Noteworthy Plants Reported from the Torrey Range— 2009 and 20101 Eric E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Noteworthy Plants Reported from the Torrey Range— 2009 and 20101 Eric E Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 138(4), 2011, pp. 472–484 Noteworthy plants reported from the Torrey Range— 2009 and 20101 Eric E. Lamont2 Torrey Botanical Society, Local Flora and Vegetation Committee, The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY 10458 Steven D. Glenn3 Brooklyn Botanic Garden, 1000 Washington Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11225 Stephen M. Young4 New York Natural Heritage Program, 625 Broadway, Albany, NY 12233 LAMONT, E. E. (Torrey Botanical Society, Local Flora and Vegetation Committee, The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY 10458), S. D. GLENN (Brooklyn Botanic Garden, 1000 Washington Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11225), AND S. M. YOUNG (New York Natural Heritage Program, 625 Broadway, Albany, NY 12233). Noteworthy plants reported from the Torrey Range—2009 and 2010. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 138: 472–484. 2011.—Twenty-four noteworthy species of vascular plants are reported from the Torrey Range, encompassing southeastern New York, northern New Jersey, and southwestern Connecticut: Acalypha australis, Carex arctata, Carex typhina, Corallorhiza trifida, Corydalis incisa, Cyperus polystachyos var. texensis, Cypripedium parviflorum var. makasin, Dryopteris celsa, Froelichia floridana, Galium boreale, Houstonia pusilla, Isotria medeoloides, Juglans ailantifolia, Juncus brachycarpus, Kyllinga pumila, Nymphoides peltata, Oldenlandia uniflora, Phlox divaricata, Platanthera pallida, Pycnanthemum verticillatum, Ranunculus pusillus, Schoenoplectus mucronatus, Stylophorum diphyllum, and Trichostema setaceum. Key words: floristics, invasive plants, northward range extensions, rare plants, Torrey Range. The Torrey Range has been long known as examples such as Eclipta prostrata, Eupatorium a region that supports plant species of both serotinum, Gamochaeta purpurea, and Hetero- southern and northern affinities. Taylor (1915) theca subaxillaris (Lamont and Young 2002, discussed this topic and concluded that approx- 2005, 2006; Lamont and Glenn 2009); in this imately 13% of the Torrey Range flora, at the paper we discuss three more species: Froelichia time, consisted of ‘‘southern species reaching floridana, Houstonia pusilla, and Kyllinga their northern distribution point’’ and approx- pumila. Other investigators also have noted imately 8% were ‘‘plants found exclusively this northern migration of southern species, north of the moraine.’’ During the past twelve including Greller et al. (2011). years, the Torrey Botanical Society has been A second change we have observed is a documenting changes in the Torrey Range general decline in occurrences of northern flora, based on extensive field studies and col- species in the Torrey Range, but many nor- lections, and four general trends have emerged. thern and circumboreal species still persist in One change is an increase in the number of small isolated colonies. For example, popula- southern species migrating into the region. Pre- tions of Ligusticum scothicum have become vious papers in this Torrey series have included increasingly rare on eastern Long Island, New York (Lamont and Fitzgerald 2001); but, as presented in this paper, other northern spe- 1 This report is the eighth in a continuing series of floristic studies produced by the Local Flora cies still persist, including Corallorhiza trifida, Committee of the Torrey Botanical Society. The Cypripedium parviflorum var. makasin, and Torrey Range comprises the region within a 50-mile Galium boreale. radius of Columbus Circle, New York City, but We continue to document the occurrence includes all of Long Island, New York. For details on the past and present boundaries of the Torrey of many rare plant species within the Torrey Range, including counties, see Lamont and Fitzger- Range. These finds are especially noteworthy ald (2001). considering that the metropolitan New York 2 Corresponding author: 717 Sound Shore Road, City region is one of the most