Maasin PCR.Pdf

LIST OF ACRONYMS

AO - Assisting Organization CBFM - Community Based Forest Management CIC - CENRO Inspection Committee CRMF - Community Resource Management Framework CSD - Comprehensive Site Development FSP - Forestry Sector Project GIS - Geographical Information System IBC - International Builders Corporation ICM - Inspection Chart Mapping IEC - Information, Education and Communication KAPAWA - Katilinban sang Pumuluyo nga naga-Tipon sang Watershed Sang Maasin KSPFI - Kahublagan sang Panimalay Foundation, Inc. LGU - Local Government Unit M & E - Monitoring and Evaluation OGA - Other Government Agencies PGI - Participatory Governance for Natural Resources and Development, Inc. PO - Peoples Organization SMP - Survey, Mapping and Planning SUSIMO - Subproject Site Management Office

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Community-Based Forest Management Program (CBFMP) revolutionized forest development and rehabilitation efforts of the government when it was institutionalized in 1995 by virtue of Executive Order No. 263.

Whereas financial gains was the sole motivating factor of contract reforestation awardees before, the adoption of the CBFM approach in the Forestry Sector Project (FSP) to rehabilitate the upland ecosystem empowered beneficiary communities economically, socially, technically and politically while transforming them into environmentally responsible managers. The tenurial right to develop subproject sites alongside the various inputs from the Subproject deepened their commitment to collaborate with other stakeholders in the implementation of these subprojects.

The Maasin Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject is a portion of the Maasin Watershed Reserve declared by Governor Leonard Wood in 1923 and the main source of domestic and commercial water supply of Iloilo City. The degradation of the Maasin Watershed prompted the implementation of the Subproject.

The intensive trainings of the members of the Katilingban sang Pumuluyo nga naga-Atipan sang Watershed sang Maasin (KAPAWA), the People’s Organization contracted to do the Comprehensive Site Development (CSD), equipped them to accomplish much for the Subproject. One indication of the strong commitment of the PO members was the construction of CSD infrastructures more than the required number as well as the establishment of 2,905.8 hectares good quality plantations with 95% survival rate.

In terms of employment generation, a total of 1, 742 community members were employed by the Subproject increasing their average household income from PHP13,000 during the time of appraisal to PHP20,000 during project implementation. With these, improvement of houses, purchase of household appliances, sending of children to school were noted.

The 9.4-kilometer farm-to-market road on the other hand provides ease of transport and marketing of agricultural products of the community.

One notable fact about this Subproject is the full confidence of participating communities in the Project for them to give up their cultivated farms in favor of forest rehabilitation and settlements inside the watershed. This is another factor to the success of the Maasin Watershed Subproject.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary ------i

I. Subproject Description ------1 1. Purpose/ Objectives 2. Subproject Scope and Dimension A. Comparison of Original and Actual Scope and Dimensions B. Reasons for Revision/ Modification Of Scope and Dimensions C. Contribution of Subproject to Relevant (Sub) Sectors

II. Subproject Implementation ------14 1. Organizations for Implementing Subproject 2. Implementation Period 3. Subproject Cost 4. Comments on Performance of AO, AP, PO, M&E, and Infra Contractors 5. Other Matters Relating to Subproject Implementation

III. Action taken by the AO, AP, and PO ------25 Relating to Recommendation(s)

IV. Initial Operation and Maintenance Of the Subproject Facilities ------28 1. Present Condition of Facilities 2. Organization for Operation and Maintenance 3. Annual Budget or Actual Expenditure For Operation and Maintenance (by year) 4. Maintenance Method

V. Benefits Derived from the Project ------34 1. Indirect Effects

VI. Conclusions and Recommendations ------36

LIST OF TABLES:

Table 1 : Trainings Attended by the PO ------37

Table 2 : Subproject Performance ------38

Table 3 : Subproject Site Management Office Equipments ------40

Table 4 : Trainings Attended by the SUSIMO ------41

Table 5a : Rice Trading Livelihood Project ------42

Table 5b :Public Utility Vehicle service/rentals Livelihood Project ------43

Table 5c : Trucking Service Livelihood Project ------44

Table 5d : Motorcycle Loan Livelihood Project ------45

Table 5e : Sawali Production and Trading Livelihood Project ------46

Table 5f : Hog Feeds Buy and Sell Livelihood Project ------47

Table 5g : Seedling Production Livelihood Project ------48

Table 5h : Hog Fattening Livelihood Project ------49

Table 6 : Subproject Status Report ------50

Table 7 : Cost Estimate for Community Organizing ------51

Table 8a : Agroforestry Cost Estimate By Activity ------52

Table 8b : Bamboo Plantation Cost Estimate per Hectare by Activity --- 53

Table 8c : Rattan Plantation Cost Estimate per Hectare by Activity ---- 54

Table 8d : Tree Plantation Cost Estimate per Hectare by Activity ------55

Table 9 : Monitoring and Evaluation Cost Estimate ------56

Table 10 : Infrastructure Project ------57

Table 11 : Annual Work and Financial Plan ------58

ANNEXES:

1. Organizational Structure ------63

1a. SMP 1b. CO 1c. PO 1d. M & E Contractor 1e. SUSIMO 1f. Infrastructure

2. Pictures ------69

3. CSD Accomplishment Map ------71

SUBPROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

MAASIN WATERSHED REHABILITATION SUBPROJECT

Forestry Sector Project Loan Agreement No. PH-P 135

I. Subproject Description

The Maasin Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject is located on the northern part of Iloilo City and lies between geographical coordinates of 100 50’ to 100 58’ latitude and 1220 20’ to 1220 28’ longitude. It is bounded on the northeast by the Municipality of Janiuay, on the southeast by the Municipality of Maasin, on the southwest by the Municipality of Alimodian and on the northwest by the province of Antique. The Subproject has a total area of 3,549.80 hectares or 53% of the Maasin Watershed Reserve and has about some 16 barangays within its jurisdiction.

1. Purpose/Objectives

A) Original

1. To improve the socio-economic conditions of the communities in and around the watershed; 2. To minimize soil loss and sedimentation of Tigum River and its tributaries by stabilizing stream banks; 3. To establish forest plantations in suitable areas within the watershed; 4. To establish Agroforestry plantations in areas cultivated/farmed by residents of nearby barangays along the periphery of the watershed; and, 5. To establish bamboo and rattan plantations.

B) Modification (No modifications was made)

a. Modified purpose/objectives (N/A)

b. Reasons for the modification (N/A)

2. Subproject Scope and Dimension

A. Comparison of Original and Actual Scope & Dimensions a.1. Please check: There has been ( revision and/or modification or  no revision and/or modification) of the Subproject scope and dimensions.

a.2. If “revision and/or modification”, please complete the Table.

Original Scope and Revised/Modified ITEM Dimensions (Actual) 1.REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/ CBFM A. Survey Mapping & 6,150.00 hectares Planning

B. Community Organizing 1 June 1997 to June 1999: 2,685.00 hectares

Year 1  IEC activities Year 2  Assistance to CSD activities  Assistance on Networking and Linkage  Organizational Development and Capacity Building  Livelihood Project implementation  Monitoring and Evaluation

C. Comprehensive Site Development 1. SOIL EROSION CONTROL a. Infrastructure b. Trail and footpath c. Plantation

2. VEGETATIVE MEASURES 2 a. Agroforestry 1,164.0 hectares 1,320.10 hectares

b. Assisted Natural Regeneration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation d.1.Bamboo (and 360.0 hectares 342.80 hectares riverbank) d.2. Rattan 111.0 hectares 200.10 hectares d.3. Mangrove d.4. Plantation Sp. 1,050.0 hectares 1,042.80 hectares e. Timber Stand Improvement

TOTAL 2,685.0 hectares 2,905.80 hectares

3. INVENTORY RESIDUAL FOREST 4. INCOME ENHANCEMENT PROJECT 5. INFRASTRUCTURE  Bunkhouse 3 units 8 units  Lookout Tower 5 units 8 units  Nurseries 7 units 5 and 22* units  Fire lines 45,817 sq.m. 46,251 sq.m.  Trail and Footpath 148.7 km. 147.7 km.

*sub-nurseries D.INFRASTRUCTURE COMPONENT Farm to Market road 9.465 km

E. MONITORING & EVALUATION*

Physical Validation Inspection Chart Conducted in three Mapping (ICM) (3) passes; Year 1 January to May 2001; Year 2 January to September 2002; Year 3 January to June 2003

2,905.80 hectares

*same activities are conducted each year . Verification of boundaries, monuments, and block corner posts . Seedling production inventory analysis . Survival Counting with 20% sampling intensity, including mapping of developed areas . Height and diameter measurement, assessment of overall health/appearance . Inspection of physical infrastructure Institutional and Project Benefit Assessment Conducted in two (2) Year 1 passes: Year 2 . Assessment of the overall development of the PO . Assessment of the capability of the PO to pursue sustainable resource management and sustain its livelihood initiatives . Identification of various issues/problems/co nstraints related to the development and strengthening of the PO and the

relevant support systems . Identification of immediate benefits of the project and evidences that would indicate the intermediate and long-term socio- economic and environmental impacts. 2. SUSIMO Equipment provided to the office:3 o 1 unit, 2-ton pick - up o 1 unit, Power Generator o 1 unit, Computer o 1 unit, Printer o 3 units, Motorcycles o 1 unit, UPS 500 VA o 1 unit, GIS Software (Maptitude) o 2 units,GPS o 1 unit, Base Radio o 3 units, Handheld Radio o 2 units, Forester’s Transit o 1 unit, Typewriter (Manual) o 3 units, Brunton Compass o 2 units, Steel Nylon Tape o 2 units, Diameter Tape o 1 unit, Planimeter o 3 units, Abney

Hand Level o 1 unit, Rain Gauge o 3 units, Binocular o 1 set, Lettering Set

Researches conducted: NONE

Trainings attended:4  FSP reorientation, assessment & SUSIMO Action planning workshop  PO FSP re orientation & action planning workshop  On-the-job training on GIS/GPS operation  Workshop on benefit sharing system for CBFM-POs  Re-orientation course for FSP implementers  Workshop on Business Plan Preparation  Team Building towards Moral Recovery  On-the-job training on map digitization  Orientation & planning workshop on CRMF preparation  Orientation on Technical Integration of the community resource map & technical map  Community-based Resource mapping

accounting  Biodiversity assessment training Others: Subproject Site 48 sq.m. floor area , Management Office Concrete with GI sheets roof.

1 Unit SUSIMO Bunkhouse

Manned by 11 SUSIMO Staff

Infra Project office  Desktop equipment/facilities Computer with turned over at the printer & table Regional Office  Conference table & comp. Chair & 6 monobloc chairs 1 Please refer to Table 1 for details of trainings attended by PO’s 2 Table 2 details the subproject performance in terms of area planted 3 Table 3 shows the details of equipment provided to SUSIMO 4 Table 4 shows the trainings attended by the SUSIMO staff

B. Reasons for Revision/Modification of scope and Dimensions

b.1. Where there has been “revision/modification” of the Subproject scope and dimensions.

Please choose the reason(s) from the following list and check.

