DOCSLIB.ORG

Dualities & Supersymmetry Breaking

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dualities & Supersymmetry Breaking Dualities & Supersymmetry Breaking I~nakiGarc´ıa-Etxebarria 10th March, 2014 A bit of a pickle for string theory: much of the work so far has been on (mostly) supersymmetric string theories (particularly on the formal side, but pheno is also often build on mostly susy backgrounds). Perhaps a good opportunity to revisit some old, and not so old, ideas on non-supersymmetric string backgrounds. Introduction S-duality Tachyons USp(32) Conclusions Motivation Despite good theoretical reasons to assume the existence of supersymmetry, we do not have any direct experimental evidence for it. Perhaps a good opportunity to revisit some old, and not so old, ideas on non-supersymmetric string backgrounds. Introduction S-duality Tachyons USp(32) Conclusions Motivation Despite good theoretical reasons to assume the existence of supersymmetry, we do not have any direct experimental evidence for it. A bit of a pickle for string theory: much of the work so far has been on (mostly) supersymmetric string theories (particularly on the formal side, but pheno is also often build on mostly susy backgrounds). Introduction S-duality Tachyons USp(32) Conclusions Motivation Despite good theoretical reasons to assume the existence of supersymmetry, we do not have any direct experimental evidence for it. A bit of a pickle for string theory: much of the work so far has been on (mostly) supersymmetric string theories (particularly on the formal side, but pheno is also often build on mostly susy backgrounds). Perhaps a good opportunity to revisit some old, and not so old, ideas on non-supersymmetric string backgrounds. All aspects of a unified theory, so things look good... but plethora of vacua, so finding our vacuum is difficult. No similar classification for non-supersymmetric theories. How many higher dimensional string theories? Dualities between them? How many vacua? Introduction S-duality Tachyons USp(32) Conclusions Classification In 10d we have 5 susy string theories (6? [Sethi: 1304.1551]). but plethora of vacua, so finding our vacuum is difficult. No similar classification for non-supersymmetric theories. How many higher dimensional string theories? Dualities between them? How many vacua? Introduction S-duality Tachyons USp(32) Conclusions Classification In 10d we have 5 susy string theories (6? [Sethi: 1304.1551]). All aspects of a unified theory, so things look good... No similar classification for non-supersymmetric theories. How many higher dimensional string theories? Dualities between them? How many vacua? Introduction S-duality Tachyons USp(32) Conclusions Classification In 10d we have 5 susy string theories (6? [Sethi: 1304.1551]). All aspects of a unified theory, so things look good... but plethora of vacua, so finding our vacuum is difficult. Introduction S-duality Tachyons USp(32) Conclusions Classification In 10d we have 5 susy string theories (6? [Sethi: 1304.1551]). All aspects of a unified theory, so things look good... but plethora of vacua, so finding our vacuum is difficult. No similar classification for non-supersymmetric theories. How many higher dimensional string theories? Dualities between them? How many vacua? This classification typically is not physical, T-duality can mix 1 $ 2 and the 2 $ 3 distinction can be an artifact of weak coupling. Introduction S-duality Tachyons USp(32) Conclusions Non-supersymmetric string theories One can imagine different classes of non-susy string backgrounds 1. Defect susy breaking: a susy bulk, with (mutually) non-susy defects. 2. Bulk susy breaking: non-susy bulk, but built from susy ingredients which are non-susy when taken together. 3. Intrinsically non-supersymmetric: no susy in sight in the bulk. All of these come in stable and unstable flavors. Introduction S-duality Tachyons USp(32) Conclusions Non-supersymmetric string theories One can imagine different classes of non-susy string backgrounds 1. Defect susy breaking: a susy bulk, with (mutually) non-susy defects. 2. Bulk susy breaking: non-susy bulk, but built from susy ingredients which are non-susy when taken together. 