The Role of the Audit Committee Center for April 2018 Board Effectiveness the Role of the Audit Committee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Role of the Audit Committee Center for April 2018 Board Effectiveness the Role of the Audit Committee The role of the audit committee Center for April 2018 Board Effectiveness The role of the audit committee Oversight of financial reporting and related internal controls Review of filings and earnings releases Risk oversight Oversight of the independent auditor Ethics and compliance Oversight of internal audit Other interactions with management and the board Audit committee external communications 2 Role of the audit committee The role of the audit committee As an audit committee member, it is important to understand the rules Oversight of financial reporting relevant to your role. This section provides an overview of an audit and related internal controls committee’s responsibilities in overseeing financial reporting and related The audit committee, management, and the independent internal controls, risk, and ethics and compliance. It also discusses the auditor all have distinct roles in financial reporting. Management is responsible for preparing the financial committee’s role in overseeing the internal and independent auditors, as well statements, establishing and maintaining adequate as how the committee may interact with other members of management and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), and evaluating the effectiveness of ICFR. The independent external stakeholders. Finally, it highlights the committee’s responsibilities auditor is responsible for expressing an opinion on the with respect to disclosures in the proxy statement. fairness with which the financial statements present, in all material respects, the financial position, the results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with GAAP, and, SEC, PCAOB, NYSE, and NASDAQ rules are highlighted where relevant, and we when applicable, evaluating the effectiveness of ICFR. have noted leading practices, tools, and resources to help audit committee To oversee ICFR successfully, the audit committee should members execute their responsibilities. be familiar with the processes and controls management has put in place and understand whether those processes and controls are designed and operating effectively. The audit committee should work with management, the internal auditors, and the independent auditor to gain the knowledge needed to provide appropriate oversight of this area. Likewise, the audit committee is responsible for overseeing the entire financial reporting process. To do so effectively, it should be familiar with the processes and controls that management has established and determine whether they were designed effectively. 3 Role of the audit committee The audit committee’s role is one of oversight and balance-sheet transactions, on the financial statements. Audit committee members should be aware of three monitoring, and in carrying out this responsibility, the For example: main areas of fraud risk: committee may rely on management, the independent • Management and the audit committee should • Financial statement fraud, which includes intentional auditor, and any advisers the committee might engage, discuss pending technical and regulatory matters misstatements in or omissions from financial provided its reliance is reasonable. that could affect the financial statements, and statements the audit committee should be updated on The audit committee should consider having • Asset misappropriation, which may include check management’s plans to implement new technical management identify and discuss any significant forgery, theft of money, inventory theft, payroll fraud, or regulatory guidelines. accounting policies, estimates, and judgments made. or theft of services The review of off-balance-sheet structures should A quarterly analysis of these areas may be useful to • • Corruption, which may include schemes such as prepare for these discussions, and management should also be a recurring agenda item, and may be kickbacks, shell companies, bribes to influence tailor the analysis to highlight changes and include new conducted as part of the committee’s review of decision makers, or manipulation of contracts. or unusual items. Because Regulation S-X, Rule 2-07 management’s discussion and analysis in the annual requires the independent auditor to discuss the effects and quarterly reports. The exact frequency of these One way the audit committee can help oversee the of alternative GAAP methods on the financial statements, discussions will depend on the company’s operations prevention and detection of financial statement fraud is the information presented by management should be and preferences. Finally, the audit committee should by monitoring management’s assessment of ICFR. corroborated by the independent auditor. consider reviewing