ELIST No. 18 – SYSTEM BOOKS (2)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Slam Bidding Lesson
Slam Bidding and Modified Scroll Bids By Neil H. Timm In this Bridge Bit, I explore more fully Slam bidding techniques, some old and some perhaps new. To reach a small slam, the partnership should have roughly thirty-three Bergen points. In addition to a trump fit and count, slams require controls (aces, kings, voids, and singletons). The more controls between the partners, the easier the slam. To evaluate whether or not the partnership has the required controls, one uses cuebids with perhaps the 5NT trump ask bid (Grand Slam Force), and Blackwood Conventions. Blackwood Conventions reveal how many aces and kings, while cuebidding or control showing bids reveal where they reside. To make a slam, one usually requires first-round control in three suits and second round control in the fourth suit. It is possible to make a slam missing two aces, provided the missing ace is opposite a void, and the second missing ace is replaced by or is opposite a second-round control (a king or a singleton). When looking for a possible slam, one often asks the following questions. 1. What cards should my partner have to be able to make a slam? 2. How may I obtain the required information? 3. Are there any bidding techniques or conventions that I can use to obtain the required information? 4. If my partner does not have the required cards for a slam, can I stop short of slam, and if not is the risk of going down worth it? We shall review techniques to help the partnership find the required information for making a slam! However, with some hands one needs only to count points to reach a slam. -
Thursday January 17 2008
NOT News 2 Thursday January 17 2008 Session Times Thursday / Friday Thursday (both venues) 10 1.30 5.00 Friday (Rydges) 10 1.30 5.00 Friday (Hellenic Club) 10 1.30 Bus One Bus Two Leaves 1 hour before play each session each Leaves 1 hour before play each session each day day From Gateway Motel, Northbourne Ave The full route is From Rydges Lakeside - Gateway Motel, Northbourne Ave - The Pavillion The full route is - Capital Executive Apartments - Rydges Lakeside - Saville Apartments - Bentley Apartments, Manuka - James Court - The Pinnicle Apartments, Owens St, Kingston - Rydges Lakeside - Eyre St Apartments (around the corner from ( about 15 minutes to here from start) Owen St) Then - The Hellenic Club - The Statesman Motel, Curtin - The Hellenic Club Buses leave both The Hellenic Club & Rydges Lakeside 10 minutes after the scheduled finishing time for the session and return participants to their accommodation. Tim Bourke’s Problem My Most Memorable Hand 2. THE RIGHT ORDER New Zealand international player and regular at Dealer South. Both Vul. the NOT and other major Australian NORTH tournaments, Michael Ware recalls an Í K J 5 2 unsuccessful operation. Ì K J 8 7 4 Ë 6 5 3 Playing teams at the Northern club in Auckland, Ê A my RHO opened 2Ë multi. I held a 1444 shape with a singleton spade and a nice looking 10 SOUTH count with pips. Í A 9 Ì A Q 10 5 3 An obvious 2Í overcall. Ë A Q 2 Ê 9 7 5 LHO doubled, partner passed, and RHO passed. -
The Eclectic Club