3. Intrinsically non-supersymmetric: no susy in sight in the bulk. All of these come in stable and unstable flavors. This classification typically is not physical, T-duality can mix 1 $ 2 and the 2 $ 3 distinction can be an artifact of weak coupling. Introduction S-duality Tachyons USp(32) Conclusions Outline 1 Introduction 2 Strong/weak duality for realistic 4d theories 3 Tachyon condensation and stable vacua in non-susy theories 4 Into the wilderness 5 Conclusions Introduction S-duality Tachyons USp(32) Conclusions Outline 1 Introduction 2 Strong/weak duality for realistic 4d theories Montonen-Olive duality A new class of 4d dualities with N = 1 N = 0 dualities 3 Tachyon condensation and stable vacua in non-susy theories 4 Into the wilderness 5 Conclusions Introduction S-duality Tachyons USp(32) Conclusions Montonen-Olive N = 4 duality Given a 4d N = 4 field theory with gauge group G and gauge coupling τ = θ + i=g2, there is a completely equivalent description with gauge group G_ and coupling −1/τ (for θ = 0 this is g $ 1=g). Examples: G G_ U(1) U(1) U(N) U(N) SU(N) SU(N)=ZN SO(2N + 1) Sp(2N) Very non-perturbative duality, exchanges gauge bosons with monopoles! (So, the usual field theory tools are not particularly illuminating here.) For example, N = 4 U(N) theory is the low energy description of N D3s on flat space. Using the duality dictionary, one gets _ 2 U(N) = U(N).(gYM = gs) More interestingly, SO(2N + 1) is the low energy theory for 2N D3s on top of a Og3−. Applying the duality dictionary, this is 2N D3s on top of a O3+, which at low energies gives SO(2N + 1)_ = Sp(2N). Beautiful field theory insights follow trivially from the duality dictionary. For example, the gauge boson ! monopole map follows easily from the F 1 ! D1 duality dictionary entry. Introduction S-duality Tachyons USp(32) Conclusions Montonen-Olive duality from string theory Just \engineer" the field theory one wants in string theory, and apply the IIB S-duality dictionary to the construction. More interestingly, SO(2N + 1) is the low energy theory for 2N D3s on top of a Og3−. Applying the duality dictionary, this is 2N D3s on top of a O3+, which at low energies gives SO(2N + 1)_ = Sp(2N). Beautiful field theory insights follow trivially from the duality dictionary. For example, the gauge boson ! monopole map follows easily from the F 1 ! D1 duality dictionary entry. Introduction S-duality Tachyons USp(32) Conclusions Montonen-Olive duality from string theory Just \engineer" the field theory one wants in string theory, and apply the IIB S-duality dictionary to the construction. For example, N = 4 U(N) theory is the low energy description of N D3s on flat space. Using the duality dictionary, one gets _ 2 U(N) = U(N).(gYM = gs) Beautiful field theory insights follow trivially from the duality dictionary. For example, the gauge boson ! monopole map follows easily from the F 1 ! D1 duality dictionary entry. Introduction S-duality Tachyons USp(32) Conclusions Montonen-Olive duality from string theory Just \engineer" the field theory one wants in string theory, and apply the IIB S-duality dictionary to the construction. For example, N = 4 U(N) theory is the low energy description of N D3s on flat space. Using the duality dictionary, one gets _ 2 U(N) = U(N).(gYM = gs) More interestingly, SO(2N + 1) is the low energy theory for 2N D3s on top of a Og3−. Applying the duality dictionary, this is 2N D3s on top of a O3+, which at low energies gives SO(2N + 1)_ = Sp(2N). Introduction S-duality Tachyons USp(32) Conclusions Montonen-Olive duality from string theory Just \engineer" the field theory one wants in string theory, and apply the IIB S-duality dictionary to the construction. For example, N = 4 U(N) theory is the low energy description of N D3s on flat space. Using the duality dictionary, one gets _ 2 U(N) = U(N).