 3% 0.9% 1.9% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% Activities of armed Checkpoints Curfews General violence Lack of identity Presence of Rules imposed by Screening processes groups documents explosive hazards concerned authorities iii. Percentage of communities reporting specific causes, out of those reporting occurrence of movement restrictions

Checkpoints 73%

Lack of identity documents 69%

Screening processes 39%

General violence 29%

Rules imposed by concerned authorities 29%

Presence of explosive hazards 23%

Activities of armed groups 23%

Curfews 9% iv. Map of top three causes of movement restrictions per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)

J!ablah Beit ! Dalyeh CAUSES OF MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS PER SU! B-DISTQRtIeCilTbiyyeh Yashout ! Tell ! ! ! L! ATTAKIA Salhib Muhradah ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ban! yas! Anaza ! ! Jeb ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taleen ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qa!dmous ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! ! Hamam ! Rawda ! HAMA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wasil ! ! ! Qumseyyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sheikh ! Baramanet ! ! ! S! oda ! ! ! ! ! Badr Elmashayekh ! ! Khawabi ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi n ! ! ! ! TARTOUS ! a ! ! ! El-oyoun ! ! ! ! ! e ! ! Harbanifse ! ! ! !! ! ! !

n ! ! ! ! ! Ein ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Halaqim a ! ! ! Dwe! ir Raslan r ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

e ! r ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! e S ! ! ! Sibbeh ! Jneinet ! ! t ! ! ! ! ! Oj i ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taldu Ham! in Rasla!n ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! d ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ras ! e ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dr!eikish ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! El-Khashufeh M Mashta ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tartous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Arwad ! ! ! ! ! Elhiu ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qabu ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ba! riqiyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Nasra ! ! Shin ! ! ! ! ! Safita ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sisni!yyeh Kherbet Elma!aza ! Hawash ! ! Safsafa ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HOMS !! ! ! Hameidiyy!eh ! ! ! ! ! Kherbet

! ! ! Tin Noor ! Kare! emeh Tall ! ! Hadideh ! Kalakh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Al Quasir

Causes of movement restrictions (Top 3 reported by most General violence % communities Lack of identity documents in the sub-district) Communities where movement restrictions were Presence of explosive hazards Activities of armed groups ! Reported Rules imposed by concerned authorities Checkpoints ! NOT reported Screening processes Curfews ! Not covered in analysis TARTOUS GOVERNORATE MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS

b. Population groups affected by movement restrictions i. Analysis coverage Number of communities covered by the analysis and number of communities reporting population groups affected by movement restrictions (by occurrence)

Covered in the analysis Reported as occurring (as least sometimes) Total number of communities in Syria 459

207 208 207 207 206 206 206 206 206

18 35 29 36 27 41 48 42 25 0 Persons with Girls (<18) moving Girls (<18) moving Women moving Women moving with Boys (<18) Men People without civil IDPs disabilities alone with a companion alone a companion documentation

ii. Percentage of communities reporting population groups affected by movement restrictions (by frequency of occurrence)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

75% 82% 81% 78% 78% 90% 84% 85% 86%

16% 19% 14% 10% 13% 9% 18% 8% 9% 0% 2% 2% 4% 2% 2% 3% 2% 1% 1.4% 1.4% 0.9% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 1.4% Persons with Girls (<18) moving Girls (<18) moving Women moving alone Women moving with a Boys (<18) Men People0.0% without civil IDPs disabilities alone with a companion companion documentation

iii. Percentage of communities reporting specific affected population groups, out of those reporting occurrence of movement restrictions

Men 71%

People without civil documentation 62%

Boys (<18) 60%

Women moving alone 52%

Girls (<18) moving alone 50%

Girls (<18) moving with a companion 42%

Women moving with a companion 40%

IDPs 37% iv. Map of top three population groups affected by movement restrictions per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)

Ja! blah Beit ! Dalyeh POPULATION GROUPS AFFECTED BY MOVEMEN! T RESTRQICteTilbIOiyNyeSh PER SYUasBh-oDuItSTRICT ! Tell ! ! ! ! LATTAKIA Salhib Muhradah ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ban! yas! Anaza ! ! Jeb ! Tawahin ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taleen ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! ! Hamam ! Rawda ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wasil ! ! Qumseyyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sheikh ! Baramanet ! ! ! S! oda ! ! ! ! ! Badr Elmashayekh ! ! ! Khawabi ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA ! ! Wadi n ! ! ! ! TARTOUS ! a ! ! ! El-oyoun ! ! ! ! ! e ! ! Harbanifse ! ! ! !! ! ! !

