GREATER VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT CLIMATE ACTION COMMITTEE
REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, July 6, 2016 1:00 p.m. 2nd Floor Boardroom, 4330 Kingsway, Burnaby, British Columbia
A G E N D A1
1. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA
1.1 July 6, 2016 Regular Meeting Agenda That the Climate Action Committee adopt the agenda for its regular meeting scheduled for July 6, 2016 as circulated.
2. ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES
2.1 May 4, 2016 Regular Meeting Minutes That the Climate Action Committee adopt the minutes of its regular meeting held May 4, 2016 as circulated.
3. DELEGATIONS
4. INVITED PRESENTATIONS
5. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEE OR STAFF
5.1 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions and Carbon Neutral Progress in 2015 Designated Speakers: Conor Reynolds, Senior Project Engineer and Jason Emmert, Air Quality Planner, Parks, Planning and Environment Department That the GVRD Board receive for information the report dated June 2, 2016, titled “Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions and Carbon Neutral Progress in 2015”.
5.2 Update on the Innovative Tools for Enhanced Energy and Climate Change Community Planning Project Designated Speaker: Jason Emmert, Air Quality Planner Parks, Planning and Environment Department
1 Note: Recommendation is shown under each item, where applicable.
June 30, 2016
Climate Action Committee - Page 1 Climate Action Committee Regular Agenda July 6, 2016 Agenda Page 2 of 3 That the Climate Action Committee receive for information the report dated June 16, 2016, titled ”Update on the Innovative Tools for Enhanced Energy and Climate Change Community Planning Project”.
5.3 Climate Change Projections Verbal Update: Jeff Carmichael, Division Manager, Utilities Research and Innovation, Liquid Waste Services Department
5.4 Update on Sustainability Innovation Fund Project – Home Energy Labelling Pilot Project Designated Speakers: Eve Hou, Air Quality Planner, Parks, Planning and Environment Department Jerry Colman, Policy Coordinator, External Relations Department That the GVRD Board direct staff to forward the report dated June 7, 2016, titled “Update on Sustainability Innovation Fund Project – Home Energy Labelling Pilot Project” to member jurisdictions and provide access to the RateOurHome.ca campaign materials in an effort to increase municipal involvement in the campaign
5.5 Update on Sustainability Innovation Fund Project – Smart Drive Challenge Designated Speakers: Derek Jennejohn, Lead Senior Engineer, Eve Hou, Air Quality Planner Parks, Planning and Environment Department That the Climate Action Committee receive for information the report dated May 31, 2016, titled “Update on Sustainability Innovation Fund Project – Smart Drive Challenge”.
5.6 Manager’s Report Designated Speaker: Roger Quan, Director, Air Quality and Climate Change Parks, Planning and Environment Department That the Climate Action Committee receive for information the report dated June 21, 2016, titled “Manager’s Report”.
6. INFORMATION ITEMS
6.1 Residential Wood Smoke Particulate Emissions – correspondence dated April 11, 2016 from Mayor Lois Jackson, The Corporation of Delta, addressed to Mayor Greg Moore, Chair Metro Vancouver and Board of Directors. 6.2 Lower Mainland "Network" of Organizations concerned about BC Hydro's Site C Project – electronic correspondence dated June 13, 2016 from Roger Bryenton, Suzuki elder, SPEC Committee addressed to the Climate Action Committee.
7. OTHER BUSINESS
8. BUSINESS ARISING FROM DELEGATIONS
Climate Action Committee - Page 2 Climate Action Committee Regular Agenda July 6, 2016 Agenda Page 3 of 3 9. RESOLUTION TO CLOSE MEETING Note: The Committee must state by resolution the basis under section 90 of the Community Charter on which the meeting is being closed. If a member wishes to add an item, the basis must be included below.
10. ADJOURNMENT/CONCLUSION That the Climate Action Committee adjourn/conclude its regular meeting of July 6, 2016.
Membership:
Corrigan, Derek (C) – Burnaby Jackson, Lois - Delta Steves, Harold – Richmond Reimer, Andrea (VC) – Vancouver Martin, Mary – Surrey Storteboom, Rudy – Langley City Buhr, Karl – Lions Bay Masse, Robert – Maple Ridge Villeneuve, Judy – Surrey Dupont, Laura – Port Coquitlam Stevenson, Tim – Vancouver Williams, Bryce – Tsawwassen Harris, Maria – Electoral Area A
Climate Action Committee - Page 3 2.1
GREATER VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT CLIMATE ACTION COMMITTEE
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD) Climate Action Committee held at 1:08 p.m. on Wednesday, May 4, 2016 in the 2nd Floor Boardroom, 4330 Kingsway, Burnaby, British Columbia.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair, Mayor Derek Corrigan, Burnaby Vice Chair, Councillor Andrea Reimer, Vancouver Mayor Karl Buhr, Lions Bay Councillor Laura Dupont, Port Coquitlam Mayor Lois Jackson, Delta (arrived at 1:22 p.m.) Councillor Robert Masse, Maple Ridge Councillor Rudy Storteboom, Langley City Councillor Judy Villeneuve, Surrey Chief Bryce Williams, Tsawwassen
MEMBERS ABSENT: Director Maria Harris, Electoral Area A Councillor Mary Martin, Surrey Councillor Tim Stevenson, Vancouver Councillor Harold Steves, Richmond
STAFF PRESENT: Roger Quan, Director, Air Quality and Climate Change, Planning, Policy and Environment Carol Mason, Commissioner/Chief Administrative Officer Deanna Manojlovic, Assistant to Regional Committees, Board and Information Services, Legal and Legislative Services
1. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA
1.1 May 4, 2016 Regular Meeting Agenda
It was MOVED and SECONDED That the Climate Action Committee adopt the agenda for its regular meeting scheduled for May 4, 2016 as circulated. CARRIED
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the GVRD Climate Action Committee held on Wednesday, May 4, 2016 Page 1 of 6
Climate Action Committee - Page 4 2. ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES
2.1 April 6, 2016 Regular Meeting Minutes
It was MOVED and SECONDED That the Climate Action Committee adopt the minutes of its regular meeting held April 6, 2016 as circulated. CARRIED
3. DELEGATIONS No items presented.
4. INVITED PRESENTATIONS No items presented.
5. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEE OR STAFF
5.1 2016 GVRD Sustainability Innovation Fund Applications Report dated April 27, 2016 from Ann Rowan, Program Manager, Collaboration Initiatives, External Relations, summarizing the staff evaluation of applications for support from the GVRD Sustainability Innovation Fund and seeking approval for funding allocation.
Members were provided with a presentation on the three applications recommended for funding from the GVRD Sustainability Innovation Fund highlighting: overview of the projects, the project partners, and funding amount requested for each project.
1:22 p.m. Mayor Jackson arrived at the meeting.
Discussion ensued on funding expectations for projects that involve future phases, funding contributions from project partners, and reviewing the current GVRD Sustainability Innovation Fund policy.
Presentation titled “2016 GVRD Sustainability Innovation Fund - Applications” is retained with the May 4, 2016 Climate Action Committee meeting agenda.
It was MOVED and SECONDED That the GVRD Board approve the allocation of funding from the GVRD Sustainability Innovation Fund to the following projects: a) Transit-Oriented Affordable Housing Fund: $100,000 in 2017; b) The Regional Park Solar-Powered Conversion Project: $100,000 in 2017; and c) City of Langley Urban Agriculture Demonstration: $50,000 in 2017. CARRIED
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the GVRD Climate Action Committee held on Wednesday, May 4, 2016 Page 2 of 6
Climate Action Committee - Page 5 5.2 2016 Liquid Waste Sustainability Innovation Fund Applications Report dated April 27, 2016 from Fred Nenninger, Director, Policy Planning and Analysis, Liquid Waste Services, summarizing the staff evaluation of applications for support from the Liquid Waste Sustainability Innovation Fund and seeking approval for funding allocation.
Members were provided with a presentation on the two applications recommended for funding from the GVS&DD Sustainability Innovation Fund highlighting: overview of the projects, the project partners, and funding amount requested for each project.
Presentation titled “2016 Liquid Waste Sustainability Innovation Fund - Applications” is retained with the May 4, 2016 Climate Action Committee meeting agenda.
It was MOVED and SECONDED That the GVS&DD Board approve the allocation from the Liquid Waste Sustainability Innovation Fund, subject to securing the required external grants, for the following projects: a) Smart Sewers – Development of Wireless In-Situ Sensors: $200,000; and b) Hydrothermal Processing Pilot Facility: $4 million. CARRIED
5.3 2016 Water Sustainability Innovation Fund Applications Report dated April 27, 2016 from Inder Singh, Director, Policy, Planning and Analysis, Water Services, summarizing the staff evaluation of applications for support from the GVWD Sustainability Innovation Fund and seeking approval for funding allocation.
Members were provided with a presentation on the two applications recommended for funding from the GVWD Sustainability Innovation Fund highlighting an overview of the projects and funding amount requested for each project.
Presentation titled “2016 Water Sustainability Innovation Fund - Applications” is retained with the May 4, 2016 Climate Action Committee meeting agenda.
It was MOVED and SECONDED That the GVWD Board approve the allocation from the Water Sustainability Innovation Fund for the following projects: a) Assessing Densification Impacts on Water Demands: $155,000; and b) Mountain Lake Tapping Project: $125,000. CARRIED
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the GVRD Climate Action Committee held on Wednesday, May 4, 2016 Page 3 of 6
Climate Action Committee - Page 6 5.4 Greater Vancouver Regional District Air Quality Management Bylaw No. 1082, 2008 – Officer Appointment Report dated April 7, 2016 from Ray Robb, Division Manager, Environmental Regulation and Enforcement, Legal and Legislative Services, seeking approval to appoint and rescind staff as Officers pursuant to the Environmental Management Act and Greater Vancouver Regional District Air Quality Management Bylaw No. 1082, 2008.
It was MOVED and SECONDED That the GVRD Board, pursuant to the Environmental Management Act and Greater Vancouver Regional District Air Quality Management Bylaw No. 1082, 2008: a) Appoint Michael Hughes and Luke Smith as Officers; and b) Rescind Donna Hargreaves and Karen Pyne as Officers. CARRIED
5.5 Caring for the Air 2016 Report Report dated April 8, 2016 from Julie Saxton, Air Quality Planner, Planning, Policy and Environment, presenting the 2016 edition of the annual “Caring for the Air” report and providing information about the outreach activity conducted for the 2015 edition of “Caring for the Air”.
Members were provided with a presentation on the 2016 Caring for the Air report, highlighting: feedback received on the 2015 Caring for the Air report; links between ecological health and air quality; energy efficiency and improving air quality at home; innovation at Metro Vancouver; air quality action update; and the global perspective.
Presentation titled “Caring for the Air 2016” is retained with the May 4, 2016 Climate Action Committee meeting agenda.
It was MOVED and SECONDED That the GVRD Board receive for information the report dated April 8, 2016, titled “Caring for the Air 2016 Report”. CARRIED
5.6 Metro Vancouver’s “Grow Green” Website Report dated April 8, 2016 from Erin Embley, Regional Planner, Planning, Policy and Environment, providing an overview of key information and tools found on Metro Vancouver’s forthcoming website “Grow Green” which was prepared using funds provided through the GVRD Sustainability Innovation Funds.
Members were provided with an overview of the Grow Green website highlighting: target audience; involvement of UBC Botanical Garden; plant database; links to sustainability; feedback received on the proposed website from focus groups; and anticipated launch date.
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the GVRD Climate Action Committee held on Wednesday, May 4, 2016 Page 4 of 6
Climate Action Committee - Page 7 Staff provided members with an on-screen demonstration of the Grow Green website, which is still under development.
It was MOVED and SECONDED That the Climate Action Committee receive for information the report dated April 8, 2016, titled “Metro Vancouver’s “Grow Green” Website”. CARRIED
5.7 Manager’s Report Report dated April 20, 2016 from Roger Quan, Director, Air Quality and Climate Change, Planning, Policy and Environment, updating the Committee on the 2016 work plan, completion of an air quality monitoring study in the Moodyville neighbourhood of North Vancouver, Regional Invasive Species Task Force, and Committee members’ attendance at 2016 events.
It was MOVED and SECONDED That the Climate Action Committee receive for information the report dated April 20, 2016, titled “Manager’s Report”. CARRIED
6. INFORMATION ITEMS
It was MOVED and SECONDED That the Climate Action Committee receive for information the following Information Item: 6.1 Delta port Third Berth - Final Report on Adaptive Management Strategy – correspondence dated April 6, 2016 from Mayor Lois Jackson, The Corporation of Delta, addressed to Mayor Greg Moore, Chair Metro Vancouver and Board of Directors. CARRIED
7. OTHER BUSINESS Members expressed concerns about products marketed as flushable or biodegradable, which is contrary to Metro Vancouver’s public outreach efforts to divert these products from the sewer system.
Request of Staff Staff was requested to report back to a future Climate Action Committee meeting with information on: • Metro Vancouver’s position on the marketing of flushable or biodegradable products, in relation to items such as wipes and cat litter • whether the Utilities Committee would be the appropriate channel for referral of this matter
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the GVRD Climate Action Committee held on Wednesday, May 4, 2016 Page 5 of 6
Climate Action Committee - Page 8 Further to the discussion in relation to Item 5.1 - 2016 GVRD Sustainability Innovation Fund Applications, members suggested that the Committee review the GVRD Sustainability Innovation Fund policy prior to the next call for applications, to ensure the criteria provides clarity to staff in terms of the expectations for evaluating proposals.
Request of Staff Staff was requested to report back to the Climate Action Committee with the GVRD Sustainability Innovation Fund policy for review of the evaluation criteria, in advance of next year’s application process.
8. BUSINESS ARISING FROM DELEGATIONS No items presented.
9. RESOLUTION TO CLOSE MEETING No items presented.
10. ADJOURNMENT/CONCLUSION
It was MOVED and SECONDED That the Climate Action Committee conclude its regular meeting of May 4, 2016. CARRIED (Time: 3:17 p.m.)
______Deanna Manojlovic, Derek Corrigan, Chair Assistant to Regional Committees
18154601 FINAL
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the GVRD Climate Action Committee held on Wednesday, May 4, 2016 Page 6 of 6
Climate Action Committee - Page 9 5.1
To: Climate Action Committee
From: Conor Reynolds, Senior Project Engineer Jason Emmert, Air Quality Planner Parks, Planning and Environment Department
Date: June 2, 2016 Meeting Date: July 6, 2016
Subject: Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions and Carbon Neutral Progress in 2015
RECOMMENDATION That the GVRD Board receive for information the report dated June 2, 2016, titled “Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions and Carbon Neutral Progress in 2015”.
PURPOSE To inform the GVRD Board of Metro Vancouver’s 2015 Climate Actions and Carbon Neutral Progress report submitted to the Province under the Climate Action Revenue Incentive Program (CARIP), highlight links to the Integrated Regional Climate Action Strategy, and overall status of member jurisdictions in the region.
BACKGROUND At its April 2016 meeting, the Committee received a presentation on the development of Metro Vancouver’s Integrated Regional Climate Action Strategy (IRCAS), which responds to direction in the Board Strategic Plan and will create the framework to build upon and take the next steps of climate action toward the region’s greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions targets and climate adaptation objectives. IRCAS recognizes that the climate actions needed will be at both the corporate level, addressing the assets and infrastructure of local governments, as well as at the broader regional level. Metro Vancouver and its member jurisdictions have been developing a portfolio of innovative and broad reaching climate actions, and the region is taking bold steps towards reducing GHG emissions and adapting to the changing climate.
Each year, Metro Vancouver prepares a climate action report to the Province under the Climate Action Revenue Incentive Program (CARIP), which arose from the BC Climate Action Charter. The program requires Charter signatories to annually report their climate actions, measure their carbon footprint, take action to reduce their carbon footprint, and work towards balancing that footprint with projects that result in emissions reductions. Local Governments who fulfill these requirements are eligible to receive a refund of their carbon tax paid on direct fuel purchases.
CARIP reports include climate actions related to both GHG reduction and adaptation, and both corporately as well as in the broader community. CARIP is aligned with the Integrated Regional Climate Action Strategy, a key element of which is Metro Vancouver’s corporate program to reduce its corporate GHG emissions and pursue carbon neutrality.
METRO VANCOUVER’S CLIMATE ACTIONS Metro Vancouver’s 2015 Climate Actions and Carbon Neutral Progress Report (Attachment) lists approximately 60 actions completed in 2015, and a total of over 75 projects underway or planned in
Climate Action Committee - Page 10 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions and Carbon Neutral Progress in 2015 Climate Action Committee Meeting Date: July 6, 2016 Page 2 of 4
2016 (a number of which are continuations of successful projects initiated in 2015 or earlier). Corporate mitigation and adaptation projects have been initiated by many different groups within Metro Vancouver. Corporate mitigation projects range from energy efficient lighting upgrades at our wastewater treatment plants and regional parks, to restoration work at Burns Bog that has potential to reduce methane emissions and restore the bog’s ability to sequester carbon. Metro Vancouver’s utilities are paying close addition to adaptation issues. For example, a Comprehensive Regional Water System Plan is under development, which will include consideration of the effects of the changing climate on Metro Vancouver’s water supply.
Over half of all Metro Vancouver’s climate actions are implemented in the community, reaching many of the region’s residents directly. A number of innovative projects have been made possible by the Metro Vancouver Sustainability Innovation Fund, such as the Smart Drive Challenge, which uses technology to engage drivers and aims to reduce fuel consumption and GHGs; and the Strata Energy Advisor Program, which will make dedicated energy advisors available to multi-family stratas in the region. In addition, a project is underway to develop a Climate Change Adaptation Strategy, which will have both internal/corporate and external/regional components – this work is a key element of the Integrated Regional Climate Action Strategy (IRCAS) referenced earlier in this report.
METRO VANCOUVER’S CARBON FOOTPRINT The Provincial government has established the scope of activities to be included in the corporate carbon footprint to be reported by local governments, and has limited the scope to “Traditional Services”, which includes the GHGs associated with energy use in local government buildings, fleet, facilities and some contracted services. GHG emissions associated with the final disposal of solid waste (i.e., landfills and waste-to-energy) are outside of the scope designated by the Provincial government. However, Metro Vancouver reports GHG emissions from the final disposal of solid waste under separate Provincial and Federal GHG legislation.
For the 2015 reporting year, Metro Vancouver’s initial corporate carbon footprint (before offsets or credits) was 6,018 tonnes CO2e (carbon dioxide-equivalent), of which approximately 10% was from fuel use by contracted services. This is a slight decrease from the 2014 footprint (6,224 tonnes CO2e). Metro Vancouver continues to implement its Corporate Energy Management Policy, which mandates continuous improvement in energy performance and thus directly impacts corporate GHG emissions. Fleet fuel use is the source of approximately half of Metro Vancouver’s corporate emissions (2,890 tonnes CO2e). A new corporate Fleet Management Policy is under development that will take into account GHG emissions during all stages of the fleet management process, including procurement. Natural gas use in buildings and facilities in 2015 resulted in approximately 15% of total corporate emissions.
GHG REDUCTIONS CREDITS For the 2015 reporting year, Metro Vancouver is carbon neutral. This has been achieved by reducing energy-related emissions where possible, in spite of growth in both regional population and services delivered, and by undertaking GHG emission reductions projects outside its traditional services scope. In 2015, Metro Vancouver secured GHG reduction credits (the non-market equivalent to “carbon offsets”) from two landfill gas capture optimization projects and one “avoided forest conversion” project.
Climate Action Committee - Page 11 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions and Carbon Neutral Progress in 2015 Climate Action Committee Meeting Date: July 6, 2016 Page 3 of 4
The Vancouver Landfill project generated 134,056 tonnes of verified GHG reduction credits in 2015, which was very similar to 2014. The City of Vancouver transferred a total of 44,238 tonnes CO2e (33% of the total verified credits) to Metro Vancouver, which were subsequently shared with member municipalities according to a methodology developed and agreed to through the Regional Engineers Advisory Committee. In 2015 Metro Vancouver’s portion of the credits was 6,197 tonnes CO2e.
Similar to the Vancouver Landfill project, improvements to the methane capture and destruction system at the closed Coquitlam Landfill resulted in additional GHG reduction credits of 958 tonnes CO2e in 2015.
The protection of two unimproved, forested properties adjacent to Kanaka Creek Regional Park in Maple Ridge in August 2015 resulted in 1,815 tonnes of verified GHG reductions in 2015. The application of these credits more than balances Metro Vancouver’s carbon footprint in 2015, and enables the carry-forward of excess credits into future years.
Metro Vancouver staff have also been assisting its member jurisdictions that have organics diversion programs with the calculation and reporting of the associated GHG reduction credits. In 2015, local government organics diversion programs resulted in a total of approximately 32,500 tonnes of GHG reduction credits. Metro Vancouver is also assisting its member jurisdictions in implementing various region-wide community projects related to building energy and clean vehicle technologies.
Through this coordination, and as a direct consequence of receiving carbon credits from organics diversion programs and the Vancouver Landfill Gas Capture Optimization project (in addition to several other projects, such as “avoided forest conversion projects”), it is Metro Vancouver’s understanding that all member jurisdictions that signed the BC Climate Action Charter have achieved carbon neutrality in 2015.
ALTERNATIVES This report is provided for information only. No alternatives are presented.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS A critical component of CARIP is the carbon tax rebate to local governments that have signed the BC Climate Action Charter and fulfill their reporting obligations each year. This rebate is equivalent to the carbon taxes they pay directly, which for Metro Vancouver is approximately $185,000 in 2016. Within Metro Vancouver, the annual carbon tax rebate is used to directly support Metro Vancouver’s corporate and regional climate action projects. A similar rebate is expected in 2017, which will help support projects and actions under the broad direction of the Integrated Regional Climate Action Strategy. Overall resources required to carry out climate action work in 2017 will be proposed for inclusion in 2017 budgets for the Committee’s consideration in the fall.
SUMMARY / CONCLUSION In 2015, Metro Vancouver and all of its member jurisdictions that signed the BC Climate Action Charter have achieved their goal of carbon neutrality by balancing their carbon footprints with a number of regionally significant GHG reduction projects. This progress has been publically reported by each participating local government to the Provincial government as part of the Climate Action Revenue Incentive Program.
Climate Action Committee - Page 12 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions and Carbon Neutral Progress in 2015 Climate Action Committee Meeting Date: July 6, 2016 Page 4 of 4
Metro Vancouver and its member jurisdictions have demonstrated burgeoning leadership to the broader community in taking climate action corporately and within their communities, and good collaboration in implementing projects that provide regional benefit. It is expected that many local governments will continue to pursue carbon neutrality in future years, as this goal motivates actions that reduce regionally significant GHG emissions within their direct sphere of influence. However, it is recognized that the collective corporate greenhouse gas emissions of Metro Vancouver and member jurisdictions (approximately 100,000 tonnes) is a relatively minor contributor to total GHG emissions in the region (approximately 15 million tonnes, or 150 times larger). Therefore, it is essential to pursue community-level actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from all sources within the region to achieve significant reductions and meet Metro Vancouver’s regional targets. Metro Vancouver is developing an Integrated Regional Climate Action Strategy that will catalyze climate action both corporately and regionally, both in terms of GHG emissions reductions and increase resilience to the changing climate.
Attachment: Metro Vancouver’s 2015 Climate Actions and Carbon Neutral Progress: Climate Action Revenue Incentive Program (CARIP) Public Report, May 27, 2016 (Doc #18561479). Available at: http://www.metrovancouver.org/services/air-quality/AirQualityPublications/CARIP2015- MetroVancouverClimateActions.pdf
18466755
Climate Action Committee - Page 13 5.1 ATTACHMENT
May 27, 2016 Metro Vancouver Climate Actions 2015 Climate Action Revenue Incentive Program (CARIP) Public Report
Climate Action Committee - Page 14 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
General Information
Regional District: Metro Vancouver (Greater Vancouver Regional District) Population 2,494,000 (2015) Regional Growth Strategy: “Metro Vancouver 2040 – Shaping our Future” (adopted July 2011)
Report Preparation and Contact Information
This report was prepared by the staff of the Air Quality and Climate Change Division of Metro Vancouver, with input from across the organization. Questions on the report should be directed to [email protected] or the Metro Vancouver Information Centre at 604-432-6200.
Reported by: Roger Quan Director, Air Quality and Climate Change Planning, Policy and Environment Department
Contact us: Metro Vancouver 4330 Kingsway, Burnaby, BC V5H 4G8 604-432-6200 www.metrovancouver.org
Cover photo shows the North Shore from Coal Harbour (credit: Eddie Cheung)
Page 2 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 15 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
TABLE OF CONTENTS
General Information ...... 2 Report Preparation and Contact Information ...... 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ...... 3 BROAD PLANNING...... 5 Regional Growth Strategy ...... 5 Integrated Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Management Plan ...... 5 Metro Vancouver Board Strategic Plan 2015-2018 ...... 5 CORPORATE – Broad Planning ...... 7 COMMUNITY-WIDE – Broad Planning ...... 8 BUILDINGS AND LIGHTING ...... 10 CORPORATE – Buildings and Lighting ...... 10 COMMUNITY-WIDE – Buildings and Lighting ...... 11 ENERGY GENERATION ...... 13 CORPORATE - Energy Generation ...... 13 COMMUNITY-WIDE - Energy Generation ...... 16 GREENSPACE/NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION ...... 17 COMMUNITY-WIDE – Greenspace/Natural Resource Protection ...... 17 CORPORATE – Greenspace/Natural Resource Protection ...... 19 SOLID WASTE ...... 20 CORPORATE - Solid Waste ...... 20 COMMUNITY-WIDE - Solid Waste...... 22 TRANSPORTATION ...... 25 CORPORATE – Transportation ...... 25 COMMUNITY-WIDE – Transportation ...... 26 WATER and WASTEWATER ...... 29 CORPORATE - Water and Wastewater ...... 29 COMMUNITY-WIDE - Water and Wastewater ...... 31 CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION ...... 32 CORPORATE – Climate Change Adaptation ...... 32
Page 3 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 16 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
COMMUNITY-WIDE - Climate Change Adaptation ...... 33 OTHER CLIMATE ACTIONS ...... 34 COMMUNITY-WIDE - Other Climate Action ...... 34 INNOVATION AND PEER-TO-PEER LEARNING ...... 36 CORPORATE – Innovation and Peer-to-Peer Learning ...... 36 COMMUNITY-WIDE – Innovation and Peer-to-Peer Learning ...... 37 PROGRAMS, PARTNERSHIPS AND FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES ...... 38 2015 CARBON NEUTRAL REPORTING ...... 39 Reporting Emissions ...... 39 LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION ...... 41 APPENDIX 1: Contracted Emissions Report for Metro Vancouver ...... 42
Page 4 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 17 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
BROAD PLANNING
Broad Planning refers to the high level, strategic planning that sets the stage for Greenhouse Gas (GHG) reductions. Land use planning that focuses on Smart Growth principles (compact, complete, connected and centred) plays an especially important role in energy and GHG reduction. Plans that relate to a certain sector are included in that sector, e.g. transportation plans in the 'Transportation' sector.
Regional Growth Strategy As a regional government, Metro Vancouver has a Regional Growth Strategy (RGS), rather than an Official Community Plan (OCP). Metro Vancouver 2040 – Shaping our Future was adopted on July 29th, 2011, after being unanimously accepted by all local governments in the region. The RGS contains targets, policies and actions to reduce GHG emissions, as per the requirements under the Local Government (Green Communities) Statutes Amendment Act. Strategy 3.3 is to “Encourage land use and transportation infrastructure that reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions, and improve air quality”. Metro Vancouver’s role is to implement the strategies and actions of the RGS, which contribute to regional targets to reduce GHG emissions by 33 percent below 2007 levels by 2020 and 80 percent below 2007 levels by 2050. Examples of strategies and actions contained in the RGS to address climate change include: efficient goods movement; green infrastructure; protected and managed natural areas; mixed use, transit-oriented communities; low-impact development; work and play close to home; protected farmland; increasing share of trips by transit, cycling and walking; green buildings; and focusing growth in urban centres and transit corridors. Metro Vancouver's Regional Growth Strategy is available here: www.metrovancouver.org/services/regional-planning/metro-vancouver-2040 Integrated Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Management Plan Metro Vancouver also adopted an Integrated Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Management Plan in 2011 with 5 strategies comprised of 37 actions to reduce GHG emissions. These actions include: strategies to reduce short-lived climate forcers such as methane and black carbon; establishment of a regional climate action fund; support for small and medium enterprises to reduce their emissions; support for low carbon vehicle infrastructure; exploration of carbon sequestration opportunities; and raising public awareness of low carbon building and transportation options. Metro Vancouver's Integrated Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Management Plan is available here: www.metrovancouver.org/services/air- quality/plans-reports/iaqggmp Metro Vancouver Board Strategic Plan 2015-2018 In 2015, Metro Vancouver’s Board adopted its 2015‐2018 Board Strategic Plan. Under the Regional Federation section the Board directs staff to “Incorporate strategies and actions into all Metro Vancouver functions to mitigate and adapt to climate change” and to “incorporate climate change messaging into public communications”. Under the Air Quality and Climate Action section the direction is more specific, stating that Metro Vancouver will “Develop, adopt and implement a regional climate action strategy for reducing regional GHG emissions and adapting to climate change”, and identifies specific elements of this new strategy. The Board Strategic Plan also confirms the importance of collaboration, education and engagement, decision‐making based on triple bottom line analysis, fiscal responsibility, and the alignment of regional and member objectives. Metro Vancouver's Board Strategic Plan is available at: http://www.metrovancouver.org/about/aboutuspublications/BoardStrategicPlan2015-2018.pdf
Page 5 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 18 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
Response
What GHG reduction targets are included in your local Metro Vancouver’s Regional Growth government’s Official Community Plan or Regional Growth Strategy includes regional targets to Strategy? reduce GHG emissions by 33 percent below 2007 levels by 2020 and 80 percent below 2007 levels by 2050. Are you familiar with the Community Energy and Emission Yes Inventory (CEEI)? Does your local government use the Community Energy Yes; Metro Vancouver conducts and and Emissions Inventory (CEEI) to measure progress? verifies its own detailed region‐wide emissions inventory every 5 years, but also used the CEEI for specific purposes such as comparing to interim years, comparing to other regions and communities in BC, cross checking methods used in our own inventory, etc. Which of the following does your local government use to guide climate action implementation? Community Energy and Emissions (CEE) Plan N/A Climate Action Plan Yes (see below) Integrated Community Sustainability Plan N/A Official Community Plan (OCP) N/A Regional Growth Strategy (RGS) Yes Others: Yes; The Integrated Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Management Plan has elements of the CEEP, Climate Action Plan, and ICSP
Does your local government have a climate action reserve No fund? Does your local government have a Corporate Climate Yes; Metro Vancouver's Corporate Action Plan? Climate Action Plan provides strategic direction to staff working on climate change issues. The plan's vision for Metro Vancouver is: "a carbon neutral corporation resilient to the impacts of climate change".
Page 6 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 19 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
CORPORATE – Broad Planning
Actions taken in 2015 Actions underway/planned for 2016
Plans, Policies, Regional Parks Plan 2016: Regulations Completion and adoption of the Regional Parks Plan 2016, one of the suite of management plans providing strategic direction for regional parks Plans, Policies, Integrated Regional Climate Action Integrated Regional Climate Action Regulations Strategy: Strategy: Initiation of the Integrated Regional Completion of the first version of IRCAS Climate Action Strategy (IRCAS) which will include a compilation of development process which will include corporate mitigation and adaptation a compilation of corporate mitigation actions. and adaptation actions.
Establishment of the IRCAS Advisory Committee with representation from across Metro Vancouver departments. Plans, Policies, Land Acquisition Strategy: Regulations Development of a Land Acquisition Strategy to guide Regional Parks in their property acquisitions for the next 25 years. Plans, Policies, Internal Carbon Price and Policy: Internal Carbon Price and Policy: Regulations Initiation of a project to establish an Propose a policy on incorporating internal carbon price for Metro carbon pricing into Metro Vancouver’s Vancouver. evaluation of capital projects, operating and maintenance projects and other activities and operations that produce (or reduce) GHGs. Feasibility Energy and Greenhouse Gas Tracking Energy and Greenhouse Gas Tracking Studies, System: System: Research, Metro Vancouver continued to improve Metro Vancouver will continue to Analysis its Energy and GHG Tracking System develop and implement detailed energy (developed and commissioned in and GHG reporting from facility to 2014), adding more data and expanding corporate level. its use within the organization.
Page 7 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 20 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
Policy Corporate Energy Management Policy: Corporate Energy Management Policy: Implementation Metro Vancouver continued to Policy implementation will continue in
implement the Corporate Energy 2016. Management Policy (2014). Policy Sustainability Innovation Funds: Sustainability Innovation Funds: Implementation Metro Vancouver has held its GST The second intake of project
rebate in reserve over the past number applications for the SIF with climate of years, and this fund was used to change again a key thematic area. create Sustainability Innovation Funds
(SIF) for internal Metro Vancouver Projects. The project eligibility criteria for the funds was established in 2014 and the first call for project proposals was issued to staff in 2015, with climate change identified as one of the key thematic areas.
COMMUNITY-WIDE – Broad Planning
Actions taken in 2015 Actions underway/planned for 2016
Plans, Policies, Integrated Regional Climate Action Integrated Regional Climate Action Regulations Strategy: Strategy: Metro Vancouver 2015 Board Strategic A draft framework for IRCAS has been Plan directs staff to “develop, adopt taken to the Board Standing Committee and implement a regional climate on Climate Action where it was action strategy for reducing regional endorsed for further development. GHG emissions and adapting to climate Throughout 2016 and into 2017, staff change”. Staff initiated an intra- will be action-planning in conjunction departmental working group to develop with an interdepartmental Advisory both an Integrated Regional Climate Committee. The action planning will Action Strategy (IRCAS) concept, along guide the next stages of the IRCAS with a process for communicating, development, which will include a engaging and educating internal staff process for engaging local governments and external stakeholders. on coordinated climate action in the The strategy was started in late 2015 region. with the intent of developing and agreeing on a workplan and schedule, as well as responsibilities, a reporting structure and process for engaging the GVRD Board through the Board Standing Committee on Climate Action.