 Revision of the superior plan (e.g. sector development plan, etc)  Revision of the supply-and-demand estimate  Large fluctuation in the Subproject cost  Substantial revision of design due to the unforeseeable physical condition at the time of the original design (e.g. poor soil condition, etc.)  Natural disaster/unseasonable weather  Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing Agency  Structural and organizational problems of the agencies concerned (e.g. lack of staff, inadequate coordination with other agencies, etc.)

 Availability of funds (e.g. lack of funds, use of contingency, fluctuation of the exchange rate, etc.)  Unrealistic initial plan/Technical problems  Procurement problems  Performance of contractor/supplier  Performance of consultant  Change in construction period  Others

b.2. Detailed statement of reason(s) and background

Others (PO initiative)

On Comprehensive Site Development (CSD)

There were changes in the CSD scope in almost all components due to PO initiatives and availability of areas except for bamboo. The PO members opted to plant in excess of the target for agro forestry and other plantation species without any additional fund from the DENR. Accomplishment for the bamboo component is below the target since a large portion of the area is already covered with bamboo. Some are just expansion of the existing bamboo plantations while the others are planted by individual farmers on their own initiative.

On Infrastructure

The distant location of plantations gave rise to an increase of nurseries as the PO found it more practical to establish sub-nurseries for ease of management and seedling distribution. Likewise, the construction of additional bunkhouses and look out tower to facilitate better monitoring and protection of plantation.

C. Contribution of Subproject to Relevant (Sub) Sector(s)

c.1. (Sub) Sector(s) to which the Subproject belongs:

 Electric power and Gas  Telecommunication Social services  (Multipurpose) Dams  Telecommunications Water supply  Power Plants  Broadcasting Sewerage Transmission lines  Education  Distribution Systems  Health  Gas  Irrigation and Flood control  Tourism  Others  Irrigation  Others  Flood control

 Transportation  Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries  Roads  Agriculture and Forestry  Bridges  Fisheries  Railways  Airport  Mining and Manufacturing  Ports  Mining  Marine Transportation  Manufacturing  Others

c.2. Original (At the time of appraisal/Planned)

Item Description

1. Project Area Development . Planting of endemic and fast growing tree species within the project has been perceived to improve biodiversity in the area in due time; promote good soil water holding capacity thus reducing the risk of flash floods, soil erosion and sedimentation. Water yield and quality will also improve as a result of better vegetative cover.

. Irrigation systems, key production areas downstream, city dwellers, industrial and commercial establishments would be serviced by the watershed in terms of supplying their water requirements. This would have positive impact on the establishment of allied industries and economic activities in the area, which in turn will benefit the communities within the watershed as well as those located nearby.

. Since the main activity in the subproject implementation is plantation development, the stumpage stock of the watershed would increase, thus can be viewed as a

future timber reserve and future sources of other valuable watershed resources. About 568,908 cu m of timber could be easily raised in the subproject.

. Subproject implementation would provide immediate employment opportunities to the watershed communities dependent on the watershed resources, thus reducing the deforestation rate in the watershed.

2. Socio-institutional Development  Through Community Organizing, the knowledge and skills of the communities on proper subproject implementation, technical forestry and environmental protection would be enhanced to effect positive development in the watershed and its environment.

 The communities would be capacitated to establish linkages/networks with other government and non-government organizations to respond to their needs and requirements, like : o Department of Agriculture (DA) for materials and technical resources to improve existing agricultural technology in the subproject area. o Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG) for strengthening LGUs and barangay capabilities particularly in protecting the watershed, improvement of barangay roads and other facilities. o Department of Health (DOH) for the delivery of basic health services. o Metro Iloilo Water District

(MIWD) and National Irrigation Administration for assistance in providing benefits for the communities charged with looking after the development and protection of the watershed. o Department of Education, Culture and Sports (DECS) for the assistance in environmental education through both formal and non-formal strategies. o Banks, Other Government Agencies (OGAs), Non- Government Organizations (NGOs) for livelihood and credit assistance, and also for information dissemination on the importance of the watershed.

3. Employment Generation  The subproject is envisioned to generate employment of estimated 473,125 man days during the first 5 years. This is equivalent to a total incentive /income of PHP 47,312,440. When the agroforestry plantations start full blast operations on the 6th year, there will be substantial number of employment opportunities that will be created as a result of the sustainable development of the watershed.

4. Income raising  The subproject including on-farm, off- farm and non-farm income sources is expected to yield an income that is greater than the poverty income level of upland areas in Region 6.

c.3. Present situation and outlook for the future

Item Description 1. The community . The Katilingban sang Pumuluyo nga naga-Atipan sang Watershed sang Maasin (KAPAWA) was formally organized and registered with the Bureau of Rural Workers last August 15, 1997. During the six-year implementation, the PO members have undergone trainings on improved CSD activities, financial management system, organizational development, and livelihood project planning and identification. These served as tools in accomplishing their targets, in augmenting knowledge and in boosting their courage to face challenges as the “manager” of the Maasin Watershed for twenty-five (25) years renewable for another 25 years. Per issued CBFMA the tenured area is 3,415.92 hectares . Presently there are fifteen (15) livelihood projects implemented by KAPAWA. Four(4) were managed within the federation level while eleven (11) were managed by the member associations. 5

2. Infrastructure . The rehabilitation of the Farm to Market Road improved access of agroforestry and bamboo products to the markets. It also paved the way for electricity to reach the barangays concerned and facilitated the construction and improvement of other connecting roads.

3. Eco-Tourism . This subproject has potential for eco- tourism but has to be planned by the SUSIMO, LGU and PO as it can provide economic opportunities in the area. In three years time, it is expected that the Maasin Watershed

Eco-Tourism and Camping Park to be managed by the KAPAWA.

4. LGU Support . With the good support of the present municipal LGU, the subproject is expected to be sustained in the future.

. Maintenance of the constructed Farm to Market Road is expected to be sustained for long-term benefit of the communities.

. The constant visits of the other LGUs from other areas of the country demonstrate the strong partnership among the LGU, DENR and PO in CBFM approach in Watershed Management.

5. Development activities on the . The areas identified for development project area were completed exceeding the target. Reforestation and Agroforestry component have been established and its growth likely to continue in the future if the People’s Organization (PO) sustains maintenance and protection activities.

. Construction of Comprehensive Site Development infrastructures more than the required number indicates the strong commitment of the PO to make the project successful.

. Bio-diversity within the project area increased with the planting of endemic and fast growing tree species.

. Water yield and quality will improve as a result of better vegetative cover. This will promote good soil water holding capacity thus, reducing risks of flash floods, soil sedimentation and

soil erosion.

. The rehabilitation of 9.465 km farm- to-market road will facilitate further improvement and development of the watershed reserve, specifically the area covered by the CBFMA. Likewise, marketing of agricultural and livelihood products of the PO and adjacent communities will also be facilitated.

5 Please refer to Table 5 for livelihood projects implemented by PO’s

II. Subproject Implementation

1. Organizations for Implementing Subproject

Function in the Name of Organization Reasons for Subproject Change Implementation (1) Original (2) Changed

1. SMP Contractor Diocesan Social Action Center, Inc.

2. AO for CO Kahublagan Sang Panimalay Foundation,I nc. (KSPFI)

3. Assisting Efren Professional Gerardino

4. PO Katilingban Sang Pumuluyo Sa Watershed

5. M & E contractor Participatory Governance for Natural Resources

and Dev’t. Inc. (PGI) – 1st Pass & 2nd Pass)

Green Forum – Western Visayas (3rd Pass & 4th Pass

6. Infrastructure International Contractor Builders Corporation (IBC)

Please state:

1.1 Reasons for the change (No change)

1.2 Problems arising, counter measures adopted and results

1. Failure of the KSP to complete the CRMF preparation and the Process Documentation

The Assisting Organization (AO) failed to complete the CRMF preparation and process documentation per CO contract. Several reminders were issued by the Regional Office to submit the required documents/accomplishments but still no reports have reached the Office. This resulted to non-payment of balances and retention fee.

Since the CRMF was not completed, the SUSIMO facilitated the preparation and affirmation of the CRMF. Responsibilities and obligations of the PO in carrying out the CBFM were clarified, thus, active participation by KAPAWA members was encouraged.

2. The Board of Directors (BODs) were dominated by the Project Management Staff.

Before the SUSIMO installation, the BODs were overruled by the Project Management Staff due to lack of understanding on their organizational and functional structure. The SUSIMO and AP then facilitated and assisted the PO to conduct review of Constitution and By-Laws CBL), clarification of functions, duties and responsibilities of BODs, Officers and members, formulation and re-formulation of

policies in relation to subproject implementation were likewise undertaken. Corresponding amendments on the policies and revision of systems were made.

3. Poor quality of the planted seedlings and backlogs on area planted under reforestation and agroforestry components.

For the first three years of implementation, the PO had planted a total of 2,315.64 hectares in all components. However, evaluation registered an average survival rate of 77% and a 300 hectare backlog. To address the issue, the SUSIMO adopted the following strategies:

1. Undertook change of species. 2. Conducted on the-job-training on proper site preparation and planting (Hole digging is done two (2) months prior to planting to allow the fertile soil to accumulate with 1’ X 1’ X 1’ dimension; 1 meter radius ringweeding and cultivation; and, basal and follow-up application of fertilizer (half foot away from seedling planted both sides); 3. Establishment of five (5) hectares demonstration farm (agro forestry farm) in So. Sambag, Brgy. Dagami as showcase of technical standards in plantation establishment. 4. Integration of crops (intercropping of banana, coconut, abaca, coffee) within the reforestation and agroforestry areas. 5. Organization of internal quality inspection committee composed of the BODs who conducted quarterly inspection and monitoring of the plantation. 6. Conduct of intensive IEC per barangay 7. Organization of fire brigade

The above strategies resulted to the recovery of the 300-hectare backlog and increased the survival of the plantations from 77% (first pass) to 95.11% (final pass). The PO is now assured of the quantity and quality of the established plantation.

Further, because of the intensive IEC by the SUSIMO and PO, most (90%) of the farmers with cultivations inside the subproject area have voluntarily given up their tilled/cultivated area.

4. Presence of stray animals and human activities

Stray animals and human activities were major causes of plantation damages. On this, the SUSIMO intensified the information, education and communication campaign (IEC) by barangay; increased visibility of

the SUSIMO staff in the area; coordinated closely with the respective municipalities and barangay officials with regard to the protection of the established plantations.

5. Frequent occurrence of fire during summer

Based on records, an average of 20 hectares per year is damage by fire. To abate, the SUSIMO assisted the PO in the creation and organization of fire brigade. A forty (40) man fire brigade to patrol 24 hours on rotation basis (Eight teams with average of 5 members) was organized and thus, minimized the area damaged by fire from an annual average of 20 hectares to 1.7 ha in 2003.

1.3 The latest organization chart (or equivalent) for the implementation of the Subproject is ( attached or  not available). Organizational Charts are attached as Annexes 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e and 1f for Diocesan Social Action Center (SMP contractor), Kahublagan Sang Panimalay, Inc (CO contractor), KAPAWA (PO), Participatory Governance for Natural Resources Development Incorporated and Green Forum-Western Visayas (M&E contractor), SUSIMO and International Builders Corporation (Infrastructure contractor), respectively.

