DOCSLIB.ORG

Quantum Simulation with Superconducting Circuits by Vinay Ramasesh Doctor of Philosophy in Physics University of California, Berkeley Professor Irfan Siddiqi, Chair

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Quantum Simulation with Superconducting Circuits by Vinay Ramasesh A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Irfan Siddiqi, Chair Professor Birgitta Whaley Professor Norman Yao Summer 2019 Quantum Simulation with Superconducting Circuits Copyright 2019 by Vinay Ramasesh 1 Abstract Quantum Simulation with Superconducting Circuits by Vinay Ramasesh Doctor of Philosophy in Physics University of California, Berkeley Professor Irfan Siddiqi, Chair Nonlinear superconducting circuits are a leading candidate to implement quantum infor- mation tasks beyond the reach of classical processors. One such task, quantum simulation, involves using a controllable quantum system to study the dynamics of another. In this thesis, we present a series of experiments using small systems of superconducting circuits to perform various quantum tasks relevant to quantum simulation. In the first experiment, we design and build a circuit comprising three transmon qubits whose dynamics mirror those of interacting bosonic particles on a lattice, described by the Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian. We verify the predictions of the Bose-Hubbard model for this system spectroscopically and then use time-domain measurements to study the decoherence processes affecting the qubits. Using a Raman process, we engineer artificial decay dynamics in the system which allow us to prepare and stabilize otherwise inaccessible states of the transmon array. The second experimental demonstration concerns topological quantum matter. Certain quantum systems are characterized by quantities known as topological invariants, which are robust to local perturbations. These topological invariants are challenging to measure in naturally-occurring systems. We engineer an artificial system, comprising a transmon qubit coupled to a high-Q cavity, capable of undergoing a protocol known as the quantum walk, which also exhibits topological invariants. By using particular non-classical state of the cavity, we modify the quantum walk protocol to make the topological invariant directly accessible. Finally, we implement a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm|known as the variational quantum eigensolver|in a two-transmon quantum processor. As a proof of principle demon- stration, we compute the ground-state and low-lying excited state energies of the hydrogen molecule as a function of nuclear separation. We show that an extension of the basic algo- rithm, known as the quantum subspace expansion, allows for the mitigation of errors caused by decoherence processes affecting the quantum processor. i To my parents, Nalini and Ranga Ramasesh, and my grandmother, Lakshmi Ramachandran, for their constant support and encouragement. ii Contents Contents ii List of Figures iv List of Tables v 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Structure of Thesis . 3 1.2 Summary of Key Results . 4 2 Superconducting Circuits: Background 6 2.1 Quantum behavior in superconducting circuits . 6 2.2 Coupling a Transmon to a Linear Cavity: the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian 10 3 Cooling in a Bose-Hubbard Chain 19 3.1 Realizing the Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian with Transmon Qubits . 20 3.2 Chip design . 22 3.3 Initial spectroscopic calibrations . 25 3.4 Natural decay dynamics . 29 3.5 Cooling via an engineered bath . 35 3.6 Conclusion . 39 4 Observing Topological Invariants: Theory 40 4.1 Background: topological features of quantum walks . 40 4.2 Measuring the winding number . 45 4.3 Experimental proposal . 52 4.4 Conclusion and Future Work . 53 5 Observing Topological Invariants: Experiment 54 5.1 Motivation . 54 5.2 Realizing quantum walks in circuit QED . 56 5.3 Details of the experimental toolbox . 62 5.4 Theoretical details . 72 iii 5.5 Conclusion . 74 6 Molecular Spectra with a Hybrid Algorithm 78 6.1 Variational Quantum Eigensolver: Theory and Background . 79 6.2 Experimental Methods . 83 6.3 Results . 85 6.4 Conclusion . 93 7 Future directions 95 Bibliography 97 iv List of Figures 2.1 Circuit QED architecture for a transmon qubit . 11 2.2 Energy levels of the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian . 16 3.1 Experimental setup and spectroscopy of the Bose-Hubbard array . 23 3.2 Layout of the three-transmon chip used in the Bose-Hubbard experiment . 24 3.3 Raw spectroscopy data of the three-transmon chip . 27 3.4 Bright and dark features of the excited manifold . 29 3.5 Readout calibration histograms for the ten lowest-lying Bose-Hubbard eigenstates 31 3.6 Natural decay dynamics of the Bose-Hubbard array . 33 3.7 Engineered decay dynamics of the Bose-Hubbard array . 36 3.8 Stabilizing eigenstates of the Bose-Hubbard array against particle loss . 38 5.1 Quantum walk implementation in cavity phase space . 55 5.2 Quantum walk protocol and resulting populations . 57 5.3 Topological classes of split-step quantum walks . 