DOCSLIB.ORG

Hydropower Special Market Report Analysis and Forecast to 2030 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hydropower Special Market Report Analysis and Forecast to 2030 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Hydropower Special Market Report Analysis and forecast to 2030 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY The IEA examines the IEA member IEA association full spectrum countries: countries: of energy issues including oil, gas and Australia Brazil coal supply and Austria China demand, renewable Belgium India energy technologies, electricity markets, Canada Indonesia energy efficiency, Czech Republic Morocco access to energy, Denmark Singapore demand side Estonia South Africa management and Finland Thailand much more. Through France its work, the IEA Germany advocates policies that Greece will enhance the Hungary reliability, affordability Ireland and sustainability of Italy energy in its 30 member countries, Japan 8 association countries Korea and beyond. Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Please note that this Slovak Republic publication is subject to Spain specific restrictions that limit its use and distribution. The Sweden terms and conditions are Switzerland available online at Turkey www.iea.org/t&c/ United Kingdom United States This publication and any map included herein are The European without prejudice to the Commission also status of or sovereignty over participates in the any territory, to the delimitation of international work of the IEA frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Source: IEA. All rights reserved. International Energy Agency Website: www.iea.org Hydropower Special Market Report Abstract Abstract The first ever IEA market report dedicated to hydropower highlights the economic and policy environment for hydropower development, addresses the challenges it faces, and offers recommendations to accelerate growth and maintain the existing infrastructure. This report presents ten-year capacity and generation forecasts for reservoir, run-of-river and pumped storage projects across the globe, based on bottom-up country and project-level monitoring. PAGE | 1 IEA. All rights reserved. Hydropower Special Market Report Foreword Foreword A little over two years ago, at the 7th World Hydropower Congress in Paris, I underscored the huge untapped potential of hydropower – the world’s largest source of clean and flexible electricity generation – particularly in emerging and developing economies. I said then that the voice of hydropower was not being heard loudly enough, and I promised that the IEA would be a strong voice for the hydropower community, notably by making hydropower the focus of our Renewables 2020 market report. We did not know then that a global pandemic in early 2020 would deliver a shock of historic proportions to our societies and economies. Today, I’m proud that despite the disruptions we faced in 2020, we are now delivering on our promise of two years ago with this Hydropower Special Market Report. And I thoroughly believe it is worth the wait. This special report is the world’s first study to provide detailed global forecasts to 2030 for the three main types of hydropower: reservoir, run-of-river and pumped storage facilities. The report shows that some things have not changed with the Covid-19 crisis. It finds that there is still a huge amount of hydropower potential worldwide that remains untapped despite being economically viable. This potential is particularly strong in emerging economies and developing economies, where demand for new energy supplies continues to expand rapidly and many people still lack access to reliable energy services. If it is developed sustainably, hydropower can bring major benefits to energy systems in many countries. The report’s forecast unfortunately shows that, based on today’s policy settings, the growth of hydropower globally is set to slow this decade. This is something the world can ill afford. As our report highlights, hydropower is the forgotten giant of low-carbon electricity; it produces more of it than any other source worldwide. And hydropower’s critical contribution clean energy transitions is not limited to the huge amounts of renewable electricity it produces – its capabilities for providing flexibility and storage for electricity systems are also unmatched, making it a natural enabler for integrating greater amounts of wind and solar power. This rare combination of attributes cannot be ignored. The IEA’s recent Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector makes it clear that the 2020s have to be the decade of massive deployment of all clean and efficient energy technologies if the world is to have a chance of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. PAGE | 2 IEA. All rights reserved. Hydropower Special Market Report Foreword Hydropower is unquestionably one of those technologies, but governments must devote significant policy attention to enabling it to overcome some of the major difficulties it currently faces. And all hydropower projects need to meet high standards for sustainability to ensure the energy and climate benefits they can bring are not undermined by negative environmental and social side effects. The gap between rhetoric and action remains a major issue today. Despite encouraging pledges by more and more governments to reach net-zero emissions by mid-century, climate ambitions are not yet backed up by credible policies to drive down emissions. One concrete step governments can take to start closing this gap is to put hydropower squarely back on the energy and climate policy agenda. That is one of seven priority areas for action set out in this report, which I hope will prove useful for policy makers seeking to build a clean and secure energy future. Finally, I