Map of the Division of Grayndler

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Map of the Division of Grayndler GRAYNDLER K B T V G R R THE IC I C T T N N A E D O WRIGHTS RD O A A R R S DA V A L I D G I K C E P A D TURNER AVE L T LL GE FA R L A A 151°7'E 151°8'E S 151°9'E 151°10'E 151°11'E Yurulbin A S A Battersea Balls E S S O Blackwall P RICKARDR ST M T S L Y B T T DR FIELD A S LE WA P O D T K E Park S O S N C WOLS COCKATOO O T Park T M R RI Head I E S ARMION RD Point A N C N A Y N IM S R O HE D LT T M A D VE O T MIRA M E E B A B L Willyama Reserve S Reserve E K L RS S V E T L R H T S I E D T E IN N AM P AT A U A RV R ISLAND D G RW K B Howse K I G Cove IN D A C R A N R E F E C P T PR AT O C W S S T E R A W CL H N Y T S R IS H V Park P I E O S V A R B O F D T D R S RO I R KE I T S D R Z BY S E LA IT T RD S C O I A R F T T W T N S RK S S T T D T A L E A S G P IC ST L N O GU S K DHEZLET ST D U N S AY R R R A E R R RTO BR S A T D S I B L G V A R T I O T IN T Abbotsford E OU A Snails P MF R S B W A P R IS H T E ST N ST S E G S T R U V MON U V S A I I A N Quarantine TROSE I P ER L N I A RD Bay E E D S I O Bay T R N C E S L CABARITAK O ST L W CE M S LT S T W T R OU I D RD R Reserve A N L A T S Abbotsford E I D G O O R O S Five Dock M E T O D D E Figtree R T TA R P S R N R C V Cove E M O Birchgrove HE T E A Bay S MOORE ST F W Bay AY N O L L Foreshore R A A A E B V F B I A R A R B WALTON E T Park C Reserve N E S R A R H BA BIRCHGROVE N S D T K I B P N H T Park V R 33°51'S GRAYNDLER DE E E OT N P O D L T S L M E E FORD G R Y Y O W D A L VICTORIA RD A S I L CHISWICK L E T A Henry F Drummoyne SW S H H S R S E RS K D ARL E K T E T A R T ST V WA S CE R R E N I O HA S RA S O T E R F S France Lawson K T Park TE S I O A TAVISTOCK ST B I NI C E RI O C R O C E A D T T M A C TER BO A N H W A W S L L N KS Park L EX C L T Taplin IA L S E B Bay B O T G E W ST A O R R S A N N V G A O V S RD N I T A B O N T E S D R E CA L T Park R C E S I S D IC T H R L R B N U C S N V S B E AR IO T E B R R K 33°51'S B D U G T A L AL O H Y B C A N T L T A R E E S Y C POI N A C D NT O C O H E T V E V A E G O O S A T Drummoyne E L B N M Concord T E U E V R A H D B A ABBOTSFORD E L O ST Q O S O D T WI T Y L B ND P Park R R Golf P D LAC WAR PDE LL M R R T E D ES H W D S G IL DO KW E G T E A R G ALL S NN E PS O Peppercorn S S N LIP E P T A S E S T L M R OI W F L T Course S E NT SW O E T S T R E D RD T E F O S E D N S R Reserve H CK Allison O C T S O A E Lysaght E R S T M AV N R Y R S R S ST LA T OR W Park E IN M E ST T N ST S F T NE AY E Park H O S P MAY R D T G R R R S D M Y S D IN N L E A A E R G T E SO V O DRUMMOYNE S C W T E A R S N A Prince LA YL Campbell O B S T S A T D RY E E W M S EN GREAT NORTH RD R R T C T W M O P EW H VE T S I L GOW STO A H IP M E I JA Edward A E S O C A T G E CA E Park G C S V R R B AD G LLE K E HE R AY A P YRNE N A Q R Mort T S B N D R I S L V Y D D A A Russell PP A C O M IC Park D O T U A N W S P O A T A T Massey D