59 5.4 Winding number measurement via direct Wigner tomography . 61 5.5 Quantum walk with angles θ1 = 0:28π and θ2 = 0:64π . 63 5.6 Pulse shaping for Q and Wigner Tomography . 65 5.7 Pulse shaping for the quantum walk . 69 5.8 Aluminum cavity and superconducting transmon qubit . 71 5.9 Detailed block diagram of the quantum walk measurement setup . 77 6.1 Variational quantum eigensolver algorithm and quantum subspace expansion . 80 6.2 Measurement setup used in the variational quantum eigensolver experiment . 85 6.3 VQE control parameter convergence during optimization . 86 6.4 Computed H2 energy spectrum as a function of internuclear distance . 87 6.5 Error mitigation via the quantum subspace expansion . 88 6.6 Quantum subspace expansion with various measurement operators . 89 6.7 Convergence of VQE optimizer: comparison with numerics . 92 6.8 Quantum subspace expansion beyond linear response . 93 v List of Tables 3.1 Theoretical and experimental dispersive shifts of the linear cavity coupled to the Bose-Hubbard array . 31 3.2 Experimentally-measured natural decay times (downward transitions) of the three- transmon eigenstates . 32 3.3 Experimentally-measured natural decay times (upward transitions) of the three- transmon eigenstates . 34 3.4 Theoretically-calculated, Purcell-limited natural decay times (downward transi- tions) of the three-transmon eigenstates . 35 vi Acknowledgments I am extremely grateful to have spent the last six years at Berkeley working in the Quantum Nanoelectronics Lab. It is a pleasure to thank the many people who contributed to making my time here an enjoyable and productive learning experience. Thanks first to my advisor, Dr. Irfan Siddiqi, for welcoming me into his lab and main- taining such a great environment for nurturing scientific curiosity. Irfan constantly pushes his students to perform at the best of their ability while giving them the freedom to explore their individual interests, for which I am truly grateful. My ability to think independently as a scientist and generate interesting research directions on my own has come about through his guidance, and I am very fortunate to have had such an inspiring mentor. One of our closest collaborators during my time here at Berkeley was Dr. Norman Yao, who was a postdoc when I started grad school and is now a professor. Norman was a fantastic collaborator; his knowledge of quantum physics is unparalleled and helped us to get the quantum walk experiment working. I had a great time working with him, and also discussing physics and life over tennis matches, Chengdu dinners, Marvel movie nights, and many many paper draft revisions. I have also been fortunate to work with five incredibly talented postdocs, who have shaped my skills and thinking a great deal. Dr. Shay Hacohen-Gourgy was a pleasure to work with as a new graduate student in QNL; he taught me the basics of working with dilution fridges, patiently led me through fabricating my first samples, and showed me what it means to be an experimental physicist. Dr. Emmanuel Flurin mentored me through the quantum walk project; his incredibly deep knowledge of circuit QED was a huge asset to that project, and I hope to have picked up some of his knowledge along the way. Dr. Kevin O'Brien showed me the value of carefully attacking a complex problem systematically and scientifically to produce almost magical-seeming results. I enjoyed all of our discussions through many hours of fabrication and testing, and especially appreciated his ability to hone in and focus on the most important parts of any given problem. From Dr. James Colless I learned the importance of precisely and quantitatively understanding as much of the experimental apparatus as possible. I was also constantly impressed by how hard he worked. Dr. Machiel Blok was my partner in the qutrit black hole experiment. I greatly enjoyed working with him, and learned a lot from his style of doing physics, specifically his approach to data analysis and his resilience in the face of inevitable setbacks. I wish we had still another year to pursue all the ideas we discussed over the last couple years. The entirety of QNL, past and present, deserves many thanks for making the lab a great place to work. These include graduate students, undergrads, visitors, and postdocs. I enjoyed our house of curries lunches, Tahoe trips, foosball matches, Bring Sally Up com- petition, and last but certainly not least, the invention of Cracketball. I am privileged to have worked with all of you: Eli Levenson-Falk, Chris Macklin, Mollie Schwartz, Andrew Eddins, Steven Weber, David Toyli, Nick Frattini, Aditya Venkatramani, Eunsong Kim, Al- lison Dove, Leigh Martin, John Mark Kreikebaum, Will Livingston, Brad Mitchell, Marie vii Lu, Trevor Christolini, Akel Hashim, Ravi Naik, Archan Banerjee, Dar Dahlen, Jack Qiu, and Noah Stevenson. I am very thankful for the many friends in the area who made daily life in Berkeley such a joy. Berkeley is a very tough place to leave thanks to all of you.
Recommended publications
  • Dynamical Control of Matter Waves in Optical Lattices Sune Schøtt