would like to thank Heymi Bahar and the team of IEA colleagues who have worked extremely hard, with the support of Paolo Frankl, to fulfil the promise I made to the hydropower community in May 2019. Dr Fatih Birol Executive Director International Energy Agency PAGE | 3 IEA. All rights reserved. Hydropower Special Market Report Acknowledgements Acknowledgements, contributors and credits This study was prepared by the Renewable Energy Division in the Directorate of Energy Markets and Security. Heymi Bahar was the project manager and directed the report. He designed and co-ordinated the study along with Yasmina Abdelilah, who also led the analytical framework. The report benefited from analysis, drafting and input from multiple colleagues. The authors of the report were, Yasmina Abdelilah, Heymi Bahar, François Briens Piotr Bojek, Trevor Criswell, Kartik Veerakumar and Grecia Rodríguez who was also responsible for data management. The report also benefited from analysis, data and input from Chenlu Cheng, Andrea Dertinger and Kazuhiro Kurumi. Craig Hart and Peerapat Vithayasrichareon from the IEA Renewables Integration and Secure Electricity (RISE) Unit contributed to the analysis and drafting on flexibility. Jinsun Lim and Luca Lo Re from the Energy and Environment Division conducted the analysis and drafted the section on the impact of climate change on hydropower generation. Paolo Frankl, Head of the Renewable Energy Division, provided strategic guidance and significant input to this work. Valuable comments, feedback and guidance were provided by other senior management and numerous other colleagues within the IEA, in particular, Keisuke Sadamori, Laura Cozzi, Laszlo Varro and Peter Fraser. Other IEA colleagues who have made important contributions to this work include: Lucila Arboleya Sarazola, Praveen Bains, Davide d’Ambrosio, Pablo Gonzalez, Shai Hassid, César Alejandro Hernández Alva, Randi Kristiansen, Ryszard Pospiech and Brent Wanner. Timely data from the IEA Energy Data Centre were fundamental to the report, with particular assistance provided by Mathilde Daugy, Julia Guyon, Nick Johnstone, Samantha Mead, Julian Prime, Céline Rouquette, Roberta Quadrelli and Aloys Nghiem and the data science team for their work on scrappers. This work benefited from extensive review and comments from the IEA Standing Group on Long-Term Co-operation, IEA Renewable Energy Working Party, PAGE | 4 IEA. All rights reserved. Hydropower Special Market Report Acknowledgements members of the Renewable Industry Advisory Board (RIAB) and experts from IEA partner countries and other international institutions. The work also benefited from feedback by the IEA Committee on Energy Research and Technology. Special thanks go to the IEA Hydropower Technology Collaboration Programme, and the International Hydropower Association for their valuable guidance on the design process and extensive review comments. Valuable input was provided by Alex Beckitt, Niels Nielson, and Atle Harby (IEA Technology Collaboration Program on Hydropower), Alex Campbell, Joao Costa, Samuel Law, David Samuel, and Nicholas Troja (International Hydropower Association), Angela Africano (GE Renewables), and Richard Taylor (RMT Renewables Consulting Ltd). Many experts from outside of the IEA provided valuable input and reviewed this report. They include: Countries Canada (Natural Resources Canada), China (Energy Research Institute – ERI), European Union (European Commission – DG Energy), Japan (METI, Institute of Energy Economics), Norway (Ministry of Petroleum and Energy), Switzerland (Federal Office of Energy), Turkey (Ministry of Energy), United States (Department of Energy) and Zambia (Ministry of Energy). Other organisations Andritz, Australian National University, BBK, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Électricité de France (EDF), Electric Power Development Company (JPOWER), Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), ENI, European Renewable Energy Foundation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trends in Electricity Prices During the Transition Away from Coal by William B
    May 2021 | Vol. 10 / No. 10 PRICES AND SPENDING Trends in electricity prices during the transition away from coal By William B. McClain The electric power sector of the United States has undergone several major shifts since the deregulation of wholesale electricity markets began in the 1990s. One interesting shift is the transition away from coal-powered plants toward a greater mix of natural gas and renewable sources. This transition has been spurred by three major factors: rising costs of prepared coal for use in power generation, a significant expansion of economical domestic natural gas production coupled with a corresponding decline in prices, and rapid advances in technology for renewable power generation.1 The transition from coal, which included the early retirement of coal plants, has affected major price-determining factors within the electric power sector such as operation and maintenance costs, 1 U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS capital investment, and fuel costs. Through these effects, the decline of coal as the primary fuel source in American electricity production has affected both wholesale and retail electricity prices. Identifying specific price effects from the transition away from coal is challenging; however the producer price indexes (PPIs) for electric power can be used to compare general trends in price development across generator types and regions, and can be used to learn valuable insights into the early effects of fuel switching in the electric power sector from coal to natural gas and renewable sources. The PPI program measures the average change in prices for industries based on the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).
