Canadian National Election Study-1965

Canadian national Election Study-1965

List of Variables

v1
v2
v3
v4
v5
v6
v7
m8.1
m8.2
m9.1
m9.2
v10
v11
v12
v13
v14
v15
v16
v17
v18
v19
v20
v21
v22
v23
v24
m25.1
m25.2
v26
v27
v28
v29
v30
v31
v32
v33
v34
v35
v36
v37
v38
v39
v40
v41
v42
v43
v44
v45
v46
v47
v48
v49
v50
v51
v52
v53
v54
v55
v56
v57
v58
v59
v60
v61
v62
v63
v64
v65
v66
v67
v68
v69
v70
v71
v72
v73
v74
v75
v76
v77
v78
v79
v80
v81
v82
v83
v84
v85
v86
v87
v88
v89
v90
v91
v92
v93
v94
v95
v96
v97
v98
v99
v100
v101
v102
v103
v104
v105
v106
v107
v108
v109
v110
v111
v112
v113
v114
v115
v116
v117
v118
v119
v120
v121
v122
v123
v124
v125
v126
v127
v128
v129
v130
m131.1
m131.2
v132
v133
v134
v135
v136
v137
v138
v139
v140
v141
v142
v143
v144
v145
v146
v147
v148
v149
v150
v151
v152
v153
v154
v155
v156
v157
v158
v159
v160
v161
v162
v163
v164
v165
v166
v167
v168
v169
v170
v171
v172
v173
v174
v175
v176
v177
v178
v179
v180
v181
v182
v183
v184
v185
v186
v187
v188
v189
v190
v191
v192
v193
v194
v195
v196
v197
v198
v199
v200
v201
v202
v203
v204
v205
v206
v207
v208
v209
v210
v211
v212
v213
v214
v215
v216
v217
v218
v219
v220
v221
v222
v223
v224
v225
v226
v227
v228
v229
v230
v231
v232
v233
v234
v235
v236
v237
v238
v239
v240
v241
v242
v243
v244
v245
v246
v247
v248
v249
v250
m251.1
m251.2
m251.3
m251.4
m252.1
m252.2
m252.3
m252.4
m253.1
m253.2
m253.3
m253.4
v254
v255
v256
v257
v258
v259
v260
v261
v262
v263
v264
v265
v266
v267
v268
v269
v270
v271
v272
v273
v274
v275
v276
v277
v278
v279
v280
v281
v282
v283
v284
v285
v286
v287
v288
v289
v290
v291
v292
v293
v294
v295
v296
v297
v298
v299
v300
v301
v302
v303
v304
v305
v306
v307
v308
v309
v310
v311
v312
v313
v314
v315
v316
v317
v318
v319
v320
v321
v322
v323
v324
v325
v326
v327
v328
v329
v330
v331
v332
v333
v334
v335
v336
v337 / ICPR STUDY NUMBER-7225
INTERVIEW NUMBER
INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE
DECIMAL WEIGHT VARIABLE
PROVINCE OF INTERVIEW
R CONSTITUENCY
SIZE OF PLACE
MOST IMP PROBLEMS FOR CANADA-1
MOST IMP PROBLEMS FOR CANADA-2
PRBLM FOR CDA-SPECIAL CONCERN TO R-1
PRBLM FOR CDA-SPECIAL CONCERN TO R-2
R FEELINGS ABOUT ELECTION RESULTS
R REASON FOR FEELINGS ELECTION RESULTS
FED/PROV GOVT HANDLES CANADIAN PROBLEMS
ANY PROVINCIAL GOVT MORE POWERFUL
NL GOVT MORE POWERFUL COMPARED W/OTHERS
PEI GOVT MORE POWERFUL COMPARED W/OTHERS
NS GOVT MORE POWERFUL COMPARED W/OTHERS
NB GOVT MORE POWERFUL COMPARED W/OTHERS
QC GOVT MORE POWERFUL COMPARED W/OTHERS
ON GOVT MORE POWERFUL COMPARED W/OTHERS
MB GOVT MORE POWERFUL COMPARED W/OTHERS
SK GOVT MORE POWERFUL COMPARED W/OTHERS
AB GOVT MORE POWERFUL COMPARED W/OTHERS
BC GOVT MORE POWERFUL COMPARED W/OTHERS
LEVEL OF GOVT MOST IMP TO R
IMP ISSUES IN ELECTION-1