populated areas Riverhead, NY 11901; E-mail: elamont@optonline. on earth and many natural ecosystems have net 3 E-mail: [email protected] been destroyed or negatively impacted by 4 E-mail: [email protected] human activity. In this paper we report on 472 2011] LAMONT ET AL.: NOTEWORTHY PLANTS 473 eleven rare plant species that have been Natural Heritage Program), Richard Stalter located after years of not being observed. (St. John’s University), and Mark Szutarski The most noteworthy is Isotria medeoloides (Torrey Botanical Society). from Orange County, New York, a species Discussion of noteworthy plants reported confirmed from only six previous localities from the Torrey Range—2009 and 2010 in the state and not observed in more than 30 years. A collection of Carex arctata from Acalypha australis L. Putnam County, New York, represents only Asian Copperleaf the second documented report of this species Euphorbiaceae, the Spurge Family from the Torrey Range, the first was from This species is a recent introduction to North 1895. And a 2009 collection of Dryopteris celsa America where it was first collected in 1989 represents the first time this species has been from Kings and Queens counties, New York documented from Staten Island in 102 years. (Delendick 1990). Since then it has been col- Finally, we report on the accelerated intro- lected from four boroughs of New York City; duction and establishment of non-native spe- Nassau County, Long Island; and adjacent cies in the Torrey Range. In previous papers northeastern New Jersey (Lamont 2010). we reported on some recently established In 2009, Michael Feder reported A. australis invasive species, including Cardamine impa- as ‘‘very common, now approaching abun- tiens, Hydrilla verticillata, Lepidium latifolium, dant’’ throughout western-most Long Island, Myriophyllum spicatum, Phellodendron amur- especially in Kings and Queens counties. It ense, Polygonum perfoliatum, Pueraria lobata, frequently occurs on roadsides, vacant lots, Thlaspi alliaceum, and Trapa natans (Lamont gardens, and even lawns; sometimes in very and Fitzgerald 2001; Lamont and Young large populations consisting of hundreds, 2002, 2004, 2006; Lamont and Glenn 2009). maybe thousands of individuals. Feder has In this paper, we discuss the status of five observed it growing with Acalypha rhomboidea more introductions to the Torrey Range: Raf., with no evidence of hybridization. In Acalypha australis, Corydalis incisa (new to 20 years, A. australis has become fully estab- the flora of North America), Juglans ailanti- lished in the Torrey Range. folia, Nymphoides peltata, and Schoenoplectus mucronatus. Carex arctata W. Boott Nomenclature follows Weldy and Werier Drooping Woodland Sedge (2011), ranges of distribution and nativity Cyperaceae, the Sedge Family status follows Gleason and Cronquist (1991) In 2009, Steven Glenn collected C. arctata unless otherwise stated, and herbarium abbre- from Putnam County, New York (Glenn viations follow Holmgren et al. (1990). 11986, BKL). This collection represents only Throughout this report, we have endeav- the second documented report of this species ored to give credit to individuals who reported from the Torrey Range. The first collection, their findings to us and provided expertise on in 1895, was from Bridgeport, Connecticut specific species. We are especially grateful to (Eames 965, CONN). This northern sedge Daniel Atha (New York Botanical Garden), usually occurs in forests from northeastern David Austin (Torrey Botanical Society), United States to the Great Lakes region and Martin Bennett (Brooklyn Botanic Garden), adjacent Canada (Waterway 2002). In New Dennis Briede (Ridge and Valley Conservan- York, C. arctata is common ‘‘in the northern cy), Robert Canace (Ridge and Valley Conser- and cooler parts’’ (Weldy and Werier 2011). vancy), Michael Feder (Long Island Botanical AfewunvoucheredreportsofC. arctata from Society), Andrew Greller (Queens College, the Torrey Range have been published during CUNY), Garrett Herth (Long Island Botanical the past 125 years. Britton (1889) reported it Society), Robert McGrath (Long Island Bo- from Bergen and Essex counties, New Jersey, tanical Society), Wayne Morris (independent but it was not listed earlier by Willis (1874) or botanist), Robert Naczi (New York Botanical later again by Britton (1901) for New Jersey. Garden), Tom Nelson (Native Orchid Confer- Taylor (1915) doubted its occurrence in Bergen ence), Larry Penny (Long Island Botanical and Essex counties as did Hough (1983). This Society), Eleanor ‘‘Sam’’ Saulys (Native Or- sedge is currently listed as a state rare plant in chid Conference), Charles Sheviak (New York New Jersey (Snyder 2010), but no specimens State Museum), Kimberly Smith (New York have been seen to confirm its presence. 