1.4 If the organizational chart (or equivalent) is not available, please state the reason.

Not applicable

2. Implementation Period

A. Comparison of Original Schedule and Actual Period

Please fill in the following blanks with actual period for each item.

ITEM ORIGINAL SCHEDULE ACTUAL PERIOD 1. SMP September 19, 1994 February 1995

2. Contract of AO June 1997 to June 1999 June 1997 to June 1999 for CO

3. Contract of PO September 1997 to September 1997 to March for CSD December 2000 2003

4. Contract of NGO January to May 2001 (1st & January to May 2001 (1st &

for M&E 2nd Pass) 2nd Pass) January to June 2002 (3rd January to June 2002 (3rd Pass) Pass) January to April 2003 (4th January to April 2003 (4th Pass) Pass)

5. Contract of January 16, 2002 to July Infrastructure 23, 2003 Component

 Completion December 31, 2000 October 13, 2003 (Completion of Subproject)

Please refer to Table 6 for the Subproject Status Report

Notes: Completion of the Subproject was defined as ( completion ceremony or final disbursement or  other than the above.

The completion date was scheduled for December 31, 2000 (at the time of appraisal) and is indicated (thus  ) in the above Table.

B. Reasons for Delay or Early Completion b.1. In case of delay or early completion, please choose the reason(s) from the following list and check.

 Change in scope/dimensions  Natural disaster/Unseasonable weather (e.g. earthquake, typhoon, etc.)  Shortage of funds/Fluctuation of the exchange rate  Problems in procurement  Inflation  Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing Agency  Structural and organizational problems of the agencies concerned (e.g. lack of staff, inadequate coordination with other agencies, etc.)  Legislative matters  Unrealistic initial plan/Technical problems  Performance of contractor/supplier  Performance of consultant  Others

b.2. Reasons and background for delay or early completion

18 o Natural disaster/Unseasonable weather (e.g. earthquake, typhoon, etc.)

The project experienced El Nino phenomenon in 1997 and 1998 that resulted to 10% survival rate of 200 hectares of Agroforestry, Bamboo and Reforestation components. Replanting of areas took place in the later years of implementation. o Structural and organizational problems of the agencies concerned (e.g. lack of staff, inadequate coordination with other agencies, etc.)

Comprehensive Site Development

During the initial stage of implementation, only one site coordinator was assigned in the subproject site to assist, facilitate, monitor and evaluate the performance of the Assisting Organization (AO), People’s Organization (PO) and the Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Contractor. This situation led to backlogs and low survival rate of the established plantation. In the same manner, the Composite Inspection Committee (CIC) were saddled with multiple functions in their respective offices, resulting to delays in the conduct of monitoring and evaluation of accomplishments of AO, PO and M&E contractors. o Performance of contractor/supplier

On Comprehensive Site Development

Due to lack of site coordinators who can fully devote their attention to the tasks on hand, there was no proper monitoring and supervision of PO activities on CSD resulting to backlogs (300 hectares) and poor quality (77% Survival rate) of the plantations. So, replanting activity, application of fertilizer, and other maintenance and protection activities were conducted in the later years of project implementation (2001-2002). Moreover, there was still a need to capacitate the PO on technical, organizational and financial aspects to facilitate the implementation and completion of the CSD activities.

On Infrastructure

A punch list or comments was signed/agreed between parties for correction by the contractor before the final inspection as a result of a pre-final inspection conducted by the site engineer. Necessary corrective measures undertaken delayed completion of the project.

o Others (Mutual Agreement of two parties)

On Monitoring and Evaluation

The Participatory Governance in Natural Resources Development, Inc. (PGI) has exceeded the contract period as stipulated. The delay was not of their own doing but because of mutual agreement to give time for KAPAWA to complete the total target area for development under the CSD contract. In which case, a 3-month extension was granted to PGI to culminate the remaining activities in the said M & E contract.

C. Remedial Action Taken in Each Case of Delay

o Natural disaster/Unseasonable weather (e.g. earthquake, typhoon, etc.) and Performance of contractor/supplier

On Comprehensive Site Development

The contract was expected to end on December 2000; however, it was further amended/extended up to June 30, 2003 giving the PO ample time to fully plant and perform other developmental activities that were not met during the period of original contract.

On Infrastructure Component

After substantial completion of the project, a pre-final inspection was done in April 1-2, 2003. A punch list or comments were signed/agreed between parties for correction by the contractor before the final inspection. After all the corrections were complied and satisfied, final inspection was done and the Certificate of 100 % completion was issued in June 2003.

o Structural and organizational problems of the agencies concerned (e.g. lack of staff, inadequate coordination with other agencies, etc.)

The institutionalization of SUSIMO was done in compliance to Department Administrative Order (DAO) 2000-65 entitled “Guidelines Governing the Creation of Subproject Site Management Office and Its Institutionalization in the Forestry Sector Project Implementation” to ensure responsive subproject implementation and management.

o Others (Mutual Agreement of two parties)

On Monitoring and Evaluation

A 3-month extension of the contract was granted to PGI to finish the remaining activities in the M & E contract as agreed upon by the DENR and PGI to give KAPAWA enough time to fully accomplish the target and satisfy the requirements of the CSD contract.

3. Subproject Cost

A. Comparison of Original Estimated Cost and Actual Expenditure (by Component)

Original Cost Actual Item (in M pesos) Expenditures (in M pesos)

Survey, Mapping and Planning (by admin)

Community Organizing 4.833000 4.130600

Comprehensive Site Development 44.269144 45.657624

Monitoring and Evaluation 6.176090 5.889850

Infrastructure Development 18.698490 18.625873

Subproject 2.544555 2.544555 Coordinating Office (SUSIMO)

TOTAL: 76.521279 76.848501

Please refer to Tables 7,8,9a-9d, 10 for details on the cost of SMP, CO, CSD & M and E. Table 11 shows the lists of infra projects with corresponding cost.

B. Reasons for Difference between Original Estimated Cost and Actual Expenditure

b.1. If there is any difference between Table a.1 and Table a.2 in Paragraph a, please choose the reason(s) from the following list and check.  Increase in reconstruction cost arising from natural disaster/unreasonable weather (e.g. earthquake, typhoon, etc.)  Increase or decrease arising from a change in construction period  Increase or decrease arising from inflation  Increase or decrease arising from fluctuation in the exchange rate  Increase or decrease arising from a change in the scope/work volume of the Subproject  Decrease arising from keen competition in tender  Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing Agency  Unrealistic cost estimates/Technical problems  Others

b.2. Description of the detailed reason(s) and background

o Increase or decrease arising from a change in the scope/work volume of the Subproject

On Comprehensive Site Development

There was a difference between the original estimated and actual expenditure of the CSD component due to the adoption of the MC 2000-19 entitled “Guidelines Governing the Updating of Cost Estimates and Intensification of Plantation Maintenance and Protection Activities for DENR-FSP Watershed Subprojects under JBIC Funding”. This resulted to increase in unit cost of different activities in different components as well as increase in frequency of ringweeding, cultivation and application of fertilizer (RCF) and patrolling.

On Infrastructure

There was a decrease in computation of surplus unclassified excavation by 6.087% equivalent to the amount unbilled.

o Others (Performance of the Contractor)

Failure of the AO contractor to complete the CRMF and the process documentation resulted to unbilled amount. On M&E, failure of the PGI to conduct soil sampling analysis resulted to unbilled amount.

C. Action taken in Case of Cost Overrun and Results

With regard to cost overrun on CSD component, additional obligation was made with corresponding revision of work and financial plan as well as amendment of the contract.

D. Comparison of Original Estimated Expenditure and Actual Expenditure (by Year)

Calendar Original Cost Actual Expenditures Year (in M pesos) (in M pesos) 1994 1995 1996 1997 25.307881 5.962459 1998 14.595013 13.770218 1999 8.999250 10.048386 2000 2.610635 5.804898 2001 0.956215 11.243880 2002 2.378455 13.217289 2003 21.473830 16.454377 Total 76.521279 76.848501 Please refer to Table 12 on details of the Annual Work & Financial Plan

4. Comments on Performance of Assisting Organizations (AOs), Assisting Professionals (APs), Peoples Organizations (POs), M&E and Infrastructure contractors.

Please describe the performance of each organization after checking the item(s) in the relevant lists on which you have any comment.

A. Performance of Assisting Organizations & Assisting Professionals (if any) Peoples Organizations, M&E and Infrastructure contractors

a.1.  Overall performance  Design  Contract administration  Construction supervision  Expertise  Staff qualifications  Coordinating ability  Compliance with Contracts  Performance related to any other than the Subproject scope, if any.  Others

23 a.2 Description o Overall performance

On Community Organizing Contractor (AO)

The performance of the Kahublagan Sang Panimalay Foundation, Inc. (KSPFI) as CO contractor is deemed fair. While that they have undergone technical, organizational and financial training, there were no past evaluation however, of trainings conducted to determine the POs’ level of understanding and internalization. Further, limited linkages were introduced to the PO in terms of support services.

The Executive Director has expertise on Community Organizing work. However, most of the deployed CO staff are foresters with minimal experience on CO work and other related activities. This resulted to weak understanding of KAPAWA as an organization or federation. Consequently, the KSP failed to comply with some provisions of the CO contract (CRMF preparation and Process Documentation) that caused reversion of portion of CO funds.

On CSD Contractor (PO)

The PO (Katilingban sang Pumuluyo nga naga-Atipan sang Watershed sang Maasin) had shown remarkable performance in attaining its target and compliance to the CSD contract with DENR. The overall performance rated VERY SATISFACTORILY for completing the activities and exceeding its target through planting of excess seedlings. With members of about 1,672, the PO is united and cooperative. There were instances however, when some could not actively participate in meetings because of their day-to-day family concerns.

On the Assisting Professional

The Assisting Professional hired by OIDCI to assist in the subproject implementation has the capability to facilitate technical assistance to the PO. He also conducted the assessment of KAPAWA capability, the result of which was used by SUSIMO as guide in readjustment planning during the second quarter of 2001 and up to the end of the contract. He also introduced the idea of transforming KAPAWA BOD into a working board and worked with the SUSIMO in installing the said system.

On Monitoring and Evaluation

Green Forum

Green Forum had performed very satisfactory, submitted quality reports on time. Its expertise on surveying and mapping facilitated the process of M&E.

5. Other matters relating to Subproject Implementation

Please choose the item(s) from the following list on which you have any comment, check it (them), and describe it (them) with measure and results in (B) below.

A.  Technical  Financial  Institutional  Economic  Social/Distributional  Others

B. Description

o Delayed implementation of the project from the time of appraisal.

Long delay in the implementation of the subproject after the SMP and appraisal altered the physical condition of the site during implementation and the original plan. Available (open) areas became less during implementation due to increased development by the individual initiatives.

o Lack of capability of the CIC to validate the accomplishments of the AO and the PO.

The DENR paid for the work accomplished by the PO as reported due to lack of capability of the CIC to validate the CSD activities. Some of the CIC members lack enough knowledge and the physical condition to do the work. On the other hand, some have the knowledge but are not physically fit, while others are physically fit but do not have the required knowledge.

o Selection of Personnel to man the project implementation

No proper selection process on personnel to man the project implementation was observed. Some project staff were selected not on the basis of technical expertise. Some staff have technical expertise but no commitment; still others have neither the technical expertise or the commitment.