OK C AV G ST A Elkington R C AR N ON K R E R H R S Bay M O R P S WM E G E K OR Park I N N K O C T H S D T LE E ST T IN A E T W IE T Park G R S V B A Park S C T O VE IE R V D Mort R Park A E W S W T E IR E T V I T T A A D S T O Hen and Chicken B T S S A B L Mort T R AY K ST S C Salton S D S E S H ST N L UT B N HE O T IN T Bay S S A TI R T M N M S I UR D P G C K U Y T C S O O R WERONA AVEMP E Reserve O S Park Bay E T S ST T T M W KL C R S N E W T R Bay A L H T M T B G E S S P I ON L A I S T S B E S Y A H S B E AY E Paringa L L IF E T C T ST N P BBI A T E V L BENT ST A I D L G L R E T M S G S I I C L R A R G S R N E U D C N SI S L Reserve T AJ L H H R L H O U H I S BIRKENHEAD I H M N D O O E LLE R Exile R T P K O N D N H TT L H C O S O G DE k S HAMPDEN RD T ST L R C T T ES LS D A ee R P R O I S N Cr T AM S S R H S V O V O J T S T T r S Bay S D W K ROSEBY ST IE ARLING S O S A T Y IE D ES e N O t N N T a D C A E R S A A A N S w alt E T R V A POINT O L L M S W H R L S G O P R C A T A SI R LEI YO A ST R T E A K BO V L ER T LITTLE ART T H S S IC R U NS C H S B V S UR T V S AR E S DIA A RES H T R C A A T UR T M T T L O B T ST I R S S H T U S T I T RI S E OW M A O Brett L REID N ITT L B M LE D T T Y P T O AR L S D LIN BALMAINS E S G E ER DE ST S P T O M N Park WA CONCORDI T L H L B M W NHO OLME IE S E B E R A E R E Greenlees A N D ED D GE O CLARE LL I RN L A E LLEWELLYN D MP V T N V P N IO U ST R A ATE I H DATCHETT ST M A R T E DE ST T R B E E E C T Park R T G E LG T S T S R A F O S L E W Y N T T T EAST R E L T U BALMAIN G O L D O EY COOPER ST E C P IR A A IN I T S L S L S T R H L L S R LL I MP T T A C E S T POLDING ST T L A N E E E E T T D J C EN RD S S LA W IN WA K I T S R T Y S A S I ST RUSSELL SO G C K N T N S T H M D T U EO ST S T H S Ann D N DORE T O H S NT I L S O N A J S EENLEES R O E S L R A U CO Y P O ILE L T T T B G A R L VICTORIA RD A JU O S T L R L ST Cashman E KE I A A N H L MO E T I N V L I TTL IE ST PL O T A T O N G E BEATT S P S M R M M H E P P UR T Y O TON N P T E E ADS D RA R L H I L YLEA R EY G W L A H Reserve H G R S T R N WAREEMBA L O D S I J R S S IE ST A IP G G U D N T L A Y SH T A RE S S E L R W T E T T E T V A S ST D N U Sisters A PA G E ST P T S H O O R S N I A M BA LM E R M E T D S T E Y EE R B R R S T LL WA G LIN W T R N E B A O E E I T M S T O D O C Z S I BE E N O T E R V Bayview P Bay A E N R I O C T S H O W N S S P Iron Cove T T I E R R H CANADA BAY A S A E A U T T T D T O ST S S S S R E B A T S W T S N V T D Park O S O T D M J Bridge MARGARET ST O ST T LY S E E T N S S T T BE NT T E T NL ST T RO N VINC I S R S S S S MAJ U E A L W S S B L O S E E D S A S E S R Y R NG LL RY EN S LE DFO T A T O T T H R T V A RAF N S Y E R T G KIR S E ST N T OR B S ST O R ON T A M RRI T A V T M R S I W S RD R T A T S O S O Half Moon A T DF N O A W S R C S N T B D S T S T O E HA S R T E E W L RS T W B A L K P S A T GH D RA N T T K L R Punch Rothwell E E O I R AGA T LY A R I D Bay A L S L T A T C UK C A S O