IMP ISSUES IN ELECTION-2
SOCIAL WELFARE ISSUE-IMP FOR ELECTION
ECONOMIC ISSUE-IMP FOR ELECTION
ENG/FR ISSUE-IMP FOR ELECTION
FLAG ISSUE-IMP FOR ELECTION
CANADIAN UNITY-IMP FOR ELECTION
GOVT CORRUPTION-IMP FOR ELECTION
MAJORITY GOVT ISSUE-IMP FOR ELECTION
STRONG LEADER ISSUE-IMP FOR ELECTION
MAKE DIFF IF PARTY FORMING GOVT MAJORITY
VOTE FOR OTHER PARTY IF MAJORITY GOVT
DEGREE OF INTEREST IN POLITICS
CROOKED PEOPLE IN GOVT
TAX MONEY WASTED BY GOVT
TRUST GOVT TO DO RIGHT THING
PPL WHO ARE HIGH IN GOVT TREAT PPL EQUAL
GOVT PEOPLE KNOW WHAT THEY'RE DOING
VOTING ALLOWS SAY IN HOW GOVT RUN THINGS
GOVT DOESN'T CARE WHAT PPL LIKE ME THINK
POLITICS TOO COMPLICATED FOR PPL LIKE ME
PPL LIKE ME HAVE NO SAY WHAT GOVT DOES
MP'S LOSE TOUCH WITH PEOPLE
INTELLECTUALS TOO STRONG IN GOVT
PERSONAL FINANCIAL SATISFACTION
CHANGE IN PERSONAL FINANCIAL SITUATION
PERSONAL EMPLOYMENT SITUATION
FUTURE PERSONAL FINANCIAL SITUATION
ELCTN RESULT AFFECT PRSNL FIN SITUATION
ELCTN RSLT-PERSONAL FINANCIAL SITUATION
R BEEN UNEMPLOYED DURING PAST YEAR
FAMILY MEMBER BEEN UNEMPLOYED PAST YEAR
R/FAMILY MBR BEEN UNEMPLOYED LAST 3 YEAR
ANY PROVINCE/REGION BTR OFF THAN OTHERS
NL BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES
PEI BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES
NS BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES
NB BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES
QC BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES
ON BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES
MB BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES
SK BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES
AB BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES
BC BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES
MARITIMES BETTER OFF THAN OTHER REGIONS
PRAIRIES BETTER OFF THAN OTHER REGIONS
SPECIFC AREA BETTER OFF THAN OTHERS
ANY PROVINCE/REGION WORSE OFF
NL WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES
PEI WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES
NS WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES
NB WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES
QC WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES
ON WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES
MB WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES
SK WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES
AB WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES
BC WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES
MARITIMES WORSE OFF THAN OTHER REGIONS
PRAIRIES WORSE OFF THAN OTHER REGIONS
SPECIFIC AREA WORSE OFF THAN OTHERS
R'S OWN PROVINCE ... THAN OTHER
R WOULD LIKE LIVE-NEWFOUNDLAND
