Cognitive Psychology: History Offered a Mechanistic Account of Selective Attention, a Concept That Had Been Banished During Behaviorism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cognitive Psychology: History Offered a Mechanistic Account of Selective Attention, a Concept That Had Been Banished During Behaviorism Cognitie Neuroscience Mesulam M M 2000 Principles of Behaioral and Cognitie ism was concerned primarily with the learning of Neurology. Oxford University Press, New York associations, particularly in nonhuman species, and it Moody S L, Wise S P, di Pellegrino G, Zipser D 1998 A model constrained theorizing to stimulus–response notions. that accounts for activity in primate frontal cortex during a The overthrow of behaviorism came not so much from delayed matching-to-sample task. Journal of Neuroscience 18(1): 399–410 ideas within psychology as from three research ap- Olson C R, Gettner N 1995 Object-centered direction selectivity proaches external to the field. in the supplementary eye field of the macaque monkey. Science 269: 985–8 Petersen S E, Fox P T, Posner M I, Mintun M, Raichle M E 1988 Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical 1.1 Communications Research and the Information anatomy of single-word processing. Nature 331: 585–9 Processing Approach Pouget A, Deneve S, Sejnowski T J 1999 Frames of reference in During World War II, new concepts and theories were hemineglect: A computational approach. Progress in Brain developed about signal processing and communica- Research 121: 81–97 Rumelhart D E, McClelland J L, the PDP Research Group 1986 tion, and these ideas had a profound impact on Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Micro- psychologists active during the war years. One im- structure of Cognition. Vol. 1: Foundations. MIT Press, portant work was Shannon’s 1948 paper about Infor- Cambridge, MA mation Theory. It proposed that information was Seidenberg M S, McClelland J L 1989 A distributed, devel- communicated by sending a signal through a sequence opmental model of word recognition and naming. Psycho- of stages or transformations. This suggested that logical Reiew 96: 523–68 human perception and memory might be concep- Tanaka K 1996 Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annual tualized in a similar way: sensory information enters Re iew Neuroscience 19: 109–39 the receptors, then is fed into perceptual analyzers, Ungerleider L G, Mishkin M 1982 Two cortical visual systems. whose outputs in turn are input to memory systems. In: Ingle D J, Goodale M A, Mansfield R J W (eds.) Analysis of Visual Behaior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA This was the start of the ‘information processing’ Wilson M A, McNaughton B L 1994 Reactivation of hippo- approach—the idea that cognition could be under- campal ensemble memories during sleep. Science 265: 676–9 stood as a flow of information within the organism, Zipser D, Andersen R A 1988 A back propagation programmed an idea that continues to dominate cognitive psy- network that simulates response properties of a subset of chology. posterior parietal neurons. Nature 331: 679–84 Perhaps the first major theoretical effort in infor- mation processing psychology was Donald Broad- J. L. McClelland bent’s Perception and Communication (Broadbent 1958). According to Broadbent’s model, information output from the perceptual system encountered a filter, which passed only information to which people were attending. Although this notion of an all-or-none filter would prove too strong (Treisman 1960), it Cognitive Psychology: History offered a mechanistic account of selective attention, a concept that had been banished during behaviorism. Information that passed Broadbent’s filter then moved Since the beginning of experimental psychology in on to a ‘limited capacity decision channel,’ a system the nineteenth century, there had been interest in the that has some of the properties of short-term memory, study of higher mental processes. But something and from there on to long-term memory. This last part discontinuous happened in the late 1950s, something of Broadbent’s model—the transfer of information so dramatic that it is now referred to as the ‘cognitive from short- to long-term memory—became the salient revolution,’ and the view of mental processes that it point of the dual-memory models developed in the spawned is called ‘cognitive psychology.’ What hap- 1970s. pened was that American psychologists rejected be- Another aspect of Information theory that attracted haviorism and adopted a model of mind based on the psychologist’s interest was a quantitative measure of computer. The brief history that follows (adapted in information in terms of ‘bits’ (roughly, the logarithm part from Hilgard (1987) and Kessel and Bevan (1985)) to the base 2 of the number of possible alternatives). In chronicles mainstream cognitive psychology from the a still widely cited paper, George Miller (1956) showed onset of the cognitive revolution to the beginning of that the limits of short-term memory had little to do the twenty-first century. with bits. But along the way, Miller’s and others’ interest in the technical aspects of information theory and related work had fostered mathematical psy- 1. Beginnings