n ! ! ! ! ! Ein ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Halaqim a ! ! ! ! Dwe! ir Raslan r ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! e r ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! e S ! ! ! ! Sibbeh Jneinet ! ! t ! ! ! ! Oj i ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taldu Ham! in Rasla!n ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! d ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! e Ras ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dr!eikish ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! El-Kh!ashu!feh ! ! ! M ! Mashta ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tartous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Arwad ! ! ! ! ! Elhiu ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qabu ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ba! riqiyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Nasra ! ! Shin ! ! ! ! ! ! Safita ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sisni!yyeh Kherbet Elma!aza ! ! Hawash ! Safsafa ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HOMS ! ! !! ! ! Hameidiyy!eh ! ! ! ! ! Kherbet

! ! ! Tin Noor ! Kare! emeh Tall ! ! Hadideh ! Kalakh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Al Quasir

Population groups affected by movement restrictions (Top 3 reported by most % communities Girls moving with a companion in the sub-district) Women moving alone Communities where movement restrictions were Women moving with a companion Men ! Reported Persons without civil documentation Boys ! NOT reported IDPs Girls moving alone ! Not covered in analysis Persons with disabilities TARTOUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION SERVICES

7. PROTECTION SERVICES

i. Analysis coverage (Number of communities covered by the analysis and number of communities reporting needs of protection services (i.e. “present but insufficient” or “not present but needed")

Covered in the analysis Reported as needed Total number of communities in the Govrenorate 459

241237 239233 234 238 240 241 235 234 226 227 228 225 218 224 222 209 197 153 125 120 112 106

0 Care mechanisms for Services for persons Community centres Women and girls Recreational activitiesProtection services for Psychosocial support Explosive hazard risk Psychosocial support Medical treatment for Legal services for civil Legal services for elderly persons with disabilities centres children services education for sexual/domestic sexual/domestic documentation Housing, Land and violence survivors violence survivors Property issues

ii. Percentage of communities reporting presence and needs of protection services across population groups Across population groups Graph a: Taking the most severe status of needs and presence

Needed but not present Present but insufficient Present and sufficient Not present and not needed

0%3% 1% 3% 5% 2% 0% 0%3% 0%1% 0%3% 4% 10% 5% 6% 18% 24% 15% 29% 26% 24% 31% 21% 30% 43% 35% 44% 21% 19% 17% 15% 17% 83% 37% 72% 34% 66% 68% 69% 64% 59% 52% 46% 41%

18% 18%

Community centres Women and girls Explosive hazard risk Legal services for civil Legal services for Psychosocial support Psychosocial support Medical treatment for Protection services for Recreational activities Care Services for persons centres education documentation Housing, Land and services for survivors of sexual survivors of sexual children mechanisms/services with disabilities Property issues violence/domestic violence/domestic for elderly persons violence violence

Graph b: Taking the average status of needs and presence

3%0% 1% 3% 2% 0% 0% 0%1% 3%0% 4% 10% 5% 6% 6% 5% 18% 24% 15% 27% 33% 35% 21% 36% 46% 36% 35% 48% 22% 19% 19% 19% 20% 83% 68% 35% 32% 64% 61% 57% 58% 59% 49% 41% 37% 17% 16%

Community centres Women and girls Explosive hazard risk Legal services for Legal services for Psychosocial support Psychosocial support Medical treatment for Protection services Recreational activities Care Services for persons centres education civil documentation Housing, Land and services for survivors of sexual survivors of sexual for children mechanisms/services with disabilities Property issues violence/domestic violence/domestic for elderly persons violence violence TARTOUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION SERVICES

ii. Percentage of communities reporting presence and needs of protection services across population groups - contd By population group

Men Needed but not present Present but insufficient Present and sufficient Not present and not needed

1% 3% 2% 1%0% 0% 6% 4% 7% 6% 4% 13% 16% 21% 28% 15% 30% 22% 32% 44% 47% 30% 22% 22% 19% 16% 17% 16% 36% 32%