    Dynamical Control of Matter Waves in Optical Lattices Sune Schøtt

    Aarhus University Faculty of Science Department of Physics and Astronomy PhD Thesis Dynamical Control of Matter Waves in Optical Lattices by Sune Schøtt Mai November 2010 This thesis has been submitted to the Faculty of Science at Aarhus Uni- versity in order to fulfill the requirements for obtaining a PhD degree in physics. The work has been carried out under the supervision of profes- sor Klaus Mølmer and associate professor Jan Arlt at the Department of Physics and Astronomy. Contents Contents i 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Thesis Outline .......................... 3 1.2 Bose-Einstein Condensation .................. 4 2 Experimental Setup and Methods 9 2.1 Overview ............................. 9 2.2 Magneto-Optic Trap and Optical Pumping .......... 9 2.3 Transport with Movable Quadrupole Traps . 13 2.4 Evaporative Cooling ...................... 14 2.5 Absorption Imaging ....................... 15 3 Optical Lattices 17 3.1 Introduction ........................... 17 3.2 AC Stark-shift Induced Potentials . 18 3.2.1 Classical and Semi-Classical Approaches . 18 3.2.2 Dressed State Picture . 20 3.3 Lattice Band Structure ..................... 22 3.3.1 Reciprocal Space Bloch Theorem . 23 3.3.2 The 1D Lattice Band-Structure . 23 4 Lattice Calibration Techniques 27 4.1 Introduction ........................... 27 4.2 Kapitza-Dirac Scattering .................... 28 4.3 Bloch Oscillation and LZ-Tunneling . 30 4.3.1 Bloch Oscillation .................... 31 4.3.2 Landau-Zener Theory . 31 i ii CONTENTS 4.3.3 Experimental Verification of the Landau-Zener Model 32 4.4 Lattice Modulation ....................... 35 4.5 Summary ............................ 35 5 Dynamically Controlled Lattices 39 5.1 Introduction ........................... 39 5.2 Overview ............................. 39 5.3 Controlled Matter Wave Beam Splitter .
  • Unit 1 Old Quantum Theory