chology, a subfield that was being fueled by other sources as well (e.g., Estes and Burke 1953, Luce 1959, From roughly the 1920s through the 1950s, American Garner 1962). Over the years, mathematical psychol- psychology was dominated by behaviorism. Behavior- ogy has frequently joined forces with the information 2140 Cognitie Psychology: History processing approach to provide precise claims about transformational grammar would change the intel- memory, attention, and related processes. lectual landscape of linguistics, and usher in a new psycholinguistics. Chomsky’s second publication (1959) was a review of Verbal Behaior, a book about language learning by 1.2 The Computer Modeling Approach the then most respected behaviorist alive, B. F. Skinner Technical developments during World War II also led (Skinner 1957). Chomsky’s review is arguably one of to the development of digital computers. Questions the most significant documents in the history of soon arose about the comparability of computer and cognitive psychology. It aimed not merely to devastate human intelligence (Turing 1950). By 1957, Alan Skinner’s proposals about language, but to undermine Newell, J. C. Shaw, and Herb Simon had designed a behaviorism as a serious scientific approach to psy- computer program that could solve difficult logic chology. To some extent, it succeeded on both counts. problems, a domain previously thought to be the unique province of humans. Newell and Simon soon followed with programs that displayed general 1.4 An Approach Intrinsic to Psychology problem-solving skills much like those of humans, and argued that these programs offered detailed models of At least one source of modern cognitive psychology human problem solving (a classic summary is con- came from within the field. This approach had its roots tained in Newell and Simon (1972)). This work would in Gestalt psychology, and maintained its focus on the also help establish the field of artificial intelligence. higher mental processes. A signal event in this tra- Early on, cross-talk developed between the com- dition was the 1956 book A Study of Thinking,by puter modeling and information-processing ap- Bruner, Goodnow, and Austin (Bruner et al. 1956). proaches, which crystallized in the 1960 book Plans The work investigated how people learn new concepts and the Structure of Behaior (Miller et al. 1960). The and categories, and it emphasized strategies of learning book showed that information-processing psychology rather than just associative relations. The proposals fit could use the theoretical language of computer model- perfectly with the information-processing approach— ing even if it did not actually lead to computer indeed, they were information processing proposals— programs. With the ‘bit’ having failed as a psycho- and offered still another reason to break from be- logical unit, information processing badly needed a haviorism. rigorous but rich means to represent psychological By the early 1960s all was in place. Behaviorism was information (without such representations, what on the wane in academic departments all over America exactly was being processed in the information proces- (it had never really taken strong root in Europe). sing approach?). Computer modeling supplied power- Psychologists interested in the information-processing ful ideas about representations (as data structures), as approach were moving into academia, and Harvard well as about processes that operate on these struc- University went so far as to establish a Center for tures. The resultant idea of human information pro- Cognitive Studies directed by Jerome Bruner and cessing as sequences of computational processes George Miller. The new view in psychology was operating on mental representations remains the information processing. It likened mind to a computer, cornerstone of modern cognitive psychology (see and emphasized the representations and processes e.g., Fodor 1975). needed to give rise to activities ranging from pattern recognition, attention, categorization, memory, reas- oning, decision making, problem solving, and language. 1.3 The Generatie Linguistics Approach A third external influence that lead to the rise of modern cognitive psychology was the development of 2. The Growth of Cognitie Psychology generative grammar in linguistics by Noam Chomsky. Two of Chomsky’s publications in the late 1950s had The 1960s brought progress in many of the above- a profound effect on the nascent cognitive psychology. mentioned topic areas, some of which are highlighted The first was his 1957 book Syntactic Structures below. (Chomsky 1957). It focused on the mental structures needed to represent the kind of linguistic knowledge that any competent speaker of a language must have. 2.1 Pattern Recognition Chomsky argued that associations per se, and even phrase structure grammars, could not fully represent One of the first areas to benefit from the cognitive our knowledge of syntax (how words are organized revolution was pattern recognition, the study of how into phrases and sentences). What had to be added people perceive and recognize objects. The cognitive was a component capable of transforming one syn- approach provided a general two-stage view of object tactic structure into another.