37% 63% 50% 17% 17% 61% 40% 56% 82% 63%

Community centres Explosive hazard risk Legal services for civil Legal services for Psychosocial support Psychosocial support for Medical treatment for Recreational activities Care Services for persons with education documentation Housing, Land and services survivors of sexual survivors of sexual mechanisms/services for disabilities Property issues violence/domestic violence/domestic elderly persons violence violence

Women 5%0% 1% 3% 2% 1% 0%1% 3%0% 4% 12% 6% 9% 7% 19% 24% 16% 28% 33% 37% 22% 26% 47% 46% 35% 21% 21% 17% 17% 17%

33% 33% 37% 57% 67% 49% 17% 14% 54% 43% 66% 83% 64%

Community centres Women and girls Explosive hazard risk Legal services for civil Legal services for Psychosocial support Psychosocial support Medical treatment for Recreational activities Care Services for persons centres education documentation Housing, Land and services for survivors of sexual survivors of sexual mechanisms/services with disabilities Property issues violence/domestic violence/domestic for elderly persons violence violence

Boys Needed but not present Present but insufficient Present and sufficient Not present and not needed 0% 3% 2% 0% 0% 0% 4% 10% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 19% 26% 36% 21% 39% 47% 37% 35% 44% 47% 22% 18% 18% 18% 17%

34% 32% 39%

59% 50% 17% 13% 55% 41% 58% 50% 58%

Community centres Explosive hazard risk Legal services for civil Legal services for Psychosocial support Psychosocial support for Medical treatment for Protection services for Recreational activities Services for persons with education documentation Housing, Land and services survivors of sexual survivors of sexual children disabilities Property issues violence/domestic violence/domestic violence violence

Girls 0% 1% 3% 2% 1% 0% 3%0% 5% 4% 10% 8% 9% 6% 6% 18% 25% 27% 22% 37% 38% 46% 35% 46% 40% 23% 43% 19% 18% 18% 16% 35% 33% 39% 57% 68% 50% 17% 13% 50% 41% 58% 50% 60%

Community centres Women and girls Explosive hazard risk Legal services for civil Legal services for Psychosocial support Psychosocial support Medical treatment for Protection services for Recreational activities Services for persons centres education documentation Housing, Land and services for survivors of sexual survivors of sexual children with disabilities Property issues violence/domestic violence/domestic violence violence iii. Map of top three protection services needed per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting need)

NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, based on the percentage of communities reporting each option as needed irrespective of presence. They are NOT indicative of the severity of need. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows more than three options, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentage of communities. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows less than three options, it means that only displayed options were reported.

J!ablah Beit Yashout ! Qteilbiyyeh HAMA PROTECTION SERVICES NEEDED PER SUB-D! ISTRICT Dalyeh Tell ! Muhradah ! Salhib ! LATTAKIA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza Ban!yas! ! ! Jeb ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taleen ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qumseyy!eh ! H! amam ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! W! asil ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Baramanet Rawd! a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmashayekh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sheikh Wadi ! ! ! Badr ! Jneinet ! ! ! Soda El-oyoun ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan !! ! ! Kh! awabi ! ! ! ! ! ! Harbanifse ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! D!weir ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ras! lan ! ! ! ! Ein ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Halaqim ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sibbeh Oj ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! H!amin ! ! ! Taldu ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikis!h ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ras El-Khashufeh ! ! ! Mashta! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tartous! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Arwad ! ! ! ! ! ! Elhiu ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qabu ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bariqiyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Kherbet ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Nasra Saf!ita ! Shin ! ! ! Elm! aaza ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! M e d i t e r r a n e a n ! ! ! ! Hawash ! Sisniyyeh S e a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Safsafa ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HOMS ! ! ! ! !! ! ! Hameidiyye! h ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! Tall ! ! Hadideh ! Kalakh ! ! ! Kherbet ! ! ! ! Tin Noor ! ! ! ! ! ! ! K!areemeh Al Quasir

Protection services needed Psychosocial support services (Top 3 reported by most % communities Psychosocial support for survivors of sexual violence/domestic violence in the sub-district) Medical treatment for sexual/domestic violence survivors Community centres Protection services for children Communities where protection services are Women and girls centres ! Recreational activities Reported as needed Explosive hazard risk education ! Care mechanisms for elderly persons NOT reported as needed Legal services for civil documentation ! Services for persons with disabilities Not covered in analysis Legal services for Housing, Land and Property issues TARTOUS GOVERNORATE CONCERNS WITH HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE

8. CONCERNS/PROBLEMS DURING DELIVERY OF HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE

YES (concerns with humanitarian NO (concerns with assistance are humanitarian reported as assistance are not occurring), 87 , reported as 37% occurring) 151 , 63%

i. Analysis coverage

Number of communities covered by the analysis and number of communities reporting concerns regarding how humanitarian assistance was delivered in the last three months (by occurrence)

Covered in the analysis Reported as occurring (at least sometimes) Number of communities in the Governorate 87 reporting concerns with humanitarian assistance 86 79 78 80 77 72 66 65 54

26 25 20 0 Assistance given is not what the Discrimination/exclusion Request for civil documentation to Sexual harassment Humanitarian assistance is not Request of sexual favour/ community needs access assistance free/ Money is asked in exchange exploitation in exchange for for assistance humanitarian assistance

ii. Number of covered communities reporting concerns reg. the way humanitarian assistance was delivered in the last 3 months by frequency of occurrence a. Across population groups (For categories which required aggregation, highest frequency was adopted)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes

52 47

14 9 48 21 24 18 9 4 4 6 -2 2 1 1 - Assistance given is not what the Request for civil documentation Discrimination/exclusion Sexual harassment Humanitarian assistance is not Request of sexual favour/ community needs to access assistance free/ Money is asked in exploitation in exchange for exchange for assistance humanitarian assistance TARTOUS GOVERNORATE CONCERNS WITH HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE ii. Number of covered communities reporting concerns reg. the way humanitarian assistance was delivered in the last 3 months by frequency of occurrence - contd b. By population groups

Humanitarian assistance is not free/ Money is asked in Request of sexual favour/ exploitation in exchange for humanitarian exchange for assistance assistance

17 17 23 24 16 19 19 10

2 1 1 -- 1 2 1 --1 1 ---- Boys Girls Men Women Boys Girls Men Women

Request for civil documentation to access assistance Sexual harassment

46 47 35 36 19 20 15 8 10 8 7 7 3 3 3 7 7 9 9 2 - 1 - 1 Boys Girls Men Women Boys Girls Men Women

iii. Number of covered communities having reported discrimination as a concern reg. the way humanitarian assistance was delivered in the last three months identifying population groups affected by discrimination

Women head of household 26

Widows 25

Old persons 23

Divorced women 20

Women living alone 20

Boys head of household 15

Girls head of household 15

Unaccompanied girls 13

Men living alone 10

Unaccompanied boys 7

Persons with disabilities (HA) 6 iv. Map of top three concerns with delivery of humanitarian assistance in the last three months per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)

Ja!blah Beit ! CONCERNS WITH DELIVERY OF HUMANITARI!AN ASSISQTtAeiNlbCiyEye PhER SUB-DYISasThRoIuCt T Muhradah ! Tell ! Dalyeh ! ! LATTAKIA Salhib ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza !Ban! yas! ! ! ! ! Jeb ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taleen ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA ! ! ! ! Q! umseyyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! H!amam ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! W! asil ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Baramanet Rawda ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmashayekh

n ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! a ! ! ! ! ! Wadi ! ! e ! ! ! Sheikh ! El-oyoun ! ! n ! Badr ! ! ! Soda ! ! ! a ! ! ! ! ! ! a ! Khawabi ! r ! Harbanifse ! Jneinet ! ! ! ! ! Ein

r e ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS ! ! ! ! ! ! Ra!slan ! ! ! Halaqim

e ! ! ! ! S ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir ! ! ! t ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! i ! ! ! Raslan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! d ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA ! ! ! ! Sib!beh e ! ! ! Oj ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taldu H!amin ! ! ! M ! ! Dreikish ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ras El-Khashufeh ! ! ! Mashta! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tartous ! ! ! ! ! Arwad ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elhiu ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qabu ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bariqiyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Kherbet ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Nasra Safita! ! Shin ! ! ! Elm! aaza ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hawash ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sisniyyeh ! ! ! HOMS ! ! ! Safsafa ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! Hameidiyye! h ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! Tall ! Karee!meh Hadideh ! Kalakh ! ! ! Kherbet ! ! ! ! Tin Noor ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Al Quasir

Concerns with delivery of humanitarian assistance (Top 3 reported by most % communities in the sub-district)

Assistance given is not what the community needs Request for civil documentation to access assistance Humanitarian assistance is not free/ Money is asked in exchange for assistance Communities where concerns with delivery of humanitarian assistance are ! Request of sexual favour/ exploitation in exchange for humanitarian assistance Reported ! Sexual harassment NOT reported