(gYM = gs) More interestingly, SO(2N + 1) is the low energy theory for 2N D3s on top of a Og3−. Applying the duality dictionary, this is 2N D3s on top of a O3+, which at low energies gives SO(2N + 1)_ = Sp(2N). Beautiful field theory insights follow trivially from the duality dictionary. For example, the gauge boson ! monopole map follows easily from the F 1 ! D1 duality dictionary entry. Introduction S-duality Tachyons USp(32) Conclusions Montonen-Olive duality from string theory There are four versions of the O3 plane in string theory, distinguished by discrete RR and NSNS 2-form fluxes B2;C2 in the transverse space: [Witten:hep-th/9805112] 3 5 H (S =Z2; Ze) = Z2 : (0; 0) : O3− + ND3s −! SO(2N) (0; 1) : Og3− + ND3s −! SO(2N + 1) (1; 0) : O3+ + ND3s −! USp(2N) (1; 1) : Og3+ + ND3s −! USp(2N) IIB SL(2; Z) exchanges the configurations. Under S-duality Og3− ! O3+ : SO(2N + 1) ! USp(2N) Introduction S-duality Tachyons USp(32) Conclusions Discrete torsion argument for N = 4 The charge of the system is classified by the cohomology on the 5 5 S =Z2 = RP that surrounds the configuration. For fields even under the orientifold action, we have: • 5 H (RP ; Z) = fZ; 0; Z2; 0; Z2; Zg ; while for fields odd under the orientifold action: • 5 H (RP ; Ze) = f0; Z2; 0; Z2; 0; Z2g : This is (co)homology with local coefficients. Working on the S5 covering space k ⊗ C ' γk ⊗ γC. For coefficients in Z we have γk = k while for coefficients in Ze we have γk = −k. Ordinary (co)homology theory otherwise: H• = ker @= im @.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Compactifying M-Theory on a G2 Manifold to Describe/Explain Our World – Predictions for LHC (Gluinos, Winos, Squarks), and Dark Matter
    Compactifying M-theory on a G2 manifold to describe/explain our world – Predictions for LHC (gluinos, winos, squarks), and dark matter Gordy Kane CMS, Fermilab, April 2016 1 OUTLINE • Testing theories in physics – some generalities - Testing 10/11 dimensional string/M-theories as underlying theories of our world requires compactification to four space-time dimensions! • Compactifying M-theory on “G2 manifolds” to describe/ explain our vacuum – underlying theory - fluxless sector! • Moduli – 4D manifestations of extra dimensions – stabilization - supersymmetry breaking – changes cosmology first 16 slides • Technical stuff – 18-33 - quickly • From the Planck scale to EW scale – 34-39 • LHC predictions – gluino about 1.5 TeV – also winos at LHC – but not squarks - 40-47 • Dark matter – in progress – surprising – 48 • (Little hierarchy problem – 49-51) • Final remarks 1-5 2 String/M theory a powerful, very promising framework for constructing an underlying theory that incorporates the Standard Models of particle physics and cosmology and probably addresses all the questions we hope to understand about the physical universe – we hope for such a theory! – probably also a quantum theory of gravity Compactified M-theory generically has gravity; Yang- Mills forces like the SM; chiral fermions like quarks and leptons; softly broken supersymmetry; solutions to hierarchy problems; EWSB and Higgs physics; unification; small EDMs; no flavor changing problems; partially observable superpartner spectrum; hidden sector DM; etc Simultaneously – generically Argue compactified M-theory is by far the best motivated, and most comprehensive, extension of the SM – gets physics relevant to the LHC and Higgs and superpartners right – no ad hoc inputs or free parameters Take it very seriously 4 So have to spend some time explaining derivations, testability of string/M theory Don’t have to be somewhere to test theory there – E.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Supersymmetry Theory Subgroup
    Report of the Supersymmetry Theory Subgroup J. Amundson (Wisconsin), G. Anderson (FNAL), H. Baer (FSU), J. Bagger (Johns Hopkins), R.M. Barnett (LBNL), C.H. Chen (UC Davis), G. Cleaver (OSU), B. Dobrescu (BU), M. Drees (Wisconsin), J.F. Gunion (UC Davis), G.L. Kane (Michigan), B. Kayser (NSF), C. Kolda (IAS), J. Lykken (FNAL), S.P. Martin (Michigan), T. Moroi (LBNL), S. Mrenna (Argonne), M. Nojiri (KEK), D. Pierce (SLAC), X. Tata (Hawaii), S. Thomas (SLAC), J.D. Wells (SLAC), B. Wright (North Carolina), Y. Yamada (Wisconsin) ABSTRACT Spacetime supersymmetry appears to be a fundamental in- gredient of superstring theory. We provide a mini-guide to some of the possible manifesta- tions of weak-scale supersymmetry. For each of six scenarios These motivations say nothing about the scale at which nature we provide might be supersymmetric. Indeed, there are additional motiva- tions for weak-scale supersymmetry. a brief description of the theoretical underpinnings, Incorporation of supersymmetry into the SM leads to a so- the adjustable parameters, lution of the gauge hierarchy problem. Namely, quadratic