DOCSLIB.ORG

Sommerfeltia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

sommerfeltia 5 J. Middelborg & J. Mattsson Crustaceous lichenized species of the Caliciales in Norway. 1987 · sommerfeltia Volume 1. A. Hansen & P. Sunding: Flora of Macaronesia . Checklist of vascular plants. 3. revised edition. 167 pp. NOK 70.00. (January 1985 . ) Volume 2. R.H. 0kland & E. Bendiksen: The vegetation of the forest-alpine transition in Grunningsdalen, S. Norway. 224 pp. NOK 90. 00. (November 1985.) Volume 3. T. Halvorsen & L. Borgen: The perennial Macaronesian species of Bubonium (Compositae-Inuleae). 103 pp. NOK 60.00. (February 1986.) Volume 4. H.B. Gjrerum & P. Sunding: Flora of Macaronesia. Checklist of rust fungi (Uredinales). 42 pp. NOK 40.00. (December 1986.) Volume 5. J. Middelborg & J. Mattsson: Crustaceous lichenized species of the Caliciales in Norway. 71 pp. NOK 55.00. (May 1987.) Volume 6. L.N. Derrick, A.C. Jermy, & A.C. Paul: Checklist of European Pteridophytes. xx + 94 pp. NOK 70.00. (June 1987.) Orders should be sent to the address inside front cover. sommerfeltia 5 J. Middelborg & J. Mattsson Crustaceous lichenized species of the Caliciales in Norway. 1987 ISBN 82-7420-001-2 ISSN 0800-6865 Middelborg J. & Mattsson J., 1987. Crustaceous lichenized species of the Caliciales in Norway. - Sommerfeltia 5: 1-70. Oslo. ISBN 82-7420-001-2. ISSN 0800-6865. Thirty-nine species are recognized in the lichen genera Calicium Pers., Chaenotheca (Th.Fr.) Th.Fr., Cyphelium Ach., Microcalicium Vain. emend. Tibell, Sclerophora Chevall., and Thelomma Massa!. emend Tibell in Norway. The genus Cybebe is reduced to synonymy with Chaenotheca, and the new combinations Chaenotheca gracilenta (Ach.) Mattsson & Middelborg and Sclerophora coniophaea (Norm.) Mattsson & Middelborg are proposed. Three families are recognized, the Caliciaceae, the Coniocybaceae, and the Microcaliciaceae. The chemistry is described, and a number of unidentified secondary substances are characterized by their Rf values. The ecology and distribution of the species are described. Keys are given to the genera and species, and distribution maps for Norway are provided. Calicium adaequatum Nyl., Calicium adspersum Pers., Calicium corynellum Ach., Calicium parvum Tibell, Chaenotheca carthusiae (Harm.) Lett., and Microcalicium ahlneri Tibell are reported new to Norway. Keywords: Caliciales, Distribution, Ecology, Lichens, Lichen substances, Norway, Taxonomy. J0rn Middelborg & Johan Mattsson, Botanical Garden and Museum, University of Oslo, Trondheimsveien 23 B, N-0562 Oslo 5, Norway. SOMMERFELTIA 5 (1987) CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 6 MATERIAL AND METHODS ....................................... 7 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .................................... 8 MORPHOLOGY AND ANATOMY 8 Thallus 8 Phycobionts 8 Apothecia 8 Asci 10 Spores 10 CHEMISTRY 13 Identified secondary substances 15 Unidentified secondary substances 17 ECOLOGY ................................................ 19 Ecological factors 19 Ecological groups 20 FENNOSCANDIAN DISTRIBUTION · · · · · · · · · · • • · · · ·. · ............. 22 Western element 23 Southern element 23 South-eastern element 24 Eastern element 24 Alpine element 25 Ubiquitous species 26 Remainder 26 CLASSIFICATION 26 Description of the Caliciaceae Fee 27 Description of the Coniocybaceae Reichenb. 27 Description of the Microcaliciaceae Tibell 27 DELIMITATION OF CHAENOTHECA (Th.Fr.) Th.Fr. VERSUS CYBEBE Tibell AND SCLEROPHORA Chevall. 27 Description of Chaenotheca 27 Description of Cybebe 28 Description of Sclerophora 28 The delimitation of Chaenotheca versus Cybebe 28 The delimitation of Chaenotheca versus Sclerophora 29 TAXONOMY . 30 KEY TO THE CRUSTACEOUS GENERA OF CALICIALES IN NORWAY 30 CALICIUM 30 Key to the species 31 Calicium abietinum Pers. 31 Calicium adaequatum Nyl. 33 Calicium adspersum Pers. 33 Calicium corynellum Ach. 33 Calicium denigratum (Vain.) Tibell 35 Calicium glaucellum Ach. 35 Calicium parvum Tibell 35 Calicium quercinum Pers. 35 Calicium salicinum Pers. 37 Calicium subquercinum Asah. 37 Calicium trabinellum Ach. 37 Calicium viride Pers. 40 S0MMERFELTIA 5 (1987) CHAEN0THECA (Th.Fr.) Th.Fr. 40 Key to the species 40 Chaenotheca brunneola (Ach.) Milll.Arg. 41 Chaenotheca carthusiae (Harm.) Lett. 43 Chaenotheca chrysocephala (Turn. ex Ach.) Th.Fr. 43 Chaenotheca cinerea (Pers.) Tibell 43 Chaenotheca ferruginea (Turn. ex Sm.) Migula 45 Chaenotheca furfuracea (L.) Tibell 45 Chaenotheca gracilenta (Ach.) Mattsson & Middelborg 45 Chaenotheca gracillima (Vain.) Tibell 48 Chaenotheca laevigata Nadv. 48 Chaenotheca phaeocephala (Ach.) Th.Fr. 48 Chaenotheca stemonea (Ach.) Milll.Arg. 50 Chaenotheca subroscida (Eitn.) Zahlbr. 