The History of Myofunctional Orthodontics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

special | REPORT The history of myofunctional orthodontics Part I - The beginning and the separation By Dr Chris Farrell, BDS (Syd) and Matt Darcy, Dental Researcher yofunctional excellent health. Upon returning from his Catlin’s written work visibly influenced therapy may final voyage, Catlin expressed his confi- Angle’s perception of orthodontics. This seem like dence that breathing was the underlying was perhaps most evident in Angle’s a relatively source of his health observations. “I am 1907 book titled The Treatment of Mal- foreign con- compelled to believe, and feel authorized occlusion of the Teeth, which detailed the cept to recent to assert, that a great proportion of the dis- effects of oral habits on occlusion. Angle graduates, eases prematurely fatal to human life, as wrote “Of all the various causes of mal- but the reality well as mental and physical deformities, occlusion, mouth breathing is the most is it has been practiced for one hundred and destruction of the teeth, are caused by potent, constant and varied in its results.”4 M 1 years and has endured a largely turbulent the abuse of the lungs.” Furthermore, Angle was determined history over the last century. Therefore, any implication which sug- to discover the aetiology of all malocclu- Before delving into the history of myo- gests it is a recent realisation that oral sions and concluded that the origin was functional therapy, one should ponder the habits can act as a causative factor in myofunctional. He believed the positions process undertaken in the scientific com- substandard health and craniofacial mal- of the teeth and arches were heavily influ- munity in order to truly understand the formations should be soundly dismissed enced by “muscular pressure - the tongue beginning of the myofunctional move- with the aforementioned literature in mind. acting upon the inside, and the lips and ment. The first step in the Scientific Despite identifying the influence dys- cheeks upon the outside, of the arches.”5 Method is to make an objective obser- functional breathing could have on human Angle also spent the early decades of vation and if we apply this principle to health, Catlin believed the subsequent the 20th century mentoring aspiring ortho- the origin of myofunctional therapy, issues could be resolved. “The perni- dontists at the renowned Angle School of it produces curious results. cious (mouth breathing) habit, though Orthodontia. It was at this school that Documented recognition of distinct oral contracted in infancy or childhood, or two contrasting factions of orthodontics habits and their effect on human wellbeing manhood, may generally be corrected by developed and were later driven by three stretches into the 19th century. One of the a steady and determined perseverance, influential graduates. earliest recordings of the influence oral based upon a conviction of its baneful and One of Angle’s students was Alfred habits can have on health, occlusion and fatal results.”2 Rogers (1903), who in 1918 presented his craniofacial development is an offering One influential figure that took a strong first paper on Myofunctional Therapy of from American artist and traveller George interest in Catlin’s findings was none other Orthodontics at the annual meeting of the Catlin, who released a best-selling book than the Father of Modern Orthodontics, American Association of Orthodontists. titled Shut Your Mouth and Save Your Life Edward Angle. So strong was his interest His literature described a series of correc- in 1870. in Catlin’s discoveries, Angle considered tive exercises designed to stimulate growth The 40-page volume detailed his obser- him to be one of his heroes3 and reprinted in the maxillofacial region and influence vations of more than 150 Native American his book titled The Breath of Life or Mal- proper occlusion. Thus, myofunctional tribes and the commonality that existed Respiration and Its Effects Upon the therapy was officially established one in all primitive cultures was consistent - Enjoyments & Life of Man in 1925. hundred years ago. 74 Australasian Dental Practice May/June 2018 special | REPORT The two additional influential graduates he had mistreated his patients or unnec- The forementioned author was one that attended Angle’s school were