Page 8 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 21 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
Feasibility Urban Centres and Frequent Transit Studies, Development Areas: Research, In 2016 Metro Vancouver will conduct Analysis an intensive review of Regional Growth Strategy implementation through an analysis of growth management tools available to Urban Centres and Frequent Transit Development Areas. Metro Vancouver staff will work with external agencies and key stakeholders (including member municipalities) in order to review the effectiveness of current growth management tools used in coordinating growth in the region. Community Metro Vancouver e-Library of Metro Vancouver e-Library of Education, Sustainability Initiatives: Sustainability Initiatives: Engagement Metro Vancouver has developed an The e-library will be updated and
online “e-library” including 20 stories integrated with other Metro Vancouver describing inspiring sustainability communications. After it is launched, initiatives. the intent is to promote e-library among member municipalities to identify new content and to encourage knowledge sharing.
Page 9 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 22 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
BUILDINGS AND LIGHTING
Low-carbon buildings use the minimum amount of energy needed to provide comfort and safety for their inhabitants, and tap into renewable energy sources for heating, cooling and power. These buildings can save money, especially viewed over the long term.
CORPORATE – Buildings and Lighting
Actions taken in 2015 Actions underway/planned for 2016
Physical 2015 Metro Vancouver Housing 2016 Metro Vancouver Housing Improvements, Corporation Measures Complete: Corporation Goals: Construction Implemented BC Hydro’s Energy Water heating: Replace 1 large domestic Conservation Assistance Program at hot water boiler (500,000 Btu/h), applicable sites, to manage and reduce approximately 100 domestic hot water tenant demand for electricity, building tanks with higher efficiency models and heating and hot water. 26 domestic hot water tanks with tankless condensing water heaters Water heating: Replaced approximately 100 domestic hot water tanks with Space Heating: Replaced 1 large boiler higher efficiency models. (800,000 Btu/h), 11 mid-level boilers (225,000 Btu/h) and 5 furnaces with Space Heating: Replaced 1 large boiler higher efficiency models. (720,000 Btu/h) and 1 smaller boiler (225,000 Btu/h) with higher efficiency Lighting: Upgrade exterior/parkade models. lighting to high efficiency lighting at approximately 10 sites; convert all Lighting: Upgraded parkade lighting common area rooms to occupancy with high efficiency T8 fluorescent sensor lighting controls. fixtures at 3 site and exterior lighting with LED fixtures at 5 sites. Other actions: replace all laundry equipment (383 units) with higher efficient models, and install metering and develop phase-out plan for 24 gas fireplaces. Physical New Head office building: Head office building: Improvements, Metro Vancouver purchase a new head Design of the interior space for the new Construction office building that is certified LEED head office building is underway. The platinum (core and shell). move is scheduled for late 2017, which is expected to result in reduced building energy consumption and water use.
Page 10 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 23 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
Physical Wastewater Treatment Plant Lighting Wastewater Treatment Plant Lighting Improvements, Upgrades: Upgrades: Construction Energy efficient lighting upgrades were Additional lighting upgrades are planned completed at Annacis Island and Iona for Annacis Island and Iona Island Island Wastewater Treatment Plants. Wastewater Treatment Plants. Physical Regional Parks Lighting Upgrades: Regional Parks Lighting Upgrades: Improvements, Planning began for an energy efficient Complete lighting upgrade at Construction lighting upgrade at Minnekhada Minnekhada Regional Park. Regional Park.
COMMUNITY-WIDE – Buildings and Lighting
Actions taken in 2015 Actions underway/planned for 2016
Physical Kanaka Creek Watershed Kanaka Creek Watershed Improvements, Stewardship Centre: Stewardship Centre: Construction Planning for a centre for education, Construction and opening of the Kanaka stewardship, community engagement Creek Watershed Stewardship Centre, and research for the entire Kanaka including landscape and storm water Creek Watershed. management systems.
Physical Pacific Spirit Regional Park Operations Pacific Spirit Regional Park Operations Improvements, Centre: Centre: Construction Research, feasibility studies, cost Site planning, design development, estimation and community tendering, construction and site engagement for a new operations renewal. facility, with consideration of energy efficiency and green building standards. Feasibility Home Energy Labelling Pilot Project: RateOurHome.ca Program: Studies, Initiate development of campaign Finalize campaign materials and Research, concept and materials aimed at website. Initiate implementation of Analysis increasing public awareness of Program, including populating website EnerGuide labels for homes. Establish with homes that have been rated by working group. EnerGuide.
Page 11 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 24 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
Feasibility RateOurHome.ca Incentive Program Studies, Research: Research, Undertake research to determine the Analysis effectiveness of an incentive program aimed at offering reduced cost EnerGuide assessments in exchange for public display of the label on RateOurHome.ca. Feasibility Strata Energy Advisor Program: Strata Energy Advisor Program: Studies, Secured funding through Metro Finalize the project design and launch Research, Vancouver’s “Sustainability Innovation the strata energy advisor services. Analysis Funds” program for an energy advisor pilot program for strata corporations. A project steering committee was established with representation from the municipalities, utilities and the Condominium Homeowners Association, and pilot project design phase was started.
Page 12 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 25 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
ENERGY GENERATION
A transition to renewable or low-emission energy sources for heating, cooling and power supports large, long-term GHG emissions reductions. Renewable energy including waste heat recovery (e.g. from biogas and biomass), geo-exchange, micro hydroelectric, solar thermal and solar photovoltaic, heat pumps, tidal, wave, and wind energy can be implemented at different scales, e.g. in individual homes, or integrated across neighbourhoods through district energy or co-generation systems.
Variable Response
Is your local government developing, or constructing a district energy project? Yes Is your local government operating a district energy system? No Is your local government developing or constructing a renewable energy project? Yes Is your local government operating a renewable energy project? Yes Are you aware of the Integrated Resource Recovery guidance page on the BC Climate Yes Action Toolkit?
CORPORATE - Energy Generation
Actions taken in 2015 Actions underway/planned for 2016
Physical Iona Island Wastewater Treatment Improvements, Plant Digester Gas Utilization Project: Construction The Iona Island Wastewater Treatment Plant cogeneration system was upgraded and a legal agreement was put into place with BC Hydro to remove the electricity export restriction. The project will considerably reduce the need to flare biogas, which will enable the cogeneration system to generate an additional 3.2 GWh of electricity per year. The system was commissioned in April 2015.
Page 13 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 26 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
Physical Annacis Island Wastewater Treatment Annacis Island Wastewater Treatment Improvements, Plant Cogen Upgrade: Plant Cogen Upgrade: Construction The cogeneration system at Annacis System detailed design will continue in Island Wastewater Treatment Plant will 2016 with construction expected in be upgraded from 3.2 MW capacity to 2017. 7.6 MW capacity. This will allow use of biogas that is currently flared due to capacity limitations of the existing system. A cogen engine purchase contract was signed and preliminary design of the new system continued through 2015.
Feasibility Electricity Generation: Electricity Generation: Studies, Commissioned the Capilano Energy Continue to move forward on steps Research, Recovery Facility, where a turbine towards generating hydroelectricity at Analysis generates electricity from treated the new Barnston Maple Ridge Pump
water that is returning from the higher Station for sale to BC Hydro. elevation Seymour-Capilano Filtration Continue to evaluate the electricity Plant to the lower elevation Capilano generation potential of upcoming capital distribution system. The electricity projects within the water transmission generated is used to offset some of the system. power requirements for the Capilano Raw Water Pump Station. Completed initial steps towards selling hydroelectricity to BC Hydro from the proposed turbine at the new Barnston Maple Ridge Pump Station. Completed business case for an electricity generating turbine in the inlet valve chamber of the new Fleetwood Reservoir, which was not deemed favourable at this time.
Feasibility Pilot Co-digestion Facility: Pilot Co-digestion Facility: Studies, Testing of regular operation of a pilot Continue with short-term pilot testing of Research, co-digestion facility for energy recovery different materials at the Facility. Begin Analysis at the Annacis Island Wastewater long-term analysis of how this process Treatment Plant continued. fits into management of Trucked Liquid Waste as a whole.
Page 14 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 27 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
Feasibility Effluent heat recovery: Effluent heat recovery: Studies, Completed a refined conceptual design Pursue approvals for providing heat Research, and updated financial model for from effluent at Lions Gate Secondary Analysis effluent heat recovery at the new Lions Wastewater Treatment Plant to a third-
Gate Secondary Wastewater Treatment party district energy system. Draft a Plant facility. contract for sale of effluent heat. Completed a conceptual design and Demand for effluent heat will be financial model for effluent heat triggered by YVR energy infrastructure recovery at the existing Iona Island plans in early 2020s. Plans for dialogue Wastewater Treatment Plant facility, with YVR and potential next steps to providing service to YVR. take place. Completed a refined conceptual design Demand for effluent heat will be and updated financial model for triggered by demand growth in City of effluent heat recovery at the Lulu Richmond district energy zones. Effluent Island Secondary Wastewater heat supply would likely not be Treatment Plant facility. economically efficient until demand was maximized, in mid-2020s. Dialogue with
Richmond will take place to plan steps for confirmation and implementation of potential project. Regional Park Solar-Powered Conversion Project: This pilot project received Sustainable Innovation Funding in 2016, and will test whether solar energy can be used to replace gas-powered generators used at park and utility facilities where access to electricity does not exist or would be expensive. The pilot will be at Colony Farm, with potential for scale up to other regional park sites. If viable, the use of solar energy would reduce the GHG emissions and other air pollutants from the use of generators and the associated noise. Results will be shared within Metro Vancouver and its members as well as the members of the British Columbia Parks and Recreation Association.
Page 15 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 28 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
COMMUNITY-WIDE - Energy Generation
Actions taken in 2015 Actions underway/planned for 2016
Feasibility Sewer heat recovery: Sewer heat recovery: Studies, Sewer heat recovery from the Gilbert Metro Vancouver Board approval for the Research, Trunk for use in the Richmond Oval Gilbert Trunk-Richmond Oval project will Analysis district energy system were requested be sought, and the project placed on the
by the City of Richmond in 2014, for list of capital projects for estimated operational date of 2019. implementation. The City of New Westminster and The City of New Westminster is initiating Metro Vancouver explored potential plans for neighbourhood development sewage heat extraction locations that will be supported by a new district along the Sapperton sewer main, to energy system. Their plans and schedule service a new district energy system will be used to determine timelines for being explored by the city, and Metro Vancouver Board approval and identified a preferred location and projection initiation. configuration. The city has identified
sewer heat as a preferred source for the new system. Several other potential opportunities for sewer heat recovery were identified by Metro Vancouver municipalities. Data was provided to allow analysis of the viability of the opportunity.
Page 16 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 29 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
GREENSPACE/NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION
Greenspace refers to parks and greenways, boulevards, community forests, urban agriculture, riparian areas, gardens, recreation/school sites, and other green spaces, such as remediated brownfield/ contaminated sites. Greenspaces support climate change mitigation (reducing emissions by absorbing and sequestering GHG) and adaptation (providing shade, cooling, deflecting strong wind, and improving air quality). Please note that the 'Greenspace' sector only has a community-wide actions section.
Variable Response
Does your local government have urban forest policies, plans or programs? Yes
COMMUNITY-WIDE – Greenspace/Natural Resource Protection
Actions taken in 2015 Actions underway/planned for 2016
Physical Ecological Restoration Program: Ecological Restoration Program: Improvements, Revegetation Program for various sites Construction Restore degraded sites, enhance biodiversity, promote ecosystem in the regional park system estimated resilience. at $120K annually. Revegetation Program for various sites Focus on restoration of sites at in the regional park system estimated Aldergrove, Burnaby Lake, Campbell at $120K for 2015. Valley, Iona, Tynehead and Widgeon Regional Parks. Policy Heritage Land Acquisition Program: Heritage Land Acquisition Program: Implementation Secure important natural lands for Ongoing acquisitions of important inclusion as part of the regional park natural lands. system to meet the goals and objectives of Metro 2040 and the Regional Parks Plan 2016. Physical Grasslands Management Program: Grasslands Management Program: Improvements, Improved old-field habitat values Priority is further assessment, Construction identified in Park Management Plans renovation and monitoring of grassland and grassland habitat for species within areas at Boundary Bay Regional Park, as the Regional Parks System identified as well as fields located in Campbell Valley being of conservation concern. Met and Tynehead Regional Parks. specific park objectives at Colony Farm,
Boundary Bay, Campbell Valley and Aldergrove Lake Regional Parks.
Page 17 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 30 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
Physical Invasive Species Management: Invasive Species Management: Improvements, Inventory and control of various Continue to map invasive plant species Construction species of concern (knotweed, occurrences and assess previous Lamiastrum, Scotch broom, English ivy, treatments in our park system and blackberry, reed canary grass, white control methods for particular species poplar, butternut, bishops weed and will be researched when required. giant hogweed) within selected parks Ongoing annual program budget is and areas. approximately $100K. Ongoing annual program (approximately $100K in 2015). Physical Surrey Bend Regional Park: Surrey Bend Regional Park: Improvements, Construction and development of new Park was opened to the public in April Construction park including habitat creation, 2016; park development is ongoing. enhancement and restoration. Plans, Policies, Widgeon Marsh Park Reserve Regulations Management Plan: Develop a plan to preserve and enhance the parks natural resources and provide opportunities for people to connect with nature at the park reserve. Undertake pre-planning and research as part of the initial stages of management planning. Community Grow Green Guide: Grow Green Guide: Education, Engagement Development of the Grow Green Guide Release and communication of the (www.GrowGreenGuide.ca), through a Grow Green Guide. This Guide supports
partnership between Metro Vancouver several Metro Vancouver sustainability and the UBC Botanical Garden, to goals by providing information on provide a step-by-step guide for water conservation, rainwater starting and maintaining beautiful and absorption, wildlife habitats, invasive sustainable gardens. The Grow Green species, soil health, and composting. Guide is specifically designed for the Grow Green is the first and only climate and ecology of this region. gardening guide created specifically for this region, and is funded through Metro Vancouver’s Sustainability Innovation Fund. Community Ecosystem valuation: Ecosystem valuation: Education, Engagement Drafted Metro Vancouver Carbon Work with regional experts to develop Storage Technical Document which tools/guidance to enable local quantifies major terrestrial stores of governments to incorporate ecosystem carbon (e.g. trees and soil) in the services into their decision making. region.
Page 18 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 31 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
CORPORATE – Greenspace/Natural Resource Protection
Actions taken in 2015 Actions underway/planned for 2016
Feasibility Burns Bog Restoration Study: Burns Bog Restoration Study: Studies, One of the Sustainability Innovation In 2016, researchers will identify several Research, Fund projects that Metro Vancouver is experimental plots within damaged Analysis undertaking will test ways to enhance areas of the Burns Bog Ecological ecological recovery in coastal bogs that Conservancy Area and collect baseline have been damaged by clearing for biophysical data. Various restoration agriculture. This study will examine the approaches and treatments will be potential for peat restoration at Burns applied to selected plots and, over the Bog, with potential to reduce methane subsequent two years, those emissions and restore the bog’s ability approaches will be evaluated for their to sequester carbon. potential to accelerate the recovery process. Cutting edge monitoring techniques will be used to assess ecosystem health and GHG emissions. Feasibility Avoided Forest Conversion Project - Avoided Forest Conversion Project - Studies, Kanaka Creek Regional Park: Kanaka Creek Regional Park: Research, In August 2015, Metro Vancouver Preparation of a Forest Management Analysis purchased two unimproved, forested Plan for the newly acquired sites in properties adjacent to Kanaka Creek Kanaka Creek Regional Park. Regional Park in Maple Ridge, which
advances the mandate of Metro Vancouver Regional Parks to protect the region’s important natural areas. By protecting these properties as parkland, Metro Vancouver has eliminated the threat of conversion to non-forest use by developers, and is eligible to claim carbon credits associated with protecting the carbon stored in the timber.
Page 19 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 32 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
SOLID WASTE
Reducing, reusing, recycling, recovering and managing the disposal of residual solid waste minimizes environmental impacts and supports sustainable environmental management, GHG reductions, and improved air and water quality. Variable Response
Does your local government have construction and demolition waste reduction policies, Yes plans or programs? Does your local government have organics reduction/diversion policies, plans or Yes programs?
CORPORATE - Solid Waste
Actions taken in 2015 Actions underway/planned for 2016
Physical Landfill Gas Utilization Project at Coquitlam Landfill Gas Capture System: Improvements, Cache Creek Landfill: Design work for expanding the landfill gas Construction Project is complete. collection system to the south side of the Coquitlam Landfill is ongoing. Physical Unattended scale project at Surrey North Shore Transfer Station Improvements, Transfer Station: Reconfiguration: Construction Implemented unattended scale to Reconfigure the transfer station layout to reduce wait times for account combine queuing and recycling on the customers. same property to improve traffic flow and services. Feasibility District Energy project at Metro Studies, Vancouver Waste-to-Energy Facility: Research, Researching the feasibility of delivering Analysis low grade heat to various users. Feasibility Coquitlam Landfill Gas Capture Coquitlam Landfill Gas Capture System: Studies, System: Verify 2015 GHG reductions, and Research, Verification of 2014 GHG reductions continue to explore options for beneficial Analysis and calculation of GHG reduction use of landfill gas. credits.
Page 20 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 33 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
Feasibility Conversion of short-haul trucks from Studies, diesel to CNG: Research, Conducting a cost/benefit analysis of fuel Analysis switching. This task will be dependent on the selection of a new transfer station operation contractor. Policy Material recycling and reuse: Implementation Continue application of recycling and reuse requirements in corporate demolition tender documents. Metro Vancouver will work with member municipalities to expand such purchasing policies in public works across the region. Feasibility Feasibility Study for biosolids drying Studies, using waste heat: Research, We are commissioning a feasibility study Analysis to determine if it is possible to dry biosolids using waste heat from the soon to be upgraded co-generation equipment at the Annacis Island Wastewater Treatment Plant. If this project is determined to be feasible it has the potential to offset GHG emissions in 3 ways: (1) Eliminate/or reduce the need to use additional fuel (natural gas) to dry biosolids; (2) Reduce the GHG emissions from transporting biosolids for beneficial use (since biosolids are >70% water – drying greatly reduces the amount of fuel needed for transport); and (3) Allow some biosolids to be used as a coal substitute (e.g. at local cement kilns) thereby reducing the amount of coal derived GHG emissions from those customers.
Page 21 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 34 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
Physical Campbell Mountain Landfill Biofilter: Improvement, This landfill in the Regional District of Construction Okanagan Similkameen will be progressively closed in the next few years. We are currently in talks with the Regional District regarding installing a biocover test pad at this landfill to oxidize methane emissions. Plans, Policies, Waste Management Plans for Parks: Waste Management Plans for Parks: Regulations Developed plans to manage waste Proceed with a first year of a 3 year streams including dog waste, (2016-2018) Implementation Plan recyclables, organics and garbage. focusing on 10 park sites. A separate Waste Management Plan has been developed for each park/site.
COMMUNITY-WIDE - Solid Waste
Actions taken in 2015 Actions underway/planned for 2016
Policy Food Scraps Disposal Ban: Food Scraps Disposal Ban: Implementation Introduced disposal ban on food Continued business and public education scraps at all regional solid waste and communication of the ban. It is facilities on January 1, 2015. expected that the allowable threshold for Estimated result was an increase of ban enforcement will be made more about 66,000 tonnes of compostable stringent as of January 1, 2017. organics diverted away from disposal and into composting or biofuel production in 2015, compared to 2014. Policy Clean Wood Waste Disposal Ban: Clean Wood Waste Disposal Ban: Implementation Introduced disposal ban on clean Continued business and public education wood waste at all regional solid waste and communication of the ban. It is facilities on January 1, 2015. expected that the allowable threshold for Estimated result was an increase of ban enforcement will be made more about 900 tonnes of clean wood stringent as of January 1, 2017. diverted away from disposal and into recycling in 2015, compared to 2014. (Large commercial loads of wood are disposed at private facilities; wood taken to regional solid waste facilities is mostly limited to small residential drop off loads).
Page 22 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 35 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
Community Behavior change campaigns around Behavior change campaigns around Education, waste reduction: waste reduction: Engagement Initiatives in 2015 included the The following initiatives are planned: following: - Continue existing programs, targeting - Food scraps recycling programs for additional materials present in the waste single family, multi-family and stream industrial / commercial / institutional - Expand “Make Memories Not Garbage” audiences, program to encompass year-round gift - Food waste reduction (through and celebration opportunities adopting Love Food Hate Waste - Initiate a National Food Waste campaign) Campaign, through the National Zero - Battery recycling initiative in Waste Council, that will involve a range of partnership with EPR programs actions including a national target, continued advocacy for a tax incentive, - Waste reduction through the support for instituting organic bans across Christmas Make Memories Not Canada and initiating a national Garbage campaign behaviour change campaign to reduce - Promoted medications return food waste based on Metro Vancouver’s programs in partnership with the BC experience with the Love Food, Hate Pharmaceutical Association and Waste campaign. others - Host the annual Zero Waste Conference - Re-launched MVRecycles, an online November 3, 2016 recycling location database specific to the Lower Mainland of BC - Further research and engagement of local governments in advocating for a Federal tax incentive to divert nutritious food from disposal (through the National Zero Waste Council, which Metro Vancouver is a founding member) - Hosted Annual Zero Waste Conference that attracted over 500 delegates to engage in ideas to promote waste prevention through innovation in technologies and policy, new design standards, resource efficiencies and behavior change. This year the conference included a satellite event in Toronto.
Page 23 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 36 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
Feasibility Organics Diversion GHG Reduction Organics Diversion GHG Reduction Studies, Credits: Credits: Research, Calculation of Organics Diversion Continue to support the regional Analysis Credits on behalf of local municipalities by calculating their GHG governments, in support of their reduction credits for additional organics carbon neutral goals. Total Green diversion activities that occurred in 2016. Communities GHG reduction credits for all eligible municipalities have been calculated to be approximately 32,500 tonnes CO2‐equivalent for the additional diversion undertaken in 2015 beyond the 2007 baseline. Feasibility Waste Composition Monitoring: Waste Composition Monitoring: Studies, Completed the measurement of In the planning phases on completing a Research, waste composition in 2015 and waste composition monitoring program in Analysis confirmed the reduction in the 2016 to confirm reductions in amount of food scraps disposed. compostable organics and to target any other materials for diversion.
Page 24 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 37 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
TRANSPORTATION
Transportation actions that increase transportation system efficiency, emphasize the movement of people and goods, and give priority to more efficient modes, e.g. walking, cycling, ridesharing, and public transit, can contribute to reductions in GHG emissions and more livable communities.
Variable Response
Does your local government have policies, plans or programs to support alternative Yes modes and technologies of transportation (e.g. walking, cycling, transit, electric vehicles) Does your local government have a transportation demand management (TDM) strategy? Yes (e.g. to reduce single-vehicle occupancy trips, increase travel options, provide incentives to encourage individuals to modify travel behavior)? Does your local government have policies, plans or programs to support local food Yes production (thus reducing transportation emissions)?
CORPORATE – Transportation
Actions taken in 2015 Actions underway/planned for 2016
Plans, Policies, Employer Transit Commuter Program: Regulations Metro Vancouver has updated its program to incentivize alternatives to driving to work, by offering staff who take transit a partial reimbursement for TransLink Compass products. Plans, Policies, Fleet Management Policy: Regulations A new corporate Fleet Management Policy is under development that will take into account environmental considerations (in particular GHG emissions) during all stages of the fleet management process.
Page 25 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 38 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
COMMUNITY-WIDE – Transportation
Actions taken in 2015 Actions underway/planned for 2016
Plans, Policies, Proposed amendments to the Non- Regulations Road Diesel Engine Emissions Regulation: Seek to update registration requirements for low-use diesel engines in order to accurately reflect the amount of time the engines are used each year and the associated emissions. These amendments will encourage more engine owners to switch to engines with lower emissions. Funding Greater Vancouver Regional Fund: Greater Vancouver Regional Fund: Metro Vancouver began development The GVRD Board will ratify the Greater of the policy and evaluation criteria for Vancouver Regional Fund’s policy and the implementation of the Greater evaluation criteria. TransLink’s first Vancouver Regional Fund. Under the application for GVRF funding is 2014 federal gas tax agreement, the anticipated in fall 2016. GVRD Board has approval authority over all TransLink applications for federal gas tax funding. Feasibility Mixed Income Transit-Oriented Rental Studies, Housing Study: Research, The Mixed Income Transit-Oriented Analysis Rental Housing Study continues to advance the goal of achieving of affordable rental housing in transit- oriented locations that meet Metro 2040’s complete communities, GHG reduction, and sustainable transportation objectives. Key activities include examining the transit ridership effects of tenure, income, and location; and the viability of regulatory and financial tools to enable the viability of affordable rental housing in transit- oriented locations.
Page 26 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 39 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
Feasibility Regional Study on Drayage (transport Studies, of goods over a short distance) Research, Scenarios: Analysis This study builds on Metro Vancouver research into inland terminals and short sea shipping to further advance the knowledge of goods movement and actions to reduce, mitigate, or pre-empt adverse impacts to communities, including GHG emissions. Development of the scope of work with study partners will continue through 2016. Feasibility George Massey Tunnel Replacement Studies, Project: Research, Metro Vancouver is engaged as a Analysis stakeholder in the provincial environmental review process, which was initiated in December 2015. GHG emissions evaluation is one element of the environmental review process. In April 2016, the GVRD Board sent a letter to the Federal Minister of Environment and Climate Change requesting a federal environmental review of the Project, noting “the potential for the project to increase GHG emissions and contribute to climate is a concern given the commitments of local, provincial, and federal governments to address climate change impacts.” Feasibility Electric Vehicle “Garage Orphans” Studies, Policy Study: Research, UBC Student researched policy issues Analysis and options to deal with so-called “garage orphans”, which are electric vehicles with no garage access. Research will pave the way for a City of Vancouver pilot project. Feasibility Electric Vehicle and EV Charging Studies, Equipment Market Study: Research, Conduct a market study of available Analysis technology for electric vehicles and their charging equipment.
Page 27 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 40 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
Community “Emotive” Electric Vehicle Outreach “Emotive” Electric Vehicle Outreach Education, Campaign: Campaign: Engagement Delivered second year of outreach on Deliver third year of outreach on EVs
electric vehicles both on social media both on social media and at events. and at events. Undertake joint initiative with Province of BC to develop new campaign creative material for launch in 2016-2017. Feasibility EVCondo.ca: EVCondo.ca: Studies, Research and content development for Web build and promotion of Research, a website to support electric vehicle EVCondo.ca, including a registry of Analysis charging in multi-unit residential “Electric Vehicle-friendly stratas”. buildings. Feasibility Metro Vancouver Smart Drive Metro Vancouver Smart Drive Studies, Challenge: Challenge: Research, Confirmed funding to develop and Year 2 of the project involves detailed Analysis implement a study to determine the program design and implementation. effectiveness of feedback and training Year 3 will involve data analysis. on driving behavior. Year 1 involved contracting program delivery. Data & Electric Vehicle Registration Tracking: Electric Vehicle Registration Tracking: Reporting Track and report (in aggregate) on Track and report (in aggregate) on quarterly basis ICBC registration quarterly basis ICBC registration information on plug in electric and information on plug in electric and hybrid vehicles. hybrid vehicles. Seek permissions from ICBC to make data public on Metro Vancouver website. Feasibility North Shore Transit Oriented Corridor North Shore Transit Oriented Corridor Studies, Study: Study: Research, A North Shore Transit Oriented Corridor The study will continue through 2016 Analysis planning study was initiated with a with the formation of a formal working partnership between Metro Vancouver agreement between TransLink and and TransLink. The partnership was Metro Vancouver, as well as another broadened out to include partner informal project agreement with the municipalities and Squamish First municipal partners and the SFN. Phases Nation (SFN) on the North Shore one and two have been completed and subregion to explore a rapid transit the third phase will explore the future through coordinated land use technical requirements in transit and transportation analysis/planning. expansion scenarios that include increasing service levels up to a phased rapid transit vision, connecting Dundarave in West Vancouver with Maplewood Village in the District of North Vancouver.
Page 28 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 41 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
WATER and WASTEWATER
Managing and reducing water consumption and wastewater is an important aspect of developing a sustainable built environment that supports healthy communities, protects ecological integrity, and reduces GHG emissions.
Variable Response
Does your local government have water conservation policies, plans or programs? Yes
CORPORATE - Water and Wastewater
Actions taken in 2015 Actions underway/planned for 2016
Plans, Policies, Comprehensive Regional Water Regulations System Plan: Development of this plan has started in 2016, with completion scheduled for 2017. It will outline a planning strategy for the regional water system over the next century, including consideration of the effects of a changing climate. Physical Annacis Island Wastewater Annacis Island Wastewater Treatment Improvements, Treatment Plant pumps upgrade: Plant pumps upgrade: Construction Parts are no longer available for the Detailed design is expected to be original variable frequency drives completed in 2016 with construction (VFDs) for the influent pumps and following in 2017. trickling filter pumps, so new efficient VFDs will be installed in 2017. Preliminary design of the new system and a detailed design RFP were completed in 2015 Physical Central Park Pump Station Efficiency: Central Park Pump Station Efficiency: Improvement, Project planning for installation of a Design will continue in 2016 with Construction variable frequency drive in 2017. construction following in 2017.
Physical Seymour Capilano Filtration Plant: Seymour Capilano Filtration Plant: Improvement, Seven additional ultra‐violet Construction Lamps in all 24 reactors have been disinfection reactors were upgraded upgraded in early 2016. The 3-year with energy saving lamps and ballasts project is now complete. (45,000 kWh/year savings).
Page 29 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 42 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
Feasibility Studies, Hydrothermal Processing Pilot Project: Research, Analysis The aim of this is to design, fabricate, commission, and evaluate a hydrothermal processing pilot facility at the Annacis Island Wastewater Treatment Plant. Hydrothermal processing is an alternative to managing solids at treatment plants and works by converting the organic matter to oil. It has the potential to displace digesters and biosolids production – the current approach to managing solids at treatment plants. This emerging technology, founded on U.S. Department of Energy patents, has the potential for Metro Vancouver’s future facilities to be zero- net energy, produce zero biosolids, reduce GHG emissions, and yield net cost savings. The proposal has received Board approval for funding under the Sustainability Innovation Fund, subject to securing additional external funding for a total of $9 million needed over a 3 year period. Installation is targeted for Q4 2017, then development and performance testing through 2018 and 2019. The pilot facility will produce 50 to 60 barrels of biocrude per week; displacing up to 1500 tCO2e per year. The approach will be considered in the design and implementation of MV’s future facilities; a full scale system for the new Iona Island Secondary Treatment plant would be about 50 times larger than the proposed pilot. Physical Annacis Island Wastewater . Improvement, Treatment Plant Air Compressor Construction Upgrade: A new, energy-efficient instrument air compressor was installed in 2015 (164,000 kWh/year savings).
Page 30 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 43 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
Physical Process Optimization: Improvement, Process optimization work is ongoing at Construction several water and wastewater treatment plants and pump stations Physical Biogas Upgrading Project at Lulu Biogas Upgrading Project at Lulu Island Improvement, Island Wastewater Treatment Plant: Wastewater Treatment Plant: Construction Metro Vancouver’s contract with Engineering design is commencing in FortisBC was amended to reflect 2016, with an expected construction changes in project scope. completion date of early 2018.
COMMUNITY-WIDE - Water and Wastewater
Actions taken in 2015 Actions underway/planned for 2016
Feasibility Lulu Island Sewerage Area Integrated Lulu Island Sewerage Area Integrated Studies, Research, Resource Recovery Study: Resource Recovery Study: Analysis Metro Vancouver initiated The study will be conducted procurement for the study that will throughout 2016 with an aim for analyze opportunities for energy completion in 2017. generation, reuse, and GHG reductions within the City of Richmond and Metro Vancouver’s liquid waste systems in the Lulu Island Sewerage Area (LSA) and relevant industries over a 40-year time horizon. Outcomes will be recommendations that will advance integrated resource recovery within the LSA.
Page 31 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 44 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION
For local governments, adaptation to a changing climate can take the form of changes in policy, management, technology and behaviour that minimize negative impacts or exploit opportunities. It can involve both “hard” and “soft” solutions, including: changes in infrastructure engineering, planning, zoning, bylaws, and public education.
Variable Response
Are you aware of the Plan2Adapt guidance page on the BC Climate Action Toolkit? Yes Are you aware of the Preparing for Climate Change, An Implementation Guide for Local Yes Governments in BC on the BC Climate Action Toolkit? Have you visited the climate change adaptation guidance page on the BC Climate Action Yes Toolkit?
CORPORATE – Climate Change Adaptation
Actions taken in 2015 Actions underway/planned for 2016
Feasibility Studies, Climate Change Impacts and Research, Analysis Adaptation for Regional Water System: As per an approved Sustainability Innovation Fund project, an evaluation of the regional water system’s vulnerability to changing climates is being completed, identifying and ranking potential adaptations
Community Outdoor Fire Program for Regional Outdoor Fire Program for Regional Education, Parks: Parks: Engagement Development of an Outdoor Fire Consider implementation of
Program including public education, recommended program elements once uniform design standards and approved. sustainable firewood components to
better manage outdoor burning and reduce emissions.
Page 32 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 45 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
Feasibility Studies, Climate projections update: Climate projections update: Research, Analysis Metro Vancouver engaged Pacific The report summarizing the climate Climate Impacts Consortium to projections will be published and develop a common set of regionally shared with stakeholders. Metro downscaled climate change Vancouver utilities staff will review the projections to be used by Metro climate projections and identify Vancouver and member municipalities opportunities to incorporate this for climate adaptation planning. information into planning and operations.
