DOCSLIB.ORG

Phenomenological Tests of Modified Gravity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Phenomenological Tests of Modified Gravity Ana Aurelia Avilez-López Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2015 For Ana Lucía and Jorge . DECLARATION I hereby declare that except where specific reference is made to the work of others, the contents of this dissertation are original and have not been submitted in whole or in part for consideration for any other degree or qualification in this, or any other university. This dissertation is my own work and contains nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration with others, except as specified in the text and Acknowledgements. This dissertation contains fewer than 100,000 words including appendices, bibliography, footnotes, tables and equations. The thesis is based in the following research • Avilez, A. and Skordis, C., Cosmological Constraints on Brans-Dicke Theory, Phys.Rev.Lett.113(2014)011101, arXiv:1303.4330 [astro-ph.CO]. • Ana Avilez-Lopez, Antonio Padilla, Paul M. Saffin, Constantinos Skordis, The Parametrized Post-Newtonian-Vainshteinian Formalism, (Submitted to JCAP) arXiv:1501.01985 [gr-qc]. Paper 1 is described in chapters 3 and 4. The motivation and part of the calculations of chapter 6 are based paper 2. Ana Aurelia Avilez-López July 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor Costas Skordis for his dedicated, patient and fruitful guidence and support during my doctoral course. I am deeply grateful to him for giving me his trust and support even in hard moments. Also, thank you Costas for the freedom you gave me to explore new ideas and your flexibility about times and forms that made possible to carry on with this research work. Also, I am grateful to the people in the department for supported me and encourage me to give my best effort. I am grateful to my collaborators Tony Padilla and Paul Saffin for their guidence, discussions and support. I would also like to thank my external collaborator Yong-Seon Song for his interesting questions and discussions. I am grateful with the national council of science and technology of Mexico CONACYT for the financial and institutional support. Many thanks to my husband Jorge for all his patience, love and support. Thanks to Ana Lucia for the time she donated to this research I promisse it will be worth. Thank you to my mother Margarita Elena López and Bertha Fernandez-Quiroz, without their support this work would have not been possible at all. Thank you: Cristina, Victoria, Gerardo, Janette, Fernando, Giovanna, Bruno, Paul Tognarelli, Mou Zong Gang and Ana Chies for your friendship and support during this period. ABSTRACT The main goal of this thesis is to test the viability of some modified theories of gravity suitable to describe gravitational phenomena at cosmological and astronomical scales. In the first part of the Thesis we study the viability of the Brans-Dicke theory (BDT) and the effective scalar-tensor theory according (gBDT) to cosmological observations. We assume that either BDT as gBDT are limiting cases on very large scales of more general scalar-tensor theories involving derivative self-interactions which have running Newton’s constant. In order to implement this assumption in a simple way we consider two types of models. The restricted models that correspond to the standard BDT with Newton constant today equal to measured Newton constant in solar-system experiments. The unrestricted models, correspond to the case where the Newton’s constant today is a free parameter, and the cosmological GN is allowed to be different than in the solar system as in more general theories. We first explore the relevant theoretical aspects of these models. Afterwards, by using different analysis techniques we fitted cosmological observations. Finally we forecast limits of BDT by considering estimated covariance matrices for measurements of the matter power spectrum in redshift space from Euclid. The effective scalar-tensor theory gBDT arises from a phenomenological setup of parametrization of the LSS growth equations, we found estimates of modifications of the growth by using the correspondance between the estimates for the gBDT parameters. In the second part of the Thesis we present an extension of the Parameterized Post- Newtonian (PPN) formalism that is able to handle Vainsteinian corrections. We argue that theories with a Vainshtein mechanism must be expanded using two small parameters. In this Parameterized Post-Newtonian-Vainshteinian (PPNV) expansion, the primary expansion parameter which controls the PPN order is as usual the velocity v. The secondary expansion parameter, a, controls the strength of the Vainshteinian correction and is a theory-specific combination of the Schwarzschild radius and the Vainshtein radius of the source that is independent of its mass. We present the general framework and apply it to the Cubic galileon theory both inside and outside the Vainshtein radius. The PPNV framework can be used to determine the compatibility of such theories with solar system and other strong-field data. