Rule of Law in Europe – Perspectives from Practitioners and Academics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rule of Law in Europe – Perspectives from Practitioners and Academics RULE OF LAW IN EUROPE PERSPECTIVES FROM PRACTITIONERS AND ACADEMICS Paul Craig, Stanislas Adam, Nuria Diaz Abad, Lorenzo Salazar European Judicial Training Network 123, rue du Commerce B-1000 Brussels Phone: +32 2 280 22 42 Funded by the Justice Programme E-mail: [email protected] www.ejtn.eu of the European Union All the texts and materials included in this publication, Rule of Law in Europe. Perspectives from practitioners and academics, except where otherwise stated, are the exclusive Property of the European Judicial Training Network (EJTN). Absolutely no reproduction of the contents of the publication, in whole or in part, may be made without the express written permission of EJTN. Extracts of the publication may be reviewed, reproduced or translated for private study only. This excludes sale or any other use in conjunction with a commercial purpose. Any public legal use or reference to Rule of Law in Europe. Perspectives from practitioners and academics should be accompanied by an acknowledgment of EJTN as the source and by a mention of the author of the text referred to. This publication was produced with the fi nancial support of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of EJTN and do not necessarily refl ect the views of the European Union. ISBN number: 9789082810684 Funded by the Justice Programme of the European Union TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD I BIOGRAPHIES III LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS IV CHAPTER 1 DEFINITION AND CONCEPTUALIZATION OF THE RULE OF LAW AND THE ROLE OF JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE THEREIN BY PAUL CRAIG 1 CHAPTER 2 JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE AS A FUNCTIONAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL INSTRUMENT FOR UPHOLDING THE RULE OF LAW IN THE EUROPEAN UNION BY STANISLAS ADAM 15 CHAPTER 3 JUDGES’, PRESIDENTS’ OF COURTS AND MEMBERS OF JUDICIAL COUNCILS PERSPECTIVE BY NURIA DIAZ ABAD 43 CHAPTER 4 PROSECUTORS’, HEADS AND MEMBERS OF PROSECUTORIAL HIGH COUNCIL’S PERSPECTIVE BY LORENZO SALAZAR 56 ANNEX 1 OVERVIEW OF THE CASE LAW OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION WITH RESPECT TO THE RULE OF LAW BY KOEN LENAERTS 70 ANNEX 2 RULE OF LAW IN EUROPE DEMANDS AND CHALLENGES FOR All the texts and materials included in this publication, Rule of Law in Europe. Perspectives from THE EUROPEAN JUDICIARY BY ANGELIKA NUßBERGER 80 practitioners and academics, except where otherwise stated, are the exclusive Property of the European Judicial Training Network (EJTN). Absolutely no reproduction of the contents of the publication, ANNEX 3 in whole or in part, may be made without the express written permission of EJTN. Extracts of the DEVELOPING THE EU RULE OF LAW POLICY BY EMMANUEL CRABIT 86 publication may be reviewed, reproduced or translated for private study only. This excludes sale or any other use in conjunction with a commercial purpose. Any public legal use or reference to Rule of Law in Europe. Perspectives from practitioners and academics should be accompanied by an acknowledgment of EJTN as the source and by a mention of the author of the text referred to. This publication was produced with the fi nancial support of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of EJTN and do not necessarily refl ect the views of the European Union. ISBN number: 9789082810684 Funded by the Justice Programme of the European Union FOREWORD It is with great pleasure that I introduce to you “Rule of Law in Europe. Perspectives from practi- tioners and academics”, produced by the European Judicial Training Network (EJTN) within the Pilot training project for justice professionals on key issues of fundamental rights and rule of law, implemented in 2018 - 2019 as part of the European Commission’s strategy for the effective implementation of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. Before explaining the aim of this publication, how it came about and its content, I wish to share some background information about the EJTN. The EJTN is the principal platform and promoter for the European judiciary’s training and exchange of knowledge. The EJTN represents the interests of over 120,000 European judges, prosecutors, judicial trainers and trainees across Europe. Formed in 2000, the EJTN’s fields of interest include EU, civil, criminal, commercial and administrative law, as well as EU fundamental rights, linguistics and societal issues training. The vision of the EJTN is to help foster a common legal and judicial European culture. Based on this mandate, the EJTN promotes training programmes with a genuine European dimension for members of the European judiciary. The EJTN Strategic Plan 2021-2027 stipulates that the rule of law, judicial independence and accountability are core competencies of judges and prosecutors, and that these aspects should be enhanced through training offered by the EJTN. The EU’s judicial systems are based on the principles of