divergences in loop corrections to the Higgs boson mass a qualitative description of the associated phenomenology at future colliders, will cancel between fermionic and bosonic loops. This mechanism works only if the superpartner particle masses comments on how to simulate each scenario with existing are roughly of order or less than the weak scale. event generators. There exists an experimental hint: the three gauge cou- plings can unify at the Grand Uni®cation scale if there ex- I. INTRODUCTION ist weak-scale supersymmetric particles, with a desert be- The Standard Model (SM) is a theory of spin- 1 matter tween the weak scale and the GUT scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Duality and Strings Dieter Lüst, LMU and MPI München
    Duality and Strings Dieter Lüst, LMU and MPI München Freitag, 15. März 13 Luis made several very profound and important contributions to theoretical physics ! Freitag, 15. März 13 Luis made several very profound and important contributions to theoretical physics ! Often we were working on related subjects and I enjoyed various very nice collaborations and friendship with Luis. Freitag, 15. März 13 Luis made several very profound and important contributions to theoretical physics ! Often we were working on related subjects and I enjoyed various very nice collaborations and friendship with Luis. Duality of 4 - dimensional string constructions: • Covariant lattices ⇔ (a)symmetric orbifolds (1986/87: W. Lerche, D.L., A. Schellekens ⇔ L. Ibanez, H.P. Nilles, F. Quevedo) • Intersecting D-brane models ☞ SM (?) (2000/01: R. Blumenhagen, B. Körs, L. Görlich, D.L., T. Ott ⇔ G. Aldazabal, S. Franco, L. Ibanez, F. Marchesano, R. Rabadan, A. Uranga) Freitag, 15. März 13 Luis made several very profound and important contributions to theoretical physics ! Often we were working on related subjects and I enjoyed various very nice collaborations and friendship with Luis. Duality of 4 - dimensional string constructions: • Covariant lattices ⇔ (a)symmetric orbifolds (1986/87: W. Lerche, D.L., A. Schellekens ⇔ L. Ibanez, H.P. Nilles, F. Quevedo) • Intersecting D-brane models ☞ SM (?) (2000/01: R. Blumenhagen, B. Körs, L. Görlich, D.L., T. Ott ⇔ G. Aldazabal, S. Franco, L. Ibanez, F. Marchesano, R. Rabadan, A. Uranga) ➢ Madrid (Spanish) Quiver ! Freitag, 15. März 13 Luis made several very profound and important contributions to theoretical physics ! Often we were working on related subjects and I enjoyed various very nice collaborations and friendship with Luis.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Supersymmetry
    An Introduction to Supersymmetry Ulrich Theis Institute for Theoretical Physics, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Max-Wien-Platz 1, D–07743 Jena, Germany [email protected] This is a write-up of a series of five introductory lectures on global supersymmetry in four dimensions given at the 13th “Saalburg” Summer School 2007 in Wolfersdorf, Germany. Contents 1 Why supersymmetry? 1 2 Weyl spinors in D=4 4 3 The supersymmetry algebra 6 4 Supersymmetry multiplets 6 5 Superspace and superfields 9 6 Superspace integration 11 7 Chiral superfields 13 8 Supersymmetric gauge theories 17 9 Supersymmetry breaking 22 10 Perturbative non-renormalization theorems 26 A Sigma matrices 29 1 Why supersymmetry? When the Large Hadron Collider at CERN takes up operations soon, its main objective, besides confirming the existence of the Higgs boson, will be to discover new physics beyond the standard model of the strong and electroweak interactions. It is widely believed that what will be found is a (at energies accessible to the LHC softly broken) supersymmetric extension of the standard model. What makes supersymmetry such an attractive feature that the majority of the theoretical physics community is convinced of its existence? 1 First of all, under plausible assumptions on the properties of relativistic quantum field theories, supersymmetry is the unique extension of the algebra of Poincar´eand internal symmtries of the S-matrix. If new physics is based on such an extension, it must be supersymmetric. Furthermore, the quantum properties of supersymmetric theories are much better under control than in non-supersymmetric ones, thanks to powerful non- renormalization theorems.