E T N S S ON D I H N R N T T M N AU D S L Park White E U R OU A S A N S B E Park I E GARTFERN AVE L GOW B ON C P L Y BA F V I H T C L A C T A V REY B D E E U HI A A R S R B N U R R Y A O D S M D Y L LD O A R I C L LDS O Bay L A B L H E A V M C T E W A M A E S E T Y M A E A S AV A M R S N M A E S A R I L E ST O L M N Y Park V F L U C T E R E B T A D T L R S T R O T O C V E CE N S D T S U S A IT Y E C T I STA O C S F E V C U V H LL E Y L N E N E A M A E T Johnstons E H U L O M E L T N N R O T LLO S I R E CR AV S V ER T SS I O S S A O C Canada P TT T N R S N NE A O E T T C D S R R S A Bay SO A E S A R B S T M E U N T D M T S ER O S T O L B G ER Y TT E V S C B MA R A T R E N Y U T T T S I P B A B Bay V N TH B E A O H L E S I O T S R Y Y L V B S S N E S V T L TA T EY CL L G UC C D EA IT A ES O R A R S IO ILD L L L O A G DA WH K EN L DS T A L S H E I S S T N A ST O T E R H N E L V O S N ST S S G O W N O E E U L A E A E V R King T T S E D K L S S ES M N C E Halliday E T D L B L R C L N Iron Cove M V A O N E A A X Y H I R E L DI A C A S L NA E George C T T E T A I M O A N E P A V N O S D Park S L T L S S V C N A S AL A O R N H E Y L K A E O S U T F V I A R T Park N L E D I E ST L S V W N R R N E J E T V I T S E V R NIELD AVE S B C A M N T M White T A E H E A I A AT S E V N R C O A V N A IN M N INNO A R O E K L SPRINGSIDE ST RY E S AN A ST O MC G IE M H U E E RD R Bay R D D S T E R M A P N B B V S O O T L T TH U R E RA R OO E A S C MCG Storey SydneyHarbour O X S SFI T AN L I T C I M B L D E M P F D T D Elizabeth R Y Kings A L L P S A E N A P H O G S R O E T S A V V E Queen A A Park D T NationalPark R G I O N E E R E R T T I E E R L N S RNS K I P S N D T I R S T A S Macarthur E L E N Bay P B S E R N S I T Elizabeth F A S O E S T S N D A Z Y L T T S AR T T L N S A G B T T N W E N D N Park T C S Bay L I O S S V E T E T E I S Y OR D T Y R ER S T S N B P K E N S S S Cintra C A T ONS L L R NT LY R C A E Neild S N S AV R L A T N E A B A D A I T V A Park R O N O N R R K D L S S B VE Park M CE R C ROZELLE B A T O H T A D A EV P AV S S RE E HO E T FIVE DOCK H R H O E R W D A P T D T LM D T E D S I C UR E N O E V E S R EW R U MATILDA C S H S V AST A O D R G L E R T O C T LE Y K S S D I A E P AB D R ST D ST C T H ST E P D E L T D Y D T A Z O T S RD E R R I T Y I A Goddard S R T O E S S T S E N T Barnwell S T L T R R H S N S IL FI S T BER E EL PADSTOW V R Park E C R T er E T O S M E R I Park J V T v A O S S S Five Leichhardt S R i A HEN A EY ST ST T BE RY L O 33°52'S T VI IR O T MME R CANADA N H W F RODD POINT L H O A O T N D S R T AV ST Dock H Peace K R T QU S WY A EN E G V IRK O S D A E P WN A T M A R B RK tta N AV E H ST W A N T I EN A a G Park Grove C BO T S W Z T T E I S A S O VE E SO D E L L E S O NE S C I N M I T E O S R TT SO N am BAY T E O r E T W V S r LA O C O ARK NC E H T E U O Y LO RN O a P T W I N S N C IN L ST EY A D H P S S R A Y E DO E S T S S C S O S T O E A R J W B N T L V RD T D A S M B T LF BROUGHTON ST A G T.