474 JOURNAL OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL SOCIETY [VOL. 138 Carex arctata also has been historically considered rare in New Jersey (Britton 1889, reported from the periphery of the Torrey Snyder 2010), where it is restricted to the Range, including Litchfield County, Connecti- northern counties, with an unverified report cut (Graves et al. 1910, Taylor 1915, Seymour from Burlington County (Hough 1983). In 1969, Magee and Ahles 2007); Dutchess, Fairfield County, Connecticut, it had been Sullivan, and Ulster counties, New York known during the 1920s and 1930s from a (Taylor 1915, Weldy and Werier 2011); and single locality near Danbury (Eames s.n., Bucks, Pike, Monroe, and Wayne counties, CONN). In New York, C. trifida was previ- Pennsylvania (Bailey 1886; Porter 1903; Wherry ously known only as far south as Dutchess and et al. 1979; Botany Department, Morris
Recommended publications
  • Squarrose Sedge Carex Squarrosa
    Natural Heritage Squarrose Sedge & Endangered Species Carex squarrosa L. Program www.mass.gov/nhesp State Status: Threatened Federal Status: None Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife GENERAL DESCRIPTION: Squarrose Sedge is a perennial, herbaceous, grass-like plant that grows in loose clumps up to 3 feet (0.9 m) in height. This species was recently rediscovered in Massachusetts. Squarrose Sedge is typically found within riparian habitats that have alluvial soils. The uppermost spikes are pistillate (ovule-bearing) flowers borne above staminate (pollen- bearing) flowers. The large, dense, reproductive spikes of Squarrose Sedge make this species rather distinctive from other members of the genus Carex. AIDS TO IDENTIFICATION: To positively identify the Squarrose Sedge and other members of the genus Carex, a technical manual should be consulted. Species in this genus have small unisexual wind-pollinated flowers that are borne in clusters or spikes. Each flower Photo by Brett Trowbridge is unisexual, and is closely subtended by small, flat scales. The staminate flowers are subtended by a single perigynium. The morphological characteristics of these flat scale (the staminate scale); the pistillate flowers are reproductive structures are important in identifying subtended by one flat scale (the pistillate scale) and are plants of the genus Carex. enclosed by a second sac-like modified scale, the perigynium (plural: perigynia). After flowering, the Squarrose Sedge is a large sedge that grows in tufts from achene (a dry, one-seeded fruit) develops within the short rhizomes. Its stout, leafy stems range in height from 1 to 3 ft. (0.3 to 0.9 m). The elongate leaves are 3 to 6 mm (1/8 to ¼ in.) in width.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE
    Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE LILIACEAE de Jussieu 1789 (Lily Family) (also see AGAVACEAE, ALLIACEAE, ALSTROEMERIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE, ASPARAGACEAE, COLCHICACEAE, HEMEROCALLIDACEAE, HOSTACEAE, HYACINTHACEAE, HYPOXIDACEAE, MELANTHIACEAE, NARTHECIACEAE, RUSCACEAE, SMILACACEAE, THEMIDACEAE, TOFIELDIACEAE) As here interpreted narrowly, the Liliaceae constitutes about 11 genera and 550 species, of the Northern Hemisphere. There has been much recent investigation and re-interpretation of evidence regarding the upper-level taxonomy of the Liliales, with strong suggestions that the broad Liliaceae recognized by Cronquist (1981) is artificial and polyphyletic. Cronquist (1993) himself concurs, at least to a degree: "we still await a comprehensive reorganization of the lilies into several families more comparable to other recognized families of angiosperms." Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) and Dahlgren, Clifford, & Yeo (1985) synthesized an early phase in the modern revolution of monocot taxonomy. Since then, additional research, especially molecular (Duvall et al. 1993, Chase et al. 1993, Bogler & Simpson 1995, and many others), has strongly validated the general lines (and many details) of Dahlgren's arrangement. The most recent synthesis (Kubitzki 1998a) is followed as the basis for familial and generic taxonomy of the lilies and their relatives (see summary below). References: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998, 2003); Tamura in Kubitzki (1998a). Our “liliaceous” genera (members of orders placed in the Lilianae) are therefore divided as shown below, largely following Kubitzki (1998a) and some more recent molecular analyses. ALISMATALES TOFIELDIACEAE: Pleea, Tofieldia. LILIALES ALSTROEMERIACEAE: Alstroemeria COLCHICACEAE: Colchicum, Uvularia. LILIACEAE: Clintonia, Erythronium, Lilium, Medeola, Prosartes, Streptopus, Tricyrtis, Tulipa. MELANTHIACEAE: Amianthium, Anticlea, Chamaelirium, Helonias, Melanthium, Schoenocaulon, Stenanthium, Veratrum, Toxicoscordion, Trillium, Xerophyllum, Zigadenus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Chinn Environmental Training, Inc. Info
    Scientific Name Common Name Region 6 Habit Scientific Name Common Name Region 6 Habit Abies balsamea FIR,BALSAM FACW NT Amaranthus californicus AMARANTH,CALIFORNIA NI ANF Abutilon theophrasti VELVET-LEAF NI AIF Amaranthus crassipes AMARANTH,TROPICAL FAC+ AIF Acacia greggii ACACIA,CATCLAW UPL NST Amaranthus greggii AMARANTH,GREGGIS FAC ANF Acacia smallii HUISACHE FACU NTS Amaranthus obcordatus AMARANTH,TRANS PECOS NI ANF Acalypha rhomboidea COPPER-LEAF,COMMON UPL* ANF Amaranthus palmeri AMARANTH,PALMER'S FACU- ANF Acalypha virginica MERCURY,THREE-SEEDED UPL* ANF Amaranthus retroflexus AMARANTH,RED-ROOT FACU- ANF Acer negundo BOX-ELDER FACW- NT Amaranthus rudis AMARANTH,TALL FAC ANF Acer rubrum MAPLE,DRUMMOND RED FACW NT Amaranthus spinosus AMARANTH,SPINY FACU- ANF Acer rubrum MAPLE,TRIDENT RED NI NT Amaranthus tuberculatus AMARANTH,ROUGH-FRUIT NI ANF Acer rubrum MAPLE,RED FAC NT Ambrosia artemisiifolia RAGWEED,ANNUAL FACU- ANF Acer saccharinum MAPLE,SILVER FAC NT Ambrosia grayi BURSAGE,WOOLLY-LEAF FACW PNF Acer saccharum MAPLE,SUGAR UPL NT Ambrosia psilostachya RAGWEED,NAKED-SPIKE FAC- PNF Achillea millefolium YARROW,COMMON FACU PNF Ambrosia trifida RAGWEED,GREAT FAC ANF Acorus calamus SWEETFLAG OBL PIEF Amelanchier alnifolia SERVICE-BERRY,SASKATOON FAC- NS Adiantum capillus-veneris FERN,SOUTHERN MAIDEN-HAIR FACW+ PNF3 Amelanchier arborea SERVICE-BERRY,DOWNY FACU NT Adiantum pedatum FERN,NORTHERN MAIDEN-HAIR FAC PNF3 Amianthium muscaetoxicum FLYPOISON FAC PNF Adiantum tricholepis FERN,HAIRY MAIDEN-HAIR FAC PNF3 Ammannia auriculata AMMANNIA,RED-STEM
    [Show full text]
  • Cotton-Tails
    Invasive plant risk assessment Biosecurity Queensland Agriculture Fisheries and Pest plant risk assessment Department of Cotton-tails Froelichia floridana and F. gracilis Steve Csurhes and Dr Yuchan Zhoe First published 2008 Updated 2016 PR08–3673 © State of Queensland, 2016. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/ deed.en" http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Cover image courtesy Wikimedia Commons Invasive plant risk assessment: Cotton-tails Froelichia floridana and F. gracilis 2 Contents Summary 3 Identity and taxonomy 4 Description 5 Native range and worldwide distribution 6 Preferred climate 10 Ecology and preferred habitat 10 Reproduction and dispersal 10 History as a weed overseas 10 Current impact in Queensland 11 Potential impact in Queensland 11 Use 12 References 12 Pest plant risk assessment: Cotton-tails Froelichia floridana and F. gracilis 3 Summary Froelichia floridana and F. gracilis (cotton-tails) are annual, or short-lived perennial, plants native to the semi-arid, inland prairies of North America. Within their native range, they are quick to colonise any open, disturbed habitats with dry, sandy soils. Both F. floridana and F. gracilis are considered to be agricultural weeds in parts of North America, where their range has expanded as a result of human activity.