Ray- essarily extracted teeth, Tweed famously Australian graduate who gained a com- mond Begg (1924-25) and Charles Tweed defended his views by declaring “just put prehensive knowledge of traditional (1927-28). Their views on orthodontics your plaster on the table.”7 orthodontics using the BEGG technique. directly contradicted those of Angle, As a result, the purely aesthetic approach Inspired by the correlation he observed who was strictly opposed to extractions. to orthodontics that was trumpeted by while treating patients for malocclusion and TMJ/D in the 1980s, he planted the seed for a modern adaptation of myofunctional therapy by questioning popular orthodontic views at the time. He put forward the notion that the aetiology of malocclusion and TMJ/D was myofunctional. Consequently, he established the modern practice of Myo- functional Orthodontics in the late 1980s. The history of myofunctional therapy/ orthodontics to date is perhaps best sum- marised by a metaphor put forward by internationally renowned orthodontic researcher Thomas Graber. “In our search we are not unlike the man who starts a Figure 2. Like Catlin before him, Angle trip from one city to another. He comes observed the correlation between mouth to a fork in the road and must choose breathing patients and the malocclusions one road or the other.”8 Is it possible the they presented (Figure 33 from The Treat- orthodontic community chose the wrong Figure 1. Catlin illustrated the facial dif- ment of Malocclusion of the Teeth, 1907). road to travel with Tweed and Begg? ferences he observed when comparing hu- mans who breathe naturally through their References nose and those who habitually breathe through their mouth. (Figures from Shut 1. Catlin, G, Shut Your Mouth and Save Your Life 4th Your Mouth and Save Your life, 1870). Edition, 1870, N. Truebner and Co., p. 17. 2. Catlin, G, Shut Your Mouth and Save Your Life 4th Edition, 1870, N. Truebner and Co., p. 23. 3. Peck, S, A Biographical Portrait of Edward Hartley Angle, the First Specialist in Orthodontics, Part 1, The Angle Orthodontist: November 2009, Vol 79, No. 6 pp. 1021-1027. 4. Angle, E.H, The Treatment of Malocclusion of the Teeth, 7th Edition, 1907, SS White Dental Manufac- turing, Philadelphia, p. 111. 5. Angle, E.H, The Treatment of Malocclusion of the Teeth, 7th Edition, 1907, SS White Dental Manufac- turing, Philadelphia, p. 26. 6. Proffit, W et al, Contemporary Orthodontics, 5th Edition, 2013, Mosby, St. Louis, p. 3. 7. The Charles H. Tweed International Foundation, Figure 3. Charles Tweed campaigned Figure 4. Raymond Begg pioneered the The Tweed Years, viewed 26 April 2018, http://www. for extractions to re-enter American or- reintroduction of extraction orthodontics tweedortho.com/about-us/the-tweed-years thodontics in the 1940/50s (The Charles in Australia and revolutionised the use 8. Graber, T.M, Orthodontics: Principles & Practice, 1961, W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, p. 256. H. Tweed International Foundation for of brackets with his light wire technique. Orthodontic Research and Education). (History Trust of South Australia). About the authors Tweed was the loudest advocate for Tweed and Begg halted development of Dr Farrell presents courses on the the reintroduction of extraction orthodon- biologically-based treatment modalities in Myofunctional Orthodontic System and tics in the United States, while Begg was the US and Australia for multiple decades. TMJ Disorder regularly in Australia and the leading proponent in Australia. The Begg’s light wire bracket technique USA and is the founder of the Myofunc- persuasive figures achieved their shared was a driving force behind his signifi- tional Research Co. For more information objective in the 1940s and 1950s as the cant influence on Australian orthodontics. visit www.myoresearch.com. extraction philosophy became the norm His pro-extraction philosophies spread in American and Australian orthodontic throughout Australian universities as the Matt Darcy is a dental researcher at the circles6 while interest in myofunctional movement gripped orthodontic communi- Myofunctional Research Co based in therapy diminished. When questioned if ties throughout Australia and the US. Queensland, Australia. 76 Australasian Dental Practice May/June 2018.
Recommended publications
  • Extraction Vs Non Extraction Controversy: a Review