    Unit 1 Old Quantum Theory

    UNIT 1 OLD QUANTUM THEORY Structure Introduction Objectives li;,:overy of Sub-atomic Particles Earlier Atom Models Light as clectromagnetic Wave Failures of Classical Physics Black Body Radiation '1 Heat Capacity Variation Photoelectric Effect Atomic Spectra Planck's Quantum Theory, Black Body ~diation. and Heat Capacity Variation Einstein's Theory of Photoelectric Effect Bohr Atom Model Calculation of Radius of Orbits Energy of an Electron in an Orbit Atomic Spectra and Bohr's Theory Critical Analysis of Bohr's Theory Refinements in the Atomic Spectra The61-y Summary Terminal Questions Answers 1.1 INTRODUCTION The ideas of classical mechanics developed by Galileo, Kepler and Newton, when applied to atomic and molecular systems were found to be inadequate. Need was felt for a theory to describe, correlate and predict the behaviour of the sub-atomic particles. The quantum theory, proposed by Max Planck and applied by Einstein and Bohr to explain different aspects of behaviour of matter, is an important milestone in the formulation of the modern concept of atom. In this unit, we will study how black body radiation, heat capacity variation, photoelectric effect and atomic spectra of hydrogen can be explained on the basis of theories proposed by Max Planck, Einstein and Bohr. They based their theories on the postulate that all interactions between matter and radiation occur in terms of definite packets of energy, known as quanta. Their ideas, when extended further, led to the evolution of wave mechanics, which shows the dual nature of matter
  • Quantum Theory of the Hydrogen Atom

    Quantum Theory of the Hydrogen Atom

    Quantum Theory of the Hydrogen Atom Chemistry 35 Fall 2000 Balmer and the Hydrogen Spectrum n 1885: Johann Balmer, a Swiss schoolteacher, empirically deduced a formula which predicted the wavelengths of emission for Hydrogen: l (in Å) = 3645.6 x n2 for n = 3, 4, 5, 6 n2 -4 •Predicts the wavelengths of the 4 visible emission lines from Hydrogen (which are called the Balmer Series) •Implies that there is some underlying order in the atom that results in this deceptively simple equation. 2 1 The Bohr Atom n 1913: Niels Bohr uses quantum theory to explain the origin of the line spectrum of hydrogen 1. The electron in a hydrogen atom can exist only in discrete orbits 2. The orbits are circular paths about the nucleus at varying radii 3. Each orbit corresponds to a particular energy 4. Orbit energies increase with increasing radii 5. The lowest energy orbit is called the ground state 6. After absorbing energy, the e- jumps to a higher energy orbit (an excited state) 7. When the e- drops down to a lower energy orbit, the energy lost can be given off as a quantum of light 8. The energy of the photon emitted is equal to the difference in energies of the two orbits involved 3 Mohr Bohr n Mathematically, Bohr equated the two forces acting on the orbiting electron: coulombic attraction = centrifugal accelleration 2 2 2 -(Z/4peo)(e /r ) = m(v /r) n Rearranging and making the wild assumption: mvr = n(h/2p) n e- angular momentum can only have certain quantified values in whole multiples of h/2p 4 2 Hydrogen Energy Levels n Based on this model, Bohr arrived at a simple equation to calculate the electron energy levels in hydrogen: 2 En = -RH(1/n ) for n = 1, 2, 3, 4, .
  • Scalability and High-Efficiency of an $(N+ 1) $-Qubit Toffoli Gate Sphere

    Scalability and High-Efficiency of an $(N+ 1) $-Qubit Toffoli Gate Sphere

    Scalability and high-efficiency of an (n + 1)-qubit Toffoli gate sphere via blockaded Rydberg atoms Dongmin Yu1, Yichun Gao1, Weiping Zhang2,3, Jinming Liu1 and Jing Qian1,3,† 1State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, Department of Physics, School of Physics and Electronic Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiaotong University and Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai 200240, China and 3Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030006, China∗ The Toffoli gate serving as a basic building block for reversible quantum computation, has man- ifested its great potentials in improving the error-tolerant rate in quantum communication. While current route to the creation of Toffoli gate requires implementing sequential single- and two-qubit gates, limited by longer operation time and lower average fidelity. We develop a new theoretical protocol to construct a universal (n + 1)-qubit Toffoli gate sphere based on the Rydberg blockade mechanism, by constraining the behavior of one central target atom with n surrounding control atoms. Its merit lies in the use of only five π pulses independent of the control atom number n which leads to the overall gate time as fast as 125ns and the average fidelity closing to 0.999. The maximal filling number of control atoms can be∼ up to n = 46, determined by the spherical diame- ter which is equal to the blockade radius, as well as by the nearest neighbor spacing between two trapped-atom lattices. Taking n = 2, 3, 4 as examples we comparably show the gate performance with experimentally accessible parameters, and confirm that the gate errors mainly attribute to the imperfect blockade strength, the spontaneous atomic loss and the imperfect ground-state prepa- ration.
  • Vibrational Quantum Number