    [Show full text]
  • Best Electricity Market Design Practices
    In My View Best Electricity Market Design Practices William W. Hogan (forthcoming in IEEE Power & Energy) Organized wholesale electricity markets in the United States follow the principles of bid-based, security-constrained, economic dispatch with locational marginal prices. The basic elements build on analyses done when large thermal generators dominated the structure of the electricity market in most countries. Notable exceptions were countries like Brazil that utilized large-scale pondage hydro systems. For such systems, the critical problem centered on managing a multi- year inventory of stored water. But for most developed electricity systems, the dominance of thermal generation implied that the major interactions in unit commitment decisions would be measured in hours to days, and the interactions in operating decisions would occur over minutes to hours. As a result, single period economic dispatch became the dominant model for analyzing the underlying basic principles. The structure of this analysis Figure 1: Spot Market integrated the terminology of economics and engineering. As shown in SHORT-RUN ELECTRICITY MARKET Figure 1: Spot Market, the Energy Price Short-Run (¢/kWh) Marginal increasing short-run Cost Price at marginal cost of generation 7-7:30 p.m. defined the dispatch stack or supply curve. Thermal Demand efficiencies and fuel cost 7-7:30 p.m. Price at were the primary sources 9-9:30 a.m. of short-run generation cost Price at Demand differences. The 2-2:30 a.m. 9-9:30 a.m. introduction of markets Demand 2-2:30 a.m. added the demand Q1 Q2 Qmax perspective, where lower MW prices induced higher loads.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy Technology Data Update: 2020 Edition
    Wind Energy Technology Data Update: 2020 Edition Ryan Wiser1, Mark Bolinger1, Ben Hoen, Dev Millstein, Joe Rand, Galen Barbose, Naïm Darghouth, Will Gorman, Seongeun Jeong, Andrew Mills, Ben Paulos Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 Corresponding authors August 2020 This work was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Wind Energy Technologies Office, under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of California. Photo source: National Renewable Energy Laboratory ENERGY T ECHNOLOGIES AREA ENERGY ANALYSISAND ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACTS DIVISION ELECTRICITY M ARKETS & POLICY Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor The Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of California.