off-balance-sheet transactions, or at least material ones, before they are executed. The audit committee should also have an awareness of NYSE listing standards require NYSE requirements. the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and other the audit committee to review major issues regarding NASDAQ requirements. NASDAQ requires disclosure non-US anticorruption laws that may be applicable accounting principles and the presentation of the of the audit committee’s purpose, as set out in its (e.g., the UK Bribery Act). As the SEC and Department financial statements. These include significant changes charter, of overseeing accounting and financial reporting of Justice note in the Resource Guide to the FCPA, in the company’s selection or application of accounting processes of the company and audits of the financial anticorruption compliance “begins with the board of principles, the adequacy of internal controls, and statements. See the audit committee charter section directors and senior executives setting the proper tone any special audit steps adopted in response to what of this guide for details. for the rest of the company.” To that end, the audit the NYSE terms “material control deficiencies.” These Fraud risk committee should: discussions can be held, generally with management, In conjunction with risk oversight, the audit committee during the review of the quarterly financial statements to • Understand the company’s obligations and should be satisfied that the company has programs and be filed with the SEC. responsibilities regarding anticorruption laws to policies in place to prevent and identify fraud. It should which it is subject work with management to oversee the establishment The audit committee is also required to review Determine whether the company has dedicated of appropriate antifraud controls and programs and • management’s analyses of significant issues in financial appropriate oversight, autonomy, and resources to to take the necessary steps when fraud is detected. reporting and judgments made in preparing the financial its anticorruption compliance program; depending The audit committee should also be satisfied that the statements, including the effects of alternative GAAP on the company’s size, this could involve assigning organization has implemented an appropriate ethics and methods. This discussion may also be held during the an individual who is specifically charged with compliance program and established a reporting hotline. review of the quarterly financial statements. anticorruption compliance and has a direct reporting See the ethics and code of conduct and reporting The audit committee also should review the effects line to the committee hotline procedures sections later in this guide for more of regulatory and accounting initiatives, as well as off- information. 4 Role of the audit committee • Understand specific policies and procedures in place to identify and mitigate corruption-related risks • Discuss with management specific corruption-related Tools and resources risks that have been identified, including allegations of corruption that may have been received through the The Anti-Fraud Collaboration released a report company’s monitoring and reporting mechanisms, as titled The Fraud-Resistant Organization that well as management’s plans for responding to such identifies three central themes critical to fraud risks deterrence and detection. • Monitor any actual violations, including management’s response. 2013 COSO framework. The 2013 Internal Control— Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) provides a formal structure for designing and evaluating the effectiveness of internal control. It emphasizes the role of the board—and, by delegation or regulation, the role of the audit committee—in overseeing internal control, which remains an essential aspect of effective governance. In particular, the framework highlights: • The board’s role in the control environment, including clarification of expectations for integrity and ethics, conflicts of interest, adherence to codes of conduct, and other matters • The board’s assessment of the risk that management could override internal controls and careful consideration of the possibility that management may override such controls • The establishment and maintenance of open lines of communication between management and the board and the provision of separate lines of communication, such as whistleblower hotlines. 5 Role of the audit committee Review of filings Note that SEC rules require the audit committee to recommend to the board that the audited financial Tothirds of ofcommittee audit committee meet ia meet and earnings releases statements be included in the company’s annual report iacofeece cofeece call call to dicuto dicu eai eai eleaeeleae hilehile 22% eieeie eaieai The audit
Recommended publications
  • Financial Reporting: Who Does What? FUTURE of AUDIT FINANCIAL REPORTING: WHO DOES WHAT?