    Extraction Vs Non Extraction Controversy: a Review

    Journal of Dental & Oro-facial Research Vol. 14 Issue 01 Jan. 2018 JDOR Extraction vs Non Extraction Controversy: A Review 1 2 3 4 5 *Adeeba Khanum , Prashantha G.S. , Silju Mathew , Madhavi Naidu and Amit Kumar *Corresponding Author Email: [email protected] Contributors: 1 Postgraduate,2Professor,3Professor Abstract and Head,4 Assitant Professor, 5 Ex Postgraduate, Department of Orthodontics, is rich in it’s history as well as controversies. Controversies unlike Orthodontics and Dentofacial disputes, never end and cannot be resolved completely validating any one side of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Dental the argument through scientific evidence. One such controversy is extraction vs non- Sciences, M.S. Ramaiah University extraction. The last two decades has seen noticeable decline of extraction in of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru - orthodontic treatment. This is augmented with increased pressure from the referring 560054 dentist to treat the patient without extraction treatment modality, being unaware of the literature supportive of extractions in specific cases. This review provides a summary of historical background of the controversy, the perspectives of various authors, the reasons for decline in extractions and the present understanding of the debate. Keywords: Orthodontics, Extraction, Non-extraction, Controversy, TMD 1. INTRODUCTION delivered a lecture in New York against extractions, stating that extractions caused “A In the common man’s perspective, crowding, loss of an important organ” .3 more often than spacing constitutes malocclusion. Treatment of a crowded arch Edward H Angle was the most dominant, requires space gaining. This has been achieved dynamic and influential figure in orthodontics. through two ways of treatment – extraction or (Fig.
  • Enhancing the Predictability of Clear Aligners

    Enhancing the Predictability of Clear Aligners

    Enhancing Predictability of Clear Aligners Bowman DRASTIC PLASTIC: ENHANCING THE PREDICTABILITY OF CLEAR ALIGNERS S. Jay Bowman ABSTRACT Once limitations of clear aligner treatments were identified, conceptualizing techniques to improve the predictability in producing desired results was the next logical step. A variety of concepts, methods, and adjuncts have subsequently been introduced to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of clear aligners. As a consequence, the scope of biomechanics and type of malocclusions that can be more predictably treated has increased. As one example, the inclusion of miniscrew temporary skeletal anchorage has permitted the addition of direct and indirect anchorage to support and control more predictable programmed tooth movements with aligners. After reviewing the reported shortcomings of plastic aligners, this chapter explores possibilities for improving predictability of aligner therapy. KEY WORDS: Clear Aligners, Miniscrews, Bootstrap Elastic, Attachments, Bonded Buttons INTRODUCTION It has been 20 years since the introduction of a commercialized clear aligner product to the orthodontic marketplace. Based on suggestion by Harold D. Kesling over 50 years earlier, Invisalign and later, increasingly numerous propriety alternatives have come to pass; including the exponential growth of so-called direct-to-consumer (DTC or DIY) offerings [1]. From the original questions of whether even “acceptable” results could be obtained from a sequence of aligners, these queries have now evolved into: Is an orthodontist even needed to be interjected between the manufacturer’s plastic and their “customers?” So, the idea of moving teeth with plastic was nothing new, but the use of software to attempt to predict desired tooth movement and the associated 3D representations of individual tooth position were innovative.
  • A Longitudinal Study of Dental Arch Dimensions in Australian Aboriginals Using 2D and 3D Digital Imaging Methods

    A Longitudinal Study of Dental Arch Dimensions in Australian Aboriginals Using 2D and 3D Digital Imaging Methods