    Vibrational Quantum Number

    Fundamentals in Biophotonics Quantum nature of atoms, molecules – matter Aleksandra Radenovic [email protected] EPFL – Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne Bioengineering Institute IBI 26. 03. 2018. Quantum numbers •The four quantum numbers-are discrete sets of integers or half- integers. –n: Principal quantum number-The first describes the electron shell, or energy level, of an atom –ℓ : Orbital angular momentum quantum number-as the angular quantum number or orbital quantum number) describes the subshell, and gives the magnitude of the orbital angular momentum through the relation Ll2 ( 1) –mℓ:Magnetic (azimuthal) quantum number (refers, to the direction of the angular momentum vector. The magnetic quantum number m does not affect the electron's energy, but it does affect the probability cloud)- magnetic quantum number determines the energy shift of an atomic orbital due to an external magnetic field-Zeeman effect -s spin- intrinsic angular momentum Spin "up" and "down" allows two electrons for each set of spatial quantum numbers. The restrictions for the quantum numbers: – n = 1, 2, 3, 4, . – ℓ = 0, 1, 2, 3, . , n − 1 – mℓ = − ℓ, − ℓ + 1, . , 0, 1, . , ℓ − 1, ℓ – –Equivalently: n > 0 The energy levels are: ℓ < n |m | ≤ ℓ ℓ E E 0 n n2 Stern-Gerlach experiment If the particles were classical spinning objects, one would expect the distribution of their spin angular momentum vectors to be random and continuous. Each particle would be deflected by a different amount, producing some density distribution on the detector screen. Instead, the particles passing through the Stern–Gerlach apparatus are deflected either up or down by a specific amount.
  • Lecture 3: Particle in a 1D Box

    Lecture 3: Particle in a 1D Box

    Lecture 3: Particle in a 1D Box First we will consider a free particle moving in 1D so V (x) = 0. The TDSE now reads ~2 d2ψ(x) = Eψ(x) −2m dx2 which is solved by the function ψ = Aeikx where √2mE k = ± ~ A general solution of this equation is ψ(x) = Aeikx + Be−ikx where A and B are arbitrary constants. It can also be written in terms of sines and cosines as ψ(x) = C sin(kx) + D cos(kx) The constants appearing in the solution are determined by the boundary conditions. For a free particle that can be anywhere, there is no boundary conditions, so k and thus E = ~2k2/2m can take any values. The solution of the form eikx corresponds to a wave travelling in the +x direction and similarly e−ikx corresponds to a wave travelling in the -x direction. These are eigenfunctions of the momentum operator. Since the particle is free, it is equally likely to be anywhere so ψ∗(x)ψ(x) is independent of x. Incidently, it cannot be normalized because the particle can be found anywhere with equal probability. 1 Now, let us confine the particle to a region between x = 0 and x = L. To do this, we choose our interaction potential V (x) as follows V (x) = 0 for 0 x L ≤ ≤ = otherwise ∞ It is always a good idea to plot the potential energy, when it is a function of a single variable, as shown in Fig.1. The TISE is now given by V(x) V=infinity V=0 V=infinity x 0 L ~2 d2ψ(x) + V (x)ψ(x) = Eψ(x) −2m dx2 First consider the region outside the box where V (x) = .
  • Chapter 5. Atoms in Optical Lattices