! Discrimination/exclusion Not covered in analysis TARTOUS GOVERNORATE CIVIL DOCUMENTATION

9. CIVIL DOCUMENTATION

a. Reasons for not having civil documentation i. Percentage of communities identifying a specific reason for not having civil documentation, out of those reporting the occurrence of lack/loss of civil documentation

NO (lack/loss of Lost 60% documentation is not reported Left behind when fleeing 44% as occurring) 88 YES , 38% (lack/loss of Expired document 41% documentatio n is reported Didn’t attempt to obtain it 35% as occurring) Concerns of approaching authority 35% 142 , 62% Could not afford it 35%

Never had it 26%

Another family member has possession of it 24%

Confiscated 14%

Counselling/legal services not available 6%

GoS Services not available 6% b. Type of document that is not possible to be obtained in the community i. Percentage of communities identifying a specific document that was not possible to obtain in the community, out of those reporting the occurrence of lack/loss of civil documentation

Passport 39%

Travel authorisation document 35%

Marriage Certificate 27%

Deed/Tabou 23%

Disability ID 23%

Syrian ID 17%

Family Booklet 12%

Birth Certificate 10%

Divorce record 8%

Residence support document 7%

Civil record (extract) 6%

Approval for lease agreement 6%

Death Certificate 6% c. Impact of not having civil documentation i. Percentage of communities identifying a specific impact of not having civil documents,out of those reporting the occurrence of lack/loss of civil documentation

Restricted freedom of movement 73%

Cannot register birth/marriage/death 60%

Unable to access humanitarian assistance 54%

Cannot claim property 48%

Cannot register land/access transactions 43%

Unable to access basic services 43%

Arrest 35% d. Map of top three reasons for not having civil documentation, per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)

NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illu s trate the top three options reported in the s u b-dis trict, bas ed on the percentage of commu nities reporting each option as occu rring s ometimes or more. They are NOT indicative of the frequ ency/s everity of occu rrence. In s u b-dis tricts where the pie chart s hows more than three options , it means that all dis played options were reported by the s ame percentage of commu nities . In s u b-dis tricts where the pie chart s hows les s than three options , it means that only dis played options were reported.

J!ablah Beit REASONS FOR NOT HAVING CIVIL DO! CUMENTATQItOeiNlb iyPyEehR SUB-DISTRICT ! Yas hou t Mu hradah ! Tell ! Dalyeh ! LATTAKIA Salhib ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza Ban! yas! ! ! Jeb ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taleen ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmou s! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qu ms eyy!eh H! amam ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! W! as il Mas yaf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Baramanet Rawd! a ! ! ! ! ! ! n ! Elmas hayekh !

a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA e ! ! Wadi ! ! ! ! Sheikh n ! El-oyou n ! ! Badr ! a ! ! ! Soda Jneinet ! a ! ! ! r ! ! ! ! !! ! Kh! awabi Ras lan Harbanifs e

e r ! Ein ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! e TARTOUS

S ! ! ! ! ! ! Dw! eir ! ! Halaqim t ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! i ! ! ! ! ! Ras! lan ! ! ! ! ! ! d ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA e ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sibbeh Oj ! ! ! ! ! M ! ! ! ! ! Taldu H!amin Dreikis h! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ras El-Khas hu feh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tartou s ! ! ! ! ! Mas hta ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Arwad ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elhiu ! ! ! ! Qabu Kherbet ! ! ! ! ! ! ! B!ariqiyeh ! ! ! Elm! aaza ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Nas ra Saf!ita ! Shin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hawas h ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sis niyyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! Safs afa ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HOMS Hameidiyye! h ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! Tall ! Karee! meh Hadideh ! Kalakh ! ! ! Kherbet ! ! ! ! Tin Noor ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Al Qu as ir

Reasons for not having civil documentation Didn’t attempt to obtain it (Top 3 reported by most Another family member has pos s es s ion of it % communities in the sub-district) Expired docu ment Concerns of approaching au thority Communities where lack/loss of civil documentation is Cou ld not afford it GoS Services not available ! Reported Confis cated Cou ns elling/legal s ervices not available ! NOT reported Left behind when fleeing Never had it ! Not covered in analys is Los t ii. Map of top three types of documents that are not possible to obtain in the community, per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)