Recommended publications
  • Literature and the Cognitive Revolution: an Introduction
    Literature and the Cognitive Revolution: An Introduction Alan Richardson English, Boston College Francis F. Steen Communication Studies, UCLA Literary studies and the cognitive sciences, pursuing common interests in language, mental acts, and linguistic artifacts, have developed markedly different approaches to similar phenomena of reading, imaginative involve- ment, and textual patterning. Until quite recently, the distance between them has drawn more attention than their possible convergence (Franchi and Güzeldere ). A number of literary theorists and critics, however, have steadily been producing work that finds its inspiration, its method- ology, and its guiding paradigms through a dialogue with one or more fields within cognitive science: artificial intelligence, cognitive psychology, post- Chomskian linguistics, philosophy of mind, neuroscience, and evolution- ary biology. Reuven Tsur () has been developing his ‘‘cognitive poet- ics’’ since the s; the prominent psychoanalytic critic Norman Holland (: ) demonstrated the advantages of attending to the ‘‘more powerful psychology’’ emerging from cognitive neuroscience in ; Mark Turner (: viii) advanced his far-reaching project of a ‘‘cognitive rhetoric’’ in ; and Ellen Spolsky (: ) trenchantly brought a theory of ‘‘cogni- tive instability’’ to bear on literary interpretation in . These and like- minded critics respond to the limitations (or, in Spolsky’s case, missed op- portunities) of poststructuralist conceptions of meaning and interpretation by questioning the reigning models in the field, whether in the interest of Poetics Today : (Spring ). Copyright © by the Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics. Downloaded from http://read.dukeupress.edu/poetics-today/article-pdf/23/1/1/458295/01.pdf by guest on 25 September 2021 2 Poetics Today 23:1 displacing, reworking, supplementing, or fundamentally regrounding them (Hart ).
    [Show full text]
  • Concepts As Correlates of Lexical Labels. a Cognitivist Perspective
    This is a submitted manuscript version. The publisher should be contacted for permission to re-use or reprint the material in any form. Final published version, copyright Peter Lang: https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-05287-9 Sławomir Wacewicz Concepts as Correlates of Lexical Labels. A Cognitivist Perspective. This is a submitted manuscript version. The publisher should be contacted for permission to re-use or reprint the material in any form. Final published version, copyright Peter Lang: https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-05287-9 CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………... 6 PART I INTERNALISTIC PERSPECTIVE ON LANGUAGE IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE Preliminary remarks………………………………………………………… 17 1. History and profile of Cognitive Science……………………………….. 18 1.1. Introduction…………………………………………………………. 18 1.2. Cognitive Science: definitions and basic assumptions ……………. 19 1.3. Basic tenets of Cognitive 22 Science…………………………………… 1.3.1. Cognition……………………………………………………... 23 1.3.2. Representationism and presentationism…………………….... 25 1.3.3. Naturalism and physical character of mind…………………... 28 1.3.4. Levels of description…………………………………………. 30 1.3.5. Internalism (Individualism) ………………………………….. 31 1.4. History……………………………………………………………... 34 1.4.1. Prehistory…………………………………………………….. 35 1.4.2. Germination…………………………………………………... 36 1.4.3. Beginnings……………………………………………………. 37 1.4.4. Early and classical Cognitive Science………………………… 40 1.4.5. Contemporary Cognitive Science……………………………... 42 1.4.6. Methodological notes on interdisciplinarity………………….. 52 1.5. Summary…………………………………………………………. 59 2. Intrasystemic and extrasystemic principles of concept individuation 60 2.1. Existential status of concepts ……………………………………… 60 2 This is a submitted manuscript version. The publisher should be contacted for permission to re-use or reprint the material in any form. Final published version, copyright Peter Lang: https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-05287-9 2.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive and Neuroscience Research on Learning And