    ICAEW THOUGHT LEADERSHIP FUTURE OF AUDIT Financial reporting: who does what? FUTURE OF AUDIT FINANCIAL REPORTING: WHO DOES WHAT? This publication explains in simple terms who does what in the financial reporting system for UK companies with full main market listings. It is intended to serve as background reading for our 2019/20 ‘The future of audit’ thought leadership essays. They, inter alia, are designed to inform the various inquiries relevant to audit and regulation in progress at the time of writing, including by Sir Donald Brydon, Sir John Kingman, the CMA and BEIS. We hope this background paper will help directors, politicians, investors and policymakers understand the complex relationships between boards, auditors, shareholders and others, and the regulatory regime within which those relationships operate. © ICAEW 2019 All rights reserved. If you want to reproduce or redistribute any of the material in this publication, you should first get ICAEW’s permission in writing. ICAEW will not be liable for any reliance you place on the information in this publication. You should seek independent advice. 2 FUTURE OF AUDIT FINANCIAL REPORTING: WHO DOES WHAT? Financial statements: at the heart of the financial reporting system Financial reporting needs to improve, and everyone involved – preparers, auditors, audit committees, shareholders – needs to do more. This is no mere exhortation: all of these players are required by law, regulation and various codes to play an active part in ensuring that the financial statements, which sit at the heart of the system, pass the test required of them by law, which is that they give a ‘true and fair’ view.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Audit Committee FAQ1
    Internal Audit Committee FAQ1 What is an audit committee? What are the roles and Members that provide oversight of auditing and responsibilities of the audit internal control for the agency and help support independence of the internal audit function. committee? • Oversight of the Internal Audit Function Why do agencies that have an internal audit • Governance • Ethics (including tone at the top) function need an audit committee? • Risk Management Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 125-700-0125 (5) • Internal Control and Compliance states that “each agency having an internal audit • Operational Effectiveness and Efficiency function shall establish and maintain an audit committee.” The OAR also provides the framework for audit committees as: • The role and function of the audit committee shall What should the audit committee review? be stated in a formal, written charter that • Audit Committee Charter describes the authority, responsibilities, and • Internal Audit Charter structure of the audit committee. The charter • Annual Risk Assessment must be approved and periodically reviewed by • Audit Plan the audit committee and governing board (or • Audit Reports (both internal and external) agency head in the absence of a governing board). • Follow-up on prior audit recommendations • The primary purpose of the audit committee is to • Annual Report to DAS enhance the quality and independence of the • Performance Metrics audit function, thereby helping ensure the • External Quality Assurance Reviews (peer integrity of the internal audit process.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Council Internal Audit Charter A
    METROPOLITAN COUNCIL INTERNAL AUDIT CHARTER A. AUDIT COMMITTEE PURPOSE: The Metropolitan Council has established a special committee of the Council to be called the Metropolitan Council Audit Committee. The purpose of the Committee is to assist the Metropolitan Council in fulfilling its oversight responsibility for the integrity of the Council’s financial and operational results, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and the performance of internal audit and external auditors. AUTHORITY: The Audit Committee has authority to conduct or authorize special audits and investigations into any matters within its scope of responsibility. It is empowered to: Approve the Chief Audit Executive’s Audit Plan. Resolve any disagreements between management and the internal/external auditors regarding financial or operational control and reporting. Review and accept external auditors’ reports along with management’s written responses when appropriate. Obtain information from employees or external parties as part of its review. Council employees are directed to cooperate with Audit Committee requests. Meet with Council employees, external auditors, legal counsel, or others as necessary. Be consulted regarding changes in the Chief Audit Executive’s duties. Be informed of all matters that impair the conduct of an audit or review. However, where feasible such matters shall be first brought to the attention of the Regional Administrator for resolution before communicating them to the Audit Committee. Make periodic reports to the Council or appropriate standing committee established by the Council. RESPONSIBILITIES: Financial and Operational Review Oversight Review significant accounting, operational and reporting issues and understand their impact on the financial and operating results on the Metropolitan Council’s system of internal control.
    [Show full text]
  • Job Title Assistant Comptroller Job Code Exempt Status Exempt
    Job Title Assistant Comptroller Job Code Exempt Status Exempt Position Status EEO Classification Job Summary The Assistant Comptroller, under general supervision, assists the Comptroller with operational activities in the supervision and control of financial activities. Monitors fiscal health and direct capital project accounting. Provides oversight by ensuring effective and efficient operations of accounting activities in the Financial Reporting System. Essential Duties and Responsibilities • Assists in the coordination and supervision of activities of associated staff, with the compilation, review, completion, and distribution of the Consolidated Annual Financial Report (AFR). • Directs liaison efforts with the State Auditor’s Office, the State Comptroller’s Office, and other oversight agencies for financial, reporting, and audit matters. • Manages and reviews accounting functions related to the maintenance and management of the accounting system, including production control and security. • Responds to inquiries. Serves as a fiscal liaison with departments, the State Comptroller’s Office, and the System Office of Budgets and Accounting. Provides financial information, records, and support to auditors, both internally and externally. • Assists in the enhancement and development of System-wide accounting and reporting procedures and regulations, including associated training and preparation of a System accounting policy manual, identification of problematic issues, and compliance with external accounting and reporting requirements and requests. • Reviews and analyzes potential legislation dealing with financial issues. Interprets and directs implementation of requirements resulting from new legislation and/or directives of State oversight agencies. • Supervises the calculation and negotiation of the long form rates, and the review and negotiation of short form rates. • Reviews and monitors compliance of the disclosure statement submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS).