R WOULD LIKE LIVE-PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND
R WOULD LIKE LIVE-NOVA SCOTIA
R WOULD LIKE LIVE-NEW BRUNSWICK
R WOULD LIKE LIVE-QUEBEC
R WOULD LIKE LIVE-ONTARIO
R WOULD LIKE LIVE-MANITOBA
R WOULD LIKE LIVE-SASKATCHEWAN
R WOULD LIKE LIVE-ALBERTA
R WOULD LIKE LIVE-BRITISH COLUMBIA
R WOULD NOT LIVE-NEWFOUNDLAND
R WOULD NOT LIVE-PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND
R WOULD NOT LIVE-NOVA SCOTIA
R WOULD NOT LIVE-NEW BRUNSWICK
R WOULD NOT LIVE-QUEBEC
R WOULD NOT LIVE-ONTARIO
R WOULD NOT LIVE-MANITOBA
R WOULD NOT LIVE-SASKATCHEWAN
R WOULD NOT LIVE-ALBERTA
R WOULD NOT LIVE-BRITISH COLUMBIA
DIEFENBAKER-CONNECTION TO MARITIMES
DIEFENBAKER-CONNECTION TO QUEBEC
DIEFENBAKER-CONNECTION TO ONTARIO
DIEFENBAKER-CONNECTION TO PRAIRIES
DIEFENBAKER-CONNECTION TO BC
PEARSON-CONNECTION TO MARITIMES
PEARSON-CONNECTION TO QUEBEC
PEARSON-CONNECTION TO ONTARIO
PEARSON-CONNECTION TO PRAIRIES
PEARSON-CONNECTION TO BC
DOUGLAS-CONNECTION TO MARITIMES
DOUGLAS-CONNECTION TO QUEBEC
DOUGLAS-CONNECTION TO ONTARIO
DOUGLAS-CONNECTION TO PRAIRIES
DOUGLAS-CONNECTION TO BC
THOMPSON-CONNECTION TO MARITIMES
THOMPSON-CONNECTION TO QUEBEC
THOMPSON-CONNECTION TO ONTARIO
THOMPSON-CONNECTION TO PRAIRIES
THOMPSON-CONNECTION TO BC
CAOUETTE-CONNECTION TO MARITIMES
CAOUETTE-CONNECTION TO QUEBEC
CAOUETTE-CONNECTION TO ONTARIO
CAOUETTE-CONNECTION TO PRAIRIES
CAOUETTE-CONNECTION TO BC
WHICH POLITICIAN MAKE BEST PM-MENTION 1
WHICH POLITICIAN MAKE BEST PM-MENTION 2
HOW MUCH DIFFERENCE BTWN FEDERAL PARTIES
FEDERAL PARTIES MOST ALIKE
FEDERAL PARTIES LEAST ALIKE
PARTY THAT GOVERNS MATTERS
YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-1
YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-2
YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-3
YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-4
YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-5
YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-6
YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-7
YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-8
YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-9
YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-10
YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-11
YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-12
YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-13
LIB PARTY RATING-1
LIB PARTY RATING-2
LIB PARTY RATING-3
LIB PARTY RATING-4
LIB PARTY RATING-5
LIB PARTY RATING-6
LIB PARTY RATING-7
LIB PARTY RATING-8
LIB PARTY RATING-9
LIB PARTY RATING-10
LIB PARTY RATING-11
LIB PARTY RATING-12
LIB PARTY RATING-13
PC PARTY RATING-1
PC PARTY RATING-2
PC PARTY RATING-3
PC PARTY RATING-4
PC PARTY RATING-5
PC PARTY RATING-6
PC PARTY RATING-7