    [Show full text]
  • From Vibrating Strings to a Unified Theory of All Interactions
    Barton Zwiebach From Vibrating Strings to a Unified Theory of All Interactions or the last twenty years, physicists have investigated F String Theory rather vigorously. The theory has revealed an unusual depth. As a result, despite much progress in our under- standing of its remarkable properties, basic features of the theory remain a mystery. This extended period of activity is, in fact, the second period of activity in string theory. When it was first discov- ered in the late 1960s, string theory attempted to describe strongly interacting particles. Along came Quantum Chromodynamics— a theoryof quarks and gluons—and despite their early promise, strings faded away. This time string theory is a credible candidate for a theoryof all interactions—a unified theoryof all forces and matter. The greatest complication that frustrated the search for such a unified theorywas the incompatibility between two pillars of twen- tieth century physics: Einstein’s General Theoryof Relativity and the principles of Quantum Mechanics. String theory appears to be 30 ) zwiebach mit physics annual 2004 the long-sought quantum mechani- cal theory of gravity and other interactions. It is almost certain that string theory is a consistent theory. It is less certain that it describes our real world. Nevertheless, intense work has demonstrated that string theory incorporates many features of the physical universe. It is reasonable to be very optimistic about the prospects of string theory. Perhaps one of the most impressive features of string theory is the appearance of gravity as one of the fluctuation modes of a closed string. Although it was not discov- ered exactly in this way, we can describe a logical path that leads to the discovery of gravity in string theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Supersymmetric Nonlinear Sigma Models
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server OU-HET 348 TIT/HET-448 hep-th/0006025 June 2000 Supersymmetric Nonlinear Sigma Models a b Kiyoshi Higashijima ∗ and Muneto Nitta † aDepartment of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan bDepartment of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Oh-okayama, Meguro, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan Abstract Supersymmetric nonlinear sigma models are formulated as gauge theo- ries. Auxiliary chiral superfields are introduced to impose supersymmetric constraints of F-type. Target manifolds defined by F-type constraints are al- ways non-compact. In order to obtain nonlinear sigma models on compact manifolds, we have to introduce gauge symmetry to eliminate the degrees of freedom in non-compact directions. All supersymmetric nonlinear sigma models defined on the hermitian symmetric spaces are successfully formulated as gauge theories. 1Talk given at the International Symposium on \Quantum Chromodynamics and Color Con- finement" (Confinement 2000) , 7-10 March 2000, RCNP, Osaka, Japan. ∗e-mail: [email protected]. †e-mail: [email protected] 1 Introduction Two dimensional (2D) nonlinear sigma models and four dimensional non-abelian gauge theories have several similarities. Both of them enjoy the property of the asymptotic freedom. They are both massless in the perturbation theory, whereas they acquire the mass gap or the string tension in the non-perturbative treatment. Although it is difficult to solve QCD in analytical way, 2D nonlinear sigma models can be solved by the large N expansion and helps us to understand various non- perturbative phenomena in four dimensional gauge theories.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Conformal Field Theory and String
    SLAC-PUB-5149 December 1989 m INTRODUCTION TO CONFORMAL FIELD THEORY AND STRING THEORY* Lance J. Dixon Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford University Stanford, CA 94309 ABSTRACT I give an elementary introduction to conformal field theory and its applications to string theory. I. INTRODUCTION: These lectures are meant to provide a brief introduction to conformal field -theory (CFT) and string theory for those with no prior exposure to the subjects. There are many excellent reviews already available (or almost available), and most of these go in to much more detail than I will be able to here. Those reviews con- centrating on the CFT side of the subject include refs. 1,2,3,4; those emphasizing string theory include refs. 5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13 I will start with a little pre-history of string theory to help motivate the sub- ject. In the 1960’s it was noticed that certain properties of the hadronic spectrum - squared masses for resonances that rose linearly with the angular momentum - resembled the excitations of a massless, relativistic string.14 Such a string is char- *Work supported in by the Department of Energy, contract DE-AC03-76SF00515. Lectures presented at the Theoretical Advanced Study Institute In Elementary Particle Physics, Boulder, Colorado, June 4-30,1989 acterized by just one energy (or length) scale,* namely the square root of the string tension T, which is the energy per unit length of a static, stretched string. For strings to describe the strong interactions fi should be of order 1 GeV. Although strings provided a qualitative understanding of much hadronic physics (and are still useful today for describing hadronic spectra 15 and fragmentation16), some features were hard to reconcile.