independence, impartiality, integrity, transparency, accountability and professionalism, all of which are key to the rule of law, upholding public trust and ensuring the effective delivery of justice. With this publication, the EJTN aims to increase judges and prosecutors’ knowledge about key elements of the rule of law and its practical implications in their professional and private lives. Awareness of the values and rules that judges and prosecutors need to adhere to in their work, such as integrity and competence, and EU law requirements and standards concerning independence, media communication strategies and appointment or disciplinary procedures, is essential to reinforcing the rule of law. The objectives of this publication are to strengthen a rule of law culture and increase knowledge of the rule of law standards deriving from several sources, such as EU law, the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), as well as the recommendations and standards of numerous European and international organisations such as the Council of Europe. The publication aims to enable practitioners from different countries to respond to the various challenges relating to the rule of law, and to be aware of how to implement mechanisms to prevent, correct and sanction abuse of the rule of law in practitioners’ daily activities. Also central to this publication is the sharing of experiences of European colleagues and increasing mutual understanding. I Rule of Law in Europe The publication consists of four articles authored by four prominent academics and practitioners: Paul Craig; Stanislas Adam; Nuria Diaz Abad; and Lorenzo Salazar. I am grateful to them for their contributions, and for the support provided to the EJTN in the implementation of actions in the field of the rule of law. Essential for the production of this publication was the information gathered from the seminars and webinars implemented by the said project, which was financed by the European Commission and implemented by the EJTN. The project was concluded with a final conference hosted by the Court of Justice of European Union on 13-14 May 2019, with three excellent keynote speeches addressed to the audience by CJEU President Koen Lenaerts, ECtHR First Vice-President Angelica Nussberger and Mr Emmanuel Crabit, EC Director, all annexed to this publication. In parallel to this publication, another output of this project was the publication of the Training Guide on the rule of law (RoL) for judges and prosecutors. EJTN’s acknowledgements go to the members of the EJTN experts’ group, which provided the scientific oversight for this project and its outputs. The group was coordinated by judge Nicolae Horatius Dumbrava (RO) and consisted of Professor Rafael Bustos Gisbert, Ms Karolina Rokicka (The Academy of European Law, ERA), judge Andrea Chis (RO, European Networks of Councils for the Judiciary), judge Zeller Edith (AT, Association of European Administrative Judges, AEAJ), Astrid Hopma (NL), prosecutor Lara Barberic (HR), Eva Pastrana (Council of Europe, CoE), Jana Gajdosova (European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, FRA), prosecutor Sava Petrov (BG), judge Luca Perilli (IT), Claudia Weisbart (DE) and Wojciech Postulski (EJTN). The EJTN is also grateful to the European Commission’s representatives supporting the experts’ group. The project was managed by Mr Georgios Klis, EJTN Project Manager, to whom I owe much gratitude for his commitment and dedication to the project’s implementation. Finally, I wish to thank the Tipik Communication Agency S.A. for its efficient collaboration in the implementation of the project. I am sure this publication will become a source of daily advice and assistance, as well as inspiration for performing the everyday duties common to judges and prosecutors across Europe. Wojciech Postulski Judge and Secretary General of the European Judicial Training Network Perspectives from practitioners and academics II BIOGRAPHIES Paul Craig is an Emeritus Professor of law at St John’s College, Oxford. He teaches, researches and writes on Constitutional law, Administrative law, EU law and Comparative Administrative law. He is a Fellow of the British Academy, and an Honorary QC. He was the UK Alternate Member of the Venice Commission on Law and Democracy from 2011-2019, and was Delegate of Oxford University Press from 2009-2019. Stanislas Adam is a legal secretary at the Court of Justice of the European Union (Luxembourg), in the chambers of President Koen Lenaerts, and professor of European Union law at Ghent University, where he is in charge of the course ‘EU Competition Law’. After graduating in law at the University of Louvain (U.C.L.) and in European law at Ghent University, he was awarded a doctorate fellowship from the National Fund for Scientific Research – Flanders (FWO). He defended his doctoral thesis in 2010, under supervision of Professor Marc Maresceau (La procédure d’avis devant la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne, Bruylant 2011). He then obtained a Master of Laws at Harvard University (LL.M. ’11), where he benefitted from theFrank Boas Scholarship for Graduate Studies.