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of figures xv 1 Introduction1 1.1 Historical Review Of General Relativity . .1 1.1.1 Solar System Precision Tests . .1 1.1.2 Origins Of The Standard Cosmology . .4 1.2 Challenges for the Standard Cosmology . 11 1.2.1 Dark Matter-Energy Mysteries . 11 1.2.2 Other Observations in Tension with the Standard Model . 19 1.3 Alternatives to The Standard Cosmology . 22 1.3.1 Lovelock’s Theorem . 23 1.3.2 Overlook to the Zoo of Modified Theories of Gravity . 23 1.3.3 The Need of Screening Mechanisms in Modified Theories of Gravity . 27 1.4 Thesis Goals and Outline . 28 2 Standard Cosmology Based On General Relativity 31 2.1 Introduction . 31 2.2 The Standard Homogeneous and Isotropic Universe . 32 2.3 The Birth of Baryonic Matter: Nucleosynthesis and Recombination . 37 2.3.1 The Boltzmann Equation . 37 2.3.2 The Epoch of Nucleosynthesis . 39 2.3.3 Recombination of Neutral Hydrogen . 45 2.3.4 Linear Cosmological Perturbations . 47 2.4 Cosmological Testable Observables from Perturbations . 63 2.4.1 The Cosmic Microwave Background . 63 2.4.2 The Large Scale Structure of the Universe . 74 xii Table of contents 2.5 Summary of the Chapter . 77 3 The Brans-Dicke Cosmology 79 3.1 Historical Review of the Brans-Dicke Theory and its Generalizations . 79 3.2 The Model . 82 3.3 Background Cosmology . 83 3.4 Conservative Bounds on the Horndeski’s Subclass . 88 3.5 Big Bang Nucleosynthesis . 90 3.6 Recombination History . 92 3.7 Linear Cosmological Perturbation Theory . 98 3.7.1 Equations of Motion for Perturbations . 98 3.7.2 Scalar Perturbations And GR As A Late-Time Attractor . 101 3.7.3 Matter Perturbations And Matter Power Spectrum . 102 3.7.4 Peculiar Velocities . 106 3.7.5 Anisotropies In The Cosmic Radiation Background . 111 3.8 Conclusion and Summary of the Chapter . 124 4 Cosmological Tests Of Brans-Dicke Theory 127 4.1 Introduction . 127 4.2 Theory v.s. Data: Some Tests And Methods . 129 4.2.1 Parametric And Phenomenological Approaches . 129 4.2.2 Tools For Comparing Predictions v.s. Data . 131 4.3 Cosmological Constraints On Brans-Dicke Gravity . 140 4.3.1 MCMC Constraints From The CMB Anisotropies . 140 4.3.2 MCMC Constraints from the CMB and LSS . 155 4.3.3 Constraints from WMAP7 and The Alcock-Paszynski Test . 162 4.4 Forecasts on BDT from Redshift Space Distortions . 167 4.4.1 Theoretical models and upper bound of the detectability . 167 4.4.2 Alcock-Paczynski Effect from RSD . 169 4.4.3 Forecasting Constraints From Future RSD Surveys . 170 4.5 Summary and Conclusions of this Chapter . 173 5 The Effective Scalar-Tensor Theory At Cosmological Scales 177 5.1 Introduction . 177 5.2 A Phenomenological Setup for Modified Gravity . 179 Table of contents xiii 5.3 Cosmological Implications of The Effective Scalar-Tensor Theory . 183 5.3.1 The Model . 183 5.3.2 Background Cosmology . 185 5.3.3 Linear Cosmological Perturbation Theory . 190 5.3.4 The Alcock-Paczynski Distortion in gBDT .......... 194 5.3.5 Anisotropies in the Cosmic Microwave Background . 195 5.4 Constraints On The Effective Scalar-Tensor Theory . 208 5.4.1 Methodology and Analysis . 208 5.4.2 Results and Discussion . 209 5.5 Conclusion . 214 6 The Parametrized Post Newtonian-Vainshteinian Formalism 215 6.1 Introduction . 215 6.2 The PPNV Expansion: Vainshteinian Correction to the PPN Formalism217 6.2.1 The Standard Post-Newtonian Approximation . 217 6.2.2 Vainshtein Mechanism for a Spherically Symmetric Source . 221 6.2.3 Paving the Way Towards PPNV: the Vainshtein Order . 223 6.2.4 The PPNV Formalism . 228 6.3 Case study: The Cubic Galileon Theory . 230 6.3.1 A Short Introduction to the Cubic Galileon Theory . 230 6.3.2 The PPNV Expansion Outside the Vainshtein Radius . 232 6.4 The Dual Cubic Galileon and The Strong Field Region . 243 6.4.1 Dualizing the Cubic Galileon . 243 6.5 The PPNV Expansion Inside the Vainshtein Region . 244 6.5.1 Leading Order Solutions: General Relativity . 244 6.5.2 Solving the Post-Newtonian Scalar Equation . 247 6.5.3 PPNV At Higher PPN Orders . 250 6.5.4 On the Need of Basis for Post-Post Newtonian Vainstenian Solutions . 252 6.5.5 The Post Post Newtonian Vainshteinian Metric . 253 6.6 Back to Spherical Symmetry . 254 6.7 Conclusion . 258 7 Discussion and Conclusions 259 xiv Table of contents References 267 Appendix A The Standard Post-Newtonian Tools 289 A.1 Post-Newtonian Potentials . 289 A.2 Renomalized Post-Newtonian Potentials . 291 A.2.1 Definitions For j(4;0) Solution .
Recommended publications
  • A Mathematical Derivation of the General Relativistic Schwarzschild