Recommended publications
  • Sewage Treatment System Impact Monitoring Program
    Sewage Treatment System Impact Monitoring Program Volume 1 Data Report 2019-20 Commercial-in-Confidence Sydney Water 1 Smith Street, Parramatta, NSW Australia 2150 PO Box 399 Parramatta NSW 2124 Report version: STSIMP Data Report 2019-20 Volume 1 final © Sydney Water 2020 This work is copyright. It may be reproduced for study, research or training purposes subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source and no commercial usage or sale. Reproduction for purposes other than those listed requires permission from Sydney Water. Sewage Treatment System Impact Monitoring Program | Vol 1 Data Report 2019-20 Page | i Executive summary Background Sydney Water operates 23 wastewater treatment systems and each system has an Environment Protection Licence (EPL) regulated by the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA). Each EPL specifies the minimum performance standards and monitoring that is required. The Sewage Treatment System Impact Monitoring Program (STSIMP) commenced in 2008 to satisfy condition M5.1a of our EPLs. The results are reported to the NSW EPA every year. The STSIMP aims to monitor the environment within Sydney Water’s area of operations to determine general trends in water quality over time, monitor Sydney Water’s performance and to determine where Sydney Water’s contribution to water quality may pose a risk to environmental ecosystems and human health. The format and content of 2019-20 Data Report predominantly follows four earlier reports (2015-16 to 2018-19). Sydney Water’s overall approach to monitoring (design and method) is consistent with the Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ANZECC 2000 and ANZG 2018) guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water and Flooding
    Chapter 18 – Surface Water and Flooding 18 Surface water and flooding This chapter describes the potential surface water and flooding impacts associated with the project. The chapter has been informed by surface water and flooding assessments provided in Appendix L (Surface water technical report) and Appendix M (Flooding technical report). Table 18-1 sets out the SEARs relevant to surface water and flooding and identifies where the requirements have been addressed in this EIS. Table 18-1 SEARs - Surface water and flooding Assessment requirements Where addressed in this EIS Water - Hydrology 1. The Proponent must describe (and map) the existing hydrological regime for Section 18.2 discusses and maps any surface and groundwater resource (including reliance by users e.g. bore the existing surface water water for domestic use and irrigation, and for ecological purposes and hydrological regime groundwater dependent ecosystems) likely to be impacted by the project, Chapter 17 (Groundwater and including rivers, streams, wetlands and estuaries as described in Appendix 2 of geology) the Framework for Biodiversity Assessment – NSW Biodiversity Offsets Policy for Major Projects (OEH, 2014). Chapter 12 (Biodiversity) 2. The Proponent must prepare a detailed water balance for ground and surface Section 18.3.1 and Section 18.4.1 water including the proposed intake and discharge locations (including mapping discuss surface water balance of these locations), volume, frequency and duration for both the construction and Chapter 17 (Groundwater and operational
    [Show full text]
  • 4.2 TURRELLA to ALEXANDRA CANAL - REVIEW 2002 February - M5 East Cycleways Description Would Be Constructed As Part of the Future Development
    WESTCONNEX NEW M5 PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE TRANSPORT NETWORK REVIEW 4.2 TURRELLA TO ALEXANDRA CANAL - REVIEW 2002 February - M5 East Cycleways Description would be constructed as part of the future development. This section did not get completed as part of the re-development hence the gap that still remains in An update on the progress on the M5 East Cycle way states the following: the present route. – A new shared 3 meter wide pedestrian and cycle path has been constructed – A shared path along Tempe Recreational Reserve included a cycle bridge over along both sides of the M5 East between King Georges Road and Bexley Road. the canal. This was not constructed. – The section of path along Alexandra Canal from Coward Street to Giovanni – The section between Princes Highway bridge and Turrella station was not Burnetti Bridge was constructed constructed due to the significant amount of redevelopment occuring. It was – The connection from Turrella Station to Giovanni Burnetti Bridge and Alexandra understood that the route from Princes Highway bridge and Turrella station Canal was not further planned due to the significant development proposed at would be constructed by future development. This did not occur. Wolli Creek Station and Turrella Station. It was considered that the cycleway Legend St Peters Station Proposed Route (not constructed) Completed Cycleway Sydney Park Princes Hwy Campbell Rd Sydenham Station Bourke Rd Canal Rd Unwins Bridge Rd Illawarra Rd Carrington Rd Cooks River IKEA Coward St Mascot Station Princes Hwy Tempe Bayview Ave Station