    [Show full text]
  • NOPES Newsletter 5 20
    Newsletter of the Native Orchid Preservation and Education Society nativeorchidpreservationeducationsociety.com May 2020 Letter from the President Hello everyone, We were finally able to have an orchid hike. Ten of us met at Shawnee Backpacking Trail. Maintaining social distancing and wearing our masks, we were able to find Cypripedium acaule, the Pink Lady's-Slipper, Galearis spectabilis, the Showy Orchis blooming and Cypripedium parviflorum var. pubescens the Large Yellow Lady's-Slipper in bud. We will be organizing other hikes in the future and Jeanne is working on Zoom meetings for us. Check website for updates. Hope to see everyone soon! Galearis spectabilis, Teresa Huesman Showy Orchis, Shawnee State Forest In Bloom in May and June in Ohio and Kentucky Corallorhiza wisteriana Galearis spectabilis Cypripedium acaule Cypripedium kentuckiense Aplectrum hyemale Putty Cleistes bifaria Wister's Coral-Root Showy Orchid Pink Lady’s-Slipper Southern Lady’s Slipper Root Spreading Pogonia Cypripedium candidum Platanthera leucophaea Isotria verticillata Large Cypripedium parviflorum Pogonia ophioglossoides Neottia cordata Heart- Small White Lady’s- Eastern Prairie Fringed Whorled Pogonia var. pubescens Large Rose Pogonia Leaved Twayblade Slipper Orchid Yellow Lady’s-Slipper Liparis loeselii Platanthera lacera Liparis liliifolia Cypripedium reginae Spiranthes lucida Shining Calopogon tuberosus Loesel's Twayblade Ragged Fringed Orchid Large Twayblade Showy Lady’s-Slipper Ladies'-Tresses Grass Pink 1 Shawnee State Park Field Trip – May 2, 2020 - Jan Yates The more I’ve hiked Shawnee State Forest, the more it seems like we orchid enthusiasts have a code that would baffle many people. Mention to a colleague that you’re hiking Shawnee and they’ll ask ‘3 and 6?’ or ‘1 and 2?’ For other friends who are regular hikers/outdoors people/gardeners, I find myself explaining that these are the forest roads so rich in native orchids that you can virtually step out of the car and find them on the roadside.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Niche Partitioning Among Riparian Sedges {Carex, Cyperaceae) in the St. Lawrence Valley, Quebec
    Environmental niche partitioning among riparian sedges {Carex, Cyperaceae) in the St. Lawrence Valley, Quebec Laura Plourde Master of Science Department of Biology McGill University Montreal, Quebec, Canada A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of requirements of the degree of Master of Science August 31st, 2007 ©Copyright Laura Plourde 2007. All rights reserved. Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-51322-4 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-51322-4 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM LIST OF THE RARE PLANTS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2012 Edition Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist and John Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org Table of Contents LIST FORMAT ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 NORTH CAROLINA RARE PLANT LIST ......................................................................................................................... 10 NORTH CAROLINA PLANT WATCH LIST ..................................................................................................................... 71 Watch Category
    [Show full text]
  • Lyonia Preserve Plant Checklist