    The 11th International Conference on Education Research New Educational Paradigm for Learning and Instruction September 29 – October 1, 2010 Cognitive and Neuroscience Research on Learning and Instruction: Recent insights about the impact of non-conscious knowledge on problem solving, higher order thinking skills 12 and interactive cyber-learning environments. Richard E. Clark University of Southern California, USA Abstract There are as least three powerful insights from recent studies of the brain that support cognitive science research findings: First, our brains learn and process two very different types of knowledge; non conscious, automated knowledge and conscious, controllable, declarative knowledge. Evidence also suggests that we believe we control our own learning by conscious choice when in fact nearly all mental operations are highly automated, including learning and problem solving; Second, human beings have a very limited capacity to think during learning and problem solving and when that capacity is exceeded, thinking and learning stop without us being aware. Thus instruction and self managed learning must strive to avoid cognitive overload; and Third, nearly all of our instructional design and cyber learning theories and models fail to account for the influence of non-conscious cognitive processes and therefore are inadequate to deal with complex learning and performance. Evidence for these points will be described and their implications for instruction and the learning of problem solving and higher order thinking skills will be discussed. Models of learning and instruction that appear to help overcome some of these biological and cognitive barriers will be described. In addition, suggestions for new research questions on interactive learning environments that take account of the three insights will also be described.
    [Show full text]
  • OSU Department of Psychology First-Tier Journals List
    OSU Department of Psychology First-Tier Journals List To search for a journal not listed here, visit the Journal Citation Reports website by clicking here FIRST TIER - GENERAL 2015 2015 Journal 2016 2016 Journal 2017 2017 Journal Impact Ranking Impact Ranking Impact Ranking Rating Rating Rating American Psychologist 5.454 10/129 (Psychology, 6.681 7/128 (Psychology, 4.856 9/135 (Psychology, Multidisciplinary) Multidisciplinary) Multidisciplinary) Annual Review of Psychology 19.085 2/129 (Psychology, 19.950 1/128 (Psychology, 22.774 2/135 (Psychology, Multidisciplinary) Multidisciplinary) Multidisciplinary) Psychological Bulletin 14.839 3/129 (Psychology, 16.793 2/128 (Psychology, 13.250 4/135 (Psychology, Multidisciplinary) Multidisciplinary) Multidisciplinary) Psychological Methods 5.000 11/129 (Psychology, 4.667 10/128 (Psychology, 6.485 7/135 (Psychology, Multidisciplinary) Multidisciplinary) Multidisciplinary) Psychological Review 7.581 5/129 (Psychology, 7.638 5/128 (Psychology, 7.230 6/135 (Psychology, Multidisciplinary) Multidisciplinary) Multidisciplinary) Psychological Science 5.476 9/129 (Psychology, 5.667 8/128 (Psychology, 6.128 8/135 (Psychology, Multidisciplinary) Multidisciplinary) Multidisciplinary) 2015 2015 Journal 2016 2016 Journal 2017 2017 Journal FIRST TIER SPECIALTY Impact Ranking Impact Ranking Impact Ranking Area Other Rating Rating Rating 3.268 9/51 (Behavioral 2.385 29/51 (Behavioral 2.036 34/51 (Behavioral Behavior Genetics Sciences) Sciences) Sciences) BN 3.048 3/13 (Psychology, 3.623 1/13 (Psychology, 3.597
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1
    Cognitive Neuroscience 1 Capstone Cognitive Neuroscience Concentrators will additionally take either a seminar course or an independent research course to serve as their capstone experience. Cognitive neuroscience is the study of higher cognitive functions in humans and their underlying neural bases. It is an integrative area of Additional requirements for Sc.B. study drawing primarily from cognitive science, psychology, neuroscience, In line with university expectations, the Sc.B. requirements include a and linguistics. There are two broad directions that can be taken in greater number of courses and especially science courses. The definition this concentration - one is behavioral/experimental and the other is of “science” is flexible. A good number of these courses will be outside of computational/modeling. In both, the goal is to understand the nature of CLPS, but several CLPS courses might fit into a coherent package as well. cognition from a neural perspective. The standard concentration for the In addition, the Sc.B. degree also requires a lab course to provide these Sc.B. degree requires courses on the foundations, systems level, and students with in-depth exposure to research methods in a particular area integrative aspects of cognitive neuroscience as well as laboratory and of the science of the mind. elective courses that fit within a particular theme or category such as general cognition, perception, language development or computational/ Honors Requirement modeling. Concentrators must also complete a senior seminar course or An acceptable upper level Research Methods, for example CLPS 1900 or an independent research course. Students may also participate in the an acceptable Laboratory course (see below) will serve as a requirement work of the Brown Institute for Brain Science, an interdisciplinary program for admission to the Honors program in Cognitive Neuroscience.