The Eclectic Club Contents Part One The Structure of the Opening Bids Page 3 Part Two Responder’s First Bid 4 The Opening Bid of 1D 4 The Opening Bid of 1H 4 The Opening Bid of 1S 5 The Opening Bid of 1NT 5 Responding in a Minor 7 1NT is Doubled 7 The Rebid of 1NT 8 The Opening Bid of 2C 9 The Opening Bid of 2D 10 The Opening Bid of 2H/2S 11 The Opening Bid of 2NT 14 Part Three Splinters 14 Slam Splinters 14 The Residual Point Count 15 The Gap Between 16 1S 3H 17 Part Four Transfers and Relays 17 Let the Weak Hand Choose Trumps 17 The Competitive Zone 17 Bidding a Passed Hand 18 Transfers in Response to 1H and 1S 18 Transfer Response to 2C 20 The 5-3 Major Fit 21 The Cost of Transfers 21 Responder Makes Two Bids 22 Responder has Hearts 24 The Transfer to Partner’s Suit 25 The Shape Ask 27 Part Five The Control Ask 28 Florentine Blackwood 28 Blackwood with a Minor Suit Agreed 30 Part Six Strong Hands 31 The Opening Bid of 1C 31 Strong Balanced Hands 32 Strong Unbalanced Hands 32 Strong Two Suiters 32 The Golden Negatives 33 Special Positives 33 Opponents Bid over Our 1C 34 R.H.O Bids 35 Our Defence to Their 1C 36 Part Seven More Bidding Techniques 36 Canape in the Majors 36 Sputnik with a One Club System 37 Appendix The Variable Forcing Pass 39 A voyage of Discovery 39 Our Version of V.F.P. -
The QBA Bulletin July - September 2018 2
HE ULLETIN TPublished by the QueenslandQBA Bridge Association BJuly-September 2018 Volume 44 No www.qldbridge.com Email: [email protected] 3 the diagnosis came out of the blue and three slightly more experienced From the following an MRI while in hospital for players mixing and matching routine treatment. All of his family partnerships as necessary. They President and friends were caught by surprise. also also came in 5th. in a triple Richard Ward, Chairman of the round robin. Tournament Committee, will be The regional finals of the GNOT are taking Tony's place as the Courier- coming up, followed by the Grand Mail bridge columnist. His first column National Final at Tweed Heads in in this role appeared on August 25. November. Good luck to all Qld Richard Wallis The ANC in Hobart during July participants. ■ and August was successfully conducted by the Tasmanian Bridge HE big story over the past three Hobart ANC Association, and Queensland teams months in Qld is the sad news T performed creditably. by Richard Wallis that Tony Jackman, arguably the best bridge player Queensland • The Open and Women’s team both The Open Teams - a Captain's has produced and unchallenged came 4th. in the double round robin, Perspective as a fine partner and all-round nice narrowly missing out on the play-offs. bloke, passed away on August 15 • The Seniors' team came 5th. in the HIS year I had the great pleasure only 5 days after being diagnosed double round robin. Tof captaining our team for the with terminal cancer. He would • The Youth team put on a game ANC in Hobart in July/August. -
C:\My Documents\Adobe\Boston Fall99
Presents They Had Their Beans Baked In Beantown Appeals at the 1999 Fall NABC Edited by Rich Colker ACBL Appeals Administrator Assistant Editor Linda Trent ACBL Appeals Manager CONTENTS Foreword ...................................................... iii The Expert Panel.................................................v Cases from San Antonio Tempo (Cases 1-24)...........................................1 Unauthorized Information (Cases 25-35)..........................93 Misinformation (Cases 35-49) .................................125 Claims (Cases 50-52)........................................177 Other (Case 53-56)..........................................187 Closing Remarks From the Expert Panelists..........................199 Closing Remarks From the Editor..................................203 Special Section: The WBF Code of Practice (for Appeals Committees) ....209 The Panel’s Director and Committee Ratings .........................215 NABC Appeals Committee .......................................216 Abbreviations used in this casebook: AI Authorized Information AWMPP Appeal Without Merit Penalty Point LA Logical Alternative MI Misinformation PP Procedural Penalty UI Unauthorized Information i ii FOREWORD We continue with our