    A longitudinal study of dental arch dimensions in Australian Aboriginals using 2D and 3D digital imaging methods A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Clinical Dentistry (Orthodontics) Ramya Thiyagarajan Orthodontic Unit Dental School Faculty of Health Sciences The University of Adelaide 2008 3. Literature Review 3.1 Introduction Man evolved in an environment in which the occlusion was worn down quickly, resulting in flattened occlusal and interproximal surfaces. Some believe this rapid wear is essential for normal development of the dentition and a lack of this process due to the evolution of food preparation and processing techniques over the last 250 years or more has led to teeth not being worn down as ‘programmed’, resulting in an increase in malocclusions and other dental problems such as periodontal disease, caries and TMD1. Should we recreate these severe wear patterns to aid in improving modern dental conditions? The answer is no, but it is an important concept of our past to understand that will improve our understanding of the development of dental arch dimensions and functional occlusions. 3.1.1 Attrition Dental attrition, both interproximal and occlusal, can be thought of as resulting from a series of interactions between the teeth, their supporting structures and the masticatory apparatus. It is wear produced by tooth-on-tooth contact between neighboring teeth or opposing teeth. The effects of dental attrition are not limited to the reduction of individual tooth dimensions alone2. Skeletal changes are evident, dental arch morphology is altered and the associated inter-relationships 11 between the upper and lower jaws and their supporting structures are modified 2.
  • Extractions, Retention and Stability: the Search for Orthodontic Truth Sheldon Peck1,2

    Extractions, Retention and Stability: the Search for Orthodontic Truth Sheldon Peck1,2

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Carolina Digital Repository European Journal of Orthodontics, 2017, 109–115 doi:10.1093/ejo/cjx004 Advance Access publication 23 February 2017 Original article Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ejo/article-abstract/39/2/109/3045908 by University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill user on 16 August 2019 Extractions, retention and stability: the search for orthodontic truth Sheldon Peck1,2 1Department of Orthodontics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA 2Historian, The Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists Correspondence to: Sheldon Peck, 180 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02116, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Adapted from the 2016 E. Sheldon Friel Memorial Lecture, presented 13 June 2016 at the 92nd Congress of the European Orthodontic Society, Stockholm, Sweden. Summary Background and objectives: From the beginnings of modern orthodontics, questions have been raised about the extraction of healthy permanent teeth in order to correct malocclusions. A hundred years ago, orthodontic tooth extraction was debated with almost religious intensity by experts on either side of the issue. Sheldon Friel and his mentor Edward H. Angle both had much to say about this controversy. Today, after significant progress in orthodontic practice, similar arguments are being voiced between nonextraction expansionists and those who see the need for tooth extractions in some orthodontic patients. Furthermore, varying concepts of mechanical retention of
  • Dr. Edward Hartley Angle, the Founder of Modern Orthodontics – Part I Dr

    Dr. Edward Hartley Angle, the Founder of Modern Orthodontics – Part I Dr

    HISTORY OF MEDICINE Ref: Ro Med J. 2020;67(4) DOI: 10.37897/RMJ.2020.4.19 DR. EDWARD HARTLEY ANGLE, THE FOUNDER OF MODERN ORTHODontics – pART I Dr. Edward Hartley Angle, fondatorul ortodonţiei moderne – partea I Asist. Univ. Dr. Irina Adriana Beuran1, Conf. Dr. Ileana Ionescu1, Şef Lucr. Dr. Gabriela Tănase1, Asist. Univ. Dr. Viorel Ştefan Perieanu1, Şef Lucr. Dr. Mădălina Maliţa1, Asist. Univ. Dr. Magdalena Natalia Dina1, Asist. Univ. Dr. Oana Eftene1, Asist. Univ. Dr. Iuliana Babiuc1, Dr. Raluca Costea2, Asist. Univ. Dr. Radu Costea1, Şef Lucr. Dr. Narcis Marcov1, Asist. Univ. Dr. Maria Glencora Costache1, Conf. Dr. Corina Marilena Cristache1, Şef Lucr. Dr. Mihaela Chirilă1, Conf. Dr. Mihai Burlibaşa1, Asist. Univ. Dr. Mădălina Violeta Perieanu1 1 Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie „Carol Davila“, Bucureşti, România 2 Cabinet stomatologic privat, Bucureşti, România ABSTRACT Edward Hartley Angle was an eminent American scientist, dentist, great inventor, being rightly considered to be the father of modern orthodontics. The great American scientist was the author of an impressive number of patents (46) and was the coordinator of 7 editions of some impressive Orthodontic Treatises. Thus, in this material, which we structured in 2 distinct parts, we tried to present as concisely as possible the most important data from the biography of Dr. Edward Hartley Angle. Keywords: orthodontics and dento-facial orthopedics, dentistry, inventor REZUMat Edward Hartley Angle a fost un eminent om de ştiinţă american, medic stomatolog, inventator de foarte mare anvergură, fiind considerat, pe drept cuvânt, a fi părintele ortodonţiei moderne. Marele savant american a fost autor al unui număr impresionant de brevete de invenţie (46) şi a fost coordonatorul a 7 ediţii ale unor impre- sionante tratate de ortodonţie.
  • Association Between the British Standards Institute’S Incisor Classification of Malocclusion and Angle’S Classification of Malocclusion - an Analytical Study