COMMUNITY-WIDE - Climate Change Adaptation
Actions taken in 2015 Actions underway/planned for 2016
Plans, Policies, Climate Change Adaptation Strategy: Climate Change Adaptation Strategy: Regulations The climate change adaptation With the establishment of IRCAS, the strategy is a component of the corporate climate change adaptation Integrated Regional Climate Action strategy will begin to more formally Strategy (IRCAS) referenced earlier in structure and coordinate the corporate this report. The adaptation strategy is approach to building resilience structured through two components; throughout the organization’s many the internal/corporate adaptation responsibilities. The Departmental strategy and the external/regional climate impact integration process will strategy. Each of these two directions continue with the intent of compiling within IRCAS require a unique process the approaches into the strategy by the in their development. 2015 saw the end of the year. The adaptation completion of the External components of the strategy will be Environmental Scan and Gap Analysis included in a draft of the IRCAS that will to determine the lay of the land in the be going to the Board for municipalities’ approaches to climate approval/adoption before the end of change adaptation. This report was the year. used, in part, to develop the direction for climate adaptation within the larger IRCAS. A number of internal staff workshops were held to begin structuring the integration of climate change impacts into decision-making within the organization.
Page 33 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 46 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
OTHER CLIMATE ACTIONS
This section includes other climate actions that could not be captured in the above sectors, including climate change adaptation actions.
COMMUNITY-WIDE - Other Climate Action
Actions taken in 2015 Actions underway/planned for 2016
Community Caring for the Air Report: Caring for the Air is published annually. Education, The 2016 issue will include topics related The Caring for the Air report is an Engagement to energy efficiency projects in the region, illustrated, plain‐language publication as well as information about climate introduced by Metro Vancouver in 2012. change mitigation and adaptation activities The 2015 report included articles and infographics presenting information about the global nature of GHG emissions and updates on projects being undertaken to mitigate climate change in the region through electric vehicle outreach initiatives, highlighting the benefits of home energy efficiency and developing opportunities to support carbon sequestration in natural areas. The 2015 issue also included information about the sectors in which decreases have been seen since 2007 in the region. Current and past issues of Caring for the Air are available at: http://www.metrovancouver.org/servic es/air-quality/information- public/caring-for-the- air/Pages/default.aspx Community Innovative Tools for Community Energy Innovative Tools for Community Energy Education, Planning: Planning: Engagement Plan the final two years of the Project by Refine and add new components to the
building on the Community Energy Community Energy Explorer refining the Explorer platform and complete the renewable energy mapping, economic and Community Energy and Emissions Plan cost information, additional case studies, pilot in the District of West Vancouver. thermal imaging, and user input of energy information for homes and apartment buildings.
Page 34 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 47 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
Community School & Youth Leadership Program – School & Youth Leadership Program: Education, Climate change outreach, education & Develop & Deliver Metro Vancouver Engagement relationship building activities: School & Youth Leadership programs and Convened Metro Vancouver Youth-4- resources on topics of regional Action Sustainability Leadership events sustainability, including energy and climate reaching high school youth leaders, change. school districts and other partners in Identify opportunities and resources to sustainability education) actively support Metro Vancouver Teachers & involved in sustainability action projects Students to integrate sustainability and – including climate action projects. climate action objectives and respond to Reached 1500+ high school youth via 20 recently revised (new) BC Curriculum. unique Youth-4-Action events. Ongoing collaboration with Metro Delivered “Metro Vancouver Vancouver School Districts and partners in Sustainability Toolbox 2015”, A Youth-4- sustainability & climate change education Action Leadership Field Course. to support teacher professional Convened Metro Vancouver Teacher development and youth leadership. Professional Development Workshops
where strategies and resources to integrate sustainability topics, concepts and actions (including climate change and climate action) to the K-12 classroom were explored. More than 400 K-12 teachers were reached via 15 teacher workshops. Ongoing collaboration with Metro Vancouver School Districts in support of K-12 teacher leadership and youth leadership to advance sustainability objectives including climate action objectives in Metro Vancouver School Communities. Provided review and input to the BC Ministry of Education Curriculum regarding inclusion of Environmental Literacy and Sustainability content / concepts. Feasibility Taking Action on Greenhouse Gas Taking Action on Greenhouse Gas Studies, Emissions for Business (TAGGE): Emissions for Business (TAGGE): Research, Explore program design options for the Complete preliminary program design and Analysis small business program with input from begin conversations with potential funding technical advisory group and steering partners on the delivering small business committee program.
Page 35 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 48 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
INNOVATION AND PEER-TO-PEER LEARNING
This section provides the opportunity to showcase an innovative Corporate and/or Community-Wide reduction or adaptation activity that your local government has undertaken and that has had a significant impact or has the potential to have a significant impact. Projects included here may be featured as success stories on the B.C. Climate Action Toolkit and/or shared with other local governments to inspire further climate action. Please add links to additional information where possible.
CORPORATE – Innovation and Peer-to-Peer Learning
Actions taken in 2015 Actions underway/planned for 2016
Metro Metro Vancouver has held its GST The second intake of project applications Vancouver’s rebate in reserve over the past number for the Sustainability Innovation Funds Sustainability of years, and this fund was used to with climate change again a key thematic Innovation create Sustainability Innovation Funds area. Funds (SIF) for internal Metro Vancouver
Projects. The project eligibility criteria for the funds was established in 2014 and the first call for project proposals was issued to staff in 2015, with climate change identified as one of the key thematic areas, along with supporting natural systems and/or complete communities. A number of innovative projects that were awarded funding are described in this report, including the Smart Drive Challenge, the Strata Energy Advisor Program, the Grow Green Guide, the Burns Bog restoration study, and the project to examine Change Impacts and Adaptation for the Regional Water System Climate.
Page 36 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 49 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
COMMUNITY-WIDE – Innovation and Peer-to-Peer Learning
Actions taken in 2015 Actions underway/planned for 2016
Metro Recognizing the importance of Staff will completion of the first version of Vancouver’s responding to the climate change the Integrated Regional Climate Action Board-directed challenge, during its 2014‐2018 term, Strategy. The document and “Integrated the Metro Vancouver Board of Directors communication approach will be Regional provided direction and scope for developed through internal and external Climate Action developing an Integrated Regional consultation. Strategy” Climate Action Strategy in the 2015‐ The IRCAS will: 2018 Board Strategic Plan. The Board directed staff to “Incorporate strategies • Establish a cohesive regional and actions into all Metro Vancouver approach to climate action based on functions to mitigate and adapt to measureable and attainable targets. climate change” and to “Develop, adopt • Bring together and coordinate and implement a regional climate action organizations and individuals in Metro strategy for reducing regional GHG Vancouver who are working to adapt emissions and adapting to climate and mitigate change”. • Complement actions already taking place by a wide variety of internal and Initiation of the Integrated Regional external stakeholders. Climate Action Strategy development • Create a multiplier effect and offer process began in 2015. direction through existing and new initiatives and projects. • Inspire others to take action
Page 37 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 50 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
PROGRAMS, PARTNERSHIPS AND FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES
Local governments often rely on programs, partnerships and funding opportunities to achieve their climate action goals. Please share the names of programs and organizations that have supported your local government’s climate actions by listing each entry in the appropriate box below.
Programs and Funding
Metro Vancouver’s climate action initiatives has been fortunate to rely on a number of partnerships and funders to successfully implement projects and programs, including but not limited to:
BC Home Safety and Standards Branch BC Hydro BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources Climate Action Secretariat, BC Ministry of Environment City Green Solutions Climate Smart Collaborative for Advanced Landscape Planning (CALP) at UBC Community Energy Association (CEA) Condominium Homeowners Associations (CHOA) Fortis BC Fraser Basin Council Greater Vancouver Home Builders’ Association Homeowners Protection Office Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, UBC Mitacs Natural Resources Canada Pacific Institute of Climate Solutions (PICS) Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium (PCIC) Pembina Institute Plug-in BC Port of Vancouver Quality Urban Energy Systems for Tomorrow (QUEST) RDH Engineering Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver Scout Environmental University of British Columbia Vancouver Electric Vehicle Association Various local governments
Page 38 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 51 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
2015 CARBON NEUTRAL REPORTING
Reporting Emissions Did you measure your local government's corporate GHG emissions in 2015? Yes
Corporate GHG emissions (in tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent) from services 5,491 delivered directly by your local government:
Corporate GHG emissions (in tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent) from 527 contracted services: TOTAL A: CORPORATE GHG EMISSIONS FOR 2015 6,018 tCO2e
Reporting Reductions and Offsets To be carbon neutral, a local government must balance their TOTAL corporate GHG emissions by one or a combination of the following actions: undertake Option 1 Projects (GCC-supported) undertake Option 2 Projects (alternative) community GHG emissions reduction projects that meet project eligibility requirements purchase carbon offsets from a credible offset provider
If applicable, please report the 2015 GHG emissions reductions (in tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO2e)) being claimed from Option 1 GHG Reduction Projects:
OPTION 1 PROJECTS REDUCTIONS
Grant Hill (Kanaka Creek Regional Park) Avoided Forest Conversion Project 1 1,815
TOTAL B: REDUCTIONS FROM OPTION 1 PROJECTS FOR 2015 1,815 tCO2e
1 For more information about the Grant Hill Avoided Forest Conversion Project, please refer to the Project Report, available at: http://www.metrovancouver.org/services/air-quality/climate-action/our-operations/corporate- action-plan/Pages/default.aspx
Page 39 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 52 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
If applicable, please report the names and 2015 GHG emissions reductions (in tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO2e)) being claimed from Option 2 GHG Reduction Projects: OPTION 2 PROJECT NAME REDUCTIONS
Coquitlam Landfill Gas Collection System Upgrade Project 2 958
Vancouver Landfill Gas Capture Optimization Project 3 6,197
TOTAL C: REDUCTIONS FROM OPTION 2 PROJECTS FOR 2015 7,155 tCO2e
If applicable, please report the number of offsets purchased (in tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO2e)) from an offset provider for the 2015 reporting year: (NOTE: DO NOT INCLUDE ANY FUNDS THAT MAY BE SET ASIDE IN A CLIMATE ACTION RESERVE FUND) OFFSET PROVIDER REDUCTIONS
Not applicable N/A
TOTAL D: OFFSETS PURCHASED FOR 2015 0 tCO2e
TOTAL REDUCTION AND OFFSETS FOR 2015 (Total B+C+D) = 8,970 tCO2e
Corporate GHG Emissions Balance for 2015
Your local government's Corporate GHG Emissions Balance is the difference between total corporate GHG emissions (direct + contracted emissions) and the GHG emissions reduced through GCC Option 1 and Option 2 projects and/or the purchase of offsets.
CORPORATE GHG EMISSIONS BALANCE FOR 2015 = (A – (B+C+D)) = -2,952 tCO2e Metro Vancouver is Carbon Neutral for the 2015 reporting year.
2 For more information about the Coquitlam Landfill Gas Collection System Upgrade Project, please refer to the validated Project Plan and the 2015 Project Report, available at: http://www.metrovancouver.org/services/air- quality/climate-action/our-operations/capturing-landfill-gas/Pages/default.aspx 3 The City of Vancouver, Metro Vancouver and the Corporation of Delta have put in place a legal agreement to share the GHG reduction credits from the Vancouver Landfill Gas Capture Optimization Project. Metro Vancouver’s share of credits from the Vancouver Landfill Offsets Project have been allocated amongst Metro Vancouver and its member municipalities for use in the 2015 reporting year. For more information, please refer to the 2015 Vancouver Landfill Carbon Credits Allocation Report, available at: http://www.metrovancouver.org/services/air- quality/climate-action/our-operations/capturing-landfill-gas/Pages/default.aspx
Page 40 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 53 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION
Variable Response
Name of Local Government Metro Vancouver Name of member Regional District (RD) Greater Vancouver (Metro Vancouver) Regional Growth Strategy (RGS) in your region Yes Population 2,494,000 (2015)
Submitted by:
Variable Response
Name: Roger Quan Position: Director, Air Quality and Climate Change Email: [email protected] Telephone Number: 604-436-6770
Page 41 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 54 Metro Vancouver’s Climate Actions 2015 May 27, 2016
APPENDIX 1: Contracted Emissions Report for Metro Vancouver
Page 42 of 42
Climate Action Committee - Page 55 Contracted Emissions Reporting Form for Metro Vancouver
Reporting Year: 2015
Local Government Information Name of local government Metro Vancouver Designate Name: Roger Quan Appointed to Sign Title: Director, Air Quality and Climate Change Off on Estimation Phone: 604-436-6770 Template Email: [email protected]
Estimation Methodology Information Rationale for For contracts in the 2015 reporting year, fuel use was reported directly from Applying an contractors (“Estimation Option 1”). Estimation Methodology Notes: • Contract name = traditional service type • Number of contracts are listed adjacent to service type in parentheses • A total of 24 contracts and 10 contractors with multiple contracts were eligible to be reported in 2015
Contracted Emissions Drinking, Storm ESTIMATION ESTIMATED CONTRACT NAME and Wastewater OPTION USED ANNUAL GHGS
Biosolids management (3) 1 232.3 Sewer maintenance (3) 1 0.3 Waste transport (9) 1 31.7 Watershed maintenance (8) 1 41.7 SUBTOTAL ANNUAL CONTRACTED EMISSIONS FOR 306.0 TRADITIONAL SERVICE AREA (tonnes CO2e) Solid Waste ESTIMATION ESTIMATED CONTRACT NAME Collection, OPTION USED ANNUAL GHGS Transportation Waste transport (1) 1 182.1 and Diversion SUBTOTAL ANNUAL CONTRACTED EMISSIONS FOR 182.1 TRADTIONAL SERVICE AREA (tonnes CO2e)
Misc Vendors with multiple maintenance 1 38.8 contracts that add to >$25K (10) SUBTOTAL ANNUAL CONTRACTED EMISSIONS FOR 38.8 TRADITIONAL SERVICE AREAS (tonnes CO2e)
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONTRACTED EMISSIONS FOR 2015 (tonnes CO2e) 527
Climate Action Committee - Page 56 Estimated Contracted Emissions: Authorization and Sign Off The information provided in this Contracted Emissions Reporting Form is to the best of my knowledge correct and complete.
Designate Signature:
Roger Quan, Director, Air Quality and Climate Change
Date: June 1, 2016
18561479 Climate Action Committee - Page 57
5.2
To: Climate Action Committee
From: Jason Emmert, Air Quality Planner Parks, Planning and Environment Department
Date: June 16, 2016 Meeting Date: July 6, 2016
Subject: Update on the Innovative Tools for Enhanced Energy and Climate Change Community Planning Project
RECOMMENDATION That the Climate Action Committee receive for information the report dated June 16, 2016, titled ”Update on the Innovative Tools for Enhanced Energy and Climate Change Community Planning Project”.
PURPOSE This staff report and the attached progress report from the Collaborative for Advanced Landscape Planning (CALP) at UBC summarize the progress for the Innovative Tools for Enhanced Energy and Climate Change Community Planning project, which has been partially funded by Metro Vancouver.
BACKGROUND At its meeting on July 3, 2015 the GVRD Board approved the following recommendation:
That the GVRD Board approve continued funding for the project titled, “Innovative Tools for Enhanced Energy and Climate Change Community Planning” in the amount of: a) $30,000 in 2015, contingent upon receiving confirmation that additional partners have contributed funding as described in the report titled “University of British Columbia – Innovative Tools for Enhanced Energy and Climate Change Community Planning”, dated May 27, 2015; and b) an additional $30,000 in 2016, contingent upon the confirmation of partner funding noted in (a) above and the submission of a progress report to the Climate Action Committee by June 2016 along with a review of project progress by Metro Vancouver staff with input from relevant municipal staff.
The purpose of the Innovative Tools Project is to support local government planning staff and practitioners by mainstreaming visual media tools and know-how to conduct ‘climate change/community energy visioning’, in order to help Metro Vancouver communities meet carbon reduction targets and prepare for climate change. The aim is to enhance best practice in community energy and climate planning processes and increase public knowledge and acceptance, through:
• Strengthening/expanding practitioner skills, resources, experience, and confidence in innovative tools and techniques for community engagement; • Building energy literacy and interest/involvement of the public on critical energy and climate change issues at the community/neighbourhood scale; • Developing a support-base among municipal council members, key stakeholders, and decision-makers for best practice methods and policy change.
Climate Action Committee - Page 58 Update on the Innovative Tools for Enhanced Energy and Climate Change Community Planning Project Climate Action Committee Meeting Date: July 6, 2016 Page 2 of 3
PROJECT DELIVERABLES IN 2012 – 2014 In the first three years of the project (2012-2014), the project deliverables were as follows: • Illustrated Guide to Community Energy: A simple, attractive educational guide to community energy solutions and issues, for use by lay people and community engagement practitioners • Community Energy Explorer (beta version): Web-interface using the latest multimedia and presentation software, providing easy access to community energy content and interactive graphics, including unique web-mapping of regional renewable energy supply potential across Metro Vancouver and energy demand • Annual Knowledge Exchange Symposia: Two well-attended all-day symposia/ workshops for municipal and other practitioners, and NGOs, to foster awareness and feedback on the Community Energy Explorer (CEE), and enable a broader exchange of experience with community energy issues among municipalities. • Collaborative learning projects: Joint projects with staff and stakeholders from Richmond, Surrey, and West Vancouver on real-world community energy projects, leading to case studies showcased in the CEE web platform • Outreach and engagement: numerous presentations, demonstrations, webinars etc. on visual tools for community energy and climate change planning, involving practitioners, elected officials and stakeholders across the region
EXPECTED DELIVERABLES IN 2015 - 2016 In the final two years (2015-2016), the expected deliverables are as follows: • Enhancements to the Community Energy Explorer including: o Website redesign to improve interface to increase accessibility and impact o Additional local community energy planning case-studies o Thermal Imaging studies to support energy retrofits of residential buildings o Municipality-specific information on renewable energy o Integration of the Community Energy Explorer with other Metro Vancouver initiatives (Home Energy Labelling, Strata Energy Advisor, etc.) • Neighbourhood Toolkit for Climate Action: a simple hands-on, block-level visual toolkit, to engage residents in local climate change solutions • Citizen Science Energy Demand Mapping with neighbourhood residents at UBC: engage residents in mapping their energy use data on the Community Energy Explorer. The prototype user interface could ultimately allow Metro Vancouver residents to input their home’s energy use data • Training/capacity-building for local government staff and other practitioners: Partnering with organizations to deliver capacity building/practitioner training/collaborative projects with Community Energy Managers, planners, consultants, etc. on using tools/ processes around implementation of a Community Energy and Emissions Plan.
As Metro Vancouver develops the Integrated Regional Climate Action Strategy the deliverables from this project will support GHG emissions reduction planning and projects in the region and help communicate important concepts regarding energy and GHG emissions.
Climate Action Committee - Page 59 Update on the Innovative Tools for Enhanced Energy and Climate Change Community Planning Project Climate Action Committee Meeting Date: July 6, 2016 Page 3 of 3
PROGRESS REPORT ON 2015 – 2016 DELIVERABLES The GVRD Board’s approval of funding for this project in 2015-2016 is conditional upon confirmation of partner funding and receipt of a progress report from CALP which describes work to date on the Innovative Tools project. Staff have now received that progress report and it is included as Attachment 1. As communicated by CALP, there were some delays in securing the final portion of partner funding, but it was confirmed in April 2016. As per the Board recommendation, Metro Vancouver’s portion of the funding was not released until all the partner funding was secured. Despite the funding delays, CALP was able to proceed with some portions of the work with its initial funding from the Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions and the Real Estate Foundation of BC. Staff is working closely with the CALP team to ensure that the final deliverables of the project will meet the proposed project objectives and the deliverables will be completed by the end of 2016 as stated in the report from March 2015 (Attachment 2).
ALTERNATIVES This is an information report. No alternatives are presented.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Metro Vancouver is contributing $60,000 to Phase II of the project. The $30,000 approved in the 2015 budget was not expended due to the delays in confirming partner funding, but at its meeting of April 29, 2016, the GVRD Board approved the carry forward of this amount to 2016. An additional $30,000 has been allocated from the 2016 Air Quality and Climate Change budget. Metro Vancouver’s contribution comprises 25% of the total Phase II project funding ($236,000) with the balance of the funding being contributed from the Real Estate Foundation, the Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions (PICS), and Mitacs (a national, not-for-profit organization founded in 1999 as a Canadian Network of Centres of Excellence).
SUMMARY / CONCLUSION Metro Vancouver staff have reviewed the progress report for the Innovative Tools for Enhanced Energy and Climate Change Community Planning Project and are satisfied that despite some delays in funding, the Collaborative for Advanced Landscape Planning (CALP) will be able to provide the deliverables as proposed by the end of 2016. Metro Vancouver staff will continue to work with the CALP team to ensure that tools developed through this project are made available to Metro Vancouver and municipal staff.
Attachments (Doc #18628964): 1. Innovative Tools for Enhanced Energy and Climate Change Community Planning Project: Progress Report – Collaborative for Advanced Landscape Planning (CALP) – May 2016 2. Metro Vancouver Staff Report, University of British Columbia - “Innovative Tools for Enhanced Energy and Climate Change Community Planning” Project – May 27, 2015 3. CALP Report to the Climate Action Committee on the “Innovative Tools for Community Energy Planning” project – March 2015.
18246386
Climate Action Committee - Page 60 5.2 ATTACHMENT 1
Collaborative for Advanced Landscape Planning (CALP) 2016-05-13 Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia 2045-2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4
Attn: Jason Emmert Planning, Policy & Environment, Metro Vancouver 4330 Kingsway, Burnaby, BC, V5H 4G8
Innovative Tools for Enhanced Energy and Climate Change Community Planning Project: Progress Report CALP has made significant progress on key components of the Innovate Tools project since its inception, despite unforeseen delays in project funding. Specifically, we have made progress on a number of the tasks outlined in the Metro Vancouver agreement, including:
1. Completion of analysis and graphics development of the housing energy archetypes case study for the District of West Vancouver’s Community Energy and Emissions Plan (CEEP) process (objective 5). This project is now ready for inclusion as a case study on the CEE (see example images in Figure 1 and Figure 2). Further work for this case study includes the addition of renewable energy/retrofit costing information, which will be completed this summer. The West Vancouver case study, like the previous Richmond and Surrey case studies currently housed on the CEE, was made possible by research partnerships with that municipality. The building and neighbourhood types analyzed and illustrated in those case studies, however, represent common archetypes throughout Metro Vancouver, providing important energy and climate change insights to all Metro Vancouver municipalities. Products from these and all future case studies will be made available via the website free for use by all municipalities and other users.
2. Based on the beta test results from 2015, and subsequent review, we have identified the priority website re-design elements and have developed a re-design strategy (objective 1) for interface improvements to increase accessibility and impact. We have hired students who will work on the redesign over the summer. The initial re-design focus this summer will be on improving the quality and relevance of the Energy in Context section and on providing additional, municipality-specific, information about local renewable energy sources across the region.
3. Initial development of the ‘neighbourhood toolkit for climate action’ as outlined in objective 2 of the agreement. This preliminary toolkit has been developed by CALP researchers and tested with students from Dr. Sheppard’s class (with additional support from a UBC donor). Work this summer will include full development/adaptation of the toolkit for web deployment and uploading to the Community Energy Explorer (CEE). The purpose of this toolkit is to provide residents of Metro Vancouver and other BC communities with fun, accessible, ‘do-it-yourself’
Climate Action Committee - Page 61 tools for addressing climate change with neighbours on their block. These toolkits will be piloted in Metro Vancouver neighbourhoods, leading to local area initiatives, competitions, etc., with results archived and highlighted on the CEE.
4. Completion of a review of thermal imaging studies (prepared for the City of Vancouver) which will be included as a CEE case study (objective 5) and a resource for Metro Vancouver municipalities considering similar applications. The City of Vancouver thermal imaging study will develop strategies for citizen engagement by making thermal energy losses visible in residential buildings. This project is ongoing and will be updated on the CEE as more details and imagery become available. The thermal imaging report will be made available on the CEE along with relevant case study examples from the thermal imaging study.
5. We are working with UBC’s Campus and Community Planning (Sustainability and Engineering) to secure additional funding to extend the existing energy demand mapping from the CEE to UBC’s neighbourhoods. We plan to use the UBC neighbourhoods to explore (and ultimately provide) a pilot/beta test for the citizen science component outlined in objective 7, which will allow residents to add their actual rather than modeled energy use data on the demand map. Existing relationships between Campus and Community Planning and the University Neighbourhood Association will facilitate this beta test. In 2017, the results of this pilot will be adapted to the Metro Vancouver energy demand map and a prototype user interface will be developed for practitioner review, which could ultimately allow Metro Vancouver residents to input their houses’ actual energy use data. There are synergies between this project and other Metro Vancouver initiatives related to providing better home energy information to residents, which will be explored with Metro Vancouver after initial testing at UBC.
As part of the Metro Vancouver funding agreement, the Collaborative for Advanced Landscape Planning (CALP) at UBC was required to first secure funding from the Real Estate Foundation of BC (REFBC), Mitacs, and the Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions (PICS), before Metro Vancouver money would be released to the project. The PICS and REFBC funding was secured in January 2016, but the Mitacs money was delayed by required revisions and re-submission of the funding application. The Mitacs funding was secured in April 2016, with supportive reviewer comments. The Mitacs funding process effectively encumbers the matching funding source (in this case, the REFBC funding), resulting in all but the PICS money being delayed until the Mitacs application was approved. The Mitacs and REFBC funds thus became available on April 17 2016.
With the Mitacs, REFBC and PICS funding now secured, we are moving on to research, development and implementation of the full set of objectives outlined in our agreement with Metro Vancouver. We have hired a Project Manager/Post-Doctoral Fellow (Jon Salter) and are hiring students and a second Post- Doctoral fellow to conduct the research. Through subsidized funding via UBC’s Work Learn program, we have hired a student with strong web development skills to work on objectives 1 and 5. We are also hiring a recent graduate of the Sustainable Building Science Program to work on the extension of the CEE demand map to the UBC neighbourhoods. Finally, we have hired a postdoctoral fellow to develop costing data for the West Vancouver case study (objective 5) and to work on developing modeling of additional renewable energy resources for Metro Vancouver (objective 1).
Climate Action Committee - Page 62 Despite the funding delays, we feel we have made significant progress on the Innovative Tools for Enhanced Energy and Climate Change Community Planning project. Most importantly, we have developed a work plan that would deliver on the Metro Vancouver agreement objectives by the end of calendar year 2016, and all project objectives by September 15th 2017 (the REFBC deadline), and hired the necessary researchers to complete the deliverables as outlined in the agreement objective.
------
Figures 1 and 2 below are examples of a unique series of graphics and accompanying narratives prepared for the District of West Vancouver’s CEEP. These graphics were used to support and illustrate the alternative CEEP scenarios presented in the District’s recent community engagement process. The labelled pictures and stories expressed several ways that GHG reductions can be made in typical suburban homes, in order to achieve net reductions in carbon emissions while increasing the diversity and affordability of housing opportunities.
Renewable energy mapping from the CEE was also used to inform the earlier development of district- wide scenarios. While these scenarios were prepared for West Vancouver, the information they present is relevant for all other municipalities in Metro Vancouver. Important modeling variables such as climate conditions and costing information are similar across the Lower Mainland, meaning that the numbers generated are valid for other Metro Vancouver municipalities.
Figure 1 shows an archetypal small character home with an accompanying narrative and infographics about the residents and their relationship with energy and GHG emissions. Figure 2 shows a comparison of alternative options at the city lot scale telling the story of how GHG emissions can be reduced through various combinations of renovations of the original home, construction of a lane-way home, and use of renewable energy, with infographics explaining how natural gas heating can be largely eliminated, relative to a tear-down situation.
Climate Action Committee - Page 63 Figure 1: An archetype small character home and accompanying resident narrative for the West Vancouver energy archetypes project (credit: Nicole Miller, CALP).
Climate Action Committee - Page 64 Figure 2: Energy retrofit options for the small character home from the West Vancouver energy archetypes project (credit: Nicole Miller, CALP)
Climate Action Committee - Page 65 5.2 ATTACHMENT 2
To: Climate Action Committee
From: Jason Emmert, Air Quality Planner Planning, Policy and Environment Department
Date: May 27, 2015 Meeting Date: June 17, 2015
Subject: University of British Columbia - “Innovative Tools for Enhanced Energy and Climate Change Community Planning” Project
RECOMMENDATION That the GVRD Board: a) approve continued funding for the project titled, “Innovative Tools for Enhanced Energy and Climate Change Community Planning” in the amount of $30,000 in 2015; and b) conditionally approve an additional $30,000 in 2016, contingent upon the submission of a progress report to the Climate Action Committee by June 2016 along with a review of project progress by Metro Vancouver staff with input from relevant municipal staff.
PURPOSE The report provides the Climate Action Committee and the GVRD Board the results of the first three years of the “Innovative Tools for Enhanced Energy and Climate Change Planning” led by the Collaborative for Advanced Landscape Planning (CALP) at UBC. The report also describes the future directions of the project, and seeks GVRD Board authorization to continue grant funding for the project for a final two years.
BACKGROUND At the March 13, 2015 Climate Action Committee meeting, Dr. Stephen Sheppard presented the results from the first three years and the potential future directions for the final two years of the project titled, Innovative Tools for Community Energy Planning (Attachment 1). Metro Vancouver has provided funding to the project in accordance with the following GVRD Board recommendation adopted on April 13, 2012:
That the GVRD Board: a. Approve funding for the project titled, “Innovative Tools for Enhanced Energy and Climate Change Community Planning” in the amount of $30,000 in 2012, with similar grants to be brought forward for consideration in the 2013 and 2014 budgets. Funding in each of 2013 and 2014 will be contingent upon the submission of an annual progress report to the Environment and Parks Committee and an annual review of project progress by Metro Vancouver staff. b. Direct staff to report back on an additional two years of funding in 2015 and 2016, based on a staff evaluation of the deliverables in the first three years.
Policy context Metro Vancouver’s Integrated Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Management Plan (IAQGGMP) supports practical research that provides knowledge and strategies aimed at reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
Climate Action Committee - Page 66 University of British Columbia - “Innovative Tools for Enhanced Energy and Climate Change Community Planning” Project Climate Action Committee Meeting Date: June 17, 2015 Page 2 of 4
The IAQGGMP contains strategies to “assess the region’s low carbon energy (e.g., biomass, geothermal, etc.), waste heat recovery, and district energy opportunities and risks, and where appropriate work with municipalities to coordinate public and private investment in supporting infrastructure, raise public awareness and uptake of low carbon building and transportation options” and to work with academic institutions and other partners to “…enhance air quality and climate change research, formal education, and public outreach within the region”.
The Innovative Tools project has resulted in a productive collaboration between local governments and an academic institution. As part of the project, several member municipalities have contributed case studies towards the development of the resources and tools. Other municipalities are currently using or have used the tools, resources, and approaches developed through this project for their own community energy planning initiatives.
Results to Date 2012-2014 As part of this project, the CALP team has produced the following deliverables to date:
a) Illustrated Guide to Community Energy: A simple attractive educational guide to community energy solutions and issues, for use by lay-people and community engagement practitioners b) Community Energy Explorer (beta version): Web-interface using the latest multimedia and presentation software, providing easy access to community energy content and interactive graphics, including unique web-mapping of regional renewable energy supplies and energy demand across Metro Vancouver. www.energyexplorer.ca c) Annual Knowledge Exchange Symposia: Two well-attended all-day symposia/workshops for practitioners and NGOs, to foster awareness and feedback on the Community Energy Explorer (CEE), and enable a broader exchange of experience with community energy issues among municipalities. d) Collaborative learning projects: Joint projects with staff and stakeholders from Richmond, Surrey, and West Vancouver on real-world community energy projects, leading to case studies show-cased in the CEE web platform e) Outreach and engagement: numerous presentations, demonstrations, webinars, etc. on visual tools for community energy and climate change planning, involving practitioners, elected officials and stakeholders across Metro Vancouver.
Next Phase of the Project The next phase of the project will build on the successes to date. Municipal sustainability and energy managers have indicated that they see value in the tools that show how local projects contribute to regional goals. The next phase of the project will focus on the continued development of the Community Energy Explorer as a platform to demonstrate how local climate and energy planning and actions contribute to reaching regional and Provincial climate goals.
The deliverables for the next phase of the project will include the development of additional local community energy case studies, using those local examples to generate regional energy and GHG reduction scenarios, and application of the Community Energy Explorer in on-the-ground engagement with the public and specific stakeholders in energy and emissions planning and project implementation.
Climate Action Committee - Page 67 University of British Columbia - “Innovative Tools for Enhanced Energy and Climate Change Community Planning” Project Climate Action Committee Meeting Date: June 17, 2015 Page 3 of 4
The table provided as Attachment 2 presents a preliminary list of deliverables for the project. Dr. Sheppard and his team are also awaiting confirmation of funding from the Vancouver Foundation and the Real Estate Foundation. As such, the final list of deliverables will be contingent on the total level of funding obtained. Metro Vancouver staff with input from municipal staff will work with Dr. Sheppard and his team to develop a detailed work plan for the final two years of the project once funding is confirmed.
Project budget The first three years of this project carried a budget of $283,000, provided by a variety of funding partners including Neptis Foundation ($70,000), GEOIDE NCE ($16,000), Vancouver Foundation ($30,000), Real Estate Foundation ($70,000), and Metro Vancouver ($90,000), as well as several municipalities in Metro Vancouver. There were also in-kind contributions from several member municipalities and CALP estimated at $96,000.