Recommended publications
  • Legal Think Tanks and Governments. Country Report. Poland
    “Legal Think Tanks and government – capacity building”: project supported by the International Visegrad Fund www.visegradfund.org Project partners: POLAND HUNGARY Legal Think Tanks and Government CZECH REPUBLIC – Capacity Building Country Report. Poland SLOVAKIA UKRAINE Authors Łukasz BOJARSKI Grzegorz WIADEREK MOLDOVA 1 Authors of the study Łukasz BOJARSKI President and co-founder of INPRIS, lawyer. Co-founder and Chairman of the Board of the Polish Legal Clinics Foundation (FUPP). Expert of Polish and international institutions (including European Commission, OSCE, Council of Europe, academia, private foundations including Stefan Batory Foundation, Open Society Institute). Member of the Editorial Board of the „National Judicial Council. Quarterly” (http://www.krs.pl/pl/kwartalnik-krs). Before: Member of the National Council of the Judiciary of Poland, (2010-2015). Member of the Board of Directors of PILnet – The Global Network for Public Interest Law (2008-2016). Employee of the Helsinki Foundation of Human Rights in the years 1998-2010. Member of the Experts Council of the „Citizen and the Law” (Obywatel i Prawo) program of the Polish- American Freedom Foundation (2005-2013), Member of the Committee on the Efficiency of Justice in the Ministry of Justice. Fields of interest: judiciary, legal services, legal profession, legal education, non- discrimination, human rights. Author of the reform proposals on the access to legal aid and the legal profession. Author of numerous publications on the judiciary, access to justice and interactive innovative methods in legal education, see list of main publications. Contact: lukasz.bojarski at inpris.pl Grzegorz WIADEREK Co-founder of INPRIS and member of the Management Board, lawyer.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Judicial Reform in Ukraine and in Poland: Onstitutional and European Legal Aspect in the Context of Independent Judiciary
    RESEARCH ARTICLES CURRENT JUDICIAL REFORM IN UKRAINE AND IN POLAND: ONSTITUTIONAL AND EUROPEAN LEGAL ASPECT IN THE CONTEXT OF INDEPENDENT JUDICIARY Grzegorz Borkowski, Doctor of Law, Judge seconded to the Regional Court Warszawa-Praga, former Head of Office of the National Council of Judiciary (Poland) Olga Sovgyria, Doctor of Science (Law), professor of the Department of Constitutional Law, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (Kyiv, Ukraine) https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-2.3-a000011 Summary: 1. Introduction. – 2. The Judicial System of Poland at the Present Stage. – 2.1. Constitutional Tribunal. – 2.1.1. Composition of the Constitutional Tribunal. – 2.1.2. Refusal of Publication of Certain Judgments of the Constitutional Tribunal. – 2.2. The Common Courts System. – 2.2.1. Merger of the Functions of Minister of Justice and Prosecutor General and its Consequences. – 2.2.2. Court directors. – 2.2.3. Random Allocation of Cases. – 2.2.4. Judicial Appointments. – 2.2.5. Secondment of Judges. – 2.2.6. Appointment and Dismissal of Court Presidents. – 2.3. Supreme Court. – 2.3.1. Extraordinary Complaint (Article 86). – 2.3.2. Changes in the Structure of the Supreme Court. – 2.3.3. Lay Judges. – 2.3.4. Changes in Disciplinary Proceedings in Respect of the SC and the Common Judiciary. – 2.4. National Council for Judiciary. – 2.4.1. Entrusting the Sejm with the Competence to Elect the Members of the Council. – 2.4.2 Termination of Office of the Current Members of the Council. – 3. Judicial Reform in Ukraine in 2016: Problems of Implementation. – 3.1. General Characteristics of the Judiciary in Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Time for Europe to Get Migrant Integration Right