    Association Between the British Standards Institute’S Incisor Classification of Malocclusion and Angle’S Classification of Malocclusion - an Analytical Study

    ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTE’S INCISOR CLASSIFICATION OF MALOCCLUSION AND ANGLE’S CLASSIFICATION OF MALOCCLUSION - AN ANALYTICAL STUDY Dissertation Submitted To THE TAMIL NADU DR. M.G.R. MEDICAL UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment for the Degree of MASTER OF DENTAL SURGERY BRANCH V ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS MARCH 2010 CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the dissertation entitled “Association between The British standards institute’s Incisor classification of malocclusion and Angle’s classification of malocclusion - An analytical study” done by Dr.V.THAILAVATHY., post graduate student (M.D.S), Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics (branch V), Tamil Nadu Govt. Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, submitted to the Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R.Medical University in partial fulfillment for the M.D.S. degree examination (March 2010) is a bonafide research work carried out by her under my supervision and guidance. GUIDED BY DR.M.C.SAINATH . M.D.S Professor.dept of orthodontics Tamilnadu govt.Dental college and Hospital,chennai Dr. W.S.MANJULA, M.D.S., Dr.K.S.G.A. NASSER, M.D.S., Professor and Head of Department Principal, Dept. of Orthodontics, TNGDC&H TNGDC & H Chennai- 3 Chennai DECLARATION I, Dr.V.Thailavathy, do hereby declare that the dissertation titled “Association between The British standards institute’s Incisor classification of malocclusion and Angle’s classification of malocclusion.- An analytical study “ was done in the Department of Orthodontics, Tamil Nadu Government Dental College & Hospital, Chennai 600 003. I have utilized the facilities provided in the Government Dental College for the study in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Dental Surgery in the specialty of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (Branch V) during the course period 2007-2010 under the conceptualization and guidance of my dissertation guide, Professor Dr.
  • Treatment of Class II Maxillary Retrusion Case Using Miniscrew (Nonextraction Treatment of Adolescent Patient)

    Treatment of Class II Maxillary Retrusion Case Using Miniscrew (Nonextraction Treatment of Adolescent Patient)

    Case Report Treatment of Class II Maxillary Retrusion Case Using Miniscrew (Nonextraction Treatment of Adolescent Patient) Fulya Ozdemir, DDS, PhD;1 Volkan Osman Uyar, DDS, PhD;2 Feyza Ulkur, DDS, PhD3 ABSTRACT Objective: This case report describes the protocol employed in the treatment of a patient with Class II subdivision malocclusion, with sagittal, transverse, and occlusal disharmonies. Materials and Methods: Treatment included the expansion of the maxilla with a banded Hyrax appliance over a period of 14 days. After a retention period, the device was removed and a stainless steel transpalatal arch was attached. The maxillary arch was bonded with MBT prescription brackets, and distalization of the left maxillary first molar commenced on a 0.016 3 0.022-inch stainless steel archwire supported by a miniscrew for indirect anchorage. After 4.7 mm of molar distalization, a Nance appliance with a bite plane was placed, and the mandibular arch was bonded to continue treatment, which lasted 18 months. Mandibular and maxillary fixed retainers were placed at the end of active treatment. Results: Pretreatment and posttreatment records showed that vertical and sagittal skeletal cephalometric findings were stable. Conclusion: A nonextraction and miniscrew anchorage approach for distalization is an effective treatment option for dental Class II correction. (Turkish J Orthod 2015;27:117–127) KEY WORDS: Class II, miniscrew, distalization INTRODUCTION Treatment choices to manage a Class II subdivi- sion malocclusion could involve extractions, a In 1899, Edward Angle described 3 classes of nonextraction approach, or surgery depending on malocclusion based on the anteroposterior occlusal the nature and extent of the problem.
  • Orthodontics and Maxillofacial Surgery: an Interdisciplinary Team