presentation of appeals from NABC tournaments. As always, our goal is to provide information and to foster change for the better in a manner that is entertaining, instructive and stimulating. The ACBL Board of Directors is testing a new appeals process at NABCs in 1999 and 2000 in which a Committee (called a Panel) comprised of pre-selected top Directors will hear appeals at NABCs from non-NABC+ events (including side games, regional events and restricted NABC events). Appeals from NABC+ events will continue to be heard by the National Appeals Committees (NAC). We will review both types of cases as we always have traditional Committee cases. Panelists were sent all cases and invited to comment on and rate each Director ruling and Panel/Committee decision. Not every panelist will comment on every case. -
Weak Two Bids
7-2-1 WEAK TWO BIDS A weak two bid opening implies a hand that has a good six-card suit, but not enough in high cards to definitely call for an opening bid. Vulnerable vs non-vulnerable, weak two bids are often hands that might be opened with one of a suit if not playing weak two bids. Also, with unfavorable vulnerability a seven-card suit is permissible. It is difficult to have enough tricks for a weak two bid with this vulnerability and yet lack opening bid strength. Requirements -- 6-12 HCP, varying with seat position and vulnerability -- Weakest suit K109xxx, usually better -- Most of the strength in the suit opened -- No side suit of four or more cards Flaws: -- Five-card suit (only in third or fourth position, please) -- Singleton or void in a minor, or major suit void -- Support for a side major -- Only one of the top three honors in the suit opened Do not open a badly flawed hand. Not vulnerable, the hand should have 1-1/2 to 2+ defensive tricks, vulnerable 1-1/2 to 2-1/2. Partner will count on more than one trick from you on defense if she has a singleton in your suit. Playing trick strength requirements vary with vulnerability: Favorable 5 to 6 playing tricks Nobody vul. 5-1/2 to 6-1/2 Both vul. 6 to 7 Unfavorable 6-1/2 to 7-1/2 With a suit like AKQ10xx or KQJ9xx, six playing tricks are enough with unfavorable vulnerability. These requirements may be relaxed somewhat in third or fourth seat. -
Bernard Magee's Acol Bidding Quiz
Number: 175 UK £3.95 Europe €5.00 July 2017 Bernard Magee’s Acol Bidding Quiz This month we are dealing with hands that contain voids. You are West in the auctions below, BRIDGEplaying ‘Standard Acol’ with a weak no-trump (12-14 points) and four-card majors. 1. Dealer West. Game All. 4. Dealer East. Love All. 7. Dealer East. Love All. 10. Dealer North. Love All. ♠ A K 6 5 ♠ Void ♠ K Q 8 7 6 ♠ Q J 7 6 ♥ Void ♥ J 6 5 4 3 ♥ Void ♥ Void N ♦ J 8 7 6 2 N ♦ Q 9 7 3 2 N ♦ K Q 4 3 2 N ♦ Q J 4 3 W E W E W E W E ♣ A K 7 4 ♣ A 6 5 ♣ 7 6 5 ♣ Q 8 7 6 5 S S S S West North East South West North East South West North East South West North East South ? 1♠ Pass 1♥ Pass 1♦ 1♥ Pass 1NT Pass 2♠ Pass 1♠ Pass 2♣ Pass ? ? ? 2. Dealer East. Game All. 5. Dealer East. Love All. 8. Dealer East. Love All. 11. Dealer North. Love All. ♠ Void ♠ Void ♠ K Q 8 7 6 ♠ Q J 7 6 N N N ♥ K Q 4 2 ♥ J 6 5 4 3 ♥ Void N ♥ K Q 3 2 W E W E W E W E ♦ J 6 5 3 ♦ Q 9 7 3 2 ♦ 7 6 5 ♦ A 8 7 6 5 S S S S ♣ J 6 5 4 2 ♣ A 6 5 ♣ K Q 4 3 2 ♣ Void West North East South West North East South West North East South West North East South 1♠ Pass 1♠ Pass 1♥ Pass 1♣ 1♠ 2♣ ? 1NT Pass 2♣ Pass 1♠ Pass 2♣ Pass ? ? ? 3. -
Using Your Judgment When Opening 1Nt