    The arrival of over one million people seeking protection in our Time for Europe continent in recent months has profoundly shaken Europe and found European governments unprepared to face up to the challenge of providing adequate reception. to get migrant Preoccupied with short-term imperatives, European governments have lost sight of more long-term challenges posed by these arrivals. integration right Little, if any, significant debate about how to promote the successful integration of these migrants into their new host societies has taken place. With this paper, the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights fills this gap and provides guidance to governments and parliaments on the design and implementation of successful integration policies. In particular, he presents the international legal standards which govern this field and sets forth a number of recommendations to facilitate the integration of migrants, with a focus on family reunification, residence rights, language and integration courses, access to the labour market and quality education, as well as protection from discrimination. www.commissioner.coe.int 055616 PREMS ENG The Council of Europe is the continent’s leading Issue paper human rights organisation. It comprises 47 member states, 28 of which are members of the European Union. All Council of Europe member states have signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights, a treaty designed to protect human rights, democracy and the rule of law. The European Court of Human Rights oversees the implementation of the Convention in the member states. Time for Europe to get migrant integration right Issue paper published by the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights Council of Europe The opinions expressed in this work are the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Council of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Studia Iuridica 2015/60. Collective Labour
    COLLECTIVE LABOUR LAW Studia Iuridica tom 60 COLLECTIVE LABOUR LAW logo WUW.inddWarszawa 1 20155/12/2014 12:54:19 PM Rada Programowa Grażyna Bałtruszajtys (przewodnicząca), Jan Błeszyński, Zdzisław Galicki, Hubert Izdebski, Jacek Lang, Maria Rogacka-Rzewnicka, Marek Wąsowicz, Beata Janiszewska (sekretarz) Członkowie Rady Programowej afiliowani za granicą Marc Bors (Uniwersytet we Fribourgu), Michael Martinek (Uniwersytet w Saarbrücken), Alessandro Somma (Uniwersytet w Ferrarze), Elena V. Timoshina (Uniwersytet w Sankt Petersburgu) Redaktorzy naukowi tomu Łukasz Pisarczyk Jakub Stelina Recenzenci „Studia Iuridica” w 2015 r. Francisco Javier Andrés Santos, Wojciech Dajczak, Włodzimierz Kamyszanskij, Luz Maria Martinez Velencoso, Andriej Łusznikow, Bronisław Sitek, Jakob Fortunat Stagl Redaktor naczelny Tomasz Giaro Redaktor tematyczny Łukasz Pisarczyk Redaktor językowy Radosław Pawelec Sekretarz Redakcji Adam Niewiadomski Projekt okładki i stron tytułowych Jakub Rakusa-Suszczewski Redaktor prowadzący Dorota Dziedzic Redaktor Krystyna Dziewanowska-Stefańczyk Opracowanie redakcyjne streszczeń anglojęzycznych Robert Stępień ISSN 0137-4346 ISBN 978-83-235-1932-4 © Copyright by Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego 2015 Wersją pierwotną czasopisma jest wersja drukowana. „Studia Iuridica” znajdują się w wykazie czasopism punktowanych przez Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego na potrzeby oceny parametrycznej jednostek naukowych. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego 00-497 Warszawa, ul. Nowy Świat 4 www.wuw.pl; e-mail: [email protected] Dział
    [Show full text]
  • Présentation Des Intervenants Line-Up of the Speakers
    Présentation des intervenants Line-up of the speakers Koen Lenaerts President of the Court of justice of the European Union, Professor at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven President Koen Lenaerts holds a Ph.D. in Law (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven), a Master’s in Law and a Master’s in Public Administration (Harvard University). He has been a Professor of European Law at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven since 1983. Previously, he was a Professor at the College of Europe, Bruges (1984-89) and a lawyer in private practice at the Brussels Bar (1986-89), as well as a Visiting Professor at the Harvard Law School (1989). He was a Judge at the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (now the General Court), from 25 September 1989 to 6 October 2003. He has been a Judge at the Court of Justice since 7 October 2003, serving as Vice- President from 9 October 2012 to 7 October 2015 and as President since 8 October 2015. Antoine Bailleux Professeur à l'Université Saint-Louis - Bruxelles, Avocat au Barreau de Bruxelles, directeur de l'Institut d'études européennes (USL-B) Prof. Antoine Bailleux is a professor of EU law and legal theory at Saint-Louis University, Brussels and a member of the Brussels Bar. He is the chief editor of the Revue interdisciplinaire d’études juridiques - Droit en contexte and a director of the Institute for European Studies (USL-B) and the Séminaire interdisciplinaire d’études juridiques. In the field of EU law, his main areas of interest are fundamental rights, free movement, institutional law and competition law.