Ja! blah Beit ! Dalyeh TYPES OF DOCUMENTS NOT POSSIBLE TO OBT!AIN PERQ tSeiUlbBiy-yDeIhSTRICT Yashout ! Tell ! ! ! L! ATTAKIA Salhib Muhradah ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ban! yas! Anaza ! ! Jeb ! Tawahin ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Taleen ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! ! Hamam ! Rawda ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wasil ! ! Qumseyyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sheikh ! Baramanet ! ! ! S! oda ! ! ! ! ! Badr Elmashayekh ! ! ! Khawabi ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA ! ! Wadi n ! ! ! ! TARTOUS ! a ! ! ! El-oyoun ! ! ! ! ! e ! ! Harbanifse ! ! ! !! ! ! !

! ! ! Tin Noor ! Kare! emeh Tall ! ! Hadideh ! Kalakh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Al Quasir

Types of documents that are not possible to obtain (Top 3 reported Divorce record Passport by most % communities Family Booklet Travel authorisation document in the sub-district) Communities where lack/loss of civil documention is Death Certificate Approval for lease agreement ! Reported Birth Certificate Disability ID Deed/Tabou ! NOT reported Civil record (extract) Syrian ID Residence support document ! Marriage Certificate Not covered in analysis TARTOUS GOVERNORATE HOUSING, LAND AND PROPERTY ISSUES

10. HOUSING, LAND AND PROPERTY ISSUES

NO (HLP a.Concerns regarding Housing, land and property (HLP) issues are not reported as i. Percentage of communities, identifying specific HLP concerns, by frequency of occurrence, out of those occurring) , 58 , 26% reporting the occurrence of HLP issues. YES (HLP Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens issues are reported as occurring), 13% 162 , 74% 31% 46% 50% 55% 50% 49% 65% 63% 66%

62% 48% 47% 43% 46% 48% 31% 32% 17% 4% 5% 2% 5% 2% 3% 3% 5% 0.0% 0.7% 0.7% 3.3% 2.6% 0.7% 0.7% 0.0% 0.7% Damage of land Looting of private Property is Disputed Rental disputes No housing Lack of Rules and Cannot or property property unlawfully ownership (landlord/tenant available documents processes on access/lost occupied by problems) housing and land access housing others not clear or because can changing afford it

ii. Map of top three HLP concerns per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence) NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, based on the percentage of communities reporting each option as occurring sometimes or more. They are NOT indicative of the frequency/severity of occurrence. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows more than three options, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentage of communities. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows less than three options, it means that only displayed options were reported.

Ja!blah Beit HOUSING, LAND AND PROPERTY CONCERNS! PER SUB-DQISteTilRbiIyCyTeh Dalyeh ! Yashout ! Tell ! ! ! ! ! LATTAKIA Salhib Muhradah ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jeb ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! Banyas ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! ! Taleen ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Rawda ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA HaBm!aarammane! t Elmashayekh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Wasil ! ! Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

n ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qumseyyeh! ! ! ! a Soda Khawabi ! ! Sheik!h ! ! ! ! ! e ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi Badr ! ! n ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! El-oyoun a ! ! !

a ! ! ! ! Harbanifse r ! ! !! ! ! ! ! e r ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! e ! S ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dwe! ir !Raslan Ein t ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

i ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ta!rt!ous ! ! Halaqim ! ! ! ! ! ! ! d ! ! ! Ar-Rastan ! Jneinet ! ! ! ! ! ! Oj e ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sibbeh Taldu ! ! ! Hamin ! Raslan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! M ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikis!h ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HOMS ! Mashta ! TART! OU! S ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Arwad ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elhiu ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qabu Ras E! l-Kh!ashufeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bariqiyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Nasra Safit!a ! Shin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sisni!yyeh Kherbet Elma!aza ! ! Hawash ! Safsafa ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Kherbet ! ! ! Tall Tin Noor ! Kare! emeh ! ! Kalakh Hadideh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hameidiyye! h Al Quasir Homs Housing, land and property concerns (Top 3 reported No housing available by most % communities Disputed ownership in the sub-district) Rental disputes (landlord/tenant problems) Communities where HLP issues are Lack of documents Property is unlawfully occupied by others ! Reported Damage of land or property Rules and processes on housing and land not clear or changing ! NOT reported Looting of private property Cannot access/lost access housing because can afford it ! Not covered in analysis