USING YOUR JUDGMENT WHEN OPENING 1NT Should you ever open 1NT with a 5 card major? What about 5-4-2-2 patterns with 15-17 points? Some people open 1NT with 6 card minors, too. What about a singleton? Opening 1NT with a 5 Card Major or How to Start an Argument with a Bridge Player When you first learned to play bridge, you probably learned never to open 1NT with a 5 card major or always to open 1NT with a 5-3-3-2 pattern and 15-17 HCP since most authors of beginning bridge series believe that beginners should be taught few exceptions to the rules. Neither approach is right all of the time; both are correct some of the time. Beginners don't need many exceptions to the rules. They have their hands full remembering the structure of the bidding system. But, as you gain some experience with this game, you should begin to develop some judgment and learn when to break the rules. If you open this hand with 1H, what will you rebid over partner's 1S response? NQx MAJTxx LKQx KAxx Approach 1 Some people open 1NT with 16 points and a 5-3-3-2 pattern and with 15 or 17 points they open the major suit. If you open 1 Major with a 15 point hand, you plan to rebid in such a way that shows a minimum balanced hand, a slight underbid. With 17 points, and the same pattern, if you open 1 Major, you plan to jump rebid in NT, a slight overbid that usually shows 18 or 19 points. -
Bidding and Play Definitions
Bidding and Play Definitions for BridgeClues2.Com BC Bidding_PlayDefs.doc Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. POINT COUNT 1 2.1 High Card Points (HCP) 1 2.2 Long Suit Distribution Points 1 2.3 Short Suit Distribution Points 1 2.4 Points 1 3. SUIT BIDS 2 3.1 Five Card Majors 2 3.2 Forcing 1NT over a Major by an Unpassed Hand 2 3.3 Convenient Minor Openings 2 3.4 Limit Raises 2 3.5 Preemptive Minor Suit Raises 2 3.6 Preemptive Jumps to Game in Partner’s Major Opening 2 3.7 Opening Four in a Major 2 3.8 Preemptive Three Bids 2 3.9 Weak Jump Overcalls 3 3.10 Weak Jump Responses 3 3.11 Weak Two Bids 3 3.12 Balancing in a Suit 3 3.13 Opening in Third Seat 3 3.14 Opening in Fourth Seat 4 4.0 NOTRUMP BIDS 4 4.1 Bid of 1NT – 15 to 17 HCP's 4 4.2 Bid of 2NT – 20 to 21 HCP's 4 4.3 Opening Bid of 2C with a Rebid of 2NT – 22 to 24 HCP's 4 4.4 Opening Bid of 2C with a Rebid of 3NT – 25 to 27 HCP's 4 4.5 3H or 3S Response to a 1NT Opening Bid 4 4.6 Balancing in Notrump 5 4.7 Stayman 5 4.8 Drop Dead Stayman (Garbage Stayman or Crawling Stayman) 5 4.9 Gerber 5 4.10 Super Gerber 5 4.11 Quantitative 4NT 6 4.12 Jacoby Transfers 6 4.13 Texas Transfers 6 BC Bidding_PlayDefs.doc ii 4.14 Relay in competition 6 4.15 ACOL 3NT 6 4.16 Gambling 3NT 6 5. -
GUERRA SU TUTTI I FRONTI Vicenda “Cheating”, Una Sintesi Di Quel Che È Successo in Questi Ultimi Tre Anni
19/03/2018 A cura dell’istruttore Michele Leone GUERRA SU TUTTI I FRONTI Vicenda “Cheating”, una sintesi di quel che è successo in questi ultimi tre anni. Caso FANTONI/NUNES Più di 500 top players USA hanno firmato la petizione Anti- Come è noto, la sentenza EBL (European Bridge League) è cheating proposta da Zia Mahmood, uno dei principali stata annullata dal CAS (Court of Arbitration for Sport) di organizzatori della manifestazione. Losanna. Pochi giorni dopo la pubblicazione della sentenza della Corte Europea, avevamo pubblicato sul nostro sito L’articolo: “Considerazioni sulla decisione del CAS”. Oltre ai vari riferimenti sulla vicenda, avevamo espresso il nostro parere, qui sotto riportato: Indubbiamente i legali dei Fantunes sono stati molto abili, hanno presentato valide motivazioni in loro difesa, tuttavia, si fa una certa fatica a pensare esclusivamente a Dite no ai bari (to cheat = imbrogliare, barare) un verdetto su base tecnica, del resto, per ricorrere al CAS bisogna essere confidenti di avere una certa In molti giocatori hanno indossato il distintivo “Say No to probabilità di successo - non è facile remare contro EBL Cheats”, indicato in