    Orthodontics and Maxillofacial Surgery: an Interdisciplinary Team

    www.medigraphic.org.mx Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia Vol. 2, No. 3 July-September 2014 pp 200-206 CASE REPORT Orthodontics and maxillofacial surgery: an interdisciplinary team. Case Report Ortodoncia y cirugía maxilofacial: un equipo multidisciplinario. Presentación de un caso clínico Wendy Gutiérrez Guerrero,* Isaac Guzmán Valdivia§ ABSTRACT RESUMEN Dentofacial anomalies cause disharmony in the maxilla and the Reporte de caso: Las alteraciones dentomaxilofaciales propician mandible with consequences in facial esthetics and masticatory una desarmonía en el maxilar y la mandíbula, distorsionando la es- function. As surgeries and osteotomies became more complex tética facial y la función masticatoria. A medida que las intervencio- the need for cooperation between the orthodontist and the nes y osteotomías fueron siendo más complejas se hizo cada vez maxillofacial surgeon became more evident. A case report of a 1 más evidente la necesidad de la colaboración del ortodoncista con year and 8 months treatment time of an 18-year-old patient, with el cirujano maxilofacial. Se presenta en este artículo el diagnóstico skeletal class III malocclusion, anterior crossbite and posterior y tratamiento durante 1 año 8 meses de un paciente de 18 años unilateral crossbite, upper incisor proclination and lower incisor con maloclusión esquelética clase III, mordida cruzada anterior y retroclination, and vertical growth is hereby presented. A treatment posterior uniteral, proinclinación dental superior y retroinclinación plan was set out with surgical-orthodontic
  • Review Paper INTRAORAL APPROACH to MOLAR

    Review Paper INTRAORAL APPROACH to MOLAR

    Received : 08‑09‑15 Review completed : 17‑11‑15 Review Paper Accepted : 01‑12‑15 INTRAORAL APPROACH TO MOLAR DISTALIZATION: A REVIEW Piyush Bolya, * Bhoopendra Singh Rajput, ** Gunjan Tiwari, *** Hitender Singh Yadav, † Ashish Choubey, †† Sandeep Kumar Swarnkar ††† * Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Darshan Dental College & Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India ** Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, RR Dental College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India *** Consultant Orthodontist, Smile Experts, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India † Post Graduate Student, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Maharana Pratap College of Dentistry and Rc, Gwalior, Madhya Pardesh, India †† Post Graduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Maharana Pratap College of Dentistry and Rc, Gwalior, Madhya Pardesh, India ††† Post Graduate Student, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Maharana Pratap College of Dentistry and Rc, Gwalior, Madhya Pardesh, India _________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT inappropriate and unacceptable. According to To extract or not to extract has been a ley Moyers (1988)[2] the nonextraction treatment question in past for decades. Traditional upper modalities for Class II cases resulted where the molar distalization techniques require patient malocclusion is due to aggravation of dental co-operation with the headgear or elastics. symptoms and has anterior posterior and vertical Recently,
  • Edward Hartley Angle