PC PARTY RATING-8
PC PARTY RATING-9
PC PARTY RATING-10
PC PARTY RATING-11
PC PARTY RATING-12
PC PARTY RATING-13
NDP PARTY RATING-1
NDP PARTY RATING-2
NDP PARTY RATING-3
NDP PARTY RATING-4
NDP PARTY RATING-5
NDP PARTY RATING-6
NDP PARTY RATING-7
NDP PARTY RATING-8
NDP PARTY RATING-9
NDP PARTY RATING-10
NDP PARTY RATING-11
NDP PARTY RATING-12
NDP PARTY RATING-13
SC PARTY RATING-1
SC PARTY RATING-2
SC PARTY RATING-3
SC PARTY RATING-4
SC PARTY RATING-5
SC PARTY RATING-6
SC PARTY RATING-7
SC PARTY RATING-8
SC PARTY RATING-9
SC PARTY RATING-10
SC PARTY RATING-11
SC PARTY RATING-12
SC PARTY RATING-13
CRED PARTY RATING-1
CRED PARTY RATING-2
CRED PARTY RATING-3
CRED PARTY RATING-4
CRED PARTY RATING-5
CRED PARTY RATING-6
CRED PARTY RATING-7
CRED PARTY RATING-8
CRED PARTY RATING-9
CRED PARTY RATING-10
CRED PARTY RATING-11
CRED PARTY RATING-12
CRED PARTY RATING-13
LIBERAL MPS-JOB PERFORMNCE
CONSERVATIVE MPS-JOB PERFORMANCE
NDP MPS-JOB PERFORMANCE
SOCIAL CREDIT MPS-JOB PERFORMANCE
CREDITISTE MPS-JOB PERFORMANCE
QC ONLY-SC PARTY BTR/WRSE THAN OTHERS
QC ONLY-SC COME TO POWER IN NEXT 10 YRS
R'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION
R'S STRENGTH OF PARTY IDENTIFICATION
R EVER FEEL CLOSER TO ANY PARTY IN PAST
PARTY ID-FEDERAL OR PROVINCIAL
FEDERAL ID KNOWN:PROVINCIAL PARTY ID
PROVINCIAL ID KNOWN:FEDERAL PARTY ID
NON-ID:LEAN TOWARDS WHICH PARTY
NON-ID:LEAN TO PARTY-FEDERAL/PROVINCIAL
NON-ID:FED ID KNOWN:LEAN PROV PARTY
NON-ID:PROV ID KNOWN:LEAN FED PARTY
NON-ID:LEAN TOWARDS PARTY-PAST
TRUE NON-ID-EVER LEAN TOWARDS A PARTY
WHEN DID R'S PARTY ID CHANGE
MAIN THING WHY R CHANGED PARTY ID
SECOND CHOICE FOR FEDERAL PARTY
LAST CHOICE FOR FEDERAL PARTY
MOST IMP WHEN VOTING:LEADER,PARTY,CAND
R'S VOTE WHEN BAD CAND,GOOD PARTY
R'S VOTE WHEN BAD POLICY,GOOD PARTY
FATHER'S INTEREST IN POLITICS
FATHER'S POLITICAL PARTY PREFERENCE
MOTHER'S INTEREST IN POLITICS
MOTHER'S PARTY PREFERENCE
REMEMBER NAME OF ELECTD CAND LAST ELECTN
REMEMBR PARTY OF ELECTD CAND LAST ELECTN
R READ/HEARD ANYTHING ABOUT ELECTED MP
TYPE OF INFO R READ/HEARD ABOUT MP
WAS THE ELECTED MP THE INCUMBENT
IF INCUMBENT, DID MP AID CONSTITUENCY
ELECTED MP EVER AID R/R'S FAMILY
RMBR NAME OF OTHR CAND IN RIDNG-MENTION1
RMBR NAME OF OTHR CAND IN RIDNG-MENTION2
RMBR NAME OF OTHR CAND IN RIDNG-MENTION3
RMBR NAME OF OTHR CAND IN RIDNG-MENTION4
RMBR PRTY OF OTHR CAND IN RIDNG-MENTION1
RMBR PRTY OF OTHR CAND IN RIDNG-MENTION2
RMBR PRTY OF OTHR CAND IN RIDNG-MENTION3
RMBR PRTY OF OTHR CAND IN RIDNG-MENTION4
READ/HEAR ANYTHING ABOUT CAND-MENTION1
READ/HEAR ANYTHING ABOUT CAND-MENTION2
READ/HEAR ANYTHING ABOUT CAND-MENTION3
READ/HEAR ANYTHING ABOUT CAND-MENTION4
REGULAR VOTER IN FEDERAL ELCTN