    [Show full text]
  • Best of Concurrences 2020 Articles
    English Edition 2020 Concurrences REVUE DES DROITS DE LA CONCURRENCE | COMPETITION LAW REVIEW Ce signe indique un article publié dans le supplément électronique Forewords Articles de la revue disponible sur Should digital antitrust be ordo‑liberal? Mobile telecommunications mergers in the EU – Alexandre de Streel, N° 1-2020 Remedies revisited Concurrences Bernd Langeheine, Beatriz Martos Stevenson, Jan www.concurrences.com Politics, digital innovation, intellectual property Przerwa, N° 1-2020 and the future of competition law Accessible sur abonnement Josef Drexl, N° 4-2019 Antitrust and the clash of sovereigns – Bringing under one roof: Extraterritoriality, industrial policy, foreign sovereign compulsion, and (bad) applications of law against “my country’s” firms Interviews Eleanor M. Fox, N° 4-2019 Dirk MIDDELSCHULTE (Unilever): How purpose‑driven business charms a competition practitioner N° 1-2020 International Marina TAVASSI (Milan Court of Appeal): Belgium: The new Book IV of the Code of Economic The development of private enforcement in Italy – Law – Dotting the i’s and crossing The experience of a specialised judge the t’s in competition law rules N° 4-2019 Caroline Cauffman, N° 1-2020 Brexit: Balancing UK and EU merger control Joel Bamford, Aiste Slezeviciute, N° 4-2019 On-Topics Digital & competition Paul Belleflamme, Martin Peitz et al. N° 1-2020 Legal practices Limitation periods in competition law damages Banking and Big Data actions in the EU: Are further clarification Adam Land, Bill Roberts, Stefano Trento, Jorge and harmonisation
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty-One Theses on the Legal Legacy of the French Revolution in Latin America
    TWENTY-ONE THESES ON THE LEGAL LEGACY OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTION IN LATIN AMERICA Dante Figueroa* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 42 II. A TWISTED NOTION OF NATURAL LAW ....................................... 48 A. Elimination of Divine Law from the HierarchicalPyramid Presentedby Thomas ofAquinas .......................................... 50 B. NaturalLaw Is No Longer Unchangeable, Universal, or P ermanent ............................................................................ 51 C. Elitist,Moralistic, and Moralizing Ethos Tainted the Concept ofNatural Law ........................................................ 52 D. The People Do Not Reserve Any Powers: All Are Transferredto the Majority As Represented by the L egislature............................................................................. 53 III. A TOTAL AND RIGID SEPARATION OF RELIGION AND STATE ........... 54 A. Religion Has No Role in the Public Square .......................... 54 B. SocialJustice Is a Secular Concept to Which Religious Views Are A lien ..................................................................... 56 IV. POSITIVISM AS A MORALLY-NEUTRAL LEGISLATIVE SYSTEM ........ 57 A. No Role for Stare Decisis ..................................................... 57 B. The TruncatedRole of Custom ............................................... 59 C. General Principles of Law ................................................... 62 D . Role of Equity .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ruled by Law
    RULED BY LAW THREATS TO THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN POLAND IN 2015-2019 RULED BY LAW THREATS TO THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN POLAND IN 2015-2019 Authors Małgorzata Szuleka, Marcin Wolny in cooperation with Maciej Kalisz Our thanks go to Danuta Przywara, Maciej Nowicki, Dr Piotr Kładoczny, Dr Barbara Grabowska-Moroz, Jarosław Jagura, Konrad Siemaszko, Patryk Wachowiec and Daniel Witko for their assistance and comments on the first versions of this report. Graphic design and layout Marta Borucka Cover photo Jan Kolar / unsplash Edition I Publication available under the Creative Commons license. Acknowledgment of authorship under the same conditions 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0) Legal status: 15th September 2019 Publisher Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights ul. Zgoda 11 00-018 Warszawa CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................... 