    A Mathematical Derivation of the General Relativistic Schwarzschild

    A Mathematical Derivation of the General Relativistic Schwarzschild Metric An Honors thesis presented to the faculty of the Departments of Physics and Mathematics East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors Scholar and Honors-in-Discipline Programs for a Bachelor of Science in Physics and Mathematics by David Simpson April 2007 Robert Gardner, Ph.D. Mark Giroux, Ph.D. Keywords: differential geometry, general relativity, Schwarzschild metric, black holes ABSTRACT The Mathematical Derivation of the General Relativistic Schwarzschild Metric by David Simpson We briefly discuss some underlying principles of special and general relativity with the focus on a more geometric interpretation. We outline Einstein’s Equations which describes the geometry of spacetime due to the influence of mass, and from there derive the Schwarzschild metric. The metric relies on the curvature of spacetime to provide a means of measuring invariant spacetime intervals around an isolated, static, and spherically symmetric mass M, which could represent a star or a black hole. In the derivation, we suggest a concise mathematical line of reasoning to evaluate the large number of cumbersome equations involved which was not found elsewhere in our survey of the literature. 2 CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................. 2 1 Introduction to Relativity ...................... 4 1.1 Minkowski Space ....................... 6 1.2 What is a black hole? ..................... 11 1.3 Geodesics and Christoffel Symbols ............. 14 2 Einstein’s Field Equations and Requirements for a Solution .17 2.1 Einstein’s Field Equations .................. 20 3 Derivation of the Schwarzschild Metric .............. 21 3.1 Evaluation of the Christoffel Symbols .......... 25 3.2 Ricci Tensor Components .................
  • Einstein's Mistakes

    Einstein's Mistakes

    Einstein’s Mistakes Einstein was the greatest genius of the Twentieth Century, but his discoveries were blighted with mistakes. The Human Failing of Genius. 1 PART 1 An evaluation of the man Here, Einstein grows up, his thinking evolves, and many quotations from him are listed. Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Einstein at 14 Einstein at 26 Einstein at 42 3 Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Einstein at age 61 (1940) 4 Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Born in Ulm, Swabian region of Southern Germany. From a Jewish merchant family. Had a sister Maja. Family rejected Jewish customs. Did not inherit any mathematical talent. Inherited stubbornness, Inherited a roguish sense of humor, An inclination to mysticism, And a habit of grüblen or protracted, agonizing “brooding” over whatever was on its mind. Leading to the thought experiment. 5 Portrait in 1947 – age 68, and his habit of agonizing brooding over whatever was on its mind. He was in Princeton, NJ, USA. 6 Einstein the mystic •“Everyone who is seriously involved in pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the universe, one that is vastly superior to that of man..” •“When I assess a theory, I ask myself, if I was God, would I have arranged the universe that way?” •His roguish sense of humor was always there. •When asked what will be his reactions to observational evidence against the bending of light predicted by his general theory of relativity, he said: •”Then I would feel sorry for the Good Lord. The theory is correct anyway.” 7 Einstein: Mathematics •More quotations from Einstein: •“How it is possible that mathematics, a product of human thought that is independent of experience, fits so excellently the objects of physical reality?” •Questions asked by many people and Einstein: •“Is God a mathematician?” •His conclusion: •“ The Lord is cunning, but not malicious.” 8 Einstein the Stubborn Mystic “What interests me is whether God had any choice in the creation of the world” Some broadcasters expunged the comment from the soundtrack because they thought it was blasphemous.
  • Penetration of Fast Projectiles Into Resistant Media: from Macroscopic