III. Action Taken by the AOs, APs and POs relating to Recommendation(s)

1. Recommendation(s) made by SUSIMO

SUSIMO check: This article is ( applicable or  not applicable. There has been no recommendation with regard to the Subproject).

2. Action Taken and Results

Recommendations Action taken Results by the SUSIMO AP PO

1. Advise the AP Identified the CRMF prepared to look for the linkages for the and completed potential preparation of linkage for the CRMF and preparation of livelihood CRMF and development livelihood opportunities. development opportunities.

2. Advise the AP Reviewed the CBL Clarified duties to assist the and other related and PO in the policies, responsibilities, review of the formulated and amended policies, existing re-formulated re-structured PO policies, policies, re- resulted to including CBL structured the PO smooth and other creation of implementation of related committees and the subproject , policies. units created (CSD, Livelihood and IEC units under the supervision of the Chairman of the Board of Directors)

3. Advise the PO Reviewed the CBL Clarified duties to review the and other related and CBL and other policies, responsibilities, related formulated and amended policies, policies. re-formulated re-structured PO Formulate and policies, re- resulted to re-formulate structured the PO smooth the policies. , creation of implementation of

4. Advise the PO committees and the subproject. and facilitate units created the creation (CSD, Livelihood and and IEC units institutionaliza under the tion of supervision of the Internal Chairman of the Quality Board of Inspection Directors) System.

5. Advise and The PO through This was used as assist the PO the assistance of showcase to all PO to establish SUSIMO members. demonstration established a 5-ha farm. demonstration farm.

6. Advise and The PO institute Revised systems assist the PO revision of the on financial to strengthen systems of operation and their Financial operation, to periodic reports Management include the on Financial System and to periodic reporting transactions. practice of audited transparency financial report to in all aspect of the GA, BOD operations. regular meetings

7. Advise the PO Procured Immediate to improve the additional (17) response of the communication units of handheld PO in any system, radio and one unit unforeseen events purchase of cell phone. on site, additional Instituted a roll specifically fire handheld radio call every night. protection and units, cell information phones and dissemination. institute roll call during nighttime.

8. Advise the PO Formulated The PO was able to formulate policies on credit to collect the policies on collection collectibles. credit collection

IV. Initial Operation and Maintenance of Subproject Facilities

1. Present Condition of Facilities

A. Please check: This article is ( applicable due to problem(s) or  not applicable. No particular problem has occurred since the initial operation started). If there have been any problems, please check the relevant space in the Table.

For the PO

Item Status Initial Mainten Managem Others Opera ance ent tion

1. PUJ serviceable 2. Canter serviceable 3. Computer serviceable   4. Computer  Printer condemned

5. Business

Center serviceable

6. Field Office serviceable

7. Session hall serviceable

8. Water tank serviceable

For the SUSIMO

Item Status Initial Mainten Managem Others Opera ance ent tion

1. SUSIMO Office serviceable 2. Computer serviceable   3. Motorcycle serviceable

4. Power

generator unserviceable  serviceable

 5. 2 ton- serviceable   tractor unserviceable

6. Water tank serviceable   7. UPS serviceable

8. Radio base serviceable 9. Typewriter 10. Handheld radio

B. Please check: The Problem(s) has arisen owing to the following reason(s).  Technical  Financial  Institutional  Economic  Social/Distributional  Others

C. Description

The problems on the facilities specified above were encountered on technical and financial aspects. Computer and UPS encountered technical problems because the systems malfunctioned while in operation. On the other hand, spare parts and supplies of 2 ton-truck, motorcycle as well as the power generator were found to be too expensive.

D. Aspect of utilizing the Subproject facilities

For the PO

Item Original Plan Actual Operation 1. PUJ For the KAPAWA For the KAPAWA 2. Canter For the KAPAWA For the KAPAWA 3. Computer For the KAPAWA For the KAPAWA 4. Computer

Printer For the KAPAWA For the KAPAWA 5. Business Center For the KAPAWA For the KAPAWA 6. Field Office For the KAPAWA For the KAPAWA 7. Session hall For the KAPAWA For the KAPAWA 8. Water tank For the KAPAWA For the KAPAWA

For the SUSIMO

Item Original Plan Actual Operation

1. SUSIMO Office For the SUSIMO Maasin For SUSIMO 2. Computer Watershed Subproject For SUSIMO 3. Power generator For SUSIMO For SUSIMO 4. Water tank For SUSIMO For SUSIMO 5. Motorcycle For SUSIMO 1 unit For SUSIMO Assigned to CENRO Iloilo City 2 unit For SUSIMO SUSIMO Maasin 1 unit For SUSIMO Assigned to FSP Regional Office 6. 2 ton-truck For SUSIMO For SUSIMO 7. UPS For SUSIMO For SUSIMO 8. Radio base For SUSIMO For SUSIMO 9. Typewriter For SUSIMO For SUSIMO 10. Handheld radio For SUSIMO For SUSIMO

2. Organization for Operation and Maintenance

A. Name of the PO and SUSIMO

a.1. Please give the name of PO and/or Body in charge of O/M.

PO : Katilingban sang Pumuluyo sa Watershed sang Maasin (KAPAWA-MAASIN) SUSIMO : SUSIMO-Maasin Watershed Subproject

a.2. Please check: The latest organization chart (or equivalent) for O/M of the Subproject facilities is ( attached or  not available).

a.3. If the organization chart (or equivalent) is not available, please state the reason.

B. Number of staff/workers of the PO or Body for Operation and Maintenance of Subproject Facilities.

PO : 25 SUSIMO : 11

C. Please check and explain the following.

c.1. The number of staff is currently ( sufficient or  insufficient). If “Insufficient”, please describe your estimate of the optimum number of staff and your plan for providing them.

c.2. Average employment period of the present staff:

P0: 7 years SUSIMO: 10 years

c.3. Availability of training program to promote the vocational ability of the staff, its contents and expected effects. None

3. Annual Budget or Actual Expenditure for Operation and Maintenance (by Year)

A. Original Expected Expenditure

For the SUSIMO (Unit: Mil Pesos) Item/ Maintenance Operation Total Calendar year 2001 0.956215 2002 0.652000 2003 0.936340

TOTAL 2.544555

B. Actual and Currently Expected Expenditure

For the PO (Unit: Mil Pesos ) Item Maintenance Operation Maintenance and Total Calendar year Operation (For expanded)

1999 1. Canter 0.012722 0.013787 0.026509

2. Field Office 0.222105 0.022210

2000 1. Canter 0.053472 0.051815 0.105287 2. PUJ 0.008938 0.037048 0.045986

2001 1. Canter 0.072622 0.058245 0.130867 2. PUJ 0.066783 0.111995 0.178779

2002 1. Canter 0.049525 0.057057 0.106582 2. PUJ 0.051628 0.090028 0.141630 3. Compute r with printer 0.016110 0.016110 4. Session Hall 0.040000 0.040000 5. Water Tank 0.010000 0.010000

2003 1. Canter 0.076725 0.051919 0.128644 2. PUJ 0.049678 0.087994 0.137672 3. Business Center 0.809982 0.809982 4. Computer with printer and 0.022980 0.022980 scanner

Total 0.442093 1.681056 2.123150

Note: Actual and currently expected expenditure for expansion, replacement or any other improvement purposes

For the SUSIMO (Unit: Mil Pesos ) Item Maintenance Operation Maintenance and Total Calendar year Operation (For expanded)

2001

1. Computer 0.045005 0.195013 0.240018 2. Motorcycle 3. Power generator 0.007545 0.007545 4. KIA 0.064000 0.020351 0.084351

2002

1. Computer 0.020419 0.010919 0.031338 2. Motorcycle 3. Power 0.020278 0.020278 generator 4.SUSIMO office 0.041881 0.087732 0.129613 5.Watertank 6. KIA ceres 0.032695 0.015871 0.048566

2003

1. Computer 0.016323 0.033390 0.049713 2. Motorcycle 0.012440 0.010405 0.022845 3. Power generator 0.006000 0.012717 0.018717 4.SUSIMO office 0.110364 0.110364 5.Watertank 6. KIA ceres 0.055068 0.074969 0.130037

TOTAL 0.293831 0.599554 0.1750 0.893385

Note: Actual and currently expected expenditure for expansion, replacement or any other improvement purposes

Please describe the basis for the above estimate and your financing plan for the same.

In case of PO, no budget for original as well as for expanded portion was allocated for the maintenance and operation of facilities, since the allocation would depend on the needs as they arise.

4. Maintenance Method

A. Content of Method

Repair and replacement of defective parts of the 2 ton-truck, motorcycle and computer set as the need arises. Change oil, tune-up, regular check-up of body parts and wheels rotation of the 2 ton truck will be undertaken on a regular basis. Change oil will likewise be undertaken periodically for motorcycle. Upgrading of computer system and check up on a regular basis will be done.

B. Frequency

Kind of Facility Maintenance Method Frequency 1. 2 ton truck Repair/replacement of As the need arises defective parts, Change oil, Every after 3,000 km Wheels rotation annually 2. Motorcycle Repair/replacement of Once a year defective parts, Change oil, Every after 3,000 km 3. Computer Repair/replacement of As the need arises defective parts,

C. Others, if any.

V. Benefits derived from Subproject

1. Indirect Effects

A. Please choose and check the item(s) which are dealt with this Article by you.

 Technological transfer (e.g. application of technology used in the Subproject to other similar projects and subprojects)  Employment creating (e.g. during construction, contribution to the sector(s) after completion)  Income-raising (e.g. income of the residents in the region)  Other intended or unintended effects on the relevant sector(s) and/or the region concerned

B. Please give details for each of the item(s) you checked.

Technological Transfer

The successful implementation of the Maasin Watershed subproject introduced a participatory scheme of watershed management particularly on the acceptance and participation of communities directly affected by the project. What other watershed projects failed to accomplish in the past, Maasin watershed was able to achieve. One particular example is the farmers acceptance to give up their cultivated farms in favor of forest rehabilitation and settlements inside the watershed. The cultivated farms were made to become agroforestry farms and affected farmers are given options to plant bamboo in their farm instead of open cultivation.

On agro-forestry technology and watershed management by the community, KAPAWA can rightfully share their actual experiences and lessons to serve as guide to other project development efforts in other watershed areas in the country. On IEC for phase II areas, KAPAWA BOD can serve as advocates/catalysts to their fellow farmers to gain their support and acceptance of the FSP Phase II.

Employment Generation

During the implementation of the subproject, a total of 1,742 members of the community residents were employed, thus, reduced the unemployment situation in the community level. About 218,948 Mondays were created during the CSD operation and infrastructure construction of the subproject.

Increased income

There was an increase in income of the project beneficiaries due to employment opportunities during the project implementation. An increase in household income from an annual average household income of P 13,000 (during the time of appraisal) to P20,000 during the project implementation (an increase of approximately 54%) is an evident direct benefit to the community. Indicators of socio-economic upliftment can be observed in the community such as improvement of individual houses, procurement of household equipment/facilities, and opportunities for children to go to school and even enroll in the college level, among others. The PO can now afford to buy farm inputs; thus, helped increase their agricultural products.

VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 Proper selection of dedicated and capable staff to fully supervise activities as well as the strong logistical and moral support given by the DENR top management played a big role in the success of the Subproject

 Rapport of the Assisting Professional with the SUSIMO staff is a positive contribution

 Dedicated and highly-committed PO is a major factor to the Project’s success

 Integrity of those involved in the Subproject implementation is important.

 On the organizational development of the PO : . It is recommended that education of farmers be vision directed, situation-grounded, experience-based and participatory . It is recommended that there be a periodic review and amendment of CBL for sustained and effective PO management . That the “WORKING BOARD” type of leadership be adopted for CBFM PO . That a program to increase literacy rate of community members be included in the preparatory activities to train them to become successful CBFM holder

 On forest resource management: . It is recommended that Crop Integration be adopted in plant protection and maintenance especially for watershed areas like Maasin . That ownership/caretaker ship be considered as an effective approach to plantation management . That the adoption of the participatory community resource management planning be sustained . That the standards on seedling production, site preparation, plantation establishment and maintenance activities be followed to ensure successful project implementation

Annex I

SUSIMO Recommendations Action taken Recommendations by the SUSIMO Results AP PO

1. Advise the AP to look for the Identified the linkages for CRMFprepared and potential linkage for the the preparationof CRMF and completed preparation of CRMF and livelihood development livelihood development opportunities. opportunities.

Reviewed the CBL and other Clarified duties and 2. Advise the AP to assit the PO related policies, formulated responsibilities, amended in the review of the existing and re-formulated policies, policies, including CBL and other re-structured the PO related policies. creation of committees and units created (CSD, Livelihood and IEC units under the supervision of the Chairman of the Board of 3. Advise the PO to review the Reviewed the CBL and Clarified duties and Directors) CBL and other related policies. other related policies, responsibilities, amended Formulate and re-formulate the formulated and re- policies, re-structured PO policies. formulated policies, re- resulted to smooth structured the PO , implementation of the creation of committees and subproject , 4. Advise the PO and facilitate units created (CSD, the creation and Livelihood and IEC units institutionalization of Internal under the supervision of Quality Inspection System. the Chairman of the Board of Directors) Annex I

SUSIMO Recommendations Action taken Recommendations by the SUSIMO Results AP PO 5. Advise and assist the PO to The PO through the This was used as showcase establish demonstration farm. assistance of SUSIMO to all PO members. established a 5-ha 6. Advise and assist the PO to The PO institute revision Revised systems on strengthen their Financial of the systems of financial operation and Management System and to operation, to include the periodic reports on practice transparency in all periodic reporting of Financial transactions. aspect of operations. audited financial report to the GA, BOD regular meetings.

7. Advise the PO to improve the Procured additional (17) Immediate response of communication system, purchse units of handheld radio and the PO in any unforeseen additional handheld radio units, one unit of cellphone. events on site, speifically cellphones and institute roll call Instituted a roll every fire protection and during nightime. night. information dessimination.

8. Advise the PO to formulate Formulated policies on The PO was able to policies on credit collection credit collection collect the collectibles. FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135 TABLE 1. TRAININGS ATTENDED BY THE PEOPLES ORGANIZATION

# OF INCLUSIVE TRAINING TRAINORS PARTICIPANTS DATES 1. Fire fighting team DENR 60 April 1999 2. On the Job Training on ESSC 5 June 11-14, 2000 Map Digitization 3. Charcoal Briquete DENR Research 25 Sept 21-22,2000 Technology 4. CBNRM Festival VSOP 3 Nov 20-21, 2000 Conference Skills for Community Based Resource Utilization and Management

5. FSP Orientation NFDO-TA 16 Nov 23-24, 2000 Assessment and SUSIMO Action Planning Workshop 6. PO Orientation and DENR-CBFM 14 Jan 17-19, 2001 Action Planning Workshop 7. Seminar Workshop by DENR-SMO 1 Feb 21-22, 2001 Laws and Policy Deve't for CBFM Program of the PO 8. Workshop on Benefit NFDO-TA 25 Feb 7, 2002 Sharing system for CBFM- POs 9. FSP Orientation Course NFDO-TA 12 March 6-8, 2002 10. Team Building Towards DENR-HRD 25 March 14-16, 2002 Moral Recovery 11. Orientation and Planning ESSC 25 July 23, 2002 Workshop on CRMF Preparation 12. ENR Framework Plan DENR-UMDP 21 Aug 21-22, 2002 Regional Stakeholders Consultation (Visayas) 13. Orientation on Technical ESSC 25 Oct 15-17, 2002 Integration of the Community Resource Map and Technical Map 14. Biodeiversity DENR-CENRO 21 Nov. 22-25, 2002 Assessment Training 51. On the job training on GIS 25 Jan 15-17, 2003 GIS/GPS Operation 16. Workshop on Business NFDO-TA 25 April 1-3, 2003 Plan preparation 17. Phase Out/In DENR/AP 14 April 8-9, 2003 18. Abaca Training FIDA 27 July 24, 2003 FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135 TABLE 2. SUBPROJECT PERFORMANCE

Year Planted Component Species Planted Area Planted Survival

1997 Reforestation 42 Agroforestry Please refer to the 24 Rattan 0 attached list Bamboo 100 Riverbank 60 Subtotal 226 1998 Reforestation 280 Agroforestry 937.5 Rattan 200.1 Bamboo and 0 Riverbank 0

Subtotal 1417.6 1999 Reforestation 0 Agroforestry 0 Rattan 0 Bamboo and 100 Riverbank 0 Subtotal 100 2000 Reforestation 720.8 Agroforestry 358.5 Rattan 0 Bamboo and 81.1 Riverbank 1.8 Subtotal 1162.2 TOTAL Reforestation 1042.8 96.25 Agroforestry 1320 95.24 Rattan 200.1 92.77 Bamboo and 281.1 91.64 Riverbank 61.8 97.45

WASR 2,905.80 95.11 Reforestation Acacia Auricauliformis Acacia Mangium Mahogany Tuai Lisak Rain tree Gmelina kakauate Akleng parang kansulog Anchoan-dilao

Agroforestry Achuete Nangka Coffee kakauate Large leaf mahogany Tuai Cacao Lanzones Rain tree Gmelina Cashew and guyabano

Rattan Palasan Limuran

Bamboo and Riverbank

Kawayan tinik Kansulog FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135 TABLE 3. SUBPROJECT SITE MANAGEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENTS

Procured ITEM Specifications Qty Cost (PhP) Date/year procured 1. Truck KIA cross truck, 1 9/30/2002 680,000.00 4x4 2. Motorcycle Honda MC, XL 3 48,000.00 125 3. Power generator Engine, gasoline, 1 4/23/2001 44,096.00 GS 280, 3.5 KVA 4. Computer HP Brio PC Intel Pentium III 733 1 2/20/2001 70,850.00 mhg 5. Printer Hp Deskjet model 1 4/27/2001 5,811.52 840 C 6. UPS Gamatronic Compact Model 1 4/15/2001 5,720.00 520VA 7. GIS maptitude Comb software & 1 3/18/2001 44,460.00 geographic data 8. GPS Global positioning 2 3/28/2001 210,000.00 Promark X 9. Handheld radio VHF, FM COM 3 1/12/2001 44,899.92 Model IC-F3GT 10. Foresters transit Surveying compass, 2 5/21/2001 69,680.00 Ushikata, model S- 27 11. Base radio VHF/FM ICOM 1 - 12. Manual typewriter Oliveti, 18 1 3/28/2001 8,309.60 carriage 13. Brunton compass Kataoke br., 3 3/28/2001 14,664.00 Model BCD-90 14. Steel nylon tape Tajima Br. 2 4/23/2001 2,700.00 15. Diameter tape Kinglong brand, 20 2 3/29/2001 1,331.20 meters 16. Planimeter OSKK KOIZUMI 1 10/26/2001 7,800.00 17. Abney hand level 3 5/21/2001 7,176.00 Model:OSK 17251 18. Rain gauge Digital rainwise 1 5/28/2001 6,300.00 19. Lettering set Leroy set 1 12/27/2001 - 20. Desk & chairs Wood 5 12/27/2001 15,000.00 21. Drafting table Wood 1 2/27/2001 3,000.00 22. Camera Canon Zoom 85 & 2 12/3/2001 16,525.00 65 23. Tape recorder Sony 2 battery 2 12/3/2001 4,600.00 AAA 24. Flashlight Eveready 2 big 8 battery 25. Lantern lamp Kamaru, Butane 5 12/27/2001 4,750.00 TOTAL 1,315,673.24 FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135 TABLE 4. TRAININGS ATTENDED BY THE SUSIMO

# OF INCLUSIVE TRAINING TRAINORS PARTICIPANTS DATES 1. FSP reorientation, assessment & SUSIMO Action planning NFDO_TA 9 Nov. 23-24, 2000 workshop 2. PO orientation & action DENR-CBFM 11 Jan. 17-19, 2001 planning workshop 3. Orientation-workshop on CBL AP/SUSIMO 10 Feb. 21-22, 2001 & policy making for CBFM POs 4. Workshop on benefit sharing FSP-TA 10 Feb. 7, 2002 system for CBFM-POs 5. Re-orientation course on FSP FSP-TA 10 March 5-8,2002 implementers 6. Team Building towards Moral DENR-HRD 8 March 14-16, 2002 Recovery 7. On-the-job training on map ESSC 6 June 11-14, 2002 digitization 8. Orientation & planning ESSC 10 23-Jul-02 workshop on CRMF preparation 9. Orientation on Technical October 15-17, Integration of the community ESSC 10 2002 resource map & technical map 10. Community-based Resource October 23-25, ESSC 8 mapping accounting 2002 11.Biodiversity assessment FMS Specialist, 5 Nov. 22-25, 2002 training CENRO, Iloilo 12. Basic skills training on Green Forum-WV 5 Jan. 15-17, 2003 GPS/GIS 13. On-the-job training on GIS staff 10 Jan. 15-17, 2003 GIS/GPS operation 14. Workshop on Business Plan NFDO-TA 10 April 1-3, 2003 Preparation FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135 TABLE 5a. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT ESTABLISHED

Name of Livelihood Project : Rice Trading

Implementor : KAPAWA-Maasin

No. of Beneficiaries : 1,628

Amount of investment : 168,000

Date of Feasibility Study : N/A

Date started : May-99

Status : On-going

Net Income : 155,081.13

CFDF : 8,726,288.92

Linkages Developed : Consignment with NAVARRA Grains Center in the amount ranging from P30,000-120,000.00 FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135 TABLE 5b. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT ESTABLISHED

Name of Livelihood Project : Public Utility Vehicle rental/service

Implementor : KAPAWA-Maasin

No. of Beneficiaries : 1,628

Amount of investment : 468,000

Date of Feasibility Study : N/A

Date started : September 1, 2000

Status : Operational

Net Income : 109,046.68

CFDF : 8,726,288.92

Linkages Developed : None yet FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135 TABLE 5c. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT ESTABLISHED