    Edward Hartley Angle

    In italiano, per favore En español, por favor Dr. Gabriele Florìa DDS Original Article VJO editor Published on 15-12-00 english translation by Dr. Andrea Marinelli and Dr. Susan Eslambolchi Edward Angle is considered to be the "father of orthodontics" by all orthodontists. His polyhedral personality allowed ideas, theories and innovations that were modified in small part by This author’s ingeniousness expressed itself in his publications scientific and technical progress. and in many appliances conceived and improved by him, signs of his great passion in our speciality. Edward Hartley Angle In occasion of the "9th International Medical Congress" in 1887, he presented "The Angle System of Regulation and Retention" after which he made many other publications. In these, he disagreed with Farrar and his intermittent force theory, while underlining the importance of post-treatment retention and condemning orthodontic extractions. The palatal expander, conceived by him, became very famous and popular. In his article published in Dental Cosmos in 1899 he wrote that it is better to talk about a "malocclusion” rather than “dental irregularity”. He explained: “There will not be irregularity of teeth if the occlusion is perfect. So first the treatment will consider the malocclusion and will try to eliminate it.” He was born in Herrick in Pennsylvania in 1855 and attended the local College of Dentistry where he graduated in 1878. He dedicated himself to In "Some Basic Principles in Orthodontia" (International Dental orthodontics immediately working first in Towanda Journal, 1903), Angle explained the principles on which and than Minneapolis. In 1892 he was appointed orthodontics should be founded.
  • A Biographical Portrait of Edward Hartley Angle, the First Specialist in Orthodontics, Part 1

    A Biographical Portrait of Edward Hartley Angle, the First Specialist in Orthodontics, Part 1

    JDO 63 CLASSICS REVISITED A Biographical Portrait of Edward Hartley Angle, Part 1 JDO 63 A Biographical Portrait of Edward Hartley Angle, the First Specialist in Orthodontics, Part 1 Abstract Much of what is known about Edward Hartley Angle, MD, DDS (1855–1930), the acknowledged “father” of modern orthodontics, has been derived from secondary sources, accounts written by his contemporaries and others. New historical research using primary sources, largely the recently published four-volume sourcebook of Angle’s correspondence and business transactions from 1899 to 1910, gives a broad view of the personality, interests, and activities of this prime mover in the evolution of orthodontics. This three- part article highlights aspects of Edward H. Angle’s life and persona, based on new findings culled from his letters and other personal documents. Part 3 presents a biographical chronology of Angle’s remarkable life. (Reprinted from News & Trends in Orthodontics 2009;16:8-14, originally reprinted with permission from Angle Orthod 2009;79:1021-1027. Copyright 2009).(J Digital Orthod 2021;63:78-88) “To arrive at a just estimate of a renowned man’s character one must judge it by the standards of his time, not ours.” Mark Twain, Personal Recollections of Joan of Arc, 1896 Part I Old letters often tell rich history. At certain junctures science and a specialty.” This inventive doctor gave in the historical record, details found in the letters malocclusion the primacy and order it needed. He of visionary leaders reveal important developments also created the first educational program to train better than a simple recounting of events can.
  • Was the Destiny of Orthodontics Written in the Stars?

    Was the Destiny of Orthodontics Written in the Stars?

    CENTENNIAL GUEST EDITORIAL Was the destiny of orthodontics written in the stars? James L. Ackerman Chapel Hill, NC his fanciful tale describes an 1882 meeting in Darwin: Perhaps you will be another John Tomes, TLondon between a young American dentist and who is a friend of ours from the Royal Society of London. 2 highly acclaimed English scientists. Although John performs orthodontia in his private dental rooms fictional, the story is historically accurate, and the ideas using removable plates and wires to apply forces to the expressed are authentic. One participant in this colloquy teeth. He was also the first to elucidate the remodeling is Edward H. Angle. He was a 27-year-old farm boy from of alveolar bone during tooth movement. John was rural Pennsylvania whose formal higher education the driving force 2 years ago in gaining recognition for consisted of 2 years at a proprietary dental college in dentistry as a profession along with the establishment Philadelphia, from which he graduated at age 23. The of the British Dental Society. Perhaps you will be able other participants are 73-year-old naturalist Charles at some point to establish orthodontia as a dental Darwin and his cousin, 60-year-old Francis Galton, an specialty in America. anthropologist and statistician. Darwin and Galton Angle: I am very flattered by your compliment; of grew up in highly educated and wealthy families and course, I heard the name “Tomes” in our dental histology graduated from the University of Cambridge. course in school. We learned about Tomes's processes in The following conversation ensued.