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Control and the Board: What Is All the Fuss About?
    The Deloitte Academy June 2021 Stakeholders Societal licence Shareholders Responsible business Transparency Corporate governance Viability Company purposeAudit committee Culture Strategy Viability Internal control KPIs Audit quality Remuneration Sustainability Trust Shareholders Strategy Assurance KPIs Reputation Capability Stakeholders Company purpose Viability Internal control and the board: What is all the fuss about? Headlines • The UK Corporate Governance Code already establishes a clear responsibility on the whole board to establish a framework of prudent and effective controls – however, behind the UK proposals for a US style internal control attestation are very real questions as to whether responsibilities go far enough and whether there is sufficient guidance for boards, together with sufficiently detailed information from management, to meet these responsibilities effectively. • In particular the guidance does not address the pervasiveness of technology in detail, and boards may not be obtaining sufficient assurance over the effectiveness of IT controls given the complexity and interdependency of the IT infrastructure which exists in many companies today. • The extent of work performed by external auditors is also not well understood - careful questioning of auditors in relation to their audit scope and approach could reveal much about the control environment. • In summary, boards should not wait for further announcements from the Government or FRC/ARGA before taking action in this area, particularly if they are not able to answer the questions which we raise throughout this publication. Internal control and the board: What is all the fuss about? A reminder of the current UK Corporate Governance Code requirements • Overarching board responsibility from Code Principle C: The board should establish a framework of prudent and effective controls, which enable risk to be assessed and managed.
    [Show full text]
  • Auditor Selection Guidance 2020
    STATE OF FLORIDA AUDITOR GENERAL AUDITOR SELECTION AND AUDITOR SELECTION COMMITTEE GUIDANCE EFFECTIVE FOR AUDITS FOR FISCAL YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2021, AND THEREAFTER SEPTEMBER 2021 Table of Contents Auditor Selection Law ....................................................................................................... 1 Auditor Selection Committee Composition and Size ...................................................... 1 Legal Requirements .................................................................................................. 1 Nonmandatory Guidance ........................................................................................... 2 Small Government Considerations ............................................................................ 3 Auditor Selection Committee Responsibilities................................................................. 3 Legal Requirements .................................................................................................. 3 Nonmandatory Guidance .......................................................................................... 3 • Establishment of the Auditor Selection Committee ........................................ 3 • Auditor Selection Committee Responsibilities ................................................ 4 • Communications with the Auditor Selection Committee ................................. 6 Small Government Considerations ............................................................................ 6 Audit Proposal Evaluation Factors ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Audit Committees and Auditor Independence Brochure
    relationships with the company, its officers, directors or significant Change of Independent Auditors shareholders. Thus, audit committees should consider whether the company The auditor generally must be independent for has implemented processes that identify the entire engagement period and the period such prohibited relationships. covered by the financial statements being audited. Once this relationship is terminated, z Certain Financial Relationships. Audit there is no continuing requirement for the auditor committees should be aware that certain to remain independent. The auditor may financial relationships between the generally re-issue its former opinions on the company and the independent auditor company’s financial statements. However, if a are prohibited. These include creditor/ restatement of the financial statements becomes debtor relationships, banking, broker- necessary, the auditor must be independent to dealer, futures commission merchant audit the restatement adjustments and re-issue its accounts, insurance products and opinion. Further, if the