    Chapter 5. Atoms in Optical Lattices

    Strongly correlated systems in atomic and condensed matter physics Lecture notes for Physics 284 by Eugene Demler Harvard University September 18, 2014 2 Chapter 5 Atoms in optical lattices Optical lattices provide a powerful tool for creating strongly correlated many- body systems of ultracold atoms. By choosing different lattice geometries one can obtain very different single particle dispersions. The ratio of the interaction and kinetic energies can be controlled by tuning the depth of the lattice. 5.1 Noninteracting particles in optical lattices The simplest possible periodic optical potential is formed by overlapping two counter-propagating beams. Electric field in the resulting standing wave is E(z) = E0 sin(kz + θ) cos !t (5.1) Here k = 2π/λ is the wavevector of the laser light. Following the general recipe for AC Stark effects, we calculate electric dipolar moments induced by this field in the atoms, calculate interaction between dipolar moments and the electric field, and average over fast optical oscillations (see chapter ??). The result is the potential 2 V (z) = −V0 sin (kz + θ) (5.2) 2 where V0 = α(!)E0 =2, with α(!) being polarizability. It is common to express 2 2 V0 in units of the recoil energy Er = ~ k =2m. In real experiments one also needs to take into account the transverse profile of the beam. Hence V (r?; z) = exp{−2r2=w2(z)g×V (z). In most experiments the main effect of the transverse profile is only to renormalize the parabolic confining potentia. Combining three perpendicular sets of standing waves we get a simple cubic lattice V (r) = −Vx 0 cosqxx − Vy 0 cosqyy − Vz 0 cosqzz (5.3) 3 4 CHAPTER 5.
  • The Quantum Mechanical Model of the Atom

    The Quantum Mechanical Model of the Atom

    The Quantum Mechanical Model of the Atom Quantum Numbers In order to describe the probable location of electrons, they are assigned four numbers called quantum numbers. The quantum numbers of an electron are kind of like the electron’s “address”. No two electrons can be described by the exact same four quantum numbers. This is called The Pauli Exclusion Principle. • Principle quantum number: The principle quantum number describes which orbit the electron is in and therefore how much energy the electron has. - it is symbolized by the letter n. - positive whole numbers are assigned (not including 0): n=1, n=2, n=3 , etc - the higher the number, the further the orbit from the nucleus - the higher the number, the more energy the electron has (this is sort of like Bohr’s energy levels) - the orbits (energy levels) are also called shells • Angular momentum (azimuthal) quantum number: The azimuthal quantum number describes the sublevels (subshells) that occur in each of the levels (shells) described above. - it is symbolized by the letter l - positive whole number values including 0 are assigned: l = 0, l = 1, l = 2, etc. - each number represents the shape of a subshell: l = 0, represents an s subshell l = 1, represents a p subshell l = 2, represents a d subshell l = 3, represents an f subshell - the higher the number, the more complex the shape of the subshell. The picture below shows the shape of the s and p subshells: (notice the electron clouds) • Magnetic quantum number: All of the subshells described above (except s) have more than one orientation.
  • Veselago Lensing with Ultracold Atoms in an Optical Lattice

    Veselago Lensing with Ultracold Atoms in an Optical Lattice

    ARTICLE Received 9 Dec 2013 | Accepted 27 Jan 2014 | Published 14 Feb 2014 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4327 Veselago lensing with ultracold atoms in an optical lattice Martin Leder1, Christopher Grossert1 & Martin Weitz1 Veselago pointed out that electromagnetic wave theory allows for materials with a negative index of refraction, in which most known optical phenomena would be reversed. A slab of such a material can focus light by negative refraction, an imaging technique strikingly different from conventional positive refractive index optics, where curved surfaces bend the rays to form an image of an object. Here we demonstrate Veselago lensing for matter waves, using ultracold atoms in an optical lattice. A relativistic, that is, photon-like, dispersion relation for rubidium atoms is realized with a bichromatic optical lattice potential. We rely on a Raman p-pulse technique to transfer atoms between two different branches of the dispersion relation, resulting in a focusing that is completely analogous to the effect described by Veselago for light waves. Future prospects of the demonstrated effects include novel sub-de Broglie wavelength imaging applications. 1 Institut fu¨r Angewandte Physik der Universita¨t Bonn, Wegelerstrae 8, 53115 Bonn, Germany. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.W. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:3327 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4327 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 & 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4327 eselago lensing is a concept based on negative of spatial periodicity l/4, generated by the dispersion of multi- refraction1–3, where a spatially diverging pencil of rays photon Raman transitions17.
  • Ultracold Atoms in a Disordered Optical Lattice