    [Show full text]
  • Microgeneration Strategy: Progress Report
    MICROGENERATION STRATEGY Progress Report JUNE 2008 Foreword by Malcolm Wicks It is just over two years since The Microgeneration Strategy was launched. Since then climate change and renewables have jumped to the top of the global and political agendas. Consequently, it is more important than ever that reliable microgeneration offers individual householders the chance to play their part in tackling climate change. In March 2006, there was limited knowledge in the UK about the everyday use of microgeneration technologies, such as solar thermal heating, ground source heat pumps, micro wind or solar photovolatics. Much has changed since then. Thousands of people have considered installing these technologies or have examined grants under the Low Carbon Buildings Programme. Many have installed microgeneration and, in doing so, will have helped to reduce their demand for energy, thereby cutting both their CO2 emissions and their utility bills. The Government’s aim in the Strategy was to identify obstacles to creating a sustainable microgeneration market. I am pleased that the majority of the actions have been completed and this report sets out the excellent progress we have made. As a consequence of our work over the last two years, we have benefited from a deeper understanding of how the microgeneration market works and how it can make an important contribution to a 60% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2050. Building an evidence base, for example, from research into consumer behaviour, from tackling planning restrictions and from tracking capital costs, means that we are now in a better position to take forward work on building a sustainable market for microgeneration in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Power Distribution in the World: Today and Tomorrow
    Electric Power Distribution in the World: Today and Tomorrow EPRG Working Paper 1826 Cambridge Working Paper in Economics 1846 Sinan Küfeoğlu, Michael Pollitt & Karim Anaya Abstract In light of the increasing importance of distributed energy resources (DERs) in the electricity system, there is an ongoing need to understand the current status of electric power distribution across the world. This review paper compiles key information about the distribution systems in 175 countries worldwide. The findings for each country include the number, legal structure and ownership of distribution system operators, the access to electricity they provide, distribution level voltages, electric power frequency and the significance of renewable electricity generation. This study covers 99.4% of the world’s population. As of June 2018, there are around 7600 distribution system operators in these 175 countries. After reviewing today’s distribution system status, this paper also reviews the various discussions and proposals for tomorrow’s electric power distribution. The discussion covers both system operation and market platform roles as well as data management options for DSOs in the near future. Keywords distribution system operator; DSO; market platform; transmission system operator; TSO JEL Classification L94 Contact [email protected] Publication August 2018 Financial Support None www.eprg.group.cam.ac.uk Electric Power Distribution in the World: Today and Tomorrow Sinan Küfeoğlu1 Michael G. Pollitt Karim Anaya Energy Policy Research Group Energy Policy Research Group Energy Policy Research Group University of Cambridge University of Cambridge University of Cambridge Abstract In light of the increasing importance of distributed energy resources (DERs) in the electricity system, there is an ongoing need to understand the current status of electric power distribution across the world.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Era for Wind Power in the United States
    Chapter 3 Wind Vision: A New Era for Wind Power in the United States 1 Photo from iStock 7943575 1 This page is intentionally left blank 3 Impacts of the Wind Vision Summary Chapter 3 of the Wind Vision identifies and quantifies an array of impacts associated with continued deployment of wind energy. This 3 | Summary Chapter chapter provides a detailed accounting of the methods applied and results from this work. Costs, benefits, and other impacts are assessed for a future scenario that is consistent with economic modeling outcomes detailed in Chapter 1 of the Wind Vision, as well as exist- ing industry construction and manufacturing capacity, and past research. Impacts reported here are intended to facilitate informed discus- sions of the broad-based value of wind energy as part of the nation’s electricity future. The primary tool used to evaluate impacts is the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s (NREL’s) Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS) model. ReEDS is a capacity expan- sion model that simulates the construction and operation of generation and transmission capacity to meet electricity demand. In addition to the ReEDS model, other methods are applied to analyze and quantify additional impacts. Modeling analysis is focused on the Wind Vision Study Scenario (referred to as the Study Scenario) and the Baseline Scenario. The Study Scenario is defined as wind penetration, as a share of annual end-use electricity demand, of 10% by 2020, 20% by 2030, and 35% by 2050. In contrast, the Baseline Scenario holds the installed capacity of wind constant at levels observed through year-end 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hydropower) Technology in South African Narrow-Reef Hard-Rock Mines
    The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Platinum 2012 P. Fraser THE USE OF HIGH-PRESSURE, WATER-HYDRAULIC (HYDROPOWER) TECHNOLOGY IN SOUTH AFRICAN NARROW-REEF HARD-ROCK MINES P. Fraser Hydro Power Equipment (Pty) Ltd Abstract This paper examines the new water-hydraulic (hydropowered) drill rigs that have been developed and proven in the last decade primarily in tabular, shallow-dipping, narrow-reef hard-rock South African mines. These include drill rigs for flat-end tunnel development, narrow inclined raises and winzes, large inclines and declines and longhole-based developments such as ore passes and vent raises. The hydropower technology rigs offer advantages both in safety and performance over traditional compressed-air-powered, hand-held development, and are generally more cost-effective than imported oil electro-hydraulic drill rigs. Furthermore, hydropowered rigs are inherently energy-efficient. The benefits of hydropower are discussed and a ‘comprehensive development model’ is presented which demonstrates that ore-bodies can be accessed in significantly shorter times. ‘Localized’ half level hydropower systems are introduced and a range of ancillary equipment available is listed. Introduction According to Neville Nicolau, CEO of Anglo Platinum, ’Safety is our moral licence to operate’ and, ’if we don’t get our safety right, then you must expect society to take away our licence to operate, and then we would be responsible for closing mines and destroying work 1. While the long-term trend in the Fatal Injury Frequency Rate (FIFR) is downward, fatalities are not acceptable to any of the stakeholders in the mining industry or investor community. Safety is therefore a non-negotiable imperative.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential for Combined Heat and Power in Massachusetts