    Lyonia Preserve Plant Checklist Volusia County, Florida Aceraceae (Maple) Asteraceae (Aster) Red Maple Acer rubrum Bitterweed Helenium amarum Blackroot Pterocaulon virgatum Agavaceae (Yucca) Blazing Star Liatris sp. Adam's Needle Yucca filamentosa Blazing Star Liatris tenuifolia Nolina Nolina brittoniana Camphorweed Heterotheca subaxillaris Spanish Bayonet Yucca aloifolia Cudweed Gnaphalium falcatum Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium Amaranthaceae (Amaranth) Dwarf Horseweed Conyza candensis Cottonweed Froelichia floridana False Dandelion Pyrrhopappus carolinianus Fireweed Erechtites hieracifolia Anacardiaceae (Cashew) Garberia Garberia heterophylla Winged Sumac Rhus copallina Goldenaster Pityopsis graminifolia Goldenrod Solidago chapmanii Annonaceae (Custard Apple) Goldenrod Solidago fistulosa Flag Paw paw Asimina obovata Goldenrod Solidago spp. Mohr's Throughwort Eupatorium mohrii Apiaceae (Celery) Ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia Dollarweed Hydrocotyle sp. Saltbush Baccharis halimifolia Spanish Needles Bidens alba Apocynaceae (Dogbane) Wild Lettuce Lactuca graminifolia Periwinkle Catharathus roseus Brassicaceae (Mustard) Aquifoliaceae (Holly) Poorman's Pepper Lepidium virginicum Gallberry Ilex glabra Sand Holly Ilex ambigua Bromeliaceae (Airplant) Scrub Holly Ilex opaca var. arenicola Ball Moss Tillandsia recurvata Spanish Moss Tillandsia usneoides Arecaceae (Palm) Saw Palmetto Serenoa repens Cactaceae (Cactus) Scrub Palmetto Sabal etonia Prickly Pear Opuntia humifusa Asclepiadaceae (Milkweed) Caesalpinceae Butterfly Weed Asclepias
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Discoveries in Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia
    Knapp, W.M., R.F.C. Naczi, W.D. Longbottom, C.A. Davis, W.A. McAvoy, C.T. Frye, J.W. Harrison, and P. Stango, III. 2011. Floristic discoveries in Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia. Phytoneuron 2011-64: 1–26. Published 15 December 2011. ISSN 2153 733X FLORISTIC DISCOVERIES IN DELAWARE, MARYLAND, AND VIRGINIA WESLEY M. KNAPP 1 Maryland Department of Natural Resources Wildlife and Heritage Service Wye Mills, Maryland 21679 [email protected] ROBERT F. C. NACZI The New York Botanical Garden Bronx, New York 10458-5126 WAYNE D. LONGBOTTOM P.O. Box 634 Preston, Maryland 21655 CHARLES A. DAVIS 1510 Bellona Ave. Lutherville, Maryland 21093 WILLIAM A. MCAVOY Delaware Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program 4876 Hay Point, Landing Rd. Smyrna, Delaware 19977 CHRISTOPHER T. FRYE Maryland Department of Natural Resources Wildlife and Heritage Service Wye Mills, Maryland 21679 JASON W. HARRISON Maryland Department of Natural Resources Wildlife and Heritage Service Wye Mills, Maryland 21679 PETER STANGO III Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Annapolis, Maryland 21401 1 Author for correspondence ABSTRACT Over the past decade studies in the field and herbaria have yielded significant advancements in the knowledge of the floras of Delaware, Maryland, and the Eastern Shore of Virginia. We here discuss fifty-two species newly discovered or rediscovered or whose range or nativity is clarified. Eighteen are additions to the flora of Delaware ( Carex lucorum var. lucorum, Carex oklahomensis, Cyperus difformis, Cyperus flavicomus, Elymus macgregorii, Glossostigma cleistanthum, Houstonia pusilla, Juncus validus var. validus, Lotus tenuis, Melothria pendula var. pendula, Parapholis incurva, Phyllanthus caroliniensis subsp.
    [Show full text]