Innovative Tools for Community Energy Planning Budget 2012 - 2014 2015 - 2016 Cash In-kind Cash GEOIDE NCE (2012) $16,000 Neptis Foundation (2012-2013) $70,000 Richmond (2013-2013) $20,000 Surrey (2012-2013) $20,000 CALP, UBC (2012-2013) $16,000 CIRS Decision Theatre, UBC (2012-2013) $30,000 Metro Vancouver $90,000 $60,000 West Vancouver $7,000 QUEST (Quality Urban Energy Systems for $10,000 Tomorrow) Vancouver Foundation (2011) $30,000 *(TBC) $80,000 Real Estate Foundation $70,000 *(TBC) $80,000 Sub-Totals $283,000 $96,000 $220,000 Total Budget $599,000 Note: *(TBC) – To be confirmed
ALTERNATIVES 1. That the GVRD Board: a) approve continued funding for the project titled, “Innovative Tools for Enhanced Energy and Climate Change Community Planning” in the amount of $30,000 in 2015; and b) conditionally approve an additional $30,000 in 2016, contingent upon the submission of a progress report to the Climate Action Committee by June 2016 along with a review of project progress by Metro Vancouver staff with input from relevant municipal staff. 2. That the GVRD Board receive this report for information and direct staff towards an alternate course of action.
Climate Action Committee - Page 68 University of British Columbia - “Innovative Tools for Enhanced Energy and Climate Change Community Planning” Project Climate Action Committee Meeting Date: June 17, 2015 Page 4 of 4
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS There is $30,000 allocated in the 2015 Climate Change program budget to support this project. Based on Committee and Board direction, an additional $30,000 could be proposed for the 2016 climate change program budget.
SUMMARY / CONCLUSION Metro Vancouver has goals of reducing GHG emissions in our region by 33% below 2007 levels by 2020 and 80% by 2050. The tools and resources developed in the first three years of the project have proven valuable for local governments in the region. Staff recommends Alternative 1, continued funding to support the further development of the Community Energy Explorer as Phase II of the project. The integration of community energy planning with land-use, infrastructure, and general sustainability plans is foundational to meeting those targets. The further development of the Community Energy Explorer will provide tools, data, and other resources to assist local government staff engage key stakeholders on conversations on community energy solutions.
Attachments (Doc. #11499768): 1. CALP Report to the Climate Action Committee on the “Innovative Tools for Community Energy Planning” project – March 2015. 2. Preliminary List of Deliverables for the Innovative Tools Project – Table.
11443040
Climate Action Committee - Page 69 5.2 ATTACHMENT 3
COLLABORATIVE FOR ADVANCED LANDSCAPE PLANNING
REPORT TO METRO VANCOUVER CLIMATE ACTION COMMITTEE
26 MARCH 2015
UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
Climate Action Committee - Page 70 Climate Action Committee - Page 71 PURPOSE
To provide an update on the project titled ‘Innovative Tools for Enhanced Energy and Climate Change Community Planning’ by Dr. Stephen Sheppard from the Collaborative Advanced Landscape Planning (CALP) at UBC to the Climate Action Committee.
This project supports local government planning staff and practitioners by mainstreamingvisual media tools & know-how to conduct ‘climate change/community energy visioning’, in order to help Metro Vancouver communities meet carbon reduction targets & prepare for climate change. The aim is to enhance best practice in community planning processes and help bring the public on board, through:
Strengthening/expanding practitioner skills, resources, experience, and confidence in innovative tools and techniques for community engagement
Building energy literacy and interest/involvement of the public on critical energy and climate change issues at the community/neighbourhood scale
Developing a support-base among municipal council-members, key stakeholders, and decision-makers for best practice methods and policy change.
COLLABORATIVE FOR ADVANCED LANDSCAPE PLANNING PG 3
Climate Action Committee - Page 72 This report will describe the following project deliverables and outcomes to date (2012-2015): –
Illustrated Guide to Community Energy: A simple attractive educational guide a) to community energy solutions and issues, for use by the lay-people and community engagement practitioners
b) Community Energy Explorer (beta version): Web-interface using latest multimedia and presentation software, providing easy access to community energy content and interactive graphics, including unique web-mapping of regional renewable energy supplies across Metro Vancouver and energy demand
c) Annual Knowledge Exchange Symposia: Two well-attended all-day symposia/ workshops for practitioners and NGOs, to foster awareness and feedback on the Community Energy Explorer (CEE), and enable a broader exchange of experience with community energy issues among municipalities.
d) Collaborative learning projects: Joint projects with staff and stakeholders from Richmond, Surrey, and West Vancouver on real-world community energy projects, leading to case studies show-cased in the CEE web platform
e) Outreach and engagement: numerous presentations, demonstrations, webinars etc. on visual tools for community energy and climate change planning, involving practitioners, elected officials and stakeholders across Metro Vancouver.
These deliverables (described next) have been made possible by leveraging Metro Vancouver’s support and networking closely with other funders, partners and associates – Real Estate Foundation (REFBC), Neptis Foundation, Community Energy Association (CEA), Climate Action Secretariat (CAS), Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions (PICS), Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA), UBC, and various municipalities.
PG 4 COLLABORATIVE FOR ADVANCED LANDSCAPE PLANNING
Climate Action Committee - Page 73 Illustrated Guide to Community Energy
The Illustrated Guide to Community Energy provides an attractive visual information package (as a hard-copy report or pdf file) which helps planners and other municipal staff improve communication to and engagement with the public and policy makers on community energy solutions, risks, and trade-offs. This Guide is a resource that can be used to build energy literacy and dispel misconceptions about unfamiliar ways of conserving and generating energy at the neighbourhood and community scale. The idea is that better informed public and policy-makers can support policy change for community energy solutions across Metro Vancouver.
The Guide includes: an introduction to community energy technologies and issues, the first comprehensive maps of regional-scale renewable energy resources ever compiled, and neighbourhood-level visualisation and information graphics. In order to ensure that the Guide is user-friendly for local government staff and the content is understandable by the public, the draft guide was reviewed by a number of committees and stakeholder groups. The Guide has been available free to the public for over a year, from the CEE and CALP websites.
PDF: http://web.forestry.ubc.ca/calp/CALP_CommunityEnergyGuide_highRes.pdf
The cover of the Illustrated Guide to Community Energy
PG 5 COLLABORATIVE FOR ADVANCED LANDSCAPE PLANNING
Climate Action Committee - Page 74 Community Energy Explorer The Community Energy Explorer is an online, expanded version of the Illustrated Guide (previously known as the Interactive Web-Interface for Sustainable Energy (iWISE). The idea to create a dynamic online resource came from participants in our stakeholder engagement workshops on the hard-copy Guide; they strongly recommended developing an interactive version, giving policy makers, municipal staff and members of the interested public access to digital visualization, communication and data tools and resources that can assist in community planning. A primary purpose is to provide better tools for municipal staff to engage and inform residents in vital discussions on local energy projects. These tools help municipalities engage the public in understanding the implications of low carbon energy projects (e.g., district energy, solar thermal, biomass, etc.) for their own neighbourhoods and communities.
The Community Energy Explorer (http://www.energyexplorer.ca/) builds on the earlier project content to deliver a highly visual, engaging, & interactive web-interface (see sample images below). In its current beta-version, it provides easy-to-understand information explaining key concepts and messages on community and renewable energy, with the ability to zoom into, explore, and query mapping on potential renewable energy supply as well as home energy demand, across the Metro Vancouver region. CEE is a one of-a-kind resource on community energy for non-experts: it provides clear & compelling graphics, maps, animation, video clips, and other visualizations that will help broaden and deepen community engagement and social learning on critical issues related to community energy and planning. To date, the CEE beta version has the following resources available:
1) Interactive maps of regional renewable energy resources identifying opportunities for public and private investment in low carbon energy opportunities (e.g. solar thermal, waste heat recovery, biomass, etc.), comprehensive information that has never before been provided across the region
COLLABORATIVE FOR ADVANCED LANDSCAPE PLANNING PG 6
Climate Action Committee - Page 75 Screen capture of regional renewable energy resource map: Biomass potential (previous) and Wind potential (above) http://energyexplorer.ca (click on the ‘explore renewable energy maps’ icon on the homepage & select category).
2) Interactive map of estimated household energy demand zoomable data on modelled energy use for single family residential neighbourhoods
Screen capture of interactive map of Estitamted household energy demand. http://www.energyexplorer.ca/home-energy
COLLABORATIVE FOR ADVANCED LANDSCAPE PLANNING PG 7
Climate Action Committee - Page 76 3) Neighbourhood-level visualizations and information graphics realistic visualizations of low carbon, resilient neighbourhoods and local-level energy projects, that residents and other stakeholders can quickly understand and relate to; simple animations, videos and dynamic diagrams that explain the pros and cons of various energy solutions warehouse of images on community energy for free use by practitioners and the public
COLLABORATIVE FOR ADVANCED LANDSCAPE PLANNING PG 8
Climate Action Committee - Page 77 4) Blog with supporting technical information Contextual information on how the new energy information and mapping was created (based on Rory Tooke’s doctoral research), and to track the website development process
5) Link to the Illustrated Guide to Community Energy (pdf version) Certain aspects of the CEE are still incomplete or in preliminary form, e.g. the energy landscape animation which will provide a more intuitive and user-driven alternative to accessing information. Planned improvements of the CEE include: interface improvements to simplify access to maps and back-up technical information mapping of sewage heat recovery more compelling narrative information and visualization on GHG emissions/implications and economic benefits of community energy neighbourhood-level toolkit for community engagement more community case studies
CALP has worked closely with energy researchers, web designers and energy planners to build on existing data sources and develop this content for the website. In February 2015, CALP conducted a beta-test survey of the CEE (beta-version), with practitioners who have provided in- depth and valuable feedback on the usability & implementation of the CEE web-tool. Review of the beta test survey shows strong consensus on the usefulness of the energy mapping and local case studies in CEE as a resource for building energy literacy with several suggestions on where improvements and extensions are needed (see Impacts Section below for summary of results).
COLLABORATIVE FOR ADVANCED LANDSCAPE PLANNING PG 9
Climate Action Committee - Page 78 Annual Knowledge Exchange Symposia
CALP, in partnership with Metro Vancouver, has successfully organized two full-day Symposia that offered a forum to share knowledge on various low carbon energy projects among local governments and other regional stakeholders. These invited partners, funders and representatives from all Metro Vancouver municipalities and enabled a dialogue on policies, planning, innovations, implementation, best practices and stakeholder engagement on community energy.
1) Community Energy Innovations: Knowledge Exchange Symposium on June 4, 2013 at the BC Hydro Decision Theatre, UBC The objective of this event was to bring together local stakeholders with a direct interest in community energy for a day-long symposium addressing some of the current topics and issues surrounding local energy planning and management initiatives. A total of 59 participants registered for the event. One of the major successes of the Symposium was the attendance of representatives from all major Metro Vancouver member municipalities. In addition, the Symposium had representation from Provincial Government, Metro Vancouver, utilities, academia, NGOs and private firms.
The Symposium consisted of an entire day split into fundamental topics each of which included initial presentations or showcases followed by a panel discussion and a more general dialogue / interaction with all attendees. Feedback and notes were collected during each session. The final session covered policy, which led to the proposal of a collaborative initiative between attendee organizations to draft a letter of recommendation to the Provincial Government for amendments to Provincial legislation that would grant greater authority to local governments to initiate energy strategies.
COLLABORATIVE FOR ADVANCED LANDSCAPE PLANNING PG 10
Climate Action Committee - Page 79 2) Community Energy Symposium: Turning Good Ideas into Real World Solutions on September 11, 2014 at Anvil Centre in New Westminster, BC This event was organized in partnership with QUEST (Quality Urban Energy Systems for Tomorrow) to foster a dialogue between local governments, developers and utilities staff on community energy and innovative building energy policy. The exciting one-day event saw a total of 125 participants and included sessions on – integrating land-use plans with energy and emissions plans; building code and policy innovations; and how to engage the public on energy and emissions. CALP presented the CEE and had interactive stations (iPads on pedestals) to demo / introduce the CEE web-platform to the symposium participants. Some initial feedback on it implementation was also received and around 20 attendees signed-up to be beta-testers.
QUEST concluded the day with their Roundtable Session – “Community Energy Systems: Fostering a Dialogue between Developers and Local Governments” – to explore opportunities and barriers around community energy systems. It addressed critical issues like – How do community energy systems work? What are the ownership and operation models? How can developers and local governments mutually address barriers such as financing, legacy for building users, meeting building energy performance targets, and opportunity cost? And how can business relationships between developers, local governments, and others, be improved to advance smart energy communities in the lower mainland?
COLLABORATIVE FOR ADVANCED LANDSCAPE PLANNING PG 11
Climate Action Committee - Page 80 Collaborative Learning Projects
CALP has been working closely with the municipalities of Richmond, Surrey & most recently West Vancouver on Collaborative Learning Projects to develop community case-studies focused on real places and issues. CALP (with Support from Ron Kellett’s Elements Lab at UBC) has provided specialized technical support and advice to municipal staff, to produce new visualizations, energy modelling and mapping for decision support and community engagements. To date, these case studies include:
Richmond urban centre redevelopment: illustrating how jobs, population, and density can be accommodated with net reductions in per capita & total carbon emissions, through improved building codes, rooftop solar energy, and district energy with renewables,
Surrey green field development: illustrating how row housing and small lot single family homes reduce energy use & GHGs relative to conventional single family homes.
West Vancouver Community Energy & Emissions Plan (CEEP): conducting modelling and visualization of iconic high-carbon building archetypes; devising feasible ways to reduce energy use and emissions that resonate with the community (in progress); and advising council’s Working Group on community engagement strategies.
These case studies are displayed in the CEE in the form of visual stories or scenarios that may be replicable across the region.
COLLABORATIVE FOR ADVANCED LANDSCAPE PLANNING PG 12
Climate Action Committee - Page 81 Outreach and Engagement
CALP has worked closely with energy and sustainability managers, city-planners, municipal engineers, consultants, NGOs, other research groups, communities, and the general public, in various outreach and engagement activities as spin-offs from the CEE development process. These have included numerous presentations and capacity building workshops on CEE and related visual media tools, to demonstrate & test best-practice visioning techniques, designed to leave a legacy of increased awareness and expertise for future community energy projects, such as –
1) Webinar jointly hosted by CALP & Climate Action Secretariat (CAS) for practitioners and energy managers, Vancouver
2) Presentations to the Regional Engineers Advisory Committee-Climate Protection Subcommitee (REAC-CPS)
3) Workshop at the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives’ (CCPA) ‘Conversation on Climate Justice’ project (with 30 citizen leaders), Vancouver
4) Workshop at the Building Sustainable Communities Conference, Kelowna
5) Workshop at the Community Innovations Lab, Kamloops
6) Several public lectures and presentations, organized by PICS, UBC, and others.
7) Planned future presentations /meetings include –
8) Regional Planning Advisory Committee (RPAC): April 10, 2015 Renewable Cities Forum: May 13-15, 2015 BC Hydro Community Energy and Emissions Modelling (CEEM) group: May, 2015
COLLABORATIVE FOR ADVANCED LANDSCAPE PLANNING PG 13
Climate Action Committee - Page 82 Impact of the Project
The deliverables produced so far on this project have been used in the following ways (that have so far been documented): By Surrey, Richmond and the North Shore municipalities, to engage their residents in discussions about a range of climate change issues, including the renewable energy potential in their communities. Surrey for example has used images from the Guide in its Community Climate Action Strategy.
The outcomes from this municipal work continue within planning processes such as CEEP implementation and climate change adaptation planning, e.g. Richmond conducted a follow-up energy modelling study from UBC for its city centre development plan, and West Vancouver is using the CEE renewable energy mapping for its CEEP analysis.
Renewable energy mapping from CEE is being used to support discussions with industrial partners in the Tilbury Eco-Industrial Network (Delta).
Images produced to date on the project have also been used in Metro Vancouver’s “The Sustainable Region” videos and numerous presentations, workshops, webinars and training sessions by other practitioners.
The CEE has also been used in various educational settings, including:
Undergraduate courses (e.g. CONS 210, FRST 490, APSC 232) and graduate courses (LARC 542, FRST 551), as a resource for class projects
Graduate research in Forestry on local energy sources
Delta high schools, as an information source supporting an educational climate change videogame.
CEA is planning to list CEE as a key reference source for enrollees in their Certificate in Community Energy Management.
COLLABORATIVE FOR ADVANCED LANDSCAPE PLANNING PG 14
Climate Action Committee - Page 83 The recent beta test on the CEE, from 14 volunteer energy and community engagement practitioners/NGOs in the region, found that comments were generally very positive: 73% of participants felt that CEE was easy or very easy to use, and all felt that the graphics were either very useful (60%) or somewhat useful (40%). Comments included:
“Excellent visual tool taking very complex information and making it accessible to a general audience”
“By far the most visually appealing website on energy I have ever seen. Definitely helps you scroll through everything.”
The most useful components of the CEE ranked by participants were the energy maps, renewable energy description section, and local case studies.
Website Usefulness by Section
10 90.0%
80.0%
7.5 70.0%
45.5% 45.5% 5
Values 40.0% 40.0%
2.5 20.0% 20.0%
9.1% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0%
0 Energy Maps Energy ‘Energy in ‘Renewable ‘Case Study’ Animation Context’ Section Energy’ Section Section
Not at all useful Not very useful Somewhat useful Very useful
COLLABORATIVE FOR ADVANCED LANDSCAPE PLANNING PG 15
Climate Action Committee - Page 84 The priority areas needing more emphasis were economic implications of energy use and climate change, and impact of individual behaviour change on energy demand.
Information that Needs More Emphasis
7.5 70.0% 70.0%
5 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% Values 2.5 20.0%
0 Energy Land use Eect of Impacts of Economic Eects on implications implications transportation individual implications national for climate for energy on energy behaviour on of energy use and/or change demand demand energy and climate provincial demand change policies on local energy issues
There were several recommendations on how the CEE could be strengthened and used to further efforts on energy planning & outreach; for example,
“The maps are one of the greatest assets, but not intuitive to find. The content was great though, and I look forward to sharing this with teams I’m working with”
“The energy maps were impressive in terms of making GIS data accessible, but there is probably not enough legend/contextual information to make this action fully understandable.”
A beta test summary report documenting results will be provided to Metro Vancouver staff in the next few weeks.
COLLABORATIVE FOR ADVANCED LANDSCAPE PLANNING PG 16
Climate Action Committee - Page 85 Specific ways in which practitioners and attendees of the 2014 Symposium have envisioned using the CEE (along with other tools) include:
Supporting community engagement and planning for OCPs, CEEP implementation, and neighborhood plans.
Specific applications for use of CEE in-practice, e.g. in training sessions (Lighthouse), local planning activities (North Vancouver), and engagement (Cool Neighbourhoods).
In combination with other tools, such as NRCAN staff suggestion identifying “synergy between TaNDM (spatial GHG data from utility records in BC) and the Community Energy Explorer, if sample TaNDM data could be available for selected communities – it would be a concrete demonstration of making measured building energy information available in the context of an education/outreach mapping and visualization tool”.
This feedback indicates that the CEE platform, once complete, would provide valuable information and tools for informing both non-experts and the decision makers about community energy, and thus assisting member municipalities and the region in reaching their greenhouse gas reduction goals. Also, CEE would support initiatives for reducing dependency on non-local energy sources, and for attaining other regional energy and sustainable development objectives. In particular, the existing and planned CEE tools would support objectives such as Strategy 3.2 and Action 3.2.3. in the Integrated Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Management Plan (IAQGGMP), e.g. in assessing the low carbon energy potential for the region and identifying opportunities for local governments to support development of those opportunities. The engagement and visioning tools can also help staff link regional growth objectives outlined in the Regional Growth Strategy (RGS) to community energy planning in municipalities and neighbourhoods. Metro Vancouver staff will continue to work closely with the CALP team to ensure the transferability of the tools to municipalities throughout the region.
COLLABORATIVE FOR ADVANCED LANDSCAPE PLANNING PG 17
Climate Action Committee - Page 86 Next Steps (2015-2016)
Broader lessons have been learned from feedback on the project and discussions with partners and government staff, with implications for next steps over the following two years. We recognized the importance of partnering more substantively for future funding, planning, hosting, publicity, roll-out and embedding of CEE in-practice e.g. – with Metro Vancouver & Community Energy Association (CEA). There exists some sensitivity around certain energy issues such as forest biomass harvesting as a regional energy source, micro-hydro, and biomass district energy plants, indicating the need for further stakeholder discussion and a possible support role for CEE, given careful consideration of communicating messages and using citizen focus groups to test outcomes, as was done with the Illustrated Guide. A recent meeting with the Regional Engineers Advisory Committee (REAC) to review the CEE web tools, suggested expansion of the platform to permit citizen input. Clearly, there is also significant potential of CEE as an educational tool in schools, universities, and continuing education.
Since February 2015, Metro Vancouver staff has worked with Dr. Sheppard and the CALP team to refine the priorities and deliverables for the next 2 years’ activities. Metro Vancouver staff has provided feedback that helps ensure the proposed deliverables continue to align with the needs of Metro Vancouver and its member municipalities. In addition, Dr. Sheppard also received feedback from the Regional Engineers Advisory Committee Climate Protection Subcommittee (REAC-CPS) on the remaining 2 years of the project.
A new proposal for continued partnering with Metro Vancouver has been submitted to the Real Estate Foundation of BC to extend and complete the CEE web-tool, apply it to building community capacity on local energy and climate change issues, and establish a generic template for use by communities across BC. New partners and collaborators are being sought. This will effectively complete and launch the Community Energy Explorer web-tool, although opportunities for ongoing development may remain.
The proposed tasks and possible ideas for further enhancement and extension of CEE are listed in the following table, in rough order of chronology and certainty, pending further discussions and partner funding decisions. This list will be refined and narrowed down through consultation with regional and local government staff, including a ‘brainstorming session” to be held in in the next few weeks.
COLLABORATIVE FOR ADVANCED LANDSCAPE PLANNING PG 18
Climate Action Committee - Page 87 OBJECTIVES PLANNED ACTIVITIES
Implement highest priority E.g. functional interface improvements/bug fixes; additional CEE improvements based on renewable resources (e.g. sewage heat); more depth on beta phase feedback land use/ density/energy/GHG trade-offs; visualizing GHGs and local economic benefits (in partnership with CEA); mapping improvements (e.g. linking demand map to supply maps, aggregating renewable capacities by municipal or neighbourhood boundaries, Regional Climate Action Map, etc.)
Additional local case-studies Year 1: West Vancouver: develop an online illustrated to the CEE website narrative on key building archetypes (with modelled scenarios) that resonate with the community, from current CEEP project.
Year 2: Develop 1 additional case study, or incorporate pre-existing case studies from leading edge consultants/ municipalities
Neighbourhood Toolkit on Develop online ‘Neighbourhood Toolkit for Climate Action’ Climate Action from current prototype to a simple hands-on, block-level visual toolkit, to engage residents in local climate change solutions Hosting / launch / support plan Year 1 planning & Year 2 implementation with partners
Design ‘enter-your-own-data’ Year 1: Brainstorming and scoping on needed functionalities capability (Citizen Science) of a platform for residents/organizations/NGO’s to enter their own energy consumption data’
Year 2: Preliminary work/ design/ prototyping of user input interface
Training/capacity-building Partnering with CAS and/or other organizations for capacity building/practitioner training/collaborative projects with Community Energy Managers, planners, consultants, etc. on using tools/ processes (around CEEP implementation); deliver CEE user workshop at Knowledge Transfer Symposium Support Climate Action Explore CEE applications to support advisors for Strata Advisors Councils and businesses
COLLABORATIVE FOR ADVANCED LANDSCAPE PLANNING PG 20
Climate Action Committee - Page 88
5.1 Attachment 2
Table: Preliminary List of Deliverables for the Innovative Tools Project
Objectives Activities Timeframe Deliverables 1. Implement - Functional improvements / bug fixes; Year 1 - Fully functional highest priority - Additional renewable resources (e.g., sewage expanded version of CEE, improvements to heat recovery); with enhanced user CEE, to improve - More in-depth content on land use / density / experience and usability usability and energy / GHG trade-offs; broaden its - Visualizing local economic benefits; applications to fill - Mapping improvements for users (e.g., linking key gaps, based demand map to supply maps, aggregating energy on beta test supplies by municipal or neighbourhood feedback boundaries, GHG mapping, linking to Metro Vancouver ‘Climate Action’ map); -Adding more links to complementary online material, e.g., new PICS summary recommendations on energy literacy; - Review by expert & non-expert groups.
2. Add - Develop ‘Neighbourhood Toolkit for Climate Year 1 – 2 - New module within Neighbourhood Action’ as an online resource, building on current CEE, providing guidance Toolkit for prototype of a DIY, block-level visual toolkit, to to neighbourhood groups Climate Action stimulate discussion & build awareness of climate change issues at block scale, with a focus on engaging residents in developing practical energy solutions (e.g., retrofitting and solar energy) collectively; -Test with participants from a sample block / neighbourhood, e.g., Evergreen’s Project Green Bloc or Canadian Centre for Policy Alternative’s (CCPA) Good Life, Green Life team.
3. Training / - Partnering with Climate ActionSecretariat (CAS), Year 1 - Presentation materials, capacity-building Community Energy Association (CEA), and/or guidance with focus on other organizations for capacity building / building support for practitioner training / collaborative projects with implementation Community Energy Managers, planners, consultants, etc. on using tools / processes (around Community Energy and Emissions Plan (CEEP) implementation); deliver CEE user workshop at Knowledge Transfer Symposium; - Apply CEE and other visual learning tools to BC Mayors Climate Leadership Council, Community Energy Planning: Getting to Implementation in Canada!, and in training materials for Certificate in Community Energy Management
Climate Action Committee - Page 89 Preliminary List of Deliverables for the Innovative Tools Project Page 2 of 2
Objectives Activities Timeframe Deliverables 4. Provide a - Document CEE as a template by producing a Year 2 - A developer guide ‘template’ for ‘developer guide’ with basic structure and available online on how similar web guidance on developing a similar web-tool, to replicate CEE in other platforms in other enabling communities beyond Metro Vancouver regions, with tips on regions of BC to generate their own content and mapping basic website using their respective data on renewable energy development, reusable supplies, demand, etc. content, & mapping - The guide will be designed primarily for users at methods. regional districts or larger BC cities, though other users may also find it useful. It will: identify existing CEE content that is generally applicable; describe how non-transferable data was created, as a guide to re-creating local data, at 2 different skill levels with assumed data sources; and provide tips on website assembly. - Create a separate ‘Tab’ on the website for the guide, making it easy to access and download. 5. Add local case- - Develop an online illustrated narrative on key Year 1 - New case studies studies to the CEE building archetypes in West Vancouver for included in CEE website effective public engagement in their Community Energy and Emissions Plan (CEEP). - Develop 1 additional case study (subject to Year 2 further funding) such as University Neighbourhood Association (UNA), which has expressed interest in working with CALP. 6. Develop - Planning & implementation with partners (e.g., Year 2 - Publically accessible CEE hosting / launch / Metro Vancouver) for CEE launch, publicity, platform via partner support plan hosting & ongoing maintenance. organizations
7. Explore ‘user - Brainstorming & scoping with partners on Year 1 - Work-plan for data-entry’ needed functions for a platform for residents / prototype (citizen science) organizations / NGO’s to enter their own energy implementation capabilities on consumption data. - Prototype interface for CEE - Preliminary design / prototyping of user input Year 2 user-generated data interface in pilot neighbourhood.
18628964 Climate Action Committee - Page 90 5.4
To: Climate Action Committee
From: Eve Hou, Air Quality Planner, Parks, Planning and Environment Department Jerry Colman, Policy Coordinator, External Relations Department
Date: June 7, 2016 Meeting Date: July 6, 2016
Subject: Update on Sustainability Innovation Fund Project – Home Energy Labelling Pilot Project
RECOMMENDATION That the GVRD Board direct staff to forward the report dated June 7, 2016, titled “Update on Sustainability Innovation Fund Project – Home Energy Labelling Pilot Project” to member jurisdictions and provide access to the RateOurHome.ca campaign materials in an effort to increase municipal involvement in the campaign.
PURPOSE To provide the Climate Action Committee with a progress update on the Metro Vancouver home energy labelling pilot project, funded in part by the 2015 GVRD Sustainability Innovation Fund.
BACKGROUND In February 2015, the Climate Action Committee received a presentation from staff on the “Home Energy Labelling Pilot Project” and in June 2015, this pilot project was awarded $100,000 from the GVRD Sustainability Innovation Fund. This report provides an update on the project.
Home energy labelling makes building energy performance ‘visible’ through validated and easy-to-understand labels, thereby allowing homebuyers to make more informed decisions. The national standard for home energy labelling is established by Natural Resources Canada (NRCan). NRCan registers energy advisors to perform residential energy assessments using NRCan’s EnerGuide Rating System (ERS). The ERS can be used to assess new and existing homes, including single-family homes, duplexes, row houses, townhomes, and low-rise apartments. Following an assessment, the property is given an EnerGuide label, similar to the one shown in Figure 1.
The goal of this project is to increase both the number of homes in the region that are voluntarily labelled through the Natural Resources Canada EnerGuide rating system, and the public display of these labels.
Development of creative assets for the campaign began in fall 2015. This Figure 1: Sample work was guided by a steering committee comprised of representatives EnerGuide label, effective April 2016. from BC Hydro, City Green Solutions, FortisBC, Greater Vancouver Home Builders Association, Natural Resources Canada, Pembina Institute, Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver, City of New Westminster, Township of Langley, BC Ministry of Energy and Mines, and BC Home Safety and Standards Branch. Through early consultation with this
Climate Action Committee - Page 91 Update on Sustainability Innovation Fund Project – Home Energy Labelling Pilot Project Climate Action Committee Meeting Date: July 6, 2016 Page 2 of 4
steering committee and a workshop held with builders and realtors, the project direction was established as follows: • Increase broad awareness of home energy labeling Raise general awareness in all audiences from currently low levels. • Wherever possible link awareness to informational resources Including website, collateral materials.
Other main results: • Key message is home energy labelling is good value It provides benefits such as comfort, peace of mind, better indoor air quality, a better performing home, reliability, home pride, etc. • Primary audiences are home buyers and home sellers These audiences need to start asking for the label to create a demand from builders. • Approach is to connect the label with a genuine need The goal is to sell the benefits of an energy efficient home (cost savings, comfort, peace of mind etc.), and raise awareness of the label as an informational tool at the point of sale.
FOCUS GROUP TESTING Based on the direction from the Steering Committee and other stakeholders, several creative concepts were developed targeting home buyers and home sellers. In January 2016, two of the concepts were tested with focus groups, comprised of homeowners and prospective homebuyers and home sellers. The testing revealed a number of key themes and observations towards the creative concepts and messages shown: • Considerations when buying a home: Personal values were a high priority when making a home purchase decision. Although the initial considerations were price, location and size, the secondary factors were focused on the quality of structure itself, including comfort. Some members of the group discussed the importance of a home inspection to avoid costly surprises, both in terms of capital and maintenance on a home. • Preference for creative concepts: The focus groups were shown two creative concepts, with a focus on homebuyers and home sellers. The group readily eliminated the more complex concept of the two. They preferred a simple concept delivered in a friendly but serious tone. • Advertising channels: The focus group provided input on where they would go when buying or selling a home. They emphasized the importance of online resources and also noted that realtors are an important source of information and guidance.
CAMPAIGN CONCEPT AND BRAND Based on the feedback provided by the Steering Committee and focus groups, a final concept was selected (see Figure 2) for the campaign. This simple, straight-forward and clear direction introduces homebuyers and home sellers to the concept of home energy labelling and its role. It highlights the role of the label as helping “spot” or identify an energy efficient home. The copy beneath the ad describes how the label can “take the guesswork out of finding a reliable, better performing and energy efficient home” when in the market to buy, and “help your property stand out in a sea of same” when looking to sell.
CAMPAIGN ELEMENTS To support these creative concepts, Metro Vancouver developed a brand for the project – RateOurHome.ca. This brand (provided as Attachment 1) will represent the website URL, which will
Climate Action Committee - Page 92 Update on Sustainability Innovation Fund Project – Home Energy Labelling Pilot Project Climate Action Committee Meeting Date: July 6, 2016 Page 3 of 4
serve as the key resource for learning about home energy labelling. A draft showing initial content under development is shown in Attachment 2. All campaign materials will direct users to this online resource, which will serve several functions: • Provide basic information on home energy labelling, including how to read the label and how to get a label. • Provide audience-specific information on how home energy labelling benefits them, either as a seller, buyer, builder or realtor. • Host an interactive, searchable map where homeowners can voluntarily display their EnerGuide labelled home.
Figure 2: Print ads for the RateOurHome.ca campaign
Other campaign elements include: • Campaign advertising (including print ads in community or real estate publications, online display ad, pre-roll video, social media paid posts, and printed collateral such as brochures and banners); • Earned media; • Direct engagement with local governments and utilities to integrate RateOurHome.ca disclosure with new home programs already requiring EnerGuide rating; • Webinars, conferences and seminars for secondary audiences (realtors, builders and local government/utilities)
PROJECT PROGRESS AND TIMELINES The RateOurHome.ca campaign is well underway with the following steps completed and planned: • Complete: Program terms, branding, logo, website, promotional videos, print collateral and forms, and waivers have been finalized. • July: Recruitment of voluntarily disclosed labels and the involvement of stakeholders and member jurisdictions in the RateOurHome.ca website. • Aug/Sept: Population of web map with labels through word-of-mouth outreach and direct engagement with secondary audiences. • Oct: Launch of advertising campaign begins in earnest, with a budget to continue through spring 2017.
Climate Action Committee - Page 93 Update on Sustainability Innovation Fund Project – Home Energy Labelling Pilot Project Climate Action Committee Meeting Date: July 6, 2016 Page 4 of 4
Staff intend to return to this Committee in spring 2017 with an update on the campaign, including metrics and recommendations.
ALTERNATIVES 1. That the GVRD Board direct staff to forward the report dated June 7, 2016, titled “Update on Sustainability Innovation Fund Project – Home Energy Labelling Pilot Project” to member jurisdictions and provide access to the RateOurHome.ca campaign materials in an effort to increase municipal involvement in the campaign.
2. That the GVRD Board receive for information the report dated June 7, 2016, titled “Update on Sustainability Innovation Fund Project – Home Energy Labelling Pilot Project”.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The RateOurHome.ca campaign budget is $180,000. The 2015 GVRD Sustainability Innovation Fund supported $100,000 of these costs with the balance funded from the approved program budgets in air quality and climate change ($25,000 in 2015 and $15,000 in 2016) and a grant from the Homeowners Protection Office ($40,000).