50 Chaenotheca sulphurea (Retz.) 50 Chaenotheca trichialis (Ach.) Th.Fr. 53 Chaenotheca xyloxena Nadv. 53 CYPHELIUM Ach. 53 Key to the species 55 Cyphelium inquinans (Sm.) Trevis 55 Cyphelium karelicum (Vain.) Ras. 55 Cyphelium pinicola Tibell 57 Cyphelium tigillare (Ach.) Ach. 57 MICR0CALICIUM Vain. 57 Key to the species 59 Microcalicium ahlneri Tibell 59 Microcalicium arenarium (Hampe ex. Massa!.) Tibell 59 Microcalicium disseminatum (Ach.) Vain. 59 SCLER0PH0RA Chevall. 61 Key to the species 61 Sclerophora coniophea (Norm.) Mattsson & Middelborg 61 Sclerophora farinacea (Chevall.) Chevall. 63 Sclerophora nivea (Hoffm.) Tibell 63 Sclerophora peronella (Ach.) Tibell 63 THELOMMA Massa!. emend. Tibell 65 Thelomma ocellatum (Korber) Tibell 65 ACKNOHLEDGEHENTS ........................................... 66 REFERENCES . 6 7 INDEX ...................................................... 70 6 S0MMERFELTIA 5 (1987) INTRODUCTION The first species to be validly described in the Caliciales was Chaenotheca furfuracea (as Mucor furfuraceus) by Linnaeus in 1753. Persoon (1794) established the genus Calicium. A more thorough revision and delimitation was made by Acharius (1815- 1817), who described Coniocybe and Cyphelium. These genera were placed in the family Calicioidea together with Calicium. During the same century Chevallier (1826) described Sclerophora and Massalongo (1860) described Thelomma. Fries (1861) gave an up­ to-date presentation of the genera in the Caliciales and also gave a description of Chaenotheca. In the following century Vainio (1927) established Microcalicium. Schmidt (1970b) segregated the saprophytic species with active spore dispersal in the new family Mycocaliciaceae Schmidt. Tibell (1984) placed the species belonging to Coniocybe in Chaenotheca and Sclerophora, and in the new genus Cybebe. J. M. Norman was the first Norwegian who made taxonomic investigations in the Caliciales. He described the macrolichen Tholurna dissimilis (Norm.) Norm. (Norman 1861) and the tiny, but beautiful crustaceous species Coniocybe coniophaea Norm. (Norman 1868), syn Sclerophora coniophaea (Norm.) Mattsson & Middelborg. L. Tibell has made extensive taxonomic and nomenclatural studies in the Caliciales in Sweden (Tibell 1977, 1978b, 1980a), Europe (Tibell 1971), and in other regions (Tibell 1975, 1976b, 1978a and 1980b). He has recently given a comprehensive taxonomic reappraisal of the Caliciales together with a historical survey (Tibell 1984). A list of the Caliciales species occurring in Sweden and Norway is given by Santesson (1984). The primary aim of our study has been to investigate the Norwegian distribution of the species, the ecology, and the secondary substances occurring in the Norwegian members of the crustaceous Caliciales. Taxonomic problems that arose during the study have been dealt with. We have studied the crustaceous genera with passive spore disperal in the Caliciales, i.e. Calicium, Chaenotheca, Cyphelium, Microcalicium, Sclerophora, and Thelomma. Sphinctrina Fr. has not been included, partly because there is only one collection from Norway, and partly because the genus has recently been studied in Europe by Lofgren & Tibell (1979). The non-lichenized species in the Mycocaliciaceae have not been included. The macrolichen genera Sphaerophorus Pers. and Tholurna Norm. are well known from earlier studies in Norway (Krog et al. 1980), and are not included in this study. SOMMERFELTIA 5 (1987) 7 MATERIAL AND METHODS We have examined approximately 1000 specimens in the herbaria BG, 0, S, TRH, TROM, and UPS, and in the private herbaria of Gunnar Degelius and Tor T~nsberg. Field studies have been carried out in South, Central, and North Norway during 1984 and 1985. Our collections, about 450 specimens, are deposited in o. The morphological studies were carried out with binocular lenses at 10 to 30x magnifications. Detailed analyses of the spore surfaces were done by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The anatomy has been studied with the aid of light microscopes at 125x, SOOx, and 1250x magnifications. Both squash preparations and sections cut on a freezing microtome were used. Preparations of spores and algae were studied in water and 2% KOH. The spore surfaces were most easily investigated in a solution of lactophenol-cotton blue. Optimum resolution was achieved with an oil immersion condenser. The majority of the specimens have been microscopically investigated. Measurements of apothecia and spores were made, and when our results were in accordance with those of Tibell (1971, 1981) we have adopted his results. The iodine reaction of the apothecia in Calicium adaequatum and C. subquercinum was studied in a solution of iodine/potassium iodide (I). Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed in accordance with the methods of Culberson & Kristinsson (1970), Culberson (1972), and Culberson & Johnson (1982). Spot tests with paraphenylene diamine
Recommended publications
  • Checklist of Calicioid Lichens and Fungi for Genera with Members in Temperate Western North America Draft: 2012-03-13