    Penetration of Fast Projectiles Into Resistant Media: from Macroscopic

    Penetration of fast projectiles into resistant media: from macroscopic to subatomic projectiles Jos´e Gaite Applied Physics Dept., ETSIAE, Universidad Polit´ecnica de Madrid, E-28040 Madrid, Spain∗ (Dated: July 21, 2017) The penetration of a fast projectile into a resistant medium is a complex process that is suitable for simple modeling, in which basic physical principles can be profitably employed. This study connects two different domains: the fast motion of macroscopic bodies in resistant media and the interaction of charged subatomic particles with matter at high energies, which furnish the two limit cases of the problem of penetrating projectiles of different sizes. These limit cases actually have overlapping applications; for example, in space physics and technology. The intermediate or mesoscopic domain finds application in atom cluster implantation technology. Here it is shown that the penetration of fast nano-projectiles is ruled by a slightly modified Newton’s inertial quadratic force, namely, F ∼ v2−β , where β vanishes as the inverse of projectile diameter. Factors essential to penetration depth are ratio of projectile to medium density and projectile shape. Keywords: penetration dynamics; energy loss; collisions; supersonic motion. I. INTRODUCTION Between subatomic and macroscopic projectiles, there is a mesoscopic range of nano-projectiles, with important technological applications.23 The few studies of their re- The analytical study of the resistance to the motion of lation to macroscopic projectiles24,25 only treat particu- projectiles begins with Book Two of Newton’s Principia, lar aspects of the problem. Here we study the problem entitled The motion of bodies (in resisting mediums).1 of resistance to projectile penetration within a unified Other classics have studied this subject, which has obvi- conceptual framework that applies to the full ranges of ous applications, for example, military applications.
  • Linearized Einstein Field Equations

    Linearized Einstein Field Equations

    General Relativity Fall 2019 Lecture 15: Linearized Einstein field equations Yacine Ali-Ha¨ımoud October 17th 2019 SUMMARY FROM PREVIOUS LECTURE We are considering nearly flat spacetimes with nearly globally Minkowski coordinates: gµν = ηµν + hµν , with jhµν j 1. Such coordinates are not unique. First, we can make Lorentz transformations and keep a µ ν globally-Minkowski coordinate system, with hµ0ν0 = Λ µ0 Λ ν0 hµν , so that hµν can be seen as a Lorentz tensor µ µ µ ν field on flat spacetime. Second, if we make small changes of coordinates, x ! x − ξ , with j@µξ j 1, the metric perturbation remains small and changes as hµν ! hµν + 2ξ(µ,ν). By analogy with electromagnetism, we can see these small coordinate changes as gauge transformations, leaving the Riemann tensor unchanged at linear order. Since we will linearize the relevant equations, we may work in Fourier space: each Fourier mode satisfies an independent equation. We denote by ~k the wavenumber and by k^ its direction and k its norm. We have decomposed the 10 independent components of the metric perturbation according to their transformation properties under spatial rotations: there are 4 independent \scalar" components, which can be taken, for instance, ^i ^i^j to be h00; k h0i; hii, and k k hij { or any 4 linearly independent combinations thereof. There are 2 independent ilm^ ilm^ ^j transverse \vector" components, each with 2 independent components: klh0m and klhmjk { these are proportional to the curl of h0i and to the curl of the divergence of hij, and are divergenceless (transverse to the ~ TT Fourier wavenumber k).
  • Equivalence Principle (WEP) of General Relativity Using a New Quantum Gravity Theory Proposed by the Authors Called Electro-Magnetic Quantum Gravity Or EMQG (Ref

    Equivalence Principle (WEP) of General Relativity Using a New Quantum Gravity Theory Proposed by the Authors Called Electro-Magnetic Quantum Gravity Or EMQG (Ref