Expenditures include: • $120,000 for creative design and market research; and • $60,000 for outreach/promotions.
A significant amount of in-kind support is provided by City Green Solutions, through a grant provided by Natural Resources Canada. City Green Solutions is an enterprising non-profit, specializing in innovative home and building energy efficiency solutions, including home evaluations and assistance with access to grants. City Green’s in-kind support will provide staff time to deliver a number of the campaign elements, such as webinars and workshops targeting realtors and builders.
SUMMARY / CONCLUSION The Metro Vancouver home energy labelling pilot project, now branded as the RateOurHome.ca campaign, will raise awareness of home energy labelling among homebuyers and home sellers, realtors and builders. The campaign will raise awareness of the label as an informational tool at the point of sale, connecting the label with a genuine need (such as being able to identify a home that is healthy, comfortable, and reliable) and by demonstrating that the label is good value, whether buying or selling a home. GVRD Sustainability Innovation Funding in 2015 has been used to develop a research-based and audience-tested campaign that should set the frame for a multi-year awareness campaign. The campaign is soft launching in the summer of 2016, with advertising beginning in earnest in October 2016, to coincide with the fall home-buying season. Staff recommend Alternative 1, which seeks to improve uptake of the campaign by member jurisdictions, by forwarding this report to them and providing access to campaign materials.
Attachments: 1. RateOurHome.ca logo 2. RateOurHome.ca draft website content
18493011
Climate Action Committee - Page 94 ATTACHMENT 1: RateOurHome.ca logo
ATTACHMENT 2: RateOurHome.ca draft website content
18493011 Climate Action Committee - Page 95 5.5
To: Climate Action Committee
From: Derek Jennejohn, Lead Senior Engineer Eve Hou, Air Quality Planner Parks, Planning and Environment Department
Date: May 31, 2016 Meeting Date: July 6, 2016
Subject: Update on Sustainability Innovation Fund Project – Smart Drive Challenge
RECOMMENDATION That the Climate Action Committee receive for information the report dated May 31, 2016, titled “Update on Sustainability Innovation Fund Project – Smart Drive Challenge”.
PURPOSE To provide the Climate Action Committee with a progress update on the Metro Vancouver Smart Drive Challenge, a pilot project funded by the 2015 GVRD Sustainability Innovation Fund.
BACKGROUND In June 2015, a pilot study entitled “The Smart Driving Study: Exploring the potential for smart on- board technologies to reduce greenhouse gases and air pollution from light duty vehicles” was awarded $100,000 from the GVRD Sustainability Innovation Fund. New technologies are available that provide drivers with more information about their vehicle and their driving behaviour. A device can be plugged into any vehicle’s on-board diagnostics (OBD) system that wirelessly communicates information to the driver’s smartphone or computer.
The objective of this project is to better understand how such “smart”, connected technologies could provide feedback to drivers that will enable them to reduce their fuel consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) and other exhaust emissions through driving better and driving less. The study aims to separately quantify fuel savings that can be realized when drivers make a conscious effort to drive more fuel efficiently and reduce the numbers of kilometers they travel on a daily basis. Previous studies suggest that “eco-driving” training can result in fuel savings of 5-10%, which is attributed to new skills learned and behaviours changed.
THE METRO VANCOUVER SMART DRIVE CHALLENGE Beginning in late August 2016, 200 residents of the Metro Vancouver region will be recruited to participate in the Metro Vancouver Smart Drive Challenge. Recruitment will rely primarily on online and social media channels to cost-effectively reach a wide audience at a low cost. Branding has been developed to support this marketing. The goal is to have more applicants than participants, in order to be able to screen for a representative sample of drivers.
STUDY DESIGN For the Metro Vancouver study, a device will be installed in each participant’s vehicle that will track fuel consumption and vehicle movement in real time, and record trips taken over the study period. After a baseline monitoring period of three weeks, participants will take a 30 minute online training course on how to drive more efficiently and how to make better trip choices that will save fuel and
Climate Action Committee - Page 96 Update on Sustainability Innovation Fund Project – Smart Drive Challenge Climate Action Committee Meeting Date: July 6, 2016 Page 2 of 3 reduce GHG emissions. A three week study period will follow the training, during which time the participants will receive feedback about how they are doing compared to their baseline.
During the study period, participants will receive daily emails indicating their progress. They will also have access to an online dashboard which will provide more detailed information, as well as allow them to see how they compare to other participants, in an anonymized manner.
A sub-set of participants will be provided with in-person training (in addition to online training). Another sub-set group of participants will be invited to participate in an extended study period of several months.
Participants will be given a target of achieving fuel savings of 15% compared to their baseline.
Data collected from the research project will be available in early 2017. These results will be used by Metro Vancouver staff to inform future public education and social marketing campaigns related to fuel consumption and GHG emissions in the privately-owned vehicle fleet, and may lead to the development of public-facing programs that offer driver training and/or access to “smart driving” technologies.
PROJECT DELIVERY AND PARTNERSHIPS Metro Vancouver has contracted Scout Environmental, formerly Summerhill Impact, to deliver this pilot project. Scout Environmental is a not-for-profit organization focused on creating and delivering public initiatives that generate positive environmental and health benefits. In 2013, Scout ran a similar pilot in the Toronto region during which they field tested a number of in-vehicle feedback devices, and identified FleetCarma as a proven technology for this pilot. Scout is also delivering a similar study in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area and Capital Regional District in the summer of 2016.
Metro Vancouver has also engaged two faculty members from the University of British Columbia: Dr. Milind Kandlikar, Professor, Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability (IRES), and Dr. Jiaying Zhao, IRES Canada Research Chair in Behavioral Sustainability. These academics are providing guidance to ensure that the study will collect scientifically valid data from a representative sample population. In addition, the study is designed to yield results that are indicative of behaviour changes that might be observed in a broader population that receives eco- driving training and feedback.
Additionally, Metro Vancouver will rely on in-kind support from member municipalities and TransLink to help promote the Smart Drive Challenge during the recruitment phase to maximize the number of applicants recruited on a minimal recruitment budget.
PROJECT PROGRESS AND TIMELINES The Metro Vancouver Smart Drive Challenge is well underway with the following steps completed and planned:
Climate Action Committee - Page 97 Update on Sustainability Innovation Fund Project – Smart Drive Challenge Climate Action Committee Meeting Date: July 6, 2016 Page 3 of 3
• Complete: o Study design is confirmed and vetted by academic partners. o Legal terms, disclaimers, waivers and a project privacy policy have been drafted and reviewed by Metro Vancouver’s legal team. o Program branding, logo, website, promotional and training videos and participant dashboard designs have been finalized. o Communications and outreach toolkit has been developed. • July 2016: Develop marketing and communications strategy • August: Distribute marketing materials to member municipalities and TransLink • End of August: Recruitment begins • September: Participants selected and devices mailed out • October to November: Baseline period; training; challenge period initiates • December: Program complete, devices returned • 1st Quarter 2017: Results available
Staff intend to return to the Climate Action Committee in spring 2017 with a report and recommendations for moving forward.
ALTERNATIVES This is an information report. No alternatives are presented.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS This Metro Vancouver Smart Drive Challenge project was designed with a budget of $150,000, funded with $100,000 from the 2015 GVRD Sustainability Innovation Fund and $50,000 from approved program budgets within the Air Quality and Climate Change function.
SUMMARY / CONCLUSION The Metro Vancouver Smart Drive Challenge will recruit 200 drivers from across the region to participate in an innovative pilot project funded in part by the GVRD Sustainability Innovation Fund. This pilot uses technology to test the effectiveness of driver training and feedback to improve fuel economy and incite mode shifting behaviour. Recruitment will begin in late-August and the project will be complete by the end of the year. Staff intend to return to the Climate Action Committee in spring 2017 with a final report and recommendations moving forward.
18118969
Climate Action Committee - Page 98 5.6
To: Climate Action Committee
From: Roger Quan, Director, Air Quality and Climate Change Parks, Planning and Environment Department
Date: June 21, 2016 Meeting Date: July 6, 2016
Subject: Manager’s Report
RECOMMENDATION That the Climate Action Committee receive for information the report dated June 21, 2016, titled “Manager’s Report”.
Climate Action Committee 2016 Work Plan Attachment 1 to this report sets out the Committee’s Workplan for 2016. The status of work program elements is indicated as pending, in progress, or complete. The listing is updated as needed to include new issues that arise, items requested by the Committee, and changes to the schedule.
Update on Proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal at Cherry Point At its meeting on February 18, 2015, the Climate Action Committee received an information report providing an “Overview of Coal Terminal Facilities in the Metro Vancouver Region”. In addition to describing proposed expanded or new coal terminals within the region (Neptune Bulk Terminals and Fraser Surrey Docks), the report noted other facilities under review in Washington State. Closest to Metro Vancouver is the proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal, a deep-water marine terminal at Cherry Point in Whatcom County that would handle up to 54 million dry metric tons per year of bulk commodities, mostly coal.
The project must undergo a full environmental review before the company can obtain a new shoreline permit or other permits required for the project. There are multiple agencies involved in the review, including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Washington State Department of Ecology and Whatcom County. These agencies have determined that the proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal and the associated rail expansion require environmental impact statements (EIS), which are being coordinated under both federal and state environmental policy acts. In addition to coordinating the preparation of the EIS with other agencies, the Seattle District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers received a letter dated January 5, 2015 from the Lummi Nation of the Lummi Reservation requesting that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers deny the Gateway Pacific Terminal permit application.
On May 9, 2016, the U.S Army Corps of Engineers posted its determination (Attachment 2) that the potential impacts of the proposed terminal on the Lummi Nation’s usual and accustomed fishing rights are greater than de minimis. The extension of this is that the project cannot be permitted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Climate Action Committee - Page 99 Manager’s Report Climate Action Committee Meeting Date: July 6, 2016 Page 2 of 4
Delta and White Rock Air Quality Study Staff have prepared a preliminary summary report on an air quality monitoring study related to coal dust, conducted in Delta and White Rock (Attachment 3). This study, conducted in 2014 and 2015, assesses air quality in the vicinity of railway lines used by coal trains, and follows up on a preliminary study in 2013. Both the preliminary and current study are collaborative efforts between the Corporation of Delta and Metro Vancouver, and were coordinated with the Corporation of Delta’s dustfall monitoring studies.
Inhalable particulate matter (PM10) monitoring was conducted in Delta at three locations near railway lines as well as in a residential location between June 2014 and May 2015. Monitoring in White Rock took place in September and October 2014 using Metro Vancouver’s Mobile Air Monitoring Unit (MAMU) and the existing particulate sampler located at White Rock City Hall.
Average particulate matter levels near railway lines are generally comparable to those found elsewhere in the region. However, there was an indication at one site near the Delta Golf Course that local airborne particulate levels can become elevated relative to other parts of the region. This site was unique in that a section of the line is used for marshalling coal trains, meaning that stationary loaded coal trains can remain in close proximity for longer periods of time than a moving coal train.
The attached report has been presented as a preliminary summary due to some issues encountered with the analysis of coal content. Prior to the study, Metro Vancouver anticipated that there were limitations with the methods currently used to quantify coal content, and these limitations became apparent over the course of the analysis, resulting in a high degree of variability and lack of repeatability in the coal content results. Metro Vancouver has been trying to resolve these issues, including repeat analyses of the same samples. Study results pertaining to total PM10 and PM2.5, other air contaminants, and meteorological data are presented in this report, but it is anticipated that an addendum will be prepared to provide additional information on coal analysis when the analytical issues are more fully addressed.
Air Quality Health Index (AQHI) Plus Pilot Project The Air Quality Health Index (AQHI) is a public information tool that provides information about the impacts of air quality on health. It is a scale based on measurements of three air contaminants (ground-level ozone, nitrogen dioxide and fine particulate matter) that allows people to plan their outdoor activities appropriately when air quality is categorized as having low, moderate, high or very high health risks. In Metro Vancouver and the Fraser Valley, the AQHI is calculated from measurements made by the air quality monitoring network stations and made available to the public on AirMap.ca.
During the significant wildfire smoke events experienced in the region during the summer of 2015, there were periods where the AQHI did not correspond well with measured levels of fine particulate matter, or with the air quality advisory conditions imposed by Metro Vancouver. To address the discrepancy, an ‘AQHI+’ (AQHI plus) pilot project is being conducted during the summer of 2016, which will involve an automated adjustment to the AQHI, when measured concentrations of fine particulate matter are higher than threshold concentrations. This pilot project has been proposed for
Climate Action Committee - Page 100 Manager’s Report Climate Action Committee Meeting Date: July 6, 2016 Page 3 of 4
British Columbia by the BC Ministry of Environment and will include the Metro Vancouver region. The AQHI+ pilot project aims to align health messaging provided through the AQHI more closely with people’s experiences when smoke from wildfires infiltrates the region. The effect on the reported AQHI will be for the health risk level to be increased during wildfire smoke events. The AQHI+ thresholds have a sound technical underpinning based on analysis of previous wildfire smoke events conducted by staff at the BC Centre for Disease Control. Discussions about implementing the proposed AQHI+ have taken place with representatives from agencies throughout the province, including Fraser Valley Regional District, Vancouver Coastal Health Authority and Fraser Health Authority, who are generally supportive of the pilot project.
Proposed National Locomotive Emissions Regulations In June, the Government of Canada published proposed Locomotive Emissions Regulations to limit air pollution from locomotives operated by railway companies under federal jurisdiction. When the regulations come into effect, it will be the first time that emission limits will be in place for locomotives in Canada.
The proposed changes would limit harmful air pollutant emissions through increasingly stringent emission standards for nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide, and standards for smoke opacity, in alignment with those of the United States Environmental Protection Agency. The emission standards would apply to new locomotives placed into service after the regulations come into effect. Locomotives that are already in service will not be required to meet the emissions standards, until they are removed from service to be remanufactured or upgraded, at which point the standards would apply. The proposed regulations also include requirements for all locomotives for idling, record keeping and reporting.
Canada and the U.S. are also working to develop strategies for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from locomotives under the Canada-U.S. Regulatory Cooperation Council.
In Metro Vancouver, rail locomotives contribute approximately five percent of nitrogen oxide emissions and six percent of diesel particulate matter emissions. The Non-Road Diesel Engine Emission Regulation Bylaw applies to older yard locomotives, and requires registration with Metro Vancouver.
The proposed regulations are available for review and comment by stakeholders and the public until September 15, 2016. Metro Vancouver staff are participating in the review. After considering comments received, Transport Canada will finalize the regulations, which would come into force on the day they are registered.
BC Lung Association State of the Air 2016 Report In June 2016, the BC Lung Association released the BC State of the Air report for 2016. The report is similar in scope to Metro Vancouver’s annual Caring for the Air report, providing information for the province as a whole. It provides a snapshot of air quality readings across BC and updates on air quality issues of concern, as well as corrective actions that are underway. This year’s edition reports on: • International, provincial and individual actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and their effects on climate change;
Climate Action Committee - Page 101 Manager’s Report Climate Action Committee Meeting Date: July 6, 2016 Page 4 of 4
• How British Columbians can prepare for poor air quality associated with wildfires; • The BC Lung Association annual workshop, which focussed on the broad range of potential health effects from air pollution; and • The introduction of air zone reporting and management in BC.
The report is included as Attachment 4 to the Manager’s Report.
Flushable Material in the Liquid Waste System At its meeting of May 4, 2016 the Climate Action Committee requested that staff report back with information on Metro Vancouver’s position on the marketing of flushable or biodegradable products, in relation to items such as wipes and cat litter.
The disposal of wipes, grease, cat litter and other materials (including biodegradable bags and liners) causes significant problems in any sewer systems. As this material travels through the sewer system, they can clog residential, municipal and regional sewer lines, pump stations, and treatment plants as they do not break down as readily as toilet paper. This can cause clogged pipes and pumps, damaged equipment, flooded basements and sewage spills into the environment.
At present, there is no standard definition of what “flushable” means for wipes, especially as related to the impact on the wastewater utility. Therefore, the Canadian Water and Wastewater Association, wastewater utilities (including Metro Vancouver) and the wipes industry are working together to develop an ISO standard that will define the term “flushable”, which will help in the development of enforceable regulations. Part of the ISO development is to standardize labeling for both flushable and non-flushable products.
While this work is being done, Metro Vancouver is asking the public not to flush wipes down the toilet. Metro Vancouver launched a regional wipes campaign on April 21st that asks residents to put wipes in the garbage. The eight-week campaign is based on a successful 2015 pilot project with the City of Pitt Meadows and includes videos, posters in women’s public washrooms and ‘shelf-talkers’ in Shoppers Drug Marts across the region. The results of the regional campaign will be communicated through the Utilities Committee.
Attachments (Doc #18643127): 1. Climate Action Committee 2016 Work Plan. 2. Army Corps halts Gateway Pacific Terminal permitting process, Release no. 16-015, posted 5/9/2016. 3. Air Quality Near Railway Lines Used by Coal Trains - Preliminary Summary of Data from White Rock and Delta, report dated June 2016. 4. BC Lung Association 2016 State of the Air Report
18241348
Climate Action Committee - Page 102 5.6 ATTACHMENT 1
Climate Action Committee 2016 Work Plan Report Date: June 21, 2016
Priorities 1st Quarter Status
Submit Written Argument and present Oral Summary Argument to National complete Energy Board for Trans Mountain Expansion Project Conduct workshop with Climate Action Committee to seek direction on complete development of an integrated regional climate action framework Consider 5 year work program related to the development of air quality bylaws complete and regulations and provide direction to staff Report on consultation program initiated in 2015 regarding proposed complete amendments to GVRD Air Quality Management Bylaw No. 1082, 2008 and GVRD Air Quality Management Fees Bylaw No. 1083, 2008, and present proposed bylaw amendments to the Climate Action Committee for GVRD Board approval Advise BC Environmental Assessment Office of Metro Vancouver’s participation in complete working group related to George Massey Tunnel Replacement Project Initiate review and revision of Ecological Health Action Plan, including broad pending consultation process Complete Urban Forest Adaptation Guidelines complete
2nd Quarter
Review proposals made to the three Sustainability Innovation Funds and make complete recommendations to the Board on proposals to support in the 2016-2017 period. Prepare fifth annual Caring for the Air report and expand outreach complete Report on the development of the next phase of the energy and greenhouse gas in progress reduction program for small- and medium-sized businesses Launch website to assist electric vehicle owners living in strata buildings to access in progress charging Review workplan and consultation process for Invasive Species project in progress
Initiate consultation on proposed amendments to Non-road Diesel Engine pending Emission Regulation Participate in environmental assessment processes as requested in progress
Review Metro Vancouver GrowGreen website for amateur gardeners complete (Sustainability Innovation Fund project initiated in 2015) Report on Water Conservation Research and 2016 Campaign in progress (Sustainability Innovation Fund project initiated in 2015)
Climate Action Committee - Page 103 3rd Quarter
Report on progress on implementation of corporate energy management program pending Implement additional energy and greenhouse gas reduction offset projects that in progress will achieve and maintain Metro Vancouver’s carbon neutral status Present a draft policy on internal carbon pricing, to ensure greenhouse gas in progress emissions are considered in Metro Vancouver business decisions Launch Home Energy Labelling campaign in progress (Sustainability Innovation Fund project initiated in 2015) Initiate consultation on proposed regulatory mechanisms to reduce discharge of pending odorous air contaminants from permitted sources Initiate consultation on proposed amendments to Automotive Refinishing pending Regulation Develop new programs in partnership with other levels of government to address pending air quality and greenhouse gas emissions from on-road light- and heavy-duty vehicles Report on the implementation of the Strata Energy Advisor pilot project in progress (Sustainability Innovation Fund project initiated in 2015) Consider approach to greenhouse gas emissions reduction target as a component pending of Metro 2040, the regional growth strategy 4th Quarter
Propose amendments to Automotive Refinishing Emission Regulation Bylaw, for pending Board adoption Adopt Integrated Regional Climate Action Strategy pending Report on the results of the Smart Drive Challenge in progress (Sustainability Innovation Fund project initiated in 2015) Participate in environmental assessment processes as requested pending
Consider proposed 2017 climate action, air quality, environmental planning and pending energy programs and budget Engage with external agencies on proposed regulatory mechanisms to reduce pending emissions from residential wood burning Report on Reducing Grease in Sewers – Behaviour Change Pilot Project pending (Sustainability Innovation Fund project initiated in 2015)
Climate Action Committee - Page 104 Page 1 of 2 5.6 ATTACHMENT 2
Army Corps halts Gateway Pacific Terminal permitting process
Posted 5/9/2016
Release no. 16-015
Contact Patricia Graesser 206-764-3760 [email protected] After careful consideration of all the information available to him, Seattle District Commander Col. John Buck has determined the potential impacts to the Lummi Nation’s usual and accustomed (U&A) fishing rights from the proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal are greater than de minimis. Because the district has determined the effects to the Lummi’s rights are more than de minimis and because the Lummi maintain their objections to this proposal, the project cannot be permitted by the Corps. In 2015 the Seattle District received a request from the Lummi Nation for the Corps to deny a permit requested for the GPT project proposed by Pacific International Holdings, LLC. (PIH). The Lummi cited impacts to their usual and accustomed treaty rights and included affidavits about their fishing practices and statements about potential impacts from the construction and operation of the terminal. The Lummi Nation signed the Treaty of Point Elliot in 1855, which established the Suquamish Port Madison, Tulalip, Swinomish, and Lummi reservations and guaranteed fishing rights in perpetuity at each tribes’ Usual and Accustomed (U&A) fishing areas. The GPT project area is included in their U&A fishing area. “I have thoroughly reviewed thousands of pages of submittals from the Lummi Nation and Pacific International Holdings,” said Col. Buck. “I have also reviewed my staff’s determination that the Gateway Pacific Terminal would have a greater than de minimis impact on the Lummi Nation’s U&A rights, and I have determined the project is not permittable as currently proposed.” Both the Lummi Nation and Pacific International Holdings, LLC, provided voluminous information regarding fishing practices, potential impacts, and mitigation to support their positions. The district’s evaluation of effects of the proposal on the Lummi’s U&A fishing rights is undertaken to fulfill the federal government’s responsibility to protect treaty rights. The Corps may not permit a project that abrogates treaty rights. As part of its evaluation of the permit application for the Gateway Pacific Terminal proposal at Cherry Point near Ferndale, Washington, the Corps had been overseeing development of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement consistent with National Environmental Policy Act requirements until the applicant suspended this work April 1. As part of standard regulatory procedures, the Corps has continued evaluating the proposal consistent with the requirements of other federal laws and conducting consultations as needed consistent with the requirements of the Endangered Species Act, the National Historic Preservation Act, and our tribal treaty trust responsibility. Consistent with standard regulatory process, if any one of the Corps’ required substantive evaluations concludes with a finding the proposal cannot be permitted, then the project proponent is notified of such finding and advised the project is not permittable. PIH was notified the GPT Project as currently planned is not permittable, and they requested a decision on the application. Because this proposal
Climate Action Committee - Page 105 http://www.nws.usace.army.mil/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/Print.aspx?PortalId=27&Mod... 5/13/2016 Page 2 of 2
cannot be permitted due to effects on the Lummi Nation’s treaty rights and because of the Lummi Nation’s objection to this proposal, Col. Buck denied this project without prejudice. If in the future the Lummi Nation withdraws its objections to the proposal, the proponent could reinitiate processing of the application. A number of other tribes have expressed concern about effects of the proposal on their treaty rights, so if processing of the application resumes, consultation with those tribes would occur as needed to collect information and make decisions with respect to effects of the proposal on their rights.
18252072 Climate Action Committee - Page 106 http://www.nws.usace.army.mil/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/Print.aspx?PortalId=27&Mod... 5/13/2016 5.6 ATTACHMENT 3
June 2016 Air Quality Near Railway Lines Used by Coal Trains Preliminary Summary of Data from White Rock and Delta
Climate Action Committee - Page 107 This report was prepared by the Air Quality and Climate Change Division of Metro Vancouver.
Cover Photo: Julie Saxton
Published: June 2016.
Metro Vancouver would like to acknowledge the involvement of staff at the Corporation of Delta and the City of White Rock in assisting with securing monitoring locations for these studies. Metro Vancouver would also like to acknowledge the assistance provided by Delta Golf Course in providing access to the Delta Golf Course monitoring site.
Questions on the report should be directed to [email protected] or the Metro Vancouver Information Centre at 604-432-6200.
Contact us: Metro Vancouver Air Quality and Climate Change Division 4330 Kingsway, Burnaby, BC V5H 4G8 604-432-6200 www.metrovancouver.org
Disclaimer and Conditions:
1. Permission is granted to produce or reproduce these data, or any substantial part of them, for personal, non-commercial, educational and informational purposes only, provided that the data are not modified or altered and provided that this disclaimer notice is included in any such production or reproduction.
2. While the information in these data is believed to be accurate, these data and all of the information contained therein are provided “as is” without warranty of any kind, whether express or implied. All implied warranties, including, without limitation, implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, are expressly disclaimed by Metro Vancouver and the Fraser Valley Regional District. Metro Vancouver reserves the right to update data files from time to time and will not be held responsible for the validity of the archives maintained by other parties. It is the user’s responsibility to ensure that the data is up-to-date and to follow-up with Metro Vancouver should any questions related to the data arise.
3. The information provided in these data is intended for educational and informational purposes only. These data are not intended to endorse or recommend any particular product, material or service provider nor is it intended as a substitute for engineering, legal or other professional advice. Such advice should be sought from qualified professionals.
Climate Action Committee - Page 108
Air quality monitoring data collected in White Rock and Delta between June 2014 and May 2015 are summarized in this preliminary report and compared with applicable ambient air quality objectives.
Introduction
Railway lines carrying trains that transport both people and goods run throughout Metro Vancouver, sometimes in close proximity to residential areas and parks. Concerns have been raised about air quality impacts related to the movement and handling of coal in the region, and particularly the effects of transporting coal by rail. Monitoring air quality in the vicinity of coal trains to assess the level of coal dust in airborne particulate matter and the extent of impacts of coal dust from trains is of interest for governments and researchers around the world. The body of work generated is expected to provide a broader understanding of the levels of coal particles in the environment, better inform environmental and health risk assessments, and assist in making regulatory decisions related to the movement and handling of coal.
In support of a Corporation of Delta initiative to assess the level of coal dust arising from trains, Metro Vancouver collected samples of airborne particulate matter in Tsawwassen during a preliminary study conducted in the summer of 2013 and had the samples analyzed for coal dust. Results from the analysis of these samples indicated that a small proportion of the particles present (estimated at 5%) in the coarse
(PM10-2.5) and fine fractions (PM2.5) of airborne particulate matter were coal dust. Identified coal particles were predominantly found to be in the size range 3 µm to 1 mm and therefore would be expected to be found more commonly in the coarse fraction, total suspended particulate matter or dustfall than in the fine particulate matter (PM2.5) fraction. In work conducted in Washington State, researchers also suggested that the larger sized particles arising during the passage of trains were associated with coal dust.1
Following the preliminary study of 2013, Metro Vancouver undertook additional air quality monitoring in Delta and White Rock in 2014 and 2015 in the vicinity of railway lines that carry coal trains. This report reflects the 2014 and 2015 studies.
Inhalable particulate matter (PM10) monitoring was conducted in Delta at three locations near railway lines as well as in a residential location between June 2014 and May 2015. The work was done in cooperation with the Corporation of Delta and coordinated with the Corporation of Delta’s dustfall monitoring study.
Monitoring in White Rock took place in September and October 2014 using Metro Vancouver’s Mobile Air Monitoring Unit (MAMU) and the existing particulate sampler Coal train adjacent to the samplers at the Delta Golf Course site. located at White Rock City Hall.
1 Jaffe, D. A., Hof, G., Malashanka, S., Putz, J., Thayer, J., Fry, J. L., Ayres, B., and Pierce, J. R., Diesel particulate matter emission factors and air quality implications from in-service rail in Washington State, USA, Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2014, 5(2), 344-351.
2 | Page
Climate Action Committee - Page 109 Sampling Methodology
Delta
Monitoring was undertaken in Delta using five E-samplers located at four sites: Delta Golf Course, John Oliver Park, North 40, and 64 Street Greenway (Figure 1). Two instruments, located at approximately 15 m and 50 m from the railway line, were installed in John Oliver Park. Instruments at the Delta Golf Course and North 40 sites were also located about 10 m to 15 m from the railway track. The 64 Street Greenway site was in a residential area, approximately 900 m from the railway line.
Figure 1 The locations of the Delta study monitoring sites are indicated in red. The nearest Lower Fraser Valley ambient air quality monitoring network stations, North Delta and Richmond South, are indicated in blue. The E-samplers took measurements of PM10 continuously at one minute resolution. The continuous measurements were supplemented by the collection of PM10 onto filters over a period of approximately one month, which occurred four times during the course of the study, once in each season. Filter-based
PM10 sampling was chosen for coal particle analysis because as noted earlier, coal particles were expected to be more abundant in this size fraction. Wind speed and direction, temperature, and pressure were also recorded at one minute resolution by meteorological sensors mounted on the E-samplers. The results
presented and discussed in this report are based on 1-hour and rolling 24-hour average PM10 concentrations.
3 | Page
Climate Action Committee - Page 110 White Rock
In White Rock, MAMU was parked parallel to the promenade, near the western end of the municipal parking lot (49.02370° N, 122.81467° W), less than 10 metres from the railway track. Nine air contaminants were measured continuously during the White Rock study: nitric oxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ground-
level ozone (O3), PM2.5, PM10, carbon monoxide (CO), sulphur
dioxide (SO2), black carbon (BC), and UV-absorbing particulate (UVPM). Meteorological data were collected by instruments mounted on a 10 metre mast and included wind speed and direction, temperature, and relative humidity. Non-continuous sampling of the coarse (PM10-2.5) and fine (PM2.5) fractions of
PM10 onto separate filters was also undertaken at the MAMU location, to provide samples for coal particle analysis. Air contaminant concentrations from MAMU averaged over periods of at least one hour are presented and discussed in this report.
A non-continuous particulate matter sampler has been operated at White Rock City Hall since 1973.2 The Partisol dichotomous sampler currently installed at this location collects The MAMU at White Rock Promenade. th both PM10 and PM2.5 samples every 6 day, which allowed the coarse (PM10-2.5) and fine (PM2.5) fractions of PM10 to be collected MAMU can be used for air quality monitoring onto separate filters for coal particle analysis. in specialized studies, compliance monitoring, Coal Particle Analysis “hot spot” evaluations and emergencies. The instrumentation contained within MAMU is At the outset of this study, it was recognized that there are comparable to that found at ambient air limitations with the methods currently used to quantify coal quality monitoring network stations and data content in samples of particulate matter. Metro Vancouver issued are collected and validated in the same way as a Request for Proposals to laboratories in Canada, the US and data from monitoring stations. Australia in an attempt to identify improved methods for coal particle analysis, but ultimately, contracted with laboratories using the same analytical methods that have been employed for previous studies.
Particulate matter filters from Delta and White Rock were analyzed for the presence of coal particles by an external contract laboratory using scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectrometry (SEM/EDS). Results and Discussion
Ambient air quality objectives
Ambient air quality objectives are levels of air contaminants that are considered acceptable and generally protective of human health and the environment, based on current knowledge about the effects of air
2 Station Information: Lower Fraser Valley Air Quality Monitoring Network, Metro Vancouver, December 2012.
4 | Page
Climate Action Committee - Page 111 contaminants.3 Metro Vancouver has ambient air quality objectives based on both short-term averaging periods and annual averages (Table 1). While it is informative to compare data to annual objectives, it is not appropriate to formally compare averages over the sampling period for the Delta and White Rock studies to the annual average, given that both took place over periods of less than 12 months and are not representative of an entire year.
Table 1: Ambient air quality objectives applicable in Metro Vancouver 1-hour 8-hour 24-hour Annual 3 3 PM10 -- -- 50 µg/m 20 µg/m 3 3 PM2.5 -- -- 25 µg/m 8 µg/m NO2 106 ppb -- -- 21 ppb O3 82 ppb 65 ppb -- -- SO2 75 ppb -- 48 ppb 11 ppb CO 26.2 ppm 8.7 ppm ------indicates there is no objective for this averaging period
Data collected in Delta
Study sampling was conducted from June/July 2014 to May 2015. PM10 concentrations measured in Delta
were compared with PM10 measurements for the same period from two air quality monitoring network stations nearest to Delta as well as a network station in an agricultural area in the Lower Fraser Valley. The summarized data are shown in Table 2.
Table 2: PM10 concentrations from measurements made at study sites in Delta and selected air quality monitoring network stations.
Maximum 1-hour PM10 Maximum 24-hour PM10 Average PM10 Station concentration concentration concentration (µg/m3) (µg/m3) (µg/m3) Delta Golf Course 102.8 30.3 8.1 John Oliver Park 15 m 63.9 33.8 10.3 John Oliver Park 50 m 71.8 36.3 9.8 North 40 101.7 31.8 9.3 64 Street Greenway 57.3 27.4 8.1 Richmond – Airport* 98.5 33.5 11.3 Burnaby South* 50.6 33.7 9.2 Abbotsford Airport* 97.6 40.8 13.5
* Data validation currently in progress for 2015 network station data.
3 Further information about the ambient air quality objectives applicable in Metro Vancouver is available at: http://www.metrovancouver.org/services/air-quality/AirQualityPublications/AQOFactsheet.pdf.
5 | Page
Climate Action Committee - Page 112 PM10 concentrations measured in Delta were generally comparable to those measured at the network stations for maximum 1-hour, maximum 24-hour and study average metrics. Levels of PM10 at the 64 Street Greenway site in the residential area were the lowest concentrations measured during the study period at both the study sites and comparison ambient air quality monitoring network stations.
No exceedances of the ambient air quality objective for PM10 occurred during the study period and the average concentration over the course of the study (10 months) was considerably lower than the annual average-based ambient air quality objective of 50 µg/m3. Intermittent, very short-term elevated concentrations (‘spikes’) were measured occasionally, giving rise to maximum 1-hour concentrations of approximately 100 µg/m3 at two of the study sites. However, these short term levels are comparable to concentrations measured in both urban (Richmond) and rural (Abbotsford) areas in the airshed.