VOTE FOR THE SAME PARTY IN FED ELECTION
VOTE WHICH SAME PARTY IN FED ELECTION
REGULAR VOTER IN PROV ELECTION
VOTE FOR SAME PARTY IN PROV ELECTION
VOTE WHICH SAME PARTY IN PROV ELECTION
QUEBEC VOTE 1962 FED ELECTION
QUEBEC VOTE 1963 FED ELECTION
QUEBEC VOTE 1965 FED ELECTION
WHEN DID R DECIDE HOW TO VOTE
WAS THE 1965 VOTE EASY OR NOT
WHY 1965 VOTE DECISION NOT EASY
DID R USE AN AID TO REMEMBER CAND NAME
WHY CHANGE VOTE FROM 1963 TO 1965
R'S REASON FOR 1965 VOTE
PARTY VOTED FOR LAST PROV ELECTION
MOST IMP ELCTNS:LOCAL/PROVINCIAL/FEDERAL
DID R ATTEND CAMPAIGN MEETINGS
# OF CAMPAIGN MEETINGS ATTENDED
DID R READ PRTY MATERIALS DURNG CAMPAIGN
R HAVE ANY PARTY CANVASS AT THEIR HOME
CONSERVATIVES CANVASSED AT R'S HOME
LIBERALS CANVASSED AT R'S HOME
NDP CANVASSED AT R'S HOME
SOCIAL CREDIT CANVASSED AT R'S HOME
OTHER PARTY CANVASSED AT R'S HOME
R PERSONALLY HELP A PARTY/CANDIDATE
R TRIED TO INFLUENCE OTHER PPLS VOTE
R A MEMBER OF A POLITICAL ORGANIZATION
HEARD ABOUT FED PARTY RAISING FUNDS
R CANVASSD FOR PARTY/CAND CONTRBUTION
WAS HH ASKED TO DONATE $ FOR PARTY/CAND
WHO IN HH WAS ASKED TO DONATE $ FOR PRTY
CONSERVATIVE ASKED R FOR CONTRIBUTION
LIBERAL ASKED R FOR CONTRIBUTION
NDP ASKED R FOR CONTRIBUTION
SOCIAL CREDIT ASKED R FOR CONTRIBUTION
OTHER PARTY ASKED R FOR CONTRIBUTION
HOW WAS R APPROACHED FOR CONTRIBUTION
R KNEW MONEY CANVASSER
R MADE CONTRIBUTIONS TO WHICH PARTY
OTHER IN HH CONTRIBUTE TO CAMPAIGN FUNDS
WOULD R HAVE CONTRIBUTD TO PRTY IF ASKED
R WOULD RATHER GIVE MONEY/TIME TO PARTY
FEELNGS ABOUT BUSNESS/UNIONS CONTRBUTION
SHOULD PLTCL CNTRBTNS BE TAX DEDUCTIBLE
SHOULD PARTY PUBLISH EXPENSES
SHOULD PARTY CONTRIBUTORS BE KNOWN
SHOULD PRTY REVEAL AMOUNT OF CONTRBTIONS
SHOULD GOVT PAY ANY CAMPAIGN EXPENSES
R'S MARITAL STATUS
WHO IS THE FAMILY'S MAIN WAGE EARNER
FAMILY'S MAIN WAGE EARNER'S OCCUPATION
R'S YEARS OF SCHOOLING
R'S SOCIAL CLASS-OWN RANKING
R'S RELIGION
R'S CHURCH ATTENDANCE
R'S ETHNIC ORIGIN
R'S PLACE OF BIRTH
YEAR R IMMIGRATED TO CANADA
R'S SPOKEN LANGUAGE AT HOME
SIZE OF GEOGRAPHIC PLACE WHERE R GREW UP
HAS R LIVED IN OTHER CANADIAN PROVINCES
R LIVED IN NEWFOUNDLAND
R LIVED IN PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND
R LIVED IN NOVA SCOTIA
R LIVED IN NEW BRUNSWICK
R LIVED IN QUEBEC
R LIVED IN ONTARIO
R LIVED IN MANITOBA
R LIVED IN SASKACTHEWAN
R LIVED IN ALBERTA
R LIVED IN BRITISH COLUMBIA
R/HH MEMBER BELONG TO LABOR UNION
R/HH MEMBER BELONG TO TRADE ASSOCIATION
R/HH MEMBER BELONG TO FARM ORGANIZATION
R/HH MEMBER BELONG TO PROF ASSOC
R/HH MEMBER BELONG TO OTHR VOL ASSOC
QC ONLY-R VISIT OTHR'S HOME-LAST 7 DAYS
QC ONLY-OTHRS VISIT R'S HOME-LAST 7 DAYS
QC ONLY-R HAS BEEN OUT W/OTHRS-LST 7 DAY
R'S AGE (YEARS)
R'S FAMILY INCOME
R'S SEX