    Checklist of Calicioid Lichens and Fungi for Genera with Members in Temperate Western North America Draft: 2012-03-13

    Draft: 2012-03-13 Checklist of Calicioids – E. B. Peterson Checklist of Calicioid Lichens and Fungi For Genera with Members in Temperate Western North America Draft: 2012-03-13 by E. B. Peterson Calicium abietinum, EBP#4640 1 Draft: 2012-03-13 Checklist of Calicioids – E. B. Peterson Genera Acroscyphus Lév. Brucea Rikkinen Calicium Pers. Chaenotheca Th. Fr. Chaenothecopsis Vainio Coniocybe Ach. = Chaenotheca "Cryptocalicium" – potentially undescribed genus; taxonomic placement is not known but there are resemblances both to Mycocaliciales and Onygenales Cybebe Tibell = Chaenotheca Cyphelium Ach. Microcalicium Vainio Mycocalicium Vainio Phaeocalicium A.F.W. Schmidt Sclerophora Chevall. Sphinctrina Fr. Stenocybe (Nyl.) Körber Texosporium Nádv. ex Tibell & Hofsten Thelomma A. Massal. Tholurna Norman Additional genera are primarily tropical, such as Pyrgillus, Tylophoron About the Species lists Names in bold are believed to be currently valid names. Old synonyms are indented and listed with the current name following (additional synonyms can be found in Esslinger (2011). Names in quotes are nicknames for undescribed species. Names given within tildes (~) are published, but may not be validly published. Underlined species are included in the checklist for North America north of Mexico (Esslinger 2011). Names are given with authorities and original citation date where possible, followed by a colon. Additional citations are given after the colon, followed by a series of abbreviations for states and regions where known. States and provinces use the standard two-letter abbreviation. Regions include: NAm = North America; WNA = western North America (west of the continental divide); Klam = Klamath Region (my home territory). For those not known from North America, continental distribution may be given: SAm = South America; EUR = Europe; ASIA = Asia; Afr = Africa; Aus = Australia.
  • Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation

    Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation

    Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation Establishment of the 95-foot wide construction corridor and TEWAs would likely remove individuals of H. caeruleus and modify microclimate conditions around individuals that are not removed. The removal of forests and host trees and disturbance to soil could negatively affect H. caeruleus in adjacent areas by removing its habitat, disturbing the roots of host trees, and affecting its mycorrhizal association with the trees, potentially affecting site persistence. Restored portions of the corridor and TEWAs would be dominated by early seral vegetation for approximately 30 years, which would result in long-term changes to habitat conditions. A 30-foot wide portion of the corridor would be maintained in low-growing vegetation for pipeline maintenance and would not provide habitat for the species during the life of the project. Hygrophorus caeruleus is not likely to persist at one of the sites in the project area because of the extent of impacts and the proximity of the recorded observation to the corridor. Hygrophorus caeruleus is likely to persist at the remaining three sites in the project area (MP 168.8 and MP 172.4 (north), and MP 172.5-172.7) because the majority of observations within the sites are more than 90 feet from the corridor, where direct effects are not anticipated and indirect effects are unlikely. The site at MP 168.8 is in a forested area on an east-facing slope, and a paved road occurs through the southeast part of the site. Four out of five observations are more than 90 feet southwest of the corridor and are not likely to be directly or indirectly affected by the PCGP Project based on the distance from the corridor, extent of forests surrounding the observations, and proximity to an existing open corridor (the road), indicating the species is likely resilient to edge- related effects at the site.
  • An Evolving Phylogenetically Based Taxonomy of Lichens and Allied Fungi

    An Evolving Phylogenetically Based Taxonomy of Lichens and Allied Fungi

    Opuscula Philolichenum, 11: 4-10. 2012. *pdf available online 3January2012 via (http://sweetgum.nybg.org/philolichenum/) An evolving phylogenetically based taxonomy of lichens and allied fungi 1 BRENDAN P. HODKINSON ABSTRACT. – A taxonomic scheme for lichens and allied fungi that synthesizes scientific knowledge from a variety of sources is presented. The system put forth here is intended both (1) to provide a skeletal outline of the lichens and allied fungi that can be used as a provisional filing and databasing scheme by lichen herbarium/data managers and (2) to announce the online presence of an official taxonomy that will define the scope of the newly formed International Committee for the Nomenclature of Lichens and Allied Fungi (ICNLAF). The online version of the taxonomy presented here will continue to evolve along with our understanding of the organisms. Additionally, the subfamily Fissurinoideae Rivas Plata, Lücking and Lumbsch is elevated to the rank of family as Fissurinaceae. KEYWORDS. – higher-level taxonomy, lichen-forming fungi, lichenized fungi, phylogeny INTRODUCTION Traditionally, lichen herbaria have been arranged alphabetically, a scheme that stands in stark contrast to the phylogenetic scheme used by nearly all vascular plant herbaria. The justification typically given for this practice is that lichen taxonomy is too unstable to establish a reasonable system of classification. However, recent leaps forward in our understanding of the higher-level classification of fungi, driven primarily by the NSF-funded Assembling the Fungal Tree of Life (AFToL) project (Lutzoni et al. 2004), have caused the taxonomy of lichen-forming and allied fungi to increase significantly in stability. This is especially true within the class Lecanoromycetes, the main group of lichen-forming fungi (Miadlikowska et al.
  • The Lichen Flora of Gunib Plateau, Inner-Mountain Dagestan (North-East Caucasus, Russia)