More detailed examination of the 1-hour data indicated that the number of short-term spikes in PM10 concentrations, defined for this study as 1-hour average concentrations over 50 µg/m3, was higher at some sites than others (Table 3), although at all sites these spikes occurred less than 0.2% of the time.
Table 3: Number of occurrences of PM10 concentration spikes during the monitoring phase of the Delta study.
Number of hours of PM10 Number of hours of Station concentration >50 µg/m3 data collected Delta Golf Course 4 6956 John Oliver Park 15 m 9 7288 John Oliver Park 50 m 12 7286 North 40 9 6678 64 Street Greenway 3 6908 Richmond – Airport* 4 7322 Burnaby South* 1 7227 Abbotsford Airport* 58 6650
* Data validation currently in progress for 2015 network station data.
Sources of PM10 in the region typically include wind-blown dust from construction, demolition and agricultural activities, combustion such as residential wood heating and open burning, industrial activities, and transportation on roads and railways. Comparison of measurements made in Delta with data from the monitoring network shows that in urban areas, spikes in PM10 concentrations occurred at approximately the same frequency as at the Delta study sites. In contrast, in the more rural surroundings
of Abbotsford Airport in which wind-blown agriculture-related dust can influence PM10 levels, occurrences are more frequent, though still less than 1% of the total hours.
Analysis of filter samples conducted by a contract laboratory indicated the presence of coal in all of the samples collected. In general, the proportion of coal detected, as a percentage of the total particles captured, was higher for samples collected at John Oliver Park and Delta Golf Course than at the other sampling sites. Notably, coal particles were also identified in samples collected at 64 Street Greenway, at times as a substantial fraction (more than one-third) of the particles present. Evaluation of these results, in conjunction with analysis of dustfall done by the Corporation of Delta and previously of samples collected in Tsawwassen by Metro Vancouver, suggests that the presence of airborne coal particles may be influenced by both local sources as well as other sources creating a ‘background’ level in the region.
6 | Page
Climate Action Committee - Page 113 To further assess the influence of localized sources, wind data (wind speed and wind direction) were analyzed. At all of the study sites, wind data may have been affected by the surrounding local environment because of practical limitations on the placement heights of the instrumentation. The instruments at 64 Street Greenway were mounted on a pole with wind measurements made E-sampler with wind instrumentation at the 64 Street at a height of approximately four metres, allowing the Greenway site. most representative wind data to be collected at this site. At Delta Golf Course, John Oliver Park, and North 40, wind data were collected at a height of approximately two metres and therefore potentially subject to more interference during certain times of year due to the growth of surrounding vegetation.
Wind rose charts (Figure 2) show how often winds blew from defined directions and also provide wind speed categorization for each direction during the study measurement period.
Wind data indicate that the highest wind speeds were measured at the residential site at 64 Street Greenway, particularly from a southeasterly direction. The area southeast of the 64 Street Greenway is relatively open, due to low-lying hedges and vegetation, and offers potential for exposure to wind-blown soil dust in periods when the surrounding fields lack vegetative cover. The railway line also lies about 900 m to the southeast of this site and emissions associated with rail transportation may contribute to the overall PM10 levels occurring in the area.
At Delta Golf Course, the prevalent wind direction was easterly. The railway line was immediately to the west-southwest of the instrument, a direction from which winds were light and relatively infrequent. Calm winds accounted for almost 40% of the data collection period at Delta Golf Course. The detection of higher coal particle levels in the samples at this site than in the regional background (64 Street Greenway) samples suggested that coal dust from coal trains can occur beyond the railway track area in relatively calm conditions. A unique feature of this site was the use of a section of this railway line for marshalling coal trains, as illustrated in the photograph on page 1. It is possible that greater exposure to coal dust may occur when a load is stationary and present for a longer period than the transient presence that occurs during the passage of a train carrying coal. However, records were not available from train companies to determine the frequency and duration of temporary marshalling next to Delta Golf Course to compare the lengths of time that a coal train was present near each site.
At the North 40 and John Oliver Park sites the prevailing wind was from the east, similar to Delta Golf Course, but during approximately one-third of the sampling time, southerly and southeasterly winds occurred. Since the railway line lies to the south of the North 40 and John Oliver Park sites, if coal dust arises from the passage of coal trains, it would be expected to be seen in the samples from these sites.
The fraction of coal particles in samples from North 40 was generally lower than samples collected at the John Oliver Park and Delta Golf Course sites. This appears to contrast with the results reported by the Corporation of Delta from dustfall monitoring collocated at John Oliver Park 15m, North 40 and Delta Golf 4 Course. However, although dustfall is not directly comparable with airborne PM10, the size distribution
4 Coal Dust Monitoring Update report, agenda item F17, March 30, 2015 Council Meeting, https://delta.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/118680?preview=118863.
7 | Page
Climate Action Committee - Page 114 analysis from the Corporation of Delta’s study indicated that the proportion of coal particles found in the smallest size fractions (between 1 µm and 10 µm) was generally lower at North 40 than John Oliver Park,
which is consistent with the findings from the PM10 analysis done for this study.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Figure 2: Wind roses showing the frequency of winds blowing from the directions indicated on the compass at (a) Delta Golf Course, (b) John Oliver Park, (c) North 40, and (d) 64 Street Greenway. Data collected in White Rock
Air contaminants were monitored in White Rock for a period of approximately five weeks. After monitoring started, this period was found to coincide with a time during which train traffic was more limited than usual due to railway line maintenance activities.
Concentrations of key air contaminants measured in White Rock are summarized in Table 4.
8 | Page
Climate Action Committee - Page 115 Table 4: Summary of air contaminant concentrations from continuous data measured using MAMU at White Rock Promenade for the period 17:00 September 08, 2014 to 08:00 October 15, 2014. Maximum Average concentration concentration 3 PM10 (1-hour, µg/m ) 54.9 13.9 3 PM10 (rolling 24-hour, µg/m ) 24.5 See 1 hour data 3 PM2.5 (1-hour, µg/m ) 28.1 6.2 3 PM2.5 (rolling 24-hour, µg/m ) 15.8 See 1 hour data NO2 (ppb) 28.5 7.2 O3 (ppb) 53.5 17.2 SO2 (ppb) 5.4 0.5 CO (ppm) 0.41 0.15 No exceedances of short-term ambient air quality objectives were recorded during the data collection period. Furthermore, examination of the 1-hour particulate matter data (not shown) indicated that short- 3 term spikes, defined for this study as 1-hour average concentrations over 50 µg/m for PM10 and over 3 20 µg/m for PM2.5, occurred infrequently, representing 0.1% and 0.5% of the valid PM10 and PM2.5 data collected respectively.
For comparison, measurements of the same pollutants at Vancouver Airport, the nearest station at which comprehensive air contaminant data are measured (including PM10), are summarized in Table 5.
Table 5: Summary of air contaminant concentrations from continuous data measured at the air quality monitoring network station at Richmond – Vancouver Airport for the period 17:00 September 08, 2014 to 08:00 October 15, 2014. Maximum Average concentration concentration 3 PM10 (1-hour, µg/m ) 45.1 12.9 3 PM10 (rolling 24-hour, µg/m ) 26.3 See 1 hour data 3 PM2.5 (1-hour, µg/m ) 25.7 6.8 3 PM2.5 (rolling 24-hour, µg/m ) 15.1 See 1 hour data NO2 (ppb) 49.0 15.0 O3 (ppb) 50.2 12.1 SO2 (ppb) 5.7 0.8 CO (ppm) 0.90 0.24 Comparing the data from Table 4 and Table 5, it is clear that air contaminant concentrations measured in White Rock were generally similar to measurements made in Richmond over the same period, however, some small differences are noteworthy. Peak (maximum 1-hour concentration) and average levels of nitrogen dioxide and carbon monoxide were higher at the Vancouver Airport station than in White Rock. Since these two air contaminants are indicative of combustion activities such as vehicle operation, the data suggest that combustion sources had less influence on air quality in White Rock than in Richmond during the study period. In contrast, measured maximum short-term (1-hour) concentrations of particulate matter were slightly higher in White Rock than at Vancouver Airport. Particulate matter concentrations at the White Rock MAMU site may be influenced by the proximity to natural sources of particulate matter, such as sand and sea salt, as well as the emissions associated with train traffic and other dust-generating activities such as any nearby construction and maintenance.
PM10 data from White Rock were also compared with those from the Delta study sites over the White Rock study period (Table 6). Maximum and average concentrations in White Rock were higher than those
9 | Page
Climate Action Committee - Page 116 measured at the residential 64 Street Greenway site and generally similar to concentrations measured at the Delta sites near railway lines.
Table 6: Summary of PM10 concentrations from continuous data measured in White Rock and at Delta study sites for the period September 10, 2014 to October 15, 2014.
Maximum 1-hour Maximum 24-hour Average PM10 Station PM10 concentration PM10 concentration concentration (µg/m3) (µg/m3) (µg/m3) MAMU – White Rock 54.9 24.5 13.9 Promenade Delta Golf Course 102.8 25.4 11.4 John Oliver Park 15 m 55.6 28.4 13.8 John Oliver Park 50 m 53.2 27.8 12.6 North 40 86.8 24.0 11.4 64 Street Greenway 35.1 18.5 9.7 The results for White Rock represent a slightly shorter time range (18:00 September 10, 2014 to 08:00 October 15, 2014), due to data availability from the instrument.
Short-term (1-hour) peak concentrations were generally higher near railway lines in White Rock and Delta than at Vancouver Airport during the White Rock study period. However, the results from the Delta study described above show that short-term peaks of the magnitudes seen at the Delta and White Rock study sites can be observed throughout the airshed.
Analysis of the number of short-term spikes in concentration can help in the assessment of whether air quality anomalies have been found at a monitoring location. The analysis of data from selected stations for the White Rock data collection period (Table 7) indicates that elevated short-term concentrations occur infrequently, even close to the sections of railway lines monitored in White Rock and Delta.
Table 7: Number of occurrences of PM10 concentration spikes during the monitoring phase of the White Rock study.
Number of hours of PM10 concentration Number of hours of data Station >50 µg/m3 examined White Rock MAMU 1 803 Delta Golf Course 2 831 John Oliver Park 15 m 2 831 John Oliver Park 50 m 3 831 North 40 1 830 64 Street Greenway 0 831 Richmond – Airport 0 828 Burnaby South 0 830
Data in this table represent a slightly shorter time range (18:00 September 10, 2014 to 08:00 October 15, 2014) for White Rock than the other stations shown (00:00 September 10, 2014 to 23:00 October 15, 2014).
Samples of particulate matter collected onto filters over two-week periods provided the particulate matter concentrations shown in Table 8. The results from these instruments were comparable to the average concentrations calculated from the continuous measurements (Table 4) and indicate that particulate matter levels were similar close to the railway line, at the Promenade, and approximately 0.5 km away at City Hall.
10 | Page
Climate Action Committee - Page 117 Table 8: Summary of particulate matter concentrations from non-continuous measurements made at White Rock City Hall and White Rock Promenade. Concentration (µg/m3) Station 12-25 Sep 2014 12-25 Sep 2014 26 Sep-10 Oct 2014 26 Sep-10 Oct 2014 PM2.5 PM10-2.5 FPM2.5 PM10-2.5 White Rock 6 6 6 6 City Hall White Rock 7 6 7 6 Promenade Coal particle identification was carried out using the filter samples. The results of the analysis suggested that airborne coal particles can be present in White Rock. The levels of coal particles were highly variable and similar to the levels found in Delta.
MAMU was well situated for collecting representative wind data at the Promenade location. The data are summarized in Figure 3. The railway track runs approximately parallel to the shoreline in an east-southeast to west-northwest direction in the vicinity of the MAMU site.
Figure 3 Wind rose showing the frequency of winds blowing from the directions indicated on the compass for the MAMU at the Promenade in White Rock. More detailed examination of the daytime and nighttime wind data (not shown) indicated that land and sea breeze type behaviour often occurred, suggesting that daytime train traffic as well as sea spray and wind-blown sand may have influenced measured air quality during the day and at night, road traffic and emissions from the neighbouring residential area were likely to have influenced air quality measurements.
11 | Page
Climate Action Committee - Page 118 Preliminary Conclusions
Average particulate matter levels near railway lines are Coal train passing John Oliver Park generally comparable to those found elsewhere in the region. Analysis of very short-term (1-minute) data has not been presented in this summary report, however, results reported here from Delta Golf Course, where stationary loaded coal trains were anticipated to have been present at times for periods longer than the time taken for a moving coal train to pass, suggest that local After coal train passage (John Oliver Park) airborne particulate levels can become elevated relative to other parts of the region while coal is in close proximity to a location.
Prior to contracting with a commercial laboratory to conduct coal particle analysis, Metro Vancouver anticipated that there were limitations with the methods currently used to quantify coal content. These limitations became evident over the course of the analysis, resulting in a high degree of variability and lack of repeatability in the coal content results. Metro Vancouver has been trying to resolve these issues, including repeat analyses of the same samples.
Study results pertaining to total PM10 and PM2.5, other air contaminants, and meteorological data are presented in this report, but it is anticipated that an addendum will be prepared to provide additional information on coal analysis when the analytical issues are more fully addressed.
Due to the transient nature of dust from coal trains, further analysis of more highly time-resolved data (1- minute data) in conjunction with photographic and video records of train movements will be necessary to assess whether there are any significant short-term impacts on air quality in the vicinity of railway lines carrying coal trains due to the transportation of coal.
12 | Page
18643127 Climate Action Committee - Page 119 5.6 ATTACHMENT 4 FOREWORD
We can’t ignore climate change anymore. Just about everywhere today, we state experience its ill effects – from stronger storms and torrential downpours to soaring temperatures and more wildfires. In this year’s State of the Air Report, we look at the efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions that cause climate change. We look at the Paris Agreement, of which aims to prevent the average global temperature from rising over 2°C above pre-industrial levels. We also look at B.C. policies to reduce concentrations of air pollutants like particulate matter (PM2.5) and the number of air quality-related illnesses and deaths. the We have a timely article on how British Columbians can deal with wildfires, a regular summer phenomenon anticipated to increase in frequency with global climate change. It is impossible to completely stop these fires, but having a plan in place allows us to better prepare for them and the smoke pollution they create. 2016 air We also look at how B.C.’s air zones are doing toward achieving the Canadian Ambient Air Quality Standards for PM2.5 and ground-level ozone (O3). This BC LUNG ASSOCIATION report has important information on when and why PM2.5 concentrations Celebrating the are at their highest in certain air zones, together with what’s being done to Clean Air Month of June manage it. Finally, we have a report on the BC Lung Association’s 13th Annual Air Quality and Health Workshop. This year’s distinguished panel of international experts presented evidence on a wide range of potential air pollution health effects CONTENTS lesser known than – but just as important as – respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. These include low birth weight and preterm birth; anxiety, depression Climate Change 2 and suicide; cognitive decline and dementia among adults; insulin resistance or 4 How to Prepare for sensitivity among type 2 diabetes patients; and childhood obesity. Wildfire Smoke Once again, thank you to all the individuals and agencies who were involved in the 2016 State of the Air Report. It’s a testament to their hard work and Air Quality Impacts on Health: 5 dedication that we have this newly updated document to guide us as we care Beyond the Heart and Lungs for and protect air quality in our province. 6 B.C. Air Zones 8 Pollution Levels: How Does B.C. Measure Up? 10 Trends: Air Pollution in B.C. Through the Years SCOTT MCDONALD President and CEO, BC Lung Association 11 Updates from Partner Agencies 16 Contact Information of Agencies
1 Climate Action Committee - Page 120 Climate change is a global crisis. It is the result of a build-up What You Can Do of “heat-trapping” greenhouse gases (GHG) in our atmosphere. The build-up is a consequence of human activities-such as how Here are some suggestions on how you can help the world meet its 2ºC we produce energy, how we farm, how we manufacture goods target, while improving air quality in climate and how we use those goods. Climate change is here and it ap- your community (for more details visit pears that the risks to health are changing. For example, we are www.cleanairbc.ca ). change seeing a lengthening allergy season, insects that carry disease Reduce your transportation emissions: moving to new areas and intensifying extreme weather events. 1. Drive less and give your car a Climate change may seem an insurmountable problem, but we ment include: increasing the level forest stewardship, sea level rise, break. Consider walking, cycling, have shown that we can, and we are, making a difference. of ambition (e.g., limit global tem- flood protection, storm surge, high- transit, carpooling, or car sharing. 2 Drive smarter – plan your route, only 5 to 6°C! To help achieve this perature increase to 1.5˚C above pre- way design and rehabilitation, and Paris Agreement accelerate smoothly and goal, all participating countries com- industrial levels), promoting clean opportunities to integrate adapta- economic growth while promoting tion into local government official don’t idle. The 21st Conference of the Par- mitted to decreasing greenhouse “The evidence jobs, delivering mitigation actions to community plans.4 3. Maintain your vehicle – Keep your ties (COP21) was the latest politi- gas emissions as soon as possible – is overwhelming: help decrease GHG emissions, and tire pressure optimal, get regular cal response to climate change, and aiming for “net zero” by the second increasing action on adaptation and Climate Change tune-ups. climate change it was heralded as a great success. half of the century. climate resilience. 4. Consider a cleaner endangers On Earth Day 2016, over 170 coun- and Air Quality Many countries are already on their vehicle (e.g. more tries signed the Paris Agreement, at human health” way to this target through the quick- British Columbia Air pollution including smoke from fuel efficient or UN headquarters, in New York City. ly emerging “green economy” which severe and frequent wildfires, can hybrid car) and scrap – Dr. Margaret Chan, Director- It is the first time we have achieved as a Climate General, World Health includes renewable energy, clean cause adverse respiratory health ef- your older vehicle 5 the universal adoption of a climate Organization, 2014. transportation and green build- Change Leader fects. According to Environment and through B.C.’s “Scrap It” program change agreement internationally. ings. In many countries, solar power Climate Change Canada (2013), “re- Reduce emissions at home: The Agreement is important because In 2008, British Columbia (B.C.) im- has advanced to a point where it is ducing the ambient levels of ground it includes legally binding provisions plemented its revenue neutral car- 1. Avoid using gas powered tools a serious contender for providing level ozone and fine particulate and regular reviews to ensure that bon tax to encourage both the pub- (e.g. lawn mowers, leaf blowers). energy needs. Some developing matter across Canada would have countries stay on track in meeting lic and businesses to reduce fossil 2. Consider a stove or heating countries are adopting renewable significant health benefits, includ- their climate change commitments. fuel use. Considered the most com- appliance that is fueled by energy sources to generate elec- ing reducing the number of prema- prehensive tax of its kind in North propane, natural gas or pellets. tricity thus bypassing other GHG ture deaths by hundreds, reducing A major commitment is to prevent America, it covers over 70% of pro- 3. Say “No” to producing forms of industrial-scale hospital admissions and emergency the average global temperature vincial emissions and returns all rev- backyard burning. power such as coal-fired plants. room visits by thousands, and re- from rising more than 2°C above enues to British Columbians through 4. Know what you are pre-industrial (1850 to 1899) lev- ducing restricted activity days by At the Vancouver Declaration on personal or business tax reductions. buying – look for an els. While it may not seem a sig- millions. These health improve- Clean Growth and Climate Change Since 2008, the province has con- EnerGuide label when nificant temperature increase, one ments would result in several hun- March, 2016, Canada’s First Ministers tinued to adopt policies aimed at buying a home, car or appliance. should consider that the difference 2 dred million dollars in savings for agreed to “build on the momentum reducing GHG emissions. Some of between now and the last ice age is Canada’s medical system.” of the Paris Agreement by develop- these mitigation measures include: ing a concrete plan to achieve Can- increasing sources of renewable en- Actions taken to reduce GHG emis- ada’s international commitments ergy, adopting clean transportation sions will also reduce concentrations Additional Resources through a pan-Canadian frame- alternatives such as electric buses, of other air pollutants. In urban ar- 1 work for clean growth and climate encouraging green building to maxi- eas like B.C.’s Lower Mainland, more http://www.scics.gc.ca/english/conferences. mize energy efficiency, and waste asp?x=1&a=viewdocument&id=2401 change”.1 Broad areas of commit- than half of all GHG emissions are 2 http://bcge.ca/ and pollution control to decrease from vehicles and from heating and 3 http://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/envi- GHG emissions.3 ronment/climate-change/policy-legislation- cooling buildings. Other significant programs/the-green-economy Several B.C. ministries are also sources are the cement industry, 4 http://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/envi- heavy trucks, and non-road equip- ronment/climate-change/policy-legislation- pursuing climate change adapta- programs/adaptation tion measures to prepare for the ment. Improving air quality in these 5 http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/re- anticipated extreme, and increas- areas is likely to see a decrease in leases/2014/climate-health-risks-action/en/ 6 http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/climat/ ingly variable, weather. Adaptation the number of cases of air quality- 6 index-eng.php measures are being considered for related illnesses and death. 2 3 Climate Action Committee - Page 121 Climate change is a global crisis. It is the result of a build-up What You Can Do of “heat-trapping” greenhouse gases (GHG) in our atmosphere. The build-up is a consequence of human activities-such as how Here are some suggestions on how you can help the world meet its 2ºC we produce energy, how we farm, how we manufacture goods target, while improving air quality in climate and how we use those goods. Climate change is here and it ap- your community (for more details visit pears that the risks to health are changing. For example, we are www.cleanairbc.ca ). change seeing a lengthening allergy season, insects that carry disease Reduce your transportation emissions: moving to new areas and intensifying extreme weather events. 1. Drive less and give your car a Climate change may seem an insurmountable problem, but we ment include: increasing the level forest stewardship, sea level rise, break. Consider walking, cycling, have shown that we can, and we are, making a difference. of ambition (e.g., limit global tem- flood protection, storm surge, high- transit, carpooling, or car sharing. 2 Drive smarter – plan your route, only 5 to 6°C! To help achieve this perature increase to 1.5˚C above pre- way design and rehabilitation, and Paris Agreement accelerate smoothly and goal, all participating countries com- industrial levels), promoting clean opportunities to integrate adapta- economic growth while promoting tion into local government official don’t idle. The 21st Conference of the Par- mitted to decreasing greenhouse “The evidence jobs, delivering mitigation actions to community plans.4 3. Maintain your vehicle – Keep your ties (COP21) was the latest politi- gas emissions as soon as possible – is overwhelming: help decrease GHG emissions, and tire pressure optimal, get regular cal response to climate change, and aiming for “net zero” by the second increasing action on adaptation and Climate Change tune-ups. climate change it was heralded as a great success. half of the century. climate resilience. 4. Consider a cleaner endangers On Earth Day 2016, over 170 coun- and Air Quality Many countries are already on their vehicle (e.g. more tries signed the Paris Agreement, at human health” way to this target through the quick- British Columbia Air pollution including smoke from fuel efficient or UN headquarters, in New York City. ly emerging “green economy” which severe and frequent wildfires, can hybrid car) and scrap – Dr. Margaret Chan, Director- It is the first time we have achieved as a Climate General, World Health includes renewable energy, clean cause adverse respiratory health ef- your older vehicle 5 the universal adoption of a climate Organization, 2014. transportation and green build- Change Leader fects. According to Environment and through B.C.’s “Scrap It” program change agreement internationally. ings. In many countries, solar power Climate Change Canada (2013), “re- Reduce emissions at home: The Agreement is important because In 2008, British Columbia (B.C.) im- has advanced to a point where it is ducing the ambient levels of ground it includes legally binding provisions plemented its revenue neutral car- 1. Avoid using gas powered tools a serious contender for providing level ozone and fine particulate and regular reviews to ensure that bon tax to encourage both the pub- (e.g. lawn mowers, leaf blowers). energy needs. Some developing matter across Canada would have countries stay on track in meeting lic and businesses to reduce fossil 2. Consider a stove or heating countries are adopting renewable significant health benefits, includ- their climate change commitments. fuel use. Considered the most com- appliance that is fueled by energy sources to generate elec- ing reducing the number of prema- prehensive tax of its kind in North propane, natural gas or pellets. tricity thus bypassing other GHG ture deaths by hundreds, reducing A major commitment is to prevent America, it covers over 70% of pro- 3. Say “No” to producing forms of industrial-scale hospital admissions and emergency the average global temperature vincial emissions and returns all rev- backyard burning. power such as coal-fired plants. room visits by thousands, and re- from rising more than 2°C above enues to British Columbians through 4. Know what you are pre-industrial (1850 to 1899) lev- ducing restricted activity days by At the Vancouver Declaration on personal or business tax reductions. buying – look for an els. While it may not seem a sig- millions. These health improve- Clean Growth and Climate Change Since 2008, the province has con- EnerGuide label when nificant temperature increase, one ments would result in several hun- March, 2016, Canada’s First Ministers tinued to adopt policies aimed at buying a home, car or appliance. should consider that the difference 2 dred million dollars in savings for agreed to “build on the momentum reducing GHG emissions. Some of between now and the last ice age is Canada’s medical system.” of the Paris Agreement by develop- these mitigation measures include: ing a concrete plan to achieve Can- increasing sources of renewable en- Actions taken to reduce GHG emis- ada’s international commitments ergy, adopting clean transportation sions will also reduce concentrations Additional Resources through a pan-Canadian frame- alternatives such as electric buses, of other air pollutants. In urban ar- 1 work for clean growth and climate encouraging green building to maxi- eas like B.C.’s Lower Mainland, more http://www.scics.gc.ca/english/conferences. mize energy efficiency, and waste asp?x=1&a=viewdocument&id=2401 change”.1 Broad areas of commit- than half of all GHG emissions are 2 http://bcge.ca/ and pollution control to decrease from vehicles and from heating and 3 http://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/envi- GHG emissions.3 ronment/climate-change/policy-legislation- cooling buildings. Other significant programs/the-green-economy Several B.C. ministries are also sources are the cement industry, 4 http://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/envi- heavy trucks, and non-road equip- ronment/climate-change/policy-legislation- pursuing climate change adapta- programs/adaptation tion measures to prepare for the ment. Improving air quality in these 5 http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/re- anticipated extreme, and increas- areas is likely to see a decrease in leases/2014/climate-health-risks-action/en/ 6 http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/climat/ ingly variable, weather. Adaptation the number of cases of air quality- 6 index-eng.php measures are being considered for related illnesses and death. 2 3 Climate Action Committee - Page 122 tia epidemic and the widespread how to prepare for exposure of the population to air BC Lung Air Quality pollutants, decreasing exposure has the potential for substantial public wildfire and Health Workshop health benefits. Two presentations then focused on the major societal air quality impacts on health: challenges of obesity and metabol- beyond the heart and lungs ic syndrome. Dr. Sanjay Rajagopa- smoke lan from the University of Maryland Seasonal wildfires have always been part of spoke about the impact of air pol- summer in British Columbia, but recent years More than 130 participants attended preterm birth due to higher expo- lution on type 2 diabetes. He pre- have been extreme due to the mountain pine the BC Lung Association’s 13th An- sure to air pollution, and called for sented studies demonstrating the nual Air Quality and Health Work- reproductive health professionals adverse effectsof fine particulate beetle infestation and global climate change. shop on February 10, 2016. The goal to recognize its negative effects. exposure on insulin resistance and We simply cannot eliminate smoke pollution, so of this year’s Workshop, “Air Qual- Dr. Frederica Perera from Columbia insulin sensitivity and showed how the best plan is to be prepared for smoke when ity Impacts on Health: Beyond the University, gave the keynote pre- exposure can produce metabolic Heart and Lungs“ was to provide an it arrives. Here is what you can do: overview of the diversity of impacts through which air pollution affects health, with an emphasis on recent tioning. Wildfires often happen when it • Be aware of people who should research uncovering non-traditional take extra care during smoky condi- is hot outside, so it is important to be impacts affecting the life course. tions, including anyone with chronic diseas- aware of the heat-related risks as well Participants heard from a distin- es such as asthma, diabetes, or heart dis- (http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/ guished panel of international ex- ease, as well as pregnant women, infants, pubs/climat/heat-adults-chaleur/in- perts on air pollution and health impacts. All presentations are avail- children, and the elderly. dex-eng.php). able at the BC Lung Association • If you have a respiratory or cardio- • Stay well-hydrated by drinking website (https://bc.lung.ca/protect- vascular disease, work with your doctor to cre- plenty of water, and encourage others to drink your-lungs/air-quality-lung-health/ ate an action plan (http://www.asthma.ca/adults/ water as well – especially children and the elderly. air-quality-health-workshop) along with short videos (https://www.you- sentation illustrating more than 25 changes in mice. Dr. Rob McCon- control/pdf/AsthmaActionPlan_ENG.pdf). Always • If you are travelling in a car with air con- tube.com/playlist?list=PLItqGoXs4J years of detailed studies (ccceh.org) nell from the University of Southern carry your rescue medications with you, make sure ditioning, use it on the recirculate setting. 1X6ZsJfTArKahkUzqqw-qSM) high- she has led to unravel the effects of California followed, by presenting that you have extra at home, and know what to do lighting key themes presented by air pollution on childhood neurode- findings from the Southern Cali- • Everyone should take it easy when the if your rescue medications cannot bring an attack each speaker. velopment. Dr. Melinda Power from fornia Children’s Health Study that air is smoky. The harder you breathe the more under control. Dr. Michael Brauer from UBC opened George Washington University built demonstrated links between air air pollution you inhale. Exercise is definitely on the theme of Dr. Perera’s talk to pollution and childhood obesity. • Listen to your body. If you feel that the smoke the workshop by describing the bur- good for the health of adults and children, but den of disease from well-recognized illustrate the potential impacts of To illustrate other ways in which air is affecting you, try to find cleaner air shelter for smoky days are a good time for less strenuous respiratory and cardiovascular im- air pollution on mental health. She pollution may have unexpected im- a while. Large public buildings such as libraries, com- outdoor activities. pacts of air pollution, estimated to suggested that, while overall evi- pacts, Dr. Gregory Carmichael from munity centers, and shopping malls often have cleaner, be responsible for more than 9000 dence is inconclusive, several stud- the University of Iowa spoke about • Check the air quality readings ies have associated air pollution cooler air than smaller buildings or the outdoors. deaths in Canada (and 3.1 million the effects of atmospheric compo- (http://www.bcairquality.ca/readings/index. exposure with elevated anxiety and If it is smoky in your home globally) in 2013. As air pollution is sition and air pollution on weath- • , portable air html) for B.C, or Metro Vancouver (www. among the leading modifiable risk depressive symptoms, as well as er and climate. He described how cleaners (with HEPA filters or electrostatic precip- AirMap.ca) and national smoke forecasts factors for compromised health, he psychiatric emergencies and suicide. aerosols can alter the balance of Dr. Jennifer Weuve from Rush Medi- itators) can significantly improve the air quality in from BlueSky (http://firesmoke.ca/fore- highlighted the important health the atmosphere-ocean-land climate cal College followed with a review small spaces when doors and windows are closed. casts/BSC00CA12/current/) and FireWork benefits from air quality manage- system and even have impacts on ment. Dr. Stephan van Eeden, from of studies evaluating the impact severe weather, such as intensifying These units cost about $150, but they might be (https://weather.gc.ca/firework/), and check St. Paul’s Hospital, then illustrated of air pollution on cognitive de- tornadoes and monsoons. Dr, Bruce hard to find in the middle of a smoke episode. daily when you know fires are burning. how inhaled pollution can lead to cline and dementia amongst adults. Lanphear of Simon Fraser University If you know that you are sensitive to smoke, it is These studies have found that ex- The best defense is a good offense when impacts beyond the lungs by initi- concluded the workshop by describ- best to purchase one before the smoke arrives. posure to fine particles and traffic- it comes to smoke from wildfires. Some pre-season ating lung inflammation that spills ing how information on air pollution over into the systemic circulation. related air pollution was generally health impacts can be used to mo- • Although portable air cleaners are great, it may be planning will help you breathe as easily as possible To illustrate the life course impacts associated with increased demen- tivate advances in policy, prevention, unhealthy to close your doors and windows through the smoky months. of air pollution, Dr. Tracey Wood- tia risk and cognitive decline. While and air quality management. if temperatures are high and you do not have air condi- ruff from University of California there is a need for further research, described evidence supporting in- Dr. Weuve stressed that given the creased risk for low birth weight and prospect of an oncoming demen- 4 5 Climate Action Committee - Page 123 tia epidemic and the widespread how to prepare for exposure of the population to air BC Lung Air Quality pollutants, decreasing exposure has the potential for substantial public wildfire and Health Workshop health benefits. Two presentations then focused on the major societal air quality impacts on health: challenges of obesity and metabol- beyond the heart and lungs ic syndrome. Dr. Sanjay Rajagopa- smoke lan from the University of Maryland Seasonal wildfires have always been part of spoke about the impact of air pol- summer in British Columbia, but recent years More than 130 participants attended preterm birth due to higher expo- lution on type 2 diabetes. He pre- have been extreme due to the mountain pine the BC Lung Association’s 13th An- sure to air pollution, and called for sented studies demonstrating the nual Air Quality and Health Work- reproductive health professionals adverse effectsof fine particulate beetle infestation and global climate change. shop on February 10, 2016. The goal to recognize its negative effects. exposure on insulin resistance and We simply cannot eliminate smoke pollution, so of this year’s Workshop, “Air Qual- Dr. Frederica Perera from Columbia insulin sensitivity and showed how the best plan is to be prepared for smoke when ity Impacts on Health: Beyond the University, gave the keynote pre- exposure can produce metabolic Heart and Lungs“ was to provide an it arrives. Here is what you can do: overview of the diversity of impacts through which air pollution affects health, with an emphasis on recent tioning. Wildfires often happen when it • Be aware of people who should research uncovering non-traditional take extra care during smoky condi- is hot outside, so it is important to be impacts affecting the life course. tions, including anyone with chronic diseas- aware of the heat-related risks as well Participants heard from a distin- es such as asthma, diabetes, or heart dis- (http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/ guished panel of international ex- ease, as well as pregnant women, infants, pubs/climat/heat-adults-chaleur/in- perts on air pollution and health impacts. All presentations are avail- children, and the elderly. dex-eng.php). able at the BC Lung Association • If you have a respiratory or cardio- • Stay well-hydrated by drinking website (https://bc.lung.ca/protect- vascular disease, work with your doctor to cre- plenty of water, and encourage others to drink your-lungs/air-quality-lung-health/ ate an action plan (http://www.asthma.ca/adults/ water as well – especially children and the elderly. air-quality-health-workshop) along with short videos (https://www.you- sentation illustrating more than 25 changes in mice. Dr. Rob McCon- control/pdf/AsthmaActionPlan_ENG.pdf). Always • If you are travelling in a car with air con- tube.com/playlist?list=PLItqGoXs4J years of detailed studies (ccceh.org) nell from the University of Southern carry your rescue medications with you, make sure ditioning, use it on the recirculate setting. 