    The Potential for Combined Heat and Power in Massachusetts Lauren Mattison and Dragoljub Kosanovic, University of Massachusetts Amherst ABSTRACT Use of combined heat and power (CHP) can benefit both the user and society by providing benefits to the economy, the environment and energy security. This study investigated the potential for use of CHP in Massachusetts. Research identified 120 existing CHP systems in the commercial/institutional, industrial and multifamily residential sectors in the state, with total electrical capacity of 375 MW and average system size of 3.1 MW. Technical potential for new CHP installations was determined using current average energy consumption and hours of operation for each facility type, and was based on existing CHP technologies. The remaining technical potential for CHP in Massachusetts was found to be more than 4,700 MW at 18,500 sites, with an average system size of 256 kW. The majority of the potential is in small systems of 50-500 kW in commercial/institutional buildings. The only area in which there has been significant market penetration to date is large systems of at least 5 MW. Reducing congestion of the electric grid and lowering the overall cost of energy with increased use of CHP would be particularly beneficial in Massachusetts where electricity rates are among the highest in the country. By reporting the current status of CHP in the state, considering the facility types best suited for CHP and estimating the size of the potential market, this study lays the groundwork for further analysis and development of CHP technology and policy in Massachusetts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of Hydropower Reservoirs to Flood Control in the Austrian Alps
    Ilydrology in Mountainous Regions. II - Artificial Reservoirs; Water and Slopes (Proceedings of two Lausanne Symposia, August 1990). IAHS Publ. no. 194,1990. The contribution of hydropower reservoirs to flood control in the Austrian Alps W. PIRCHER Tiroler Wasserkraftwerke Aktiengesellschaft (TIWAG) Landhausplatz 2, A-6o2o Innsbruck, Austria ABSTRACT A considerable improvement to flood control is a significant - and free - additional utility accruing to the general public from the construction of hydropower storage reservoirs. By way of illustration, the author presents a comparative study on the basis of a number of flood events in valleys influenced by storage power plants. INTRODUCTION Austria has approximately thirty major storage reservoirs built by hy­ dropower companies and operated on a seasonal basis. Since they tend to be located at high altitudes, total stored energy from a combined active storage of 1.3oo hm^ is over 3.5oo GWh for winter and peak power generation, and this forms the backbone of electricity generation in Austria. Taking into account also the smaller reservoirs for daily and weekly storage, approximately 31% of the country's present annual total hydroelectric generation of 34.ooo GWh is controlled by reservoir sto­ rage, with the high degree of control and flexibility this offers. The primary goal in the construction of all storage power schemes in Austria, and the only source of subsequent earnings for the hydro- power companies, is of course electricity generation, but such schemes also involve a whole series of additional utilities that accrue to the general public free of charge. As a rule, significant improvements in flood control are the most important of these spin-offs, although be­ nefits to the local infrastructure and tourism as well as a markable increase of flow during the winter period are not to be underestimated, either.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydroelectric Power -- What Is It? It=S a Form of Energy … a Renewable Resource
    INTRODUCTION Hydroelectric Power -- what is it? It=s a form of energy … a renewable resource. Hydropower provides about 96 percent of the renewable energy in the United States. Other renewable resources include geothermal, wave power, tidal power, wind power, and solar power. Hydroelectric powerplants do not use up resources to create electricity nor do they pollute the air, land, or water, as other powerplants may. Hydroelectric power has played an important part in the development of this Nation's electric power industry. Both small and large hydroelectric power developments were instrumental in the early expansion of the electric power industry. Hydroelectric power comes from flowing water … winter and spring runoff from mountain streams and clear lakes. Water, when it is falling by the force of gravity, can be used to turn turbines and generators that produce electricity. Hydroelectric power is important to our Nation. Growing populations and modern technologies require vast amounts of electricity for creating, building, and expanding. In the 1920's, hydroelectric plants supplied as much as 40 percent of the electric energy produced. Although the amount of energy produced by this means has steadily increased, the amount produced by other types of powerplants has increased at a faster rate and hydroelectric power presently supplies about 10 percent of the electrical generating capacity of the United States. Hydropower is an essential contributor in the national power grid because of its ability to respond quickly to rapidly varying loads or system disturbances, which base load plants with steam systems powered by combustion or nuclear processes cannot accommodate. Reclamation=s 58 powerplants throughout the Western United States produce an average of 42 billion kWh (kilowatt-hours) per year, enough to meet the residential needs of more than 14 million people.