    The Lichen Flora of Gunib Plateau, Inner-Mountain Dagestan (North-East Caucasus, Russia)

    Turkish Journal of Botany Turk J Bot (2013) 37: 753-768 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/botany/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/bot-1205-4 The lichen flora of Gunib plateau, inner-mountain Dagestan (North-East Caucasus, Russia) 1, 2 Gennadii URBANAVICHUS * , Aziz ISMAILOV 1 Institute of North Industrial Ecology Problems, Kola Science Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Murmansk Region, Russia 2 Mountain Botanical Garden, Dagestan Scientific Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, Makhachkala, Republic of Dagestan, Russia Received: 02.05.2012 Accepted: 15.03.2013 Published Online: 02.07.2013 Printed: 02.08.2013 Abstract: As a result of lichenological exploration of the Gunib plateau in the Republic of Dagestan (North-East Caucasus, Russia), we report 402 species of lichenised, 37 lichenicolous, and 7 nonlichenised fungi representing 151 genera. Nineteen species are recorded for the first time for Russia: Abrothallus chrysanthus J.Steiner, Abrothallus microspermus Tul., Caloplaca albopruinosa (Arnold) H.Olivier, Candelariella plumbea Poelt & Vězda, Candelariella rhodax Poelt & Vězda, Cladonia firma (Nyl.) Nyl., Halospora deminuta (Arnold) Tomas. & Cif., Halospora discrepans (J.Lahm ex Arnold) Hafellner, Lichenostigma epipolina Nav.-Ros., Calat. & Hafellner, Milospium graphideorum (Nyl.) D.Hawksw., Mycomicrothelia atlantica D.Hawksw. & Coppins, Parabagliettoa cyanea (A.Massal.) Gueidan & Cl.Roux, Placynthium garovaglioi (A.Massal.) Malme, Polyblastia dermatodes A.Massal., Rusavskia digitata (S.Y.Kondr.) S.Y.Kondr. & Kärnefelt, Squamarina stella-petraea Poelt, Staurothele elenkinii Oxner, Toninia nordlandica Th.Fr., and Verrucaria endocarpoides Servít. In addition, 71 taxa are new records for the Caucasus and 15 are new to Asia. Key words: Lichens, lichenicolous fungi, biodiversity, Gunib plateau, limestone, Dagestan, Caucasus, Russia 1.
  • Lichens and Associated Fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska

    Lichens and Associated Fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska

    The Lichenologist (2020), 52,61–181 doi:10.1017/S0024282920000079 Standard Paper Lichens and associated fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska Toby Spribille1,2,3 , Alan M. Fryday4 , Sergio Pérez-Ortega5 , Måns Svensson6, Tor Tønsberg7, Stefan Ekman6 , Håkon Holien8,9, Philipp Resl10 , Kevin Schneider11, Edith Stabentheiner2, Holger Thüs12,13 , Jan Vondrák14,15 and Lewis Sharman16 1Department of Biological Sciences, CW405, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada; 2Department of Plant Sciences, Institute of Biology, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria; 3Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA; 4Herbarium, Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA; 5Real Jardín Botánico (CSIC), Departamento de Micología, Calle Claudio Moyano 1, E-28014 Madrid, Spain; 6Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 16, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden; 7Department of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen Allégt. 41, P.O. Box 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway; 8Faculty of Bioscience and Aquaculture, Nord University, Box 2501, NO-7729 Steinkjer, Norway; 9NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; 10Faculty of Biology, Department I, Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; 11Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; 12Botany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany; 13Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK; 14Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic; 15Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic and 16Glacier Bay National Park & Preserve, P.O.
  • Phylogeny, Taxonomy and Diversification Events in the Caliciaceae