Name of Livelihood Project : Trucking Service

Implementor : KAPAWA-Maasin

No. of Beneficiaries : 1,628

Amount of investment : 280,000

Date of Feasibility Study : N/A

Date started : March 1999

Status : Operational

Net Income : 80,331.80

CFDF : 8,726,288.92

Linkages Developed : None yet FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135 TABLE 5d. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT ESTABLISHED

Name of Livelihood Project : Motorcycle Loan

Implementor : KAPAWA-Maasin

No. of Beneficiaries : 10

Amount of investment : 237,000

Date of Feasibility Study :

Date started : September 2000

Status : Operational

Net Income : 111,777.60

CFDF : 8,726,288.92

Linkages Developed : None yet FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135 TABLE 5e. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT ESTABLISHED

Name of Livelihood Project : Sawali Production and Trading

Implementor : BEA, DAWP, ASSA, LIFAEP, NEA, PAEP BAEP

No. of Beneficiaries : 821

Amount of investment : 14000 per Association

Date of Feasibility Study : N/A

Date started : 2001

Status : Operational

Net Income 112,096.00

CFDF : 8,726,288.92

Linkages Developed : None FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135 TABLE 5f. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT ESTABLISHED

Name of Livelihood Project : Hog Feeds Buy and Sell

Implementor : Buntalan Association for Livelihood and Environmental Protection

No. of Beneficiaries : 33 members

Amount of investment : 14,400

Date of Feasibility Study : CY 1999

Date started : March 1999

Status : Operational

Net Income : 25,100.00

CFDF : 8,726,288.92

Linkages Developed : None yet FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135 TABLE 5g. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT ESTABLISHED

Name of Livelihood Project : Seedling Production

Implementor : Sta. Rita Management Association and Daja Association for Environmental Protection

No. of Beneficiaries : 105

Amount of investment : 14, 400

Date of Feasibility Study :

Date started : CY 2001

Status : Stopped (one production cycle only)

Net Income : 28,887.16

CFDF : 8,726,288.92

Linkages Developed : None yet FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135 TABLE 5h. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT ESTABLISHED

Name of Livelihood Project : Hog Fattening

Implementor : Katilingban sang taga-Bugang sa Linya

No. of Beneficiaries : 274

Amount of investment : 14,400

Date of Feasibility Study : CY 2001

Date started : CY 2001

Status : Operational

Net Income : 14,400.00

CFDF : 8,726,288.92

Linkages Developed : The LGU od Alimodian and the Department of Agriculture assisted the PO to identify good source of hogs for fattening. FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135 TABLE 6. SUBPROJECT STATUS REPORT

PROJECT STATUS OF PROGRESS NAME/LOCATION OF PROJECT Region COST (Mil (O:on going C: Completion) THE SUBPROJECT AREA (ha) peso) SMP CO CSD M & E INFRA

Maasin Watershed Rehabilitation 6 2,905.80 74.303946 CCCC C Subproject/Alimodian, Antique

TOTAL 2,905.80 74.303946 FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135 TABLE 7. Cost Estimate for Community Organizing per Activity

UNIT of ACTIVITIES TARGET UNIT COST TOTAL COST MEASURE

1. Social Investigation 210,000.00

2. Information and Education Campaign 228,000.00

3. Documentation Process 175,000.00

4. Identification of Possible CBFMA 60,000.00

5. Organizing Activities 2,862,000.00

6. Community Activities 545,600.00

7. Others (CO staff dev't) 50,000.00

8. Contingency

Total 2,685 ha. 1,538.40 4,130,600.00 FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135 TABLE 8a. Cost Estimate for Agroforestry Component per Activity

TARGET UNIT OF UNIT TOTAL MAJOR ACTIVITY/ACTIVITY OUTPUT MEASURE COST COST 1. SEEDLING PRODUCTION a. procured/purchased 988,390.00 sdlg 4.42 4,364,179.50 SUB-TOTAL 988,390.00 sdlg 4.42 4,364,179.50 2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT a. Strip brushing/clearing 1,164.00 ha 950.32 1,106,172.48 b. Staking 908,186.00 spot 0.25 227,046.50 c. Hole Digging 908,186.00 spot 1.00 908,186.00 d. Hauling 908,186.00 sdlg 0.44 372,771.25 e. Planting 908,186.00 sdlg 0.84 762,461.25 SUB-TOTAL 1,164.00 ha 2,900.89 3,376,637.48 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION a. Ringweeding, cultivation, fertilizer 1,140.00 ha 6,077.46 6,928,301.02 b. Replanting 1,195,646.00 sdlg 1.33 1,590,703.07 c. Patrol Works 1,164.00 ha/yr 999,495.57 d. Construction of trail 84.00 km 4,976.67 418,040.00 e. Tools and materials SUB-TOTAL 1164 ha 8,536.55 9,936,539.66 4. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION a. First and Second Year ('97-'98) 985.50 ha 1,137.56 1,121,065.60 b. Third Year ('99) 641.00 ha 828.17 530,855.63 c. Fourth Year ('00) 1,319.40 ha 373.46 492,744.52 d. Fifth Year ('01) 1,319.40 ha 347.72 458,786.20 e. Sixth Year ('02) 1,319.40 ha 268.64 354,437.80 f. Seventh Year ('03) 1,319.40 ha 104.79 138,253.70 SUB-TOTAL 3,096,143.45 GRAND T O T A L 1,319.40 ha 15,744.66 20,773,500.09 Appendix 9a

Table 8a. Cost Estimate For Agro Forestry, By Activity TARGET UNIT OF UNIT actual accomp actual disbursement TOTAL MAJOR ACTIVITY/ACTIVITY OUTPUT MEASURE COST (total) (total) COST 1. SEEDLING PRODUCTION a. procured/purchased 5,925,327.00 sdlg 4.42 988,390.00 4,364,179.50 4,364,179.50 nangka 1,918,820.00 sdlg 83,400.00 391,729.40 cacao/achuete 574,770.00 sdlg 155,093.00 728,937.10 chico/cashew/citrus 81,806.00 sdlg 35,568.00 167,062.00 hibyok 81,806.00 sdlg 14,200.00 66,740.00 guyabano 287,500.00 sdlg 125,925.00 311,234.00 kakawate 312,500.00 sdlg coffee 527,625.00 sdlg 560,764.00 2,635,309.00 rambutan 69,000.00 sdlg lanzones 34,500.00 sdlg 13,440.00 63,168.00 Cover crops sdlg kakawate 465,600.00 sdlg siratro/kudzo 1,396,800.00 sdlg firebreak sdlg banana 174,600.00 sdlg SUB-TOTAL 4.42 4,364,179.50 4,364,179.50 2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT a. Strip brushing/clearing 1,164.00 ha 950.32 1,164.00 1,106,172.48 1,106,172.48 b. Staking 908,186.00 spot 0.25 908,186.00 227,046.50 227,046.50 c. Hole Digging 908,186.00 spot 1.00 908,186.00 908,186.00 908,186.00 d. Hauling 908,186.00 sdlg 0.44 854,080.00 372,771.25 372,771.25 e. Planting 908,186.00 sdlg 0.84 908,186.00 762,461.25 762,461.25 SUB-TOTAL 3,376,637.48 3,376,637.48 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION a. Ringweeding, cultivation, fertilizer ha 6,077.46 1,140.00 6,928,301.02 6,928,301.02 a.1 Ringweeding, cultivation, fertilizer (old) 2,770,626.00 sdlg 1,390,658.00 1,390,658.00 a.2 MC 19 4,601,309.38 Year 1 415.00 ha 415.00 1,763,750.00 Year 2 465.00 ha 113.41 1,629,168.20 Year 3 1,140.00 ha 1,140.00 1,208,391.18 a.3 Fertilizer Application (MC 19) 936,333.64 Year 1 415.00 ha 400.00 355,276.77 Year 2 465.00 ha 400.00 581,056.87 b. Replanting sdlg 1.33 1,195,646.00 1,590,703.07 1,590,703.07 b.1 Replanting (old) 272,456.00 sdlg 272,456.00 599,530.00 b.2 Replanting (MC 19) 923,190.00 991,173.07 c. Patrol Works ha/yr 122.67 1,164.00 999,495.57 999,495.57 c.1 Patrol Works (old) 1,816,202.00 tree/qtr 908,186.00 749,733.30 c.2 Patrol works (MC 19) 1,164.00 249,762.27 d. Construction of trail 114.00 km 4,976.67 84.00 418,040.00 418,040.00 e. Tools and materials (fertilizer) SUB-TOTAL 9,936,539.66 4. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION a. First and Second Year b. Third Year c. Fourth Year d. Fifth Year SUB-TOTAL 0.00 GRAND T O T A L 15,186.73 17,677,356.64 FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135 TABLE 8b. Cost Estimate for Bamboo Plantation per Activity

UNIT OF TARGET MAJOR ACTIVITY / ACTIVITY Unit Cost TOTAL COST MEASURE OUTPUT

1. SEEDLING PRODUCTION a. Purchased/procured 304,385.00 5.59 1,702,530.00 a. Nursery Site Preparation b. Planting Stock c. Bags d. Soil Collection e. Bagging SUB-TOTAL sdlg 304,385.00 5.59 1,702,530.00 2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT a. Lodging/pressing treatment 341 847.31 288,933.70 b. Staking spot 177995 0.47 83,147.15 c. Spot cleaning and holing spot 177995 4.11 730,990.00 d. Hauling pole cutting 177,995.00 3.55 631,914.30 e. Planting pole cutting 177,995.00 7.84 1,395,270.00 SUB-TOTAL ha 341 9,179.63 3,130,255.15 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION a. Ringweeding, cultivation, fertilizer pole cutting 295,775.00 2.22 657,449.47 b. Replanting ha 341 1,903.67 649,150.94 c. Patrol works tree/qtr 341 154.67 369,192.41 d. Tools and materials SUB-TOTAL ha 341 4,914.35 1,675,792.82 4. PROTECTION a. Footpath (includes maintenance cost) b. Graded trail (includes maintenance cost) c. Patrol Work/ Fire prevention sq.m 45,817.00 1.00 45,817.00 SUB-TOTAL 45,817.00 5. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION a. First and Second Year ('97,'98) ha 160.00 1,807.53 289,205.23 b. Third Year ('99) ha 260.00 755.49 196,427.83 c. Fourth Year ('00) ha 61.80 69.14 4,272.86 d. Fifth Year ('01) ha 342.90 437.70 150,086.91 e. Sixth ('02) ha 342.90 242.34 83,098.71 f. Seventh ('03) ha 342.90 85.90 29,455.14 SUB-TOTAL ha 342.9 2,194.65 752,546.70 GRAND T O T A L ha 342.9 21,309.25 7,306,941.67 FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135 TABLE 8c. Cost Estimate for Rattan Plantation per Activity