    Ultracold Atoms in a Disordered Optical Lattice

    ULTRACOLD ATOMS IN A DISORDERED OPTICAL LATTICE BY MATTHEW ROBERT WHITE B.S., University of California, Santa Barbara, 2003 DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2009 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Paul Kwiat, Chair Assistant Professor Brian DeMarco, Director of Research Assistant Professor Raffi Budakian Professor David Ceperley Acknowledgments This work would not have been possible without the support of my advisor Brian DeMarco and coworkers Matt Pasienski, David McKay, Hong Gao, Stanimir Kondov, David Chen, William McGehee, Matt Brinkley, Lauren Aycock, Cecilia Borries, Soheil Baharian, Sarah Gossett, Minsu Kim, and Yutaka Miyagawa. Generous funding was provided by the Uni- versity of Illinois, NSF, ARO, and ONR. ii Table of Contents List of Figures..................................... v Chapter 1 Introduction .............................. 1 1.1 Strongly-interacting Boson Systems.......................1 1.2 Bose-Hubbard Model...............................2 1.3 Disordered Bose-Hubbard Model with Cold Atoms..............3 1.4 Observations...................................4 1.5 Future Work on the DBH Model........................5 1.6 Quantum Simulation...............................5 1.7 Outline......................................6 Chapter 2 BEC Apparatus............................ 8 2.1 Introduction....................................8 2.2 Atomic Properties................................8
  • Dynamics of Hubbard Hamiltonians with the Multiconfigurational Time-Dependent Hartree Method for Indistinguishable Particles Axel Lode, Christoph Bruder

    Dynamics of Hubbard Hamiltonians with the Multiconfigurational Time-Dependent Hartree Method for Indistinguishable Particles Axel Lode, Christoph Bruder

    Dynamics of Hubbard Hamiltonians with the multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree method for indistinguishable particles Axel Lode, Christoph Bruder To cite this version: Axel Lode, Christoph Bruder. Dynamics of Hubbard Hamiltonians with the multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree method for indistinguishable particles. Physical Review A, American Physical Society 2016, 94, pp.013616. 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.013616. hal-02369999 HAL Id: hal-02369999 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02369999 Submitted on 19 Nov 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. PHYSICAL REVIEW A 94, 013616 (2016) Dynamics of Hubbard Hamiltonians with the multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree method for indistinguishable particles Axel U. J. Lode* and Christoph Bruder Department of Physics, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 82, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland (Received 29 April 2016; published 22 July 2016) We apply the multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree method for indistinguishable particles (MCTDH-X) to systems of bosons or fermions in lattices described by Hubbard-type Hamiltonians with long-range or short-range interparticle interactions. The wave function is expanded in a variationally optimized time-dependent many-body basis generated by a set of effective creation operators that are related to the original particle creation operators by a time-dependent unitary transform.
  • Two Classes of Unconventional Photonic Crystals

    Two Classes of Unconventional Photonic Crystals

    Two Classes of Unconventional Photonic Crystals by Y. D. Chong B.S. Physics Stanford University, 2003 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AUGUST 2008 c 2008 Y. D. Chong. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author: Department of Physics August 2008 Certified by: Marin Soljaˇci´c Assistant Professor of Physics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: Professor Thomas J. Greytak Associate Department Head for Education Abstract This thesis concerns two classes of photonic crystal that differ from the usual solid-state dielectric photonic crystals studied in optical physics. The first class of unconventional photonic crystal consists of atoms bound in an optical lattice. This is a “resonant photonic crystal”, in which an underlying optical resonance modifies the usual band physics. I present a three-dimensional quantum mechanical model of exciton polaritons which describes this system. Amongst other things, the model explains the reason for the resonant enhancement of the photonic bandgap, which turns out to be related to the Purcell effect. An extension of this band theoretical approach is then used to study dark-state polaritons in Λ-type atomic media. The second class of unconventional photonic crystal consists of two di- mensional photonic crystals that break time-reversal symmetry due to a magneto-optic effect. The band theory for such systems involves topological quantities known as “Chern numbers”, which give rise to the phenomenon of disorder-immune one-way edge modes.