    Phylogeny, Taxonomy and Diversification Events in the Caliciaceae

    Fungal Diversity DOI 10.1007/s13225-016-0372-y Phylogeny, taxonomy and diversification events in the Caliciaceae Maria Prieto1,2 & Mats Wedin1 Received: 21 December 2015 /Accepted: 19 July 2016 # The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Although the high degree of non-monophyly and Calicium pinicola, Calicium trachyliodes, Pseudothelomma parallel evolution has long been acknowledged within the occidentale, Pseudothelomma ocellatum and Thelomma mazaediate Caliciaceae (Lecanoromycetes, Ascomycota), a brunneum. A key for the mazaedium-producing Caliciaceae is natural re-classification of the group has not yet been accom- included. plished. Here we constructed a multigene phylogeny of the Caliciaceae-Physciaceae clade in order to resolve the detailed Keywords Allocalicium gen. nov. Calicium fossil . relationships within the group, to propose a revised classification, Divergence time estimates . Lichens . Multigene . and to perform a dating study. The few characters present in the Pseudothelomma gen. nov available fossil and the complex character evolution of the group affects the interpretation of morphological traits and thus influ- ences the assignment of the fossil to specific nodes in the phy- Introduction logeny, when divergence time analyses are carried out. Alternative fossil assignments resulted in very different time es- Caliciaceae is one of several ascomycete groups characterized timates and the comparison with the analysis based on a second- by producing prototunicate (thin-walled and evanescent) asci ary calibration demonstrates that the most likely placement of the and a mazaedium (an accumulation of loose, maturing spores fossil is close to a terminal node rather than a basal placement in covering the ascoma surface).
  • The Phylogeny of Plant and Animal Pathogens in the Ascomycota

    The Phylogeny of Plant and Animal Pathogens in the Ascomycota

    Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology (2001) 59, 165±187 doi:10.1006/pmpp.2001.0355, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on MINI-REVIEW The phylogeny of plant and animal pathogens in the Ascomycota MARY L. BERBEE* Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada (Accepted for publication August 2001) What makes a fungus pathogenic? In this review, phylogenetic inference is used to speculate on the evolution of plant and animal pathogens in the fungal Phylum Ascomycota. A phylogeny is presented using 297 18S ribosomal DNA sequences from GenBank and it is shown that most known plant pathogens are concentrated in four classes in the Ascomycota. Animal pathogens are also concentrated, but in two ascomycete classes that contain few, if any, plant pathogens. Rather than appearing as a constant character of a class, the ability to cause disease in plants and animals was gained and lost repeatedly. The genes that code for some traits involved in pathogenicity or virulence have been cloned and characterized, and so the evolutionary relationships of a few of the genes for enzymes and toxins known to play roles in diseases were explored. In general, these genes are too narrowly distributed and too recent in origin to explain the broad patterns of origin of pathogens. Co-evolution could potentially be part of an explanation for phylogenetic patterns of pathogenesis. Robust phylogenies not only of the fungi, but also of host plants and animals are becoming available, allowing for critical analysis of the nature of co-evolutionary warfare. Host animals, particularly human hosts have had little obvious eect on fungal evolution and most cases of fungal disease in humans appear to represent an evolutionary dead end for the fungus.
  • A Multigene Phylogenetic Synthesis for the Class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 Fungi Representing 1139 Infrageneric Taxa, 317 Genera and 66 Families

    A Multigene Phylogenetic Synthesis for the Class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 Fungi Representing 1139 Infrageneric Taxa, 317 Genera and 66 Families

    A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families Miadlikowska, J., Kauff, F., Högnabba, F., Oliver, J. C., Molnár, K., Fraker, E., ... & Stenroos, S. (2014). A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 79, 132-168. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2014.04.003 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.04.003 Elsevier Version of Record http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/sa-termsofuse Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79 (2014) 132–168 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families ⇑ Jolanta Miadlikowska a, , Frank Kauff b,1, Filip Högnabba c, Jeffrey C. Oliver d,2, Katalin Molnár a,3, Emily Fraker a,4, Ester Gaya a,5, Josef Hafellner e, Valérie Hofstetter a,6, Cécile Gueidan a,7, Mónica A.G. Otálora a,8, Brendan Hodkinson a,9, Martin Kukwa f, Robert Lücking g, Curtis Björk h, Harrie J.M. Sipman i, Ana Rosa Burgaz j, Arne Thell k, Alfredo Passo l, Leena Myllys c, Trevor Goward h, Samantha Fernández-Brime m, Geir Hestmark n, James Lendemer o, H. Thorsten Lumbsch g, Michaela Schmull p, Conrad L. Schoch q, Emmanuël Sérusiaux r, David R. Maddison s, A. Elizabeth Arnold t, François Lutzoni a,10,
  • Calicium Denigratum (Vain.) Tibell, a New Lichen Record for North America