    [Show full text]
  • Extending Psychophysics Methods to Evaluating Potential Social Anxiety
    logy ho & P yc s s y Gabay, J Psychol Psychother 2014, 5:1 c P f h o o t DOI: 10.4172/2161-0487.1000167 l h a e n r r a u p o y J Journal of Psychology & Psychotherapy ISSN: 2161-0487 Research Article Article OpenOpen Access Access Extending Psychophysics Methods to Evaluating Potential Social Anxiety Factors in Face of Terrorism Gillie Gabay* College of Management Academic Studies, Rishon Letzion, Israel Abstract Objective: There is an urgent need to develop tools to effectively measure the impact of psychological responses consequent a terror attack or threat. There is also a need to understand the impact both the personal preparedness of each citizen, and acts of counter terrorism by governments. This paper addresses the question ‘how to create a database of the citizen’s mind about anxiety-provoking situations in the face of terrorism’. Approach: The approach is grounded in a combination of experimental design, psychophysics, as a branch of psychology and consumer research. The theoretical foundation is illustrated using a set of fifteen empirical studies using conjoint analysis, which help uncover how people respond to anxiety-provoking situations. The approach identifies the mindset towards terrorism at the level of the individual respondent. This study identifies critical drivers of anxiety; the specific terrorist act; the location of the act; the feelings and the proposed remedies to reduce anxiety. Results: By exploring responses embedded in a general study of ‘dealing with anxiety provoking situations’, the study uncovers the ‘algebra of the individual respondent’s mind; how important the basic fear of terrorism actually is, how important it is to specify the type of terrorism (bombing versus contamination of the food supply), and how fears of terrorism are structured.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognition and Development
    Cognition and Development A mosaic of axial brain images composed of photographs from different laboratories in Psychology. Social Sciences Cognition and Development The Program in Cognition and Development at Emory approaches the study of cognition from multiple The Cognition and Development program’s multi-faceted training features the following: perspectives including adult and child behavioral The program covers six primary areas of study: perspectives, neuroimaging and neuroscientific Memory, Language, Grounded Cognition, Emotion, Social/Cultural Processes, and Plasticity. perspectives, computational perspectives, and Students and faculty attend and participate in a variety of talks and research groups designed to emotional/social/situated perspectives. foster interaction across labs and experimental approaches We train students for research and teaching at the fore- front of cognition and its development. Our goal is to ground students in an interdisciplinary understanding of the basic issues in cognition from the perspectives of cog- nitive psychology, developmental psychology, cognitive and affective neuroscience, and computational model- ing. Through research training, coursework, and teach- ing, students acquire the professional skills necessary for careers in academic research and teaching institutions, as well as in other public and private research settings. Research The primary research areas across the faculty and stu- dents within the program include conceptual processing and the perceptual grounding of knowledge representa- tion, plasticity, language, social and emotional cognition, and memory. We employ a wide range of techniques and methodologies including observational, interview/ques- tionnaire, forced-choice, reaction time, looking time, perceptual discrimination, psychophysiology, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), Transcranial Mag- netic Stimulation (TMS), and event related potentials CREATE NEW KNOWLEDGE COGNITION AND DEVELOPMENT (ERP).