figura. Dettagli e traduzione italiana a e ACBL -, viene il sospetto che qualche personaggio questo link: altolocato, bridgisticamente co-interessato e ben inserito nelle sedi internazionali dello sport, si sia dato NeapolitanClub da fare per acquisire il verdetto pilatesco del CAS, ed ora costui stia facendo salti di gioia, con il dito medio eretto verso l’alto, per lo più indirizzato al presidente EBL, al norvegese Brogeland e alle personalità del bridge americano. Un’ovvia deduzione che, seppur descritta con un linguaggio colorito, dava l’idea dell’impatto che il verdetto CAS avrebbe avuto sul mondo del bridge. -
FOUR ACES Could Have Done More Safely
Number: 214 October 2020 BRIDGEJulian Pottage’s Double Dummy Problem UR ACE FO S ♠ 3 2 ♥ A 3 2 ♦ Q ♣ A Q 6 5 4 3 2 ♠ K Q J 10 9 ♠ 8 7 ♥ N ♥ K Q J 10 W E 9 8 7 ♦ 10 S ♦ K J 9 8 7 6 5 ♣ J 10 9 ♣ K ♠ A 6 5 4 ♥ 6 5 4 ♦ A 4 3 2 ♣ 8 7 Contract 3NT by South Lead: ♠K BRIDGE is ceasing publication. The last issueThe will answer be will benumber published on page 216 4 next - month.December 2020. See page 5 for more information. A Sally Brock Looks At Your Slam Bidding Sally’s Slam Clinic Where did we go wrong? Slam of the month Another regular contributor to these Playing standard Acol, South would This month’s hand was sent in by pages, Alex Mathers, sent in the open 2♣, but whatever system was Roger Harris who played it with his following deal which he bid with played it is likely that he would then partner Alan Patel at the Stratford- his partner playing their version of rebid 2NT showing 23-24 points. It is upon-Avon online bridge club. Benjaminised Acol: normal to play the same system after 2♣/2♦ – negative – 2NT as over an opening 2NT, so I was surprised North Dealer South. Game All. Dealer West. Game All. did not use Stayman. In my view the ♠ A 9 4 ♠ J 9 8 correct Acol sequence is: ♥ K 7 6 ♥ A J 10 6 ♦ 2 ♦ K J 7 2 West North East South ♣ A 9 7 6 4 2 ♣ 8 6 Pass Pass Pass 2♣ ♠ Q 10 8 6 3 ♠ J 7 N ♠ Q 4 3 ♠ 10 7 5 2 Pass 2♦ Pass 2NT ♥ Q 9 ♥ 10 8 5 4 2 W E ♥ 7 4 3 N ♥ 9 8 5 2 Pass 3♣ Pass 3♦ ♦ Q J 10 9 5 ♦ K 8 7 3 S W E ♦ 8 5 4 ♦ Q 9 3 Pass 6NT All Pass ♣ 8 ♣ Q 5 S ♣ Q 10 9 4 ♣ J 5 Once South has shown 23 HCP or so, ♠ K 5 2 ♠ A K 6 North knows the values are there for ♥ A J 3 ♥ K Q slam. -
A Case to CRO About?
A Case to CRO about? Sitting West you hold: and your partner opens 1NT (15-17). You transfer your partner into hearts then bid 2S. Partner now bids 3H showing 3 x hearts and lower point range. You have at least a 6-3 heart fit with a relatively strong hand opposite and you feel that a slam is possible. What do you do bid next? If you use simple Gerber or Blackwood to ask for Aces and Kings, partner tells you that she has two of each. If you use Key Card to ask for controls (the controls are the 4 Aces and the K of trumps), partner tells you that she has two Aces without the QH and two Kings. Do you bid the heart slam? Thoughts: Standard Ace asking bids like Gerber and Blackwood are not that helpful when you have a void since they will not tell you which Aces and Kings partner holds. If, on this board, partner holds the AC and KC opposite your void the slam is unlikely to make. Advanced players can get around this problem by control cue bidding prior to Ace asking. There are augmented versions of Blackwood and Key Card asking which will identify voids but they don’t apply to the situation where the Ace asker has a void herself as in the situation here. If you are missing two Aces which is quite common in Ace asking enquiries, there is a bidding system that can help. It is called CRO and is most effectively used as a 4C asking bid in order to keep the bidding level lower for signoff if slam looks unlikely.