    [Show full text]
  • TASI 2008 Lectures: Introduction to Supersymmetry And
    TASI 2008 Lectures: Introduction to Supersymmetry and Supersymmetry Breaking Yuri Shirman Department of Physics and Astronomy University of California, Irvine, CA 92697. [email protected] Abstract These lectures, presented at TASI 08 school, provide an introduction to supersymmetry and supersymmetry breaking. We present basic formalism of supersymmetry, super- symmetric non-renormalization theorems, and summarize non-perturbative dynamics of supersymmetric QCD. We then turn to discussion of tree level, non-perturbative, and metastable supersymmetry breaking. We introduce Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model and discuss soft parameters in the Lagrangian. Finally we discuss several mech- anisms for communicating the supersymmetry breaking between the hidden and visible sectors. arXiv:0907.0039v1 [hep-ph] 1 Jul 2009 Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Motivation..................................... 2 1.2 Weylfermions................................... 4 1.3 Afirstlookatsupersymmetry . .. 5 2 Constructing supersymmetric Lagrangians 6 2.1 Wess-ZuminoModel ............................... 6 2.2 Superfieldformalism .............................. 8 2.3 VectorSuperfield ................................. 12 2.4 Supersymmetric U(1)gaugetheory ....................... 13 2.5 Non-abeliangaugetheory . .. 15 3 Non-renormalization theorems 16 3.1 R-symmetry.................................... 17 3.2 Superpotentialterms . .. .. .. 17 3.3 Gaugecouplingrenormalization . ..... 19 3.4 D-termrenormalization. ... 20 4 Non-perturbative dynamics in SUSY QCD 20 4.1 Affleck-Dine-Seiberg
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Supersymmetry
    Introduction to Supersymmetry Pre-SUSY Summer School Corpus Christi, Texas May 15-18, 2019 Stephen P. Martin Northern Illinois University [email protected] 1 Topics: Why: Motivation for supersymmetry (SUSY) • What: SUSY Lagrangians, SUSY breaking and the Minimal • Supersymmetric Standard Model, superpartner decays Who: Sorry, not covered. • For some more details and a slightly better attempt at proper referencing: A supersymmetry primer, hep-ph/9709356, version 7, January 2016 • TASI 2011 lectures notes: two-component fermion notation and • supersymmetry, arXiv:1205.4076. If you find corrections, please do let me know! 2 Lecture 1: Motivation and Introduction to Supersymmetry Motivation: The Hierarchy Problem • Supermultiplets • Particle content of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model • (MSSM) Need for “soft” breaking of supersymmetry • The Wess-Zumino Model • 3 People have cited many reasons why extensions of the Standard Model might involve supersymmetry (SUSY). Some of them are: A possible cold dark matter particle • A light Higgs boson, M = 125 GeV • h Unification of gauge couplings • Mathematical elegance, beauty • ⋆ “What does that even mean? No such thing!” – Some modern pundits ⋆ “We beg to differ.” – Einstein, Dirac, . However, for me, the single compelling reason is: The Hierarchy Problem • 4 An analogy: Coulomb self-energy correction to the electron’s mass A point-like electron would have an infinite classical electrostatic energy. Instead, suppose the electron is a solid sphere of uniform charge density and radius R. An undergraduate problem gives: 3e2 ∆ECoulomb = 20πǫ0R 2 Interpreting this as a correction ∆me = ∆ECoulomb/c to the electron mass: 15 0.86 10− meters m = m + (1 MeV/c2) × .