    [Show full text]
  • The Science of Psychology 1
    PSY_C01.qxd 1/2/05 3:17 pm Page 2 The Science of Psychology 1 CHAPTER OUTLINE LEARNING OBJECTIVES INTRODUCTION PINNING DOWN PSYCHOLOGY PSYCHOLOGY AND COMMON SENSE: THE GRANDMOTHER CHALLENGE Putting common sense to the test Explaining human behaviour THE BEGINNINGS OF MODERN PSYCHOLOGY Philosophical influences Physiological influences PSYCHOLOGY TODAY Structuralism: mental chemistry Functionalism: mental accomplishment Behaviourism: a totally objective psychology Gestalt psychology: making connections Out of school: the independents The cognitive revolution FINAL THOUGHTS SUMMARY REVISION QUESTIONS FURTHER READING PSY_C01.qxd 1/2/05 3:17 pm Page 3 Learning Objectives By the end of this chapter you should appreciate that: n psychology is much more than ‘common sense’; n psychological knowledge can be usefully applied in many different professions and walks of life; n psychology emerged as a distinct discipline around 150 years ago, from its roots in physiology, physics and philosophy; n there are fundamental differences between different schools of thought in psychology; n psychology is the science of mental life and behaviour, and different schools of thought within psychology place differing degrees of emphasis on understanding these different elements of psychology; n most academic departments in the English-speaking world focus on the teaching of experimental psychology, in which scientific evidence about the structure and function of the mind and behaviour accumulates through the execution of empirical investigations; n in the history of psychology many different metaphors have been used for thinking about the workings of the human mind, and since the Second World War the most influential of these metaphors has been another complex information-processing device – the computer.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Board of Behavioral and Cognitive Psychology
    The American Board of Behavioral and Cognitive Psychology Manual for Applicants (Revised January 1, 2017) Page 2 of 20 TABLE OF CONTENTS WELCOME ............................................................................................................................. 3 DEFINITION OF THE SPECIALTY OVERVIEW OF THE APPLICATION PROCESS ............................................................................ 4 COMPETENCIES CHARACTERIZING THE SPECIALTY .................................................................. 4 FOUNDATIONAL COMPETENCIES FUNCTIONAL COMPETENCIES ELIGIBILITY FOR CANDIDACY .................................................................................................. 6 GENERIC DEGREE AND PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS SPECIALTY REQUIREMENTS FOR BEHAVIORAL AND COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY APPLICATION FORMS AND STEPS ........................................................................................... 8 OVERVIEW OF THE THREE STAGE PROCESS ............................................................................ 8 WRITTEN DOCUMENTS THE ORAL EXAMINATION NOTIFICATION AND AWARD OF THE DIPLOMA .................................................................... 15 APPEALING AN UNSUCCESSFUL EXAM PERSONAL AFFILIATION AND STANDARDS OF PRACTICE ...................................................... 16 MAINTENANCE OF CERTIFICATION……………………………………………………………………………………….16 MAINTENANCE OF CERTIFICATION APPEAL PROCEDURE CLOSING STATEMENT .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropology's Disenchantment with the Cognitive Revolution
    Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (2012) 354–361 Copyright Ó 2012 Cognitive Science Society, Inc. All rights reserved. ISSN: 1756-8757 print / 1756-8765 online DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01199.x Anthropology’s Disenchantment With the Cognitive Revolution1 Richard A. Shweder Department of Comparative Human Development, University of Chicago Received 25 June 2011; received in revised form 3 November 2011; accepted 28 November 2011 Abstract Beller, Bender, and Medin should be congratulated for their generous attempt at expressive aca- demic therapy for troubled interdisciplinary relationships. In this essay, I suggest that a negative answer to the central question (‘‘Should anthropology be part of cognitive science?’’) is not necessar- ily distressing, that in retrospect the breakup seems fairly predictable, and that disenchantment with