    WHAT ARE THE HIDDEN QUANTUM PROCESSES IN EINSTEIN’S WEAK PRINCIPLE OF EQUIVALENCE? Tom Ostoma and Mike Trushyk 48 O’HARA PLACE, Brampton, Ontario, L6Y 3R8 [email protected] Monday April 12, 2000 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We wish to thank R. Mongrain (P.Eng) for our lengthy conversations on the nature of space, time, light, matter, and CA theory. ABSTRACT We provide a quantum derivation of Einstein’s Weak Equivalence Principle (WEP) of general relativity using a new quantum gravity theory proposed by the authors called Electro-Magnetic Quantum Gravity or EMQG (ref. 1). EMQG is manifestly compatible with Cellular Automata (CA) theory (ref. 2 and 4), and is also based on a new theory of inertia (ref. 5) proposed by R. Haisch, A. Rueda, and H. Puthoff (which we modified and called Quantum Inertia, QI). QI states that classical Newtonian Inertia is a property of matter due to the strictly local electrical force interactions contributed by each of the (electrically charged) elementary particles of the mass with the surrounding (electrically charged) virtual particles (virtual masseons) of the quantum vacuum. The sum of all the tiny electrical forces (photon exchanges with the vacuum particles) originating in each charged elementary particle of the accelerated mass is the source of the total inertial force of a mass which opposes accelerated motion in Newton’s law ‘F = MA’. The well known paradoxes that arise from considerations of accelerated motion (Mach’s principle) are resolved, and Newton’s laws of motion are now understood at the deeper quantum level. We found that gravity also involves the same ‘inertial’ electromagnetic force component that exists in inertial mass.
  • Derivation of Generalized Einstein's Equations of Gravitation in Some

    Derivation of Generalized Einstein's Equations of Gravitation in Some

    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 5 February 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202102.0157.v1 Derivation of generalized Einstein's equations of gravitation in some non-inertial reference frames based on the theory of vacuum mechanics Xiao-Song Wang Institute of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan Province, 454000, China (Dated: Dec. 15, 2020) When solving the Einstein's equations for an isolated system of masses, V. Fock introduces har- monic reference frame and obtains an unambiguous solution. Further, he concludes that there exists a harmonic reference frame which is determined uniquely apart from a Lorentz transformation if suitable supplementary conditions are imposed. It is known that wave equations keep the same form under Lorentz transformations. Thus, we speculate that Fock's special harmonic reference frames may have provided us a clue to derive the Einstein's equations in some special class of non-inertial reference frames. Following this clue, generalized Einstein's equations in some special non-inertial reference frames are derived based on the theory of vacuum mechanics. If the field is weak and the reference frame is quasi-inertial, these generalized Einstein's equations reduce to Einstein's equa- tions. Thus, this theory may also explain all the experiments which support the theory of general relativity. There exist some differences between this theory and the theory of general relativity. Keywords: Einstein's equations; gravitation; general relativity; principle of equivalence; gravitational aether; vacuum mechanics. I. INTRODUCTION p. 411). Theoretical interpretation of the small value of Λ is still open [6]. The Einstein's field equations of gravitation are valid 3.
  • Formulation of Einstein Field Equation Through Curved Newtonian Space-Time

    Formulation of Einstein Field Equation Through Curved Newtonian Space-Time

    Formulation of Einstein Field Equation Through Curved Newtonian Space-Time Austen Berlet Lord Dorchester Secondary School Dorchester, Ontario, Canada Abstract This paper discusses a possible derivation of Einstein’s field equations of general relativity through Newtonian mechanics. It shows that taking the proper perspective on Newton’s equations will start to lead to a curved space time which is basis of the general theory of relativity. It is important to note that this approach is dependent upon a knowledge of general relativity, with out that, the vital assumptions would not be realized. Note: A number inside of a double square bracket, for example [[1]], denotes an endnote found on the last page. 1. Introduction The purpose of this paper is to show a way to rediscover Einstein’s General Relativity. It is done through analyzing Newton’s equations and making the conclusion that space-time must not only be realized, but also that it must have curvature in the presence of matter and energy. 2. Principal of Least Action We want to show here the Lagrangian action of limiting motion of Newton’s second law (F=ma). We start with a function q mapping to n space of n dimensions and we equip it with a standard inner product. q : → (n ,(⋅,⋅)) (1) We take a function (q) between q0 and q1 and look at the ds of a section of the curve. We then look at some properties of this function (q). We see that the classical action of the functional (L) of q is equal to ∫ds, L denotes the systems Lagrangian.
  • Einstein's 1916 Derivation of the Field Equations