Board is contemplating or interests in investment companies. plans a change in auditors, the audit committee Communications Between the Audit must consider whether the prospective firm will be independent during the audit engagement period. Committee and the Independent Auditor That is, the prospective firm must cease all Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 prohibited services and/or sever all prohibited AUDIT COMMITTEES AND requires that the auditor disclose to the audit relationships with the issuer prior to the beginning AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE committee in writing all relationships between of the audit engagement period. Therefore, the the audit firm and the company that may audit committee should consider these issues reasonably be thought to bear on the audit firm’s before hiring a predecessor auditor or a independence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Internal Auditing in Enterprise-Wide Risk Management
    IIA POSITION PAPER: THE ROLE OF INTERNAL AUDITING IN ENTERPRISE-WIDE RISK MANAGEMENT Issued: January 2009 ERM PP Revised: Page 1 of 8 Introduction The importance to strong corporate governance of managing risk has been increasingly acknowledged. Organizations are under pressure to identify all the business risks they face; social, ethical and environmental as well as financial and operational, and to explain how they manage them to an acceptable level. Meanwhile, the use of enterprise-wide risk management frameworks has expanded, as organizations recognize their advantages over less coordinated approaches to risk management. Internal auditing, in both its assurance and its consulting roles, contributes to the management of risk in a variety of ways. What is Enterprise-wide Risk Management? People undertake risk management activities to identify, assess, manage, and control all kinds of events or situations. These can range from single projects or narrowly defined types of risk, e.g. market risk, to the threats and opportunities facing the organization as a whole. The principles presented in this paper can be used to guide the involvement of internal auditing in all forms of risk management but we are particularly interested in enterprise-wide risk management because this is likely to improve an organization’s governance processes. Enterprise-wide risk management (ERM) is a structured, consistent and continuous process across the whole organization for identifying, assessing, deciding on responses to and reporting on opportunities and threats that affect the achievement of its objectives. Responsibility for ERM The board has overall responsibility for ensuring that risks are managed. In practice, the board will delegate the operation of the risk management framework to the management team, who will be responsible for completing the activities below.
    [Show full text]
  • Audit Committee Charter & Checklist
    Audit Committee Charter & Checklist GP Natural Resource Partners LLC Purpose The Audit Committee (the "Committee") is appointed by the Board of Directors of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC (the "Company") to serve as an independent and objective party to: • oversee the quality and integrity of the financial statements, reports and other financial information of Natural Resource Partners L.P. (the "Partnership") that the Partnership provides to any governmental body or to the public; • oversee the Partnership's compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; • oversee the independent public accountant's qualifications and independence; • oversee the performance of the independent public accountants; • oversee the performance of the internal audit functions of the Partnership and the Company; • oversee the Partnership's systems of internal controls regarding finance, accounting, legal compliance and ethics that management and the Board of Directors have established; • prepare on an annual basis a Report of the Audit Committee for inclusion in the Partnership's annual report on Form 10-K; • provide an open avenue of communication among the independent public accountants, financial and senior management, the personnel responsible for internal audit functions, and the Board of Directors, always emphasizing that the independent public accountants are accountable to the Committee; and • perform such other duties as are directed by the Board of Directors and report regularly to the Board of Directors. Consistent with this purpose, the Committee should encourage continuous improvement of, and should foster adherence to, the Partnership's policies, procedures and practices at all levels. Committee Membership The Committee shall be comprised of three or more Directors, as recommended by the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee and approved by the Board of Directors.