the cognitive revolution is nothing new. Keywords: Cognitive revolution; Behaviorism; Anthropology; Jerome Bruner; Roy D’Andrade; Clifford Geertz; Roger Shepard Some of the leaders of the cognitive revolution of the late 1950s and 1960s began parting from the cause almost as soon as it triumphed. Jerome Bruner, for example, who always enjoyed writing essays for both the left hand and the right hand, turned to hermeneutics, the study of law, and the interpretation of narratives (see Bruner, 1979, 1990). Even in the early days of the rebellion Bruner was attentive to language pragmatics, which may be one reason he named his 1960s big tent interdisciplinary center at Harvard University the ‘‘Center for Cognitive Studies’’ and not the ‘‘Center for Cognitive Science.’’ Bruner had just as much interest in the humanistic writings of E. H. Gombrich, Nelson Goodman, and Clifford Ge- ertz as in the latest claims about basic ⁄fundamental⁄universal cognitive processes coming out of experimental labs situated in Cambridge, London, or Geneva.
    [Show full text]
  • The 100 Most Eminent Psychologists of the 20Th Century
    Review of General Psychology Copyright 2002 by the Educational Publishing Foundation 2002, Vol. 6, No. 2, 139–152 1089-2680/02/$5.00 DOI: 10.1037//1089-2680.6.2.139 The 100 Most Eminent Psychologists of the 20th Century Steven J. Haggbloom Renee Warnick, Jason E. Warnick, Western Kentucky University Vinessa K. Jones, Gary L. Yarbrough, Tenea M. Russell, Chris M. Borecky, Reagan McGahhey, John L. Powell III, Jamie Beavers, and Emmanuelle Monte Arkansas State University A rank-ordered list was constructed that reports the first 99 of the 100 most eminent psychologists of the 20th century. Eminence was measured by scores on 3 quantitative variables and 3 qualitative variables. The quantitative variables were journal citation frequency, introductory psychology textbook citation frequency, and survey response frequency. The qualitative variables were National Academy of Sciences membership, election as American Psychological Association (APA) president or receipt of the APA Distinguished Scientific Contributions Award, and surname used as an eponym. The qualitative variables were quantified and combined with the other 3 quantitative variables to produce a composite score that was then used to construct a rank-ordered list of the most eminent psychologists of the 20th century. The discipline of psychology underwent a eve of the 21st century, the APA Monitor (“A remarkable transformation during the 20th cen- Century of Psychology,” 1999) published brief tury, a transformation that included a shift away biographical sketches of some of the more em- from the European-influenced philosophical inent contributors to that transformation. Mile- psychology of the late 19th century to the stones such as a new year, a new decade, or, in empirical, research-based, American-dominated this case, a new century seem inevitably to psychology of today (Simonton, 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Psychology
    COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY PSYCH 126 Acknowledgements College of the Canyons would like to extend appreciation to the following people and organizations for allowing this textbook to be created: California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office Chancellor Diane Van Hook Santa Clarita Community College District College of the Canyons Distance Learning Office In providing content for this textbook, the following professionals were invaluable: Mehgan Andrade, who was the major contributor and compiler of this work and Neil Walker, without whose help the book could not have been completed. Special Thank You to Trudi Radtke for editing, formatting, readability, and aesthetics. The contents of this textbook were developed under the Title V grant from the Department of Education (Award #P031S140092). However, those contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Unless otherwise noted, the content in this textbook is licensed under CC BY 4.0 Table of Contents Psychology .................................................................................................................................................... 1 126 ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Chapter 1 - History of Cognitive Psychology ............................................................................................. 7 Definition of Cognitive Psychology
    [Show full text]