    Calicium Denigratum (Vain.) Tibell, a New Lichen Record for North America

    North American Fungi Volume 7, Number 11, Pages 1-5 Published October 26, 2012 Calicium denigratum (Vain.) Tibell, a new lichen record for North America Richard Troy McMullin1,, Steven B. Selva2, Jose R. Maloles1, and Steven G. Newmaster1 1Biodiversity Institute of Ontario Herbarium, Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 2University of Maine at Fort Kent, 23 University Drive, Fort Kent, Maine 04743 McMullin, R. T., S. B. Selva, J. R. Maloles, and S. G. Newmaster. 2012. Calicium denigratum (Vain.) Tibell, a new lichen record for North America. North American Fungi 7(11): 1-5. doi: http://dx.doi: 10.2509/naf2012.007.011 Corresponding author: R. Troy McMullin, [email protected]. Accepted for publication October 23, 2012. http://pnwfungi.org Copyright © 2012 Pacific Northwest Fungi Project. All rights reserved. Abstract: Calicium denigratum was previously known from Europe and Siberia. It is reported here for the first time in North America from open canopy woodlands in northeastern Ontario and northeastern New Brunswick. Distinctions between the two species that are most similar, C. abietinum and C. glaucellum, are also presented. Key words: Calicium denigratum, Calicium abietinum, Calicium glaucellum, North America. 2 McMullin et al. Calicium denigratum in North America. North American Fungi 7(11): 1-5 Introduction and Methods: Calicium was 101-140 yrs old, the canopy closure was 44%, denigratum (Vain.) Tibell (syn. Calicium curtum the live tree stem density was 320 stems/ha, the var. denigratum Vain.) was first moved to the snag stem density was 69 stems/hectare, and the species level by Tibell (1976). This uncommon tree composition was Picea mariana 68% and lichen occurs in open canopy woodlands in Pinus banksiana 32%.
  • Chaenotheca Chrysocephala Species Fact Sheet

    Chaenotheca Chrysocephala Species Fact Sheet

    SPECIES FACT SHEET Common Name: yellow-headed pin lichen Scientific Name: Chaenotheca chrysocephala (Turner ex Ach.) Th. Fr. Division: Ascomycota Class: Sordariomycetes Order: Trichosphaeriales Family: Coniocybaceae Technical Description: Crustose lichen. Photosynthetic partner Trebouxia. Thallus visible on substrate, made of fine grains or small lumps or continuous, greenish yellow. Sometimes thallus completely immersed and not visible on substrate. Spore-producing structure (apothecium) pin- like, comprised of a obovoid to broadly obconical head (capitulum) 0.2-0.3 mm diameter on a slender stalk, the stalk 0.6-1.3 mm tall and 0.04 -0.8 mm diameter; black or brownish black or brown with dense yellow colored powder on the upper part. Capitulum with fine chartreuse- yellow colored powder (pruina) on the under side. Upper side with a mass of powdery brown spores (mazaedium). Spore sacs (asci) cylindrical, 14-19 x 2.0-3.5 µm and disintegrating; spores arranged in one line in the asci (uniseriate), 1-celled, 6-9 x 4-5 µm, short ellipsoidal to globose with rough ornamentation of irregular cracks. Chemistry: all spot tests negative. Thallus and powder on stalk (pruina) contain vulpinic acid, which gives them the chartreuse-yellow color. This acid also colors Letharia spp., the wolf lichens. Other descriptions and illustrations: Nordic Lichen Flora 1999, Peterson (no date), Sharnoff (no date), Stridvall (no date), Tibell 1975. Distinctive Characters: (1) bright chartreuse-yellow thallus with yellow pruina under capitulum and on the upper part of the stalk, (2) spore mass brown, (3) spores unicellular (4) thallus of small yellow lumps. Similar species: Many other pin lichens look similar to Chaenotheca chrysocephala.
  • A Provisional Checklist of the Lichens of Belarus