1X6ZsJfTArKahkUzqqw-qSM) high- she has led to unravel the effects of California followed, by presenting that you have extra at home, and know what to do lighting key themes presented by air pollution on childhood neurode- findings from the Southern Cali- • Everyone should take it easy when the if your rescue medications cannot bring an attack each speaker. velopment. Dr. Melinda Power from fornia Children’s Health Study that air is smoky. The harder you breathe the more under control. Dr. Michael Brauer from UBC opened George Washington University built demonstrated links between air air pollution you inhale. Exercise is definitely on the theme of Dr. Perera’s talk to pollution and childhood obesity. • Listen to your body. If you feel that the smoke the workshop by describing the bur- good for the health of adults and children, but den of disease from well-recognized illustrate the potential impacts of To illustrate other ways in which air is affecting you, try to find cleaner air shelter for smoky days are a good time for less strenuous respiratory and cardiovascular im- air pollution on mental health. She pollution may have unexpected im- a while. Large public buildings such as libraries, com- outdoor activities. pacts of air pollution, estimated to suggested that, while overall evi- pacts, Dr. Gregory Carmichael from munity centers, and shopping malls often have cleaner, be responsible for more than 9000 dence is inconclusive, several stud- the University of Iowa spoke about • Check the air quality readings ies have associated air pollution cooler air than smaller buildings or the outdoors. deaths in Canada (and 3.1 million the effects of atmospheric compo- (http://www.bcairquality.ca/readings/index. exposure with elevated anxiety and If it is smoky in your home globally) in 2013. As air pollution is sition and air pollution on weath- • , portable air html) for B.C, or Metro Vancouver (www. among the leading modifiable risk depressive symptoms, as well as er and climate. He described how cleaners (with HEPA filters or electrostatic precip- AirMap.ca) and national smoke forecasts factors for compromised health, he psychiatric emergencies and suicide. aerosols can alter the balance of Dr. Jennifer Weuve from Rush Medi- itators) can significantly improve the air quality in from BlueSky (http://firesmoke.ca/fore- highlighted the important health the atmosphere-ocean-land climate cal College followed with a review small spaces when doors and windows are closed. casts/BSC00CA12/current/) and FireWork benefits from air quality manage- system and even have impacts on ment. Dr. Stephan van Eeden, from of studies evaluating the impact severe weather, such as intensifying These units cost about $150, but they might be (https://weather.gc.ca/firework/), and check St. Paul’s Hospital, then illustrated of air pollution on cognitive de- tornadoes and monsoons. Dr, Bruce hard to find in the middle of a smoke episode. daily when you know fires are burning. how inhaled pollution can lead to cline and dementia amongst adults. Lanphear of Simon Fraser University If you know that you are sensitive to smoke, it is These studies have found that ex- The best defense is a good offense when impacts beyond the lungs by initi- concluded the workshop by describ- best to purchase one before the smoke arrives. posure to fine particles and traffic- it comes to smoke from wildfires. Some pre-season ating lung inflammation that spills ing how information on air pollution over into the systemic circulation. related air pollution was generally health impacts can be used to mo- • Although portable air cleaners are great, it may be planning will help you breathe as easily as possible To illustrate the life course impacts associated with increased demen- tivate advances in policy, prevention, unhealthy to close your doors and windows through the smoky months. of air pollution, Dr. Tracey Wood- tia risk and cognitive decline. While and air quality management. if temperatures are high and you do not have air condi- ruff from University of California there is a need for further research, described evidence supporting in- Dr. Weuve stressed that given the creased risk for low birth weight and prospect of an oncoming demen- 4 5 Climate Action Committee - Page 124 B.C. air zones reducing PM2.5 emissions from wood combustion sourc- CAAQS will be supported by new emission require- es in the valley (see: http://www.cvrd.bc.ca/2115/Air). ments for major industry, action on motor vehicle emis- The air zone reports have also supported further action sions, collaboration where air pollution crosses provin- in Smithers and Vanderhoof, beginning with a door-to- Air zones cial or international borders, and air zone management door survey to determine the extent of woodstove use are areas within as the basis for monitoring, reporting and taking action in these communities. This important information will a province or on the CAAQS. be used to refine emission estimates and design pro- grams to further reduce residential wood smoke emis- Air zones are areas within a province or territory with territory with similar sions. Vanderhoof is also considering a wide-ranging similar air quality issues. In 2014, the province of B.C. air quality issues. bylaw that would facilitate the shift to cleaner-burning identified seven broad air zones. The province released woodstoves, restrict woodstove use during periods of the first air zone reports in 2015, based on data col- degraded air quality, and ban all yard waste and grass lected between 2011 to 2013.2 These reports showed burning. Within Courtenay and the surrounding Comox that while all monitored areas of the province met the Valley, a number of discussions were initiated to deter- national standards for O3, four communities in two air Figure 1: Summary of B.C. air zones and their colour-coded man- agement level for PM2.5. “Red” air zones include at least one com- mine information needs and next steps. This past year, zones exceeded the national standards for PM2.5: Van- In 2013, provinces and territories across Canada began munity that exceeds the national standard. More rigorous actions the Comox Valley Regional District, the CVRD and the implementing the new national Air Quality Manage- derhoof and Smithers in the Central Interior Air Zone, are expected as the air zone management levels move from green to yellow to orange to red. Where air zones are coloured grey, Regional District of Bulkley Nechako (which includes and Courtenay and Duncan in the Georgia Strait Air there was insufficient air quality data to set management levels. ment System (AQMS), with the goal of a more com- both Smithers and Vanderhoof) all participated in the Zone (see Figure 1). Aside from periods of summer wild- For more information, see: http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/soe/indica- prehensive approach to addressing air quality issues in tors/air/fine_pm.html. Provincial Wood Stove Exchange Program to encourage 1 fire activity, the highest daily concentrations in each of this country. Under the AQMS, the Canadian Ambient the shift to cleaner wood stoves. For more information these communities occurred during the winter, when The first air zone reports have reinforced efforts already Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) drive action to protect on this program and other participating communities, stagnant weather conditions and wood combustion underway in Duncan and the surrounding Cowichan human health and the environment. New CAAQS for see: http://www.bcairquality.ca/topics/wood-stove-ex- sources such as woodstoves and open burning contrib- Valley. The Cowichan Valley Regional District (CVRD) ground-level ozone (O3) and fine particulates (PM2.5) change-program/contact.html. were formally adopted in 2013. Achievement of the uted to periods of poor air quality. was successful in obtaining funding from the Healthy Communities Capacity Building Fund to begin imple- Updated air zone reports for 2012-2014 and 2013-2015 1 See: http://www.bcairquality.ca/plans/pdf/air_quality_man_system_fs.pdf. menting recommendations from Cowichan’s Regional are expected to be released by the Ministry of Environ- 2 See: http://www.bcairquality.ca/reports/air-zone-reports.html. Airshed Protection Strategy – one that is focused on ment during the fall of 2016. 6 7 Climate Action Committee - Page 125 B.C. air zones reducing PM2.5 emissions from wood combustion sourc- CAAQS will be supported by new emission require- es in the valley (see: http://www.cvrd.bc.ca/2115/Air). ments for major industry, action on motor vehicle emis- The air zone reports have also supported further action sions, collaboration where air pollution crosses provin- in Smithers and Vanderhoof, beginning with a door-to- Air zones cial or international borders, and air zone management door survey to determine the extent of woodstove use are areas within as the basis for monitoring, reporting and taking action in these communities. This important information will a province or on the CAAQS. be used to refine emission estimates and design pro- grams to further reduce residential wood smoke emis- Air zones are areas within a province or territory with territory with similar sions. Vanderhoof is also considering a wide-ranging similar air quality issues. In 2014, the province of B.C. air quality issues. bylaw that would facilitate the shift to cleaner-burning identified seven broad air zones. The province released woodstoves, restrict woodstove use during periods of the first air zone reports in 2015, based on data col- degraded air quality, and ban all yard waste and grass lected between 2011 to 2013.2 These reports showed burning. Within Courtenay and the surrounding Comox that while all monitored areas of the province met the Valley, a number of discussions were initiated to deter- national standards for O3, four communities in two air Figure 1: Summary of B.C. air zones and their colour-coded man- agement level for PM2.5. “Red” air zones include at least one com- mine information needs and next steps. This past year, zones exceeded the national standards for PM2.5: Van- In 2013, provinces and territories across Canada began munity that exceeds the national standard. More rigorous actions the Comox Valley Regional District, the CVRD and the implementing the new national Air Quality Manage- derhoof and Smithers in the Central Interior Air Zone, are expected as the air zone management levels move from green to yellow to orange to red. Where air zones are coloured grey, Regional District of Bulkley Nechako (which includes and Courtenay and Duncan in the Georgia Strait Air there was insufficient air quality data to set management levels. ment System (AQMS), with the goal of a more com- both Smithers and Vanderhoof) all participated in the Zone (see Figure 1). Aside from periods of summer wild- For more information, see: http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/soe/indica- prehensive approach to addressing air quality issues in tors/air/fine_pm.html. Provincial Wood Stove Exchange Program to encourage 1 fire activity, the highest daily concentrations in each of this country. Under the AQMS, the Canadian Ambient the shift to cleaner wood stoves. For more information these communities occurred during the winter, when The first air zone reports have reinforced efforts already Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) drive action to protect on this program and other participating communities, stagnant weather conditions and wood combustion underway in Duncan and the surrounding Cowichan human health and the environment. New CAAQS for see: http://www.bcairquality.ca/topics/wood-stove-ex- sources such as woodstoves and open burning contrib- Valley. The Cowichan Valley Regional District (CVRD) ground-level ozone (O3) and fine particulates (PM2.5) change-program/contact.html. were formally adopted in 2013. Achievement of the uted to periods of poor air quality. was successful in obtaining funding from the Healthy Communities Capacity Building Fund to begin imple- Updated air zone reports for 2012-2014 and 2013-2015 1 See: http://www.bcairquality.ca/plans/pdf/air_quality_man_system_fs.pdf. menting recommendations from Cowichan’s Regional are expected to be released by the Ministry of Environ- 2 See: http://www.bcairquality.ca/reports/air-zone-reports.html. Airshed Protection Strategy – one that is focused on ment during the fall of 2016. 6 7 Climate Action Committee - Page 126 In 2015, daily 1-hour maximum con- Ground-level Ozone (O3) Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) centrations ranged from a low of 2 pollution parts per billion (ppb) in Kelowna, Ground-level ozone (O3) is a gas- Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is a reddish- Terrace and Doig River to a high of eous pollutant formed in the air brown gas with a pungent odour 225 ppb in Trail.* Trail was the only from reactions involving nitrogen that results from high-tempera- levels community to exceed the provin- oxides (NOx) and hydrocarbons ture combustion sources found in how does B.C. measure up cial objective of 75 ppb. Concen- in the presence of sunlight. Mo- transportation and industry. Short- trations in North Burnaby (Capitol tor vehicles are a major source of term exposures to elevated levels Hill) were 73 ppb, and there was both NOx and hydrocarbon emis- can cause increased respiratory Summer wildfires were again a dominant factor insufficient data to report SO2 con- sions. Ozone exposure is linked to symptoms. There is also increasing affecting B.C. air quality in 2015. Wildfire season centrations in Prince George (Plaza breathing difficulties, aggravation evidence linking NO2 exposures to began early, and was fueled by record-break- 400). The majority of monitoring of asthma and other lung diseases more serious health effects such ing hot and dry conditions in June and July. The stations in the province recorded and early deaths. as cardiovascular mortality, cancer and reproductive effects. southwest coast was blanketed in smoke in early July, followed by the southern interior in SO2 concentrations below 20 ppb. Ozone concentrations in 2015 late August. Most areas of the province were affected to some degree, although monitoring This included Victoria-James Bay, ranged from 41 to 68 ppb.** The Annual average NO2 concentrations sites in the northwest saw less smoke than elsewhere in the province. which had exceeded the provincial highest levels were observed in the in 2015 ranged from 2 to 18 ppb, with objective the previous year. A study eastern Fraser Valley, specifically the highest levels observed in the In the following, air quality data from several monitoring sites are summarized. Where multiple is currently underway to determine in Hope (67 ppb) and Agassiz (68 western part of Metro Vancouver, in sites are located within a single community, data from the site best reflecting community air whether these improvements are a ppb). In comparison to the national particular, downtown Vancouver. All quality are shown. Where large populations reside near a major source, additional sites may result of the shift to lower-sulphur standard of 63 ppb, which is based monitoring sites reported annually be shown. Data from all available monitoring sites are summarized in the Technical Appendix. fuels and new emission control tech- on a three-year average concentra- averaged NO2 levels below the pro- nology by the cruise ship industry. tion, only Agassiz (64 ppb) exceed- vincial objective of 32 ppb and Met- ed the standard over the period of ro Vancouver’s objective of 21 ppb. Fine Particulate crometres or smaller in diameter. average objective of 8 µg/m3. Seven 2013-2015.. Metro Vancouver issued Hourly concentrations (not shown) PM2.5 affects respiratory and cardio- of these communities also exceeded two ozone-related air quality advi- were also below the provincial ob- Matter (PM2.5) *Based on an annual 99th percentile con- vascular health. Open burning, wild- the 24-hour average objective of 25 centration to allow for comparison to provin- sories during the summer of 2015. jective of 100 ppb. fires, and wood stoves are the major µg/m3, and an additional seven com- cial objective. Maximum 1-hour values listed Fine particulate matter refers to mi- in the Technical Appendix can be compared **Based on the 4th highest daily value over sources of PM2.5 in B.C. Other major munities were within 10% of this level. croscopic particles that are 2.5 mi- to the Metro Vancouver interim objective of 2015. In comparison, the national standard is sources include marine vessels and Wood combustion emissions com- 75 ppb (not-to-be-exceeded level). averaged over a three-year period. diesel vehicles. bined with periods of cold, stagnant In 2015, the shift from older TEOM weather conditions during the fall and (Tapered Element Oscillating Micro- winter led to periodic spikes of PM2.5 balance) instruments (dark blue bars) levels in many of B.C.’s valley com- to the new U.S. EPA-approved Federal munities. In addition, wildfires were a Equivalent Method (FEM) monitors contributing factor to the high PM2.5 (light blue bars) was nearing comple- levels recorded in the southern inte- tion across the monitoring network. rior and coastal areas. This change is being implemented because the FEM monitors provide Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) a more complete measure of PM2.5 Sulphur dioxide (SO2) is a colour- than the TEOM monitors. As a result, less gas with a pungent odour. higher reported concentrations may Short-term exposures to elevated be expected due to these changes. levels can aggravate asthma and Annual average PM2.5 concentrations increase respiratory symptoms. ranged from 2.9 µg/m3 in Powell River The largest sources of SO2 in B.C. 3 to 9.7 µg/m in Houston and Golden. include the upstream oil and gas A total of 15 monitored communi- sector, metal smelting facilities, ties exceeded the provincial annual pulp mills and marine vessels.
8 9 Climate Action Committee - Page 127 In 2015, daily 1-hour maximum con- Ground-level Ozone (O3) Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) centrations ranged from a low of 2 pollution parts per billion (ppb) in Kelowna, Ground-level ozone (O3) is a gas- Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is a reddish- Terrace and Doig River to a high of eous pollutant formed in the air brown gas with a pungent odour 225 ppb in Trail.* Trail was the only from reactions involving nitrogen that results from high-tempera- levels community to exceed the provin- oxides (NOx) and hydrocarbons ture combustion sources found in how does B.C. measure up cial objective of 75 ppb. Concen- in the presence of sunlight. Mo- transportation and industry. Short- trations in North Burnaby (Capitol tor vehicles are a major source of term exposures to elevated levels Hill) were 73 ppb, and there was both NOx and hydrocarbon emis- can cause increased respiratory Summer wildfires were again a dominant factor insufficient data to report SO2 con- sions. Ozone exposure is linked to symptoms. There is also increasing affecting B.C. air quality in 2015. Wildfire season centrations in Prince George (Plaza breathing difficulties, aggravation evidence linking NO2 exposures to began early, and was fueled by record-break- 400). The majority of monitoring of asthma and other lung diseases more serious health effects such ing hot and dry conditions in June and July. The stations in the province recorded and early deaths. as cardiovascular mortality, cancer and reproductive effects. southwest coast was blanketed in smoke in early July, followed by the southern interior in SO2 concentrations below 20 ppb. Ozone concentrations in 2015 late August. Most areas of the province were affected to some degree, although monitoring This included Victoria-James Bay, ranged from 41 to 68 ppb.** The Annual average NO2 concentrations sites in the northwest saw less smoke than elsewhere in the province. which had exceeded the provincial highest levels were observed in the in 2015 ranged from 2 to 18 ppb, with objective the previous year. A study eastern Fraser Valley, specifically the highest levels observed in the In the following, air quality data from several monitoring sites are summarized. Where multiple is currently underway to determine in Hope (67 ppb) and Agassiz (68 western part of Metro Vancouver, in sites are located within a single community, data from the site best reflecting community air whether these improvements are a ppb). In comparison to the national particular, downtown Vancouver. All quality are shown. Where large populations reside near a major source, additional sites may result of the shift to lower-sulphur standard of 63 ppb, which is based monitoring sites reported annually be shown. Data from all available monitoring sites are summarized in the Technical Appendix. fuels and new emission control tech- on a three-year average concentra- averaged NO2 levels below the pro- nology by the cruise ship industry. tion, only Agassiz (64 ppb) exceed- vincial objective of 32 ppb and Met- ed the standard over the period of ro Vancouver’s objective of 21 ppb. Fine Particulate crometres or smaller in diameter. average objective of 8 µg/m3. Seven 2013-2015.. Metro Vancouver issued Hourly concentrations (not shown) PM2.5 affects respiratory and cardio- of these communities also exceeded two ozone-related air quality advi- were also below the provincial ob- Matter (PM2.5) *Based on an annual 99th percentile con- vascular health. Open burning, wild- the 24-hour average objective of 25 centration to allow for comparison to provin- sories during the summer of 2015. jective of 100 ppb. fires, and wood stoves are the major µg/m3, and an additional seven com- cial objective. Maximum 1-hour values listed Fine particulate matter refers to mi- in the Technical Appendix can be compared **Based on the 4th highest daily value over sources of PM2.5 in B.C. Other major munities were within 10% of this level. croscopic particles that are 2.5 mi- to the Metro Vancouver interim objective of 2015. In comparison, the national standard is sources include marine vessels and Wood combustion emissions com- 75 ppb (not-to-be-exceeded level). averaged over a three-year period. diesel vehicles. bined with periods of cold, stagnant In 2015, the shift from older TEOM weather conditions during the fall and (Tapered Element Oscillating Micro- winter led to periodic spikes of PM2.5 balance) instruments (dark blue bars) levels in many of B.C.’s valley com- to the new U.S. EPA-approved Federal munities. In addition, wildfires were a Equivalent Method (FEM) monitors contributing factor to the high PM2.5 (light blue bars) was nearing comple- levels recorded in the southern inte- tion across the monitoring network. rior and coastal areas. This change is being implemented because the FEM monitors provide Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) a more complete measure of PM2.5 Sulphur dioxide (SO2) is a colour- than the TEOM monitors. As a result, less gas with a pungent odour. higher reported concentrations may Short-term exposures to elevated be expected due to these changes. levels can aggravate asthma and Annual average PM2.5 concentrations increase respiratory symptoms. ranged from 2.9 µg/m3 in Powell River The largest sources of SO2 in B.C. 3 to 9.7 µg/m in Houston and Golden. include the upstream oil and gas A total of 15 monitored communi- sector, metal smelting facilities, ties exceeded the provincial annual pulp mills and marine vessels.
8 9 Climate Action Committee - Page 128 We track trends in air quality levels to determine the effectiveness of actions already implemented and the updates trends need for additional actions to protect current and future from partner air quality. Year-to-year variations in air quality levels re- vehicles and the impacts of in-vehicle Industrial Emissions air pollution in B.C. flect the influence of a number of factors, including the agencies air pollution exposure on indicators of cardiovascular health and cognitive Health Canada in collaboration with through the years amount of emissions as well as the weather. The follow- functioning. the BCCDC and the Institut National ing figures show 10-year trends in annual concentrations de Santé Publique du Québec (INSPQ) • A study of the potential neurotoxic ef- at select monitoring sites, and compare these values to is doing a research project to study the fects of diesel exhaust completed in effects of daily exposure to air pollut- the range of concentrations measured at all B.C. sites. collaboration with Dr. Chris Carlsten of ants near petroleum refineries, metal UBC. The results suggest that short- smelters and pulp mills on respiratory term exposure of healthy adults to hospital admissions in adults in Quebec diesel exhaust does not affect central and B.C. National Air Quality nervous system inflammation. Health Effects Air Quality Health Index Health Effects of (AQHI) Wood Smoke Health Canada is engaged in several re- search projects looking at exposure to air pollutants from wood smoke and their effects on health (http://www.bcair- quality.ca/topics/smoke-burning.html). Health Canada has completed several research projects looking at exposure to air pollutants and their effects on Health Canada, in partnership with the health. These include; Province of British Columbia, is pleased to announce the release of the nation- • National analysis of the public health al AQHI mobile app available for free The transition from TEOM to FEM instruments over the past Ozone trends are influenced by a number of factors, includ- impacts of changes in fine particle air few years has been accompanied by a bump upwards in re- ing year-to-year variations in meteorology as well as the download via the Google Play Store, pollution between 2000 and 2010. There iTunes or by visiting airquality.alberta.ca. ported PM2.5 concentrations. The change in technology is be- changes in emissions of precursor pollutants like nitrogen was no change in B.C.’s average concen- These include: lieved to be a large contributing factor as observed in Burnaby oxides and hydrocarbons. Trends in 8-hour ozone concen- tration. However, the national average and Chilliwack in 2013 and Kelowna in 2015. Wildfire smoke trations (daily maximum, annual 4th highest) are not readily • In collaboration with the B.C. Cen- concentration dropped by nearly 25% also contributed to higher PM2.5 levels in 2015 at the Burnaby, apparent, although research indicates that average back- tre for Disease Control (BCCDC) on a over this period, resulting in estimated Chilliwack and Kelowna sites. Note: A complete year of data ground concentrations are increasing. multi-year project aimed at strength- reductions of deaths and illness, as well was not available for Prince George in 2015. ening the Canadian response to forest as increased life expectancy. fire smoke events. (The research will • Extensive national studies that linked include evaluation of public health fine particle air pollution with reduced performance around wildfire smoke birth weight, as well as linking nitro- events and investigation of some of gen dioxide, ozone and fine particulate the health risks associated with forest matter with increased mortality [second fire smoke exposure.) study in collaboration with Dr. Michael • In collaboration with UBC, BCCDC, Brauer at the University of British Co- and the B.C. Ministry of Environment, Ground-level Ozone lumbia (UBC)]. a project to characterize wood smoke The FVRD completed a study on vola- Traffic & Transportation impacts in B.C. communities. (The goals tile organic compound and nitrogen ox- of the monitoring campaign are to cre- ide emission reduction opportunities in ate maps of wood smoke in six B.C. the region. The project was identified communities, assess how much wood as a policy direction in the Regional smoke contributes to community pol- Ground-Level Ozone Strategy (2014) lution levels, and validate a monitoring and focused on species and sources Annually averaged SO2 levels continue to be low (>4 ppb) Annually averaged NO2 levels have generally declined over method that can be applied in a wider Health Canada is engaged in or has com- of emissions primarily responsible for in urban areas of B.C., helped by lower sulphur in fuels and the past decade. These trends are attributed to improve- Canadian context.) pleted several research projects looking ozone formation in the FVRD and anal- reduced emissions from the petroleum products industry ments in motor vehicle emissions and the former AirCare at exposure to traffic pollutants and • Ongoing study of residential wood ysis of programs and policies for emis- in Metro Vancouver. Note: A complete year of data was not vehicle inspection and maintenance program in the Lower their effects on health. These include; burning as a source of ambient fine sion reduction. The FVRD is currently available for Prince George in 2015. Fraser Valley. More recent data suggest that NO2 concentra- particulate air pollution and hospital reviewing the set of recommendations tions are levelling off in some areas such as South Burnaby • On-going study of the protection pro- admissions for acute myocardial infarc- of new programs and policies. and Kelowna, but the contributing factors have not been vided by cabin air filters in passenger tion in Courtenay/Comox, Kamloops fully assessed. and Prince George. (Cont’d on p.12) 10 11 Climate Action Committee - Page 129 We track trends in air quality levels to determine the effectiveness of actions already implemented and the updates trends need for additional actions to protect current and future from partner air quality. Year-to-year variations in air quality levels re- vehicles and the impacts of in-vehicle Industrial Emissions air pollution in B.C. flect the influence of a number of factors, including the agencies air pollution exposure on indicators of cardiovascular health and cognitive Health Canada in collaboration with through the years amount of emissions as well as the weather. The follow- functioning. the BCCDC and the Institut National ing figures show 10-year trends in annual concentrations de Santé Publique du Québec (INSPQ) • A study of the potential neurotoxic ef- at select monitoring sites, and compare these values to is doing a research project to study the fects of diesel exhaust completed in effects of daily exposure to air pollut- the range of concentrations measured at all B.C. sites. collaboration with Dr. Chris Carlsten of ants near petroleum refineries, metal UBC. The results suggest that short- smelters and pulp mills on respiratory term exposure of healthy adults to hospital admissions in adults in Quebec diesel exhaust does not affect central and B.C. National Air Quality nervous system inflammation. Health Effects Air Quality Health Index Health Effects of (AQHI) Wood Smoke Health Canada is engaged in several re- search projects looking at exposure to air pollutants from wood smoke and their effects on health (http://www.bcair- quality.ca/topics/smoke-burning.html). Health Canada has completed several research projects looking at exposure to air pollutants and their effects on Health Canada, in partnership with the health. These include; Province of British Columbia, is pleased to announce the release of the nation- • National analysis of the public health al AQHI mobile app available for free The transition from TEOM to FEM instruments over the past Ozone trends are influenced by a number of factors, includ- impacts of changes in fine particle air few years has been accompanied by a bump upwards in re- ing year-to-year variations in meteorology as well as the download via the Google Play Store, pollution between 2000 and 2010. There iTunes or by visiting airquality.alberta.ca. ported PM2.5 concentrations. The change in technology is be- changes in emissions of precursor pollutants like nitrogen was no change in B.C.’s average concen- These include: lieved to be a large contributing factor as observed in Burnaby oxides and hydrocarbons. Trends in 8-hour ozone concen- tration. However, the national average and Chilliwack in 2013 and Kelowna in 2015. Wildfire smoke trations (daily maximum, annual 4th highest) are not readily • In collaboration with the B.C. Cen- concentration dropped by nearly 25% also contributed to higher PM2.5 levels in 2015 at the Burnaby, apparent, although research indicates that average back- tre for Disease Control (BCCDC) on a over this period, resulting in estimated Chilliwack and Kelowna sites. Note: A complete year of data ground concentrations are increasing. multi-year project aimed at strength- reductions of deaths and illness, as well was not available for Prince George in 2015. ening the Canadian response to forest as increased life expectancy. fire smoke events. (The research will • Extensive national studies that linked include evaluation of public health fine particle air pollution with reduced performance around wildfire smoke birth weight, as well as linking nitro- events and investigation of some of gen dioxide, ozone and fine particulate the health risks associated with forest matter with increased mortality [second fire smoke exposure.) study in collaboration with Dr. Michael • In collaboration with UBC, BCCDC, Brauer at the University of British Co- and the B.C. Ministry of Environment, Ground-level Ozone lumbia (UBC)]. a project to characterize wood smoke The FVRD completed a study on vola- Traffic & Transportation impacts in B.C. communities. (The goals tile organic compound and nitrogen ox- of the monitoring campaign are to cre- ide emission reduction opportunities in ate maps of wood smoke in six B.C. the region. The project was identified communities, assess how much wood as a policy direction in the Regional smoke contributes to community pol- Ground-Level Ozone Strategy (2014) lution levels, and validate a monitoring and focused on species and sources Annually averaged SO2 levels continue to be low (>4 ppb) Annually averaged NO2 levels have generally declined over method that can be applied in a wider Health Canada is engaged in or has com- of emissions primarily responsible for in urban areas of B.C., helped by lower sulphur in fuels and the past decade. These trends are attributed to improve- Canadian context.) pleted several research projects looking ozone formation in the FVRD and anal- reduced emissions from the petroleum products industry ments in motor vehicle emissions and the former AirCare at exposure to traffic pollutants and • Ongoing study of residential wood ysis of programs and policies for emis- in Metro Vancouver. Note: A complete year of data was not vehicle inspection and maintenance program in the Lower their effects on health. These include; burning as a source of ambient fine sion reduction. The FVRD is currently available for Prince George in 2015. Fraser Valley. More recent data suggest that NO2 concentra- particulate air pollution and hospital reviewing the set of recommendations tions are levelling off in some areas such as South Burnaby • On-going study of the protection pro- admissions for acute myocardial infarc- of new programs and policies. and Kelowna, but the contributing factors have not been vided by cabin air filters in passenger tion in Courtenay/Comox, Kamloops fully assessed. and Prince George. (Cont’d on p.12) 10 11 Climate Action Committee - Page 130 Reducing Wood Visit www.emotivebc.ca or www.face- Burning Emissions book.com/emotivebc to learn when Emotive will be in your neighbourhood Residential wood burning is the source this summer. of a quarter of the PM2.5 emissions in Metro Vancouver. This percentage is Solutions for Greenhouse likely higher in the winter months as Gas Emissions (Cont’d from p.11 - Updates: From Partner Agencies) wood burning activity does not typi- A number of initiatives are underway cally occur year round. Metro Vancou- that aim to reduce greenhouse gas Open Burning Regulatory Updates New Modelling Guideline Mobile Air ver is working to reduce wood smoke emissions and climate change impacts emissions through initiatives like the Practices Review The Ministry released policy updates The ministry released an updated guide- Monitoring Studies in Metro Vancouver. The Smart Driv- wood stove exchange program and on regulatory reviews of the Solid Fuel line on air quality dispersion modelling ing Study will pilot the effectiveness The FVRD completed an initial open Burn It Smart workshops, most re- Burning Domestic Appliance Regulation in B.C. The intent of this document is to of new “smart” technologies in reduc- burning practices and policy options re- cently held in Maple Ridge and Bowen (SFBDAR) and the Open Burning Smoke ensure that dispersion modelling stud- ing vehicle fuel consumption and emis- view in 2015. The study identified major Island. A new tool is also available to Control Regulation (OBSCR). ies prepared for the major project re- sions, by recruiting drivers who will sources of open burning in the Lower help minimize the potential impacts views or authorizations meet the needs have a “smart” plug-in device fitted in Proposed changes to SFBDAR are in- of wood burning on your neighbours. of the particular application and are their vehicles to track real-time fuel tended to reduce emissions of wood Daily weather forecasts for Metro Van- done in a correct and consistent manner. consumption. By comparing fuel con- smoke from home heating, ensure that couver are used to develop forecasts This guideline can be found at: http:// sumption before and after training, the only cleaner models are sold in B.C., har- of whether wood smoke is expected to www.bcairquality.ca/pdf/bc-dispersion- study will determine whether training monize with new wood heater emission dissipate. The forecast is available to modelling-guideline-2015.pdf. and feedback from the smart device is standards released by the U.S. EPA, and residents through Metro Vancouver’s helping people drive more efficiently. Metro Vancouver’s mobile air moni- establish a sunset date for the use of Monitoring in air quality phone line (604-436-6777). Metro Vancouver is launching a home toring unit (MAMU) was busy during high-emitting outdoor wood boilers. The the Northeast energy labelling campaign called Ra- Fraser Valley, analyzed regulatory tools the past year. Following a nine month Regulatory Updates public comment period has now closed. teOurHome.ca. EnerGuide for Homes and revealed existing knowledge gaps. An “Air Quality Characterization of the study in the Moodyville neighbourhood It is anticipated that the new SFBDAR Metro Vancouver is considering regula- labels provide information about how The FVRD is planning to continue as- Peace Region of