    [Show full text]
  • Brookfield Business Partners Limited Audit Committee Charter
    BROOKFIELD BUSINESS PARTNERS LIMITED AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER A committee of the board of directors (the “Board”) of Brookfield Business Partners Limited (the “BBU General Partner”), the general partner of Brookfield Business Partners LP (the “Partnership”), to be known as the Audit Committee (the “Committee”) shall have the following terms of reference: MEMBERSHIP AND CHAIR Annually the Board shall appoint three or more directors (the “Members” and each a “Member”) to serve on the committee for the upcoming year or until the Member ceases to be a director, resigns or is replaced, whichever occurs first. The Members will be selected by the Board on the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee of the BBU General Partner (the “Governance and Nominating Committee”). Any Member may be removed, with or without cause, from office or replaced at any time by the Board. All Members will be Independent directors (as defined below). In addition, every Member will be Financially Literate (as defined below). Members may not serve on more than two other public company audit committees, except with the prior approval of the Chair of the Board. Not more than fifty percent of the Members may be residents of any one jurisdiction (other than Bermuda and any other jurisdiction designated by the Board from time to time). The Board shall appoint one Member as the chair of the Committee (the “Chair”). If the Board fails to appoint a Chair, the Members of the Committee shall elect a Chair by majority vote to serve at the pleasure of the majority. If the Chair is absent from a meeting, the Members shall select a Member from those in attendance to act as Chair of the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict of Interest?: Executive-Auditor Relationship and the Likelihood of a SEC- Prompted Restatement Henry Lyford Claremont Mckenna College
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2010 Conflict of Interest?: Executive-Auditor Relationship and the Likelihood of a SEC- Prompted Restatement Henry Lyford Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Lyford, Henry, "Conflict of Interest?: Executive-Auditor Relationship and the Likelihood of a SEC-Prompted Restatement" (2010). CMC Senior Theses. Paper 39. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/39 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE Conflict of Interest?: Executive-Auditor Relationship and the Likelihood of an SEC- Prompted Restatement SUBMITTED TO PROFESSOR MARC MASSOUD AND DEAN GREGORY HESS BY HENRY ANDREW LYFORD FOR SENIOR THESIS FALL 2010 11/29/2010 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………4 INTRODUCTION & RESEARCH MOTIVATION………………………..5 LITERATURE REVIEW & HYPOTHESES……………………………...14 METHODOLOGY…………………………………………………………21 DATA & RESULTS……………………………………………………….27 CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………….31 BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………………………….34 4 Acknowledgements I would like to extend special thanks to the following parties for aiding me in this study. First, I would like to thank Professor Massoud for his kind, even if sometimes firm, advice and guidance throughout the entire process. He kept me on task and always motivated me to do my best work possible. Secondly, I would like to thank Professor Cronqvist for his invaluable insight concerning research approach and empirical method. He challenged me to think critically about my proxies and regressors in order to make the results as meaningful as possible. I would also like to thank Professor Batta for providing information on useful past studies and sources for data.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disclosure in the Annual Reports by the Listed Companies on the Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange
    International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 6, No. 12; December 2015 The Disclosure in the Annual Reports by the Listed Companies on the Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange Vo Thi Thuy Trang Nha Trang Uinversity, Nha Trang Viet Nam Nguyen Cong Phuong College of Economics, Da Nang University Da Nang Viet Nam Abstract Purpose: This study aims to examine levels of the disclosure in the annual reports of the listed companies on the HOSE. Design/methodology/approach: This paper applies disclosure indexes to measure the amount information that is disclosure in the annual report of companies listed on HOSE in 2013. The disclosure index is designed basing on 94 disclosure items. Findings: The results show that the levels of the voluntary disclosure in the annual report by the listed companies is low, only at 23,9%. Research limitation: Information disclosure is an abstract concept and cannot be measured directly due to researchers’ subjective opinions. Originality/value: This research contributes to the literature by showing that although the existence of regulations and a monitoring system by regulatory authorities, voluntary disclosure by listed companies in a developing country such as Vietnam is low which influences company’s transparency. The results of this research provide useful information for the State agencies to review, modify and develop disclosure regulations in the future. The paper also can be used as an useful materials for teaching. Keywords: Voluntary Disclosure, Corporate Governance, Annual Report, listed companies 1. Introduction This paper aims to measure the level of information disclosure of the companies listed on the stock market of Vietnam.
    [Show full text]