5 Summary of events in the years 2015–2019 ........................................ 7 The parliamentary elections in October, 2015 .............................................. 7 Information on the most important systemic changes ...................................... 8 The shrinking space for human rights ...................................................... 9 Calendar of changes .......................................................................10 A crisis in the rule of law – attacks on the judiciary ...............................13 Changes in the Constitutional Tribunal ...................................................13 Changes to the Supreme
    [Show full text]
  • How to Foster the Rule of Law in the Western Balkans: 10 Notes to Decision-Makers
    supported by How to Foster the Rule of Law in the Western Balkans: 10 Notes to Decision-Makers By Dorian Jano and Jovana Marović June 2019 This project No. 21830277 was made possible through Visegrad+ Grant from the International Visegrad Fund. How to Foster the Rule of Law in the Western Balkans: 10 Notes to Decision-Makers By Dorian Jano and Jovana Marović Acknowledgements: The project is co-financed by the Governments of Czechia, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia through Visegrad Grants from International Visegrad Fund. The mission of the fund is to advance ideas for sustainable regional cooperation in Central Europe. This project No. 21830277 was made possible through Visegrad+ Grant from the International Visegrad Fund. Disclaimer: All views expressed in this research paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of International Visegrad Fund. supported by Impressum Title: How to Foster the Rule of Law in the Western Balkans: 10 Notes to Decision-Makers Publisher: Institutite for Democracy “Societas Civilis” - Skopje Authors: Dorian Jano and Jovana Marović Proofreading: Jana Dimitrovska Design: Dejan Kuzmanovski The publication can be downloaded from: https://idscs.org.mk/ Introduction In a recent communication on enlargement been able so far to adapt Western Balkan policy and individual country reports, the countries to the values ​​it advocates, but European Commission has highlighted a these countries have developed a new number of issues that stand in the path governing model which combines elements of Western Balkans’ democratization. of authoritarianism and democracy. 4 The message is the same as years ago: if Western Balkan countries want to join the With the appointment of the new European European Union, ”comprehensive reforms Commission, the EU and the Western are required in crucial areas, notably on Balkans have a chance to shape the rule the rule of law, including the fight against of law reform on a new stronger basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Free Fulltext
    The European Journal of International Law Vol. 29 no. 1 © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. A Very Short History of International Law Journals (1869–2018) Ignacio de la Rasilla* Abstract The first part of this article presents an overview of the rise of the first international and comparative law journals in the late 19th century followed by an account of the three factors lying behind the relative fall of the comparative element in the title of some of the interna- tional law journals published in French, Russian, Spanish, German, Japanese, Italian and English from 1869 to the end of World War I. The second part surveys the consolidation of international law periodicals in the interwar period under the impact of the establishment of the League of Nations in both Latin America and Europe, including Nordic and Eastern Europe. The third part examines the expansion and main characteristics of international law journals during the Cold War and their geographical extension towards Asia, Oceania and, occasionally, the Middle East and Africa. The fourth part focuses on the main features of the global post-1989 period in the field of periodicals of international law, examining the impact on them of the expansion and sectoral specialization of international law, regionalization, globalization, interdisciplinarity and the transformative influence of new technologies respec- tively.