Northeast B.C.” was re- in North Vancouver that ended in mid- will be enacted later in 2016. tory approaches to address key sourc- much energy is used in a home and the sessing open burning practices to de- leased in 2015, based on air quality data 2015, MAMU carried out a four-month es of air emissions over the next few resulting greenhouse gas emissions. velop better regulations and options for Proposed changes to OBSCR are in- collected at permanent and temporary monitoring program at two locations in years, to protect public health, improve RateOurHome.ca provides informa- reducing emissions. tended to reduce smoke pollution from monitoring sites between 1998-2013. Tsawwassen in collaboration with Tsaw- visual air quality, and minimize the re- tion on the EnerGuide label, including open burning while simplifying require- This report can be found at: http://www. wassen First Nation and the Vancouver Electric Vehicles gion’s contributions to climate change. a searchable map which shows actual ments for industry in remote areas. The bcairquality.ca/readings/northeast/. In Fraser Port Authority, to help address Work is underway to update the bylaw labeled homes in the region. The FVRD continues its effort on raising policy update describes the ministry’s Phase II of the Northeast B.C. air moni- local air quality concerns related to the for non-road diesel engines, to regu- Metro Vancouver, local governments awareness and promoting use of elec- proposed approach to revising the regu- toring project, mobile air quality moni- Deltaport Terminal, rail and transporta- late the release of odours from indus- and utilities and the Condominium tric vehicles in the region. In 2015, the lation. Feedback received from past pol- tors were located in Farmington, Toms- tion activities in the Roberts Bank area. trial and commercial activities that af- Home Owner’s Association are collabo- FVRD added two electric vehicles into icy intentions papers and stakeholder lake and Doig River. Collected data from MAMU next sampled the air from Sep- fect surrounding communities, and to rating to create a Strata Energy Advisor its corporate fleet. With nearly 5,000km working groups were considered in the these monitors showed that air quality tember to November at Musqueam Park update the bylaw for automotive re- Program. There are over 5,500 strata driven between the two electric vehicles drafting of this document. The public was very good, with low concentrations in Vancouver to assist with addressing finishing facilities. Metro Vancouver is corporations (i.e. condominium build- in the first four months, their adoption comment period ends on June 17, 2016. of sulphur dioxide, hydrogen sulphide local odour issues. MAMU was then de- also exploring regulatory approaches ings), in Metro Vancouver, and many by FVRD staff has been a success. In ad- Information on these and other regu- and PM2.5 observed. As a result, these ployed to a study in the Village of Lions to reduce harmful emissions of smoke buildings are older and in need of major dition, with support from the B.C. gov- latory reviews can be found at: http:// monitors have been moved to three new Bay to assess local air quality and how from outdoor burning and residential repair. Renewal projects offer opportu- ernment, Natural Resources Canada, www.env.gov.bc.ca/epd/codes/. communities: Taylor, Blueberry and Rol- it is impacted by residential wood burn- wood burning. nities to improve energy efficiency and and BC Hydro, the FVRD will be unveil- la as part of Phase III of this project. For ing. Results from these studies will be Provincial Wood Stove reduce emissions. Energy advisors will ing two new fast charging stations, one an overview of the Northeast monitoring reported as they become available. The Electric at the FVRD office in Chilliwack and the Exchange Program project, see: http://www.bcairquality.ca/ Vehicle Experience help incorporate energy efficiency into New Westminster Air major building renewal projects, lead- other in Boston Bar, helping to bridge In 2015, the province allocated $200,000 readings/northeast.html Quality Monitoring Station ing to more climate-friendly buildings. the charging gap to the Cariboo and in funding to support the change-out of Thompson-Okanagan. older wood stoves with new EPA-cer- Metro Vancouver operates a network of Caring for the Air Air Quality tified stoves that produce less smoke. air quality monitoring stations through- Metro Vancouver’s annual “State of the Management Plan A total of 14 regional districts or mu- out our airshed, from Horseshoe Bay Air” report, Caring for the Air, has more nicipalities around the province were to Hope. The newest station is in New on these and other air quality stories at The FVRD is in the process of updating awarded with funding to support these Westminster in Sapperton Park. With www.metrovancouver.org/air. its Air Quality and Climate Protection local programs. There will be a new call support from the City of New Westmin- Metro Vancouver has been running Above: Ambient air quality stations in the Plan. Visit www.fvrd.ca to learn more for proposals for funding in 2016. ster, the new station is the 29th perma- Emotive: The Electric Vehicle Experi- and become involved in the process. south Peace in northeastern British Colum- bia. From left to right, these stations are nent station operated by Metro Vancou- ence campaign in partnership with Plug Doig River, Farmington and Tomslake. ver as part of the Lower Fraser Valley Air In BC for the past three years. This cam- Quality Monitoring Network. Data from paign brings electric vehicles to events the monitoring network is available to throughout the region to introduce resi- the public in real-time at www.AirMap.ca. dents to this viable, low carbon alterna- tive to the internal combustion engine. (Cont’d on p.14) 12 13 Climate Action Committee - Page 131 Reducing Wood Visit www.emotivebc.ca or www.face- Burning Emissions book.com/emotivebc to learn when Emotive will be in your neighbourhood Residential wood burning is the source this summer. of a quarter of the PM2.5 emissions in Metro Vancouver. This percentage is Solutions for Greenhouse likely higher in the winter months as Gas Emissions (Cont’d from p.11 - Updates: From Partner Agencies) wood burning activity does not typi- A number of initiatives are underway cally occur year round. Metro Vancou- that aim to reduce greenhouse gas Open Burning Regulatory Updates New Modelling Guideline Mobile Air ver is working to reduce wood smoke emissions and climate change impacts emissions through initiatives like the Practices Review The Ministry released policy updates The ministry released an updated guide- Monitoring Studies in Metro Vancouver. The Smart Driv- wood stove exchange program and on regulatory reviews of the Solid Fuel line on air quality dispersion modelling ing Study will pilot the effectiveness The FVRD completed an initial open Burn It Smart workshops, most re- Burning Domestic Appliance Regulation in B.C. The intent of this document is to of new “smart” technologies in reduc- burning practices and policy options re- cently held in Maple Ridge and Bowen (SFBDAR) and the Open Burning Smoke ensure that dispersion modelling stud- ing vehicle fuel consumption and emis- view in 2015. The study identified major Island. A new tool is also available to Control Regulation (OBSCR). ies prepared for the major project re- sions, by recruiting drivers who will sources of open burning in the Lower help minimize the potential impacts views or authorizations meet the needs have a “smart” plug-in device fitted in Proposed changes to SFBDAR are in- of wood burning on your neighbours. of the particular application and are their vehicles to track real-time fuel tended to reduce emissions of wood Daily weather forecasts for Metro Van- done in a correct and consistent manner. consumption. By comparing fuel con- smoke from home heating, ensure that couver are used to develop forecasts This guideline can be found at: http:// sumption before and after training, the only cleaner models are sold in B.C., har- of whether wood smoke is expected to www.bcairquality.ca/pdf/bc-dispersion- study will determine whether training monize with new wood heater emission dissipate. The forecast is available to modelling-guideline-2015.pdf. and feedback from the smart device is standards released by the U.S. EPA, and residents through Metro Vancouver’s helping people drive more efficiently. Metro Vancouver’s mobile air moni- establish a sunset date for the use of Monitoring in air quality phone line (604-436-6777). Metro Vancouver is launching a home toring unit (MAMU) was busy during high-emitting outdoor wood boilers. The the Northeast energy labelling campaign called Ra- Fraser Valley, analyzed regulatory tools the past year. Following a nine month Regulatory Updates public comment period has now closed. teOurHome.ca. EnerGuide for Homes and revealed existing knowledge gaps. An “Air Quality Characterization of the study in the Moodyville neighbourhood It is anticipated that the new SFBDAR Metro Vancouver is considering regula- labels provide information about how The FVRD is planning to continue as- Peace Region of Northeast B.C.” was re- in North Vancouver that ended in mid- will be enacted later in 2016. tory approaches to address key sourc- much energy is used in a home and the sessing open burning practices to de- leased in 2015, based on air quality data 2015, MAMU carried out a four-month es of air emissions over the next few resulting greenhouse gas emissions. velop better regulations and options for Proposed changes to OBSCR are in- collected at permanent and temporary monitoring program at two locations in years, to protect public health, improve RateOurHome.ca provides informa- reducing emissions. tended to reduce smoke pollution from monitoring sites between 1998-2013. Tsawwassen in collaboration with Tsaw- visual air quality, and minimize the re- tion on the EnerGuide label, including open burning while simplifying require- This report can be found at: http://www. wassen First Nation and the Vancouver Electric Vehicles gion’s contributions to climate change. a searchable map which shows actual ments for industry in remote areas. The bcairquality.ca/readings/northeast/. In Fraser Port Authority, to help address Work is underway to update the bylaw labeled homes in the region. The FVRD continues its effort on raising policy update describes the ministry’s Phase II of the Northeast B.C. air moni- local air quality concerns related to the for non-road diesel engines, to regu- Metro Vancouver, local governments awareness and promoting use of elec- proposed approach to revising the regu- toring project, mobile air quality moni- Deltaport Terminal, rail and transporta- late the release of odours from indus- and utilities and the Condominium tric vehicles in the region. In 2015, the lation. Feedback received from past pol- tors were located in Farmington, Toms- tion activities in the Roberts Bank area. trial and commercial activities that af- Home Owner’s Association are collabo- FVRD added two electric vehicles into icy intentions papers and stakeholder lake and Doig River. Collected data from MAMU next sampled the air from Sep- fect surrounding communities, and to rating to create a Strata Energy Advisor its corporate fleet. With nearly 5,000km working groups were considered in the these monitors showed that air quality tember to November at Musqueam Park update the bylaw for automotive re- Program. There are over 5,500 strata driven between the two electric vehicles drafting of this document. The public was very good, with low concentrations in Vancouver to assist with addressing finishing facilities. Metro Vancouver is corporations (i.e. condominium build- in the first four months, their adoption comment period ends on June 17, 2016. of sulphur dioxide, hydrogen sulphide local odour issues. MAMU was then de- also exploring regulatory approaches ings), in Metro Vancouver, and many by FVRD staff has been a success. In ad- Information on these and other regu- and PM2.5 observed. As a result, these ployed to a study in the Village of Lions to reduce harmful emissions of smoke buildings are older and in need of major dition, with support from the B.C. gov- latory reviews can be found at: http:// monitors have been moved to three new Bay to assess local air quality and how from outdoor burning and residential repair. Renewal projects offer opportu- ernment, Natural Resources Canada, www.env.gov.bc.ca/epd/codes/. communities: Taylor, Blueberry and Rol- it is impacted by residential wood burn- wood burning. nities to improve energy efficiency and and BC Hydro, the FVRD will be unveil- la as part of Phase III of this project. For ing. Results from these studies will be Provincial Wood Stove reduce emissions. Energy advisors will ing two new fast charging stations, one an overview of the Northeast monitoring reported as they become available. The Electric at the FVRD office in Chilliwack and the Exchange Program project, see: http://www.bcairquality.ca/ Vehicle Experience help incorporate energy efficiency into New Westminster Air major building renewal projects, lead- other in Boston Bar, helping to bridge In 2015, the province allocated $200,000 readings/northeast.html Quality Monitoring Station ing to more climate-friendly buildings. the charging gap to the Cariboo and in funding to support the change-out of Thompson-Okanagan. older wood stoves with new EPA-cer- Metro Vancouver operates a network of Caring for the Air Air Quality tified stoves that produce less smoke. air quality monitoring stations through- Metro Vancouver’s annual “State of the Management Plan A total of 14 regional districts or mu- out our airshed, from Horseshoe Bay Air” report, Caring for the Air, has more nicipalities around the province were to Hope. The newest station is in New on these and other air quality stories at The FVRD is in the process of updating awarded with funding to support these Westminster in Sapperton Park. With www.metrovancouver.org/air. its Air Quality and Climate Protection local programs. There will be a new call support from the City of New Westmin- Metro Vancouver has been running Above: Ambient air quality stations in the Plan. Visit www.fvrd.ca to learn more for proposals for funding in 2016. ster, the new station is the 29th perma- Emotive: The Electric Vehicle Experi- and become involved in the process. south Peace in northeastern British Colum- bia. From left to right, these stations are nent station operated by Metro Vancou- ence campaign in partnership with Plug Doig River, Farmington and Tomslake. ver as part of the Lower Fraser Valley Air In BC for the past three years. This cam- Quality Monitoring Network. Data from paign brings electric vehicles to events the monitoring network is available to throughout the region to introduce resi- the public in real-time at www.AirMap.ca. dents to this viable, low carbon alterna- tive to the internal combustion engine. (Cont’d on p.14) 12 13 Climate Action Committee - Page 132 (Cont’d from p.13 - Updates: From Partner Agencies)
Air Quality Monitoring at a Marine Boundary Layer Site A joint EC/B.C. Environment/Metro Van- Environment Canada has a mandate National Visibility Mountains at Barrier Lake, Alberta, a site couver monitoring site at Ucluelet, on to provide Canadians with a clean, safe Monitoring in Egbert, Ontario, and one in Wolfville, the west coast of Vancouver Island, has and sustainable environment. This is Nova Scotia. Current activities include been collecting data on background achieved through a variety of programs Environment Canada continues to run a comparison of visibility conditions air quality data since 2010. Scientists such as the Clean Air Regulatory Agen- the National Visibility Monitoring Initia- across Canada using data from the Na- are carrying out various studies at the da, the Air Quality Management System tive aimed at assessing visibility condi- tional Air Pollution Surveillance (NAPS) site including, characterization of ma- and the Canada-U.S. Air Quality Accord. tions in border areas of Canada. The speciation network, inter-comparison rine boundary layer chemistry, assess- In the Pacific-Yukon region, Environment initiative includes a monitoring com- studies with the NAPS and CAPMoN ing background ozone concentrations Canada is involved in a number of long ponent with multiple sites in the Lower networks and the development of a reaching the west coast of Canada, and short-term studies. These include: Fraser Valley of B.C., a site in the Rocky forecasting tool for visibility conditions. characterization of long-range transport of pollutants from Asia and assessing the effect of MARPOL Annex VI Ma- A rine Emission Control Area regulations on sulphur dioxide and sulphate. New studies have been completed over the past year on the role of marine aerosols as cloud condensation nuclei and the role of halogens in ozone chemistry. A new mercury passive sampler has been added in the past year in collaboration with the University of Toronto. Above Photo: The air quality trailer at Ucluelet, B.C.
A Mobile Air Quality Air Quality Modelling Research Platform to Inform Air A mobile trailer has been outfitted by Quality Management Environment Canada with state of the Modelling studies were carried out by
Photo courtesy: Environment Canada Environment courtesy: Photo art instruments for measuring real-time Environment Canada over the past year gases and particulates, including a Gas to better understand the impacts of B Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer for the July 2012 Siberian Forest fire on air measuring volatile organic compounds. quality in the Pacific Northwest and the The trailer is specialized for carrying impacts of pollution on visibility in the out chemical process studies aimed at Lower Fraser Valley of B.C. These stud- understanding ozone and particulate ies help us better understand the con- matter sources and formation in sensi- ditions under which air quality impacts tive airsheds in western Canada. Over occur and possible mitigation options. the past year, the trailer was used in the Vancouver area to take part in the Na- For more information on regional air tional Air Pollution Surveillance Near- quality research carried out by Environ- Road Study, led by Environment Canada ment Canada please see the 2014 Geor- in partnership with the University of To- gia-Basin/Puget Sound Airshed Charac- ronto and Metro Vancouver. The study’s terization report at: http://www.ec.gc.ca/ aim is to understand air quality impacts air/default.asp?lang=En&n=1F36EFBB-1t near major urban roads by measuring ultrafines and other components of ur- ban smog. Photo courtesy: Environment Canada Environment courtesy: Photo
Figure 2: A view looking southeast over British Columbia’s Lower Fraser Valley at Chilliwack. Left Photo: Environment Canada’s mobile air quality research platform. (A) On a clear day (25 September 2010 at 4:30PM PDT) with PM2.5 values of 1.1 µg/m3 and aerosol optical thickness t = 0.062, giving 94 percent light transmission. (B) On a day when particulate matter and other pollutants reduce visibility (5 August 2010 at 1:30 PM PDT) with PM2.5 values of 24.6 µg/m3 and an aerosol optical thickness, t = 0.964, giving 38 percent transmission
14 15 Climate Action Committee - Page 133 (Cont’d from p.13 - Updates: From Partner Agencies)
Air Quality Monitoring at a Marine Boundary Layer Site A joint EC/B.C. Environment/Metro Van- Environment Canada has a mandate National Visibility Mountains at Barrier Lake, Alberta, a site couver monitoring site at Ucluelet, on to provide Canadians with a clean, safe Monitoring in Egbert, Ontario, and one in Wolfville, the west coast of Vancouver Island, has and sustainable environment. This is Nova Scotia. Current activities include been collecting data on background achieved through a variety of programs Environment Canada continues to run a comparison of visibility conditions air quality data since 2010. Scientists such as the Clean Air Regulatory Agen- the National Visibility Monitoring Initia- across Canada using data from the Na- are carrying out various studies at the da, the Air Quality Management System tive aimed at assessing visibility condi- tional Air Pollution Surveillance (NAPS) site including, characterization of ma- and the Canada-U.S. Air Quality Accord. tions in border areas of Canada. The speciation network, inter-comparison rine boundary layer chemistry, assess- In the Pacific-Yukon region, Environment initiative includes a monitoring com- studies with the NAPS and CAPMoN ing background ozone concentrations Canada is involved in a number of long ponent with multiple sites in the Lower networks and the development of a reaching the west coast of Canada, and short-term studies. These include: Fraser Valley of B.C., a site in the Rocky forecasting tool for visibility conditions. characterization of long-range transport of pollutants from Asia and assessing the effect of MARPOL Annex VI Ma- A rine Emission Control Area regulations on sulphur dioxide and sulphate. New studies have been completed over the past year on the role of marine aerosols as cloud condensation nuclei and the role of halogens in ozone chemistry. A new mercury passive sampler has been added in the past year in collaboration with the University of Toronto. Above Photo: The air quality trailer at Ucluelet, B.C.
A Mobile Air Quality Air Quality Modelling Research Platform to Inform Air A mobile trailer has been outfitted by Quality Management Environment Canada with state of the Modelling studies were carried out by
Photo courtesy: Environment Canada Environment courtesy: Photo art instruments for measuring real-time Environment Canada over the past year gases and particulates, including a Gas to better understand the impacts of B Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer for the July 2012 Siberian Forest fire on air measuring volatile organic compounds. quality in the Pacific Northwest and the The trailer is specialized for carrying impacts of pollution on visibility in the out chemical process studies aimed at Lower Fraser Valley of B.C. These stud- understanding ozone and particulate ies help us better understand the con- matter sources and formation in sensi- ditions under which air quality impacts tive airsheds in western Canada. Over occur and possible mitigation options. the past year, the trailer was used in the Vancouver area to take part in the Na- For more information on regional air tional Air Pollution Surveillance Near- quality research carried out by Environ- Road Study, led by Environment Canada ment Canada please see the 2014 Geor- in partnership with the University of To- gia-Basin/Puget Sound Airshed Charac- ronto and Metro Vancouver. The study’s terization report at: http://www.ec.gc.ca/ aim is to understand air quality impacts air/default.asp?lang=En&n=1F36EFBB-1t near major urban roads by measuring ultrafines and other components of ur- ban smog. Photo courtesy: Environment Canada Environment courtesy: Photo
Figure 2: A view looking southeast over British Columbia’s Lower Fraser Valley at Chilliwack. Left Photo: Environment Canada’s mobile air quality research platform. (A) On a clear day (25 September 2010 at 4:30PM PDT) with PM2.5 values of 1.1 µg/m3 and aerosol optical thickness t = 0.062, giving 94 percent light transmission. (B) On a day when particulate matter and other pollutants reduce visibility (5 August 2010 at 1:30 PM PDT) with PM2.5 values of 24.6 µg/m3 and an aerosol optical thickness, t = 0.964, giving 38 percent transmission
14 15 Climate Action Committee - Page 134 visit or contact us
THE LUNG ASSOCIATION B.C. MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT ISLAND HEALTH AUTHORITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA www.bcairquality.ca www.viha.ca www.bc.lung.ca Environmental Standards Branch 1952 Bay Street 2675 Oak Street PO Box 9341, Stn Prov Govt Victoria, B.C. V8R 1J8 Vancouver, B.C. V6H 2K2 Victoria, B.C. V8W 9M1 (250) 370-8699 (604) 731-5864 or toll-free at (250) 387-9932 1-800-665-5864 (in B.C. but VANCOUVER COASTAL outside the Lower Mainland) Ministry of Environment HEALTH AUTHORITY Regional Offices www.vch.ca ENVIRONMENT AND www.env.gov.bc.ca/main/ 11th Floor, 601 West Broadway CLIMATE CHANGE CANADA regions.html Vancouver, B.C. V5Z 4C2 www.ec.gc.ca (604) 736-2033 or 401 Burrard Street METRO VANCOUVER 1-866-884-0888 Vancouver, B.C. V6C 3S5 www.metrovancouver.org (604) 664-9100 4330 Kingsway FRASER HEALTH AUTHORITY Burnaby, B.C. V5H 4G8 www.fraserhealth.ca HEALTH CANADA ENVIRONMENTAL (604) 432-6200 Suite 400, Central City Tower HEALTH PROGRAM - B.C. REGION 13450 – 102nd Ave. www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/air/ FRASER VALLEY Surrey, B.C. V3T 0H1 index-eng.php REGIONAL DISTRICT (604) 587 -4600 or Federal Building Sinclair Centre www.fvrd.bc.ca 1-800-935-5699 420-757 Hastings St W 45950 Cheam Avenue Vancouver, BC V6C 1A1 Chilliwack, B.C. V2P 1N6 INTERIOR HEALTH AUTHORITY (604)-666-2083 (604) 702-5000 or www.interiorhealth.ca 1-800-528-0061 220 – 1815 Kirschener Rd. BC CENTRE FOR DISEASE CONTROL Kelowna, B.C. V1Y 4N7 www.bccdc.ca B.C. MINISTRY OF HEALTH (250) 862-4200 655 West 12th Avenue www.bcairquality.ca Vancouver, B.C. V5Z 4R4 Health Protection Branch Please send correspondence (604) 707-2400 1515 Blanshard Street, RBB 4-2 and evaluation to: Victoria, B.C. V8W 3C8 Dr. Menn Biagtan (250) 565-2649 [email protected] (604) 731-5864 BC Lung Association, 2675 Oak St, B.C. HEALTH AUTHORITIES Vancouver, BC Canada, V6H 2K2 Northern Health Authority www.northernhealth.ca Suite 600, 299 Victoria Street Published in 2016 Prince George, BC V2L 5B8 (250) 565-2649 Working Committee: Dr. Menn Biagtan Dr. Michael Brauer Dr. Sarah Henderson Mr. Derek Jennejohn Ms. Marina Richter Dr. Paula Smith Ms. Natalie Suzuki
16 Climate Action Committee - Page 135 6.1
THE CORPORATION OF DELTA Office of Tile Mayor, Lois E. Jackso11
April 11,2016
Mayor Greg Moore, Chair Q)~ Board of Directors GM~ c~PR2 Metro Vancouver Actfon: ...... c:t.\~ ·· s~ ...... 4330 Kingsway :::::::::::::::::::::...... :: .::.. .:::::: .. : ~~: Burnaby BC, VSH 4G8 ...... "."{Yf.i'······ ..·· n·t, ...... lnfD Copy: "' t""~ ······\'i>-.:'ii: .\...... File No.· ...... Doc. Na.: .. "...... Dear Chair Moore, CAO Tracker No.: ...... Re: Residential Wood Smoke Particulate Emissions
At the April 4, 2016 Regular Meeting, Delta Council considered the enclosed report regarding residential wood smoke particulate emissions and unanimously resolved as follows:
A THAT a letter from Mayor Lois E. Jackson be sent to the Chair of the Metro Vancouver Board of Directors in support of further measures to address residential wood smoke emissions. B. THAT this report be provided to the Environment Advisory Committee for information. C. THAT Delta staff identify opportunities to educate the public on the effects of residential wood smoke particulate emissions and incentives for encouraging the public to switch to cleaner burning appliances.
An air quality bulletin issued to the Corporation of Delta in November 2015 forecasted elevated levels of fine particulate matter within the municipality, which were confirmed by readings from Metro Vancouver's air quality monitoring stations in North Delta and Tsawwassen on November 29 and 30.
Emissions from the use of wood burning appliances are becoming a greater contributor of fine particulate matter in the local airshed; estimates indicate these appliances are responsible for 25% of the fine particulate in the air. The human health impacts of airborne fine particulate matter are significant and concerning. Furthermore, while more stringent fine particulate emission regulatory controls are being imposed on other sources such as transportation and industry, controlling emissions from residential wood smoke does not appear to be as strongly scrutinized.
Accordingly, we support Metro Vancouver pursuing further efforts to address the issue of residential wood smoke to improve the air quality not only locally in Delta, but throughout the region, as per Council's resolution above. We look forward to further discussions on this subject. . ..12
4500 Clarence Taylor Crescent, Delta, British Columbia, Canada V4K 3E2 T 604 946-3210Climate I ActionF 604 Committee 946-6055 - PageI E ma~or 136 cn : delta.ca April 11, 2016 Page 2
Thank you for your consideration of this letter. Please contact my office at (604) 946-3210 if you require any additional information.
Enclosure cc: Carol Mason, Chief Administrative Officer, Metro Vancouver Delta Council Delta Environment Advisory Committee George V. Harvie Chief Administrative Officer Sean McGill, Director of Human Resources and Corporate Planning Mike Brotherston, Manager of Climate Action and Environment
Climate Action Committee - Page 137 The Corporation of Delta COUNCIL REPORT F.20 Regular Meeting
To: Mayor and Council
From: Office of Climate Action & Environment
Date: March 8, 2016
Residential Wood Smoke Particulate Emissions
The following report has been reviewed and endorsed by the Chief Administrative Officer.
• RECOMMENDATIONS:
A. THAT a letter from Mayor Lois E. Jackson be sent to the Chair of the Metro Vancouver Board of Directors in support of further measures to address residential wood smoke emissions. B. THAT this report be provided to the Environment Advisory Committee for information. ------• PURPOSE:
The purpose of this report is to provide information on the emissions of airborne pollutants from residential wood smoke and the relevant regulations.
• BACKGROUND:
On November 27. 2015, Metro Vancouver issued an air quality bulletin advising of elevated levels of fine particulate matter within some parts of the region, including Delta. The bulletin cited "smoke from local sources, such as wood stoves, fireplaces, and open burning" being a key source to the elevated particulate matter levels. A temperature inversion along with very calm winds contributed to the elevated levels.
Residential wood smoke is generated by residents burning wood or wood products for the purposes of home heating, cooking, or aesthetics. Home appliances ttiat generate residential wood smoke include wood furnaces, wood-fired cooking stoves, wood boilers and fireplaces. When wood is burned, various airborne pollutants are produced, including particulate matter. Long-term and short-term exposure to fine particulate matter under 2.5 microns in diameter (PM 2.s) has been linked to the development or aggravation of various respiratory and cardiovascular diseases due to particles of this size being inhaled deeper into the lungs. In addition to health concerns, residential wood smoke has an effect on both visual and olfactory perceptions of air quality. The BC ambient air quality objective for PM2 5 is 25 µg/m3 over a 24 hour averaging period.
The effects of residential wood smoke are more apparent during cold days in winter, especially during temperature inversions. During tnis meteorological condition, there is little to no wind present to disperse the smoke, either laterally or vertically, which causes the
Climate Action Committee - Page 138 Page 2 of 4
Regulations regarding Residential Wood Smoke March 8, 201 6 smoke to be trapped close to the ground. Moreover, the colder temperatures during winter would accelerate residential use of wood burning appliances. Provincially, it is estimated that 15% of the total PM2.s emissions originates from residential wood smoke; in Metro Vancouver, the estimated percentage rises to 25% of the region's PM2.5 emissions. This relative percentage has increased over the past number of years due to the decreases in other sources of PM2 s such as diesel particulate.
The provincial government regulates the sale of wood burning appliances through the Solid Fuel Burning Domestic Appliance Regulation (B.C. Reg. 304/94). This regulation sets out particulate matter emission standards for wood burning appliances that will be sold in B.C. The regulation is currently in the process of being revised . For new construction, the BC Building Code requires wood burning appliances to meet emissions standards prescribed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency or the Canadian Standards Association: the provincial regulation refers to these federal government-level standards as the baseline for conformity.
Regionally, Metro Vancouver is responsible for monitoring air quality and responding to air quality complaints. Two monitoring stations are located in Delta: one in North Delta (8600- 1 block 116 h St.) and one in Tsawwassen (Pebble Hill Park). When local meteorological and emission trends are forecasted to produce poor air quality for at least 24 hours, Metro Vancouver will issue an air quality bulletin to the affected municipalities; if poor air quality is forecasted on a regional scale ,, then an air quality advisory is issued.
• DISCUSSION:
Prior to the November 27, 2015 air quality bulletin being issued, the mean 24-hour average 3 PM2.5 concentrations in North Delta and Tsawwassen were approximately 7.5 µg/m and 3 3 5.5 µg/m , respectively. The BC ambient air quality objective for PM2 sis 25 µg/m over a 24 hour averagin~ period. The monitoring station at North Delta was not working for portions of November 291 and all of November 30th due to a technical issue. Because the North Delta station was not in operation for parts of November 29th, a 24-hour average for the day could not be calculated. The Tsawwassen monitoring station did not experience any operational 1 3 problems and the 24-hour average concentration for November 29 h was 17.6 µg/m • The maximum measured PM2.5 concentration (1-hour average~ during the air quality advisory 1 3 occurred in North Delta on the afternoon of November 29 , when 58.5 µg/m was detected. The maximum PM2 5 recorded in Tsawwassen was also at the same time, but the 3 concentration was lower, 32.9 µg/m •
The proposed revisions to the provincial Solid Fuel Burning Domestic Appliance Regulation will regulate the sale of wood burning appliances so that only models that meet modern emission standards will be permitted for sale. The intent of the regulatory changes is to gradually replace less efficient appliances with more efficient and cleaner burning models. The Regulation will not enforce the modern emission standards on existing appliances. Metro Vancouver has a wood stove exchange program to further incentivize the public to switch to cleaner burning appliances; residents can receive a $250 rebate for trading in an uncertified wood burning appliance for a new low emission appliance: This has been promoted on Delta's website and social media.
An air quality bulletin (or advisory) issued by Metro Vancouver contains information on how residents can reduce their exposure to air pollutants, but the regional district does not have
Climate Action Committee - Page 139 Page 3 of 4
Regulations regarding Residential Wood Smoke March 8, 2016 a specific bylaw that addresses indoor wood burning in residential properties. Metro Vancouver's Air Quality Management Bylaw (No. 1082) has one reference to residential burning; section 8 requires residents to not use a wood burning appliance to burn prohibited materials (e.g. plastic) and to use the appliance as per the manufacturer's instructions. In the past, a regulatory approach by Metro Vancouver to combat residential wood smoke emissions has not been supported and the focus has been on promoting the incentive program for high efficiency wood stoves and providing information to the public on best practices for residential wood burning. When an air quality advisory or bulletin is issued, Delta has used its social media avenues to alert residents of the anticipated poor air quality and methods residents can take to reduce generation of air pollutants, such as refraining from using wood burning appliances. Raising awareness and giving residents an opportunity to change their behavior without resorting to formal inspections, orders, or violation tickets is expected to be effective in many circumstances.
Residential wood smoke is seen as the main primarily unregulated source of fine particulate emissions in the region and its relative contribution to local air pollution is increasing as successful measures to reduce other sources of fine particulate have been implemented. Metro Vancouver has been consulting with the local health authorities on this issue due to the neighbourhood public health implications. Metro Vancouver is currently considering potential additional regulatory actions to address wood smoke in the region and will be reporting out to the Climate Action Committee on this subject in the near future. Accordingly, it is recommended that a letter from Mayor Lois E. Jackson be sent to the Chair of the Metro Vancouver Board In support of further measures to address residential wood smoke emissions. If regulatory changes are proposed, there will be further consultation with the public and member municipalities and staff will report back to Council on this subject.
Implications: Financial Implications - There are no financial implications associated with this report.
• CONCLUSION:
Residential wood smoke is a significant source of airborne fine particulate matter during the winter months. Legislation does exist at the provincial and regional level that can potentially prohibit a resident from using a wood burning appliance if pollution is occurring; howev~r. enforcement of these laws on private residential property is challenging. Metro Vancouver is currently considering potential additional actions to address residential wood smoke in the region. It is recommended that a letter be sent from Mayor Lois E. Jackson to the Metro Vancouver Board of Directors in support of further measures to address wood smoke in the region.
Mike Brotherston Manager of Climate Action & Environment
Department submission prepared by: Kevin Li, Environmental Officer
Climate Action Committee - Page 140 Page 4 of 4
Regulations regarding Residential Wood Smoke March 8, 2016
Thls report has been prepared in consultation with the following listed departments
Concurrlng Departments Department Name Signature Al' Human Resources & Corporate Sean McGill Planning /L /
18238231 Climate Action Committee - Page 141 6.2
From: Roger Bryenton [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 3:33 PM To: Lizette Lee; Roger Bryenton Subject: Lower Mainland "Network" of Organizations concerned about BC Hydro's Site C Project
Dear Metro Vancouver Climate Action Committee, Lizette
There is a "Network" of Lower Mainland organizations formed to address BC Hydro's Site C dam and powerplant. The "Network" includes: Sierra Club, Wilderness Committee, Amnesty International, Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, Council of Canadians, Dogwood Initiative, Farmland Defence League, KAIROS, Lawyers Rights Watch, the NDP party, Outdoor Recreation Council of BC, Peace Valley Environmental Association, Respecting Aboriginal Values and Environmental Needs, SPEC, Scientists and Professors across Canada, several Suzuki Elders, Union of BC Indian Chiefs, Union of BC Municipalities, Vancouver 350, and more.
We would like to include a wider association, such as Metro Vancouver, as well as others, to coordinate communications, information and education the public about the Site C project and impacts. Site C power is not needed, but the project is being built regardless. It is expensive, does not honour First Nations Treaty rights, has major negative environmental impacts - destroying forests and rangeland, interfering with wildlife and fish, floods some of the best farmland in BC, and does not create nearly as many jobs as would an electricity conservation strategy, in combination with other smaller scale projects when needed. (This is compiled from BCH's own documents).
We are planning a strategy meeting Wed. June 22 at 6pm at the Wilderness Committee offices, 46 East 6th Ave in Vancouver. We would be very appreciative of your, or your Vancouver area representative's attendance at this meeting. Please contact me or RSVP. If you wish, I am available to brief your association. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely, Roger Bryenton, P. Eng. (former), MBA 778 232-1326 Suzuki Elder, SPEC Energy Committee
Please join the BC Hydro Ratepayers Association on Facebook.
18673954
Climate Action Committee - Page 142