    Einstein's 1916 Derivation of the Field Equations

    1 Einstein's 1916 derivation of the Field Equations Galina Weinstein 24/10/2013 Abstract: In his first November 4, 1915 paper Einstein wrote the Lagrangian form of his field equations. In the fourth November 25, 1915 paper, Einstein added a trace term of the energy- momentum tensor on the right-hand side of the generally covariant field equations. The main purpose of the present work is to show that in November 4, 1915, Einstein had already explored much of the main ingredients that were required for the formulation of the final form of the field equations of November 25, 1915. The present work suggests that the idea of adding the second-term on the right-hand side of the field equation might have originated in reconsideration of the November 4, 1915 field equations. In this regard, the final form of Einstein's field equations with the trace term may be linked with his work of November 4, 1915. The interesting history of the derivation of the final form of the field equations is inspired by the exchange of letters between Einstein and Paul Ehrenfest in winter 1916 and by Einstein's 1916 derivation of the November 25, 1915 field equations. In 1915, Einstein wrote the vacuum (matter-free) field equations in the form:1 for all systems of coordinates for which It is sufficient to note that the left-hand side represents the gravitational field, with g the metric tensor field. Einstein wrote the field equations in Lagrangian form. The action,2 and the Lagrangian, 2 Using the components of the gravitational field: Einstein wrote the variation: which gives:3 We now come back to (2), and we have, Inserting (6) into (7) gives the field equations (1).
  • Analysis and Simulation of Hypervelocity Gouging Impacts

    Analysis and Simulation of Hypervelocity Gouging Impacts

    Air Force Institute of Technology AFIT Scholar Theses and Dissertations Student Graduate Works 3-13-2006 Analysis and Simulation of Hypervelocity Gouging Impacts John D. Cinnamon Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.afit.edu/etd Part of the Engineering Science and Materials Commons Recommended Citation Cinnamon, John D., "Analysis and Simulation of Hypervelocity Gouging Impacts" (2006). Theses and Dissertations. 3318. https://scholar.afit.edu/etd/3318 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Graduate Works at AFIT Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of AFIT Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Analysis and Simulation of Hypervelocity Gouging Impacts DISSERTATION John D. Cinnamon, Major, USAF AFIT/DS/ENY/06-01 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR UNIVERSITY AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED. The views expressed in this work are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the United States Government. AFIT/DS/ENY/06-01 Analysis and Simulation of Hypervelocity Gouging Impacts DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Graduate School of Engineering and Management Air Force Institute of Technology Air University Air Education and Training Command In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy John D. Cinnamon, B.S.E., M.S.E., P.E. Major, USAF June 2006 APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED. AFIT/DS/ENY/06-01 Abstract Hypervelocity impact is an area of extreme interest in the research community.
  • Post-Newtonian Approximations and Applications

    Post-Newtonian Approximations and Applications

    Monash University MTH3000 Research Project Coming out of the woodwork: Post-Newtonian approximations and applications Author: Supervisor: Justin Forlano Dr. Todd Oliynyk March 25, 2015 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 The post-Newtonian Approximation 5 2.1 The Relaxed Einstein Field Equations . 5 2.2 Solution Method . 7 2.3 Zones of Integration . 13 2.4 Multi-pole Expansions . 15 2.5 The first post-Newtonian potentials . 17 2.6 Alternate Integration Methods . 24 3 Equations of Motion and the Precession of Mercury 28 3.1 Deriving equations of motion . 28 3.2 Application to precession of Mercury . 33 4 Gravitational Waves and the Hulse-Taylor Binary 38 4.1 Transverse-traceless potentials and polarisations . 38 4.2 Particular gravitational wave fields . 42 4.3 Effect of gravitational waves on space-time . 46 4.4 Quadrupole formula . 48 4.5 Application to Hulse-Taylor binary . 52 4.6 Beyond the Quadrupole formula . 56 5 Concluding Remarks 58 A Appendix 63 A.1 Solving the Wave Equation . 63 A.2 Angular STF Tensors and Spherical Averages . 64 A.3 Evaluation of a 1PN surface integral . 65 A.4 Details of Quadrupole formula derivation . 66 1 Chapter 1 Introduction Einstein's General theory of relativity [1] was a bold departure from the widely successful Newtonian theory. Unlike the Newtonian theory written in terms of fields, gravitation is a geometric phenomena, with space and time forming a space-time manifold that is deformed by the presence of matter and energy. The deformation of this differentiable manifold is characterised by a symmetric metric, and freely falling (not acted on by exter- nal forces) particles will move along geodesics of this manifold as determined by the metric.
  • Einstein's $ R^{\Hat {0}\Hat {0}} $ Equation for Non-Relativistic Sources