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 16 Surface Water
    Transport for NSW/Sydney Airport Corporation Limited Sydney Gateway Road Project Environmental Impact Statement/ Major Development Plan Chapter 16 Surface water 2020 Environmental Impact Statement / Major Development Plan Contents 16. Surface water .................................................................................................................................... 16.1 16.1 Assessment approach ............................................................................................................. 16.1 16.2 Existing environment ............................................................................................................... 16.5 16.3 Assessment of construction impacts ..................................................................................... 16.12 16.4 Assessment of operation impacts .......................................................................................... 16.19 16.5 Cumulative impacts ............................................................................................................... 16.23 16.6 Management of impacts ........................................................................................................ 16.24 Tables Table 16.1 Pollutant reduction targets for Botany Bay catchment ........................................................ 16.5 Table 16.2 Existing annual pollutant loads ............................................................................................ 16.9 Table 16.3 Comparison of baseline water quality and default trigger values
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL-REPORT-Review-Of-Alligator-Weed-Priorities-In-The-Sydney
    Review of Priorities for the Control of Alligator Weed in the Sydney Region JANUARY 2015 Review of priorities for the control of Alligator Weed in the Sydney Region – January 2015 Background Alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides) is a potentially devastating weed that grows in water and on land, affecting both waterways and floodplain areas. It is listed as a Weed of National Significance (WoNS). It is a native of South America and a major problem in south-eastern United States, China, New Zealand, Burma, Thailand, Indonesia and India. Alligator weed has not reached its potential distribution in Australia or within NSW, but has the ability to devastate the environment and agriculture if left unchecked. Alligator weed has extremely vigorous growth and great tolerance of normal control measures, which makes it a major threat to wetlands, rivers and irrigation systems. It is declared a noxious weed throughout NSW and is one of the highest priority weeds for detection and management in NSW. Alligator Weed Primefact: NSW DPI (2012) Alligator weed infestations are well established in the Sydney Region and if unmanaged pose high risks for further spread and/or ecological impact. The document entitled Priorities for the control of Alligator Weed in the Sydney Region was produced by the Sydney Weeds Committees in February 2010, and was the result of collaboration with the NSW Department of Primary Industries and weeds professionals throughout the Sydney Basin. The document identifies priority areas for the control of alligator weed and uses risks assessments to rank each area. The Sydney Region Weeds Action Project is a partnership between the NSW Government, local government and the Sydney Weeds Committees to reduce the impact of weeds across Sydney.
    [Show full text]
  • Noxious Trades Floods
    Noxious trades Pollution of waterways became a severe problem in the early settlement leading to noxious industries being outlawed from the population centre of Sydney Catchment by government regulation. In 1883, a Commission of Inquiry was set up to examine Sydney’s noxious trades. Wolli Creek farms were described as Wolli Creek and its tributary, Bardwell Creek, ‘the filthiest ever seen’ and strong reservations form the second largest sub-catchment of the expressed about the smell and noxious liquids Cooks River catchment covering 15.52 km2. draining into Wolli Creek. Looking at the creek today, it is hard to Diseases such as typhoid and gastro-enteritis were imagine that, in the late 1800s, it was one of common amongst residents living along waterways. the most polluted waterways in Sydney. Local resident, John Curtis, stated ‘there is no doubt that Wolli Creek is filled up, compared with what it was twenty-five or thirty years ago. At that time an old resident living next to my place [at the junction of Bardwell Creek] used to go in his boat down the creek, but at the present time I could walk across Wolli Creek in many places, even after rain...’ Water flowing through the Wolli Creek Valley contains the run-off from all the industrial and residential developments in the whole of the catchment before it flows into the Cooks River at Tempe. This has a major MISTAKES OF THE PAS impact on the water quality in Wolli Creek. In 1838, the government built a sandstone dam across Cooks River at Tempe to provide fresh water for In the past, building of dams, clearing of natural farmers on the lower Cooks River.