UNIT OF TARGET MAJOR ACTIVITY / ACTIVITY Unit Cost TOTAL COST MEASURE OUTPUT

1. SEEDLING PRODUCTION a. Seedlings Purchased/procured sdlg 71,524.00 10.45 747,297.60 SUB-TOTAL sdlg 71,524.00 10.45 747,297.60 2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT a. Lodging/pressing treatment ha 200.10 745.15 149,104.71 b. Staking spot 44,400.00 0.36 16,100.05 c. Spot cleaning and holing spot 44,400.00 2.90 128,800.00 d. Hauling sdlg 44,400.00 5.09 225,782.55 e. Planting sdlg 44,400.00 3.43 152,394.25 SUB-TOTAL ha 200.10 3,359.23 672,181.56 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION a. Ringweeding, cultivation, fertilizer ha 200.10 4,390.24 878,486.66 b. Replanting sdlg 200.10 688.79 137,827.27 c. Patrol Works ha/yr 200.10 34.57 48,423.38 d. Construction of trail e. Tools and materials (fertilizer) SUB-TOTAL ha 200.10 5,321.03 1,064,737.31 4. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION a. First and Second Year ('97,'98) ha 200.10 382.94 76,626.75 b. Third Year ('99) ha - - c. Fourth Year ('00) ha 181.00 69.14 12,514.36 d. Fifth Year ('01) ha 200.10 532.75 106,603.76 e. Sixth Year ('02) ha 200.10 268.64 53,753.98 f. Seventh Year ('03) ha 200.10 104.79 20,967.54 SUB-TOTAL ha 200.10 1,351.66 270,466.39 G R A N D T O T A L ha 200.10 13,766.53 2,754,682.86 FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135 TABLE 8d. Cost Estimate for Tree Plantation per Activity

UNIT OF TARGET MAJOR ACTIVITY / ACTIVITY Unit Cost TOTAL COST MEASURE OUTPUT 2. Nursery Operation a. Sdlg procured/purchased 984,121.00 3.09 3,042,940.76 Mahogany sdlg 429,087.00 Acacia Auri sdlg 243,105.00 Acacia mangium sdlg 112,417.00 Akleng parang sdlg 199,512.00 a. Nursery Site Preparation b. Planting Stock c. Bags d. Soil Collection e. Bagging SUB-TOTAL sdlg 984,121.00 3.09 3,042,940.76 3. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT a. Lodging/pressing/brushing ha 1,042.50 888.25 925,999.78 b. Staking spot 1,000,000.00 0.25 250,000.00 c. Spot cleaning and holing spot 1,000,000.00 1.00 1,000,000.00 d. Hauling sdlg 184,120.00 1.04 190,721.22 e. Planting sdlg 1,154,271.00 0.40 456,753.16 SUB-TOTAL ha 1,042.50 2,708.37 2,823,474.16 4. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION a. Ringweeding, cultivation, fertilizer ha 958.00 4,166.21 3,991,226.86 b. Replanting ha 956.00 1,961.02 1,874,732.63 c. Patrol Works ha 963.00 650.29 626,228.62 d. Construction of trail km 20.00 5,000.00 100,000.00 e. Tools and materials (Fertilizer) bags 280.00 84,000.00 SUB-TOTAL ha 1,042.50 6,404.02 6,676,188.11 5. CSD Infrastructure a. Graded Trail b. Footpath c. Bunkhouse unit 3.00 50,000.00 150,000.00 d. Lookout Tower unit 5.00 10,000.00 50,000.00 e. Fireline/firebreak SUB-TOTAL ha 1,042.50 191.85 200,000.00 6. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION a. First and Second Year ('97,'98) ha 364.80 1,164.27 424,724.52 b. Third Year ('99) ha 215.20 828.17 178,221.73 c. Fourth Year ('00) ha 1,042.50 196.93 205,303.15 d. Fifth Year ('01) ha 1,042.50 436.27 454,809.08 e. Sixth Year ('02) ha 1,042.50 123.74 128,995.34 f. Seventh Year ('03) ha - SUB-TOTAL ha 1,042.50 1,335.30 1,392,053.83 G R A N D T O T A L ha 1,042.50 13,558.42 14,134,656.86 FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135 TABLE 9. Cost Estimate for Monitoring and Evaluation per Activity

Unit Target ACTIVITIES of Unit Cost Total Cost Output Measure Physical Validation Component

1. Development of appropriate tools for participatory M&E 2,905.80 ha 61.95 180,000.00 2. Verification of Boundaries, UTM monuments and block corner post 2,905.00 ha 407.21 1,182,949.19 3. Seedling Production/Inventory Analysis 2,905.00 ha 97.12 282,125.00 4. Survival Inventory (height and diameter measurements and related observations per 2,905.00 ha 997.85 2,898,768.20 area/components and parcels

5. Documentation/Reports 2,905.00 ha 120.98 351,455.00

B. Institutional/Environmental Impacts 764,552.20

S U B T O T A L 2,905.00 ha 1,948.31 5,659,849.59

Institutional and Project Benefit Assessment

1. Preparatory activities 35,000.00

2. Primary data collection and preliminary assessment 162,000.00

3. Documentation/Reports 33,000.00

S U B T O T A L 2,905.80 ha 79.15 230,000.00 G R A N D T O T A L 2,905.80 ha 2,026.93 5,889,849.59 FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135 TABLE 10. INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT

Infrastructure Project : Farm to Market Road rehabilitation Project

Location : Barangay daja-dagami, Maasin, Iloilo

Contractor : International Builders Corporation

Contract Cost : P18,698,490.19

Contract Duration : 450 calendar days (15 months)

Effectivity of Notice to proceed : 16-Jan-02

Expected Completion date : 10-Apr-03

Revised Completion date : 12-Jun-03

Date of MOA with LGU : 23-Jul-03

Brief description : Over all project Length: 9.465 km Road Width: 3.0 m Shoulder Width: 1m x 2m Total length of Drainage lines: 14.43 km Culverts for construction: 17

Major Items of work: Gravel pavement, side drainage ditch, cross drains (pipe culverts and vented spillway) and slope protection. Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P135

TABLE 11. ANNUAL WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN Planned Actual 1996 ACTIVITIES Planned Actual Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Target Budget Target Budget

1. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM 27,551.85 73,976,723.94 25,570.91 74,303,945.93 A. SMP - - B. CO (Phase 1 & 2) 1,800.00 4,833,000.00 1,441.75 4,130,600.00 - - 1. Old Sites - - - Year 1 - - -Year 2 - - 2. New Sites 1,800.00 4,833,000.00 1,538.40 4,130,600.00 - - - Year 1 531.84 1,428,000.00 384.46 1,032,275.00 -Year 2 - 619.64 1,663,725.00 - Year 3 1,268.16 3,405,000.00 453.48 1,217,600.00 -Year 4 - 80.82 217,000.00 C. CSD 16,487.58 44,269,143.50 15,712.58 45,657,623.48 - - 1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping 256.18 687,842.00 256.18 687,842.00 2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC a. Infrastructure - - b. Trails and footpath - - 3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) 16,231.40 43,581,301.50 15,475.87 44,969,781.48 - - a. Agroforestry 15,129.98 17,611,295.57 15,737.50 20,773,500.09 b. Assisted Natural Regeneration - - c. Enrichment Planting - - d. Tree Plantation 17,074.30 25,970,005.93 15,258.09 24,196,281.39 - - d.1. Bamboo 25,151.34 9,054,482.23 21,309.25 7,306,941.67 - - - - d.2. Rattan 14,612.99 1,622,041.65 13,766.53 2,754,682.86 d.3. Mangrove - - d.4. Plantation Species 14,565.22 15,293,482.05 13,554.52 14,134,656.86 e. Timber Stand Improvement - - 4. Inventory Residual Forest - - 5. Income Enhancement Project - - D. Infrastructure Component 18,698,490.19 18,625,872.86 E. Monitoring & Evaluation 2,300.22 6,176,090.25 2,026.93 5,889,849.59 - - -Year 1 1,002.49 2,610,635.25 545.93 1,421,695.66 -Year 2 643.00 1,726,455.00 322.44 865,756.28 -Year 3 684.92 1,839,000.00 679.81 1,975,397.65 -Year 4 559.91 1,627,000.00 2. SUSIMO 2,544,554.97 2,544,554.97 Equipment provided to the Office Researches conducted Trainings Others GRAND TOTAL 76,521,278.91 76,848,500.90 - - Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P135

TABLE 11. ANNUAL WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN 1997 1998 ACTIVITIES Planned Actual Planned Actual Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget

1. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM 4,370.00 29,532,349.31 386.00 5,962,458.92 2,635.00 14,595,012.69 1,643.60 13,770,218.04 A. SMP B. CO (Phase 1 & 2) 2,685.00 1,428,000.00 2,685.00 1,032,275.00 2,685.00 2,515,000.00 2,685.00 1,663,725.00 1. Old Sites - Year 1 -Year 2 2. New Sites 2,685.00 1,428,000.00 2,685.00 1,032,275.00 2,685.00 2,515,000.00 2,685.00 1,663,725.00 - Year 1 2,685.00 1,428,000.00 2,685.00 1,032,275.00 -Year 2 2,685.00 1,663,725.00 - Year 3 2,685.00 2,515,000.00 -Year 4 C. CSD 4,370.00 28,104,349.31 386.00 4,930,183.92 2,635.00 12,080,012.69 1,643.60 12,106,493.04 1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping 2,685.00 687,842.00 2,685.00 687,842.00 2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC a. Infrastructure b. Trails and footpath 3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) 1,685.00 25,806,720.11 386.00 4,930,183.92 2,635.00 10,872,672.29 1,643.60 11,418,651.04 a. Agroforestry 1,164.00 10,884,293.37 24.00 106,994.65 1,164.00 4,275,820.60 961.50 6,759,408.77 b. Assisted Natural Regeneration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation 521.00 14,922,426.74 362.00 4,823,189.27 1,471.00 6,596,851.69 682.10 4,659,242.27 d.1. Bamboo 360.00 5,476,214.54 160.00 4,491,784.47 360.00 1,897,170.19 160.00 525,352.31 d.2. Rattan 111.00 1,072,410.65 111.00 382,051.00 200.10 737,218.96 d.3. Mangrove d.4. Plantation Species 50.00 8,373,801.55 42.00 331,404.80 1,000.00 4,317,630.50 322.00 3,396,671.00 e. Timber Stand Improvement 4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project D. Infrastructure Component E. Monitoring & Evaluation - - - - -Year 1 -Year 2 -Year 3 -Year 4 2. SUSIMO Equipment provided to the Office Researches conducted Trainings Others GRAND TOTAL 29,532,349.31 5,962,458.92 14,595,012.69 13,770,218.04 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P135

TABLE 11. ANNUAL WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN 1999 2000 ACTIVITIES Planned Actual Planned Actual Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget

1. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM 2,685.00 8,999,249.50 1,543.50 10,048,386.12 - 2,610,635.25 2,705.70 5,804,897.72 A. SMP B. CO (Phase 1 & 2) 2,685.00 890,000.00 2,685.00 1,217,600.00 - 2,685.00 217,000.00 1. Old Sites - Year 1 -Year 2 2. New Sites 2,685.00 890,000.00 2,685.00 1,217,600.00 - 2,685.00 217,000.00 - Year 1 -Year 2 - Year 3 2,685.00 890,000.00 2,685.00 1,217,600.00 -Year 4 217,000.00 C. CSD 2,685.00 8,109,249.50 1,543.50 8,830,786.12 - 2,705.70 4,166,202.06 1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping 2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC a. Infrastructure b. Trails and footpath 3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) 2,685.00 6,901,909.10 1,543.50 8,830,786.12 - 2,705.70 4,166,202.06 a. Agroforestry 1,164.00 2,451,181.60 961.50 2,712,396.18 1,320.00 3,364,644.43 b. Assisted Natural Regeneration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation 1,521.00 4,450,727.50 582.00 6,118,389.94 - - 1,385.70 801,557.63 d.1. Bamboo 360.00 1,681,097.50 260.00 832,186.07 - - 342.90 211,368.98 d.2. Rattan 111.00 167,580.00 d.3. Mangrove d.4. Plantation Species 1,050.00 2,602,050.00 322.00 5,286,203.87 1,042.80 590,188.65 e. Timber Stand Improvement 4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project D. Infrastructure Component E. Monitoring & Evaluation - - 2,604.15 2,610,635.25 2,604.15 1,421,695.66 -Year 1 2,604.15 2,610,635.25 2,604.15 1,421,695.66 -Year 2 -Year 3 -Year 4 2. SUSIMO Equipment provided to the Office Researches conducted Trainings Others GRAND TOTAL 8,999,249.50 10,048,386.12 2,610,635.25 5,804,897.72 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P135

TABLE 11. ANNUAL WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN 2001 2002 ACTIVITIES Planned Actual Planned Actual Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget

1. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM - - 2,905.80 10,287,665.37 - 1,726,455.00 2,905.80 12,565,289.05 A. SMP B. CO (Phase 1 & 2) 1. Old Sites - Year 1 -Year 2 2. New Sites - Year 1 -Year 2 - Year 3 -Year 4 C. CSD - 2,905.80 9,421,909.09 - 2,905.80 4,755,523.88 1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping 2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC a. Infrastructure b. Trails and footpath 3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) - 2,905.80 9,421,909.09 - 2,905.80 4,755,523.88 a. Agroforestry 1,320.00 3,640,772.88 1,320.00 2,951,497.57 b. Assisted Natural Regeneration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation - - 1,585.80 5,781,136.21 - - 1,585.80 1,804,026.31 d.1. Bamboo - - 342.90 1,029,134.84 - - 342.90 152,081.41 d.2. Rattan 200.10 1,459,153.08 200.10 414,604.65 d.3. Mangrove d.4. Plantation Species 1,042.80 3,292,848.29 1,042.80 1,237,340.25 e. Timber Stand Improvement 4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project D. Infrastructure Component 5,834,367.52 E. Monitoring & Evaluation - 2,685.00 865,756.28 2,685.00 1,726,455.00 2,905.80 1,975,397.65 -Year 1 -Year 2 2,685.00 865,756.28 2,685.00 1,726,455.00 -Year 3 2,905.80 1,975,397.65 -Year 4 2. SUSIMO 956,214.97 956,214.97 652,000.00 652,000.00 Equipment provided to the Office Researches conducted Trainings Others GRAND TOTAL 956,214.97 11,243,880.34 2,378,455.00 13,217,289.05 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P135

TABLE 11. ANNUAL WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN 2003 Planned (TOTAL) Actual (TOTAL) ACTIVITIES Planned Actual Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget

1. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM - 20,537,490.19 1,863.00 15,865,030.71 2,685.00 73,976,723.94 2,905.80 74,303,945.93 A. SMP - - - B. CO (Phase 1 & 2) 2,685.00 4,833,000.00 2,685.00 4,130,600.00 1. Old Sites - - - - Year 1 - - - -Year 2 - - - 2. New Sites 2,685.00 4,833,000.00 2,685.00 4,130,600.00 - Year 1 2,685.00 1,428,000.00 2,685.00 1,032,275.00 -Year 2 - 2,685.00 1,663,725.00 - Year 3 2,685.00 3,405,000.00 2,685.00 1,217,600.00 -Year 4 - - 2,685.00 217,000.00 C. CSD - 1,863.00 1,446,525.37 2,685.00 44,269,143.50 2,905.80 45,657,623.48 1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping 2,685.00 687,842.00 2,685.00 687,842.00 2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC - - - a. Infrastructure - - - b. Trails and footpath - - - 3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) - 1,863.00 1,446,525.37 2,685.00 43,581,301.50 2,905.80 44,969,781.48 a. Agroforestry 1,320.00 1,237,785.61 1,164.00 17,611,295.57 1,320.00 20,773,500.09 b. Assisted Natural Regeneration - - - c. Enrichment Planting - - - d. Tree Plantation - - 543.00 208,739.76 1,521.00 25,970,005.93 1,585.80 24,196,281.39 d.1. Bamboo - - 342.90 65,033.59 360.00 9,054,482.23 342.90 7,306,941.67 d.2. Rattan 200.10 143,706.17 111.00 1,622,041.65 200.10 2,754,682.86 d.3. Mangrove - - - d.4. Plantation Species 1,050.00 15,293,482.05 1,042.80 14,134,656.86 e. Timber Stand Improvement - - - 4. Inventory Residual Forest - - - 5. Income Enhancement Project - - - D. Infrastructure Component 18,698,490.19 12,791,505.34 - 18,698,490.19 18,625,872.86 E. Monitoring & Evaluation 2,905.80 1,839,000.00 2,905.80 1,627,000.00 2,685.00 6,176,090.25 2,905.80 5,889,849.59 -Year 1 2,604.15 2,610,635.25 2,604.15 1,421,695.66 -Year 2 2,685.00 1,726,455.00 2,685.00 865,756.28 -Year 3 2,905.80 1,839,000.00 2,685.00 1,839,000.00 2,905.80 1,975,397.65 -Year 4 2,905.80 1,627,000.00 2,905.80 1,627,000.00 2. SUSIMO 936,340.00 936,340.00 2,544,554.97 2,544,554.97 Equipment provided to the Office Researches conducted Trainings Others GRAND TOTAL 21,473,830.19 16,801,370.71 2,685.00 76,521,278.91 2,905.80 76,848,500.90 Annex 1a

ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE OF DIOCESAN SOCIAL ACTION CENTER OF AKLAN (SMP Contractor)

Bishop of Aklan

Director

Target in Justice Socio- Relief and Maternal SMP and Peace Economic Rehabilita- and Child Project Desk Desk tion Desk Health Program

Technical Administration Staff Staff

Annex 1b

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF KAHUBLAGAN SANG PANIMALAY, INC (CO Contractor)

Associates Board of Directors Advisers

Auditor President Treasurer

Adminis- Cashier trative

Development Research and Technical Projects Communication Assistance

Annex 1c

KAPAWA ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE (People’s Organization)

GENERAL ASSEMBLY

Board of Directors

Administrative and Finance Unit

Livelihood Management Comprehensive Site Information, Education and and Development Unit Development and Communication Campaign Management Unit Unit

Member Association

1. ASSA 9. STAREMA 2. BEA 10. KPPB Comprehensive Site 3. BALEP 11. BAEP Development Area 4. DAWP 12. KBL Coordinators 5. DAEP 13. SIKAT-Dao

6. LIFAEP 14. PAEP 7. NEA 15. WUA 8. KPL 16. KPC

Annex 1d

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF GREEN FORUM – WESTERN VISAYAS (M & E Contractor)

Board of Trustees

M & E Project Coordinator

Consultant Administrative Officer

Process Documentor

Community Geomatics/GIS Facilitators

Foresters (6)

Annex 1d

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF KAHUBLAGAN SANG PANIMALAY, INC (CO Contractor)

Associates Board of Directors Advisers

Auditor President Treasurer

Adminis- Cashier trative

Development Research and Technical Projects Communication Assistance

Annex 1d

ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE OF DIOCESAN SOCIAL ACTION CENTER OF AKLAN (SMP Contractor)

Bishop of Aklan

Director

Target in Justice Socio- Relief and Maternal SMP and Peace Economic Rehabilita- and Child Project Desk Desk tion Desk Health Program

Technical Administration Staff Staff

Annex 1d

Participatory Governance for Natural Resources Development Incorporated (PGNRI) (M & E Contractor)

PGI-Makati Main Office

Project Manager

Project Project Consultant Officer

Project Project Coordinator Assistant

Survey Area Infrastructure Environmental Socio-econ Team Development Team Team Team

Annex 1e

Organizational Structure of the SUSIMO

SECRETARY

REGIONAL EXECUTIVE

DIRECTOR (RED)

PENRO

CENRO

SUBPROJECT SITE ASSISTING MANAGEMENT PROFESSIONAL OFFICE S (SUSIMO)

ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT

COMMUNITY SITE VALIDATION ORGANIZING AND DEVELOPMENT & AND BILLING STRENGTHENING MANAGEMENT UNIT UNIT UNIT

Annex 1f

IBC International Builders Corporation (Infrastructure Contractor)

Project Manager

Administrative Officer

Project Equipment Materials Engineer Engineer Engineer

Drivers Chief Materials Lab. Mechanic Technicians

Laborers Helpers Helpers

Helpers

2,905.80 hectares of Reforestation Livelihood project-Sawali Pro- and Agro-forestry Component. duction and Trading.

Rice Trading and bamboo Livelihood project-Public Utility Handicraft making. Vehicle rental/service.

9.465 km Farm to Market Road Cross Drains (pipe culvert and Rehabilitation Project. vented spillway) and slope protection.

Organizational meeting. Community Organizing activities - Monitoring and Evaluation.

Comprehensive Site Develop- Comprehensive Site Development ment Activities. activities - Plantation establishment.

Reforestation Plantation. Agro-forestry Plantation.

Cross Drains (pipe culvert and Agro-forestry Plantation. vented spillway) and slope protection.

Comprehensive Site Development Community Organizing activities - activities - Plantation establishment. Monitoring and Evaluation.

Rice Trading and bamboo 2,905.80 hectares of Reforestation Handicraft making. and Agro-forestry Component. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Maasin Watershed Subproject

Line BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 1-2 S 30 ° 58 ' E 1,674.63 2-3 S 72 ° 31 ' E 2,442.38 3-4 S 3 ° 35 ' E 2,557.85 4-5 N 89 ° 39 ' W 5,201.57 5-6 N 48 ° 9 ' W 2,056.46 6-7 S 90 ° 0 ' W 733.95 7-8 N 43 ° 50 ' W 1,105.88 8-9 N 52 ° 36 ' E 682.87 9-10 N 66 ° 7 ' W 551.85 10-11 S 75 ° 26 ' W 1,522.82 11-12 N 80 ° 35 ' E 7,020.42 12-13 N 76 ° 5 ' W 10,882.89 13-14 N 25 ° 37 ' E 2,583.41 14-15 N 66 ° 2 ' E 3,771.42 15-16 S 82 ° 28 ' E 730.90 16-17 S 43 ° 56 ' E 2,082.89 17-18 S 0 ° 47 ' E 2,329.71 18-19 S 23 ° 26 ' E 1,043.34 19-20 S 76 ° 46 ' E 1,114.60 20-21 S 66 ° 23 ' E 1,114.83 21-1 N 71 ° 34 ' E 706.13 Reference : Corner 1 long X 122 ° 23 ' 13 " lat-Y 10 ° 56 ' 22 "