    A Provisional Checklist of the Lichens of Belarus

    Opuscula Philolichenum, 17: 374-479. 2018. *pdf effectively published online 31December2018 via (http://sweetgum.nybg.org/philolichenum/) A Provisional Checklist of the Lichens of Belarus ANDREI TSURYKAU1 ABSTRACT. – A total of 606 species and five subspecific taxa of lichens and allied fungi are documented from Belarus based on combined historical (pre-1980) and modern (post-1980) records. Of these, 50 (8.3%) are represented by only historical reports, 235 (38.8%) are represented by only modern vouchers, and 310 (51.2%) are represented by both historical and modern records. Eleven species are known only from generalized published reports that lacked specific location data. Eighty-eight species are excluded as erroneous reports, or considered as doubtful records. KEYWORDS. – Biodiversity, distribution, lichenized fungi, historical baseline. INTRODUCTION Published accounts of the lichens of Belarus date to the end of the 18th century (Gilibert 1781). In the first phase of lichenological discovery in the country (1780–1900) lichens did not attract special attention and were reported among the general lists of vascular plants and fungi. However, 49 species were reported by the French botanist J.E. Gilibert, the Russian ethnographer of Belarusian origin N. Downar (Dovnar-Zapol'skiy) and Polish botanists K. Filipowicz and F. Błoński (Błoński 1888, 1889; Downar 1861; Filipowicz 1881; Gilibert 1781, 1792). In the early 20th century (1900–1925), there was a second phase of lichenological discovery in Belarus. During that time, Belarusian pioneer lichenologist V.P. Savicz and his wife L.I. Ljubitzkaja (later Savicz-Ljubitzkaja) reported 91 species new to the country (Ljubitzkaja 1914; Savicz 1909, 1910, 1911, 1925; Savicz & Savicz 1924; Wyssotzky et al.
  • Remarkable Records of Lichens and Lichenicolous Fungi Found During a Nordic Lichen Society Meeting in Estonia

    Remarkable Records of Lichens and Lichenicolous Fungi Found During a Nordic Lichen Society Meeting in Estonia

    Folia Cryptog. Estonica, Fasc. 57: 73–84 (2020) https://doi.org/10.12697/fce.2020.57.09 Where the interesting species grow – remarkable records of lichens and lichenicolous fungi found during a Nordic Lichen Society meeting in Estonia Ave Suija1, Inga Jüriado1, Piret Lõhmus1, Rolands Moisejevs2, Jurga Motiejūnaitė3, Andrei Tsurykau4,5, Martin Kukwa6 1Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai 40, EE-51005 Tartu, Estonia. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] 2Institute of Life Sciences and Technology, Daugavpils University, Parades 1A, LV-5401 Daugavpils, Latvia. E-mail: [email protected] 3Institute of Botany, Nature Research Centre, Žaliųjų Ežerų 49, LT-08406 Vilnius, Lithuania. E-mail: [email protected] 4Department of Biology, Francisk Skorina Gomel State University, Sovetskaja 104, BY-246019 Gomel, Belarus. E-mail: [email protected] 5Department of Ecology, Botany and Nature Protection, Institute of Natural Sciences, Samara National Research University, Moskovskoye road 34, RU-443086 Samara, Russia 6Department of Plant Taxonomy and Nature Conservation, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, PL-80–308 Gdańsk, Poland. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: In August 2019, the Nordic Lichen Society held its bi-annual meeting and excursion in south-western Estonia. The most remarkable findings of lichenized and lichenicolous fungi are recorded herewith, including nine new species (of them two lichenicolous), and one new intraspecific taxon for the country. Full species lists are provided for two notable locations, sandstone outcrop at the river Pärnu and an oak woodland in the Naissoo Nature Reserve, for which no previous data were available, to illustrate the importance of collective survey effort.