    [Show full text]
  • District Sydney Green Grid
    DISTRICT SYDNEY GREEN GRID SPATIAL FRAMEWORK AND PROJECT OPPORTUNITIES 145 TYRRELLSTUDIO PREFACE Open space is one of Sydney’s greatest assets. Our national parks, harbour, beaches, coastal walks, waterfront promenades, rivers, playgrounds and reserves are integral to the character and life of the city. In this report the hydrological, recreational and ecological fragments of the city are mapped and then pulled together into a proposition for a cohesive green infrastructure network for greater Sydney. This report builds on investigations undertaken by the Office of the Government Architect for the Department of Planning and Environment in the development of District Plans. It interrogates the vision and objectives of the Sydney Green Grid and uses a combination of GIS data mapping and consultation to develop an overview of the green infrastructure needs and character of each district. FINAL REPORT 23.03.17 Each district is analysed for its spatial qualities, open space, PREPARED BY waterways, its context and key natural features. This data informs a series of strategic opportunities for building the Sydney Green Grid within each district. Green Grid project opportunities have TYRRELLSTUDIO been identified and preliminary prioritisation has been informed by a comprehensive consultation process with stakeholders, including ABN. 97167623216 landowners and state and local government agencies. MARK TYRRELL M. 0410 928 926 This report is one step in an ongoing process. It provides preliminary E. [email protected] prioritisation of Green Grid opportunities in terms of their strategic W. WWW.TYRRELLSTUDIO.COM potential as catalysts for the establishment of a new interconnected high performance green infrastructure network which will support healthy PREPARED FOR urban growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge Improvement Work Starting in Kyeemagh
    JOHN FLOWERS MP MEMBER FOR ROCKDALE NSW Legislative Assembly MEDIA RELEASE Friday, 28 June 2013 BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT WORK STARTING IN KYEEMAGH Restoration work will start next week on Endeavour Bridge over the Cooks River at Kyeemagh to extend the life of the bridge and reduce future maintenance costs. “The work is being carried out in three stages and will take about six months to complete,” John Flowers said. “The first stage will involve sandblasting and repainting the bridge bearings under the bridge. “The second stage will see the pedestrian handrails along both sides of the bridge replaced and the final stage will replace street lighting along the bridge. “The NSW Government provided $1.34 million for this improvement work as part of Roads and Maritime Services’ commitment to restore and upgrade bridges in the Rockdale area,” Mr Flowers said. Stage one work is scheduled to start next Wednesday 3 July and boaters may experience changed conditions in the area including channel closures on the Cooks River until the work is completed in about by December. Pedestrians can expect short delays when the blasting is carried out close to the walkway. Wet weather may change work dates and times. Every effort will be made to minimise any noise associated with this work. Pedestrians and water users are advised to plan their journey, allow extra travel time and follow all signs. The second stage of work is expected to start in October and some work in the second and third stages will be carried out at night to minimise traffic disruptions on General Holmes Drive.