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to String Theory A.N
    Introduction to String Theory A.N. Schellekens Based on lectures given at the Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen Last update 6 July 2016 [Word cloud by www.worldle.net] Contents 1 Current Problems in Particle Physics7 1.1 Problems of Quantum Gravity.........................9 1.2 String Diagrams................................. 11 2 Bosonic String Action 15 2.1 The Relativistic Point Particle......................... 15 2.2 The Nambu-Goto action............................ 16 2.3 The Free Boson Action............................. 16 2.4 World sheet versus Space-time......................... 18 2.5 Symmetries................................... 19 2.6 Conformal Gauge................................ 20 2.7 The Equations of Motion............................ 21 2.8 Conformal Invariance.............................. 22 3 String Spectra 24 3.1 Mode Expansion................................ 24 3.1.1 Closed Strings.............................. 24 3.1.2 Open String Boundary Conditions................... 25 3.1.3 Open String Mode Expansion..................... 26 3.1.4 Open versus Closed........................... 26 3.2 Quantization.................................. 26 3.3 Negative Norm States............................. 27 3.4 Constraints................................... 28 3.5 Mode Expansion of the Constraints...................... 28 3.6 The Virasoro Constraints............................ 29 3.7 Operator Ordering............................... 30 3.8 Commutators of Constraints.......................... 31 3.9 Computation of the Central Charge.....................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9: the 'Emergence' of Spacetime in String Theory
    Chapter 9: The `emergence' of spacetime in string theory Nick Huggett and Christian W¨uthrich∗ May 21, 2020 Contents 1 Deriving general relativity 2 2 Whence spacetime? 9 3 Whence where? 12 3.1 The worldsheet interpretation . 13 3.2 T-duality and scattering . 14 3.3 Scattering and local topology . 18 4 Whence the metric? 20 4.1 `Background independence' . 21 4.2 Is there a Minkowski background? . 24 4.3 Why split the full metric? . 27 4.4 T-duality . 29 5 Quantum field theoretic considerations 29 5.1 The graviton concept . 30 5.2 Graviton coherent states . 32 5.3 GR from QFT . 34 ∗This is a chapter of the planned monograph Out of Nowhere: The Emergence of Spacetime in Quantum Theories of Gravity, co-authored by Nick Huggett and Christian W¨uthrich and under contract with Oxford University Press. More information at www.beyondspacetime.net. The primary author of this chapter is Nick Huggett ([email protected]). This work was sup- ported financially by the ACLS and the John Templeton Foundation (the views expressed are those of the authors not necessarily those of the sponsors). We want to thank Tushar Menon and James Read for exceptionally careful comments on a draft this chapter. We are also grateful to Niels Linnemann for some helpful feedback. 1 6 Conclusions 35 This chapter builds on the results of the previous two to investigate the extent to which spacetime might be said to `emerge' in perturbative string the- ory. Our starting point is the string theoretic derivation of general relativity explained in depth in the previous chapter, and reviewed in x1 below (so that the philosophical conclusions of this chapter can be understood by those who are less concerned with formal detail, and so skip the previous one).
    [Show full text]
  • Supersymmetry and Stationary Solutions in Dilaton-Axion Gravity" (1994)
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Physics Department Faculty Publication Series Physics 1994 Supersymmetry and stationary solutions in dilaton- axion gravity R Kallosh David Kastor University of Massachusetts - Amherst, [email protected] T Ortín T Torma Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/physics_faculty_pubs Part of the Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Kallosh, R; Kastor, David; Ortín, T; and Torma, T, "Supersymmetry and stationary solutions in dilaton-axion gravity" (1994). Physics Review D. 1219. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/physics_faculty_pubs/1219 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Physics at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Physics Department Faculty Publication Series by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SU-ITP-94-12 UMHEP-407 QMW-PH-94-12 hep-th/9406059 SUPERSYMMETRY AND STATIONARY SOLUTIONS IN DILATON-AXION GRAVITY Renata Kallosha1, David Kastorb2, Tom´as Ort´ınc3 and Tibor Tormab4 aPhysics Department, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305, USA bDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA 01003 cDepartment of Physics, Queen Mary and Westfield College, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, U.K. ABSTRACT New stationary solutions of 4-dimensional dilaton-axion gravity are presented, which correspond to the charged Taub-NUT and Israel-Wilson-Perj´es (IWP) solu- tions of Einstein-Maxwell theory. The charged axion-dilaton Taub-NUT solutions are shown to have a number of interesting properties: i) manifest SL(2, R) sym- arXiv:hep-th/9406059v1 10 Jun 1994 metry, ii) an infinite throat in an extremal limit, iii) the throat limit coincides with an exact CFT construction.
    [Show full text]