    [Show full text]
  • Poland's Constitutional Crisis
    Contemporary Issues Poland’s P o l i Constitutional Crisis: c y B Facts and interpretations r i e f Marcin Matczak w w w . f l j s . o The Foundation for Law, Justice and Society r g in association with the Centre for Socio-Legal Studies and Wolfson College, University of Oxford www.fljs.org The Foundation for Law, Justice and Society © The Foundation for Law, Justice and Society 2018 Executive Summary This policy brief presents the crucial events of ‘the Polish constitutional crisis’, and what has been widely described as a backsliding on the part of Poland into authoritarianism. It attempts to explain the nature and possible causes of the crisis, offering three explanations: (1) historical, originating from the smooth, non-punitive nature of the post- Communist transition; (2) legal, relating to the excessive formalism of Polish legal culture; and (3) sociological, as a crisis of liberalism and of political identification among the youth and across society at large. POLAND’S CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS: FACTS AND INTERPRETATIONS . 1 Poland’s Constitutional Crisis: Facts and interpretations Introduction response was premature because a constitutional review of the previous appointments was already The Polish constitutional crisis began in November underway, and it was disproportionate because 2015, just after Poland’s governing party Prawo I three out of five of the previous appointments were Sprawiedliwosc (which translates as Law and Justice absolutely compliant with the Polish Constitution. and is commonly abbreviated to PiS) won the country’s parliamentary elections, and is characterized Some of the events that took place at the beginning by two principal phases.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultative Council of European Judges (Ccje
    Strasbourg, 12 October 2017 CCJE-BU(2017)9REV CONSULTATIVE COUNCIL OF EUROPEAN JUDGES (CCJE) Opinion of the CCJE Bureau following the request of the Polish National Council of the Judiciary to provide an opinion with respect to the Draft Act of September 2017 presented by the President of Poland amending the Act on the Polish National Council of the Judiciary and certain other acts 1 A. The request and the procedure of the assessment 1. By letter of 3 October 2017, the Chairman of the National Council of the Judiciary of Poland addressed the CCJE, requesting its opinion on the Draft Act on the National Council of the Judiciary of Poland (hereafter the Draft Act) presented by the President of Poland. The CCJE was requested, in particular, to assess the compatibility of the Draft Act with European standards on the independence of the judiciary and the status of councils for the judiciary. The CCJE was provided with the Draft Act as well as the Act of 12 May 2011 on the Polish National Council of the Judiciary, both in English translation. 2. According to its Terms of Reference, one of the tasks of the CCJE is to provide targeted cooperation, inter alia, at the request of the CCJE members, judicial bodies or relevant associations of judges, to enable States to comply with the Council of Europe standards concerning judges. The aforementioned request of the Polish National Council of the Judiciary (hereafter the Council) falls within the Terms of Reference of the CCJE. 3. The CCJE Bureau emphasises that it is not in a position to assess the constitutionality of the Draft Act.
    [Show full text]