    [Show full text]
  • Georges River Coastal Management Program Scoping Study
    FINAL REPORT: Georges River Coastal Management Program Scoping Study December 2020 Document history Revision: Revision no. 02 Author/s M. Rosenthal M. Sano Checked M. Sano E. Zavadil Approved E. Zavadil Distribution: Revision no. 01a Issue date 18 May 2020 Issued to Peter Ryan (Georges Riverkeeper) Description: Draft for comment Revision no. 02 Issue date 4 December 2020 Issued to Peter Ryan (Georges Riverkeeper) Description: Final Report Citation: Please cite as: Alluvium (2020). Georges River Coastal Management Program Scoping Study. Report by Alluvium for Georges Riverkeeper. December 2020. Acknowledgement: Alluvium acknowledges the Traditional Owners and custodians of the lands on which we work. The sites assessed are on the lands of the Dharug and Dharawal People, and we acknowledge them as Traditional Owners. We pay our respects to their elders, and the elders of all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, past, present, and into the future. Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Scoping study purpose 1 1.2 Study area 1 1.3 Report structure 6 2 Program context 7 2.1 NSW Coastal Management Framework 7 2.2 Coastal Management Programs 8 3 Strategic context 11 3.1 Physical setting 12 3.1.1 Landscape context, geology and soils 12 3.1.2 Coastal processes, sediment supply and transport 14 3.1.3 Coastal hazards 17 3.1.4 Shoreline management 20 3.2 Hydrology and hydrodynamics 24 3.2.1 Catchment hydrology 24 3.2.2 Groundwater 24 3.2.3 Hydrodynamics 25 3.2.4 Tides 26 3.2.5 Flooding 26 3.3 Climate 27 3.3.1 Current climate 27 3.3.2 Past observations
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Cooks River Alliance Annual Report Ashfield Bankstown Canterbury City of Sydney Hurstville Marrickville Rockdale Strathfield Contents About this Report ...................................................................................................................................... 4 About the Cooks River.............................................................................................................................. 5 Councils working together to achieve regional improvements............................................................. 6 About the Cooks River Alliance ................................................................................................................ 7 How the Alliance Operates ....................................................................................................................... 9 Alliance Board ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Alliance Staff........................................................................................................................................ 10 Alliance Working Group ...................................................................................................................... 10 Alliance Executive Committee ............................................................................................................ 10 Resourcing .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • F6 Extension Stage 1 EIS Volume 2A
    Chapter 12 – Biodiversity 12 Biodiversity This chapter provides a summary of the biodiversity impacts associated with the project and outlines how the desired performance outcomes for biodiversity have been met. A detailed biodiversity development assessment report (BDAR) has been prepared for the project and is included in Appendix H (Biodiversity development assessment report). Table 12-1 sets out the assessment requirements as provided in the SEARs relevant to biodiversity and where the requirements have been addressed in this EIS. Table 12-1 SEARs – Biodiversity Assessment requirements Where addressed Environmental Impact Assessment Process 2. It is the Proponent’s responsibility to determine whether the An assessment of the project’s impact on matters of project needs to be referred to the Commonwealth Department national environmental significance is included in section of the Environment and Energy for an approval under the 12.3 and section 12.4. Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity A referral to the Australian Government Department of the Conservation Act (EPBC Act). Environment and Energy for an approval under the EPBC Act is not required for the project. The assessment process and determination that the project does not need to be referred to the Australian Government Department of the Environment and Energy is included in Chapter 2 (Assessment process). Biodiversity 1. Biodiversity impacts related to the proposal are to be The biodiversity assessment was undertaken in assessed in accordance with the Biodiversity Assessment accordance with the Biodiversity Assessment Method and Method and documented in a Biodiversity Development documented in a Biodiversity Development Assessment Assessment Report (BDAR). Report (BDAR) (refer to Appendix H (Biodiversity development assessment report).
    [Show full text]
  • RTA Annual Report 2009 Main Body
    REVIEW OF OPERATIONS Transport Development 18 Alternative transport 29 Traffi c 32 REVIEW OF OPERATIONS Development Transport Project delivery During the year, the RTA managed the planning and The RTA manages the road transport construction of 82 major projects with a total expenditure of almost $1.8 billion and opened 10 of those projects to traffi c. system to provide reliable and effi cient Appendix 1 contains details of progress on all major projects. movement of people and goods Motorways M5 East fi ltration plant trial In April 2008, construction began on a $65 million trial fi ltration plant to remove particulate matter and nitrogen dioxide from air extracted from the western end of the M5 East westbound tunnel. The plant is due to be completed in late 2009, with the trial to begin in early 2010. When completed, the plant will be capable of continuously The NSW road transport system drawing 200m3 of air per second from the westbound tunnel, removing particulate matter from this air, removing nitrogen The transport system is crucial to the prosperity dioxide from 50m3 of the same air and then returning the and well-being of the NSW community. The treated air to the westbound tunnel. RTA’s role is to develop the road network to meet the needs of a growing population, Following an operational trial of the plant that is planned to including day-to-day transport requirements of take up to 18 months, the RTA will assess the effi ciency of individuals, and the growing freight task. In this the fi ltration systems and the plant’s effectiveness in reducing role, the RTA manages a major program of new visible haze in the westbound tunnel.
    [Show full text]