    Einstein's $ R^{\Hat {0}\Hat {0}} $ Equation for Non-Relativistic Sources

    Einstein’s R0ˆ0ˆ equation for nonrelativistic sources derived from Einstein’s inertial motion and the Newtonian law for relative acceleration Christoph Schmid∗ ETH Zurich, Institute for Theoretical Physics, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland (Dated: March 22, 2018) With Einstein’s inertial motion (freefalling and nonrotating relative to gyroscopes), geodesics for nonrelativistic particles can intersect repeatedly, allowing one to compute the space-time curvature ˆˆ ˆˆ R00 exactly. Einstein’s R00 for strong gravitational fields and for relativistic source-matter is iden- tical with the Newtonian expression for the relative radial acceleration of neighbouring freefalling test-particles, spherically averaged. — Einstein’s field equations follow from Newtonian experiments, local Lorentz-covariance, and energy-momentum conservation combined with the Bianchi identity. PACS numbers: 04.20.-q, 04.20.Cv Up to now, a rigorous derivation of Einstein’s field structive. Newtonian relative acceleration in general La- equations for general relativity has been lacking: Wald [1] grangian 3-coordinates (e.g. comoving with the wind) writes “a clue is provided”, “the correspondence suggests has the same number of 106 uninstructive terms. the field equation”. Weinberg [2] takes the ”weak static The expressions for Einstein’s R 0ˆ (P ) and the New- 0ˆ limit”, makes a ”guess”, and argues with ”number of tonian relative acceleration are extremely simple and ex- derivatives”. Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler [3] give ”Six plicitely identical with the following choices: (1) We work Routes to Einstein’s field equations”, among which they with Local Ortho-Normal Bases (LONBs) in Cartan’s recommend (1) “model geometrodynamics after electro- method. (2) We use a primary observer (non-inertial or dynamics”, (2) ”take the variational principle with only inertial) with worldline through P , withu ¯obs =e ¯0ˆ, and a scalar linear in second derivatives of the metric and no with his spatial LONBse ¯ˆi along his worldline.
  • Relativity Theory, We Often Use the Convention That the Greek6 Indices Run from 0 to 3, Whereas the Latin Indices Take the Values 1, 2, 3

    Relativity Theory, We Often Use the Convention That the Greek6 Indices Run from 0 to 3, Whereas the Latin Indices Take the Values 1, 2, 3

    Relativity Theory Jouko Mickelsson with Tommy Ohlsson and H˚akan Snellman Mathematical Physics, KTH Physics Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm 2005 Typeset in LATEX Written by Jouko Mickelsson, 1996. Revised by Tommy Ohlsson, 1998. Revised and extended by Jouko Mickelsson, Tommy Ohlsson, and H˚akan Snellman, 1999. Revised by Jouko Mickelsson, Tommy Ohlsson, and H˚akan Snellman, 2000. Revised by Tommy Ohlsson, 2001. Revised by Tommy Ohlsson, 2003. Revised by Mattias Blennow, 2005. Solutions to the problems are written by Tommy Ohlsson and H˚akan Snellman, 1999. Updated by Tommy Ohlsson, 2000. Updated by Tommy Ohlsson, 2001. Updated by Tommy Ohlsson, 2003. Updated by Mattias Blennow, 2005. c Mathematical Physics, KTH Physics, KTH, 2005 Printed in Sweden by US–AB, Stockholm, 2005. Contents Contents i 1 Special Relativity 1 1.1 Geometry of the Minkowski Space . 2 1.2 LorentzTransformations. 4 1.3 Physical Interpretations . 5 1.3.1 LorentzContraction ............................ 7 1.3.2 TimeDilation................................ 7 1.3.3 Relativistic Addition of Velocities . 7 1.3.4 The Michelson–Morley Experiment . 8 1.3.5 The Relativistic Doppler Effect . 10 1.4 The Proper Time and the Twin Paradox . 11 1.5 Transformations of Velocities and Accelerations . 12 1.6 Energy, Momentum, and Mass in Relativity Theory . 13 1.7 The Spinorial Representation of Lorentz Transformations . 16 1.8 Lorentz Invariance of Maxwell’s Equations . 17 1.8.1 Physical Consequences of Lorentz Transformations . 20 1.8.2 TheLorentzForce ............................. 22 1.8.3 The Energy-Momentum Tensor . 24 1.9 Problems ...................................... 27 2 Some Differential Geometry 39 2.1 Manifolds .....................................