    [Show full text]
  • Time-Frequency Connectedness Between Coal Market Prices, New Energy Stock Prices and CO2 Emissions Trading Prices in China
    sustainability Article Time-frequency Connectedness between Coal Market Prices, New Energy Stock Prices and CO2 Emissions Trading Prices in China Chun Jiang 1, Yi-Fan Wu 1, Xiao-Lin Li 2 and Xin Li 2,* 1 Department of Finance, School of Economics and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 476411, China; [email protected] (C.J.); [email protected] (Y.-F.W.) 2 Department of Finance, School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 15 March 2020; Accepted: 1 April 2020; Published: 2 April 2020 Abstract: This paper aims to examine whether there is inherent dynamic connectedness among coal market prices, new energy stock prices and carbon emission trading (CET) prices in China under time- and frequency-varying perspectives. For this purpose, we apply a novel wavelet method proposed by Aguiar-Conraria et al. (2018). Specifically, utilizing the single wavelet power spectrum, the multiple wavelet coherency, the partial wavelet coherency, also combined with the partial phase difference and the partial wavelet gains, this paper discovers the time-frequency interaction between three markets. The empirical results show that the connectedness between the CET market price and the coal price is frequency-varying and mainly occur in the lower and higher frequency bands, while the connectedness between the CET market price and the new energy stock price mainly happen in the middle and lower frequency bands. In the high-frequency domain, the CET market price is mainly affected by the coal price, while the CET market price is dominated by the new energy stock price in the middle frequency.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study in the Dudh Koshi Basin of Nepal
    water Article Hydropower Potential of Run of River Schemes in the Himalayas under Climate Change: A Case Study in the Dudh Koshi Basin of Nepal Daniele Bocchiola 1,2,* , Mattia Manara 1 and Riccardo Mereu 3 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (DICA), Politecnico di Milano, L. da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy; [email protected] 2 EVK2CNR Committee of Italy, S. Bernardino 145, 24122 Bergamo, Italy 3 Department of Energy Engineering (DENG), Politecnico di Milano, Campus-Bovisa, Lambruschini, 4a, 20156 Milano, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 20 July 2020; Accepted: 16 September 2020; Published: 19 September 2020 Abstract: In spite of the very large hydropower potential given from the melting snow and ice of Himalayas, Nepal’s population has little hydropower production. The high use of fossil fuels and biomasses results in measurable air pollution, even in the mountain areas. Hydropower planning and implementation, in the face of the changing climate, is therefore paramount important. We focus here on Nepal, and particularly on the Dudh Koshi river basin, with a population of ca. 170,000 people, within an area with large potential for hydropower production. Our main objectives are to (i) preliminarily design a local hydropower grid based on a distributed run of river ROR scheme, and (ii) verify the resilience of the grid against modified hydrology under perspective climate change, until the end of the century. To do so, we set up and tune the Poli-Hydro semi-distributed glacio-hydrological model, mimicking the complex hydrology of the area. We then modify a state of the art algorithm to develop and exploit a heuristic, resource-demand based model, called Poli-ROR.
    [Show full text]